Search
2026 Volume 6
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

PtoHsfB1 regulates growth and salt response by affecting ABA biosynthesis in Populus tomentosa

  • # Authors contributed equally: Kunjin Han, Huayu Si

More Information
  • Received: 09 August 2025
    Revised: 16 January 2026
    Accepted: 02 February 2026
    Published online: 28 February 2026
    Forestry Research  6 Article number: e005 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Poplar is an important commercial timber species and a model organism for forest molecular biology. Here, we identified PtoHsfB1, a subgroup B heat shock transcription factor from Populus tomentosa that is homologous to AtHsfB1 and PtrHsfB1, and contains the conserved repression motif '-LFGV-'. To elucidate its function, transgenic poplars overexpressing PtoHsfB1 were generated. Overexpression significantly enhanced growth rate and biomass accumulation. Histological analyses revealed increased cambial cell layers and enlarged phloem caps, indicating a positive role in cambial activity and phloem development. In roots, PtoHsfB1 promoted growth by suppressing abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis. Conversely, PtoHsfB1 overexpression reduced salt stress tolerance, as evidenced by increased oxidative damage under salt stress conditions. Collectively, these results show that PtoHsfB1 plays a dual regulatory role by promoting growth but negatively regulating salt stress responses, highlighting its potential application in improving poplar phloem yield and soil conservation.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 Primers sequences used for gene cloning and for identification of transgenic lines.
    Supplementary Table S2 Primer sequences used for quantitative real-time PCR verified selected DEG candidates.
    Supplementary Table S3 The Aux/IAA genes downregulated in the roots of P. tomentosa.
    Supplementary Fig. S1 Leaf phenotypes and quantities of WT and OE.
    Supplementary Fig. S2 Phenotype of stem cross-sections of the tenth internodes.
    Supplementary Fig. S3 Phenotypes of WT and transgenic lines after 28 days of culture on rooting medium.
    Supplementary Fig. S4 GO classifications of DEGs in OE1-VS-WT and OE8-VS-WT. The y- axis indicates the number of DEGs, and the X-axis indicates the top 25 enriched GO terms. The red, green and blue colors represent biological processes, cellular components and molecular function, respectively.
    Supplementary Fig. S5 ABA content in stem tissues.
    Supplementary Fig. S6 Relative expression of PtoHsfB1 in different tissues under 200 mM NaCl treatment at different time points.
  • [1] Guo Y, Shi YX, Song S, Zhao YQ, Lu MZ. 2025. PagNAC2a promotes phloem fiber development by regulating PagATL2 in poplar. Plant Science 350:112283 doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112283

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] An X, Gao K, Chen Z, Li J, Yang X, et al. 2022. High quality haplotype-resolved genome assemblies of Populus tomentosa Carr., a stabilized interspecific hybrid species widespread in Asia. Molecular Ecology Resources 22:786−802 doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13507

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Cseke LJ, Cseke SB, Podila GK. 2007. High efficiency poplar transformation. Plant Cell Reports 26:1529−1538 doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0365-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Borthakur D, Busov V, Cao XH, Du Q, Gailing O, et al. 2022. Current status and trends in forest genomics. Forestry Research 2:11 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Song Q, He F, Kong L, Yang J, Wang X, et al. 2024. The IAA17.1/HSFA5a module enhances salt tolerance in Populus tomentosa by regulating flavonol biosynthesis and ROS levels in lateral roots. New Phytologist 241:592−606 doi: 10.1111/nph.19382

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Zhu Y, Li L. 2024. Wood of trees: cellular structure, molecular formation, and genetic engineering. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 66:443−467 doi: 10.1111/jipb.13589

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Jacob P, Hirt H, Bendahmane A. 2017. The heat-shock protein/chaperone network and multiple stress resistance. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15:405−414 doi: 10.1111/pbi.12659

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Bakery A, Vraggalas S, Shalha B, Chauhan H, Benhamed M, et al. 2024. Heat stress transcription factors as the central molecular rheostat to optimize plant survival and recovery from heat stress. New Phytologist 244:51−64 doi: 10.1111/nph.20017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Scharf KD, Berberich T, Ebersberger I, Nover L. 2012. The plant heat stress transcription factor (Hsf) family: structure, function and evolution. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1819:104−119 doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.10.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Guo Q, Wei R, Xu M, Yao W, Jiang J, et al. 2023. Genome-wide analysis of HSF family and overexpression of PsnHSF21 confers salt tolerance in Populus simonii × P. nigra. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1160102 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1160102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Guo J, Wu J, Ji Q, Wang C, Luo L, et al. 2008. Genome-wide analysis of heat shock transcription factor families in rice and Arabidopsis. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 35:105−118 doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60016-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Guo M, Liu JH, Ma X, Luo DX, Gong ZH, et al. 2016. The plant heat stress transcription factors (HSFs): structure, regulation, and function in response to abiotic stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:114 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Li Z, Li Z, Ji Y, Wang C, Wang S, et al. 2024. The heat shock factor 20-HSF4-cellulose synthase A2 module regulates heat stress tolerance in maize. The Plant Cell 36:2652−2667 doi: 10.1093/plcell/koae106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Tan W, Chen J, Yue X, Chai S, Liu W, et al. 2023. The heat response regulators HSFA1s promote Arabidopsis thermomorphogenesis via stabilizing PIF4 during the day. Science Advances 9:eadh1738 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh1738

