Search
2026 Volume 6
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

A comprehensive overview of edible crickets: nutritional composition, health benefits, and safety considerations

More Information
  • Edible crickets (Orthoptera) are recognized as a sustainable and nutrient-dense food source, which can be used to address food security and environmental challenges. These insects comprise high-quality protein, essential amino acids, unsaturated fatty acids, dietary fiber, B vitamins, and essential minerals. The cricket protein has a biological value, net protein ratio, a protein efficiency ratio, and protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score of approximately 93.02%, 3.04, 1.78%, and 73%, respectively. Apart from their nutritional composition, these insects offer various health benefits, such as reducing the risk of metabolic disorders, improving gut health, and supporting the immune system. Currently, studies have shown that edible insects can be utilized in the food industry and hospitality sector in various applications, including protein powders, baked goods, snacks, and meat analogues. However, several challenges exist to the widespread adoption of crickets, including sensory attributes, cultural perceptions, allergenicity, microbial safety, and regulatory concerns. This review summarizes the nutritional composition, functional health benefits, and food applications of edible crickets, while highlighting associated risks and safety considerations.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Lumsden CL, Jägermeyr J, Ziska L, Fanzo J. 2024. Critical overview of the implications of a global protein transition in the face of climate change: key unknowns and research imperatives. One Earth 7:1187−1201 doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.06.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] USDA. 2015. USDA Agricultural Projections to 2024. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief Economist, World Agricultural Outlook Board, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Long-term Projections Report OCE-2015-1. 97 pp. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/outlooks/37753/51683_oce151.pdf
    [3] FAO. 2023. World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030 - An FAO perspective, ed. Bruinsma J. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd. 444 pp. www.fao.org/3/Y4252E/Y4252E.pdf
    [4] Caputo V, Sun J, Staples AJ, Taylor H. 2024. Market outlook for meat alternatives: challenges, opportunities, and new developments. Trends in Food Science & Technology 148:104474 doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2024.104474

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Anyasi TA, Acharya P, Udenigwe CC. 2025. Edible insects as an alternative protein source: nutritional composition and global consumption patterns. Future Foods 12:100699 doi: 10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100699

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Omuse ER, Tonnang HEZ, Yusuf AA, Machekano H, Egonyu JP, et al. 2024. The global atlas of edible insects: analysis of diversity and commonality contributing to food systems and sustainability. Scientific Reports 14:5045 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55603-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Kumar A, Goyal N, Pramanik J, Joia S, Singh S, et al. 2025. Feasting on the future: unveiling edible insects as a sustainable food with enriched health benefits. Current Nutrition & Food Science 21:191−201 doi: 10.2174/0115734013288788240405053034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Sogari G, Amato M, Palmieri R, Hadj Saadoun J, Formici G, et al. 2023. The future is crawling: evaluating the potential of insects for food and feed security. Current Research in Food Science 6:100504 doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100504

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Reid G. 2023. A value chain to improve human animal and insect health in developing countries. Microbiome Research Reports 3:10 doi: 10.20517/mrr.2023.46

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Magara HJO, Niassy S, Ayieko MA, Mukundamago M, Egonyu JP, et al. 2021. Edible crickets (Orthoptera) around the world: distribution, nutritional value, and other benefits—a review. Frontiers in Nutrition 7:537915 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.537915

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Murugu DK, Onyango AN, Ndiritu AK, Osuga IM, Xavier C, et al. 2021. From farm to fork: crickets as alternative source of protein minerals, and vitamins. Frontiers in Nutrition 8:704002 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.704002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Matandirotya NR, Filho WL, Mahed G, Maseko B, Murandu CV. 2022. Edible insects consumption in Africa towards environmental health and sustainable food systems: a bibliometric study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19:14823 doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214823

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Larouche J, Campbell B, Hénault-Éthier L, Banks IJ, Tomberlin JK, et al. 2023. The edible insect sector in Canada and the United States. Animal Frontiers 13:16−25 doi: 10.1093/af/vfad047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Oibiokpa FI, Akanya HO, Jigam AA, Saidu AN, Egwim EC. 2018. Protein quality of four indigenous edible insect species in Nigeria. Food Science and Human Wellness 7:175−183 doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2018.05.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Magara HJO, Hugel S, Fisher BL. 2025. Growth performance and nutritional content of tropical house cricket (Gryllodes sigillatus [Walker, 1969]) reared on diets formulated from weeds and agro by-products. Insects 16:600 doi: 10.3390/insects16060600

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Kröger T, Dupont J, Büsing L, Fiebelkorn F. 2022. Acceptance of insect-based food products in Western societies: a systematic review. Frontiers in Nutrition 8:759885 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.759885

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] van Huis A, Rumpold B. 2023. Strategies to convince consumers to eat insects? A review. Food Quality and Preference 110:104927 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104927

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Siddiqui SA, Zhao T, Fitriani A, Rahmadhia SN, Alirezalu K, et al. 2024. Acheta domesticus (house cricket) as human foods - an approval of the European Commission - a systematic review. Food Frontiers 5:435−473 doi: 10.1002/fft2.358

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Lampová B, Kopecká A, Šmíd P, Kulma M, Kurečka M, et al. 2024. Evaluating protein quality in edible insects: a comparative analysis of house cricket. yellow mealworm, and migratory locust using DIAAS methodologies. LWT 213:117062 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117062

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Ndiritu AK, Kinyuru JN, Kenji GM, Gichuhi PN. 2017. Extraction technique influences the physico-chemical characteristics and functional properties of edible crickets (Acheta domesticus) protein concentrate. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 11:2013−2021 doi: 10.1007/s11694-017-9584-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Hammer L, Moretti D, Abbühl-Eng L, Kandiah P, Hilaj N, et al. 2023. Mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor) and crickets (Acheta domesticus) show high total protein in vitro digestibility and can provide good-to-excellent protein quality as determined by in vitro DIAAS. Frontiers in Nutrition 10:1150581 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1150581

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Udomsil N, Imsoonthornruksa S, Gosalawit C, Ketudat-Cairns M. 2019. Nutritional values and functional properties of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) and field cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus). Food Science and Technology Research 25:597−605 doi: 10.3136/fstr.25.597

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Lampová B, Doskočil I, Šmíd P, Kouřimská L. 2024. Comparison of cricket protein powder and whey protein digestibility. Molecules 29:3598 doi: 10.3390/molecules29153598

