Search
2026 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Application of biochar for the prevention and control of soil continuous cropping obstacles in solanaceous vegetables: a review

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Received: 18 January 2026
    Revised: 02 March 2026
    Accepted: 20 March 2026
    Published online: 03 April 2026
    Biochar X  2 Article number: e013 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Causes of CCOs in the major solanaceous vegetables are reviewed.

    Performance and mechanism of biochar in alleviating CCOs are systematically summarized.

    Effects of biochar on rhizosphere soil physicochemical properties, allelochemicals, and microbial communities are comprehensively analyzed.

    Suggestions and perspectives for future studies are proposed.

  • Continuous cropping obstacles (CCOs) pose severe threats to the quality and yield of solanaceous vegetables. Biochar has emerged as an effective soil amendment to mitigate CCOs due to its nutrient-rich composition and unique structural properties. However, its performance can be affected by feedstock types, pyrolysis temperature, soil conditions, and crop species, resulting in inconsistent outcomes in the field. Thus, a review on the effect and mechanism of biochar in the prevention and control of CCOs of solanaceous vegetables is highly needed. This is the first systematic review focusing on the mechanism of biochar in alleviating CCOs in solanaceous vegetables. This review systematically delineates the causes and detrimental impacts of CCOs across major solanaceous crops (tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, and potatoes), and comprehensively evaluates biochar-based soil management strategies in comparison with conventional agronomic, physical, and chemical control measures. The underlying specific mechanisms of biochar in alleviating CCOs are explored, including improving soil properties and soil microbial community structure, as well as alleviating allelopathic autotoxicity in solanaceous plants. Based on the current research status and the nature of biochar, future research should focus on exploring the microscopic reaction mechanism and long-term effects of biochar and its composites on alleviating CCOs. In addition, further research on the allelopathic effects of biochar on the aboveground parts of crops should also be considered. This review provides a foundational reference for the use of biochar to combat CCOs in solanaceous vegetables.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • [1] Rosa-Martínez E, Bovy A, Plazas M, Tikunov Y, Prohens J, et al. 2023. Genetics and breeding of phenolic content in tomato, eggplant and pepper fruits. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1135237 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1135237

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Pradhan P, Naresh P, Barik S, Acharya GC, Bastia R, et al. 2023. Breeding for root-knot nematode resistance in fruiting Solanaceous vegetable crops: a review. Euphytica 219:71 doi: 10.1007/s10681-023-03204-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Bennett AJ, Bending GD, Chandler D, Hilton S, Mills P. 2012. Meeting the demand for crop production: the challenge of yield decline in crops grown in short rotations. Biological Reviews 87:52−71 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00184.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Ma HK, Pineda A, van der Wurff AWG, Bezemer TM. 2018. Carry-over effects of soil inoculation on plant growth and health under sequential exposure to soil-borne diseases. Plant and Soil 433:257−270 doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3837-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Ku Y, Li W, Mei X, Yang X, Cao C, et al. 2022. Biological control of melon continuous cropping obstacles: weakening the negative effects of the vicious cycle in continuous cropping soil. Microbiology Spectrum 10:e01776-22 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01776-22

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Li Y, Chi J, Ao J, Gao X, Liu X, et al. 2021. Effects of different continuous cropping years on bacterial community and diversity of cucumber rhizosphere soil in solar-greenhouse. Current Microbiology 78:2380−2390 doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02485-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Liao J, Xia P. 2024. Continuous cropping obstacles of medicinal plants: focus on the plant-soil-microbe interaction system in the rhizosphere. Scientia Horticulturae 328:112927 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2024.112927

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Tan G, Liu Y, Peng S, Yin H, Meng D, et al. 2021. Soil potentials to resist continuous cropping obstacle: three field cases. Environmental Research 200:111319 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111319

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Zhao X, Elcin E, He L, Vithanage M, Zhang X, et al. 2024. Using biochar for the treatment of continuous cropping obstacle of herbal remedies: a review. Applied Soil Ecology 193:105127 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105127

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Aly A, Piscitelli L, Laarif Y, Rouifi A, Mondelli D, et al. 2024. Compost tea supplied by partial root-zone drying irrigation affected growth and productivity of eggplants and cucumbers grown in succession. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 40:12−23 doi: 10.1080/01448765.2023.2248957

