Search
2026 Volume 6
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Hydraulic limitation drives differential crown dieback in Populus alba varieties

More Information
  • Received: 08 November 2025
    Revised: 14 March 2026
    Accepted: 23 March 2026
    Published online: 15 May 2026
    Forestry Research  6 Article number: e017 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • The widespread decline and mortality of the Three-North Shelter Forest under climate change is threatening the sustainability of arid and semi-arid ecosystems. As the dominant tree genus in these shelterbelt forests, poplars (Populus spp.) display clear varietal differences in decline patterns, yet the underlying physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address this question, we compared two poplar varieties, Populus alba var. bachofenii (P.b) and Populus alba var. pyramidalis (P.p), using branch samples from upper and lower canopy positions. The results showed that although hydraulic conductivities (Ks and Kl) did not differ significantly between varieties, P.b consistently exhibited lower percent loss of conductivity (PLC), particularly in the upper canopy branches. In contrast, P.p experienced more negative midday water potentials (Ψmd) in the upper crown, indicating greater water deficit. Within P.p, declining individuals (P.p-D) displayed higher PLC, whereas hydraulic conductivity, predawn water potential (Ψpd), and non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) concentrations were similar to those of healthy trees, indicating that dieback was associated primarily with increased hydraulic vulnerability, rather than reduced transport capacity or carbon depletion. Tree-ring analyses further revealed stable growth in P.b, whereas P.p was more drought-sensitive and showed greater interannual variability. Trees with higher PLC exhibited greater growth sensitivity and reduced radial growth rates, supporting the hydraulic limitation hypothesis. Overall, this study clarifies the physiological mechanisms underlying the contrasting decline patterns among poplar varieties in water-limited regions, and provides guidance for optimizing species selection and management strategies in arid shelterbelts.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Shen JX, Zhang YJ, Maenpuen P, Zhang SB, Zhang L, et al. 2022. Response of four evergreen savanna shrubs to an incidence of extreme drought: high embolism resistance, branch shedding and maintenance of nonstructural carbohydrates. Tree Physiology 42(4):740−753 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpab150

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2023. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge doi: 10.1017/9781009157926
    [3] Babst F, Bouriaud O, Poulter B, Trouet V, Girardin MP, et al. 2019. Twentieth century redistribution in climatic drivers of global tree growth. Science Advances 5(1):eaat4313 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat4313

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Fang LD, Ning QR, Guo JJ, Gong XW, Zhu JJ, et al. 2021. Hydraulic limitation underlies the dieback of Populus pseudo-simonii trees in water-limited areas of northern China. Forest Ecology and Management 483:118764 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Choat B, Brodribb TJ, Brodersen CR, Duursma RA, López R, et al. 2018. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature 558:531−539 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0240-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Anderegg WRL, Berry JA, Field CB. 2012. Linking definitions, mechanisms, and modeling of drought-induced tree death. Trends in Plant Science 17:693−700 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.09.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Nardini A, Battistuzzo M, Savi T. 2013. Shoot desiccation and hydraulic failure in temperate woody angiosperms during an extreme summer drought. New Phytologist 200(2):322−329 doi: 10.1111/nph.12288

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Rowland L, da Costa ACL, Galbraith DR, Oliveira RS, Binks OJ, et al. 2015. Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation. Nature 528:119−122 doi: 10.1038/nature15539

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] McDowell NG. 2011. Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiology 155(3):1051−1059 doi: 10.1104/pp.110.170704

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, et al. 2008. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytologist 178(4):719−739 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Choat B, Jansen S, Brodribb TJ, Cochard H, Delzon S, et al. 2012. Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491:752−755 doi: 10.1038/nature11688

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Rosso L, Cantamessa S, Bergante S, Biselli C, Fricano A, et al. 2023. Responses to drought stress in poplar: what do we know and what can we learn? Life 13:533 doi: 10.3390/life13020533

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Anderegg WRL, Klein T, Bartlett M, Sack L, Pellegrini AFA, et al. 2016. Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:5024−5029 doi: 10.3410/f.726295514.793519925

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Awad H, Barigah T, Badel E, Cochard H, Herbette S. 2010. Poplar vulnerability to xylem cavitation acclimates to drier soil conditions. Physiologia Plantarum 139:280−288 doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01367.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Mitchell PJ, O'Grady AP, Tissue DT, White DA, Ottenschlaeger ML, et al. 2013. Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality. New Phytologist 197:862−872 doi: 10.1111/nph.12064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Fichot R, Brignolas F, Cochard H, Ceulemans R. 2015. Vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation in poplars: synthesis and future opportunities. Plant, Cell & Environment 38:1233−1251 doi: 10.1111/pce.12491

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] McGregor IR, Helcoski R, Kunert N, Tepley AJ, Gonzalez-Akre EB, et al. 2021. Tree height and leaf drought tolerance traits shape growth responses across droughts in a temperate broadleaf forest. New Phytologist 231(2):601−616 doi: 10.1111/nph.16996

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Trugman AT, Anderegg LDL, Anderegg WRL, Das AJ, Stephenson NL. 2021. Why is tree drought mortality so hard to predict? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 36(6):520−532 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.02.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Xu GQ, Chen TQ, Liu SS, Ma J, Li Y. 2023. Within-crown plasticity of hydraulic properties influence branch dieback patterns of two woody plants under experimental drought conditions. Science of the Total Environment 854:158802 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158802

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Zhang YJ, Meinzer FC, Hao GY, Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, et al. 2009. Size-dependent mortality in a Neotropical savanna tree: the role of height-related adjustments in hydraulic architecture and carbon allocation. Plant, Cell & Environment 32:1456−1466 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02012.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Fritts HC. 1971. Dendroclimatology and dendroecology. Quaternary Research 1:419−449 doi: 10.1016/0033-5894(71)90057-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Du J, Wang X, Huo Z, Guan H, Xiong Y, et al. 2021. Response of shelterbelt transpiration to shallow groundwater in arid areas. Journal of Hydrology 592:125611 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125611

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Scott RL, Shuttleworth WJ, Goodrich DC, Maddock T III. 2000. The water use of two dominant vegetation communities in a semiarid riparian ecosystem. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 105:241−256 doi: 10.1016/s0168-1923(00)00181-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Xi B, Clothier B, Coleman M, Duan J, Hu W, et al. 2021. Irrigation management in poplar (Populus spp.) plantations: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 494:119330 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119330

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] He Y, Lin X, Wang L, Ma X, Fang L, et al. 2023. Effects of long-term irrigation on soil phosphorus fractions and microbial communities in populus euphratica plantations. Forestry Research 3:17 doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Shah N, Nachabe M, Ross M. 2007. Extinction depth and evapotranspiration from ground water under selected land covers. Ground Water 45:329−380 doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00302.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Anderegg WRL, Flint A, Huang CY, Flint L, Berry JA, et al. 2015. Tree mortality predicted from drought-induced vascular damage. Nature Geoscience 8(4):367−371 doi: 10.1038/ngeo2400

