Search
2026 Volume 6
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Precise identification of intersectional hybrids in Morus using genomic in situ hybridization (GISH)

  • # Authors contributed equally: Qiming Zhou, Jiacheng Li, Yahui Xuan

More Information
  • Received: 23 October 2025
    Revised: 28 January 2026
    Accepted: 11 February 2026
    Published online: 03 April 2026
    Forestry Research  6 Article number: e010 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Mulberry (Morus spp.) includes ecologically important tree species that are highly valued for their exceptional economic and medicinal properties. Among its diverse species, Morus wittiorum and Morus laevigata are particularly valuable genetic resources because of their resistance to Sclerotinia, their relatively high content of specific flavonoids, and elongated fruit morphology. In this study, hybridization experiments were conducted using 10 mulberry accessions spanning three taxonomic sections (Alba, Wittiorum, and Laevigata). All six attempted intersectional crosses successfully yielded hybrid progeny. Using genomic in situ hybridization with blocking DNA, we detected distinct chromosomal signal patterns among the three sections, enabling precise identification of hybrid and wild-type chromosomal constitutions. Notably, this study provides the first documented evidence of 2n gamete formation in the genus Morus, where 2n eggs from M. wittiorum 'W-4' produced a pentaploid hybrid, 'Mp-7'. This discovery not only rewrites the chromosomal inheritance patterns of Morus but also unveils untapped polyploid breeding potential. These findings provide an efficient approach for identifying hybrids and offer novel polyploid breeding strategies, thereby promising to reshape global mulberry breeding and creating new opportunities for the genetic improvement of this agronomically important species.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 List of the mulberry accessions used in this study.
    Supplementary Table S2 List of seven mulberry accessions from six hybrid combinations.
    Supplementary Fig. S1 Fruit morphological characteristics of M. laevigata and M. wittiorum.
    Supplementary Fig. S2 cGISH signal patterns in M. alba 'A-1', M. wittiorum 'W-1', their hybrid M. alba × M. wittiorum 'Mp-1', M. wittiorum 'W-2', M. alba 'A-2', and their hybrid M. wittiorum × M. alba 'Mp-2'.
    Supplementary Fig. S3 cGISH signal patterns in M. alba 'A-3', M. laevigata 'L-1', their hybrid M. alba × M. laevigata 'Mp-3', M. laevigata 'L-2', M. alba 'A-4', and their hybrid M. laevigata × M. alba 'Mp-4'.
    Supplementary Fig. S4 cGISH signal patterns in M. laevigata 'L-2', M. wittiorum 'W-3', their hybrid M. laevigata × M. wittiorum 'Mp-5', M. wittiorum 'W-4', M. laevigata 'L-1', and their hybrid M. wittiorum × M. laevigata 'Mp-6'.
    Supplementary Fig. S5 cGISH signal patterns in M. laevigata 'Wg-1' and M. australis 'Wg-2'.
  • [1] He N, Zhang C, Qi X, Zhao S, Tao Y, et al. 2013. Draft genome sequence of the mulberry tree Morus notabilis. Nature Communications 4:2445 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3445

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Lin CY, Lay HL. 2013. Characteristics of fruit growth, component analysis and antioxidant activity of mulberry (Morus spp.) Scientia Horticulturae 162:285−292 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.08.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Tian S, Wang M, Liu C, Zhao H, Zhao B. 2019. Mulberry leaf reduces inflammation and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic mice by TLRs and insulin Signalling pathway. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 19:326 doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2742-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Zhang F, Liu X, Xia H, Wu H, Zong Y, et al. 2025. Identification of genetic loci for growth and stem form traits in hybrid Liriodendron via a genome-wide association study. Forestry Research 5:e001 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Gong B, Gao J, Xie Y, Zhang H, Zhu W, et al. 2024. Development of wheat-tetraploid Thinopyrum elongatum 4EL small fragment translocation lines with stripe rust resistance gene Yr4EL. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 137:246 doi: 10.1007/s00122-024-04756-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Guan H, Huang B, Yan X, Zhao J, Yang S, et al. 2024. Identification of distinct roses suitable for future breeding by phenotypic and genotypic evaluations of 192 rose germplasms. Horticulture Advances 2:5 doi: 10.1007/s44281-023-00024-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Chen X, Gao Y, Zhang D, Gao Y, Song Y, et al. 2023. Evaluation of salinity resistance and combining ability analysis in the seedlings of mulberry hybrids (Morus alba L.). Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 29:543−557 doi: 10.1007/s12298-023-01304-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Britten EJ. 1960. A proposed classification of screening methods for plant breeding programs. Euphytica 9:293−303 doi: 10.1007/BF00029481

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Tani N, Kawahara T, Yoshimaru H, Hoshi Y. 2003. Development of SCAR markers distinguishing pure seedlings of the endangered species Morus boninensis from M. boninensis × M. acidosa hybrids for conservation in Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Conservation Genetics 4:605−612 doi: 10.1023/A:1025655331429

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Stetter MG, Zeitler L, Steinhaus A, Kroener K, Biljecki M, et al. 2016. Crossing methods and cultivation conditions for rapid production of segregating populations in three grain amaranth species. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:816 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00816

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Du F, Jiang J, Jia H, Zhao XY, Wang WH, et al. 2015. Selection of generally applicable SSR markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and identity in Lilium. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 61:278−285 doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2015.05.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Yin ZF, Zhao B, Bi WL, Chen L, Wang QC. 2013. Direct shoot regeneration from basal leaf segments of Lilium and assessment of genetic stability in regenerants by ISSR and AFLP markers. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 49:333−342 doi: 10.1007/s11627-013-9501-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Xuan Y, Wu Y, Li P, Liu R, Luo Y, et al. 2019. Molecular phylogeny of mulberries reconstructed from ITS and two cpDNA sequences. PeerJ 7:e8158 doi: 10.7717/peerj.8158

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Zeng Q, Chen H, Zhang C, Han M, Li T, et al. 2015. Definition of eight mulberry species in the genus Morus by internal transcribed spacer-based phylogeny. PLoS One 10:e0135411 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135411

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Mandák B, Krak K, Vít P, Lomonosova MN, Belyayev A, et al. 2018. Hybridization and polyploidization within the Chenopodium album aggregate analysed by means of cytological and molecular markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 129:189−201 doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.08.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Moarefi N, Michael P, Beckett P, Nkongolo K. 2018. Identification of molecular markers differentiating Betula papyrifera and B. pumila populations from Northern Ontario (Canada). American Journal of Environmental Sciences 14:246−256 doi: 10.3844/ajessp.2018.246.256

