Search
2025 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Interventions of plant tissue culture techniques and genome editing in medicinally important spice crops

  • # Authors contributed equally: Himanshu Pandey, Varucha Misra, Avinash Sharma

More Information
  • The recalcitrant nature and high water content of seed germplasm in spice crops contribute to pest infestation, desiccation, microbial contamination, and reduced lifespan. Vegetatively propagated spice crops also face biotic and abiotic stresses, limiting their yield potential. Over-extraction and formulation of value-added products have further reduced the efficacy of asexual propagation methods. This review explores the integration of plant tissue culture techniques with gene manipulation approaches, such as gene transfer and CRISPR/Cas systems, to overcome these challenges. Tissue culture methods, including organogenesis, somatic embryogenesis, anther culture, shoot tip culture, and in vitro pollination, have been effective in enhancing disease resistance, early maturity, and yield potential in crops like cumin, turmeric, ginger, vanilla, saffron, cardamom, and black pepper. Gene transfer techniques, such as biolistic transformation and agrobacterium-mediated methods, have successfully achieved non-chimeric plant regeneration and synthetic seed production, mitigating desiccation and microbial contamination. Somaclonal variation has improved growth, yield, and stress resilience, as seen in tissue-cultured Wuling ginger and micropropagated baby ginger. Despite these advancements, the application of CRISPR/Cas in spice crops remains underexplored. Future research should focus on integrating CRISPR/Cas with tissue culture for enhanced stress tolerance, biofortification, and climate adaptation. Additionally, soilless culture and speed breeding could accelerate spice crop improvement, aligning with the Donald concept of plant ideotype. This review provides insights into these advancements and their potential to transform medicinally important spice crop cultivation.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Balkrishna A, Sharma G, Sharma N, Kumar P, Mittal R, et al. 2021. Global perspective of agriculture systems: from ancient times to the modern era. In Sustainable Agriculture for Food Security, ed. Balkrishna A. New York: Apple Academic Press. pp. 3−45. doi: 10.1201/9781003242543
    [2] Sharma U, Mishra A, Sahni PK, Sharma B, Tuli HS, et al. 2025. Worldwide uses of spices. In Anticancer Spices, ed. Tuli HS. New York: Jenny Stanford Publishing. pp. 41−94. doi: 10.1201/9781003534662
    [3] Sivaraman K, Thankamani CK, Srinivasan V. 2023. Crop diversification: cropping/system approach for enhancing farmers' income. In Handbook of Spices in India: 75 Years of Research and Development, eds. Ravindran PN, Sivaraman K, Devasahayam S, Babu KN. Singapore: Springer. pp. 3847−926. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-3728-6_61
    [4] Khanal A, Devkota HP, Kaundinnyayana S, Gyawali P, Ananda R. 2021. Culinary herbs and spices in Nepal: a review of their traditional uses, chemical constituents, and pharmacological activities. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 14:1−18 doi: 10.32859/era.21.40.1-18

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Nollet LML, Ahmad J, Ahamad J. 2023. Analysis of food spices: identification and authentication. 1st Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 339 pp. doi: 10.1201/9781003279792
    [6] Branson S. 2017. 101 Amazing uses for ginger: reduce muscle pain, fight motion sickness, heal the common cold and 98 more! US: Workman Publishing. 139 pp.
    [7] Adetuyi BO, Odine GO, Olajide PA, Adetuyi OA, Atanda OO, et al. 2022. Nutraceuticals: role in metabolic disease, prevention and treatment. World News of Natural Sciences 42:1−27

    Google Scholar

    [8] Zubair S, Sharif A, Altaf HA, Karim F, Raees H. 2023. Eugenia aromatic (Clove) in focus: a scientific review of its pharmacological applications and therapeutic benefits. International Journal of Trends in Food Science and Technologies 1:29−37 doi: 10.61980/3049-7647/2023/1/4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Malik T, Sharma R, Panesar PS, Gehlot R, Tokusoglu O, et al. 2022. Nutmeg nutraceutical constituents: In vitro and in vivo pharmacological potential. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 46:e15848 doi: 10.1111/jfpp.15848

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Divakaran M, Babu KN, Peter KV. 2022. Potential of spices as medicines and immunity boosters. In Medicinal Plants, eds. Sharangi AB, Peter KV. New York: Apple Academic Press. pp. 507−20. doi: 10.1201/9781003277408
    [11] Chauhan S, Tiwari A, Verma A, Padhan PK, Verma S, et al. 2024. Exploring the potential of saffron as a therapeutic agent in depression treatment: a comparative review. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 97:365 doi: 10.59249/XURF4540

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Hussein HJ, Hameed IH, Hadi MY. 2017. A review: anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory effect and cardiovascular effects of garlic: Allium sativum. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 10:4069−78 doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00738.7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Farooqi AA, Sreeramu BS. 2004. Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic crops. India: Universities Press. 344 pp. http://m.universitiespress.com/details?id=9788173715044
    [14] Sharangi AB, Bhutia PH, Raj AC, Sreenivas M, Sreenivas M. 2018. Underexploited spice crops: present status, agrotechnology, and future research directions. New York: Apple Academic Press. 356 pp. doi: 10.1201/9781351136464
    [15] Agrawal A, Singh S, Malhotra EV, Meena DPS, Tyagi RK. 2019. In vitro conservation and cryopreservation of clonally propagated horticultural species. In Conservation and utilization of horticultural genetic resources, eds. Rajasekharan P, Rao V. Singapore: Springer. pp. 529−78. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3669-0_18
    [16] Sahu B, Choudhary VK, Sahu MP, Kumar KK, Sujayanand GK, et al. 2023. Biotic Stress Management. In Trajectory of 75 years of Indian Agriculture after Independence, eds. Ghosh PK, Das A, Saxena R, Banerjee K, Kar G, Vijay D. Singapore: Springer. pp. 619−53. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-7997-2_23
    [17] Sharangi AB, Prasada Rao GSLHV, Das S, Krishnamurthy KS, Upadhyay TK, et al. 2023. Brunt of climate change and spice crops: scenario, response, and resilience. In Handbook of Spices in India: 75 Years of Research and Development . Singapore: Springer. pp. 755−812. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-3728-6_12
    [18] Banerjee S, Banerjee S, Bose S, Banerjee S. 2024. Effect of geographical location and climatic variation on the composition of active principles in Indian spices. In Medicinal Spices and Herbs from India, eds. Bose S, Majee SB, Banerjee S. vol. 2. New York: Apple Academic Press. pp. 61−84. doi: 10.1201/9781003511656-4
    [19] Pati SG, Paital B, Panda F, Jena S, Sahoo DK, et al. 2023. Impacts of habitat quality on the physiology, ecology, and economical value of mud crab Scylla sp.: a comprehensive review. Water 15:2029 doi: 10.3390/w15112029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Sharangi AB, Datta S, Deb P. 2018. Spices: Agrotechniques for Quality Produce. New York: Apple Academic Press. 430 pp. doi: 10.1201/b22337
    [21] Gracz J, Tyczewska A, Hoffa A, Zmienko A, Swiercz A, et al. 2014. The role of alternative splicing in two maize lines under herbicide stress conditions. Agrotechnolgy 2(4):192

    Google Scholar

    [22] Balestrini R, Brunetti C, Cammareri M, Caretto S, Cavallaro V, et al. 2021. Strategies to modulate specialized metabolism in Mediterranean crops: from molecular aspects to field. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:2887 doi: 10.3390/ijms22062887

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Neenu MG, Aswathi A, Prasath D, et al. 2024. Synthetic polyploidy in spice crops: a review. Crop Science 64:2−23 doi: 10.1002/csc2.21134

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Alamgir ANM. 2017. Cultivation of herbal drugs, biotechnology, and in vitro production of secondary metabolites, high-value medicinal plants, herbal wealth, and herbal trade. In Therapeutic use of medicinal plants and their extracts: pharmacognosy. Cham: Springer. pp. 379−452. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-63862-1_9
    [25] Das P, Chandra T, Negi A, Jaiswal S, Iquebal MA, et al. 2023. A comprehensive review on genomic resources in medicinally and industrially important major spices for future breeding programs: Status, utility and challenges. Current Research in Food Science 7:100579 doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100579

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Ali MN, Ray SS. 2018. Plant tissue culture as potential option in developing climate resilient spices. In Indian Spices, ed. Sharangi A. Cham: Springer. pp. 405−19. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75016-3_15
    [27] Quiroz LF, Khan M, Gondalia N, Lai L, McKeown PC, et al. 2024. Tissue culture-independent approaches to revolutionizing plant transformation and gene editing. Horticulture Research 3:292 doi: 10.1093/hr/uhae292

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Sharma SK, Gupta OP, Pathaw N, Sharma D, Maibam A, et al. 2021. CRISPR-Cas-led revolution in diagnosis and management of emerging plant viruses: new avenues toward food and nutritional security. Frontiers in Nutrition 8:751512 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.751512

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Singh A, Rajput VD, Varshney A, Sharma R, Ghazaryan K, et al. 2024. Revolutionizing crop production: nanoscale wonders-current applications, advances, and future frontiers. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 64:221−58 doi: 10.21608/ejss.2023.246354.1684

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Sharma A, Hazarika M, Heisnam P, Pandey H, Devadas VASN, et al. 2024. Controlled environment ecosystem: a cutting-edge technology in speed breeding. ACS Omega 9:29114−38 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09060

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Taji A, Kumar P, Lakshmanan P, et al. 2024. In vitro plant breeding. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 220 pp. doi: 10.1201/9781003578529
    [32] Phillips GC, Garda M. 2019. Plant tissue culture media and practices: an overview. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 55:242−57 doi: 10.1007/s11627-019-09983-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Rajmohan K. 2005. Plant biotechnology research at the kerala agriculture university. Vellanikkara: Kerala Agricultural University. 86 pp. http://14.139.185.57:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10713?mode=full
    [34] Quoirin M. 2003. Micropropagation of Acacia species. In Micropropagation of woody trees and fruits. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 245−68. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0125-0_9
    [35] Yan G, Liu H, Wang H, Lu Z, Wang Y, et al. 2017. Accelerated generation of selfed pure line plants for gene identification and crop breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1786 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01786

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Espinosa-Leal CA, Puente-Garza CA, García-Lara S. 2018. In vitro plant tissue culture: means for production of biological active compounds. Planta 248:1−18 doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2910-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Anuruddi, HIGK, Nakandalage N, Fonseka DK, et al. 2023. New insights for the production of medicinal plant materials: ex vitro and in vitro propagation. In Biosynthesis of Bioactive Compounds in Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, eds. Kumar N, Singh RS. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 181−212. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-35221-8_9
    [38] Srivastava M, Singh G, Misra P. 2016. Contribution of biotechnological tools in the enhancement of secondary metabolites in selected medicinal climbers. In Biotechnological strategies for the conservation of medicinal and ornamental climbers, eds. Shahzad A, Sharma S, Siddiqui S. Cham: Springer. pp. 465−86. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19288-8_20
    [39] Chaurasia PK, Bharati SL (Eds.). 2022. The chemistry inside spices & herbs: research and development. United Arab Emirates: Bentham Science Publishers. 220 pp. doi: 10.2174/97898150395661220101
    [40] Singh H. 2023. Enhancement of plant secondary metabolites by genetic manipulation. In Genetic Manipulation of Secondary Metabolites in Medicinal Plant, eds. Singh R, Kumar N. Singapore: Springer Nature. pp. 59−90. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-4939-7_4
    [41] Singh RB, Paroda RS, Dadlani M. 2022. Science, technology and innovation. In Indian agriculture towards 2030, eds. Chand R, Joshi P, Khadka S. Singapore: Springer. pp. 213–50. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-0763-0_8
    [42] Paul T. 2018. Debnath S. Recent researches on molecular breeding for spice crop improvement. In Indian Spices, ed. Sharangi A. Cham: Springer. pp. 317−39. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75016-3_11
    [43] Nandini B, Giridhar P. 2019. Insight view of topical trends on synthetic seeds of rare and endangered plant species and its future prospects. In Synthetic Seeds, eds. Faisal M, Alatar A. Cham: Springer. pp. 113−54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-24631-0_5
    [44] Shukla S, Bhutani R, Das S, Kapoor N, Raman T. 2023. Secondary metabolite enhancement via in vitro techniques and its industrial prospects. In Genetic Manipulation of Secondary Metabolites in Medicinal Plant, eds. Singh R, Kumar N. Singapore: Springer Nature. pp. 307-37. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-4939-7_14
    [45] Mishra R, Mohanty JN, Mahanty B, Joshi RK. 2021. A single transcript CRISPR/Cas9 mediated mutagenesis of CaERF28 confers anthracnose resistance in chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Planta 254:5 doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03660-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Shylaja MR, Nair S. 2022. Omics research for crop improvement in spices. In Inomics in horticultural crops, eds. Rout GR, Peter KV. UK: Academic Press. pp. 467−500. 10.1016/C2020-0-03078-1
    [47] Shrestha A, Khan A, Dey N. 2018. Cis–trans engineering: advances and perspectives on customized transcriptional regulation in plants. Molecular Plant 11:886−98 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.05.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Kashtwari M, Mansoor S, Wani AA, Najar MA, Deshmukh RK, et al. 2022. Random mutagenesis in vegetatively propagated crops: opportunities, challenges and genome editing prospects. Molecular Biology Reports 49:5729−49 doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06650-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Chen JT (Ed.). 2024. Plant speed breeding and high-throughput technologies. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 398 pp.
    [50] Sembiyaa A, Dharshini J, Rashmika B, Manoj M, Velayuthaprabhu S, et al. 2025. Integrated molecular strategies for improving traditional chinese medicinal plants. In Biotechnology, Multiple Omics, and Precision Breeding in Medicinal Plants, Chen JT. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 231−47. doi: 10.1201/9781003475491
    [51] Kim YC, Kang Y, Yang EY, Cho MC, Schafleitner R, et al. 2021. Applications and major achievements of genome editing in vegetable crops: a review. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:688980 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.688980

