Search
2023 Volume 3
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

The utilization and molecular mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in vegetables

More Information
  • Received Date: 25 May 2022
    Accepted Date: 22 November 2022
    Published Online: 17 January 2023
    Vegetable Research  3 Article number: 10.48130/VR-2023-0001 (2023)  |  Cite this article
  • Vegetables are an important food and many of them can form AM (arbuscular mycorrhiza) symbiosis with AMF (AM fungi) that belongs to the sub-phylum Glomeromycota. The symbiosis with AM in vegetables enhances their tolerance to various stresses, such as low Pi (phosphate), salinity and soil-borne diseases. In the past decades, the molecular mechanism of AM symbiosis in vegetables has begun to emerge. Here, we review the key studies characterizing the molecular mechanism of AM symbiosis and highlights the huge potential of AMF in vegetable cultivation.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Nour M, Lutze SA, Grech A, Allman-Farinelli M. 2018. The relationship between vegetable intake and weight outcomes: A systematic review of cohort studies. Nutrients 10:1626

    doi: 10.3390/nu10111626

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Cramer GR, Urano K, Delrot S, Pezzotti M, Shinozaki K. 2011. Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biology 11:163

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-163

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Genre A, Lanfranco L, Perotto S, Bonfante P. 2020. Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology 18:649−60

    doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0402-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Chen M, Arato M, Borghi L, Nouri E, Reinhardt D. 2018. Beneficial services of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi – from ecology to application. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1270

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01270

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Malhi GS, Kaur M, Kaushik P, Alyemeni MN, Alsahli AA, et al. 2021. Arbuscular mycorrhiza in combating abiotic stresses in vegetables: An eco-friendly approach. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 28:1465−76

    doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.12.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Baylis GTS. 1967. Experiments on the ecological significance of phycomycetous mycorrhizas. New Phytologist 66:231−43

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1967.tb06001.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Mosse, B. 1973. Plant growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. New Phytologist 72:127−36

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1973.tb02017.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Menge JA, Steirle D, Bagyaraj DJ, Johnson ELV, Leonard RT. 1978. Phosphorus Concentrations in Plants Responsible for Inhibition of Mycorrhizal Infection. New Phytologist 80:575−78

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01589.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Jasper DA, Robson AD, Abbott LK. 1979. Phosphorus and the formation of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 11:501−5

    doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(79)90009-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Thomson BD, Robson AD, Abbott LK. 1986. Effects of Phosphorus on the Formation of Mycorrhizas By Gigaspora Calospora and Glomus Fasciculatum in Relation to Root Carbohydrates. New Phytologist 103:751−65

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb00850.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Breuillin F, Schramm J, Hajirezaei M, Ahkami A, Favre P, et al. 2010. Phosphate systemically inhibits development of arbuscular mycorrhiza in Petunia hybrida and represses genes involved in mycorrhizal functioning. The Plant Journal 64:1002−17

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04385.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Balzergue C, Puech-Pagès V, Bécard G, Rochange SF. 2011. The regulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis by phosphate in pea involves early and systemic signalling events. Journal of Experimental Botany 62:1049−60

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq335

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kobae Y, Ohmori Y, Saito C, Yano K, Ohtomo R, et al. 2016. Phosphate Treatment Strongly Inhibits New Arbuscule Development But Not the Maintenance of Arbuscule in Mycorrhizal Rice Roots. Plant Physiology 171:566−79

    doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00127

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Li X, George E, Marschner H. 1991. Extension of the phosphorus depletion zone in VA-mycorrhizal white clover in a calcareous soil. Plant and Soil 136:41−48

    doi: 10.1007/BF02465218

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Jakobsen I, Abbott LK, Robson AD. 1992. External hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Trifolium subterraneum L. New Phytologist 120:371−80

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01077.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Golubkina N, Krivenkov L, Sekara A, Vasileva V, Tallarita A, et al. 2020. Prospects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi utilization in production of Allium plants. Plants 9:279

    doi: 10.3390/plants9020279

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Galván GA, Kuyper TW, Burger K, Keizer LCP, Hoekstra RF, et al. 2011. Genetic analysis of the interaction between Allium species and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122:947−60

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1501-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Metwally RA, Al-Amri SM. 2020. Individual and interactive role of Trichoderma viride and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and pigment content of onion plants. Letters in Applied Microbiology 70:79−86

    doi: 10.1111/lam.13246

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Rozpądek P, Rąpała-Kozik M, Wężowicz K, Grandin A, Karlsson S, et al. 2016. Arbuscular mycorrhiza improves yield and nutritional properties of onion (Allium cepa). Plant Physiology & Biochemistry 107:264−72

