Search
2025 Volume 4
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Transcriptomic analysis to understand the alternative splicing event on regulating secondary metabolism during flowering stages of Lonicera japonica

  • # Authors contributed equally: Jie Chen, Xu Tian

More Information
  • Lonicera japonica Thunb. is an important traditional Chinese medicinal resource. The synthetic pathways, as well as the functional genes involved in the biosynthesis of phenolic acids and flavonoids, have been intensively studied; however, the mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation during the flowering stages remains largely unexplained. In this study, the L. japonica transcriptome and genome were used to identify the alternative splicing (AS) events that occur during L. japonica flowering and the relevant genes. A total of 31,739, 30,752, 31,147, and 32,071 AS events were identified based on a comparison of flowering stages with the first flowering stage, and 20,916, 20,501, 20,632, and 21,020 genes were involved in the AS events. Exon skipping (ES) has been identified as the most frequent type of alternative splicing event, whereas mutually exclusive exons (MXE) are typically among the least frequently occurring types. Functional analysis of genes underlying the two types of AS events showed these genes were mainly related to protein metabolism, RNA metabolism, cell cycle, transport, signaling, and secondary metabolism. Further pathway mapping analysis demonstrated the occurrence of AS event in chalcone isomerase (CHI), 2'-hydroxyisoflavone reductase (IFR), tyrosine decarboxylase (TYDC), and strictosidine synthase (STR) genes, which are responsible for the production of liquiritigenin, vestitone, tyramine, and strychnine, respectively. PCR and sequencing confirmed these AS events, further validating our findings. Our study elucidates the correlation between alterations in secondary metabolism and alternative splicing events during L. japonica flowering, which enhances our understanding of the complex regulation of its secondary metabolism and provides a basis for subsequent in-depth exploration of the regulatory mechanisms of active ingredient synthesis in L. japonica.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 The sequence of primers used in this study.
    Supplementary Fig. S1 Gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products for validating the alternative splicing events in genes.
    Supplementary Fig. S2 Sequence alignment of the amplified fragments of the alternative splicing isoforms.
  • [1] Xiao Q, Li Z, Qu M, Xu W, Su Z, et al. 2021. LjaFGD: Lonicera japonica functional genomics database. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 63(8):1422−36 doi: 10.1111/jipb.13112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Shang X, Pan H, Li M, Miao X, Ding H. 2011. Lonicera japonica Thunb.: ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology of an important traditional Chinese medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 138(1):1−21 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.08.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Ge L, Xie Q, Jiang Y, Xiao L, Wan H, et al. 2022. Genus Lonicera: New drug discovery from traditional usage to modern chemical and pharmacological research. Phytomedicine 96:153889 doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153889

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Yuan Y, Wang Z, Jiang C, Wang X, Huang L. 2014. Exploiting genes and functional diversity of chlorogenic acid and luteolin biosyntheses in Lonicera japonica and their substitutes. Gene 534(2):408−16 doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.09.051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Zha L, Liu S, Liu J, Jiang C, Yu S, et al. 2017. DNA methylation influences chlorogenic acid biosynthesis in Lonicera japonica by mediating LjbZIP8 to regulate phenylalanine ammonia-lyase 2 expression. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1178 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01178

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Kwon SH, Ma SX, Hong SI, Lee SY, Jang CG. 2015. Lonicera japonica THUNB. extract inhibits lipopolysaccharide-stimulated inflammatory responses by suppressing NF-κB signaling in BV-2 microglial cells. Journal of Medicinal Food 18(7):762−75 doi: 10.1089/jmf.2014.3341

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Li RJ, Kuang XP, Wang WJ, Wan CP, Li WX. 2020. Comparison of chemical constitution and bioactivity among different parts of Lonicera japonica Thunb. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 100(2):614−22 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10056

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Yang B, Guan Q, Tian J, Komatsu S. 2017. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of leaves from Clematis terniflora DC. under high level of ultraviolet-B irradiation followed by dark treatment. Journal of Proteomics 150:323−40 doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.10.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Wang T, Yang B, Guan Q, Chen X, Zhong Z, et al. 2019. Transcriptional regulation of Lonicera japonica Thunb. during flower development as revealed by comprehensive analysis of transcription factors. BMC Plant Biology 19(1):198 doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1803-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Geng JL, Li HB, Liu WJ, Wang ZZ, Ge W, et al. 2022. Two new chemical constituents from Lonicera japonica. Natural Product Research 36(20):5174−80 doi: 10.1080/14786419.2021.1921769

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Wang X, Chen J, Ni H, Mustafa G, Yang Y, et al. 2021. Use Chou's 5-steps rule to identify protein post-translational modification and its linkage to secondary metabolism during the floral development of Lonicera japonica Thunb. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 167:1035−48 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.09.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Guan R, Guo F, Guo R, Wang S, Sun X, et al. 2023. Integrated metabolic profiling and transcriptome analysis of Lonicera japonica flowers for chlorogenic acid, luteolin and endogenous hormone syntheses. Gene 888:147739 doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2023.147739

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Xia H, Zhang L, Wu G, Fu C, Long Y, et al. 2016. Genome-wide identification and characterization of MicroRNAs and target genes in Lonicera japonica. PLoS One 11(10):e0164140 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164140

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Li M, Tian X, Mustafa G, Chen Y, Shan L, et al. 2024. Involvement of miRNAs regulation on both flower development and secondary metabolism in Lonicera japonica Thunb. Environmental and Experimental Botany 218:105569 doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105569

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Ner-Gaon H, Halachmi R, Savaldi-Goldstein S, Rubin E, Ophir R, et al. 2004. Intron retention is a major phenomenon in alternative splicing in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 39(6):877−85 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02172.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Wright CJ, Smith CWJ, Jiggins CD. 2022. Alternative splicing as a source of phenotypic diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 23(11):697−710 doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00514-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Muhammad S, Xu X, Zhou W, Wu L. 2023. Alternative splicing: an efficient regulatory approach towards plant developmental plasticity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA 14(3):e1758 doi: 10.1002/wrna.1758