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Huang Y, An J, Sircar S, Bergis C, Lopes CD, et al. 2023. HSFA1a modulates plant heat stress responses and alters the 3D chromatin organization of enhancer-promoter interactions. Nature Communications 14:469 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36227-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Chen H, Liu X, Li S, Yuan L, Mu H, et al. 2023. The class B heat shock factor HSFB1 regulates heat tolerance in grapevine. Horticulture Research 10:uhad001 doi: 10.1093/hr/uhad001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Kumar M, Busch W, Birke H, Kemmerling B, Nürnberger T, et al. 2009. Heat shock factors HsfB1 and HsfB2b are involved in the regulation of Pdf1.2 expression and pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 2:152−165 doi: 10.1093/mp/ssn095

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Gao L, Pan L, Shi Y, Zeng R, Li Z, et al. 2024. Genetic variation in a heat shock transcription factor modulates cold tolerance in maize. Molecular Plant 17:1423−1438 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2024.07.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Fragkostefanakis S, Simm S, El-Shershaby A, Hu Y, Bublak D, et al. 2019. The repressor and co-activator HsfB1 regulates the major heat stress transcription factors in tomato. Plant, Cell & Environment 42:874−890 doi: 10.1111/pce.13434

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Begum T, Reuter R, Schöffl F. 2013. Overexpression of AtHsfB4 induces specific effects on root development of Arabidopsis. Mechanisms of Development 130:54−60 doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2012.05.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Zhao K, Dang H, Nan S, Yu C, Li Y, et al. 2025. PagHSF4 mediates the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid and plant hormone signal transduction to regulate the growth and development as well as salt stress tolerance of poplar. Industrial Crops and Products 234:121582 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121582

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Chen K, Li GJ, Bressan RA, Song CP, Zhu JK, et al. 2020. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 62:25−54 doi: 10.1111/jipb.12899

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Brookbank BP, Patel J, Gazzarrini S, Nambara E. 2021. Role of basal ABA in plant growth and development. Genes 12:1936 doi: 10.3390/genes12121936

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Belda-Palazón B, Costa M, Beeckman T, Rolland F, Baena-González E. 2022. ABA represses TOR and root meristem activity through nuclear exit of the SnRK1 kinase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119:e2204862119 doi: 10.1101/2021.12.27.474243

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Qin H, Wang J, Zhou J, Qiao J, Li Y, et al. 2023. Abscisic acid promotes auxin biosynthesis to inhibit primary root elongation in rice. Plant Physiology 191:1953−1967 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac586

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Rowe J, Grangé-Guermente M, Exposito-Rodriguez M, Wimalasekera R, Lenz MO, et al. 2023. Next-generation ABACUS biosensors reveal cellular ABA dynamics driving root growth at low aerial humidity. Nature Plants 9:1103−1115 doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01447-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Dong H, Chen Q, Fu Y, Xie H, Li T, et al. 2024. PbGBF3 enhances salt response in pear by upregulating PbAPL2 and PbSDH1 and reducing ABA-mediated salt sensitivity. The Plant Journal 119:2837−2853 doi: 10.1111/tpj.16953

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Song LY, Xu CQ, Zhang LD, Li J, Jiang LW, et al. 2024. Trehalose along with ABA promotes the salt tolerance of Avicennia marina by regulating Na+ transport. The Plant Journal 119:2349−2362 doi: 10.1111/tpj.16921

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Liu KH, Lin Z, Guo Y, Zhang R, Li Y, et al. 2025. ABA-activated low-nanomolar Ca2+-CPK signalling controls root cap cycle plasticity and stress adaptation. Nature Plants 11:90−104 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3929094/v1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Barrero JM, Rodríguez PL, Quesada V, Piqueras P, Ponce MR, et al. 2006. Both abscisic acid (ABA)-dependent and ABA-independent pathways govern the induction of NCED3, AAO3 and ABA1 in response to salt stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 29:2000−2008 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01576.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Xiang Z, Zhang L, Long Y, Zhang M, Yao Y, et al. 2024. An ABA biosynthesis enzyme gene OsNCED4 regulates NaCl and cold stress tolerance in rice. Scientific Reports 14:26711 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78121-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28:2731−2739 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, et al. 2020. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Molecular Plant 13:1194−1202 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Sadowski I, Ma J, Triezenberg S, Ptashne M. 1988. GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator. Nature 335:563−564 doi: 10.1038/335563a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Du N, Liu X, Li Y, Chen S, Zhang J, et al. 2012. Genetic transformation of Populus tomentosa to improve salt tolerance. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 108:181−189 doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-0026-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9:671−675 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Zhao Y, Jia K, Tian Y, Han K, El-Kassaby YA, et al. 2023. Time-course transcriptomics analysis reveals key responses of Populus to salt stress. Industrial Crops and Products 194:116278 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116278

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2015. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nature Methods 12:357−360 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 15:550 doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Meng J, Cui X, Rao MK, Chen Y, Huang Y. 2013. Exome-based analysis for RNA epigenome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 29:1565−1567 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Lombardi M, De Gara L, Loreto F. 2021. Determinants of root system architecture for future-ready, stress-resilient crops. Physiologia Plantarum 172:2090−2097 doi: 10.1111/ppl.13439

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Yu Z, Duan X, Luo L, Dai S, Ding Z, et al. 2020. How plant hormones mediate salt stress responses. Trends in Plant Science 25:1117−1130 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.06.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Zheng L, Meng Y, Ma J, Zhao X, Cheng T, et al. 2015. Transcriptomic analysis reveals importance of ROS and phytohormones in response to short-term salinity stress in Populus tomentosa. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:678 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00678

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Tsikas D. 2017. Assessment of lipid peroxidation by measuring malondialdehyde (MDA) and relatives in biological samples: analytical and biological challenges. Analytical Biochemistry 524:13−30 doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.10.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Zhang T, Xiang Y, Ye M, Yuan M, Xu G, et al. 2025. The uORF-HsfA1a-WOX11 module controls crown root development in rice. New Phytologist 247:760−773 doi: 10.1111/nph.70214

