Search
2026 Volume 6
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Altitudinal relocation alters growth and nutrient allocation of young mango cultivars: implications for climate-resilient orchard systems

More Information
  • Shifting fruit production to higher elevations is a key climate-adaptation strategy to mitigate the impacts of rising temperatures in tropical regions. However, empirical field evidence regarding early tree physiological responses to such shifts remains scarce. This study evaluated the vegetative growth dynamics and leaf nutrient allocation of four commercial mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars (Jingdong, Guifei, Jinhuang, and Tainong No. 1) grown at two contrasting altitudes (450 and 1,050 m a.s.l.) in Honghe County, China. Standardized fertilization and irrigation regimes were applied at both sites. Leaf nutrient concentrations were determined using Mid-Infrared (MIR) spectroscopy calibrated against primary chemical analysis (n = 48). At 450 m, scion height and stem diameter increments were significantly greater, driven by warmer temperatures and higher vapor pressure deficit (VPD) (Multiple Linear Regression, R2 = 0.87). Conversely, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) concentrations were significantly higher at 1,050 m across all cultivars. These findings suggest that higher elevations promote enhanced nutrient retention and utilization efficiency rather than rapid biomass dilution. Within a circular agricultural framework, moderate upslope relocation acts as a potent spatial adaptation strategy. By aligning crop physiological requirements with natural altitudinal gradients, producers can reduce the linear flow of synthetic inputs, optimize internal nutrient cycling, and develop more resource-efficient, climate-resilient orchard systems.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Mukherjee SK. 1972. Origin of mango (Mangifera indica). Economic Botany 26:260−264 doi: 10.1007/BF02861039

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Shah KA, Patel MB, Patel RJ, Parmar PK. 2010. Mangifera indica (mango). Pharmacognosy Reviews 4:42−48 doi: 10.4103/0973-7847.65325

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Singh NK, Mahato AK, Jayaswal PK, Singh A, Singh S, et al. 2016. Origin, diversity and genome sequence of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Indian Journal of History of Science 51:355−368 doi: 10.16943/ijhs/2016/v51i2.2/48449

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Gao A, Luo R, Huang J, Zhao Z, Chen Y, et al. 2022. Mango Industry Development Status of China in 2020. Advances in Agriculture, Horticulture and Entomology AAHE-175 doi: 10.37722/AAHAE.2022301

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Gao A, Chen Y, Luo R, Huang J, Zhao Z, et al. 2020. Development status of Chinese mango industry in 2018. Advances in Agriculture, Horticulture and Entomology AAHE-104

    Google Scholar

    [6] Liu FX, Fu SF, Bi XF, Chen F, Liao XJ, et al. 2013. Physico-chemical and antioxidant properties of four mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars in China. Food Chemistry 138:396−405 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.111

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Memon IN, Noonari S, Sidhu MY, Arain MU, Jamali RH, et al. 2015. Economic analysis of mango orchard production under contract farming in Taluka Tando Adam District Sanghar Sindh, Pakistan. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 5:24−36 doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4283.1847

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Bhagwan A, Kumar AK, Purushotam K, Misra AK. 2013. Effect of climate change on productivity of mango cv. Banganpalli under Andhra Pradesh agroclimatic conditions. Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture 8:31−34

    Google Scholar

    [9] da Silva AC, de Souza AP, Leonel S, de Souza ME, Ramos DP, et al. 2014. Growth and flowering of five mango cultivar under subtropics conditions of Brazil. American Journal of Plant Sciences 5:393−402 doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.53052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Halder S, Abu Hasan M. 2020. Climate change and mango production. Chemical Science Review and Letters 9:55−57 doi: 10.37273/chesci.cs122050121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Rajan S. 2012. Phenological responses to temperature and rainfall: a case study of mango. In Tropical Fruit Tree Species and Climate Change, eds. Sthapit B, Rao VR, Sthapit S. New Delhi: Bioversity International. pp. 71–96 https://libird.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/TropicalFruitTreeSpecies_n_CC-Final.pdf
    [12] Colwell RK, Brehm G, Cardelús CL, Gilman AC, Longino JT. 2008. Global warming, elevational range shifts and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science 322:258−261 doi: 10.1126/science.1162547

