Search
2026 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Chinese Medicine for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by targeting the tumor microenvironment: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential

More Information
  • Received: 30 June 2026
    Revised: 25 August 2026
    Accepted: 01 September 2026
    Published online: 29 September 2026
    Targetome  2(5),  Article number: e050 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with aggressive progression and rapid development of therapeutic resistance. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has been gradually revealed as a major contributor to the interventional dilemma, which is composed of diverse cellular and acellular components, constructing a desmoplastic and immunosuppressive pro-tumorigenic environment for cancer cells. The heterogeneity, plasticity, and dynamic interplay of these components give rise to complex compensatory responses to therapies, requiring a comprehensive, multi-target remodeling strategy. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been suggested to exert effects in modulating the TME and thus suppressing tumor growth and enhancing the efficacy of conventional therapies. Based on insights into the complex TME and its role in metastasis and resistance, this review summarizes findings from studies that explore the modulatory effects of CHM classified by the components it targets, revealing the therapeutic potential of CHM and prospects for innovative intervention strategies and approaches.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. 2025. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 75:10−45 doi: 10.3322/caac.21871

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Tempero M. 2017. Active systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 15:723−725 doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0084

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Hayat U, Croce PS, Saadeh A, Desai K, Appiah J, et al. 2025. Current and emerging treatment options for pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Medicine 14:1129 doi: 10.3390/jcm14041129

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] van Goor IWJM, Schouten TJ, Verburg DN, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, et al. 2024. Predicting long-term disease-free survival after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a nationwide cohort study. Annals of Surgery 279:132−137 doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Ko AH, Malafa MP, Aguilera T, Al-Hawary MM, Basturk O, et al. 2025. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Version 4.2026. National comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines in oncology. NCCN
    [6] Halbrook CJ, Lyssiotis CA, Pasca di Magliano M, Maitra A. 2023. Pancreatic cancer: advances and challenges. Cell 186:1729−1754 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.02.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Springfeld C, Ferrone CR, Katz MHG, Philip PA, Hong TS, et al. 2023. Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 20:318−337 doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00746-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Wood LD, Canto MI, Jaffee EM, Simeone DM. 2022. Pancreatic cancer: pathogenesis, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastroenterology 163:386−402.e1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.056

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Dvorak HF. 2015. Tumors: wounds that do not heal − redux. Cancer Immunology Research 3:1−11 doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-14-0209

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Foster DS, Jones RE, Ransom RC, Longaker MT, Norton JA. 2018. The evolving relationship of wound healing and tumor stroma. JCI Insight 3:e99911 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.99911

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Ramanathan RK, McDonough SL, Philip PA, Hingorani SR, Lacy J, et al. 2019. Phase IB/II randomized study of FOLFIRINOX plus pegylated recombinant human hyaluronidase versus FOLFIRINOX alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: SWOG S1313. Journal of Clinical Oncology 37:1062−1069 doi: 10.1200/jco.18.01295

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Gunderson AJ, Yamazaki T, McCarty K, Phillips M, Alice A, et al. 2019. Blockade of fibroblast activation protein in combination with radiation treatment in murine models of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 14:e0211117 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211117

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Gao Y, Chen S, Sun J, Su S, Yang D, et al. 2021. Traditional Chinese medicine may be further explored as candidate drugs for pancreatic cancer: a review. Phytotherapy Research 35:603−628 doi: 10.1002/ptr.6847

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Ju Y, Xu D, Liao MM, Sun Y, Bao WD, et al. 2024. Barriers and opportunities in pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. npj Precision Oncology 8:199 doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00681-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Sherman MH, Beatty GL. 2023. Tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic resistance. Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease 18:123−148 doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-031621-024600

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Sinn M, Denkert C, Striefler JK, Pelzer U, Stieler JM, et al. 2014. α-Smooth muscle actin expression and desmoplastic stromal reaction in pancreatic cancer: results from the CONKO-001 study. British Journal of Cancer 111:1917−1923 doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.495

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Du Y, Zhao Y, Li J, Wang J, You S, et al. 2025. PLXDC1+ tumor-associated pancreatic stellate cells promote desmoplastic and immunosuppressive niche in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Advanced Science 12:2415756 doi: 10.1002/advs.202415756

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Elyada E, Bolisetty M, Laise P, Flynn WF, Courtois ET, et al. 2019. Cross-species single-cell analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma reveals antigen-presenting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Discovery 9:1102−1123 doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0094

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Öhlund D, Handly-Santana A, Biffi G, Elyada E, Almeida AS, et al. 2017. Distinct populations of inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 214:579−596 doi: 10.1084/jem.20162024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Tian C, Huang Y, Clauser KR, Rickelt S, Lau AN, et al. 2021. Suppression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma growth and metastasis by fibrillar collagens produced selectively by tumor cells. Nature Communications 12:2328 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22490-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Jacobetz MA, Chan DS, Neesse A, Bapiro TE, Cook N, et al. 2013. Hyaluronan impairs vascular function and drug delivery in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Gut 62:112−120 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302529

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Shakiba M, Tuveson DA. 2025. Macrophages and fibroblasts as regulators of the immune response in pancreatic cancer. Nature Immunology 26:678−691 doi: 10.1038/s41590-025-02134-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Tian C, Clauser KR, Öhlund D, Rickelt S, Huang Y, et al. 2019. Proteomic analyses of ECM during pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression reveal different contributions by tumor and stromal cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116:19609−19618 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908626116

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Kung HC, Zheng KW, Zimmerman JW, Zheng L. 2025. The tumour microenvironment in pancreatic cancer − new clinical challenges, but more opportunities. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 22:969−995 doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01077-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Bayne LJ, Beatty GL, Jhala N, Clark CE, Rhim AD, et al. 2012. Tumor-derived granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor regulates myeloid inflammation and T cell immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 21:822−835 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Zhang J, Song J, Tang S, Zhao Y, Wang L, et al. 2023. Multi-omics analysis reveals the chemoresistance mechanism of proliferating tissue-resident macrophages in PDAC via metabolic adaptation. Cell Reports 42:112620 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112620

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Zhu Y, Herndon JM, Sojka DK, Kim KW, Knolhoff BL, et al. 2017. Tissue-resident macrophages in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma originate from embryonic hematopoiesis and promote tumor progression. Immunity 47:323−338.e6 doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.07.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Blériot C, Dunsmore G, Alonso-Curbelo D, Ginhoux F. 2024. A temporal perspective for tumor-associated macrophage identities and functions. Cancer Cell 42:747−758 doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.04.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Giese MA, Hind LE, Huttenlocher A. 2019. Neutrophil plasticity in the tumor microenvironment. Blood 133:2159−2167 doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-844548

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Matlung HL, Babes L, Zhao XW, van Houdt M, Treffers LW, et al. 2018. Neutrophils kill antibody-opsonized cancer cells by trogoptosis. Cell Reports 23:3946−3959.e6 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Ronchetti L, Boubaker NS, Barba M, Vici P, Gurtner A, et al. 2021. Neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer: not only catching microbes. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 40:231 doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02036-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Teijeira Á, Garasa S, Gato M, Alfaro C, Migueliz I, et al. 2020. CXCR1 and CXCR2 chemokine receptor agonists produced by tumors induce neutrophil extracellular traps that interfere with immune cytotoxicity. Immunity 52:856−871.e8 doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.03.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Jin Y, Christenson ES, Zheng L, Li K. 2024. Neutrophils in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: bridging preclinical insights to clinical prospects for improved therapeutic strategies. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology 20:945−958 doi: 10.1080/1744666x.2024.2348605