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Chen W, Guo X, Guo Q, Tan X, Wang Z. 2021. Long-term chili monoculture alters environmental variables affecting the dominant microbial community in rhizosphere soil. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:681953 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.681953

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Cheng F, Ali M, Liu C, Deng R, Cheng Z. 2020. Garlic allelochemical diallyl disulfide alleviates autotoxicity in the root exudates caused by long-term continuous cropping of tomato. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68:11684−11693 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03894

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Wang Y, Shi M, Zhang R, Zhang W, Liu Y, et al. 2023. Legume-potato rotation affects soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activity, and rhizosphere metabolism in continuous potato cropping. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 10:132 doi: 10.1186/s40538-023-00508-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Mao T, Jiang X. 2021. Changes in microbial community and enzyme activity in soil under continuous pepper cropping in response to Trichoderma hamatum MHT1134 application. Scientific Reports 11:21585 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00951-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Ma L, Ma S, Chen G, Lu X, Chai Q, et al. 2023. Mechanisms and mitigation strategies for the occurrence of continuous cropping obstacles of Legumes in China. Agronomy 14:104 doi: 10.3390/agronomy14010104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Jokela D, Nair A. 2016. Effects of reduced tillage and fertilizer application method on plant growth, yield, and soil health in organic bell pepper production. Soil and Tillage Research 163:243−254 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.06.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Ma HJ, Lin L, Chen ZB, Xu SG, Li Y, et al. 2023. Biochar preparation and its effects with reduced compound fertilizer on nutrients, phenolic acid and fungal community in tobacco rhizosphere soil. Materials Express 13:1888−1898 doi: 10.1166/mex.2023.2574

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Zhao L, Zhao Y, Nan H, Yang F, Qiu H, et al. 2020. Suppressed formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) during pyrolytic production of Fe-enriched composite biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials 382:121033 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Chen X, Zhang D, Li X, Li X, Lou J, et al. 2022. Effect of vegetable residues incorporation on soil fertility, rhizosphere microbial community structure, and plant growth of continuously cropped cucumber in a solar greenhouse. Annals of Microbiology 72:32 doi: 10.1186/s13213-022-01690-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Cui J, Zhang E, Zhang X, Wang Q, Liu Q. 2022. Effects of 2, 4-di-tert-butylphenol at different concentrations on soil functionality and microbial community structure in the Lanzhou lily rhizosphere. Applied Soil Ecology 172:104367 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104367

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Kaur J, Singh JP. 2014. Long-term effects of continuous cropping and different nutrient management practices on the distribution of organic nitrogen in soil under rice-wheat system. Plant, Soil and Environment 60:63−68 doi: 10.17221/440/2013-PSE

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Manici LM, Kelderer M, Franke-Whittle IH, Rühmer T, Baab G, et al. 2013. Relationship between root-endophytic microbial communities and replant disease in specialized apple growing areas in Europe. Applied Soil Ecology 72:207−214 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.07.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Wang Y, Ma X, Saleem M, Yang Y, Zhang Q. 2022. Effects of corn stalk biochar and pyrolysis temperature on wheat seedlings growth and soil properties stressed by herbicide sulfentrazone. Environmental Technology & Innovation 25:102208 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.102208

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Xing Y, Zhang P, Zhang W, Yu C, Luo Z. 2024. Continuous cropping of potato changed the metabolic pathway of root exudates to drive rhizosphere microflora. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1318586 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1318586

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Barik S, Reddy AC, Ponnam N, Kumari M, Acharya GC, et al. 2020. Breeding for bacterial wilt resistance in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.): progress and prospects. Crop Protection 137:105270 doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105270

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Ding M, Dai H, He Y, Liang T, Zhai Z, et al. 2024. Continuous cropping system altered soil microbial communities and nutrient cycles. Frontiers in Microbiology 15:1374550 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1374550

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Ashworth AJ, Owens PR, Allen FL. 2020. Long-term cropping systems management influences soil strength and nutrient cycling. Geoderma 361:114062 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114062

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Hati KM, Swarup A, Dwivedi AK, Misra AK, Bandyopadhyay KK. 2007. Changes in soil physical properties and organic carbon status at the topsoil horizon of a vertisol of central India after 28 years of continuous cropping, fertilization and manuring. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 119:127−134 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.06.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Almajmaie A, Hardie M, Acuna T, Birch C. 2017. Evaluation of methods for determining soil aggregate stability. Soil and Tillage Research 167:39−45 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.11.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Amézketa E. 1999. Soil aggregate stability: a review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 14:83−151 doi: 10.1300/J064v14n02_08