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Raksakantong P, Meeso N, Kubola J, Siriamornpun S. 2010. Fatty acids and proximate composition of eight Thai edible terricolous insects. Food Research International 43:350−355 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.10.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Ghosh S, Lee SM, Jung C, Meyer-Rochow VB. 2017. Nutritional composition of five commercial edible insects in South Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 20:686−694 doi: 10.1016/j.aspen.2017.04.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Hart T, DiMattia ZS, Tate KE, Jafari F, Damani JJ, et al. 2024. Dietary polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acid ratio as a predictor for LDL-C response in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Current Developments in Nutrition 8:102796 doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.102796

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Okwee-Acai J, Agea JG, Nakimbugwe D, Akullo J, Obaa BB. 2018. Nutrient composition of commonly consumed edible insects in the Lango sub-region of northern Uganda. International Food Research Journal 25:159−165

    Google Scholar

    [28] van Huis A. 2019. Edible insects. In Handbook of Eating and Drinking, ed. Meiselman HL. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1−16 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75388-1_123-1
    [29] Pilco-Romero G, Chisaguano-Tonato AM, Herrera-Fontana ME, Chimbo-Gándara LF, Sharifi-Rad M, et al. 2023. House cricket (Acheta domesticus): a review based on its nutritional composition, quality, and potential uses in the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology 142:104226 doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2023.104226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Loypimai P, Moontree T, Pranil T, Moongngarm A. 2024. A comparative study of nutritional components of Gryllus bimaculatus and Acheta domesticus cricket powder prepared using different drying methods. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 18:3974−3983 doi: 10.1007/s11694-024-02469-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Finke MD. 2002. Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates used as food for insectivores. Zoo Biology 21:269−285 doi: 10.1002/zoo.10031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Micronutrients. 2001. Vitamin A. In Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 800 pp. doi: 10.17226/10026
    [33] NIH. 2025. Vitamin B12. Health Professional Fact Sheet. https://ods.od.nih.gov (Accessed on 24 August 2025)
    [34] Stull VJ, Finer E, Bergmans RS, Febvre HP, Longhurst C, et al. 2018. Impact of edible cricket consumption on gut microbiota in healthy adults, a double-blind, randomized crossover trial. Scientific Reports 8:10762 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29032-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Kipkoech C. 2019. Nutrient profile, prebiotic potential of edible cricket, and effect of cricket-based porridge on growth, haemoglobin and fatty acid levels of school children. Thesis. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya. 203 pp. http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/handle/123456789/5179
    [36] Mwangi MN, Oonincx DGAB, Hummel M, Utami DA, Gunawan L, et al. 2022. Absorption of iron from edible house crickets: a randomized crossover stable-isotope study in humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 116:1146−1156 doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac223

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Hilaj N, Boit T, Andang'o P, Zeder C, Mwangi MN, et al. 2025. Zinc absorption from maize-based meals enriched with edible house crickets: a randomized crossover stable-isotope study in Kenyan pre-school children. Nature Communications 16:1003 doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56259-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Dai J, Lov J, Martin-Arrowsmith PW, Gritsas A, Churchward-Venne TA. 2022. The acute effects of insect vs. beef-derived protein on postprandial plasma aminoacidemia, appetite hormones, appetite sensations, and energy intake in healthy young men. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 76:1548−1556 doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01157-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Skotnicka M, Mazurek A, Karwowska K, Folwarski M. 2022. Satiety of edible insect-based food products as a component of body weight control. Nutrients 14:2147 doi: 10.3390/nu14102147

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Lanng SK, Oxfeldt M, Pedersen SS, Johansen FT, Risikesan J, et al. 2023. Influence of protein source (cricket, pea, whey) on amino acid bioavailability and activation of the mTORC1 signaling pathway after resistance exercise in healthy young males. European Journal of Nutrition 62:1295−1308 doi: 10.1007/s00394-022-03071-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Toontom N, Namyotha C, Wongprachum K, Nilkamheang T, Tudpor K. 2024. Development of health-promoting edible cricket products by using sensory evaluation techniques. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 314:163−167 doi: 10.3233/shti240085

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Barton A, Richardson CD, McSweeney MB. 2020. Consumer attitudes toward entomophagy before and after evaluating cricket (Acheta domesticus)-based protein powders. Journal of Food Science 85:781−788 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Liang Z, Zhu Y, Leonard W, Fang Z. 2024. Recent advances in edible insect processing technologies. Food Research International 182:114137 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114137

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Mozhui L, Kakati LN, Kiewhuo P, Changkija S. 2020. Traditional knowledge of the utilization of edible insects in Nagaland, north-east India. Foods 9:852 doi: 10.3390/foods9070852

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Manditsera FA, Luning PA, Fogliano V, Lakemond CMM. 2019. Effect of domestic cooking methods on protein digestibility and mineral bioaccessibility of wild harvested adult edible insects. Food Research International 121:404−411 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Tenyang N, Tiencheu B, Mamat A, Mawamba LA, Ponka R. 2021. Effect of cooking methods on the nutritive value and lipid oxidation of two cricket species consumed in Cameroon. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety 13:11−23 doi: 10.9734/ejnfs/2021/v13i230372

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Durst PB, Hanboonsong Y. 2015. Small-scale production of edible insects for enhanced food security and rural livelihoods: experience from Thailand and Lao People's Democratic Republic. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 1:25−31 doi: 10.3920/JIFF2014.0019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Krongdang S, Phokasem P, Venkatachalam K, Charoenphun N. 2023. Edible insects in Thailand: an overview of status, properties, processing, and utilization in the food industry. Foods 12:2162 doi: 10.3390/foods12112162

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Vasilica BTB, Chiș MS, Alexa E, Pop C, Păucean A, et al. 2022. The impact of insect flour on sourdough fermentation-fatty acids, amino-acids, minerals and volatile profile. Insects 13:576 doi: 10.3390/insects13070576

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Galli V, Venturi M, Pini N, Granchi L. 2020. Technological feature assessment of lactic acid bacteria isolated from cricket powder's spontaneous fermentation as potential starters for cricket-wheat bread production. Foods 9:1322 doi: 10.3390/foods9091322

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Rossi S, Parrotta L, Gottardi D, Glicerina VT, Del Duca S, et al. 2022. Unravelling the potential of cricket-based hydrolysed sourdough on the quality of an innovative bakery product. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 8:921−935 doi: 10.3920/JIFF2021.0184

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Bartkiene E, Zokaityte E, Starkute V, Zokaityte G, Kaminskaite A, et al. 2023. Crickets (Acheta domesticus) as wheat bread ingredient: influence on bread quality and safety characteristics. Foods 12:325 doi: 10.3390/foods12020325