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Lloret F, Keeling EG, Sala A. 2011. Components of tree resilience: effects of successive low-growth episodes in old ponderosa pine forests. Oikos 120:1909−1920 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19372.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Yao Y, Fu B, Liu Y, Li Y, Wang S, et al. 2022. Evaluation of ecosystem resilience to drought based on drought intensity and recovery time. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 314:108809 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108809

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Wu G, Xu G, Wang B, Liu X, Chen T, et al. 2023. Post-drought moisture condition determines tree growth recovery after extreme drought events in the Tianshan Mountains, northwestern China. Ecological Indicators 151:110275 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110275

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Shi H, Peng X, Zhou YJ, Wang AY, Sun XK, et al. 2024. Resilience and response: unveiling the impacts of extreme droughts on forests through integrated dendrochronological and remote sensing analyses. Forest Ecosystems 11:100209 doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100209

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Luo GN, Luo X, Chen KY, Zhang XD. 2023. A study on the evolution of ecological space in Aral city. Journal of Hebei GEO University 46(1):73−79

    Google Scholar

    [33] Thevs N, Zerbe S, Peper J, Succow M. 2008. Vegetation and vegetation dynamics in the Tarim River floodplain of continental-arid Xinjiang, NW China. Phytocoenologia 38:65−84 doi: 10.1127/0340-269x/2008/0038-0065

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Melcher PJ, Holbrook N, Burns MJ, Zwieniecki MA, Cobb AR, et al. 2012. Measurements of stem xylem hydraulic conductivity in the laboratory and field. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3:685−694 doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00204.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Sperry JS, Donnelly JR, Tyree MT. 1988. A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant, Cell & Environment 11(1):35−40 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1988.tb01774.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Mencuccini M, Rosas T, Rowland L, Choat B, Cornelissen H, et al. 2019. Leaf economics and plant hydraulics drive leaf: wood area ratios. New Phytologist 224:1544−1556 doi: 10.1111/nph.15998

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pittermann J. 2000. Drought experience and cavitation resistance in six shrubs from the Great Basin, Utah. Basic and Applied Ecology 1(1):31−41 doi: 10.1078/1439-1791-00006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Hansen J, Møller I. 1975. Percolation of starch and soluble carbohydrates from plant tissue for quantitative determination with anthrone. Analytical Biochemistry 68(1):87−94 doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(75)90682-X

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Grissino-Mayer HD. 2001. Evaluating crossdating accuracy: a manual and tutorial for the computer program COFECHA. Tree-Ring Research 57(2):205−221

    Google Scholar

    [40] Cook ER. 1985. A Time Series Analysis Approach to Tree Ring Standardization (Dendrochronology, Forestry, Dendroclimatology, Autoregressive Process). PhD. Thesis. The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. https://ltrr.arizona.edu/content/time-series-analysis-approach-tree-ring-standardization
    [41] Biondi F, Qeadan F. 2008. A theory-driven approach to tree-ring standardization: defining the biological trend from expected basal area increment. Tree-Ring Research 64(2):81−96 doi: 10.3959/2008-6.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Gazol A, Camarero JJ, Anderegg WRL, Vicente-Serrano SM. 2017. Impacts of droughts on the growth resilience of Northern Hemisphere forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26:166−176 doi: 10.1111/geb.12526

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Chen YJ, Choat B, Sterck F, Maenpuen P, Katabuchi M, et al. 2021. Hydraulic prediction of drought-induced plant dieback and top-kill depends on leaf habit and growth form. Ecology Letters 24:2350−2363 doi: 10.1111/ele.13856

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Li MY, Fang LD, Duan CY, Cao Y, Yin H, et al. 2020. Greater risk of hydraulic failure due to increased drought threatens pine plantations in Horqin Sandy Land of northern China. Forest Ecology and Management 461:117980 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117980

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Meinzer FC, McCulloh KA, Lachenbruch B, Woodruff DR, Johnson DM. 2010. The blind men and the elephant: the impact of context and scale in evaluating conflicts between plant hydraulic safety and efficiency. Oecologia 164(2):287−296 doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1734-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Plavcová L, Hacke UG. 2012. Phenotypic and developmental plasticity of xylem in hybrid poplar saplings subjected to experimental drought, nitrogen fertilization, and shading. Journal of Experimental Botany 63:6481−6491 doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers303

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Hammond WM, Yu K, Wilson LA, Will RE, Anderegg WRL, et al. 2019. Dead or dying? Quantifying the point of no return from hydraulic failure in drought-induced tree mortality. New Phytologist 223(4):1834−1843 doi: 10.1111/nph.15922

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Koch GW, Sillett SC, Jennings GM, Davis SD. 2004. The limits to tree height. Nature 428:851−854 doi: 10.1038/nature02417

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Ryan MG, Yoder BJ. 1997. Hydraulic limits to tree height and tree growth. BioScience 47:235−242 doi: 10.2307/1313077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Fang LD, Gong XW, Jin Y, Li MY, Ning QR, et al. 2026. Poplar species with tall columnar crowns are more prone to hydraulic limitation than congener with short oval crowns in water-limited areas. Tree Physiology 46:tpaf149 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpaf149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Hartmann H, Trumbore S. 2016. Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees–from what we can measure to what we want to know. New Phytologist 211:386−403 doi: 10.1111/nph.13955

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Kono Y, Ishida A, Saiki ST, Yoshimura K, Dannoura M, et al. 2019. Initial hydraulic failure followed by late-stage carbon starvation leads to drought-induced death in the tree Trema orientalis. Communications Biology 2:8 doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0256-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Fu A, Chen Y, Li W. 2006. Analysis on water potential of Populus euphratica oliv and its meaning in the lower reaches of Tarim River, Xinjiang. Chinese Science Bulletin 51:221−228 doi: 10.1007/s11434-006-8229-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Li D, Si J, Zhang X, Gao Y, Luo H, et al. 2019. The mechanism of changes in hydraulic properties of Populus euphratica in response to drought stress. Forests 10:904 doi: 10.3390/f10100904

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Woodruff DR, Meinzer FC. 2011. Water stress, shoot growth and storage of non-structural carbohydrates along a tree height gradient in a tall conifer. Plant, Cell & Environment 34(11):1920−1930 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02388.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Poorter L, McDonald I, Alarcón A, Fichtler E, Licona JC, et al. 2010. The importance of wood traits and hydraulic conductance for the performance and life history strategies of 42 rainforest tree species. New Phytologist 185(2):481−492 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03092.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Fan ZX, Zhang SB, Hao GY, Ferry Slik JW, Cao KF. 2012. Hydraulic conductivity traits predict growth rates and adult stature of 40 Asian tropical tree species better than wood density. Journal of Ecology 100(3):732−741 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01939.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Sun S, Qiu L, He C, Li C, Zhang J, et al. 2018. Drought-affected Populus simonii Carr. show lower growth and long-term increases in intrinsic water-use efficiency prior to tree mortality. Forests 9:564 doi: 10.3390/f9090564