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Czarnecka-verner E, Pan S, Salem T, Gurley WB. 2004. Plant class B HSFs inhibit transcription and exhibit affinity for TFIIB and TBP. Plant Molecular Biology 56:57−75 doi: 10.1007/s11103-004-2307-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Ikeda M, Ohme-Takagi M. 2009. A novel group of transcriptional repressors in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology 50:970−975 doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Noll GA, Furch ACU, Rose J, Visser F, Prüfer D. 2022. Guardians of the phloem – forisomes and beyond. New Phytologist 236:1245−1260 doi: 10.1111/nph.18476

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Teng Z, Lyu J, Chen Y, Zhang J, Ye N. 2023. Effects of stress-induced ABA on root architecture development: positive and negative actions. The Crop Journal 11:1072−1079 doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2023.06.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Schwarz N, Armbruster U, Iven T, Brückle L, Melzer M, et al. 2015. Tissue-specific accumulation and regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidase in Arabidopsis reflect the multiple functions of the enzyme in plastids. Plant and Cell Physiology 56:346−357 doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu167

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Zhao C, Zhang H, Song C, Zhu JK, Shabala S. 2020. Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. The Innovation 1:100017 doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Bian XH, Li W, Niu CF, Wei W, Hu Y, et al. 2020. A class B heat shock factor selected for during soybean domestication contributes to salt tolerance by promoting flavonoid biosynthesis. New Phytologist 225:268−283 doi: 10.1111/nph.16104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Jiang L, Xiao W, Chen H, Qi Y, Kuang X, et al. 2024. The OsGAPC1-OsSGL module negatively regulates salt tolerance by mediating abscisic acid biosynthesis in rice. New Phytologist 244:825−839 doi: 10.1111/nph.20061

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Han K, Si H, Li Y, Yan J, El-Kassaby YA, et al. 2026. PtoHsfB1 regulates growth and salt response by affecting ABA biosynthesis in Populus tomentosa. Forestry Research 6: e005 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0005
    Han K, Si H, Li Y, Yan J, El-Kassaby YA, et al. 2026. PtoHsfB1 regulates growth and salt response by affecting ABA biosynthesis in Populus tomentosa. Forestry Research 6: e005 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0005

Figures(8)

Article Metrics

Article views(505) PDF downloads(180)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

PtoHsfB1 regulates growth and salt response by affecting ABA biosynthesis in Populus tomentosa

Forestry Research  6 Article number: e005  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Poplar is an important commercial timber species and a model organism for forest molecular biology. Here, we identified PtoHsfB1, a subgroup B heat shock transcription factor from Populus tomentosa that is homologous to AtHsfB1 and PtrHsfB1, and contains the conserved repression motif '-LFGV-'. To elucidate its function, transgenic poplars overexpressing PtoHsfB1 were generated. Overexpression significantly enhanced growth rate and biomass accumulation. Histological analyses revealed increased cambial cell layers and enlarged phloem caps, indicating a positive role in cambial activity and phloem development. In roots, PtoHsfB1 promoted growth by suppressing abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis. Conversely, PtoHsfB1 overexpression reduced salt stress tolerance, as evidenced by increased oxidative damage under salt stress conditions. Collectively, these results show that PtoHsfB1 plays a dual regulatory role by promoting growth but negatively regulating salt stress responses, highlighting its potential application in improving poplar phloem yield and soil conservation.

    • Poplar trees possess high-quality fibers and rapid growth rates, making them a valuable renewable resource for paper and pulp production, industrial cordage, and soil erosion prevention[1,2]. The availability of complete genome databases and stable genetic transformation systems has established poplar trees as a model organism for studying woody plants[3,4]. Populus tomentosa (P. tomentosa), a tree native to northern China, is characterized by fast growth, a straight trunk, broad environmental adaptability, and longevity[3,5]. The application of modern biotechnology to enhance secondary growth and wood quality in P. tomentosa offers a practical approach to boosting biomass yield and timber quality[6]. In the annual herbaceous model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana), the heat shock factor (Hsf) family is extensively involved in plant growth and development as well as responses to various stresses. For example, Hsfa mutants exhibit defects in seed development[7], while overexpression of HsfA enhances combined resistance to heat stress, hypoxia, and salt stress[7]. Additionally, studies have shown that HsfB plays a crucial role in recovery following heat stress[8]. Although substantial progress has been made in A. thaliana, research on Hsf function in woody plants remains relatively scarce. In particular, the role of HsfB family members in tree growth and stress responses is still poorly understood. Therefore, expanding and deepening research on HsfB members in woody plants is essential for a comprehensive understanding of Hsf family functions.

      The Hsf family constitutes a group of transcription factors present in all eukaryotic species, including fungi, plants, and mammals[9]. Plant Hsfs are classified into three groups, A, B, and C[10,11]. Class HsfA members are characterized by transactivation activity and play a crucial positive regulatory role in heat stress response[8]. In contrast, class B and C members generally lack intrinsic transcriptional activation activity. Most class B Hsfs (with the exception of HsfB5) contain a conserved -LFGV- motif that functions as a transcriptional repressor[12,13]. Members of class A Hsfs play a central role in regulating stress resistance. For instance, HsfA1 enhances heat tolerance in both A. thaliana and tomato[14,15]. Class B members also play important roles in stress responses. HsfB1 has been shown to positively modulate stress tolerance despite functioning as a transcriptional repressor[16]. In A. thaliana, HsfB1/B2b interacts with class A Hsfs to regulate the termination of heat shock response[17]. In maize, natural variations in the ZmHsf21 promoter (HsfB family) improve cold tolerance through the regulation of lipid metabolism[18]. Despite the well-documented involvement of several HsfB members in stress resistance, their roles in plant growth and development remain largely unexplored[19]. To date, only Arabidopsis AtHsf4 and poplar PagHsf4 are known to function in inhibiting plant growth[20,21].

