Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

How do cool-season turfgrasses respond to high temperature: progress and challenges

More Information
  • Received Date: 26 November 2023
    Accepted Date: 21 March 2024
    Published Online: 10 April 2024
    Grass Research  4 Article number: e010 (2024)  |  Cite this article
  • The utilization of cool-season turfgrasses is widespread in urban greening, ecological restoration, and sports fields. The primary limiting factor affecting its growth and application is considered to be high temperature stress. Under heat stress condition, a range of physiological and morphological traits will be modulated in cool-season turfgrasses, resulting in a deterioration of lawn quality and subsequently impacting the ornamental and functional value of lawns. In this review, we summarize physiological and morphological changes in cool-season turfgrasses caused by high temperature stress. The research progress in molecular characterization of high temperature regulatory networks was further summarized. Approaches for improving cool-season turfgrasses thermotolerance were proposed. We further put forward challenges and perspectives of research on heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses, aiming to provide references for the research on characterization of heat tolerance mechanism and breeding heat tolerant cold-season turfgrass.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Table S1 Exogenous substances enhanced heat tolerance of cool season turfgrass species.
  • [1]

    DaCosta M, Huang B. 2013. Heat-stress physiology and management. In Turfgrass: Biology, Use, and Management, ed. Stier JC, Horgan BP, Bonos SA, Volume 56, Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America. pp. 249−78. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr56.c7

    [2]

    Fan J, Zhang W, Amombo E, Hu L, Kjorven JO, et al. 2020. Mechanisms of environmental stress tolerance in turfgrass. Agronomy 10:522

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy10040522

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Tan Z, Zhang X, Yang Z. 2021. Research advances in heat resistance of cool-season turfgrasses. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 30:193−202

    doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Li L, Zhao L, Zhong H, He S, Yang X, et al. 2018. Effects of high temperature stress on the seedling characteristics of perennial ryegrass. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences 46:85−86

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2018.26.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Beard JB, Daniel WH. 1965. Effect of temperature and cutting on the growth of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) roots. Agronomy Journal 57:249−50

    doi: 10.2134/agronj1965.00021962005700030006x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Huang B, Liu X, Fry JD. 1998. Effects of high temperature and poor soil aeration on root growth and viability of creeping bentgrass. Crop Science 38:1618−22

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060034x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zhao Z, Hu L, Hu T, Fu J. 2015. Differential metabolic responses of two tall fescue genotypes to heat stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 24:58−69

    doi: 10.11686/cyxb20150306

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Xu Q, Huang B. 2001. Morphological and physiological characteristics associated with heat tolerance in creeping bentgrass. Crop Science 41:127−33

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.411127x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Zhang J, Xie X, Dong Z. 2007. An evaluation on the heat tolerance of coolseason turf grasses under field heat stress. Pratacultural Science 24:105−09

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2007.02.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    He Y, Huang B. 2007. Protein changes during heat stress in three Kentucky bluegrass cultivars differing in heat tolerance. Crop Science 47:2513−20

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.12.0821

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Rossi S, Chapman C, Yuan B, Huang B. 2021. Glutamate acts as a repressor for heat-induced leaf senescence involving chlorophyll degradation and amino acid metabolism in creeping bentgrass. Grass Research 1:4

    doi: 10.48130/GR-2021-0004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yu G, Xie Z, Chen W, Xu B, Huang B. 2022. Knock down of NON-YELLOW COLOURING 1-like gene or chlorophyllin application enhanced chlorophyll accumulation with antioxidant roles in suppressing heat-induced leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass. Journal of Experimental Botany 73:429−44

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab426

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Sies H, Jones DP. 2020. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 21:363−83

    doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Mittler R, Zandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Van Breusegem F. 2022. Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 23:663−79

    doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00499-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Huang B, Liu X, Xu Q. 2001. Supraoptimal soil temperatures induced oxidative stress in leaves of creeping bentgrass cultivars differing in heat tolerance. Crop Science 41:430−35

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.412430x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Bi A, Fan J, Hu Z, Wang G, Amombo E, et al. 2016. Differential acclimation of enzymatic antioxidant metabolism and photosystem II photochemistry in tall fescue under drought and heat and the combined stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:453

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00453

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Sun T, Shao K, Huang Y, Lei Y, Tan L, et al. 2020. Natural variation analysis of perennial ryegrass in response to abiotic stress highlights LpHSFC1b as a positive regulator of heat stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 179:104192

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104192

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Du H, Wang Z, Huang B. 2009. Differential responses of warm-season and cool-season turfgrass species to heat stress associated with antioxidant enzyme activity. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 134:417−22

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.134.4.417

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Liu M, Sun T, Liu C, Zhang H, Wang W, et al. 2022. Integrated physiological and transcriptomic analyses of two warm- and cool-season turfgrass species in response to heat stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 170:275−86

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.12.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Huang B, DaCosta M, Jiang Y. 2014. Research advances in mechanisms of turfgrass tolerance to abiotic stresses: from physiology to molecular biology. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 33:141−89

    doi: 10.1080/07352689.2014.870411

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Xu Y, Chu C, Yao S. 2021. The impact of high-temperature stress on rice: challenges and solutions. The Crop Journal 9:963−76

    doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2021.02.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Niu Y, Xiang Y. 2018. An overview of biomembrane functions in plant responses to high-temperature stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:915

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00915

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Yang Y, Liu D, Wang L. 2022. Research progress on the effects of high temperature stress on Festuca arundinacea. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science 264:15−22

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3971.2022.01.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Zhao J, Lu Z, Wang L, Jin B. 2021. Plant responses to heat stress: physiology, transcription, noncoding RNAs, and epigenetics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:117

    doi: 10.3390/ijms22010117

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Hu T, Sun X, Zhao Z, Amombo E, Fu J. 2020. High temperature damage to fatty acids and carbohydrate metabolism in tall fescue by coupling deep transcriptome and metabolome analysis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 203:110943

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110943

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Zhao N, Xu Q, Su P, Liang D, Tang Y. 2019. Differences in resistance to high temperature stres of 10 cool-season turfgrass varieties. Pratacultural Science 36:1743−53

    Google Scholar

    [27]

    Larkindale J, Huang B. 2004. Changes of lipid composition and saturation level in leaves and roots for heat-stressed and heat-acclimated creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Environmental and Experimental Botany 51:57−67

    doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(03)00060-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Dhanda SS, Munjal R. 2012. Heat tolerance in relation to acquired thermotolerance for membrane lipids in bread wheat. Field Crops Research 135:30−37

