Search
2025 Volume 5
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Development of an endogenous promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in Fraxinus mandshurica

More Information
  • Received: 24 April 2025
    Revised: 14 July 2025
    Accepted: 17 July 2025
    Published online: 04 August 2025
    Forestry Research  5 Article number: e016 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing has revolutionized tree improvement by enabling precise trait modification, accelerating breeding cycles, and enhancing forestry sustainability. Fraxinus mandshurica, valued for its desirable traits and adaptability, serves as a strategic focus for the National Reserve Forest Project (NRFP) and forestry germplasm resource breeding and quality improvement in China. Developing a species-specific genome editing system is crucial for valuable yet recalcitrant species like F. mandshurica. In this study, the development of a species-specific CRISPR/Cas9 platform is presented for F. mandshurica, which incorporates endogenous promoter engineering, sgRNA optimization, light quality modulation, and temperature control protocols to enhance genome editing efficiency. Truncated endogenous FmU6 promoter variants (FmU6-6-4 and FmU6-7-4) drove sgRNA expression at levels 3.36 and 3.11 times higher than that of the AtU6-26 promoter. The expression of Cas9 was controlled by the endogenous constitutive FmECP3 promoter, exhibiting an activity 5.48 times greater than the positive control. A highly active sgRNA4 targeting FmPDS1/2 was identified, demonstrating a cleavage efficiency of 36.10%. Heat treatment at 37 °C effectively increased the Cas9 cleavage efficiency to 7.77 times that observed at 22 °C. Chimeric albino mutants with an editing efficiency of 18.2% were obtained through transient and stable transformations, combined with light quality optimization and heat treatment during different regeneration stages. The mutation types included nucleotide insertions, deletions, and substitutions, leading to early termination codons and truncated FmPDS1/2 protein. Additionally, mutations in FmPDS1/2 resulted in albino phenotypes and a reduction in chlorophyll content to 46.44%−58.88%. This optimized system provides a robust platform for functional genomics studies and trait improvement in F. mandshurica, with potential applications in forestry biotechnology.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 Primer sequences for cloning.
    Supplementary Table S2 Primer sequences for vector construction.
    Supplementary Table S3 Primer sequences for qRT-PCR.
    Supplementary Table S4 Primer sequences for gRNA efficiency detection.
    Supplementary Table S5 Primer sequences for mutation detection.
    Supplementary Table S6 Summary of the edited genes and phenotypes of the sequenced transgenic plants.
    Supplementary Table S7 Summary of off-target site sequencing results for mutations (#1 and #3).
    Supplementary Fig. S1 Multiple alignments of F. mandshurica, Arabidopsis and soybean U6 gene and promoter sequences.
    Supplementary Fig. S2 Genomic sequences of FmPDS1 and FmPDS2.
    Supplementary Fig. S3 Multiple alignments of PDS protein from different species.
    Supplementary Fig. S4 Temperature effect on endogenous promoter activity.
    Supplementary Fig. S5 The influence of light quality combinations on tissue culture in F. mandshurica.
  • [1] Li Y, Ma J, Pan R, Wang T. 2024. Hydrogen production from Fraxinus mandshurica solid wood waste using FeCl3 as a non-precious metal Lewis acid catalyst: a comprehensive utilization approach. Renewable Energy 230:120810 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120810

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Liu XY, Timar MC, Varodi AM. 2019. A comparative study on the artificial UV and natural ageing of beeswax and Chinese wax and influence of wax finishing on the ageing of Chinese Ash (Fraxinus mandshurica) wood surfaces. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 201:111607 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111607

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] FAO. 2024. The State of the World's Forests 2024 – Forest-sector innovations towards a more sustainable future. FAO Rome, Italy
    [4] Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Phillips OL, Houghton RA, Fang J, et al. 2024. The enduring world forest carbon sink. Nature 631:563−69 doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07602-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Sterck L, Rombauts S, Jansson S, Sterky F, Rouzé P, et al. 2005. EST data suggest that poplar is an ancient polyploid. New Phytologist 167:165−70 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01378.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Li JF, Norville JE, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, et al. 2013. Multiplex and homologous recombination–mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nature Biotechnology 31:688−91 doi: 10.1038/nbt.2654

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Miao J, Guo D, Zhang J, Huang Q, Qin G, et al. 2013. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Research 23:1233−36 doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Gao C. 2014. Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nature Protocols 9:2395−410 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.157

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Svitashev S, Schwartz C, Lenderts B, Young JK, Mark Cigan A. 2016. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nature Communications 7:13274 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13274

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Chaudhuri A, Halder K, Datta A. 2022. Classification of CRISPR/Cas system and its application in tomato breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 135:367−87 doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03984-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Livneh Y, Leor-Librach E, Agmon D, Makov-Bouaniche T, Tiwari V, et al. 2025. Combined enhancement of ascorbic acid, β-carotene and zeaxanthin in gene-edited lettuce. Plant Biotechnology Journal 23:1954−67 doi: 10.1111/pbi.70018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Prasad K, Gadeela H, Bommineni PR, Reddy PS, Tyagi W, et al. 2024. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of phytoene desaturase in pigeonpea and groundnut. Functional & Integrative Genomics 24:57 doi: 10.1007/s10142-024-01336-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Su J, Jiang J, Zhang F, Liu Y, Ding L, et al. 2019. Current achievements and future prospects in the genetic breeding of chrysanthemum: a review. Horticulture Research 6:109 doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0193-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Xu S, Li F, Zhou F, Li J, Cai S, et al. 2024. Efficient targeted mutagenesis in tetraploid Pogostemon cablin by the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genomic editing system. Horticulture Research 11:uhae021 doi: 10.1093/hr/uhae021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Thapliyal G, Bhandari MS, Vemanna RS, Pandey S, Meena RK, et al. 2023. Engineering traits through CRISPR/cas genome editing in woody species to improve forest diversity and yield. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 43:884−903 doi: 10.1080/07388551.2022.2092714

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Sulis DB, Jiang X, Yang C, Marques BM, Matthews ML, et al. 2023. Multiplex CRISPR editing of wood for sustainable fiber production. Science 381:216−21 doi: 10.1126/science.add4514

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Liu Y, Li G, Mao Y, Gao Y, Zhao M, et al. 2024. Genome-edited trees for high-performance engineered wood. Matter 7:3658−71 doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2024.07.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Yu J, Zhou C, Li D, Li S, Lin YCJ, et al. 2022. A PtrLBD39-mediated transcriptional network regulates tension wood formation in Populus trichocarpa. Plant communications 3:100250 doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100250

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Nayeri S, Baghban Kohnehrouz B, Ahmadikhah A, Mahna N. 2022. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated P-CR domain-specific engineering of CESA4 heterodimerization capacity alters cell wall architecture and improves saccharification efficiency in poplar. Plant Biotechnology Journal 20:1197−212 doi: 10.1111/pbi.13803

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. 2014. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157:1262−78 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Friedland AE, Tzur YB, Esvelt KM, Colaiácovo MP, Church GM, et al. 2013. Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nature Methods 10:741−43 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2532

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Lowder LG, Zhang D, Baltes NJ, Paul JW III, Tang X, et al. 2015. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiology 169:971−85 doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00636

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Mao Y, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhang B, Gou F, et al. 2013. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Molecular Plant 6:2008−11 doi: 10.1093/mp/sst121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Svitashev S, Young JK, Schwartz C, Gao H, Falco SC, et al. 2015. Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA. Plant Physiology 169:931−45 doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00793

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Cheng D, Liu Y, Wang Y, Cao L, Wu S, et al. 2024. Establishment of high-efficiency genome editing in white birch (Betula platyphylla Suk.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 22:7−9 doi: 10.1111/pbi.14176

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Di YH, Sun XJ, Hu Z, Jiang QY, Song GH, et al. 2019. Enhancing the CRISPR/Cas9 system based on multiple GmU6 promoters in soybean. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 519:819−23 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Long L, Guo DD, Gao W, Yang WW, Hou LP, et al. 2018. Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in cotton by improved sgRNA expression. Plant Methods 14:85 doi: 10.1186/s13007-018-0353-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Ren C, Liu Y, Guo Y, Duan W, Fan P, et al. 2021. Optimizing the CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in grape by using grape promoters. Horticulture Research 8:52 doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00489-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Senthil K, Rathinam M, Parashar M, Dokka N, Tyagi S, et al. 2025. Establishing a CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing framework in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) by targeting phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene disruption. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 23:100465 doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2025.100465