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Gea-Izquierdo G, Fonti P, Cherubini P, Martín-Benito D, Chaar H, et al. 2012. Xylem hydraulic adjustment and growth response of Quercus canariensis Willd. to climatic variability. Tree Physiology 32(4):401−413 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Yuan CF, Wang WZ, Wu ZH, Su Y, Luo LZ. 2025. Differences in radial growth responses to climate and ecological resilience between healthy and declining Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica and Populus L. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 36(2):411−417 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202502.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Liu SD, Luo DD, Zhao GY, Yu YX, Zhai JT, et al. 2026. Hydraulic limitation drives differential crown dieback in Populus alba varieties. Forestry Research 6: e017 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0017
    Liu SD, Luo DD, Zhao GY, Yu YX, Zhai JT, et al. 2026. Hydraulic limitation drives differential crown dieback in Populus alba varieties. Forestry Research 6: e017 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0017

Figures(6)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(87) PDF downloads(25)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Hydraulic limitation drives differential crown dieback in Populus alba varieties

Forestry Research  6 Article number: e017  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The widespread decline and mortality of the Three-North Shelter Forest under climate change is threatening the sustainability of arid and semi-arid ecosystems. As the dominant tree genus in these shelterbelt forests, poplars (Populus spp.) display clear varietal differences in decline patterns, yet the underlying physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address this question, we compared two poplar varieties, Populus alba var. bachofenii (P.b) and Populus alba var. pyramidalis (P.p), using branch samples from upper and lower canopy positions. The results showed that although hydraulic conductivities (Ks and Kl) did not differ significantly between varieties, P.b consistently exhibited lower percent loss of conductivity (PLC), particularly in the upper canopy branches. In contrast, P.p experienced more negative midday water potentials (Ψmd) in the upper crown, indicating greater water deficit. Within P.p, declining individuals (P.p-D) displayed higher PLC, whereas hydraulic conductivity, predawn water potential (Ψpd), and non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) concentrations were similar to those of healthy trees, indicating that dieback was associated primarily with increased hydraulic vulnerability, rather than reduced transport capacity or carbon depletion. Tree-ring analyses further revealed stable growth in P.b, whereas P.p was more drought-sensitive and showed greater interannual variability. Trees with higher PLC exhibited greater growth sensitivity and reduced radial growth rates, supporting the hydraulic limitation hypothesis. Overall, this study clarifies the physiological mechanisms underlying the contrasting decline patterns among poplar varieties in water-limited regions, and provides guidance for optimizing species selection and management strategies in arid shelterbelts.

    • In recent decades, the frequency and intensity of extreme drought events has increased, causing widespread forest degradation and tree mortality worldwide; a trend that is expected to intensify with future climate warming[1]. Climate-driven disturbances can substantially reshape forest ecosystems by altering stand structure, modifying species composition and distribution, and weakening key ecosystem functions[2]. In arid and semi-arid regions, water availability is a key limiting factor for tree growth[3], making these water-limited systems increasingly vulnerable to drought-induced mortality[4]. This knowledge is therefore critical for improving predictions of climate-driven shifts in water-carbon dynamics and for developing more effective forest management and climate adaptation strategies[5].

      Tree mortality under drought stress is generally attributed to two main mechanisms: hydraulic failure and carbon starvation. According to the hydraulic failure hypothesis, when xylem water potential falls below a critical threshold, air is drawn into conduits through intervessel pits, initiating cavitation and embolism that disrupt the continuity of water transport[6]. This breakdown of hydraulic function is now regarded as one of the primary drivers of drought-induced decline and mortality in trees[7,8]. By contrast, the carbon starvation hypothesis emphasizes that early stomatal closure and sustained reductions in stomatal conductance limit carbon assimilation via photosynthesis, causing a gradual depletion of non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) reserves and potentially triggering carbon starvation[9,10]. Collectively, these physiological and ecological factors interact to determine tree responses to drought stress[11].

      Among temperate woody species, poplars are among the most susceptible to drought-induced xylem embolism[12]. A global meta-analysis of 475 plant species showed that hydraulic traits are the most effective predictors of plant mortality, explaining approximately 70% of the observed mortality rates[13]. In Populus, accumulating evidence indicates that drought-induced decline is typically initiated by hydraulic dysfunction, which often precedes substantial depletion of NSC reserves[4,14]. Although drought stress can modify the concentration and allocation of NSC within Populus tissues, carbon-related adjustments typically play a secondary role relative to hydraulic failure[15]. Previous studies have revealed considerable variation among Populus varieties in xylem structure and embolism resistance. In addition, both hydraulic traits and NSC allocation may vary along vertical canopy gradients within individual trees[12,16]. However, how water transport and carbon allocation are coordinated along canopy gradients in co-occurring Populus varieties remains incompletely understood, limiting our ability to explain their observed contrasting decline patterns.

      As trees grow taller, water transport from the roots to the upper canopy must overcome greater gravitational forces and increasing hydraulic resistance, thereby reducing xylem conductivity and steepening the water potential gradient[17,18]. Consequently, tissues located in the upper canopy are often exposed to greater hydraulic tension and are therefore more susceptible to water deficit and cavitation[19]. Across, and within species, taller trees tend to be more vulnerable to drought, often exhibiting a characteristic 'top-down' dieback pattern in their shoots[10]. This phenomenon aligns with the 'hydraulic limitation hypothesis', which links taller tree height to reduced hydraulic efficiency and top-down canopy dieback[20]. To mitigate water deficits, trees often shed their upper leaves and branches. However, species and organs differ in their capacity to make these adjustments, depending on the coordination between hydraulic function and carbon reserves.

      Tree-ring width (TRW) provides a long-term and high-resolution archive of radial growth, reflecting trees' responses to environmental variability over time[21]. In shelterbelt plantations established in arid and semi-arid regions, tree growth depends primarily on irrigation and groundwater recharge rather than on natural precipitation alone[22]. Even under managed irrigation regimes, spatial heterogeneity in groundwater depth, irrigation frequency, and root access to deeper soil moisture can generate substantial variability in tree water status and vitality[23]. Unlike natural forests, the decline of plantation trees is therefore shaped not only by regional climatic conditions, but also by local water management practices and irrigation regimes[24]. Long-term irrigation can also alter below-ground conditions, potentially imposing additional constraints on tree performance[25]. Previous studies have shown that shallow groundwater regulates transpiration in shelterbelt forests[22,26], whereas deep soil water deficits accelerate the degradation of Populus plantations. Notably, even under irrigation, some individuals exhibit apical dieback and reduced vigor, suggesting that internal hydraulic dysfunction or constraints on carbon allocation may underlie the observed decline patterns[10,27]. Within this context, TRW serves not only as an indicator of tree water status and growth reduction, but also as a valuable early signal of forest degradation[28]. Therefore, integrating TRW with hydraulic traits enables the assessment of both short-term drought impacts and long-term growth trajectories[29].