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Güngör N, Knaapen AM, Munnia A, Peluso M, Haenen GR, et al. 2010. Genotoxic effects of neutrophils and hypochlorous acid. Mutagenesis 25:149−154 doi: 10.1093/mutage/gep053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Szczerba BM, Castro-Giner F, Vetter M, Krol I, Gkountela S, et al. 2019. Neutrophils escort circulating tumour cells to enable cell cycle progression. Nature 566:553−557 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0915-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Rodríguez PC, Ochoa AC. 2008. Arginine regulation by myeloid derived suppressor cells and tolerance in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Immunological Reviews 222:180−191 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2008.00608.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Kemp SB, Pasca di Magliano M, Crawford HC. 2021. Myeloid cell mediated immune suppression in pancreatic cancer. Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology 12:1531−1542 doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.07.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Youn JI, Nagaraj S, Collazo M, Gabrilovich DI. 2008. Subsets of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. The Journal of Immunology 181:5791−5802 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5791

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Porta C, Consonni FM, Morlacchi S, Sangaletti S, Bleve A, et al. 2020. Tumor-derived prostaglandin E2 promotes p50 NF-κB-dependent differentiation of monocytic MDSCs. Cancer Research 80:2874−2888 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-2843

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Trovato R, Fiore A, Sartori S, Canè S, Giugno R, et al. 2019. Immunosuppression by monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with pancreatic ductal carcinoma is orchestrated by STAT3. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 7:255 doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0734-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Mota Reyes C, Demir E, Çifcibaşı K, Istvanffy R, Friess H, et al. 2022. Regulatory T cells in pancreatic cancer: of mice and men. Cancers 14:4582 doi: 10.3390/cancers14194582

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Farhangnia P, Khorramdelazad H, Nickho H, Delbandi AA. 2024. Current and future immunotherapeutic approaches in pancreatic cancer treatment. Journal of Hematology & Oncology 17:40 doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01561-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Hiraoka N, Onozato K, Kosuge T, Hirohashi S. 2006. Prevalence of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells increases during the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its premalignant lesions. Clinical Cancer Research 12:5423−5434 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0369

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Zhou X, Bailey-Bucktrout SL, Jeker LT, Penaranda C, Martínez-Llordella M, et al. 2009. Instability of the transcription factor Foxp3 leads to the generation of pathogenic memory T cells in vivo. Nature Immunology 10:1000−1007 doi: 10.1038/ni.1774

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Zhao J, Zhao J, Perlman S. 2012. Differential effects of IL-12 on tregs and non-treg T cells: roles of IFN-γ, IL-2 and IL-2R. PLoS One 7:e46241 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046241

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Davis M, Conlon K, Bohac GC, Barcenas J, Leslie W, et al. 2012. Effect of pemetrexed on innate immune killer cells and adaptive immune T cells in subjects with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Journal of Immunotherapy 35:629−640 doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e31826c8a4f

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Peng YP, Xi CH, Zhu Y, Yin LD, Wei JS, et al. 2016. Altered expression of CD226 and CD96 on natural killer cells in patients with pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 7:66586−66594 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11953

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Huang Q, Huang M, Meng F, Sun R. 2019. Activated pancreatic stellate cells inhibit NK cell function in the human pancreatic cancer microenvironment. Cellular & Molecular Immunology 16:87−89 doi: 10.1038/s41423-018-0014-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Liu W, Yin B, Liang ZH, Yu Y, Lu N. 2022. Computed tomography perfusion imaging evaluation of angiogenesis in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World Journal of Clinical Cases 10:2393−2403 doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2393

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] An YF, Pu N, Jia JB, Wang WQ, Liu L. 2023. Therapeutic advances targeting tumor angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer: current dilemmas and future directions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) − Reviews on Cancer 1878:188958 doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188958

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Saiyin H, Ardito-Abraham CM, Wu Y, Wei Y, Fang Y, et al. 2015. Identification of novel vascular projections with cellular trafficking abilities on the microvasculature of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The Journal of Pathology 236:142−154 doi: 10.1002/path.4506

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Itakura J, Ishiwata T, Shen B, Kornmann M, Korc M. 2000. Concomitant over-expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in pancreatic cancer. International Journal of Cancer 85:27−34 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000101)85:1<27::AID-IJC5>3.0.CO;2-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Yuan H, Zhang Y, Liu F, Wu Y, Huang X, et al. 2025. Exploring the biological mechanism and clinical value of perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Letters 613:217515 doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217515

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Chen SH, Zhang BY, Zhou B, Zhu CZ, Sun LQ, et al. 2019. Perineural invasion of cancer: a complex crosstalk between cells and molecules in the perineural niche. American Journal of Cancer Research 9:1−21

    Google Scholar

    [55] Xue M, Zhu Y, Jiang Y, Han L, Shi M, et al. 2023. Schwann cells regulate tumor cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts in the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma microenvironment. Nature Communications 14:4600 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40314-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Yang MW, Tao LY, Jiang YS, Yang JY, Huo YM, et al. 2020. Perineural invasion reprograms the immune microenvironment through cholinergic signaling in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Research 80:1991−2003 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-2689

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Banh RS, Biancur DE, Yamamoto K, Sohn ASW, Walters B, et al. 2020. Neurons release serine to support mRNA translation in pancreatic cancer. Cell 183:1202−1218. e25 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Pushalkar S, Hundeyin M, Daley D, Zambirinis CP, Kurz E, et al. 2018. The pancreatic cancer microbiome promotes oncogenesis by induction of innate and adaptive immune suppression. Cancer Discovery 8:403−416 doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-1134

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Aykut B, Pushalkar S, Chen R, Li Q, Abengozar R, et al. 2019. The fungal mycobiome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via activation of MBL. Nature 574:264−267 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1608-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Nejman D, Livyatan I, Fuks G, Gavert N, Zwang Y, et al. 2020. The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type-specific intracellular bacteria. Science 368:973−980 doi: 10.1126/science.aay9189

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Riquelme E, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Montiel M, Zoltan M, et al. 2019. Tumor microbiome diversity and composition influence pancreatic cancer outcomes. Cell 178:795−806. e12 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Postler TS, Ghosh S. 2017. Understanding the holobiont: how microbial metabolites affect human health and shape the immune system. Cell Metabolism 26:110−130 doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.05.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Stromnes IM, Brockenbrough JS, Izeradjene K, Carlson MA, Cuevas C, et al. 2014. Targeted depletion of an MDSC subset unmasks pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to adaptive immunity. Gut 63:1769−1781 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306271

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Yang D, Sun X, Wang H, Wistuba II, Wang H, et al. 2025. TREM2 depletion in pancreatic cancer elicits pathogenic inflammation and accelerates tumor progression via enriching IL-1β+ macrophages. Gastroenterology 168:1153−1169 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.01.244

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Esparza-Baquer A, Labiano I, Sharif O, Agirre-Lizaso A, Oakley F, et al. 2021. TREM-2 defends the liver against hepatocellular carcinoma through multifactorial protective mechanisms. Gut 70:1345−1361 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319227

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Thomas SK, Lee J, Beatty GL. 2020. Paracrine and cell autonomous signalling in pancreatic cancer progression and metastasis. EBioMedicine 53:102662 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102662

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RYJ, Nieto MA. 2009. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139:871−890 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Aiello NM, Bajor DL, Norgard RJ, Sahmoud A, Bhagwat N, et al. 2016. Metastatic progression is associated with dynamic changes in the local microenvironment. Nature Communications 7:12819 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12819