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Wang H, You C, Chang F, Wang Y, Wang L, et al. 2014. Alternative splicing during Arabidopsis flower development results in constitutive and stage-regulated isoforms. Frontiers in Genetics 5:25 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Zhang J, Liu G, Guo C, He Y, Li Z, et al. 2011. The FLOWERING LOCUS T orthologous gene of Platanus acerifolia is expressed as alternatively spliced forms with distinct spatial and temporal patterns. Plant Biology 13(5):809−20 doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00432.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Qin Z, Wu J, Geng S, Feng N, Chen F, et al. 2017. Regulation of FT splicing by an endogenous cue in temperate grasses. Nature Communications 8:14320 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14320

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Qi HD, Lin Y, Ren QP, Wang YY, Xiong F, et al. 2019. RNA splicing of FLC modulates the transition to flowering. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1625 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01625

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Zhang JZ, Li ZM, Mei L, Yao JL, Hu CG. 2009. PtFLC homolog from trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) is regulated by alternative splicing and experiences seasonal fluctuation in expression level. Planta 229(4):847−59 doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0885-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Lam PY, Wang L, Lo C, Zhu FY. 2022. Alternative splicing and its roles in plant metabolism. International Journal Of Molecular Sciences 23(13):7355 doi: 10.3390/ijms23137355

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Carqueijeiro I, Koudounas K, de Bernonville TD, Sepúlveda LJ, Mosquera A, et al. 2021. Alternative splicing creates a pseudo-strictosidine β-d-glucosidase modulating alkaloid synthesis in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Physiology 185(3):836−56 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaa075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Lamberto I, Percudani R, Gatti R, Folli C, Petrucco S. 2010. Conserved alternative splicing of Arabidopsis transthyretin-like determines protein localization and S-allantoin synthesis in peroxisomes. The Plant Cell 22(5):1564−74 doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.070102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Qi T, Song S, Ren Q, Wu D, Huang H, et al. 2011. The Jasmonate-ZIM-domain proteins interact with the WD-Repeat/bHLH/MYB complexes to regulate Jasmonate-mediated anthocyanin accumulation and trichome initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 23(5):1795−814 doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.083261

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Zhu J, Yan X, Liu S, Xia X, An Y, et al. 2022. Alternative splicing of CsJAZ1 negatively regulates flavan-3-ol biosynthesis in tea plants. The Plant Journal 110(1):243−61 doi: 10.1111/tpj.15670

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Dombrecht B, Xue GP, Sprague SJ, Kirkegaard JA, Ross JJ, et al. 2007. MYC2 differentially modulates diverse jasmonate-dependent functions in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 19(7):2225−45 doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Chen D, Liu Y, Yin S, Qiu J, Jin Q, et al. 2020. Alternatively spliced BnaPAP2. A7 isoforms play opposing roles in anthocyanin biosynthesis of Brassica napus L. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:983 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00983

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. 2019. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nature Biotechnology 37(8):907−15 doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Stewart MJ, Stewart P, Rivera-Posada J. 2015. De novo assembly of the transcriptome of Acanthaster planci testes. Molecular Ecology Resources 15(4):953−66 doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12360

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, et al. 2012. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nature Protocols 7:562−78 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Usadel B, Nagel A, Thimm O, Redestig H, Blaesing OE, et al. 2005. Extension of the visualization tool MapMan to allow statistical analysis of arrays, display of corresponding genes, and comparison with known responses. Plant Physiology 138(3):1195−204 doi: 10.1104/pp.105.060459

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K, et al. 2017. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Research 45(D1):D353−D361 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1092

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Zhang M, Li M, Fu H, Wang K, Tian X, et al. 2022. Transcriptomic analysis unravels the molecular response of Lonicera japonica leaves to chilling stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1092857 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1092857

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Cai Z, Wang C, Chen C, Zou L, Yin S, et al. 2022. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals variations of bioactive constituents in Lonicera japonica flowers under salt stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 173:87−96 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Melzer R. 2017. Regulation of flowering time: a splicy business. Journal of Experimental Botany 68(18):5017−20 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx353

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Xing YQ, He ZX, Liu GQ, Lu C. 2019. Differential analysis of gene expression and alternative splicing in different tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana. Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics 46(11):1118−29 doi: 10.16476/j.pibb.2019.0139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Barbazuk WB, Fu Y, McGinnis KM. 2008. Genome-wide analyses of alternative splicing in plants: opportunities and challenges. Genome Research 18(9):1381−92 doi: 10.1101/gr.053678.106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Marquez Y, Brown JWS, Simpson C, Barta A, Kalyna M. 2012. Transcriptome survey reveals increased complexity of the alternative splicing landscape in Arabidopsis. Genome Research 22(6):1184−95 doi: 10.1101/gr.134106.111

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Yang H, Li P, Jin G, Gui D, Liu L, et al. 2022. Temporal regulation of alternative splicing events in rice memory under drought stress. Plant Diversity 44(1):116−25 doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2020.11.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Xu T, Zhang J, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Li W, Zhang Y, et al. 2022. Exon skipping in IspE gene is associated with abnormal chloroplast development in rice albino leaf 4 mutant. Front. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:986678 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.986678

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Chaudhary S, Jabre I, Syed NH. 2021. Epigenetic differences in an identical genetic background modulate alternative splicing in A. thaliana. Genomics 113(6):3476−86 doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.08.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Jabre I, Chaudhary S, Guo W, Kalyna M, Reddy ASN, et al. 2021. Differential nucleosome occupancy modulates alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist 229(4):1937−45 doi: 10.1111/nph.17062