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Lu P, Normand F, Lauri PÉ, Legave JM. 2018. Implications of climate change for global mango production: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the International Mango Conference, Vengurle, India, 8–10 May, 2018. India: ISASaT. 1 p. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/591526
    [14] Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood SS, Zou X, Zhang X, et al. 2019. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: a review. Plants 8:34 doi: 10.3390/plants8020034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Normand F, Lauri PE, Legave JM. 2015. Climate change and its probable effects on mango production and cultivation. Acta Horticulturae 1075:21−31 doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1075.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Bita CE, Gerats T. 2013. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Frontiers in Plant Science 4:273 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00273

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. 2015. Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes 10:4−10 doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Körner C. 2007. The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:569−574 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Rajan S, Kumar R, Negi SS. 2001. Variation in canopy characteristics of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars from diverse eco-geographical regions. Journal of Applied Horticulture 3:95−97 doi: 10.37855/jah.2001.v03i02.08

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Capelli M, Lauri PÉ, Normand F. 2016. Deciphering the costs of reproduction in mango – vegetative growth matters. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1531 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01531

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Gale J. 2004. Plants and altitude – revisited. Annals of Botany 94:199 doi: 10.1093/aob/mch143

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Douglas PMJ, Pagani M, Canuto MA, Brenner M, Hodell DA, et al. 2015. Drought, agricultural adaptation and sociopolitical collapse in the Maya lowlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112:5607−5612 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419133112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Liu J, Chen S, Li L, Li J. 2017. Statistical downscaling and projection of future air temperature changes in Yunnan Province, China. Advances in Meteorology 2017:2175904 doi: 10.1155/2017/2175904

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Davenport TL. 2007. Reproductive physiology of mango. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 19:363−376 doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202007000400007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Will RE, Wilson SM, Zou CB, Hennessey TC. 2013. Increased vapor pressure deficit due to higher temperature leads to greater transpiration and faster mortality during drought for tree seedlings common to the forest–grassland ecotone. New Phytologist 200:366−374 doi: 10.1111/nph.12321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Lihavainen J, Keinänen M, Keski-Saari S, Kontunen-Soppela S, Sõber A, et al. 2016. Artificially decreased vapour pressure deficit in field conditions modifies foliar metabolite profiles in birch and aspen. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:4367−4378 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw219

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Hernández Delgado PM, Aranguren M, Reig C, Fernández Galván D, Mesejo C, et al. 2011. Phenological growth stages of mango (Mangifera indica L.) according to the BBCH scale. Scientia Horticulturae 130:536−540 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.07.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Souza JMA, Leonel S, Modesto JH, Ferraz RA, Gonçalves BHL. 2015. Phenological cycles, thermal time and growth curves of mango fruit cultivars in subtropical conditions. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 9:100−107 doi: 10.9734/BJAST/2015/18239

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Bastias CC, Fortunel C, Valladares F, Baraloto C, Benavides R, et al. 2017. Intraspecific leaf trait variability along a boreal-to-tropical community diversity gradient. PLoS One 12:e0172495 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172495

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Hovenden MJ, Vander Schoor JK. 2004. The response of leaf morphology to irradiance depends on altitude of origin in Nothofagus cunninghamii. New Phytologist 169:291−297 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01585.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Vieccelli JC, de Siqueira DL, da Silva Bispo WM, Lemoss LMC. 2016. Characterization of leaves and fruits of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Imbu 1. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 38:e193 doi: 10.1590/0100-29452016193

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Tworkoski T, Miller S. 2007. Rootstock effect on growth of apple scions with different growth habits. Scientia Horticulturae 111:335−343 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.10.034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Ibacache GA, Sierra BC. 2009. Influence of rootstocks on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in petioles of four table grape varieties. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 69:503−508 doi: 10.4067/s0718-58392009000400004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Sharma MK, Bhat R, Nazir N, Khalil A, Simnani SA, et al. 2019. Influence of rootstocks on scion growth and vigour, production, water relations, physiology and leaf nutrient status of temperate fruit crops-a review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8:1089−1104 doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.802.128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Jia H, Pan D. 2016. Drought risk assessment in Yunnan Province of China based on wavelet analysis. Advances in Meteorology 2016:1579415 doi: 10.1155/2016/1579415

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Liu Y, Zheng J, Hao Z, Zhang X. 2017. Unprecedented warming revealed from multi-proxy reconstruction of temperature in southern China for the past 160 years. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 34:977−982 doi: 10.1007/s00376-017-6228-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Lihavainen J, Ahonen V, Keski-Saari S, Kontunen-Soppela S, Oksanen E, et al. 2016. Low vapour pressure deficit affects nitrogen nutrition and foliar metabolites in silver birch. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:4353−4365 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw218