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Lee JW, Stone ML, Porrett PM, Thomas SK, Komar CA, et al. 2019. Hepatocytes direct the formation of a pro-metastatic niche in the liver. Nature 567:249−252 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1004-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Katsuta E, Qi Q, Peng X, Hochwald SN, Yan L, et al. 2019. Pancreatic adenocarcinomas with mature blood vessels have better overall survival. Scientific Reports 9:1310 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37909-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Joyce JA, Fearon DT. 2015. T cell exclusion, immune privilege, and the tumor microenvironment. Science 348:74−80 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6204

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Hessmann E, Patzak MS, Klein L, Chen N, Kari V, et al. 2018. Fibroblast drug scavenging increases intratumoural gemcitabine accumulation in murine pancreas cancer. Gut 67:497−507 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311954

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Kalbasi A, Komar C, Tooker GM, Liu M, Lee JW, et al. 2017. Tumor-derived CCL2 mediates resistance to radiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research 23:137−148 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0870

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Vijayan D, Young A, Teng MWL, Smyth MJ. 2017. Targeting immunosuppressive adenosine in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer 17:709−724 doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.86

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Nywening TM, Belt BA, Cullinan DR, Panni RZ, Han BJ, et al. 2018. Targeting both tumour-associated CXCR2+ neutrophils and CCR2+ macrophages disrupts myeloid recruitment and improves chemotherapeutic responses in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut 67:1112−1123 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313738

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Al Alawi R, Alhamdani MSS, Hoheisel JD, Baqi Y. 2020. Antifibrotic and tumor microenvironment modulating effect of date palm fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.) extracts in pancreatic cancer. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 121:109522 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109522

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Xiao Y, Qin T, Sun L, Qian W, Li J, et al. 2020. Resveratrol ameliorates the malignant progression of pancreatic cancer by inhibiting hypoxia-induced pancreatic stellate cell activation. Cell Transplantation 29:0963689720929987 doi: 10.1177/0963689720929987

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Yan B, Cheng L, Jiang Z, Chen K, Zhou C, et al. 2018. Resveratrol inhibits ROS-promoted activation and glycolysis of pancreatic stellate cells via suppression of miR‐21. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2018:1346958 doi: 10.1155/2018/1346958

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Tsang SW, Zhang H, Lin Z, Mu H, Bian ZX. 2015. Anti-fibrotic effect of trans-resveratrol on pancreatic stellate cells. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 71:91−97 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2015.02.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Chen Z, Chen LY, Wang P, Dai HY, Gao S, et al. 2012. Tumor microenvironment varies under different TCM ZHENG models and correlates with treatment response to herbal medicine. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012:635702 doi: 10.1155/2012/635702

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Feng J, Xu M, Wang J, Zhou S, Liu Y, et al. 2020. Sequential delivery of nanoformulated α-mangostin and triptolide overcomes permeation obstacles and improves therapeutic effects in pancreatic cancer. Biomaterials 241:119907 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119907

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Wang Q, Qu C, Xie F, Chen L, Liu L, et al. 2017. Curcumin suppresses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells by inhibiting cancer-associated fibroblasts. American Journal of Cancer Research 7:125−133

    Google Scholar

    [83] Zhou X, Zhang P, Liu N, Zhang X, Lv H, et al. 2023. Enhancing chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer through efficient and sustained tumor microenvironment remodeling with a fibroblast-targeted nanosystem. Journal of Controlled Release 361:161−177 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.07.061

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Wang Y, Zhang A, Li Q, Liu C. 2024. Modulating pancreatic cancer microenvironment: the efficacy of Huachansu in mouse models via TGF-β/Smad pathway. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 326:117872 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.117872

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Yan D, Jiang Y, Hu Y, Hu Z, Feng H, et al. 2026. Dahuang Zhechong pill combined with TNS4 silencing inhibits the NF-κb/VEGF pathway to slow down the progression of pancreatic cancer. Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery 21:211−223 doi: 10.2174/0115748928379439250621171215

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Choi HS, Lee K, Kim MK, Lee KM, Shin YC, et al. 2016. DSGOST inhibits tumor growth by blocking VEGF/VEGFR2-activated angiogenesis. Oncotarget 7:21775−21785 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7982

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Qiao Y, Yan LJ, Yan C. 2020. Sauchinone inhibits hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Anti-Cancer Drugs 31:918−924 doi: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000956

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Chen H, Zhang J, Luo J, Lai F, Wang Z, et al. 2013. Antiangiogenic effects of oxymatrine on pancreatic cancer by inhibition of the NF-κB-mediated VEGF signaling pathway. Oncology Reports 30:589−595 doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2529

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Prasad S, Yadav VR, Sung B, Gupta SC, Tyagi AK, et al. 2016. Ursolic acid inhibits the growth of human pancreatic cancer and enhances the antitumor potential of gemcitabine in an orthotopic mouse model through suppression of the inflammatory microenvironment. Oncotarget 7:13182−13196 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7537

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Lin SZ, Xu JB, Ji XU, Chen HUI, Xu HT, et al. 2015. Emodin inhibits angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer by regulating the transforming growth factor-β/drosophila mothers against decapentaplegic pathway and angiogenesis-associated microRNAs. Molecular Medicine Reports 12:5865−5871 doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4158

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Zhang J, Wang P, Ouyang H, Yin J, Liu A, et al. 2013. Targeting cancer-related inflammation: Chinese herbal medicine inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer. PLoS One 8:e70334 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070334

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Wang Z, Zhou X, Guo Y, Zhang J, Liu Y, et al. 2026. Integrating network pharmacology and metabolomics to explore the mechanism of Xihuang Pill in exerting anti-tumor immune effects against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 356:120788 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2025.120788

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Zhang Y, Ruan L, Li X, Si W, Yang P, et al. 2025. Modified sijunzi decoction inhibits pancreatic cancer progression and improves immune suppression: network pharmacology and experimental validation. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 19:8949−8966 doi: 10.2147/dddt.s520390

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Wang B, Zheng X, Liu J, Zhang Z, Qiu C, et al. 2018. Osthole inhibits pancreatic cancer progression by directly exerting negative effects on cancer cells and attenuating tumor-infiltrating M2 macrophages. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences 137:290−298 doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2018.07.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Zheng X, Li D, Li J, Wang B, Zhang L, et al. 2019. Optimization of the process for purifying icariin from Herba Epimedii by macroporous resin and the regulatory role of icariin in the tumor immune microenvironment. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 118:109275 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109275

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Liu X, Zhang H, Cao J, Zhuo Y, Jin J, et al. 2022. Isobavachalcone activates antitumor immunity on orthotopic pancreatic cancer model: a screening and validation. Frontiers in Pharmacology 13:919035 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.919035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Xu X, Cui L, Zhang L, Yang L, Zhuo Y, et al. 2023. Saikosaponin d modulates the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages by deactivating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in murine models of pancreatic cancer. International Immunopharmacology 122:110579 doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110579

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Zhang C, Jiang X, Li Y, Liu F, Shen Q, et al. 2026. Pi Ji Pills reshape the pancreatic cancer immune microenvironment and enhance the efficacy of gemcitabine through dual mechanisms of PI3K/AKT pathway blockade and NETs inhibition. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 355:120579 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2025.120579

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Ikemoto T, Shimada M, Iwahashi S, Saito Y, Kanamoto M, et al. 2014. Changes of immunological parameters with administration of Japanese Kampo medicine (Juzen-Taihoto/TJ-48) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology 19:81−86 doi: 10.1007/s10147-013-0529-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Hao C. 2023. Clinical efficacy of QYHJ and standard chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. ClinicalTrials. gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05840341
  • Cite this article