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Mafu A, Ketnawa S, Phongthai S, Schönlechner R, Rawdkuen S. 2022. Whole wheat bread enriched with cricket powder as an alternative protein. Foods 11:2142 doi: 10.3390/foods11142142

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Dridi C, Millette M, Aguilar B, Salmieri S, Lacroix M. 2022. Storage stability of a fermented probiotic beverage enriched with cricket protein hydrolysates. Food and Bioprocess Technology 15:2587−2600 doi: 10.1007/s11947-022-02900-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Sotelo-Díaz LI, Ramírez B, García-Segovia P, Igual M, Martínez-Monzó J, et al. 2022. Cricket flour in a traditional beverage (chucula): emotions and perceptions of Colombian consumers. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 8:659−672 doi: 10.3920/JIFF2021.0137

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Murefu TR, Macheka L, Musundire R, Manditsera FA. 2019. Safety of wild harvested and reared edible insects: a review. Food Control 101:209−224 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.03.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] van Huis A. 2021. Prospects of insects as food and feed. Organic Agriculture 11:301−308 doi: 10.1007/s13165-020-00290-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Srinroch C, Srisomsap C, Chokchaichamnankit D, Punyarit P, Phiriyangkul P. 2015. Identification of novel allergen in edible insect, Gryllus bimaculatus and its cross-reactivity with Macrobrachium spp. allergens. Food Chemistry 184:160−166 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.094

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Pener MP. 2016. Allergy to crickets: a review. Journal of Orthoptera Research 25:91−95 doi: 10.1665/034.025.0208

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health S, Fernandez-Cassi X, Supeanu A, Jansson A, et al. 2018. Novel foods: a risk profile for the house cricket (Acheta domesticus). EFSA Journal 16:e16082 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.e16082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Imathiu S. 2020. Benefits and food safety concerns associated with consumption of edible insects. NFS Journal 18:1−11 doi: 10.1016/j.nfs.2019.11.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Francis F, Doyen V, Debaugnies F, Mazzucchelli G, Caparros R, et al. 2019. Limited cross reactivity among arginine kinase allergens from mealworm and cricket edible insects. Food Chemistry 276:714−718 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Ulrich RG, Buthala DA, Klug MJ. 1981. Microbiota associated with the gastrointestinal tract of the common house cricket, Acheta domestica. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 41:246−254 doi: 10.1128/aem.41.1.246-254.1981

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Vandeweyer D, Crauwels S, Lievens B, Van Campenhout L. 2017. Microbial counts of mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor) and crickets (Acheta domesticus and Gryllodes sigillatus) from different rearing companies and different production batches. International Journal of Food Microbiology 242:13−18 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.11.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Grabowski NT, Klein G. 2017. Microbiology of cooked and dried edible Mediterranean field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus) and superworms (Zophobas atratus) submitted to four different heating treatments. Food Science and Technology International 23:17−23 doi: 10.1177/1082013216652994

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Poma G, Cuykx M, Amato E, Calaprice C, Focant JF, et al. 2017. Evaluation of hazardous chemicals in edible insects and insect-based food intended for human consumption. Food and Chemical Toxicology 100:70−79 doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.12.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] EFSA Scientific Committee. 2015. Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed. EFSA Journal 13:4257 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Van der Spiegel M, Noordam MY, van der Fels-Klerx HJ. 2013. Safety of novel protein sources (insects, microalgae, seaweed, duckweed, and rapeseed) and legislative aspects for their application in food and feed production. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 12:662−678 doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Ryu HY, Lee S, Ahn KS, Kim HJ, Lee SS, et al. 2016. Oral toxicity study and skin sensitization test of a cricket. Toxicological Research 32:159−173 doi: 10.5487/TR.2016.32.2.159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Yadav S, Kumar S, Batta K, Joia S, Bawa Y, et al. 2026. A comprehensive overview of edible crickets: nutritional composition, health benefits, and safety considerations. Food Materials Research 6: e005 doi: 10.48130/fmr-0026-0003
    Yadav S, Kumar S, Batta K, Joia S, Bawa Y, et al. 2026. A comprehensive overview of edible crickets: nutritional composition, health benefits, and safety considerations. Food Materials Research 6: e005 doi: 10.48130/fmr-0026-0003

Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(319) PDF downloads(175)

REVIEW   Open Access    

A comprehensive overview of edible crickets: nutritional composition, health benefits, and safety considerations

Food Materials Research  6 Article number: e005  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Edible crickets (Orthoptera) are recognized as a sustainable and nutrient-dense food source, which can be used to address food security and environmental challenges. These insects comprise high-quality protein, essential amino acids, unsaturated fatty acids, dietary fiber, B vitamins, and essential minerals. The cricket protein has a biological value, net protein ratio, a protein efficiency ratio, and protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score of approximately 93.02%, 3.04, 1.78%, and 73%, respectively. Apart from their nutritional composition, these insects offer various health benefits, such as reducing the risk of metabolic disorders, improving gut health, and supporting the immune system. Currently, studies have shown that edible insects can be utilized in the food industry and hospitality sector in various applications, including protein powders, baked goods, snacks, and meat analogues. However, several challenges exist to the widespread adoption of crickets, including sensory attributes, cultural perceptions, allergenicity, microbial safety, and regulatory concerns. This review summarizes the nutritional composition, functional health benefits, and food applications of edible crickets, while highlighting associated risks and safety considerations.

    • Globally, protein consumption and preference patterns are changing, primarily driven by demographic shifts, urbanization, and socioeconomic advancements, particularly in low- and middle-income countries[1]. The per capita meat consumption has increased by approximately 3% per year since the mid-1990s, particularly in developing and emerging economies[2]. It is predicted that there will be a sustained increase in meat consumption[3]. However, the meat industry faces several challenges, including resource depletion, labor shortages, public health consequences, rising operational costs, diseases and biosecurity risks, climatic vulnerabilities, changing consumer demand for healthier and more sustainable products, and environmental concerns such as deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions[4]. This leads to a shift toward alternative protein sources that have low environmental footprints, while also offering health and economic co-benefits.

      Edible insects are commonly consumed in various parts of Africa, Asia, and Latin America, and are emerging as a globally promising solution to fulfill the protein demand. They can offer dietary diversification and nutritional fortification, particularly in regions suffering from hidden hunger[5]. A study has identified that 2,205 species of insects are consumed across 128 nations[6]. Insects are rich sources of high-quality proteins, lipids, dietary fibers, and essential micronutrients. Insects offer enhanced feed conversion ratios, shortened life cycles, and higher edible biomass yields, producing significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions. They require minimal inputs of land, water, energy, and feedstocks compared to conventional animal husbandry[7]. Additionally, insects offer several benefits, including enhanced food security, alternative feed sources, and nutrient-enriched fertilizers that improve agricultural productivity and resilience[8]. The insect value chain can provide employment opportunities, particularly for marginalized demographics[9]. Due to these attributes, and increasing consumer demand for eco-friendly proteins, the edible insect sector is expected to experience exponential growth.