      The plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) is a sesquiterpene compound containing 15 carbon atoms[22]. Plants synthesize ABA primarily through an 'indirect pathway' that depends on carotenoid metabolism[22], with key regulatory enzymes including NCED, ZEP1, ABA2, and AAO[22]. ABA is generally considered a growth inhibitor, as it suppresses growth, reduces root elongation, and decreases fresh weight[23]. Research has demonstrated that rapid subcellular relocalization of SnRK1 is necessary for the ABA-induced suppression of cell proliferation in the A. thaliana root meristem[24]. In rice, ABA inhibits primary root elongation yet promotes root thickening[25]. Additionally, ABA accumulation under abiotic stress conditions plays a critical role in reshaping water relations and regulating growth[26]. ABA is essential for plant defense against salt stress and is among the most important stress-responsive hormones[27,28]. Under salt stress, ABA signaling buys time for root adaptation by delaying developmental processes[29]. NCED3, a salt-sensitive gene, encodes the rate-limiting enzyme in ABA biosynthesis[30]. Similarly, by regulating ABA levels and maintaining ROS homeostasis, OsNCED4 promotes rice resistance to salt and cold stress[31].

      This study demonstrates that overexpression of PtoHsfB1 in P. tomentosa significantly promotes growth but reduces salt tolerance. Further analyses indicate that this phenotype is likely due to decreased ABA levels mediated by PtoHsfB1 overexpression. Collectively, these findings suggest that PtoHsfB1 plays a key role in regulating growth and salt response in poplar.

    • The sequences of 21 Hsf members from A. thaliana were retrieved from the PlantTFDB5.0 database (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn). To perform sequence alignment, the Muscle method was used to align the Hsf members of P. tomentosa. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method with the Poisson model and 1,000 bootstrap repetitions in MEGA 5.05[32]. For protein sequence comparison between P. tomentosa and P. trichocarpa, the alignment was performed using DNAMAN 6.0 (https://www.dnaman.net). The phylogenetic tree was visualized using TBtools[33].

    • Transcriptional activation was assessed using the Yeast Transcription Assay kit (Coolaber, Beijing, China). The coding sequence of PtoHsfB1 was inserted into the pGBKT7-VP16 yeast expression vector. The VP16 protein, derived from the herpes simplex virus, acts as a transcriptional activation factor to increase the expression of downstream genes[34].

    • The plant material used in this study was the 'Yixian' clone line (P. tomentosa). Shoot tips ranging from 1.5 to 2 cm in length were excised from P. tomentosa plantlets and cultivated in sterile tissue culture flasks with a rooting medium containing 1/2 MS, 0.4 mg/L IBA, 20 g/L sucrose, and 6.5 g/L agar. The cultures were maintained under a 16-h light (4,500 lux), and 8-h darkness cycle at 25 °C[10]. After 30 d, the plantlets were transferred to a soil mixture consisting of vermiculite, turfy soil, and potting soil (1:3:1 ratio) in a greenhouse under similar conditions to those in the tissue culture room[10].

    • The amino acid sequences of PtoHsfB1 homologs were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database. The full coding sequences of PtoHsfB1 were amplified from the 'Yixian' clone using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1, and subsequently integrated into the pBI121 vector to create the 35S::PtoHsfB1 fusion construct. For P. tomentosa genetic transformation, the fusion vector was transferred to the GV3101 strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens[35].

    • For morphological analysis, one-month-old and three-month-old wild-type (WT), and transgenic plants were assessed. Key growth parameters, including plant height, fresh weight, and dry weight, were recorded. Plant growth was photographically documented at multiple stages.

    • For histological analysis, three-month-old transgenic and WT plants were selected. Stem segments (approximately 0.5 cm long) were embedded in 7% agarose and cut into 50-μm-thick cross-sections using a vibratome microtome (Leica VT1000S, Nussloch, Germany). The sections were then stained with a 0.05% (v/v) solution of toluidine blue O (TBO). The stained sections were observed using an Olympus BX51 digital microscope. Xylem and cambium cell dimensions were measured using ImageJ software[36].

    • Total RNA was extracted from root tissue of one-month-old WT, and PtoHsfB1 OE1 and OE8 plants (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Three biological replicates were used for each sample. RNA sequencing libraries were constructed from high-quality RNA, and raw sequencing data were filtered[37].

      Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired-end sequencing was used. The clean data was mapped to the Populus genome (PRJNA613008-SRA-NCBI) using HISAT2, and gene expression levels were quantified using FPKM[38]. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using DEseq2[39]. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the DEGs was performed using KOBAS v2.1.1 with a p-value cutoff of 0.05[40].

      Reverse transcription and RT-qPCR analysis were performed using the RNA isolated from the aforementioned root tissues (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The internal control utilized to normalize the amount of gene expression was the P. tomentosa Actin gene. Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 provide a list of primers used in RT-qPCR.

    • For the salt stress experiment, one-month-old P. tomentosa plants were chosen. The control group was treated with a nutrient solution, while the experimental group was treated with a nutrient solution containing 200 mM NaCl. After 10 d, the 3rd and 4th fully expanded leaves from six plants were collected, then immediately immersed in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C. Each treatment group consisted of three biological replicates, with two plants per replicate.

    • Protein content in fresh plants was determined using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Cowin Biotech Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China). The plant tissues were homogenized in phosphate buffer before the assay.

