Search
2025 Volume 5
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

PtABI3 represses the age biomarker gene PtDAL1 during male cone development in conifer

  • # Authors contributed equally: Yi-Tong Song, Feng-Yi Li

More Information
  • Received: 07 June 2025
    Revised: 29 August 2025
    Accepted: 04 September 2025
    Published online: 29 September 2025
    Forestry Research  5 Article number: e021 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • The age biomarker gene PtDAL1 in conifers undergoes expression resetting during pollen maturation, but its regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. This study identifies PtABI3, a B3 transcription factor (TF) in Pinus tabuliformis, as a key repressor of PtDAL1. PtABI3 exhibits strict spatiotemporal complementarity with PtDAL1. Phylogenetic and structural studies revealed PtABI3 as a gymnosperm homolog of angiosperm ABI3, retaining conserved B3 domains critical for DNA binding and transcriptional repression. Ectopic expression of PtABI3 in Arabidopsis recapitulated the classic ABI3 late-flowering phenotype. Mechanistically, PtABI3 directly binds the RY motif (CATGCA) within the PtDAL1 promoter via its B3 domain, as demonstrated by dual-luciferase assays, yeast one-hybrid assays, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). These results revealed that PtABI3 is an evolutionary conserved transcriptional repressor that silences PtDAL1 during pollen maturation, providing the first evidence of B3 TFs mediating age timer gene resetting in conifers. This work bridges gymnosperm and angiosperm regulatory paradigms, highlighting ancient mechanisms for gene expression resetting in plants.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 Selection of linearization digest sites for seamless cloning vectors.
    Supplementary Table S2 Primer information used to construct vectors in this study.
    Supplementary Table S3 EMSA probe sequences used in this section.
    Supplementary Table S4 Protein sequence information used in phylogenetic analysis and multiple sequence alignment.
    Supplementary Fig. S1 Comparison diagram of predicted structures of ABI3 proteins.
  • [1] Bäurle I, Dean C. 2006. The timing of developmental transitions in plants. Cell 125:655−64 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Huijser P, Schmid M. 2011. The control of developmental phase transitions in plants. Development 138:4117−29 doi: 10.1242/dev.063511

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Borg M, Jacob Y, Susaki D, LeBlanc C, Buendía D, et al. 2020. Targeted reprogramming of H3K27me3 resets epigenetic memory in plant paternal chromatin. Nature Cell Biology 22:621−29 doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0515-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Chałupka W, Cecich RA. 1997. Control of the first flowering in forest trees. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 12:102−11 doi: 10.1080/02827589709355390

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Hyun Y, Richter R, Coupland G. 2017. Competence to flower: age-controlled sensitivity to environmental cues. Plant Physiology 173:36−46 doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Bhogale S, Mahajan AS, Natarajan B, Rajabhoj M, Thulasiram HV, et al. 2014. Microrna156: a potential graft-transmissible microrna that modulates plant architecture and tuberization in Solanum tuberosum ssp. andigena. Plant Physiology 164:1011−27 doi: 10.1104/pp.113.230714

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Wang JW, Park MY, Wang LJ, Koo Y, Chen XY, et al. 2011. MiRNA control of vegetative phase change in trees. PLoS Genetics 7:e1002012 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Cheng YJ, Shang GD, Xu ZG, Yu S, Wu LY, et al. 2021. Cell division in the shoot apical meristem is a trigger for miR156 decline and vegetative phase transition in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118:e2115667118 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115667118

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Shen L, Zhang Y, Sawettalake N. 2022. A Molecular switch for FLOWERING LOCUS C activation determines flowering time in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 34:818−33 doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab286

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Zhao Y, Zhu P, Hepworth J, Bloomer R, Antoniou-Kourounioti RL, et al. 2021. Natural temperature fluctuations promote COOLAIR regulation of FLC. Genes & Development 35:888−98 doi: 10.1101/gad.348362.121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Poethig RS. 2009. Small RNAs and developmental timing in plants. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 19:374−78 doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.06.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Yu S, Lian H, Wang JW. 2015. Plant developmental transitions: the role of microRNAs and sugars. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 27:1−7 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Jia XL, Chen YK, Xu XZ, Shen F, Zheng QB, et al. 2017. miR156 switches on vegetative phase change under the regulation of redox signals in apple seedlings. Scientific Reports 7:14223 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14671-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Cui L, Zheng F, Wang J, Zhang C, Xiao F, et al. 2020. miR156a-targeted SBP-Box transcription factor SlSPL13 regulates inflorescence morphogenesis by directly activating SFT in tomato. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:1670−82 doi: 10.1111/pbi.13331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Yamagishi M, Nomizu T, Nakatsuka T. 2024. Overexpression of lily microRNA156-resistant SPL13A stimulates stem elongation and flowering in Lilium formosanum under non-inductive (non-chilling) conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1456183 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1456183

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Manning K, Tör M, Poole M, Hong Y, Thompson AJ, et al. 2006. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nature Genetics 38:948−52 doi: 10.1038/ng1841

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Nielsen M, Menon G, Zhao Y, Mateo-Bonmati E, Wolff P, et al. 2024. COOLAIR and PRC2 function in parallel to silence flc during vernalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121:e1983493175 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2311474121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Franco-Echevarría E, Nielsen M, Schulten A, Cheema J, Morgan TE, et al. 2023. Distinct accessory roles of Arabidopsis VEL proteins in polycomb silencing. Genes & Development 37:801−17 doi: 10.1101/gad.350814.123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Heo JB, Sung S. 2011. Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA. Science 331:76−79 doi: 10.1126/science.1197349

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Gao J, Zhang K, Cheng YJ, Yu S, Shang GD, et al. 2022. A robust mechanism for resetting juvenility during each generation in Arabidopsis. Nature Plants 8:257−68 doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01110-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Liu C, Lu F, Cui X, Cao X. 2010. Histone methylation in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61:395−420 doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.091939