      It is observed that Africa, China, India, and Thailand consume around 500, 324, 255, and 164 species of edible insects, respectively. These insects belong to the orders Coleoptera (beetles), Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies), Hymenoptera (ants, bees, and wasps), Orthoptera (grasshoppers, locusts, and crickets), and Hemiptera (true bugs). This demonstrates that a broad taxonomic spectrum is used for culinary applications[10]. Among these, Orthopterans, particularly crickets, have emerged as the most widely consumed insects due to their accessibility, palatability, and nutritional density[11]. Brachytrupes membranaceus (African field cricket), Gryllus similis (Jamaican field cricket), Gryllus bimaculatus (two-spotted cricket), Gryllotalpa orientalis (oriental mole cricket), and Acheta domesticus (house cricket) are consumed across multiple continents for their dietary roles[10]. In Africa, crickets are used to complement nutrient-poor staples, and address seasonal food shortages[12]. Similarly, cricket consumption is increasing in Europe, North America, and Australia due to its contributions to nutritional security and sustainability[13].

      Crickets are rich in high-quality proteins, essential amino acids, lipids, particularly monounsaturated (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), as well as mineral elements (e.g., iron, zinc, calcium), carbohydrates, and caloric energy[7]. The cricket has a biological value of 93.02%, a net protein ratio of 3.04, a protein efficiency ratio of 1.78%, and an amino acid score of 0.91[14]. Crickets can thrive on agro-byproducts and weeds, promoting waste valorization and environmental remediation[15].

      Despite these advantages, several challenges exist in utilizing crickets as a food source, including variability in nutritional value, sensory perceptions, and the scalability of farming, as well as potential health risks such as allergens or contaminants. Traditional societies use whole crickets, whereas Western consumers prefer processed forms, such as powders or flours, to mitigate visual and textural barriers[16,17]. The consumer acceptance of edible insects varies and is influenced by cultural norms, neophobia, and familiarity with the product. Thus, this review primarily focuses on the nutritional composition and potential health benefits of edible crickets. Additionally, the manuscript also addresses the safety considerations, consumer acceptance, and regulatory perspectives regarding cricket entomophagy.

    • A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies related to nutritional, health, and safety prospects of consuming edible crickets. Databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCO, and Medline, were searched up to July 2025. The search strategy used a combination of relevant keywords and Boolean operators. The keywords used were: 'entomophagy', 'edible insects', 'insect protein', 'crickets', 'Brachytrupes membranaceus', 'Gryllus similis', 'Gryllus bimaculatus', 'Gryllotalpa orientalis', 'Acheta domesticus', 'nutrition', 'amino acid', 'micronutrients', 'digestibility', 'bioavailability', 'health benefits', 'functional food', 'cardiovascular health', 'metabolic health', 'gut microbiota', 'oxidative stress', 'allergenicity', 'safety', 'consumer acceptance', and 'regulatory aspects'. Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) were used to combine terms and refine the search for higher precision. In addition to database searches, the reference lists of all included articles and relevant reviews were manually screened to identify additional studies. Only peer-reviewed articles published in English were included. Eligible studies included in vitro and in vivo studies regarding the nutritional composition and bioactive components. Additionally, human clinical studies evaluating physiological effects or health outcomes associated with the consumption of edible crickets were included in the manuscript. Studies focusing exclusively on animal feed, insect farming technologies, or non-nutritional applications were excluded. From the selected studies, relevant information was extracted and presented in a narrative review, while studies related to clinical trials were summarized in Table 1. However, the narrative review may have limitations, including the lack of formal inclusion-exclusion criteria, the absence of meta-analysis, restriction to English-language publications, study quality, and risk of bias.

      Table 1.  Impact of cricket consumption on various health outcomes.