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.06.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Tran BTT, Watts-Williams SJ, Cavagnaro TR. 2019. Impact of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on the growth and nutrition of fifteen crop and pasture plant species. Functional Plant Biology 46:732−42

    doi: 10.1071/FP18327

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Baum C, El-Tohamy W, Gruda N. 2015. Increasing the productivity and product quality of vegetable crops using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A review. Scientia Horticulturae 187:131−41

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Hijri M. 2016. Analysis of a large dataset of mycorrhiza inoculation field trials on potato shows highly significant increases in yield. Mycorrhiza 26:209−14

    doi: 10.1007/s00572-015-0661-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Bona E, Cantamessa S, Massa N, Manassero P, Marsano F, et al. 2017. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting pseudomonads improve yield, quality and nutritional value of tomato: a field study. Mycorrhiza 27:1−11

    doi: 10.1007/s00572-016-0727-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Schubert R, Werner S, Cirka H, Rödel P, Tandron Moya Y, et al. 2020. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhization on fruit quality in industrialized tomato production. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:7029

    doi: 10.3390/ijms21197029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Pasković I, Soldo B, Goreta Ban S, Radić T, Lukić M, et al. 2021. Fruit quality and volatile compound composition of processing tomato as affected by fertilisation practices and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi application. Food Chemistry 359:129961

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129961

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. 2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218:1−14

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Balliu A, Sallaku G, Rewald B. 2015. AMF inoculation enhances growth and improves the nutrient uptake rates of transplanted, salt-stressed tomato seedlings. Sustainability 7:15967−81

    doi: 10.3390/su71215799

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Neeraj, Singh K. 2011. Organic amendments to soil inoculated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Pseudomonas fluorescens treatments reduce the development of root-rot disease and enhance the yield of Phaseolus vulgaris L. European Journal of Soil Biology 47:288−95

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Ozgonen H, Erkilic A. 2007. Growth enhancement and Phytophthora blight (Phytophthora capsici Leonian) control by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation in pepper. Crop Protection 26:1682−88

    doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.02.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Liu J, You L, Amini M, Obersteiner M, Herrero M, et al. 2010. A high-resolution assessment on global nitrogen flows in cropland. PNAS 107:8035−40

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913658107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Bender SF, Conen F, Van D. 2015. Mycorrhizal effects on nutrient cycling, nutrient leaching and N2O production in experimental grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 80:283−92

    doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Cavagnaro TR, Barrios-Masias FH, Jackson LE. 2012. Arbuscular mycorrhizas and their role in plant growth, nitrogen interception and soil gas efflux in an organic production system. Plant & Soil 353:181−94

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1021-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs EM, Dannenmann M, Kiese R, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. 2014. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 368:20130122

    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0122

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Lazcano C, Barrios-Masias FH, Jackson LE. 2014. Arbuscular mycorrhizal effects on plant water relations and soil greenhouse gas emissions under changing moisture regimes. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 74:184−92

    doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Bowles TM, Jackson LE, Cavagnaro TR. 2018. Mycorrhizal fungi enhance plant nutrient acquisition and modulate nitrogen loss with variable water regimes. Global Change Biology 24:e171−e182

    doi: 10.1111/gcb.13884

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Riaz M, Kamran M, Fang Y, Wang Q, Cao H, et al. 2020. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-induced mitigation of heavy metal phytotoxicity in metal contaminated soils: A critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 402:123919

    doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123919

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Garg N, Chandel S. 2015. Role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in arresting reactive oxygen species (ROS) and strengthening antioxidant defense in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. nodules under salinity (NaCl) and cadmium (Cd) stress. Plant Growth Regulation 75:521−34

    doi: 10.1007/s10725-014-0016-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Akiyama K, Matsuzaki K, Hayashi H. 2005. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 435:824−27

    doi: 10.1038/nature03608

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Arumingtyas EL, Floyd RS, Gregory MJ, Murfet IC. 1992. Branching in Pisum: inheritance and allelism tests with 17 ramosus mutants. Pisum Genetics 24:17−31

    Google Scholar

    [40]

    Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, Puech-Pagès V, Dun EA, et al. 2008. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 455:189−94

    doi: 10.1038/nature07271

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Foo E, Yoneyama K, Hugill CJ, Quittenden LJ, Reid JB. 2013. Strigolactones and the regulation of pea symbioses in response to nitrate and phosphate deficiency. Molecular Plant 6:76−87

    doi: 10.1093/mp/sss115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    de Saint Germain A, Clavé G, Badet-Denisot MA, Pillot JP, Cornu D, et al. 2016. An histidine covalent receptor and butenolide complex mediates strigolactone perception. Nature Chemical Biology 12:787−94

    doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2147

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Ligerot Y, de Saint Germain A, Waldie T, Troadec C, Citerne S, et al. 2017. The pea branching RMS2 gene encodes the PsAFB4/5 auxin receptor and is involved in an auxin-strigolactone regulation loop. Plos Genetics 13:e1007089