      Xinjiang, located in arid northwest China, is characterized by severe droughts threatening local forests and plantations[2,30]. Fast-growing poplars are widely planted in the Three-North Shelterbelt because of their rapid establishment and strong adaptability[31]. Among them, Populus alba var. bachofenii (P.b) and Populus alba var. pyramidalis (P.p) play key roles in windbreak establishment, sand stabilization, and ecological restoration. However, unlike the relatively healthy P.b, many P.p individuals exhibit apical dieback, reduced vigor, and premature leaf shedding, particularly in the upper crown[4]. Despite increasing recognition of hydraulic limitation and carbon starvation as mechanisms of drought-induced decline, it remains unclear whether intervarietal differences in crown dieback within Populus alba are primarily driven by hydraulic vulnerability or by carbohydrate depletion. In addition, a few studies have integrated canopy-position-specific hydraulic traits with long-term tree-ring growth to mechanistically explain these decline patterns. We investigated healthy individuals of P.b and both healthy and declining individuals of P.p (P.p-D) in shelterbelt plantations in Alar City, Xinjiang. Measurements included predawn (Ψpd) and midday (Ψmd) leaf water potentials, branch hydraulic traits, NSC concentrations across canopy positions, and tree-ring width indices (RWI). We aimed to: (i) investigate how P.b and P.p coordinate water transport and carbon storage along canopy height gradients under drought stress; (ii) test whether hydraulic limitation contributes to canopy decline in P.p; and (iii) examine whether combining short-term hydraulic traits with long-term tree-ring growth records can help identify intervarietal differences in mortality risk. Based on the contrasting growth performance and canopy dieback observed at our study site, and a potential growth-hydraulic safety trade-off between the two varieties, we formulated two hypotheses: (i) intervarietal differences in drought vulnerability between P.b and P.p arise from divergent plastic responses of branch functional traits along the vertical canopy gradient, whereby insufficient hydraulic coordination in the upper canopy of P.p predisposes branches to dieback; (ii) a trade-off exists between growth and hydraulic safety in the two poplar varieties, with P.p favoring higher growth efficiency at the cost of increased embolism risk; this trade-off should be reflected in both short-term hydraulic traits and long-term tree-ring growth patterns.

    • Alaer City is a county-level city in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of northwestern China (80°30′–81°58′ E, 40°22′–40°57′ N), located on the southern slope of the Tianshan Mountains and along the northern border of the Taklimakan Desert. Our specific sampling site (marked by the red dot in Fig. 1b, c) is positioned at 81°18′ E, 40°36′ N. The region has an annual precipitation of 40.1 to 82.5 mm, and an annual evaporation ranging from 1,876.6 to 2,558.9 mm[32]. Under these extremely arid conditions, precipitation contributes little to soil water supply, and groundwater levels are mainly sustained by agricultural irrigation, a typical feature of farmland shelterbelt systems in this region[22]. The study area is part of the Tarim River alluvial plain, featuring severe desertification, salinization, and soil degradation, resulting in limited natural forest coverage[33].

      Figure 1. 

      Map of the study area. (a) Location of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in China. (b) Detailed location of Alar City in Aksu Prefecture, with the red dot indicating the specific study site. (c) Land use classification in Alar City, where dark green denotes forested regions and brown indicates agricultural land, both featuring farmland protection forests established to combat wind erosion and desertification. (d) Photograph showing farmland shelterbelts with poplars exhibiting varying degrees of decline. Base maps (a–c): https://cloudcenter.tianditu.gov.cn/administrativeDivision.

      Field surveys conducted in local farmland shelterbelts indicated that P.p, the dominant planted species in the region, frequently displayed dieback symptoms in the upper canopy. In contrast, comparable signs of decline were not observed in P.b (Fig. 1d). To investigate the physiological mechanisms underlying this contrasting canopy performance, branch samples were collected during July 2021 (peak growing season). Samples were carried out across different canopy positions in three tree groups: healthy P.b, healthy P.p, and declining P.p-D individuals, with six trees per group (n = 6). All sampled trees originated from plantations established in the same year, ensuring comparable stand age among the groups. Mean diameter at breast height (DBH), estimated from cumulative TRW measurements, was 22.54 cm for P.b, 26.46 cm for P.p, and 22.62 cm for P.p-D, with tree height ranging from 18 to 22 m. Maximum vessel length was determined using the air-injection technique at 60 kPa following the method described by Melcher et al.[34], with mean values of 31.16 cm in P.b and 36.33 cm in P.p. Trees were planted at a spacing of 2 × 2 m as part of windbreak and sand-fixation shelterbelts. All sampled individuals grew under similar environmental conditions (comparable soil properties, groundwater depth, irrigation regimes, and planting density), minimizing environmental influences on hydraulic traits and growth. To characterize physiological differences between the two varieties, we measured hydraulic traits and quantified NSC concentrations in multiple tissues. In addition, tree RWI data were combined with radial growth rates to evaluate links between short-term hydraulic traits and long-term growth dynamics.

    • For each group (P.b, P.p, and declining P.p-D), six representative sun-exposed twigs were sampled from both upper and lower canopy positions. Immediately after sampling, the twigs were sealed in Ziploc bags containing moist paper towels to maintain hydration and then transported to the laboratory without delay. Leaf water potential was determined using a pressure chamber (PMS 1505D; PMS Instrument Company, Albany, OR, USA; in MPa). Measurements were performed during two periods representing the daily extremes of plant water status: predawn (04:00–06:00) and midday (12:00–14:00).

    • Before sunrise, six sun-exposed branches (~50 cm in length) were sampled from both upper and lower canopy positions of P.b, P.p, and declining P.p-D. Immediately after sampling, the branches were submerged in buckets containing distilled water, covered with black plastic bags to reduce transpiration, and transported to the laboratory. Hydraulic conductivity was measured on stem segments excised underwater to avoid additional embolism. Stem segments approximately 20 cm in length were used for the measurements. Initial hydraulic conductivity (Kh, kg·m−1·s−1·MPa−1) was determined using a 50 cm water head pressure with degassed 20 mmol·L−1 KCl solution, and was calculated according to the following equation:

      $ K_{\mathrm{\mathit{h}}}=\dfrac{J_v}{\Delta\mathrm{P}/\Delta\mathrm{L}} $ (1)

      where, Jv (kg·s−1) is the flow rate and ΔP/ΔL (MPa·m−1) is the pressure gradient. Following the initial conductivity measurement, the stem segments were flushed with degassed 20 mmol·L−1 KCl solution at 0.1 MPa for 15−20 min to remove xylem embolisms. After this flushing procedure, maximum hydraulic conductivity (Kh-max, kg·m−1·s−1·MPa−1) was determined. The percent loss of conductivity (PLC) was subsequently calculated using the following equation:

      $ \mathrm{PLC}=\dfrac{100\left({K}_{h-\max }-{K}_{h}\right)}{{K}_{h-\max }} $ (2)

      For anatomical analyses, basal stem segments (10 cm in length) were perfused with a 0.1% basic fuchsin solution[35]. Transverse sections were subsequently scanned using an EPSON scanner and analyzed with ImageJ software to quantify sapwood area (SA, mm2) and the total cross-sectional wood area (WA, mm2). All leaves attached to the measured stems were scanned to determine total leaf area (LA, m2). The leaves were then oven-dried at 105 °C for 30 min, followed by drying at 75 °C for 48 h until a constant dry mass was reached (LM, g). From these measurements, two structural ratios were derived: SA/WA (mm2·mm-2), and LA/SA (m2·mm−2). Hydraulic conductivity was normalized by SA and LA following Mencuccini et al.[36]. Specific conductivity (Ks, kg·m−1·s−1·MPa−1) and leaf-specific conductivity (Kl, kg·m−1·s−1·MPa−1) were calculated using the following equations:

      $ {K}_{s}=\dfrac{{K}_{h}}{\text{SA}} $ (3)
      $ {K}_{l}=\dfrac{{K}_{h}}{\text{LA}} $ (4)
    • Wood density (WD, g·cm−3) was determined using six replicate stem segments (2−3 cm in length) collected from the basal portion of the branches. After removing the bark, the xylem samples were submerged in water for 24 h to ensure full saturation. Fresh volume was then measured using the water displacement method after gently blotting surface moisture. Subsequently, the samples were oven-dried at 65 °C until constant mass was achieved. WD was calculated as the ratio of dry mass to fresh volume following Hacke et al.[37]. After hydraulic conductivity measurements, transverse sections (20 μm thick) were prepared from the distal end of each stem using a semi-automatic microtome (Leica, Germany). The sections were temporarily stained with 0.1% methylene blue to enhance the visibility of xylem anatomical structures. For each stem, two sections were imaged at magnifications of 10× and 40× vessel diameter (D, μm) and vessel density (VD, mm−2) were subsequently quantified using ImageJ software.

    • Samples of leaves, xylem, and bark used for NSC analysis were collected from the same branches that had been used for hydraulic trait and biomass measurements. After collection, the samples were oven-dried at 105 °C for 30 min, followed by further drying at 75 °C for 48 h until constant mass was obtained. The dried tissues were then ground to a fine powder using a JXFSTPRP-64L ball mill and stored in sealed bags prior to analysis. Soluble sugars and starch were quantified using the anthrone colorimetric method[38]. Soluble sugars were extracted with 80% ethanol, whereas starch was extracted from the remaining residue using distilled water and perchloric acid. Absorbance was measured at 620 nm with a UV SP-752 spectrophotometer (Shanghai Techcomp Bio-equipment Ltd., China). Total NSC concentration was calculated as the sum of soluble sugars and starch and expressed as mg·g−1 dry mass.

    • Increment cores were collected at breast height (1.3 m) from 10 trees per group P.b, P.p, and declining P.p-D trees, with two cores per tree. After air-drying, the cores were mounted on wooden holders with adhesive and progressively polished with increasingly fine sandpaper to clearly expose annual growth rings for measurement[21]. Ring widths were measured to a precision of 0.001 mm using a LINTAB measuring system. Cross-dating was verified with the COFECHA program to ensure chronological accuracy[39]. Cores showing decay, structural defects, or correlations below the 95% threshold with the reference chronology were excluded from further analysis. To isolate climate-related growth signals, ring-width series were detrended using the ARSTAN program with age-related curve fitting[40], thereby removing ontogenetic growth trends and other non-climatic influences.

      Radial growth rates among the three groups were compared using cumulative basal area (CBA) increment as the growth indicator. In this analysis, tree age was treated as the independent variable in a linear regression model. CBA was derived from raw, non-detrended TRW data according to the following equation[41]:

      $ \mathrm{CB}{A}_{i}=\pi r_{i}^{2} $ (5)

      where, CBAi is the cumulative basal area in i-th year, and ri is the cumulative radius from the 1st to the i-th year. For each group, CBA values were first calculated for individual trees and then averaged to construct a mean CBA chronology. The resulting mean series was subsequently regressed against tree age using a linear regression model. The slope of this regression was used to represent the average radial growth rate. In this context, a steeper slope indicates a higher growth rate, whereas a lower slope corresponds to slower radial growth.

    • Given the observed differences in decline patterns between upper and lower canopy branches of P.b and P.p, branch samples were collected separately from the upper and lower canopy layers for analysis. For intervarietal comparisons, only sun-exposed branches from the mid-to-upper canopy were selected to minimize light heterogeneity. Differences were assessed at three levels: intervarietal (P.b and P.p), intravarietal (healthy P.p and declining P.p-D), and among canopy positions.

      For both intervarietal and intravarietal datasets, two-way ANOVA was used to test the effects of group (variety or health status), canopy position, and their interaction. When interactions were significant (p < 0.05), simple effects analyses were conducted to examine group differences within each canopy position and vertical differences within each group. When interactions were non-significant, main effects were interpreted, and post hoc comparisons were performed using Tukey's HSD test. Data satisfied the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. For significant main effects, stratified comparisons were conducted to identify biologically meaningful patterns: group effects were evaluated within the upper canopy, and canopy position effects were evaluated within each group. All statistical analyses and graphical visualizations were performed using R software (v4.5.0).

    • Leaf water potential showed clear variation along the canopy gradient, and the magnitude of this variation differed between Populus varieties (Fig. 2). In the comparison between P.b and healthy P.p, Ψpd was significantly influenced by variety (p < 0.05) as well as by the interaction between variety and canopy position (p < 0.01; Fig. 2a). No significant difference in Ψpd was detected between the two varieties in the upper canopy (p > 0.05). Within healthy P.p individuals, however, Ψpd was significantly lower in the upper canopy than in the lower canopy (−0.49 vs −0.30 MPa; p < 0.05). Such a vertical difference was not observed in P.b (p > 0.05). Midday water potential (Ψmd) was significantly affected by both variety (p < 0.05) and canopy position (p < 0.001), while the interaction between these factors was not significant (Fig. 2b). Overall, Ψmd values were more negative in P.p than in P.b (−2.58 vs −2.25 MPa; p < 0.01). In addition, both varieties exhibited a clear canopy gradient, with lower Ψmd values in the upper canopy compared with the lower canopy.

      Figure 2. 

      Variations in (a) Ψpd (predawn leaf water potential), and (b) Ψmd (midday leaf water potential) across different comparisons: intervarietal (P.b vs P.p), intravarietal (P.p vs declining P.p-D), and between upper and lower canopy layers within each group. The effects of variety (or health status) and canopy position were assessed using two-way ANOVA. In the panel annotations, bracketed labels show between-group differences; bar-side labels show within-group canopy differences. 'Var' denotes variety, 'HS' denotes health status, 'Can' denotes canopy position, and 'Var × Can/HS × Can' denotes their respective interactions. 'ns' indicates no significant difference; asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SE (n = 6).

      Within P.p, comparisons between healthy and declining P.p-D revealed no significant effects of health status, canopy position, or their interaction on Ψpd (p > 0.05; Fig. 2a), indicating broadly similar predawn water status across health conditions and canopy levels. In contrast, canopy position significantly affected Ψmd (p < 0.01), whereas health status and the interaction term were not significant (Fig. 2b). Healthy P.p trees showed a significant vertical gradient in Ψmd, with more negative values in the upper canopy than in the lower canopy (−2.58 vs −2.16 MPa; p < 0.05). This canopy-related difference was not evident in declining P.p-D.

    • In the comparison between P.b and healthy P.p, PLC varied significantly with both variety and canopy position, and a significant interaction between these factors was also detected (p < 0.001; Fig. 3c). Upper canopy branches of P.p displayed markedly higher PLC than those of P.b (7.31 vs 1.56; p < 0.001). Within healthy P.p trees, PLC was substantially greater in the upper canopy than in the lower canopy (p < 0.001). In contrast, P.b exhibited the opposite pattern, with relatively lower PLC in the upper canopy. Hydraulic efficiency traits, including Kl and Ks were influenced by both variety and canopy position, and the interaction between these two factors was significant (p < 0.05; Fig. 3a, b). In P.b, both Kl and Ks were considerably higher in upper branches than in lower branches (Kl: 9.78 vs 3.76; p < 0.05; Ks: 4.80 vs 2.08; p < 0.001). By comparison, P.p showed no significant vertical variation in these hydraulic efficiency traits. Xylem anatomical characteristics, including WD, D, and VD, remained largely unchanged across varieties, canopy positions, and their interaction (p > 0.05; Fig. 3df).

      Figure 3. 

      Variations in (a) K1 (leaf-specific hydraulic conductivity), (b) Ks (sapwood-specific hydraulic conductivity), (c) PLC (percent loss of hydraulic conductivity), (d) WD (wood density), (e) D (mean vessel diameter), and (f) VD (vessel density) across different comparison groups: intervarietal (P.b vs P.p), intravarietal (healthy P.p vs declining P.p-D), and between upper and lower canopy positions within each group. The effects of variety (or health status) and canopy position were assessed using two-way ANOVA. Bracketed labels show between-group differences; bar-side labels show within-group canopy differences. 'ns' indicates no significant difference; asterisks indicate significance levels (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SE (n = 6).

      Within P.p populations, comparisons between healthy and declining P.p-D revealed a significant interaction between health status and canopy position for PLC (p < 0.05; Fig. 3c). Declining P.p-D showed substantially higher PLC in upper canopy branches than healthy individuals (23.56 vs 7.31; p < 0.001). In both health conditions, PLC was significantly higher in the upper canopy than in the lower canopy (healthy: 7.31 vs 1.63; declining P.p-D: 23.56 vs 4.56). In contrast, hydraulic efficiency traits and xylem anatomical variables did not vary significantly with health status or canopy position, suggesting that the observed decline was mainly associated with differences in hydraulic safety rather than hydraulic efficiency or anatomical structure.

    • The LA/SA was used to describe branch-level carbon allocation patterns (Fig. 4a). In the comparison between P.b and healthy P.p, LA/SA remained similar across varieties and canopy positions, and no interaction between these factors was detected (p > 0.05). In contrast, SA/WA, representing the proportion of functional sapwood, varied significantly with both variety and canopy position, and their interaction was significant (p < 0.001; Fig. 4b). Upper canopy branches of P.b had higher SA/WA values than those of P.p (p < 0.05). Moreover, P.b displayed a clear vertical pattern, with substantially greater SA/WA in upper branches than in lower branches (0.97 vs 0.62; p < 0.001). P.p showed the opposite trend, with reduced SA/WA values in the upper canopy (p < 0.05).

      Figure 4. 

      Variations in (a) LA/SA (leaf area to sapwood area ratio), an indicator of hydraulic supply–transpiration balance, and (b) SA/WA (sapwood area to whole cross-sectional wood area ratio), an indicator of functional xylem proportion, across different comparison groups: intervarietal (P.b vs P.p), intravarietal (healthy P.p vs declining P.p-D), and between upper and lower canopy positions within each group. The effects of variety (or health status) and canopy position were evaluated using two-way ANOVA. Bracketed labels show between-group differences; bar-side labels show within-group canopy differences. 'ns' indicates no significant difference; asterisks indicate significance levels (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SE (n = 6).

      Within P.p populations, LA/SA did not vary significantly with tree health status, canopy position, or their interaction (p > 0.05). In contrast, SA/WA differed along the canopy gradient (p < 0.05), while health status and the interaction term were not significant (p > 0.05). Both healthy and declining P.p-D exhibited lower SA/WA values in the upper canopy than in the lower canopy (p < 0.01; Fig. 4b).

    • Non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentrations varied across tissues, canopy positions, and varieties (Fig. 5). In the intervarietal comparison (P.b vs healthy P.p), leaf starch content was significantly influenced by both variety (p < 0.05), and canopy position (p < 0.01), with no significant interaction between these factors (p > 0.05). Within healthy P.p individuals, leaf starch content was significantly higher in the lower canopy than in the upper canopy (p < 0.01), whereas no such vertical difference was observed in P.b (p > 0.05). Leaf total NSC was affected only by canopy position (p < 0.05); however, post-hoc comparisons revealed no significant differences between the upper and lower canopy for either variety (p > 0.05). Bark starch content showed a significant intervarietal effect (p < 0.01), with P.b displaying lower values than P.p, particularly in the upper canopy. No other NSC components or tissues differed significantly between the two varieties (p > 0.05). In the intravarietal comparison between healthy P.p and declining P.p-D, only bark total NSC content was affected by canopy position (p < 0.05). Stratified comparisons, however, indicated no significant upper–lower canopy differences for either health status (p > 0.05). No other significant effects were detected (p > 0.05).

      Figure 5. 

      Variations in soluble sugars, starch, and total NSC in leaves, stems, and bark across different comparison groups: intervarietal (P.b vs P.p), intravarietal (healthy P.p vs declining P.p-D), and between upper and lower canopy positions within each group. The effects of variety (or health status) and canopy position were evaluated using two-way ANOVA. Bracketed labels show between-group differences; bar-side labels show within-group canopy differences. 'ns' marks non-significant differences; asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SE (n = 6).