      Intervention Dosage Duration Subject Outcome Ref.
      Pumpkin spice muffin and dry mix chocolate malt shake containing dried, roasted cricket powder Total daily intake of 25 g (shake containing 10 g of cricket powder and muffins containing 15 g of cricket powder) Randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, with two 14-d intervention periods, and a 14-d washout period Twenty healthy adults aged between 20 to 48 Acetate level in the stool was reduced to
      2.31 uM/g, and propionate levels were reduced
      to 0.58 uM/g. No significant changes observed in excreted bile acids or fecal triglycerides. Bifidobacterium animalis level increased by a log fold of 5.7. Lactobacillus reuteri and two other lactic acid-producing bacteria (LAB) levels decreased by 3 to 4. Reduced plasma TNF-α
      [34]
      Porridge containing maize, millet, and 5% cricket powder 250 ml of porridge A single-blind, randomized, controlled dietary intervention for 6 months, every 5 d of the week One hundred and thirty-eight children aged between 3−4.5 years Hemoglobin levels increased from 11.93 g/dl to 13.10.05 g/dl to 13.59 g/dl (p = 0.02) [35]
      Intrinsically [57Fe]-labeled and control house crickets (Acheta domesticus) powder consumed with refined (low-phytate, noninhibiting) or nonrefined (high-phytate, inhibiting) meals Two portions of 400–450 g each Two-time blocks of 3 consecutive days, separated by 2 weeks Twenty iron-depleted Dutch females with serum ferritin levels under 25 µg/L, aged 18–30 years old The fractional iron absorption (FIA) from meals containing 57Fe-labeled crickets was 3.06% (95% CI: 1.75–4.37). Meals with unlabeled crickets combined with 54FeSO4 showed a higher absorption of 4.92% (95% CI: 3.59–6.25). The reference meal fortified with 58FeSO4 demonstrated the highest absorption, at 14.2% (95% CI: 12.9–15.5) [36]
      Maize-based meals with intrinsically 67Zn-labeled house crickets (Acheta domesticus) (2.61 mg Zn); meals containing 68Zn (low-enriched: 0.90 mg Zn; high-enriched: 3.24 mg Zn, or with intrinsically 67Zn-labeled low-chitin cricket flour (2.51 mg) Twenty grams of cricket flour Single-center, single-blind, randomized crossover trial with a one-month washout period between test meals Twenty-five pre-school Kenyan children aged between 24 and 36 months Whole cricket meal: 0.36 mg (geometric mean; 95% CI: 0.30–0.43 mg). Low-enriched maize meal: 0.14 mg (95% CI: 0.11–0.16 mg). The cricket meal resulted in 2.6 times higher absorbed zinc compared to the low-enriched meal (p < 0.001). Low-chitin cricket meal exhibited similar available zinc to the whole-cricket meal. Both cricket-enriched meals outperformed the high-enriched ZnSO4 meal in performance [37]
      Beverages containing 25 g of cricket protein Twenty-five grams of insect protein Two occasions separated
      by a minimum interval of
      1 week
      Twenty healthy, active young men The adjusted mean postprandial incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was higher for cricket-derived protein in relation to plasma leucine, branched-chain amino acids, and essential amino acids concentrations (all p < 0.0001). The adjusted mean postprandial iAUC for hunger was lower for cricket-derived protein (−1197 (SE: 525), p = 0.02). The adjusted mean ad libitum energy intake was recorded as 4,408 (SE: 316) kJ for cricket-derived protein (p = 0.30) [38]
      Drinks enriched with cricket protein after one-legged resistance exercise 0.25 g protein per kilogram of fat-free mass A randomized, single-blind, parallel trial consisting of
      one experimental day
      Fifty healthy young men, aged 18−30, with a BMI ranging from 18.5 to 30 Cricket protein resulted in lower circulating levels of amino acids. Cricket protein elevates plasma amino acids above baseline. No significant differences were observed in mTORC1 activation among whey, cricket, or pea protein. Cricket proteins stimulate mTORC1 signaling [40]
      Pancakes with an addition of 20% and 30% A. domesticus flour One 240-kcal serving of pancakes One-meal test session. Assessment of satiety and hunger levels using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at multiple intervals
      throughout 3 h after eating
      Seventy-one healthy volunteers (n = 39 women, n = 32 men) A. domesticus flour (20% and 30% Cr) suppressed the feeling of hunger quickly and for an extended period. Pancakes with 20% cricket and 30% cricket are the most satisfying [39]
    • Edible crickets are a rich source of macronutrients and micronutrients; however, their nutritional profile is not uniform and can vary depending on various factors, including species, developmental stage, habitat, climate, sex, diet, and processing methods. The nutritional compositions of various species of crickets are presented in Table 2. The protein content of house cricket ranges from 15.1% to 75.34%; this wide difference is due to the varied processing conditions. The present study demonstrates that frozen house crickets contain less protein content than dried and defatted ones. Additionally, the crude protein content of dried and partially defatted cricket products was determined using the Kjeldahl method, with a conversion factor of 6.25; however, literature recommends using 5.57 and 5.33, respectively, to account for chitin-derived non-protein nitrogen. This also contributes to the high protein content in these two products[18]. This highlights that the protein content of crickets is higher than that of roasted goat, broiler chicken, and pork; therefore, it is a potential option for individuals with protein deficiencies[10]. The protein digestibility of A. Domesticus (adult) ranges from 80.36% to 85.28%[19,20], which is lower than that of eggs and beef but higher than many plant sources, such as sorghum, wheat, rice, and maize[7]. However, the oven-drying method results in a reduction in protein digestibility. In vitro DIAAS for blanched A. domesticus was 92, which is lower than that of chicken and balanced Tenebrio molitor larvae. However, there is a significant impact of processing conditions on DIAAS, for example, a reduction in chitin in A. domesticus, resulting in a substantial decrease in DIAAS. This indicates that the protein quality of A. domesticus is excellent, allowing it to be incorporated into the diet of 6-month-old children[21]. The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) of cricket powder was reported as 73%, with threonine identified as the first limiting amino acid and a true protein digestibility of 81% in young male weanling albino rats[14]. A. domesticus and G. bimaculatus are good sources of essential amino acids (EAAs), including valine (3.50–4.50 g/100 g protein), leucine (3.80–3.88 g/100 g), and lysine (2.89–3.22 g/100 g). Crickets can provide lysine (2.89−3.22 g/100 g), threonine (1.65−1.69 g/100 g), and tryptophan (0.27−0.43 g/100 g)[22], which are deficient in cereal- and tuber-based diets. This demonstrates that crickets can be used to mitigate malnutrition when incorporated into local meals.

      Table 2.  Nutritional composition of edible crickets and their comparison with animal foods (data is adapted from the following studies[10,18,22,29,30]).

