Search
2026 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Soil microplastics hidden web: interaction of microbes and viruses as a frontier for sustainable ecosystem recovery

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Microplastics as abiotic stressors alter the functioning of soil ecosystems.

    Bacteriophages are strong but overlooked agents in microplastic-contaminated soils.

    VLPs equipped with nanoenzymes enable focused, direct attack on polymer chains and phage-assisted microbial augmentation.

    These concepts require a single framework to link lab science with long-term ecosystem recovery.

    Viral-mediated HGT can enhance the capacity to degrade plastic and raise the risk of transmitting virulence genes and antibiotic resistance.

  • Microplastics (MPs) act as an emerging contaminant in agricultural ecosystems, affecting the health and function of the soil. Their presence can alter soil physicochemical properties, disrupt nutrient cycling processes, and ultimately influence crop productivity and quality. Meanwhile, MPs can also modify the soil microbiome by forming polymer-associated biofilms known as plastispheres, and altering the interactions between various microbial taxa. With a focus on the impact of bacteriophages on microbial communities and traits through processes like lysis, lysogeny, and horizontal gene transfer, this review summarizes the current understanding of soil-specific interactions between microorganisms and viruses. While examining the dual ecological effects of viral horizontal gene transfer on both plastic-degrading capacities, and the spread of antibiotic resistance, possible relationships between phage activity and soil biogeochemical processes are evaluated. Together with carefully planned biotechnological approaches, such as phage-assisted microbial augmentation and the application of virus-like particles, innovative analytical techniques, including metagenomics, viromics, and single-cell methodologies, enable the investigation of new diagnostic methods and potential approaches to support soil recovery under MP stress. In conclusion, a practical framework is proposed that connects diagnostics to management, focusing on continuous monitoring, standardized indicators, and a comprehensive risk assessment. This review demonstrates that MPs serve not only as physical pollutants but also as an abiotic stressor that alter the interactions among microbes, viruses, and soils. This finding indicates that the soil virome plays a significant yet underexplored role in the sustainability of agriculture.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • [1] de Souza Machado AA, Kloas W, Zarfl C, Hempel S, Rillig MC. 2018. Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology 24(4):1405−1416 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Jin T, Tang J, Lyu H, Wang L, Gillmore AB, et al. 2022. Activities of microplastics (MPs) in agricultural soil: a review of MPs pollution from the perspective of agricultural ecosystems. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 70:4182−4201 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c07849

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Ren Y, Liu X, Hu H, Liu D, Li N, et al. 2025. Do microplastics always harm agroecosystem services? A global synthesis. Global Change Biology 31:e70269 doi: 10.1111/gcb.70269

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Hartmann M, Six J. 2023. Soil structure and microbiome functions in agroecosystems. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 4:4−18 doi: 10.1038/s43017-022-00366-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] He D, Zhang Y, Gao W. 2021. Micro (nano) plastic contaminations from soils to plants: human food risks. Current Opinion in Food Science 41:116−121 doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.04.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Boctor J, Hoyle FC, Farag MA, Ebaid M, Walsh T, et al. 2025. Microplastics and nanoplastics: fate, transport, and governance from agricultural soil to food webs and humans. Environmental Sciences Europe 37:68 doi: 10.1186/s12302-025-01104-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Qin Y, Tian X, Zhang J, Tu Y, Chen C. 2025. Combined toxicity and ecological impacts of soil microplastics and heavy metals in rhizosphere microenvironments: a comprehensive review. Journal of Soils and Sediments 25:2551−2570 doi: 10.1007/s11368-025-04102-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Ma Y, Yang K, Yu H, Tan W, Gao Y, et al. 2024. Effects and mechanism of microplastics on organic carbon and nitrogen cycling in agricultural soil: a review. Soil Use and Management 40:e12971 doi: 10.1111/sum.12971

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Prajapati A, Narayan Vaidya A, Kumar AR. 2022. Microplastic properties and their interaction with hydrophobic organic contaminants: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29:49490−49512 doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20723-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Yu H, Fan P, Hou J, Dang Q, Cui D, et al. 2020. Inhibitory effect of microplastics on soil extracellular enzymatic activities by changing soil properties and direct adsorption: an investigation at the aggregate-fraction level. Environmental Pollution 267:115544 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115544

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Shaji S, Chellam PV, Sundaram B. 2025. Interactions of microplastics with co-occurring pollutants in soil environment. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 236:212 doi: 10.1007/s11270-025-07855-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Huang X, Yang L, Zhou S, Zhong L, Xu G, et al. 2025. Plastic biofilms as hotspots of nitrogen cycling in estuarine ecosystems: comparative ecological, genomic, and transcriptomic analysis across substrates. Global Change Biology 31:e70329 doi: 10.1111/gcb.70329

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Liu Y, Liu L, Wang X, Shao M, Wei Z, et al. 2025. Microplastics enhance the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in mariculture sediments by enriching host bacteria and promoting horizontal gene transfer. Eco-Environment & Health 4(1):100136 doi: 10.1016/j.eehl.2025.100136

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Deng H, Fu Q, Li D, Zhang Y, He J, et al. 2021. Microplastic-associated biofilm in an intensive mariculture pond: temporal dynamics of microbial communities, extracellular polymeric substances and impacts on microplastics properties. Journal of Cleaner Production 319:128774 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128774

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Wang L, Lin D, Xiao KQ, Ma LJ, Fu YM, et al. 2024. Soil viral–host interactions regulate microplastic-dependent carbon storage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121:e2413245121 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2413245121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Chevallereau A, Pons BJ, van Houte S, Westra ER. 2022. Interactions between bacterial and phage communities in natural environments. Nature Reviews Microbiology 20:49−62 doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00602-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Liang X, Radosevich M, DeBruyn JM, Wilhelm SW, McDearis R, et al. 2024. Incorporating viruses into soil ecology: a new dimension to understand biogeochemical cycling. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 54(2):117−137 doi: 10.1080/10643389.2023.2223123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Xia R, Yin X, Balcazar JL, Huang D, Liao J, et al. 2025. Bacterium-phage symbiosis facilitates the enrichment of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the plastisphere. Environmental Science & Technology 59:2948−2960 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c08265

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Pan H, Zhao X, Zhou X, Yan H, Han X, et al. 2023. Research progress on the role of biofilm in heavy metals adsorption-desorption characteristics of microplastics: a review. Environmental Pollution 336:122448 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122448

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Aralappanavar VK, Mukhopadhyay R, Yu Y, Liu J, Bhatnagar A, et al. 2024. Effects of microplastics on soil microorganisms and microbial functions in nutrients and carbon cycling – a review. Science of The Total Environment 924:171435 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171435

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Adamu H, Bello U, IbrahimTafida U, Garba ZN, Galadima A, et al. 2024. Harnessing bio and (Photo)catalysts for microplastics degradation and remediation in soil environment. Journal of Environmental Management 370:122543 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122543

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Okal EJ, Heng G, Magige EA, Khan S, Wu S, et al. 2023. Insights into the mechanisms involved in the fungal degradation of plastics. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 262:115202 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115202

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Edwards S, León-Zayas R, Ditter R, Laster H, Sheehan G, et al. 2022. Microbial consortia and mixed plastic waste: pangenomic analysis reveals potential for degradation of multiple plastic types via previously identified PET degrading bacteria. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:5612 doi: 10.3390/ijms23105612

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Arab M, Yu J, Nayebi B. 2024. Microplastics in sludges and soils: a comprehensive review on distribution, characteristics, and effects. ChemEngineering 8(5):86 doi: 10.3390/chemengineering8050086