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Pervaiz ZH, Iqbal J, Zhang Q, Chen D, Wei H, et al. 2020. Continuous cropping alters multiple biotic and abiotic indicators of soil health. Soil Systems 4:59 doi: 10.3390/soilsystems4040059

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Huang LF, Song LX, Xia XJ, Mao WH, Shi K, et al. 2013. Plant-soil feedbacks and soil sickness: from mechanisms to application in agriculture. Journal of Chemical Ecology 39:232−242 doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0244-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Kumbar S, Narayanankutty C, Sainamole KP, Sreelatha U, Barik S. 2021. Evaluation of eggplant rootstocks for grafting eggplant to improve fruit yield and control bacterial wilt disease. European Journal of Plant Pathology 161:73−90 doi: 10.1007/s10658-021-02305-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Ma H, Li J, Luo A, Lv H, Ren Z, et al. 2023. Vanillin, a newly discovered autotoxic substance in long-term potato continuous cropping soil, inhibits plant growth by decreasing the root auxin content and reducing adventitious root numbers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 71:16993−17004 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c05027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Rial C, Gómez E, Varela RM, Molinillo JMG, Macías FA. 2018. Ecological relevance of the major allelochemicals in Lycopersicon esculentum roots and exudates. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66:4638−4644 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01501

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Rahaman F, Shukor Juraimi A, Rafii MY, Uddin K, Hassan L, et al. 2022. Allelopathic potential in rice-a biochemical tool for plant defence against weeds. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1072723 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1072723

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Terán-Figueroa Y, de Loera D, Toxqui-Terán A, Montero-Morán G, Saavedra-Leos MZ. 2022. Bromatological analysis and characterization of phenolics in snow mountain garlic. Molecules 27:3712 doi: 10.3390/molecules27123712

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Zeeshan Ul Haq M, Yu J, Yao G, Yang H, Iqbal HA, et al. 2023. A systematic review on the continuous cropping obstacles and control strategies in medicinal plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24:12470 doi: 10.3390/ijms241512470

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Wang L, Liu S, Tian G, Pan Y, Wang H, et al. 2025. Impacts of continuous potato cropping on soil microbial assembly processes and spread of potato common scab. Applied Soil Ecology 206:105805 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105805

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Colak N, Kurt-Celebi A, Gruz J, Strnad M, Hayirlioglu-Ayaz S, et al. 2022. The phenolics and antioxidant properties of black and purple versus white eggplant cultivars. Molecules 27:2410 doi: 10.3390/molecules27082410

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Xiao Z, Lu C, Wu Z, Li X, Ding K, et al. 2024. Continuous cropping disorders of eggplants (Solanum melongena L.) and tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in suburban agriculture: microbial structure and assembly processes. Science of The Total Environment 909:168558 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168558

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Gao H, Tian G, Khashi u Rahman M, Wu F. 2022. Cover crop species composition alters the soil bacterial community in a continuous pepper cropping system. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:789034 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.789034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Sánchez-Mata MC, Yokoyama WE, Hong YJ, Prohens J. 2010. α-Solasonine and α-solamargine contents of gboma (Solanum macrocarpon L.) and scarlet (Solanum aethiopicum L.) eggplants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58:5502−5508 doi: 10.1021/jf100709g

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Bao L, Liu Y, Ding Y, Shang J, Wei Y, et al. 2022. Interactions between phenolic acids and microorganisms in rhizospheric soil from continuous cropping of Panax notoginseng. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:791603 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.791603

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Fan Y, Liu J, Liu Z, Hu X, Yu Z, et al. 2022. Chitin amendments eliminate the negative impacts of continuous cropping obstacles on soil properties and microbial assemblage. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1067618 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1067618

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Gu S, Xiong X, Tan L, Deng Y, Du X, et al. 2022. Soil microbial community assembly and stability are associated with potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) fitness under continuous cropping regime. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1000045 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1000045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Liu S, Wang Z, Niu J, Dang K, Zhang S, et al. 2021. Changes in physicochemical properties, enzymatic activities, and the microbial community of soil significantly influence the continuous cropping of Panax quinquefolius L. (American ginseng). Plant and Soil 463:427−446 doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-04911-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Yang T, Zhai D, Ding X, Guo Z, Zhao Y. 2023. Shifts in soil microbial diversity and functions during continuous cropping of strawberry. Land Degradation & Development 34:4810−4820 doi: 10.1002/ldr.4811