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Rajan S, Tiwari D, Singh VK, Saxena P, Singh S, et al. 2011. Application of extended BBCH scale for phenological studies in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Journal of Applied Horticulture 13:108−114 doi: 10.37855/jah.2011.v13i02.25

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Schulte LA, Liebman M, Asbjornsen H, Crow TR. 2006. Agroecosystem restoration through strategic integration of perennials. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 61:164A−169A doi: 10.1080/00224561.2006.12435902

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Lemaire G, Franzluebbers A, de Faccio Carvalho PC, Dedieu B. 2014. Integrated crop-livestock systems: strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 190:4−8 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Wubshet TT, Lu P, Xie X. 2026. Altitudinal relocation alters growth and nutrient allocation of young mango cultivars: implications for climate-resilient orchard systems. Circular Agricultural Systems 6: e012 doi: 10.48130/cas-0026-0014
    Wubshet TT, Lu P, Xie X. 2026. Altitudinal relocation alters growth and nutrient allocation of young mango cultivars: implications for climate-resilient orchard systems. Circular Agricultural Systems 6: e012 doi: 10.48130/cas-0026-0014

Figures(7)  /  Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(41) PDF downloads(14)

Other Articles By Authors

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Altitudinal relocation alters growth and nutrient allocation of young mango cultivars: implications for climate-resilient orchard systems

Circular Agricultural Systems  6 Article number: e012  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Shifting fruit production to higher elevations is a key climate-adaptation strategy to mitigate the impacts of rising temperatures in tropical regions. However, empirical field evidence regarding early tree physiological responses to such shifts remains scarce. This study evaluated the vegetative growth dynamics and leaf nutrient allocation of four commercial mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars (Jingdong, Guifei, Jinhuang, and Tainong No. 1) grown at two contrasting altitudes (450 and 1,050 m a.s.l.) in Honghe County, China. Standardized fertilization and irrigation regimes were applied at both sites. Leaf nutrient concentrations were determined using Mid-Infrared (MIR) spectroscopy calibrated against primary chemical analysis (n = 48). At 450 m, scion height and stem diameter increments were significantly greater, driven by warmer temperatures and higher vapor pressure deficit (VPD) (Multiple Linear Regression, R2 = 0.87). Conversely, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) concentrations were significantly higher at 1,050 m across all cultivars. These findings suggest that higher elevations promote enhanced nutrient retention and utilization efficiency rather than rapid biomass dilution. Within a circular agricultural framework, moderate upslope relocation acts as a potent spatial adaptation strategy. By aligning crop physiological requirements with natural altitudinal gradients, producers can reduce the linear flow of synthetic inputs, optimize internal nutrient cycling, and develop more resource-efficient, climate-resilient orchard systems.

    • Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is a major tropical fruit crop belonging to the family Anacardiaceae[13]. It ranks as the third most economically important tropical fruit globally, and China is currently the world’s second-largest producer[4,5]. Production is concentrated in southern China, particularly in Yunnan Province, one of the country’s primary mango-growing regions[46]. Commercial orchards rely on grafted systems using locally adapted rootstocks and elite scions, with Tainong No.1, Guifei, and Jinhuang among the most widely cultivated cultivars[4,5].

      Optimal mango production is typically achieved 4–5 years after establishment and requires substantial investment in irrigation, fertilization, and orchard management[4,5,7]. However, climate change poses increasing risks to mango cultivation worldwide. Approximately 26% of currently suitable mango-growing areas are projected to experience negative impacts due to warming and altered climatic regimes[811]. Warming trends are particularly pronounced at lower elevations[1214], threatening established orchards in valley and lowland systems.

      Within the framework of circular agriculture systems, long-term sustainability depends on enhancing resource-use efficiency, minimizing external inputs, and increasing resilience to environmental variability. Instead of increasing fertilizer or irrigation to offset climatic stress, spatial adaptation strategies such as shifting cultivation along natural altitudinal gradients—offer a viable alternative. Relocation to higher altitudes has been proposed as a promising climate adaptation strategy for mango[8,10,13,14]. However, implementation requires robust field-based evidence of physiological responses across elevation gradients[8,15].

