Search
2021 Volume 1
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Comparative analysis of the TCP gene family in celery, coriander and carrot (family Apiaceae)

  • These authors contributed equally: Qiaoying Pei, Nan Li
More Information
  • Apiaceae is one of the most important families in Apiales and includes many economically important vegetables and medicinal plants. The TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR 1/2 (TCP) gene family plays an important role in regulating plant growth and development, but it has not been widely studied in Apiaceae. In the present study, we identified 215 TCP family genes in six species of plant, of which 122 genes were present in three Apiaceae including 29 in celery (Apium graveolens), 43 in coriander (Coriandrum sativum), and 50 in carrot (Daucus carota). Whole-genome duplication likely contributed to TCP gene family expansion in Apiaceae. There were more paralogs in carrot than in coriander and celery, which was attributable to the greater number of tandem and proximal duplicated genes on chromosome 1. Nine microRNAs were found to regulate 20 TCP genes in the three Apiaceae species, with miR-319 having the most target genes. Several TCP genes showed high expression in the root, petiole and leaf of celery and coriander. These results provide a basis for comparative and functional genomic analyses of TCP genes in Apiaceae and other plants.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Table S1 The TCP gene family members and their abbreviation name in celery, coriander, carrot, lettuce, grape, and Arabidopsis.
    Supplemental Table S2 The summary of TCP gene family members in  A.  graveolens , C. sativum, D. carota and compared with  A. thaliana .
    Supplemental Table S3 The list of orthologous TCP gene pairs between A. graveolens,  C. sativum, and  D. carota.
    Supplemental Table S4 The list of paralogous TCP gene pairs in each of other examined species.
    Supplemental Table S5 Ka/Ks calculation and divergent time of the orthologous  gene pairs between A. graveolens, C. sativum, and  D. carota.
    Supplemental Table S6 The duplicated type of TCP genes in A. graveolens,C. sativum and D. carota. The 0 to 4 indicate the singleton, dispersed, proximal, tandem, WGD duplication type, respectively.
    Supplemental Table S7 The prediction of target TCP family genes of miRNA in carrot, coriander, and celery.
    Supplemental Table S8 The expression level of the TCP genes in root, leaf and petiole for A. graveolens and C. savitum.  The gene expression was determined by the RNA-Seq data (RPKM).
    Supplemental Fig. S1 The gene structure of TCP gene family in three Apiaceae species.
    Supplemental Fig. S2 The circle plot of paralogous TCP gene pairs among three Apiaceae species.
  • [1] Knothe G, Steidley KR. 2019. Composition of Some Apiaceae Seed Oils Includes Phytochemicals, and Mass Spectrometry of Fatty Acid 2-Methoxyethyl Esters. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 121:1800386 doi: 10.1002/ejlt.201800386

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Serag A, Baky MH, Döll S, Farag MA. 2020. UHPLC-MS metabolome based classification of umbelliferous fruit taxa: a prospect for phyto-equivalency of its different accessions and in response to roasting. RSC Advances 10:76−85 doi: 10.1039/C9RA07841J

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Song X, Sun P, Yuan J, Gong K, Li N, et al. 2021. The celery genome sequence reveals sequential paleo-polyploidizations, karyotype evolution and resistance gene reduction in apiales. Plant Biotechnol J 19:731−44 doi: 10.1111/pbi.13499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Wu T, Feng S, Yang Q, Bhetariya P, Gong K, et al. 2021. Integration of the metabolome and transcriptome reveals the metabolites and genes related to nutritional and medicinal value in Coriandrum sativum. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 20:1807−18 doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63358-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Li M, Hou X, Wang F, Tan G, Xu Z, Xiong A. 2018. Advances in the research of celery, an important Apiaceae vegetable crop. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 38:172−83 doi: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1312275

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Lin L, Lu S, Harnly JM. 2007. Detection and quantification of glycosylated flavonoid malonates in celery, Chinese celery, and celery seed by LC-DAD-ESI/MS. J Agric Food Chem 55:1321−26 doi: 10.1021/jf0624796

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Kooti W, Daraei N. 2017. A Review of the Antioxidant Activity of Celery (Apium graveolens L). Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine 22:1029−34 doi: 10.1177/2156587217717415

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Palmieri S, Pellegrini M, Ricci A, Compagnone D, Lo Sterzo C. 2020. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Thyme, Hemp and Coriander Extracts: A Comparison Study of Maceration, Soxhlet, UAE and RSLDE Techniques. Foods 9:1221 doi: 10.3390/foods9091221

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Xu Z, Yang Q, Feng K, Xiong A. 2019. Changing Carrot Color: Insertions in DcMYB7 Alter the Regulation of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis and Modification. Plant Physiology 181:195−207 doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Song X, Nie F, Chen W, Ma X, Gong K, et al. 2020. Coriander Genomics Database: a genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolic database for coriander. Horticulture Research 7:55 doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0261-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Iorizzo M, Ellison S, Senalik D, Zeng P, Satapoomin P, et al. 2016. A high-quality carrot genome assembly provides new insights into carotenoid accumulation and asterid genome evolution. Nature Genetics 48:657−66 doi: 10.1038/ng.3565

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Song X, Wang J, Li N, Yu J, Meng F, et al. 2020. Deciphering the high-quality genome sequence of coriander that causes controversial feelings. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:1444−56 doi: 10.1111/pbi.13310