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Xia P, Xun L, Liang Z. 2019. Impact of continuous Panax notoginseng plantation on soil microbial and biochemical properties. Scientific Reports 9:13205 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49625-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Huang Y, Xiao X, Huang H, Jing J, Zhao H, et al. 2018. Contrasting beneficial and pathogenic microbial communities across consecutive cropping fields of greenhouse strawberry. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 102:5717−5729 doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9013-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Liu L, Sun C, Liu S, Chai R, Huang W, et al. 2015. Bioorganic fertilizer enhances soil suppressive capacity against bacterial wilt of tomato. PLoS One 10:e0121304 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121304

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Liu W, Wang Q, Wang B, Wang X, Franks AE, et al. 2015. Changes in the abundance and structure of bacterial communities under long-term fertilization treatments in a peanut monocropping system. Plant and Soil 395:415−427 doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2569-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Cen Z, Zheng Y, Guo Y, Yang S, Dong Y. 2023. Nitrogen fertilization in a faba bean-wheat intercropping system can alleviate the autotoxic effects in faba bean. Plants 12:1232 doi: 10.3390/plants12061232

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Huang S, Yu J, Hou D, Yue H, Zhang D, et al. 2023. Response of soil microbial community diversity to continuous cucumber cropping in facilities along the Yellow River irrigation area. PLoS One 18:e0289772 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289772

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Su L, Li H, Wang J, Gao W, Shu X, et al. 2023. Composition, function and succession of bacterial communities in the tomato rhizosphere during continuous cropping. Biology and Fertility of Soils 59:723−732 doi: 10.1007/s00374-023-01731-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Chen J, Du Y, Zhu W, Pang X, Wang Z. 2022. Effects of organic materials on soil bacterial community structure in long-term continuous cropping of tomato in greenhouse. Open Life Sciences 17:381−392 doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Ding Y, Huang X, Li Y, Liu H, Zhang Q, et al. 2021. Nitrate leaching losses mitigated with intercropping of deep-rooted and shallow-rooted plants. Journal of Soils and Sediments 21:364−375 doi: 10.1007/s11368-020-02733-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Ghani MI, Ali A, Atif MJ, Ali M, Amin B, et al. 2022. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dry raw garlic stalk amendment alleviate continuous monocropping growth and photosynthetic declines in eggplant by bolstering its antioxidant system and accumulation of osmolytes and secondary metabolites. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:849521 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.849521

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Liu F, Li X, Hu H, Li J, Du G, et al. 2023. Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) interruption cultivation evidently decreases the anthracnose in the succeeding crop chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Agronomy 13:1228 doi: 10.3390/agronomy13051228

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Qin S, Yeboah S, Wang D, Zhang J. 2016. Effects of ridge‐furrow and plastic mulching planting patterns on microflora and potato tuber yield in continuous cropping soil. Soil Use and Management 32:465−473 doi: 10.1111/sum.12291

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Zheng X, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Zhang H, Chen M, et al. 2020. Effects of a novel bio-organic fertilizer on the composition of rhizobacterial communities and bacterial wilt outbreak in a continuously mono-cropped tomato field. Applied Soil Ecology 156:103717 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103717

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Zhong S, Zeng HC. 2019. Effect of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)/cowpea (Vigna unquiculata L.) intercropping combined with organic mature application on soil microfauna. Geoderma 354:113863 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.07.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Wang T, Xu J, Chen J, Liu P, Hou X, et al. 2024. Progress in microbial fertilizer regulation of crop growth and soil remediation research. Plants 13:346 doi: 10.3390/plants13030346

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Galindo FS, Pagliari PH, da Silva EC, de Lima BH, Fernandes GC, et al. 2024. Impact of nitrogen fertilizer sustainability on corn crop yield: the role of beneficial microbial inoculation interactions. BMC Plant Biology 24:268 doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04971-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Xiong W, Li R, Guo S, Karlsson I, Jiao Z, et al. 2019. Microbial amendments alter protist communities within the soil microbiome. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 135:379−382 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Huang X, Zhao J, Zhou X, Zhang J, Cai Z. 2019. Differential responses of soil bacterial community and functional diversity to reductive soil disinfestation and chemical soil disinfestation. Geoderma 348:124−134 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.04.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Liu X, Feng Z, Zhou Y, Zhu H, Yao Q. 2020. Plant species-dependent effects of liming and plant residue incorporation on soil bacterial community and activity in an acidic orchard soil. Applied Sciences 10:5681 doi: 10.3390/app10165681