      Nutrients A. domesticus G. bimaculatus Gryllodes sigillatus Pork Chicken Lamb
      Proximate (g/100 g DW)
      Energy (kcal/100g) 147.0−455.50 120.00 452.00 233.00 143.00 282.00
      Crude protein 15.40−76.19 58.30–60.70 56–71.15 48.97 64.80 40.99
      Lipid/fat 3.30−43.90 11.88−23.40 14.92−18.23 48.26 30.22 57.78
      Carbohydrates 1.60−11.80 0.1 0.10−4.83 0.00 0.15 0.00
      Fiber 3.90−10.20 9.53−10.00 3.65−7.10
      Chitin 5.40−8.34 9.77 3.4
      Ash 3.00−11.50 2.8 4.35−18.10 2.56 4.37 2.14
      Essential amino acids (g/100 g of protein)
      Valine 0.05−4.50 3.20 5.20 5.00 4.50 2.32
      Isoleucine 0.04−4.45 2.16 2.66−3.70 4.90 4.20 2.38
      Leucine 0.07−6.50 3.97 5.78−6.90 7.50 6.90 3.86
      Lysine 0.05−5.40 2.42 3.84−5.30 7.90 7.80 3.84
      Threonine 0.74−3.60 2 3.50−3.68 5.10 3.70 2.52
      Phenylalanine 0.03−3.00 1.83 2.20−3.10 4.10 2.50 2.40
      Methionine 0.01−1.40 0.27 1.59−1.60 2.50 2.10 1.63
      Histidine 0.02−2.25 2.5 1.72−2.20 3.20 4.40 1.87
      Tryptophan
      0.13−0.68 0.9
      Unsaturated fatty acids (g/100 g DM)
      Myristoleic acid (C14:1) 0.019–0.44 0.007 0.000
      Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) 0.09–0.70 0.17-1.22 3.780 2.1-2.8 0.270 1.679
      cis Oleic acid (C18:1n-9) 3.90−20.18 2.91−23.32 32.8–43.7
      cis Linoleic acid (C18:2n-6) 1.17−41.39 34.52 10.7−14.2
      Linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) 0.01–1.59 1.78 2.130 1.0−1.1 0.670
      Eicosapentaenoic (C20:5n-3) 0.01−0.06 0.070 0.2−0.4 0.00
      Erucic acid (C22:1n-9) 0.014−0.52 0.01−0.02 0.00 0.00
      MUFA 4.14−29.99 9.85−4.33 34.33 3.26−43.04 46.670 23.704
      PUFA 1.45−36.48 1.80−7.46 31.910 0.62−16.00 20.00 4.568
      Saturated fatty acid (g/100 g DM)
      Lauric acid (C12:0) < 0.02−0.10 0.04−0.44 0.100 0.210
      Myristic acid (C14:0) 0.04–0.55 0.05−0.271 1.650 1.3−1.4 1.330 2.296
      Pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) 0.01–0.11 0.01−0.036 4.1−4.7
      Palmitic acid (C16:0) 1.56–24.92 2.16−23.92 23.500 23.2−27.3 22.670 12.667
      Heptadecanoic acid (C17:0) 0.02–0.12 0.03−0.101 0.320 0.2−0.3
      Stearic acid (C18:0) 0.58–8.97 0.76−8.34 7.350 12.2−16.1 8.00 7.951
      Minerals (mg/100 g of DM)
      Calcium 27.50−3,105.04 240.17 117.30−130.00 6.00 6.00 16.00
      Copper 0.51−5.08 4.55 4.79−4.90 0.07 0.04 0.10
      Iron 1.93−11.23 8.75 4.23−4.70 0.79 0.59 1.55
      Magnesium 22.60−136.58 143.65 42.70−101.00 19.00 20.50 21.00
      Manganese 0.89−4.40 2.90 < 0.0125 0.01 0.02
      Phosphorus 32.37−1,806.00 1,169.60 782.10 173.00−320.00 166.00−407.00 157.00
      Potassium 347.00−1,280.00 1,079.90 870.00−1,190.00 318.00−400.00 248.00−302.00 222.00
      Selenium 0.02−0.60 0.09 18.80
      Sodium 95.05−863.34 452.99 298.00−330.00 45.00−87.00 63.00 59.00
      Zinc 2.18−24.40 22.43 13.90−16.80 2.23 1.18 3.41
      Vitamins (mg/100 g DM)
      Retinol 24.33 0.006–0.020
      Thiamine (B1) 0.02-1.66 0.42 0.49 0.08−0.09 0.11
      Riboflavin (B2) 3.84 0.89 0.23 0.15−0.25 0.21
      Niacin (B3) 3.84 1.09 4.86 3.06−12.44 5.96
      Pantothenic acid (B5) 2.30 0.65
      Pyridoxine (B6) 0.13-0.23 5.28 0.25 0.33−0.55 0.13
      Biotin (B7) 0.02
      Folate (B9) 0.15−0.49 0.51
      Vitamin B12 0.01 0.57 0.40 0.00
      Vitamin C 3.00 0.00
      Vitamin E (α-tocopherol) 1.32 0.33 0.30 0.20
      Choline 151.90 69.30
      Variations in the reported nutrient contents may arise due to differences in species, developmental stage, diet composition, analytical methodologies, and processing conditions. These details are excluded from the table to maintain clarity and readability.

      The amino acid digestibility demonstrated that during the intestinal phase of in vitro digestion, it clearly indicates that both the nutrient composition and bioavailability differ substantially between cricket protein and whey protein. At the onset of the intestinal phase (0 min), the digestibility of most amino acids in cricket protein ranged between 40%–59%, whereas whey protein exhibited comparatively higher values (approximately 61%–65%), reflecting its inherently higher solubility and susceptibility to enzymatic hydrolysis. Over the digestion period, a progressive increase in digestibility was observed in both samples. However, the rate and extent of digestion was significantly higher for whey protein. After 120 min, the total amino acid digestibility of cricket protein reached 79.64% ± 2.16%, while whey protein achieved near-complete hydrolysis (98.38% ± 2.19%). Essential amino acids digestibility remained lower in cricket protein (78%–82%), compared to whey protein (97%–99%). This may be due to higher content of chitin and complex protein–polysaccharide matrices in insect-derived proteins, which may limit enzymatic accessibility, and thus reduce amino acid bioavailability[23].

      The lipids are composed of triglycerides for energy storage, and phospholipids for cellular functions. The lipid content of crickets ranges from 6–34 g/100 g dry weight, with higher levels observed in nymphs of G. assimilis and lower levels in Acheta Testacea[10]. The fatty acid composition emphasizes health-promoting unsaturated fats; for example, the range of polyunsaturated fatty acids is 4.33−58.37 g/100 g dry matter[24,25]. The present study found that the PUFA/SFA ratio of Gryllus testaceus was 3.49, which demonstrates that cricket consumption may reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol[26]. It has been observed that Brachytrupes spp comprises approximately 13.29 ± 1.61 g/100 g dry weight of fiber[27]. The significant component of edible cricket fiber is insoluble chitin, which is present in the exoskeleton of the edible crickets[7,28]. Crickets provide 18.10–537.50 kcal/100 g of calories based on dry weight[10], varying from species to species, such as 18.10 kcal/100 g found in Gryllus testaceus, while other species have a high energy value[10]. These energy- and protein-rich foods are particularly beneficial for populations suffering from protein-energy malnutrition.

      Crickets are a good source of minerals, for example G. bimaculatus had high levels of phosphorus (1,169.6 mg/100 g DM), potassium (1,079.9 mg/100 g DM), sodium (452.99 mg/100 g DM), calcium (240.17 mg/100 g DM), and magnesium (143.65 mg/100 g DM), with zinc (22.43 mg/100 g DM) and manganese (10.36 mg/100 g DM). Similarly, Teleogryllus ema and A. domesticus exhibited relatively good quantities of phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium, with significant iron (8.75–10.75 mg/100 g DM) and zinc contents (18.47–20.22 mg/100 g DM). Whereas, the iron content of Tarbinskiellus portentosus is 122.5 mg/100 g dry matter. This suggests that it can be used as a dietary intervention for combating iron deficiency[10]. Cricket adults and nymphs have less than 1,000 IU/kg of vitamin A[31]. The Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of vitamin A for men and women is 3,000 and 2,333 IU/day, respectively[32]. Studies have shown that the thiamine and riboflavin content of cricket (adult) is 0.4 mg per 100 g, and 3.41 mg per 100 g of dry weight[31]. Vitamin B12 is essential for neurological function and the production of red blood cells. Cricket adults and nymphs can provide a significant amount of vitamin B12 (5.37–8.72 µg per 100 g)[31]. The RDA of vitamin B12 is 2.4 to 2.8 µg for adults, and 0.4 to 2.8 µg for infants, children, and adolescents[33]. This indicates that a 100 g serving of crickets can provide a significantly higher amount of vitamin B12. Thus, the excessive intake of crickets should be monitored to avoid potential adverse effects. Although vitamin B12 has a low risk of toxicity due to its water-soluble nature, it is still advisable to limit intake to prevent potential adverse effects.