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L. 1997. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386:485−88 doi: 10.1038/386485a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E. 1996. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383:794−99 doi: 10.1038/383794a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Kosugi S, Ohashi Y. 1997. PCF1 and PCF2 specifically bind to cis elements in the rice proliferating cell nuclear antigen gene. The Plant Cell 9:1607−19 doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.9.1607

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Aguilar-Martínez JA, Poza-Carrión C, Cubas P. 2007. Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. The Plant Cell 19:458−72 doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048934

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Takeda T, Amano K, Ohto MA, Nakamura K, Sato S, et al. 2006. RNA interference of the Arabidopsis putative transcription factor TCP16 gene results in abortion of early pollen development. Plant Molecular Biology 61:165−77 doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-6265-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Tatematsu K, Nakabayashi K, Kamiya Y, Nambara E. 2008. Transcription factor AtTCP14 regulates embryonic growth potential during seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 53:42−52 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03308.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Pagnussat GC, Yu HJ, Ngo QA, Rajani S, Mayalagu S, et al. 2005. Genetic and molecular identification of genes required for female gametophyte development and function in Arabidopsis. Development 132:603−14 doi: 10.1242/dev.01595

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Wei B, Zhang J, Pang C, Yu H, Guo D, et al. 2015. The molecular mechanism of sporocyteless/nozzle in controlling Arabidopsis ovule development. Cell Research 25:121−34 doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.145

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Sarvepalli K, Nath U. 2011. Hyper-activation of the TCP4 transcription factor in Arabidopsis thaliana accelerates multiple aspects of plant maturation. The Plant Journal 67:595−607 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04616.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Koyama T, Furutani M, Tasaka M, Ohme-Takagi M. 2007. TCP transcription factors control the morphology of shoot lateral organs via negative regulation of the expression of boundary-specific genes in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 19:473−84 doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.044792

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Efroni I, Blum E, Goldshmidt A, Eshed Y. 2008. A protracted and dynamic maturation schedule underlies Arabidopsis leaf development. The Plant Cell 20:2293−306 doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.057521

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Koyama T, Mitsuda N, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Ohme-Takagi M. 2010. TCP transcription factors regulate the activities of ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and miR164, as well as the auxin response, during differentiation of leaves in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 22:3574−88 doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.075598

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Koyama T, Sato F, Ohme-Takagi M. 2010. A role of TCP1 in the longitudinal elongation of leaves in Arabidopsis. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 74:2145−7 doi: 10.1271/bbb.100442

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Zhou Y, Xu Z, Zhao K, Yang W, Cheng T, et al. 2016. Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization and Expression Analysis of the TCP Gene Family in Prunus mume. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1301 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01301

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Schommer C, Palatnik JF, Aggarwal P, Chételat A, Cubas P, et al. 2008. Control of jasmonate biosynthesis and senescence by miR319 targets. PLoS Biology 6:e230 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060230

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Danisman S, van der Wal F, Dhondt S, Waites R, de Folter S, et al. 2012. Arabidopsis class I and class II TCP transcription factors regulate jasmonic acid metabolism and leaf development antagonistically. Plant Physiology 159:1511−23 doi: 10.1104/pp.112.200303

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Giraud E, Ng S, Carrie C, Duncan O, Low J, et al. 2010. TCP transcription factors link the regulation of genes encoding mitochondrial proteins with the circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 22:3921−34 doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.074518

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Ma J, Liu F, Wang Q, Wang K, Jones DC, Zhang B. 2016. Comprehensive analysis of TCP transcription factors and their expression during cotton (Gossypium arboreum) fiber early development. Scientific Reports 6:21535 doi: 10.1038/srep21535

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Nag A, King S, Jack T. 2009. miR319a targeting of TCP4 is critical for petal growth and development in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:22534−39 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908718106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Chen D, Yan W, Fu L, Kaufmann K. 2018. Architecture of gene regulatory networks controlling flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Communications 9:4534 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06772-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Bresso EG, Chorostecki U, Rodriguez RE, Palatnik JF, Schommer C. 2018. Spatial Control of Gene Expression by miR319-Regulated TCP Transcription Factors in Leaf Development. Plant Physiology 176:1694−708 doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00823

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Yao X, Ma H, Wang J, Zhang D. 2007. Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis and Expression Pattern of TCP Gene Families in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 49:885−97 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00509.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Parapunova V, Busscher M, Busscher-Lange J, Lammers M, Karlova R, et al. 2014. Identification, cloning and characterization of the tomato TCP transcription factor family. BMC Plant Biology 14:157 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-157

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Huo Y, Xiong W, Su K, Li Y, Yang Y, et al. 2019. Genome-Wide Analysis of the TCP Gene Family in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). International Journal of Genomics 2019:8514928 doi: 10.1155/2019/8514928

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Feng K, Hao J, Liu J, Huang W, Wang G, et al. 2019. Genome-wide identification, classification, and expression analysis of TCP transcription factors in carrot. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 99:525−35 doi: 10.1139/cjps-2018-0232