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Tang Y, Abdelrahman M, Li J, Wang F, Ji Z, et al. 2021. CRISPR/Cas9 induces exon skipping that facilitates development of fragrant rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal 19(4):642−44 doi: 10.1111/pbi.13514

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Kesari R, Lasky JR, Villamor JG, Des Marais DL, Chen YC, et al. 2012. Intron-mediated alternative splicing of Arabidopsis P5CS1 and its association with natural variation in proline and climate adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(23):9197−202 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203433109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Tang W, Zheng Y, Dong J, Yu J, Yue J, et al. 2016. Comprehensive transcriptome profiling reveals long noncoding RNA expression and alternative splicing regulation during fruit development and ripening in Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis). Frontiers in Plant Science 7:335 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00335

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Ye J, Cheng S, Zhou X, Chen Z, Kim SU, et al. 2019. A global survey of full-length transcriptome of Ginkgo biloba reveals transcript variants involved in flavonoid biosynthesis. Industrial Crops and Products 139:111547 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111547

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Wu YQ, Zhu MY, Jiang Y, Zhao DQ, Tao J. 2018. Molecular characterization of chalcone isomerase (CHI) regulating flower color in herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture 17(1):122−29 doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61628-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Luo XP, Bai YC, Fei G, Chenglei Li, Hui C, et al. 2013. Gene cloning and expression level of chalcone isomerase during florescence and content of flavonoids in Fagopyrum dibotrys. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 44(11):1481−85 doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2013.11.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] McKhann HI, Paiva NL, Dixon RA, Hirsch AM. 1998. Expression of genes for enzymes of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in the early stages of the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 439:45−54 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5335-9_4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Gui Y, Fu G, Li X, Dai Y. 2023. Identification and analysis of isoflavone reductase gene family in Gossypium hirsutum L. Scientific Reports 13(1):5703 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32213-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Jiao C, Gu Z. 2019. iTRAQ-based analysis of proteins involved in secondary metabolism in response to ABA in soybean sprouts. Food Research International 116:878−82 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Khatoon A, Rehman S, Hiraga S, Makino T, Komatsu S. 2012. Organ-specific proteomics analysis for identification of response mechanism in soybean seedlings under flooding stress. Journal of Proteomics 75(18):5706−23 doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.07.031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Yang B, Zhong Z, Wang T, Ou Y, Tian J, et al. 2019. Integrative omics of Lonicera japonica Thunb. flower development unravels molecular changes regulating secondary metabolites. Journal of Proteomics 208:103470 doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103470

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Chen J, Tian X, Weng X, Ni H, Yang H, et al. 2025. Transcriptomic analysis to understand the alternative splicing event on regulating secondary metabolism during flowering stages of Lonicera japonica. Medicinal Plant Biology 4: e014 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0025-0011
    Chen J, Tian X, Weng X, Ni H, Yang H, et al. 2025. Transcriptomic analysis to understand the alternative splicing event on regulating secondary metabolism during flowering stages of Lonicera japonica. Medicinal Plant Biology 4: e014 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0025-0011

Figures(8)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(2739) PDF downloads(568)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Transcriptomic analysis to understand the alternative splicing event on regulating secondary metabolism during flowering stages of Lonicera japonica

Medicinal Plant Biology  4 Article number: e014  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Lonicera japonica Thunb. is an important traditional Chinese medicinal resource. The synthetic pathways, as well as the functional genes involved in the biosynthesis of phenolic acids and flavonoids, have been intensively studied; however, the mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation during the flowering stages remains largely unexplained. In this study, the L. japonica transcriptome and genome were used to identify the alternative splicing (AS) events that occur during L. japonica flowering and the relevant genes. A total of 31,739, 30,752, 31,147, and 32,071 AS events were identified based on a comparison of flowering stages with the first flowering stage, and 20,916, 20,501, 20,632, and 21,020 genes were involved in the AS events. Exon skipping (ES) has been identified as the most frequent type of alternative splicing event, whereas mutually exclusive exons (MXE) are typically among the least frequently occurring types. Functional analysis of genes underlying the two types of AS events showed these genes were mainly related to protein metabolism, RNA metabolism, cell cycle, transport, signaling, and secondary metabolism. Further pathway mapping analysis demonstrated the occurrence of AS event in chalcone isomerase (CHI), 2'-hydroxyisoflavone reductase (IFR), tyrosine decarboxylase (TYDC), and strictosidine synthase (STR) genes, which are responsible for the production of liquiritigenin, vestitone, tyramine, and strychnine, respectively. PCR and sequencing confirmed these AS events, further validating our findings. Our study elucidates the correlation between alterations in secondary metabolism and alternative splicing events during L. japonica flowering, which enhances our understanding of the complex regulation of its secondary metabolism and provides a basis for subsequent in-depth exploration of the regulatory mechanisms of active ingredient synthesis in L. japonica.

    • Lonicera japonica Thunb. is an important medicinal herb widely used in both traditional Chinese medicine and modern preparations[1,2]. Due to its widespread cultivation in many countries[3], the chemical composition of L. japonica has been extensively studied, with chlorogenic acid and luteoloside identified as major active ingredients[4,5]. The active constituents of L. japonica provide a wide range of pharmacological properties, including antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral effects[6,7]. Although L. japonica is now cultivated widely[3], it still faces numerous challenges in agricultural production, the most prominent being the significant decrease in main active compounds as flowers bloom, which severely reduces the plant's utilization efficiency[810]. To address this issue, research has increasingly focused on studying the synthesis and regulatory mechanisms of active ingredients during the flower development stage of L. japonica. However, there remains considerable room for exploration regarding the underlying regulatory mechanisms[10,11].