    • Significant differences were detected in standardized RWI chronologies among P.b, healthy P.p, and declining P.p-D (Table 1). P.p exhibited a higher standard deviation (SD) and mean sensitivity (MS), indicating stronger climate signals. Declining P.p-D showed a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reflecting a more pronounced climate influence on growth. The first-order autocorrelation coefficient (AC1) reflects the lagged effect of the previous year's climate on current-year growth, with values of 0.073, 0.399, and 0.142 for P.b, P.p, and declining P.p-D, respectively. Among them, P.p displayed a relatively high AC1 coefficient, indicating that its growth is more strongly influenced by the previous year's climatic conditions. The mean correlation among all tree-ring series (R) measures the synchrony of RWI variations among trees within a chronology, with higher values indicating a stronger environmental signal. Declining P.p-D showed higher mean correlation within trees (R1) and between trees (R2) than both P.p and P.b. The expressed population signal (EPS) values were 0.859, 0.968, and 0.988, respectively, indicating that the collected samples sufficiently represent the local population.

      Table 1.  Key statistical characteristics of standardized chronologies.

      Feature P.b P.p P.p-D
      Time interval 1975−2021 1974−2021 1974−2021
      Mean sensitivity (MS) 0.156 0.313 0.294
      Standard deviation (SD) 0.147 0.372 0.279
      First-order autocorrelation coefficient (AC1) 0.073 0.399 0.142
      Mean correlation among all radii (R) 0.253 0.517 0.721
      Mean correlation within trees (R1) 0.248 0.537 0.665
      Mean correlation between trees (R2) 0.252 0.507 0.738
      Signal to noise ratio (SNR) 6.084 29.956 79.98
      Expressed population signal (EPS) 0.859 0.968 0.988

      RWI revealed significant differences in radial growth dynamics among P.b, healthy P.p, and declining P.p-D during 1974–2021 (Fig. 6a). P.b exhibited relatively small interannual fluctuations in RWI with an overall stable trend (R2 = 0.0006, p = 0.58), indicating long-term stability in radial growth. In contrast, P.p showed no significant long-term trend (R2 = 0.005, p = 0.63), but its RWI fluctuated more strongly, suggesting greater sensitivity to environmental variability. Notably, declining P.p-D exhibited a persistent decrease in RWI (slope = –0.003, R2 = 0.07, p < 0.001), reflecting a pronounced reduction in radial growth. Results from CBA further highlighted intervarietal and intravarietal growth differences (Fig. 6b). With increasing tree age, average CBA increased continuously in all three groups. However, P.b and P.p exhibited faster accumulation, with regression slopes of 9.325 and 12.894, respectively, reflecting stronger radial expansion capacity. In contrast, the growth rate of declining P.p-D was markedly lower (slope = 8.93), and its growth curve leveled off in later years, indicating restricted radial growth.

      Figure 6. 

      (a) Standardized tree-ring width index (RWI) chronologies for the three poplar groups. The black line indicates the number of cores available each year (right axis). (b) Average cumulative basal area increment (CBA) in relation to tree age for P.b, healthy P.p, and declining P.p-D. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals, and solid lines represent regressions describing long-term growth trends.

    • Differences in canopy stability between the two Populus varieties under water-limited conditions are primarily associated with contrasting patterns of hydraulic safety regulation along the vertical canopy gradient rather than differences in overall hydraulic transport capacity. Our results suggest that the distinct drought responses of P.b and P.p are largely determined by the distribution of hydraulic tension and embolism risk within the crown, particularly in upper canopy branches[10]. Although Ψpd varied significantly with both variety and canopy position, no clear intervarietal difference was observed in the upper canopy. This finding implies that predawn water status alone cannot fully explain the contrasting drought responses between the two varieties[4,42]. In contrast, Ψmd was consistently more negative in P.p, especially in the upper canopy, indicating that these branches experienced greater hydraulic tension under high atmospheric demand. Together with the substantially higher PLC observed in the upper canopy branches of P.p, this pattern indicates an elevated risk of embolism formation under drought conditions. However, increased embolism vulnerability does not necessarily trigger immediate stomatal closure. Some Populus species maintain relatively high stomatal conductance even at low water potentials, thereby sustaining carbon assimilation at the expense of hydraulic safety[12,16]. Such a hydraulic strategy has frequently been associated with drought-induced branch dieback[43,44].

      Despite the absence of consistent intervarietal differences in branch hydraulic efficiency (Kl and Ks) across canopy positions, the significant interaction between variety and canopy position revealed contrasting patterns of vertical hydraulic coordination. In P.b, upper canopy branches maintained relatively low PLC while preserving hydraulic conductivity, suggesting coordinated adjustments that help maintain functional xylem in hydraulically exposed portions of the crown[45,46]. This interpretation is further supported by the higher SA/WA observed in the upper canopy of P.b, indicating preferential sapwood that may help buffer embolism formation under drought stress[36]. In contrast, P.p exhibited weaker vertical coordination of hydraulic traits. Upper canopy branches experienced more negative Ψmd and higher PLC, yet these changes were not accompanied by corresponding increases in hydraulic efficiency or sapwood allocation. Such a mismatch between hydraulic demand and structural adjustment may facilitate embolism accumulation in exposed branches, plausibly explaining why P.p is more susceptible to canopy degradation and branch dieback under prolonged drought[43,47]. Similar top-down patterns of canopy decline linked to stronger hydraulic limitation in upper branches have also been reported in drought-stressed Populus species[19], highlighting the importance of within-crown hydraulic gradients in determining drought vulnerability.

      Canopy architecture may further amplify these intervarietal differences by shaping vertical gradients in light interception and transpirational demand. Field observations showed that P.b tends to form a broader and more layered crown, whereas P.p typically develops a narrow, columnar canopy. A wider crown may reduce peak transpiration and embolism risk by distributing leaf area more evenly across canopy layers[4850], thereby stabilizing branch water potential. In contrast, the columnar crown structure of P.p may concentrate transpiration in upper canopy branches and lengthen hydraulic transport pathways, increasing hydraulic strain in exposed tissues. This interpretation is consistent with recent findings suggesting that columnar Populus crowns may intensify hydraulic limitation during drought[50]. Compared with hydraulic traits, carbon-related variables showed relatively limited variation among varieties and canopy positions. Although P.p displayed higher starch concentrations in certain tissues, total NSC levels remained broadly comparable among groups. This pattern suggests that the observed branch dieback was unlikely to result primarily from carbon depletion. Instead, the results support previous studies indicating that hydraulic failure often precedes significant NSC depletion during drought-induced mortality in Populus[12,51,52].