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Duan A, Wang Y, Feng K, Liu J, Xu Z, et al. 2019. TCP family genes control leaf development and its responses to gibberellin in celery. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 41:153 doi: 10.1007/s11738-019-2945-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Reyes-Chin-Wo S, Wang Z, Yang X, Kozik A, Arikit S, et al. 2017. Genome assembly with in vitro proximity ligation data and whole-genome triplication in lettuce. Nature Communications 8:14953 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14953

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, et al. 2007. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449:463−67 doi: 10.1038/nature06148

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, et al. 2012. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Research 40:D290−D301 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1065

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. 2012. SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Research 40:D302−D305 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr931

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, et al. 2009. CDD: specific functional annotation with the Conserved Domain Database. Nucleic Acids Research 37:D205−D210 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn845

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Li KB. 2003. ClustalW-MPI: ClustalW analysis using distributed and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 19:1585−86 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg192

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35:1547−49 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Chen K, Durand D, Farach-Colton M. 2000. NOTUNG: a program for dating gene duplications and optimizing gene family trees. Journal of Computational Biology 7:429−47 doi: 10.1089/106652700750050871

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Song X, Ma X, Li C, Hu J, Yang Q, et al. 2018. Comprehensive analyses of the BES1 gene family in Brassica napus and examination of their evolutionary pattern in representative species. BMC Genomics 19:346 doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4744-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, et al. 2020. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Molecular Plant 13:1194−202 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Hu B, Jin J, Guo A, Zhang H, Luo J, Gao G. 2015. GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 31:1296−7 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu817

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, et al. 2009. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Research 37:W202−8 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. 2003. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Research 13:2178−89 doi: 10.1101/gr.1224503

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, et al. 2009. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Research 19:1639−45 doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Wang Y, Tang H, DeBarry JD, Tan X, Li J, et al. 2012. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Research 40:e49 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1293

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Wang D, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhu J, Yu J. 2010. KaKs_Calculator 2.0: a toolkit incorporating gamma-series methods and sliding window strategies. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 8:77−80 doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(10)60008-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:1586−91 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Kozomara A, Birgaoanu M, Griffiths-Jones S. 2019. miRBase: from microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Research 47:D155−D162 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1141

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Dai X, Zhuang Z, Zhao PX. 2018. psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server (2017 release). Nucleic Acids Research 46:W49−W54 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky316

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, et al. 2003. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research 13:2498−504 doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Palatnik JF, Allen E, Wu X, Schommer C, Schwab R, et al. 2003. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 425:257−63 doi: 10.1038/nature01958

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Koyama T, Sato F, Ohme-Takagi M. 2017. Roles of miR319 and TCP Transcription Factors in Leaf Development. Plant Physiology 175:874−85 doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00732

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Fang Y, Zheng Y, Lu W, Li J, Duan Y, et al. 2021. Roles of miR319-regulated TCPs in plant development and response to abiotic stress. The Crop Journal 9:17−28 doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2020.07.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Feng K, Hou X, Li M, Jiang Q, Xu Z, et al. 2018. CeleryDB: a genomic database for celery. Database 2018:bay070 doi: 10.1093/database/bay070

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Jia X, Li M, Jiang Q, Xu Z, Wang F, et al. 2015. High-throughput sequencing of small RNAs and anatomical characteristics associated with leaf development in celery. Scientific Reports 5:11093 doi: 10.1038/srep11093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Martín-Trillo M, Cubas P. 2010. TCP genes: a family snapshot ten years later. Trends in Plant Science 15:31−39 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Song X, Huang Z, Duan W, Ren J, Liu T, et al. 2014. Genome-wide analysis of the bHLH transcription factor family in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis). Molecular Genetics and Genomics 289:77−91 doi: 10.1007/s00438-013-0791-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] McCarthy EW, Mohamed A, Litt A. 2015. Functional Divergence of APETALA1 and FRUITFULL is due to Changes in both Regulation and Coding Sequence. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:1076 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01076

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Sandve SR, Rohlfs RV, Hvidsten TR. 2018. Subfunctionalization versus neofunctionalization after whole-genome duplication. Nature Genetics 50:908−9 doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0162-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Qiao X, Li Q, Yin H, Qi K, Li L, et al. 2019. Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization–diploidization cycles in plants. Genome Biology 20:38 doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1650-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Panchy N, Lehti-Shiu M, Shiu SH. 2016. Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants. Plant Physiology 171:2294−316 doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Li Z, Tiley GP, Galuska SR, Reardon CR, Kidder TI, et al. 2018. Multiple large-scale gene and genome duplications during the evolution of hexapods. PNAS 115:4713 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710791115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Assis R, Bachtrog D. 2013. Neofunctionalization of young duplicate genes in Drosophila. PNAS 110:17409−14 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313759110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Teshima KM, Innan H. 2008. Neofunctionalization of duplicated genes under the pressure of gene conversion. Genetics 178:1385−98 doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.082933

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan YL, et al. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531−45 doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Stoltzfus A. 1999. On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 49:169−81 doi: 10.1007/PL00006540

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] He X, Zhang J. 2005. Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics 169:1157−64 doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.037051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Danisman S, van Dijk ADJ, Bimbo A, van der Wal F, Hennig L, et al. 2013. Analysis of functional redundancies within the Arabidopsis TCP transcription factor family. Journal of Experimental Botany 64:5673−85 doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert337