      Research has shown that fluctuations in endogenous hormones such as abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic, and jasmonic acid are linked to the growth and development of Lonicera japonica, thereby affecting its secondary metabolism[9]. Guan et al. demonstrated that certain members of the MYB, AP2/ERF, bHLH, and NAC transcription factor families are closely associated with the biosynthesis of chlorogenic acid and luteolin in L. japonica[12]. Despite significant advances in understanding the regulatory effects of hormones and transcription factors on L. japonica, research at the post-transcriptional level remains limited, leaving room for further exploration to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying the active components of L. japonica. Recently, Xia et al. identified numerous miRNAs along with their target genes in L. japonica, providing a comprehensive miRNA expression profile and valuable insights for functional genomics research[13]. Additionally, miRNAs have been reported to regulate both flower development and secondary metabolism in L. japonica[14]. AS is also a critical post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism, allowing a single gene to significantly increase transcriptome and proteome diversity by producing multiple mRNA isoforms[1517]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, AS has been shown to be closely related to flower development[18]. The FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) protein is a key component of the 'florigen' signal, which is crucial for transitioning from vegetative to reproductive growth. In Platanus acerifolia, levels of various AS_PaFT isoforms correlate with different stages of flower development[19]. In Brachypodium distachyon, age-dependent AS of FT2 produces the FT2β isoform, which forms heterodimers with FT2α and FT1, disrupting the florigen-mediated flowering initiation complex, and delaying flowering[20]. Moreover, studies have shown that AS regulates the flowering transition by generating diverse transcripts of the FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) gene in A. thaliana[21]. In an early flowering mutant of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata), five alternatively spliced transcripts of PtFLC were identified, with their abundances varying between juvenile and adult stages[22]. These findings suggest that AS of the FLC gene may be a target of natural selection for flowering regulation under natural conditions.

      It has been shown that AS has a strong connection to plant secondary metabolism[23]. In Catharanthus roseus, AS of strictosidine β-D-glucosidase (SGD) generates a truncated form known as shSGD which interacts with SGD to influence the relevant reactions and regulate monoterpene indole alkaloid biosynthesis[24]. In plants, allantoin biosynthesis is dependent on transthyretin-like proteins, while in Arabidopsis thaliana, the two transthyretin-like isoforms are due to the expression of AS[25]. JASMONATE ZIM-domain (JAZ) repressor, a key inhibitor of flavonoid biosynthesis[26], is regulated by AS in tea plants resulting in the creation of three JAZ splice isoforms[27]. CsJAZ1-1 and CsJAZ1-2 (rather than CsJAZ1-3), in the absence of jasmonates, competitively bind to CsMYC2, a positive regulator of flavonoid biosynthesis[28], thereby repressing flavonoid biosynthetic genes. In rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), BnaPAP2 has been demonstrated as a MYB transcription factor essential for regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis[29]. AS gives rise to different isoforms of BnaPAP2.A7 with opposite functions. The complete BnaPAP2.A7 harbors crucial MYB domains and could interact with a bHLH protein in vitro. In contrast, the two truncated splice isoforms of BnaPAP2.A7 lack the ability to interact with bHLH proteins[29]. Accordingly, AS emerges as a crucial mechanism for regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in rapeseed.

      In this study, we combined previous transcriptome data with the genome data of L. japonica to investigate differential AS events across different growth periods. On this basis, further key secondary metabolic genes for the occurrence of AS were screened by analysis. Molecular biology techniques were used to verify gene expression before and after splicing at different developmental stages, elucidating the impact of AS events on L. japonica quality. Our study further expands the current understanding of AS and provides a new theoretical basis for the growth and quality improvement of L. japonica.

    • The L. japonica plants used in this experiment were grown in the Pingyi outdoor cultivation base (Shandong Province, China) without exposure to extreme drought, plant diseases, and insect pests. Flowers of L. japonica were collected at five different developmental stages, named juvenile bud stage (JBS), third green stage (TGS), complete white stage (CWS), silver flowering stage (SFS), and gold flowering stage (GFS). Flowers of the same development stage from at least 10 plants were combined to form a single biological replicate. Collected plant materials were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further analysis.

    • RNA was extracted from the flowers of L. japonica and transcriptome analysis was performed following a previously described protocol[8]. Initially, 100 mg of each flower sample was ground to powder in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the quantity and quality were measured using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). RNA was then reverse-transcribed using a cDNA synthesis kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The obtained cDNA was used for the following PCR verification experiment.

    • The raw data of transcriptome sequences from five flowering stages of L. japonica were obtained from NCBI Sequence Read Archive under project PRJNA507904 (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA507904) deposited by our previous publication[9]. Clean reads were aligned with the reference genome via HISAT2[30]. Single-gene sequences were compared with Viridiplantae database (taxid: 33090) from the UniProt using BLASTX, with a cutoff E-value of 10−5. Single-gene sequences that could not be aligned with the database were scanned for coding region nucleotide (5'-3') and amino acid sequences using ESTScan[31]. The value of fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) was calculated using cufflinks[32] to represent the expression level of genes.

    • A paired comparison of five flowering stages of RNA transcriptome data was performed to identify AS events. The reference genome of L. japonica (PRJCA001719) was obtained from China National Center for Bioinformation (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwh/Assembly/660/show). rMATS (http://rnaseq-mats.sourceforge.net/index.html) software was used for identifying the differential AS events with the default parameters (adjusted p < 0.05 and |ΔPSI| > 10). All AS events were matched with the corresponding five major types of AS events.

    • Gene functions were analyzed by using MapMan bin codes[33]. Predictions of identified genes from L. japonica were performed by converting annotations to the Arabidopsis genome and considering orthologous genes. Pathway mapping of identified genes was conducted using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (www.genome.jp/kegg)[34].

    • PCR reactions were performed for the amplification of gene fragments by the designed primers (listed in Supplementary Table S1) using the PCR Reaction Kit (Accurate) and Instrument (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA), in which samples at the SFS stage were used. For further validating the alternative splicing events, the target fragments were purified and recovered using a Gel Extraction Kit (Accurate) and then recombined into the pET28 vector. PCR amplification reaction was performed again using the primers and the following sequencing analysis was conducted.