    • ABA content in fresh stem and root tissues was quantified using a Plant Abscisic Acid (ABA) test (NJJCbio, Nanjing, China). The protein content, as determined by the BCA assay, was used to normalize the ABA levels.

    • For reactive oxygen species (ROS) detection, the leaves were punched into 1 cm diameter discs following salt treatment for 10 d. The discs were then stained overnight at room temperature with either 3,3' N-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) solution (1 mg/m L, pH 3.8), or nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) (0.5 mg/mL, pH 7.8) to detect H2O2 and O2, respectively[40]. Following staining, the discs were destained by boiling in ethanol to remove chlorophyll, cooled to room temperature, and then imaged.

    • To assess oxidative stress, H2O2 content in fresh leaf tissues was determined using a Hydrogen Peroxide Content Assay Kit (NJJCbio, Nanjing, China). The absorbance of each sample was measured at 405 nm.

      Malondialdehyde (MDA) content was determined using a Plant assay kit (NJJCbio, Nanjing, China) following homogenization of the tissues in Reagent V, with absorbance measured at 532 nm.

    • All experiments were conducted with at least three biological replicates. Results were presented as mean ± SE. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), with significant differences between groups assessed using Duncan's multiple range test. Significant differences are indicated by * (p < 0.05) and ** (p < 0.01).

    • The poplar genome was searched using the hidden Markov model (HMM) of Hsf (PF00447) as a guide, and after multiple confirmations using Pfam and NCBI-CDD, 58 Hsf members were identified. To illustrate the evolutionary links between the species, we constructed a phylogenetic tree for P. tomentosa and A. thaliana that included 58 PtoHsf and 21 AtHsf proteins (Fig. 1a). Class B member PtoHsfB1 (POTOM_028152) is homologous to A. thaliana protein AtHsfB1 (AT4G36990). Additionally, PtoHsfB1 exhibited high homology with P. trichocarpa PtrHsfB1 (Potri.007G043800), with a sequence similarity as high as 98.60% (Fig. 1b). The protein sequence of PtoHsfB1 contained 283 amino acid residues, with its Hsf DNA binding domain located between the 20th and 120th amino acid residues. The core tetrapeptide 'LFGV' is located at the C-terminus (Fig. 1c). Subsequently, PtoHsfB1 has transcriptional repressive activity, according to transcriptional activation tests conducted in yeast (Fig. 1d), indicating that the core tetrapeptide of C-terminus is essential for the transcriptional inhibitory function of PtoHsfB1.

      Figure 1. 

      The protein sequence analysis of PtoHsfB1 in P. tomentosa. (a) A NJ phylogenetic tree of Hsfs from A. thaliana and P. tomentosa was generated. The line colors blue, purple, and pink represent subgroups A, B, and C, respectively. (b) Comparison of the protein sequence of PtoHsfB1 and PtrHsfB1. The red underlined part represents the core tetrapeptide of the subgroup B transcriptional repressor Hsf. (c)The protein structure of PtoHsfB1. The blue part represents the Hsf DNA binding domain, and the purple part represents the core tetrapeptide 'LFGV' of the repressor domain. (d) Yeast transcriptional activation assay for PtoHsfB1 (negative control: pGBKT7; positive control: pGBKT7-VP16).

    • To explore HsfB1 function, transgenic poplars (35S::PtoHsfB1) carrying the PtoHsfB1 gene controlled by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter were created through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. After screening with kanamycin, a total of 10 transgenic lines were verified through DNA identification. We randomly selected four transgenic lines (OE1, OE6, OE8, and OE10) for RT-qPCR. The results suggested that the overexpression (OE) lines OE1 and OE8 had the highest expression levels of PtoHsfB1 (Fig. 2). Therefore, these two transgenic lines (OE1 and OE8) were selected for further study. According to the RT-qPCR data, PtoHsfB1 expression levels in OE1 and OE8 are 175 and 59 times more than those in WT, respectively.

      Figure 2. 

      Expression of PtoHsfB1 in leaves of plantlets. (a) PCR amplification of PtoHsfB1 from WT and different transgenic lines. CK+: Plasmid pBI121-PtoHsfB1, M: DL2000 DNA marker, CK: untransformed line. (b) Relative quantification of RNA in transgenic plants and WT plants.

    • To determine whether PtoHsfB1 regulates shoot growth, we compared the shoot phenotype of one-month-old plantlets (Fig. 3a). Phenotypic analysis suggested that the OE lines were significantly taller than the WT (Fig. 3a). The average heights of OE1 and OE8 exceeded those of the WT by 9.17% and 18.35%, respectively (Fig. 3b). Moreover, OE lines produced more leaves and accumulated over twice the shoot biomass of the WT (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. S1). Consistent with the fresh weight measurements, the shoot dry weight was also significantly higher in the OE lines. The shoot dry matter content (dry weight as a percentage of fresh weight) was 81.9% in the WT and at least 84.6% in the OE (Fig. 3c, d). Furthermore, these lines accumulated approximately 1.7 to 1.8 times the shoot dry weight of the WT (Fig. 3c, d). To determine whether the enhanced shoot growth was sustained, we measured the shoot growth metrics of three-month-old plantlets transplanted to the greenhouse using the same methodology as for the one-month-old plantlets. After three months of growth, the growth rate of OE1 and OE8 remained considerably higher than that of WT plants (Fig. 3e). Specifically, the average heights of OE1 and OE8 were 11.3% and 16.2% taller than those of the WT, respectively (Fig. 3f). After three months of growth, OE lines produced more leaves than the WT (Fig. 3e). Their shoot fresh and dry weights were also significantly greater (Fig. 3g, h). The shoot fresh weight in OE1 was 14.97 g, which indicates a 10% increase over the WT, whereas OE8 had a fresh weight of 17.20 g, representing a 26.5% increase relative to the WT (Fig. 3g). Additionally, the shoot dry weights of OE1 and OE8 were 1.5 and 1.8 times greater than that of the WT, respectively (Fig. 3h).