    Xue LR, Wu YL, Lin ZX, Xian YF. 2026. Chinese Medicine for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by targeting the tumor microenvironment: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential. Targetome 2(5): e050 doi: 10.48130/targetome-0026-0049
    Xue LR, Wu YL, Lin ZX, Xian YF. 2026. Chinese Medicine for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by targeting the tumor microenvironment: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential. Targetome 2(5): e050 doi: 10.48130/targetome-0026-0049

Figures(2)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(879) PDF downloads(155)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Chinese Medicine for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by targeting the tumor microenvironment: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential

Targetome  2,  Article number: e050  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with aggressive progression and rapid development of therapeutic resistance. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has been gradually revealed as a major contributor to the interventional dilemma, which is composed of diverse cellular and acellular components, constructing a desmoplastic and immunosuppressive pro-tumorigenic environment for cancer cells. The heterogeneity, plasticity, and dynamic interplay of these components give rise to complex compensatory responses to therapies, requiring a comprehensive, multi-target remodeling strategy. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been suggested to exert effects in modulating the TME and thus suppressing tumor growth and enhancing the efficacy of conventional therapies. Based on insights into the complex TME and its role in metastasis and resistance, this review summarizes findings from studies that explore the modulatory effects of CHM classified by the components it targets, revealing the therapeutic potential of CHM and prospects for innovative intervention strategies and approaches.

    • Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies, with a 5-year relative survival rate of merely 13%, and is estimated to become the second leading cause of cancer death by 2030[1,2]. Surgical resection and chemotherapy serve as the main options for PDAC patients[3]. However, up to 80% of PDAC patients are diagnosed at advanced stages and precluded from surgery, while adverse responses and rapid development of resistance to chemotherapy have been broadly reported[4−7]. Moreover, the efficacy of many targeted therapies in PDAC clinical trials is limited, and the application of immunotherapy remains controversial and requires further investigation and validation[2]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify vulnerabilities and develop novel therapeutic strategies and interventions against PDAC.

      PDAC carcinogenesis results from molecular alterations in cancer cells and cellular alterations to the non-cancerous tumor microenvironment (TME)[8]. Dvorak suggested in the 1980s that tumor stroma was the result of wound healing gone awry, which modulated the vascular supply, metabolite exchange, and immune cell infiltration to support cancer progression and metastasis; thus, targeting tumor stroma might serve as a potential approach to cancer interventions[9,10]. However, it has been reported that single inhibition of components in the TME has demonstrated subtle and even negative responses in PDAC experimental and clinical studies[11,12], indicating the importance of comprehensively investigating and understanding the pro-tumorigenic and anti-tumorigenic properties and interactions of different components of the TME in PDAC.

      The application of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) in cancer treatment has been explored over the past several decades and has been shown to possess anti-tumor properties and few side effects[13]. In accordance with its philosophy of holism and retaining balance, CHM has been verified to play a therapeutic role in a multi-component, multi-target, and multi-stage way[13]. Recent studies investigating the effects of CHM on TME have also revealed its role in modulating immune cells by maintaining Th1/Th2 balance, regulating macrophage polarization, and suppressing angiogenesis[14]. This review aims to summarize CHM formulae, herbs, and active compounds derived from natural medical materials that modulate single or multiple TME components in PDAC and their underlying mechanisms.

    • As mentioned above, the TME is one of the major factors shaping and interacting with pancreatic cancer cells (PCCs) that create a favorable environment for tumorigenesis, progression, and metastasis, while it also significantly contributes to the development of therapeutic resistance[15].

    • The TME is a complex ecosystem with heterogeneity and dynamics, composed of cancer cells, stromal cells, extracellular matrix (ECM), infiltrating immune cells, vasculature, nerves, microbiome, and a large number of signaling molecules[15], as shown in Fig. 1.

      Figure 1. 

      Components of the TME in PDAC. Heterogenous CAFs and PSCs produce materials for ECM formation and contribute to desmoplasia. The immune cells infiltrated into tumors include TAMs, TANs, MDSCs, Treg cells, cytotoxic T cells, B cells, NK cells, and so on, creating an immunosuppressive environment. Microbiota, neurons, and vasculature also serve as important constituents of the TME in PDAC.

    • Stromal cells primarily include pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). PSCs are activated during the pathogenesis of PDAC with excessive expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and abnormal ECM production, and are composed of myofibroblast, smooth muscle cell (SMC)-like, and inflammatory subclusters[16,17]. The fibroblastic phenotype serves as a main precursor for CAFs, which can also be differentiated from various other cellular sources, exert functional heterogeneity, and possess the potential for interconversion, including myofibroblastic (myCAFs), inflammatory CAFs (iCAFs), and antigen-presenting CAFs (apCAFs)[18,19]. CAFs primarily produce components for the ECM, such as the most abundant proteins, fibrillar collagens, proteoglycans, and hyaluronan, which contribute to water retention, high pressure, and impaired vascular perfusion in the TME[20,21]. The rigid matrix of ECM physically inhibits the infiltration of immune cells, while some of the matrix-modifying enzymes conversely promote the recruitment of immunosuppressive cells such as TAMs, creating a cancer-promoting immunological 'cold' TME for PDAC growth[22]. Furthermore, ECM collagens have been revealed to be closely correlated with the overall survival of PDAC patients, either positively or negatively, determined by their cellular origin and structural differences and thus differentiation of anti-tumorigenic and pro-tumorigenic functions[23,24].

    • Infiltrating immune cells are mainly composed of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and so on. TAMs play an essential role in immunosuppression and carcinogenesis, closely correlated with clinical outcomes[25−27]. TAM subpopulations differ in tumor-restrictive (M1) and tumor-promoting (M2) phenotypes as well, which can be influenced by tissue-specific factors induced by environmental stimuli[22]. For example, embryonically derived TAMs promote fibrosis by activating CAF secretion and directly induce ECM deposition or remodeling, while monocyte-derived TAMs have been observed to be involved in higher levels of antigen presentation and immunomodulation[27,28].

      Traditionally, TANs are classified into anti-tumor N1 and pro-tumor N2 phenotypes[24]. N1 can induce direct cytotoxicity via DNA damage, mutations, and antigen-dependent trogocytosis, secreting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and enhancing pro-inflammatory response[29,30]. Conversely, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), constructed from NETosis, can suppress the activity of NK cells and cytotoxic T cells by physically forming a protective network and modulating arginase-1 (ARG1) and cytokine secretion[30−34]. Moreover, it has been hypothesized that the cluster of TANs and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) presents a more efficient metastasis pattern with enhanced cell cycle progression[35].

      MDSCs can induce T-cell inhibition by producing reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide and expressing high levels of ARG1[36,37]. The two main subpopulations, polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs) and mononuclear MDSCs (M-MDSCs), both possess the function of suppressing T cells, and the latter is suggested to be more restrictive[38−40]. Therefore, targeting the entire myeloid cell subsets might be an alternative strategy[37].

      Immune exhaustion, especially in CD8+ T cells, is present in PDAC and is characterized by loss of effector function and inhibitory receptors such as PD-1, while FOXP3+CD4+CD25+ T cells (Tregs) are recruited into tumors and induce effector T cell lysis, cytokine release, and immune checkpoint expression[41,42]. An increased Treg/CD8+ T cell ratio is correlated with the inferior outcome of PDAC[43]. However, downregulation or loss of FOXP3 expression has been reported to induce helper T (Th) cell-like activated immune response and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion such as IFNγ[44,45]. Impaired cytotoxic function of NK cells is detected in PDAC patients, whose progression of cancer is associated with CD96 and CD226 derived from NK cells[46,47]. Other components such as PSCs and TAMs also participate in inhibiting NK cell cytotoxicity[48].