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Clevenger J, Chavarro C, Pearl SA, Ozias-Akins P, Jackson SA. 2015. Single nucleotide polymorphism identification in polyploids: a review, example, and recommendations. Molecular Plant 8:831−846 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.02.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Wang H, Liu J, Xu X, Li Y, Yuan J, et al. 2024. MGCPdb, a collective resource for mulberry genome size, chromosome number, and ploidy. Forestry Research 4:e027 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Wang M, Zhu M, Qian J, Yang Z, Shang F, et al. 2024. Phylogenomics of mulberries (Morus, Moraceae) inferred from plastomes and single copy nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 197:108093 doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Xuan Y, Wang S, Li S, Yuan J, Zhou Q, et al. 2023. Chromosome constitution and genetic relationships of Morus spp. revealed by genomic in situ hybridization. BMC Plant Biology 23:428 doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04448-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Zeng Q, Chen M, Wang S, Xu X, Li T, et al. 2022. Comparative and phylogenetic analyses of the chloroplast genome reveal the taxonomy of the Morus genus. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1047592 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1047592

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Zhao W, Pan Y, Zhang Z, Jia S, Miao X, et al. 2005. Phylogeny of the genus Morus (Urticales: Moraceae) inferred from ITS and trnL-F sequences. African Journal of Biotechnology 4:563−569 doi: 10.4314/ajb.v4i6.15143

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Li X, Huang F, Chai J, Wang Q, Yu F, et al. 2021. Chromosome behavior during meiosis in pollen mother cells from Saccharum officinarum × Erianthus arundinaceus F1 hybrids. BMC Plant Biology 21:139 doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-02911-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Park HW, Sevilleno SS, Ha MKTT, Cabahug-Braza RA, Yi JH, et al. 2024. The application of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the prescreening of Veronica hybrids. Plants 13:1264 doi: 10.3390/plants13091264

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Wang G, Zhang W, Qin Y, Wu Q, Liang Q, et al. 2025. Verification of the introgression of Narenga porphyrocoma germplasm into Saccharum officinarum using molecular markers and GISH analysis. Agronomy 15:121 doi: 10.3390/agronomy15010121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Zhou M, Yong X, Zhu J, Xu Q, Liu X, et al. 2024. Chromosomal analysis of progenies between Lilium intersectional hybrids and wild species using ND-FISH and GISH. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1461798 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1461798

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Kopecký D, Bartoš J, Lukaszewski AJ, Baird JH, Černoch V, et al. 2009. Development and mapping of DArT markers within the Festuca - Lolium complex. BMC Genomics 10:473 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-473

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] De Storme N, Geelen D. 2013. Sexual polyploidization in plants–cytological mechanisms and molecular regulation. New Phytologist 198:670−684 doi: 10.1111/nph.12184

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Younis A, Hwang YJ, Lim KB. 2014. Exploitation of induced 2n-gametes for plant breeding. Plant Cell Reports 33:215−223 doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1534-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Zhou Q, Cheng X, Kong B, Zhao Y, Li Z, et al. 2022. Heat shock-induced failure of meiosis I to meiosis II transition leads to 2n pollen formation in a woody plant. Plant Physiology 189:2110−2127 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac219

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Dong J, Tu W, Wang H, Zuo Y, Liu T, et al. 2023. Genome sequence analysis provides insights into the mode of 2n egg formation in Solanum malmeanum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 136:157 doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04406-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Palumbo F, Gabelli G, Pasquali E, Vannozzi A, Farinati S, et al. 2024. RNA-seq analyses on gametogenic tissues of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) revealed plant reproduction- and ploidy-related genes. BMC Plant Biology 24:826 doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05542-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Xie KD, Xia QM, Peng J, Wu XM, Xie ZZ, et al. 2019. Mechanism underlying 2n male and female gamete formation in lemon via cytological and molecular marker analysis. Plant Biotechnology Reports 13:141−149 doi: 10.1007/s11816-019-00525-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Alix K, Gérard PR, Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS. 2017. Polyploidy and interspecific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants. Annals of Botany 120:183−194 doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx079

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Zhong Y, Du MJ, Ji RZ, Cheng FY. 2024. Cytological origination of the first found allotriploid tree peony, Paeonia × lemoinei 'Oukan' (AAB), reveled by molecular karyotype comparation. Scientia Horticulturae 324:112563 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112563

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Parrish SB, Deng Z. 2022. Discovery and characterization of novel fertile triploids and a new chromosome number in caladium (Caladium × hortulanum). HortScience 57:1078−1085 doi: 10.21273/hortsci16701-22

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Pomiès V, Turnbull N, Le Squin S, Syahputra I, Suryana E, et al. 2023. Occurrence of triploids in oil palm and their origin. Annals of Botany 131:17−32 doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Kang X, Wei H. 2022. Breeding polyploid Populus: progress and perspective. Forestry Research 2:4 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Deng H, Zhang X, Sheng S, Huang Y, Ye Z, et al. 2024. High temperature treatment induced production of unreduced 2n pollen in Camellia oleifera. Horticultural Plant Journal 10:879−896 doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2023.10.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Xu Y, Hu Q, Lin Q, Chi X, Shen P, et al. 2025. Polyploid crape myrtle was produced through hybridizing with 2n gametes induced by high-temperature. Euphytica 221:30 doi: 10.1007/s10681-025-03477-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Jiang H, Jin X, Shi X, Xue Y, Jiang J, et al. 2020. Transcriptomic analysis reveals candidate genes responsive to Sclerotinia scleroterum and cloning of the Ss-inducible chitinase genes in Morus laevigata. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:8358 doi: 10.3390/ijms21218358

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Li D, Chen G, Ma B, Zhong C, He N. 2020. Metabolic profiling and transcriptome analysis of mulberry leaves provide insights into flavonoid biosynthesis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68:1494−1504 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06931

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Sugiyama M, Katsube T, Koyama A, Itamura H. 2013. Varietal differences in the flavonol content of mulberry (Morus spp.) leaves and genetic analysis of quercetin 3-(6-malonylglucoside) for component breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61:9140−9147 doi: 10.1021/jf403136w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Zhou Q, Xuan Y, Li J, Qiu J, Yuan J, et al. 2025. Cytological identification of a genus-wide chromosomal fusion-fission cycles in genus Morus. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 72:6435−6445 doi: 10.1007/s10722-024-02312-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Cremona G, Iovene M, Festa G, Conicella C, Parisi M. 2018. Production of embryo rescued hybrids between the landrace "Friariello" (Capsicum annuum var. annuum) and C. baccatum var. pendulum: phenotypic and cytological characterization. Euphytica 214:129 doi: 10.1007/s10681-018-2211-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Ramzan F, Hwang YJ, Choi YH, Ramzan Y, Islam MM, et al. 2022. Evaluation of young F1 Lilium hybrids using fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis and morphological attributes. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 63:701−708 doi: 10.1007/s13580-022-00424-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Xiao K, Sun Y, Zhou S. 2023. Revealing the abnormal meiosis and the variation of the functional female gametes of aneuploid lily (Lilium) using genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Euphytica 219:108 doi: 10.1007/s10681-023-03238-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Tan GX, Xiong ZY, Jin HJ, Li G, Zhu LL, et al. 2006. Characterization of interspecific hybrids between Oryza sativa L. and three wild rice species of China by genomic in situ hybridization. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 48:1077−1083 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00336.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Zhao Y, Deng H, Chen Y, Li J, Chen S, et al. 2022. Establishment and optimization of molecular cytogenetic techniques (45S rDNA-FISH, GISH, and Fiber-FISH) in kiwifruit (Actinidia Lindl.). Frontiers in Plant Science 13:906168 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.906168