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Song X, Wang J, Sun P, Ma X, Yang Q, et al. 2020. Preferential gene retention increases the robustness of cold regulation in Brassicaceae and other plants after polyploidization. Horticulture Research 7:20 doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0253-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Song X, Wang J, Ma X, Li Y, Lei T, et al. 2016. Origination, Expansion, Evolutionary Trajectory, and Expression Bias of AP2/ERF Superfamily in Brassica napus. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1186 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01186

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Duan W, Huang Z, Song X, Liu T, Liu H, et al. 2016. Comprehensive analysis of the polygalacturonase and pectin methylesterase genes in Brassica rapa shed light on their different evolutionary patterns. Scientific Reports 6:25107 doi: 10.1038/srep25107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Huang Z, Duan W, Song X, Tang J, Wu P, et al. 2016. Retention, molecular evolution, and expression divergence of the Auxin/Indole Acetic Acid and Auxin Response Factor gene families in Brassica rapa shed light on their evolution patterns in plants. Genome Biology and Evolution 8:302−16 doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv259

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Zheng L, Zhou X, Guo M. 2018. Genome-wide identification and characterization of TCP family genes associated with flower and fruit development in fragaria vesca. Pakistan Journal of Botany 51:513−19 doi: 10.30848/PJB2019-2(16)

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Lin J, Zhu M, Cai M, Zhang W, Fatima M, et al. 2019. Identification and Expression Analysis of TCP Genes in Saccharum spontaneum L. Tropical Plant Biology 12:206−18 doi: 10.1007/s12042-019-09238-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Pei Q, Li N, Bai Y, Wu T, Yang Q, et al. 2021. Comparative analysis of the TCP gene family in celery, coriander and carrot (family Apiaceae). Vegetable Research 1: 5 doi: 10.48130/VR-2021-0005
    Pei Q, Li N, Bai Y, Wu T, Yang Q, et al. 2021. Comparative analysis of the TCP gene family in celery, coriander and carrot (family Apiaceae). Vegetable Research 1: 5 doi: 10.48130/VR-2021-0005

Figures(9)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(4682) PDF downloads(918)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Comparative analysis of the TCP gene family in celery, coriander and carrot (family Apiaceae)

Vegetable Research  1 Article number: 5  (2021)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Apiaceae is one of the most important families in Apiales and includes many economically important vegetables and medicinal plants. The TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR 1/2 (TCP) gene family plays an important role in regulating plant growth and development, but it has not been widely studied in Apiaceae. In the present study, we identified 215 TCP family genes in six species of plant, of which 122 genes were present in three Apiaceae including 29 in celery (Apium graveolens), 43 in coriander (Coriandrum sativum), and 50 in carrot (Daucus carota). Whole-genome duplication likely contributed to TCP gene family expansion in Apiaceae. There were more paralogs in carrot than in coriander and celery, which was attributable to the greater number of tandem and proximal duplicated genes on chromosome 1. Nine microRNAs were found to regulate 20 TCP genes in the three Apiaceae species, with miR-319 having the most target genes. Several TCP genes showed high expression in the root, petiole and leaf of celery and coriander. These results provide a basis for comparative and functional genomic analyses of TCP genes in Apiaceae and other plants.

    • The Apiaceae family of plants includes more than 400 genera and 3,000 species[1,2]. Several Apiaceae species such as carrot (Daucus carota), celery (Apium graveolens), and coriander (Coriandrum sativum) are cultivated as a vegetable or for medicinal purposes worldwide[3,4].

      Celery is an annual or biennial herbage species originating from the Mediterranean and Middle East[5,6]. Besides being a vegetable, celery is also used as a medicinal plant[7]. Coriander, which is also known as cilantro, is a popular herb and a major ingredient of curry powder[8]. Carrot is an economically important vegetable with a high nutritional value[9]. All three of these plants are diploid species although their chromosome number and genome size differ: celery and coriander each have 22 chromosomes (2n = 2x = 22) whereas carrot has 18 (2n = 2x = 18)[3,10,11], and the assembled genome size of celery is 3.33 Gb, which is larger than coriander (2.11 Gb) and carrot (421.5 Mb)[3,11,12].

      The TCP gene family in plants is named after the first identified members—ie, TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1 (TB1) in maize (Zea mays)[13], CYCLOIDEA (CYC) in snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus)[14], and PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR 1 (PCF1) and PCF2 in rice (Oryza sativa)[15]. TCP genes regulate multiple processes in plant growth and development such as shoot branching[16], seed germination[17,18], gametophyte development[19,20], leaf development[2125], leaf senescence[2628], mitochondrial biogenesis[29], flower development[3032] and cell cycle[29,33]. There are 24 TCP genes in Arabidopsis thaliana[34], 22 in rice[34], 24 in tomato[35], 19 in plum[26], 42 in switchgrass[36], 36 in carrot[37], and 32 in celery[38]. However, to date, no TCP genes have been identified in coriander. High-quality genome sequences of celery, carrot and coriander were recently released[3,11,12], which can facilitate comparative analyses of specific genes in Apiaceae.

      In this study, we identified and characterized TCP genes in celery, coriander and carrot and performed comparisons with genes in Lactuca sativa (lettuce), Vitis vinifera (grape), and Arabidopsis. We mapped the TCP genes to chromosomes, identified orthologs and paralogs, detected collinearity and gene expansion or loss, and analyzed their expression patterns in plant tissues. Our results provide a basis for comparative studies on the function and evolution of TCP genes in plants.