    • Compressed massively by the dense stroma, the vasculature in the PDAC TME is significantly distinct from other malignancies, with a low microvessel density (MVD) and leaky structure, resulting in high interstitial fluid pressure, decreased blood perfusion and thus hypoxia, an acidic TME, retarded drug delivery, and immunosuppression[49−51]. However, the nutrient needs of PCCs in an active metabolic state can still be fulfilled by basal microvilli, a unique microvasculature facilitating high glucose uptake with glucose transport-1-positive vesicles[52].

    • Neural components in the TME have attracted growing research interest recently. Perineural invasion (PNI), a hallmark of PDAC, contributes to local progression and intraneural spread of PCCs[53,54]. Activated Schwann cells have been shown to promote cancer cells via midkine signaling, enhance the differentiation of CAFs to a pro-tumor phenotype by IL-1α secretion, and increase accumulation of MDSCs, resulting in tumor progression and immunosuppression[55]. Acetylcholine released from cholinergic signaling is observed to inhibit production of IFN-γ by CD8+ T cells and decrease the Th1/Th2 ratio[56]. Moreover, serine secreted by axonal extensions of neurons helps nourish cancer cells in the deserted TME[57].

    • The role of microbiota in PDAC is being explored continuously. For instance, increased bacterial and fungal DNA load has been identified in PDAC tumors, and the signatures of microbiota, where specific microbial species manifest enriched abundance, are also suggested to be associated with clinical outcomes[58−60]. Emerging evidence has been provided for the anti-tumor effects induced by ablation of microbes in animal models, while specific species and their metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, indole derivatives, bile acids, polyamines, and purines, have distinct pro-tumor and anti-tumor functions directly on cancer cells or via immunomodulation, pointing out the necessity of further mechanistic and functional studies involving diverse cohorts of PDAC subjects[61,62].

      Several studies have found that compensatory effects exist in the single depletion of a certain component of the TME. For example, single depletion of MDSCs induces an increase in macrophages and monocytes[63]. Additionally, depletion of TREM2+TAMs has been suggested to trigger pathogenic inflammation and accelerate tumor deterioration[64,65]. These findings, together with the plasticity and heterogeneity of TME components, indicate the need to develop a highly selective and multifaceted targeted strategy, with the aim of tilting the functional state of these components towards a tumor-suppressive or baseline state.

    • The TME participates in the PDAC metastatic cascade through direct action on PCCs as well as indirect modulation of signaling molecules and formation of a permissive environment, resulting in dissemination of cancer cells into the bloodstream, lymphatic vasculature, and perineural invasion (PNI)[15,66]. Firstly, hypoxia, a consequence of hypovascularity resulting from desmoplasia created by CAFs and ECM, is essential for the metastatic potential of PCCs[67]. Meanwhile, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is required for the initiation of cancer cell migration, which is induced by the signal molecules derived from the TME, such as TAM-derived TGF-β[15,67]. In secondary sites, prometastatic niche formation is regulated by microenvironmental factors released from the primary site[68]. For example, CAFs in the primary TME have been found to secrete IL-6, which upregulates STAT3 signaling and activates hepatocytes, promoting the prometastatic niche and thus liver metastasis[69].

    • Fibrosis and hypovascularity are two significant characteristics of the PDAC TME. The densely fibrotic stroma works as a physical barrier and possibly traps proangiogenic factors, resulting in decreased vascularity[70]. Vascular perfusion is correlated with cellular infiltration, drug penetration and distribution, and the TME effectively suppresses the efficacy of immunotherapy and chemotoxicity via selective anti-tumor leukocyte exclusion and hindered drug delivery, respectively[15,71]. PSCs have also been shown to limit the effect of gemcitabine by entrapping it in the cytoplasm[72]. With prominent heterogeneity and plasticity, the TME in PDAC demonstrates resilience and pliability, enabling the tumor to withstand various therapies and develop acquired resistance. For example, ATP released from cancer cell death into the TME in response to cytotoxic agents is converted to immunosuppressive adenosine that recruits myeloid cells and inflammatory cells[73,74]. Moreover, resistance also develops in therapies targeting adoptive responses, such as antagonizing CCR2 to limit monocyte recruitment, which leads to increased TAN infiltration[75]. These findings underscore the importance of a multifaceted strategy in reversing therapeutic resistance and improving efficacy.

    • As mentioned above, a multipronged strategy might outweigh single depletion, where TCM can exploit its advantage of retaining holistic balance. A total of seven herbal formulae involving 44 herbs, one herbal extract, and 14 active compounds were identified with therapeutic effects by targeting the TME in PDAC. These CHM formulae, herbs, and compounds mainly modulate the TME by targeting CAFs, TAMs, TANs, PSCs, MDSCs, cytotoxic T cells, Tregs, NK cells, and vasculature.

    • Phoenix dactylifera L. is considered to contain abundant nutrients, while research also found that its extracts could modulate the TME by reducing the activity and fibrotic phenotype of PSCs and thus ameliorating fibrosis, a mechanism involving suppressed fibronectin 1 (FN1) and α-SMA expression[76]. Resveratrol (RSV) possessed the properties of targeting PSCs as well. The dysregulation of HIF-1α and SDF-1 induced by hypoxia was observed to be reversed by RSV in cancer cells, and PSC-derived α-SMA, IL-6, and SDF-1 were suppressed[77]. Moreover, RSV could inhibit ROS-induced miR-21 and glycolysis in PSCs, with an increase in PTEN expression[78]. Specifically, trans-resveratrol (TRSV) demonstrated an effect of inhibiting viability and fibrotic mediators of PSCs by downregulating Acta2, Col2-α1, α-SMA, and FN1 expression, with NF-κB and AKT signaling suppressed[79].

    • The Qing-Yi-Hua-Ji (QYHJ) formula, composed of Scutellariae Barbatae Herba, Hedyoti Diffusae Herba, Amorphopallus Ribieri Rhizoma, Coicis Semen, Gynostemmatis Pentaphylli Herba, Ganoderma, and Amomi Rotundus Fructus, is a representative of CHM designed for PDAC in clinical practice. It is suggested to suppress the proliferative activity of CAFs with decreased SDF-1, α-SMA, and vimentin[80]. α-mangostin (α-M), which is extracted from pericarps of mangosteen widely used in folk medicine, was suggested to have TME-modulatory properties. A study utilizing a nanoplatform to enhance the biodistribution of α-M found that the nanoparticles decreased FN, α-SMA, and FAP-α expression and viability of NIH3T3 cells, as well as facilitated vascular normalization and thus increased blood perfusion, mainly through blocking the TGF-β/Smad pathway and inhibiting phosphorylated Smad2/3[81]. Curcumin from Curcuma longa was shown to directly inhibit the proliferation and mesenchymal characteristics of CAFs, which were observed from increased E-cadherin, decreased Vimentin, and α-SMA[82]. A study employing a CAF-tailored nanosystem that loaded quercetin (QUE) was found to inhibit α-SMA and Wnt16 in NIH3T3 cells, leading to remodeling of the TME where FN and collagen were remarkably reduced, P-gp induced by high levels of HIF-1α was reversed, and thus amelioration of drug resistance[83].

    • Huachansu (HCS), isolated from dried skin glands of Bufonis Venenum, manifested ECM suppressive effects via decreasing collagen type-1, TGF-β1, and Smad2/3 expression of the TGF-β/Smad pathway in PSCs[84].