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Zhang S, Wu S, Hu C, Yang Q, Dong T, et al. 2022. Increased mutation efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in banana by optimized construct. PeerJ 10:e12664 doi: 10.7717/peerj.12664

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K, et al. 2013. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nature Biotechnology 31:686−88 doi: 10.1038/nbt.2650

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Xia X, Li S, Wang N, Cheng P, Zhu B, et al. 2025. Convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in autotetraploid alfalfa using endogenous U6 promoters and visual reporters. aBIOTECH 6:81−90 doi: 10.1007/s42994-025-00200-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Wang ZP, Xing HL, Dong L, Zhang HY, Han CY, et al. 2015. Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation. Genome Biology 16:144 doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0715-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Yan L, Wei S, Wu Y, Hu R, Li H, et al. 2015. High-efficiency genome editing in Arabidopsis using YAO promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 system. Molecular Plant 8:1820−23 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.10.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Feng C, Su H, Bai H, Wang R, Liu Y, et al. 2018. High-efficiency genome editing using a dmc1 promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 system in maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16:1848−57 doi: 10.1111/pbi.12920

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Hashimoto R, Ueta R, Abe C, Osakabe Y, Osakabe K. 2018. Efficient multiplex genome editing induces precise, and self-ligated type mutations in tomato plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:916 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00916

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Zhang F, LeBlanc C, Irish VF, Jacob Y. 2017. Rapid and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in Citrus using the YAO promoter. Plant Cell Reports 36:1883−87 doi: 10.1007/s00299-017-2202-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Qin G, Gu H, Ma L, Peng Y, Deng XW, et al. 2007. Disruption of phytoene desaturase gene results in albino and dwarf phenotypes in Arabidopsis by impairing chlorophyll, carotenoid, and gibberellin biosynthesis. Cell Research 17:471−82 doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.40

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Feng Y, Sun Y, Zhang H, Guo X, Feng Y, et al. 2025. Increased genome editing efficiency in poplar by optimizing sgRNA length and copy number. Industrial Crops and Products 226:120664 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120664

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Ma M, Zhang C, Yu L, Yang J, Li C. 2024. CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein mediated DNA-free genome editing in larch. Forestry Research 4:e036 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Wu L, Yang J, Gu Y, Wang Q, Zhang Z, et al. 2025. Bamboo mosaic virus-mediated transgene-free genome editing in bamboo. New Phytologist 245:1810−16 doi: 10.1111/nph.20386

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Wang Z, He Z, Qu M, Liu Z, Wang C, et al. 2021. A method for determining the cutting efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas system in birch and poplar. Forestry Research 1:16 doi: 10.48130/FR-2021-0016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Qi F, Tang M, Wang W, Liu L, Cao Y, et al. 2022. In vitro adventitious shoot regeneration system for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. Trees 36:1387−99 doi: 10.1007/s00468-022-02302-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Liang N, Zhan Y, Yu L, Wang Z, Zeng F. 2019. Characteristics and expression analysis of FmTCP15 under abiotic stresses and hormones and interact with DELLA protein in Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. Forests 10:343 doi: 10.3390/f10040343

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Lu H, Zhang H, Wang P, Chen M, Liang R, et al. 2025. Development of a xylem protoplast expression system for gene function analysis and genome editing in Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. Industrial Crops and Products 225:120446 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.120446

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, et al. 2015. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Molecular Plant 8:1274−84 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Xing JX, Luo AJ, Wang XH, Ding Q, Yang L, et al. 2025. Identification of U6 promoter and establishment of gene-editing system in Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carr. Plants 14:45 doi: 10.3390/plants14010045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Zhu X, Xu W, Liu B, Zhan Y, Xia T. 2023. Adaptation of high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-based multiplex genome editing system in white lupin by using endogenous promoters. Physiologia Plantarum 175:e13976 doi: 10.1111/ppl.13976

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Raha D, Wang Z, Moqtaderi Z, Wu L, Zhong G, et al. 2010. Close association of RNA polymerase II and many transcription factors with Pol III genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:3639−44 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911315106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Gao Z, Herrera-Carrillo E, Berkhout B. 2018. RNA polymerase II activity of type 3 Pol III promoters. Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids 12:135−45 doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.05.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Simmen KA, Mattaj IW. 1990. Complex requirements for RNA poIymerase III transcription of the Xenopus U6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Research 18:5649−57 doi: 10.1093/nar/18.19.5649

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Roberts S, Colbert T, Hahn S. 1995. TFIIIC determines RNA polymerase III specificity at the TATA-containing yeast U6 promoter. Genes & Development 9:832−42 doi: 10.1101/gad.9.7.832

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Rumi M, Ishihara S, Aziz M, Kazumori H, Ishimura N, et al. 2006. RNA polymerase II mediated transcription from the polymerase III promoters in short hairpin RNA expression vector. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 339:540−47 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Li X, Jiang DH, Yong K, Zhang DB. 2007. Varied transcriptional efficiencies of multiple Arabidopsis U6 small nuclear RNA genes. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 49:222−29 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00393.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Luo P, Li S, Li L, Li Y, Qiao Y, et al. 2024. Validation of endogenous U6 promoters for expanding the CRISPR toolbox in Nicotiana tabacum. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 60:378−83 doi: 10.1007/s11627-024-10418-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Wang C, Li Y, Wang N, Yu Q, Li Y, et al. 2023. An efficient CRISPR/Cas9 platform for targeted genome editing in rose (Rosa hybrida). Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 65:895−99 doi: 10.1111/jipb.13421

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Syombua ED, Zhang Z, Tripathi JN, Ntui VO, Kang M, et al. 2021. A CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing system for yam (Dioscorea spp.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 19:645−47 doi: 10.1111/pbi.13515

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Zafar K, Khan MZ, Amin I, Mukhtar Z, Yasmin S, et al. 2020. Precise CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing in super basmati rice for resistance against bacterial blight by targeting the major susceptibility gene. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:575 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00575

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Eid A, Ali Z, Mahfouz MM. 2016. High efficiency of targeted mutagenesis in Arabidopsis via meiotic promoter-driven expression of Cas9 endonuclease. Plant Cell Reports 35:1555−58 doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2000-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Osakabe Y, Watanabe T, Sugano SS, Ueta R, Ishihara R, et al. 2016. Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify abiotic stress responses in plants. Scientific Reports 6:26685 doi: 10.1038/srep26685

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Zhu J, Song N, Sun S, Yang W, Zhao H, et al. 2016. Efficiency and inheritance of targeted mutagenesis in maize using CRISPR-Cas9. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 43:25−36 doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.10.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Bruegmann T, Deecke K, Fladung M. 2019. Evaluating the efficiency of gRNAs in CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing in poplars. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:3623 doi: 10.3390/ijms20153623

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Dang Y, Jia G, Choi J, Ma H, Anaya E, et al. 2015. Optimizing sgRNA structure to improve CRISPR-Cas9 knockout efficiency. Genome Biology 16:280 doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0846-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Kim HK, Kim Y, Lee S, Min S, Bae JY, et al. 2019. SpCas9 activity prediction by DeepSpCas9, a deep learning-based model with high generalization performance. Science Advances 5:eaax9249 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax9249

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Xie X, Ma X, Zhu Q, Zeng D, Li G, et al. 2017. CRISPR-GE: a convenient software toolkit for CRISPR-based genome editing. Molecular Plant 10:1246−49 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Liu H, Ding Y, Zhou Y, Jin W, Xie K, et al. 2017. CRISPR-P 2.0: an improved CRISPR-Cas9 tool for genome editing in plants. Molecular Plant 10:530−32 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.01.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Kannan B, Jung JH, Moxley GW, Lee SM, Altpeter F. 2018. TALEN-mediated targeted mutagenesis of more than 100 COMT copies/alleles in highly polyploid sugarcane improves saccharification efficiency without compromising biomass yield. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16:856−66 doi: 10.1111/pbi.12833

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Illa-Berenguer E, LaFayette PR, Parrott WA. 2023. Editing efficiencies with Cas9 orthologs, Cas12a endonucleases, and temperature in rice. Frontiers in Genome Editing 5:1074641 doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2023.1074641

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] LeBlanc C, Zhang F, Mendez J, Lozano Y, Chatpar K, et al. 2018. Increased efficiency of targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 in plants using heat stress. The Plant Journal 93:377−86 doi: 10.1111/tpj.13782

