Search
2023 Volume 3
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

In vitro propagation, shoot regeneration, callus induction, and suspension from lamina explants of Sorbus caloneura

  • # These authors contributed equally: Miaomiao Guo, Qiuying Yu

More Information
  • Sorbus caloneura has high ornamental and medicinal value but is endangered, and significant effort is required to preserve this natural resource. In this study, the stem and sterilized leaves of S. caloneura were used to explore the effects of different plant hormones basic medium type, initial callus quality, initial liquid volume, and ratio of old liquid culture medium to new on stem proliferation, regeneration and callus suspension culture. Naphthylacetic acid (NAA) and 6-benzyladenine (6-BA) significantly affected the proliferation of stem tissue. Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium supplemented with 1.75 mg/L 6-BA, 0.25 mg/L NAA, and 0.25 mg/L indole butyric acid (IBA) yielded a proliferation rate of 100%, with an average number of adventitious shoots per stem of 4.9. The best callus induction was observed with MS basal medium containing 0.5 mg/L 6-BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), and 0.2 mg/L thidiazuron (TDZ). The adventitious shoots were directly induced by MS basal medium containing 5.0 mg/L 6-BA, 0.5 mg/L NAA, and 1.5 mg/L kinetin (KT) and indirectly induced by medium containing 3.0 mg/L 6-BA, 0.3 mg/L NAA, and 0.1 mg/L TDZ. NAA significantly affected rooting rate, with ideal conditions found to be medium supplemented with 0.2 mg/L NAA and 1.5 mg/L IBA. MS basal medium with 4.5 g of calli and 120 mL of liquid culture medium without retention of the original culture medium yielded the best suspension effect for callus proliferation. Taken together, the results of this study lay a foundation for the breeding, preservation of germplasm resources, and genetic transformation of S. caloneura.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Olszewska MA, Michel P. 2011. Activity-guided isolation and identification of free radical-scavenging components from various leaf extracts of Sorbus aria (L.). Crantz. Natural Product Research 26:243−254

    doi: 10.1080/14786419.2010.537271

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Li H, Matsuura M, Li W, Li Q, Zhang Q, et al. 2012. Chemical constituents from the fruits of Sorbus pohuashanensis. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 43:166−8

    doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2012.03.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Tian CF, LI M, Huang YJ, Zhou YH, Wang XR, et al. 2022. Leaf venation characteristics of simple-leaved taxa of Sorbus in China. Guangxi Plants 42(1):122−32

    doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw202108045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Zhang C, Fu SP, Tang GJ, Hu XW, Guo JC. 2013. Factors influencing direct shoot regeneration from mature leaves of Jatropha curcas, an important biofuel plant. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 49:529−40

    doi: 10.1007/s11627-013-9530-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Matt A, Jehle JA. 2005. In vitro plant regeneration from leaves and internode sections of sweet cherry cultivars (Prunus avium L. ). Plant Cell Reports 24(8):468−76

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-005-0964-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Iliev, IA. 2017. Factors affecting the axillary and adventitious shoot formation in woody plants in vitro (Conference Paper). Acta Horticulturae 1155:15−28

    doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1155.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Liu C, Callow P, Rowland LJ, Hancock JF, Song GQ. 2010. Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf explants of southern highbush blueberry cultivars. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 103:137−44

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9755-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Winkelmann T. 2012. Recent advances in propagation of woody plants. Acta Horticulturae 990:375−81

    doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.990.47

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lall S, Mandegaran Z, Roberts AV. 2006. 2006. Shoot multiplication and adventitious regeneration in Sorbus aucuparia. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 85(1):23−29

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-005-9045-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    An J, 2004. Study on the technique system of micropropagation in Sorbus folgneri. Dissertations. Sichuan Agricultural University. China. pp.16−17

    [11]

    Lu Q, Liu X, Zhou D, Liu W. 2008. 2008. Adventitious shoot induction of duplicate leaf and the leaf rachis of Sorbus aucuparia. Forestry Science and Technology 33(3):51−23

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9499.2008.03.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Bao W, Zou W, Chao L, Bai Y, Tian Y, et al. 2013. Culture culture of Sorbus aucuparia. Economic Forest Research 31(2):91−95

    Google Scholar

    [13]

    Chang P, 2013. Research on the system of tissue culture and rapid propagation for Sorbus alnifolia. Dissertations. Nanjing Forestry University, China. pp. 44−50

    [14]

    Wang A. 2004. Shoot and callus induction and plant regeneration from different explants of Sorbus Pohuashanesis. Dissertation. Northeast Forestry University, China. pp. 47−53

    [15]

    Hu T, Wang R, Chen S, Ma B, Gao W, et al. 2017. Protoplast isolation and establishment of transient expression system of Tripterygium wilfordii suspension culture cells. Chinese Bulletin of Botany 52(6):774−82 DOI: 10.11983/CBB16171

    Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang M, Song Y, An H, Pang Q, Yan X. 2021. Research progress on the effect of exogenous elicitors on the accumulation of secondary metabolites in plant suspension cells. Plant Physiology Journal 57(4):739−48

    doi: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2020.0596

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Nam HJ, Kwon JY, Choi HY, Kang SH, Jung HS, et al. 2017. Production and purification of recombinant glucocerebrosidase in transgenic rice cell suspension cultures. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 181(4):1401−15

    doi: 10.1007/s12010-016-2292-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Tong ZK, Zhu YQ, Wang ZR. 2002. Studies on tissue culture and the establishment of a high-yield cell line of Magnolia officinalis. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University 45:23−6

    Google Scholar

    [19]

    Qiu XF. 2007. Study on cell suspension culture and dynamic accumulation of secondary metabolites of Eucommia ulmiodes. Dissertation. Jiangxi Normal University, China. pp. 28−38