    • The Dahuang Zhechong Pill (DHZCP) is a classical formula that resolves blood stasis and was found to significantly reduce tumor size and NF-κB and VEGF expression, combined with TNS4 knockdown[85]. Danggui-Sayuk-Ga-Osuyu-Saenggang-Tang (DSGOST), which is Danggui-Sini-Jia-Wuzhuyu-Shengjian-Tang in Chinese, was found to inhibit VEGF-dependent angiogenesis by directly blocking the binding of VEGF to VEGFR2, restricting VEGF-dependent phosphorylation of VEGFR2, FAK, SRC, AKT, IKKα/β, IκBα, and NF-κB in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and inhibiting NF-κB-dependent MM9 expression[86]. Sauchinone, a bioactive compound of Saururus chinensis, was found capable of inhibiting VEGF and HIF-1α expression, as well as the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway[87]. Sophorae Flavescentis Radix is commonly used in diseases of the digestive system, whose compound oxymatrine was revealed to downregulate angiogenesis by suppressing NF-κB-mediated VEGF signaling[88]. Ursolic acid (UA) was observed to reduce a series of proteins related to angiogenic function, including VEGF, VEGFR2, and CD31, with decreased STAT3 phosphorylation[89]. Emodin, an anthraquinone that can be isolated from diverse TCM herbs, manifested an effect of inhibiting angiogenesis by modulating TGFβ/Smad signaling and miRNA, including a decrease in miR-155, miR-210, TGF-βI, IL-6, and Angptl4 expression and an increase in miR-20b, TβRI, TβRII, and Smad4[90].

    • The QYHJ formula, apart from inhibiting CAFs, exerts suppressive effects on TAM infiltration as well, with a decrease in IL-6 and CCL5[80,91]. Xihuang Pill (XHP), consisting of Calculus Bovis, Moschus, Olibanum, and Myrrha, demonstrates TAM modulation. It could promote the polarization of macrophages towards an M1 phenotype by increasing CXCL9 and CXCL10 expression that are closely associated with anti-tumor immune cell recruitment, as well as inhibiting the Kyn-Ahr axis in RAW264.7 cells, with an increase in CD86 and a decrease in CD206[92]. Modified Sijunzi Decoction (MSJZD), which is composed of Rhizoma Poria, Codonopsis Radix, Rhodiolae Crenulatae Radix et Rhizoma, Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, and Dioscoreae Rhizoma, was identified with effects on tumor suppression and immune modulation. The infiltration of TAMs was switched to M1 phenotype dominance, and thus the secretion of ARG1, IL-10, IL-6, and PPARγ by M2 macrophages was inhibited[93]. Osthole extracted from Cnidii Fructus exerted the functions of targeting TAMs by inhibiting both M2 macrophage infiltration and polarization via suppressing STAT6 and C/EBP β signaling pathways, with MRC1, CCL22, and TGF-β expression decreased, as well as blocking phosphorylation of STAT6 and ERK1/2[94]. Icarrin, one of the active compounds of Epimedii Herba, is suggested to decrease infiltration and the number of M2 macrophages, which is achieved by downregulating the STAT6 signaling pathway in RAW 264.7 cells[95]. Isobavachalcone (IBC), one of the active compounds of Psoraleae Fructus, mediates attenuation of M2 macrophages[96]. Bupleuri Radix is one of the most used herbs in clinical practice, whose active compound Saikosaponin D (SSD) exerts immunomodulatory effects on the TME. By downregulating the STAT6 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways, polarization of macrophages towards M2 phenotypes is inhibited in both RAW 264.7 and primary bone marrow cells, while infiltration of M2-TAMs into tumors is also blocked[97].

    • A study investigating the effects of Pi Ji Pill (PJP) demonstrated that it can modulate the immune TME, where the expression of CD45, F4/80, and Ly6G/Ly6c was upregulated, and IL-8 was downregulated[98]. Specifically, PJP was also suggested to inhibit NET production with downregulation of neutrophil elastase (NE), MPO, and CitH3[98].

    • Icarrin, apart from decreasing M2-TAMs in both the TME and spleen, is also able to restrain infiltration of PMN-MDSCs in tumor and spleen populations[95]. After treatment of IBC, the infiltration of MDSCs is also inhibited, with an attenuated expression of ARG1 and TGF-β[96]. Following the suppressive M2 polarization induced by SSD, PMN-MDSCs were also restrained in both the tumor and spleen[97].

    • Juzen-Taihoto (TJ-48), which is Shi-Quan-Da-Bu decoction in CHM, was investigated in clinical trials involving PDAC patients of advanced stage. After administration, CD4/CD8 ratios increased, while a significant decrease in the Treg population was observed, with no major side effects reported, indicating the modulation of the immune response towards an anti-tumor state by TJ-48[99]. MSJZD was also associated with increased CD8+ T cell infiltration with elevated L-arginine levels, as a result of reduced ARG1 secretion by M2-TAMs[93]. After treatment of IBC, elevated accumulation of CD8+ T cells was also detected[96]. Regulated by the polarization of TAMs, CD3+, CD8+, and T cell infiltration in tumors was enhanced in the SSD treatment group as well[97].

    • The cytotoxicity and CD27 expression of NK cells were reported to be downregulated by M2-TAMs. Researchers also found that SSD can restore NK cell activity at the primary tumor site with inhibition of M2-polarization[97].

      In conclusion, CHM modulates the TME in PDAC in a multi-target, multi-pathway manner, with mechanisms that include suppressing the fibrotic activity of PSCs and CAFs, remodeling the ECM, regulating the polarization of TAMs, inhibiting MDSC recruitment, NET production, and angiogenesis, as well as inducing cytotoxic T cell and NK cell infiltration. Multiple signaling pathways are involved, such as C/EBP β, NF-κB, TGFβ/Smad, PI3K/AKT, JAK1/STAT3, and STAT6. These CHMs are classified based on the components they target, and the underlying mechanisms are summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 2.

      Table 1.  TME-modulatory effects and corresponding mechanisms of CHM formulae, herbs and active compounds.