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Iftikhar A, Qaiser Z, Sarfraz W, Ejaz U, Aqeel M, et al. 2024. Understanding the leaching of plastic additives and subsequent risks to ecosystems. Water Emerging Contaminants & Nanoplastics 3:5 doi: 10.20517/wecn.2023.58

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Barreira-Pinto R, Carneiro R, Miranda M, Guedes RM. 2023. Polymer-matrix composites: characterising the impact of environmental factors on their lifetime. Materials 16(11):3913 doi: 10.3390/ma16113913

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Luo H, Liu C, He D, Xu J, Sun J, et al. 2022. Environmental behaviors of microplastics in aquatic systems: a systematic review on degradation, adsorption, toxicity and biofilm under aging conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials 423:126915 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126915

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Gillieatt BF, Coleman NV. 2024. Unravelling the mechanisms of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance co-selection in environmental bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 48(4):fuae017 doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuae017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Silveira CB, Luque A, Rohwer F. 2021. The landscape of lysogeny across microbial community density, diversity and energetics. Environmental Microbiology 23(8):4098−4111 doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15640

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Dong H, Huang L, Zhao L, Zeng Q, Liu X, et al. 2022. A critical review of mineral–microbe interaction and co-evolution: mechanisms and applications. National Science Review 9(10):nwac128 doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Nazeer A, Ahmad A, Ahmad F, Ahmad S. 2024. Microbial biodegradation of plastics and microplastics: recent development. In Plastic Pollution, eds. Goel M, Tripathi NG. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. pp. 231−248 doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-5528-8_14
    [32] Huang D, Xia R, Chen C, Liao J, Chen L, et al. 2024. Adaptive strategies and ecological roles of phages in habitats under physicochemical stress. Trends in Microbiology 32(9):902−916 doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2024.02.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Barrangou R. 2015. The roles of CRISPR–Cas systems in adaptive immunity and beyond. Current Opinion in Immunology 32:36−41 doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.12.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Saini N, Bharti D, Singh S, Banoo R, Bundela V, et al. 2024. Genetically engineered plastic munching microbes: recent advancements and perspectives. In Advanced Strategies for Biodegradation of Plastic Polymers, eds. Soni R, Debbarma P, Suyal DC, Goel R. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 193−224 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-55661-6_8
    [35] Hassen B, Hammami S. 2025. Environmental phages: ecosystem dynamics, biotechnological applications and their limits, and future directions. Journal of Applied Microbiology 136:lxaf136 doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxaf136

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Schneider CL. 2021. Bacteriophage-mediated horizontal gene transfer: transduction. In Bacteriophages, eds. Harper DR, Abedon ST, Burrowes BH, McConville ML. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 151−192 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41986-2_4
    [37] Lu H, Wang Y, Liu H, Wang N, Zhang Y, et al. 2025. Review of the presence and phage-mediated transfer of ARGs in biofilms. Microorganisms 13(5):997 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13050997

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Kumar A, Pal D. 2018. Antibiotic resistance and wastewater: correlation, impact and critical human health challenges. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 6:52−58 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.059

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Witsø IL, Basson A, Aspholm M, Wasteson Y, Myrmel M. 2024. Wastewater-associated plastispheres: a hidden habitat for microbial pathogens? PLoS One 19:e0312157 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312157

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Abedon ST. 2020. Phage-phage, phage-bacteria, and phage-environment communication. In Biocommunication of Phages, ed. Witzany G. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 23−70 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-45885-0_2
    [41] Shafana Farveen M, Narayanan R. 2024. Omic-driven strategies to unveil microbiome potential for biodegradation of plastics: a review. Archives of Microbiology 206:441 doi: 10.1007/s00203-024-04165-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Doub JB. 2021. Risk of bacteriophage therapeutics to transfer genetic material and contain contaminants beyond endotoxins with clinically relevant mitigation strategies. Infection and Drug Resistance 14:5629−5637 doi: 10.2147/IDR.S341265

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Yaashikaa PR, Devi MK, Kumar PS. 2022. Engineering microbes for enhancing the degradation of environmental pollutants: a detailed review on synthetic biology. Environmental Research 214:113868 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113868

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Lenneman BR, Fernbach J, Loessner MJ, Lu TK, Kilcher S. 2021. Enhancing phage therapy through synthetic biology and genome engineering. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 68:151−159 doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.11.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Peng H, Chen IA, Qimron U. 2025. Engineering phages to fight multidrug-resistant bacteria. Chemical Reviews 125(2):933−971 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00681

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Lammens EM, Nikel PI, Lavigne R. 2020. Exploring the synthetic biology potential of bacteriophages for engineering non-model bacteria. Nature Communications 11:5294 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19124-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Edwardson TGW, Levasseur MD, Tetter S, Steinauer A, Hori M, et al. 2022. Protein cages: from fundamentals to advanced applications. Chemical Reviews 122(9):9145−9197 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00877

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Fernbach J. 2023. Synthetic biology for genetically engineered bacteriophages to target infectious diseases. Doctoral dissertation. ETH Zurich, Switzerland. doi: 10.3929/ethz-b-000607236
    [49] Silas S, Carion H, Makarova KS, Laderman ES, Todeschini T, et al. 2025. Activation of bacterial programmed cell death by phage inhibitors of host immunity. Molecular Cell 85(9):1838−1851.e10 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.04.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Homem NC, Paixão RM, Miranda CS, Antunes JC, Amorim MTP, et al. 2023. Potential biomolecules of microbial origin against infectious diseases. In Microbial Systematics, ed. Rekadwad BN. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. 29 pp. doi: 10.1201/9781003307679
    [51] Sarkar A, Bhattacharjee S. 2025. Biofilm-mediated bioremediation of xenobiotics and heavy metals: a comprehensive review of microbial ecology, molecular mechanisms, and emerging biotechnological applications. 3 Biotech 15(4):78 doi: 10.1007/s13205-025-04252-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Li Z, Tang J, Wang X, Ma X, Yuan H, et al. 2025. The environmental lifecycle of antibiotics and resistance genes: transmission mechanisms, challenges, and control strategies. Microorganisms 13(9):2113 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13092113

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Lin Z, Yuan T, Zhou L, Cheng S, Qu X, et al. 2021. Impact factors of the accumulation, migration and spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 43(5):1741−1758 doi: 10.1007/s10653-020-00759-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Ju X, Sun H, Ruan C, Wang H, Shi B, et al. 2025. Prophage induction and quorum sensing enhance biofilm stability and resistance under ammonia-oxidizing bacteria-mediated oxidative stress. Water Research 284:124010 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2025.124010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Niu L, Zhao S, Chen Y, Li Y, Zou G, et al. 2023. Diversity and potential functional characteristics of phage communities colonizing microplastic biofilms. Environmental Research 219:115103 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.115103

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Shruti VC, Kutralam-Muniasamy G, Pérez-Guevara F. 2024. Viruses in the era of microplastics and plastispheres: analytical methods, advances and future directions. Science of The Total Environment 955:177010 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Liu Y, Liu W, Yang X, Wang J, Lin H, et al. 2021. Microplastics are a hotspot for antibiotic resistance genes: progress and perspective. Science of The Total Environment 773:145643 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145643

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Alfinaikh RS, Alamry KA, Hussein MA. 2025. Sustainable and biocompatible hybrid materials-based sulfated polysaccharides for biomedical applications: a review. RSC Advances 15:4708−4767 doi: 10.1039/D4RA07277D

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Ji M, Treu L, Campanaro S. 2025. Plasticizers determine a deeper reshape of soil virome than microplastics. Chemical Engineering Journal 510:161877 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.161877