      Mango has been reported to grow across altitudes ranging from 450 to 1,200 m above sea level in tropical regions[1618]. Yet, growth limitations and increased seedling mortality have been observed above 1,000 m due to low-temperature stress[8,11,19]. Most previous studies are observational or conducted under controlled or homogeneous orchard conditions[9,10], limiting their applicability to heterogeneous production landscapes.

      Honghe County in Yunnan Province provides a natural experimental gradient, where orchards are distributed across varying altitudes and exposed to distinct microclimatic conditions[46,18]. Climate projections indicate continued temperature increases in this region, with warming patterns closely tied to seasonal dynamics[12,20,21]. Elevated temperatures may reduce seedling survival, prolong vegetative phases, delay flowering, and ultimately compromise productivity[9,11,22]. These effects are expected to intensify during the hot-dry season[911,19,23,24].

      Tracking early growth patterns across different altitudes and seasons is key to creating sustainable orchards. This approach aligns with circular agriculture by optimizing where we plant, making nutrient use more efficient, and lowering the demand for external inputs.

    • The study was conducted in Honghe County, Yunnan Province, China (Fig. 1a, b), from August 2018 to September 2019. Seasons were classified based on the regional climatic regime as cold–dry (November–February), hot–dry (March–May), and wet–warm (June–October). Experimental mango plantations were established at two elevations representing contrasting climatic conditions: 450 (23°25'34" N, 102°15'50" E), and 1,050 m (23°24'30" N, 102°14'47" E) above sea level (a.s.l.) (Fig. 1c).

      Figure 1. 

      (a) Experimental plots located at altitude 450 and 1,050 m a.s.l. (a), (b) Map of the study location at Honghe County, Yunnan Province, China (c) Experimental plots at 450 or 1,050 m a.s.l. (d) Illustration of experimental plots layout located within a radius of (ca. 100 m), and facing north. (GIS clip from global map).

      At each altitude, six north-facing, 25 m × 25 m plots were established (designated as Plots A–C; Fig. 1d). Local climate data were retrieved from automated weather stations (HOBO-Onset U30, Onset Computer, Bourne, Massachusetts, USA) installed approximately 100 m from the study plots at both elevations (Fig. 2ac). To assess the initial soil chemical composition, 60 composite samples were collected—30 per altitude and five per plot. These were randomly sampled from a depth of 0–10 cm using a 38 mm diameter auger. The samples were then analyzed via conventional chemical methods, with the findings summarized in Table 1.

      Figure 2. 

      (a) Monthly mean air temperature (°C), and rainfall (mm). (b) Vapor pressure deficit (VPD kPa) of the study site at 450 and 1,050 m a.s.l.

      Table 1.  Soil chemical composition of the study plots located at 450 and 1,050 m altitudes before any treatment is applied. Different letters indicate the difference between means is statistically significant, whereas similar letters indicate the absence of a statistically significant difference between means, p ≤ 0.05.

      Composition Unit Altitude (m)
      450 1,050
      pH 6.72 ± 0.05a 6.67 ± 0.07a
      Soil organic carbon g/kg 8.89 ± 0.8a 7.61 ± 0.4a
      Total nitrogen g/kg 1.21 ± 0.7a 1.016 ± 0.03a
      Total phosphorous g/kg 0.5 ± 0.01a 0.54 ± 0.02a
      Available phosphorous mg/kg 9.49 ± 0.34a 8.93 ± 0.68a
      Total potassium g/kg 26.12 ± 0.7a 27.3 ± 1.0a
      Available potassium g/kg 0.224 ± 0.02a 0.22 ± 0.01a

      Two-year-old grafted mango tree seedlings were purchased from a local nursery. The graft union comprised four scions (a detached shoot grafted to rootstock) cultivars, namely 'Tainong No. 1', 'Guifei', 'Jingdong', and 'Jinhuang', grafted to the local rootstock/trunk (the portion of the stem to which a scion is grafted) cultivar 'Daheman'. Initial heights and diameters of the scions and the trunk were equivalent, and they were planted randomly at a similar depth, with planting density of 5 m × 3 m, at 450 and 1,050 m a.s.l. During seedling transplantation, 2 kg of compost was mixed into the soil. Next, 0.15 kg of urea per tree was applied in April, and 0.8 kg of compound fertilizer N, P, K (ratio = 16:16:16) per tree was applied in June and August, 2019. Initial soil chemical properties did not differ significantly between altitudes (Table 1), and mango trees at both sites were managed under identical fertilization and irrigation regimes following local commercial practices. However, soil nutrients were not monitored continuously during the experimental period.