    • To verify the expression of selected genes at different flowering stages, Primer 5.0 software was used to design primers (Supplemental Table S1) and qRT-PCR was conducted using ABI 7500 fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The SYBR® Green Pro Taq HS qPCR Kit (Accurate Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Hunan, China) was used, and β-actin as the housekeeping gene[35]. Three biological replicates were performed on each group sample and the relative expression levels were calculated based on the 2−ΔΔCᴛ method[36].

    • The SPSS statistical software (version 22.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical evaluation. Statistical significance was evaluated by the student's t-test when only two groups were compared or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test when multiple groups were compared. A p-value < 0.05 was considered as the statistical significance. Three independent biological replicates per sample were tested in this study.

    • The RNA-seq data obtained consisted of 15 libraries divided into five groups, each representing a different flowering stage, with three biological replicates per group (Table 1). Most raw reads exceeded 30 million, except for sample GFS_1, which had 27 million reads. The highest read count was observed in sample SFS_3, with 50 million reads. The majority of total raw bases exceeded 4 gigabases (G), with sample CWS_3 having the fewest bases at 3.9 G, and sample GFS_2 having the most at 7.4 G. The average read length was over 120 bases; samples in the GFS stage had the longest reads at 148 bases, while reads from other stages ranged from 120 to 130 bases.

      Table 1.  Quality data of samples from each of the five stages of the L. japonica transcriptome.

      Sample Raw reads (M) Raw bases (G) Raw Q20 (G) Raw Q30 (G) Clean reads (M) Clean bases (G) Clean Q20 (G) Clean Q30 (G) Average
      length (bp)
      JBS_1 32.623 4.226 3.981 (94.2%) 3.725 (88.1%) 29.040 (89.0%) 3.654 (86.5%) 3.560 (97.4%) 3.419 (93.6%) 125.8
      JBS_2 49.964 6.245 5.884 (94.2%) 5.528 (88.5%) 44.648 (89.4%) 5.431 (87.0%) 5.285 (97.3%) 5.087 (93.7%) 121.6
      JBS_3 40.982 5.123 4.830 (94.3%) 4.533 (88.5%) 36.754 (89.7%) 4.464 (87.2%) 4.344 (97.3%) 4.175 (93.5%) 121.5
      TGS_1 48.764 6.095 5.741 (94.2%) 5.379 (88.2%) 43.324 (88.8%) 5.281 (86.6%) 5.141 (97.4%) 4.941 (93.6%) 121.9
      TGS_2 48.817 6.102 5.768 (94.5%) 5.434 (89.1%) 44.174 (90.5%) 5.377 (88.1%) 5.233 (97.3%) 5.037 (93.7%) 121.7
      TGS_3 36.493 4.728 4.483 (94.8%) 4.231 (89.5%) 32.980 (90.4%) 4.176 (88.3%) 4.075 (97.6%) 3.929 (94.1%) 126.6
      CWS_1 34.153 4.316 4.050 (93.8%) 3.794 (87.9%) 30.309 (88.7%) 3.702 (85.8%) 3.599 (97.2%) 3.459 (93.4%) 122.1
      CWS_2 40.121 5.110 4.829 (94.5%) 4.536 (88.8%) 35.785 (89.2%) 4.425 (86.6%) 4.317 (97.6%) 4.156 (93.9%) 123.7
      CWS_3 30.453 3.917 3.693 (94.3%) 3.462 (88.4%) 27.201 (89.3%) 3.407 (87.0%) 3.317 (97.4%) 3.187 (93.6%) 125.2
      SFS_1 48.938 6.117 5.757 (94.1%) 5.393 (88.2%) 43.576 (89.0%) 5.295 (86.6%) 5.152 (97.3%) 4.950 (93.5%) 121.5
      SFS_2 46.323 5.790 5.469 (94.5%) 5.137 (88.7%) 41.419 (89.4%) 5.054 (87.3%) 4.925 (97.4%) 4.738 (93.7%) 122
      SFS_3 50.913 6.364 5.930 (93.2%) 5.519 (86.7%) 44.178 (86.8%) 5.344 (84.0%) 5.189 (97.1%) 4.978 (93.1%) 121
      GFS_1 27.133 4.070 3.977 (97.7%) 3.853 (94.7%) 25.913 (95.5%) 3.834 (94.2%) 3.798 (99.0%) 3.721 (97.0%) 148
      GFS_2 49.948 7.492 7.324 (97.8%) 7.099 (94.8%) 47.727 (95.6%) 7.066 (94.3%) 7.001 (99.1%) 6.861(97.1%) 148
      GFS_3 38.352 5.753 5.620 (97.7%) 5.444 (94.6%) 36.600 (95.4%) 5.425 (94.3%) 5.374 (99.1%) 5.265 (97.0%) 148.2
    • The HISAT2 software was used to map clean reads to the reference genome. The average number of clean reads for each flowering stage was as follows: JBS (36,814,019), TGS (40,159,280), CWS (31,098,199), SFS (43,057,608), and GFS (36,746,742) (Table 1). As shown in Fig. 1, the average total mapping rate for most samples exceeded 97%. The unique mapping rates for each stage were 68.61% for JBS, 77.05% for TGS, 74.50% for CWS, 62.09% for SFS, and 86.95% for GFS (Table 2). Additionally, rMAT was used to compare splicing patterns across four developmental stages (TGS, CWS, SFS, and GFS) relative to JBS, identifying all AS events. In total, 31,739 AS events (20,916 AS genes) were detected at TGS, 30,572 AS events (20,501 AS genes) at CWS, 31,147 AS events (20,632 AS genes) at SFS, and 32,071 AS events (21,020 AS genes) at GFS, compared to JBS (Fig. 2).

      Figure 1. 

      Mapping of L. japonica transcriptome to the reference genome. 'Total mapping ratio' refers to the proportion of clean reads that align with the reference genome, while 'Uniquely mapping ratio' represents the proportion of clean reads that align uniquely to a specific location on the reference genome.

      Table 2.  Mapping of the L. japonica transcriptome to the reference genome.

      Sample Total mapping ratio Uniquely mapping ratio
      JBS_1 96.85% 56.37%
      JBS_2 97.19% 81.70%
      JBS_3 97.32% 67.75%
      TGS_1 98.50% 53.61%
      TGS_2 96.94% 88.34%
      TGS_3 96.97% 89.20%
      CWS_1 96.66% 92.97%
      CWS_2 97.32% 58.13%
      CWS_3 97.53% 72.41%
      SFS_1 97.54% 62.00%
      SFS_2 98.39% 55.27%
      SFS_3 96.94% 68.99%
      GFS_1 91.43% 87.21%
      GFS_2 91.17% 86.69%
      GFS_3 91.25% 86.94%

      Figure 2. 

      Overview of the number of alternative splicing events and related genes between different stages. All of the AS events and related genes were identified through the comparison of four stages including TGS, CWS, SFS, and GFS with the first stage of JBS. rMATS software was used for identifying the differential alternative splicing events.

    • Based on the observed number of AS events, five major types of AS events were identified: exon skipping (ES), mutually exclusive exons (MXE), alternative 5' donor sites (A5SS), alternative 3' acceptor sites (A3SS), and intron retention (IR) (Fig. 3). The distribution of AS events across different flowering stages showed distinct patterns for each AS type. A total of 14,976, 15,654, 15,548, and 14,692 ES events were observed, respectively, across the different stages, making it the most prevalent type of AS event. However, the number of MXE events identified was 996, 1,136, 1,045, and 940, respectively, representing a smaller proportion of the overall AS events. A5SS events were observed 5,755, 5,799, 5,734, and 5,739 times across the stages, making this one of the more frequent types of splicing events. And the A3SS events occurred 5,617, 5,673, 5,609, and 5,585 times, respectively, showing a similar distribution to the A5SS events. From this distribution, it is evident that ES is the most prevalent AS type, representing 40% of all events. This is followed by A3SS, A5SS, IR, and finally MXE, with MXE accounting for less than 5% of total AS events (Fig. 3).

      Figure 3. 

      Number of identified alternative splicing events at different periods. The left side represents a schematic of the five AS types identified, with the white boxes representing the constitutive regions, and the grey representing the alternative regions. The four coloured blocks on the right represent the number of events in which several types of AS occurred

    • To gain deeper insights, a comparative analysis of differential AS events was performed between JBS vs TGS and JBS vs SFS, revealing distinct patterns (Fig. 4). In the JBS vs TGS comparison, 177, 150, 292, 18, and 2,222 differential AS events were identified for A3SS, A5SS, MXE, IR, and ES, respectively. In the JBS vs SFS comparison, these numbers were 185, 171, 243, 18, and 1,650 for the same AS types. Notable variations in the discrepancy proportion among the different AS types were observed. MXE exhibited the highest discrepancy proportion, approximately 25%, reaching 27.94% in JBS vs TGS, and 24.40% in JBS vs SFS. ES displayed the second-highest discrepancy proportion, ranging from 10%–15%, with values of 14.29% in JBS vs TGS, and 11.40% in JBS vs SFS. A3SS and A5SS showed a more moderate discrepancy proportion, around 3.50% and 2.90%, respectively; A3SS reached 3.16% in JBS vs TGS, and 3.29% in JBS vs SFS, while A5SS peaked at 2.62% in JBS vs TGS, and 2.92% in JBS vs SFS. IR presented the lowest discrepancy proportion, around 0.47% in both comparisons. Based on these results, ES and MXE were selected for further analysis due to their higher frequency of AS events and greater discrepancy proportion, with MXE showing the largest difference proportion among all AS types.

      Figure 4. 

      Distribution of differential alternative splicing events at different flowering stages. The number and proportion of differential alternative splicing events from JBS vs TGS, and JBS vs SFS were calculated. The left vertical axis represents the number of differential alternative splicing events, while the right vertical axis represents the proportion of differential alternative splicing events.

    • To explore the impact of AS on physiological metabolism in L. japonica, we conducted a statistical screening of genes exhibiting variable splicing across the five flowering stages. The analysis focused intensively on genes undergoing ES and MXE splicing events. Genes with MXE splicing events were identified specifically in TGS and SFS when compared to JBS. Functional analysis of these genes revealed distinct patterns of enrichment. Genes with MXE splicing events (GMXEs) identified in TGS were predominantly involved in protein metabolism, RNA metabolism, transport, DNA metabolism, and development. In contrast, GMXEs identified in SFS were primarily associated with protein metabolism, lipid metabolism, RNA metabolism, secondary metabolism, and signaling/stress/amino acid metabolism. Notably, genes related to lipid metabolism and secondary metabolism were more abundant in JBS than in SFS. Additionally, GMXEs specifically involved in DNA metabolism, cell wall formation, major carbohydrate metabolism, photosynthesis, and mitochondrial electron transport were uniquely identified in TGS (Fig. 5).

      Figure 5. 

      The function of genes involved in mutually exclusive exon events. Gene functions were predicted and categorized using MapMan bin codes. '(−)' indicates that no gene was categorized. Abbreviations: CHO, carbohydrate.

    • To investigate the impact of ES events on physiological metabolism, genes modified by ES events (GES) were functionally categorized. GESs identified in TGS and SFS were primarily enriched in protein metabolism, RNA metabolism, cell metabolism, transport, and signaling pathways. Additionally, the number of GESs associated with development, DNA metabolism, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and major carbohydrate metabolism were significantly lower in SFS compared to TGS. Secondary metabolism played a notable role, with 14 genes associated with secondary metabolic functions in the JBS vs TGS comparison, and 18 genes in the JBS vs SFS comparison (Fig. 6). The gene annotations were submitted to the KEGG database for enzyme identification. Four key enzymes closely related to secondary metabolism were identified: tyrosine decarboxylase (TYDC), chalcone isomerase (CHI), strictosidine synthase (STR), and 2'-hydroxyisoflavone reductase (IFR). Interestingly, TYDC and CHI were found in the TGS group but not in the SFS group, suggesting that ES events may occur specifically in TGS, involving metabolic pathways related to aromatic amino acid metabolism, isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, and flavonoid biosynthesis. Conversely, STR and IFR were present in the SFS group but absent in the TGS group, indicating that ES events likely occur only in SFS, affecting metabolic pathways associated with indole alkaloid biosynthesis and isoflavonoid biosynthesis.

      Figure 6. 

      The function of genes involved in exon skipping events. Gene functions were predicted and categorized using MapMan bin codes. Abbreviations: TCA, tricarboxylic acid.

    • The metabolic pathways involving the four key genes were summarized and analyzed, revealing two main pathways: flavonoid metabolism and alkaloid metabolism (Fig. 7). In the flavonoid metabolic pathway, the process begins with phenylalanine, which is converted into the intermediates cinnamoyl-CoA and p-coumaroyl-CoA to isoliquiritigenin. This compound is then catalyzed by CHI to form liquiritigenin. Through a series of complex biochemical reactions, liquiritigenin is further transformed into daidzein and 2'-hydroformononetin, which are subsequently synthesized into (−)-vestitone, catalyzed by IFR, thus completing the flavonoid metabolic pathway. In the alkaloid metabolic pathway, both tyrosine and tryptophan contribute to the alkaloid formation, with tyrosine and phenylalanine capable of interconversion. Tyrosine is catalyzed by TYDC to form tyramine, which subsequently leads to dopamine and progresses further along the alkaloid pathway. Meanwhile, tryptophan is converted to tryptamine, which is then transformed into 3-alpha(S)-strictosidine by STR, entering the downstream steps of the alkaloid biosynthesis pathway.

      Figure 7. 

      The metabolic pathway mapping and structure validation of exon skipping event genes. The ES genes were mapped to the metabolic pathways using the KEGG database. Hollow circles represent compounds in the pathway, while solid black lines represent a single reaction step and dotted lines represent multiple steps. Gene structure was analyzed by PCR and sequencing to identify splicing variants. Boxes represent the exons, boxes filled with dashed lines represent the splicing exons, solid lines represent the introns, and dotted lines indicate the splicing sites of introns.

    • In the previous analysis, four genes were screened: IFR, CHI, STR, and TYDC. The first two are associated with flavonoid metabolism, while the latter two are linked to alkaloid metabolism. To confirm the accuracy of these findings, the sequence structures of these genes were validated. Primers were designed to amplify potential variants based on the identified AS types in these genes. Due to the presence of ES events, a homologous recombination strategy was employed, connecting the target gene with or without the corresponding spliceosome sequence in a vector. Differences in the length of PCR products from the same gene were used to assess the occurrence of AS events (Fig. 7). Sequencing technologies were then utilized to confirm the produced isoforms and the AS types of these genes. PCR analysis of the IFR gene with the same primer pair produced two products, approximately 250 and 750 bp in length. Sequencing results confirmed that the IFR gene underwent a two-ES splicing event. Additionally, PCR and sequencing analyses validated the occurrence of ES events during the transcription of the other three genes, CHI, STR, and TYDC (Fig. 7, Supplemental Figs S1 & S2).

    • To further investigate the relationship of AS events of the selected genes with their potential functions, the expression levels of AS-modified transcripts of the IFR, CHI, STR, and TYDC genes were analyzed using qRT-PCR (Fig. 8). The IFR_AS transcript exhibited low expression levels during the first three stages, followed by a significant increase in the SFS and GFS stages. CHI_AS expression was significantly higher during the TGS, CWS, and GFS stages compared to the JBS and SFS stages. The STR_AS gene showed an initial slight decrease in expression, followed by a rapid increase, reaching its peak during the GFS stage. In contrast, TYDC_AS had the highest expression levels at the early flowering stage, followed by a steady decline throughout the later flowering stages.

      Figure 8. 

      Expression levels of genes involved in AS events at different flowering stages. RNAs were extracted and the expression of genes was measured by qRT-PCR. The data are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent biological replicates. Means with the same letter were not significantly different among floral stages, while different letters indicate that the change is significant according to Tukey's multiple comparison (p < 0.05).

    • The flowers of L. japonica, the traditional Chinese medicinal plant under investigation, are of particular interest due to their medicinal properties. AS is recognized as a critical mechanism for post-transcriptional regulation of floral development[37]. In plants, IR is the most prevalent type of AS, while MXE splicing events are less frequent[38]. Studies have shown that approximately 60% of introns in Arabidopsis undergo variable splicing, with IR accounting for about 40% of AS events[39,40]. However, IR is not always the most predominant type. Sometimes plants may favor ES for precise protein isoform regulation under stress[41] or rapid developmental transitions[42]. Notably, a high frequency of AS events occur in flowers further suggesting a key role for AS in regulating the development in Arabidopsis[38]. In our study, we analyzed the AS events across different flowering stages of L. japonica by combining de novo sequencing with genomic data. Specifically, the results indicated that ES events were the most prevalent, constituting 40% of the total AS events observed (Fig. 3). A comparison between normal temperature incubation (22 °C) with cold stress (4 °C) in Arabidopsis thaliana exhibited a higher occurrence of IR events, with a lesser proportion of ES events[43]. Jabre et al. also arrived at similar results, but it is notable that for ES events alternative regions with higher inclusion levels (higher PSI values) display more nucleosome occupancy across the splice sites[44]. CRISPR/Cas9 technology was employed to induce ES in rice betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH), resulting in the creation of BADH-2, which enhances rice quality by imparting flavor during its maturation[45]. Additionally, under drought conditions, the third exon of the proline synthesis enzyme in Arabidopsis thaliana undergoes ES, leading to proline accumulation and indicating the significance of ES as a pivotal mechanism in plant response to abiotic stressors[46]. These results above indicate that IR and ES play crucial roles in plant development, under both normal growth conditions and under stress-induced scenarios.

