Search
  • All Journals
Advanced Search
Search articles by Title, Author, Keywords, DOI
3.9CiteScore
1.3Impact Factor
Advanced Search
MAP  >  The Knowledge Engineering Review
1993 Volume 8
Article Contents
Next Previous
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Embedding critics in design environments

More Information
  • Abstract: Human understanding in design evolves through a process of critiquing existing knowledge and consequently expanding the store of design knowledge. Critiquing is a dialogue in which the interjection of a reasoned opinion about a product or action triggers further reflection on or changes to the artifact being designed. Our work has focused on applying this successful human critiquing paradigm to human-computer interaction. We argue that computer-based critiquing systems are most effective when they are embedded in domain-oriented design environments, which are knowledge-based computer systems that support designers in specifying a problem and constructing a solution. Embedded critics play a number of important roles in such design environments: (1) they increase the designer's understanding of design situations by pointing out problematic situations early in the design process; (2) they support the integration of problem framing and problem solving by providing a linkage between the design specification and the design construction; and (3) they help designers access relevant information in the large information spaces provided by the design environment. Three embedded critiquing mechanisms—generic, specific, and interpretive critics—are presented, and their complementary roles within the design environment architecture are described.
  • 加载中
  • Bobrow DG and Goldstein I, 1980. “Representing design alternatives” In: Proceedings of AISB Conference, AISB, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar

    Buchanan B and Shortliffe E, 1984. “Human engineering of medical expert systems” In: Buchanan B and Shortliffe E (Eds), Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 599–612.

    Google Scholar

    Burton R and Brown JS, 1982. “An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities” In: Sleeman D and Brown JS (Eds), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Academic Press, London, pp 79–98.

    Google Scholar

    Chambers AB and Nagel DC, 1985. “Pilots of the future: Human or computer?” Commun. ACM28 (11) 1187–1199.

    Google Scholar

    Conklin J and Begeman M, 1988. “gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion” Trans. Office Infor. Syst.6 (4) 303–331.

    Google Scholar

    Draper SW, 1984. “The nature of expertise in UNIX” In: Proceedings of INTERACT'84, IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp 182–186, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar

    Ehn P, 1989. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts (2nd ed), Arbetslivscentru, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, 1987. “A critic for LISP” In: Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence, pp 177–184, Milan, Italy.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, 1990. “Communication requirements for cooperative problem solving systems” Information Syst.15 (1) pp 21–36.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, 1991. “Supporting learning on demand with design environments” In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences, pp 165–172, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, 1992. “Domain-oriented design environments” In: Proceedings of 7th Annual Knowledge-Based Software Engineering (KBSE-92) Conference, pp 204–213, McLean, VA.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, 1993. “Turning breakdowns into opportunities for creativity” In: Edmonds E (Eds), Creativity in Cognition, Penrose Press.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, and Girgensohn A, 1990. “End-user modifiability in design environments” In: Proceedings of CHI'90, pp 183–191, ACM Press.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, Grudin J, Lemke AC, McCall R, Ostwald J, Reeves BN and Shipman F, 1992. “Supporting indirect, collaborative design with integrated knowledge-based design environments” Human Computer Interaction (Special Issue on Computer Supported Cooperative Work) 7 (3).

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, Lemke AC, Mastaglio T and Morch A, 1991. “The role of critiquing in cooperative problem solving” ACM Trans. Infor. Syst.9 (2) 123–151.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, Lemke AC, McCall R and Morch A, 1991 “Making argumentation serve design” Human Computer Interaction6 (3–4) 393–419.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, Lemke AC and Schwab T, 1985. “Knowledge-Based Help Systems” In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'85 Conference Proceedings, pp 161–167, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, McCall R and Morch A, 1989. “Design environments for constructive and argumentativc design” In: Proceedings of CHI'89, pp 269–275, ACM Press.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G and Nakakoji K, 1991. “Making design objects relevant to the task at hand” In: Proceedings of AAAI-91, Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 67–73, AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar

    Girgensohn A, 1992. End-User Modifiability in Knowledge-Based Design Environments, Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder. (Also available as TechReport CU–CS–595–92.)

    Google Scholar

    Greenbaum J and Kyng M, 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar

    Hackman JR and Kaplan RE, 1974. “Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups” 5 459–480.

    Google Scholar

    Johansen R, 1988. Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams, Free Press.

    Google Scholar

    Kolodner J, 1991. “Improving human decision making through case-based decision aiding” 12 (2) 52–68.