      Growth measurements were obtained from 96 trees at each altitude, comprising 24 trees per cultivar per site. Replication was therefore based on multiple trees per cultivar at each altitude. Plant height, measured from ground level to the tip of the apical shoot, and trunk height, measured from ground level to the graft union (representing rootstock height), were determined using a measuring tape. Trunk (rootstock) and scion diameters were measured at 3 cm above ground level and 3 cm above the graft union, respectively, using a digital caliper. Height and diameter increments were recorded at 30-d intervals and subsequently used for statistical analyses.

      Leaf samples were collected from 72 trees at each altitude, comprising 18 trees per cultivar per site. From each sampled tree, three fully expanded mature leaves were collected from a mid-canopy position to ensure uniform sampling. Leaf area was measured using a leaf area meter (Li-Cor 3001A, USA).

      To minimize potential residual nursery effects on nutrient status, leaf sampling was conducted one year after field establishment (August 2019). To ensure a representative nutrient profile, three fully expanded leaves were collected from the mid-canopy of each mango tree. To minimize intra-tree variability, these leaves were pooled into a single composite sample per tree prior to processing. Samples were oven-dried at 70 °C for 48 h to determine dry weight, then ground using a mortar and pestle and passed through a No. 100 mesh sieve to obtain a homogeneous powder for nutrient analysis.

      Leaf nutrient concentrations were determined using mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (MIR), with an ALPHA II FT-IR Base Spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) based on a calibrated prediction model. To develop the spectral calibration, a representative subset (n = 48) was randomly selected for primary chemical analysis. Carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) concentrations were determined via dry combustion using an elemental analyzer (vario MICRO Cube, Elementar, Germany) on 10 mg subsamples. Phosphorus (P), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca) were quantified using atomic absorption spectrometry (PinAAcle 900T, PerkinElmer, USA). These primary measurements served as the reference data to calibrate and validate the Mid-Infrared (MIR) spectral prediction models; performance statistics for these models are summarized in Table 2. For the broader MIR analysis, 100 mg of finely ground leaf tissue per sample was scanned. The resulting spectral data were exported and processed in R to predict nutrient concentrations across the remaining sample set.

      Table 2.  Calibration and validation statistics for the mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy models of mango leaf nutrients (n = 48).

      Nutrient Unit R2cal R2Val RMSE RPD
      Carbon (C) g/kg 0.88 0.84 20.53 2.4
      Nitrogen (N) g/kg 0.91 0.87 2.96 2.8
      Potassium (K) g/kg 0.89 0.85 1.15 2.5
      Calcium (Ca) g/kg 0.92 0.88 0.55 2.9
      Phosphorus (P) g/kg 0.85 0.81 0.27 2.1
      Magnesium (Mg) g/kg 0.86 0.82 0.06 2.2

      Individual trees were considered the experimental units for statistical analyses, while plots served as spatial blocks within each altitude to maintain uniform site conditions. Accordingly, growth and nutrient measurements were analyzed at the tree level. The experiment followed a completely randomized design to evaluate the effects of altitude on vegetative growth and leaf nutrient composition of four mango cultivars. To compare vegetative growth and nutrient concentrations between the two altitudes (450 and 1,050 m), independent-sample t-tests were performed for each cultivar. Statistical significance was determined at (α = 0.05). Differences were considered significant at (p ≤ 0.05), and highly significant at (p < 0.01). Analyses were conducted using Statistix (Version 8.1), and results are presented as means ± standard error (± SE). Multivariate regression analysis was performed in R (Version 4.2.0) to quantify the influence of climatic variables on growth. The relative contribution of each factor was determined using standardized regression coefficients (β), normalized to 100% to represent the proportional influence of temperature, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and rainfall. Graphical representations were generated using OriginPro 2021 (Version 9.65).

    • Altitudinal relocation significantly influenced vegetative growth dynamics of mango cultivars, demonstrating strong climatic regulation of biomass accumulation and structural development.

      Across cultivars, mean annual growth in plant and scion heights increment was significantly greater at 450 m compared to 1,050 m (p < 0.01; Fig. 3a, b), whereas trunk height increment was significantly lower at 450 m (Fig. 3c). This contrasting response suggests a shift in vertical growth allocation along the altitudinal gradient, with lower elevation promoting rapid shoot elongation and higher elevation relatively favoring trunk extension under cooler conditions.