    • The genome sequences of coriander and celery were downloaded from the coriander genome database (http://cgdb.bio2db.com) and celery genome database (http://celerydb.bio2db.com), respectively[3,10]. The Arabidopsis genome sequence was retrieved from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR10; http://www.arabidopsis.org). The sequences of carrot (version 2), lettuce (version 5), and grape (Genoscope.12X) were downloaded from Phytozome (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html)[11,39,40]. The Pfam database (https://pfam.sanger.ac.uk) was used to identify TCP family genes with the identifier PF03634 (E value < 1e−4)[41]. The Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART v9.0) database and Conserved Domains Database (CDD) were used for domain validation[42,43].

    • To analyze the evolutionary relationships of TCP genes in Apiaceae, multiple sequence alignment of the TCP amino acid sequences of Arabidopsis, grape, lettuce, carrot, coriander and celery was performed with ClustalW software (v2.0)[44] and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with the neighborhood-joining method (bootstrap = 1,000) using MEGA X[45]. The reconstructed TCP gene tree was compared to the actual species tree using Notung v2.9 software with default parameters[46,47].

    • The location of coriander, celery and carrot TCP genes on chromosomes was drawn using Tbtools software and the files were saved in general feature format (gff)[48]. Gene structure was determined using Gene Structure Display Server 2.0 (https://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn)[49]. Conserved motifs were analyzed using Multiple Expectation maximizations for Motif Elicitation suite 5.2.0 (http://meme-suite.org)[50].

    • Orthologous and paralogous TCP gene pairs in celery, coriander and carrot were analyzed using OrthoMCL software v2.0 (https://orthomcl.org/orthomcl)[51]. The relationships of the genes among the three species was depicted using Circos software (v0.69)[52].

    • MCScanX was used to identify collinear blocks and duplication types of the TCP genes[53]. Whole-genome sequences were searched against themselves using BLASTp (E value < 1e−5). We extracted TCP genes located in the collinear blocks using Perl scripts. The duplication type of TCP genes was estimated using the subprogram duplicate_gene_classifier.

    • The nonsynonymous rate (Ka), synonymous rate (Ks), their ratio (Ka/Ks) and divergence time among orthologous gene pairs of the three species were calculated using KaKs_Calculator 2.0[54]. The coding sequence of orthologous gene pairs were aligned using ClustalW (v2.0)[44]; AXTconvertor software (v1.0) was then used to convert the alignment file to axt format. Lastly, the Ka value, Ks value and their ratio were calculated based on the Nei–Gojobori method[54]. Ks was used to estimate the divergence time based on the formula T = Ks/2r, where r indicates neutral substitutions (5.2 × 10−9 for Apiaceae)[12].

    • We used the maximum likelihood method and codon substitution models to determine the likelihood ratio of positive selection. We analyzed each branch of the phylogenetic tree to infer ω (the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous distances) using CodeML implemented in PAML4.9[47,55]. We adopted a complete deletion method for analyzing alignments with gaps and eliminated sequences with gaps in over 40% of their length. The likelihood ratio test between M0 and M1 and between M7 and M8 models were used to determine variation sites.

    • Mature miRNA sequences of A. thaliana were downloaded from miRBase (release 22.1; http://www.mirbase.org)[56]. TCP genes that are miRNA targets were predicted using psRNATarget Schema v2 (2017 release)[57] with maximum expectation ≤ 3 and other default parameters. A miRNA–TCP gene network was constructed using Cytoscape v3.7.2 software[58].

    • TCP gene expression data in celery and coriander were extracted from RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) datasets previously published by our group[3,10] using Perl script; the values were normalized as reads per kilobase per million reads (RKPM). An expression heatmap was created using TBtools software (v1.0)[48].

    • We identified 29 TCP genes in the genome of celery, 43 in coriander, and 50 in carrot (Supplemental Table S1 and S2). Additionally, 24 TCP genes were identified in Arabidopsis along with 20 in grape and 49 in lettuce (Supplemental Table S2). Thus, a total of 215 TCP genes were identified in the six species for further analysis.

    • To classify the TCP gene family in plants, we constructed a phylogenetic tree of all 215 amino acid sequences from the six abovementioned species using MEGA X (Fig. 1). Consistent with the phylogenetic relationships described in Arabidopsis and grape, the phylogenetic tree had three groups according to the type of TCP protein domain including the PCF, CINCINNATA (CIN), and CYC/TB1 classes.

      Figure 1.  Phylogenetic tree of TCP family genes in three Apiaceae species (carrot, celery and coriander) and lettuce, grape and Arabidopsis. The topology of the phylogenetic tree was determined using IQ-TREE with maximum likelihood (ML) based on the JTT+F+R8 model. The bootstrap was set to 1,000 replicates, and values > 40% are shown. The three classes were identified based on bootstrap values and phylogenetic topology.

      In class PCF, there were ten AgTCP, 26 CsTCP, and 36 DcTCP genes; in class CYC/TB1, there were eight AgTCP, seven CsTCP, and seven DcTCP genes; and in class CIN, there were 11 AgTCP, ten CsTCP and seven DcTCP genes (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Table S2). Notably, in coriander and carrot there were more TCP genes in class PCF than in the other two classes.