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Das Astapati A, Nath S. 2023. The complex interplay between plant-microbe and virus interactions in sustainable agriculture: Harnessing phytomicrobiomes for enhanced soil health, designer plants, resource use efficiency, and food security. Crop Design 2(1):100028 doi: 10.1016/j.cropd.2023.100028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Junaid M, Ali Siddiqui J, Sadaf M, Liu S, Wang J. 2022. Enrichment and dissemination of bacterial pathogens by microplastics in the aquatic environment. Science of The Total Environment 830:154720 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154720

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Steinmetz NF. 2019. Biological and evolutionary concepts for nanoscale engineering: viruses as natural nanoparticles have great potential for a wide range of nanoscale products. EMBO Reports 20:e48806 doi: 10.15252/embr.201948806

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Cárdenas-Alcaide MF, Godínez-Alemán JA, González-González RB, Iqbal HMN, Parra-Saldívar R. 2022. Environmental impact and mitigation of micro(nano)plastics pollution using green catalytic tools and green analytical methods. Green Analytical Chemistry 3:100031 doi: 10.1016/j.greeac.2022.100031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Laxmi B, Devi PUM, Thanjavur N, Buddolla V. 2024. The applications of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tools in virus-like particles (VLPs) research. Current Microbiology 81:234 doi: 10.1007/s00284-024-03750-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Li L, Yue T, Feng J, Zhang Y, Hou J, et al. 2024. Recent progress in lactate oxidase-based drug delivery systems for enhanced cancer therapy. Nanoscale 16:8739−8758 doi: 10.1039/D3NR05952A

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Inamuddin, Altalhi T. 2023. Biosensors Nanotechnology. 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781394167135
    [67] Jagadesh M, Dash M, Kumari A, Singh SK, Verma KK, et al. 2024. Revealing the hidden world of soil microbes: metagenomic insights into plant, bacteria, and fungi interactions for sustainable agriculture and ecosystem restoration. Microbiological Research 285:127764 doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2024.127764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Sommers P, Chatterjee A, Varsani A, Trubl G. 2021. Integrating viral metagenomics into an ecological framework. Annual Review of Virology 8:133−158 doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-010421-053015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Zeng Y, Feng R, Huang C, Liu J, Yang F. 2025. Antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soils: a comprehensive review of the hidden crisis and exploring control strategies. Toxics 13:239 doi: 10.3390/toxics13040239

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Haft DH, Badretdin A, Coulouris G, DiCuccio M, Durkin AS, et al. 2024. RefSeq and the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline in the age of metagenomes. Nucleic Acids Research 52(D1):D762−D769 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad988

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Adriaenssens EM, Roux S, Brister JR, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Kuhn JH, et al. 2023. Guidelines for public database submission of uncultivated virus genome sequences for taxonomic classification. Nature Biotechnology 41:898−902 doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01844-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Liang X, Wang Y, Xie N, Wang S, Zhang Y, et al. 2024. Studying soil viral ecology under an ecosystem services framework. Applied Soil Ecology 197:105339 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105339

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Anthony WE, Allison SD, Broderick CM, Chavez Rodriguez L, Clum A, et al. 2024. From soil to sequence: filling the critical gap in genome-resolved metagenomics is essential to the future of soil microbial ecology. Environmental Microbiome 19:56 doi: 10.1186/s40793-024-00599-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Schulz F, Alteio L, Goudeau D, Ryan EM, Yu FB, et al. 2018. Hidden diversity of soil giant viruses. Nature Communications 9:4881 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07335-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Iqbal B, Khan AA, Hu J, Liu Q, Wang C, et al. 2026. Soil microplastics hidden web: interaction of microbes and viruses as a frontier for sustainable ecosystem recovery. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 2: e006 doi: 10.48130/aee-0026-0003
    Iqbal B, Khan AA, Hu J, Liu Q, Wang C, et al. 2026. Soil microplastics hidden web: interaction of microbes and viruses as a frontier for sustainable ecosystem recovery. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 2: e006 doi: 10.48130/aee-0026-0003

Figures(4)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(106) PDF downloads(77)

Review   Open Access    

Soil microplastics hidden web: interaction of microbes and viruses as a frontier for sustainable ecosystem recovery

Agricultural Ecology and Environment  2 Article number: e006  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Microplastics (MPs) act as an emerging contaminant in agricultural ecosystems, affecting the health and function of the soil. Their presence can alter soil physicochemical properties, disrupt nutrient cycling processes, and ultimately influence crop productivity and quality. Meanwhile, MPs can also modify the soil microbiome by forming polymer-associated biofilms known as plastispheres, and altering the interactions between various microbial taxa. With a focus on the impact of bacteriophages on microbial communities and traits through processes like lysis, lysogeny, and horizontal gene transfer, this review summarizes the current understanding of soil-specific interactions between microorganisms and viruses. While examining the dual ecological effects of viral horizontal gene transfer on both plastic-degrading capacities, and the spread of antibiotic resistance, possible relationships between phage activity and soil biogeochemical processes are evaluated. Together with carefully planned biotechnological approaches, such as phage-assisted microbial augmentation and the application of virus-like particles, innovative analytical techniques, including metagenomics, viromics, and single-cell methodologies, enable the investigation of new diagnostic methods and potential approaches to support soil recovery under MP stress. In conclusion, a practical framework is proposed that connects diagnostics to management, focusing on continuous monitoring, standardized indicators, and a comprehensive risk assessment. This review demonstrates that MPs serve not only as physical pollutants but also as an abiotic stressor that alter the interactions among microbes, viruses, and soils. This finding indicates that the soil virome plays a significant yet underexplored role in the sustainability of agriculture.

    • Microplastics (MPs), defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm, have become an emerging contaminant of global concern in terrestrial ecosystems, particularly in agricultural ecosystems[1]. Due to human agricultural activities (e.g., plastic film application, sewage irrigation, etc.), MPs in agricultural soils have accumulated to higher levels than those in other ecosystems[2]. The occurrence of MPs in the agricultural soils can disrupt multiple agroecosystem services, by altering soil physical, chemical, and biological processes[3]. For example, by altering aggregate stability and pore architecture, MPs can modify soil water retention, aeration, and microbial habitats that regulate microbial activity and diversity. MPs can also modify microbially mediated nutrient cycling processes and disrupt plant–soil interactions. This may lead to declining soil fertility, and a reduction in crop productivity and quality, ultimately compromising the long-term sustainability of food systems[4]. Moreover, MPs can enter the ecosystem and food web by being taken up by plants or consumed by soil organisms, potentially resulting in bioaccumulation, and posing health risks to humans[5]. The increasing evidence of MPs in the agricultural soil, which acts as both a reservoir, and a secondary source, underscores the urgent need to understand how it influences the ecological processes in the soil, which are vital for food security and environmental sustainability[6].

      MPs in the soil have a negative impact on the microbiome in several ways, both directly and indirectly[7]. The microbial environment in the soil can change due to modifications in the porosity, water retention, aeration, and nutrient availability, which in turn influence the gradients and diffusion of oxygen, water, and nutrients within the soil[8]. MPs in the soil release plasticizers, stabilizers, and other detrimental substances that hinder the activity of enzymes and cellular metabolism[9,10]. Similarly, MPs serve as carriers of various pollutants, such as heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or pesticides, leading to severe toxicity that eliminates sensitive microbial communities while promoting the growth of stress-resistant populations[11]. This can lead to a decline in microbial diversity and deteriorate functional processes over time.