      Figure 3. 

      Overexpressing PtoHsfB1 promoted shoot growth in transgenic poplars. (a) The shoot phenotype of one-month-old plantlets. Scale bar = 5 cm. (b) The height of one-month-old plantlets. (c) The shoot fresh weight of one-month-old plantlets. (d) The shoot dry weight of one-month-old plantlets. (e) The shoot phenotype of three-month-old plantlets. Scale bar = 5 cm. (f) The height of three-month-old plantlets. (g) The shoot fresh weight of three-month-old plantlets. (h) The shoot dry weight of three-month-old plantlets.

    • Since the stems of three-month-old transgenic seedlings were significantly thicker than those of WT plants, we performed tissue section analysis on three-month-old seedlings cultivated in the greenhouse (Supplementary Fig. S2). Cytological analysis of stem cross-sections from the 10th internodes revealed anatomical differences. In OE stems, the phloem cap was more prominent, causing increased cell wall thickness in the phloem fiber cells (Fig. 4a). However, compared with the WT, the xylem widths of the 10th internode in the OE were significantly reduced, indicating that xylem development was suppressed (Fig. 4a). The xylem width of the WT (449.9 μm) was 1.7 times that of OE1, and 1.6 times that of OE8 (Fig. 4b). To determine whether the reduced xylem resulted from changes in cambial activity, a comparison of the cambial zones found that the OE lines had roughly twice as many cambial cell layers as the WT (Fig. 4c, d). The cambium widths of OE1 and OE8 were 2.2 and 2.5 times those of the WT, respectively (Fig. 4e).

      Figure 4. 

      Overexpressing PtoHsfB1 increases cambial activity and enhances phloem cell growth. (a) Cytological observations of stem cross-sections. The red arrow indicates the phloem. (b) Xylem width. (c) Magnified photos of the cambial area. (d) Number of cambial cell layers. (e) Cambium width.

    • To determine the effect of PtoHsfB1 on root growth, we statistically analyzed root growth indicators and phenotypes. Seven days after inserting branch tips into the rooting medium, adventitious roots had emerged in the transgenic plantlets, but not in the WT. After 14 d, WT plants began to form adventitious roots, while OE plants exhibited a greater number of adventitious roots that were significantly longer. After 21 d, the WT plants had also developed a certain number of adventitious roots; however, both the number and length of the roots were significantly smaller than those in the transgenic lines (Fig. 5a). After 28 d of culture in the rooting medium, we examined the phenotypes of the different lines and found that the OE lines were substantially taller than the WT (Supplementary Fig. S3). Additionally, the root densities of both the one-month-old, and three-month-old transgenic plantlets were much greater than those of the WT (Fig. 5b, c).

      Figure 5. 

      Overexpressing PtoHsfB1 promoted root growth in transgenic poplars. (a) Growth of adventitious roots in OE and WT plants at different time points under tissue culture conditions. Scale bar = 1 cm. (b) The root phenotype of one-month-old plantlets. Scale bar = 5 cm. (c) The root phenotype of three-month-old plantlets. Scale bar = 5 cm. (d) The root fresh weight of one-month-old plantlets. (e) The root dry weight of one-month-old plantlets. (f) The root fresh weight of three-month-old plantlets. (g) The root dry weight of three-month-old plantlets.

      In one-month-old plantlets, the OE plants exhibited significantly more roots and higher fresh weight than the WT plants (Fig. 5b, d). The root fresh weights of OE1 and OE8 exceeded those of the WT by 58.97% and 105.13%, respectively (Fig. 5d). The dry matter content of roots was significantly higher in OE plants. The root dry weights of OE1 and OE8 were 2.2 and 3.6 times those of the WT, respectively (Fig. 5e). In the three-month-old plantlets, the root biomass of the OE plants was also significantly greater than that of the WT (Fig. 5f, g). The root fresh weights of the OE plants increased by 27.7% relative to the WT plants (Fig. 5f), and their root dry weights were 1.4 times those of the WT (Fig. 5g). In summary, root biomass (both fresh and dry weight) was significantly higher in the OE than in the WT (Fig. 5).

    • The root system of plants is crucial for nutrient storage and for providing water and essential nutrients that support shoot growth[41]. We performed a comparative transcriptome analysis using the roots of one-month-old WT and OE (PtoHsfB1-OE1 and PtoHsfB1-OE8). Two pairwise comparisons (OE1 vs WT, OE8 vs WT) were performed to study the probable molecular pathways of PtoHsfB1. In the OE1 and OE8, a total of 1,689 and 1,568 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified compared to the WT (Fig. 6a). Comparison of these DEGs identified a total of 820 genes, with 695 down-regulated and 125 up-regulated (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table S2). An analysis of these 820 DEGs indicated that members of the Aux/IAA family (e.g., POTOM_022766, POTOM_024959, POTOM_057620, POTOM_024235, and POTOM_056487), which act as repressors of early auxin-responsive genes, showed a downward expression trend (Supplementary Table S3).

      Figure 6. 

      Transcriptome analysis and ABA content detection. (a) Venn diagram analysis of the OE1-VS-WT and OE8-VS-WT comparative groupings. (b) GO enrichment analysis of 820 DEGs depicts dots where their sizes reflect the number of enriched genes. Larger dots indicate a higher gene count. The color of the dots reflects the significance level of the enrichment; dots with a redder hue correspond to smaller Q values, indicating greater significance in the enrichment degree. (c) Left shows the ABA standard curve. The fitting method is polynomial, and the fitting equation is y = −18.607x3 + 102.24x2 − 188.23x + 118.49, R2 = 0.997, right shows ABA content in root tissues.

      Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed to classify DEGs according to their functions. Three categories were used to group the GO terms: molecular function (MF), cellular component (CC), and biological process (BP). Significant changes in BP were observed in processes linked to development, reproduction, and growth. For CC, major changes occurred in the cell, cell part, and organelle classifications, while for MF, the changes were concentrated in catalytic activity, binding, and nucleic acid binding transcription factor activity (Supplementary Fig. S4). Subsequently, enrichment analysis of GO terms revealed that the top 25 significantly enriched pathways were associated with hormone-related processes, including ABA response (Fig. 6b). Transcriptome analysis suggested that HsfB1 may regulate poplar root growth by modulating the ABA pathway. Subsequently, we measured the ABA content present in root tissues of WT plants and transgenic poplar lines. The findings demonstrated that overexpression of PtoHsfB1 dramatically reduced ABA content (Fig. 6c).

    • The regulatory enzymes ZEP1, NCED, ABA2, and AAO are the primary regulators of the ABA synthesis pathway[17]. These genes were identified in the P. tomentosa genome and their expression changes were analyzed (Fig. 7a). GO enrichment analysis revealed that numerous genes associated with ABA production were significantly downregulated in the transgenic lines (Fig. 7a). A heatmap based on TPM values indicated that members of the ABA synthesis pathway (ZEP1 [4], NCED [5], ABA2 [3], AAO [2]) showed downregulation trends (Fig. 7a). To validate these findings, we randomly selected genes from the ABA synthesis pathway for qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 7b). Specifically, in the RT-qPCR results, ZEP1 members (POTOM_005326 and POTOM_0028159) exhibited a downregulation trend in the transgenic lines. Similarly, NCED members (POTOM_039827, POTOM_041052, POTOM_059757, and POTOM_059472), which encode the rate-limiting enzyme for ABA synthesis, were significantly inhibited in the OE plants. POTOM_051624 (ABA2) was markedly downregulated in the OE plants as compared to the WT plants. Similarly, the expression of POTOM_017964 (AAO) was lower in the OE plants (Fig. 7b).

      Figure 7. 

      PtoHsfB1 overexpressing represses ABA biosynthesis. (a) Gene expression is presented in the heatmap. Red and blue represent higher and lower gene expression levels. (b) The relative expression of nine selected ABA biosynthesis related genes.

    • ABA functions as a critical regulator of plant salt stress responses[42]. In this study, the overexpression of PtoHsfB1 reduced ABA levels (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Fig. S5). Furthermore, transcriptome data from previous studies revealed that PtoHsfB1 is significantly responsive to salt stress[43]. To verify this observation, RT-qPCR analyses were conducted on various tissues of P. tomentosa subjected to salt stress over different time periods. These results provided preliminary evidence confirming the significant responsiveness of PtoHsfB1 to salt stress (Supplementary Fig. S6). Therefore, we then examined the salt tolerance of the transgenic poplars. Under non-salt treatment, there were no noticeable phenotypic differences between OE and WT plants. However, after 5 d of treatment with 200 mM NaCl, the number of leaves in the transgenic lines decreased sharply. After 10 d of salt treatment, the leaves of transgenic lines were severely shriveled, and the shoot tips had dried up, whereas the WT leaves showed only slight drooping (Fig. 8a). Furthermore, ABA levels were measured in the root and stem tissues after the treatment with 200 mM NaCl. The findings demonstrated that ABA levels in the OE1 and OE8 lines were significantly lower than in the WT (Fig. 8b, c). We used DAB and NBT histochemical staining to measure changes in H2O2 and O2 concentration in order to gauge the degree of oxidative stress. Under non-salt conditions, DAB staining showed no differences between OE and WT plants. However, after salt treatment, the leaf discs from the transgenic lines exhibited more intense staining than those from the WT (Fig. 8d). Consistent with the DAB staining results, H2O2 content detection revealed that the OE plants had significantly greater H2O2 levels than the WT plants following salt treatment, but no significant difference was observed under non-salt circumstances (Fig. 8e). NBT staining revealed that leaf discs from OE plants turned a darker purple than WT plants after salt treatment, indicating higher O2 levels in OE plants (Fig. 8f). MDA, a well-known indicator of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation[44], was also measured to assess the effect of salt stress on cell membrane permeability. Under non-salt treatment, OE and WT plants showed no significant difference in MDA content. However, during salt stress, the MDA levels in OE plants were significantly higher than those in WT plants (Fig. 8g).

      Figure 8. 

      Overexpressing PtoHsfB1 reduced salt tolerance under 200 mM NaCl. (a) The phenotypes of plantlets. Scale Bar = 5 cm. (b) ABA content in root tissues. (c) ABA contents in stem tissue. (d) DAB staining. (e) H2O2 content. (f) NBT staining. (g) MDA content.

    • Previous studies have demonstrated that Hsf family members play crucial roles in regulating growth and stress responses[16]. For example, overexpression of HsfA5a in P. tomentosa enhances tolerance under salt stress[5]. Although the HsfB subfamily is the most highly conserved among the three Hsf subfamilies, its members demonstrate considerable functional diversity[13]. In tomato, HsfB1 functions as both a transcriptional repressor and a co-activator, and its overexpression significantly enhances thermotolerance[19]. In Glycine max, overexpression of GmHsfB2b enhances salt tolerance. In Populus, the B subfamily member PagHsf4 inhibits growth[21]. In contrast to previous research, this study demonstrates that overexpression of PtoHsfB1 in P. tomentosa promotes growth but reduces salt stress tolerance. This study expands the understanding of HsfB1 in both plant growth and salt stress response.