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Weinhofer I, Hehenberger E, Roszak P, Hennig L, Köhler C. 2010. H3K27me3 profiling of the endosperm implies exclusion of polycomb group protein targeting by DNA methylation. PLoS Genetics 6:e1001152 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001152

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Crevillén P, Yang H, Cui X, Greeff C, Trick M, et al. 2014. Epigenetic reprogramming that prevents transgenerational inheritance of the vernalized state. Nature 515:587−90 doi: 10.1038/nature13722

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Tao Z, Hu H, Luo X, Jia B, Du J, et al. 2019. Embryonic resetting of the parental vernalized state by two B3 domain transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Nature Plants 5:424−35 doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0402-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Choi K, Kim J, Hwang HJ, Kim S, Park C, et al. 2011. The FRIGIDA complex activates transcription of FLC, a strong flowering repressor in Arabidopsis, by recruiting chromatin modification factors. The Plant Cell 23:289−303 doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.075911

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Yuan W, Luo X, Li Z, Yang W, Wang Y, et al. 2017. A cis cold memory element and a trans epigenome reader mediate Polycomb silencing of FLC by vernalization in Arabidopsis. Nature Genetics 48(12):1527−34 doi: 10.1038/ng.3712

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Xu G, Tao Z, He Y. 2022. Embryonic reactivation of FLOWERING LOCUS C by ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE 3 establishes the vernalization requirement in each Arabidopsis generation. The Plant Cell 34:2205−21 doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Li J, Han F, Yuan T, Li W, Li Y, et al. 2023. The methylation landscape of giga-genome and the epigenetic timer of age in Chinese pine. Nature Communications 14:1947 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37684-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Song YT, Liu SW, Ma JJ, Chen X, Li FY, et al. 2025. The MADS-box transcription factor DAL1 links age to reproductive development through regulation of LEAFY homologs in conifer. Plant Physiology 198:kiaf139 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaf139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Niu S, Li J, Bo W, Yang W, Zuccolo A, et al. 2022. The Chinese pine genome and methylome unveil key features of conifer evolution. Cell 185:204−217.e14 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Clough SJ, Bent AF. 1998. Floral dip: a simplified method for agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 16:735−43 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Zhang Y, Wu Z, Feng M, Chen J, Qin M, et al. 2021. The circadian-controlled PIF8–BBX28 module regulates petal senescence in rose flowers by governing mitochondrial ros homeostasis at night. The Plant Cell 33:2716−35 doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab152

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Wu L, Ma N, Jia Y, Zhang Y, Feng M, et al. 2017. An ethylene-induced regulatory module delays flower senescence by regulating cytokinin content. Plant Physiology 173:853−62 doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Zhang B, Horvath S. 2005. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 4:17 doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Langfelder P, Horvath S. 2008. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9:559 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, et al. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596:583−89 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Ma JJ, Chen X, Song YT, Zhang GF, Zhou XQ, et al. 2021. MADS-box transcription factors MADS11 and DAL1 interact to mediate the vegetative-to-reproductive transition in pine. Plant Physiology 187:247−62 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab250

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Ezcurra I, Wycliffe P, Nehlin L, Ellerström M, Rask L. 2000. Transactivation of the Brassica napus napin promoter by ABI3 requires interaction of the conserved B2 and B3 domains of ABI3 with different cis-elements: B2 mediates activation through an ABRE, whereas B3 interacts with an RY/G-box. The Plant Journal 24(1):57−66 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00857.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Marella HH, Quatrano RS. 2007. The B2 domain of VIVIPAROUS1 is bi-functional and regulates nuclear localization and transactivation. Planta 225:863−72 doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0398-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Suzuki M, Wang HHY, McCarty DR. 2007. Repression of the LEAFY COTYLEDON 1/B3 regulatory network in plant embryo development by VP1/ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3-LIKE B3 genes. Plant Physiology 143:902−11 doi: 10.1104/pp.106.092320

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Mönke G, Seifert M, Keilwagen J, Mohr M, Grosse I, et al. 2012. Toward the identification and regulation of the Arabidopsis thaliana ABI3 regulon. Nucleic Acids Research 40(17):8240−54 doi: 10.1093/nar/gks594

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Reidt W, Wohlfarth T, Ellerström M, Czihal A, Tewes A, et al. 2000. Gene regulation during late embryogenesis: the RY motif of maturation-specific gene promoters is a direct target of the FUS3 gene product. The Plant Journal 21(5):401−8 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00686.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Duan S, Guan S, Fei R, Sun T, Kang X, et al. 2024. Unraveling the role of PlARF2 in regulating deed formancy in Paeonia lactiflora. Planta 259(6):133 doi: 10.1007/s00425-024-04411-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Ghosh TK, Kaneko M, Akter K, Murai S, Komatsu K, et al. 2016. Abscisic acid-induced gene expression in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha is mediated by evolutionarily conserved promoter elements. Physiologia Plantarum 156(4):407−20 doi: 10.1111/ppl.12385

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Song S, Wang G, Hu Y, Liu H, Bai X, et al. 2018. OsMFT1 increases spikelets per panicle and delays heading date in rice by suppressing Ehd1, FZP and SEPALLATA-like genes. Journal of Experimental Botany 69(18):4283−93 doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery232

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Hobo T, Asada M, Kowyama Y, Hattori T. 1999. ACGT-containing abscisic acid response element (ABRE) and coupling element 3 (CE3) are functionally equivalent. The Plant Journal 19:679−89 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00565.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Tian R, Wang F, Zheng Q, Niza VMAG, Downie AB, Perry SE. 2020. Direct and indirect targets of the arabidopsis seed transcription factor ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3. The Plant Journal 103:1679−94 doi: 10.1111/tpj.14854