      MPs generate polymer-associated microhabitats in the soil, which promote the development of surface-associated biofilms, collectively referred to as plastispheres[12]. Microbial cells are densely clustered and enveloped by extracellular polymeric substances in these microhabitats, which facilitates their interactions and forms robust biological connections. These observed conditions are associated with a higher possibility of horizontal gene transfer (HGT), and the accumulation of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), indicating the plastisphere as a crucial hub for genetic exchange and microbial adaptation[13]. The formation of MP-associated biofilms modifies soil microbial interaction networks, and influences ecosystem processes mediated by microorganisms[14]. MPs may reduce soil fertility and hinder the ability of plants to absorb nutrients, disrupting the ecological processes driven by microorganisms in the soil, and ultimately limiting agricultural productivity[8]. MPs in the soil serve as both a physical and chemical stressor, indirectly interfering with essential biological processes crucial for sustainable crop production.

      On the other hand, soil microbiomes are highly impacted by the presence of MPs in the soil, and closer attention has been directed towards the significance of soil viruses, particularly bacteriophages, which play a crucial role in regulating microbial diversity and function[15]. Viruses influence microbial communities through various processes, including lytic infection, lysogenic conversion, and gene transduction, which alter the movement of nutrients, metabolic processes, and transfer of genetic material within soil ecosystems[16]. In soils, viral processes play a crucial role in carbon and nitrogen cycling by breaking down host cells and releasing labile organic matter. At the same time, lysogeny enables phages to influence host metabolism through auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs)[17]. MPs create new ecological niches that may alter these virus–host interactions; moreover, the varied microenvironment of the plastisphere enhances the likelihood of interactions between phages and their hosts, potentially resulting in prophage induction, increased gene exchange, and a shift in the equilibrium between lysis and lysogeny[18]. MPs may trigger a cascading effect on soil biogeochemical processes facilitated by microorganisms, influencing the decomposition of soil organic matter and nutrient cycling. These interactions are undoubtedly significant; however, there has been limited research on the relationships among MPs, soil microbes, and viruses. The current understanding regarding how MP pollution alters the functioning of agricultural ecosystems has enhanced our perspective, spanning from the microscopic scale to the broader ecosystem level.

      Therefore, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the MP–microbiome–virome triad in agricultural soils. The objectives are: (1) to summarize current knowledge regarding the impact of MPs on soil microbial communities, metabolic processes, and ecosystem functions influenced by microbes; (2) to elucidate the potential role of soil viruses in regulating microbial and biogeochemical responses induced by MP pollution in the soil; and (3) to identify key research gaps and propose a framework for future investigations. This review highlights the interconnected roles of microorganisms, viruses, and other biological entities in shaping soil ecosystem resilience, the coupling of carbon and nutrients, and enhancing agricultural productivity, thereby contributing to the broader conversation on soil health and the sustainable management of agroecosystems.

    • MPs in soil function as enduring surfaces that support biofilm formation, allowing prominent microbial genera such as Pseudomonas and Bacillus to thrive among a diverse array of microorganisms[19]. They exhibit remarkable metabolic adaptability, create robust biofilms, demonstrate proficiency in pollutant degradation, produce spores, engage in enzymatic processes, and play a crucial role in nutrient cycling. These microorganisms adapt to non-living environmental stresses associated with MPs, facilitating the interaction of pollutants and the transfer of genes among them, thereby maintaining the ecological and functional dynamics of MPs within soil ecosystems[20].

      The expression of functional genes, which play a significant role in the degradation of MPs, signifies a crucial adaptive mechanism in specific microbial communities residing on the surfaces of these materials and thus involves the initiation and control of specific enzymes that degrade MPs. For example, PETase (polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase), and MHETase (mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate hydrolase) work synergistically to break down polyethylene terephthalate (PET) MPs into environmentally friendly monomers[21]. The activity of these enzymes tends to increase when plastic substrates are present, triggered by environmental factors like the availability of plastic oligomers or associated stressors[22]. The genes responsible for these enzymes are frequently located in bacteria that decompose plastic, such as Ideonella sakaiensis. These genes transfer among various bacterial species, enhancing the ability of microbial communities in the plastisphere to degrade plastic efficiently[23]. Hence, a better understanding of the regulation of these enzymes may lead to the development of bioaugmentation techniques for environmentally friendly plastic remediation.

    • MPs and their associated pollutants exerted physical and chemical pressure on microorganisms. MPs also pose a significant abiotic stress on soil ecosystems, primarily due to their size and the substances they release. MPs exhibit a greater surface area-to-volume ratio, allowing them to navigate soil pores with greater ease and interact with a larger number of microbial cells[24]. Typically, MPs contain synthetic additives, including plasticizers (such as phthalates), flame retardants, stabilizers, and pigments, which gradually leach into the soil structure as time progresses[25]. Additionally, the absence of covalent bonds between these compounds and the polymer matrix increases their potential for degradation when exposed to UV light, temperature fluctuations, and microbial activity[26]. Thus, their release can be harmful, disrupting microbial metabolism and enzyme function, which might lead to the emergence of resistant strains; however, in terrestrial ecosystems, the ecological risk can be exacerbated by the mechanical and/or chemical stresses.

      Exposure to MP pollution alters microbial responses through both the physical properties of plastic particles and the chemical toxicity of associated additives and adsorbed contaminants[27]. These selective pressures can drive shifts in microbial community composition and function, leading to the enrichment of ARGs, heavy metal resistance genes, and efflux pump systems[28]. Microorganisms may utilize compounds derived from MP or co-contaminants as alternative sources of carbon and energy, and thus activate genes that assist in the degradation of external substances, manage stress responses, and facilitate the formation of biofilms. HGT, primarily facilitated by plasmids and bacteriophages, can enhance the dissemination of adaptive traits within communities linked to plastispheres[18], which enhance microbial resistance and alter the interactions among microbes within ecosystems, potentially influencing nutrient cycling and the intricate networks of microbial relationships.

      Biofilms linked to MP form microhabitats, which are considered to be beyond the adaptation of bacteria, influencing the interactions between viruses and their hosts in the soil environment. The plastisphere influences the dynamics of bacteriophage infections through mechanisms such as lytic, lysogenic, and virus-mediated gene transfer, thereby affecting microbial hosts within the biofilms[29]. As stress induced by MPs affects the microbial communities, virus-mediated processes may aid in later stages of co-adaptation, influencing the composition, stability, and functional capabilities of these communities in contaminated soils[30].

    • Phages are abundant in soil ecosystems and influence the variety and composition of microbial communities through lytic, lysogenic, and virus-mediated gene transfer pathways, subsequently impacting microbial activity. The development of plastisphere biofilms and the presence of MPs in agricultural soils produce distinct microenvironments that may affect the frequency of interactions between phages and hosts, as well as the spread of infections, thus altering the structure of microbial communities and their microscale activities.

    • By inducing lytic activity and lysogenic conversion, viruses have a significant impact on the function of microorganisms. Lysis can effectively inhibit competing or non-viable bacterial strains, while lysogenic conversion enables phages to survive within host genomes and, in some cases, affect host physiology through regulatory elements or additional metabolic genes. By focusing on and eliminating species that don't aid in the breakdown of plastic, some viruses may promote the growth of helpful bacteria, resulting in less rivalry for resources[31]. Furthermore, when introduced into host genomes, the presence of metabolic genes or regulatory elements in specific temperate phages can enhance stress tolerance, metabolic efficiency, or degrading abilities[18,32]. The selection and gene transfer process facilitated by phages can yield a more specialized and efficient population of bacteria capable of degrading plastic. Bacteriophage regulation may serve as an effective tool for enhancing bioaugmentation techniques in environments contaminated with MP (Fig. 1a, b).

      Figure 1. 