    • There are limited clinical studies that have demonstrated the physiological impacts of cricket consumption (shown in Table 1). In a randomized crossover study, adults consuming 25 g of cricket powder daily (comprising approximately 14.78 g of protein, and 2.21 g of dietary fiber, provided through muffins and shakes) demonstrated significant alterations in gut microbial composition. Levels of Bifidobacterium animalis increased markedly, while certain lactic acid bacteria, including Lactobacillus reuteri, declined. Parallel biochemical analyses indicated reductions in stool short-chain fatty acids such as acetate and propionate, alongside a decrease in circulating tumor necrosis factor-alpha, suggesting potential anti-inflammatory and gut-modulating effects of cricket intake[34]. Nutritional benefits have also been observed in vulnerable populations. A six-month dietary intervention among preschool-aged children showed that porridge enriched with 5% cricket powder significantly improved hemoglobin concentrations, indicating a positive influence on iron status[35]. This is particularly relevant in regions with a high burden of anemia, where cricket-based foods may provide a sustainable dietary strategy to enhance micronutrient intake. The bioavailability of key minerals from cricket powder has been further validated through isotope-labeled feeding studies. In iron-depleted women, fractional iron absorption from cricket-based meals was modest yet comparable to conventional dietary sources[36], while zinc absorption in young Kenyan children consuming cricket-enriched maize meals exceeded that of standard fortified meals[37]. These results highlight the potential of cricket protein to serve as a vehicle for improving micronutrient nutrition, particularly in populations vulnerable to micronutrient deficiencies. Cricket protein has also been investigated in relation to postprandial amino acid kinetics and satiety regulation. Acute feeding trials in healthy men demonstrated that beverages containing 25 g of cricket protein produced robust increases in circulating leucine, branched-chain amino acids, and essential amino acids, while concurrently reducing hunger ratings[38]. Similarly, cricket-enriched pancakes, containing 20%–30% flour substitution, were effective in suppressing hunger over a three-hour postprandial window, supporting their use in satiety management[39]. From a performance nutrition perspective, resistance exercise trials revealed that cricket protein stimulated mTORC1 signaling to a similar degree as whey and pea protein, affirming its capacity to promote anabolic responses essential for muscle recovery and adaptation[40]. These studies highlight that cricket-based ingredients offer a multifaceted contribution to human diets. Cricket consumption not only increases protein and micronutrient intake but also offers several health benefits, including gut modulation, reduced inflammation, and appetite regulation.

    • Several studies have investigated the effect of incorporating cricket powder on the sensory properties of various food products. Early consumer-based studies tested snack formulations such as puffed rice fortified with 33% cricket powder, and chili paste containing 25% cricket powder. In both cases, young adult participants reported high acceptance scores, particularly for attributes such as color and aroma. While taste responses reflected modest improvements in perceived sweetness, and relatively lower effects on saltiness and spiciness. These findings suggest that even at moderate inclusion levels, cricket-fortified foods can achieve favorable sensory acceptance without compromising palatability[41]. Consumer perception trials have additionally demonstrated the role of cricket-based products in shaping attitudes toward insect consumption. When exposed to chocolate beverages containing 30% cricket powder, participants not only rated the products favorably but also reported a measurable decline in feelings of disgust and misconceptions about insects as disease vectors. Importantly, participants became more likely to recommend, purchase, and integrate such products into their diets, reflecting the power of direct exposure in shifting cultural attitudes toward entomophagy[42].

      Traditional cooking methods such as toasting, boiling, frying, steaming, and smoking can be used to prepare cuisines from crickets. Frying is the most common cooking method to improve the sensory attributes of edible insects. Additionally, cooking can inactivate enzymes, kill microorganisms, increase palatability, improve digestibility, and enhance the biological activity of the insect's protein. However, before cooking, it is necessary to remove the intestines, wings, legs, and heads, followed by washing. After washing, the crickets must be processed according to local eating habits[43]. For example, in India, crickets (Tarbinskiellus orientalis, Tarbinskiellus portentosus, and Teleogryllus occipitalis) are consumed in various forms, including cooked (with bamboo shoots and local spices), deep-fried, and boiled. In contrast, the Naga tribes use a traditional way of preparing crickets. They mixed the salt, dry bamboo shoots, and crickets, then stuffed them into bamboo pipes and enclosed them in a banana leaf. Afterwards, they were cooked over a fire for 20−30 min[44].

      In a study, Henicus whellani were cooked using various techniques, including boiling, roasting, or a combination of boiling and roasting. These cooking methods are commonly used in Zimbabwe. The study found that boiling crickets resulted in the loss of protein, a reduction in protein digestibility, and a loss of minerals; therefore, it was concluded that roasting is a more suitable method of cooking[45]. In Thailand, live insects were cleaned and toasted for 5 min in a hot, non-frying pan with regular stirring. Similarly, smoking is another method of cooking used to cook, dry, and provide a smoky flavor. Additionally, this method preserves the insects by reducing the pH and preventing the growth of microorganisms. Crickets are fried in vegetable oil or animal fat at a temperature of 170–210 °C for cooking[4648].

      Crickets such as A. domesticus and G. bimaculatus have emerged as promising edible insects for improving the nutritional, functional, and sensory properties of various baked products. In sourdough bread (SDB) production, fermentation of A. domesticus powder with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 8014 has been shown to increase the organic acid levels (e.g., acetic, lactic, and oxalic acids) while reducing citric acid content. Fermentation for 24 h resulted in increased mineral bioavailability, amino acid content, and the production of aromatic volatile compounds[49]. Spontaneous fermentation of cricket powder (CRIP) facilitates the isolation of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains, including Enterococcus durans, Lactococcus garvieae, Latilactobacillus curvatus, L. plantarum, L. sakei, and Weissella confusa. Incorporation of 20% CRIP into wheat flour doughs using these strains increases the lipid content (from 0.7 to 6 g/100 g), and protein content (up to 94%) in the bread, highlighting spontaneous fermentation as a potential method for developing nutritionally improved bread[50]. SDB developed with CRIP hydrolysate fermented by Yarrowia lipolytica RO25 exhibits increased levels of free fatty acids and proteins, which are attributed to the yeast's lipolytic and proteolytic activities, as well as a reduced biogenic amine index. The developed SDB demonstrated an acceptable level of sensory attributes[51]. Optimized fermentation of CRIP with L. plantarum No. 122 achieves high LAB counts (8.24 log CFU/g) and a pH of 4.26, reducing total biogenic amines by 13.1%, while wheat bread enriched with 10%–30% fermented CRIP exhibits superior specific volume, sensory acceptability, and lower acrylamide levels at 10% inclusion. However, higher concentrations may increase acrylamide content[52]. Whole wheat breads fortified with CRIP (up to 20%) have shown an increased level of ash (2.09%–2.33%), protein (18.97%–25.94%), and fat (10.91%–15.07%), as well as darker crumb, firmer texture, and high consumer acceptance[53].