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Hobo T, Kowyama Y, Hattori T. 1999. A bZIP factor, TRAB1, interacts with VP1 and mediates abscisic acid-induced transcription. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96:15348−53 doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15348

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Zhang K, Zhao L, Yang X, Li M, Sun J, et al. 2019. GmRAV1 regulates regeneration of roots and adventitious buds by the cytokinin signaling pathway in Arabidopsis and soybean. Physiologia Plantarum 165:814−29 doi: 10.1111/ppl.12788

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Li G, Chandrasekharan MB, Wolffe AP, Hall TC. 2001. Chromatin structure and phaseolin gene regulation. Plant Molecular Biology 46:121−29 doi: 10.1023/A:1010693703421

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Kroj T, Savino G, Valon C, Giraudat J, Parcy F. 2003. Regulation of storage protein gene expression in Arabidopsis. Development 130:6065−73 doi: 10.1242/dev.00814

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Lazarova G, Zeng Y, Kermode AR. 2002. Cloning and expression of an ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE 3 (ABI3) gene homologue of yellow-cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis). Journal of Experimental Botany 53:1219−21 doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.371.1219

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Song YT, Li FY, Chen X, Zhao HH, Wang DY, et al. 2025. PtABI3 represses the age biomarker gene PtDAL1 during male cone development in conifer. Forestry Research 5: e021 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0021
    Song YT, Li FY, Chen X, Zhao HH, Wang DY, et al. 2025. PtABI3 represses the age biomarker gene PtDAL1 during male cone development in conifer. Forestry Research 5: e021 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0021

Figures(6)

Article Metrics

Article views(1214) PDF downloads(426)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

PtABI3 represses the age biomarker gene PtDAL1 during male cone development in conifer

Forestry Research  5 Article number: e021  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The age biomarker gene PtDAL1 in conifers undergoes expression resetting during pollen maturation, but its regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. This study identifies PtABI3, a B3 transcription factor (TF) in Pinus tabuliformis, as a key repressor of PtDAL1. PtABI3 exhibits strict spatiotemporal complementarity with PtDAL1. Phylogenetic and structural studies revealed PtABI3 as a gymnosperm homolog of angiosperm ABI3, retaining conserved B3 domains critical for DNA binding and transcriptional repression. Ectopic expression of PtABI3 in Arabidopsis recapitulated the classic ABI3 late-flowering phenotype. Mechanistically, PtABI3 directly binds the RY motif (CATGCA) within the PtDAL1 promoter via its B3 domain, as demonstrated by dual-luciferase assays, yeast one-hybrid assays, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). These results revealed that PtABI3 is an evolutionary conserved transcriptional repressor that silences PtDAL1 during pollen maturation, providing the first evidence of B3 TFs mediating age timer gene resetting in conifers. This work bridges gymnosperm and angiosperm regulatory paradigms, highlighting ancient mechanisms for gene expression resetting in plants.

    • Plant developmental phase transitions throughout their life cycle are meticulously orchestrated by intricate genetic programs and epigenetic regulatory networks. The tightly controlled progression from juvenility to maturity (vegetative phase change) and subsequent shift to reproductive growth displays remarkable stability across diverse environmental conditions[1,2]. As sessile organisms, plants employ sophisticated temporal memory systems to coordinate morphological architecture, resource allocation, and developmental timing—critical adaptations ensuring reproductive success[3]. This temporal regulation assumes particular significance in perennial woody species where distinct juvenile-to-adult developmental strategies require prolonged vegetative growth prior to first flowering[4,5]. The molecular mechanisms underlying plant 'memory' of time remain a central question in plant biology.

      Angiosperm research has identified two temporal regulation systems: age-dependent flowering controlled by the microRNA miR156[68] and vernalization-mediated flowering through FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC)[9,10]. The evolutionarily conserved miR156-SPL (SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE) module functions as an endogenous age timer, with declining miR156 levels coupling cell division history[11,12] to developmental transitions via SPL transcription factors[1316]. Concurrently, FLC serves as a vernalization memory integrator where prolonged cold induces Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2)-mediated H3K27me3 deposition, stably silencing FLC to permit flowering[1719].

      In the adequate operation of these temporal memory systems, generation after generation, lies a fundamental biological imperative—developmental timers must undergo intergenerational resetting in newly formed embryos. The miR156 target loci undergo chromatin state reprogramming through a conserved juvenility resetting region (JRR) located upstream of the transcription initiation site[20]. This regulatory element exhibits open chromatin architecture enriched with active H3K27ac marks during embryogenesis and juvenility, transitioning to a closed state with repressive H3K27me3 marks in mature plants[20,21]. DNA hypomethylation facilitates PRC2 recruitment and H3K27me3 accumulation at miR156 loci, progressively repressing miR156 expression via cell division-coupled dilution of active chromatin marks[22]. Embryonic factor LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) orchestrates this resetting through dual mechanisms: recruiting SWITCH/SUCROSE NON-FERMENTING (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodelers to maintain JRR accessibility while suppressing PRC2 activity by repressing FIE (FERTILIZATION INDEPENDENT ENDOSPERM) expression[20].

      Parallel vernalization memory resetting occurs through embryonic reactivation of FLC via LEC2-mediated chromatin reorganization and ABA signaling[23,24]. FRIGIDA (FRI), a scaffold protein that enhances FLC expression by recruiting transcriptional machinery, prevents premature flowering[25], while cold-induced VIVIPAROUS1/ABI3-LIKE 1 (VAL1)/VAL2-PRC2 complexes silence FLC through H3K27me3 deposition at cold memory elements (CMEs)[26]. Embryonic maturation triggers ABA accumulation, driving ABI3/ABI5 recruitment to ABA-responsive elements (ABREs) that reset FLC chromatin to an active state[27].