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Xiang G, Zhang X, An C, Cheng C, Wang H. 2017. Temperature effect on CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 44:199−205 doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2017.03.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Gao S, Chen X, Lin M, Yin Y, Li X, et al. 2024. A birch ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 gene enhances UV-B and drought tolerance. Forestry Research 4:e022 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Borthakur D, Busov V, Cao XH, Du Q, Gailing O, et al. 2022. Current status and trends in forest genomics. Forestry Research 2:11 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Fister AS, Landherr L, Maximova SN, Guiltinan MJ. 2018. Transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 machinery targeting TcNPR3 enhances defense response in Theobroma cacao. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:268 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00268

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Sun S, Han X, Jin R, Jiao J, Wang J, et al. 2024. Generation of CRISPR-edited birch plants without DNA integration using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation technology. Plant Science 342:112029 doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] An Y, Dong H, Zhao W, Shen H, Yang L, et al. 2023. A stable and efficient genetic transformation method for embryogenic callus of Fraxinus mandshurica. Forests 14:957 doi: 10.3390/f14050957

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Chen L, Li W, Katin-Grazzini L, Ding J, Gu X, et al. 2018. A method for the production and expedient screening of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated non-transgenic mutant plants. Horticulture Research 5:13 doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0023-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Hoengenaert L, Anders C, Van Doorsselaere J, Vanholme R, Boerjan W. 2025. Transgene-free genome editing in poplar. New Phytologist 247:224−32 doi: 10.1111/nph.20415

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Gao S, Zhao M, Sun S, Fan X, Yan J, et al. 2025. Development of an endogenous promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in Fraxinus mandshurica. Forestry Research 5: e016 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0016
    Gao S, Zhao M, Sun S, Fan X, Yan J, et al. 2025. Development of an endogenous promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in Fraxinus mandshurica. Forestry Research 5: e016 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0016

Figures(8)

Article Metrics

Article views(2407) PDF downloads(548)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Development of an endogenous promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in Fraxinus mandshurica

Forestry Research  5 Article number: e016  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing has revolutionized tree improvement by enabling precise trait modification, accelerating breeding cycles, and enhancing forestry sustainability. Fraxinus mandshurica, valued for its desirable traits and adaptability, serves as a strategic focus for the National Reserve Forest Project (NRFP) and forestry germplasm resource breeding and quality improvement in China. Developing a species-specific genome editing system is crucial for valuable yet recalcitrant species like F. mandshurica. In this study, the development of a species-specific CRISPR/Cas9 platform is presented for F. mandshurica, which incorporates endogenous promoter engineering, sgRNA optimization, light quality modulation, and temperature control protocols to enhance genome editing efficiency. Truncated endogenous FmU6 promoter variants (FmU6-6-4 and FmU6-7-4) drove sgRNA expression at levels 3.36 and 3.11 times higher than that of the AtU6-26 promoter. The expression of Cas9 was controlled by the endogenous constitutive FmECP3 promoter, exhibiting an activity 5.48 times greater than the positive control. A highly active sgRNA4 targeting FmPDS1/2 was identified, demonstrating a cleavage efficiency of 36.10%. Heat treatment at 37 °C effectively increased the Cas9 cleavage efficiency to 7.77 times that observed at 22 °C. Chimeric albino mutants with an editing efficiency of 18.2% were obtained through transient and stable transformations, combined with light quality optimization and heat treatment during different regeneration stages. The mutation types included nucleotide insertions, deletions, and substitutions, leading to early termination codons and truncated FmPDS1/2 protein. Additionally, mutations in FmPDS1/2 resulted in albino phenotypes and a reduction in chlorophyll content to 46.44%−58.88%. This optimized system provides a robust platform for functional genomics studies and trait improvement in F. mandshurica, with potential applications in forestry biotechnology.

    • Fraxinus mandshurica is a valuable deciduous woody species belonging to the Oleaceae family. It is extensively utilized in landscaping, bioenergy, and various industries due to its exceptional resistance and remarkable wood quality[1]. F. mandshurica serves as the primary afforestation tree species for the National Reserve Forest Project (NRFP) and is a strategic focus for forestry germplasm resources breeding and quality improvement in China, owing to its desirable traits and adaptability[2]. However, with the escalating global population, drastic climate changes, and environmental pollution, the demand for timber is projected to increase by 49% by 2050, surpassing the capacity to meet both economic development needs and ecological sustainability[3,4]. Consequently, the emphasis on genetic breeding in F. mandshurica has shifted towards the development and application of tree varieties that exhibit high yield, superior quality, and enhanced adaptability. The extended growth period, large and complex genome, high genetic heterozygosity, and intricate regeneration capacity present significant challenges to traditional forestry breeding methods, including chemically or radiation-induced mutagenesis and cross-breeding techniques[5]. Molecular design offers a promising pathway for the precise modification of specific traits and the efficient creation of new plant varieties.

      Currently, CRISPR is recognized as the genome editing technology with the most widely acknowledged developmental potential. The CRISPR/Cas9 system was first utilized in the model plants Arabidopsis and tobacco, marking a significant milestone in genetic engineering[6]. Since then, it has found extensive applications in genome editing across various crops, such as rice[7], wheat[8], and maize[9], as well as in horticultural crops like tomato[10], lettuce[11], and groundnut[12]. Furthermore, its utility has extended to floricultural species, including chrysanthemum[13], and medicinal plants such as patchouli[14]. Notably, the application of CRISPR/Cas9 in woody species promotes the creation of novel varieties and enhances timber sustainability through comprehensive studies on timber properties, stress resistance, growth and developmental processes, flower development, and secondary metabolism[15]. Taking poplar as an example, multiple CRISPR editing targeting lignin synthesis genes achieves a combinatorial improvement in lignin composition and wood properties, increasing the wood carbohydrate-to-lignin ratio to 228% of that in WT[16]. By knocking out 4CL1, the lignin content in poplar wood is effectively reduced by 12.8%, resulting in a tensile strength of 313.6 ± 6.4 MPa[17]. CRISPR-based genome editing of PtrLBD39/22 leads to a decrease in cellulose content and an increase in lignin content, severely inhibiting the formation of tension wood (TW)[18]. CRISPR-mediated knockout mutants of CESA4 exhibit developmental retardation, physiological abnormalities, altered cell wall structure, and improved saccharification efficiency[19]. These remarkable advances facilitate fundamental research, tree breeding, and germplasm improvement programs at an accelerated pace[16].

      The CRISPR/Cas9 system consists of two primary components: the Cas9 nuclease, which cleaves DNA, and the single guide RNA (sgRNA) that directs this action[20]. For effective genome editing in plants, it is essential to utilize appropriate promoters that enable the expression of both sgRNA and Cas9. The sgRNA serves as a small RNA with a specific secondary structure, typically synthesized by RNA polymerase III (pol III) promoters, such as U3 and U6[21]. Notably, the U3 promoter is predominantly employed in the genome editing of monocotyledonous plants, while the U6 promoter is commonly utilized in dicotyledonous plants[22]. The expression of Cas9 is generally activated by pol II promoters, including the CaMV35S and ubiquitin (Ubi) promoters[22,23]. Various studies have demonstrated that the application of species-specific promoters significantly enhances the expression levels of sgRNA and Cas9, representing a robust and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system. To date, genome editing systems have been successfully established and optimized in maize[24], white birch[25], soybean[26], cotton[27], grape[28], pigeonpea[29], banana[30], and various other species by leveraging endogenous U6 promoters to drive sgRNA expression. The same U6 promoter exhibits varying transcriptional activities across different species, which may be attributed to differences in transcription, translation, and regulatory mechanisms among these species[26]. For instance, the AtU6 promoter effectively mediates sgRNA expression in tobacco, tomato, and poplar but exhibits low efficiency in wheat and rice[31]. Compared with AtU6-26, MtU6-5, and MtU6-6 promoters, the endogenous MsU6 promoter from alfalfa effectively enhances sgRNA expression and enables simultaneous editing of multiple genes in Medicago sativa[32]. The endogenous GhU6.3.3 promoter drives sgRNA expression at levels six to seven times higher than AtU6-29, and the editing efficiency is four to six times higher than that of AtU6-29 in cotton[27]. The genome editing efficiencies of pigeonpea achieve 8.80% in planta and 9.16% in vitro via the editing vector driven by the CcU6_7.1 promoter[29]. Furthermore, the screening of Cas9 promoters (constitutive, inducible, or tissue-specific) has led to spatiotemporal control and higher efficiency in targeted editing in species such as Arabidopsis[33,34], grape[28], maize[35], tomato[36], and citrus[37]. Species-specific VvU6 and UBQ2 promoters lead to higher editing efficiencies by effectively promoting the expression of sgRNA and Cas9 in grapes[28].