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.06.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Higashi Y, Saito K. 2019. Lipidomic studies of membrane glycerolipids in plant leaves under heat stress. Progress in Lipid Research 75:100990

    doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2019.100990

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Hu L, Bi A, Hu Z, Amombo E, Li H, et al. 2018. Antioxidant metabolism, photosystem II, and fatty acid composition of two tall fescue genotypes with different heat tolerance under high temperature stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1242

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01242

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Peng Y, Huang B, Xu L, Li Z. 2013. Heat stress effects on osmotic potential, membrane fatty acid composition and lipid peroxidation content of two Kentucky bluegrass cultivars differing in drought tolerance. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 40:971−80

    Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wang X, Xu C, Cai X, Wang Q, Dai S. 2017. Heat-responsive photosynthetic and signaling pathways in plants: insight from proteomics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18:2191

    doi: 10.3390/ijms18102191

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Hüve K, Bichele I, Rasulov B, Niinemets Ü. 2011. When it is too hot for photosynthesis: heat-induced instability of photosynthesis in relation to respiratory burst, cell permeability changes and H2O2 formation. Plant, Cell & Environment 34:113−26

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02229.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam MM, Roychowdhury R, Fujita M. 2013. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14:9643−84

    doi: 10.3390/ijms14059643

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Xu S, Li J, Zhang X, Wei H, Cui L. 2006. Effects of heat acclimation pretreatment on changes of membrane lipid peroxidation, antioxidant metabolites, and ultrastructure of chloroplasts in two cool-season turfgrass species under heat stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 56:274−85

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.03.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Cui L, Li J, Fan Y, Xu S, Zhang Z. 2006. High temperature effects on photosynthesis, PSII functionality and antioxidant activity of two Festuca arundinacea cultivars with different heat susceptibility. Botanical Studies 47:61−69

    Google Scholar

    [37]

    Zhang J, Li H, Huang X, Xing J, Yao J, et al. 2022. STAYGREEN-mediated chlorophyll a catabolism is critical for photosystem stability during heat-induced leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass. Plant, Cell & Environment 45:1412−27

    doi: 10.1111/pce.14296

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Sun X, Sun C, Li Z, Hu Q, Han L, et al. 2016. AsHSP17, a creeping bentgrass small heat shock protein modulates plant photosynthesis and ABA-dependent and independent signalling to attenuate plant response to abiotic stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 39:1320−37

    doi: 10.1111/pce.12683

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Morvan-Bertrand A, Boucaud J, Le Saos J, Prud'homme MP. 2001. Roles of the fructans from leaf sheaths and from the elongating leaf bases in the regrowth following defoliation of Lolium perenne L. Planta 213:109−20

    doi: 10.1007/s004250000478

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Wang R, Wang Z, Xang Z. 2019. Effect of γ-aminobutyric acid on photosynthetic characteristics and carbohydrate metabolism under high temperature stress in perennial ryegrass. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 28:168−78

    doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018167

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Xu Q, Huang B, Wang Z. 2004. Effects of extended daylength on shoot growth and carbohydrate metabolism for creeping bentgrass exposed to heat stress. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 129:193−97

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.129.2.0193

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Sadok W, Lopez JR, Smith KP. 2021. Transpiration increases under high-temperature stress: potential mechanisms, trade-offs and prospects for crop resilience in a warming world. Plant, Cell & Environment 44:2102−16

    doi: 10.1111/pce.13970

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Scafaro AP, Fan Y, Posch BC, Garcia A, Coast O, et al. 2021. Responses of leaf respiration to heatwaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 44:2090−101

    doi: 10.1111/pce.14018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Jiang Y, Huang B. 2001. Physiological responses to heat stress alone or in combination with drought: a comparison between tall fescue and perennial ryegrass. HortScience 36:682−86

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.36.4.682

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Ozturk M, Turkyilmaz Unal B, García-Caparrós P, Khursheed A, Gul A, et al. 2021. Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants. Physiologia Plantarum 172:1321−35

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.13297

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Jiang J, Guo Z, Sun X, Jiang Y, Xie F, et al. 2023. Role of proline in regulating turfgrass tolerance to abiotic stress. Grass Research 3:2

    doi: 10.48130/GR-2023-0002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Sheikh-Mohamadi MH, Etemadi N, Arab M. 2018. Correlation of heat and cold tolerance in Iranian tall fescue ecotypes with reactive oxygen species scavenging and osmotic adjustment. HortScience 53:1062−68

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI13088-18

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Xia F, Han Z, Zhu H, Dong K, Du L. 2020. Comparison of osmoprotectants and antioxidant enzymes of different wild Kentucky bluegrass in Shanxi province under high-temperature stress. European Journal of Horticultural Sciences 85:284−92

    Google Scholar

    [49]

    Rossi S, Chapman C, Huang B. 2020. Suppression of heat-induced leaf senescence by γ-aminobutyric acid, proline, and ammonium nitrate through regulation of chlorophyll degradation in creeping bentgrass. Environmental and Experimental Botany 177:104116

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104116

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Chan Z, Zhang H, Liu M. 2019. Roles of plant growth regulators during abiotic stress responses of turfgrass and forage. Pratacultural Science 36:3007−23

    doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2019-0510

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Wani SH, Kumar V, Shriram V, Sah SK. 2016. Phytohormones and their metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. The Crop Journal 4:162−76

    doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.01.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Li N, Euring D, Cha JY, Lin Z, Lu M, et al. 2021. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of heat tolerance in response to global climate change. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:627969

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.627969

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Li M, Jannasch AH, Jiang Y. 2020. Growth and hormone alterations in response to heat stress in perennial ryegrass accessions differing in heat tolerance. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 39:1022−29

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-019-10043-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Xu Y, Huang B. 2007. Heat-induced leaf senescence and hormonal changes for thermal bentgrass and turf-type bentgrass species differing in heat tolerance. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 132:185−92

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.132.2.185

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Li F, Zhan D, Xu L, Han L, Zhang X. 2014. Antioxidant and hormone responses to heat stress in two Kentucky bluegrass cultivars contrasting in heat tolerance. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 139:587−96