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Newman A, Starrs L, Burgio G. 2020. Cas9 cuts and consequences; detecting, predicting, and mitigating CRISPR/Cas9 on- and off-target damage: techniques for detecting, predicting, and mitigating the on- and off-target effects of Cas9 editing. Bioessays 42:2000047 doi: 10.1002/bies.202000047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Kakoulidou I, Avramidou EV, Baránek M, Brunel-Muguet S, Farrona S, et al. 2021. Epigenetics for crop improvement in times of global change. Biology 10:766 doi: 10.3390/biology10080766

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Pisias MT, Bakala HS, McAlvay AC, Mabry ME, Birchler JA, et al. 2022. Prospects of feral crop de novo redomestication. Plant & Cell Physiology 63:1641−53 doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcac072

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Gowthami R, Agrawal A, Chander S, Pandey R, Sharma N, et al. 2025. In vitro Genebank of India for safe conservation of horticultural plant diversity: four decades of milestones. 3 Biotech 15:11 doi: 10.1007/s13205-024-04177-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Pinto G, Araújo C, Santos C, Neves L. 2013. Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis in Eucalyptus spp.: current status and future perspectives. Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science 75:59−69 doi: 10.2989/20702620.2013.785115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Pijeira-Fernández G, Santana-Buzzy N. 2024. Capsicum recalcitrance: physiological and molecular challenges of pepper tissue culture. In vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 22:725−41 doi: 10.1007/s11627-024-10445-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Wijerathna-Yapa A, Hiti-Bandaralage J. 2023. Tissue culture − a sustainable approach to explore plant stresses. Life 13:780 doi: 10.3390/life13030780

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Kaladharan K, Kumar A, Gupta P, Illath K, Santra TS, et al. 2021. Microfluidic based physical approaches towards single-cell intracellular delivery and analysis. Micromachines 12:631 doi: 10.3390/mi12060631

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Wang HX, Li M, Lee CM, Chakraborty S, Kim HW, et al. 2017. CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing for disease modeling and therapy: challenges and opportunities for nonviral delivery. Chemical Reviews 117:9874−906 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00799

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Chovatiya A, Rajyaguru R, Tomar RS, Joshi P. 2024. Revolutionizing agriculture: harnessing CRISPR/cas9 for crop enhancement. Indian Journal of Microbiology 64:59−69 doi: 10.1007/s12088-023-01154-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Nielsen E, Temporiti MEE, Cella R. 2019. Improvement of phytochemical production by plant cells and organ culture and by genetic engineering. Plant Cell Reports 38:1199−215 doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02415-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Wen Y, Liu H, Meng H, Qiao L, Zhang G, et al. 2022. In vitro induction and phenotypic variations of autotetraploid garlic (Allium sativum L.) with dwarfism. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:917910 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.917910

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Zhang Y, Malzahn AA, Sretenovic S, Qi Y. 2019. The emerging and uncultivated potential of CRISPR technology in plant science. Nature Plants 5:778−94 doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0461-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Shams S, Naeem B, Ma L, Li R, Zhang Z, et al. 2024. Developing an optimized protocol for regeneration and transformation in pepper. Genes 15:1018 doi: 10.3390/genes15081018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Prestwich BD, Cardi T, Bakhsh A, Nicolia A, Bhati KK, et al. 2023. Novel delivery methods for CRISPR-based plant genome editing. In A Roadmap for Plant Genome Editing, eds. Ricroch A, Eriksson D, Miladinović D, Sweet J, Van Laere K, et al. Switzerland: Springer Nature. pp. 41−67. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-46150-7_3
    [67] Sebiani-Calvo A, Hernández-Soto A, Hensel G, Gatica-Arias A. 2024. Crop genome editing through tissue-culture-independent transformation methods. Frontiers in Genome Editing 6:1490295 doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2024.1490295

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Sharma G, Ahalawat S, Islam A, Vignesh S, Unnikrishnan S, et al. 2023. A comprehensive review of CRISPR/Cas9 based strategies in horticultural crop modification. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 13:310−23 doi: 10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i113174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Ribas AF, Dechamp E, Champion A, Bertrand B, Combes MC, et al. 2011. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Coffea arabica (L.) is greatly enhanced by using established embryogenic callus cultures. BMC Plant Biology 11:92 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-92

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Hamid R, Jacob F, Entesari M, Prasad SH, Lavale SA, et al. 2022. Spices biotechnology: opportunities and challenges. In The Chemistry inside Spices & Herbs: Research and Development, eds. Chaurasia PK, Bharati SL. vol. 1. Singapore: Bentham Science Publishers. pp. 1−31. doi: 10.2174/9789815039566122010004
    [71] Reed KM, Bargmann BOR. 2021. Protoplast regeneration and its use in new plant breeding technologies. Frontiers in Genome Editing 3:734951 doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2021.734951

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Levengood H, Zhou Y, Zhang C. 2024. Advancements in plant transformation: from traditional methods to cutting-edge techniques and emerging model species. Plant Cell Reports 43:273 doi: 10.1007/s00299-023-03106-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Reyna-Llorens I, Ferro-Costa M, Burgess SJ. 2023. Plant protoplasts in the age of synthetic biology. Journal of Experimental Botany 74:3821−32 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad172

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Zhong H, Elumalai S, Li C, Liu W, Dong S, et al. 2025. Development of high‐throughput tissue culture‐free plant transformation systems. The Plant Journal 121:e17163 doi: 10.1111/tpj.17163

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Hu H, Yu F. 2022. A CRISPR/Cas9-based system with controllable auto-excision feature serving cisgenic plant breeding and beyond. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:5597 doi: 10.3390/ijms23105597

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Abbas F, Zhou Y, O'Neill Rothenberg D, Alam I, Ke Y, et al. 2023. Aroma components in horticultural crops: chemical diversity and usage of metabolic engineering for industrial applications. Plants 12:1748 doi: 10.3390/plants12091748

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Gad MA, Li MJ, Ahmed FK, Almoammar H. 2020. Nanomaterials for gene delivery and editing in plants: challenges and future perspective. In Multifunctional Hybrid Nanomaterials for Sustainable Agri-Food and Ecosystems, ed. Abd-Elsalam KA. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 135−53. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821354-4.00006-6
    [78] Chuang YF, Phipps AJ, Lin FL, Hecht V, Hewitt AW, et al. 2021. Approach for in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas system: a recent update and future prospect. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 78:2683−708 doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03725-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Lanubile A, Stagnati L, Marocco A, Busconi M. 2024. DNA-based techniques to check quality and authenticity of food, feed and medicinal products of plant origin: a review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 149:104568 doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2024.104568

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Mohammed AAH, Masyab HM. 2020. Genetic transformation of Nigella sativa L. plants with Agrobacterium rhizogenes 35S GUS R1000 and estimation of thymoquinone level in transformed hairy roots cultures. Plant Archives 20:3649−52

    Google Scholar

    [81] Varghese JM, Bhat AI. 2011. An efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol for black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) using embryogenic mass as explant. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 14:247−54 doi: 10.1007/s12892-011-0031-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Ponnuswami V, Kumar AR, Selvi BS, Jagadeesan R, Prabhu M. 2008. Biotechnological tools for crop improvement in spices. The Asian Journal of Horticulture 3:467−72

    Google Scholar

    [83] Soulange JG, Ranghoo-Sanmukhiya VM, Seeburrun SD, et al. 2007. Tissue culture and RAPD analysis of Cinnamonum camphora and Cinnamomum verum. Biotechnology 6:239−44 doi: 10.3923/biotech.2007.239.244

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Sapara KK, Jani M, Dharajiya D, Patel F, Patel AK, et al. 2023. Development of efficient embryo-derived regeneration system and optimization of genetic transformation in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 155:297−312 doi: 10.1007/s11240-023-02582-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Kahrizi D, Soorni J. 2013. Study on shoot regeneration and somatic embryogenesis in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) landraces. Biharean Biologist 7:37−41

    Google Scholar

    [86] Jebasingh T, Backiyarani S, Manohari C, Somanath A, Usha R. 2017. Transformation of cardamom with the RNA dependent RNA polymerase gene of cardamom mosaic virus. Journal of Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering 3:00066 doi: 10.15406/jabb.2017.03.00066

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Malabadi RB, Nataraja K. 2007. Genetic transformation of Vanilla planifolia by Agrobacterium-tumefaciens using shoot tip sections. Research Journal of Botany 2:86−94 doi: 10.3923/rjb.2007.86.94

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Das S, Bhattacharya SBT, Adhikary A, Bandyopadhyay DK, Ghosh DK. 2020. Micropropagation and its utilization in spice crops. Hi-Tech Horticulture 1:1−16

    Google Scholar

    [89] Subasinghe S, Hettiarachchi CS, Iddagoda N, et al. 2016. In-vitro propagation of cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum Presl.) using embryos and in vitro axillary buds. Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies 3:164−69 doi: 10.18178/joaat.3.3.164-169

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Mathew MK, Hariharan M, et al. 1990. In vitro multiple shoot regeneration in Syzygium aromaticum. Annals of Botany 65:277−79 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087934

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Voisey CR, White DWR, Dudas B, Appleby RD, Ealing PM, et al. 1994. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of white clover using direct shoot organogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 13:309−14 doi: 10.1007/BF00232627

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Lincy AK, Remashree AB, Sasikumar B. 2004. Direct multiple shoot induction from aerial stem of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rose.). Journal of Applied Horticulture 6:99−101 doi: 10.37855/jah.2004.v06i02.21

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Lincy AK, Remashree AB, Sasikumar B. 2009. Indirect and direct somatic embryogenesis from aerial stem explants of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Acta Botanica Croatica 68:93−103

    Google Scholar

    [94] Widyastuti DA, Santosa D, Nuringtyas TR, Rohman A, et al. 2024. Callus induction of red ginger (Zingiber officinale var. rubrum) with 2,4-D and Kinetin combination to enhance total phenolic and flavonoid content. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1364:012051 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1364/1/012051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Babu KN, Samsudeen K, Ratnambal MJ. 1992. In vitro plant regeneration from leaf-derived callus in ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 29:71−74 doi: 10.1007/BF00033610

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Krishnan N, Soniya E. 2008. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated genetic transformation in ginger. Research Journal of Biotechnology 3:141−43

    Google Scholar

    [97] Suma B, Keshavachandran R, Nybe EV. 2008. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation and regeneration of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Journal of Tropical Agriculture 46:38−44