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Liu M, Linna C, Ma S, Ma Q, Guo J, et al. 2022. Effects of biochar with inorganic and organic fertilizers on agronomic traits and nutrient absorption of soybean and fertility and microbes in purple soil. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:871021 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.871021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Singh HP, Batish DR, Kohli RK. 1999. Autotoxicity: concept, organisms, and ecological significance. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 18:757−772 doi: 10.1080/07352689991309478

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Schneider F, Don A, Hennings I, Schmittmann O, Seidel SJ. 2017. The effect of deep tillage on crop yield–What do we really know? Soil and Tillage Research 174:193−204 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.07.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Chen Q, Lan P, Wu M, Lu M, Pan B, et al. 2022. Biochar mitigates allelopathy through regulating allelochemical generation from plants and accumulation in soil. Carbon Research 1:6 doi: 10.1007/s44246-022-00003-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Zheng X, Wang Z, Zhu Y, Wang J, Liu B. 2020. Effects of a microbial restoration substrate on plant growth and rhizosphere bacterial community in a continuous tomato cropping greenhouse. Scientific Reports 10:13729 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70737-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Wang C, Zheng N, Wan S, Wang J. 2021. Assessment of the modes of occurrence of trace elements in agricultural crop residues and their enrichments and bioavailability in bio-chars. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 11:2065−2077 doi: 10.1007/s13399-019-00597-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Jiang M, He L, Niazi NK, Wang H, Gustave W, et al. 2023. Nanobiochar for the remediation of contaminated soil and water: challenges and opportunities. Biochar 5:2 doi: 10.1007/s42773-022-00201-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Alghamdi AG, Aljohani BH, Aly AA. 2021. Impacts of olive waste-derived biochar on hydro-physical properties of sandy soil. Sustainability 13:5493 doi: 10.3390/su13105493

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Ndede EO, Kurebito S, Idowu O, Tokunari T, Jindo K. 2022. The potential of biochar to enhance the water retention properties of sandy agricultural soils. Agronomy 12:311 doi: 10.3390/agronomy12020311

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Jaiswal AK, Alkan N, Elad Y, Sela N, Philosoph AM, et al. 2020. Molecular insights into biochar-mediated plant growth promotion and systemic resistance in tomato against Fusarium crown and root rot disease. Scientific Reports 10:13934 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70882-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Ge S, Gao J, Chang D, He T, Cai H, et al. 2023. Biochar contributes to resistance against root rot disease by stimulating soil polyphenol oxidase. Biochar 5:55 doi: 10.1007/s42773-023-00257-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] de Medeiros EV, Lima NT, de Sousa Lima JR, Pinto KMS, da Costa DP, et al. 2022. Biochar from different sources against tomato bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 22:540−548 doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00667-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Xie H, Zhou X, Zhang Y. 2024. Effects of biochar under different preparation conditions on the growth of capsicum. Sustainability 16:6869 doi: 10.3390/su16166869

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Arshad U, Azeem F, Mustafa G, Bakhsh A, Toktay H, et al. 2021. Combined application of biochar and biocontrol agents enhances plant growth and activates resistance against Meloidogyne incognita in tomato. Gesunde Pflanzen 73:591−601 doi: 10.1007/s10343-021-00580-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Lin CC, Liu YT, Chang PH, Hsieh YC, Tzou YM. 2023. Inhibition of continuous cropping obstacle of celery by chemically modified biochar: an efficient approach to decrease bioavailability of phenolic allelochemicals. Journal of Environmental Management 348:119316 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119316

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Luigi M, Manglli A, Dragone I, Antonelli MG, Contarini M, et al. 2022. Effects of biochar on the growth and development of tomato seedlings and on the response of tomato plants to the infection of systemic viral agents. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:862075 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.862075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Calcan SI, Pârvulescu OC, Ion VA, Răducanu CE, Bădulescu L, et al. 2022. Effects of biochar on soil properties and tomato growth. Agronomy 12:1824 doi: 10.3390/agronomy12081824

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Tao R, Zhang Y, Yang J, Yang T, White JC, et al. 2023. Biochar nanoparticles alleviate salt stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings. Environmental Science: Nano 10:1800−1811 doi: 10.1039/d2en00816e