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.139.5.587

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Li Q, He Y, Tu M, Yan J, Yu L, et al. 2019. Transcriptome sequencing of two Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) genotypes in response to heat Stress. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 47:328−38

    doi: 10.15835/nbha47111365

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Wang Y, Dai Y, Tao X, Wang J, Cheng H, et al. 2015. Heat shock factor genes of tall fescue and perennial ryegrass in response to temperature stress by RNA-Seq analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:1226

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Li Z, Cheng B, Zeng W, Liu Z, Peng Y. 2019. The transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation in perennial creeping bentgrass in response to γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and heat stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 162:515−24

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.03.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Wang K, Liu Y, Tian J, Huang K, Shi T, et al. 2017. Transcriptional profiling and identification of heat-responsive genes in perennial ryegrass by RNA-sequencing. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1032

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Andrási N, Pettkó-Szandtner A, Szabados L. 2021. Diversity of plant heat shock factors: regulation, interactions, and functions. Journal of Experimental Botany 72:1558−75

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa576

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Ohama N, Sato H, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2017. Transcriptional regulatory network of plant heat stress response. Trends in Plant Science 22:53−65

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Scharf KD, Berberich T, Ebersberger I, Nover L. 2012. The plant heat stress transcription factor (Hsf) family: structure, function and evolution. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1819:104−19

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.10.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Sun T, Wang W, Hu X, Fang Z, Wang Y, et al. 2022. Genome-wide identification of heat shock transcription factor families in perennial ryegrass highlights the role of LpHSFC2b in heat stress response. Physiologia Plantarum 174:e13828

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.13828

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Wang X, Huang W, Liu J, Yang Z, Huang B. 2017. Molecular regulation and physiological functions of a novel FaHsfA2c cloned from tall fescue conferring plant tolerance to heat stress. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15:237−48

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12609

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Ma G, Shen J, Yu H, Huang X, Deng X, et al. 2022. Genome-wide identification and functional analyses of heat shock transcription factors involved in heat and drought stresses in ryegrass. Environmental and Experimental Botany 201:104968

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104968

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Zhuang L, Cao W, Wang J, Yu J, Yang Z, et al. 2018. Characterization and functional analysis of FaHsfC1b from Festuca arundinacea conferring heat tolerance in Arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:2702

    doi: 10.3390/ijms19092702

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    ul Haq S, Khan A, Ali M, Khattak AM, Gai WX, et al. 2019. Heat shock proteins: dynamic biomolecules to counter plant biotic and abiotic stresses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:5321

    doi: 10.3390/ijms20215321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A. 2004. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends in Plant Science 9:244−52

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Kotak S, Larkindale J, Lee U, von Koskull-Döring P, Vierling E, et al. 2007. Complexity of the heat stress response in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10:310−16

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Kim KH, Alam I, Kim YG, Sharmin SA, Lee KW, et al. 2012. Overexpression of a chloroplast-localized small heat shock protein OsHSP26 confers enhanced tolerance against oxidative and heat stresses in tall fescue. Biotechnology Letters 34:371−77

    doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0769-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Bi A, Wang T, Wang G, Zhang L, Wassie M, et al. 2021. Stress memory gene FaHSP17.8-CII controls thermotolerance via remodeling PSII and ROS signaling in tall fescue. Plant Physiology 187:1163−76

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab205

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Sun X, Huang N, Li X, Zhu J, Bian X, et al. 2021. A chloroplast heat shock protein modulates growth and abiotic stress response in creeping bentgrass. Plant, Cell & Environment 44:1769−87

    doi: 10.1111/pce.14031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Wang J, Zhuang L, Zhang J, Yu J, Yang Z, et al. 2019. Identification and characterization of novel homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-Zip) transcription factors associated with heat tolerance in perennial ryegrass. Environmental and Experimental Botany 160:1−11

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.12.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Huang K, Liu Y, Shi Y, Tian J, Shi T, et al. 2022. Overexpression of TaMBF1c improves thermo-tolerance of perennial ryegrass. Scientia Horticulturae 295:110812

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110812

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Lei S, Yu G, Rossi S, Yu J, Huang B. 2021. LpNOL-knockdown suppression of heat-induced leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass involving regulation of amino acid and organic acid metabolism. Physiologia Plantarum 173:1979−91

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.13541

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Zhang J, Li H, Jiang Y, Li H, Zhang Z, et al. 2020. Natural variation of physiological traits, molecular markers, and chlorophyll catabolic genes associated with heat tolerance in perennial ryegrass accessions. BMC Plant Biology 20:520

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02695-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Khraiwesh B, Zhu JK, Zhu J. 2012. Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1819:137−48

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.05.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Amini Z, Salehi H, Chehrazi M, Etemadi M, Xiang M. 2023. miRNAs and their target genes play a critical role in response to heat stress in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Molecular Biotechnology 65:2004−17

    doi: 10.1007/s12033-023-00713-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Liao Z, Ghanizadeh H, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Huang L, et al. 2023. Exogenous methyl jasmonate mediated miRNA-mRNA network improves heat tolerance of perennial ryegrass. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24:11085

    doi: 10.3390/ijms241311085

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Taier G, Hang N, Shi T, Liu Y, Ye W, et al. 2021. Ectopic expression of Os-miR408 improves thermo-tolerance of perennial ryegrass. Agronomy 11:1930

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy11101930

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Zhao J, Yuan S, Zhou M, Yuan N, Li Z, et al. 2019. Transgenic creeping bentgrass overexpressing Osa‐miR393a exhibits altered plant development and improved multiple stress tolerance. Plant Biotechnology Journal 17:233−51

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12960

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Li H, Hu T, Amombo E, Fu J. 2017. Genome-wide identification of heat stress-responsive small RNAs in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) by high-throughput sequencing. Journal of Plant Physiology 213:157−65

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.03.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Balazadeh S. 2022. A 'hot' cocktail: the multiple layers of thermomemory in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 65:102147

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102147

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Xu S, He X, Chen W, Li J, Zhang J. 2008. Effects of heat acclimation on high-temperature stress resistance and heattolerance mechanism of Festuca arundinacea and Lolium perenne. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28:162−71

    Google Scholar

    [85]