      Contrasting with angiosperm systems, gymnosperms employ unique age-regulatory mechanisms. The MADS-box gene DAL1 (DEFICIENS-AGAMOUS-LIKE 1) functions as a conserved age timer in conifers, showing progressive DNA demethylation and age-correlated upregulation to activate reproductive programs[28]. The recent identification of PtDAL1 (Pt6G35050) as a direct activator of LEAFY homologs in P. tabuliformis highlights its role in converting temporal information into reproductive signals[29]. Intriguingly, DAL1 undergoes transcriptional silencing during pollen and embryo development across conifer species[29], mirroring miR156 resetting patterns in angiosperms. However, the mechanistic basis for conifer age-timer resetting remains unknown.

      Emerging evidence suggests potential conservation of B3 domain transcription factors (TFs) in developmental timer regulation. Angiosperm B3 proteins (LEC2, ABI3, VAL1) coordinate chromatin resetting through sequence-specific DNA binding[24,26,27], raising intriguing questions about their homologs in gymnosperms. Here, the identification of a B3 family transcription factor, PtABI3, is reported as a pivotal regulator of PtDAL1 silencing during pollen maturation in P. tabuliformis. Phylogenetic and molecular analyses characterize PtABI3 (PtXG06020) as a functional ortholog of angiosperm ABI3. These findings reveal that age-timer regulation is a conserved mechanism, establishing an evolutionary link between angiosperms and gymnosperms in temporal and developmental memory.

    • Arabidopsis thaliana: plants were grown in a 2:1 mixture of charcoal-enriched and nutrient-supplemented soil at 23 °C under either long-day (16-h light/8-h dark) or short-day (8-h light/16-h dark) photoperiods, with a photosynthetic photon flux density of 120 µmol/m2/s.

      Pinus tabuliformis: samples were collected from a clonal seed orchard in Pingquan City, Hebei Province, PR China, including apical buds, vegetative buds, needles, cambium, roots, female and male cones, pollen, embryos, and ovules. Male cone samples were also collected from mature trees at Beijing Forestry University, China. All samples were immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. For each tissue type, at least three biological replicates were prepared.

      Nicotiana benthamiana: plants were grown in a 1:1 mix of vermiculite and charcoal-based soil at 23 °C under long-day conditions (16-h light/8-h dark) with a photosynthetic photon flux density of 120 µmol/m2/s. Four-week-old plants with six to eight fully expanded true leaves were used for experiments.

    • Total RNA was extracted from shoot apex tissues of Pinus tabuliformis at various developmental stages using the Plant Total RNA Extraction Kit (Cat. No. RC401-01, Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, PR China), following the manufacturer's protocol. To eliminate potential genomic DNA contamination, an on-column DNase I digestion step was included during RNA purification. RNA quantity and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and RNA integrity was further evaluated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, USA). Only RNA samples with an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) > 7.0 were used for subsequent cDNA library construction and RNA-seq analysis.

      mRNA was fragmented into shorter sequences through divalent ion-dependent cleavage under elevated temperature conditions. The fragmented RNA was then used for cDNA library preparation via reverse transcription, following the protocol of the Illumina mRNA-Seq Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The constructed libraries were subsequently sequenced using paired-end sequencing (2 × 150 bp) on the Illumina NovaSeq platform. After quality filtering, clean reads from each sample were mapped to the P. tabuliformis reference genome[30], and transcript quantification was performed using Kallisto. All RNA-seq analyses in this study were performed with three or more biological replicates per condition.

    • All vectors and restriction sites used in this study are shown in Supplementary Table S1, and all primers used in the construction of the vectors are shown in Supplementary Table S2.

    • The coding sequence (CDS) of PtABI3 was amplified via PCR from Pinus tabuliformis cDNA and subsequently cloned into the plant expression vector pBI121 under the control of the 35S promoter. The vector's native nptII marker was kept for transgenic event selection. All constructed plasmids were confirmed by Sanger sequencing to verify proper insert orientation and sequence integrity. For A. thaliana (ecotype Col-0) transformation, Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying the expression constructs was employed using the floral dip method[31]. Primary transformants were selected on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 50 mg/L kanamycin. Transgenic seedlings with four to five true leaves were transferred to pots containing a 2:1 mixture of nutrient soil and peat moss. Both transgenic and wild-type control plants were maintained in controlled environment chambers under long-day (LD) conditions.

    • The full-length coding sequence (CDS) of PtABI3, including its PtABI3_A1B1B2 and PtABI3_B3 domains, was cloned into the pGreen62-SK vector to generate effector constructs. For reporter constructs, the promoter region of PtDAL1 (–2,301 to 0 bp upstream of the transcription start site) was amplified from genomic DNA and cloned into the pGreenII 0800-LUC vector. A series of PtDAL1 promoter truncations were generated: PtDAL1-1 (–2,301 to –1,478 bp), PtDAL1-2 (–1,479 to –1,171 bp), PtDAL1-3 (–1,172 to –760 bp), PtDAL1-4 (–761 to –622 bp), PtDAL1-5 (–621 to 0 bp). All recombinant vectors, along with the corresponding negative controls, were transformed into A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 harboring the helper plasmid pSoup. Transformed Agrobacterium colonies were cultured in LB medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,500 rpm for 10 min and resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM acetosyringone, pH 5.6) to an OD600 of ~1.0[32]. For N. benthamiana infiltration, leaves from four-week-old plants were co-infiltrated with mixtures of effector and reporter constructs. For P. tabuliformis, the callus collected at ~14 d post-inoculation was used. After infiltration, plants were kept in the dark for 12 h and then transferred to growth chambers under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod for 48–60 h. Prior to luminescence imaging, leaves were sprayed with 10 μM d-luciferin, and luminescence was captured using a Tianneng5200 multimolecular imaging system. All primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2.