      Phytoene desaturase (PDS) catalyzes the conversion of colorless phytoene into colored carotenoids in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway. Silencing PDS gene expression causes plants to exhibit a unique albino phenotype[38]. Given that PDS gene alterations produce an observable phenotype, it has become a popular target gene in plant genome editing systems. Current research on species such as white birch[25], poplar[39], larch[40], and bamboo[41], has used the PDS gene to confirm the establishment and optimization of their CRISPR/Cas9 system. Furthermore, these studies have added to the evidence for the effects of PDS gene knockout, such as reduced chlorophyll content, albino phenotypes, and plant growth retardation/dwarfism.

      F. mandshurica, a valuable timber species, holds significant ecological and economic importance. Genome editing technologies have emerged as transformative tools in forestry research, enabling precise genetic improvements in woody species. However, the genetic enhancement and acquisition of novel germplasm in forest tree species present considerable challenges, primarily due to their prolonged sexual reproduction cycles and the recalcitrant, complex nature of their asexual propagation. In this study, a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technique specifically tailored for F. mandshurica was developed, addressing the limitations inherent in conventional breeding methods. Several endogenous pol II and pol III promoters with high activity were meticulously identified, and a comprehensive investigation was conducted to elucidate the effects of species-specific promoters, sgRNA sequences, temperature, and light quality on sgRNA and Cas9 activity, as well as genome editing efficiency. By integrating transient transformation methodologies that facilitate rapid gene functional analysis and the generation of T-DNA-free mutants with stable transformation approaches enabling the production of T-DNA-positive mutants, an optimized and efficient pathway for acquiring F. mandshurica mutants was established. Consequently, this study provides reliable technical support for gene function studies, targeted mutant construction, and the creation of novel varieties of F. mandshurica. Furthermore, this work lays a foundational framework for implementing genome editing technologies in recalcitrant woody species.

    • The seeds of F. mandshurica were taken from the experimental forest of the Northeast Forestry University, sterilized, and grown in Woody Plant Medium (WPM). The poplar and birch seedlings were cultured in WPM. The Nicotiana tabacum seedlings were cultured in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium. All plants were grown at 25 ± 2 °C and 60% relative humidity under a photoperiod of 16 h light/8 h dark.

    • Based on the conservation of U6 snRNA (small nuclear RNA) among different species, the sequences of Arabidopsis and soybean were used to identify the U6 snRNA of F. mandshurica. The 1.5 kb sequences upstream were identified as FmU6 promoters from the genome. The promoters were analyzed using PlantCARE and aligned by DNAMAN. According to the number of CAAT-boxes, the promoters were truncated with different sequence lengths.

      Eleven highly expressed genes, including non-tissue-specific genes, and ELONGATION FACTOR-1 alpha (EF-1α) genes, were selected based on transcriptome data of F. mandshurica. The heatmaps were shown by TBtools. The 2 kb fragments upstream of these genes were isolated and cloned as endogenous constitutive promoters of F. mandshurica (FmECPs). Specific primer pairs were designed for promoter cloning (Supplementary Table S1).

    • The pNC-121-pro, in which the 35S promoter of pBI121 was replaced with the NC frame, was used to detect promoter activity of FmU6s and FmECPs. The AtU6-26 promoter was cloned into pNC-121-pro as a positive control, while empty vector was used as a negative control. Primers for vector construction were listed in Supplementary Table S2. Recombinant plasmids, pNC-121-proFmU6s and pNC-121-proFmECPs, were used for the transformation of F. mandshurica, tobacco, poplar, and birch.

      The FmU6-6-4/FmU6-7-4 was inserted into pEgP237-2A-gfp between HindⅢ and BsaI, and the FmECP3 promoter was inserted into pEgP237-T2A-GFP between AscI and XbaI using the Seamless Assembly cloning kit (C5891, CloneSmarter, USA), which was named as pEgU6E3/pEgU7E3. The oligo DNA for gRNA target was ligated into the optimized CRISPR/Cas9 expression cassette by T4 DNA Ligase (EL0014, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The pEgU6E3/pEgU7E3-FmPDS-sgRNA4/6 constructs were used for F. mandshurica transformation.

    • Protein sequences of PDS in different species were retrieved from NCBI. Multiple sequence alignment was performed by DNAMAN. The target sequences of CRISPR/Cas9 were designed by an online program (http://skl.scau.edu.cn/targetdesign/ and https://crispr.dbcls.jp/), and the efficiency was predicted by www.crispredict.org. The first two target sequences were used to construct genome editing vectors, and primers were listed in Supplementary Table S2. Total RNA was extracted using the CTAB method. Subsequently, reverse transcription was conducted using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (RR047, Takara, China), while qRT-PCR was performed with the TransStart® Top Green qPCR SuperMix (AQ132, TransGen Biotech, China). Specific primer pairs, detailed in Supplementary Table S3, were designed for expression detection. The Cas9 enzyme in vitro digestion kit (PC1400, Invogen Tech. Co., China) and the sgRNA transcription kit (PC1380, Invogen Tech. Co., China) were used to determine the cutting efficiency of different gRNA in vitro. Primers were listed in Supplementary Table S4. The relative cutting efficiency of different gRNA under different temperatures in vivo was performed as previously described[42].

    • The GV3101 strain was used for plant genetic transformation. The process of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in F. mandshurica according to the previous method[43]. After regeneration of adventitious shoots for 7 d, the explants were transferred to selective medium with 50 mg/L Kanamycin (Kan). During the first 14 d of selection, adventitious shoots were treated at 37 °C for 24 h and recovered at 24 °C for 24 h, moving in cycles.

      To explore the impact of light quality on tissue culture regeneration, light-emitting diode (LED) lights served as the artificial light, delivering 12 μmol/m2/s and 40 W light. The white light emitted a wavelength range of 410–690 nm, while the red and blue lights had wavelength ranges of 600–900 nm (peak at 612 nm) and 410–540 nm (peak at 435 nm), respectively. The explants at different stages of the regeneration process (including adventitious shoot regeneration, adventitious shoot elongation, and rooting) were exposed to various light quality combinations, including white, red light, as well as blue-to-red (B:R) ratios of 1:4 and 2:3.

      Transient transformation was conducted following the methodology detailed by Liang et al. with some modifications[44]. In brief, the 10-day-old seedlings were subjected to treatment with a hypertonic solution (WPM + 25% sucrose) for 30 min. The Agrobacterium was adjusted to an OD600 = 0.6 with the solution [WPM + 10 mM CaCl2 + 10 mM MES + 200 µM AS + 200 mg/L DTT + 0.02% (W/V) Tween-20 + 2 mg/L 5-aza], which the whole seedlings were treated with for 4 h using the vacuum infiltration method. The plantlets were moved into WPM solid medium [WPM + 10 mM CaCl2 + 10 mM MES + 100 µM AS + 200 mg/L DTT + 0.02% (W/V) Tween-20 + 2 mg/L 5-aza] for 48 h in darkness. According to different purposes, the seedlings were treated differently: (1) The samples were collected to determine the activity of different promoters, by qRT-PCR and β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining with the GUS kit (SL7160, Coolaber, China). (2) Seedlings were transferred to incubators with different temperatures (22, 28, 32, and 37 °C) for 24 h to detect the effect of temperature on cutting efficiency. (3) To obtain transient mutants and preliminary research of gene function, the whole plantlets were planted vertically on selection medium (WPM + 50 mg/L Kan) for 7 d, during which they were treated at 37 °C for 3 h a day.

    • Total DNA was extracted using the CTAB method. The fragments of DNA, including target sequences, were cloned by Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (P505, Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China) and sequenced on the Sanger and HI-TOM platform. DSDecodeM and Hi-TOM were used to analyze the sequencing results. Primers for transgenic plants identification and sequencing were listed in Supplementary Table S5. Detection kits (G0613W, Grace Biotechnology, Suzhou, China) were employed for the quantification of photosynthetic pigments, including chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b content. SWISS-MODEL software was used to predict tertiary structure.

    • The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 22, and the results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All experiments were conducted and analyzed in at least triplicate.