      Schematic representation of the proposed role of microplastics (MPs) in microbial adaptation under environmental stress. (a) Environmental stressors, such as ozonation, chlorination, UV radiation, pH changes, and antibiotics which accelerate the oxidation, hydrolysis, and ionization of MPs. These processes promote the degradation of MPs and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). (b) The same stressors also induce horizontal gene transfer (HGT), particularly transduction, wherein bacteriophages carrying antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) transfer these genes to susceptible bacteria, converting them into antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB). Additionally, dead cells may release ARGs that are acquired via transformation. MP degradation enhances microbial stress tolerance and metabolic efficiency, creating a feedback loop that supports the survival and proliferation of ARB under persistent environmental stress. ARB: antibiotic-resistant bacteria; ARGs: antibiotic resistance genes.

      In MP-associated environments, the intricate relationships between bacterial defense mechanisms, such as CRISPR-Cas, facilitate the coevolution of phages and their bacterial hosts, which are shielded from invasive phages that target specific sequences by CRISPR-Cas systems. Nevertheless, HGT, which entails the acquisition of beneficial traits, may also be inhibited by these systems[33]. Accordingly, CRISPR-Cas may prevent genetic exchange in biofilms associated with MP while also contributing to the stability of specific bacterial populations[34]. The total impact on the ecosystem will likely depend on the prevalence of infection, the types of flora and fauna present in the area, and the climatic conditions. The lifespan and susceptibility of microorganisms to phage infection can be altered using CRISPR-Cas systems; however, applying these findings to soils requires caution[35]. The characteristics of the soil microenvironment considerably restrict the interactions between phages and their hosts in terrestrial ecosystems. Therefore, phages are essential to the microbial dynamics of soils contaminated by MP. However, their contributions are frequently underappreciated, and they are best described as context-dependent regulators rather than straightforward catalysts for the decomposition of plastic.

    • Through the dissemination of functional genes, virus-mediated HGT, particularly through bacteriophages, can change the structure of microbial communities. Nonetheless, the extent to which phages disseminate genes that degrade plastic among soil ecosystems remains ambiguous. Transduction is the mechanism by which bacteriophages transfer genetic material between bacterial hosts. This can occur primarily through two mechanisms: specialized transduction, in which particular genes located near prophage integration sites are transferred during phage excision, and generalized transduction, in which random bacterial DNA is inadvertently incorporated into phage particles[36]. Phage-mediated processes may facilitate the transfer of ARGs among species in MP-associated biofilms, which are characterized by dense cell aggregation. This could increase the predominance of multidrug-resistant populations in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems[37]. At the same time, plastic-degrading genes could spread through phages, accelerating the formation of microbial communities with enhanced biodegradation capacities[34]. The importance of viruses as gene carriers in contaminated environments has been confirmed by recent metagenomic studies of plastisphere communities, which have revealed phage-related sequences linked to both resistance determinants and catabolic processes. This gene transfer may aid in the breakdown of plastic, but it may also have negative ecosystem impacts by increasing the resistance of natural microbiomes to environmental changes. This highlights the importance of enhancing our understanding of phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer to develop effective and sustainable bioremediation techniques (Fig. 1a, b).

      The ecosystem and public health may suffer greatly if phages transfer resistant traits. Through runoff, erosion, aerosols, or plant growth-related processes, resistant bacteria or their genes can spread from soils to nearby ecosystems, disrupting food production systems[38]. A recent study indicates that phages can transport genes that enhance the virulence of their hosts and improve their stress resilience, thereby increasing their likelihood of survival and pathogenicity[32]. Thus, the widespread presence of MPs in aquatic and terrestrial environments, along with the discovery of virulence factors and ARGs in microbial communities associated with plastic waste and their viral counterparts, suggests a complex and poorly understood mechanism of gene transfer that could unintentionally promote the survival of highly resilient microbial populations.

    • Bacteriophages may be used as vectors to introduce or mobilize genes associated with plastic breakdown throughout bacterial communities, according to the emerging concept of utilizing viruses to facilitate the delivery of enzymes or genes. There is still little proof, nevertheless, to justify its use in soil environments. Phages inject their genetic material into the cells of vulnerable hosts. Depending on the life cycle of the phages, this genetic material may include catabolic genes that are either active temporarily during lytic infection or preserved through lysogenic integration in both engineered designs and rare natural events[39]. In the lytic pathway, phage infection triggers the rapid expression of enzyme genes in tandem with phage replication. Consequently, new phage particles and active enzymes are released into the surrounding environment as a result of this process, potentially causing bacterial cells to rupture[40]. In some niches, particularly within the biofilms prevalent in MPs, this may lead to the breakdown of plastic. The lysogenic cycle, on the other hand, utilizes a temperate phage that incorporates its DNA into the host's genetic material, converting the host bacteria into a reliable and persistent source of plastic-degrading enzymes[41]. Under ideal conditions, this gene delivery could expand the number of bacterial community members capable of degradative activities. However, transforming non-degraders into effective degraders necessitates verified expression, suitable secretion/localization, and quantifiable increases in degradation rates, all of which have not been fully evaluated in complex soil communities (Fig. 1a).

      Virus-assisted enzyme delivery systems have been proposed as a viable bioremediation strategy, particularly in environments where native microorganisms lack sufficient enzymatic activity to degrade plastics effectively. To ensure accurate gene delivery and reduce any unexpected environmental effects, phages can be designed to target particular bacterial strains. This strategy, however, could also raise biosafety issues, as gene transfer through phages may unintentionally spread other functional genes, such as those linked to virulence factors or antibiotic resistance[42]. Therefore, even though virus-assisted enzyme delivery presents a potentially valuable strategy to improve plastic biodegradation in contaminated environments, its application necessitates careful risk assessment and regulatory control.

      The application of synthetic biology for environmental remediation has revealed promising prospects, particularly through the development of modified bacteriophages that enhance plastic degradation[43]. Furthermore, phage genomes can be modified using synthetic biology to improve enzyme expression levels, stabilize enzymes in a variety of conditions, and control phage life cycles to optimize degradation and reduce effects on microbial populations[44]. In addition to providing enzymes, it is suggested that synthetic phages have regulatory or detecting gene circuits. However, the viability of triggering environmentally responsive mechanisms in complex soil matrices remains primarily theoretical and has not yet been confirmed by actual data[45]. By improving the natural breakdown processes without introducing additional microbial species, this strategy could help preserve the environmental equilibrium. Phage cocktails, made possible by synthetic biology, comprise modified phages intended to target different kinds of polymers or bacteria[46], making them valuable due to their wide variety of applications against various contaminants and microbial populations. Despite the great potential of modified phages, their use presents serious ethical and biosafety concerns, including the potential hazards of HGT and their environmental impacts. Consequently, any investigation into synthetic phage-based methods should be limited to carefully monitored experimental environments. To be successful, these types of projects require thorough testing and efficient containment strategies. It is crucial to put preventative regulatory measures in place before conducting any ecological assessments.

      A proposed containment technique involves modifying phages to rely on specific host-derived tRNAs or metabolites, thereby facilitating efficient replication predominantly in genetically modified host bacteria within regulated settings. To function as a replication protein or a crucial capsid component, the phage might be genetically altered to require an amino acid that is not naturally present[47]. The phage is unable to complete its life cycle or reproduce within natural, unaltered bacterial communities because this particular metabolite or amino acid is exclusively present in regulated remediation settings, such as specialized bioreactors or enhanced soils. Genetic circuits designed to induce self-inactivation in phages or transition them to a non-replicative state after a predetermined number of replication cycles can be integrated into the genome to enhance safety[48]. For instance, a phage's integrated CRISPR-Cas system may be programmed to activate and eliminate crucial phage genomic sequences after a few generations. A 'dead-man's switch' would be inserted as a result, preventing the phage from surviving for very long. Furthermore, inducible promoters that regulate genes responsible for cell death may be present in specially engineered phages[49]. These promoters can be activated by an artificial, external stimulus that is uncommon in nature, such as a particular chemical inducer or a particular wavelength of light. At the conclusion of the remediation procedure, a toxin or nuclease would be released in response to this stimulus, eliminating the remaining altered phages.