    Google Scholar

    [98] Lee SY, Kim HH, Kim YK, Park NI, Park SU. 2009. Plant regeneration of garlic (Allium sativum L.) via somatic embryogenesis. Scientific Research and Essay 4:1569−74

    Google Scholar

    [99] Tkalec Kojić M, Kujundžić S, Parađiković N, Bošnjak D, Vinković T, et al. 2023. Establishment of indigenous garlic varieties in vitro under influence of growth regulator and light. Journal of Central European Agriculture 24:491−97 doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/24.2.3764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Robledo-Paz A, Villalobos-Arámbula VM, Jofre-Garfias AE. 2000. Efficient plant regeneration of garlic (Allium sativum L.) by root-tip culture. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 36:416−19 doi: 10.1007/s11627-000-0075-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Kizil S, Icgil DY, Khawar KM. 2014. Improved in vitro regeneration and propagation of Tunceli garlic (Allium tuncelianum L.). The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 89:408−14 doi: 10.1080/14620316.2014.11513099

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Chib S, Thangaraj A, Kaul S, Dhar MK, Kaul T. 2020. Development of a system for efficient callus production, somatic embryogenesis and gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9 in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Plant Methods 16:47 doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00589-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Parray JA, Kamili AN, Hamid R, Husaini AM. 2012. In vitro cormlet production of saffron (Crocus sativus L. Kashmirianus) and their flowering response under greenhouse. GM Crops & Food 3:289−95 doi: 10.4161/gmcr.21365

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Teixeira da Silva JA, Kulus D, Zhang X, Zeng S, Ma G, et al. 2016. Disinfection of explants for saffron (Crocus sativus) tissue culture. Environmental & Experimental Biology 14:183−98 doi: 10.22364/eeb.14.25

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Gantai S, Vahedi M. 2015. In vitro regeneration of high value spice Crocus sativus L.: a concise appraisal. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 2(4):124−33 doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2015.07.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Pikulthong V, Teerakathiti T, Thamchaipenet A, Peyachoknagul S. 2016. Development of somatic embryos for genetic transformation in Curcuma longa L. and Curcuma mangga Valeton & Zijp. Agriculture and Natural Resources 50:276−85 doi: 10.1016/j.anres.2015.08.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Shirgurkar MV, Naik VB, Von Arnold S, Nadgauda RS, Clapham D. 2006. An efficient protocol for genetic transformation and shoot regeneration of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) via particle bombardment. Plant Cell Reports 25:112−16 doi: 10.1007/s00299-005-0033-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Singh N, Mishra A, Joshi M, Jha B. 2010. Microprojectile bombardment mediated genetic transformation of embryo axes and plant regeneration in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 103:1−6 doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9746-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Pandey S, Mishra A, Patel MK, Jha B. 2013. An efficient method for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and plant regeneration in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.). Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 171:1−9 doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0349-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Pandey S, Patel MK, Mishra A, Jha B. 2016. In planta transformed cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) plants, overexpressing the SbNHX1 gene showed enhanced salt endurance. PLoS One 11:e0159349 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159349

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Retheesh ST, Bhat AI. 2011. Genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic plants from protocorm-like bodies of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia Andrews) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal of plant biochemistry and biotechnology 20:262−69 doi: 10.1007/s13562-011-0057-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Halim R, Akyol B, Güner A. 2017. In vitro regeneration of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia L.). Journal of Applied Biological Sciences 11:5−10

    Google Scholar

    [113] Mahardhini AD, Anwar S. 2023. BAP and kinetin application for in vitro bud induction of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia Andrews.) from stem node explants in the initiation stage. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1246:012030 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1246/1/012030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Ramírez-Mosqueda MA, Iglesias-Andreu LG, Luna-Sánchez IJ. 2017. Light quality affects growth and development of in vitro plantlet of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. South African Journal of Botany 109:288−93 doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2017.01.205

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Izzati KHFL, Nazreena OA, Zaliha WSW, Radziah CMZC, Zamri Z. 2013. A simple and efficient protocol for the mass propagation of Vanilla planifolia. American Journal of Plant Sciences 4:1685−92 doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.49205

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Sidek N, Anuar NSM, Naher L, Rahman KAMA, et al. 2018. The effect of different nutrient media on in vitro shoot and root proliferation of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews. African Journal of Biotechnology 17:1241−46 doi: 10.5897/AJB2018.16610

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Slimani C, El Goumi Y, Rais C, El Ghadraoui L, Benjelloun M, et al. 2022. Micropropagation and potential of bioactive compounds of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) for nutrition and health. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 14:11278 doi: 10.55779/nsb14311278

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] de Oliveira SOD, Sayd RM, Balzon TA, Scherwinski-Pereira JE. 2013. A new procedure for in vitro propagation of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia) using a double-phase culture system. Scientia Horticulturae 161:204−9 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.06.039

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Erawati DN, Wardati I, Humaida S, Fisdiana U. 2020. Micropropagation of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia Andrews) with modification of cytokinins. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 411:012009 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/411/1/012009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Chattaraj S, Nandi S, Nandy S. 2024. Biology and genetic improvement of spice and condiment plant species. In Medicinal Spice and Condiment Crops, ed. Husen A. 1st Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 9−34. doi: 10.1201/9781003387046
    [121] Husen A, Pant M. 2024. Tissue culture techniques and medicinal plants: enhancing propagation and production. 1st Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 348 pp. doi: 10.1201/b23374
    [122] Nirmal Babu K, Divakaran M, Raj RP, Anupama K, Peter KV, et al. 2015. Biotechnological approaches in improvement of spices: a review. In Plant Biology and Biotechnology, eds. Bahadur B, Venkat Rajam M, Sahijram L, Krishnamurthy K. Vol. 2. New Delhi: Springer. pp. 487−516. doi: 10.1007/978-81-322-2283-5_25
    [123] Sharma A, Pant S, Wani ZA, Mahajan R. 2021. Understanding the barriers of underutilization and applicability of biotechnological tools for augmenting spice crop production. In Neglected and Underutilized Crops-Towards Nutritional Security and Sustainability, eds. Zargar SM, Masi A, Salgotra RK. Singapore: Springer. pp. 237−66. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-3876-3_11
    [124] Halka J, Kowsalya K, Anand AV, Anand M, Ramalashmi K, et al. 2025. Genetic engineering of medicinal plants for enhanced secondary metabolite production. In Biotechnology, Multiple Omics, and Precision Breeding in Medicinal Plants, ed. Chen JT. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 146−59. doi: 10.1201/9781003475491
    [125] Prashant SP, Bhawana M. 2024. An update on biotechnological intervention mediated by plant tissue culture to boost secondary metabolite production in medicinal and aromatic plants. Physiologia Plantarum 176:e14400 doi: 10.1111/ppl.14400

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Bhat AI, Divakaran M, Nirmal Babu K. 2024. Biotechnological approaches for improvement of spices. In Handbook of Spices in India: 75 Years of Research and Development. Singapore: Springer. pp. 397−470. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-3728-6_7
    [127] Das S, Shukla S, Debnath S, Kalyani MI. 2024. Synergistic role of plant tissue culture and plant growth-promoting micro-organisms as conservation strategies for himalayan medicinal plants amidst climate change. In Threatened Medicinal Plants in the Indian Himalayan Region: Sustainability Challenges and Conservation Strategies, eds. Mishra AP, Kumar A, Chandra N, Singh G, Pande CB. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. pp. 133−65. 10.1007/978-3-031-73687-2_8
    [128] Ravindran PN, Babu N. 2002. Production of haploids of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton.) through anther culture/microspore culture. ICAR Project report. Indian Institute of Spices Research, Calicut, Kerala, India. 51 pp.
    [129] Kashtwari M, Wani AA, Dhar MK, Jan S, Kamili AN. 2018. Development of an efficient in vitro mutagenesis protocol for genetic improvement of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 24:951−62 doi: 10.1007/s12298-018-0576-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Zhao X, Yu S, Wang Y, Jiang D, Zhang Y, et al. 2023. Field performance of disease-free plants of ginger produced by tissue culture and agronomic, cytological, and molecular characterization of the morphological variants. Agronomy 13:74 doi: 10.3390/agronomy13010074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Yang G. 2021. Ginger propagation and production protocol development for niche markets. Report. Natural Resources & Environmental Design, North Carolina a&t State University, USA. pp. 1−7. https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/1013322-ginger-propagation-and-production-protocol-development-for-niche-markets.html#:~:text=Laboratory%20experiments%3A%20developing%20micropropagation%20protocols,and%20acclimatization%20of%20micropropagated%20seedlings
    [132] Khuat QV, Kalashnikova EA, Kirakosyan RN, Nguyen HT, Baranova EN, et al. 2022. Improvement of in vitro seed germination and micropropagation of Amomum tsao-ko (Zingiberaceae Lindl.). Horticulturae 8:640 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8070640

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133] Bhat AI. 2016. Elimination of piper yellow mottle virus (PYMoV) from virus-infected black pepper and production of virus-free plants through somatic embryogenesis and meristem-tip culture. Krishi Technology Data Repository, ICAR-Indian Institute of Spices, Kerala. pp. 1−6
    [134] Babu KN, Minoo D, Geetha SP, Samsudeen K, Rema J, et al. 1998. Plant biotechnology - its role in improvement of spices. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 68(8):1−15

    Google Scholar

    [135] Zahid NA, Jaafar HZE, Hakiman M. 2021. Micropropagation of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) 'Bentong' and evaluation of its secondary metabolites and antioxidant activities compared with the conventionally propagated plant. Plants 10:630 doi: 10.3390/plants10040630

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136] Wei KH, Miao JH, Huang HP, Gao SL. 2011. Generation of autotetraploid plant of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) and its quality evaluation. Pharmacognosy Magazine 7:200−6 doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.84230

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [137] Chitra R. 2019. Comparative studies on growth and Yield of Conventional and Tissue culture plants of Turmeric (Curcuma longa) var. CO2. Journal of Horticultural Sciences 14:162−65 doi: 10.24154/jhs.v14i2.802

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138] Pascua ME, Gabriel MLS, Badar AJ, Antonio MA, Atis MI, et al. 2012. Development of a multiplication technique for virus-free garlic planting materials. Science and Technology Journal 2(1):1

    Google Scholar

    [139] Azizi-Dargahlou S, Pouresmaeil M. 2024. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated plant transformation: a review. Molecular Biotechnology 66:1563−80 doi: 10.1007/s12033-023-00788-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140] Marthe F. 2018. Tissue culture approaches in relation to medicinal plant improvement. In Biotechnologies of Crop Improvement, Cellular Approaches, eds. Gosal S, Wani S. vol.1. Cham: Springer. pp. 487−497. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78283-6_15
    [141] Valizadeh M, Tabar SK, Nematzadeh GA. 2007. Effect of plant growth regulators on callus induction and regeneration of cumin (Cuminum cyminum). Asian Journal of Agricultural Research 1(1):17−22 doi: 10.3923/ajar.2007.17.22

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142] Balliu A, Zheng Y, Sallaku G, Fernández JA, Gruda NS, et al. 2021. Environmental and cultivation factors affect the morphology, architecture and performance of root systems in soilless grown plants. Horticulturae 7:243 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7080243

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143] Pasala R, Chennamsetti M, Patil B, Kadirvel P, Geethanjali S, et al. 2024. Revolutionizing crop production: the imperative of speed breeding technology in modern crop improvement. Crop Breeding Genetics and Genomics 6(2):e240003 doi: 10.20900/cbgg20240003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144] Swami P, Deswal K, Rana V, Yadav D, Munjal R. 2023. Speed breeding—a powerful tool to breed more crops in less time accelerating crop research. In Abiotic Stresses in Wheat, eds. Khan MK, Pandey A, Hamurcu M, Gupta OP, Gezgin S. UK: Academic Press. pp. 33−49. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-95368-9.00004-7
    [145] Reddy RVSK, Omprasad J, Janakiram T. 2022. Technological innovations in commercial high tech horticulture, vertical farming and landscaping. International Journal of Innovative Horticulture 11:78−91 doi: 10.5958/2582-2527.2022.00008.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [146] Potts J, Jangra S, Michael VN, Wu X. 2023. Speed breeding for crop improvement and food security. Crops 3:276−91 doi: 10.3390/crops3040025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [147] Sharma A, Pandey H, Devadas VS, Kartha BD, Vashishth A. 2023. Phytoremediation, stress tolerance and bio fortification in crops through soilless culture. Crop Design 2:100027 doi: 10.1016/j.cropd.2023.100027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [148] Samantara K, Bohra A, Mohapatra SR, Prihatini R, Asibe F. 2022. Breeding more crops in less time: a perspective on speed breeding. Biology 11:275 doi: 10.3390/biology11020275