    Google Scholar

    Lave J, 1988. Cognition in Practice. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Lemke AC and Fischer G, 1990. “A cooperative problem solving system for user interface design” In: Proceedings of AAAI-90, Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 479–484, AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar

    McCall R, 1987. “PHIBIS: Precedurally Hierarchical Issue-Based Information Systems” In: Proceedings of the Conference on Architecture at the International Congress on Planning and Design Theory (New York), American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Google Scholar

    Nakakoji K, 1993. Increasing shared knowledge of design tasks between humans and design environments: The role of a specification component, PhD Dissertation Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder.

    Google Scholar

    Norman DA, 1993. Things That Make Us Smart, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar

    Petroski H, 1985. To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design, St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar

    Polanyi M, 1966. The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar

    Popper KR, 1965. Conjectures and Refutations, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar

    Prieto-Diaz R and Freeman P, 1987. “Classifying software for reusability” 4 (1) 6–16.

    Google Scholar

    Repenning A and Sumner T, 1992. “Using agentsheets to create a voice dialog design environment” In: Proceedings of Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC'92), pp 1199–1207, ACM Press.

    Google Scholar

    Rittel H, 1984. “Second generation design methods” In: Cross N (Ed.) Developments in Design Methodology, pp 317–327, Wiley.

    Google Scholar

    Rittel H and Webber MM, 1984. “Planning problems are wicked problems” In: Cross N (Ed.) Developments in Design Methodology, pp 134–144, Wiley.

    Google Scholar

    Schoen DA, 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar

    Silverman B, 1992. “Survey of expert critiquing systems: Practical and theoretical frontiers” Comm. ACM35 (4) 106–127.

    Google Scholar

    Simon HA, 1981. The Sciences of the Artificial (2nd ed.), The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar

    Stahl G, 1992. Toward a Theory of Hermeneutic Software Design, No. CU–CS–589–92, Computer Science Department, University of Colorado at Boulder.

    Google Scholar

    Stahl G, 1993. “Supporting interpretation in design” J. Architecture and Planning Research (Special Issue on Computational Representations of Knowledge) (Forthcoming).

    Google Scholar

    Stahl G, McCall R and Peper G, 1992. “A hypermedia inference language as an alternative to rule-based expert systems” (Submitted to Expert Systems ITL Conference).

    Google Scholar

    Sumner T, Davies S, Lemke AC and Polson PG, 1991. Iterative Design of a Voice Dialog Design Environment, Technical Report No. CU–CS–546–91, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder.

    Google Scholar

    Winograd T and Flores F, 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Gerhard Fischer, Kumiyo Nakakoji, Jonathan Ostwald, Gerry Stahl, Tamara Sumner. 1993. Embedding critics in design environments. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 8: doi: 10.1017/S026988890000031X
    Gerhard Fischer, Kumiyo Nakakoji, Jonathan Ostwald, Gerry Stahl, Tamara Sumner. 1993. Embedding critics in design environments. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 8: doi: 10.1017/S026988890000031X
    shu
Download PDF

Article Metrics

Article views(30) PDF downloads(235)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Embedding critics in design environments

  • Published online: 07 July 2009
The Knowledge Engineering Review  8,  Article number: 10.1017/S026988890000031X  (1993)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: Human understanding in design evolves through a process of critiquing existing knowledge and consequently expanding the store of design knowledge. Critiquing is a dialogue in which the interjection of a reasoned opinion about a product or action triggers further reflection on or changes to the artifact being designed. Our work has focused on applying this successful human critiquing paradigm to human-computer interaction. We argue that computer-based critiquing systems are most effective when they are embedded in domain-oriented design environments, which are knowledge-based computer systems that support designers in specifying a problem and constructing a solution. Embedded critics play a number of important roles in such design environments: (1) they increase the designer's understanding of design situations by pointing out problematic situations early in the design process; (2) they support the integration of problem framing and problem solving by providing a linkage between the design specification and the design construction; and (3) they help designers access relevant information in the large information spaces provided by the design environment. Three embedded critiquing mechanisms—generic, specific, and interpretive critics—are presented, and their complementary roles within the design environment architecture are described.

    HTML

    Rights and permissions
    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 19931993Cambridge University Press
References (44)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Gerhard Fischer, Kumiyo Nakakoji, Jonathan Ostwald, Gerry Stahl, Tamara Sumner. 1993. Embedding critics in design environments. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 8: doi: 10.1017/S026988890000031X
    Gerhard Fischer, Kumiyo Nakakoji, Jonathan Ostwald, Gerry Stahl, Tamara Sumner. 1993. Embedding critics in design environments. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 8: doi: 10.1017/S026988890000031X
    shu

    • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return