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007089

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Kohlen W, Charnikhova T, Lammers M, Pollina T, Tóth P, et al. 2012. The tomato CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE8 (SlCCD8) regulates rhizosphere signaling, plant architecture and affects reproductive development through strigolactone biosynthesis. New Phytologist 196:535−47

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04265.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Guillotin B, Etemadi M, Audran C, Bouzayen M, Bécard G, et al. 2017. Sl-IAA27 regulates strigolactone biosynthesis and mycorrhization in tomato (var. MicroTom). New Phytologist 213:1124−32

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14246

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Foo E, Ross JJ, Jones WT, et al. 2013. Plant hormones in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: An emerging role for gibberellins. Annals of Botany 111:769−79

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mct041

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Choi J, Summers W, Paszkowski U. 2018. Mechanisms underlying establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. Annual Review of Phytopathology 56:135−60

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035521

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Buendia L, Wang T, Girardin A, Lefebvre B. 2016. The LysM receptor-like kinase SlLYK10 regulates the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in tomato. New Phytologist 210:184−95

    doi: 10.1111/nph.13753

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Liao D, Sun X, Wang N, Song F, Liang Y. 2018. Tomato LysM Receptor-Like Kinase SlLYK12 Is Involved in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1004

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Girardin A, Wang T, Ding Y, Keller J, Buendia L, et al. 2019. LCO Receptors Involved in Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Are Functional for Rhizobia Perception in Legumes. Current Biology 29:4249−4259E5

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Prihatna C, Larkan NJ, Barbetti MJ, Barker SJ. 2018. Tomato CYCLOPS/IPD3 is required for mycorrhizal symbiosis but not tolerance to Fusarium wilt in mycorrhiza-deficient tomato mutant rmc. Mycorrhiza 28:495−507

    doi: 10.1007/s00572-018-0842-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Indrasumunar A, Wilde J, Hayashi S, Li D, Gresshoff PM. 2015. Functional analysis of duplicated Symbiosis Receptor Kinase (SymRK) genes during nodulation and mycorrhizal infection in soybean (Glycine max). Journal of Plant Physiology 176:157−68

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.01.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Arthikala MK, Montiel J, Nava N, Santana O, Sánchez-López R, et al. 2013. PvRbohB negatively regulates Rhizophagus irregularis colonization in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant & Cell Physiology 54:1391−402

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct089

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Nagy R, Karandashov V, Chague V, Kalinkevich K, Tamasloukht M, et al. 2005. The characterization of novel mycorrhiza-specific phosphate transporters from Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum tuberosum uncovers functional redundancy in symbiotic phosphate transport in solanaceous species. The Plant Journal 42:236−50

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02364.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Kobae Y, Tamura Y, Takai S, Banba M, Hata S. 2010. Localized expression of arbuscular mycorrhiza-inducible ammonium transporters in soybean. Plant and Cell Physiology 51:1411−15

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq099

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Liu J, Liu J, Liu J, Cui M, Huang Y, et al. 2019. The Potassium Transporter SlHAK10 Is Involved in Mycorrhizal Potassium Uptake. Plant Physiology 180:465−79

    doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01533

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Liu J, Chen J, Xie K, Tian Y, Yan A, et al. 2020. A mycorrhiza-specific H+-ATPase is essential for arbuscule development and symbiotic phosphate and nitrogen uptake. Plant, Cell & Environment 43:1069−83

    doi: 10.1111/pce.13714

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Pimprikar P, Carbonnel S, Paries M, Katzer K, Klingl V, et al. 2016. A CCaMK-CYCLOPS-DELLA Complex Activates Transcription of RAM1 to Regulate Arbuscule Branching. Current Biology 26:987−98

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.069

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Ho-Plágaro T, Morcillo RJL, Tamayo-Navarrete MI, Huertas R, Molinero-Rosales N, et al. 2021. DLK2 regulates arbuscule hyphal branching during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist 229:548−62

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16938

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Ho-Plágaro T, Molinero-Rosales N, Fariña Flores D, Villena Díaz M, García-Garrido JM. 2019. Identification and expression analysis of GRAS transcription factor genes involved in the control of arbuscular mycorrhizal development in tomato. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:268

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00268

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Ho-Plágaro T, Huertas RL, Tamayo-Navarrete MI, Blancaflor E, Gavara N, et al. 2021. A novel putative microtubule-associated protein is involved in arbuscule development during arbuscular mycorrhiza formation. Plant and Cell Physiology 62:306−20