    • The A1B1B2 and B3 domains of PtABI3 were individually cloned into the pB42AD vector using seamless cloning technology, generating the effector constructs pB42AD-PtABI3_A1B1B2 and pB42AD-PtABI3_B3. The PtDAL1-4 promoter fragment (–761 to –622 bp) was inserted into the pLacz2µ vector to create the reporter plasmid pLacZ2µ-PtDAL1-4. For interaction analysis, both fusion plasmids were co-transformed into the yeast strain EGY48. Four stringent negative controls were established: pB42AD + pLacz2µ, pB42AD + pLacZ2µ-PtDAL1-4, pB42AD-PtABI3_A1B1B2 + pLacz2µ, pB42AD-PtABI3_B3 + pLacz2µ. Transformants were selected on SD/-Trp/-Ura solid medium and incubated at 28–30 °C for 3–5 d. Six positive colonies were subsequently cultured in liquid SD/-Trp/-Ura medium at 28 °C with 200 rpm shaking for 24–36 h. For β-galactosidase assays, 2 μL aliquots of each culture were spotted onto synthetic glucose plates lacking uracil and tryptophan but supplemented with 20 μg/mL X-gal[33]. Plates were incubated in darkness for 3–5 d to monitor colony color development.

    • The PtABI3_B3 coding sequence was cloned into the pGEX-4T-1 vector to generate a GST-tagged fusion protein (GST-PtABI3_B3), which was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells. Protein expression was induced with 0.3 mM IPTG at 16 °C for 16–18 h after reaching an OD600 of 0.8 at 37 °C. For EMSA, biotin-labeled probes (Supplementary Table S3) were prepared using the Biotin Labeling Kit (GS008, Beyotime, PR China). Unlabeled specific probes served as cold competitors, while mutant probes containing 'AAAAAA' substitutions in the RY motifs were used as controls. The EMSA was carried out using the Chemiluminescent Kit (GS009, Beyotime, PR China), and signals were detected on nylon membranes using a BIORAD ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System. Primer sequences used for EMSA are provided in Supplementary Table S2.

    • The 35S::PtABI3-GFP construct was generated and transformed into A. tumefaciens strain GV3101. Transformed cells were cultured in LB liquid medium containing 50 mg/L kanamycin (Kana) and 50 mg/L rifampicin (Rif) at 28 °C with shaking (200–220 rpm) for 24 h. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (4,500 rpm, 5 min, room temperature), washed once or twice with infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, pH 5.6, 10 mM MgCl2, 150 μM acetosyringone), and resuspended in the same buffer to an OD600 of 0.8–1.2. Suspensions were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 1–3 h before infiltration. For leaf infiltration, bacterial suspensions were pressure-injected into the abaxial epidermis of N. benthamiana leaves using a 1 mL syringe. After infiltration, plants were kept in darkness for at least 8 h, then transferred to a 16 h light/8 h photoperiod for 48–60 h. GFP fluorescence was visualized using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope with 488 nm excitation and emission detection at 505–530 nm.

    • To analyse the phylogenetic relationships of ABI3 homologs in P. tabuliformis with those from other plants, a phylogenetic tree was constructed. The amino acid sequences of ABI3 homologs from all species (Supplementary Table S4) were aligned using the CLUSTAL algorithm. The phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA X software using its maximum likelihood (ML) method, with bootstrap values set to 800 replicates. The protein sequences used in this study were downloaded from the GenBank database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

    • All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise specified. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test depending on the experimental design and data distribution.

      Error bars in the figures represent the standard deviation (SD) of the mean. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (* p < 0.05), less than 0.01 was considered a highly significant difference (** p < 0.01), and less than 0.001 was considered an extremely significant difference (*** p < 0.001).

    • Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed on all samples collected during male cone development using standard methodologies[34,35]. Genes were hierarchically clustered via average linkage based on topological overlap measures, and a clustering dendrogram was generated. Subsequently, the correlation between hub genes within the module containing PtDAL1 and male cone developmental stages was systematically evaluated.

    • The three-dimensional structure of PtABI3 was predicted using AlphaFold3[36], the latest iteration of the deep learning-based protein structure prediction system. The full-length amino acid sequence of PtABI3 was submitted to the AlphaFold3 pipeline with default parameters. The model was generated using the multimer prediction mode to account for potential intra-molecular interactions. Five models were produced for each prediction, with the highest-ranked model selected based on the predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) score. The predicted structure was visualized and analysed using PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (Version 2.5.2, Schrödinger, LLC). Structural domains were identified through comparison with known B3 domain-containing proteins in the Protein Data Bank (PDB).

    • Sequence data used or produced for this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries and CPIR (http://conifers.cn/#/) under the accession numbers in Supplementary Table S4.

    • The previous study revealed that DAL1 serves as a conserved age biomarker in conifers[30,37]. Interestingly, its expression undergoes dramatic suppression during the late stage of male cone development and is completely silenced in mature pollen[28]. To investigate regulatory factors involved in this DAL1 expression resetting process, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed on transcriptomes from five developmental stages of male cones of P. tabuliformis. The result revealed 2,979 genes co-clustered with DAL1 in the blue module (MEblue) (Fig. 1a). Using thresholds of both gene significance (GS) and module membership (kME) greater than 0.9, the candidate list was further refined to 860 genes, including 56 transcription factors (TFs). Tissue-specific expression profiling (Fig. 1b) showed that some genes, such as PtXG51640 (Fig. 1c), displayed ubiquitous expression across multiple tissues—a pattern inconsistent with PtDAL1's strict resetting specificity to reproductive tissues. Notably, half of the candidates exhibited reproductive tissue-specific expressions (Fig. 1b), as potential DAL1 resetting regulators, such as PtABI3, PtLOB31, PtLOB29, PtDREB77, PtREM8, PtXG51640, PtTIFY62, and PtTIFY51 (Fig. 1dj).

