Search
2003 Volume 18
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

The state of the art in ontology learning: a framework for comparison

More Information
  • In recent years there have been some efforts to automate the ontology acquisition and construction process. The proposed systems differ from each other in some factors and have many features in common. This paper presents the state of the art in Ontology Learning (OL) and introduces a framework for classifying and comparing OL systems. The dimensions of the framework concern what to learn, from where to learn it and how it may be learnt. They include features of the input, the methods of learning and knowledge acquisition, the elements learned, the resulting ontology and also the evaluation process. To extract this framework, over 50 OL systems or modules thereof that have been described in recent articles are studied here and seven prominent ones, which illustrate the greatest differences, are selected for analysis according to our framework. In this paper after a brief description of the seven selected systems we describe the dimensions of the framework. Then we place the representative ontology learning systems into our framework. Finally, we describe the differences, strengths and weaknesses of various values for our dimensions in order to present a guideline for researchers to choose the appropriate features to create or use an OL system for their own domain or application.
  • 加载中
  • Cite this article

    MEHRNOUSH SHAMSFARD, AHMAD ABDOLLAHZADEH BARFOROUSH. 2003. The state of the art in ontology learning: a framework for comparison. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 18:687 doi: 10.1017/S0269888903000687
    MEHRNOUSH SHAMSFARD, AHMAD ABDOLLAHZADEH BARFOROUSH. 2003. The state of the art in ontology learning: a framework for comparison. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 18:687 doi: 10.1017/S0269888903000687

Article Metrics

Article views(14) PDF downloads(210)

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

The state of the art in ontology learning: a framework for comparison

The Knowledge Engineering Review  18 Article number: 10.1017/S0269888903000687  (2003)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: In recent years there have been some efforts to automate the ontology acquisition and construction process. The proposed systems differ from each other in some factors and have many features in common. This paper presents the state of the art in Ontology Learning (OL) and introduces a framework for classifying and comparing OL systems. The dimensions of the framework concern what to learn, from where to learn it and how it may be learnt. They include features of the input, the methods of learning and knowledge acquisition, the elements learned, the resulting ontology and also the evaluation process. To extract this framework, over 50 OL systems or modules thereof that have been described in recent articles are studied here and seven prominent ones, which illustrate the greatest differences, are selected for analysis according to our framework. In this paper after a brief description of the seven selected systems we describe the dimensions of the framework. Then we place the representative ontology learning systems into our framework. Finally, we describe the differences, strengths and weaknesses of various values for our dimensions in order to present a guideline for researchers to choose the appropriate features to create or use an OL system for their own domain or application.

    • © 2003 Cambridge University Press
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    MEHRNOUSH SHAMSFARD, AHMAD ABDOLLAHZADEH BARFOROUSH. 2003. The state of the art in ontology learning: a framework for comparison. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 18:687 doi: 10.1017/S0269888903000687
    MEHRNOUSH SHAMSFARD, AHMAD ABDOLLAHZADEH BARFOROUSH. 2003. The state of the art in ontology learning: a framework for comparison. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 18:687 doi: 10.1017/S0269888903000687
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return