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcaa159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Floss DS, Gomez SK, Park HJ, MacLean AM, Müller LM, et al. 2017. A transcriptional program for arbuscule degeneration during AM symbiosis is regulated by MYB1. Current Biology 27:1206−12

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Li C, Zhou J, Wang X, Liao H. 2019. A purple acid phosphatase, GmPAP33, participates in arbuscule degeneration during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in soybean. Plant, Cell & Environment 42:2015−27

    doi: 10.1111/pce.13530

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Liu Y, Shi G, Mao L, Cheng G, Jiang S, et al. 2012. Direct and indirect influences of 8 yr of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on Glomeromycota in an alpine meadow ecosystem. New Phytologist 194:523−35

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04050.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Bonneau L, Huguet S, Wipf D, Pauly N, Truong HN. 2013. Combined phosphate and nitrogen limitation generates a nutrient stress transcriptome favorable for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in Medicago truncatula. New Phytologist 199:188−202

    doi: 10.1111/nph.12234

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Corrêa A, Cruz C, Pérez-Tienda J, Ferrol N. 2014. Shedding light onto nutrient responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants: nutrient interactions may lead to unpredicted outcomes of the symbiosis. Plant Science 221−222:29−41

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.01.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Nouri E, Breuillin-Sessoms F, Feller U, Reinhardt D. 2014. Phosphorus and nitrogen regulate arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in Petunia hybrida. PLoS One 9:e90841

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090841

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Wang C, Velandia K, Kwon CT, Wulf KE, Nichols DS, et al. 2021. The role of CLAVATA signalling in the negative regulation of mycorrhizal colonization and nitrogen response of tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany 72:1702−13

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa539

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Liao D, Sun C, Liang H, Wang Y, Bian X, et al. 2022. SlSPX1-SlPHRs medicate the suppression of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis by phosphate repletion in tomato. The Plant Cell 34:4045−65

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Zhou Y, Ge S, Jin L, Yao K, Wang Y, et al. 2019. A novel CO2-responsive systemic signaling pathway controlling plant mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist 224:106−16

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15917

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. 2020. Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nature Reviews Microbiology 18:607−21

    doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Thiergart T, Zgadzaj R, Bozsóki Z, Garrido-Oter R, Radutoiu S, et al. 2019. Lotus japonicus symbiosis genes impact microbial interactions between symbionts and multikingdom commensal communities. mBio 10:e01833−19

    doi: 10.1128/mbio.01833-19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Wang X, Feng H, Wang Y, Wang M, Xie X, et al. 2021. Mycorrhizal symbiosis modulates the rhizosphere microbiota to promote rhizobia-legume symbiosis. Molecular Plant 14:503−16

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.12.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Santos-Medellín C, Liechty Z, Edwards J, Nguyen B, Huang B, et al. 2021. Prolonged drought imparts lasting compositional changes to the rice root microbiome. Nature Plants 7:1065−77

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00967-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Huang R, Li Z, Mao C, Zhang H, Sun Z, et al. 2020. Natural variation at OsCERK1 regulates arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in rice. New Phytologist 225:1762−76

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16158

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Lu Y, Wang J, Chen B, Mo S, Lian L, et al. 2021. A donor-DNA-free CRISPR/Cas-based approach to gene knock-up in rice. Nature Plants 7:1445−52

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01019-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Oehl F, Sieverding E, Palenzuela J, Ineichen K, Alves da Silva G. 2011. Advances in Glomeromycota taxonomy and classification. IMA Fungus 2:191−9

    doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Redecker D, Schüssler A, Stockinger H, Stürmer SL, Morton JB, et al. 2013. An evidence-based consensus for the classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). Mycorrhiza 23:515−31

    doi: 10.1007/s00572-013-0486-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Liao D, Sun C, Li S, Tauqeer A, Bian X, et al. 2023. The utilization and molecular mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in vegetables. Vegetable Research 3:1 doi: 10.48130/VR-2023-0001
    Liao D, Sun C, Li S, Tauqeer A, Bian X, et al. 2023. The utilization and molecular mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in vegetables. Vegetable Research 3:1 doi: 10.48130/VR-2023-0001

Figures(2)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(2928) PDF downloads(539)

REVIEW   Open Access    

The utilization and molecular mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in vegetables

Vegetable Research  3 Article number: 10.48130/VR-2023-0001  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Vegetables are an important food and many of them can form AM (arbuscular mycorrhiza) symbiosis with AMF (AM fungi) that belongs to the sub-phylum Glomeromycota. The symbiosis with AM in vegetables enhances their tolerance to various stresses, such as low Pi (phosphate), salinity and soil-borne diseases. In the past decades, the molecular mechanism of AM symbiosis in vegetables has begun to emerge. Here, we review the key studies characterizing the molecular mechanism of AM symbiosis and highlights the huge potential of AMF in vegetable cultivation.