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149] Southern Region - ASHS. 2022. Abstracts of presentations from American Society of Horticultural Science 2022 Annual Conference. HortScience 57(9S):S1−S297 doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.57.9S.S1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [150] Khan MM, Akram MT, Janke R, Qadri RWK, Al-Sadi AM, et al. 2020. Urban horticulture for food secure cities through and beyond COVID-19. Sustainability 12:9592 doi: 10.3390/su12229592

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [151] Ogwu MC, Osawaru M. 2016. Diversity, composition and utilization of home garden crops. The Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development 6:1−16

    Google Scholar

    [152] Majsztrik JC, Fernandez RT, Fisher PR, Hitchcock DR, Lea-Cox J, et al. 2017. Water use and treatment in container-grown specialty crop production: a review. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 228:151−27 doi: 10.1007/s11270-017-3272-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [153] Raj JR, Rajula BIP, Tamilbharathi R, Srinivasulu S. 2020. AN IoT based waste segreggator for recycling biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste. 2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), 6−7 March 2020, Coimbatore, India. USA: IEEE. pp. 928−-30. doi: 10.1109/icaccs48705.2020.9074251
    [154] Satisha J. 2023. Horticultural Crops. Trajectory of 75 years of Indian Agriculture after Independence, eds. Ghosh PK, Das A, Saxena R, Banerjee K, Kar G, et al. Singapore: Springer. pp. 265−93. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-7997-2_11
    [155] Debnath M, Malik CP, Bisen PS. 2026. Micropropagation: a tool for the production of high quality plant-based medicines. Current pharmaceutical biotechnology 7:33−49 doi: 10.2174/138920106775789638

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [156] Rao SG, Radhika RM. 2023. Prospects for sustainable cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants in India. In Sustainable Uses and Prospects of Medicinal Plants, eds. Kambizi L, Bvenura C. Boca Raton: CRC press. pp. 227−43. doi: 10.1201/9781003206620
    [157] Bhojiya AA, Joshi H. 2024. Crispr gene editing for secondary metabolite production: a review. In Gene editing in plants: CRISPR-Cas and its applications, eds. Kumar A, Arora S, Ogita S, Yau YY, Mukherjee K. Singapore: Springer. pp. 437−75. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-8529-6_17
    [158] Meena RS, Praneetha S, Meena NK, Bagra SK, Ravi Y, et al. 2025. Genetics, genomics, and breeding of coriander: a review. In Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Seed Spices. Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences, ed. Kole C. Singapore: Springer. pp. 45−67. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-9630-4_4
    [159] Garagounis C, Georgopoulou ME, Beritza K, Papadopoulou KK. 2020. An Agrobacterium rhizogenes mediated hairy root transformation protocol for fenugreek. MethodsX 7:101098 doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101098

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [160] Stephan R, Jayabalan N. 2003. Genetic transformation and regeneration of coriander. In Improvement of Commercial Plants, eds. Rana PS, Pawan KJ. USA: Science and Technology Publishing House. pp. 161−78
    [161] Halder M, Jha S. 2021. Morphogenesis, genetic stability, and secondary metabolite production in untransformed and transformed cultures. In Plant cell and tissue differentiation and secondary metabolites: fundamentals and applications, eds. Ramawat KG, Ekiert HM, Goyal S. Cham: Springer. pp. 663−722. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30185-9_15
    [162] Chaurasia PK, Bharati SL. 2022. The chemistry inside spices & herbs: research and development. vol. 1. Bentham Science Publishers. 233 pp. doi: 10.2174/97816810894921220201
    [163] Sehgal D, Khan T. 2020. Plant tissue culture: beyond being a tool for genetic engineering. In Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology. Biovalorization of Solid Wastes and Wastewater Treatment, eds. Singh A, Srivastava S, Rathore D, Pant D. vol. 1. Singapore: Springer. pp. 175−200. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-6021-7_9
    [164] Phanindra P, Vinay M, Paul SS, Kotiyal A. 2024. Regulations of flowering in fruit crop for higher yield and quality production. The Agriculture Magazine 3(10):91−94

    Google Scholar

    [165] Kumar A, Anju T, Kumar S, Chhapekar SS, Sreedharan S, et al. 2021. Integrating omics and gene editing tools for rapid improvement of traditional food plants for diversified and sustainable food security. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:8093 doi: 10.3390/ijms22158093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [166] Camlica M, Yaldiz G. 2023. Variability in the biofortification properties of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). In Legumes Biofortification, eds. Nadeem, MA, et al. Singapore: Springer. pp. 507−20. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-33957-8_22
    [167] Phiri CK, Alimoso N, Mabedi F, Chitedze G. 2024. An overview of spice production, promotion, and economic benefits in Malawi. Journal of Crop Improvement 38:277−98 doi: 10.1080/15427528.2024.2336265

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [168] Singh HP, Malhotra SK. 2012. Horticulture for food, nutrition, health care and livelihood security. Biospectra 2012:1−20

    Google Scholar

    [169] Sthapit B, Rana R, Eyzaguirre P, Jarvis D. 2008. The value of plant genetic diversity to resource-poor farmers in Nepal and Vietnam. International journal of agricultural sustainability 6:148−66 doi: 10.3763/ijas.2007.0291

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Pandey H, Misra V, Sharma A, Chatterjee B, Sutradhar M, et al. 2025. Interventions of plant tissue culture techniques and genome editing in medicinally important spice crops. Medicinal Plant Biology 4: e023 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0025-0019
    Pandey H, Misra V, Sharma A, Chatterjee B, Sutradhar M, et al. 2025. Interventions of plant tissue culture techniques and genome editing in medicinally important spice crops. Medicinal Plant Biology 4: e023 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0025-0019

Figures(2)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(2980) PDF downloads(1263)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Interventions of plant tissue culture techniques and genome editing in medicinally important spice crops

Medicinal Plant Biology  4 Article number: e023  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The recalcitrant nature and high water content of seed germplasm in spice crops contribute to pest infestation, desiccation, microbial contamination, and reduced lifespan. Vegetatively propagated spice crops also face biotic and abiotic stresses, limiting their yield potential. Over-extraction and formulation of value-added products have further reduced the efficacy of asexual propagation methods. This review explores the integration of plant tissue culture techniques with gene manipulation approaches, such as gene transfer and CRISPR/Cas systems, to overcome these challenges. Tissue culture methods, including organogenesis, somatic embryogenesis, anther culture, shoot tip culture, and in vitro pollination, have been effective in enhancing disease resistance, early maturity, and yield potential in crops like cumin, turmeric, ginger, vanilla, saffron, cardamom, and black pepper. Gene transfer techniques, such as biolistic transformation and agrobacterium-mediated methods, have successfully achieved non-chimeric plant regeneration and synthetic seed production, mitigating desiccation and microbial contamination. Somaclonal variation has improved growth, yield, and stress resilience, as seen in tissue-cultured Wuling ginger and micropropagated baby ginger. Despite these advancements, the application of CRISPR/Cas in spice crops remains underexplored. Future research should focus on integrating CRISPR/Cas with tissue culture for enhanced stress tolerance, biofortification, and climate adaptation. Additionally, soilless culture and speed breeding could accelerate spice crop improvement, aligning with the Donald concept of plant ideotype. This review provides insights into these advancements and their potential to transform medicinally important spice crop cultivation.

    • Spices are phanerogamic and angiospermic seed-bearing crops cultivated in specific agroclimatic zones. The practice of cultivating spice crops dates back to the Indus Valley Civilization and the Mesopotamian Valley Civilization around 9000 BCE[1]. Farmer communities in countries such as India, Türkiye, Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Pakistan, Ethiopia, Nepal, Colombia, and Myanmar are actively involved in the cultivation and management of these crops. Indian farmers contribute approximately 75% of the global production and supply of spices[2]. In India, a wide variety of spice crops, including Piper nigrum, Elettaria cardamomum, Cinnamomum verum, Zingiber officinale, Curcuma longa, Syzgium aromaticum, Myristica sp., Vanilla, Crocus sativus, and Allium sativum, are successfully grown across diverse agroecological zones[3]. Various parts of these plants—such as roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and fruits—are processed into culinary powders, medicinal syrups, pastes, cosmetics, and disinfectants.

      Spice crops contain bioactive phytochemicals such as polyphenols and flavonoids, which provide numerous health benefits, including anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, neuroprotective, antimicrobial, anti-diabetic, antioxidant, antiviral, and cardioprotective properties[4]. P. nigrum contributes to 13% of the daily recommended intake of manganese and 3% of vitamin K, essential for bone health, wound healing, and immune function. E. cardamomum offers anti-cancer, anti-ulcer, and anti-inflammatory benefits while promoting the release of natural antioxidants[5]. C. verum supports immune function, digestion, and circulation, helping regulate blood pressure and heart rate. Z. officinale aids in alleviating nausea, motion sickness, constipation, and osteoarthritis while supporting cardiovascular and immune health[6]. C. longa helps manage osteoarthritis, fever, depression, liver diseases, and high cholesterol. It provides curcumin, omega-3 fatty acids, and essential vitamins, reducing the risk of chronic diseases[7]. S. aromaticum contains eugenol, which alleviates pain and fights infections, aiding in dental health and digestion[8]. Myristica sp. possesses antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and liver-protective properties, helping with joint pain and inflammation[9]. Vanilla sp. is beneficial for fever, spasms, blood clotting issues, and gastrointestinal distress[10]. C. sativus supports cardiovascular health, reduces inflammation, and helps manage depression[11]. Allium sativum is known for its ability to lower blood pressure, prevent atherosclerosis, and reduce serum cholesterol. It enhances fibrinolytic activity and possesses antimicrobial, antifungal, and anti-inflammatory properties[12]. Additionally, garlic may aid in the management of Alzheimer's, dementia, and arthritis. Regular consumption of these spices can significantly contribute to overall well-being by reducing the risk of chronic diseases and promoting a healthy immune system[13].

      The overexploitation of spice crops during post-harvest processing has mitigated the effectiveness of vegetative propagating and seed materials[14]. The recalcitrant nature of seed germplasm in spice crops—characterized by high water content, susceptibility to desiccation, microbial invasion, and short lifespan—has further weakened seed viability[15]. Juvenile or immature vegetative propagating planting materials are often vulnerable to insect-pest invasions and abiotic stress responses, which can impact their growth and development[16]. The over-extraction and formulation of economic products, such as powdered spices and medicinal drugs, have led to a decline in the diversity of spice crops. Climatic variations, including changes in temperature, light, and wind, as well as factors like non-uniform light radiation, life cycle stages, and floral initiation, collectively influence the growth (including fruit ripening), production, and yield of spice crops[17,18]. Excessive use of agrochemicals can introduce heavy metals and xenobiotic compounds into the soil, which slow down the morphological and physiological maturity of the crops[19]. The invasion of resistant insects and microbes can cause necrosis and blight in the phenotypic parts of the crops. Additionally, high light intensity and the carbon dioxide compensation point can inhibit biochemical synthesis, pulp formation, and other physiological responses in spice crops[20]. The accumulation of heavy metals and xenobiotics in the morphological parts and fruit pulp of spice crops can lead to the presence of toxic chemicals, further affecting their quality and safety[21].