    • In genome editing of dicotyledonous plants, the promoter of endogenous U6 snRNA is frequently utilized to drive the expression of gRNA. According the conservation of U6 snRNA sequences across different species, the BLAST search was performed in the F. mandshurica genome using Arabidopsis U6 (AtU6-1, AtU6-26, and AtU6-29) sequences as references, and identified seven homologous sequences of 102 bp in F. mandshurica (Fig. 1a). All the seven FmU6 snRNA exhibited high homology with the U6 snRNA transcription sequences of Arabidopsis, and soybean, but significant differences were observed in their promoter regions (Supplementary Fig. S1). However, the examination of the 100 bp sequences located upstream of FmU6 snRNA revealed that they all contained typical pol III promoter elements: the plant-specific upstream sequence element (USE) situated around –70 bp and a TATA-like box present at positions –28 to –30 bp.

      Figure 1. 

      Identification and activity validation of FmU6 promoters in F. mandshurica. (a) Multiple alignments of F. mandshurica, Arabidopsis, and soybean U6 gene and promoter sequences. The red boxes with solid lines indicate upstream sequence element (USE), TATA-like box, and the transcription start site. The black line shows the U6 snRNA transcript. (b) The relative expression levels of GUS driven by the promoters of AtU6-26, FmU6-3, FmU6-5, FmU6-6, and FmU6-7 in seedlings of F. mandshurica. Values represented mean ± SD (n = 3); different letters indicated significant differences (p < 0.05). (c) GUS staining driven by the negative control, promoters of AtU6-26, FmU6-3, FmU6-5, FmU6-6, and FmU6-7 in F. mandshurica seedlings. The scale bar represents 1 cm.

      Based on the homology with AtU6 promoters and the number of transcriptional enhancers (e.g., CAAT boxes) within FmU6 promoters, four of seven FmU6 promoter sequences were cloned, namely FmU6-3, FmU6-5, FmU6-6, and FmU6-7 promoters. To investigate whether these FmU6 promoters could effectively drive gene expression, the four promoters were individually inserted upstream of the GUS gene in the pNC-121-pro vector. All four promoters facilitated GUS expression in F. mandshurica seedlings, with FmU6-6 and FmU6-7 exhibiting higher promotive capabilities than FmU6-3 and FmU6-5 (Fig. 1b, c). Specifically, the promoter activities of FmU6-6 and FmU6-7 were 2.83-fold and 6.35-fold of the AtU6-26 promoter, respectively, which may be correlated with the higher number of CAAT boxes in the sequences. Therefore, FmU6-6 and FmU6-7 promoters were selected for further investigation.

      Based on the number of CAAT boxes, the FmU6-6 and FmU6-7 promoter sequences were truncated to different lengths, including FmU6-6-1 (1,735 bp), FmU6-6-2 (1,029 bp), FmU6-6-3 (652 bp), FmU6-6-4 (307 bp), and FmU6-7-4 (307 bp) (Fig. 2a). GUS gene expression analysis and GUS staining indicated that all five truncated fragments of FmU6 promoter possessed transcriptional activity and significantly exceeded the control levels (Fig. 2b, c). Notably, FmU6-6-4 and FmU6-7-4 promoters, truncated to approximately 300 bp, demonstrated the highest promotive activity, which was approximately 3.36 and 3.11 times that of the AtU6-26 promoter, respectively. Consequently, the shortest fragments, FmU6-6-4 and FmU6-7-4 promoters, were utilized to induce the production of gRNA in the CRISPR/Cas9 system of F. mandshurica.

      Figure 2. 

      Functional verification of FmU6 promoter fragments. (a) Truncation of FmU6-6 and FmU6-7 promoters. (b) The relative expression levels of GUS driven by the promoters of AtU6-26, FmU6-6-1, FmU6-6-2, FmU6-6-3, FmU6-6-4, and FmU6-7-4 in seedlings of F. mandshurica. Values represented mean ± SD (n = 3); different letters indicated significant differences (p < 0.05). (c) GUS staining in F. mandshurica seedlings. The scale bar represents 1 cm.

    • The utilization of ECP effectively promotes Cas9 expression in plants, thereby enhancing genome editing efficiency[28]. Based on RNA-seq of various tissues (xylem, phloem, leaf) and developmental stages (earlywood, transition, latewood) in F. mandshurica, nine highly expressed genes with non-temporal or non-spatial specificity were observed, and two EF-1α genes, the promoters of which were named endogenous constitutive promoter 1−11 (FmECP1−11), respectively (Fig. 3a). The promoters were isolated as endogenous promoters to induce Cas9 expression and assessed their activity in F. mandshurica seedlings with the 35S promoter as a control. Four promoters exhibited lower activity than 35S (promoters of FmECP4, FmECP8, FmECP10, FmECP11), while six promoters demonstrated significantly higher activity than 35S (promoters of FmECP1, FmECP3, FmECP5, FmECP6, FmECP7, FmECP9) (Fig. 3b). FmECP3 promoter exhibited the highest activity, 5.48-fold of 35S, followed by promoters of FmECP5 and FmECP6, with activities of 3.76 and 3.39 times of 35S, respectively. Staining results indicated that these three promoters could effectively drive GUS expression in different tissues of F. mandshurica seedlings (Fig. 3c). The findings demonstrated that the FmECP3 promoter could serve as an efficient promoter in the genome editing system of F. mandshurica.

      Figure 3. 

      Functional verification of FmECP promoters in F. mandshurica. (a) The expression profiles of genes driven by FmECP promoters, including the relative expression levels in leaves, xylem, phloem, earlywood, transition, and latewood. (b) The relative expression levels of GUS driven by 35S (enhanced) and FmECP promoters in seedlings of F. mandshurica. Values represented mean ± SD (n = 3); different letters indicated significant differences (p < 0.05). (c) GUS staining in F. mandshurica seedlings. The scale bar represents 1 cm.

    • Defects in PDS gene function result in the albino phenotype of plants, making PDS a convenient gene and indicator in genome editing systems. The F. mandshurica genome contains two highly homologous PDS genes: Chr16G002539 on chromosome 16 (hereafter named FmPDS1) and Chr07G002414 on chromosome 7 (hereafter named FmPDS2) (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Fig. S2). The two paralogues have 14 exons separated by 13 introns in each and consist of 6,055 and 6,011 bp of transcript sequence, respectively, sharing 71.37% identity in nucleotide coding sequence. The amino acid sequences of FmPDS1 and FmPDS2, with lengths of 1,734 and 1,740 bp, respectively, shared 92.59% identity at the amino acid level and possessed typical characteristics of plant phytoene desaturases, including the dinucleotide binding motif, putative substrate conserved motif, and carotenoid binding domain (Supplementary Fig. S3). gRNAs were designed for both FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 using online tools, in which gRNA4 and gRNA6 designed to target two conserved sites located showed the highest efficiency (Fig. 4a). The sgRNA4 binding to FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 was located on the third exons of two genes (red letters in Supplementary Fig. S2); and the sgRNA6 binding to FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 was located on the eighth exons of two genes (blue letters in Supplementary Fig. S2). The corresponding sequences were constructed into the pEgU6E3 and pEgU7E3 vectors, in which Cas9 was induced by the FmECP3 promoter and gRNA4 was driven by FmU6-6-4 and FmU6-7-4 promoters, respectively (Fig. 4c). The addition of Cas9 protein and gRNA effectively cleaved DNA in vitro (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, the cleavage activity of Cas9 at these two sites was determined in vivo through the TCEP method, revealing that the efficiency targeting gRNA4 reached 36.10%, which was 3.97-fold of gRNA6 (Fig. 4d). Therefore, gRNA4 was selected for further research.

      Figure 4. 

      SgRNA targeting sites in FmPDS1/2 and schematic structure of genome editing vectors. (a) Schematic position of the two gRNAs targeting FmPDS1/2 genes. The selected target sequences are blue, and the PAM sequences are red. The purple box indicates UTR; the green box represents exon; the grey line represents intron. (b) Determination of the cutting efficiency of different gRNA in vitro. (c) The CRISPR/Cas9 vector structure of F. mandshurica named pEgU6E3 and pEgU7E3, respectively. (d) Determination of cleaving efficiencies at the different target sites. Asterisks indicate levels of significance (t-test; **p < 0.01).