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Sari H, Eker T, Sari D, Aksoy M, Bakır M, et al. 2023. The fastest and most reliable identification of true hybrids in the genus Pisum L. Life 13:2222 doi: 10.3390/life13112222

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Meng X, Liu Z, Dai L, Zhao W, Wang J, et al. 2024. Shikimic acid accelerates phase change and flowering in Chinese jujube. Horticultural Plant Journal 10:413−424 doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2023.02.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Pinto RT, Abeyratne CR, Paiva LV, Benedito VA. 2023. Making headway toward enduring changes: perspectives on breeding tree crops through genome editing. Tree Genetics & Genomes 19:7 doi: 10.1007/s11295-022-01583-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Chang H, Wang Q, Qiu Y, Qin Y, Li X, et al. 2020. Production, identification and characterization of Erianthus rockii × Narenga porphyrocoma intergeneric hybrids as a new germplasm for sugarcane breeding and genetic research. Sugar Tech 22:389−395 doi: 10.1007/s12355-020-00804-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Xia Z, Dai X, Fan W, Liu C, Zhang M, et al. 2022. Chromosome-level genomes reveal the genetic basis of descending dysploidy and sex determination in Morus plants. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 20:1119−1137 doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2022.08.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Venkatesh KH, Nijagunaiah R, Munirajappa. 2013. Cytogenetical studies in some diploid mulberry varieties (Moraceae). Cytologia 78:69−72 doi: 10.1508/cytologia.78.69

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Venkatesh KH, Nijagunaiah R, Munirajappa. 2014. Cytogenetical studies in some triploid mulberry varieties (Moraceae). Cytologia 79:365−369 doi: 10.1508/cytologia.79.365

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Dewitte A, Eeckhaut T, Van Huylenbroeck J, Van Bockstaele E. 2010. Meiotic aberrations during 2n pollen formation in Begonia. Heredity 104:215−223 doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.111

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Wang J, Li D, Shang F, Kang X. 2017. High temperature-induced production of unreduced pollen and its cytological effects in Populus. Scientific Reports 7:5281 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05661-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Pang W, Wang Q, Li C, He W, Wang J, et al. 2025. ClPS1 gene-mediated manipulation of 2n pollen formation enables the creation of triploid seedless watermelon. Molecular Horticulture 5:48 doi: 10.1186/s43897-025-00170-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Yao H, Gray AD, Auger DL, Birchler JA. 2013. Genomic dosage effects on heterosis in triploid maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:2665−2669 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221966110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Sun P, Nishiyama S, Asakuma H, Voorrips RE, Fu J, et al. 2021. Genomics-based discrimination of 2n gamete formation mechanisms in polyploids: a case study in nonaploid Diospyros kaki 'Akioui'. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 11:jkab188 doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab188

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Li Y, Wang Y, Wang P, Yang J, Kang X. 2016. Induction of unreduced megaspores in Eucommia ulmoides by high temperature treatment during megasporogenesis. Euphytica 212:515−524 doi: 10.1007/s10681-016-1781-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Liu S, Sun Y, Peng M, Zhang X, Zhou S. 2024. F1 distant hybrids between two edible lilies (Lilium brownii var. viridulum and L. davidii var. unicolor) produce more n than 2n functional eggs with more recombinant chromosomes. Euphytica 220:4 doi: 10.1007/s10681-023-03269-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Xi XJ, Jiang XB, Li D, Guo LQ, Zhang JF, et al. 2011. Induction of 2n pollen by colchicine in Populus × popularis and its triploids breeding. Silvae Genetica 60:155−160 doi: 10.1515/sg-2011-0021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Zhang X, Ren G, Li K, Zhou G, Zhou S. 2012. Genomic variation of new cultivars selected from distant hybridization in Lilium. Plant Breeding 131:227−230 doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01906.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Zhao Y, Xie Y, Kong B, Cao D, Du J, et al. 2025. Genetic composition and heterozygosity of gibberellin-induced 2n gametes evaluated by SSR markers in Populus. BMC Plant Biology 25:773 doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06824-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhou Q, Li J, Xuan Y, Qiu J, Yuan J, et al. 2026. Precise identification of intersectional hybrids in Morus using genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Forestry Research 6: e010 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0009
    Zhou Q, Li J, Xuan Y, Qiu J, Yuan J, et al. 2026. Precise identification of intersectional hybrids in Morus using genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Forestry Research 6: e010 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0009

Figures(8)

Article Metrics

Article views(53) PDF downloads(11)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Precise identification of intersectional hybrids in Morus using genomic in situ hybridization (GISH)

Forestry Research  6 Article number: e010  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Mulberry (Morus spp.) includes ecologically important tree species that are highly valued for their exceptional economic and medicinal properties. Among its diverse species, Morus wittiorum and Morus laevigata are particularly valuable genetic resources because of their resistance to Sclerotinia, their relatively high content of specific flavonoids, and elongated fruit morphology. In this study, hybridization experiments were conducted using 10 mulberry accessions spanning three taxonomic sections (Alba, Wittiorum, and Laevigata). All six attempted intersectional crosses successfully yielded hybrid progeny. Using genomic in situ hybridization with blocking DNA, we detected distinct chromosomal signal patterns among the three sections, enabling precise identification of hybrid and wild-type chromosomal constitutions. Notably, this study provides the first documented evidence of 2n gamete formation in the genus Morus, where 2n eggs from M. wittiorum 'W-4' produced a pentaploid hybrid, 'Mp-7'. This discovery not only rewrites the chromosomal inheritance patterns of Morus but also unveils untapped polyploid breeding potential. These findings provide an efficient approach for identifying hybrids and offer novel polyploid breeding strategies, thereby promising to reshape global mulberry breeding and creating new opportunities for the genetic improvement of this agronomically important species.