    Chan Z, Hu T, Wang Z, Shao A, Han L, et al. 2023. Research progress, future challenge and development trend of turf science. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China 37:623−31

    doi: 10.16262/j.cnki.1000-8217.2023.04.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Driedonks N, Rieu I, Vriezen WH. 2016. Breeding for plant heat tolerance at vegetative and reproductive stages. Plant Reproduction 29:67−79

    doi: 10.1007/s00497-016-0275-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Meyer WA, Hoffman L, Bonos SA. 2017. Breeding cool-season turfgrass cultivars for stress tolerance and sustainability in a changing environment. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal 13:3−10

    doi: 10.2134/itsrj2016.09.0806

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Zhang W, Dewey RE, Boss W, Phillippy BQ, Qu R. 2013. Enhanced Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiencies in monocot cells is associated with attenuated defense responses. Plant Molecular Biology 81:273−86

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9997-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Wang Z, Ge Y. 2005. Agrobacterium-mediated high efficiency transformation of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Journal of Plant Physiology 162:103−13

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.07.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Luo H, Hu Q, Nelson K, Longo C, Kausch AP, et al. 2004. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) transformation using phosphinothricin selection results in a high frequency of single-copy transgene integration. Plant Cell Reports 22:645−52

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-003-0734-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Zhang K, Wang J, Hu X, Yang A, Zhang J. 2010. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of shoot apices of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) and production of transgenic plants carrying a betA gene. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 102:135−43

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9713-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Zhang Y, Ran Y, Nagy I, Lenk I, Qiu J, et al. 2020. Targeted mutagenesis in ryegrass (Lolium spp.) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:1854

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13359

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Ha SB, Wu FS, Thorne TK. 1992. Transgenic turf-type tall fescue (Festuca amndinacea Schreb.) plants regenerated from protoplasts. Plant Cell Reports 11:601−04

    doi: 10.1007/BF00236381

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Xie Y, Haq SIU, Jiang X, Zheng D, Feng N, et al. 2022. Plant genome editing: CRISPR, base editing, prime editing, and beyond. Grassland Research 1:234−43

    doi: 10.1002/glr2.12034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Yao J, Hao H, Zhang J, Xu B. 2023. The use of the tRNA-sgRNA/Cas9 system for gene editing in perennial ryegrass protoplasts. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 32:129−41

    doi: 10.11686/cyxb2022180

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Zhang L, Wang T, Wang G, Bi A, Wassie M, et al. 2021. Simultaneous gene editing of three homoeoalleles in self-incompatible allohexaploid grasses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 63:1410−15

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Wu X, Feng H, Wu D, Yan S, Zhang P, et al. 2021. Using high-throughput multiple optical phenotyping to decipher the genetic architecture of maize drought tolerance. Genome Biology 22:185

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02377-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Kim SL, Kim N, Lee H, Lee E, Cheon KS, et al. 2020. High-throughput phenotyping platform for analyzing drought tolerance in rice. Planta 252:38

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03436-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Sun T, Wang W, Chan Z. 2024. How do cool-season turfgrasses respond to high temperature: progress and challenges. Grass Research 4: e010 doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0008
    Sun T, Wang W, Chan Z. 2024. How do cool-season turfgrasses respond to high temperature: progress and challenges. Grass Research 4: e010 doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0008

Figures(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(721) PDF downloads(107)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

How do cool-season turfgrasses respond to high temperature: progress and challenges

Grass Research  4 Article number: e010  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The utilization of cool-season turfgrasses is widespread in urban greening, ecological restoration, and sports fields. The primary limiting factor affecting its growth and application is considered to be high temperature stress. Under heat stress condition, a range of physiological and morphological traits will be modulated in cool-season turfgrasses, resulting in a deterioration of lawn quality and subsequently impacting the ornamental and functional value of lawns. In this review, we summarize physiological and morphological changes in cool-season turfgrasses caused by high temperature stress. The research progress in molecular characterization of high temperature regulatory networks was further summarized. Approaches for improving cool-season turfgrasses thermotolerance were proposed. We further put forward challenges and perspectives of research on heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses, aiming to provide references for the research on characterization of heat tolerance mechanism and breeding heat tolerant cold-season turfgrass.

    • Turfgrasses are divided into cool-season and warm-season turfgrasses according to the differences in climate types of origin. The optimum temperature range for cool-season turfgrasses aboveground parts is approximately 15−24 °C, and that for underground parts is approximately 10−18 °C[1]. Cool-season turfgrasses are mainly distributed in cool and humid, semi-humid, semi-arid and transitional zones. They have the characteristics of dark green leaves, and good adaptation to cold stress[2]. Commonly used cool-season turfgrass species include Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera).

      High temperature is one of the important environmental factors limiting the management and growth of cool-season turfgrasses. When the ambient temperature exceeds 30 °C, it hampers the growth of cool-season turfgrasses, leading to leaf wilting, yellowing, and even seedling mortality[3]. The cool-season turfgrasses in temperate and transitional zones are highly sensitive to extreme heat in the summer season. High temperature leads to the decrease of ornamental value and increase of maintenance cost of cool-season turfgrasses, which severely hinders the promotion and application of cool-season turfgrasses, posing an urgent challenge in turf production. The cultivation of heat-tolerant varieties is therefore the foremost priority in temperate and transitional zones. It is crucial to investigate the physiological and biochemical characteristics of cool-season turfgrasses in response to high temperatures, elucidate heat-tolerance-associated genes and proteins, and unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying the heat-tolerance response. In this review, the research progress of morphological and physiological changes induced by high temperature in cool-season turfgrass species were summarized, as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms governing the response to heat stress. Furthermore, potential strategies for enhancing the heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses were also explored.

    • Elevated ambient temperatures lead to suboptimal conditions for the growth of cool-season turfgrasses, resulting in reduced seed germination rates, decreased root vitality and tillering, wilting and yellowing leaves, and the occurrence of dead seedlings (Fig. 1). The seeds of three perennial ryegrass varieties, namely 'Yatsyn', 'Nui', and 'Mathilde', exhibited a significant decrease in germination rates when subjected to different temperatures. Specifically, the germination rates at 36 °C were only 3.3%, 29.7%, and 1.6% for three perennial ryegrass varieties, respectively, whereas that at 25 °C was 100%[4]. Previous studies have shown that the root growth and viability of tall fescue and creeping bentgrass decreased significantly under high temperature stress[57]. The tiller density (tiller number per unit area) of two varieties of creeping bentgrass ('L-93' and 'Penncross') experienced a significant reduction under high temperature treatment[8]. Tiller density is one of the important indexes to evaluate the turfgrass quality. The heat tolerance comparison among four representative cool-season turfgrasses species revealed that the turfgrasses initially exhibited leaf wilting and the emergence of dead spots, and ultimately leading to diminished grass cover and root growth under natural high temperature conditions[9]. The leaf senescence symptoms (such as chlorophyll decreases, leaf yellowing) of creeping bentgrass, perennial ryegrass, and bluegrass can also be induced by high temperatures[1012]. The stay-green phenotype (leaves remain green phenotype for a long time) is one of the ornamental traits for evaluating the turfgrass quality. Heat sensitivity of cool-season turfgrass causes leaf senescence in summer season which increases turf management cost and limits the application of cool-season turfgrasses. Therefore, breeding of varieties with an improved stay-green trait in the summer season is highly required.