      The functions of most TCP family genes have been well studied in the model plant Arabidopsis. We inferred the function of homologous genes within the same taxonomic group in the phylogenetic tree in order to clarify the function of TCP genes in Apiaceae. For example, AT1G53230.1 (AtTCP3) is known to suppress the expression of CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON (CUC), resulting in cotyledon fusion[24]. We identified three TCP genes—namely, DcTCP34, AgTCP2, and CsTCP6—that clustered together with AtTCP3 (Fig. 1), suggesting that they are also related to cotyledon fusion. It may also be possible to deduce the function of other Apiaceae TCP genes based on the function of the homologous genes in Arabidopsis.

    • We carried out a gene structure analysis of TCP family genes to identify exons, introns and untranslated regions (Supplemental Fig. S1). Of the 122 TCP genes in Apiaceae, 94—including all 50 DcTCP genes—lacked introns. Most TCP genes had a single exon, although there were some exceptions. For example, CsTCP15 (class CIN) had four exons and DcTCP11 (class PCF) had three. In general, genes in the same class or subclass had similar gene structure and size.

      As gene structure varied among genes, we performed a motif analysis to examine the structure in greater detail. We compared five motifs in Apiaceae species and found that motif 3 was found at the beginning of most genes, followed by motif 1 and motif 2 (Fig. 2). However, motif 2 was located at the start of the CsTCP7, DcTCP15, CsTCP23, CsTCP36, and CsTCP2 and motif 5 was present at the beginning of DcTCP11. Almost all TCP genes had motif 1 except for DcTCP and CsTCP in class PCF, indicating that this motif is highly conserved and plays an important role in Apiaceae. Motif 3 was also present in most TCP genes and is likely conserved in Apiaceae.

      Figure 2.  Conversed motifs in TCP family genes of three Apiaceae species.

      Most genes in classes CYC/TB1 and CIN lacked motif 2 except for DcTCP17 and CsTCP79. Only five genes in class CIN had motif 4, which was present in all class CYC/TB1 genes. Motif 5 was only found in class PCF and not in other classes. Interestingly, DcTCP14 (class PCF) did not have any of the 5 motifs, suggesting that they were lost during the course of the evolution of carrot. Thus, genes in the same class had similar motif composition, indicating that they are functionally similar.

    • In celery, 27/29 TCP genes mapped to nine chromosomes (Fig. 3a and Supplemental Table S1). Two celery TCP genes did not map to any chromosomes, and no TCP family gene was found on chromosomes Agr6 and Agr10. There were five genes that mapped to chromosomes Agr3, Agr5, and Agr11 while only one was located on chromosomes Agr1 and Agr2.

      Figure 3.  Distribution of TCP transcription factors on each chromosome in three Apiaceae species. (a) Celery, (b) Coriander, (c) Carrot.

      In coriander, 35/43 TCP genes mapped to nine chromosomes (Fig. 3b and Supplemental Table S1); none were found on chromosome Csa8. Chromosome Csa9 had the most TCP genes (10), followed by chromosomes Csa7 (6) and Csa1 (5). Chromosomes Csa2 and Csa3 each had just one TCP gene.

      The 50 carrot TCP genes were unevenly distributed across nine chromosomes (Dca1–9) (Fig. 3c and Supplemental Table S1). Interestingly, TCP gene expansion was observed on chromosome 1, which had 16 genes. Additionally, 15 genes (DcTCP1–15) were clustered together, mainly through tandem and proximal duplication.

    • We examined orthologous and paralogous gene pairs in Apiaceae and found that there were 22 orthologous gene pairs between any two of celery, coriander and carrot (Fig. 4 and Supplemental Table S3), indicating a close phylogenetic relationship between these species. There were only three paralogous gene pairs in celery and coriander (Supplemental Fig. S2 and Supplemental Table S4) but 29 were found in carrot.

      Figure 4.  Circle plot of orthologous TCP gene pairs among three Apiaceae species.

      The Ks value was calculated to estimate the divergence time of orthologous TCP gene pairs among celery, coriander and carrot (Fig. 5 and Supplemental Table S5). The divergence time ranged from 14.03 to 116.15 million years between celery and coriander TCP genes, 24.94 to 81.44 million years between celery and carrot, and 22.59 to 94.72 million years between coriander and carrot orthologous TCP gene pairs. Therefore, the divergence time of most TCP genes was earlier than that of any two species (celery vs coriander, 11–13 Mya; carrot vs celery or coriander, 20–23 Mya)[4].

      Figure 5.  Ks and divergence time of TCP orthologs. Ks values (a) and divergence time estimation (b) of orthologous gene pairs between any two of three Apiaceae species.

    • Various types of gene duplication can lead to the expansion of a gene family. We examined five types of gene duplication in celery, coriander and carrot (Fig. 6a, Table 1 and Supplemental Table S6)—namely, singleton, dispersed, proximal, tandem and whole-genome duplication (WGD). There were no singleton TCP gene in the three species of Apiaceae (Table 1). Dispersed and tandem duplications were the predominant types in celery and coriander. In celery, the percentage of genes showing dispersed duplication and WGD was 48.1% and 40.7%, respectively; in coriander, the percentages were 40.0% and 45.7%, respectively. WGD was also the predominant type in carrot (32.0%), which had a lower percentage of dispersed duplication (24.0%) than celery and coriander. Moreover, the percentage of the tandem type was higher in carrot (30.0%) than in celery (11.1%) and coriander (11.4%). These results demonstrate that WGD played an important role in TCP gene expansion in celery, coriander and carrot, which is supported by the previous suggestion that they underwent two WGD events since their divergence from lettuce[3].