    [20]

    Yao N, An X, Yang K, Zhang Z. 2010. Establishment of suspension cell line of Populus tomentosa carr. and plant regeneration from cells. Plant Physiology Communications 46(11):1114−20

    Google Scholar

    [21]

    Xie HY. 2004. Study on embryogenic suspension culture and protoplast fusion of poplar. Dissertation. Nanjing Forestry University, China. pp. 33−34

    [22]

    Yang Y, He Y, Zheng C. 2005. Induction of callus from the ovule of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr and establishment of suspension cell line. Plant Physiology Communications 5:591−94

    Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hua Q, Zhai XQ, Duan YF. 2008. Research advances in affecting factors of woody plant cell suspension culture. Journal of Henan Forestry Science and Technology13−15. 22

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2630.2008.02.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Liu CX. 2021. Establishment and application of haploid suspension cell screening system from Populus simonii × P. nigra. Dissertation. Northeast Forestry University, China. pp. 1−10

    [25]

    Liu B, Beuerle T, Klundt T, Beerhues L. 2004. Biphenyl synthase from yeast - extract-treated cell cultures of Sorbus aucuparia. Planta 218:492−96

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1144-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Huang L, Xiao WJ, Wang S, Liu T, Wu ZG, et al. 2016. Application of Sorbus aucupariaL. and its suspension cells in plant resistance research. Modern Chinese Medicine 18(10):1359−1363. 1380

    doi: 10.13313/j.issn.1673-4890.2016.10.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li Y, Luo ZQ, Yuan J, Wang S, Liu J, et al. 2022. Metabolic and transcriptional stress memory in Sorbus pohuashanensis suspension cells induced by yeast extract. Cells 11(23):3757

    doi: 10.3390/cells11233757

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15(3):473−97

    doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Aichinger E, Kornet N, Friedrich T, Laux T. 2012. Plant stem cell niches. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63:615−36

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105555

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Sang YL, Cheng ZJ, Zhang XS. 2018. Plant stem cells and de novo organogenesis. New Phytologist 218(4):1334−39

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Gaspar T, Kevers C, Penel C, Greppin H, Reid DM, et al. 1996. Plant hormones and plant growth regulators in plant tissue culture. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 32(4):272−89

    doi: 10.1007/BF02822700

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Skoog F, Miller CO. 1957. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured In vitro. Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology 11:118−30

    Google Scholar

    [33]

    Hussain A, Qarshi IA, Nazir H, Ullah I. 2012. Plant tissue culture: current status and opportunities. Recent Advances in Plant in vitro Culture 6(10):1−28

    doi: 10.5772/50568

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Rout GR. 2004. Effect of cytokinins and auxin on micropropagation of Clitoria ternatea L. Biology Letters 41(1):21−26

    Google Scholar

    [35]

    Sil SK. 2021. Influence of auxin and cytokinin on callus induction of mulberry. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology 25:2310−18

    Google Scholar

    [36]

    Xu Z, Um YC, Kim CH, Lu G, Guo DP, et al. 2008. Effect of plant growth regulators, temperature and sucrose on shoot proliferation from the stem disc of Chinese jiaotou (Allium chinense) and in vitro bulblet formation. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 30(4):521−28

    doi: 10.1007/s11738-008-0150-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Li L, Sun Y, Zhang L, Hu X, Li G, et al. 2021. Tissue culture technology of stem segment of Malus 'Yunxiangrong'. Northern Horticulture 2021(7):66−72

    doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20201728

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Alasania N, Lomtatidze N, Gorgiladze L. 2021. Peculiarities of morphogenesis of cherry laurel Laurocerasus officinalis ro. (Prunus laurocerasus L.) in vitro culture. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences 15(1):83−88

    Google Scholar

    [39]

    Zhang Y, Wang B, Guo L, Xu W, Wang Z, et al. 2018. Factors influencing direct shoot regeneration from leaves, petioles, and plantlet roots of triploid hybrid Populus sect. Tacamahaca. Journal of Forestry Research 29(6):1533−45

    doi: 10.1007/s11676-017-0559-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Jones AMP, Saxena PK. 2013. Inhibition of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L.: a novel approach to reduce oxidative browning in plant tissue culture. PLoS One 8(10):e76802

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076802

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Arya SS, Rookes JE, Cahill DM, Lenka SK. 2020. Next-generation metabolic engineering approaches towards development of plant cell suspension cultures as specialized metabolite producing biofactories. Biotechnology Advances 45:107635

    doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107635

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Soomro R. 2007. Establishment of callus and suspension culture in Jatropha curcas. Pakistan Journal of Botany 39(7):2431−41

    Google Scholar

    [43]

    Xu Z, Wang T, Lou J, Wei S. 2019. Study on optimization of cell suspension culture system and kinetics of Taxus chinensis var. mairer. Forest Research 32(1):8−14

    doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2019.01.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Mo G, Huang L, Kang L, Hua G, Guo L. 2014. Effects of different types of elicitors on secondary metabolism of Sorbus aucuparia cell cultures. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials 37(6):927−31

    Google Scholar

    [45]

    Hrazdina G, Borejsza-Wysocki W, Lester C. 1997. Phytoalexin production in an apple cultivar resistant to Venturia inaequalis. Phytopathology 87(8):868−76

    doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.8.868

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Al-Khayri JM. 2012. Determination of the date palm cell suspension growth curve, optimum plating efficiency, and influence of liquid medium on somatic embryogenesis. Emirates Journal of Food & Agriculture 24(5):444−45

    Google Scholar

    [47]

    Song Y, Li S, Zhang H, Bai X, Bi X, et al. 2018. Establishment and optimization of embryogenic callus suspension culture system of Larix. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 54(7):146−54

    Google Scholar

    [48]

    Li JY, Zhu DY. 2005. Course of plant tissue culture. In Suspension Culture, eds. Li JY, Zhu DY. Third Edition. China: Agricultural University Press. pp. 80−84

    [49]

    Zhuge Q, Que GN. 1992. Establishment of Cunninghamia lanccolata suspension cell line and isolation of protoplasts. Forest Research 5(6):628−32

    Google Scholar

    [50]

    Xiao W, Yang G, Guo L, Hao Q, Lin S. 2013. Study on the growth kinetics of Sorbus aucuparia cell suspension culture. Modern Chinese Medicine 7:569−73

    Google Scholar

    [51]

    Lo KY, Jelodar NJ, Chan LK. 2012. Investigation on the effect of subculture frequency and inoculum size on the artemisinin content in a cell suspension culture of Artemisia annua L. Australian Journal Crop Science 6(5):801−7

    Google Scholar

    [52]

    Wu C. 2009. Influencing Factors on the Culturing of Plant Suspension Cell. Anhui Agricultural Sciences 37(1):36−38

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2009.01.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Mustafa NR, de Winter W, van Iren F, Verpoorte R. 2011. Initiation, growth and cryopreservation of plant cell suspension cultures. Nature Protocols 6:715−42

    doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.144

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Shi K, Yang M, Li Z, Zhang D, Wang Q, et al. 2014. Establishment of embryogenic suspension cultures in somatic embryogenesis of Pinus massoniana Lamb. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology 34(1):64−68

    Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zhang F, Chang J, Ji Q. 2010. Establishment of Populus euphratica suspension cell line. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences 47(12):2510−15

    Google Scholar

    [56]

    Li C, Wang G, Yue Y, Jiang B, Fang H. 2003. Research on effect of culture condition factors on synthesis of flavone glycosides in cell suspension of Ginkgo biloba L. Journal of Dalian University of Technology 43(3):287−91

    doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-8608.2003.03.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Guo M, Yu Q, Li D, Xu K, Di Z, et al. 2023. In vitro propagation, shoot regeneration, callus induction, and suspension from lamina explants of Sorbus caloneura. Forestry Research 3:7 doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0007
    Guo M, Yu Q, Li D, Xu K, Di Z, et al. 2023. In vitro propagation, shoot regeneration, callus induction, and suspension from lamina explants of Sorbus caloneura. Forestry Research 3:7 doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0007

Figures(4)  /  Tables(11)

Article Metrics

Article views(3102) PDF downloads(519)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

In vitro propagation, shoot regeneration, callus induction, and suspension from lamina explants of Sorbus caloneura

Forestry Research  3 Article number: 7  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Sorbus caloneura has high ornamental and medicinal value but is endangered, and significant effort is required to preserve this natural resource. In this study, the stem and sterilized leaves of S. caloneura were used to explore the effects of different plant hormones basic medium type, initial callus quality, initial liquid volume, and ratio of old liquid culture medium to new on stem proliferation, regeneration and callus suspension culture. Naphthylacetic acid (NAA) and 6-benzyladenine (6-BA) significantly affected the proliferation of stem tissue. Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium supplemented with 1.75 mg/L 6-BA, 0.25 mg/L NAA, and 0.25 mg/L indole butyric acid (IBA) yielded a proliferation rate of 100%, with an average number of adventitious shoots per stem of 4.9. The best callus induction was observed with MS basal medium containing 0.5 mg/L 6-BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), and 0.2 mg/L thidiazuron (TDZ). The adventitious shoots were directly induced by MS basal medium containing 5.0 mg/L 6-BA, 0.5 mg/L NAA, and 1.5 mg/L kinetin (KT) and indirectly induced by medium containing 3.0 mg/L 6-BA, 0.3 mg/L NAA, and 0.1 mg/L TDZ. NAA significantly affected rooting rate, with ideal conditions found to be medium supplemented with 0.2 mg/L NAA and 1.5 mg/L IBA. MS basal medium with 4.5 g of calli and 120 mL of liquid culture medium without retention of the original culture medium yielded the best suspension effect for callus proliferation. Taken together, the results of this study lay a foundation for the breeding, preservation of germplasm resources, and genetic transformation of S. caloneura.

    • Sorbus is a genus of deciduous shrubs and small trees belonging to the Rosaceae family that are valued for their ornamental, ecological, and medicinal properties. Plants of this genus are popular worldwide, especially in central European countries, and are used in traditional Chinese and North American medicine[1,2]. Sorbus caloneura is an ornamental tree of the Micromeles section[3], which is distributed across southwest China and northern Vietnam and is commonly found in river valleys and mountains. It is also an endangered species in Fujian Province, China; thus, it is essential to preserve the existing germplasm and increase the population of this highly valuable tree species.

      In vitro plant regeneration has been shown to be critical for large-scale commercial production, germplasm preservation, and plant improvement[4]. The efficiency of shoot regeneration of woody plants is influenced by the type of explant, composition of the basal medium, and admixture of phytohormones and growth additives[57]. Due to the long growth cycle of woody plants, in vitro propagation techniques are limited by a lack of understanding of growth rhythms, dormancy, and production of phenolic compounds[8].

      In vitro shoot regeneration has only been successfully achieved in a few Sorbus species such as S. pohuashanensis, S. aucuparia, S. folgneri, and S. alnifolia[913]. In addition, leaves, petioles, and cotyledons have been used as explants to induce adventitious shoots in Sorbus[10,11,13]. Moreover, the type and concentration of cytokinin and auxin used during shoot regeneration have been shown to significantly impact its success rate[13,14]. However, at present, there are no reports of shoot regeneration in S. caloneura.

      Plant cell suspension culture is an efficient technology that has been widely used in protoplast isolation, culture and hybridization, gene transfer, and rapid production of secondary metabolites[1517]. Many suspension culture systems have been established for woody plants such as Houpoea officinalis[18], Eucommia ulmoides[19], and Populus tomentosa[20]. The main factors affecting the suspension culture of woody plants are plant material, medium composition, initial inoculum, shaking speed, length of subculture period, and ratio of old-to-new medium[2124]. In Sorbus, suspension cultures of S. aucuparia and S. pohuashanensis were established to explore different types of inducers that stimulate plant suspension cells to initiate different pathways to produce and accumulate secondary metabolites with antibacterial activity such as biphenyls and dibenzofurans. These compounds are utilized by plants as chemical defence measures to counteract both abiotic and biotic stresses[2527]. However, suspension culture technology has not yet been applied to S. caloneura.

      In this study, stem segments and sterile leaves of S. caloneura were used as explants to explore the effects of plant hormones and other conditions on stem segment proliferation, callus induction, suspension culture, and shoot regeneration. The resulting protocol will be useful for Sorbus breeding and genetic modification.

    • In this study, Sorbus caloneura stems were collected from four-year-old plants with a height of 90–120 cm that were cultivated at Beijing University of Agriculture (40° N, 116° E, Beijing, China) from May to June 2021 (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Morphology of young stems and leaves of Sorbus caloneura. (a) Four-year-old S. caloneura plant. (b) Young stems and leaves.

      The collected stems were cut into small segments of approximately 2–3 cm, cleaned with detergent, soaked for 10 min in detergent solution to remove surface material, and subsequently washed under running water for 1–1.5 h. After treatment, the stem segments were transferred to a clean bench for disinfection. The disinfection procedure was as follows: stem segments with shoots were soaked in 75% alcohol for 1 min, sterilized with 0.2% w/v sodium hypochlorite solution for 12 min, washed three times with sterile distilled water, and inoculated into the proliferation medium that was composed of MS basal medium[28] supplemented with 1.25 mg/L 6-benzyladenine (6-BA), 0.25 mg/L naphthylacetic acid (NAA), 0.25 mg/L indole butyric acid (IBA), and 30 g/L sucrose + 6.5 g/L agar. All media in this study contained the same sucrose and agar content. The cultures were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C with a 16-h photoperiod under fluorescent light at 20 μmol/m2/s.

    • Stems were subcultured every four weeks and cultured on stem proliferation medium (MS basal medium supplemented with 1.25 mg/L 6-BA, 0.25 mg/L NAA, and 0.25 mg/L IBA). Sterile stem segments (≥ 2 cm) from the subculture were used as explants that were transferred to MS basal medium supplemented with 0.25 mg/L IBA, 6-BA (1.25 or 1.75 mg/L), NAA (0.25 or 0.50 mg/L), and 30 g/L sucrose + 6.50 g/L agar (Table 1). The pH of all media was adjusted to 5.8. Each of the four combinations of growth regulators were tested in triplicate, with each test containing 10 explants. The cultures were then incubated at 25 ± 2 °C with a 16-h photoperiod for 30 d. The number of adventitious shoots (shoot height ≥ 1 cm) were counted, and the rates of proliferation and vitrification were calculated using the following formulae:

      Proliferation rate (%) = (number of proliferation shoots / number of primary explants) × 100%

      Vitrification (%) = (number of vitrificated explants / induced explants) × 100%

      Table 1.  Effects of 6-BA and NAA on stem proliferation.

      Medium6-BA (mg/L)NAA (mg/L)Number of shoots/
      explant
      Proliferation rate (%)Vitrification (%)
      11.250.252.77 ± 0.31c1000.00 ± 0.00b
      21.250.503.30 ± 0.46bc1000.00 ± 0.00b
      31.750.254.90 ± 0.10a10013.33 ± 5.77a
      41.750.503.37 ± 0.15b10020.00 ± 10.00a
      Data are represented as the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments as determined by Duncan's test (P ≤ 0.05). Abbreviations: SE = standard error; 6-BA = 6-benzyladenine; NAA = naphthylacetic acid.
    • The leaf samples were proximal halves cut twice vertically through the main vein (Fig. 2a). These samples were placed in shoot regeneration medium, with the adaxial side in contact with the medium.

      Figure 2. 

      Morphology of callus induction, shoot regeneration, and callus suspension. (a) Morphology of the leaf samples that were proximal halves cut twice vertically through the main vein. (b) Direct adventitious shoot regeneration (red mark). (c) Calli induced from leaves. (d) Callus adventitious shoot regeneration from callus. (e) Calli proliferation in suspension culture. (f) Suspension subculture. Scale bars (a), (b), (d) = 0.5 cm, (c), (e), (f) = 1 cm.

      Different concentrations of 6-BA (1.00, 3.00, or 5.00 mg/L), NAA (0.10, 0.25, or 0.50 mg/L), and kinetin (KT) (1.00, 1.50, or 2.00 mg/L) were added to the medium in combination to determine the optimum combination of growth regulators for a total of nine treatments (Table 2). Each combination was tested in triplicate, with each test containing 10 explants, and the adventitious shoot regeneration rate was calculated using the following formula:

      Adventitious shoot regeneration rate (%) = (number of explants with adventitious shoots / total number of explants) × 100%

      Table 2.  Effects of 6-BA, NAA, and KT on direct shoot regeneration from leaves.

      Medium6-BA (mg/L)NAA (mg/L)KT (mg/L)Regeneration rate (%)Growth status of explants
      11.000.101.000.00 ± 0.00bPoor and dense horizontal distribution of yellowish-brown callus
      21.000.251.500.00 ± 0.00bGeneral, yellow-green dense callus distributed in a few spots
      31.000.502.000.00 ± 0.00bGeneral, yellow-green dense callus
      43.000.101.500.00 ± 0.00bGeneral, light-yellow dense callus
      53.000.252.000.00 ± 0.00bPoor, yellow-brown callus, denser
      63.000.501.000.00 ± 0.00bGeneral, light-yellow dense callus
      75.000.102.000.00 ± 0.00bGrew well, callus was loose when it was yellowish and healed
      85.000.251.000.00 ± 0.00bGood growth, shoot point appeared
      95.000.501.5020.00 ± 0.20aGrew well, adventitious shoots detected
      Data are represented as the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments as determined by Duncan’s test (P ≤ 0.05). Abbreviations: SE = standard error; 6-BA = 6-benzyladenine; NAA = naphthylacetic acid; KT = kinetin.
    • Sterile leaves from the adventitious shoots that were subcultured on new medium for 15 d were used as explants. The main veins were cut 1–2 times, and the leaves were placed in medium with the paraxial surface facing up. The medium was composed of MS basal medium supplemented with 6-BA (0.10, 0.50, or 2.00 mg/L), 2,4-D (0.10, 1.00, or 2.00 mg/L), and TDZ (0.10, 0.20, or 0.50 mg/L). The test was conducted using a randomized block design for a total of 27 treatments (Table 3). Each combination was tested in triplicate, with each test containing 10 explants. Callus growth was observed and recorded after 20 d. The callus induction rate was calculated using the following formula:

      Callus induction rate (%) = (number of inducted callus explants / total number of explants) × 100%

      Table 3.  Effects of 6-BA, 2, 4-D, and TDZ on leaf callus induction.

      Medium6-BA
      (mg/L)
      2,4-D
      (mg/L)
      TDZ
      (mg/L)
      Induction rate
      (%)
      Growth status of explant
      10.100.100.1023.33 ± 3.83ePoor growth, little yellowish-brown calli with uneven distribution
      20.100.100.2083.33 ± 4.70cGeneral growth, swelling, fewer light-yellow calli
      30.100.100.5096.67 ± 10.64abGeneral growth, yellowish and whitish relatively compact calli, with small white particles in bulges
      40.101.000.1090.00 ± 13.61bcPoor growth, almost no calli
      50.101.000.2096.67 ± 10.64abGeneral growth, yellow compact calli with uniform distribution
      60.101.000.5090.00 ± 13.61bcGeneral growth, yellowish compact calli and brown leaves without calli
      70.102.000.10100.00 ± 0.00aGeneral growth, obvious wounds, light-green with yellow, more compact calli
      80.102.000.20100.00 ± 0.00aGeneral growth, many pale-yellow dense calli over the leaves
      90.102.000.5086.67 ± 4.70cGood growth, yellow-green, rapid proliferation and vitrification
      100.500.100.10100.00 ± 0.00aGeneral growth, yellow-green, relatively compact calli, many bulges
      110.500.100.20100.00 ± 0.00aGood growth, yellow-green, compact, evenly covered with calli at the incision
      120.500.100.50100.00 ± 0.00aGood growth, loose and yellowish-green granular calli with even distribution
      130.501.000.10100.00 ± 0.00aGeneral growth
      140.501.000.20100.00 ± 0.00aGood growth, loose yellowish calli
      150.501.000.50100.00 ± 0.00aGood growth, loose yellow-green granular calli
      160.502.000.10100.00 ± 0.00aGood growth, full of calli, granular, loose, yellow-green, with white base
      170.502.000.20100.00 ± 0.00aGeneral growth, yellowish compact calli
      180.502.000.50100.00 ± 0.00aWeak growth, yellowish and whitish with even distribution, tended to turn brown
      192.000.100.1086.67 ± 4.70cGeneral growth, few scattered yellow-green calli
      202.000.100.20100.00 ± 0.00aPoor growth, banded or small calli
      212.000.100.5063.33 ± 3.48dGeneral growth, light-yellow loose calli only appeared at the incision, and calli turned brown gradually
      222.001.000.10100.00 ± 0.00aPoor growth, slightly whiter yellow band, slower emergence, browning of leaf edge, denser and smaller particles
      232.001.000.20100.00 ± 0.00aPoor growth, pale yellow with white, waterlogged, small patches
      242.001.000.5096.67 ± 10.64abPoor growth, dense cluster distribution, and little browning
      252.002.000.10100.00 ± 0.00aPoor growth, light green and more brown granular calli, severe browning of leaves, slower emergence
      262.002.000.2096.67 ± 10.64abGeneral growth, yellow-green brownish and compact calli
      272.002.000.5096.67 ± 10.64abGeneral growth, large leaf curl, uniform distribution of yellow-brown calli
      Data are represented as the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments as determined by Duncan’s test (P ≤ 0.05). Abbreviations: SE = standard error; 6-BA = 6-benzyladenine; NAA = naphthylacetic acid; KT = kinetin.
    • Different concentrations of 6-BA (1.00, 3.00, or 5.00 mg/L), NAA (0.10, 0.30, or 0.50 mg/L), and TDZ (0.10 mg/L) were added to the medium in combination to determine the optimum combination of growth regulators for a total of nine treatments (Table 4). After subculturing in callus induction medium for 20 d, the calli of the group with the best callus induction were transferred to the regeneration medium. After 40–45 d, leaf differentiation was observed, and the number of adventitious shoots (shoot length > 1 cm) were counted. The adventitious shoot regeneration rate was calculated as described above.

      Table 4.  Effects of 6-BA and NAA on indirect shoot regeneration from calli.

      Medium6-BA (mg/L)NAA (mg/L)Regeneration rate (%)
      11.000.100.00 ± 0.00a
      21.000.300.00 ± 0.00a
      31.000.500.00 ± 0.00a
      43.000.100.00 ± 0.00a
      53.000.303.33 ± 0.19a
      63.000.500.00 ± 0.00a
      75.000.100.00 ± 0.00a
      85.000.300.00 ± 0.00a
      95.000.500.00 ± 0.00a
      Data are represented as the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments as determined by Duncan’s test (P ≤ 0.05). Abbreviations: SE = standard error; 6-BA = 6-benzyladenine; NAA = naphthylacetic acid.
    • Healthy stem segments (> 2 cm) were inoculated into 1/2 MS rooting medium containing auxin, NAA (0, 0.20, 0.40, or 0.80 mg/L), and IBA (1.00 or 1.50 mg/L) for a total of eight treatments (Table 5). The rooting morphology was observed, and the rooting number was recorded after 25 d. The rooting rate was calculated using the following formula:

      Rooting rate (%) = (number of rooting plantlets / all shoots) × 100%

      Table 5.  Effects of NAA and IBA on rooting of S.caloneura.

      NAA
      (mg/L)
      IBA
      (mg/L)
      Rooting Rate
      (%)
      Rooting number
      (strip)
      Rooting status
      10.001.0026.67 ± 2.29cd2.50 ± 0.13cdLight-green with white roots, thick, and more extensive aboveground parts
      20.001.5036.67 ± 3.89c2.75 ± 0.09cLight-green with white roots, thick, and more extensive aboveground parts
      30.201.0056.67 ± 2.03b4.11 ± 0.06bWhite main root, many lateral roots
      40.201.5076.67 ± 4.43a4.78 ± 0.12aWhite main root, many lateral roots
      50.401.0023.33 ± 3.83de2.29 ± 0.15dWhite main root, stout, with lateral roots
      60.401.506.67 ± 8.66f1.50 ± 0.50efWhite stout short root
      70.801.0016.67 ± 2.74de1.20 ± 0.20fWhite main root, few lateral roots
      80.801.5013.33 ± 2.96e1.75 ± 0.25eWhite roots with browning at the base
      Data are represented as the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments as determined by Duncan's test (P ≤ 0.05). Abbreviations: SE = standard error; NAA = naphthylacetic acid; IBA = indole butyric acid.
    • A light-yellow callus of S. caloneura with a soft texture and vigorous growth (less than three subcultures) was selected as the material for suspension culture, with an orthogonal experimental design L9(34) (Table 6). Several parameters were assessed, including basic medium type (A), initial callus quality (B), initial liquid volume (C), and ratio of old-to-new liquid culture medium (D). Each treatment was repeated three times. The suspension was subcultured for 15 d in a 200 mL volume flask at a rotating speed of 120 rpm, and the amount of callus proliferation was calculated. The basic medium was composed of MS basal medium supplemented with 0.50 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.05 mg/L TDZ. In a previous preliminary experiment, we found that the weight of calli tended to stabilize after approximately 15 d of culture; therefore, we chose to measure the amount of callus proliferation at 15 d and 30 d after suspension culture.

      Table 6.  Influencing factors and level of orthogonal test for callus suspension.

      LevelFactor
      ABCD
      Basic medium typeInitial callus quality (g)Initial liquid volume (mL)Ratio of old-to-new liquid culture medium
      1MS1.51200
      2WPM3.01001/3
      3½MS4.5801/1
      Abbreviations: MS = Murashige and Skoog; WPM = woody plant medium; ½MS = ½Murashige and Skoog.
    • Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Arcsine transformation was applied to the percentage data before ANOVA using Microsoft Excel 2013 (Microsoft Corp., Richmond, VA, USA). The data were then subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan's multiple range test at P ≤ 0.05 and expressed as the mean ± standard error.

    • Samples grown on MS basal medium supplemented with 1.75 mg/L 6-BA, 0.25 mg/L NAA, 0.25 mg/L IBA had proliferation rates of 100% and an average of 4.9 adventitious shoots, which was significantly higher than that of the other three groups (Table 1). Visual inspection indicated that these explants had vigorous growth, with bright green leaves and stems (Fig. 3). ANOVA showed that 6-BA significantly affected the average number of shoots (Table 1). However, vitrification markedly increased as the concentration of 6-BA increased, reaching 20% at the highest 6-BA concentration (Table 7).

      Figure 3. 

      Effects of different concentrations of 6-BA and NAA on the proliferation of stems. (a) 6-BA (1.25 mg/L) and NAA (0.25 mg/L). (b) 6-BA (1.25 mg/L) and NAA (0.50 mg/L). (c) 6-BA (1.75 mg/L) and NAA (0.25 mg/L). (d) 6-BA (1.75 mg/L) and NAA (0.50 mg/L), Scale bars = 2 cm.

      Table 7.  Variation analyses of the average number of shoots for different 6-BA and NAA combinations.

      Variation sourcedfMSFP-value
      6-BA13.64111.6140.008*
      NAA10.6031.9320.199
      Error90.314
      Total12
      * Represents a significant difference at P < 0.05. ** Represents a highly significant difference at P < 0.01. Abbreviations: df = degree of freedom; MS = mean square; 6-BA = 6-benzyladenine; NAA = naphthylacetic acid.
    • Our results demonstrated that hormone treatment had a positive effect on the number of adventitious buds induced directly from S. caloneura leaves. We employed three different concentrations of 6-BA, NAA, and KT in several different combinations, one of which resulted in direct adventitious shoots and a leaf regeneration rate of 20% (Fig. 3b, Table 2).

      We found that increasing concentrations of 2,4-D during the callus induction of leaves resulted in a larger calli volume. After two weeks of growth, explants were inoculated into callus induction medium. In the third week, granular and compact expanded calli formed at the cut site of the explants (Fig. 3c). The best callus induction medium for leaves was MS basal medium supplemented with 0.50 mg/L 6-BA, 1.00 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.20 mg/L TDZ, with a callus induction rate of 100% (Table 3). The induction rate increased gradually with decreasing cytokinin-to-auxin ratios. The calli of the explants grew well when the concentration of 6-BA was 0.50 mg/L, with yellowish-green colour, granular distribution, and loose structure.

      We achieved indirect adventitious bud differentiation from the calli of S. caloneura. MS basal medium supplemented with 0.50 mg/L 6-BA, 1.00 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.20 mg/L TDZ resulted in calli that differentiated into adventitious shoots with media containing 3.00 mg/L 6-BA, 0.30 mg/L NAA, and 0.1 mg/L TDZ, which was the only combination of growth regulators that resulted in differentiation into adventitious shoots (Fig. 3d). However, this combination resulted in a regeneration rate of only 3.33% (Table 4).

    • ANOVA analysis indicated that NAA had a significant effect on the rooting of S. caloneura (Table 8), but all eight media combinations tested resulted in some level of rooting (Table 5). The combination of 1/2 MS with 0.20 mg/L NAA and 1.50 mg/L IBA resulted in a rooting rate of 76.67% and a rooting number of 4.78, indicating that it was the most suitable medium. The resulting explants showed vigorous growth, with dark green leaves (Fig. 4a) and long roots (Fig. 4b).

      Table 8.  Variation analyses of rooting rate for different NAA and IBA combinations.

      Variation sourcedfMSFP-value
      NAA31558.76483.091< 0.001 **
      IBA13.1900.1700.686
      Error1638.076
      Total21
      * Represents a significant difference at P < 0.05. ** Represents a highly significant difference at P < 0.01. Abbreviations: df = degree of freedom; MS = mean square; NAA = naphthylacetic acid; IBA = indole butyric acid.

      Figure 4. 

      Morphology of roots treated with NAA (0.20 mg/L) and IBA (1.50 mg/L). (a) 30 d old root, front view. (b) 30 d old root, bottom view. Scale bars = 2 cm.

    • The best combination of conditions was determined with orthogonal tests, in which the proliferative effect of the suspension culture was obvious (Table 9). After 15 d of suspension culture, the average callus proliferation rate was 2–5 times that of initial callus quality (Table 9, Fig. 3e). After 30 d of suspension culture, all calli showed greater proliferative growth than that at 15 d, and the average callus proliferation rate was 3–11 times that of initial callus quality (Fig. 3f). Range analysis of suspension culture proliferation showed that the most important factor affecting callus proliferation at both X1 (15 d) and X2 (30 d) was B (inoculum), but for (X2–X1), the most important factor was A (medium type) (Table 10). The optimal medium for X2 and X2–X1 was MS medium with 4.5 g of calli and 120 mL of culture solution that was subcultured once without retaining the original culture solution (Table 10). ANOVA results showed that B (inoculum) had highly significant effects on X1 and X2, A (medium type) had highly significant effects on X2–X1, and D (retention of old medium) had significant effects on both X1 (15 d) and X2 (30 d) (Table 11).

      Table 9.  Results of orthogonal table for calli proliferation.

      XI proliferation
      (g)
      X2 proliferation
      (g)
      (X2–X1) proliferation
      (g)
      XI proliferation coefficientX2 proliferation coefficient(X2–X1) proliferation coefficient
      c17.5117.9710.465.0011.986.97
      c27.5414.647.102.514.882.37
      c38.6915.937.251.933.541.61
      c47.1710.403.234.786.932.15
      c510.0812.332.253.364.110.75
      c69.8516.556.702.193.681.49
      c76.5411.374.834.367.583.22
      c86.7713.236.472.264.412.16
      c99.0919.8010.712.024.402.38
      X1 is the amount of calli proliferation after 15 d of suspension culture, X2 is the amount of calli proliferation after 30 d of suspension culture, (X2–X1) is the difference between the two calli proliferation rates. Proliferation coefficient = (proliferation amount – initial addition amount) / initial addition amount × 100.

      Table 10.  Weight range analysis of suspension proliferation.

      ABCD
      X1K123.7421.2126.68
      K227.1024.3823.93
      K322.4027.6422.62
      k17.917.078.89
      k29.038.137.98
      k37.479.217.54
      R1.572.141.35
      X2K148.5439.7450.1047.75
      K239.2840.2042.5644.84
      K344.4152.2939.5639.63
      k116.1813.2516.7015.92
      k213.0913.4014.1914.95
      k314.8017.4313.1913.21
      R3.094.183.512.71
      (X2–X1)K124.8018.5223.4223.63
      K212.1815.8118.6321.03
      K322.0124.6516.9414.33
      k18.276.177.817.88
      k24.065.276.217.01
      k37.348.225.654.78
      R4.212.952.163.10
      Range = k(max) − k(mix); K1A = XA1 + XA2 + XA3, K2A = XA4 + XA5 + XA6, K3A = XA7 + XA8 + XA9…; kx = Kx/number of levels.

      Table 11.  Variation analyses for suspension proliferation.