      The integration of multi-omics resources such as gene transfer methods or the CRISPR/Cas system, alongside technologies like plant tissue culture, soilless culture, and speed breeding techniques has proven to be highly effective in advancing the improvement of spice crops[22]. The direct and indirect gene transfer methods as well as CRISPR/Cas systems and plant tissue culture techniques have successfully facilitated the transformed/non-chimeric plant regeneration for fulfilling the phenotypic improvements, population lines development, and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in spice crops[23]. The comprehensive use of soilless culture and plant tissue culture techniques has effectively supported plant regeneration, the generation of population lines, and the prevention of tissue culture-induced plant loss in spice crops under a controlled environmental ecosystem[24]. The combined application of soilless culture or speed breeding techniques with gene transfer methods, CRISPR/Cas systems, and plant tissue culture techniques has efficiently led to non-chimeric plant regeneration, phenotypic improvements, population line advancement, and increased resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses in spice crops within advanced controlled environment ecosystems[25]. Plant tissue culture techniques such as cell culture, suspension culture, Bergmann plating technique, raft nurse tissue paper, seed culture, embryo culture, endosperm culture, ovary culture, ovule culture, anther culture, protoplast culture/somatic hybridization, and somaclonal variation are commonly used for the virus- and disease-free regeneration of spice crops[26]. These methods are often combined with direct or indirect gene manipulation techniques, including the CRISPR/Cas system, to develop crops with enhanced resistance to both biotic and abiotic stresses[27]. The integration of plant tissue culture methods with gene manipulation techniques has led to the generation of biofortified population lines, resistant population lines, and other specialized crop variants in spice crops[28]. These approaches also contribute to the creation of climate-adapted, uniform, or distinct phenotypic and genotypic profiles in spice crops[29]. Furthermore, plant tissue culture and gene transfer techniques, including CRISPR/Cas, are being integrated with soilless culture methods to develop regenerated plant populations in controlled environmental ecosystems[30]. Extensive research has been conducted on various species of spice crops, with a focus on integrating gene transfer and plant regeneration techniques to improve population lines, variety development, and trait enhancement. This review article highlights innovative approaches integrating plant tissue culture, genetic transformation, soilless culture, and speed breeding techniques to enhance plant regeneration, trait improvement, and variety development in spice crops.

    • The sterilized morphological parts of spice crops, including root cells, shoot cells, leaf cells, flower cells, anthers, seeds, embryos, endosperms, ovaries, ovules, protoplasts, apical tips, axillary buds, and nodes, are subjected to genetic transformation using direct or indirect genetic engineering methods or the CRISPR/Cas system in isolated chamber systems[31]. The transformed plant parts are then inoculated onto various media, such as Murashige and Skoog (MS) media, N6 media, Gamborg (B5) media, Nitsch-Nitsch media, Driver and Kuniyuki Walnut (DKW) media, Woody Plant Media (WPM), and Schenk and Hildebrandt (SH) media, which contain appropriate concentrations of auxins. Under controlled culture conditions, callus induction is typically observed within 3 to 8 weeks[32]. The callus-derived plant parts are then transferred to media with specific concentrations of auxins and cytokinins, either combined or alone, to induce shoot regeneration, a process that generally takes 3 to 8 weeks[33]. The responding shootlets are subsequently placed in 1/2 strength MS media, N6 media, B5 media, Nitsch-Nitsch media, DKW media, WPM, or SH media containing auxins for root regeneration, which typically occurs within 2 to 6 weeks[34]. Afterward, the tissue-cultured plant lines are adapted and acclimatized in nutrient-rich growing systems under protected cultivation conditions. These regenerated plant populations are then grown in open environmental conditions to complete biological growth, as well as the development of population lines or varieties[35].

      The unique and modified chemical compositions of organized media have significant potential to enhance plant regeneration within a shorter generation time[36]. Key factors such as the selection of appropriate explants, the chemical composition of the media, stable concentrations of auxins, cytokinins, and organic supplements, as well as the maintenance of standardized controlled conditions, play a crucial role in overcoming recalcitrant traits. These factors also promote improved plant regeneration and the synthesis of secondary metabolites in spice crops under controlled environment systems[37] (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Prototype of gene transfers and plant regeneration in spice crops (CRISPR: Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats; Cas: associated protein; gRNA: guide ribonucleic acid; ds DNA: doubled stranded deoxy ribonucleic acid; PAM: protospacer adjacent motif/short DNA sequence).

    • Molecular tools, including direct or indirect genetic engineering methods and the CRISPR/Cas system, combined with plant tissue culture techniques, have proven to be effective in promoting plant regeneration in spice crops[38]. Healthy and uniform external plant parts of spice crops are capable of achieving high rates of regeneration through the application of genetic engineering or CRISPR/Cas technologies, in conjunction with plant tissue culture methods[39]. Countries with favorable agroclimatic conditions and rich vegetation have successfully induced tissue-cultured plant regeneration in various spice crops, such as C. verum, Cuminum cyminum, E. cardamomum, C. longa, P. nigrum, Vanilla sp., S. aromaticum, Z. officinale, Myristica, C. sativus, and A. sativum, using direct or indirect gene transfer methods or the CRISPR/Cas system[40]. The use of distinct and stable organized media, appropriate concentrations of plant growth regulators, and controlled environmental conditions has enabled the successful development of transformed plants with accelerated regeneration cycles[41]. The use of plant tissue culture methods such as organogenesis, somatic embryogenesis, anther culture, and gene transfer techniques including direct gene transfer via gene gun/biolistic gun/particle bombardment or indirect gene transfer via Agrobacterium-mediated methods has proven effective in achieving transformed gene/non-chimeric plant regeneration within a short generation time in spice crops[42]. Additionally, the plant tissue culture technique of synthetic seed production has successfully facilitated the synthesis of artificial seeds in a relatively short period for spice crops[43].

      The integration of CRISPR/Cas technology with tissue culture has opened new avenues for precise genome editing in spice crops, enabling targeted trait modifications such as disease resistance, enhanced phytochemical content, and improved post-harvest stability[44]. Significant progress has been made in developing transformation protocols for spice crops, particularly in species like Capsicum annuum, where Agrobacterium-mediated transformation combined with CRISPR/Cas9 has been successfully employed to edit genes related to pungency and fungal resistance[45]. Similarly, in C. longa and P. nigrum, researchers have explored protoplast-based CRISPR delivery systems to bypass the challenges associated with conventional transformation. The advancements in callus induction, somatic embryogenesis, and regeneration techniques have improved the feasibility of genome editing in some recalcitrant spice crops[46]. Additionally, the use of transient expression systems has allowed researchers to introduce CRISPR components without stable transformation, thereby reducing regulatory concerns associated with transgenic modifications[47]. The current application of plant tissue culture techniques, along with direct or indirect genetic engineering and the CRISPR/Cas system, has proven highly effective in developing plant populations resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as biofortified population lines in spice crops[22]. The integration of soilless culture with genetic modification methods, including direct or indirect gene transfer or the CRISPR/Cas system, has efficiently led to the production of genetically modified, tissue-cultured plant regenerations in spice crops under controlled environmental conditions[48]. Combining soilless culture and speed breeding techniques with plant tissue culture methods and gene transfer technologies has resulted in the successful development of biotic and abiotic stress-resistant, biofortified plant populations, as well as advancements in variety or seed development within controlled ecosystems[49]. Further research is needed to facilitate tissue-cultured plant regeneration in additional spice crops using plant tissue culture techniques and genetic engineering tools like CRISPR/Cas. This research should also focus on developing biotic and abiotic stress-resistant plants, biofortified population lines, climate-adapted varieties, and enhanced seed development through the integration of soilless culture and speed breeding techniques within controlled environmental systems. Investigations should aim to demonstrate transformed plant regenerations in spice crops by combining soilless culture, speed breeding, plant tissue culture methods, and genetic engineering tools, including CRISPR/Cas.

      Despite significant advancements in CRISPR/Cas technology and tissue culture techniques, several knowledge gaps remain that hinder its effective application in spice crops[50]. One major gap is the lack of well-annotated reference genomes for many spice crops, making it challenging to design precise guide RNAs (gRNAs) for targeted gene editing. While some progress has been made in sequencing genomes of crops like C. annuum and P. nigrum, other economically important spices such as C. longa and Z. officinale have incomplete or poorly annotated genomic datasets[51]. Without comprehensive genomic resources, identifying functionally relevant genes, predicting off-target effects, and validating gene edits remain difficult[52]. Additionally, limited transcriptomic and epigenomic data for spice crops further restricts the understanding of gene regulatory networks, which is crucial for developing precise genome-editing strategies[53]. Another critical knowledge gap lies in the low transformation and regeneration efficiency of spice crops, which limits the successful application of CRISPR/Cas systems[54]. Many spice crops are recalcitrant to tissue culture due to their slow growth, high polyphenolic content, and susceptibility to oxidative stress during in vitro conditions[55]. While somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis protocols exist for some species, their efficiency is highly variable, and regeneration rates remain low[56]. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying recalcitrance and regeneration potential in spice crops are not well understood, making it difficult to develop universally applicable tissue culture protocols[57]. The role of hormonal regulation, epigenetic modifications, and stress responses in regeneration needs further exploration to enhance tissue culture-based CRISPR applications[58]. Additionally, there is a lack of research on alternative gene delivery methods such as nanoparticle-mediated or viral vector-based CRISPR systems, which could offer viable solutions for difficult-to-transform species[59,60]. Addressing these knowledge gaps through integrative studies involving genomics, transcriptomics, and innovative transformation technologies will be essential for unlocking the full potential of CRISPR/Cas in spice crop improvement (Table 1, Fig. 1).

      Table 1.  Integration of gene transformations and plant tissue culture techniques in plant regenerations in spice crops with medical importance.