      Figure 6.  Duplication and loss of TCP family genes. (a) Percentage of duplication types for TCP family genes and genes in the whole genome of three Apiaceae species. (b) Duplication (+) or loss (−) of TCP family genes in three Apiaceae species and three other representative species. Numbers after '+' and '−' are the number of genes. Agr, Apium graveolens (celery); Ath, Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis); Csa, Coriandrum sativum (coriander); Dca, Daucus carota (carrot); Lsa, Lactuca sativa (lettuce); Vvi, Vitis vinifera (grape).

      Table 1.  The identification of duplicated type for TCP family genes and all genes in A. graveolens, C. sativum and D. carota.

      Duplication typea Categoryb A. graveolens C. sativum D. carota
      Singleton All genes 3,028 3,577 3,543
      TCP 0 0 0
      Percentage (%) 0 0 0
      Dispersed All genes 15,258 14,963 13,378
      TCP 13 14 12
      Percentage (%) 48.15 40 24
      Proximal All genes 1,167 2,161 1,428
      TCP 0 1 7
      Percentage (%) 0 2.86 14
      Tandem All genes 2,426 3,032 3,501
      TCP 3 4 15
      Percentage (%) 11.11 11.43 30
      WGD/segmental All genes 7,787 10,200 8,974
      TCP 11 16 16
      Percentage (%) 40.74 45.71 32
      Total All genes 29,666 33,933 30,824
      TCP 27 35 50
      Note: a the classification of duplicate genes was conducted using the MCScanX program. WGD/segmental duplicates were inferred by the anchor genes in collinear blocks. Tandem duplicates were defined as paralogs that were adjacent to each other on chromosomes. Proximal duplicates were paralogs near each other, while interrupted by several other genes. Dispersed duplicates were paralogs that were neither near each other on chromosomes, nor do they showed conserved synteny. b TCP indicated the TCP family genes. Percentage (%) indicated the percentage of TCP family gene number among all genes.
    • We compared species and gene trees in celery, coriander and carrot to identify gene losses and duplications during the evolution of the TCP gene family. There were more gene losses in celery (20) than in coriander (7) and carrot (17) but more gene duplications in carrot (18) than in coriander (4) and celery (3). In the common ancestor of coriander, celery and carrot, there were 20 gene duplications and 14 gene losses (Fig. 6b).

    • We analyzed natural selection in the evolution of TCP genes in Apiaceae (Fig. 7). Strong positive selection was observed at the major nodes of the phylogenetic tree, which may have contributed to the functional divergence of Apiaceae species. We detected 35 positive selection sites overall; most were in class PCF (29), followed by class CYC/TB1 (5) and class CIN (1), indicating that TCP genes in class PCF underwent greater positive selection in the evolution of Apiaceae.

      Figure 7.  Positive selection of TCP family genes in celery, coriander and carrot. Red stars represent branches in which positive selection occurred. The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was constructed using PhyML software.

    • We next sought to identify TCP family genes in Apiaceae that are regulated by miRNAs. We found nine miRNAs that regulated 20 TCP family genes including five genes in celery, nine in coriander and six in carrot (Supplemental Table S7 and Fig. 8). Of the nine miRNAs, miR-319 had the most target genes (11), followed by miR-172 (3) and miR-181 (3) (Fig. 8). Specifically, miR-319 regulated four TCP family genes in celery, four in coriander, and three in carrot. Our results are supported by other studies demonstrating that miR-319 regulates TCP family genes[31,5961]. We also found that four genes were regulated by more than one miRNA: DcTCP20 was regulated by miR-319 and miR-837, CsTCP33 was regulated by miR-319 and miR-8181, and AgTCP26 and AgTCP27 were regulated by miR-319 and miR-8181 (Supplemental Table S7 and Fig. 8).

      Figure 8.  Interaction network of miRNAs and target TCP family genes in carrot, celery and coriander.

    • We analyzed the expression patterns of TCP genes in root, petiole and leaf tissues of celery and coriander. In celery, all TCP family genes in class CYC/TB1 had relatively low expression in the three tissues (Fig. 9a and Supplemental Table S8) whereas AgTCP22 had the highest expression level (RPKM > 60), suggesting a key role in celery growth and development. In coriander and celery, all TCP family genes in class CYC/TB1 were expressed at a relatively low level in the three tissues (Fig. 9b and Supplemental Table S8); meanwhile, several genes including CsTCP39, CsTCP14, CsTCP12, CsTCP31, and CsTCP40 had high expression. CsTCP6 and CsTCP30 were more highly expressed in leaf than in the other two tissues.

      Figure 9.  Expression of TCP family genes in three replicates of plant tissues including root (R1, R2 and R3), petiole (P1, P2 and P3), and leaf (L1, L2 and L3). Hierarchical gene expression clustering of TCP genes in celery (a) and coriander (b). Expression levels were calculated based on RPKM.