    • To efficiently and rapidly investigate the impact of temperature on genome editing, transient transformation of F. mandshurica seedlings was exposed to various temperature treatments (22, 28, 32, and 37 °C). The results indicated that an increase in temperature effectively enhanced the promoter activities of FmU6-6-4, FmU6-7-4, and FmECP3 (Supplementary Fig. S4; Fig. 5a), as well as gRNA and Cas9 expression levels (Fig. 5b, c). The transcriptional expression levels of gRNA and Cas9 at 37 °C were 4.32 times and 9.08 times respectively at 22 °C. The relative cleavage efficiency mediated by the pEgU7E3 vector at 37 °C was 7.77-fold of that at 22 °C, demonstrating the steady increase in cleavage efficiency with temperature (Fig. 5d). Therefore, appropriate high-temperature treatment of plants effectively enhanced genome editing efficiency. Additionally, the endogenous promoters of FmU6-6-4, FmU6-7-4, and FmECP3 of F. mandshurica were found to exhibit high activities in tobacco, birch, and poplar, suggesting their suitability for genome editing systems in other woody plants (Fig. 5e).

      Figure 5. 

      Temperature effect on CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing. (a) The staining of GUS driven by FmU6-6-4, FmU6-7-4, and FmECP3 promoters under different temperature (22, 28, 32, 37 °C) treatments in F. mandshurica seedlings. The scale bar represents 1 cm. (b) The relative expression level of gRNA driven by FmU6-7-4 promoter. (c) Cas9 driven by FmECP3 promoter in seedlings of F. mandshurica under different temperature treatments. (d) Determination of the cutting efficiency under different temperature treatments. Values represented mean ± SD (n = 3); different letters indicated significant differences (p < 0.05). (e) GUS staining in tobacco, birch, and poplar seedlings. GUS was under the control of promoters of FmU6-6-4, FmU6-7-4, and FmECP3. The scale bar represents 1 cm.

    • To quickly acquire gene-edited mutants for an initial analysis of gene functions, transient transformation of F. mandshurica seedlings was utilized to knock out FmPDS (Fig. 6a). After a rigorous antibiotic selection process, 14 seedlings were thriving. The expression cassette was successfully incorporated into the genome of six seedlings (#3, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14), according to the results of PCR validation (Fig. 6b). A 1,202 bp fragment of FmPDS1 and 1,174 bp fragment of FmPDS2, covering the region targeted by gRNA4, were cloned and sequenced, respectively. For three of the six plants (#3, #12, and #14), overlapping peaks were observed in the target site region of FmPDS1, which is suggestive of chimeric and a 50% mutation efficiency (Fig. 6c). In contrast, the control (empty vector, EV) sequences showed no change. Further sequencing analysis revealed various mutation types and combinations. Two types of deletion patterns, such as a 2-nucleotide deletion in #3 and #12 and a 21-nucleotide deletion in #14, were observed. One type of insertion pattern was noted, with a 2-nucleotide insertion observed in #14 (Fig. 6c). However, no mutations were found in the target site region of FmPDS2 (Supplementary Table S6). Functional redundancy and chimeric mutations are considered the primary reasons for the variegated phenotype observed in the mutant plants.

      Figure 6. 

      Transient transformation mediated CRISPR/Cas9 system in F. mandshurica. (a) Flow chart of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in F. mandshurica mediated by transient transformation. (b) PCR assay of the genomic DNA of six transgene-positive seedlings (#3, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14). P, plasmid; EV, empty vector. (c) Sanger sequencing results of FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 in mutations. N, without mutation. +, insertion, –, deletion. (d) Phenotypes of mutations, including the whole plant and true leaf. The scale bar represents 1 cm. (e) Statistics of chlorophyll a. (f) Chlorophyll b. (g) Total chlorophyll content. (h) Carotenoid content. Values represented mean ± SD (n = 3); different letters indicated significant differences (p < 0.05).

      The three chimeric mutant plants exhibited light green overall compared to the control, with the appearance of small white or yellowish streaks and spots on their leaves, particularly at the leaf margins (Fig. 6d). Additionally, the mutant plants revealed a considerable drop in chlorophyll content in leaves (Fig. 6eg). Interestingly, as compared to the control, the total chlorophyll content of #3, #12, and #14 decreased by 41.12%, 50.06%, and 53.56%, respectively. The carotenoid content in #3, #12, and #14 showed a substantial decrease, being only 35.59%, 39.10%, and 20.47% of that in the EV, respectively (Fig. 6h). These results offered information on the function of the FmPDS by indicating that its knockout in F. mandshurica seedlings caused visible phenotypic changes as well as alterations in chlorophyll content.

    • The establishment and optimization of an efficient tissue culture regeneration system is crucial for generating mutants by CRISPR/Cas9. To explore the impact of light quality, various combinations were applied, including white and red light, as well as blue-to-red (B:R) ratios of 1:4 and 2:3, at different stages of the regeneration process using hypocotyls as explants. Findings revealed that the optimized light quality combination effectively increased the regeneration rate from 28.10% to 69.78%–70.19%, that red light was used for germination, white light was used for elongation, and B:R = 1:4 (G2) or B:R = 2:3 (G3) were used for rooting (Supplementary Fig. S5). To further ascertain the applicability of the optimized CRISPR/Cas9 vector in F. mandshurica, the Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation with hypocotyls as explants was used to produce stable mutants of F. mandshurica, combined with light quality optimization (Fig. 7a). Out of the 250 explants co-cultured for 3–5 d, 129 were encouraged to develop adventitious shoots within a week. During the first 14 d of selection culture, high temperature (37 °C) and room temperature (24 °C) were alternated to promote high gRNA and Cas9 expression and activity (Fig. 7b). After a month of selection and elongation culture, 11 of the 52 surviving adventitious buds elongated to form seedlings. These 11 seedlings (symptomatic/albino and non-symptomatic) were all confirmed as transgenic plants through specific validation primers YZ-sgRNA4-F/R (Fig. 7c). The control (EV) and other transgenic lines (e.g., #2) showed the whole green plants, whereas lines #1 and #3 exhibited albino and chimera phenotypes with albino stems and pale green leaves (Fig. 7d). Furthermore, #1 and #3 demonstrated slower regeneration and smaller, unexpanded leaves.

      Figure 7. 

      CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of FmPDS1/2 genes in F. mandshurica. (a) Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation process of F. mandshurica with hypocotyl explants. The scale bar represents 5 mm. (b) Schematic diagram of high temperature (37 °C) and room temperature (24 °C) alternating culture during selective cultivation. (c) PCR assay of the genomic DNA of seedlings. P, plasmid; EV, empty vector. (d) Bleaching phenotype of FmPDS gene-mutated plants of F. mandshurica. EV, non-edited plants. The white scale bar represents 1 cm. The callus was enlarged in the upper right corner. The black scale bar represents 25 mm. (e) Sanger sequencing results of mutations (#1 and #3). +, insertion; G-T, G substituted by T. (f) The 3D structures of FmPDS1, FmPDS2, pds1 mutation in #1, and pds2 mutation in #3.

      To confirm whether the observed albino phenotype was caused by FmPDS1/2 gene mutations, sequencing of the target sequence regions of FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 was conducted. The sequencing results revealed homozygous mutations in the target genes (Fig. 7e). Line #1 had a one-nucleotide insertion in FmPDS1, while line #3 possessed a one-nucleotide substitution in FmPDS2, resulting in premature termination codons and truncated PDS proteins (Fig. 7f). Since the functional redundancy in the relationship between FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 in F. mandshurica, the mutants #1 and #3 exhibited chimeric phenotypes rather than complete albino. The flanking PCR fragments of five potential off-target sites were sequenced, which were obtained by using Cas-OFFinder (www.rgenome.net/cas-offinder) and searching the F. mandshurica genome database with the BLAST tool against the 20 bp target sequence of FmPDS. The results showed that none of the five examined off-target sites had any mutations (Supplementary Tables S5 & S7). Given the albino callus of the transgenic lines in Fig. 7d, it was speculated that simultaneous editing of two homologous FmPDS genes may have inhibited adventitious shoots regeneration in F. mandshurica, directly leading to failure in seedling formation. In conclusion, the CRISPR/Cas9 system is effectively applicable to F. mandshurica, with an editing effectiveness of 18.2% in this study.

    • Despite the extensive application of CRISPR/Cas9 in various plant species, its utilization in woody plants is constrained by challenges in genetic transformation and heterozygosity, with well-established genome editing systems limited to tree species such as poplar and birch. The acquisition of genome-edited mutant plants in F. mandshurica has not been achieved to present, with the exception of the study by Lu et al., which reported a genome editing efficiency of only 8.6% in protoplasts[45]. Numerous studies have indicated that parameters including the promoters of sgRNA and Cas9, GC content and secondary structure of the target sgRNA, Cas9 codon, and temperature influence editing efficiency. In this study, a CRISPR/Cas9 system for F. mandshurica was developed and optimized through the identification of endogenous promoters, screening for highly efficient sgRNAs, and optimization of the optimal temperature. This system enabled the generation of genome-edited mutants targeting FmPDS (Fig. 8).