    • Vegetables are important food sources for humans, providing fiber, vitamins, carotenes and other nutrients[1]. However, due to limited arable land, many vegetables are cultivated in unfavorable conditions, such as drought and salinity. In addition, some vegetables are repeatedly grown in the same areas for several years in succession, which often causes serious soil-borne diseases. These stresses significantly reduce the yield and the quality of vegetables[2].

      AM (arbuscular mycorrhizal) symbiosis is an important way to enhance the stress tolerance in host plants. More than 72% of terrestrial plants, including many vegetables, can form AM symbiosis with AMF (AM fungi), which belongs to the sub-phylum Glomeromycota[3]. Modern agricultural activities often cause serious environmental pollution partly because farmers tend to over-apply fertilizers to achieve high yield. The application of AM fungi is a good strategy to improve the agricultural environment and ecology during vegetable cultivation, and in particular it has positive effects on vegetable growth under low Pi condition as summarized by two previous reviews[4,5]. However, establishment of AM symbiosis is not always successful in plants and it usually inhibited by high Pi (phosphate) conditions[613]. In addition to the optimization of AM fungi application in vegetable cultivation, we can breed new vegetable varieties with stronger ability to establish AM symbiosis. To this end, understanding the molecular mechanism underlying AM symbiosis in different vegetables, as well as in various conditions, will be very helpful. In recent years, the molecular mechanism of AM symbiosis in vegetable studies has emerged, and here we review the important progress in the molecular mechanism of AM symbiosis, with special focus on its application in vegetable growth.

    • The extraradical hyphae of AMF can extend the root surface by more than 10 cm, forming an extensive absorbing network beyond the rhizosphere nutrient-depletion zones around roots[14,15]. This allows host plants to access a larger volume of soil than the roots without AMF colonization. The extraradical hyphae of AMF can transfer many elements, such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and potassium (K), and H2O, from soil far away to the host roots, which greatly benefits the plant growth (Fig. 1)[3]. It was reported that AMF colonization promoted the accumulation of biomass of Allium L. genus, such as onion and leek[16]. This study showed that the total biomass of Allium cepa inoculated with R. intraradices was at least twice as much as the uninoculated plants[17]. Interestingly, the Allium cepa inoculated with the mixed AMF (F. monosporus, R. clarum, D. nigra and A. laevis) (Table 1) exhibited increased dry weight of shoots, roots and bulbs by 84%, 110%, and 41.6% respectively[18]. However, the promotion effect by AMF varies in different species of Allium cepa. The fresh weight of Allium cepa cv. Karmen inoculated with R. irregularis was just slightly increased compared with Allium cepa cv. Kuba, Sochaczewska and Wolska, although Allium cepa cv. Karmen could also be well colonized by AMF[19]. The total dry weight of Allium fistulosum inoculated with R. intraradices (Table 1) was increased by nearly 150%[17] and the Allium ampeloprasum var. Porrum inoculated with R. irregularis (Table 1) showed an increased biomass of at least 100%[20]. These results suggest that the establishment of AMF can help to achieve the increased yield in Allium L genus without further fertilizer application.

      Figure 1. 

      The formation of AM symbiosis improves the stress tolerance of host plants. The phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), potassium (K) and other essential nutrients in soil are transferred to the host plants via extraradical hyphae to increase the quality and yield of host plants. The formation of AM symbiosis also enhances the defense of the host plants against various pathogens and the tolerance to HMs (heavy metals) and salt stresses. The thickness of the gray arrow represents the amount of N leaching.

      Table 1.  The morphological characters of different AM fungi[77, 78].

      Abbreviated nameFull nameNumber of spore wallsMycorrhizal structures stained
      by trypan blue
      A. laevisAcaulospora laevis3V, A, H
      C. claroideumClaroideoglomus claroideum1V, A, H
      C. etunicatumClaroideoglomus etunicatum1V, A, H
      D. nigraDentiscutata nigra3A, H
      F. monosporusFunneliformis monosporus1V, A, H
      F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseae1V, A, H
      G. albidaGigaspora albida1A, H
      R. clarumRhizoglomus clarum1V, A, H
      R. intraradicesRhizoglomus intraradices1V, A, H
      R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularis1V, A, H
      S. sinuosaSclerocystis sinuosa1V, A, H
      V, vesicles; A, arbuscules; H, hyphae.