    • Hydraulic constraints appear to play a central role in driving growth decline and branch mortality in P.p under prolonged water stress[43]. In this variety, canopy dieback and reduced growth were primarily associated with localized hydraulic dysfunction in upper canopy branches rather than with a uniform decline in whole-tree hydraulic transport capacity. Healthy P.p and declining P.p-D were exposed to similar irrigation regimes and groundwater conditions. Correspondingly, Ψpd did not differ significantly between health states or across canopy positions (Fig. 2a), indicating similar baseline water status among individuals. This observation suggests that the observed decline is unlikely to be explained by persistent differences in soil water access or predawn plant water status[4,53,54]. In contrast, PLC displayed a pronounced interaction between health status and canopy position. Declining P.p-D exhibited substantial embolism accumulation in upper canopy branches, whereas lower canopy branches were comparatively less affected. At the same time, branch-level hydraulic efficiency (Kl and Ks) and xylem anatomical traits showed little variation across health states or canopy positions (Fig. 3a, c). These results indicate that canopy decline in P.p reflects spatially localized hydraulic dysfunction rather than a general reduction in conductive capacity. Such spatial concentration of hydraulic impairment is consistent with previous observations in drought-stressed Populus species and other diffuse-porous trees, which often display high vulnerability to embolism formation[12,16,46]. The greater hydraulic strain experienced by upper branches likely results from the combined effects of longer hydraulic path length and stronger atmospheric demand along the canopy gradient. Under conditions of high light exposure and elevated vapor pressure deficit, these factors can disproportionately increase embolism risk in exposed branches[45,48]. Similar patterns have been reported in several Populus species, where upper canopy branches accumulate embolism more readily under drought stress, particularly in fast-growing diffuse-porous taxa[12,19]. This mechanism provides a physiological explanation for the frequently observed top-down progression of canopy dieback, where distal branches fail before whole-tree hydraulic collapse[50].

      Changes in biomass allocation may further contribute to this process. Declining P.p-D showed lower SA/WA ratios and greater variability in this trait (Fig. 4b), suggesting reduced proportional investment in functional sapwood relative to supporting tissues. Such shifts in allocation could further compromise hydraulic safety and accelerate functional decline[36,55]. Despite clear evidence of hydraulic impairment, total NSC concentrations remained broadly similar across canopy positions and between healthy and declining trees, with no indication of large-scale carbon depletion. This pattern reinforces the view that hydraulic dysfunction and carbon starvation can become decoupled during drought stress, with hydraulic limitation acting as the primary driver of decline in this system[12]. Nevertheless, carbon allocation strategies may still influence drought responses. Higher LA/SA or SA/WA has the potential to buffer water stress under certain conditions[36]. In the present study, however, the reductions in SA/WA observed in declining P.p-D were insufficient to offset hydraulic dysfunction, as reflected in elevated PLC and reduced radial growth.

    • Previous studies have shown that species with higher xylem conductivity often achieve faster radial growth[56]. A similar pattern emerged in the present study. Healthy P.p individuals exhibited larger mean DBH than both P.b and declining P.p-D, consistent with their higher radial growth rates. Differences in radial growth among the three groups corresponded closely to variation in hydraulic traits (Figs 3, 6). For example, healthy P.p displayed the highest CBA growth rate (slope = 12.894), which coincided with relatively high hydraulic efficiency (Kl and Ks). However, this growth advantage was accompanied by lower hydraulic safety. In contrast, P.b exhibited a more balanced strategy: radial growth was moderate (CBA slope = 9.325), while PLC remained comparatively low, indicating greater hydraulic safety[44,57]. The elevated Kl observed in upper canopy branches of P.b likely enhances water delivery to leaves during periods of high atmospheric demand, thereby helping to maintain stable growth over time. Declining P.p-D showed a markedly lower CBA growth rate (slope = 8.93) and a clear slowdown in growth during later stages. Despite having a stand age comparable to healthy P.p, these trees displayed smaller DBH values together with substantially higher PLC in upper canopy branches (Figs 3c, 6b). The concentration of embolism in these branches suggests that hydraulic constraints progressively limit water transport. Importantly, this limitation appears to arise from embolism accumulation rather than a general reduction in hydraulic efficiency, since Kl and Ks did not differ significantly between healthy and declining trees. Similar patterns have been reported in other studies, where drought-induced embolism accumulation suppresses long-term radial growth without necessarily reducing theoretical conductivity[16,58,59].

      Tree-ring characteristics further support the link between short-term hydraulic impairment and long-term growth dynamics. In declining P.p-D, the higher PLC observed in upper canopy branches likely reduced hydraulic safety and constrained gas exchange during drought periods, effects that are subsequently reflected in multi-year growth chronologies[42,60]. Chronological statistics revealed that healthy P.p had higher SD, MS, and AC1 values (Table 1), indicating stronger sensitivity to climatic variability and continued dependence of growth on previous year's water availability[3]. By contrast, declining P.p-D showed higher SNR and R values, suggesting increasingly synchronized growth responses among trees exposed to water limitation. Such synchronization likely reflects reduced physiological buffering capacity against climatic stress. These patterns align with the variation in branch hydraulic traits and CBA trends, indicating that short-term hydraulic impairment and long-term reductions in radial growth are closely linked. Over time, the cumulative effects of hydraulic limitation may contribute to the top-down progression of canopy dieback observed in susceptible individuals[45]. In irrigated shelterbelt plantations, this process may be further exacerbated when irrigation supply becomes insufficient[24]. Integrating long-term tree-ring records with hydraulic trait measurements, therefore provides a valuable framework for understanding how hydraulic processes shape drought-induced growth decline.

    • This study provides evidence that drought-induced decline in poplar shelterbelt plantations of two Populus alba varieties (P.b and P.p) is closely associated with canopy-scale hydraulic dysfunction rather than carbon depletion. Spatially heterogeneous hydraulic failure within the canopy, driven by divergent plastic responses of branch functional traits in the two varieties along the vertical canopy gradient represents a key mechanism linking drought stress to growth decline and top-down canopy dieback. By revealing growth and hydraulic safety trade-offs among these closely related poplar varieties, our findings highlight the critical role of vertical hydraulic coordination in determining drought vulnerability, advancing understanding beyond traditional whole-tree perspectives. Future research integrating long-term hydraulic and carbon dynamics will further improve predictions for shelterbelt plantation resilience under intensifying drought.

      • This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32001288), the Open Grant for State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resource in Tarim Basin (BRZD2502), the Anhui Provincial Department of Education Research Project for Higher Education Institutions (2023AH051041), the Open Grant for Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management (Northeast Forestry University), Ministry of Education (KFJJ2023ZD01), the Anhui Agricultural University Young Faculty Development Program, and the Outstanding Youth Research Project for Universities in Anhui Province (2024AH020003). The fieldwork of the study was supported by Tarim University. The authors thank Yiang Wang and Jiongyan Sun for their assistance with fieldwork.

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Fang LD, Xia ZC; data collection: Luo DD, Wang H, Zhai JT; analysis and interpretation of results: Liu SD, Zhao GY, Yu YX, Zhai JT; draft manuscript preparation: Liu SD. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  Table (1) References (60)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Liu SD, Luo DD, Zhao GY, Yu YX, Zhai JT, et al. 2026. Hydraulic limitation drives differential crown dieback in Populus alba varieties. Forestry Research 6: e017 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0017
    Liu SD, Luo DD, Zhao GY, Yu YX, Zhai JT, et al. 2026. Hydraulic limitation drives differential crown dieback in Populus alba varieties. Forestry Research 6: e017 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0017

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return