      Phylogenetic analysis and protein structural characterization indicated that PtoHsfB1 is a typical member of the HsfB subfamily. Its C-terminal region contains the conserved inhibitory core tetrapeptide 'LFGV'[45,46]. Our research further confirmed that the core tetrapeptide is essential for the transcriptional repression function of PtoHsfB1. In addition, we demonstrated that overexpression of PtoHsfB1 promotes growth, as reflected by increased plant height, leaf number, and biomass of both shoots and roots (Fig. 3). The enhanced cambial activity was also observed in PtoHsfB1-OE plants. Notably, transgenic lines overexpressing PtoHsfB1 exhibited a more prominent phloem cap and significantly enhanced thickening of phloem fiber cell walls (Fig. 4). Previous research has shown that the thickening of phloem fiber cell walls enhances the structural integrity of the phloem, facilitates more efficient long-distance transport of photosynthates, and provides protection against herbivores and pathogens[47]. Collectively, these findings show that PtoHsfB1 plays a significant role in promoting poplar growth.

      In this study, compared with WT plants, PtoHsfB1 overexpressing plants exhibited significantly more developed root tissues at the tissue culture stage, as well as at the 1-month and 3-month growth stages. Subsequently, transcriptome sequencing was performed on the root systems of 1-month-old greenhouse plants. RNA-seq and corresponding RT-qPCR analyses indicated that the transcriptional levels of ABA synthesis genes were significantly inhibited in PtoHsfB1-OE plants. Measurements of ABA content further confirmed that PtoHsfB1 overexpression reduced endogenous ABA levels. Multiple studies have shown that reduced expression of ABA biosynthesis genes leads to decreased ABA production[48,49], thereby promoting root growth. These research findings are consistent with the results of the present study, collectively supporting the conclusion that reduced ABA content promotes root growth. Therefore, PtoHsfB1-OE lines may promote root growth by reducing ABA content.

      ABA is not only a vital hormone for growth and development but also a key regulator of abiotic stress responses[50]. An increase in ABA content helps enhance plant salt stress resistance, while a decrease in ABA leads to reduced salt stress resistance[51]. In the present study, overexpression of PtoHsfB1 caused a decrease in ABA content. Previous research has firmly established the crucial importance of the Hsf family in enhancing salt tolerance in plants[52,53]. However, our findings revealed that HsfB1 functions as a negative regulator of salt stress tolerance rather than a positive one. The analysis of plant wilting and oxidative damage under salt stress further confirmed that PtoHsfB1-OE reduces salt tolerance of plants. Moreover, measurement of ABA content before and after salt stress suggested that PtoHsfB1 overexpression leads to lower ABA levels, which in turn compromised salt stress resistance. Collectively, these findings provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms by which PtoHsfB1 regulates salt stress responses through modulation of the ABA pathway.

    • This study demonstrates that PtoHsfB1 functions as a transcriptional repressor in P. tomentosa. Overexpression of PtoHsfB1 significantly promotes the growth of roots, phloem, and cambium. RNA-seq analysis combined with ABA content measurements in PtoHsfB1-OE plants indicate that reduced ABA levels may be a key factor driving enhanced poplar growth. Under salt stress conditions, overexpression of PtoHsfB1 led to decreased ABA accumulation, resulting in reduced salt tolerance, increased oxidative damage, and diminished antioxidant enzyme activity. Collectively, these findings provide a foundation for further investigation into the regulatory roles of the Hsf family in poplar growth, and their underlying mechanisms in salt stress responses.

      • This work was supported by the Biological Breeding-National Science and Technology Major Project (2023ZD04056), Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (2023M740277), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (GZC20240114), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32401611).

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Li Y, Zhao Y, Han K; draft manuscript preparation and analysis of results: Han K; data analysis: Han K, Si H, Cheng Y; preformation of the experiments and data collection: Li Y, Yan J, Deng H, Liu J, Sun Y; manuscript modification: Li Y, Zhao Y, El-Kassaby YA. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Kunjin Han, Huayu Si

      • Supplementary Table S1 Primers sequences used for gene cloning and for identification of transgenic lines.
      • Supplementary Table S2 Primer sequences used for quantitative real-time PCR verified selected DEG candidates.
      • Supplementary Table S3 The Aux/IAA genes downregulated in the roots of P. tomentosa.
      • Supplementary Fig. S1 Leaf phenotypes and quantities of WT and OE.
      • Supplementary Fig. S2 Phenotype of stem cross-sections of the tenth internodes.
      • Supplementary Fig. S3 Phenotypes of WT and transgenic lines after 28 days of culture on rooting medium.
      • Supplementary Fig. S4 GO classifications of DEGs in OE1-VS-WT and OE8-VS-WT. The y- axis indicates the number of DEGs, and the X-axis indicates the top 25 enriched GO terms. The red, green and blue colors represent biological processes, cellular components and molecular function, respectively.
      • Supplementary Fig. S5 ABA content in stem tissues.
      • Supplementary Fig. S6 Relative expression of PtoHsfB1 in different tissues under 200 mM NaCl treatment at different time points.
      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (8)  References (53)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Han K, Si H, Li Y, Yan J, El-Kassaby YA, et al. 2026. PtoHsfB1 regulates growth and salt response by affecting ABA biosynthesis in Populus tomentosa. Forestry Research 6: e005 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0005
    Han K, Si H, Li Y, Yan J, El-Kassaby YA, et al. 2026. PtoHsfB1 regulates growth and salt response by affecting ABA biosynthesis in Populus tomentosa. Forestry Research 6: e005 doi: 10.48130/forres-0026-0005

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint