Search
2026 Volume 3
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

AI-powered spatial multi-omics discerns spatial patterns within immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma

More Information
  • The clinical management and long-term survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are severely constrained by its insidious silent onset, pronounced spatial heterogeneity, and profound immunotherapeutic resistance. Traditional diagnostic and bulk sequencing strategies fail to capture these region-specific topographies, obscuring the critical landmarks that dictate disease progression and therapeutic failure. Recent paradigm shifts in spatial multi-omics—encompassing ultra-high-resolution transcriptomics, high-plex proteomics, label-free mass spectrometry metabolomics, and single-cell immune repertoire profiling—now permit direct, multi-layered biomolecular mapping within intact liver tissue architectures. In parallel, artificial intelligence has become an integral computational framework, driving precise cell segmentation, automated tissue-domain identification, and cross-modality data integration. By systematically coupling histopathological features with spatially resolved molecular states, AI-powered spatial multi-omics has successfully decoded advanced oncogenic mechanisms, including the myeloid-stromal interlocked 'Tumor Immune Barrier' at the invasive front and localized glycolytic metabolic zonation that drive effector cell exhaustion. Translating these multi-layered tissue geometries into space-aware predictive scoring systems establishes robust, patient-specific stratifiers for immunotherapy response and post-resection recurrence monitoring. Ultimately, this integrative analytical paradigm redefines our systemic understanding of the HCC microenvironment ecosystem, unlocking scalable avenues for clinical precision oncology.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. 2024. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 74:229−263 doi: 10.3322/caac.21834

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Kalasekar SM, VanSant-Webb CH, Evason KJ. 2021. Intratumor heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma: challenges and opportunities. Cancers 13:5524 doi: 10.3390/cancers13215524

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Halpern KB, Shenhav R, Matcovitch-Natan O, Tóth B, Lemze D, et al. 2017. Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver. Nature 542:352−356 doi: 10.1038/nature21065

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Yu Y, Li Y, Zhou L, Cheng X, Gong Z. 2024. Hepatic stellate cells promote hepatocellular carcinoma development by regulating histone lactylation: Novel insights from single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics analyses. Cancer Letters 604:217243 doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217243

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Saviano A, Roehlen N, Virzì A, Roca Suarez AA, Hoshida Y, et al. 2019. Stromal and immune drivers of hepatocarcinogenesis. In Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Translational Precision Medicine Approaches, ed. Hoshida Y. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 317–331 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-21540-8_15
    [6] Traum D, Wang YJ, Schwarz KB, Schug J, Wong DKH, et al. 2021. Highly multiplexed 2-dimensional imaging mass cytometry analysis of HBV-infected liver. JCI Insight 6:e146883 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.146883

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Dolina JS, Van Braeckel-Budimir N, Thomas GD, Salek-Ardakani S. 2021. CD8+ T cell exhaustion in cancer. Frontiers in Immunology 12:715234 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.715234

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Myojin Y, Babaei S, Trehan R, Hoffman C, Kedei N, et al. 2025. Multiomics analysis of immune correlatives in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with tremelimumab plus durvalumab. Gut 74:983−995 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-334026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Liu S, Iorgulescu JB, Li S, Borji M, Barrera-Lopez IA, et al. 2022. Spatial maps of t cell receptors and transcriptomes reveal distinct immune niches and interactions in the adaptive immune response. Immunity 55:1940−1952.e5 doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.09.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Rao A, Barkley D, França GS, Yanai I. 2021. Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics. Nature 596:211−220 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03634-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Janesick A, Shelansky R, Gottscho AD, Wagner F, Williams SR, et al. 2023. High resolution mapping of the tumor microenvironment using integrated single-cell, spatial and in situ analysis. Nature Communications 14:8353 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43458-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Langer-Safer PR, Levine M, Ward DC. 1982. Immunological method for mapping genes on Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 79:4381−4385 doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.14.4381

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Ståhl PL, Salmén F, Vickovic S, Lundmark A, Navarro JF, et al. 2016. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353:78−82 doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2403

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Moses L, Pachter L. 2022. Museum of spatial transcriptomics. Nature Methods 19:534−546 doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01409-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] de Oliveira MF, Romero JP, Chung M, Williams SR, Gottscho AD, et al. 2025. High-definition spatial transcriptomic profiling of immune cell populations in colorectal cancer. Nature Genetics 57:1512−1523 doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02193-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Stickels RR, Murray E, Kumar P, Li J, Marshall JL, et al. 2021. Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics at near-cellular resolution with Slide-seqV2. Nature Biotechnology 39:313−319 doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0739-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] You Y, Fu Y, Li L, Zhang Z, Jia S, et al. 2024. Systematic comparison of sequencing-based spatial transcriptomic methods. Nature Methods 21:1743−1754 doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02325-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Cho CS, Xi J, Si Y, Park SR, Hsu JE, et al. 2021. Microscopic examination of spatial transcriptome using Seq-Scope. Cell 184:3559−3572.e22 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Zhao Y, Li Y, He Y, Wu J, Liu Y, et al. 2025. Stereo-seq V2: spatial mapping of total RNA on FFPE sections with high resolution. Cell 188:6554−6571.e21 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.08.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Chen KH, Boettiger AN, Moffitt JR, Wang S, Zhuang X. 2015. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348:aaa6090 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6090

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Liu M, Hernandez MO, Castven D, Lee HP, Wu W, et al. 2026. Tumor cell villages define the co-dependency of tumor and microenvironment in liver cancer. Nature Communications 17:1986 doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69797-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Liu B, Hu X, Feng K, Gao R, Xue Z, et al. 2022. Temporal single-cell tracing reveals clonal revival and expansion of precursor exhausted T cells during anti-PD-1 therapy in lung cancer. Nature Cancer 3:108−121 doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00292-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Lim CJ, Lee YH, Pan L, Lai L, Chua C, et al. 2019. Multidimensional analyses reveal distinct immune microenvironment in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 68(5):916−927 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316510

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Ramachandran P, Dobie R, Wilson-Kanamori JR, Dora EF, Henderson BEP, et al. 2019. Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level. Nature 575:512−518 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1631-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Ruf B, Bruhns M, Babaei S, Kedei N, Ma L, et al. 2023. Tumor-associated macrophages trigger MAIT cell dysfunction at the HCC invasive margin. Cell 186:3686−3705.e32 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Liang Y, Qiao L, Qian Q, Zhang R, Li Y, et al. 2025. Integrated single-cell and spatial transcriptomic profiling reveals that CD177+ tregs enhance immunosuppression through apoptosis and resistance to immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 44:1578−1591 doi: 10.1038/s41388-025-03330-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Cable DM, Murray E, Zou LS, Goeva A, Macosko EZ, et al. 2022. Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics. Nature Biotechnology 40:517−526 doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00830-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Biancalani T, Scalia G, Buffoni L, Avasthi R, Lu Z, et al. 2021. Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with tangram. Nature Methods 18:1352−1362 doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01264-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Jing SY, Liu D, Feng N, Dong H, Wang HQ, et al. 2024. Spatial multiomics reveals a subpopulation of fibroblasts associated with cancer stemness in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Genome Medicine 16:98 doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01367-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Stringer C, Wang T, Michaelos M, Pachitariu M. 2021. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nature Methods 18:100−106 doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Bannon D, Moen E, Schwartz M, Borba E, Kudo T, et al. 2021. DeepCell Kiosk: scaling deep learning – enabled cellular image analysis with kubernetes. Nature methods 18:43−45 doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01023-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Yang M, Song X, Zhang F, Li M, Chang W, et al. 2025. Spatial proteomic landscape of primary and relapsed hepatocellular carcinoma reveals immune escape characteristics in early relapse. Hepatology 81:1452−1467 doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000979

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Liu Y, Xun Z, Ma K, Liang S, Li X, et al. 2023. Identification of a tumour immune barrier in the HCC microenvironment that determines the efficacy of immunotherapy. Journal of Hepatology 78:770−782 doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.01.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Meroueh C, Warasnhe K, Tizhoosh HR, Shah VH, Ibrahim SH. 2025. Digital pathology and spatial omics in steatohepatitis: clinical applications and discovery potentials. Hepatology 82:1619−1644 doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000866

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Hong L, Mei J, Sun X, Wu Y, Dong Z, et al. 2026. Spatial single-cell proteomics landscape decodes the tumor microenvironmental ecosystem of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 83(1):57−74 doi: 10.1097/hep.0000000000001283

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Mund A, Brunner AD, Mann M. 2022. Unbiased spatial proteomics with single-cell resolution in tissues. Molecular Cell 82:2335−2349 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Rosenberger FA, Mädler SC, Thorhauge KH, Steigerwald S, Fromme M, et al. 2025. Deep visual proteomics maps proteotoxicity in a genetic liver disease. Nature 642:484−491 doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08885-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Andersson A, Bergenstråhle J, Asp M, Bergenstråhle L, Jurek A, et al. 2020. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics enables probabilistic inference of cell type topography. Communications Biology 3:565 doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01247-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Editorial Team. 2024. Method of the year 2024: spatial proteomics. Nature Methods 21:2195−2196 doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02565-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Lin JR, Izar B, Wang S, Yapp C, Mei S, et al. 2018. Highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging of human tissues and tumors using t-CyCIF and conventional optical microscopes. eLife 7:e31657 doi: 10.7554/eLife.31657

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Giesen C, Wang HAO, Schapiro D, Zivanovic N, Jacobs A, et al. 2014. Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nature Methods 11:417−422 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2869

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Angelo M, Bendall SC, Finck R, Hale MB, Hitzman C, et al. 2014. Multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI) of human breast tumors. Nature Medicine 20:436−442 doi: 10.1038/nm.3488

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Goltsev Y, Samusik N, Kennedy-Darling J, Bhate S, Hale M, et al. 2018. Deep profiling of mouse splenic architecture with CODEX multiplexed imaging. Cell 174:968−981.e15 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Bao F, Deng Y, Wan S, Shen SQ, Wang B, et al. 2022. Integrative spatial analysis of cell morphologies and transcriptional states with MUSE. Nature Biotechnology 40:1200−1209 doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01251-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Santos AA, Delgado TC, Marques V, Ramirez-Moncayo C, Alonso C, et al. 2024. Spatial metabolomics and its application in the liver. Hepatology 79:1158−1179 doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000341

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Wu L, Jin Y, Zhao X, Tang K, Zhao Y, et al. 2023. Tumor aerobic glycolysis confers immune evasion through modulating sensitivity to T cell-mediated bystander killing via TNF-α. Cell Metabolism 35:1580−1596.e9 doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.07.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Zhao M, Yuan H, Yang G, Wang Y, Bu Y, et al. 2024. Tumour cell-expressed PD-L1 reprograms lipid metabolism via EGFR/ITGB4/SREBP1c signalling in liver cancer. JHEP Reports 6:101009 doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Miyamoto S, Hsu CC, Hamm G, Darshi M, Diamond-Stanic M, et al. 2016. Mass spectrometry imaging reveals elevated glomerular ATP/AMP in diabetes/obesity and identifies sphingomyelin as a possible mediator. eBioMedicine 7:121−134 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.03.033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Morato NM, Cooks RG. 2023. Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: 20 years. Accounts of Chemical Research 56:2526−2536 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00382

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Lockyer NP, Aoyagi S, Fletcher JS, Gilmore IS, van der Heide PAW, et al. 2024. Secondary ion mass spectrometry. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 4:32 doi: 10.1038/s43586-024-00311-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Rae Buchberger A, DeLaney K, Johnson J, Li L. 2018. Mass spectrometry imaging: a review of emerging advancements and future insights. Analytical chemistry 90:240−265 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04733

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Lv Y, Li T, Guo C, Sun C, Tang F, et al. 2019. A high-performance bio-tissue imaging method using air flow-assisted desorption electrospray ionization coupled with a high-resolution mass spectrometer. Chinese Chemical Letters 30:461−464 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.06.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Rappez L, Stadler M, Triana S, Gathungu RM, Ovchinnikova K, et al. 2021. SpaceM reveals metabolic states of single cells. Nature Methods 18:799−805 doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01198-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Pachuta SJ and Cooks RG. 1987. Mechanisms in molecular SIMS. Chemical Reviews 87:647−669 doi: 10.1021/cr00079a009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Liu ZY, Wu CY, Wu RQ, Wang JC, Huang CX, et al. 2025. Efflux of N1-acetylspermidine from hepatoma fosters macrophage-mediated immune suppression to dampen immunotherapeutic efficacy. Immunity 58:1572−1585.e10 doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.05.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Peiris-Pagés M, Pestell RG, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. 2017. Cancer metabolism: a therapeutic perspective. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 14:11−31 doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.60

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Martínez-Reyes I, Chandel NS. 2021. Cancer metabolism: looking forward. Nature Reviews Cancer 21:669−680 doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00378-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. 2016. The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metabolism 23:27−47 doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Vander Heiden MG. 2011. Targeting cancer metabolism: a therapeutic window opens. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 10:671−684 doi: 10.1038/nrd3504

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Finley LWS. 2023. What is cancer metabolism? Cell 186:1670−1688 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Schumacher TN, Thommen DS. 2022. Tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer. Science 375:eabf9419 doi: 10.1126/science.abf9419

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Zhao L, Jin S, Wang S, Zhang Z, Wang X, et al. 2024. Tertiary lymphoid structures in diseases: immune mechanisms and therapeutic advances. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 9:225 doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01947-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Chen S, Huang C, Liao G, Sun H, Xie Y, et al. 2023. Distinct single-cell immune ecosystems distinguish true and de Novo HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma recurrences. Gut 72:1196−1210 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328428

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Engblom C, Thrane K, Lin Q, Andersson A, Toosi H, et al. 2023. Spatial transcriptomics of B cell and T cell receptors reveals lymphocyte clonal dynamics. Science 382:eadf8486 doi: 10.1126/science.adf8486

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Benotmane JK, Kueckelhaus J, Will P, Zhang J, Ravi VM, et al. 2023. High-sensitive spatially resolved T cell receptor sequencing with SPTCR-Seq. Nature Communications 14:7432 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43201-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Jia G, He P, Dai T, Goh D, Wang J, et al. 2025. Spatial immune scoring system predicts hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Nature 640:1031−1041 doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08668-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Wu L, Yan J, Bai Y, Chen F, Zou X, et al. 2023. An invasive zone in human liver cancer identified by stereo-seq promotes hepatocyte-tumor cell crosstalk, local immunosuppression and tumor progression. Cell Research 33:585−603 doi: 10.1038/s41422-023-00831-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Zhao E, Stone MR, Ren X, Guenthoer J, Smythe KS, et al. 2021. Spatial transcriptomics at subspot resolution with BayesSpace. Nature Biotechnology 39:1375−1384 doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00935-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Dries R, Zhu Q, Dong R, Eng CHL, Li H, et al. 2021. Giotto: a toolbox for integrative analysis and visualization of spatial expression data. Genome Biology 22:78 doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02286-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Hu J, Li X, Coleman K, Schroeder A, Ma N, et al. 2021. SpaGCN: integrating gene expression, spatial location and histology to identify spatial domains and spatially variable genes by graph convolutional network. Nature Methods 18:1342−1351 doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01255-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Petukhov V, Xu RJ, Soldatov RA, Cadinu P, Khodosevich K, et al. 2022. Cell segmentation in imaging-based spatial transcriptomics. Nature Biotechnology 40:345−354 doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01044-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Jones DC, Elz AE, Hadadianpour A, Ryu H, Glass DR, et al. 2025. Cell simulation as cell segmentation. Nature Methods 22:1331−1342 doi: 10.1038/s41592-025-02697-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Chen H, Li D, Bar-Joseph Z. 2023. SCS: cell segmentation for high-resolution spatial transcriptomics. Nature Methods 20:1237−1243 doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01939-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Wang Y, Wang W, Liu D, Hou W, Zhou T, et al. 2023. GeneSegNet: a deep learning framework for cell segmentation by integrating gene expression and imaging. Genome Biology 24:235 doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-03054-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Kleshchevnikov V, Shmatko A, Dann E, Aivazidis A, King HW, et al. 2022. Cell2location maps fine-grained cell types in spatial transcriptomics. Nature Biotechnology 40:661−671 doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01139-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Elosua-Bayes M, Nieto P, Mereu E, Gut I, Heyn H. 2021. SPOTlight: seeded NMF regression to deconvolute spatial transcriptomics spots with single-cell transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Research 49:e50 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Liu X, Peng T, Xu M, Lin S, Hu B, et al. 2024. Spatial multi-omics: deciphering technological landscape of integration of multi-omics and its applications. Journal of Hematology & Oncology 17:72 doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01596-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Enninful A, Zhang Z, Klymyshyn D, Ingalls M, Yang M, et al. 2026. Integration of imaging-based and sequencing-based spatial omics mapping on the same tissue section via DBiTplus. Nature Methods 2026:1−13 doi: 10.1038/s41592-025-02948-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Vicari M, Mirzazadeh R, Nilsson A, Shariatgorji R, Bjärterot P, et al. 2024. Spatial multimodal analysis of transcriptomes and metabolomes in tissues. Nature Biotechnology 42:1046−1050 doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01937-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Miao J, Li J, Xin J, Tu J, Ge M, et al. 2025. MultiGATE: integrative analysis and regulatory inference in spatial multi-omics data via graph representation learning. Nature Communications 16:9403 doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63418-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Bienroth D, Charitakis N, Wong D, Zhang YC, Jaeger-Honz S, et al. 2025. Automated integration of multi-slice spatial transcriptomics data in 2D and 3D using VR-Omics. Genome Biology 26:182 doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03630-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Si Y, Lee JS, Jun G, Kang HM, Lee JH. 2025. Spatial omics enters the microscopic realm: opportunities and challenges. Trends in Genetics 41:774−787 doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2025.05.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Reynolds DE, Roh YH, Oh D, Vallapureddy P, Fan R, et al. 2025. Temporal and spatial omics technologies for 4D profiling. Nature Methods 22:1408−1419 doi: 10.1038/s41592-025-02683-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Bressan D, Battistoni G, and Hannon GJ. 2023. The dawn of spatial omics. Science 381:eabq4964 doi: 10.1126/science.abq4964

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Gu Y, Jia G. 2026. AI-powered spatial multi-omics discerns spatial patterns within immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Genomics Communications 3: e017 doi: 10.48130/gcomm-0026-0016
    Gu Y, Jia G. 2026. AI-powered spatial multi-omics discerns spatial patterns within immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Genomics Communications 3: e017 doi: 10.48130/gcomm-0026-0016

Figures(2)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(161) PDF downloads(19)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

AI-powered spatial multi-omics discerns spatial patterns within immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Genomics Communications  3 Article number: e017  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The clinical management and long-term survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are severely constrained by its insidious silent onset, pronounced spatial heterogeneity, and profound immunotherapeutic resistance. Traditional diagnostic and bulk sequencing strategies fail to capture these region-specific topographies, obscuring the critical landmarks that dictate disease progression and therapeutic failure. Recent paradigm shifts in spatial multi-omics—encompassing ultra-high-resolution transcriptomics, high-plex proteomics, label-free mass spectrometry metabolomics, and single-cell immune repertoire profiling—now permit direct, multi-layered biomolecular mapping within intact liver tissue architectures. In parallel, artificial intelligence has become an integral computational framework, driving precise cell segmentation, automated tissue-domain identification, and cross-modality data integration. By systematically coupling histopathological features with spatially resolved molecular states, AI-powered spatial multi-omics has successfully decoded advanced oncogenic mechanisms, including the myeloid-stromal interlocked 'Tumor Immune Barrier' at the invasive front and localized glycolytic metabolic zonation that drive effector cell exhaustion. Translating these multi-layered tissue geometries into space-aware predictive scoring systems establishes robust, patient-specific stratifiers for immunotherapy response and post-resection recurrence monitoring. Ultimately, this integrative analytical paradigm redefines our systemic understanding of the HCC microenvironment ecosystem, unlocking scalable avenues for clinical precision oncology.

    • Primary liver cancer presents one of the most formidable challenges in contemporary oncology, retaining its position as the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally and representing approximately 7% to 8% of all oncological deaths. The disease burden exhibits profound geographical disparity, with an exceptionally heavy concentration in Asia; notably, patients from China alone account for more than half of the emerging cases worldwide. The vast majority of these diagnoses, exceeding 80%, are pathologically classified as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)[1]. A defining clinical feature of HCC is its remarkably insidious onset, meaning that the disease remains largely asymptomatic in its early developmental stages and is consequently diagnosed at an advanced, often unresectable stage. This diagnostic delay is critically compounded by a pervasive lack of effective early-screening strategies capable of capturing initial malignant transformations. When coupled with a high propensity for therapeutic resistance, these compounding factors culminate in an exceptionally poor overall prognosis for patients, positioning HCC as a paramount public health priority that demands urgent diagnostic and therapeutic innovation.

      The clinical and biological complexity of HCC is rooted in the progressive disruption of the liver's native spatial organization, together with systemic remodeling of immune and stromal architectures. In healthy liver tissue, the intrinsic portal–central axis establishes stable gradients of oxygen, nutrients, and metabolites, giving rise to well-defined hepatocyte metabolic zonation and a characteristic transcriptional program[2,3]. This ordered spatial-metabolic framework provides a critical molecular reference for interpreting physiological and pathological states. However, chronic liver injury, fibrosis, and tumorigenesis progressively blur or reprogram this spatial order, complicating the distinction between tumor-specific alterations and background liver disease-associated changes[1,4,5].

      The critical necessity of resolving these spatial dynamics has triggered a major methodological paradigm shift away from traditional statistical assumptions and destructive biological assays. For decades, conventional bulk RNA sequencing represented the gold standard for molecular profiling; however, because it captures an averaged gene expression profile across bulk cell populations, it inherently fails to resolve the underlying intra-tumor cellular heterogeneity. To overcome this limitation, the maturation of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has provided unprecedented resolution into individual cellular transcriptomes, uncovering a vast diversity of rare cell states and sub-clusters within the tumor ecosystem. Nevertheless, scRNA-seq exhibits a fundamental technical limitation: the mandatory requirement for mechanical tissue dissociation and cell suspension preparation results in the complete and irreversible loss of the native spatial context. Consequently, dissociated single-cell approaches cannot capture region-specific spatial domains—such as the highly organized arrangements characterizing the tumor core, the invasive front, or the surrounding fibro-inflammatory stroma—nor can they map the structural microenvironments that govern local immune cell signaling and physical cell-cell interaction networks (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      The spatial architecture of HCC dictates its diverse microenvironments and impacts therapeutic efficacy. (a) Spatial heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment. Anisotropic, non-uniform spatial distribution of malignant subclones, specialized stromal subpopulations, and metabolic zones across the tumor core, invasive front, and adjacent stroma. (b) Spatial organization of immunosuppression. Cellular localization of immune-suppressive niches. (c) Stromal barrier and lymphocyte exclusion. Integrated spatial transcriptomics and mIHC identifying dense extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and aligned collagen at the invasive front. (d) Metabolic rewiring and localized stress gradients. Distortion of native hepatic metabolic zonation via hyper-activated glycolysis and altered lipid/glutamine flux, generating microscale metabolic stress zones (high lactate accumulation) that compromise effector cell mitochondrial function. (e) Spatial configurations predict therapy response.

    • A major diagnostic challenge stems from the pronounced spatial heterogeneity of HCC. Distinct immune, metabolic, and stromal states coexist within the tumor core, invasive front, and peritumoral regions[6]. Metabolic zonation that characterizes healthy liver tissue becomes distorted or locally reprogrammed in tumor regions[79], leading to heterogeneous expression of glycolytic, oxidative phosphorylation, and glutamine metabolic pathways across spatial compartments. This microenvironmental compartmentalization creates severe sampling bias in conventional clinical assays, as molecular features captured by standard bulk profiling or single-site biopsies often reflect only a fraction of the tumor ecosystem, limiting their representativeness for disease staging, risk stratification, and therapeutic decision-making.

      To map these regional dynamics, early iterations of spatial transcriptomics leveraged macro-scale approaches, including laser-capture microdissection (LCM), microarray profiling, and low-multiplex single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH)[1012]. While smFISH successfully enabled the subcellular localization of individual transcripts by hybridizing fluorescently labeled probes directly to target RNA, its utility remained severely constrained by a finite number of optical channels, restricting its use to small-scale targeted gene validation rather than unbiased, tissue-wide discovery. The maturation of single-cell transcriptomics and next-generation sequencing (NGS) eventually catalyzed a fundamental paradigm shift. In 2016, Ståhl and colleagues introduced an NGS-enabled platform capable of systematically mapping transcript distributions directly across tissue sections[13]. This landmark achievement established the foundation for high-throughput spatial transcriptomics and spurred rapid innovation across multiple technological frameworks, driving the field's explosive growth within just a few years[14]. Spatial transcriptomics keeps increasing resolutions: early methods operated at 100 µm, the first commercial Visium platform improved resolution to 55 µm, and the most recent Visium HD further reduced spot size to approximately 2 µm[15].

      Despite these technological evolutionary steps, early sequencing-based implementations and region-of-interest (ROI) microdissection platforms operated primarily at a multicellular scale. For instance, the prototypical ROI-based GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) platform utilizes photocleavable oligonucleotide-tagged probes to profile RNA and over 570 protein targets within microscopically directed tissue compartments. By steering UV light via digital micromirror devices (DMD), GeoMx cleaves and sequences these barcodes to generate region-level profiles that are exceptionally well-suited for interrogating defined pathological macro-structures. Similarly, first-generation 10x Genomics Visium arrays excel at capturing sweeping transcriptomic gradients across large liver tissue areas, allowing researchers to track how premalignant hepatocytes progressively drift from their native zonation baselines.

      However, because these spatial bulk platforms routinely average transcriptomic signals across multi-cellular arrays (typically 50–100 µm), they suffer from distinct structural limitations when confronting the high-density cellular networks characteristic of the HCC invasive front. Within these multi-cellular pixels, the transcriptomic signatures of highly proliferative malignant hepatocytes, activated matrix-secreting cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and infiltrating lymphocytes become artificially mixed. This lateral diffusion introduces a severe computational 'blurring effect' that obscures critical single-cell features, leaving these platforms inherently constrained in resolving microscale spatial domains, identifying rare cell subpopulations, or mapping localized immune synapses.

    • To untangle these dense multi-cellular coordinates and map the exact spatial boundaries governing liver cancer pathogenesis, the transition to true single-cell and subcellular spatial transcriptomics is methodologically imperative. These high-resolution approaches encompass two dominant technological paradigms: high-density NGS-barcoded arrays that preserve whole-transcriptome coverage, and targeted imaging-based in situ hybridization or sequencing (ISH/ISS) platforms that deliver single-molecule clarity.

      Among NGS-barcoded platforms, Slide-seq v2 leverages randomly deposited barcoded magnetic beads to achieve single- cell resolution with reduced lateral transcript diffusion, striking a valuable balance between coverage and resolution[16]. Conversely, while platforms like HDST[15] achieve a tighter 2 µm resolution, their practical utility in dense tumor tissues is heavily undermined by severe data sparsity and low capture efficiency[17]. Similarly, the high-coverage, ultra-high-resolution Seq-Scope platform (0.5–0.8 µm) utilizes repurposed Illumina flow cells to capture transcript bursts, yet it remains hindered by a lack of commercialization and a high susceptibility to technical artifacts, such as scratches and data dropout, which are particularly problematic in fragile liver tissues[18].

      To overcome these sampling constraints, the 2025 release of Stereo-seq v2 represents a major milestone in high-resolution spatial transcriptomics[19]. By leveraging DNA Nanoball (DNB) patterned arrays generated via rolling circle amplification, Stereo-seq v2 maintains a programmable 0.5 µm subcellular resolution while expanding robust compatibility to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) clinical samples. Crucially, Stereo-seq v2 bypasses poly(A)-dependent transcript capture through random priming linked to adaptor oligonucleotides. This strategy enables the unbiased capture of low-abundance or degraded RNAs that are frequently missed by poly(A)-dependent methods, while simultaneously mitigating the diffusion artifacts during tissue permeabilization that commonly plague traditional array-based workflows.

    • While ultra-high-resolution NGS arrays provide a global, whole-transcriptome view of regional tissue architecture, they remain indirect measurements that rely on the vertical diffusion of transcripts onto a physical substrate. To eliminate diffusion artifacts and directly visualize individual transcripts within their native, undistorted microenvironment, targeted imaging-based methods offer a highly complementary and precise alternative.

      Modern multiplexed in situ platforms—such as 10x Genomics Xenium, NanoString CosMx Spatial Molecular Imager (SMI), and Vizgen MERSCOPE—leverage automated fluidics and high-resolution microscopy to decode curated, cancer-specific gene panels across large clinical cohorts. MERSCOPE implements an error-robust, combinatorial single-molecule FISH (smFISH) strategy to achieve high-plex single-cell mapping[20], while Xenium in situ utilizes specific padlock probe hybridization and ligation followed by rolling-circle amplification (RCA) to generate high-fidelity optical signatures without destroying tissue architecture[15].

      Furthermore, leveraging this enzymatically amplified signal alongside multi-round fluorescent reporter hybridization, CosMx SMI achieves a true subcellular readout down to 50 nanometers. Armed with an expansive panel library extending toward 18,000 targets, CosMx SMI successfully bridges the historic divide between targeted imaging and whole-transcriptome scanning. In the specific context of the HCC invasive front, these single-molecule imaging technologies allow researchers to isolate cellular coordinates with absolute precision.

      This single-molecule spatial transcriptomics paradigm offers a combination of spatial resolution and cellular throughput that renders it exceptionally well-suited for large-scale spatial proximity analysis and cellular neighborhood network mapping. In the context of the HCC microenvironment, this technical capability played a decisive role in the discovery of 'Tumor Cell Villages' proposed by Liu et al. Within high-density malignant cell aggregates, conventional imaging techniques routinely fail to determine whether specific transcripts originate from a malignant cell or an adjacent stromal counterpart. Leveraging its extreme spatial resolution alongside in situ protein co-staining and deep learning-based cell segmentation algorithms, CosMx SMI successfully delineated the irregular physical boundaries between malignant hepatocytes and adjacent matrix-secreting cancer-associated fibroblasts (mCAFs). This enabled the in situ identification of the spatial co-localization between SPINK1 (malignant cell-derived) and EGFR (mCAF-expressed) within a tight 40-µm neighborhood. Furthermore, through the unsupervised analysis of spatial transcriptomic data spanning approximately 2.3 million cells, the platform successfully identified 12 discrete malignant transcriptional states, establishing a solid data foundation for subsequent spatial modeling via graph attention networks (GATs)[21].

      Consequently, within the research of solid tumors like HCC, these distinct spatial transcriptomics technologies do not simply replace one another; rather, they serve as highly complementary tools dictated by their underlying biophysical principles. Taken together, these technological milestones empower researchers to resolve cellular coordinates with absolute spatial precision, unraveling the intercellular 'spatial sociology' networks that govern tumor fitness and clinical therapeutic response across multiple structural scales.

    • At the immunological level, persistent chronic inflammation and viral antigen exposure establish a baseline of widespread immune dysfunction prior to actual tumor formation. Sustained antigen stimulation drives T-cell exhaustion, characterized by prolonged expression of inhibitory receptors within the tumor microenvironment such as PD-1, CTLA-4, and TIM-3, thereby creating a pro-tumor immunosuppressive landscape[6,7,22,23]. Crucially, spatial omics reveals that immune suppression in HCC is not merely a passive consequence of generalized effector cell depletion; instead, it is a highly orchestrated, spatially organized phenomenon[6,24]. Effector lymphocytes, regulatory T cells (Tregs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs) frequently co-localize within highly defined microanatomical immune niches. This suppressive co-localization pattern—particularly when Tregs, MDSCs, and SPP1+ TAMs cluster in close physical proximity to CD8+ T cells—enforces functional inhibition and checkpoint signaling despite the physical presence of effector populations[8,25,26], actively neutralizing the host immune response within the tumor core and across key functional compartments[2731].

      This spatially organized immunosuppression is further reinforced and protected by extensive, localized stromal remodeling. Continuous inflammatory and chemokine signaling within the microenvironment activates quiescent hepatic stellate cells, which in turn drive rapid extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, structural fibrosis, and increased tissue stiffness. Within the complex landscape of the tumor margin, coordinated interactions among these activated stellate cells, CAFs, macrophages, and adjacent endothelial cells promote the structural formation of dense, ECM-rich tumor immune barriers[25,32,33]. These highly organized cellular bands function as critical physical and immunological gatekeepers, strictly restricting effector immune-cell infiltration and impeding therapeutic drug penetration. Consequently, the frequent clinical failure of aggressive immune checkpoint blockade strategies in HCC often reflects the physical inability of primed immune cells to traverse these dense spatial-stromal barriers at the invasive front, rather than a failure of systemic immune activation or baseline priming.

      Under the severe hypoxic stress and metabolic distortions characteristic of the HCC core and the invasive front, post- transcriptional silencing, microenvironmental stressors, and localized translational blocks cause a profound disconnect between mRNA synthesis and functional protein expression. Consequently, transcriptional abundance maps captured by spatial transcriptomics often reflect mRNA that is never successfully translated, failing to accurately delineate active signaling cascades. Resolving these operational pathways demands direct, in situ proteomic quantification to map protein-level functional states, checkpoint molecule distributions, and tumor-immune interactions in HCC.

      While the absolute number of detectable proteins is fundamentally constrained by antibody availability, panel plexity, and epitope compatibility compared to whole-transcriptome sequencing, spatial proteomics delivers direct readouts of cellular execution and checkpoint networks, emerging as a cornerstone technology for constructing spatial maps of biomolecular architecture within large-scale initiatives such as HuBMAP and the Human Tumor Atlas Network (HTAN)[11,3439].

    • To capture these functional states, fluorescence-based imaging methods employ labeled antibodies to visualize protein expression under conventional microscopy. Because traditional low-plex immunofluorescence is limited by the number of spectrally separable fluorophores, high-plex imaging is achieved through iterative cycles of staining, fluorophore inactivation, or signal amplification. Recent advances in multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and cyclic immunofluorescence (such as t-CyCIF)[40] enable quantitative detection of dozens of proteins on a single FFPE section, supported by automated fluidics platforms including Akoya Biosciences' PhenoImager series, Miltenyi's MACSima, and Lunaphore's COMET workflows.

    • However, highly vascularized, fibrotic, and cirrhotic liver sections present a pervasive optical challenge: extreme tissue autofluorescence caused by lipofuscin accumulation and collagen cross-linking, which frequently masks low-abundance checkpoint signals in conventional fluorescence microscopy. To completely bypass this optical noise and eliminate spectral overlap, metal-isotope mass cytometry imaging—represented by Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC)[41] and Multiplexed Ion Beam Imaging (MIBI)[42]—offers a powerful alternative. These approaches utilize antibodies conjugated to rare-earth lanthanide metal isotopes instead of fluorophores, entirely eliminating fluorescence optics from the readout.

      Signal acquisition is achieved through laser ablation or ion-beam sputtering; MIBI uses an oxygen ion beam to sputter the sample and detect secondary ions via time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS) with sub-cellular resolutions as high as 0.4 µm, while IMC employs ultraviolet (UV) laser ablation to vaporize tissue pixels for CyTOF analysis at approximately 1 µm resolution. This mass-tag paradigm enables the simultaneous, high-resolution, and autofluorescence-free mapping of over 40 antibodies in a single round of staining, allowing for the precise, uncorrupted in situ quantification of critical overlapping checkpoint molecules—such as PD-1, CTLA-4, and LAG-3—directly within localized immunosuppressive niches. Nonetheless, because ion-beam sputtering and laser ablation irreversibly remove tissue material, this destructive workflow demands the careful restriction of imaging to predefined ROIs.

    • In addition to mass cytometry-based technologies that rely on metal tags, cyclic imaging platforms based on oligonucleotide barcodes, such as PhenoCycler (formerly CODEX) and SignalStar, offer a complementary workflow[43]. This technology is optimized for high-multiplex profiling of stromal and immune lineages. The foundational workflow of the oligonucleotide-barcoded paradigm involves a single, non-destructive staining step utilizing an expansive panel of antibodies (> 100) covalently coupled to unique DNA barcodes. In contrast to the irreversible tissue vaporization inherent to ion-beam or laser-ablation mass cytometry, or the epitope degradation associated with aggressive chemical bleaching in conventional cyclic immunofluorescence, this framework relies on microfluidic-mediated iterative cycling. Complementary, fluorophore-labeled oligonucleotides are sequentially hybridized, imaged via high-resolution microscopy, and gently removed under mild, non-denaturing fluidic conditions. This biochemical cycling mechanism maintains tissue morphological integrity across cm-scale clinical specimens while circumventing the physical detection limits (typically $ \leqq $ 50 heavy-metal channels) dictated by time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Consequently, DNA-barcoded multiplexing is technically optimized for decrypting the complex structural and cellular configurations of the tumor immune barrier (TIB).

    • Beyond physical entrapment, the progression and therapeutic resistance of HCC are dynamically orchestrated by the rigorous spatial reorganization of cellular energy metabolism and nutrient-processing pathways. High-resolution spatial metabolomics has shattered the conventional view of uniform tumor metabolism by revealing that distinct classes of small-molecule metabolites—including lactate, cholesteryl esters, phosphatidylcholines, purines, and nucleotides—form highly organized, region-specific gradients aligned with the tissue architecture[20,44,45]. These structured metabolic distributions are frequently confined to areas characterized by enhanced tumor invasiveness and active angiogenesis, highlighting that metabolic remodeling is inherently constrained by microenvironmental constraints.

      Crucially, rather than serving as mere descriptive readouts, these spatially restricted metabolic circuits actively dictate metabolic coupling across cancer cells, infiltrating lymphocytes, and CAFs. Phenotypic coupling processes, such as the lactate–pyruvate cycle, fatty acid-driven bioenergetics, and localized glutamine dependency, directly impose persistent metabolic stress on the surrounding immune landscape. Multimodal spatial omics integration has uncovered that regions enriched in intense glycolytic activity directly coincide with severe T-cell exhaustion, marked by mitochondrial dysfunction and a loss of cytotoxic capacity[46]. Conversely, lipid-rich zones form metabolically driven 'immune-tolerant sanctuaries' that shield malignant cells from host immunosurveillance[47].

      Spatial metabolomics integrates metabolomic profiling with imaging technologies to generate in situ maps of small-molecule distributions across tissue sections. In HCC, where hypoxia, nutrient gradients, and stromal remodeling profoundly reshape cellular metabolism, protein-level information alone is often insufficient to capture functional metabolic states. Spatial metabolomics therefore provides a critical extension to spatial proteomics by directly mapping metabolite distributions within tumor, stromal, and peritumoral regions. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) techniques, including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI)[48], desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging (DESI-MSI)[49], secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging (SIMS)[50], and related modalities, enable the visualization of hundreds of metabolites while preserving their native spatial context. These approaches reveal region-specific metabolic variation across different tissue compartments and cell populations. MSI[51,48] enables the direct, label-free analysis of metabolites within intact sections, and among its variants, MALDI-MSI and DESI-MSI represent the most widely applied techniques for metabolic visualization in biological specimens[48].

      The most representative technology is MALDI-MSI. In MALDI-MSI, a uniform matrix layer is first applied to the tissue, after which the sample is rasterized with a laser; the matrix absorbs laser energy to ionize embedded molecules, and the mass spectra from each pixel are subsequently recorded to reconstruct spatial abundance maps. Commonly coupled with time-of-flight (TOF) mass analyzers to infer mass-to-charge ratios, this paradigm is compatible with diverse sample types and can detect tens to hundreds of biomolecules simultaneously. Modern commercial instruments now achieve lateral resolutions of 5–10 µm; for example, systems such as Space M[52] and MicroMS[53]. Because the method does not rely on antibody specificity, it is particularly well suited for unbiased mapping of protein biomarkers or small-molecule drugs within tissues.

      In contrast, DESI-MSI is an ambient ionization technique that operates under atmospheric pressure and requires minimal sample preparation. In DESI-MSI, a charged solvent spray is directed onto the tissue surface, where it extracts and desorbs analytes that are subsequently transported into the mass spectrometer. Because DESI relies on a soft ionization mechanism, it allows analysis of intact molecular species while largely preserving tissue morphology. DESI-MSI is particularly attractive for translational and clinical applications, as it avoids matrix deposition and can be readily integrated with conventional histopathological workflows. Typical spatial resolution achieved with DESI-MSI ranges from 50 to 200 µm, although recent instrumental and methodological developments have enabled higher resolution through optimized spray geometry and oversampling strategies[49]. In contrast to the ambient and soft ionization of DESI-MSI, Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)—specifically Time-of-Flight SIMS (ToF-SIMS)—utilizes a high-energy primary ion beam to achieve subcellular spatial resolution[54]. In SIMS, a focused stream of primary ions (such as $ Bi_{3}^{+} $ or $ C_{60}^{+} $) bombards the tissue surface, triggering a collision cascade that ejects 'secondary ions' from the uppermost molecular layers. This process, known as sputtering, allows for an extraordinary spatial resolution typically ranging from 50 nm to 1 µm, making it the gold standard for mapping the distribution of small molecules, lipids, and elemental species at the single-cell or even organelle level. However, the high-energy nature of SIMS often leads to significant molecular fragmentation, traditionally limiting its utility for the analysis of larger, intact biomolecules. To mitigate this, recent advancements in Gas Cluster Ion Beams have enhanced the desorption of intact lipids and metabolites, bridging the gap between ultra-high resolution and molecular preservation. Despite its superior resolution, SIMS requires high-vacuum conditions and intensive sample preparation, positioning it as a powerful complementary tool to the more clinically accessible DESI-MSI for deep mechanistic investigations of the tumor microenvironment.

      At the molecular level, this spatial-metabolic coupling is driven by precise intracellular signaling cascades. For instance, tumor cell-expressed PD-L1 has been shown to actively reprogram lipid metabolism via the EGFR/ITGB4/SREBP1c signaling pathway, thereby accelerating lipogenesis to fortify these spatial sanctuaries[47]. In parallel, hepatocellular carcinoma cells locally upregulate SAT1 and secrete N1-acetylspermidine into the surrounding microenvironment. This localized metabolic secretion triggers aberrant SRC-SYK-BTK signaling in adjacent tumor-associated macrophages, polarizing them into a distinct CCL1+ immunosuppressive phenotype. These specialized macrophages subsequently execute the continuous, spatial recruitment of regulatory T cells via the CCL1-CCR8 chemokine axis, effectively locking in an unassailable niche of localized immune evasion[55].

      Such observations support a growing conceptual framework in which cancer development and progression are influenced not only by genetic alterations but also by spatial reorganization of cellular energy metabolism and nutrient-processing pathways. In this context, spatial metabolomics has emerged as a powerful approach for interrogating the metabolic ecology of tumors and for identifying metabolism-oriented therapeutic vulnerabilities[5660]. Importantly, metabolic alterations are not merely downstream consequences of genetic changes; they can also feed back to influence epigenetic regulation, signal transduction, and microenvironmental interactions, thereby contributing to tumor maintenance and evolution at a systems level[60]. Viewed through this metabolic lens, cancer can be understood as a disease shaped by aberrant energy utilization and dynamic interactions with host metabolic networks.

    • The definitive success of anti-tumor immunity in HCC is fundamentally predicated on the adaptive immune system's capacity to execute targeted, antigen-driven clonal expansion. Within the chronic inflammatory and cirrhotic landscape characteristic of primary liver malignancies, ectopic lymphoid aggregates known as tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) frequently assemble in the peritumoral stroma and adjacent margin. These structures serve as critical local microanatomical hubs for lymphocyte priming, somatic hypermutation (SHM), and affinity maturation, often functioning as the principal spatial cradle for TILs[61,62].

      However, investigating the precise functional trajectories and spatial origins of these adaptive compartments has exposed a critical methodological impasse. Droplet-based single-cell V(D)J sequencing effectively pairs α/β or heavy/light receptor chains but demands total tissue dissociation, which strips lymphocytes of their anatomical context and severs the link between clonal identity and local microenvironmental niches[63]. Conversely, conventional spatial transcriptomic platforms rely heavily on 3'-end poly(A) capture on physical substrates. Because these array-based strategies sample transcripts near the polyadenylation tail, they systematically fail to sequence the highly variable, distal variable-diversity-joining (V[D]J) recombination regions and the complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) loops located further upstream. This technical read-length constraint leaves standard spatial transcriptomics blind to antigen receptor identity, rendering it impossible to map specific T-cell receptor (TCR) and B-cell receptor (BCR) clonotypes to distinct histological zones, or to trace the migratory and evolutionary lineages of adaptive cells across complex liver microanatomical structures.

      To resolve this structural blind spot, the emerging field of spatial immunomics integrates spatial barcoding with targeted antigen receptor reconstruction, allowing investigators to map full-length immune repertoires in situ. Slide-TCR-seq[9] is among the earliest approaches to enable spatially resolved analysis of TCRs. This method integrates the Slide-seq v2 platform with RNase H-dependent PCR to capture TCRα and TCRβ CDR3 sequences at an approximate spatial resolution of 10 µm, thereby reconstructing the spatial distribution of T cell clonotypes. By linking TCR clonotype information with local transcriptomic profiles, Slide-TCR-seq allows joint analysis of clonal identity and transcriptional state within defined tissue regions and supports the investigation of intra-clonal and inter-clonal transcriptional variability in tumors and lymphoid tissues. In HCC, this approach is particularly suitable for resolving the fine-scale spatial distribution of T cells across complex liver microanatomical structures, including tumor parenchyma, fibrotic septa, sinusoidal regions, and tumor margins. However, because the method relies on targeted PCR amplification, Slide-TCR-seq primarily captures CDR3 sequence information and does not enable reconstruction of full V(D)J architectures. In addition, its current implementation is limited to TCR analysis.

      On barcoding-based spatial transcriptomic platforms, Spatial VDJ offers an alternative strategy for spatial immune-repertoire analysis[64]. This approach builds on cDNA libraries generated by the 10x Genomics Visium spatial transcriptomics platform and applies hybrid-capture enrichment to selectively isolate immune-receptor transcripts. By combining either short-read or long-read sequencing, Spatial VDJ enables spatially resolved reconstruction of full-length V(D)J sequences for both TCRs and BCRs. In addition to recovering the spatial distribution of lymphocyte clonotypes, the method supports BCR heavy- and light-chain pairing as well as analysis of B-cell clonal lineages and somatic hypermutation, thereby extending the applicability of spatial immune-repertoire profiling to studies of humoral immunity. In HCC, Spatial VDJ is particularly well suited for investigating B-cell-associated immune processes, including the presence of TLSs within or adjacent to tumors and the extent to which B cells within TLSs undergo clonal expansion, somatic hypermutation, and lineage diversification. However, the spatial resolution of this approach is constrained by the spot size of the Visium platform, which limits its ability to resolve fine-scale microanatomical features.

      SPTCR-seq[65] further extends immune-repertoire analysis on barcoding-based spatial transcriptomic platforms. This method uses optimized hybrid-capture probes targeting TCR transcripts and combines them with nanopore long-read sequencing to enable high-sensitivity reconstruction of full-length TCR sequences. Compared with PCR-based approaches, SPTCR-seq provides improved completeness of TCR V(D)J architecture and higher accuracy in clonotype reconstruction, while remaining applicable across multiple spatial transcriptomic platforms. In HCC, this approach is well suited for characterizing the clonal composition, expansion patterns, and spatial bias of tumor-infiltrating T cells, including assessments of whether specific tumor regions are dominated by highly expanded clonotypes and whether these clonotypes are associated with exhausted phenotypes or immunosuppressive microenvironments. However, the method primarily focuses on TCR analysis, involves relatively high experimental and sequencing costs, and requires more demanding downstream error-correction and computational analysis pipelines.

      In contrast to the approaches described above, Stereo-seq[19] does not rely on receptor-targeted enrichment as its primary strategy. Instead, it uses random priming to enable unbiased capture of total RNA, followed by assembly-based reconstruction of immune receptor sequences at ultra-high spatial resolution. This design provides lower sensitivity for reconstructing individual receptor clonotypes than targeted enrichment methods, but it offers distinct advantages in precisely mapping immune clonotypes to fine microanatomical structures, maintaining compatibility with FFPE clinical specimens, and integrating regulatory information from both coding and noncoding transcripts.

      By directly coupling antigen receptor sequence integrity with precise spatial coordinates, spatial immunomics provides an uncorrupted view into the adaptive selection forces operating within peritumoral TLSs. These technologies allow researchers to distinguish between true, antigen-driven resident effectors undergoing localized clonal expansion and unengaged, systemically recruited bystander lymphocytes that passively drift through vascular or sinusoidal spaces. When applied to the highly structured architecture of peritumoral TLSs in HCC, full-length spatial V(D)J profiling can cleanly separate the distinct zones of the B-cell follicle. It maps how B-cell clonotypes transition from the naive mantle zones into the active germinal centers, allowing for the direct in situ tracking of SHM kinetics and class-switch recombination[64]. By quantifying the spatial density of point mutations within paired heavy- and light-chain CDR3 loops across consecutive anatomical coordinates, researchers can construct explicit phylogenetic trees that trace lineage diversification directly within the germinal center. Simultaneously, these platforms can measure how these evolving B-cell lineages interface with adjacent CD4+ follicular helper T (TFH) cells and follicular dendritic cells. This spatial proximity analysis establishes the exact physical and transcriptomic thresholds required to drive localized affinity maturation and plasma cell differentiation[64,9]. Ultimately, by mapping these intra-clonal and inter-clonal evolutionary trajectories across explicit physical coordinates, spatial immunomics transforms our understanding of HCC lymphoid niches. It proves that peritumoral TLSs are not merely passive cellular aggregates, but function as highly active, structurally autonomous microenvironments capable of generating fully mature, localized adaptive responses geared toward controlling tumor fitness and dictating clinical immunotherapy outcomes (Table 1).

      Table 1.  Comparison of spatial omics platforms in HCC.

      PlatformResolutionThroughputTissuePrimary strengthsLimitationsApplications
      Spatial transcriptomicsVisium v255 µmWTFFPE/FFUnbiased capture, standard workflowCoarse resolutionDissecting region-specific immune, stromal, and metabolic partitions[33,66]
      Visium HD2 µmWTFFPE/FFSingle-cell profiling, untargetedHigh cost, data sparsityProfiling localized cellular heterogeneity and immune aggregates[15]
      Stereo-seq500 nmWTFFLarge FOV, sub-micron resolutionLimited sensitivityMapping suppressive invasive front dynamics and progress cues[67]
      Stereo-seq v2500 nmWTFFSimultaneous profiling of the V(D)J immune repertoireHigh sequencing depth relianceTracing spatial clonal lineages in archived clinical FFPE cohorts[19]
      GeoMx DSP10–600 µmTargeted WTFFPE/FFFlexible ROI selectionNon-single-cellCompartment-specific (intratumoral vs stromal) profiles[66]
      Xenium50 nmTargeted
      (≤ 5,000)
      FFPE/FFHigh sensitivity and throughputClosed gene panelMapping subcellular ligand-receptor networks and checkpoints[11]
      MERFISH100 nmTargeted
      (≤ 1,000+)
      FFPE/FFHigh quantitative accuracyLong imaging timesDirect visualization and quantification of oncogenic transcripts[20]
      CosMx SMI< 1 µmTargeted
      (≤ 6,000)
      FFPE/FFTrue subcellular imagingSegmentation artifactsIsolating metabolic-transcriptomic niches in cell communities[21]
      Spatial proteomicsPhenoCycler0.2–0.5 µmTargeted (40–100+)FFPE/FFHigh-plex single-cell screeningIterative fluidics timeElucidating physical barriers formed by CAFs and TAMs[43]
      IMC1 µmTargeted (40)FFPE/FFNegligible signal overlapLow SNR for low-expression proteinsMapping multiplexed 2D immune topology in HBV-infected tissues[6]
      Spatial metabolomicsMALDI-MSI10–100 µmm/z 500–
      20,000
      FFLabel-free intact trackingMatrix interferenceDeconstructing peritumoral lactate gradients and lipid rewiring[48,45]
      DESI-MSI50–200 µmm/z 10–
      2,000
      FFAmbient soft ionizationLow resolutionRapid label-free metabolic mapping with minimal preparation[49]
      Abbreviations: WT, whole transcriptome; FF, fresh-frozen; FFPE, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded; FOV, field of view; ROI, region of interest; IMC, imaging mass cytometry; MSI, mass spectrometry imaging; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; m/z, mass-to-charge ratio; CAFs, cancer-associated fibroblasts; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.
    • The rapid expansion of spatially resolved transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic technologies has generated datasets characterized by high dimensionality, strong spatial dependency, and complex tissue architecture. Conventional statistical approaches, which often treat observations as independent and rely on linear assumptions, are insufficient to capture the structured heterogeneity and multiscale organization inherent to spatial biological data. Artificial intelligence, and in particular machine learning (ML) along with its specialized subclass deep learning (DL), has therefore become an essential analytical framework for extracting meaningful biological information from spatial datasets.

    • Deciphering the spatial architecture of heterogeneous tissue microenvironments represents a cornerstone of spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) data analysis. To map these complex spatial domains, researchers strategically choose from four distinct algorithmic paradigms based on structural topology, multimodal integration, and computational constraints.

      For biological systems with well-defined structural priors where causal interpretability is paramount, non-neural probabilistic models (e.g., BayesSpace[68], Giotto[69]) represent a statistically rigorous option. Rooted in statistical mechanics, these approaches rely heavily on Markov Random Fields (MRFs) or Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to explicitly formulate the spatial dependency among neighboring spots, offering high mathematical interpretability and robustness against noise in structured grid layouts, though they struggle to capture high-order non-linear dynamics and encounter scalability bottlenecks on massive datasets. In contrast, when absolute computational efficiency and rapid cohort screening are prioritized, traditional machine learning approaches serve as the pragmatic choice. Represented by conventional clustering (e.g., k-means or spectral clustering) coupled with linear dimensionality reduction (e.g., PCA) that incorporates spatial constraints as Euclidean distances, this paradigm lacks the capacity to abstract subtle, complex non-linear biological variations, yet its minimal computational footprint renders it indispensable for preliminary high-throughput explorations.

      As multimodal datasets become increasingly prevalent, deep learning methods (e.g., MUSE[44]) offer a paradigm explicitly centered on multimodal representation fusion. Leveraging deep autoencoders (AEs) or contrastive learning techniques, these algorithms project high-dimensional, non-linear transcriptomic profiles and matched histological images (e.g., H&E staining) into a shared, joint latent space; for intricate tissue architectures where structural morphology heavily dictates cellular states, this strategy provides deep cross-modality contextualization, revealing subtle spatial subpopulations that remain hidden from a single modality. Finally, for studies demanding direct, end-to-end optimization of continuous tissue geometry, graph neural networks (GNNs, e.g., SpaGCN[70]) stand out as a premier architectural choice. By abstracting SRT arrays into non-Euclidean graphs—where spots or cells form nodes and spatial proximity defines edges—GNNs utilize graph convolutions to natively aggregate transcriptomic and geometric information across topological neighborhoods. This paradigm excels remarkably in smoothing localized technical noise and delineating continuous anatomical boundaries, establishing itself as a robust high-resolution tool for dissecting complex tissue heterogeneity.

    • Accurate delineation of individual cell boundaries is a critical prerequisite for many downstream spatial analyses, particularly for spatial platforms that achieve single-cell or subcellular resolution. Without reliable cell segmentation, molecular signals originating from neighboring cells may be incorrectly merged, leading to confounding between spatial proximity and molecular similarity.

      When high-quality morphological imaging (such as DAPI, cell boundary staining, or immunofluorescence) is available, and smooth boundary contours are prioritized, pure image-driven computer vision models provide a classic, benchmark option. This paradigm has evolved from dedicated semantic segmentation architectures typified by U-Net to versatile, training-free generalized models like Cellpose[30], which leverages simulated vector flow fields. To overcome the massive computational bottleneck encountered when applying pixel-level deep learning inference across thousands of whole-slide images, distributed architectures such as DeepCell Kiosk[31] introduce cloud-native orchestration frameworks (e.g., Kubernetes). Without altering the underlying algorithmic cores, these systems substantially optimize computational scalability, offering a high-throughput pipeline for large-scale clinical cohort analyses. Nevertheless, pure image-driven segmentation remains a 'morphology-first' strategy. In tissue regions plagued by overlapping cellular layers, uneven staining artifacts, or a lack of clear plasma membrane markers, this paradigm is highly susceptible to transcript cross-talk or the artificial omission of real cellular entities.

      To completely bypass the absolute reliance on high-quality cell morphology imaging, non-neural probabilistic models offer a distinct, 'molecular feature-first' alternative. Statistical frameworks, most notably exemplified by Baysor[71], abandon pixel-based image segmentation logic entirely. Instead, they model the joint likelihood of single-molecule transcripts within a non-Euclidean spatial point process. By employing Markov Random Fields (MRFs) to jointly optimize spatial cell morphology priors alongside the local expression homogeneity of the transcriptome, Baysor can backward-infer true cellular boundaries directly from raw transcript coordinates—even in extreme scenarios completely lacking nuclear or membrane stains. This approach delivers exceptional statistical robustness when resolving highly interleaved and structurally complex cell types, such as tumor-infiltrating immune cells within dense microenvironments. Advancing this probabilistic framework further, Proseg[72] incorporates cellular physical behaviors derived from biophysical cell simulations directly into spatial boundary inference. By using probabilistic sampling to deduce morphologically plausible physical boundaries, Proseg establishes a novel architectural trade-off that enhances computational efficiency while minimizing the generation of artificial noise bubbles.

      With the widespread adoption of subcellular multi-omic datasets, multimodal DL fusion architectures that concurrently model tissue morphology and transcriptomic spatial heterogeneity are becoming the dominant technological route for high-resolution profiling. Within this paradigm, several distinct supervision strategies and architectural pathways have emerged. Under supervised or adaptive learning frameworks, the SCS algorithm[73] deploys a Transformer architecture to adaptively learn multimodal spatial distance representations of each transcript relative to its inferred cell center, successfully breaking through the assignment precision limits of traditional image segmentation at subcellular scales. Complementing this, GeneSegNet[74] introduces a recursive training strategy that effectively mitigates the reliance on noisy, manually annotated training labels that frequently confound conventional DL pipelines.

      Importantly, many AI methods used in spatial analysis are modality-agnostic, operating on spatially indexed feature matrices regardless of whether the features represent gene expression, protein abundance, or metabolite intensity. This property facilitates consistent analytical frameworks across spatial transcriptomics, spatial proteomics, and spatial metabolomics, while still allowing modality-specific interpretations at the biological level.

    • Deciphering spatial transcriptomics data captured at multi-cellular resolution, such as 10x Genomics Visium and standard Spatial Transcriptomics arrays, requires resolving the mixed transcriptional signals within each sequencing spot. To accurately chart cell-type compositions or achieve single-cell resolution across these heterogeneous mixtures, researchers utilize matched single-cell RNA sequencing datasets as reference panels and strategically choose among distinct mathematical frameworks based on data characteristics and computational constraints.

      For analysis scenarios that require explicit modeling of technical biases and high sensitivity toward rare cell populations, probabilistic models rooted in Bayesian inference represent a statistically rigorous option. Approaches like Stereoscope parameterize the gene expression counts from both single-cell and spatial modalities within a probabilistic framework by assuming a negative binomial distribution to infer the latent proportions of each cell type per spot[38]. Extending this probabilistic framework, cell2location implements a hierarchical Bayesian model with comprehensive prior distributions to accommodate platform-specific technical variations, which allows the model to borrow statistical strength across spatial locations to map fine-grained cellular subtypes, although this heavy reliance on complex hierarchical configurations inherently incurs substantial computational costs during variational inference or Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling on large cohorts[75]. When the analytical focus shifts toward absolute computational scalability, architectural interpretability, and direct molecular feature extraction, methods leveraging matrix factorization or targeted regression offer a pragmatic alternative. The SPOTlight algorithm employs a seeded non-negative matrix factorization architecture to identify cell-type-specific or state-specific topic profiles from single-cell references, subsequently utilizing non-negative least squares regression to fit these topics into spatial profiles to determine cellular proportions[76]. Operating under a maximum likelihood framework, RCTD incorporates a technology-specific platform effect parameter to explicitly correct for systemic discrepancies between single-cell and spatial sequencing technologies, and its mathematical formulation allows for spot-independent parallel computation, making it highly efficient for high-throughput exploration of massive tissue sections[27].

      Instead of estimating cellular proportions within mixed spots, aligning entire single-cell transcriptomes onto spatial coordinates to reconstruct a single-cell resolution spatial atlas represents a different modality-alignment choice. Tangram implements a DL strategy coupled with spatial alignment to cast mapping as an optimization task that maximizes the correlation between spatial profiles and single-cell entities. By utilizing specialized objective functions, this algorithm systematically assigns single cells to their optimal spatial coordinates, which enables the spatial imputation of unmeasured genes and transcends the limitation of proportion estimation to provide an alternative pathway for studying continuous tissue architecture and localized cellular interactions at single-cell resolution[28].

    • The critical imperative for multi-omics integration stems from its unique capacity to systematically bridge the spatial and regulatory disconnect across genomic alterations, transcriptomic drifts, functional proteomic executions, and metabolic rewiring inherent to the highly heterogeneous architecture of HCC. Within complex solid tumor ecosystems, single-omics modalities are inherently constrained by an incomplete view of biological causality. By leveraging computational co-registration and in situ spatial topological alignment, multi-omics frameworks seamlessly integrate micro-scale suppressive networks—such as interlocking immune checkpoint axes and localized metabolic stress niches—with macro-scale anatomical barriers, notably extracellular matrix structures and cancer-associated fibroblast networks that orchestrate physical lymphocyte exclusion. This systems-biology paradigm delivers an uncorrupted view of the in situ evolutionary dynamics and intercellular circuitries driving therapeutic resistance, thereby establishing a translationally viable roadmap for precision oncology.

      In the field of spatial transcriptomics and spatial proteomics, only a limited number of platforms currently enable true co-measurement on the same tissue section, such as the DSP. SM-Omics[77] provides an end-to-end, fully automated sequencing-based spatial multi-omics framework that integrates spatial transcriptome profiling with antibody-derived protein detection through DNA-barcoded antibodies, enabling simultaneous in situ quantification of mRNA and protein epitopes at single-cell resolution. In parallel, DBiTplus[78] (Deterministic Barcoding in Tissue Plus) represents a microfluidics-based spatial barcoding strategy that enables multiplexed spatial co-localization analysis of transcriptomic and proteomic features on the same tissue section. This method employs two sets of orthogonally arranged microfluidic channels to sequentially deliver distinct DNA spatial barcodes onto the tissue surface, thereby assigning precise spatial coordinates to mRNA molecules and antibody-conjugated oligonucleotide tags without reliance on optical imaging-based decoding. DBiTplus achieves single-cell-scale spatial resolution while preserving tissue morphology and is compatible with standard high-throughput sequencing workflows.

      Spatial transcriptomics-metabolomics integration is most commonly achieved through same-section or serial-section workflows that combine sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics platforms (e.g., Spatial Multimodal Analysis[79]) with MSI modalities such as MALDI-MSI or DESI-MSI. In this workflow, fresh-frozen samples are mounted onto spatially barcoded slides, followed by MALDI-MSI to capture high-resolution, label-free metabolite distributions while preserving tissue morphology. Crucially, matrix deposition and laser parameters are optimized to maintain RNA integrity, allowing the tissue to subsequently undergo sequencing-based spatial transcriptomic profiling on identical spatial coordinates. This sequential same-section design establishes a direct spatial correspondence between gene-expression profiles and metabolite intensities at the level of individual capture spots. Computationally, SMA integrates these modalities through spatial co-registration, joint dimensionality reduction, and correlation- or graph-based modeling to identify region-specific transcriptional-metabolic coupling, metabolic gradients aligned with tissue architecture, and spatially restricted functional niches.

      While these platforms and workflows enable the acquisition of spatial multi-omics data, extracting coherent biological insights from heterogeneous modalities requires dedicated computational frameworks capable of jointly modeling spatial context and cross-modality relationships. MultiGATE[80] addresses this need by providing a graph neural network-based deep learning framework for spatial multi-omics integration and regulatory inference. Rather than relying on unified molecular indexing, MultiGATE operates on pre-generated spatial transcriptomic, epigenomic, or proteomic datasets, constructing feature-level graphs to model cross-modality regulatory interactions and spatial graphs to encode neighborhood dependencies among spots or cells. Through a dual-layer graph attention mechanism, MultiGATE learns shared low-dimensional representations while simultaneously inferring spatially resolved regulatory relationships between molecular features. This computational strategy complements experimental multi-omics platforms by enabling unified analysis, spatial domain identification, and mechanistic interpretation of heterogeneous spatial datasets (Fig. 2).

      Figure 2. 

