Search
2026 Volume 2
Article Contents
ORIGINAL RESEARCH   Open Access    

Metagenomic study on functional characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling under rice-crayfish farming

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Received: 01 November 2025
    Revised: 08 December 2025
    Accepted: 26 January 2026
    Published online: 13 March 2026
    Nitrogen Cycling  2 Article number: e016 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • RC farming promoted the transformation and cycling of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus.

    TN, TP and DOC were the most important environmental factors regulating C, N, and P cycles.

    The N cycle was regulated by the C and P cycles within the microbial functional network in the RC system.

  • Rice-crayfish farming (RC) is a widely adopted sustainable agricultural system, yet a comprehensive understanding of its microbially driven nutrient cycling mechanisms remains limited. This study employed metagenomic sequencing to investigate the functional characteristics of soil carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) cycling under long-term RC farming, and compared them with those under rice monoculture (RM). The results demonstrated that RC farming significantly reshaped the soil microbial community and its metabolic potential. It enhanced the abundances of key functional genes involved in methane oxidation, soil N degradation, denitrification, and organic P mineralization. Conversely, RC led to increased gene abundance for the Calvin cycle and specific P transport systems. Notably, the paddy planting area (RCP) consistently exhibited higher microbial diversity and stronger nutrient cycling potential than the trench area (RCT). Mantel tests identified that total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and dissolved organic carbon in soil are significantly correlated with microbial communities and functions related to C, N, and P cycles. Furthermore, network analysis revealed tight functional coupling among C-, N-, and P-cycling genes, with key hub genes exhibiting significant cross-cycle correlations. By elucidating the microbial mechanisms of nutrient cycling within integrated cropping systems, this study highlights how RC farming cultivates a complex, interconnected microbial network. This network enhances nutrient use efficiency, providing scientific evidence for improving sustainable agricultural practices.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • The supplementary files    can be downloaded from here.
  • [1] Wu Y, Li Y, Niu L, Zhang W, Wang L, et al. 2022. Nutrient status of integrated rice-crayfish system impacts the microbial nitrogen-transformation processes in paddy fields and rice yields. Science of The Total Environment 836:155706 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155706

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Du L, Wang H, Zhang Z, Zhou Y, Xiao Z, et al. 2024. Effects of long-term rice-crayfish farming on soil CNP storage and stoichiometry. Soil and Tillage Research 235:105882 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2023.105882

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Jiang Y, Cao C. 2021. Crayfish–rice integrated system of production: an agriculture success story in China. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 41:68 doi: 10.1007/s13593-021-00724-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Yuan P, Wang J, Li C, Cao C. 2022. Long-term rice–crayfish farming aggravates soil gleying and induced changes of soil iron morphology. Soil Use and Management 38:757−770 doi: 10.1111/sum.12688

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Dong S, Gao Y, Gao Y, He M, Liu F, et al. 2021. Evaluation of the trophic structure and energy flow of a rice-crayfish integrated farming ecosystem based on the Ecopath model. Aquaculture 539:736626 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736626

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Fan L, Li F, Chen X, Shen L, Chu Y, et al. 2023. Co-culture of red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkia influenced glycoside hydrolase families and fungal communities in the rice-paddy soils. Applied Soil Ecology 186:104816 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104816

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Guo Y, Hu Q, Liu T, Du Y, Li C, et al. 2025. Long-term rice–crayfish coculture increases plant lignin but not microbial necromass contribution to soil organic carbon. Soil and Tillage Research 475:106424 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2024.106424

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Fernández-Romero ML, Parras-Alcántara L, Lozano-García B, Clark JM, Collins CD. 2016. Soil quality assessment based on carbon stratification index in different olive grove management practices in Mediterranean areas. CATENA 137:449−458 doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Guo L, Lin W, Cao C, Li C. 2023. Integrated rice-crayfish farming system does not mitigate the global warming potential during rice season. Science of The Total Environment 867:161520 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161520

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Xu Q, Dai L, Gao P, Dou Z. 2022. The environmental, nutritional, and economic benefits of rice-aquaculture animal coculture in China. Energy 249:123723 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123723

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Ling L, Shuai Y, Xu Y, Zhang Z, Wang B, et al. 2021. Comparing rice production systems in China: economic output and carbon footprint. Science of The Total Environment 791:147890 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147890

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Xu Q, Peng X, Guo H, Che Y, Dou Z, et al. 2022. Rice-crayfish coculture delivers more nutrition at a lower environmental cost. Sustainable Production and Consumption 29:14−24 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Ge T, Luo Y, Singh BP. 2020. Resource stoichiometric and fertility in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 56:1091−1092 doi: 10.1007/s00374-020-01513-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Duan P, Xiao K, Jiang Y, Li D. 2022. Mechanisms underlying the responses of soil N2O production by ammonia oxidizers to nitrogen addition are mediated by topography in a subtropical forest. Geoderma 425:116036 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Zheng S, Xia Y, Hu Y, Chen X, Rui Y, et al. 2021. Stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in soil: effects of agricultural land use and climate at a continental scale. Soil and Tillage Research 209:104903 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104903

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Zhang J, Feng L, Ouyang Y, Hu R, Xu H, et al. 2020. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and fungi in relation to phosphorus availability under different land uses for some latosols from Guangdong, China. CATENA 195:104686 doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104686

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Li P, Wu G, Li Y, Hu C, Ge L, et al. 2022. Long-term rice-crayfish-turtle co-culture maintains high crop yields by improving soil health and increasing soil microbial community stability. Geoderma 413:115745 doi: 10.1016/jgeoderma.2022.115745

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Fang X, Wang C, Xiao S, Yu K, Zhao J, et al. 2023. Lower methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice-aquaculture co-culture systems than from rice paddies in southeast China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 338:109540 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109540

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Zhu X, Yang P, Xiong G, Wei H, Zhang L, et al. 2023. Microbial biogeochemical cycling reveals the sustainability of the rice-crayfish co-culture model. iScience 26:106769 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106769

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Zhang Y, Gao W, Ma L, Luan H, Tang J, et al. 2023. Long-term partial substitution of chemical fertilizer by organic amendments influences soil microbial functional diversity of phosphorus cycling and improves phosphorus availability in greenhouse vegetable production. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 341:108193 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108193

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884−i890 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674−1676 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/tv033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Noguchi H, Park J, Takagi T. 2006. MetaGene: prokaryotic gene finding from environmental genome shotgun sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 34:5623−5630 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl723

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, et al. 2012. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490:55−60 doi: 10.1038/nature11450

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. 2015. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nature Methods 12:59−60 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Hu X, Gu H, Liu J, Wei D, Zhu P, et al. 2022. Metagenomics reveals divergent functional profiles of soil carbon and nitrogen cycling under long-term addition of chemical and organic fertilizers in the black soil region. Geoderma 418:115846 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115846

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Li Q, Xu L, Xu L, Qian Y, Jiao Y, et al. 2018. Influence of consecutive integrated rice-crayfish culture on phosphorus fertility of paddy soils. Land Degradation & Development 29:3413−3422 doi: 10.1002/ldr.3107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Shen H, Zhang Q, Bi R, Xu X, Zhang X, et al. 2022. Linkages of nitrogen-cycling microbial resistance and resilience to soil nutrient stoichiometry under dry-rewetting cycles with different fertilizations and temperatures in a vegetable field. Science of The Total Environment 820:153294 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153294

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Wang Q, Huang Q, Wang J, Khan MA, Guo G, et al. 2021. Dissolved organic carbon drives nutrient cycling via microbial community in paddy soil. Chemosphere 285:131472 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131472

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Xu M, Li F, Zhang X, Chen B, Geng Y, et al. 2024. Microbiome analysis reveals the intestinal microbiota characteristics and potential impact of Procambarus clarkii. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 108:77 doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12914-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Mod HK, Buri A, Yashiro E, Guex N, Malard L, et al. 2021. Predicting spatial patterns of soil bacteria under current and future environmental conditions. The ISME Journal 15:1516−1528 doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00947-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Wang R, Lu J, Jiang Y, Dijkstra FA. 2022. Carbon efficiency for nutrient acquisition (CENA) by plants: role of nutrient availability and microbial symbionts. Plant and Soil 476:289−300 doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05347-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Zhu Z, Fang Y, Liang Y, Li Y, Liu S, et al. 2022. Stoichiometric regulation of priming effects and soil carbon balance by microbial life strategies. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 169:108669 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108669

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] McBride SG, Osburn ED, Lucas JM, Simpson JS, Brown T, et al. 2023. Volatile and dissolved organic carbon sources have distinct effects on microbial activity, nitrogen content, and bacterial communities in soil. Microbial Ecology 85:659−668 doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-01967-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Wang S, Redmile-Gordon M, Shahbaz M, Ge T, Zhang M, et al. 2022. Microbial formation and stabilisation of soil organic carbon is regulated by carbon substrate identity and mineral composition. Geoderma 414:115762 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115762

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Wang K, Ren T, Yan J, Zhu D, Liao S, et al. 2022. Straw returning mediates soil microbial biomass carbon and phosphorus turnover to enhance soil phosphorus availability in a rice-oilseed rape rotation with different soil phosphorus levels. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 335:107991 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107991

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Stone BW, Li J, Koch BJ, Blazewicz SJ, Dijkstra P, et al. 2021. Nutrients cause consolidation of soil carbon flux to small proportion of bacterial community. Nature Communications 12:3381 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23676-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Ren C, Wang J, Bastida F, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Yang Y, et al. 2022. Microbial traits determine soil C emission in response to fresh carbon inputs in forests across biomes. Global Change Biology 28:1516−1528 doi: 10.1111/gcb.16004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Craig ME, Mayes MA, Sulman BN, Walker AP. 2021. Biological mechanisms may contribute to soil carbon saturation patterns. Global Change Biology 27:2633−2644 doi: 10.1111/gcb.15584

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Zhang K, Maltais-Landry G, Liao HL. 2021. How soil biota regulate C cycling and soil C pools in diversified crop rotations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 156:108219 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108219

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Malik AA, Bouskill NJ. 2022. Drought impacts on microbial trait distribution and feedback to soil carbon cycling. Functional Ecology 36:1442−1456 doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.14010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Jassey VEJ, Walcker R, Kardol P, Geisen S, Heger T, et al. 2022. Contribution of soil algae to the global carbon cycle. New Phytologist 234:64−76 doi: 10.1111/nph.17950

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Karhu K, Alaei S, Li J, Merilä P, Ostonen I, et al. 2022. Microbial carbon use efficiency and priming of soil organic matter mineralization by glucose additions in boreal forest soils with different C: N ratios. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 167:108615 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108615

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Longepierre M, Feola Conz R, Barthel M, Bru D, Philippot L, et al. 2022. Mixed effects of soil compaction on the nitrogen cycle under pea and wheat. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:822487 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.822487

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Huang S, Cui X, Xu Z, Zhang Z, Wang X. 2022. Nitrogen addition exerts a stronger effect than elevated temperature on soil available nitrogen and relation to soil microbial properties in the rhizosphere of Camellia sinensis L. seedlings. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29:35179−35192 doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18748-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Morris KA, Richter A, Migliavacca M, Schrumpf M. 2022. Growth of soil microbes is not limited by the availability of nitrogen and phosphorus in a Mediterranean oak-savanna. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 169:108680 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108680

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Zhang J, Zhou J, Lambers H, Li Y, Li Y, et al. 2022. Nitrogen and phosphorus addition exerted different influences on litter and soil carbon release in a tropical forest. Science of The Total Environment 832:155049 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Zhang M, Han F, Liu Z, Han Y, Li Y, et al. 2022. Ammonium-assimilating microbiome: a halophilic biosystem rationally optimized by carbon to nitrogen ratios with stable nitrogen conversion and microbial structure. Bioresource Technology 350:126911 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126911

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Grassmann CS, Mariano E, Diniz PP, Borges BMF, Borges CD, et al. 2022. Functional N-cycle genes in soil and N2O emissions in tropical grass-maize intercropping systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 169:108655 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108655

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Si G, Peng C, Yuan J, Xu X, Zhao S, et al. 2017. Changes in soil microbial community composition and organic carbon fractions in an integrated rice–crayfish farming system in subtropical China. Scientific Reports 7:2856 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02984-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Schleuss PM, Widdig M, Biederman LA, Borer ET, Crawley MJ, et al. 2021. Microbial substrate stoichiometry governs nutrient effects on nitrogen cycling in grassland soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 155:108168 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108168

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] He Y, Song Z, Dong X, Zheng Q, Peng X, et al. 2022. Candida tropicalis prompted effectively simultaneous removal of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in activated sludge reactor: microbial community succession and functional characteristics. Bioresource Technology 348:126820 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126820

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Cui E, Lu R, Xu X, Sun H, Qiao Y, et al. 2022. Soil phosphorus drives plant trait variations in a mature subtropical forest. Global Change Biology 28:3310−3320 doi: 10.1111/gcb.16148

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Wang JT, Zhang YB, Xiao Q, Zhang LM. 2022. Archaea is more important than bacteria in driving soil stoichiometry in phosphorus deficient habitats. Science of The Total Environment 827:154417 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154417

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Zhang T, Wu X, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Bolan NS, et al. 2021. Effects of microorganism-mediated inoculants on humification processes and phosphorus dynamics during the aerobic composting of swine manure. Journal of Hazardous Materials 416:125738 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125738

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Bi W, Weng B, Yan D, Wang H, Wang M, et al. 2022. Responses of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms mediated phosphorus cycling to drought-flood abrupt alternation in summer maize field soil. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:768921 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.768921

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Chen Q, Hu Y, Hu A, Niu B, Yang X, et al. 2021. Shifts in the dynamic mechanisms of soil organic matter transformation with nitrogen addition: from a soil carbon/nitrogen-driven mechanism to a microbe-driven mechanism. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 160:108355 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108355

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Hussain SI, Phillips LA, Hu Y, Frey SK, Geuder DS, et al. 2021. Differences in phosphorus biogeochemistry and mediating microorganisms in the matrix and macropores of an agricultural clay loam soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 161:108365 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108365

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Wang C, Jiao R. 2022. Adaptive pathways of microorganisms to cope with the shift from P- to N-limitation in subtropical plantations. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:870667 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.870667

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Wu X, Rensing C, Han D, Xiao KQ, Dai Y, et al. 2022. Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals distinct phosphorus acquisition strategies between soil microbiomes. mSystems 7:e01107−e1121 doi: 10.1128/msystems.01107-21

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Wei X, Hu Y, Cai G, Yao H, Ye J, et al. 2021. Organic phosphorus availability shapes the diversity of phoD-harboring bacteria in agricultural soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 161:108364 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108364

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Zhang Q, Chen Y, Wang M, Zhang J, Chen Q, et al. 2021. Molecular responses to inorganic and organic phosphorus sources in the growth and toxin formation of Microcystis aeruginosa. Water Research 196:117048 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Hua Z, Ouellette M, Makkay AM, Papke RT, Zhaxybayeva O. 2021. Nutrient supplementation experiments with saltern microbial communities implicate utilization of DNA as a source of phosphorus. The ISME Journal 15:2853−2864 doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00960-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Du T, Hu Q, Mao W, Yang Z, Chen H, et al. 2023. Metagenomics insights into the functional profiles of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles in a walnut orchard under various regimes of long-term fertilisation. European Journal of Agronomy 148:126887 doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126887

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Wang Z, Wang M, Yu K, Hu H, Yang Y, et al. 2021. Global synthesis for the scaling of soil microbial nitrogen to phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Research Letters 16:044034 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abed78

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Geng Y, Ding Y, Zhou P, Wang Z, Peng C, et al. 2023. Soil microbe-mediated carbon and nitrogen cycling during primary succession of biological soil crusts in tailings ponds. Science of The Total Environment 894:164969 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164969

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Li Y, Tremblay J, Bainard LD, Cade-Menun B, Hamel C. 2020. Long-term effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on soil microbial community structure and function under continuous wheat production. Environmental Microbiology 22:1066−1088 doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14824

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB. 2007. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354−1364 doi: 10.1890/05-1839

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Du L, Wang H, Zhang Z, Xiao Z, Sun G, et al. 2024. Changes in soil quality under long-term rice-crayfish farming in the Dongting Lake Plain, China. Land Degradation & Development 35:1352−1364 doi: 10.1002/ldr.4991

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Johnson WM, Alexander H, Bier RL, Miller DR, Muscarella ME, et al. 2020. Auxotrophic interactions: a stabilizing attribute of aquatic microbial communities? FEMS Microbiology Ecology 96(11):fiaa115 doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Yang G, Peng Y, Abbott BW, Biasi C, Wei B, et al. 2021. Phosphorus rather than nitrogen regulates ecosystem carbon dynamics after permafrost thaw. Global Change Biology 27:5818−5830 doi: 10.1111/gcb.15845

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Du L, Zhu Z, Qi Y, Zou D, Zhang G, et al. 2020. Effects of different stoichiometric ratios on mineralisation of root exudates and its priming effect in paddy soil. Science of The Total Environment 743:140808 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140808

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Luo L, Meng H, Gu JD. 2017. Microbial extracellular enzymes in biogeochemical cycling of ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Management 197:539−549 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Xu Z, Yu G, Zhang X, He N, Wang Q, et al. 2017. Soil enzyme activity and stoichiometry in forest ecosystems along the North-South Transect in Eastern China (NSTEC). Soil Biology and Biochemistry 104:152−163 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.10.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Bhattacharyya SS, Ros GH, Furtak K, Iqbal HMN, Parra-Saldívar R. 2022. Soil carbon sequestration – an interplay between soil microbial community and soil organic matter dynamics. Science of The Total Environment 815:152928 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152928

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Monteux S, Keuper F, Fontaine S, Gavazov K, Hallin S, et al. 2020. Carbon and nitrogen cycling in Yedoma permafrost controlled by microbial functional limitations. Nature Geoscience 13:794−798 doi: 10.1038/s41561-020-00662-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Leyrer V, Patulla M, Hartung J, Marhan S, Poll C. 2022. Long-term manipulation of mean climatic conditions alters drought effects on C- and N-cycling in an arable soil. Global Change Biology 28:3974−3990 doi: 10.1111/gcb.16173

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Dai Z, Zang H, Chen J, Fu Y, Wang X, et al. 2021. Metagenomic insights into soil microbial communities involved in carbon cycling along an elevation climosequences. Environmental Microbiology 23:4631−4645 doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15655

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Yang Y, Li T, Wang Y, Dou Y, Cheng H, et al. 2021. Linkage between soil ecoenzyme stoichiometry ratios and microbial diversity following the conversion of cropland into grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 314:107418 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107418

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Du L, Xin J, Sun G, Wang H. 2026. Metagenomic study on functional characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling under rice-crayfish farming. Nitrogen Cycling 2: e016 doi: 10.48130/nc-0026-0003
    Du L, Xin J, Sun G, Wang H. 2026. Metagenomic study on functional characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling under rice-crayfish farming. Nitrogen Cycling 2: e016 doi: 10.48130/nc-0026-0003

Figures(6)

Article Metrics

Article views(423) PDF downloads(77)

Other Articles By Authors

Original Research   Open Access    

Metagenomic study on functional characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling under rice-crayfish farming

Nitrogen Cycling  2 Article number: e016  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Rice-crayfish farming (RC) is a widely adopted sustainable agricultural system, yet a comprehensive understanding of its microbially driven nutrient cycling mechanisms remains limited. This study employed metagenomic sequencing to investigate the functional characteristics of soil carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) cycling under long-term RC farming, and compared them with those under rice monoculture (RM). The results demonstrated that RC farming significantly reshaped the soil microbial community and its metabolic potential. It enhanced the abundances of key functional genes involved in methane oxidation, soil N degradation, denitrification, and organic P mineralization. Conversely, RC led to increased gene abundance for the Calvin cycle and specific P transport systems. Notably, the paddy planting area (RCP) consistently exhibited higher microbial diversity and stronger nutrient cycling potential than the trench area (RCT). Mantel tests identified that total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and dissolved organic carbon in soil are significantly correlated with microbial communities and functions related to C, N, and P cycles. Furthermore, network analysis revealed tight functional coupling among C-, N-, and P-cycling genes, with key hub genes exhibiting significant cross-cycle correlations. By elucidating the microbial mechanisms of nutrient cycling within integrated cropping systems, this study highlights how RC farming cultivates a complex, interconnected microbial network. This network enhances nutrient use efficiency, providing scientific evidence for improving sustainable agricultural practices.

    • Sustainable agricultural systems are crucial for balancing productivity and environmental conservation[1,2]. As a prominent integrated farming model, rice-crayfish (RC) co-cultivation has been widely promoted in China due to its ecological and economic benefits[3]. Crayfish activities such as bioturbation and excretion introduce additional organic matter into paddy soils, altering the biogeochemical environment[4,5]. Soil microorganisms are core drivers of element cycling and energy flow, regulating organic matter mineralization and nutrient transformation to maintain ecosystem stability[6,7].

      Emerging evidence suggests that RC systems could enhance soil quality and microbial activity; for instance, the increased soil organic matter characteristic of RC systems provides more active carbon sources, supporting greater microbial diversity[4,8]. Specific shifts in microbial functional groups have also been reported, such as a lower abundance of methanogens coupled with a higher abundance of methanotrophs compared to rice monoculture (RM), and notable alterations in the community structure of denitrifying microbes harboring the nirK gene, alongside increased abundances of the nosZ and AOA/AOB amoA genes[9]. Despite these valuable insights, significant knowledge gaps persist, constraining a mechanistic understanding of nutrient cycling in RC systems.

      Currently, existing research has largely focused on individual elemental cycles, particularly C or N, in a fragmented manner[10,11]. A comprehensive, simultaneous investigation into the interconnected microbial-driven mechanisms of C, N, and P cycling is notably lacking. This singular focus prevents a holistic view of how these nutrient cycles are coupled and co-regulated within the integrated system[12]. Secondly, there is a pronounced temporal and spatial bias in current research[13,14]. Most studies are confined to the rice-growing season, overlooking the critical non-rice period, which is essential for crayfish cultivation[15,16]. During this phase, substantial feed input provides rich nitrogen sources, and the distinct, perpetually flooded conditions create a biogeochemical environment vastly different from that of drained fields in RM, likely fostering unique microbial processes[17]. Furthermore, the trench (RCT) area, which represents a unique habitat that serves as the main arena for crayfish activity, a repository for residual feed, and a zone of persistent deep flooding, has been largely ignored[18]. The adaptive responses and functional roles of microbial communities, especially those involved in nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus transformation, in this distinctive niche remain virtually unexplored[19]. Consequently, the microbial driving mechanisms driving transformation processes, particularly for phosphorus transformations, are still poorly understood, limiting the ability to predict and manage the overall efficiency and environmental impact of RC systems.

      This study aimed to: (1) systematically characterize the functional genes and co-occurrence patterns of C-, N-, and P-cycling microorganisms in RC systems; (2) explore potential functional couplings among these cycles; and (3) identify key environmental factors regulating elemental cycling. It was hypothesized that: (1) RC farming would significantly enhance the abundances of genes involved in methane oxidation, N degradation, denitrification, anammox, organic P mineralization, and P transport compared to RM; (2) soil nutrients and their availability would be the primary environmental factors regulating these cycling processes.

    • The experiment was established in 2014 at the rice-crayfish farming experimental base of Hunan Agricultural University, located in Wangcheng District, Changsha City, China (Supplementary Fig. S1). The site has a subtropical monsoon climate with an annual average temperature of 17.5 °C Hunan Agricultural University, located in Wangcheng District, Changsha City, China would significantly enhance the abundances of genes involved in methane oxida experiment (2013), the soil was classified as a clay loam (29% sand, 21% silt, 50% clay) with the following chemical properties: soil organic C = 22.7 g kg−1; ammonium N = 11 mg kg−1; available potassium (AK) = 35.3 mg kg−1; pH = 6.15.

    • This study employed a completely randomized design with three replications, focusing on RM and RC systems. Within the RC system, two spatially and functionally distinct zones were defined: the central paddy field (RCP) and the surrounding forage ditch (RCT). Consequently, three primary treatments were established for comparison: RM (rice monoculture), RCP (paddy field within the RC system), and RCT (forage ditch within the RC system).

      In the RC systems, each 660 m2 (20 m × 33 m) experimental field was surrounded by a circular water ditch. This ditch measured 1.5 m wide and 1.2 m deep, covering approximately 66 m2. Its primary function was to provide habitat and refuge for crayfish. Adjacent plots were separated by soil barriers covered with plastic sheeting (40 cm × 40 cm) to prevent the exchange of moisture and nutrients between plots. To prevent crayfish escape, all RC experimental fields were surrounded by a 1.5 m embankment and an additional 0.3 m-high nylon net.

      The rice cultivar used was Nongxiang 42. In early June, at the beginning of the rice growing season, the paddy field areas in all RC and RM plots were leveled, compacted, and received a basal fertilizer application. Fertilizer management during the rice growing season was identical for both treatments. All fertilizers were applied exclusively in this season at the following rates: urea (N 46.0%) supplying 100.0 kg N hm−2, calcium superphosphate (P2O5 12.0%) supplying 30.0 kg P2O5 hm−2, and potassium chloride (K2O 60.0%) supplying 50.0 kg K2O hm−2. Four days after fertilization and flooding, rice seedlings were transplanted at a density of 160,000 hills hm−2. One week prior to rice transplanting, juvenile crayfish (average weight 7.0 ± 1.0 g) were stocked into the RCT at a density of 1.2 × 105 individuals hm−2. Besides, the planting field and trench were initially connected to allow water exchange. After the basal fertilizer application and field flooding, the connection was closed until the drainage period before rice harvest. Throughout the growth period, crayfish could freely move across the low barrier between the trench and the paddy field for foraging. Crayfish were harvested one week prior to rice harvest.

      Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0−20 cm after rice harvest. Six subsamples were collected per plot to cover heterogeneity, thoroughly mixed to form one composite sample, and stored at −80 °C for subsequent analysis. Methods for determining soil physicochemical characteristics are detailed in Supplementary Text 1.

    • Total genomic DNA was isolated from 0.5 g of fresh soil using the EZNA® Soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). DNA concentration and quality were evaluated using a Thermo Fisher Scientific spectrophotometer and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Qualified DNA samples were fragmented using a Covaris M220 focused-ultrasonicator. Sequencing libraries were constructed with the NEXTFLEX Rapid DNA-Seq Kit and subjected to paired-end sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq 6,000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) by Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). All raw sequencing data were deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) for public access.

      Raw metagenomic sequences were quality-controlled using Fastp, retaining high-quality paired-end and single-end reads[20,21]. Sequences were assembled at varying depths using MEGAHIT (https://github.com/voutcn/megahit)[22]. Using MEGAHIT v1.1.2, the optimally assembled sequences were selected for ORF prediction[23]. For subsequent translation and analysis, predicted genes were retained only if they met the length threshold of ≥ 100 bp[23]. After aligning high-quality reads to genes in SOAPaligner v2.21, gene abundance was quantified by normalizing the mapping read count for each gene according to its length[24]. Based on the NCBI-NR and KEGG databases, Diamond (v0.8.35) was employed to classify and annotate gene sequences for functional assignment, thereby generating their KEGG functional profiles[25]. Based on prior research, core genes involved in C, N, and P cycling (present in all samples) were identified, and the abundance of each microbial group was defined as the sum of abundances of all genes assigned to that taxonomic unit[26,27].

    • Statistical analyses were performed using R software (v4.3.2). Redundancy analysis (RDA) was applied to assess the impact of environmental variables on microbial communities, with a variance inflation factor (VIF) threshold of 10 to mitigate multicollinearity. The Kruskal-Wallis test identified significant differences in microbial functional gene abundances among treatments. The Mantel test evaluated correlations between environmental factors and microbial functional genes. Co-occurrence network analysis was conducted on all samples (n = 9) using a stringent Spearman correlation criterion (|r| > 0.6, p < 0.05), with visualization via Gephi software (https://gephi.org).

    • An overview of the metagenomic sequencing and assembly for nine soil samples across the RM and RC systems is provided in Supplementary Table S1. After quality control, an average of 48.3 million clean reads and 211,000 contigs per sample were obtained, identifying 8,386 KEGG orthologs (KOs) in total. Microbial taxonomic diversity in the RCP area exceeded that of RM (Supplementary Fig. S2a), though functional diversity did not differ significantly (Supplementary Fig. S2b). Moreover, RCP outstripped RCT in both taxonomic (max: 5.37) and functional (max: 7.63) diversity. A significant positive correlation existed between these two diversity types (p < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. S2c).

      The rice-crayfish system significantly altered the microbial functional profiles for C, N, and P cycling (Fig. 1), with 49, 36, and 41 related genes predicted. PCoA confirmed a significant shift (p < 0.05) in these genes compared to monoculture, indicating that co-culture restructured the microbial community and its C, N, and P metabolism.

      Figure 1. 

      Microbial functional characteristics of (a) soil C, (b) N, and (c) P cycles identified by principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distances. RM: rice monoculture; RCP: paddy field of rice-crayfish farming system; RCT: the peripheral trench of rice-crayfish farming system.

    • In this study, the functional microbes are characterized as associated with soil carbon cycling under the rice-crayfish system. The related functional genes are summarized in Supplementary Table S2 and categorized into carbon fixation, carbon degradation, and methane metabolism, respectively. Among these, the rTCA cycle accounted for 39.05%–41.23% of the relative functional gene abundance. Carbon degradation was classified into labile and recalcitrant carbon fractions, encompassing starch, hemicellulose, pectin, cellulose, chitin, and lignin (p < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. S3e). Genes associated with starch catabolism exhibited the highest relative abundance, ranging from 36.36% to 41.42%.

      The carbon cycling process in the RC system (Fig. 2) was evaluated. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests revealed significant alterations in relevant gene abundances. In methane metabolism, the abundances of methane-oxidizing genes pmoA, pmoB, and pmoC were significantly enriched in the RCP and RCT areas, but the abundances of methanogenic genes were unaffected (p < 0.05). Conversely, abundances of korA and korB (rTCA cycle) genes were increased, while rbcL and cbbR (Calvin cycle) genes were decreased in the rice-crayfish farming system. Regarding carbon degradation, chi (chitin), malQ, and malZ (starch) genes were significantly increased (p < 0.05). Notably, the RCT area had a lower abundance of the chi gene than the RCP area (p < 0.05).

      Figure 2. 

      Diagram depicting the different carbon cycling processes based on metagenomic sequencing. Red indicates that gene abundances were significantly and consistently increased in the former treatment; blue indicates that gene abundances were significantly and consistently decreased in the former treatment. RM: rice monoculture; RCP: paddy field of rice-crayfish farming system; RCT: the peripheral trench of rice-crayfish farming system.

      The relative abundance of the phylum-level microbial community in the rice-crayfish system was shown in Supplementary Fig. S4. Taxonomic annotation of C-cycle genes revealed Proteobacteria as the dominant phylum across all treatments, with a mean relative abundance of 40.07%, followed by Acidobacteria (17.37%), and Chloroflexi (11.84%) (Supplementary Fig. S4a). Significant shifts in the abundances of major bacterial phyla were observed in the RCP area compared to the monoculture. These shifts were characterized by an enrichment of Verrucomicrobia and Actinobacteria alongside a depletion of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the RCT area exhibited a significant increase in Bacteroidota and Actinobacteria, alongside a decrease in Proteobacteria and Chloroflexi (p < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. S4b).

    • Functional gene analysis revealed that nitrogen degradation (55.88%−59.01%) and denitrification (25.35%−27.03%) were the two most dominant processes in the soil N cycle of the rice-crayfish system (Supplementary Fig. S5,Supplementary Table S3).

      Differential nitrogen cycling processes in the RC system were shown in Fig. 3. Wilcoxon tests confirmed significant alterations in N-cycling genes. Specifically, compared with rice monoculture, in the RCP area, increased abundances were recorded for glnA (5.15%), gltB (6.57%), gltD (13.62%), and arcC (11.37%) (p < 0.05). Significant elevations were also observed for denitrification genes (narG, narH, narI, nirK, nirS, norB, norC) and nitrification genes (amoA, amoB, amoC) (p < 0.05). In the RCT area, increases were measured for gltB (6.75%) and gltD (5.39%), along with narG, nirK, and nirS (11.59%, 5.32%). The napB gene was significantly increased by 6.77%, whereas the amoA gene was significantly reduced by 7.27% (p < 0.05).

      Figure 3. 

      Diagram depicting the different nitrogen cycling processes based on metagenomic sequencing. Red indicates that the gene abundances were significantly and consistently increased in the former treatment, blue indicates that the gene abundances were significantly and consistently decreased in the former treatment. RM: rice monoculture; RCP: paddy field of rice-crayfish farming system; RCT: the peripheral trench of rice-crayfish farming system.

      Taxonomic annotation of N-cycling genes revealed that Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Bacteroidota accounted for 81.66%−88.02% of the total community (Supplementary Fig. S6a). Compared to RM, RC systems showed increased mean relative abundances of Acidobacteria and Bacteroidota, with reduced Proteobacteria (p < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. S6b).

    • Functional microbes associated with soil P cycling were characterized (Supplementary Table S4). As shown in Supplementary Fig. S7, genes pertaining to the P transport system were most abundant (54.82%–56.72%). Those contributing to inorganic P solubilization were the next highest, at 21.02% of the P (p < 0.05). The rice-crayfish system elevated the abundance of inorganic P solubilization genes by 3.34%–6.22% while depressing that of P transport system genes by 2.70%–3.35% (p < 0.05), respectively.

      Phosphorus cycling processes in the RC farming system were shown in Fig. 4. Significant P-cycling gene alterations were induced by rice-crayfish farming. In organic P mineralization, abundances of appA, phnA, phnM, and phnX were increased in RCP and RCT, while phoN and phnG were decreased (p < 0.05); RCT showed stronger effects than RCP. For inorganic P solubilization, the abundance of ppa was reduced with RCP > RCT. In P regulation, the abundance of phoB was decreased (p < 0.05). In P transport, abundances of phnC and ugpC were increased, while pstB, pstS, and phnD were decreased; RCP showed higher pstB, pstS, and phnD but lower phnC and ugpC than RCT (p < 0.05).

      Figure 4. 

      Difference of soil P cycle gene in different rice farming systems. RM: rice monoculture; RCP: paddy field of rice-crayfish farming system; RCT: the peripheral trench of rice-crayfish farming system.

      The P-cycling genes were predominantly distributed among Proteobacteria (24.09%−30.14%), Acidobacteria (18.78%−22.93%), Chloroflexi (15.29%−21.96%), Candidatus_Rokubacteria (8.56%−9.84%), and Actinobacteria (5.38%−6.89%) (Supplementary Fig. S8a). Significant enrichments of Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria were observed in RCP, while Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Actinobacteria were significantly enhanced in RCT compared to monoculture (p < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. S8b).

    • Mantel tests revealed significant relationships between environmental factors and C/N/P cycling components in the rice-crayfish system (Fig. 5). Soil TP, DOC, and NH4+-N significantly influenced functional genes, while soil SW, CEC, SOC, TN, TP, DOC, NH4+-N, MBC, and MBN significantly affected the relevant microbial communities key to biogeochemical cycling processes involving C, N, and P.

      Figure 5. 

      Environmental drivers of (a) soil microbial functional genes, and (b) taxa in different rice farming systems. RM: rice monoculture; RCP: paddy field of rice-crayfish farming system; RCT: the peripheral trench of rice-crayfish farming system.

      Soil environmental factors differentially influenced specific functional genes involved in C, N, and P cycling (Supplementary Fig. S9). For carbon cycling, significant negative correlations were observed between soil BD and vanA and accA genes, while soil pH showed positive correlations with pel, xylH, FUCA, and MAN2C1. Soil SW was positively correlated with vanB, coxM, korA, icd, lacA, abfA, and malQ. Soil SOC and CEC exhibited positive correlations with cbbR, fhs, and yvak. A significant positive correlation was observed between soil DOC and the genes mttB, chi, and malZ, whereas a negative correlation was found between DOC and pmoC, cbhA, and bglB (Supplementary Fig. S9a). In nitrogen cycling, significant negative correlations were identified between soil BD and pmoC, as well as between soil NAG and hao. Soil SW was positively correlated with narH and nxrB. Soil CEC and NH4+-N were negatively correlated with norB. Soil TN and MBN were negatively correlated with norC but positively correlated with ureA (Supplementary Fig. S9b). Soil SW and NAG were negatively correlated with gltB. For phosphorus cycling, several soil phosphorus forms (TP, Olsen-P, MBP, AP) were inversely linked to phnM but positively linked to pstB. Separately, soil BD was correlated negatively with phoU and ugpA, and soil SW showed a similar negative relationship with phnX and phnA (Supplementary Fig. S9c).

      In C cycling, negative correlations of Proteobacteria with pH, Olsen-P, NH4+-N, TP, TN, MBC, MBN, MBP, and AP; negative correlations of Acidobacteria with CEC and SOC; positive correlations of Bacteroidota and Firmicutes with BD; negative correlations of Candidatus_Rokubacteria with pH and SW; positive correlation of Gemmatimonadetes with SOC (Supplementary Fig. S10a). Within nitrogen cycling, Proteobacteria exhibit a negative correlation with pH, while Candidatus_Rokubacteria display negative correlations with both pH and MBC (Supplementary Fig. S10b). Within phosphorus cycling, Proteobacteria exhibit a positive correlation with BD. Acidobacteria are positively correlated with both BD and DOC. Chloroflexi show positive correlations with SW and NAG. In contrast, Candidatus_Rokubacteria display negative correlations with SW, TP, TN, MBN, MBP, BG, NAG, and AP. Bacteroidota and Gemmatimonadetes are positively correlated with multiple factors, including SW, CEC, SOC, TN, TP, NH4+-N, MBC, MBN, MBP, BG, NAG, and AP (Supplementary Fig. S10c).

      As illustrated in Fig. 6, this study examined the interactions between genes participating in the C, N, and P cycling processes of the rice-crayfish co-culture system. The top 20 genes with the highest degree centrality scores included five C-cycling genes (korA, pccA, coxS, mttB, coxM), eleven N-cycling genes (nirB, nifK, nifD, norB, nifH, nirD, narG, nrfA, gltD, napA, GDH2, narH), and four P-cycling genes (phoR, pstS, pstC, phnE). According to Spearman correlation analysis, significant correlations were observed among C-, N-, and P-related genes. Among the high-degree centrality genes, korA (rTCA cycle) showed significant negative correlations with nifK and norB (denitrification genes) as well as with nifD, nifK, and nifH (nitrogen fixation genes). mttB (methanogenesis gene) was significantly negatively correlated with GDH2 (nitrogen degradation gene). Additionally, korA (rTCA cycle gene) was significantly positively correlated with phoR (P regulation gene) but negatively correlated with pstC and phnE (P transport genes). gltD and gltB showed significant negative correlations with pstC and phnE, whereas nifK, norB, narG, and narH (denitrification genes) showed significant negative correlations with phoR and pstS.

      Figure 6. 

      Network analysis between genes related to (a) carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling genes, and (b) degree centrality scores for different rice farming systems. RM: rice monoculture; RCP: paddy field of rice-crayfish farming system; RCT: the peripheral trench of rice-crayfish farming system.

    • This study explored the RC farming system, aiming to deeply investigate its sustainability from a deep perspective on biogeochemical cycles. Simultaneously, it revealed the key microbial driving mechanisms driving the cycling processes in this integrated system. Soil microbiota serves as a vital indicator of ecosystem health, where rich microbial diversity helps maintain ecosystem stability and promotes efficient nutrient cycling[28,29]. The significant increase in soil microbial diversity within the RC system suggests that the observed structural and functional shifts in the microbiota are a direct result of the agricultural system conversion, rather than minor environmental fluctuations (Fig. 1; Supplementaty Fig. S2). The study found that rice-crayfish farming involves diverse nutrient inputs, including straw incorporation, feed supply, crayfish excretion, and fertilizer application, which significantly enhance soil organic matter content and subsequently provide energy for microorganisms, promoting microbial metabolism and reproduction[30]. This predation pressure may also result in a simplified community composition of soil invertebrates and protists in the integrated system compared to monoculture[6,27]. This top-down effect can propagate through the food chain, reducing predation pressure on microorganisms and, consequently, enhancing the diversity of fungi and archaea at lower trophic levels in the rice-crayfish system[31]. The significantly higher microbial taxonomic and functional diversity in RCP soils compared to RCT areas (Figs 24). It is mainly attributed to long-term deep flooding, which enhances soil-reducing conditions, decreases aerobic microbial abundance, and ultimately reduces microbial taxonomic diversity in RCT areas.

    • Soil microorganisms actively participate actively in organic matter decomposition and transformation via diverse metabolic pathways, playing a pivotal role in the carbon cycle of paddy ecosystems[28,29], and serving as a key component of the system's carbon budget that modulates soil carbon storage and turnover[17]. Notably, the relative abundance of chitin-degradation genes was significantly elevated in the rice-crayfish system relative to the rice monoculture (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S2). This increase is primarily attributed to the frequent molting of crayfish over ten times during growth, as their chitin-rich shells stimulate the proliferation of chitin-degrading microorganisms, thereby elevating the abundance of related functional genes[3032]. The distinct chitin (chi) degradation gene abundance between RCP and RCT areas further reflects the regulatory effects of crayfish activity and dissolved oxygen levels (Fig. 2). In contrast, the lower relative abundance of starch degradation genes (malQ and malZ) in the rice-crayfish system (Fig. 2) may stem from uneven soil organic matter distribution caused by crayfish feeding and excretion, which alters the ecological niches of starch-degrading microorganisms[33,34]. Regarding methane oxidation, all rice cultivation systems showed higher relative abundance of aerobic methane oxidation genes than anaerobic ones (pomA, pomB, pomC) (Fig. 2); however, continuous deep flooding in the rice-crayfish system enhanced anaerobic methane oxidation gene abundance, especially in RCP areas[35,36]. In the rice-crayfish system, the reductive acetyl-CoA pathway and CO oxidation were suppressed in the rice-crayfish system (Fig. 2). This may be attributed to heterotrophic microorganisms rapidly utilizing available carbon from crayfish excrement and rice straw, thereby reducing heterotrophic carbon fixation[37,38]. Conversely, these organic inputs significantly increased functional gene abundance associated with the rTCA pathway, as the heterotrophic rice-crayfish system provides sufficient carbon and energy sources to promote autotrophic carbon metabolism[39,40].

    • Across different rice cultivation systems, nitrogen degradation accounts for the largest proportion of the soil nitrogen cycle (Supplementary Fig. S4), indicating the potential of paddy soils to convert both fertilizer- and inherent-soil nitrogen into NH4+-N for crop uptake[4143]. The rice-crayfish system exerted a divergent effect on the nitrogen-cycle gene pool, fostering the abundance of genes for degradation, denitrification, and DNRA at the expense of those responsible for nitrification (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. S4). This suggests that the integrated system accelerates nitrogen turnover in paddy fields[43,44]. The elevated abundances of glnA, gltB, gltD, and arcC in the rice-crayfish system promote soil nitrogen degradation and increase NH4+-N production (Fig. 3). Under high NH4+-N conditions, this facilitates amino acid formation, which microorganisms can subsequently assimilate[45,46]. Continuous deep flooding in the rice-crayfish system significantly reduced the relative abundance of pomA, pomB, and pomC genes, thereby inhibiting the conversion of NH4+-N to NO3-N and promoting the accumulation of soil NH4+-N[47]. The enhanced denitrification in the rice-crayfish system also contributed to increased N2O emissions[48]. Studies have found that nitrogen loss through soil denitrification is generally comparable to nitrogen emissions as N2O[49]. Furthermore, the relative gene abundances of napA, napB, norB, and nirK were significantly increased in the rice-crayfish system, primarily due to abundant exogenous nitrogen inputs and enhanced reducing conditions[6,50]. The DNRA process converts nitrogen from its highest oxidation state (NO3-N) to its lowest reduced state (NH4+-N) while simultaneously harvesting energy from soil organic carbon. These key mechanisms effectively improve the retention of available nitrogen in soil, thereby promoting its absorption and utilization by crops[51].

      Different farming systems influenced soil P availability (Supplementary Table S5), with soil microorganisms playing a major role in regulating phosphorus cycling[52]. Compared to rice monoculture, the rice-crayfish system appeared to enhance the genetic potential for mineralizing organic phosphorus, indicating a greater microbial capacity to access this nutrient pool (Supplementary Fig. S6). Elevated soil C and N levels in the integrated system could stimulate microbial investment into the genetic machinery required for organic P mineralization (Supplementary Figs S7 & S8). The mineralization of organically bound phosphorus is often enhanced under conditions of elevated carbon and nitrogen availability, as supported by multiple studies[53,54]. Another study indicated that additional carbon inputs to soil can also increase available P content[55,56]. Furthermore, elevated soil C and N can create a favorable niche for bacteria involved in P transformations, thereby selecting for a more abundant community (Supplementary Fig. S9). Genes critical for organic phosphorus mineralization, particularly phoD, phnA, and phnP, were markedly more abundant in the rice-crayfish system than in monoculture soils (Supplementary Fig. S7). The phoD, phnA, and phnP genes are widely recognized as key drivers of the organophosphorus mineralization process[36,57], while phoN, phnA, and phnG influence phosphatase activity, thereby affecting soil available phosphorus content[58]. The rice-crayfish system exhibited the highest abundance of inorganic P solubilization genes, indicating a greater advantage in inorganic phosphorus dissolution[59,60]. Existing research has shown that inorganic phosphorus solubilization is an essential pathway for increasing bioavailable phosphorus in soil[61]. The functional divergence in inorganic P solubilization was attributable to changes in gcd and gppa gene abundance[62], which were significantly elevated in the rice-crayfish system (Supplementary Fig. S7). These genes are considered hallmark genes for this specific microbial function[63]. The machinery for phosphorus assimilation centers on the phoB two-component system, alongside the high-affinity PstSCAB system and complemented by the low-affinity inorganic phosphate transporter (pit)[64]. Although the abundance of pstB was significantly elevated in rice-crayfish farming soils, its corresponding phoR did not exhibit a corresponding change (Fig. 4). This imbalance may have led to impaired signal transduction between pathways[53], thereby affecting phosphorus regulation efficiency. This phenomenon may stem from differences in their sensitivity to soil available phosphorus concentrations[27,65].

    • The functional potential of microbial communities is highly correlated with microbial taxa (Figs 5 & 6). Here, bacteria dominated the soil microbiota in the rice-crayfish system, while other microorganisms (archaea and fungi) were non-dominant, consistent with the findings of Wu et al.[1]. According to the oligotrophic-copiotrophic theory, the observed increase in functional microbe abundance in this study may be attributed to enhanced copiotrophic bacterial populations, such as phoD-carrying Actinobacteria[66]. Furthermore, the predicted functional gene classification highlighted the significance of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria in C, N, and P cycling during rice-crayfish co-culture[67]. Members of Proteobacteria are recognized for their high nutrient-use potential and serve as major drivers of functional changes in fertile soils[68]. Some studies indicate that the r- and K-selection growth strategy classification may not apply to Actinobacteria, making their response to labile carbon changes difficult to predict[69]. Previous studies have demonstrated Actinobacteria enrichment in nutrient-rich soils[70]. Acidobacteria are typically considered oligotrophic bacteria[16], yet, in this study, Acidobacteria carrying C-, N-, and P-cycling functional genes showed significantly higher abundance in the nutrient-richer rice-crayfish soils compared to monoculture (Fig. 5). This is primarily because the rice-crayfish system could maintain neutral soil pH conditions, which favor Acidobacteria growth[63]. Studies have identified Acidobacteria as thriving in neutral pH environments[62].

      Soil TN, TP, and DOC were identified as primary factors influencing C, N, and P cycling processes in rice-crayfish system, including both functional genes and microbial taxa (Fig. 5). This is primarily attributed to the input of diverse nutrients during rice-crayfish co-culture—including straw, fertilizers, feed, and crayfish excreta—which provide abundant exogenous carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, significantly enhancing soil TN, TP, and DOC concentrations[71]. Soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus are pivotal regulators of ecosystem productivity, functioning through their influence on microbial dynamics, organic matter turnover, and the cycling of essential nutrients[72]. Functioning as a central node, soil TN modulates carbon sequestration and decomposition processes in parallel with N and P cycling[73]. In the context of rice-crayfish co-culture, P availability emerges as a key modulator of this integrated nutrient network[74]. Based on these findings, it was hypothesized that soil TN, TP, and DOC likely constitute key environmental factors that microbially drive C, N, and P cycling in the rice-crayfish farming system.

      The genetic machinery mediating the transformations of C, N, and P demonstrates tightly coupled interactions, characterized by both synergistic and antagonistic relationships (Fig. 6). Nodes with higher degree centrality scores were identified as dominant elements maintaining network connectivity[49,75]. Despite their lower numerical representation compared to nitrogen cycle genes, genes involved in carbon and phosphorus cycles held a higher degree of centrality within the co-occurrence network. This indicates they exerted a disproportionately strong influence, underscoring their critical role in regulating nitrogen transformations[49]. In the rice-crayfish system, NADH encoded by GDH not only participates in soil N mineralization but may also promote methane oxidation[76]. Additionally, reducing nitrogen oxides through denitrification has been reported to enhance carbon fixation under anaerobic conditions, while this study detected negative correlations between denitrification-related N-cycle genes and soil carbon sequestration-related C-cycle genes in the rice-crayfish system[77]. Microorganisms exhibiting high denitrification and carbon fixation capabilities through the rTCA cycle may indicate synergistic interactions between these processes[76]. The coordinated expression of genes linked to carbon and nitrogen cycles fine-tunes nutrient and metabolite levels. This co-regulation serves to maintain metabolic homeostasis, ensuring that the assimilation of nitrogen is synchronized with the availability of replenished carbon[70]. Coupling between the C and P cycles occurs principally through inositol phosphate metabolism, which produces acetyl-CoA (catalyzed by mmsA) and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (catalyzed by TPI). These products subsequently enter the core pathways of central carbon metabolism[50,78]. A critical step in the C-P cycle linkage is the hydrolysis of inositol phosphates by phytase (phy, appA), which generates bioavailable phosphate for plant and microbial use, thus acting as a key nexus between these elemental cycles[79].

    • In the rice-crayfish farming system, the coupled cycling of C, N, and P is governed by the functional genetic potential and the taxonomic composition of the soil microbiota. Specifically, a marked increase was observed in the abundance of genes governing methane oxidation, nitrogen degradation, denitrification, anammox, organic phosphorus mineralization, and phosphorus transport within the integrated system. Across the integrated field, the system acted to enhance carbon retention, which in turn substantially supported the concurrent cycling and transformation of nitrogen and phosphorus. The findings indicate that the rice-crayfish farming system could be a promising, environmentally friendly strategy, capable of enhancing carbon sequestration and increasing the availability of NH4+-N for plants by stimulating aerobic DNRA and denitrification processes. The results of this study pinpoint soil TN, TP, and DOC as the principal environmental determinants behind the observed biogeochemical transformations of C, N, and P. A tight functional coupling was observed among the genes involved in these cycles, and their interrelationships were altered by variations in nutrient input. Consequently, these findings offer a theoretical foundation for improved management of fertilization and the microbial regulation of soil nutrient cycles.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: Linsen Du: material preparation, data collection and analysis and the first draft of the manuscript; Junliang Xin: material preparation and data collection and analysis; Geng Sun: material preparation and data collection and analysis; Hua Wang: obtained funding support. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

      • This work was supported by the Key Technologies Research and Development Program, China (Grant No. 2022YFD2300305), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42377319), the Department of Ecology and Environment of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. HBKYXM-2024017), the earmarked fund for HARS (Grant No. HARS-07), and the Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Project of Hunan Province (Grant No. LXBZZ2024133).

      • All the authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

      • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  References (79)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Du L, Xin J, Sun G, Wang H. 2026. Metagenomic study on functional characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling under rice-crayfish farming. Nitrogen Cycling 2: e016 doi: 10.48130/nc-0026-0003
    Du L, Xin J, Sun G, Wang H. 2026. Metagenomic study on functional characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling under rice-crayfish farming. Nitrogen Cycling 2: e016 doi: 10.48130/nc-0026-0003

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return