      Figure 8. 

      A generalized road map of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in F. mandshurica. These practices all involve the identification and screening of endogenous promoters, sgRNA design, vector construction, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and mutation detection. Among them, transformation is categorized into transient and stable forms, depending on whether the T-DNA integrates into the mutant genome. Furthermore, various combinations of light quality and heat treatments are incorporated into the transformation process to increase transformation and editing efficiencies.

    • In gene editing, the expression of gRNA is typically induced by Pol III promoters, including U3 and U6. Notably, AtU6-1 and AtU6-29 promoters in Arabidopsis, as well as OsU6a, OsU6b, and OsU6c promoters in rice, are commonly employed for genome editing in dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants, respectively[46]. The precise transcription initiation and stringent control over transcript length provided by U6 promoters have facilitated their widespread adoption in the CRISPR/Cas9 system. However, recent studies indicate endogenous U6 or U3 promoters significantly enhance gRNA synthesis and editing efficiency. For example, the VvU3/U6 promoters elevate the expression of sgRNA-targeted PDS by over 3-fold, compared to the AtU6 promoter, resulting in a notable increase in editing efficiency in grapevine, which ranges from 14.65% to 22.10%[28]. The ProLaU6-7 promoter enhances genome editing efficiency in larch from 4.92% (with AtU6-26) to 14.29%[47]. In contrast to the AtU6-26 and GmU6-5 promoters, the endogenous U6-2, U6-6, and 7S promoters in white birch exhibit superior biallelic mutation rates[25]. Additionally, endogenous LaU3/U6 promoters in white lupin have been reported to improve the efficiency of multi-target genome editing[48]. Notably, multiple U3 and U6 promoters often exist within the same species, exhibiting variations in activity and transcription efficiency. Among seven CcU6 promoters identified in pigeonpea, the CcU6_7.1 promoter exhibits the highest activity, while CcU6_3, CcU6_9.1, and CcU6_9.2 promoters are ineffective[29]. In cotton, the GhU6.3 promoter demonstrates superior activity compared to the GhU6.1 and GhU6.2 promoters[27]. There are significant differences in mutation efficiency among eleven GmU6 promoters in soybeans, ranging from 2.8% to 20.6%[26].

      In the genome of F. mandshurica, seven FmU6 snRNA genes were identified along with their corresponding promoters, successfully cloning four of these promoters (including FmU6-3, FmU6-5, FmU6-6, and FmU6-7 promoters). It is generally accepted that each polymerase independently transcribes a unique set of genes, with Pol III specifically participating in the transcription of 5S rRNA, tRNA, and small RNAs. Nevertheless, some research has unveiled a synergistic interaction among the different types of polymerases in regulating gene expression[49]. Notably, Pol III, including U6, 7SK, and H1, displays dual polymerase activity and has been shown to transcribe mRNA capable of translation, such as Luc[50,51]. The U6 upstream promoter in yeast exhibits dual polymerase activity, being Pol II-specific in vivo but convertible to Pol III-specificity by TFIIIC[52]. Similarly, the mouse U6 promoter generates transcripts sufficiently long to express multiple reporter genes, including Luc, eGFP, and JRed[53]. The integration of reporter genes (e.g., GUS, GFP, Luc) with transient transformation techniques facilitates a swift and effective evaluation of U6 promoter activity. To date, a multitude of studies conducted on Arabidopsis, tobacco, roses, cotton, grapes, yams, and other organisms have proved the viability and efficacy of this methodology[27,28,5457]. In this study, the reporter gene GUS was used to assess the endogenous U6 promoter activity. These promoters exhibited significant differences in activity, with the FmU6-7 promoter displaying the highest activity and the FmU6-6 promoter showing the second-highest. Despite the high homology of the FmU6 snRNA transcription sequences with other species, notable differences were observed in the promoter regions, apart from the conserved USE and TATA-like boxes (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S1). It has been speculated that variations in the activity of different U6 promoters within the same species may correlate with the number of CAAT-boxes and transcription factor (TF)-binding sites[29]. Additionally, large expression vectors result in genetic transformation in plants, which is complicated and difficult. Truncated promoter fragments of FmU6-6 and FmU6-7, designated as FmU6-6-4 and FmU6-7-4 promoters, respectively, were identified to be 307 bp in length and contained USE and TATA-like boxes, which were sufficient to drive sgRNA expression (Fig. 2). Consequently, the FmU6-6-4 and FmU6-7-4 promoters were used to regulate the expression of target sequences within the F. mandshurica CRISPR/Cas9 system.

    • Similarly, species-specific Pol II promoters demonstrate remarkable efficacy in enhancing Cas9 expression and increasing mutation frequencies. The rice Ubi promoter has been extensively employed in genome editing studies aimed at various traits in rice[58]. The grape UBQ2 promoter has also shown effectiveness in driving Cas9 expression and facilitating gene editing processes[28]. To ensure efficient Cas9 protein expression in F. mandshurica, nine promoters derived from highly expressed genes with non-tissue and non-developmental stages specificity were screened, in addition to two promoters of the EF-1α gene. Notably, the FmECP3 promoter exhibited the highest activity, being 5.48 times higher than 35S (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the identified FmU6-6-4, FmU6-7-4, and FmECP3 promoters demonstrated activity in driving GUS expression in tobacco and other woody plants, including poplar and birch, indicating the potential applicability of the established CRISPR/Cas9 system in F. mandshurica to other woody species (Fig. 5e).

      The integration of tissue-specific and inducible promoters into the CRISPR/Cas9 system has allowed for precise spatial and temporal regulation of genome editing. Efficient genome editing in maize has been achieved by employing the promoter of meiosis-specific dmc1 to regulate the CRISPR/Cas9 system[35]. The employment of Egg cell-specific and early embryo-specific promoter (DD45/EC1.2)-controlled CRISPR as well as meiotic promoter (MGE1p)-driven CRISPR in Arabidopsis has facilitated the production of non-chimeric T1 mutants[33,59]. The Yao and EF-1α promoters, which are predominantly expressed in meristematic tissues and germ cells, provide advantages for mutant generation and have been applied to the CRISPR system across various species, such as citrus[37], Arabidopsis[34,60], and tomato[36]. Nevertheless, compared to U3/U6 promoters, there remains a relative scarcity of studies focusing on promoters that govern Cas9 expression. Two FmEF-1α (FmECP10 and FmECP11) promoters were tested to regulate Cas9 expression; however, the efficiency was not optimal. This could potentially be attributed to the fact that the explants were not derived from meristematic tissues. To elucidate the functions of genes with tissue-specific or developmental stage-specific expression patterns, tissue-specific and inducible promoters will be employed to regulate Cas9 expression in future investigations. Furthermore, studies have indicated that employing plant- or species-codon-optimized Cas9 enhances mutation frequencies[30,61]. In the present study, the Cas9 protein utilized was codon-optimized for Arabidopsis. To further improve mutation efficiency, it would be beneficial to apply F. mandshurica codon-optimized Cas9 in the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

    • The sequence and secondary structure of gRNA directly influence the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9. Studies focused on genome editing in poplar indicated that gRNAs with a GC content ranging from 40% to 60%, along with purine residues in the last four nucleotides, are more suitable for target sites[62]. Target sequences with higher GC content exhibit relatively higher CRISPR/Cas9 knockout efficiencies[46]. The optimization of sgRNA by extending the duplex by approximately 5 bp and mutating consecutive thymine (T) nucleotides at the fourth position to cytosine (C) or guanine (G), significantly enhances genome editing efficiency[63]. To design sgRNAs with high efficacy and specificity (low off-target activity), various sgRNA models and design tools tailored for plant genomes, such as DeepSpCas9[64], CRISPR-GE[65], and CRISPR-P 2.0[66], have been developed. In this study, the target sequences for CRISPR/Cas9 were designed by online programs (https://crispr.dbcls.jp/ and http://skl.scau.edu.cn/targetdesign/). The efficiency of the six selected sgRNAs was predicted using CRISPRedict and the two sgRNAs with the highest predicted effectiveness were selected to construct vectors. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that sgRNA4 exhibited the highest activity, consistent with the predictions (Fig. 4).