    • Celery, coriander and carrot are typical members of the Apiaceae family. The draft genomes of these three species were recently released[3,11,12] and there have been several studies on TCP family genes in carrot and celery based on the sequences[37,38,62,63]. The latest versions of the celery, coriander and carrot genomes are of high quality with chromosomal-level assembly, allowing us to accurately and comprehensively analyze the TCP gene family in Apiaceae. To date there have been no reports on TCP genes in coriander. In this study, we identified 43 TCP genes in coriander as well as 29 in celery and 50 in carrot. Our results provide a resource for future studies on the TCP gene family in Apiaceae or related species.

      TCP transcription factors have a 59-amino acid basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) motif that is involved in DNA binding and protein–protein interaction[64]. The bHLH-like domain of TCP differs from the canonical bHLH in its basic region[34,65]. PCF1 and PCF2 interact with DNA-binding proteins that specifically bind to the PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN (PCNA) promoter[15]. Our analyses of gene structure and motifs of TCP genes in Apiaceae revealed similarities within the same class or subclass.

      Gene duplication is the main mechanism underlying the evolution of complex phenotypes[66]. Many duplicated genes in plants were produced by WGD or whole-genome triplication[6770]. Most duplicated genes were functionally redundant and had one of four fates during the course of evolution namely: conservation, neofunctionalization, subfunctionalization and specialization[67,71]. In conservation, the ancestral function was maintained in both copies, thus preserving gene dosage[71]. In neofunctionalization, one copy retained the original function while the other acquired a novel function[71,72]. In subfunctionalization, both copies were required to preserve the ancestral gene function[71,73,74]. In specialization, subfunctionalization and neofunctionalization acted cooperatively, producing two gene copies that were functionally distinct from each other and from the ancestral gene[71,75]. Functional redundancies of TCP genes have been reported in Arabidopsis[76]. In carrot, 15 TCP genes were clustered on chromosome 1, and the number of paralogous gene pairs was greater in carrot (29) than in celery (3) and coriander (3). Although there were more gene losses than duplications in the evolution of celery, coriander and carrot, we found that WGD made a major contribution to TCP gene family expansion in Apiaceae, which is similar to what has been reported in most other gene families in higher plants[47,7780].

      The broad range of functions of TCP family genes in plants can be attributed to the diverse structures of different members. Most TCP genes are highly expressed in meristematic tissues, suggesting that their main function is to promote plant proliferation and growth[81]. However, some TCP genes, such as CIN and CYC/TB1, are known to negatively regulate plant proliferation and development[82] (lateral organ development for CIN genes and flower and lateral shoot development for CYC/TB1 genes)[26]. Our gene expression analysis showed that TCP gene expression in celery (AgTCP22) and coriander (CsTCP12) was nearly 2x higher in root and petiole than in leaf, suggesting roles in plant growth and development.

      In conclusion, we identified and characterized TCP genes in three Apiaceae species. We described their chromosomal location, exon–intron structure, motifs, collinearity, positive selection and expression patterns in plant tissues. These results provide a basis for investigations on the molecular networks regulating growth and development in Apiaceae and other plants.

      • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31801856), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M673188), Hebei Province Higher Education Youth Talents Program (BJ2018016), and Key Science Research and Development Program of Tangshan (19150206E).
      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
      • Supplemental Table S1 The TCP gene family members and their abbreviation name in celery, coriander, carrot, lettuce, grape, and Arabidopsis.
      • Supplemental Table S2 The summary of TCP gene family members in  A.  graveolens , C. sativum, D. carota and compared with  A. thaliana .
      • Supplemental Table S3 The list of orthologous TCP gene pairs between A. graveolens,  C. sativum, and  D. carota.
      • Supplemental Table S4 The list of paralogous TCP gene pairs in each of other examined species.
      • Supplemental Table S5 Ka/Ks calculation and divergent time of the orthologous  gene pairs between A. graveolens, C. sativum, and  D. carota.
      • Supplemental Table S6 The duplicated type of TCP genes in A. graveolens,C. sativum and D. carota. The 0 to 4 indicate the singleton, dispersed, proximal, tandem, WGD duplication type, respectively.
      • Supplemental Table S7 The prediction of target TCP family genes of miRNA in carrot, coriander, and celery.
      • Supplemental Table S8 The expression level of the TCP genes in root, leaf and petiole for A. graveolens and C. savitum.  The gene expression was determined by the RNA-Seq data (RPKM).
      • Supplemental Fig. S1 The gene structure of TCP gene family in three Apiaceae species.
      • Supplemental Fig. S2 The circle plot of paralogous TCP gene pairs among three Apiaceae species.
      • Copyright: © 2021 by the author(s). Exclusive Licensee Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (9)  Table (1) References (82)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Pei Q, Li N, Bai Y, Wu T, Yang Q, et al. 2021. Comparative analysis of the TCP gene family in celery, coriander and carrot (family Apiaceae). Vegetable Research 1: 5 doi: 10.48130/VR-2021-0005
    Pei Q, Li N, Bai Y, Wu T, Yang Q, et al. 2021. Comparative analysis of the TCP gene family in celery, coriander and carrot (family Apiaceae). Vegetable Research 1: 5 doi: 10.48130/VR-2021-0005

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return