      Figure 3. 

      Mean ± SE annual growth in (cm). (a) Plant height, (b) scion heights, (c) trunk height of four mango cultivars grown at altitudes of 450 and 1,050 m a.s.l. Different letters indicate differences between means are statistically significant p < 0.01.

      Mean annual scion and trunk diameter increments also differed significantly between altitudes (p < 0.01), with consistently greater radial growth observed at 450 m (Fig. 4a, b). The combined increase in height and diameter growth at lower altitude indicates enhanced early biomass accumulation and underscores altitude as a critical environmental determinant of vegetative performance.

      Figure 4. 

      Mean ± SE annual growth in (mm). (a) Scion, (b) trunk diameters of mango cultivars grown at altitudes of 450 and 1,050 m a.s.l. Different letters indicate the difference between means is statistically significant, p < 0.01.

      Vegetative growth dynamics were strongly governed by environmental variables (R2 = 0.87; Fig. 5), with temperature and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) emerging as the predominant drivers of mango canopy development.

      Figure 5. 

      Relative weight (%) of climatic factors to vegetative growth variation (R2 = 0.87).

      These growth responses closely mirrored the climatic differences observed between sites. Temperature and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were consistently higher at 450 m (Fig. 2a, b), and multivariate analysis confirmed that temperature and VPD were the dominant climatic drivers of vegetative growth (Fig. 5). Such conditions are widely recognized to stimulate mango vegetative development[8,10,11]. Optimal vegetative performance in mango has been reported under day/night temperature regimes between 20/25 °C and 30/25 °C[15], which were more closely approximated at the lower elevation site. Elevated VPD at 450 m may have further enhanced transpiration-driven nutrient transport and metabolic activity[8,9,11,25], supporting increased shoot elongation and radial expansion. Comparable responses have been documented in silver birch, where VPD altered foliar metabolites and growth dynamics[26], reinforcing the role of atmospheric demand in regulating vegetative performance.

      In contrast, vegetative growth was uniformly restricted at 1,050 m (Fig. 3a, b; Fig. 4a, b), most likely due to prolonged exposure to lower temperatures that constrained photosynthesis and cambial activity, as demonstrated in both field and controlled studies[10,15,27,28]. These findings collectively confirm that mango vegetative growth is strongly temperature-limited. Nevertheless, cooler conditions have also been associated with enhanced floral induction[9,11,20,24,28], suggesting a vegetative–reproductive trade-off along the altitudinal gradient. This trade-off implies that higher elevations may become increasingly favorable for sustaining reproductive stability under projected warming scenarios[13], even if vegetative growth remains comparatively moderate.

      Seasonal variation further confirmed the dominant influence of temperature and atmospheric demand on growth dynamics. Height increments (Fig. 6a, b) and scion and trunk diameter increments (Fig. 7a, b, d) were significantly greater during the hot-dry and wet-warm seasons than during the cold-dry season at both altitudes, except for scion diameter during the hot-dry season at 1,050 m (Fig. 7c). This seasonal pattern confirms that mango vegetative flushing is closely synchronized with warmer periods[8,11]. Growth suppression during the cold-dry season highlights the sensitivity of vegetative development to cooler temperatures, particularly at higher elevations.

      Figure 6. 

      Mean ± SE seasonal height growth (cm) during cold-dry, hot-dry, and wet-warm of four mango cultivars grown at 450 and 1,050 m, p < 0.01.

      Figure 7. 

      Mean ± SE seasonal growth in scion and trunk diameter (mm) during cold-dry, hot-dry, and wet-warm of four mango cultivars grown at 450 and 1,050 m, p < 0.01.

      Leaf morphological responses were cultivar-dependent. Leaf fresh weight, dry weight, and leaf area were significantly greater at 450 m for Jingdong and Tainong No. 1 (p < 0.05; Table 3), whereas Jinhuang and Guifei exhibited no significant altitudinal differences. In contrast, specific leaf area (SLA) remained stable across altitudes for all cultivars (Table 3). The conservation of SLA suggests that structural investment in leaf construction is largely genetically regulated or linked to cultivar origin, consistent with findings in mango and other woody species[25,2931]. Thus, altitude primarily influenced total leaf biomass accumulation rather than intrinsic structural density or thickness.