      Variation sourceSum of squaresdfMSFP-value
      X1Type of medium9.3624.680.9170.413
      Addition of initial calli amount100.107250.05337.7970.000**
      Addition of initial liquid amount7.16723.5830.690.511
      X2Type of medium26.82523.4121.4750.249
      Addition of initial calli amount143.564271.78216.9690.000**
      Addition of initial liquid amount33.632216.8161.9090.170
      Liquid retention20.283210.1421.0830.355
      (X2-X1)Type of medium140.251270.1259.8630.001**
      Addition of initial calli amount62.952231.4763.0470.066
      Addition of initial liquid amount18.19029.0950.7460.485
      Liquid retention71.879235.9393.6090.043*
      df: degree of freedom; MS: mean square; Sig.: significance; * Represents a significant difference at P < 0.05. ** Represents a highly significant difference at P < 0.01.
    • Cytokinin is effective in promoting cell division and shoot regeneration and plays an important role in stem cell proliferation[29,30]. A commonly used cytokinin in tissue culture is 6-BA, which promotes shoot growth and leaf expansion and enhances chloroplast development[31]. Auxin also plays a role in callus formation[32,33]. When the concentration of auxin is higher than that of cytokinin, callus and root formation are promoted, and shoots are easily induced[34,35]. However, high cytokinin concentrations are often accompanied by vitrification and limited shoot development[36]. In this study, we found that high concentrations of 6-BA led to significant vitrification of explants. An earlier analysis of stem proliferation of Malus 'Yunxiangrong' showed that the number of clustered shoots first increased and then decreased with increasing 6-BA concentrations in Prunus laurocerasus[37]. When the 6-BA concentration reached a certain threshold, the number of shoots continued to increase, and stem shortening was observed[38], which was consistent with our results (Fig. 2d).

      The regeneration ability of Sorbus has been shown to be highly variable. For example, the regeneration rate of S. alnifolia leaves was 16%, but that of S. folgneri was 90%[10,13]. In this study, the regeneration efficiency of S. caloneura was similar to that of S. alnifolia, both of which were lower than 20%. In addition to species specificity, another reason for the low regeneration efficiency of adventitious shoots may be the long duration of the dark culture. Similar results were observed in the regeneration of adventitious shoots of poplar leaves, where adventitious shoots browned and died[39]. It has also been found that as culture time increases, the differentiation potential of organs and the regeneration ability gradually decrease, whereas browning increases[40]. These findings may therefore explain the low induction rate of adventitious shoots in our study, indicating that regeneration efficiency is closely related to explant genotype, hormone concentration and range, culture conditions, and other factors.

      Plant cell suspension culture has emerged as a key technology for producing plant-specialized metabolites, which can promote rapid cellular and tissue proliferation, and the technology allows for a large number of uniformly dispersed and high-quality calli to be obtained easily[4143]. Large-scale cell suspension culture is required to obtain a large number of calli in a short time to meet the demand for the production of secondary metabolites, which is important for industrial applications aimed at generating synthetic active ingredients[44]. In this study, the proliferation efficiency of the suspension system was high, with a more than 12-fold increase in the number of calli after 30 d. The establishment of a suspension system can potentially enable the industrial raising of seedlings and the production of a large number of secondary metabolites of Sorbus, such as biphenyl compounds, which can inhibit pathogenic bacteria and are widely used in the study of plant stress responses[45]. The growth of the plant suspension cell line followed an S-shaped curve, achieving slow, logarithmic, and stable phases[46,47]. The typical growth cycle of suspension cultures is approximately 1–2 weeks, and subculture is needed once every 5–7 d[48]. Zhuge & Que[49] showed that the subculture cycle of Cunninghamia lanecolata suspension cells could not exceed 10 d. In a preliminary experiment, we found that the fresh weight of calli stabilized after approximately 15 d of culture, and Xiao et al.[50] also reported similar results when they found that S. aucuparia suspension culture reached its maximum fresh cell weight at 14 d[50]. In this study, the subculture cycle was 15 d, and no browning was observed, indicating that the tissue quality did not decline. In addition, high initial inoculation density has been shown to be effective in establishing cell suspension cultures[51]. We found that the initial callus inoculation amount was the most important factor affecting callus proliferation and adding an appropriate amount of calli was beneficial to suspension culture proliferation. A small initial inoculation amount led to a long lag period due to the cell growth clustering effect. Moreover, suspended cells can only start to grow at a certain density, and their initial density is generally (0.5–2.5) × 105 cells/mL[52]. In addition, when cells are densely populated in culture medium, the cell proliferation slows down or stagnates due to nutrient shortage. For Pinus massoniana cells, 1.0 g of callus in 30 mL of liquid medium was found to be the ideal condition for establishing a suspension system[53,54]. An inoculation amount of 30 g/L was most favourable for the establishment of the Populus euphratica suspension cell line[55]. Similarly, the optimal inoculation amount for a Ginkgo suspension cell line was 30–40 g/L[56]. Our results indicated that the best suspension culture conditions were 4.5 g of callus to 120 mL liquid medium, an inoculation amount of 37.5 g/L, and a ratio of callus-to-liquid per litre between 30 and 40, which is similar to the optimal inoculation concentration for suspension cultures of woody plants determined in other studies.

    • To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of stem proliferation, callus induction, rooting culture, and suspension culture of S. caloneura, as well as the first demonstration of adventitious shoot regeneration from leaves. We assessed the effects of multiple factors to identify the ideal conditions for culture and regeneration, providing a foundation for industrial seedling growth and genetic transformation of S. caloneura. Our findings also have implications for the breeding and genetic transformation of Sorbus.

      • This work was supported by the Subject of Key R&D Plan of Shandong Province (Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project) 'Mining and Accurate Identification of Forest Tree Germplasm Resources' (2021LZGC023) and Youth Science Fund Project of Beijing University of Agriculture (5077516002/006).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # These authors contributed equally: Miaomiao Guo, Qiuying Yu

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (4)  Table (11) References (56)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Guo M, Yu Q, Li D, Xu K, Di Z, et al. 2023. In vitro propagation, shoot regeneration, callus induction, and suspension from lamina explants of Sorbus caloneura. Forestry Research 3:7 doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0007
    Guo M, Yu Q, Li D, Xu K, Di Z, et al. 2023. In vitro propagation, shoot regeneration, callus induction, and suspension from lamina explants of Sorbus caloneura. Forestry Research 3:7 doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0007

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return