    • The intricate processes by which bacteriophages impact the plastisphere have been explained in the sections above, which also portray them as beneficial bioremediation agents and potential sources of ecological risk. A conceptual conundrum arises from the apparent contradiction regarding the circumstances under which the balance shifts in favor of a net positive or net negative result. A conceptual framework is proposed that integrates phage traits, environmental constraints, and microplastic–interface properties to support more predictive interpretations of phage effects (Fig. 2). In this framework, net outcomes emerge from dynamic interactions among phage traits, environmental filters, and microplastic-interface properties, rather than being intrinsic to phages alone.

      Figure 2. 

      Conceptual framework determining the net ecological effect of bacteriophages in the plastisphere.

      The primary function of lytic phages is top-down regulation. Host specificity has a significant influence on their overall impact. Selective lysis can, in some cases, shift community composition by suppressing particular host populations; however, phages do not 'target' organisms based on ecological function, and whether lysis favors degraders or non-degraders is context dependent. Furthermore, regardless of their significance, non-specific or broad-host-range lytic activity can kill crucial degraders, such as Bacillus or Pseudomonas, halting biodegradation, and destroying the functional community[50]. Through lysogeny, temperate phages act as genetic modulators. By altering the host bacterium's DNA to confer beneficial characteristics, such as enzymes that degrade plastic (like PETase), genes that enhance its stress tolerance, or elements that facilitate biofilm formation, integrating a prophage can be beneficial[51]. The primary risk occurs when the prophage is activated. In addition to killing the host, environmental stressors can trigger a synchronized lytic cycle that disperses any encoded genes, such as virulence factors or ARGs, across the biofilm[52]. For focused actions that don't significantly alter the environment, a host range that incorporates a phage with a limited host range is also beneficial. Conversely, a phage with a broad host range is more likely to have both beneficial and detrimental effects. For instance, it might widely enhance a catabolic function or disperse ARGs, which would make its ecological effects less predictable and perhaps more extensive[53].

      Phage behavior is altered by its surroundings, which act as powerful filters and switches. In addition to exerting selection pressure on bacteria, antibiotics, heavy metals, nutrient deficiencies, and UV radiation are potent regulators of phage dynamics. These stressors can activate bacterial DNA damage responses (e.g., the SOS response), which can trigger prophage excision and the transition from lysogeny to lytic replication[54]. As a result, the system may transition from a helpful, stable lysogeny to one of unchecked gene transduction and destructive lytic growth. The same pressures can select for resistant microorganisms; phages may then influence the distribution of resistance determinants indirectly through transduction and by reshaping host population dynamics. The frequency of interactions between phages and hosts is also influenced by the physical composition of the soil and the availability of nutrients[16]. While nutrient-rich, stable settings, such as established biofilms, may support more temperate interactions and lysogenic stability, oligotrophic (nutrient-poor) conditions often encourage lytic cycles and 'kill-the-winner' dynamics (Fig. 2).

      The MP particle actively shapes the interaction rather than acting as a passive substrate. Different populations of bacteria are attracted to varying types of plastics, and these microbes, in turn, host diverse groups of phages[55]. Thus, the surface area of MPs increases and becomes rougher with weathering, which promotes the formation of biofilms and facilitates cell-to-cell contact. These conditions may increase the potential for genetic exchange (e.g., conjugation, transformation, and transduction), although in situ rates and dominant pathways remain poorly quantified in soils. Phage-related responses may also result from environmental stress brought on by the polymer's chemical additives leaching. The plastisphere creates an extraordinarily dense and interconnected microenvironment by collecting bacteria and viruses on a limited surface area[56]. This may increase local phage–host encounter probabilities relative to adjacent bulk soil, although the magnitude of this contrast depends on soil moisture connectivity and adsorption processes. This implies that each MP may develop into a hotspot for both the propagation of harmful ARGs and advantageous gene transfer[57]. The overall ecological effect is depicted as a scale that balances things out in this context (Fig. 2). The position of the scale is determined by the total weight of factors that are pushing for a net positive effect (such as stable acquisition of catabolic genes and targeted lysis of competitors), vs those that are resulting in a net adverse effect (such as induction-driven ARG bloom and disruption of essential degraders). By understanding this intricacy, we may utilize phages as a sophisticated tool for managing the plastisphere's environment rather than a crude one.

    • The interplay between microorganisms and viruses represents a promising, nature-inspired strategy for mitigating microplastic pollution and restoring soil functions impaired by MP contamination[58]. Phages can be regarded as possible modulators of microbial community dynamics via infection and gene transfer; however, the phage host range limits host targeting, and HGT may encompass both advantageous and detrimental traits[59]. This collaboration enhances the adaptability of microorganisms and their functional capabilities, resulting in a more effective and sustainable process for degrading contaminants, such as MPs. This technology may offer a strategy based on biological principles to attain more adaptive and sustainable remediation by combining microbial metabolism with virus-mediated gene delivery and regulation[60]. Pathogenic bacteria or rapidly proliferating non-degraders may overshadow or hinder beneficial degraders, such as Pseudomonas or Bacillus species, thereby reducing the overall effectiveness of plastic biodegradation. Phage predation can affect microbial competition; however, it does not directly inhibit pathogens or resistance genes, and in certain circumstances, it may even facilitate their spread[61]. Moreover, alterations in population dynamics induced by phages may affect the longevity of specific degradative groups; however, increased degradation is more likely for hydrolysable polymers (such as PET) than for polyolefins like polyethylene (PE), which necessitate different oxidative or abiotic preconditioning. Some phages undergo lysogenic conversion, integrating into the host genome and potentially imparting advantageous traits that enhance bacterial metabolism, increase stress resistance, or promote biofilm formation, thereby further assisting degraders. Phage-mediated mechanisms can serve as ecological filters, modifying the composition of microbial populations linked to MP. The results may differ, shaped by the environmental factors and community dynamics[18]. This selection pressure promotes and maintains a population of bacteria proficient in plastic degradation, which is essential for advancing microbial bioremediation efforts to mitigate plastic pollution in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

      It has been suggested that Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) containing nanoenzymes could provide a theoretical framework for examining catalytic systems on MP surfaces, potentially facilitating polymer transformation in a controlled environment. VLPs are nanoscale protein assemblies that mimic natural viruses but are devoid of any viral genetic material, therefore rendering them incapable of inducing disease. However, the incapacity to spread diseases does not suggest that they are devoid of potential harm to the ecosystem[62]. These particles can be designed to encapsulate or display catalytic enzymes or enzyme-mimetic substances. Nonetheless, the most efficacious approach to activate enzymes is to use polymers that contain esters, such as PET. The direct enzymatic cleavage of polyolefins, including PE and polypropylene (PP), is significantly limited and generally necessitates prior activation by oxidation or abiotic techniques. Nanoenzyme-loaded VLPs exhibit a notable ability to target and attach to MP surfaces, utilizing the structural benefits of VLPs, such as their uniform size, extensive surface area, and adeptness in traversing complex biofilms or soil matrices. When the nanoenzymes are optimally positioned, they promote the degradation of polymer chains by hydrolysis, oxidation, or other enzymatic processes. This technique deconstructs long-chain molecules into smaller, more environmentally friendly fragments[63]. Encapsulation or immobilization within VLPs may enhance enzyme stability under specific conditions; however, it is uncertain if these configurations effectively address concerns regarding substrate accessibility, sorption, and inactivation in soils. VLPs can be modified with targeting ligands to enhance their selectivity for specific plastics or environmental niches, thereby enabling a more precise bioremediation strategy[64] (Fig. 3). Their nanoscale dimensions facilitate their diffusion within soil ecosystems, thereby enhancing interaction with more widely dispersed MP particles. The modularity of VLP design is essential, as it reduces the simultaneous administration of many enzymes or synergistic catalysts, which could improve degradation rates and expand the range of substrates[65]. This method leverages the most effective aspects of virology, nanotechnology, and enzymology to develop resilient and efficient catalytic systems for MP remediation (Fig. 3). Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding large-scale production, ecological stability, and potential impacts on natural systems, necessitating further evaluation and improvement. VLPs with nanoenzymes may offer a novel strategy to alleviate plastic pollution by degrading polymer chains at the nanoscale[66].