    • Mulberry (Morus spp.), a perennial woody plant belonging to the family Moraceae in the order Rosales[1], is not only the primary food source for silkworms (Bombyx mori) but also possesses significant medicinal value, including blood glucose regulation and antioxidant properties[2,3]. Hybridization serves as a key strategy in plant improvement, facilitating novel gene flow and enhancing desirable traits across diverse plant species[46]. In mulberry breeding, hybrids exhibiting potential salt tolerance have been developed[7]. Early hybrid identification is crucial for enhancing breeding efficiency. However, studies on the authentication of Morus hybrids remain limited. Traditional identification methods, such as morphological trait observation[8], are often inadequate because of the pronounced morphological variation observed in mulberry hybrids compared with their parental lines[9]. Therefore, relying solely on morphological characteristics for identifying hybrids is unreliable.

      High-throughput molecular DNA markers provide a robust framework for hybrid screening. For instance, 11 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers have been used to distinguish intraspecific and interspecific hybrids of grain amaranth (Amaranthus spp.)[10]. Similarly, 70 simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers and 8 inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) primers have been used to detect genetic diversity and polymorphism in Lilium, facilitating the identification of hybrids and analyses of their genetic relationships[11,12]. In Morus, phylogenetic analysis using internal transcribed spacer and sequence-characterized amplified region markers has enabled the discrimination of putative interspecific hybrids[9,13,14]. However, molecular marker-based hybrid identification faces challenges in polyploid genomes, where the presence of polymorphic loci and varying ploidy levels complicates the correspondence between markers and species[15,16]. This limitation is particularly prominent in autopolyploid species; for instance, SNP markers often fail to differentiate between allelic variants and homologous SNPs arising from genome duplication[17]. The genus Morus exhibits extensive ploidy variation and frequent interspecific hybridization, resulting in a highly complex genetic background[1822]. Consequently, though molecular DNA markers offer partial insights into hybrid identification, their efficacy is limited in dissecting the precise genomic contributions of the parental lineages.

      Cytogenetics, particularly molecular cytogenetic tools such as fluorescence in situ hybridization and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), is a powerful approach for identifying hybrids and genomic characterization in plants[23]. For instance, hybrid populations in the genus Veronica were successfully identified by comparing the signal numbers of 45S and 5S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) between parents and offspring[24]. Similarly, GISH analysis enabled the accurate identification of intergeneric hybrids between Saccharum officinarum and Narenga porphyrocoma while revealing their chromosomal constitution and n + n inheritance patterns[25]. Recently, the application of GISH has elucidated the genetic relationships among 12 species and three varieties in the genus Morus, leading to the establishment of a cytotaxonomy system comprising five sections and two subsections[20]. Subsequent studies employing comparative GISH (cGISH) with blocking DNA and self-GISH refined this system further, proposing the division of the section Wittiorum into two sections, Wittiorum and Laevigata. Notably, GISH offers several advantages, including reference-genome-free analysis, cost-effectiveness, rapid processing, and intuitive chromosomal visualization. These features make it particularly valuable for studying wild Morus species such as Morus laevigata and Morus wittiorum, which lack reference genomes. Unlike molecular markers (e.g., SSRs or SNPs) that provide fragmented genetic locus information, GISH enables the direct identification of parental chromosome sets and their recombination events in hybrid progenies[26]. Although GISH has limitations in detecting small-fragment genomic structural variations and in discriminating species with extremely close genetic relationships[27], the technique remains critical for analyzing polyploid Morus hybrids, where comprehensive chromosomal insights are essential.

      The formation of 2n gametes in plants can occur through pre-meiotic or postmeiotic genome doubling, as well as via meiotic restitution[2830]. These gametes have been widely documented across diverse plant species, including wild potato (Solanum malmeanum) and lemon (Citrus limon)[3133]. As a pivotal mechanism for sexual polyploidization, 2n gametes contribute significantly to spontaneous polyploid formation in plants[29,34,35]. For instance, the detection of 2n gametes in cultivated caladium (Caladium × hortulanum) and oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) has provided direct evidence for naturally occurring sexual polyploidization events in these species[36,37]. Furthermore, 2n gametes serve as a crucial tool for artificial polyploid induction, offering significant potential for plant breeding[38]. High-temperature treatment has been shown to induce unreduced 2n pollen, with successful applications reported in Lagerstroemia indica and Camellia oleifera[39,40]. However, no evidence for the occurrence of 2n gametes has been reported in the genus Morus, highlighting a critical gap in polyploidy research and mulberry breeding programs.

      The exceptional resistance of M. laevigata to Sclerotinia scleroterum and its elongated fruit phenotype underscore its potential as valuable genetic resources for introgression via hybridization[41]. Moreover, M. wittiorum 'Twcgs' was found to contain significantly higher levels of rutin and nicotiflorin compared with other mulberry cultivars[42]. Previous studies have also shown that hybridization can effectively enhance the content of quercetin 3-(6-malonylglucoside)[43]. On the basis of these findings, six cross combinations were designed as part of breeding programs aimed at improving fruit length, enhancing resistance to S. scleroterum, and increasing flavonoid accumulation. In this study, GISH was used to confirm the hybrid authenticity of seven hybrid progenies derived from these six cross combinations and to characterize the chromosomal composition of two wild mulberry accessions. Comparative analysis against the respective parental lines conclusively verified the hybrid status of all seven progenies. This research provides a reliable method for early identification of mulberry hybrids, which facilitates the effective utilization of mulberry resources and supports advanced genetic breeding programs.

    • Intersectional hybridization experiments were conducted using 10 mulberry accessions (Morus spp.) selected from three taxonomic sections (Alba, Wittiorum, and Laevigata). These accessions were selected because of their superior morphological traits and typical cytotaxonomic characteristics, prioritizing germplasm possessing homologous chromosomes[20]. All accessions, including the wild genotypes and hybrids, were maintained through grafting or seeding in the Mulberry Germplasm Nursery at Southwest University, Chongqing, China. Three representative accessions, namely Morus multicaulis 'Heyebai' (Ma), M. laevigata 'Menghai No. 2' (Ml), and M. wittiorum 'Ailaoshan No. 9' (Mw), were used for genomic DNA extraction. Detailed information regarding the mulberry accessions, including those used for genomic DNA extraction, the parental lines, and the wild specimens, is provided in Supplementary Table S1. Additionally, the seven hybrids from six cross combinations are documented in Supplementary Table S2.