      The formation of AM symbiosis is significantly inhibited in the plants supplied with high Pi[613]. Therefore, most studies examining the promotion effect by AMF were performed under low Pi conditions, which considerably limits the application of AMF in agriculture[5,21]. Interestingly, field trials showed that potato inoculated with R. intraradices could increase yield by 9.5% under conventional agricultural conditions, including the application of pesticides and fertilizers[22,23]. In addition, Solanum lycopersicum cv. Brioso and var. MicroTom inoculated with R. irregularis were also shown to gain the increased yield and enhanced fruit quality under sufficient Pi condition[24,25].

      Drought and soil salinity are the frequently occurred stresses that limit crop production in agriculture[26]. The tolerance of host plants against drought and soil salinity can be greatly enhanced by AMF (Fig. 1)[21]. The mixture of AM-fungal spores (R. intraradices, C. etunicatum, F. mosseae, F. geosporum, and C. claroideum) (Table 1) was still shown to increase the tolerance of Solanum lycopersicum cv. Syta seedlings to salt-stress under sufficient Pi conditions[27]. In addition, the inoculation with AMF can boost the plant defense responses to pathogen and disease under low Pi condition (Fig. 1)[20]. Under sufficient Pi condition, the inoculation with S. sinuosa and G. albida (Table 1) enables Phaseolus vulgaris cv. French bean survive the root-rot incidence, resulting in the yield increase by nearly 100%[28]. In Capsicum annuum cv. Charliston Bagci addition, the inoculation with F. mosseae and C. etunicatum (Table 1) alleviates the symptoms of Phytophthora blight[29].

      Usually crops can only take up half of the nutrients in the applied chemical fertilizers, while the other half are leached into ground water and surface water, leading to eutrophication and loss of biodiversity[30]. N, a major nutrient in fertilizers, can also be lost from soil as a potent greenhouse gas, including N2O (nitrous oxide) and N2 (dinitrogen gas)[3134]. Interestingly, the inoculation with R. irregularis in Solanum lycopersicum cv. 76R decreased losses of $\text{NO}_3^- $ by 54%[35].

      Heavy metal pollution is a worldwide problem. AMF has been emerging as a cost-effective and environmently friendly strategy to assist alleviation of heavy metal phytotoxicity[36]. The previous study showed that Cajanus cajan cv. Millsp inoculated with F. mosseae significantly decreased Cd uptake (by 20%) in the root[37]. This result indicates the potential value of AMF for cultivating vegetables in soil slightly polluted by heavy metal. In addition to the alleviation of heavy metal phytotoxicity, AMF can also enhance the plant tolerance to cold, which has been well summarized in a previous review[5].

    • SLs (Strigolactones) are a group of carotenoid-derived compounds synthesized in plant roots and secreted into the rhizosphere where SLs activate mitochondria and energy metabolism of AMF to promote spore germination and prime the branching of extraradical hyphae[38]. Pea shoots branching mutants (rms (RAMOSUS)1-6) were obtained many years ago by ethylmethanesulfonate mutagenesis[39], but until recently, researchers confirmed the causive genes in the mutants (rms1-5) are involved in the biosynthesis and perception of SLs and the reduced AM symbiosis was observed in these mutants (Fig. 2a, Table 2)[4043]. In tomato, the function of SlCCD7 (Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase 7), the enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of SLs, is essential for the formation of AM symbiosis[44]. Other genes that affect SLs pathway, such as SlIAA7 was also shown to regulate AM symbiosis (Fig. 2a, Table 2)[45].

      Figure 2. 

      The molecular mechanism of AM symbiosis in vegetables. (a) RMS1/4/5 are involved in biosynthesis of SLs that promote the spore germination and prime the branching of extraradical hyphae. SlLYK10 binds to COs/LCOs that are secreted by AMF to regulate AM symbiosis. CSSP is required for the early invasion of intra-hyphae and branching of arbuscule. PvRbohB negatively affects the early invasion of intra-hyphae by controlling ROS levels in beans. GmPAP33 negatively regulates the arbuscule degeneration by promoting the hydrolysion of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidic acid. (b) Many proteins located on PAM, such as SlPT4, SlHA8, SlHAK10 and GmAMT4.1, are required for the exchange of the nutrients and signals between AM and host plants. In addition, GRAS proteins, such as DELLA, RAM1 and RAD1, can regulate the formation of arbuscule.

      Table 2.  The genes involved in the formation of AM symbiosis in different crop species.