      In fermented probiotic beverages, the incorporation of cricket protein hydrolysates (CPH) has been demonstrated to improve both the physicochemical and nutritional properties. For example, enrichment with CPH significantly increases viscosity, reduces pH, and increases titratable acidity, while maintaining viable probiotic counts above 8.45 log CFU/mL over 5 months of refrigerated storage at 4 °C. This stability is attributed to the antimicrobial effects of organic acids produced during fermentation, which inhibit the growth of spoilage microorganisms. Furthermore, fermented CPH-enriched beverages exhibit an increase in low molecular weight (LMW) peptides (< 260 Da), reaching 74.7% after storage, compared to 59.9% in the non-enriched product, indicating continuous proteolysis that enhances bioavailability. In vitro gastrointestinal simulations found high probiotic survival rates (up to 83%) in CPH-enriched formulations, highlighting their potential as functional foods for gut health[54]. A Colombian traditional beverage (chucula) is fortified with 4.6% cricket flour (CR), which results in altered granulometry, increased particle size at 150 μm, elevated water activity (aw), and reduced solubility. Sensory evaluations indicate a 74% liking for CR-enriched chucula, characterized by a milky brown appearance, a cocoa aroma, and a sweet-nutty flavor, with emotions evoked including adventurousness and enthusiasm. However, neophobia scores are higher among consumers over 45 years old, although overall values below 2.5 suggest opportunities for integrating familiar products[55].

    • In recent years, the consumption pattern of edible insects has increased. However, in many countries, there is no regulation governing the use and rearing of edible insects, which raises special concerns about food safety issues. There are three different types of hazards commonly associated with edible insects, including chemical, biological, and allergenic hazards[56]. During the rearing of insects, there is a high risk of contamination, which can be influenced by various factors, including the insect species, developmental stage, substrate used, and production method[57]. A significant component of crickets is protein, which means there is a chance of an allergic reaction in some people. The field cricket contains Hexamerin B1, an allergenic protein[58]. Arginine kinase is considered an allergen, and exposure to it may cause skin reactions, respiratory issues, and systemic symptoms in some individuals. It was observed that thermal processing (frying) may reduce the arginine kinase in Bombay locust[59]. It can be assumed that similar changes may occur in crickets with thermal processing; however, further studies are necessary.

      Additionally, α-amylase and tropomyosin are the other common allergens of edible crickets[60,61]. A study has found that 19% of people in Belgium are sensitive to grilled A. domesticus. This highlights that people are at high risk of developing allergic reactions upon consumption of A. domesticus[62]. To minimize the health risk, all food products containing crickets are labeled appropriately[60]. The label should explicitly declare the presence of cricket-derived ingredients, and include a clear allergen warning statement to inform consumers about potential allergic reactions, particularly for individuals sensitive to crustaceans, dust mites, or other related allergens. Such mandatory labeling ensures transparency, consumer safety, and regulatory compliance in the commercialization of edible insect products.

      Studies have reported that entomophagy may cause microbial foodborne infections and intoxications[62]. Edible insects can be contaminated with Citrobacter spp., Fusobacterium spp., Salmonella spp., Yersinia spp., Bacteroides spp., and Escherichia coli[6365]. Therefore, good manufacturing and hygiene practices should be used across all the unit operations (from farm to fork) to protect consumers. Additionally, controlled rearing conditions and thermal processing are crucial in minimizing the risk of pathogenic microorganisms and spoilage, thereby ensuring the microbiological safety and quality of edible cricket-based products.

      In crickets, heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury can accumulate[60]. Whereas, in a study, cadmium, arsenic, chromium, lead, and tin were found in acceptable levels for human consumption[66]. According to EFSA, no toxic compounds are present in crickets[67], as they lack specific organs for producing toxic compounds[67,68]. Similarly, a study has shown that administering 5,000 mg/kg of cricket powder does not produce any adverse effects[69]. These points highlight that crickets are generally safe to consume.

    • Edible crickets are a good source of protein, essential amino acids, fiber, minerals, and vitamins; thus, they can be used as an adjunct therapy to alleviate the risk of nutrient deficiency. Apart from their nutritional composition, clinical studies have shown the potential role of crickets in enhancing zinc and iron absorption, modulating gut microbiota, reducing inflammatory markers, and improving satiety responses. Cricket protein can stimulate mTORC1 signaling and play a crucial role in muscle protein metabolism. However, to date, there are limited clinical studies. Therefore, well-designed clinical studies are needed to explore the potential of edible crickets in managing anemia and micronutrient deficiencies, modulating gut microbiota and inflammation, addressing obesity, diabetes, and inflammatory bowel disorders, enhancing satiety and weight management, and stimulating muscle protein synthesis. Additionally, cohort studies focused on the long-term impact of consuming edible insects should be conducted.

      Crickets are considered safe to consume; however, it is crucial to maintain appropriate rearing practices and processing technologies. Therefore, exploring optimal processing conditions to reduce allergenicity, anti-nutritional factors, and microbial risk will be essential to increase consumer acceptance. Additionally, regulatory guidelines must be strengthened to optimize the farming practice, handling, processing, and labelling practices are required to ensure consumer safety and to build consumer trust.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: conceptualization: Kumar A, Kumar S, Mehra R; writing − original draft and editing: Yadav S, Kumar A, Batta K, Joia S, Bawa Y, Mishra SS; writing − review and editing: Mehta L, Khatkar P, Rustagi S, Ruliya R; supervision: Kumar S, Mehra R; visualisation: Kumar A. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Nanjing Agricultural University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Table (2) References (69)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Yadav S, Kumar S, Batta K, Joia S, Bawa Y, et al. 2026. A comprehensive overview of edible crickets: nutritional composition, health benefits, and safety considerations. Food Materials Research 6: e005 doi: 10.48130/fmr-0026-0003
    Yadav S, Kumar S, Batta K, Joia S, Bawa Y, et al. 2026. A comprehensive overview of edible crickets: nutritional composition, health benefits, and safety considerations. Food Materials Research 6: e005 doi: 10.48130/fmr-0026-0003

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return