      Table 3.  Mean ± SE of leaf fresh weight, dry weight, area, specific leaf area of mango cultivars at altitudes of 450 and 1,050 m a.s.l. Different letters indicate that the difference between means is statistically significant, whereas similar letters indicate the absence of statistically significant differences between means (p < 0.05).

      Altitude (m) Cultivars Fresh weight (g) Dry weight (g) Leaf area (cm2) Specific leaf area (cm2 g−1)
      450 Jingdong 1.72 ± 0.07a 0.75 ± 0.03a 59.8 ± 1.9a 86.52 ± 1.6a
      Jinhuang 2.30 ± 0.2a 0.97 ± 0.04a 67.2 ± 2.2a 72.28 ± 1.1a
      Tainong No.1 1.77 ± 0.1a 0.77 ± 0.03a 58.0 ± 1.8a 77.98 ± 1.5a
      Guifei 2.35 ± 0.01a 1.07 ± 0.04a 72.8 ± 2.4a 72.43 ± 1.1a
      1,050 Jingdong 1.35 ± 0.06b 0.60 ± 0.02b 48.3 ± 1.5b 87.22 ± 1.6a
      Jinhuang 2.00 ± 0.06a 0.85 ± 0.03a 59.8 ± 1.7a 75.10 ± 3.6a
      Tainong No.1 1.52 ± 0.05b 0.68 ± 0.02b 49.3 ± 1.4b 74.77 ± 1.2a
      Guifei 2.03 ± 0.08a 0.87 ± 0.04a 64.3 ± 2.2a 77.33 ± 1.6a

      Leaf nutrient composition exhibited a distinct altitudinal pattern (Table 4). N and K concentrations were significantly higher at 1,050 m across cultivars, whereas calcium (Ca) was generally higher at 450 m except in Tainong No. 1. The C:N ratio was significantly higher at 450 m, while C:P remained largely stable except for Tainong No.1. The elevated N and K concentrations at higher altitude likely reflect reduced biomass dilution under slower vegetative growth rather than enhanced nutrient uptake by itself. Conversely, higher Ca concentrations at 450 m are consistent with greater transpiration flux under elevated VPD, facilitating Ca transport through the xylem[25]. These nutrient shifts illustrate how climatic gradients influence internal nutrient allocation and stoichiometric balance.

      Table 4.  Mean ± SE of leaf nutrient content of four mango cultivars of mango cultivars at altitudes of 450 and 1,050 m a.s.l. Different letters indicates the difference between means is statistically significant.

      Altitude (m) Cultivar N (%) p < 0.01 K (mg g−1) p < 0.05 Ca (mg g−1) p < 0.05 C : P ratio p < 0.05 C : N ratio p < 0.05
      450 Jingdong 2.2 ± 0.029b 6.4 ± 0.12b 25.08 ± 0.7a 312.2 ± 5.3a 18.7 ± 0.17a
      Jinhuang 2.2 ± 0.03b 6.3 ± 0.1b 25.7 ± 0.7a 321.8 ± 5.1a 19.135 ± 0.28a
      Tainong No.1 2.2 ± 0.028b 6.7 ± 0.12b 24.5 ± 0.8a 305.4 ± 7.8b 18.6 ± 0.13a
      Guifei 2.2 ± 0.037b 6.1 ± 0.21b 26.7 ± 0.9a 305.4 ± 7.8a 18.7 ± 0.2a
      1,050 Jingdong 2.4 ± 0.02a 7.01 ± 0.14a 22.7 ± 0.6b 324 ± 5.5a 17.6 ± 0.17b
      Jinhuang 2.37 ± 0.027a 7.02 ± 0.12a 23.2 ± 0.4a 322.6 ± 8.1a 17.8 ± 0.18b
      Tainong No.1 2.4 ± 0.02a 7.01 ± 0.12a 22.8 ± 0.6b 326.45 ± 5a 17.8 ± 0.12b
      Guifei 2.39 ± 0.03a 7.02 ± 0.1a 23.4 ± 0.5b 318.7 ± 6.4a 17.7 ± 0.26b

      Scion–rootstock interactions may also have contributed to the observed growth differences. Enhanced scion vigor can stimulate rootstock development, improving hydraulic conductivity, nutrient uptake efficiency, and mechanical stability, as reported in apple and grape systems[3234]. Such interactions become increasingly important under climatic gradients where efficient resource allocation determines overall system performance.