      S. No. Spices Medicinal importance Country Media + growth regulator levels Tissue culture methods Explants Callus induction, shoot regeneration, and root regeneration
      (d: days, w: weeks)
      Transformation methods Regeneration and transformation efficiency Ref.
      1 Nigella sativa Reduce blood pressure, cholesterol, triglyceride levels, improve insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta cell function Iraq Hairy root: MS + 200/300/100 mg/L cefotaxime Hairy Root Culture Seeds NA, NA, 20−25 d Agrobacterium rhizogenes +
      x-gluc + 35s
      33% of hairy root induction with 4.2 hairy roots/segment; 6.31 mg/g thymoquinone content in hairy roots which was higher compared to seed (4.19 mg/g) and normal seedlings (1.27 mg/g) [80]
      2 Piper nigrum L. Regulate blood pressure, lower cholesterol levels, anticancer potential, neuroprotective effects, promotes fat burning and weight loss, regulates blood sugar levels India Callus: SM media + 1.5% sucrose + 100 μg/L cefotaxime + 25 μg/L kanamycin Direct somatic embryogenesis Mature Seeds 3−5 w, 4 w, NA Agrobacterium mediated + PCR
      + RAPD
      Average of 9 hardened putative transgenic plantlets per gram of embryonic mass; Dot blot confirmed NPT II gene presence in 62 of 74 putative transformants. Southern analysis confirmed stable NPT II integration in six of 17 screened transformants [81]
      3 India Callus + plant regeneration: MS + kinetin + NAA; shoot: MS + 1 mg/L IAA / 1 mg/L IBA; root: MS + 0.2 mg/L NAA Organogenesis + somatic embryogenesis Shoot tips, nodes, leaf NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      4 India Sterile water + 5% alginate Synthetic seeds Shoot buds NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      5 Elethania cardamomum Matra. Blood sugar regulation, neuroprotective effects, metabolic and weight management, aphrodisiac and hormonal balance India MS + 1 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L IBA + 5% alginate Synthetic beeds Callus NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      6 Cinnamomum verum Persl. Regulation of blood pressure and heart rate India Shoot: MS + 0.5 mg/L NAA / 0.5 mg/L BAP Organogenesis Shoot tips NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      7 Cinnamomum verum Persl. Regulation of blood pressure and heart rate India MS + 3 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L kinetin Synthetic seeds Shoot buds NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      8 Syzgium aromaticum L., Merr. & L. M. Perry For digestive health, antinfallmatory effects India Shoot: MS + 0.5 mg/L NAA / 0.5 mg/L BAP Organogenesis Shoot tips NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      9 Zingiber officinale Roscoe Treating nausea, motion sickness, constipation, and osteoarthritis, etc. India Haploid lines + callus- MS + 2−3 mg/L 2,4-D; plant regeneration: MS + 10 mg/L BA / 0.2 mg/L 2,4-D Anther culture Anthers - uninucleate stage NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      10 Shoot: MS + 4 mg/L BA Organogenesis Rhizome buds NA, 5 w, NA NA [82]
      11 MS + 1 mg/L BAP + 5% alginate Synthetic seeds Somatic embryo NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      12 Myristica fragrans Sedative and sleep aid, antimicrobial properties, cognitive support, digestive health, anti-inflammatory effects, etc India Shoot: WPM + 3 mg/L BAP / 1 mg/L kinetin Organogenesis Shoot tips NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      13 Curcuma longa L.) Management of osteoarthritis, fever, depression, liver diseases, and high cholesterol India Callus + shoot: MS + 10% coconut milk + 2.5 mg/L BAP Organogenesis Vegetative buds NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      14 C. longa L. Management of osteoarthritis, fever, depression, liver diseases, and high cholesterol India MS + 1 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L IBA + 5% alginate Synthetic seeds Adventitious buds NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      15 Vanilla planifolia Jacks. For fever, spasms, blood clotting issues, and gastrointestinal distress India Plant regeneration: MS + 0.5 mg/L IBA Secondary metabolites-MS +
      0.1 mg/L 2,4-D / 0.5 mg/L kinetin / 1 mg/L IBA
      Somatic embryogenesis, suspension culure Aerial root NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      16 Vanilla planifolia Jacks. For fever, spasms, blood clotting issues, and gastrointestinal distress India Sterile water + 5% alginate Synthetic beeds Shoot buds NA, NA, NA NA [82]
      17 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora L. J. Persl., Cinnamomum verum Diagnosis in resuscitation, heat clearance, pain relief, fever, convulsions, stroke, sputum fainting, sputum coma, laryngeal pain, mouth pain, anthrax, bloodshot eye Mauritius Callus: MS + 1 mg/L BAP + 0.005-5 mg/L TDZ; Shoot: MS + 1 mg/L BAP + 2.5 mg/L TDZ Organogenesis Shoot tips, leaf 4 w, 6−8 w, 2 w C. verum explants: Responded by sprouting. Rooting: 100% shoots rooted within two weeks on basic MS medium No Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was performed, so transformation efficiency is not applicable in this study [83]
      18 Cumin Cuminum cyminum L. Reduce blood pressure, cholesterol, triglyceride levels, improve insulin sensitivity, and pancreatic beta cell function India Callus + shoot: B5 media + 2 μM BA + 0.5 μM NAA Indirect organogenesis Seeds-embryo NA, 29 d, NA Agrobacterium mediated + GFP + RT-PCR; gene gun method + GFP
      + RT-PCR
      Explants showed highest regeneration and transformation efficiency at 0.5 OD600 with 24 h co-cultivation, compared to other OD and time combinations. [84]
      19 Zingiber officinale Roscoe Treating nausea, motion sickness, constipation, and osteoarthritis, etc. India Callus: B5 media + 2 μM BA + 0.5 μM NAA Organogenesis Seed- embryo NA, NA, NA Agrobacterium mediated + GFP + PCR Gene gun + PCR Regeneration efficiency of transformed explants was highest (96.2%) on 0.4 M sorbitol-containing media, with the lowest browning rate (4.07%) compared to 0.2 and 0.6 M sorbitol. The transformed cumin embryos showed 51.93% regeneration efficiency [84]
      20 Cuminum cyminum L. Reduce blood pressyre, cholesterol, triglyceride levels, improve insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta cell function Iran Direct somatic embryogenesis: B5 media + 1/10 μM TDZ Indirect somatic embryogenesis: callus: B5 media + 0.1−0.4 mg/L / 1 mg/L BAP + 0.2/0.4 mg/L NAA; shoot: MS + 0.4 mg/L BAP + 0.1 mg/L NAA, MS + 1 mg/L BAP + 0.1 mg/L NAA Direct ir Indirect somatic embryogenesis Mature seeds 14 d, 5 w, NA Direct regeneration was highest (57.5%) at 10 μM TDZ and lowest (6.67%) at 1 μM, while indirect regeneration peaked (25.83%) with 0.1 mg/L NAA + 0.4 mg/L BAP; Shahdad and Afghanistan accessions showed superior response. [85]
      21 Elethania cardamomum Matra. Blood sugar regulation, neuroprotective effects, metabolic and weight management, aphrodisiac and hormonal balance India Callus: MS + 9 μM 2,4-D / 2−3 μM kinetin Rhizome 4−8 w, NA, NA Agrobacterium mediated + PCR + southern blot + dot blot No specific transformation or regeneration efficiency data [86]
      22 E. cardamomum Matra. Blood sugar regulation, neuroprotective effects, metabolic and weight management, aphrodisiac and hormonal balance India Shoot: MS + 1 mg/L BAP + 0.2 mg/L kinetin / 0.2 mg/L IAA / 0.1 mg/L calcium panthothenate + 5% cocnut milk Organogenesis Vegetative buds NA, NA, NA NA [87,88]
      23 Cinnamomum verum Persl. Regulation of blood pressure and heart rate Sri Lanka Shoot: ½MS + 1.5 mg/L BAP + 0.2 mg/L IAA; root: ½MS 0.1 mg/L NAA + 4 mg/L BAP Organogenesis Axillary buds NA, 14 d, 6 w Stem elongation: 19.5 mm after 14 d; leaf initiation: 2.06 leaves/plantlet after 14 d; root length: 6.7 cm after 6 w (on full MS + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 4.0 mg/L BAP + 1 g/L activated charcoal) [89]
      24 Syzgium aromaticum L., Merr. & L. M. Perry For digestive health, antinfallmatory effects India Shoot: ½MS salts + B5 media + 3 mg/L BAP / 0.5 mg/L NAA Organogenesis Nodes, shoot tips NA, 4−5 w, NA 6−8 shoots were obtained when 3 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA used in medium. Furthermore, 1−3 mg/L BAP and 0.1 mg/L NAA proved most effective for promotion of shoot proliferation. [90]
      25 Syzgium aromaticum L., Merr. & L. M. Perry For dental health, digestive aid, antimicrobial properties, blood sugar regulation, liver protection, aphrodisiac and reproductive health New Zealand Plant regeneration: white and voisey (CR) media + MS salts + B5 vitamins + 1 mg/L BAP + 1 mg/L NAA; root: white and voisey (CR) media + hormone free Seeds NA, 4 w, 2−3 w Agrobacterium mediated + GUS
      + PCR
      NA [91]
      26 Zingiber officinale Roscoe Treating nausea, motion sickness, constipation, and osteoarthritis, etc. India MS + 1 mg/L BAP/ 2 mg/L BAP; MS + 1 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L NAA; MS + 1 mg/L BAP + 1 mg/L NAA; MS + 2 mg/L BAP + 1 mg/L NAA; MS + 3 mg/L BAP + 1 mg/L NAA Direct organogenesis AerialaStem- axillary meristem, apical meristem NA, 2 w, 2 w 85% of plantlets were successfully hardened and established in the field, with 95% success from basal (axillary meristem) and 70% from middle (apical meristem) stem explants. [9294]
      27 India Callus: MS + 9−22.6 μM 2,4-D; shoot: 0.9 μM 2,4-D + 44.4 μM BA; root: MS + 5.4 μM NAA Indirect organogenesis Aerial shoot, young leaf 4 w, 4 w, 5 w Organogenesis and regeneration occurred at 11.9 μM 2,4-D + 44.4 μM BA with 80% soil establishment; transformation efficiency not reported. [95]
      28 Myristica fragrans Sedative and sleep aid, antimicrobial properties, cognitive support, digestive health, anti-inflammatory effects, etc. India Callus: WPM + 1 mg/L BA + 1 mg/L NAA Indirect organogenesis Matured unopened fruits NA, NA, NA [95]
      29 Z. officinale Roscoe Treating nausea, motion sickness, constipation, and osteoarthritis, etc. India NA, NA, NA Agrobacterium mediated + GUS
      + PCR
      The regeneration of hygromycin-resistant plantlets was confirmed, it does not include detailed regeneration efficiency [96]
      30 Z. officinale Roscoe Treating nausea, motion sickness, constipation, and osteoarthritis, etc. India Shoot: ½MS + 1−10 mg/L 2,4-D / 3 mg/L BA Organogenesis Shoot buds. leaf discs, pseudostem 2−4 w, NA, NA Agrobacterium mediated + GUS
      + PCR
      Using young bud as explant, transformation frequency ranged from 1.1% to 2.2%, with slow callus growth under antibiotic selection [97]
      31 Allium sativum L. Management of heart health, immune boosting, digestive health, bone health, aphrodisiac amd reproductive health Korea, Croatia Callus: MS + 2 mg/L 2,4-D; shoot: MS + 0.1 mg/L BAP Indirect organogenesis Shoot tips 4 w, 14 w, NA Regeneration declined with callus age, but healthy plantlets were obtained from callus up to 16 months old across all clones. [98,99]
      32 Mexico, Turkey Callus: MS + 2.2−4.5 μM 2,4-D, MS + 2.2−4.5 μM 2,4-D + 2.2−4.6 μM kinetin; Shoot: MS + 4.4 μM kinetin Indirect organogenesis, root tip culture Root tips 8 w, 3−6 w, NA Regeneration data showed a high efficiency—up to 170 plantlets per gram fresh weight (FW) of callus—when cultured on MS medium with 4.6 μM kinetin + 4.5 μM 2,4-D. [100,101]
      33 Crocus sativus L. For cardiovascular health management, reduction in inflammation, and helps manage depression India Callus: MS + 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D + 1 mg/L BAP + 1 mg/L IAA; plant regeneration: 0.5 mg/L TDZ +1 mg/L IAA + 0.1 g/L activated charcoal Indirect somatic embryogenesis Corm slice 3−4 w, 4 w, NA Agrobacterium mediated + PCR
      + southern blot
      4% transformation efficiency with Agrobacterium, > 70% callus induction, and cormlet regeneration in 8 w using TDZ + IAA + activated charcoal [102]
      34 Japan, India Callus: 2 μM BA + 2 μM NAA + 40, 60 g/L table sugar; root: 8.8 μM IBA + 40 g/L table sugar Corms 8 w, NA, 12 w Cormlet regeneration: 70.0 ± 0.30 cormlets per corm slice on ½ MS + TDZ (20 μM) + IAA (10 μM) + sucrose (40 g/L) Cormlet germination: 90% on MS + BAP (20 μM) + NAA (15 μM) Cormlet enlargement: Up to 2.5 g on MS + TDZ (15 μM) + IAA (12.5 μM) + sucrose (30 g/L) Flowering: 25% of 2.5 g cormlets flowered under greenhouse conditions [103105]
      35 Curcuma longa L., Curcuma mangga valeton & zijp Management of osteoarthritis, fever, depression, liver diseases, and high cholesterol Thailand Embryo: MS + 5 mg/L 2,4-D / 5 mg/L NAA; shoot: MS + 3 mg/L BA + 0.5 mg/L NAA + 3% maltose; root: MS + 3 mg/L NAA Organogenesis Rhizome buds NA, 5 w, 2 w Agrobacterium mediated + PCR Somatic embryo formation was highest on MS medium with 5 mg/L 2,4-D and 5 mg/L NAA, reaching 87.50% in Curcuma longa and 95.83% in C. mangga. Increasing NAA or 2,4-D to 8 mg/L reduced embryo formation to 4.2% and 8.3% in C. longa, and 4.2% and 12.5% in C. mangga, respectively [106]
      36 Curcuma longa L. Management of osteoarthritis, fever, depression, liver diseases, and high cholesterol Sweden, India Callus: MS + 1 mg/L basta; shoot: 2.2 μM BA + 0.93 μM kinetin + 5% coconut water + 2% sucrose Indirect somatic embryogenesis Mature rhizomes 4 w, 3−4 w, NA Particle bombardment
      gene gun method
      + GUS + PCR
      Transient GUS expression was observed in 91% of bombarded embryos after 24 h, while stable expression was detected in the shoot tips and roots of plantlets after 3 months [107,108]
      37 India Cotyledon: B5 media + ½MS media; shoot: B5 media + 0.5 μM BA + 2.4 μM NAA; root: B5 media + 2.4 μM NAA Mature seeds NA, 25−30 d, 2−3 w Agrobacterium mediated + GUS + semi-quantitative RT-PCR The post-transformation regeneration efficiency was 2.9%, with a confirmed transformation efficiency of 1.5% (PCR-based) and a 36.4% survival rate after hardening [109,110]
      38 Vanilla planifolia Jacks. For fever, spasms, blood clotting issues, and gastrointestinal distress India, Turkey, Indonesia Plant regeneration: 4.43 μM BA + 2.68 μM NAA Direct somatic embryogenesis Shoot Ttps NA, 45 d, 45 d Agrobacterium mediated + GUS + PCR + southern blot + northern blot The highest callus regeneration (80%) occurred in VK4, while 100% direct shoot regeneration was achieved in VK3 and VK6, with VK6 also yielding 50% rooting, 33.3% indirect shoot regeneration in VK2, and 71.4% globular-stage embryo formation in VK4. [111113]
      39 India NA, NA, NA Agrobacterium mediated + GUS + PCR + southern blot + northern blot Transformation efficiency averaged 39.4% for the nptII gene and 23.4% for GUS across three independent experiments [87]
      40 V. planifolia Jacks. For fever, spasms, blood clotting issues, and gastrointestinal distress Mexico Callus: MS + 50 mg/L cysteine HCl + 100 mg/L ascorbic acid + 0.45 μM TDZ; callus: MS + 0.45 μM TDZ, MS + 8.88 μM TDZ / 11.11 μM BA Cell suspension culture Immature seeds 4 w, NA, NA In V. planifolia in vitro culture, B:R LEDs enhanced shoot elongation and chlorophyll synthesis during multiplication, while B LEDs promoted shoot elongation, root and leaf formation during rooting. All LED treatments increased photosynthetic pigment synthesis and achieved 100% acclimatization success [114]
      41 Malaysia Shoot: MS + 1−10 mg/L BAP, ½MS + 1 mg/L BAP; root: ½MS + 1 mg/L BAP Organogenesis Nodes, shoot tips NA, 30−45 d, 30 d Auxin-free half-strength MS medium with 1 mg/L BAP enabled 100% rooting and was optimal for shoot propagation and early differentiation, with stem nodal segments showing high regeneration potential [115]
      42 Malaysia, Moroco Shoot + root: MS + 0.5 mg/L NAA + 1 mg/L BAP; Knudson C media (KC) + 0.5 mg/L NAA + 1 mg/L BAP; Vacin & went media (VC) + 0.5 mg/L NAA + 1 mg/L BAP Direct somatic embryogenesis Nodes NA, 2−6 w, 2−6 w MS medium produced the highest shoot (2.37 ± 0.76 cm) and root (2.04 ± 0.95 cm) lengths with well-formed leaves and extended roots, significantly outperforming KC and VW media in V. planifolia nodal segment cultures [116,117]
      43 Brazil Shoot: double culture system media + 1, 2, 3 mg/L BAP; root: double culture system media + 1, 2, 3 mg/L IBA Organogenesis Nodes, axillary buds NA, 30, 60, 90 d, 30, 60, 90 d DPS medium with 1 mg/L BA yielded over a 2.5-fold increase in axillary shoot multiplication compared to SS medium after 90 d, with 100% rooting in full-strength MS (without IBA) and 100% acclimatization success. [118,119]
      NA: Not available.
    • Several challenges persist in implementing CRISPR/Cas with tissue culture technology in spice crops[61]. One of the major hurdles is the low transformation efficiency in many spice crops, as they often exhibit recalcitrance to genetic modification due to complex tissue regeneration pathways[62]. Species like A. sativum and Z. officinale lack efficient in vitro regeneration protocols, limiting the ability to generate stable CRISPR-edited lines[63]. Moreover, prolonged tissue culture conditions can lead to somaclonal variations, which may introduce unintended genetic modifications, complicating the evaluation of CRISPR-induced edits[64]. Additionally, optimizing delivery methods for CRISPR reagents remains a challenge, as traditional Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and biolistic methods show variable success rates in spice crops[65]. The development of novel delivery approaches such as nanoparticle-mediated CRISPR delivery, electroporation of protoplasts, and viral vector-based systems may provide solutions to these limitations[66]. Another critical issue is the time-consuming and labor-intensive nature of tissue culture-based CRISPR workflows, making large-scale applications difficult[67].