    • It has been reported that AS serves as a significant mechanism in the regulation of secondary metabolism[23]. This is particularly evident in medicinal plants where the abundance of bioactive constituents is indicative of their quality. In Actinidia chinensis, several structural genes for anthocyanin biosynthesis, including chalcone synthase, dihydroflavonol-4-reductase, and anthocyanidin synthase are regulated by AS during fruit development[47]. In Ginkgo biloba, selective splicing regulates flavonoid biosynthesis genes and their transcriptional regulators in different tissues, thereby affecting secondary metabolism[48]. In L. japonica, the presence of flavonoids and phenolic acids is various during floral development, while some of indicative components such as chlorogenic acid and luteoloside, were highest in CWS, while lower in other developmental stages[9]. We screened variable splicing genes related to flavonoid synthesis, CHI, and IFR, and their expression trends also changed with the flowering stage. The expression level of IFR_AS was relatively low at CWS and higher in SFS and GFS, which was opposite to the changing pattern of chlorogenic acid and luteoloside. The potential interplay between AS events and the accumulation of secondary metabolites may exist, warranting further in-depth investigation.

      Studies have shown variations in CHI expression within the same plant species. Notably, the inner petals exhibit higher CHI expression compared to the outer petals[49]. In Fagopyrum dibotrys, CHI expression is most prominent in flowers and least pronounced in the stems[50]. CHI has been verified its distinctive function as a unique enhancer within the flavonoids pathway[51]. Our research has unveiled differing levels of CHI expression across various stages of flowering. The expression of CHI_AS exhibited a higher value at CWS and GFS than at JBS and SFS. IFR is a key enzyme in the isoflavone synthesis pathway, controlling the synthesis of isoflavone in plants[52]. The importance of IFR has been highlighted in previous publications with regard to its significant role in plants' secondary metabolism and defense mechanisms against stressors. In soybeans, exposure to ABA triggers the upregulation of isoflavone reductase expression, aiding in the mitigation of ABA-induced stress through the synthesis of secondary metabolites[53]. During periods of flooding stress, the upregulation of genes associated with isoflavone is notably observed, suggesting a significant involvement in responding to flooding stress[54]. The present study specifically delves into the variations in IFR levels throughout the floral development of L. japonica. During the initial three stages (JBS, TGS, CWS), there was minimal disparity in the expression levels of IFR_AS. However, in the SFS and GFS stages, IFR_AS consistently exhibited higher expression levels. Furthermore, in accordance with the research conducted by Yang et al.[55], we can infer that CHI_AS and IFR_AS play an essential role in the biosynthesis of flavonoids during the flower development of L. japonica. While investigating flavonoids, we also examined genes undergoing variable splicing with the alkaloid biosynthetic pathway. The genes STR and TYDC, critical components located upstream of indole alkaloids and isoquinoline alkaloids, are subject to variable splicing. Consequently, it is plausible to postulate that AS is capable of influencing the secondary metabolism of L. japonica.

    • The objective of this study was to identify the specific genes engaged in AS and the corresponding AS events that transpire during the flowering phase of L. japonica flowering utilizing the plant's transcriptome and genome. Comparative analysis between the first flowering stage with the other four stages revealed 20,916, 20,501, 20,632, and 21,020 genes undergoing AS, accompanied by 31,739, 30,752, 31,147, and 32,071 AS events. TGS and SFS were selected for further examination based on variations in active components across different flowering stages. Upon comparing these stages, the AS type exhibiting the greatest disparity in occurrence (ES) and the highest ratio of differences in AS events incidence (MXE) was singled out for examination. Subsequent gene function analysis and categorization of genes in these AS forms led to the selection of genes linked with secondary metabolism for detailed investigation. Our findings imply that AS may be essential for regulating secondary metabolism at distinct developmental phases of L. japonica. Our study elucidates the correlation between alterations in secondary metabolism and AS events during L. japonica flowering. These results not only enrich our comprehension of the intricacies of L. japonica in secondary metabolism regulation but also establish a platform for further investigation into the regulatory mechanisms governing active component synthesis.

      • This work was supported by the Zhejiang Province Key R&D Program Project (Grant No. 2023C04019), the Research Initiation Funding of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (Grant No. 23042215-Y), Zhejiang Province Basic Public Welfare Research Program (Grant No. LGC22H200012), and Zhejiang Xinmiao Talents Program (Grant No. 2023R406037).

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and designed: Zhang L, Yang B; writing - draft manuscript: Chen J, Tian X, Yasmeen F; writing - manuscript revision and editing: Zhang L, Zhang N; language polishing: Yasmeen F; ES events identification: Tian X; transcriptomic and genomic data analysis: Ni H; bioinfomatic analysis: Yang H; experiments performed: Chen J, Tian X. All of the authors have read and agreed to the final published version of the manuscript.

      • The data used and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The sequences used for de novo assembly have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under project PRJNA507904 in our previous work (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA507904).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Jie Chen, Xu Tian

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (8)  Table (2) References (55)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Chen J, Tian X, Weng X, Ni H, Yang H, et al. 2025. Transcriptomic analysis to understand the alternative splicing event on regulating secondary metabolism during flowering stages of Lonicera japonica. Medicinal Plant Biology 4: e014 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0025-0011
    Chen J, Tian X, Weng X, Ni H, Yang H, et al. 2025. Transcriptomic analysis to understand the alternative splicing event on regulating secondary metabolism during flowering stages of Lonicera japonica. Medicinal Plant Biology 4: e014 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0025-0011

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return