      Figure 1. 

      Morphological and physiological characteristics of cool-season turfgrasses under heat stress.

    • Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are an array of highly active molecular oxygen derivatives[13]. The generation of ROS primarily occurs in chloroplasts photosystem system I and photosystem system II, and when photorespiration is activated, peroxisomes also produce ROS[14]. High temperature can induce a substantial accumulation of ROS in plants, which changes the properties of membrane proteins and membrane lipids, inducing lipid peroxidation and enzyme inactivation, thus increasing membrane permeability, causing damage to plants[13,14]. Simultaneously, plant cells possess a repertoire of enzymatic defense mechanisms, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), etc[3,14]. Therefore, the changes of ROS levels and antioxidant enzyme activities are employed as crucial criteria for assessing the thermotolerance of cool-season turfgrasses. For example, the heat-tolerant varieties of creeping bentgrass, perennial ryegrass, and tall fescue exhibit decreased ROS levels, reduced lipid peroxidation, increased membrane stability as well as antioxidant enzyme (SOD, POD, and CAT) activity when compared with heat-sensitive ones under high temperature stress[1517]. Similarly, heat-tolerant warm-season turfgrasses showed higher ROS removal capacity due to higher antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT) activity when compared with heat-sensitive cool-season turfgrasses under high temperature stress[18,19]. After high temperature treatment, the activities of CAT, SOD and POD in perennial ryegrass initially increased before subsequently decreasing[17]. SOD, POD, and CAT function as effective ROS scavengers to detoxify overproduced ROS and maintain oxidative balance in plant cells, which helps to improve the heat tolerance and ornamental performance of cool-season turfgrasses[20].

    • The primary impact of high temperature stress on plants is the impairment of cell membrane integrity and the elevation of plasma membrane permeability. Cell membranes, composed of lipids and proteins, are highly organized structures and considered to be the most temperature-sensitive components in plant cells[21,22]. High temperature stress causes damage to the membrane structure, resulting in the disintegration of membrane lipids and an increase in fluidity, permeability, and loss of cell electrolytes[22]. Malondialdehyde (MDA), a byproduct of peroxidation in unsaturated fatty acids, serves as a crucial indicator for assessing the extent of lipid membrane peroxidation[23]. Under high temperature stress, a substantial quantity of superoxide free radicals, hydroxyl free radicals, and MDA accumulate in plant cells, which leads to alterations in membrane proteins and membrane lipids, resulting in increased membrane permeability and damage to plants[24]. Previous studies have shown that the heat-tolerant varieties of tall fescue and creeping bentgrass stocks exhibited lower MDA content, lower lipid peroxidation level and higher membrane stability under high temperature stress than those in heat sensitive ones[2527].

      Fatty acids play crucial roles as integral components within cellular membranes, the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi apparatus, and chloroplast[28,29]. Under high temperature stress, a large amount of ROS accumulate in plants, which leads to the oxidation of fatty acids, causes the change of the composition and saturation of fatty acids, and disrupts the structure of phospholipid bimolecular layer, thus increasing fluidity and permeability, destroying the integrity of the membrane, increasing the leakage of organic and inorganic ions in the cells, thereby affecting plant heat tolerance[29,30]. The fatty acid content of tall fescue heat-tolerant varieties was significantly lower than that of heat-sensitive varieties under high temperature stress[25]. The content of saturated fatty acids in the leaves of creeping bentgrass increased proportionally with the duration of high temperature treatment[27]. Previous studies have further shown that high levels of saturated fatty acids is helpful to reduce the damage of high temperature to plant cell membrane[25,31]. Therefore, regulation of fatty acid metabolism provides new approaches to maintain cell membrane stability under high temperature condition for cool-season turfgrasses.

    • Photosynthesis is one of the most heat-sensitive physiological processes in plants[32]. Under high temperature stress, the thylakoid membrane structure of plant chloroplasts and the thermal stability of each component within the photosynthetic system are changed, the photochemical reactions in the thylakoid and carbon metabolism in the chloroplast matrix are impaired[24,33,34]. Moreover, the chlorophyll and photosynthetic pigment content, the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II, transpiration rate, photosynthetic rate and activities of membrane-associated enzymes are inhibited, thus reducing the photosynthetic rate of plants under heat stress condition[24,3336]. Zhang et al. found that knockdown of perennial ryegrass STAY-GREEN (SGR) gene resulted in heat sensitivity as evidenced by degradation of photosystem protein (including Lhca3, Lhcb1/2/3/5, PsaA, PsbA (D1), PsbD (D2) and RbcL), decrease of the photosystem II quantum yield, and increase of energy dissipation level when compared to wild type (WT)[37]. Bi et al. observed that the potential to protect the photosystem II of heat-tolerant tall fescue varieties was higher than that of heat-sensitive varieties due to increased gene expression of PsbA (encoding protein subunits of photosystem II core reaction center complex) under high temperature stress[16]. Overexpression of creeping bentgrass SMALL HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 17 (HSP17) reduced heat tolerance in Arabidopsis by reducing chlorophyll and inhibiting plant photosynthesis[38]. In the above studies, a positive correlation between heat tolerance and photosynthesis efficiency of cool-season turfgrasses was observed, which indicated that maintaining high photosynthesis efficiency was very important to improve heat tolerance of plants.

      Carbohydrates serve as a crucial intermediary storage product bridging the gap between photosynthesis and growth utilization, not only providing energy for plant growth and development, but also playing a pivotal role in regulating plant stress tolerance[39]. High temperature will destroy the carbon assimilation process in photosynthesis and the carbon consumption process in respiration, while long-term exposure to high temperature will lead to carbon consumption or starvation of plants, thus limiting the growth of cool-season turfgrasses[20]. Studies have shown that under high temperature stress conditions, carbohydrates including glucose, sucrose, and starch in perennial ryegrass[40], tall fescue[25], creeping bentgrass[41], kentucky bluegrass[26], Festuca rubra[26] and Trifolium repens[26] accumulated, and heat-tolerant varieties exhibited higher carbohydrate contents than that in heat-sensitive varieties. These results indicated that carbon metabolism was closely related to heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses. However, the molecular mechanism of carbon metabolism during heat stress response of cool-season turfgrasses is still unclear.