    • Mitotic chromosome preparation followed established protocols[44]. Briefly, fresh leaf and root tip samples were pretreated with 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline at room temperature for 3 h, fixed in 3:1 (v/v) ethanol : glacial acetic acid for 4 h, and stored in 70% ethanol at 4 °C. After three washes with distilled water, the tissues were enzymatically digested at 37 °C in a solution containing 2% (w/v) cellulase Onozuka R-10 (YaKult, Japan) and 1% (w/v) pectolyase Y-23 (YaKult, Japan) (pH 5.5). The duration of digestion varied by tissue type: 3 h for leaves and 1 h for root tips. The digested samples were rinsed with 70% ethanol and macerated into a cell suspension. For slide preparation, one drop of the cell suspension was mixed with glacial acetic acid. Chromosome spreads were observed using an Olympus IX73 microscope (Olympus, Japan).

    • Genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves of Ma, Ml, and Mw using the DNAquick Plant System kit (TIANGEN BIOTECH, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Genomic DNA was then fluorescently labeled by nick translation with either ChromaTide Alexa Fluor 488-5-dUTP (Thermo Fisher Scientific [Invitrogen], Massachusetts, USA) or Texas-Red-5-dCTP (PerkinElmer, Massachusetts, USA)[20]. Blocking DNA (~200-bp fragments) was generated by autoclaving genomic DNA from Ma, Ml, and Mw at 121 °C for 2 min.

    • GISH analysis was performed according to our previously established protocol[20]. Chromosome slides were crosslinked by ultraviolet light at 1,250 mJ/cm2 for 2 min prior to hybridization. The probe mixture (15 ng/μL of fluorescently labeled DNA in a hybridization buffer: 2 × Saline-Sodium Citrate Buffer (SSC) and 1 × TE; pH 7.0) was denatured with chromosomes at 100 °C for 5 min and then incubated overnight at 42 °C. For GISH with blocking DNA, the hybridization mixture was supplemented with blocking DNA (30× the probe concentration). After being washed in 2× SSC at room temperature for 5 min, the slides were counterstained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1 ng/μL) and sealed with nail polish. For multiple rounds of GISH, the probes were stripped in 50% formamide (containing 2× SSC) at 42 °C for 10 min after removing the coverslips. The slides were dehydrated in an ethanol series (70%, 90%, and 100% for 3 min each at room temperature) before the next hybridization round. Images were captured using an Olympus DP80 CCD camera (Olympus, Japan) under an Olympus IX73 fluorescence microscope and processed using Adobe Photoshop 2021 and Adobe Illustrator 2021 (Adobe, USA).

      To ensure accurate and reliable GISH signal quantification, signals were defined as discrete fluorescent foci exceeding an intensity threshold of 50 arbitary units (AU). For each hybrid individual, at least 20 metaphase cells exhibiting a clear chromosome distribution were imaged. Enumeration of the signals within these cells was independently performed by three researchers (Qiming Zhou, Jiacheng Li, and Ziang Li of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China), with the results used for subsequent analyses.

    • M. wittiorum and M. laevigata exhibit the longest fruit morphologies in the genus Morus (Supplementary Fig. S1), making them valuable genetic donors for intersectional hybridization programs focused on improving fruit traits. In the present study, 10 mulberry accessions spanning three taxonomic sections (Alba, Wittiorum, and Laevigata) were selected as parental lines for systematic intersectional crosses (Supplementary Table S1), with the crossing scheme detailed in Supplementary Table S2. All designed crosses successfully produced hybrid progeny. Crosses 1−6 yielded 280, 816, 5, 85, 36, and 925 seeds, respectively. For cytological verification of the plants' hybridity, one vigorous individual plant was randomly selected for each cross. To assess their chromosomal composition, GISH was performed using the representative cultivars Ma (Alba), Ml (Laevigata), and Mw (Wittiorum), as either genomic probes or blocking DNA (Supplementary Table S1). This analysis encompassed seven progeny lines derived from six crosses (Supplementary Table S2).

    • Two intersectional hybrids were successfully generated between Morus section Alba and section Wittiorum: (1) M. alba 'A-1' × M. wittiorum 'W-1' and (2) M. wittiorum 'W-2' × M. alba 'A-2'. Genomic probes derived from Ma and Mw were used reciprocally as either hybridization probes or blocking DNA to analyze chromosomal compositions. An initial GISH analysis without blocking DNA revealed substantial signal co-localization between the Ma and Mw probes in both the parents and the hybrid progeny, preventing unambiguous chromosomal assignment (Supplementary Fig. S2). To resolve this limitation, cGISH was subsequently performed by using standardized blocking DNA, which enabled precise discrimination of the parental chromosomal contributions in the hybrid offspring.

      In the M. alba 'A-1' × M. wittiorum 'W-1' cross, cGISH analysis revealed parental genomic distributions as follows. The Ma probe with Mw blocking DNA identified four hybridization signals in the female parent (Fig. 1ac). The Mw probe with Ma blocking DNA detected 26 signals in the male parent (Fig. 1jl). Their hybrid progeny, 'Mp-1', showed differential incorporation with two Ma-derived and 13 Mw-derived signals (Fig. 1di). The cross M. wittiorum 'W-2' × M. alba 'A-2' exhibited parallel findings. The Mw probe with Ma blocking revealed 32 signals in the female parent (Fig. 2jl). The Ma probe with Mw blocking detected four signals in the male parent (Fig. 2ac). The hybrid 'Mp-2' demonstrated two Ma-specific and 16 Mw-specific signals (Fig. 2di).

      Figure 1. 

      The cGISH signal patterns in M. alba 'A-1', M. wittiorum 'W-1', and their hybrid M. alba × M. wittiorum 'Mp-1'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from M. alba (Ma) (green) with blocking DNA from M. wittiorum (Mw) were detected in (a)−(c) M. alba 'A-1' and (d)−(f) the hybrid 'Mp-1'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Mw (red) with blocking DNA from Ma were detected in (g), (h) the hybrid 'Mp-1' and (j)−(l) M. wittiorum 'W-1'. (i) The two-round cGISH showing overlapping signals from Ma (green) and Mw (red) genomic probes with reciprocal blocking DNA. (m) Ideogram summarizing chromosome counts with different genomic probes' signals. White and red arrows point to chromosomes with Ma and Mw signals, respectively. Blue arrows indicate transmission of the parental chromosome to the hybrid. Scale bars represent 5 μm.

      Figure 2. 

      cGISH signal patterns in M. alba 'A-2', M. wittiorum 'W-2', and their hybrid M. wittiorum × M. alba 'Mp-2'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Ma (green) with blocking DNA from Mw were detected in (a)−(c) M. alba 'A-2' and (d)−(f) the hybrid 'Mp-2'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Mw (red) with blocking DNA from Ma were detected in (g), (h) the hybrid 'Mp-2' and (j)−(l) M. wittiorum 'W-2'. (i) The two-round cGISH showing overlapping signals from Ma (green) and Mw (red) genomic probes with reciprocal blocking DNA. (m) Ideogram summarizing the chromosome counts with different genomic probes' signals. White and red arrows point to the chromosomes with Ma and Mw signals, respectively. Blue arrows indicate the transmission of parental chromosome to the hybrid. Scale bars represent 5 μm.