      The CRISPR/Cas9-based multiplex genome editing system targets multiple copies of the same gene, (homeo) alleles/paralogs, or different genes simultaneously, effectively addressing the challenges associated with obtaining mutants for target traits due to high genetic and gene redundancy. Currently, up to 107 genes are targeted simultaneously in plants[67]. A CRISPR/Cas9-induced genome editing system capable of targeting multiple sites and genes in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants has been established, which reveals that transgenic plants targeting eight sites simultaneously exhibited higher sgRNA levels than those targeting only one site[46]. In F. mandshurica, FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 shared 92.59% amino acid sequence similarity, suggesting similar functions. The two mutant lines developed in this work, lines #1 and #3, both exhibited chimeric albino phenotypes (Fig. 7). Line #1 had a 1-nucleotide insertion in FmPDS1, while line #3 had a 1-nucleotide substitution in FmPDS2, resulting in premature termination of FmPDS1/2 translation. This means that FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 regulate the synthesis of chlorophyll and carotenoids in a dose-dependent manner, and albino in transgenic lines only occurs when both genes are altered simultaneously. Unfortunately, a double mutant of FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 was not obtained in this study. Notably, it was observed that callus tissues from transgenic lines were entirely albino, whereas callus tissues of the control were yellow, leading us to speculate that simultaneous mutations in FmPDS1 and FmPDS2 may inhibit adventitious shoot regeneration, preventing the obtention of albino seedlings. To verify this speculation and improve genome editing efficiency, a multiplex genome editing system for F. mandshurica would be developed by linking multiple sgRNA expression cassettes induced by the FmU6 promoter to simultaneously target various sites of the same gene or multiple genes.

    • Temperature treatment influences genome editing efficacy. The Cas9 nuclease, produced from bacteria with optimal growth temperatures ranging from 35 to 45 °C, encounters partial inhibition of its activity under room temperature conditions (20–28 °C), which are suitable for most plant growth[68]. Empirical studies have shown that brief exposure of transformed plants to higher temperatures significantly increases nuclease activity. Specifically, in poplar and birch, heat treatment at 35 °C has been demonstrated to improve target site cleavage efficiency substantially[42]. Heat treatment at 37 °C significantly enhances the cleavage activity of SpCas9, sgRNA expression levels, and CRISPR-induced mutation efficiency in Arabidopsis and citrus[69]. Research conducted by Xiang et al. suggests that the increase in genome editing efficiency induced by high temperature is attributed, at least in part, to the upregulation of sgRNA expression and the enhancement of Cas9 protein activity[70]. To ascertain the optimal temperature for the CRISPR/Cas9 system in F. mandshurica and investigate its fundamental mechanisms, the activities of the FmU6-6-4, FmU6-7-4, and FmECP3 promoters were quantified, as well as the cleavage efficiency in vivo across a range of temperatures (22, 28, 32, and 37 °C) (Fig. 5; Supplementary Fig. S4). Consistent with previous findings, the results revealed that high temperature, 37 °C, effectively upregulates the expression of sgRNA and Cas9 in F. mandshurica, thereby promoting the cleavage of genomic DNA.

    • Genetic transformation has provided a powerful tool for studying gene functions in woody plants and for the directional improvement of desirable traits[71,72]. Plant transformation techniques primarily include direct (such as physical and chemical) and indirect (like biological) approaches. Currently, Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of T-DNA is the preferred method for plant transformation. Transformations are categorized into transient and stable types, depending on whether the introduced foreign gene can be a stable inheritance. Progress in applying CRISPR/Cas9 technology to woody plants has been relatively slow, with the inefficiency and complexity of stable transformation systems serving as a key impediment to its utilization in trees. Notably, the transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 in cacao has identified TcNPR3 as a defense regulator[73]. A novel method, named CPDAT, enables the generation of CRISPR-edited plants without the integration of foreign DNA, in which Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is used to introduce T-DNA encoding gRNA and Cas9 into birch cells via transient transformation, achieving genome editing in 80% of the cell lines[74].

      However, the genetic transformation system for F. mandshurica still requires refinement. The transformation efficiency is low and the process is lengthy when hypocotyls and embryogenic callus are used as explants[43,75]. In this study, F. mandshurica mutants targeting FmPDS were obtained by combining transient transformation with seedlings and stable transformation with hypocotyls as explants. Through transient transformation, chimeric mutants targeting FmPDS1/2 were rapidly created, and preliminary evidence that the deletion of these genes inhibits chlorophyll synthesis was provided, consistent with previous findings (Fig. 6). By adopting transient transformation, the transformation time, including mutant identification and functional studies, was reduced to three weeks, significantly enhancing efficiency. Furthermore, mutants were successfully generated via the stable genetic transformation, validating the high effectiveness of our established genome editing system mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in F. mandshurica, achieving an editing efficiency of 18.2% (Fig. 7).

    • Given current genetically modified organism (GMO) regulations, transgene-free (non-GMO) genome editing has emerged as a preferred approach. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated crop mutants produce non-transgenic progenies through sexual reproduction and screening of segregating populations; however, this method does not apply to perennial woody plants. As an alternative, CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) is delivered into protoplasts via transient transformation or particle bombardment using plasmids that encode sgRNA and Cas9. Nonetheless, pre-assembled RNPs and a comprehensive system for protoplast preparation and regeneration are necessary, both complex and time-consuming.

      Transient transformation-based CRISPR/Cas9 provides a quick and effective DNA-free process for obtaining mutants. Tobacco leaves are used as explants to generate non-transgenic mutant plants without sexual segregation through an Agrobacterium-mediated transient genome editing system, achieving an editing efficiency of 47.5%, with 17.2% confirmed as non-transgenic[76]. Similarly, in the CPDAT method, white birch explants derived from transient transformation are employed to induce callus and adventitious buds, and edited plants are screened through sequencing, resulting in an editing efficiency of 80.00%, with 7.69% of the plants being DNA-free[74]. Recently, an efficient transgene-free CRISPR/Cas9 method using transient transformation has been devised for poplar[77]. Using an Agrobacterium-mediated approach, callus tissues and plants are transformed with a base-editing construct targeting ALS for positive selection and CCoAOMT1. Explants were stimulated to generate shoots on the medium containing chlorsulfuron, with 49% of the newly formed buds originating from transient transformations devoid of T-DNA and 7% identified as non-chimeric mutants. In the present study, whole seedlings were employed as explants, and multiple mutants were obtained via temporary expression of sgRNA and Cas9. Sequencing results indicated that plants generated via this strategy were inherently chimeric (Fig. 6c). Isolating and regenerating the chimeric mutants may provide an effective means to separate chimeras and obtain homozygous transgene-free mutants (Fig. 8). However, due to the lack of a supporting tissue culture system, the induction of transgenic DNA-free plants was not pursued.

    • This study demonstrates the critical significance of species-specific promoters, sgRNA design, and thermal regulation in optimizing CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing efficiency in F. mandshurica. A set of endogenous FmU6-6-4/FmU6-7-4 and FmECP3 promoters was discovered in F. mandshurica, which effectively drive sgRNA and Cas9 expression, respectively. F. mandshurica mutants targeting FmPDS were successfully acquired by combining transient transformation with seedlings and stable transformation with hypocotyls (Fig. 8). The CRISPR/Cas9 system, particular to F. mandshurica, provides a flexible platform for functional genomics research and enhancement of traits in this species, facilitating the incorporation of remarkable characteristics. Notably, the endogenous promoters identified in this study displayed conserved activity in poplar and birch, demonstrating broad application of this editing platform to other woody species. This work establishes a transformative framework for implementing CRISPR/Cas9 technologies in forest tree molecular breeding programs.

      • This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFD2200303), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos U24A20428 and 32271903), Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (Grant No. ZL2024C026), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2572024AW25).

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Zeng F, Gao S; draft manuscript preparation and analysis of results: Gao S; interpretation of results: Gao S, Zhao M; preformation of the experiments and data collection: Sun S, Fan X, Yan J; manuscript modification: Zhan Y, Xin Y, Zeng F. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (8)  References (77)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Gao S, Zhao M, Sun S, Fan X, Yan J, et al. 2025. Development of an endogenous promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in Fraxinus mandshurica. Forestry Research 5: e016 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0016
    Gao S, Zhao M, Sun S, Fan X, Yan J, et al. 2025. Development of an endogenous promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in Fraxinus mandshurica. Forestry Research 5: e016 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0016

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return