      GeneOrganismGene functionMutant phenotype involved in AM symbiosisReference
      RMS1PeaRequired for the biosynthesis of SLsReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[40]
      RMS4PeaRequired for the biosynthesis of SLsReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[41]
      RMS5PeaRequired for the biosynthesis of SLsReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[40]
      NAPeaRequired for the biosynthesis of GAsIncreased the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[46]
      SlCCD7TomatoRequired for the biosynthesis of SLsReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[44]
      SlIAA7TomatoRequired for the biosynthesis of SLsReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[45]
      SlLYK10TomatoRequired for the perception of LCOsReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[48]
      SlLYK12TomatoRequired for the perception of LCOsReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[49]
      SlCCaMKTomatoRequired for the calcium ion spiking in the nuclearReduced the early invasion of intra-hyphae and the branching of arbuscule[48]
      SlCYCLOPSTomatoRequired for the induction of RAM1Reduced the early invasion of intra-hyphae and the branching of arbuscule[51]
      GmSYMRKα/βSoybeanRequired for the calcium ion spiking in the nuclearReduced the early invasion of intra-hyphae[52]
      PvRbohBBeanRequired for the production of ROSIncreased the early invasion of intra-hyphae[53]
      CRY/LA
      (DELLA)
      PeaRequired for the induction of RAM1 and interacted with MYB1Inhibited the branching and the degeneration of arbuscule[46]
      SlDLK2TomatoRemains unknownIncreased the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[60]
      SlPT4TomatoRequired for the transporting of phosphateReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[54]
      SlHA8TomatoRequired for the generation of H+ gradientInhibited the branching of arbuscule[57]
      SlHAK10TomatoRequired for the transporting of potassiumReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[56]
      TSBTomatoMicrotubules-associated geneReduced the colonization levels of AM symbiosis[62]
      GmPAP33SoybeanRequired for the promotion of hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidic acidIncreased the percentage of small arbuscule[63]

      In contrast to the rms1-5 mutants in pea, the Gibberellin acids (GAs)-deficient pea mutant (na-1) showed a significant increase of AM symbiosis (Table 2), suggesting GAs have a negative effect on AM symbiosis[46]. This GA-mediated negative effect on AM symbiosis was also confirmed in other species, including rice, Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus[37]. Besides SLs and GAs, other phytohormones can also affect AM symbiosis and their roles in AM symbiosis have been previously reviewed[46].

      AMF can produce short chain chitooligosaccharides (COs) and lipo-chitooligosaccharides (LCOs), which are bound by LYSIN MOTIF RECEPTOR KINASE (LYK) to activate Ca2+ spiking and initiate AM symbiosis[47]. In tomato, SlLYK10 and SlLYK12 are required for AM symbiosis and SlLYK10 can bind to LCOs (Fig. 2a, Table 2)[4850]. Besides the perception of signals from AMF, the common symbiosis signaling pathway (CSSP) is activated in the host plants to initiate the formation of AM symbiosis and nodulation in legume (Fig. 2a, Table 2)[3]. In tomato, CCaMK (Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent protein Kinase) and CYCLOPS were shown to be indispensible for the early invasion of intra-hyphae (Fig. 2a, Table 2)[48,51]. In soybean, the ancestor of SYMRK (Symbiosis Receptor-like Kinase), also belonging to CSSP, gave rise to two paralogous genes GmSYMRKα and GmSYMRKβ, both of which are required for the early invasion of intra-hyphae (Fig. 2a, Table 2)[52]. In addition, the influencing factors also include ROS (reactive oxygen species) as PvRbohB has been shown to negatively regulate the early invasion of intra-hyphae by affecting ROS levels in beans (Fig. 2a, Table 2)[53].

      The intra-hyphae enter into the cortical cells of the host plants to form arbuscule, which is then enveloped by the cell membrane called PAM (Periarbuscular Membrane) (Fig. 2b)[3]. Many PAM locating proteins, such as SlPT4 (Phosphate Transporter 4), SlHA8 (H+-ATPase 8), SlHAK10 (High-affinity K+ Transporter 10) and GmAMT4.1 (Ammonium Transporter 4.1), are required for the exchange of the nutrients and signals and AM symbiosis (Fig. 2b, Table 2)[5457]. The arbuscule is also regulated by many TFs (Transcriptional Factors), such as RAM1 (Reduced Arbuscular Mycorrhiza 1) and RAD1 (Required for Arbuscule Development 1), both of which belong to GRAS family[57]. The loss-of-function of DELLA, another GRAS family gene, caused impaired AM symbiosis in pea[46]. The follow-up studies further showed that DELLA interacted with CYCLOPS to enhance the expression of RAM1[58]. Interestingly, SlDELLA was also shown to interact with SlDLK2 (DWARF14-Like 2), a negative regulator of AM symbiosis, but the function of SlDLK2-SlDELLA complex is unclear yet (Table 2)[59]. The study in tomato suggested that many GRAS family TFs function redundantly to regulate AM symbiosis (Fig. 2b, Table 2)[60].

      The formation of arbuscule is also accompanied by the morphological and physiological changes of the arbuscule-containing cortical cells, partly due to the affected cytoskeletons[47]. A recent study showed that tsb (tomato similar to SB401) gene clustered into the same group as microtubules-associated proteins of Solanaceae species, providing further evidence supporting the roles of cytoskeletons in the arbuscule formation (Table 2)[61]. The arbuscule can usually survive for 7−14 d before the final degeneration, which is accompanied by the gradual disappearance of the PAM and matrix[58]. Previous studies showed that MYB1 induced the expression of hydrolase genes by forming a complex with GRAS family transcription factors DELLA and NSP1, and GmPAP33 (Purple Acid Phosphatase 33) inhibited the arbuscule degeneration by promoting the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidic acid (Fig. 2b, Table 2)[62,63].

      The formation of AM symbiosis is influenced by environmental conditions. Previous studies showed that high N and P both inhibited the formation of AM symbiosis[613, 6468]. Recently, a study in tomato found that the FAB (fasciated and branched) and FIN (fasciated inflorescence), homologous genes to PsNARK (Nodule Autoregulation Receptor Kinase) and PsRDN1 (ROOT DETERMINED NODULATION 1) that are involved in autoregulation of nodulation, were required for the suppression of AM symbiosis by high N[68]. We found that conseved SPX-PHR module regulated the formation of AM symbiosis in response to different phoaphate conditions[69]. SlPHR1/4/10/11/12 were localized in the arbuscule-containing cells to transactivate the expression of AM maker genes. SlSPX1 interacted with them to inhibit their transactivity and negatively regulate the formation of AM symbiosis under medium and replete phoaphate conditions. The elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, which causes problems to the global climate, has increasingly raised concerns. A recent study showed that the rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide could promote the formation of AM symbiosis by triggering the redox-auxin-strigolactone systemic signaling cascade[70].

    • Accumulating evidence has shown that AMF can enhance the tolerance of host plants (including vegetables and crops) under abiotic and biotic stresses. However, the mechanism behind this AMF-mediated stress tolerance is not entirely clear. Microbiome has been emerging as an important way to dissect the underlying mechanism[71]. A few studies showed that AM symbiosis shaped the rhizosphere microbiota and some bacteria such as Streptomyces were beneficial to plants under different stresses[7274]. In future, recently developed microbiome approaches will drive the progress in understanding whether AM symbiosis recruits the beneficial microbe during the defense against the abiotic and biotic stresses.

      Another major issue in the study of AM symbiosis is the effect of external environmental conditions, such as high N and P, which limit the application of AMF in vegetable cultivation[613,6468]. The future studies of the molecular mechanism that limits AM symbiosis under different environmental conditions will benefit the breeding for cultivars with stronger stress resistance. Recently, we uncovered the mechanism behind the inhibition of AM symbiosis by repleted Pi condition in tomato and the key role of SlSPX1 in this process[69]. It is interesting to further examine how AM fungi help Slspx1 mutants to cope with abiotic and biotic stresses under replete Pi conditions, and this will provide the basis for the application of AM fungi in modern agriculture.

      The application of AM fungi in vegetables can also benefit from the studies in other crops as many genes involved in the formation of AM symbiosis are conserved in different species. In rice, it has been shown that the natural variation of OsCERK1 enhanced the colonization of AM symbiosis[75]. It is possible to modify the amino acid sequence of such genes, including the homologs of OsCERK1 in vegetables, to enhance the AM colonization in vegetable growth. Technical advancement can also facilitate this purpose. A recent study showed that the expression of the target gene can be up-regulated by a donor-DNA-free CRISPR/Cas-based approach[76], so the specific increase of the expresssion of target genes, such as SlPT4, SlHAK10 and SlHA8 that localize at PAM, to enhance the absorption of N, P and K form AM fungi is theoretically feasible.

      • This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2019J01418) and the Prominent Subject Foundation of Fujian Province (712018011) to Dehua Liao.

      • Shuang Wu is the Editorial Board member of journal Vegetable Research. He is blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and his research groups.

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (2) References (78)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Liao D, Sun C, Li S, Tauqeer A, Bian X, et al. 2023. The utilization and molecular mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in vegetables. Vegetable Research 3:1 doi: 10.48130/VR-2023-0001
    Liao D, Sun C, Li S, Tauqeer A, Bian X, et al. 2023. The utilization and molecular mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in vegetables. Vegetable Research 3:1 doi: 10.48130/VR-2023-0001

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return