      Figure 1. 

      Identification of transcription factors associated with DAL1 expression during the development of the male cone in P. tabuliformis. (a) WGCNA analysis of genes at different developmental stages of the male cone. Cluster dendrograms were obtained using the gene average chain hierarchical clustering method based on topological overlap. Co-expressed gene modules are indicated by different color bars below the dendrogram. (b) Expression of core transcription factors related to the resetting process of PtDAL1 in male cones in different tissues, where expression has been log-transformed. (c)–(j) Expression of core transcription factors related to the resetting process of PtDAL1 in the male cone in different tissues.

    • Given that B3 family TFs are known to play pivotal roles in resetting expression of the angiosperm age timer miR156 and vernalization memory factor FLC[29], the focus was on PtABI3, also a B3 family member in P. tabuliformis. Intriguingly, PtABI3 exhibits striking spatiotemporal complementarity with PtDAL1 expression in different tissues and organs across developmental stages. PtABI3 is exclusively expressed in male cones, mature pollen, and embryos, whereas PtDAL1 shows suppressed or undetectable expression in these tissues (Fig. 2). During late stages of male cone development, a stage-specific expression switch was observed (Fig. 2ce). At stage four (April 12) of male cone development, PtABI3 remained silent while PtDAL1 showed high expression. This pattern dramatically reversed at stage five (April 20), with PtABI3 abruptly activated and PtDAL1 expression halved (Fig. 2ce). The two genes exhibited a strong negative correlation (Pearson's R = –0.96). Notably, PtDAL1 was completely silenced in mature pollen, where PtABI3 remained active (Fig. 2d, e). This inverse temporal-spatial regulation suggests PtABI3 may directly participate in resetting PtDAL1 expression during reproductive development, mirroring B3 TFs' conserved silencing mechanisms in flowering plants.

      Figure 2. 

      Expression patterns of PtDAL1 and PtABI3 in different tissues and developmental stages of P. tabuliformis. (a), (b) Expression patterns of PtDAL1 and PtABI3 in different tissues of P. tabuliformis, showing a clear spatial complementary relationship. (c), (d) Expression patterns of PtDAL1 and PtABI3 during pollen development in P. tabuliformis, showing a clear temporal complementary relationship[28]. (e) Expression patterns of PtDAL1 and PtABI3 in the final two stages of male cone development and pollen in P. tabuliformis.

    • Phylogenetic analysis showed that PtABI3 is a homolog of angiosperm ABI3 proteins (Fig. 3a). The PtABI3 protein, like its homologs, comprises four conserved domains: A1, B1, B2, and B3 (Fig. 3b), which are critical for transcriptional regulation (A1), nuclear localization and protein interactions (B1, B2), as well as DNA binding (B3)[38,39]. Although gymnosperm ABI3 proteins and angiosperm homologs form two distinct clades (Fig. 3a), their core domains remain highly conserved, particularly the B1, B2, and B3 domains (Fig. 3c). AlphaFold structural predictions indicate that the B3 domain of PtABI3 serves as the primary DNA-binding domain (Fig. 3d), with its sequence and structure being remarkably conserved across seed plants (Fig. 3c; Supplementary Fig. S1). This conservation suggests not only its indispensable functional role but also potentially shared DNA motif recognition mechanisms during evolution.

      Figure 3. 

      Phylogenetic and structural analysis of PtABI3. (a) The phylogenetic tree of PtABI3, with the species and sequence information used presented in Supplementary Table S4. PtABI3 is highlighted in red in the phylogenetic tree. (b) Schematic diagram of the conserved domains in the PtABI3 protein, including four conserved domains: A1, B1, B2, and B3. (c) Multiple sequence alignment of the amino acid sequences of the ABI3 proteins, with conserved domains marked by horizontal lines of different colors. The PtABI3 sequence is highlighted with a blue box. (d) Three-dimensional structure prediction of PtABI3, where red represents the B1 domain, purple represents the B2 domain, and cyan represents the B3 domain. The right figure is a magnified view of the left figure, showing the binding pattern of PtABI3 with the DNA sequence. (e) Subcellular localization of the PtABI3 protein in N. benthamiana epidermal cells.

      Subcellular localization assays in tobacco leaf epidermal cells demonstrated nuclear enrichment of PtABI3, with additional cytoplasmic distribution (Fig. 3e), consistent with its role in transcriptional regulation. Collectively, these findings imply that PtABI3 likely retains transcriptional regulatory functions analogous to its angiosperm counterparts.

    • Given the current technical challenges in genetic transformation of P. tabuliformis, which include low transformation efficiency and recalcitrance of tissues to regenerate, functional validation of PtABI3 was conducted in the model plant A. thaliana. Overexpressing PtABI3 plants exhibited distinct morphological alterations compared to wild-type (WT) Arabidopsis (Fig. 4). The most conspicuous phenotype was significantly delayed flowering time (Fig. 4a, b). Concurrently, 35S::PtABI3 lines produced more inflorescences than WT (Fig. 4c, d), along with overall plant dwarfism and reduced leaf size (Fig. 4b, e). Remarkably, 35S::PtABI3 plants persisted in vegetative growth when WT plants bolted, initiating reproductive growth only after developing 15–18 leaves (Fig. 4f, g). These phenotypic similarities mirror observations in angiosperm PtABI3-overexpression lines, suggesting potential overlap in downstream target gene sets between PtABI3 and its angiosperm counterparts in Arabidopsis.