      To overcome the limitations associated with CRISPR/Cas genome editing in spice crops, it is crucial to refine transformation protocols and improve tissue regeneration efficiencies[68]. One approach is optimizing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation by identifying suitable explant tissues with high transformation potential, such as embryogenic calli or meristematic tissues[69]. The use of phytohormone combinations to enhance callus induction and somatic embryogenesis can significantly improve regeneration rates in recalcitrant spice crops like Z. officinale and A. sativum[70]. Furthermore, employing stress treatments such as osmotic conditioning and antioxidant supplementation can enhance explant viability and reduce oxidative stress during transformation, leading to better recovery of edited plants[71]. Protoplast-based CRISPR delivery systems, which eliminate the need for stable transformation, also show promise in editing species with low regeneration potential[72]. By optimizing polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated uptake of CRISPR components and integrating microfluidic platforms for efficient protoplast manipulation, transformation efficiencies can be improved. In addition to refining traditional transformation techniques, exploring non-tissue culture-based genome editing strategies such as in planta transformation offers a viable alternative for spice crop improvement[73]. In planta transformation bypasses the need for prolonged tissue culture by directly delivering CRISPR reagents into developing plant tissues, thereby reducing somaclonal variation and enhancing editing efficiency[74]. One promising method is the use of floral dip transformation, where Agrobacterium carrying CRISPR constructs is applied to flowering plants, leading to edited seed progeny[75]. While this technique has been extensively utilized in model plants like A. thaliana, its application in spice crops requires further optimization due to differences in floral structures and reproductive mechanisms[76]. Another emerging approach is nanoparticle-mediated CRISPR delivery, where functionalized nanoparticles are used to transport gene-editing components into plant cells without the need for transgene integration[77]. Additionally, viral vector-based CRISPR delivery systems can facilitate transient genome editing, enabling rapid trait modification without stable transformation[78]. These approaches not only enhance the feasibility of CRISPR in spice crops but also address regulatory concerns by minimizing foreign DNA integration[79]. Future research should focus on adapting these innovative methodologies to diverse spice crop species, ensuring their applicability for large-scale breeding programs and commercial applications.

    • Plant tissue culture methods such as anther culture, ethyl methyl sulfate (EMS) mutation, somaclonal variation, shoot tip/meristem culture, root tip culture, in vitro pollination, embryo rescue, and rhizome culture have been highly effective in achieving plant regeneration for traits improvement, population line development, and enhanced tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in spice crops[120]. Additionally, plant tissue culture technique synthetic seed production has successfully facilitated the creation of artificial seeds, addressing challenges such as high water content, desiccation, microbial spoilage, and short seed lifespan in spice crops[121]. Plant tissue culture techniques have successfully enhanced biotic stress resistance, population line development, and phenotypic traits in various spice crops such as E. cardamomum, C. sativus, Z. officinale, P. nigrum, Amomum subulatum, Vanilla sp., C. longa, and A. sativum[122]. Key factors, including the selection of explants, appropriate concentrations of growth regulators, and controlled environmental conditions, play a crucial role in stimulating biological growth, physiological activity, and the regeneration of population lines. These factors also contribute to trait improvement and synthetic seed development in spice crops[123]. The careful selection of explants has been shown to effectively regulate gene expression, improving biotic stress resistance and promoting the synthesis of secondary metabolites in regenerated spice crop population lines[124].

      Plant tissue culture techniques, along with consistent influencing factors, are highly effective in advancing trait improvement, population line development, synthetic seed production, and secondary metabolite synthesis in spice crops[125]. However, the integration of plant tissue culture methods with direct or indirect gene transfers, or the CRISPR/Cas system, has not yet fully contributed to morphological improvements, population line development, or variety and synthetic seed production. Further research is needed to explore the development of population lines, morphological improvements, and variety creation by integrating plant tissue culture techniques with gene transfer technologies, including CRISPR/Cas system. The combination of soilless culture with plant tissue culture methods can significantly enhance population line development, phenotypic improvement, variety and synthetic seed production, and secondary metabolite synthesis in spice crops under controlled environmental systems[126]. Studies are also required to improve traits, develop population lines or varieties, and enrich secondary metabolites in spice crops using soilless culture in combination with plant tissue culture techniques or gene transfer methods under controlled conditions. The integration of soilless culture and speed breeding techniques with plant tissue culture methods or gene transfer technologies holds great potential for developing population lines or varieties, creating biofortified populations, and improving resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses in spice crops within controlled ecosystems[127]. Further investigation is needed to address abiotic stress traits, improve population lines, develop biofortified populations, multiply varieties, enhance secondary metabolites, and form synthetic seeds in spice crops by combining soilless culture or speed breeding techniques with plant tissue culture methods or gene transfer technologies, including CRISPR/Cas, under controlled environment conditions. The application of soilless culture, speed breeding techniques, and gene transfer or CRISPR/Cas technologies is crucial to ensuring food security and enhancing germplasm resources (Table 2).

      Table 2.  Generations of population lines and variety in spice crops with plant tissue culture techniques.

      S. No. Spices Country Tissue
      cultured variety
      Tissue culture methods Traits improvement/
      population line generations
      Explants Ref.
      1 Elethania cardamomum Matra. India Anther Culture Homozygous Haploid Lines Anthers [128]
      2 Crocus sativus L. India EMS Mutation Mutant Population Lines Development Corm [129]
      3 Zingiber officinale Roscoe China Wuling Somaclonal Variations Disease Free, High Performance Growth Parameters Or Yield Rhizome [130]
      4 Z. officinale Roscoe USA Baby ginger Micropropagation Cold Hardy Ginger Lines, High Yield, Early Durations Rhizome [131]
      5 Amomum subulatum Vietnam Shoot Tip Culture Micropropagated Population Line Generations Shoot Tips [132]
      6 Piper nigrum L. India Somatic Embryo,
      Meristem Culture
      Virus Free Population Lines Enhancement Shoot Tips [133]
      7 E. cardamomum Matra. India Micropropagation Virus or Disease Free Resistance Lines Such As Katte, Kokke Kundu, Nilgiri Necrosis, High Yield Population Lines Floral Buds [134]
      8 Z. officinale Roscoe India Somaclonal Variations, Invitro Pollinations,
      Embryo Rescue
      High Yield, High Quality Lines, Rhizome Rot or Bacterial Wilt Resistance Seed-Embryo [134]
      9 Vanilla planifolia Jacks. India Shoot Tip Culture,
      Root Tip Culture
      Root Rot Resistance Population Lines Development Shoot Tips, Root Tips [134]
      10 Z. officinale Roscoe, V. planifolia Jacks., P. nigrum, E. cardamoum, Cuminum cyminum India Synthetic Seeds Artificial Seed Productions Somatic Embryo, Shoot Tips [134]
      11 Z. officinale Roscoe Malaysia Micropropagation-

      Rhizome Culture

      Disease Free Plants, Secondary Metabolites or Anti-Oxidants Synthesis Immature Rhizome Buds [135]
      12 Z. officinale Roscoe China Root Tip Culture High Yield, Autotetraploid Population Lines Generations, High Gingerol Contents Root Tip [136]
      13 Curcuma longa L. India Micropropagation High Yield, Rhizome Rot Resistance, Uniform Population Lines, High Curcumin Contents Rhizome [137]
      14 Allium sativum L. Philippines Shoot Tip Culture Onion Yellow Dwarf Virus, Leek Yellow Strip Potyvirus Resistant Lines, High Yield Medium Size Bulb, Shoot Tips [138]
    • The phenotypic parts of spice crops are sterilized using appropriate protective stock solutions. Once sterilized, these parts are subjected to genetic engineering through the incorporation of direct or indirect gene transfers, or the CRISPR/Cas system, under controlled environmental conditions[139]. The transformed plant parts are then inoculated onto the organized and standard chemical composition media supplemented with stable concentrations of auxins or cytokinins to regulate both direct and indirect plant regeneration processes[140]. Callus induction typically occurs within 3 to 8 weeks, while plant regeneration is observed within 2 to 6 weeks in spice crops[141]. The regenerated plant population lines are then integrated into soilless or water-based culture systems to promote efficient biological and physiological growth under controlled environmental conditions[142]. These developed plant populations are further subjected to speed breeding techniques such as mass selection, bulk selection, pedigree methods, backcrossing, mutation techniques, clonal or asexual propagation, polyploidy, single seed descent (SSD), recombinant inbred lines (RILs), and near-isogenic lines (NILs) to facilitate the development of new varieties, seeds, and population lines[143].