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Guo L, Bornø ML, Niu W, Liu, F. 2021. Biochar amendment improves shoot biomass of tomato seedlings and sustains water relations and leaf gas exchange rates under different irrigation and nitrogen regimes. Agricultural Water Management 245:106580 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106580

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Ebrahimi M, Souri MK, Mousavi A, Sahebani N. 2021. Biochar and vermicompost improve growth and physiological traits of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) under deficit irrigation. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 8:19 doi: 10.1186/s40538-021-00216-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Ali Ahmad C, Akhter A, Haider MS, Abbas MT, Hashem A, et al. 2024. Demonstration of the synergistic effect of biochar and Trichoderma harzianum on the development of Ralstonia solanacearum in eggplant. Frontiers in Microbiology 15:1360703 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1360703

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Mawof A, Prasher S, Bayen S, Nzediegwu C. 2021. Effects of biochar and biochar-compost mix as soil amendments on soil quality and yield of potatoes irrigated with wastewater. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 21:2600−2612 doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00549-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Wang H, Chen S, Liu H, Li J, Zaman QU, et al. 2023. Maize straw biochar can alleviate heavy metals stress in potato by improving soil health. South African Journal of Botany 162:391−401 doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2023.09.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Kassaye KT, Boulange J, Kurebito S, Tokunari T, Saito H, et al. 2022. The role of biochar in improving soil properties, water retention and potato yield in a Fluvisol under temperate monsoon climate. Soil Use and Management 38:1069−1083 doi: 10.1111/sum.12769

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Zhang M, Liu Y, Wei Q, Liu L, Gu X, et al. 2023. Chemical fertilizer reduction combined with biochar application ameliorates the biological property and fertilizer utilization of pod pepper. Agronomy 13:1616 doi: 10.3390/agronomy13061616

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Lan P, Chen Q, Lu M, Steinberg CEW, Wu M, et al. 2023. Biochar reduces generation and release of benzoic acid from soybean root. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 23:5026−5035 doi: 10.1007/s42729-023-01534-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Chen Y, Qiu Y, Hao X, Tong L, Li S, et al. 2023. Does biochar addition improve soil physicochemical properties, bacterial community and alfalfa growth for saline soils? Land Degradation & Development 34:3314−3328 doi: 10.1002/ldr.4685

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Gujre N, Soni A, Rangan L, Tsang DCW, Mitra S. 2021. Sustainable improvement of soil health utilizing biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a review. Environmental Pollution 268:115549 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115549

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Feng W, Wang T, Yang F, Cen R, Liao H, et al. 2023. Effects of biochar on soil evaporation and moisture content and the associated mechanisms. Environmental Sciences Europe 35:66 doi: 10.1186/s12302-023-00776-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Huang R, Tian D, Liu J, Lv S, He X, et al. 2018. Responses of soil carbon pool and soil aggregates associated organic carbon to straw and straw-derived biochar addition in a dryland cropping mesocosm system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 265:576−586 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.07.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Ahmad Bhat S, Kuriqi A, Dar MUD, Bhat O, Sammen SS, et al. 2022. Application of biochar for improving physical, chemical, and hydrological soil properties: a systematic review. Sustainability 14:11104 doi: 10.3390/su141711104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Molnár M, Vaszita E, Farkas É, Ujaczki É, Fekete-Kertész I, et al. 2016. Acidic sandy soil improvement with biochar—a microcosm study. Science of The Total Environment 563:855−865 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.091

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Öz H. 2018. A new approach to soil solarization: addition of biochar to the effect of soil temperature and quality and yield parameters of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. Duna). Scientia Horticulturae 228:153−161 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.10.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Limwikran T, Kheoruenromne I, Suddhiprakarn A, Prakongkep N, Gilkes RJ. 2019. Most plant nutrient elements are retained by biochar in soil. Soil Systems 3:75 doi: 10.3390/soilsystems3040075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, et al. 2017. The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Science of The Total Environment 574:139−147 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Ali AB, Elshaikh NA. 2022. Review: performance of biochar under diminish water stress in plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 53:1−16 doi: 10.1080/00103624.2021.1984508