      Target CHM formula/extract/compound Constituents/solvent/origins Model Effect TME-modulatory mechanisms Ref.
      PSCs Phoenix Dactylifera L. Water, EtOH, acetone, EtOAc extracts PSCs ↓ PSCs’ fibrotic phenotype ↓ FN1, α-SMA
      ↑ antioxidant capacity
      [76]
      Resveratrol Multiple PSCs
      PANC-1 cells
      ↓ PSCs activation, migration, invasion
      ↓ ROS-induced glycolysis in PSCs
      ↓ α-SMA
      ↓ ROS/miR-21
      ↑ PTEN
      [78]
      PSCs
      PANC-1, Mia Paca-2 cells
      KPC mice
      ↓ PSCs activation ↓ HIF-1α, α-SMA, SDF-1, IL-6 [77]
      Trans-resveratol Multiple LTC-14 cells ↓ PSCs
      ↓ Fibrotic mediators
      ↓ α-SMA, FN1
      ↓ Acta2, Fn1, Col2-α1
      ↓ p-AKT
      ↓ NF-κB and AKT signaling
      [79]
      CAFs Qing-Yi-Hua-Ji formula Scutellariae Barbatae Herba, Hedyoti Diffusae Herba, Amorphopallus Ribieri Rhizoma, Coicis Semen, Gynostemmatis Pentaphylli Herba, Ganoderma, Amomi Rotundus Fructus Panc02 cells
      C57 mice
      ↓ CAFs proliferative activity ↓ SDF-1, α-SMA, vimentin [80]
      α-Mangostin Mangosteen NIH3T3
      PANC-1, PANC-1-Luc2 cells
      BALB/c nude mice
      ↓ CAFs
      ↑ Vascular normalization
      ↓ α-SMA, FAP-α, FN
      ↓ TGF-β, p-Smad2, p-Smad3
      ↓ TGF-β/Smad signaling
      [91]
      Curcumin Curcumae Longae Rhizoma CAFs
      Capan-1, PANC-1 cells,
      BALB/c nude mice
      ↓ CAFs
      ↓ Mesenchymal characteristic
      ↓ Vimentin, α-SMA [82]
      Quercetin Multiple NIH3T3 cells
      Panc02, Panc02-luc cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↓ CAFs
      ↑ Blood perfusion
      ↓ α-SMA, Wnt 16
      ↓ HIF-1α, FN, collagen
      [83]
      ECM Huachansu Bufonis Venenum PSCs
      SW1990 cells
      BALB/c-nu mice
      ↓ ECM ↓ collagen-1
      ↑ Smad4
      ↓ Smad2/3, p-Smad2/3
      ↓ TGF-β/Smad2/3 pathway
      [84]
      Vasculature Dahuang Zhechong pill Rhei Radix et Rhizoma, Eupolyphaga seu Steleophaga, Armeniacae Amarum Semen, Persicae Semen, Scutellariae Radix, Rehmanniae Radix, Paeoniae Alba Radix, Glycyrrhizae Radix, Tabanus, Hirudo, Holotrichia Sauteri Moser, Toxicodendri Resina CFPAC-1 cells
      Nude mice
      ↓ Angiogenesis ↓ VEGF, NF-κB [85]
      Danggui-Sayuk-Ga-Osuyu-Saenggang-Tang Radix Angelicae Sinensis, Cinnamomi Cortex, Paeoniae Alba Radix, Clematidis Armandii Caulis, Asari Radix et Rhizoma, Glycyrrhizae Radix, Jujubae Fructus, Evodiae Fructus, Zingiberis Rhizoma Recens HUVECs
      Panc-28-luc cells
      BALB/c nude mice
      ↓ HUVECs/HDMECs migration, invasion, and tube formation
      ↓ Vascular leakage
      ↓ Phosphorylation of VEGFR2, FAK, SRC, AKT, IKKα/β, IκBα, NF-κB
      ↓ MMP-9
      ↓ VEGF binding to VEGFR2
      [86]
      Sauchinone Saururi Herba PANC-1, BxPC-3 cells ↓ Tumor blood flow ↓ VEGF, HIF-1α [87]
      Oxymatrine Sophorae Flavescentis Radix PANC-1 cells
      BALB/C (nu/nu) mice
      ↓ Angiogenesis ↓ NF-κB-mediated VEGF [88]
      Ursolic acid Multiple AsPC-1, MIA PaCa-2, Panc-28 cells
      Athymic nu/nu mice
      ↓ Angiogenesis ↓ VEGF, VEGFR2, CD31
      ↓ p-STAT3
      ↓ STAT3 signaling
      [89]
      Emodin Multiple SW1990 cells
      BALB/c nu/nu mice
      ↓ Angiogenesis ↑ TβRI, TβRII, Smad4
      ↓ TGF-βI, Angptl4
      ↑ miR-20b
      ↓ miR-155 and miR-210
      [90]
      TAMs Qingyihuaji formula Scutellariae Barbatae Herba, Hedyoti Diffusae Herba, Amorphopallus Ribieri Rhizoma, Coicis Semen, Gynostemmatis Pentaphylli Herba, Ganoderma, Amomi Rotundus Fructus BxPC, SW1990 cells
      BALB/c-nu/nu nude mice
      ↓ TAMs ↓ IL-6 [91]
      Panc02 cells
      C57 mice
      ↓ TAMs ↓ CCL5 [80]
      Xihuang pill Bovis Calculus, Moschus, Olibanum, Myrrha RAW 264.7 cells Panc02, Panc02-luc cells
      C57BL/6J mice
      ↑ M1-TAMs
      ↓ M2-TAMs
      ↑ CXCL9, CXCL10, Cd86
      ↓ Cd206
      ↓ Kyn-AhR axis
      ↓ AKT/mTOR pathway
      [92]
      Modified Sijunzi decoction Poria, Codonopsis Radix, Rhodiolae Crenulatae Radix et Rhizoma Atractylodis, Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Dioscoreae Rhizoma Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↑ M1-TAMs
      ↓ M2-TAMs
      ↓ ARG1, IL-10, IL-6, PPARγ [93]
      Osthole Cnidii Fructus RAW 264.7
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↓ M2-TAMs infiltration ↓M2 polarization ↓ MRC1, CCL22, TGF-β
      ↓ p-ERK1/2, p-STAT6
      ↓ STAT6 and C/EBP β signaling:
      [94]
      Icarrin Epimedii Herba RAW 264.7
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↓ M2-TAMs infiltration
      ↓ M2 polarization
      ↓ ARG1, MRC1
      ↓ p-STAT6
      ↓ STAT6 signaling
      [95]
      Isobavachalcone Fructus Psoraleae RAW 264.7
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↓ M2-TAMs infiltration
      ↓ M2 polarization
      ↓ ARG1, MRC1 [96]
      Saikosaponin D Bupleuri Radix RAW 264.7, H7, BMDM
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↑ M1-TAMs
      ↓ M2-TAMs
      ↓ STAT6 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR in RAW264.7 cells [97]
      TANs Piji pills Curcuma Rhizoma, Sparganii Rhizoma, Alpiniae Officinarum Rhizoma, Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae Viride, Aucklandiae Radix, Gleditsiae Abnormalis Fructus, Pulvis Fumi Carbonisatus HL-60 cells
      SW1990
      BALB/c nude mice
      ↓ NETs ↑ CD45, F4/80, Ly6G/Ly6C, IL-8
      ↓ NE, MPO, CitH3
      [98]
      MDSCs Icarrin Epimedii Herba RAW 264.7 cells
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↓ PMN-MDSCs [95]
      Isobavachalcone Fructus Psoraleae RAW 264.7 cells
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↓ MDSCs ↓ ARG, TGFβ [96]
      Saikosaponin D Bupleuri Radix H7, RAW 264.7, BMDM cells
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↓ PMN-MDSCs [97]
      T cells Juzen-Taiboto Codonopsis Radix, Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba, Rhizoma Poria, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Rehmanniae Radix Preparata, Paeoniae Radix Alba, Chuanxiong Rhizoma, Angelicae Sinensis Radix, Astragali Radix, and Cinnamomi Cortex Clinical trial ↑ CD4/CD8 cells
      ↓ Treg cells
      [99]
      Modified Sijunzi decoction Poria, Codonopsis Radix, Rhodiolae Crenulatae Radix et Rhizoma Atractylodis, Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Dioscoreae Rhizoma Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↑ CD8+ T cells ↑ L-arginine [93]
      Isobavachalcone Fructus Psoraleae RAW 264.7 cells
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↑ CD8+T cells [96]
      Saikosaponin D Bupleuri Radix H7, RAW 264.7, BMDM cells
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↑ CD3+CD8+ cells [97]
      NK cells Juzen-Taiboto Codonopsis Radix, Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba, Rhizoma Poria, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Rehmanniae Radix Preparata, Paeoniae Radix Alba, Chuanxiong Rhizoma, Angelicae Sinensis Radix, Astragali Radix, and Cinnamomi Cortex Clinical trial ↑ NK cells [99]
      Saikosaponin D Bupleuri Radix H7, RAW 264.7, BMDM cells
      Panc02 cells
      C57BL/6 mice
      ↑ NK cells [97]
      ARG1: Arginase-1; BMDM: Bone marrow mononuclear cells; CAFs: Cancer-associated fibroblasts; ECM: Extracellular matrix; FN: Fibronectin; Glut1: Glucose transporter 1; HDMECs: Human dermal microvascular endothelial cells; HIF: Hypoxia-Inducible Factors; HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; IL: Interleukin; MDSCs: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells; NETs: Neutrophil extracellular traps; NK: Natural killer; PMN-MDSCs: Polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells; PSCs: Pancreatic stellate cells; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; TAMs: Tumor-associated macrophages; TANs:Tumor-associated neutrophils; TGF-β: Transforming growth factor-β; Treg: Regulatory T. α-SMA: Alpha-smooth muscle actin; ↓: Decreased level; ↑: Elevated level.