    • Consistent with the cross combinations of section Alba and section Wittiorum, genomic probes targeting Ma and Ml exhibited extensive signal overlap (Supplementary Fig. S3). This ambiguity required the application of cGISH with species-specific blocking DNA to resolve the genomic origins.

      cGISH analysis of the M. alba 'A-3' × M. laevigata 'L-1' cross revealed distinct parental genomic distributions. When the Ma probe with Ml blocking DNA was applied, five hybridization signals were detected in the female parent (Fig. 3ac). The Ml probe with Ma blocking DNA identified eight signals in the male parent (Fig. 3jl). Their hybrid progeny, 'Mp-3', exhibited differential genomic incorporation, with five signals derived from each parent (Fig. 3di). A similar pattern was observed in the M. wittiorum 'L-2' × M. alba 'A-4' cross. The Ml probe with Ma blocking revealed 10 signals in the female parent (Fig. 4jl), whereas the Ma probe with Ml blocking detected five signals in the male parent (Fig. 4ac). In the resulting hybrid, 'Mp-4', four Ma-specific and nine Ml-specific signals were observed (Fig. 4di).

      Figure 3. 

      cGISH signal patterns in M. alba 'A-3', M. laevigata 'L-1', and their hybrid M. alba × M. laevigata 'Mp-3'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Ma (green) with blocking DNA from M. laevigata (Ml) were detected in (a)−(c) M. alba 'A-3' and (d)−(f) the hybrid 'Mp-3'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Ml (red) with blocking DNA from Ma were detected in (g), (h) the hybrid 'Mp-3' and (j)−(l) M. laevigata 'L-1'. (i) The two-round cGISH showing overlapping signals from the Ma (green) and Ml (red) genomic probes with reciprocal blocking DNA. (m) Ideogram summarizing chromosome counts with different genomic probes' signals. White and red arrows point to the chromosomes with Ma and Ml signals, respectively. Blue arrows indicate the transmission of parental chromosome to the hybrid. Scale bars represent 5 μm.

      Figure 4. 

      cGISH signal patterns in M. alba 'A-4', M. laevigata 'L-2', and their hybrid M. laevigata × M. alba 'Mp-4'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Ma (green) with blocking DNA from M. laevigata (Ml) were detected in (a)−(c) M. alba 'A-4' and (d)−(f) the hybrid 'Mp-4'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Ml (red) with blocking DNA from Ma were detected in (g), (h) the hybrid 'Mp-4' and (j)−(l) M. laevigata 'L-2'. (i) The two-round cGISH showing overlapping signals from the Ma (green) and Ml (red) genomic probes with reciprocal blocking DNA. (m) Ideogram summarizing chromosome counts with different genomic probes' signals. White and red arrows point to chromosomes with the Ma and Ml signals, respectively. Blue arrows indicate the transmission of parental chromosome to the hybrid. Scale bars represent 5 μm.

    • Intersectional hybridization between Morus section Laevigata and section Wittiorum yielded two hybrid combinations: (1) M. laevigata 'L-2' × M. wittiorum 'W-3' and (2) M. wittiorum 'W-4' × M. laevigata 'L-1'. Genomic probes derived from Ml and Mw were used reciprocally as either hybridization probes or blocking DNA to analyze chromosomal compositions. Consistent with the abovementioned findings, the Ml and Mw genomic probes showed extensive signal overlap (Supplementary Fig. S4), necessitating cGISH with blocking DNA.

      In the M. laevigata 'L-2' × M. wittiorum 'W-3' cross, the Ml probe with Mw blocking DNA identified 12 hybridization signals in the female parent (Fig. 5ac). The Mw probe with Ml blocking DNA detected 29 signals in the male parent (Fig. 5jl). Their hybrid progeny, 'Mp-5', exhibited 15 Ml-derived and 15 Mw-derived signals (Fig. 5di). In the case of M. wittiorum 'W-4' × M. laevigata 'L-1' exhibited parallel findings, as the Mw probe with Ml blocking revealed 28 signals in the female parent (Fig. 6jl). The Ml probe with Mw blocking detected eight signals in the male parent (Fig. 6ac). The hybrid 'Mp-6' demonstrated 16 Ml-specific and 14 Mw-specific signals (Fig. 6di).

      Figure 5. 

      cGISH signal patterns in M. laevigata 'L-2', M. wittiorum 'W-3', and their hybrid M. laevigata × M. wittiorum 'Mp-5'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Ml (green) with blocking DNA from Mw were detected in (a)−(c) M. laevigata 'L-2' and (d)−(f) the hybrid 'Mp-5. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Mw (red) with blocking DNA from Ml were detected in (g), (h) the hybrid 'Mp-5', and (j)−(l) M. wittiorum 'W-3'. (i) The two-round cGISH showing overlapping signals from the Ml (green) and Mw (red) genomic probes with reciprocal blocking DNA. (m) Ideogram summarizing chromosome counts with different genomic probes' signals. White and red arrows point to chromosomes with the Ml and Mw signals, respectively. Blue arrows indicate the transmission of parental chromosomes to the hybrid. Scale bars represent 5 μm.

      Figure 6. 

      cGISH signal patterns in M. laevigata 'L-1', M. wittiorum 'W-4', and their hybrid M. wittiorum × M. laevigata 'Mp-6'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Ml (green) with blocking DNA from Mw were detected in (a)−(c) M. laevigata 'L-1' and (d)−(f) the hybrid 'Mp-6'. cGISH signals using the genomic probe from Mw (red) with blocking DNA from Ml were detected in (g), (h) the hybrid 'Mp-6', and (j)−(l) M. wittiorum 'W-4'. (i) The two-round cGISH showing overlapping signals from the Ml (green) and Mw (red) genomic probes with reciprocal blocking DNA. (m) Ideogram summarizing chromosome counts with different genomic probes' signals. White and red arrows point to the chromosomes with Ml and Mw signals, respectively. Blue arrows indicate the transmission of parental chromosomes to the hybrid. Scale bars represent 5 μm.

      A pentaploid hybrid, designated 'Mp-7', was identified in the cross of M. wittiorum 'W-4' × M. laevigata 'L-1'. The genomic probes of Ml and Mw (no blocking DNA) hybridized to nearly all chromosomes (Fig. 7ad). The Ml probe with Mw blocking DNA detected 9 clear signals, whereas the Mw probe with Ml blocker identified 30 signals in 'Mp-7' (Fig. 7eh).