      Figure 3. 

      A multi-step approach combining genetic engineering and viral-like particles to improve microplastic degradation and soil bioremediation. It includes: (1) double enzyme digestion for plasmid preparation, gene prediction, and expression host selection; (2) ligation and transformation for clone selection (42 °C); and (3) virus-like particle production to co-deliver synergistic enzymes while protecting viral infectivity. It also highlights the challenges posed by pathogenic bacteria that may inhibit plastic degradation, as well as strategies to monitor the impacts of gene expression on soil fertility, pollution degradation, and antibiotic resistance.

    • Phage-microbe systems have recently been shown to be capable of enhancing MP pollutant degradation and modulating community structure; however, significant challenges remain before these discoveries can be applied in field-scale, environmentally sustainable applications. Future studies must be cross-disciplinary, moving beyond transient lab studies to investigate the complex, long-term dynamics of soil ecosystems impacted by MPs.

    • There is still a significant knowledge gap regarding long-term field data on the interactions between MPs and viruses, despite growing awareness of the environmental impacts of MP pollution and the significance of viruses, particularly bacteriophages, to the dynamics of microbial communities. Due to this gap, it is challenging to understand how these interactions evolve in the natural world and to develop effective and efficient strategies to mitigate their consequences. The lack of long-term research examining how the MP–virus interaction varies across various ecosystems (soil, freshwater, and marine) over extended periods, spanning multiple seasons and years, is a primary concern.

      ● The majority of current research relies on laboratory experiments or brief field surveys that capture static snapshots of the phenomenon under study. Thus, detailed information is lacking on how viral populations colonize MP surfaces over time, how viral infection cycles affect the succession and functionality of microbial communities involved in plastic degradation, and how these relationships respond to environmental factors such as temperature, moisture content, and pollution levels.

      In-situ processes and rates of viral-mediated HGT on mobile elements are still poorly understood. Genes that make bacteria resistant to antibiotics, and that degrade plastic are among the genes that viruses are known to facilitate. The effectiveness of MPs as hotspots for this type of gene flow in nature, however, is not well understood. This knowledge is crucial when assessing ecological concerns, such as the spread of resistance genes or virulence factors linked to viral activity on MPs[67,68].

      ● The impact of viral lysis and lysogeny on microbial metabolism and ecosystem functioning in MP-contaminated environments represents another significant knowledge gap. We must understand the long-term effects of virus-induced cell death or integration on microbial community resilience, nutrient cycling, and pollutant degradation to forecast ecosystem responses and the duration of bioremediation efforts.

      ● Insufficient research has been carried out on the interactions between MP-associated viruses and chemical pollutants or plastic additives, including their roles as stressors or vectors[69]. This interaction may alter the propagation of viruses, the susceptibility of microorganisms to infection, and the general toxicity of contaminated environments (Table 1).

      Table 1.  An overview of various viral databases and their potential use in soil microplastic studies

      Database Primary focus areas Main features Limitations specific to general virology Soil MP research limitations Ref.
      NCBI RefSeq Viral
      (viral genomes; proteins; transcripts)
      High-quality reference sequences; Taxonomic breadth; Data standardization; Comprehensive metadata Standardized annotation framework; Integration with NCBI resources; Facilitation of viral research; Cross-disciplinary utility Representation bias; Homology-dependent curation; Limited environmental virome data; Genomic diversity challenges Incomplete coverage of environmental viruses; Difficulty in novel viral discovery; Annotation limitation; Host-assignment complexity [70,71]
      IMG/VR (Integrated Microbial Genomes/Virus)
      (Studying viral genomes and their integration with microbial genomes in various environments)
      Viral genetic diversity; Host-virus interactions; Functional annotation; Ecosystem-level implications Scalability and dataset size; Integrated analysis tools; Ecological context mapping; Host prediction frameworks; Downloadable and visualizable data; Continuous updates ensure that researchers have access to the latest insights Sampling biases; Error-prone predictions (inaccuracies stemming from incomplete genome assemblies); Data resolution gaps (insufficient in cases where a detailed functional role, life cycle, or ecological impacts of specific virus need further exploration) Underrepresentation of soil viral sequences (lag behind other environments like marine and human gut ecosystems); Challenges in linking the virus to microbial hosts (dense and diverse with intertwined tropic network); Depth and assembly gaps (low-abundance and challenging to resolve due to sequencing depth limitation) [72,73]
      GVD (Giant virus database) Access to genomics, proteomics, and phylogenetic data of Nucleocytoviricota, which are notable for their genome sizes reaching megabases. (Supporting taxonomic classification and evolutionary studies; Enabling exploration of interactions between giant viruses and their host organisms; Investigating the role in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems) Advanced data integration (functional dynamics of giant viruses); Search capabilities (access tailored datasets); Visualization tools (improve accessibility and interpretation of data); Global coverage (aquatic systems, forest soils, wastewater, and human-associated habitats); Interoperability with other databases Narrow scope (limits studying RNA viruses, bacteriophages, or other small genome DNA viruses); Limited clinical relevance (i.e., studying human pathogenic viruses or animal-associated viromes); Bias in sampling (difficult to detect viruses in environmental samples); Data completeness Lack of direct linkages (do not explicitly focus on giant virus activity in relation to MP particles); Limited environmental metadata (lack of information specific to soil ecosystems impacted by MPs); Neglect of abiotic factors (integration in hydrophobicity, chemical sorption, and mechanical effects of MPs on microbial communities); Host specificity constraints (giant viruses infect protists and algae while MP-associated microbiomes may involve bacteria, archaea, and other small organisms) [74]

      ● Methodological limitations also exist, especially with regard to the creation of high-resolution, affordable instruments for simultaneous metagenomic and viromic monitoring in complex field settings, as well as the lack of standardized procedures for data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Comparing studies across ecosystems becomes challenging as a result.

      ● The lack of standardized, comprehensive, and well-curated viral databases is a primary technical issue in the functional annotation of viral groups. Because of this, it is challenging to precisely identify and describe the functions of viral sequences present in environmental samples (Table 1). The genomes of bacteria and archaea differ greatly from those of viruses. They lack globally conserved marker genes that facilitate organism classification, such as the 16S rRNA gene in bacteria, and frequently have novel genes with uncertain functions. This makes it challenging to infer the function of viral sequences or to attribute them to particular groups with confidence. Although current viral databases, such as GVD (giant virus database), IMG/VR (Integrated Microbial Genomes/Virus), and NCBI RefSeq Viral, are helpful, they do not fully represent the diversity of viruses, particularly those environmental viruses like bacteriophages that are connected to MPs or soil ecosystems.