      Figure 4. 

      Overexpression of PtABI3 in A. thaliana. (a), (b) Compared to wild-type (WT) Arabidopsis, all 35S::PtABI3 lines exhibit a distinct late-flowering and delayed-development phenotype. (c), (d) Representative images of inflorescences from 35S::PtABI3_8 lines and WT Arabidopsis. (e), (f) Images of 35S::PtABI3_8 lines during development, showing the number of rosette leaves immediately before and at the bolting stage. (g) The number of rosette leaves was counted at the first flowering stage for both wild-type and 35S::PtABI3 lines, **** p < 0.0001.

    • To determine whether PtABI3 directly regulates PtDAL1 expression, dual-luciferase reporter (DLR) assays were performed using a –2,301 bp fragment of the PtDAL1 promoter region. The result showed that PtABI3 significantly suppressed PtDAL1 promoter activity (Fig. 5a). Given that PtABI3 contains four structural domains (Fig. 3b), truncations retaining either the A1B1B2 domains or the B3 domain were generated to identify the functional domain responsible for this repression. Only PtABI3_B3 exhibited significant inhibitory effects (Fig. 5b), indicating the indispensability of the B3 domain.

      Figure 5. 

      PtABI3 binds directly to the RY motif in the PtDAL1 promoter region to inhibit its expression. (a) A dual luciferase reporter assay was performed on the full-length PtABI3 protein and the PtDAL1 promoter. Differential analysis indicated that PtABI3 significantly inhibits the PtDAL1 promoter (**, p < 0.01). (b) Dual luciferase reporter assays were performed using different domains of PtABI3 and the PtDAL1 promoter. (*, p < 0.05, ns, p > 0.05). (c) Schematic diagram of the truncation sites in the PtDAL1 promoter region. (d) Schematic diagram of vector construction. (e), (f) Dual luciferase reporter assay of PtABI3_B3 and five PtDAL1 promoter fragments. (g) Quantitative detection of dual luciferase assay LUC (firefly luciferase) fluorescence values. (h) Dual luciferase assay of PtABI3_B3 and PtDAL1-4 in P. tabuliformis callus. (i) Direct binding of PtABI3_B3 to the PtDAL1-4 promoter in a yeast one-hybrid system. (j) EMSA using a biotin-labeled DNA probe containing the RY motif from PtDAL1-4 and purified GST-PtABI3_B3 protein. GST protein, unlabeled probes (competitors), and mutant probes were used as controls.

      To pinpoint the PtDAL1 promoter region bound by PtABI3, the –2,301 bp of the PtDAL1 promoter region was divided into five segments (Fig. 5c). DLR assays revealed that PtABI3_B3 binds to PtDAL1-4 (–761 to –621 bp) and PtDAL1-5 (–621 to –1 bp) but only repress transcriptional activation mediated by PtDAL1-4 (Fig. 5dg). Notably, the binding of PtABI3 to the PtDAL1-5 segment exhibits a certain level of promoter activity; however, the net repressive effect observed on the full-length promoter indicates that the inhibitory effect mediated by PtDAL1-4 is the dominant regulatory mechanism. To validate this regulation in the native system, the experiment in P. tabuliformis callus was replicated, confirming that PtABI3_B3 suppresses PtDAL1 promoter activity in its endogenous context (Fig. 5h). Yeast one-hybrid assays further demonstrated direct binding of PtABI3_B3 to segment four of PtDAL1 promoter (Fig. 5i). Notably, segment four contains an RY motif (CATGCA, –649 to –644 bp), a conserved binding site for B3 domain proteins. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) using a 39-bp biotin-labeled probe spanning the RY motif (–663 to –624 bp) showed that GST-PtABI3_B3 fusion protein specifically binds the wild-type probe but not a mutated RY motif control (Fig. 5j). These results indicate that PtABI3 directly represses PtDAL1 expression in P. tabuliformis by binding the RY motif in its promoter via the B3 domain. This mechanism may serve as a critical component of PtDAL1 expression resetting during pollen maturation.

    • As a representative conifer species, P. tabuliformis undergoes complex and tightly regulated developmental transitions during its reproductive cycle. This regulation is governed by an age-dependent molecular network that ensures proper timing and coordination of key developmental events. In this study, PtABI3 (PtXG06020) was identified as a central regulator that directly suppresses the expression of PtDAL1 (Pt6G35050), the age bio-marker, through binding to RY cis-regulatory elements (CATGCA). Moreover, a functional model was proposed wherein PtABI3 mediates the resetting of the age-associated marker PtDAL1 during male gametophyte development (Fig. 6). These findings expand the understanding of ABI3 family functions in gymnosperms and provide novel insights into the evolution of regulatory mechanisms underlying reproductive phase transitions in seed plants.

      Figure 6. 

      Schematic diagram of PtABI3 inhibition of PtDAL1 during male gametophyte development. The age biomarker DAL1 is reset during intergenerational alternation. During male gametophyte development, PtABI3 directly binds to the RY motif on the PtDAL1 promoter through the B3 domain, directly inhibiting its expression.