      Figure 7. 

      cGISH signal patterns in the hybrid 'Mp-7' from the cross M. wittiorum 'W-4' × M. laevigata 'L-1'. (a)−(d) Dual-color GISH signals using the genomic probes from Ml (green) and Mw (red) were detected in the hybrid 'Mp-7'. (e)−(h) The two-round cGISH signals using the genomic probes from Ml (green) and Mw (red) with reciprocal blocking DNA were detected in the hybrid 'Mp-7'. (i) Ideogram summarizing chromosome counts with different genomic probes' signals. White and red arrows point to chromosomes with the Ml and Mw signals, respectively. The blue gradient arrow indicates the changes in signal number after the application of blocking DNA. Scale bars represent 5 μm.

    • On the basis of prior work demonstrating the utility of the Ma and Mw genomic probes for rapid mulberry genotyping[20], we used these two probes to analyze the wild accessions M. laevigata 'Wg-1' and M. australis 'Wg-2' (Supplementary Fig. S5). The Ma probe hybridized to five chromosomal loci, whereas the Mw probe detected four clear signals in M. laevigata 'Wg-1' (Supplementary Fig. S5a1a4). In M. australis 'Wg-2', the Ma probe marked chromosome 1 and chromosome 2, whereas Mw detected 31 signals (Supplementary Fig. S5b1b4). According to the established cytotaxonomic criteria for mulberry[20], this pattern suggested that 'Wg-L1' is a hybrid between sections Laevigata and Alba, and 'Wg-2' is a hybrid between sections Alba and Wittiorum. cGISH validation with blocking DNA was performed. The Ma probe with Ml blocking DNA produced 8 signals in M. laevigata 'Wg-1', whereas the Ml probe with Ma blocking DNA yielded 10 signals (Fig. 8ad). In M. australis 'Wg-2', the Ma probe with Mw blocking detected 3 signals, whereas the Mw probe with Ma blocker revealed 29 signals (Fig. 8e, f).

      Figure 8. 

      cGISH signal patterns in the wild accessions M. laevigata 'Wg-1' and M. australis 'Wg-2'. (a)−(d) The two-round cGISH signals using genomic probes from Ma (green) and Ml (red) with reciprocal blocking DNA were detected in M. laevigata 'Wg-1'. (e)−(h) Corresponding two-round cGISH signals using genomic probes from Ma (green) and Mw (red) with reciprocal blocking DNA were detected in M. australis 'Wg-2'. (i), (j) Ideograms summarizing chromosome counts with different genomic probes' signals. White arrows point to chromosomes with Ma signals, whereas red arrows point to chromosomes with (a)−(d) Ml signals or (e)−(h) Mw signals. Scale bars represent 5 μm.

    • Cytology-based early hybrid authentication has been widely adopted as an efficient and reliable method for identifying hybrids in various plant species, including Lilium and Capsicum[4547]. However, GISH faces challenges in Morus species because of the highly similar chromosome size and the cross-hybridization of genomic probes, which generate nonspecific signals across different mulberry sections. This limitation has been successfully overcome in other crops, such as rice (Oryza sativa) and kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis), through the incorporation of blocking DNA, which suppresses repetitive DNA interference[48,49]. In this study, cGISH with blocking DNA enabled precise chromosomal delineation in hybrids derived from six cross combinations. Hybrid status was confirmed through a comparative analysis of quantitative signals, where the progeny exhibited approximately half the number of cGISH signals relative to their parents. For instance, when probed with Ma (blocked with Mw DNA), the hybrid 'Mp-1' displayed two distinct signals, contrasting with the four signals observed in its female parent M. alba 'A-1'.

      Early hybrid authentication at the seedling stage is crucial for minimizing resource expenditure on false hybrids[50]. Given the prolonged juvenile phase in perennial species like Morus, rapid detection significantly accelerates breeding programs[51,52]. Our results demonstrate that GISH is a robust tool for identifying intersectional mulberry hybrids, facilitating efficient mulberry breeding programs. Moreover, the successful development and precise identification of intersectional hybrids provide a clear direction for advancing distant hybridization strategies in mulberry.

    • As a wind-pollinated species with weak interspecific reproductive barriers, mulberry has generated numerous wild interspecific hybrids[13,14,19,21,22]. However, the parental origins and ploidy variability of these wild accessions remain poorly resolved[20], significantly impeding their utilization in breeding. Although cGISH previously predicted 15 accessions as hybrids, their precise chromosomal composition was unresolved[20]. In this study, cGISH with blocking DNA outperformed dual-color GISH in clarifying the genomic constitution of wild mulberries, yielding unambiguous chromosomal compositions. Specifically, it was confirmed that M. laevigata 'Wg-1' (derived from sections Laevigata and Alba) and M. australis 'Wg-2' (from sections Alba and Wittiorum) are intersectional hybrids. M. laevigata 'Wg-1' exhibited a balanced LaevigataAlba inheritance, whereas M. australis 'Wg-2' showed asymmetry, with Wittiorum being dominant.

      Although dual-color GISH enables rapid hybrid screening, cGISH with blocking DNA facilitates precise chromosomal identification. Their complementary use provides a robust framework for dissecting the genetic complexity of wild mulberries. Furthermore, these validated wild hybrids represent valuable germplasm for trait introgression (e.g., via backcrossing), offering a faster alternative to conventional breeding by bypassing lengthy generation cycles.

    • Previous studies using cGISH with blocking DNA have identified distinct chromosomal signal patterns among Morus sections Alba, Wittiorum, and Laevigata[20]. In this study, we applied this approach to 10 mulberry accessions and seven intersectional hybrids derived from these sections, providing multidimensional insights into their genetic relationships and taxonomic boundaries. Variations in the probes' specificity and signal patterns were detected. For instance, the Ml probe produced differences in both signal numbers and intensities in M. laevigata 'L-2' under different blocking DNA conditions. Despite the presence of blocking DNA, the Ml probe consistently generated signals on chromosomes corresponding to its parental origin. This effect was further demonstrated in the hybrids 'Mp-3' and 'Mp-4', where overlapping two-round GISH signals were detected. Consequently, progeny derived from laevigata crosses exhibited a pronounced abundance of GISH signals, suggesting that laevigata genomes harbor diverse repeat sequences and share closer genetic affinity with section Alba than previously recognized. These results align with earlier observations in hybridization studies of Erianthus rockii × N. porphyrocoma[53].

      Furthermore, clear intersectional genetic divergence was observed. In the hybrids 'Mp-1' to 'Mp-6', differential signal intensities generated by different genomic probes confirmed substantial genomic differentiation among the three sections. Previously sequenced genomic data indicated a significant difference in the divergence time between M. wittiorum and M. alba[54]. Phylogenetic analyses based on plastomes and single-copy nuclear genes also demonstrated that the two species occupy distinct phylogenetic positions[19]. These results provide improved phylogenetic resolution for the three mulberry sections, refining their taxonomic boundaries and offering a framework for future studies on the dynamics of intersectional hybridization.