      Figure 2. 

      Effects and mechanisms of CHM in targeting TME components. CHM inhibits the proliferation and activity of PSCs and CAFs, as well as remodeling of the ECM, via suppression of a variety of fibrotic mediators, miRNAs, and pathways such as TGF-β/Smad. Vasculature in the TME can be regulated by CHM mainly through inhibition of NF-κB-mediated VEGF, VEGF binding to VEGFR2, pathways including STAT3 and TGF-β/Smad, and modulation of miRNAs. Multiple tumor-infiltrating immune cells have been revealed as targets of CHM, including targeting the polarization of M1/M2 macrophages, inhibition of TAMs, MDSCs, TANs, and Treg infiltration, as well as increasing cytotoxic T cell and NK cell responses, involving cytokines and chemokines such as IL-6, ARG1, MRC1, TGF-β, and signaling pathways including STAT6 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR.

    • Although pre-clinical studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effectiveness of CHM in modulating the TME, clinical trials of CHM for treating PDAC by targeting the TME are still lacking. For instance, improvement in overall survival and quality of life after receiving CHM or integrative treatments remains the sole objective of clinical trials, while specific evaluation of their effects on the TME in real patients is neglected. For example, an ongoing trial investigating the efficacy of combined therapy of QYHJ and standard chemotherapy is designed to be measured primarily by overall survival and disease-free survival[100].

    • Toxicity, adverse effects, and potential drug–drug interactions remain major concerns and obstacles for the clinical application of CHM and its products. In order to gain comprehensive insight and provide evidence for the translational application of these CHMs, we summarize the known toxicity profiles of these selected CHMs by searching databases including TCMSP, TCM-ID, and Livertox, as shown in Table 2. The three formulae, QYHJ, DHZCP, and DSGOST, have one, five, and one herb recognized as toxic, respectively, while all single-herb extracts and active compounds are safe for use based on current findings.

      Table 2.  Toxicity of selected CHM.

      CHM formulae/extract/
      compounds
      Target Constituents/solvent/
      origins
      Toxicity
      Qingyihuaji formula CAFs, TAMs, vasculature Amorphopallus Ribieri Rhizoma Toxic
      Dahuang Zhechong pill Vasculature Toxicodendri Resina Slight
      Armeniacae Amarum Semen Toxic
      Holotrichia Sauteri Moser Extreme
      Hirudo Slight
      Persicae Semen Slight
      Danggui-Sayuk-Ga-Osuyu-Saenggang-Tang Vasculature Evodiae Fructus Slight
      Extreme: Causing severe adverse response at low dosage. Toxic: Therapeutic dose being close to toxic dose. Slight: Toxic when used in excess.
    • As summarized above, CHM can modulate the TME in PDAC through multi-target and multi-pathway mechanisms. As for the stromal compartments, although in-depth mechanistic studies are still lacking, studies have shown that CHM can directly inhibit the activity and proliferation of PSCs, mainly by suppressing HIF-1α, α-SMA, and SDF-1 expression. α-SMA and vimentin are usually selected for the measurement of CAF activity, whose inhibition can be achieved by blocking the TGFβ/Smad signaling pathway. As for targeting vasculature, suppression of NF-κB-mediated VEGF and STAT3 signaling serves as the core mechanism of CHM effects in anti-angiogenesis, while modulation of miRNA is also involved. As for the immune compartments, most CHMs manifest inhibitory effects on M2-TAM infiltration and M2 polarization, with a decrease in M2-derived ARG1 and MRC1 expression, achieved by inhibition of the STAT6 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways. As M2 polarization participates in the promotion of MDSC recruitment and suppression of cytotoxicity of T cells and NK cells, restrained MDSC infiltration and increased CD8+ T cells and NK cells are also detected following the M2-TAM subpopulation, such as in MSJZD, IBC, and SSD treatment. Moreover, CHMs such as the QYHJ formula are able to target CAFs and TAMs, which belong to different compartments, at the same time. Therefore, CHMs possess the potential to systematically regulate the TME towards a baseline and even anti-tumor state through diverse signaling pathways and miRNA modulation.

      There are a few limitations in the current literature regarding TCM in treating PDAC by targeting the TME. 1) The quality of current studies is yet to be improved. Among the limited literature, many are short of in-depth mechanistic investigation and validation; some are lacking in vivo models, while toxicity and safety evaluations of CHM are usually missing, which serve as obstacles to further promoting CHM in clinical trials and practice. 2) Clinical trials assessing both survival outcomes, quality of life, and TME-modulatory effects of CHM are extremely lacking, leading to the retardation of translational research progress. As for developing innovative medicines from CHM, challenges mainly result from difficulties in standardization and quality control of formulae and herbs, as well as low solubility, bioavailability, and stability of active compounds.

    • First, studies assessing modulatory effects of CHM on peripheral nerves and microbiota-mediated immunosuppression are still lacking. As mentioned above, neural compartments in the TME are able to recruit tumor-promoting immune cells and nourish PCCs, while microbiota-derived metabolites selectively induce tumor progression and immunosuppression[55−57,61,62]. CHM might be able to interrupt these actions by blocking infiltration of immune-suppressive cells, limiting release of signaling or nutrient molecules, and eliminating microbiota and its metabolites with its well-known anti-pathogenic effects. Second, several obstacles for clinical translation of CHM remain unsolved, including toxicity, safety profiles, and potential drug–herb interactions. Further investigation is required for the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic understanding of these CHMs and their combination with modern medication. Additionally, standardization of CHMs is essential for consistency in experimental and clinical studies, with the advancement of chromatographic fingerprinting, standard-based quantification, and rigorous quality control and quality assurance. Last but not least, integration of TME-targeted CHMs and modern interventions exerts considerable potential that is worthy of further exploration, such as the prolonged survival of TJ-48 combined with the GFP (Gemcitabine, Fluorouracil [5-FU], and Platin [Cisplatin]) protocol in clinical trials[99], and well-designed, multi-center clinical trials are urgently needed for the validation of combinatorial strategies.

    • In conclusion, the heterogeneity and dynamics of the TME in PDAC bring not only stern challenges but also the possibility of modulating the surrounding environment of cancer cells towards a tumor-suppressive state. CHM has manifested multi-target and multi-pathway modulatory effects on TME components, indicating the therapeutic potential of integrating TCM and modern therapies against PDAC with the involvement of TME regulation.

      • Not applicable.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to this study as follows: conceived and designed the review, revised the manuscript: Lin ZX, Xian YF; retrieved the literature and drafted the manuscript: Xue LR; participated in the design of the study and assessed the quality of the study: Wu YL. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of China Pharmaceutical University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (2) References (100)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Xue LR, Wu YL, Lin ZX, Xian YF. 2026. Chinese Medicine for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by targeting the tumor microenvironment: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential. Targetome 2(5): e050 doi: 10.48130/targetome-0026-0049
    Xue LR, Wu YL, Lin ZX, Xian YF. 2026. Chinese Medicine for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by targeting the tumor microenvironment: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential. Targetome 2(5): e050 doi: 10.48130/targetome-0026-0049

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return