      In angiosperms, B3-domain-containing transcription factors such as VAL (VP1/ABI3-LIKE) are known to repress embryonic gene programs by recognizing Sph/RY motifs (CATGCA), thereby preserving meristematic identity[40]. The RY motif is a highly conserved cis-element central to seed development, serving as the binding site for B3 domain proteins[41]. It is pivotal for the expression of seed storage protein genes and the establishment of dormancy[42,43]. Beyond this, it is implicated in stress responses[44], flowering time regulation[45], and, as this work shows, in vegetative developmental transitions in conifers. Given the high conservation of the B3 domain across seed plants (Fig. 3c), it is reasonable to hypothesize that similar regulatory mechanisms may operate in gymnosperms. These results confirm that PtABI3 specifically binds to the RY motif within the PtDAL1 promoter via its B3 domain, leading to direct transcriptional repression. This mechanism shares temporal features with the ABI3-FLC regulatory module in Arabidopsis[29]. However, there are differences in the regulatory directions; Arabidopsis ABI3 acts synergistically with LEC1 (LEAFY COTYLEDON 1) to erase vernalization memory and reactivate FLC (FLOWERING LOCUS C) expression, while PtABI3 inhibits PtDAL1. This divergence may reflect functional specialization driven by evolutionary adaptation in gymnosperms. Please note that our DLR analysis shows that the binding of the PtDAL1-5 segment to PtABI3 exhibits a certain level of activation capacity. This suggests the existence of a complex regulatory pattern: the net inhibitory effect of PtABI3 on PtDAL1 is most likely caused by the dominant inhibitory effect mediated by the PtDAL1-4 segment containing the RY motif, which overrides the potential activation effect mediated by other regions such as PtDAL1-5. The balance between these inhibitory and activating forces may enable the fine-tuned regulation of PtDAL1 expression.

      ABI3 exhibits dynamic regulatory roles across developmental stages. For example, in Arabidopsis, ABI3 differentially modulates miR156 expression. It interacts with various bZIP cofactors (AREB, ABSCISIC ACID-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING PROTEIN) to form transcriptional complexes that bind ABRE sites, influencing multiple physiological processes[4648]. The dwarfism and delayed flowering observed in our PtABI3-OE Arabidopsis lines are consistent with the findings of Zhang et al. in soybean (Glycine max)[49]. Ectopic expression of a master seed regulator like ABI3 in vegetative tissues likely causes widespread misregulation of gene networks. Additionally, the B2 domain of ABI3/VP1 has been shown to induce nucleosome sliding, promoting open chromatin structures in target promoters[50]. A well-characterized case is the regulation of At2S3, where FUS3 (FERTILIZATION INDEPENDENT SEED DEVELOPMENT 3) and LEC2 directly bind RY elements. At the same time, ABI3 cooperates with bZIP proteins bound to G-box motifs (CACGTG), forming a 'dual-factor synergistic enhancer' that amplifies gene expression signals[51]. Therefore, future studies should investigate whether PtABI3 employs similar protein interaction strategies to regulate PtDAL1 expression during male cone development.

      Despite growing interest in conifer developmental biology, research on ABI3 homologs remains limited. Evidence from heterologous expression experiments indicates that ABI3 from Chamaecyparis nootkatensis can partially rescue the abi3 mutant phenotype in Arabidopsis[52], suggesting that core functions of ABI3 are conserved across seed plants. However, the distinct reproductive strategies of gymnosperms imply that ABI3 may have evolved unique roles in conifers. The PtABI3-mediated regulation of PtDAL1 expression observed in this study, supported by yeast one-hybrid, EMSA, and transient dual-luciferase assays in callus tissue, provides molecular evidence supporting a potential age biomarker resetting mechanism in gymnosperm reproductive development (Fig. 6). These findings may contribute to understanding the evolution of regulatory networks in ancestral seed plants.

      While these findings represent significant progress, several questions remain unresolved. First, the precise regulatory position of PtABI3 within the PtDAL1 resetting pathway is still unclear, and the identities of potential interacting partners or upstream regulators remain to be determined. Second, although the current analysis focuses on male reproductive tissues, future work should assess whether a similar resetting mechanism operates in female reproductive organs. Finally, the involvement of epigenetic modifications, histone remodeling, or non-coding RNA pathways in the clearance of age-associated markers warrants further investigation.

    • This work provides the first evidence that B3 transcription factors mediate age-biomarker PtDAL1 expression resetting in conifers, bridging a fundamental gap between gymnosperm and angiosperm regulatory paradigms.

      This study demonstrates that PtABI3 is a gymnosperm ortholog of angiosperm ABI3 proteins, retaining conserved functional domains and regulatory properties. PtABI3 appears to silence PtDAL1 during pollen maturation, likely through B3 domain-mediated binding to the RY motif in its promoter. This repression mechanism exhibits striking parallels with B3 TF function in angiosperms, suggesting an ancient origin for transcriptional resetting of developmental timing genes in seed plants.

      These findings not only advance understanding of conifer reproductive biology but also reveal a conserved regulatory mechanism, reflecting the deep conservation of transcriptional regulation across 300 million years of seed plant evolution. Future studies should explore whether this PtABI3-PtDAL1 module coordinates with other age-related pathways to govern developmental transitions in perennial conifers.

      • This work was supported by the 'Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program' (Grant No. JWZQ20240102012) and 'the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. QNTD202502)'.

      • The authors confirm contributions to the paper as follows: study conception and design, funding acquisition and project administration: Niu SH; data collection, analysis, interpretion: Song YT; sample preparation and performing experiments: Li FY, Chen X, Zhao HH, Wang DY, Zhang XH; experimental assistance: Li JJ, Zhang H, Wang PY, Zuo Q, Han FX, Yang JH, Zhu QY, Zhou B; draft the mauscript: Niu SH. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The RNA-seq data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in CPIR (http://conifers.cn/).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Shihui Niu is the Editorial Board member of Forestry Research who was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and the research groups.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Yi-Tong Song, Feng-Yi Li

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  References (52)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Song YT, Li FY, Chen X, Zhao HH, Wang DY, et al. 2025. PtABI3 represses the age biomarker gene PtDAL1 during male cone development in conifer. Forestry Research 5: e021 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0021
    Song YT, Li FY, Chen X, Zhao HH, Wang DY, et al. 2025. PtABI3 represses the age biomarker gene PtDAL1 during male cone development in conifer. Forestry Research 5: e021 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0021

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return