    • Although mulberry has traditionally been characterized by n + n inheritance, reports of abnormal meiotic behavior[55,56] suggested potential deviations from this pattern. However, prior to this study, 2n gametes had never been documented in Morus. The standard n + n chromosomal inheritance pattern was consistently observed in the identified hybrids 'Mp-1' to 'Mp-6'. Here, we provide the first evidence of teh formation of 2n gametes in the female parent M. wittiorum 'W-4' (2n = 4x = 56), which generated the pentaploid hybrid 'Mp-7' (2n = 5x = 70). As is well known, there are three primary mechanisms underlie the formation of 2n gametes: the omission of one meiotic division, alterations in spindle morphology during meiotic division (e.g., parallel spindles), or defects in the cytokinesis of meiosis[5759]. According to the genetic composition, 2n gametes are classified into two types: first division restitution (FDR) and second division restitution (SDR). FDR 2n gametes contain complete homologous chromosome pairs, comprising unreduced sets derived from both parents[60]. Consequently, SDR 2n gametes consist of sister chromatid pairs derived from a single parent, resulting in significantly lower heterozygosity compared with FDR gametes[61]. In this study, direct cytological evidence of abnormal female meiotic behavior in the maternal parent M. wittiorum 'W-4' was unobtainable because of the production of a 2n egg. Therefore, the specific mechanism responsible for the formation of 2n gametes in 'W-4' could not be determined. Further investigations into this mechanism will be conducted using cytogenetic analysis with other male mulberry accessions.

      Moreover, a chromosome constitution similar to that of the pentaploid hybrid 'Mp-7' was detected in M. australis 'Wg-2', suggesting it may also be a pentaploid accession derived from the formation of 2n gametes. The findings indicate that ploidy variation in the genus Morus may be driven by the occurrence of 2n gametes, a phenomenon that is more prevalent in wild accessions than in cultivated accessions, which typically exhibit lower ploidy levels. Beyond their role in natural polyploidization, 2n gametes could have significant implications for breeding. They may stabilize the chromosomal composition in progeny, mitigate dosage effects, and overcome the reproductive barriers associated with odd-ploidy levels, thereby preserving breeding potential. This parallels their well-documented roles in polyploid breeding systems in species such as Lilium, Eucommia, and Populus[6266]. Further research should focus on protocols for inducing 2n gametes and elucidating their underlying mechanisms in Morus. Such studies would advance our understanding of natural sexual polyploidization and support the development of targeted polyploid breeding strategies.

    • In this study, cGISH with blocking DNA proved to be highly effective for early hybrid identification and precise analysis of the chromosomal composition across wild mulberry accessions. We present the first documented evidence of 2n gametes in Morus, showing that a maternal 2n egg from M. wittiorum 'W-4' (2n = 4x = 56) produced the pentaploid hybrid 'Mp-7' (2n = 5x = 70). These results establish GISH as a robust cytogenetic tool for authentication of species and hybrids in mulberry, while highlighting the critical role of 2n gametes in polyploidy-based breeding strategies. This work not only advances our understanding of natural polyploidization mechanisms in mulberry but also introduces innovative approaches for accelerating the genetic improvement of this agronomically significant species. Future studies should optimize GISH-based screening to improve breeding efficiency and explore the molecular pathways underlying the formation of 2n gametes.

      • All experimental methods, including the collection of plant materials, complied with the relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. The voucher specimens of all plants are deposited at the Mulberry Germplasm Nursery at Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: conceptualization: He N, data curation, methodology: Zhou Q, Li J; visualization: Zhou Q, Qiu J; resources: Yuan J, Li Z, Chen S; funding acquisition: Xuan Y, He N; writing – original draft: Zhou Q; writing – review & editing: Zhou Q, Li J, Xuan Y, He N. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The plant materials reported in the manuscript are included in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 and are freely available to all the readers upon reasonable request.

      • This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2024YFD2201302), the Science and Technology Pilot Project—Key Research and Development Project (Grant No. SWU-XDZD22008), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU-KQ24048), Chongqing Mulberry Germplasm Repository at Beibei (Grant No. ZWZZ20240002), and Zhonghuai Xiang Academician Workstation Project, Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. 202305AF150166). We extend our gratitude to Ziang Li from Nanjing Agricultural University for his assistance in counting the fluorescent signals on the chromosomes and to Jianglian Yuan for her assistance in operating the fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX73). The authors acknowledge the support from the Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve Administration, Zhenyuan Management and Protection Bureau of Ailao Mountain National Nature Reserve Administration in Yunnan Province, and Baoshan Agricultural Science Research Institute (Baoshan Agricultural Technology Extension Center) for their assistance with and permission for sample collection.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Qiming Zhou, Jiacheng Li, Yahui Xuan

      • Supplementary Table S1 List of the mulberry accessions used in this study.
      • Supplementary Table S2 List of seven mulberry accessions from six hybrid combinations.
      • Supplementary Fig. S1 Fruit morphological characteristics of M. laevigata and M. wittiorum.
      • Supplementary Fig. S2 cGISH signal patterns in M. alba 'A-1', M. wittiorum 'W-1', their hybrid M. alba × M. wittiorum 'Mp-1', M. wittiorum 'W-2', M. alba 'A-2', and their hybrid M. wittiorum × M. alba 'Mp-2'.
      • Supplementary Fig. S3 cGISH signal patterns in M. alba 'A-3', M. laevigata 'L-1', their hybrid M. alba × M. laevigata 'Mp-3', M. laevigata 'L-2', M. alba 'A-4', and their hybrid M. laevigata × M. alba 'Mp-4'.
      • Supplementary Fig. S4 cGISH signal patterns in M. laevigata 'L-2', M. wittiorum 'W-3', their hybrid M. laevigata × M. wittiorum 'Mp-5', M. wittiorum 'W-4', M. laevigata 'L-1', and their hybrid M. wittiorum × M. laevigata 'Mp-6'.
      • Supplementary Fig. S5 cGISH signal patterns in M. laevigata 'Wg-1' and M. australis 'Wg-2'.
      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (8)  References (66)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhou Q, Li J, Xuan Y, Qiu J, Yuan J, et al. 2026. Precise identification of intersectional hybrids in Morus using genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Forestry Research 6: e010 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0009
    Zhou Q, Li J, Xuan Y, Qiu J, Yuan J, et al. 2026. Precise identification of intersectional hybrids in Morus using genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Forestry Research 6: e010 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0009

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return