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Hossain MZ, Bahar MM, Sarkar B, Donne SW, Ok YS, et al. 2020. Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant. Biochar 2:379−420 doi: 10.1007/s42773-020-00065-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Yadav V, Singh NB, Singh H, Singh A, Hussain I. 2019. Putrescine affects tomato growth and response of antioxidant defense system due to exposure to cinnamic acid. International Journal of Vegetable Science 25:259−277 doi: 10.1080/19315260.2018.1508110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Zhang Z, Chen L, Wang J, Yao J, Li J. 2018. Biochar preparation from Solidago canadensis and its alleviation of the inhibition of tomato seed germination by allelochemicals. RSC Advances 8:22370−22375 doi: 10.1039/c8ra03284j

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Graber ER, Meller HY, Kolton M, Cytryn E, Silber A, et al. 2010. Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media. Plant and Soil 337:481−496 doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0544-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Chen Z, Wang J, Wang Y, Li B, Wang M. 2021. Rapid formation of pyrogenic char (biochar) with high and low sorption capacity towards organic chemicals. Environmental Pollution 273:116472 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116472

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Dong M, He L, Jiang M, Zhu Y, Wang J, et al. 2023. Biochar for the removal of emerging pollutants from aquatic systems: a review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20:1679 doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031679

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Ma S, Jing F, Sohi SP, Chen J. 2019. New insights into contrasting mechanisms for PAE adsorption on millimeter, micron-and nano-scale biochar. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:18636−18650 doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05181-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Yuan Y, Bolan N, Prévoteau A, Vithanage M, Biswas JK, et al. 2017. Applications of biochar in redox-mediated reactions. Bioresource Technology 246:271−281 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.154

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Abu Hasan Johir M, Sun L, et al. 2018. Sorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants on functionalized biochar: Protagonist role of π-π electron-donor-acceptor interactions and hydrogen bonds. Journal of Hazardous Materials 360:270−278 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113] Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, et al. 2014. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19−33 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Dai Y, Zhang N, Xing C, Cui Q, Sun Q. 2019. The adsorption, regeneration and engineering applications of biochar for removal organic pollutants: a review. Chemosphere 223:12−27 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.161

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Xu Y, Yu X, Xu B, Peng D, Guo X. 2021. Sorption of pharmaceuticals and personal care products on soil and soil components: influencing factors and mechanisms. Science of The Total Environment 753:141891 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141891

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Rasul M, Cho J, Shin HS, Hur J. 2022. Biochar-induced priming effects in soil via modifying the status of soil organic matter and microflora: a review. Science of The Total Environment 805:150304 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150304

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Fang G, Zhu C, Dionysiou DD, Gao J, Zhou D. 2015. Mechanism of hydroxyl radical generation from biochar suspensions: implications to diethyl phthalate degradation. Bioresource Technology 176:210−217 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] Chen Y, Du J, Li Y, Tang H, Yin Z, et al. 2022. Evolutions and managements of soil microbial community structure drove by continuous cropping. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:839494 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.839494

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Qin Y, Li G, Gao Y, Zhang L, Ok YS, et al. 2018. Persistent free radicals in carbon-based materials on transformation of refractory organic contaminants (ROCs) in water: a critical review. Water Research 137:130−143 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Lai C, Zhan J, Chai Q, Wang C, Yang X, et al. 2025. Dissolved carbon in biochar: exploring its chemistry, iron complexing capability, toxicity in natural redox environment. Journal of Environmental Sciences 147:217−229 doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2023.09.040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121] Swagathnath G, Rangabhashiyam S, Murugan S, Balasubramanian P. 2019. Influence of biochar application on growth of Oryza sativa and its associated soil microbial ecology. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 9:341−352 doi: 10.1007/s13399-018-0365-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122] Jaiswal AK, Elad Y, Paudel I, Graber ER, Cytryn E, et al. 2017. Linking the belowground microbial composition, diversity and activity to soilborne disease suppression and growth promotion of tomato amended with biochar. Scientific Reports 7:44382 doi: 10.1038/srep44382

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Ogundeji AO, Li Y, Liu X, Meng L, Sang P, et al. 2021. Eggplant by grafting enhanced with biochar recruits specific microbes for disease suppression of Verticillium wilt. Applied Soil Ecology 163:103912 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103912