      The integration of speed breeding techniques and soilless culture in plant regeneration for spice crops helps prevent the loss of regenerated plant population lines. By utilizing these techniques, spice crop varieties and population lines can be developed in a shorter generation time[144]. The combination of speed breeding techniques and soilless culture effectively supports the development of uniform phenotypic and genotypic plant population lines under controlled environmental conditions[145]. This integration has significant potential for developing biotic stress resistance (e.g., resistance to diseases, insects, and pests) and abiotic stress resistance (e.g., tolerance to water, light, temperature, heavy metals, frost, cold injury, problematic soils, and photo-insensitivity) in spice crops[146]. Furthermore, speed breeding techniques and soilless culture offer considerable promise for achieving biofortification, early flowering, early maturation, high yields, biochemical enrichment, metabolic enhancements, and climate-adapted lines in spice crops under controlled conditions[147]. However, the application of these techniques may also address morphological challenges such as self-incompatibility, male sterility, embryo abortion, pseudo-seed formation, seed setting issues, and the recalcitrant nature of some spice crops[148]. The use of speed breeding techniques and soilless culture can also prevent albino plant regeneration and help develop disease-free, nutrient-enriched species in controlled environments, contributing to climate restoration and food security[149]. Research is needed to promote plant regeneration, as well as the development of population lines or varieties, in spice crops through the integration of speed breeding techniques and soilless culture under controlled environmental conditions. Additionally, studies should focus on developing biotic and abiotic stress-resistant populations, biofortified or biochemically enriched population lines, and climate-smart lines using these integrated methods. Further investigations are required to explore plant regeneration in other spice crops by integrating soilless culture or speed breeding techniques with plant tissue culture methods or gene transfer technologies, including CRISPR/Cas, under controlled environmental conditions (Fig. 2).

      Figure 2. 

      Integration of gene transfers, plant tissue culture, and speed breeding techniques in spice crops under a controlled environment ecosystem (CRISPR- Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats; Cas9- associated protein 9).

    • The production and management of horticultural crops and tree species with the utilization of kitchen waste and wastewater in the surrounding home areas is referred to as home gardens. Other scientific terms for home gardens are kitchen garden or nutrient garden[150]. The home garden cultivates fruit crops—Magnifera indica, Musa sp., Manilkara zapota, Psidium guajava, Carica papaya, Citrus aurantifolia, Phyllanthus emblica, Punica granatum, Annona muricata, and Phoenix dactylifera; vegetable crops—Solanum lycopersicum, Solanum melongena, Capsicum annuum, Allium cepa, Abelmoschus esculentus, Momordica charantia L., Trichosanthes cucmerina, Luffa acutangula, Lagenaria siceraria, Amaranthus spp., Lablab purpureus, and Beta vulgaris; spice crops—Cucrcuma longa, Coriandrum sativum, and Trigonella foenum-graecum; medicinal plants—Aloe vera, Solanum spp., Acorus calamus, Centella asiatica, Mentha spp., basil, Ocimum tenuiflorum, Plectranthus amboinicus, Eclipta prostrata, Phyllanthu niruri, Cisscus quandrangularis, Soalnum trilobatum, Alternanthera sessilis, Phyla nodiflora, Solanum nigrum, and Chrysopogon zizanioides; flower crops—Rosa indica, Hibiscus rosa-sinersis, Jasminum officinale, and Nerium olerander; and trees—Callistemon acuminatus Cheel, Styphnolobium japonicum, and Bauhinia vahlii in the fenced surrounding areas[151]. Disposed plastic materials such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes, PVC containers, and PVC buckets, along with natural fencing like bamboo terracing and metal terracing, and artificial fencing such as plastic pots/pits, cement pots/pits, and wooden containers are used in the application of kitchen waste and wastewater[152]. The utilization of home gardens recycles kitchen waste or wastewater and prevents waste disposal and microbial contamination. The application of home gardens effectively manages both biodegradable and non-biodegradable solid waste[153].

      The convergence of tissue culture and genome editing technologies is revolutionizing the future of home gardening by enabling the development of high-yielding, disease-resistant, and nutritionally enhanced spice crops[154]. Tissue culture techniques, such as micropropagation and somatic embryogenesis, allow for the mass production of high-quality, pathogen-free spice plants like C. annuum, C. longa, and P. nigrum, ensuring a consistent supply of elite planting material for home gardeners[155]. These techniques also facilitate the rapid multiplication of rare or slow-growing spice crops that are traditionally difficult to cultivate in household environments[156]. With the integration of CRISPR-based genome editing, spice plants can be modified to exhibit desirable traits such as improved growth in confined spaces, enhanced resistance to common pests and diseases, and increased production of essential bioactive compounds. This ensures that home gardeners can grow robust, high-quality spices with minimal effort and reduced dependence on chemical pesticides or fertilizers[157].

      The plant tissue culture methods and gene transfer techniques have effectively resulted in transformed/non-chimeric plant regeneration in home garden spice crops such as fenugreek and coriander[158]. The application of indirect gene transfer using Agrobacterium rhizogenes and plant tissue culture methods like hairy root culture or indirect organogenesis has effectively exhibited non-chimeric root regeneration in a short time period in fenugreek[159]. The use of indirect gene transfer with Agrobacterium tumefaciens and plant tissue culture techniques like indirect somatic embryogenesis has effectively stimulated embryo formation and non-chimeric shoot regeneration in coriander[160]. The comprehensive application of indirect gene transfers using A. rhizogenes or A. tumefaciens and plant tissue culture methods like organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis has successfully induced non-chimeric plant regeneration in home garden spice crops[161]. However, the application of the CRISPR/Cas system and plant tissue culture techniques have not yet been applied to home garden spice crops for plant regeneration, population line generation, morphological improvement, and biotic or abiotic stress resistance[162]. Studies may be required to explore plant regeneration and improvements in home garden spice crops using the CRISPR/Cas system and plant tissue culture techniques. Further investigation may be needed to improve efficient plant regeneration and mitigate regenerated plant loss in home garden spice crops with the application of soilless culture and plant tissue culture techniques, gene transfers, or the CRISPR/Cas system under a controlled environment ecosystem. Research may also be required to advance plant regeneration and improvements in home garden spice crops with the integration of soilless culture or speed breeding techniques, plant tissue culture methods, gene transfers, or the CRISPR/Cas system under controlled environmental conditions.

      The advancements in tissue culture and genome editing technologies present several opportunities in the home gardening sector[163]. First, the development of dwarf or compact spice varieties through targeted genetic modifications can cater to urban gardeners with limited space, enabling efficient cultivation on balconies, rooftops, and indoor hydroponic setups[164]. Second, genome editing can enhance abiotic stress tolerance, allowing spice crops to thrive in diverse home environments with varying light, temperature, and humidity conditions[165]. Additionally, biofortified spice varieties with enhanced nutritional and medicinal properties-such as curcumin-enriched C. longa or capsaicin-enhanced C. annuum—can provide home gardeners with fresh, health-boosting spices tailored to dietary needs[166]. The commercialization of genetically improved spice plants through ready-to-grow tissue-cultured seedlings and CRISPR-edited seeds could open new markets for nurseries, biotech startups, and gardening enthusiasts[167]. As regulatory frameworks evolve, the accessibility of these advanced spice plants will further encourage sustainable, pesticide-free, and high-yield home gardening, ultimately contributing to food security and personal wellness[168,169] (Table 3).

      Table 3.  Approaches of genetic transformations and plant tissue culture techniques in non-chimeric plant regenerations in home garden spice crops.

      S. No. Spices Country Media + growth
      regulator levels
      Tissue culture methods Explants Callus induction, shoot regeneration, root regeneration (weeks) Transformation methods Regeneration and transformation efficiency Ref.
      1 Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Greece Callus + root: 2.2 g/L MS salts + vitamins + 1% sucrose + 0.05% MES (2-N-morpolino ethanesulfonic acid); full strength McCowns WPM + 3% sucrose + 0.05% MES; full strengths Hoagland nutrient solutions Hairy root culture/Indirect organogenesis Seeds 2, NA, 2.5−3 Agrobacterium rhizogenes
      + GFP + PCR
      Callus responder transformed root at 12 d in solid or liquid media [159]
      2 Coriandrum sativum L. India Callus: MS + 1 mg/L 2,4 D; embryo: MSH media (Murashige & Skoog, 1962 and Schenk and Hildebrandt, 1972) + 0.5 mg/L NAA + 1 mg/L 2,4 D; shoot: MSH media + 0.5 mg/L BAP Indirect somatic embryogenesis Seed: radicle: root tip NA, NA, NA Agrobacterium tumefaciens + GUS + PCR Embryo successfully exhibited plantlets [160]
      NA: Not available.
    • Plant tissue culture methods, along with gene transfer techniques are highly effective in tissue-cultured plant regeneration and population line development in spice crops. Plant tissue culture methods and direct or indirect gene transfers have successfully facilitated the development of modified gene tissue-cultured plant regeneration in several spice crops, including Vanilla spp., C. sativus, E. cardamomum, P. nigrum, C. longa, garlic, C. cyminum, Myristica spp., C. verum, S. aromaticum, and Nigella sativum have been achieved through the use of distinct growth regulators, media chemical compositions, explant selections, organic supplements, and controlled environmental conditions. Plant tissue culture methods and direct or indirect gene transfers are essential for stimulating modified gene plant regenerations within a shorter generation time in spice crops. Plant tissue culture methods and gene transfers have proven successful in improving traits, developing population lines, producing varieties or seeds, enhancing biotic stress resistance, and increasing secondary metabolite production in spice crops. However, the full integration of plant tissue culture techniques and CRISPR/Cas systems has not yet been fully realized in modified gene plant regeneration, population line development, enhancement of biotic and abiotic stress resistance, and the creation of climate-adapted lines in spice crops. Further research is needed to explore tissue-cultured plant regeneration and population line development with the intervention of plant tissue culture techniques and CRISPR/Cas systems in spice crops. The integration of soilless culture or speed breeding techniques with plant tissue culture methods and gene transfer or CRISPR/Cas systems has been shown to efficiently promote plant regeneration, development of biotic and abiotic stress-resistant population lines, enhancement of biofortified population lines, and the generation of climate-adapted population lines and Donald concept-plant ideotype under controlled environmental conditions. Further research is needed to investigate modified gene plant regeneration, enhancement of biotic and abiotic stress-resistant population lines, and the development of biofortified and climate-adapted population lines in spice crops by combining soilless culture or speed breeding techniques with plant tissue culture methods, gene manipulations, or CRISPR/Cas systems under controlled environmental conditions. The comprehensive integration of these novel technologies holds great potential for addressing food security, combating undernourishment, and enhancing germplasm resources in spice crops within controlled ecosystem environments.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: conceptualizations: Sharma A, Pandey H, Misra V; draft manuscript preparations, compilation: Sharma A; evaluation, proofreading: Pandey H, Misra V, Chatterjee B, Sutradhar M, Kumar R, Heisnam P, Devadas VASN, Kesavan AK, Mall AK, Vashishth A, Tehri N, Longkho K, Sharma S; directions: Pandey H, Misra V, Sutradhar M, Kumar R, Heisnam P, Devadas VASN, Kesavan AK, Mall AK, Vashishth A, Tehri N; figure designing & making: Misra V. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Himanshu Pandey, Varucha Misra, Avinash Sharma

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (3) References (169)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Pandey H, Misra V, Sharma A, Chatterjee B, Sutradhar M, et al. 2025. Interventions of plant tissue culture techniques and genome editing in medicinally important spice crops. Medicinal Plant Biology 4: e023 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0025-0019
    Pandey H, Misra V, Sharma A, Chatterjee B, Sutradhar M, et al. 2025. Interventions of plant tissue culture techniques and genome editing in medicinally important spice crops. Medicinal Plant Biology 4: e023 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0025-0019

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return