      Honghe County remains one of the largest mango-producing regions in mainland China[4,5], yet projected increases in temperature and VPD across Yunnan Province[22,35,36] may intensify climatic stress, particularly at lower elevations. Temperature increases of up to 2.7°C under RCP8.5 scenarios[22,36] could prolong vegetative phases and disrupt flowering synchrony[24,27,28], potentially reducing yield stability. The 2019 growing season, during which this experiment was conducted, was warmer and drier than previous years, reflecting emerging climate trends. Although warmer conditions enhanced vegetative growth in the present study, consistent with previous findings[9,27,28], continued warming may negatively affect reproductive development[8,10,14,37,38].

      Within the framework of circular agriculture systems, these findings have important implications for sustainable mango production under climate variability. Spatial redistribution of orchards along altitudinal gradients offers a strategy to align crop physiological requirements with prevailing climatic conditions rather than relying solely on compensatory external inputs[4,5,22,35,36]. In the present study, higher leaf N and K concentrations observed at 1,050 m under identical fertilization regimes suggest that trees at higher elevations may utilize nutrients more efficiently, offering potential to optimize fertilizer application while maintaining adequate plant nutritional status[9,27,28]. Such altitude-mediated nutrient patterns can enhance internal nutrient cycling within orchard systems, as leaf litter, pruned material, and other organic residues decompose and return essential nutrients to the soil[39]. Stable specific leaf area (SLA) across altitudes further indicates that biomass quality and litter decomposition dynamics are relatively predictable, supporting efficient nutrient retention and turnover within the system[39,40].

      By aligning orchard placement with specific climatic and physiological requirements, production systems can become more self-sustaining. Combining spatial optimization with residue recycling and integrated nutrient management allows mango production to reduce dependence on synthetic inputs, maintain soil fertility, and improve long-term sustainability[11,13].

      Furthermore, altitudinal relocation buffers production against climatic stress by distributing temperature and vapor pressure deficits across landscapes with varying elevations, effectively diversifying risk and enhancing resilience[39,40]. The predictable nutrient dynamics and biomass quality observed at higher altitudes also provide opportunities to integrate agroecological practices such as cover cropping, mulching, and compost application, which further close nutrient loops and improve water and soil conservation[39].

      Adopting these circular principles strengthens the adaptive capacity of orchards by improving resource-use efficiency, reducing the environmental footprint of fertilization, and maintaining productivity under projected warming scenarios[39]. Although this study focused on vegetative growth, these findings indicate that aligning orchard location with climatic requirements creates a more coordinated system where nutrient inputs, plant growth, and biomass turnover are tightly linked. However, future research evaluating flowering phenology, fruit set, yield stability, and long-term soil nutrient dynamics will be essential to fully validate the viability of altitudinal relocation as a climate-resilient, circular mango production strategy[8,10,14,38].

    • Our results indicate that altitudinal relocation significantly modifies vegetative architecture and nutrient partitioning in young mango trees. While low-altitude conditions favor biomass accumulation via shoot and radial elongation, higher elevations promote greater foliar N and K concentrations, suggesting enhanced nutrient retention over rapid growth. Because growth intensity is primarily governed by temperature and VPD, lowland orchards face the highest risk from climate warming. Consequently, moderate upslope expansion serves as a viable adaptive strategy, optimizing the trade-off between vegetative vigor and reproductive resilience while reducing the need for intensive external inputs.

      • This work was generously supported by the Ministry of Sciences and Technology of China (2017YFC0505100), Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department (202003AD150004) and Chinese Academy of Sciences, President’s International Fellowship Initiative (2026PVB0124). We would like to express our gratitude to ICRAF, Honghe County Kubo Agricultural Development Co. Ltd for providing plots of land for this experiment. We extend our gratitude to colleagues at Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Centre for Mountain Futures, Honghe in facilitating the necessary logistics during field study.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, and draft preparation: Wubshet TT; supervision, review and editing: Lu P; technical support: Xie X. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (7)  Table (4) References (40)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Wubshet TT, Lu P, Xie X. 2026. Altitudinal relocation alters growth and nutrient allocation of young mango cultivars: implications for climate-resilient orchard systems. Circular Agricultural Systems 6: e012 doi: 10.48130/cas-0026-0014
    Wubshet TT, Lu P, Xie X. 2026. Altitudinal relocation alters growth and nutrient allocation of young mango cultivars: implications for climate-resilient orchard systems. Circular Agricultural Systems 6: e012 doi: 10.48130/cas-0026-0014

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return