    • In the early stage of heat stress, transpiration of plant leaves increases, and water vapor is released to the environment through stomata to reduce leaf temperature[42]. With the prolonged duration of high temperature, the water evaporation of plant leaves is excessive, and the stomata is gradually reduced or closed, followed by declined transpiration, and photosynthesis[42,43]. Similar results were observed in perennial ryegrass and tall fescue, where transpiration rates increased during the first 9 d of heat stress[44]. Under the condition of sufficient soil moisture, the increase of plant transpiration can effectively reduce leaf temperature, so as to maintain plant physiological function at high temperature stress. Under high temperature stress, plants adjust cellular osmotic pressure through accumulation of compatible solutes, which are a group of highly soluble organic molecules acting as osmoprotectants to stabilize cellular proteins[24]. The compatible solutes not only serve as a stress signal, but also play crucial roles in mitigating the stress-induced plant injury possibly by maintaining photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme activity, and nonenzymatic antioxidant compound levels, thereby reducing ROS content and enhancing plant cell osmotic potential[45,46]. Under high temperature stress, the increase of osmoprotectants in plants can effectively buffer the water loss caused by transpiration, thus maintaining the physiological function of cells and reducing the damage of high temperature to plants[46]. The content of soluble sugar and proline significantly increased in Kentucky bluegrass, perennial ryegrass, and tall fescue under high temperature stress, and heat-tolerant varieties demonstrated superior growth rates, tiller numbers and antioxidant activity, and also exhibited higher soluble sugar and proline contents than those in heat-sensitive varieties[17,4648]. Exogenous application of proline may enhance heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass by increasing endogenous proline content[49]. Therefore, understanding the regulatory mechanism of compatible solutes (such as soluble sugar and proline) will help improve the heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses.

    • Phytohormones, such as auxin, abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), jasmonate acids, cytokinin (CTK) and ethylene (ET), serve as crucial endogenous signaling molecules in plants and play pivotal roles in regulating plant growth and development as well as abiotic stress responses[5055]. Li et al. investigated the alterations in endogenous hormone levels in heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive varieties of perennial ryegrass under high temperature stress, and observed that maintaining appropriate levels of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), and SA, as well as delaying the increase in ABA content and the decrease in gibberellin content, may contribute to enhancing the thermotolerance of perennial ryegrass[53]. The ABA content exhibited an initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease in creeping bentgrass under high temperature stress, whereas the ET and CTK contents gradually declined[54]. The ABA content in Kentucky bluegrass gradually increased under high temperature stress, while the IAA content exhibited an initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease[55]. Exogenous ABA, SA, CTK, and ET significantly enhanced the heat tolerance of various cool-season turfgrasses (Supplemental Table S1). ABA, ET and SA function as pivotal hormones in plant response to abiotic stress including heat through regulating stress responsive genes and senescence related genes, whereas IAA and CTK are important hormones in maintaining plant growth under heat stress condition[5053]. Hormone metabolisms are complex and the homeostasis of endogenous hormones is important for proper growth and development of cool-season turfgrasses under heat stress condition.

    • With the rapid development of next-generation sequencing technology, high-throughput RNA sequencing has become extensively employed in investigating the stress response mechanism of turfgrasses. Currently, transcriptomic methods have been employed by researchers to investigate the response of Kentucky bluegrass[56], tall fescue[19,57], creeping bentgrass[58], and perennial ryegrass[17,57,59] as well as other cool-season turfgrass species to high temperature stress. These studies aim to elucidate key genes involved in the response and explore the molecular mechanisms underlying turfgrass adaptation to high temperature.

      Qiong et al. conducted transcriptome analysis on two Kentucky bluegrass varieties subjected to 40 °C stress and observed that heat-sensitive Kentucky bluegrass exhibited a higher number of up-regulated differentially expressed genes than that of heat-tolerant variety, including HEAT STRESS TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS (HSFs, such as HSFA2, HSFA3, HSFB1 and HSFC1) and HEAT SHOCK PROTEINS (HSPs, such as HSP70 and HSP81)[56]. Liu et al. conducted transcriptome analysis of tall fescue and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) under 42 °C stress, and found that high temperature stress induced the specific expression of F-box genes and ABA pathway genes in tall fescue[19]. The transcriptomic analysis of creeping bentgrass in response to high temperature stress revealed a close association between the heat tolerance and expressions changes of four miRNA, including cca-miR156b, miR398s, aly-miR159c-3p and ata-miR408-3p[58]. The transcriptome data of perennial ryegrass after heat stress treatment showed that genes involving in antioxidant response, plant hormones, signal transduction, and cellular metabolic pathways were enriched under high temperature stress[59]. Although a large number of genes related to heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses have been identified and cloned based on RNA sequencing, the detailed functions and regulatory mechanisms of these genes during turfgrass heat stress response remain to be characterized.

    • Plant HSFs are the most important components of transcriptional regulatory networks in response to high temperature stress[60]. Under high temperature conditions, plant HSFs activate heat stress-responsive genes (HSRs) by binding to heat shock elements (HSEs, 5'-nGAAnnTTCn-3') in HSRs promoters, thereby enhancing plant heat tolerance[60,61]. The heat stress-responsive genes encompass HSPs and other molecular chaperones, ROS scavenging enzymes, metabolic balance-protecting enzymes, plant hormone synthesis-related enzymes, and other transcription factors[60,61]. Based on the characteristics of DNA-binding domain and oligomerization domain in its amino acid sequence, HSFs can be divided into three classes: A, B and C. HSFA and HSFC have similar functions, often acting as positive regulators of high temperature stress, while HSFB mainly acts as inhibitors[60,62]. In total, 25 HSFs have been systematically identified in perennial ryegrass, and nine HSF genes were significantly induced by high temperature stress[63]. Seventy-four HSF genes were identified in tall fescue based on transcriptome data, and 34 HSF genes were significantly induced at high temperature stress[57]. The overexpression of tall fescue FaHSFA2c has been shown to enhance the heat tolerance of both tall fescue and Arabidopsis, as well as restore the heat-sensitive phenotype observed in Arabidopsis hsfa2 mutants[64]. Italian ryegrass (L. multiflorum) LmHSFA5 enhanced plant heat and drought tolerance by activating the expression of LmHSP18.2 and LmAPX2[65]. The heat tolerance function of class C HSF gene in cool-season turfgrasses has been recently investigated. Overexpression of perennial ryegrass LpHSFC1b and LpHSFC2b and tall fescue FaHSFC1b increased the heat tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis and activated the expression of downstream heat stress response genes[17,63,66]. The above results indicate that HSFs are closely related to heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses, and functional characterization of HSFs target genes provides further clues to understand heat stress response to high temperature.