      ● There are many viral genes that are either unannotated or insufficiently annotated since many viral sequences obtained from metagenomic and viromic investigations are categorized as 'viral dark matter', meaning they lack homologs in reference databases.

      ● Furthermore, compared to bacteria, viruses have less sophisticated functional annotation systems. The short and extremely varied sequences of viral genes often make homology-based annotation techniques more challenging. Additionally, the functions of viral proteins have not been experimentally verified, which makes it more difficult to use computational methods to generate precise predictions. Because viruses are known to exhibit high amounts of genomic recombination and mosaicism, tools for assembling and classifying viral genomes struggle. This complicates downstream annotation.

      ● Additionally, it is challenging to incorporate multi-omics data (such as metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and proteomics) due to the need for sophisticated bioinformatics methods and computing resources that are currently being created to determine the roles of viruses in the environment.

      ● To overcome these challenges, we must collaborate to establish community standards for viral functional ontologies, build and manage viral genome databases with environmental isolates, and develop viral-specific annotation methods using structural modeling and machine learning. These kinds of developments are critical to understanding the impact of viruses on ecosystems in MP-contaminated areas and applying them to environmental cleanup and ecosystem restoration.

    • The way we study and address the connections between viruses, microbes, and MPs is set to alter due to new techniques. We can now analyze these complex systems and develop targeted bioremediation strategies with an unprecedented degree of detail thanks to new technologies like single-cell viromics, AI-driven phage-host prediction, and synthetic virus-like particles (Fig. 4). These cutting-edge technologies must be integrated in order to transform fundamental ecological information into solutions that can be used widely. A few of them are discussed below:

      Figure 4. 

      Schematic representation of various emerging tools that elucidate the interaction of viruses, bacteria, and MPs.

      ● Viral genomes and their interactions with particular microbial hosts can be sequenced at the single-cell level using environmental samples, primarily due to single-cell viromics. It is crucial for understanding how infections spread without the need to cultivate the viruses and for linking viruses to their hosts in the complex plastisphere.

      ● CRISPR spacers and k-mer frequencies are examples of genomic information that machine learning models can use to make exact predictions about the interactions between phages and hosts. This bypasses the laborious, antiquated methods of cultivating phages and rapidly identifies the finest ones for targeted biocontrol or enzyme delivery.

      ● Long, continuous DNA sequences produced by platforms such as PacBio are revolutionary for assembling entire viral genomes from complex metagenomes. This helps fill the gaps in viral databases, and addresses the genetic mosaicism of phages.

      ● In the field, specific viral sequences, ARGs, or genes that degrade plastic can be identified using engineered CRISPR systems. This is an efficient and affordable method to monitor bioremediation progress and environmental risks.

      ● It is possible to design genetic circuits and incorporate them into phage genomes to regulate their life cycle, enhance the efficiency of plastic-degrading enzyme delivery, or create environmental sensors that initiate degradation pathways only upon encountering MPs.

      ● On the surface of an MP particle, spatial transcriptomics and other techniques can reveal the locations of microbial and viral gene expression. This identifies the locations of the biofilm's functional 'hotspots' as well as the real-time activity of the degradation pathways.

      ● Custom enzyme cocktails, or nanoenzymes, can be loaded into engineered VLPs and directed towards specific kinds of plastic polymers. These stable, non-replicating nanoreactors enable the precise degradation of MPs without the environmental hazards associated with live viruses.

      ● New plastic-degrading enzymes (like PETase and MHETase) that are more stable, active, and capable of breaking down a greater variety of substrates can be produced rapidly in vitro, and then, these enhanced genes can be transferred using phages or VLPs.

      ● It is essential to have sophisticated bioinformatics systems that incorporate information from viromics, metabolomics, metagenomics, and metatranscriptomics. With an emphasis on significant regulatory nodes and novel functions, they present the MP-microbe-virus network from a systems-level perspective.

      ● Prior to application in the field, computer models based on real-world data on viral predation, HGT rates, and microbial metabolism can simulate the long-term environmental impacts of MP contamination and the effectiveness of various virus-assisted remediation techniques.

    • Experts from all disciplines must collaborate to provide comprehensive, practical, and long-lasting solutions to the expanding issue of MP pollution and its complex interactions with viral ecology. Ecological scientists, virologists, and policymakers must collaborate to address the myriad biological, environmental, and sociopolitical facets of virus-MP interactions. To aid in the restoration of ecosystems and the mitigation of pollution, each group contributes its unique perspective and skill set.

      These domains must collaborate to generate new ideas to overcome issues, including societal challenges, ecological uncertainty, and technical limitations. For instance, collaboration can help establish monitoring systems that utilize metagenomic, viromic, and environmental health data; standardize procedures for implementing virus-based remediation; and enhance the consistency of risk assessment techniques. Cross-disciplinary research consortia and international networks can exchange information, combine resources, and expedite the process of converting laboratory findings into field applications with broad applicability. Additionally, interdisciplinary cooperation facilitates education and capacity development. It enables policymakers and scientists to collaborate on training programs that equip communities and practitioners with the skills and information necessary to implement virus-assisted remediation safely and successfully. Additionally, this collaboration encourages the integration of local experiences and indigenous knowledge, thereby enhancing scientific methods and highlighting their cultural significance.

    • A better understanding of virus–microorganism interactions is essential for developing cleaner, more adaptive, and environmentally sustainable strategies for managing MP pollution. Phages can alter the composition of microbial communities by lysing specific bacterial species, which regulates the quantity of microorganisms that degrade plastic, as well as those that are harmful or competitive. By acknowledging ecological complexity, emphasizing practical applications, ensuring safety, and promoting cooperative innovation, the scientific community can maximize the potential of microbial-virus networks for comprehensive, effective, and sustainable MP remediation. We must comprehend the 'duality' that these phages produce if we are to maximize their potential in the future. Future research and implementation must be grounded in context-specific risk assessments and strict regulations to strike a balance between efficacy and environmental safety. By maximizing remediation efficiency while maintaining ecological safety, this enables the development of workable, secure, and scalable solutions to the worldwide MP problem.

      • Not applicable.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: Babar Iqbal: supervision, visualization, and writing – the original draft. Amir Abdullah Khan: software analysis. Jian Hu: investigation, software analysis. Qiang Liu: writing, review & editing. Chen Wang: writing, review & editing. Guanlin Li: conceptualization, investigation, project administration, resources, writing, review & editing. Mao Ye: visualization, writing, review & editing. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32350410400), and the Zhenjiang Municipal Policy Guidance Project of International Science and Technology Cooperation (Grant No. GJ2023005).

      • The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

      • Microplastics as abiotic stressors alter the functioning of soil ecosystems.

        Bacteriophages are strong but overlooked agents in microplastic-contaminated soils.

        VLPs equipped with nanoenzymes enable focused, direct attack on polymer chains and phage-assisted microbial augmentation.

        These concepts require a single framework to link lab science with long-term ecosystem recovery.

        Viral-mediated HGT can enhance the capacity to degrade plastic and raise the risk of transmitting virulence genes and antibiotic resistance.

      • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (4)  Table (1) References (74)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Iqbal B, Khan AA, Hu J, Liu Q, Wang C, et al. 2026. Soil microplastics hidden web: interaction of microbes and viruses as a frontier for sustainable ecosystem recovery. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 2: e006 doi: 10.48130/aee-0026-0003
    Iqbal B, Khan AA, Hu J, Liu Q, Wang C, et al. 2026. Soil microplastics hidden web: interaction of microbes and viruses as a frontier for sustainable ecosystem recovery. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 2: e006 doi: 10.48130/aee-0026-0003

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return