      Overview of spatial omics technologies in hepatocellular carcinoma. This schematic summarizes major spatial omics platforms and computational strategies for resolving spatial heterogeneity in HCC. (a) Spatial transcriptomics maps RNA expression in situ using sequencing/barcoding-based methods (for example, Visium, Visium HD, and Slide-seq v2) or imaging-based approaches (such as MERFISH, seqFISH+, MERSCOPE, CosMx SMI, and Xenium), enabling spatial reconstruction from multicellular to near single-cell or subcellular resolution. (b) Spatial proteomics profiles protein distribution through multiplex immunofluorescence, metal-isotope imaging mass cytometry, and DNA-barcoded cyclic protein imaging. (c) Spatial metabolomics maps metabolites and lipids using MALDI-MSI, DESI-MSI, and SIMS, revealing metabolic gradients across tumor, stromal, hypoxic, necrotic, and perivascular regions. (d) Spatial immune repertoire profiling localizes TCR/BCR clonotypes through Slide-TCR-seq, Spatial VDJ, SPTCR-seq, and Stereo-seq-based inference. (e) AI-enabled spatial analysis supports spatial clustering, domain segmentation, cell segmentation, deconvolution, and multimodal integration. Together, these approaches provide integrated spatial insight into HCC tissue architecture, tumor microenvironment organization, and clinically relevant biological states.

    • Despite the rapid evolution of spatial multi-omics technologies, which now offer substantial resolution for dissecting the structural and functional heterogeneity of complex tissues such as liver cancer, their broad application and deep biological interpretation continue to face substantial challenges. Technical and analytical bottlenecks remain at every stage, from sample acquisition and experimental platforms to computational analysis and downstream biological interpretation.

      One of the central obstacles lies in the constraints of tissue sampling and spatial resolution. Spatial omics data are highly dependent on the quality, thickness, and spatial coverage of tissue sections, and organs such as the liver possess intricate 3D architectures that are difficult to fully reconstruct from 2D slices. Moreover, high-resolution platforms such as MERFISH, CosMx, and Xenium are costly and low-throughput, limiting their feasibility for large-cohort studies, whereas lower-resolution approaches like Visium cannot reliably distinguish transcriptional signals from adjacent cells. Thus, achieving an optimal balance among resolution, throughput, and cost remains a critical challenge for the future development of spatial omics technologies.

      A second major challenge arises from the computational complexity of multi-omics integration. Different modalities exhibit pronounced batch effects, platform-specific noise, and quantitative non-linearities, requiring sophisticated algorithms for cross-modal alignment. At the spatial level, distinguishing technical artifacts and stochastic cellular variation from biologically meaningful spatial patterns remains difficult. This process often demands detailed pathological expertise and extensive biological knowledge, making spatial data analysis one of the most interdisciplinary frontiers of modern computational biology.

      In addition, limited reproducibility and lack of standardization currently constrain the scalability of spatial research. Experimental workflows, segmentation algorithms, annotation strategies, and spatial statistical models differ substantially across research groups, hindering direct comparison of datasets. Establishing standardized data formats, analytical pipelines, and shared resources will therefore be essential for advancing spatial multi-omics toward clinical translation and population-scale research.

    • Looking ahead, several emerging technological innovations continue to advance spatial biology. First, spatial omics is progressing from 2D tissue sections toward 3D spatial omics[8183], where sequential imaging and volumetric reconstruction enable spatial resolution that more closely reflects the true architecture of intact tissues. Second, the concept of in vivo spatial omics is beginning to take shape, raising the possibility that future technologies could monitor gene expression, protein modifications, and metabolic activity of individual cells in real time, analogous to a molecular live imaging system, thereby advancing spatial biology into a truly spatiotemporal framework. Third, as data accumulate from model organisms and human cohorts, spatial omics is poised to illuminate the disease continuum spanning hepatitis, fatty liver disease, fibrosis, and liver cancer, while also offering insights into cross-species differences in antitumor immunity and contributing foundational knowledge on immune system evolution[84].

      Both spatial transcriptomics and spatial proteomics have been recognized as Methods of the Year by Nature Methods, and spatial metabolomics is likewise emerging as a highly promising and transformative approach. Within the TME, persistent metabolic stress and nutrient competition restrict the energy supply of effector T cells and disrupt redox homeostasis, ultimately driving them toward exhaustion, characterized by mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired glycolysis, and loss of cytotoxic capacity. Recent applications of spatial metabolomics have provided a new technical avenue for dissecting these metabolism–immunity interactions. By jointly mapping metabolite distributions and cellular spatial organization at the tissue level, spatial metabolomics reveals how metabolic heterogeneity constrains immune-cell function within the TME. For example, localized accumulation of lactate, lipids, and amino-acid metabolites in distinct tumor regions such as hypoxic zones, perivascular niches, and necrotic areas may precisely correspond to T-cell dysfunction, enrichment of immunosuppressive cell populations, and differential responses to immunotherapy.

      In the translational landscape of HCC, AI-based predictive models are increasingly moving beyond conventional sample-level biomarkers toward spatially informed representations of the tumor microenvironment. By integrating region-specific molecular features with anatomically defined compartments—such as the tumor core, invasive margin, and adjacent stroma—these models capture immune and tumor states that are organized in space rather than uniformly distributed. A representative example is the spatial immune scoring framework that quantifies the in situ expression of immune-related genes, including SPON2, ZFP36L2, ZFP36, VIM, and HLA-DRB1, across distinct histological regions. Building on this concept, the TIMES scoring system integrates tile-level mIHC measurements from both intratumoral and stromal compartments, combines multiple biomarkers through a two-step spatial aggregation, and employs an XGBoost algorithm to generate a patient-specific HCC recurrence risk score, reportedly achieving over 95% prediction accuracy for specific multi-marker combinations[66].

      However, the translational potential and clinical robustness of such space-aware predictive pipelines warrant cautious and critical interrogation. At present, most existing frameworks remain methodologically constrained by retrospective designs and relatively modest sample sizes, which inherently inflates the risk of overfitting when deploying parameter-dense machine learning algorithms or gradient-boosting trees. Although models like the TIMES system demonstrate exceptional metrics during internal cross-validation, their true generalization capacity across highly heterogeneous HCC cohorts remains technically ambiguous due to a pervasive lack of large-scale, prospective, and geographically distinct external validation datasets. Furthermore, inter-center variations in tissue preparation, antibody affinity staining batches, and digital tile sampling strategies introduce confounding technical noise that challenges model stability. Consequently, establishing standardized, multi-center quality control pipelines and strictly validating predictive robustness across low-resolution or noisy real-world specimens remain paramount architectural hurdles before these spatially informed representations can be reliably implemented into clinical prognostic stratification.

      More broadly, AI enables disease prediction models to accommodate nonlinear relationships, spatial dependency, and multiscale organization inherent to HCC tissues. Graph-based learning, representation learning, and spatial feature aggregation allow predictive frameworks to integrate molecular signals with physical proximity, immune neighborhood structure, and tissue architecture. These capabilities are particularly relevant for modeling immune exclusion, spatially restricted immune suppression, and region-specific therapeutic vulnerability, all of which are central to HCC progression and treatment response. Looking forward, AI-driven predictive modeling in HCC is expected to increasingly incorporate multimodal spatial data, including spatial transcriptomics, spatial proteomics, spatial metabolomics, and histopathological imaging. Rather than serving solely as risk classifiers, future models are likely to function as integrative systems that link spatial molecular states to clinical outcomes, therapeutic response, and disease evolution. In this context, AI-based spatial prediction frameworks may play a central role in precision stratification, recurrence risk assessment, and decision support for personalized management of HCC.

    • Over the past decade, spatial multi-omics has successfully shifted the field of liver cancer research from broad cell-type cataloging to the high-resolution, in situ mapping of the HCC microenvironment. The integration of spatial transcriptomics and proteomics has established the foundational architecture of region-specific tumor compartments, definitively showcasing how specialized cellular neighborhoods cooperate to orchestrate malignant progression. Despite these unprecedented milestones in physical atlas drafting, several unresolved questions and technological bottlenecks must be addressed before this framework can achieve full clinical translation.

      Computationally and methodologically, the field faces significant scalability constraints. Current spatial transcriptomics and proteomics are severely hindered by cell-segmentation artifacts in histologically dense, cirrhotic liver tissues, matrix interference in label-free spatial metabolomics, and stochastic noise across multi-modal registration. Spatial immunomics is constrained by lower capture efficiencies and localized stochastic noise, which complicates the accurate tracing of antigen-specific lymphocyte expansion at the critical tumor invasive front. Crucially, the lack of standardized analytical workflows and cross-platform benchmarking across disparate spatial multi-omics technologies continues to generate batch effects, limiting data reproducibility across independent clinical cohorts.

      To bridge the gap to precision immuno-oncology, future efforts must shift from descriptive, two-dimensional retrospective studies toward 3D and longitudinal spatiotemporal modeling. Crucially, the systematic coupling of spatial multi-omics with digital whole-slide pathology and radiographic clinical imaging, alongside prospective validation in therapeutic cohorts, will offer scalable and actionable stratifiers for post-resection monitoring and personalized treatment escalation.

      • The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and encouragement from their colleagues during the preparation of this review. No specific funding was received for this work.

      • During the preparation of this work, the authors used Gemini (version: May 2026) for language refinement, text polishing, and figure enhancement. The authors reviewed and edited all content produced with the assistance of this tool, verified its accuracy, and take full responsibility for the integrity and originality of the final manuscript. This work represents the authors' own intellectual contribution, and no AI tool is credited as an author.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: manuscript preparation and methodological analysis: Gu Y; conceptualization, supervision, manuscript logical structuring and revision: Jia G. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (1) References (84)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Gu Y, Jia G. 2026. AI-powered spatial multi-omics discerns spatial patterns within immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Genomics Communications 3: e017 doi: 10.48130/gcomm-0026-0016
    Gu Y, Jia G. 2026. AI-powered spatial multi-omics discerns spatial patterns within immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Genomics Communications 3: e017 doi: 10.48130/gcomm-0026-0016

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return