      Heat shock proteins play a crucial role as molecular chaperones in plant thermoregulatory networks, facilitating the refolding or degradation of denatured proteins[67]. HSPs can be classified into five classes based on their molecular weight: HSP100, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, and small heat shock proteins[68,69]. Heterologous expression of rice (Oryza sativa) OsHSP26 significantly enhanced the antioxidant and heat tolerance of tall fescue[70]. Tall fescue FaHSP17.8-CII enhances plant heat tolerance by modulating transcriptional memory by remodeling photosystem II and ROS signaling[71]. Creeping bentgrass AsHSP26.8 negatively regulates plant heat tolerance by regulating auxin related genes, HSPs, HSFs and other stress-related genes[72].

      In addition to HSF genes, other family genes also play an important role in the plant transcriptional regulation network at high temperature, such as F-box, MULTIPROTEIN-BRIDGING FACTOR 1c (MBF1C), NON-YELLOW COLORING 1 (NYC1), STAYGREEN (SGR) and HOMEOBOX (HOX) genes (Fig. 2)[12,19,37,7375]. Heterologous expression of tall fescue and bermudagrass F-box genes significantly increased the heat tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis[19]. Heterologous expression of wheat (Triticum aestivum) TaMBF1C significantly increased the heat tolerance of perennial ryegrass[74]. Zhang et al. conducted heat tolerance identification and molecular marker experiments on 98 varieties of perennial ryegrass, revealing a close association between heat tolerance and four chlorophyll catabolism genes (NYC1, NYC1-like (NOL), SGR, and PHEOPHYTINASE (PPH))[76]. Subsequent investigations demonstrated that the interference of NOL and SGR in perennial ryegrass could effectively delay heat-induced leaf senescence and enhance leaf greenness retention[12,37,75]. The expression levels of HOX6, HOX8, and HOX24 in perennial ryegrass exhibited a negative correlation with heat stress, whereas the expression levels of HOX21 showed a positive correlation with heat stress[73]. These studies characterized the detailed functions of heat stress responsive genes and provide genetic resources for molecular breeding of heat tolerant cool-season turfgrasses in the future.

      Figure 2. 

      The regulatory network involved in heat stress response in cool-season turfgrasses. Heat stress induces expression of heat stress-related genes (HSFs, F-box, MBF1C, HOXs, etc) or miRNA, which controls the expression of downstream genes to regulate plant heat tolerance. HSFs, heat stress transcription factor family genes; MBF1C, multiprotein-bridging factor 1c; HOX21, HOMEOBOX gene 21; miRNA, microRNAs.

    • The microRNAs, as small noncoding regulatory RNAs, perform posttranscriptional regulation by facilitating mRNA degradation (Fig. 2)[77]. miRNAs have been demonstrated to play a pivotal role in the response of turfgrass to high temperature stress[58,7882]. Li et al. found that the expression profiles of miRNA in the two genotypes of tall fescue were significantly different through small RNA sequencing, and identified four miRNAs (including miR7758, miR5568c-5p, miR5813, and miR9774) significantly induced by high temperature[82]. Analysis of creeping bentgrass small RNA data revealed that nine miRNAs (including miR398s, cca-miR156b, aly-miR159c-3p, ata-miR408-3p, vvi-miR845c, ama-miR156, novel-24223, novel-2964, and novel-10098) were closely related to heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass[58]. Based on the comprehensive analysis of transcriptome and small RNA data, the miRNA-RNA regulated heat tolerance network in perennial ryegrass was constructed, and 20 miRNAs (such as miR5658-z, miR5185-y, miR1144-z, novel-m0258-5p, novel-m0163-3p and novel-m0008-5p) and their corresponding 51 target genes (such as LpCOMT, LpLOX, LpPPH, LpNAC, LpDDP and LpLAC) were identified to be involved in the regulation of heat tolerance in perennial ryegrass[79]. Ectopic expression of rice OsmiR408 significantly enhanced the thermotolerance of perennial ryegrass[80]. Rice OsmiR393 may increase the heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass by regulating the expression of AsHSP17 and AsHSP26.7[81]. Small RNA sequencing identified a large number of miRNAs and target genes involving in heat stress response in cool-season turfgrasses[82]. The data showed that small RNAs and their targets were extensively changed under heat stress condition. Although a large number of miRNAs related to heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses have been identified based on small RNA sequencing technology, functions and mechanisms of miRNA regulated pathways need to be characterized in cool-season turfgrasses under heat stress condition.

    • Several cultivation and maintenance management strategies enhanced the heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses, including application of exogenous small molecule substances or microorganisms, optimization of nutrient and water management, and stress acclimation[50,2]. Exogenous application of phytohormones and growth regulators proved to effectively enhance the heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses, including abscisic acid, melatonin, polyamines, cytokinin, salicylic acid, brassinosteroids, ethylene, gibberellin, strigolactones, jasmonate acids and paclobutrazole. Additionally, osmoregulatory substances (proline), inorganic substances (calcium and silicon), gas molecules (nitric oxide and carbon dioxide), other small molecules (γ-aminobutyric acid, inorganic nitrogen, ascorbic acid, citric acid, butanediol and hydrogen peroxide) and microorganisms (Arbuscular mycorrhizal and Aspergillus aculeatus) also showed protective effects on heat stress tolerance in cool-season turfgrasses (for details, see Supplemental Table S1 and associated references). Previous studies have shown that heat acclimation enhanced plants tolerance to high temperature, that is, plants can acquire stress memory through short-term heat stress treatment to survive under long-term and more severe heat stress condition[70,83,84]. High temperature acclimation diminished chloroplast damage and decreased the contents of antioxidant ascorbic acid and glutathione in tall fescue and perennial ryegrass, thereby improving the heat tolerance of plants[84]. Attention should be paid to the fact that these research results were obtained under laboratory conditions. However, the heat tolerances of cool-season turfgrasses were affected by many factors such as environment and management. Therefore, further field experiments are needed to test these research results.

