Search
2005 Volume 20
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery

More Information
  • It is a well-known fact that the data mining process can generate many hundreds and often thousands of patterns from data. The task for the data miner then becomes one of determining the most useful patterns from those that are trivial or are already well known to the organization. It is therefore necessary to filter out those patterns through the use of some measure of the patterns actual worth. This article presents a review of the available literature on the various measures devised for evaluating and ranking the discovered patterns produced by the data mining process. These so-called interestingness measures are generally divided into two categories: objective measures based on the statistical strengths or properties of the discovered patterns and subjective measures that are derived from the user's beliefs or expectations of their particular problem domain. We evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the various interestingness measures with respect to the level of user integration within the discovery process.
  • 加载中
  • Cite this article

    KEN MCGARRY. 2005. A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 20:8 doi: 10.1017/S0269888905000408
    KEN MCGARRY. 2005. A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 20:8 doi: 10.1017/S0269888905000408

Article Metrics

Article views(15) PDF downloads(1195)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery

The Knowledge Engineering Review  20 Article number: 10.1017/S0269888905000408  (2005)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: It is a well-known fact that the data mining process can generate many hundreds and often thousands of patterns from data. The task for the data miner then becomes one of determining the most useful patterns from those that are trivial or are already well known to the organization. It is therefore necessary to filter out those patterns through the use of some measure of the patterns actual worth. This article presents a review of the available literature on the various measures devised for evaluating and ranking the discovered patterns produced by the data mining process. These so-called interestingness measures are generally divided into two categories: objective measures based on the statistical strengths or properties of the discovered patterns and subjective measures that are derived from the user's beliefs or expectations of their particular problem domain. We evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the various interestingness measures with respect to the level of user integration within the discovery process.

    • © 2006 Cambridge University Press
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    KEN MCGARRY. 2005. A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 20:8 doi: 10.1017/S0269888905000408
    KEN MCGARRY. 2005. A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 20:8 doi: 10.1017/S0269888905000408
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return