    • The conventional breeding method serves as the fundamental approach for cultivating new turfgrass varieties that possess superior heat tolerance and agronomic characteristics[85]. Conventional breeding approaches typically relies on phenotypic selection associated with heat tolerance, enabling the successful transfer of heat-tolerant traits to specific varieties exhibiting favorable agronomic characteristics through accurate evaluation and selection of exceptional tolerant varieties or breeding lines[21,86]. The effects of high temperature on seed germination rate, tiller number, growth rate, root activity, chlorophyll, soluble sugar and proline content in leaves of cool-season turfgrass can be used as an important index to evaluate the heat resistance of cool-season turfgrass. At present, numerous turfgrass varieties with exceptional quality were obtained through conventional breeding. For example, Oregro Seeds Inc (Albany, NY, USA) used tall fescue 'K31' and other tall fescue varieties ('Stargrazer', 'Orygun' and 'Fawn') as parents to breed 'K32' varieties which can adapt to extensive maintenance conditions and have excellent durability. In the US, germiplasms of cool season turfgrass with improved heat stress tolerance were screened and selected at two different research farms, including tall fescue, perennial ryegrass and bentgrass species[87]. Therefore, many widely used cool season turfgrass come from conventional breeding approaches.

      The utilization of genetic engineering in breeding heat-tolerant turfgrass is a more efficient and time-saving approach compared to conventional breeding methods. However, genetic engineering breeding may cause serious ecological crisis due to genetic drift, and the safety of transgenic plants must be considered. The presence of an efficient genetic transformation system is the prerequisite and basis for molecular breeding in turfgrass. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation method has been successfully applied in perennial ryegrass[88], tall fescue[89], creeping bentgrass[90], and Kentucky bluegrass[91]. In addition, gene gun transformation was also successfully applied in perennial ryegrass[92], tall fescue[93]. The CRISPR/Cas9 system can realize accurate improvement of plant stress tolerance, yield and quality through precise editing of a genome, which can greatly promote the creation of heat-tolerant germplasm of turfgrass[94]. The establishment and application of CRISPR/Cas9 system for perennial ryegrass and tall fescue have also been successfully accomplished[92,95,96]. The application of CRISPR/Cas9 system and genetic transformation technology in cool-season turfgrasses could not only shorten the breeding process and improve the breeding efficiency, but accurately improve the ecological adaptability and ornamental quality of turfgrass. The efficient application of CRISPR/Cas9 systems requires high-quality genomes as a support. With the continuous updates of high throughput sequencing technology, more genome data of cool-season turfgrasses will be released to promote the genetic engineering breeding of turfgrasses.

    • Numerous studies have been conducted on the heat tolerance of cool-season turfgrasses to primarily focus on the evaluation of heat tolerance, growth and development, physiological and biochemical aspects. However, the transcriptional regulatory network of turfgrass in response to heat stress still needs to be further characterized. Considering the fact that plant response to high temperature is a highly intricate process encompassing complex transcriptional regulation, posttranscriptional regulation, epigenetic regulation, as well as protein and metabolite balance, it becomes feasible to employ a combination of genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics for systematic characterization of regulatory networks in response to high temperature and delving deeper into pivotal genes associated with heat tolerance. The results of these studies will provide genetic resources and serve as a reference for breeding new turfgrass varieties exhibiting high heat tolerance and exceptional agronomic traits.

      Currently, despite the existence of numerous studies on exogenous substances mitigating high temperature stress in cool-season turfgrasses, the majority studies predominantly concentrated on individual plant hormones or small molecules, the evaluation of germplasm thermotolerance, and physiological level changes in response to heat stress. Less attention was paid regarding genes associated with plant hormone metabolic pathways and their molecular mechanisms within high temperature regulation networks. In the future, a comprehensive molecular analysis on how exogenous substances regulate the heat tolerance of turfgrass is worthy to be conducted. These efforts will contribute to establishing a solid theoretical foundation for both turfgrass maintenance and tolerance breeding.

      The findings from studies on other plant species should also be extrapolated to turfgrasses. For instance, the overexpression of wheat TaMBF1C and rice OsmiR408 in perennial ryegrass has been shown to significantly enhance the thermotolerance of transgenic perennial ryegrass[74,80]. Turfgrass can be categorized into cool-season turfgrasses and warm-season turfgrasses based on their climate and regional origins. To explore the key regulatory genes associated with heat tolerance traits in these two types of turfgrass, a systematic comparison utilizing genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomics techniques may serve as an effective approach to uncovering their natural differences in heat tolerance.

      Research on turfgrass heat tolerance necessitates accurate phenotypic identification. The evaluation system for heat tolerance (for example, measurements of electrolyte leakage, malondialdehyde, chlorophyll, proline and antioxidant enzyme activities) has drawbacks due to low measurement accuracy, destructiveness, time and effort requirements, and limited applicability. These limitations fail to meet the demands of rapidly advancing turfgrass tolerance research and significantly impede the exploration of heat-tolerant resources in turfgrass. A systematic high-throughput phenotyping platform developed for maize[97] and rice[98] has the potential to be established in turfgrass. Subsequently, the high-flux turfgrass phenotyping platform for cool-season turfgrasses could be established using advanced technologies such as visible light imaging, spectral imaging, thermal imaging, fluorescence imaging, and other cutting-edge techniques. This system aims to achieve accurate identification of plant phenotypes in a dynamic and nondestructive manner, thereby facilitating rapid development in the improvement and breeding of heat-tolerant turfgrasses.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Sun T, Chan Z; figure preparation: Sun T, Wang W; draft manuscript preparation and revision: Sun T, Chan Z. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFE0123200 to Zhulong Chan, the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32201451 to Tianxiao Sun, and 32071884 and 32371761 to Zhulong Chan.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  References (98)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Sun T, Wang W, Chan Z. 2024. How do cool-season turfgrasses respond to high temperature: progress and challenges. Grass Research 4: e010 doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0008
    Sun T, Wang W, Chan Z. 2024. How do cool-season turfgrasses respond to high temperature: progress and challenges. Grass Research 4: e010 doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0008

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return