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124] Bhatti AA, Haq S, Bhat RA. 2017. Actinomycetes benefaction role in soil and plant health. Microbial Pathogenesis 111:458−467 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.09.036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Fu Y, Luo Y, Auwal M, Singh BP, Van Zwieten L, et al. 2022. Biochar accelerates soil organic carbon mineralization via rhizodeposit-activated Actinobacteria. Biology and Fertility of Soils 58:565−577 doi: 10.1007/s00374-022-01643-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Hematimatin N, Igaz D, Aydın E, Horák J. 2024. Biochar application regulating soil inorganic nitrogen and organic carbon content in cropland in the Central Europe: a seven-year field study. Biochar 6:14 doi: 10.1007/s42773-024-00307-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Liu X, Li Y, Ren X, Chen B, Zhang Y, et al. 2020. Long-term greenhouse cucumber production alters soil bacterial community structure. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 20:306−321 doi: 10.1007/s42729-019-00109-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Li H, Lou J, Chen X, Dou Y, Zhang D, et al. 2024. Effects of sweet pepper straw biochar on soil microbial communities and growth of continuously cropped cucumber. Annals of Microbiology 74:12 doi: 10.1186/s13213-024-01755-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] He X, Xie H, Gao D, Khashi u Rahman M, Zhou X, et al. 2021. Biochar and intercropping with potato-onion enhanced the growth and yield advantages of tomato by regulating the soil properties, nutrient uptake, and soil microbial community. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:695447 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.695447

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Jia W, Wang C, Ma C, Wang J, Sun H, et al. 2019. Mineral elements uptake and physiological response of Amaranthus mangostanus (L.) as affected by biochar. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 175:58−65 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.039

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Foong SY, Cheong KY, Kong SH, Yiin CL, Yek PNY, et al. 2023. Recent progress in the production and application of biochar and its composite in environmental biodegradation. Bioresource Technology 387:129592 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129592

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Luo Z, Wang A, Quan W, Li C, Wang B. 2026. Application of biochar for the prevention and control of soil continuous cropping obstacles in solanaceous vegetables: a review. Biochar X 2: e013 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0026-0012
    Luo Z, Wang A, Quan W, Li C, Wang B. 2026. Application of biochar for the prevention and control of soil continuous cropping obstacles in solanaceous vegetables: a review. Biochar X 2: e013 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0026-0012

Figures(10)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(102) PDF downloads(24)

Review   Open Access    

Application of biochar for the prevention and control of soil continuous cropping obstacles in solanaceous vegetables: a review

Biochar X  2 Article number: e013  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Continuous cropping obstacles (CCOs) pose severe threats to the quality and yield of solanaceous vegetables. Biochar has emerged as an effective soil amendment to mitigate CCOs due to its nutrient-rich composition and unique structural properties. However, its performance can be affected by feedstock types, pyrolysis temperature, soil conditions, and crop species, resulting in inconsistent outcomes in the field. Thus, a review on the effect and mechanism of biochar in the prevention and control of CCOs of solanaceous vegetables is highly needed. This is the first systematic review focusing on the mechanism of biochar in alleviating CCOs in solanaceous vegetables. This review systematically delineates the causes and detrimental impacts of CCOs across major solanaceous crops (tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, and potatoes), and comprehensively evaluates biochar-based soil management strategies in comparison with conventional agronomic, physical, and chemical control measures. The underlying specific mechanisms of biochar in alleviating CCOs are explored, including improving soil properties and soil microbial community structure, as well as alleviating allelopathic autotoxicity in solanaceous plants. Based on the current research status and the nature of biochar, future research should focus on exploring the microscopic reaction mechanism and long-term effects of biochar and its composites on alleviating CCOs. In addition, further research on the allelopathic effects of biochar on the aboveground parts of crops should also be considered. This review provides a foundational reference for the use of biochar to combat CCOs in solanaceous vegetables.

    • With the rapid growth of the population, the demand for vegetables has been continuously rising. Solanaceous vegetables, due to their nutritional value and multi-functionality, have become important crops worldwide. Their planting area reaches 9 million ha with an annual output of approximately 280 million t, among which, tomatoes, peppers, potatoes, and eggplants account for a prominent proportion. Solanaceous vegetables are rich in essential nutrients for the human body, and their demand at home and abroad is constantly increasing[1,2]. However, the implementation of intensive agricultural production to meet the continuously growing demand has led to the widespread application of long-term continuous cropping systems, triggering a series of biotic and abiotic stress-related challenges. Within solanaceous cropping systems, continuous cropping significantly exacerbates infestations of root-knot nematodes, resulting in economic losses of up to 21%–25%. Taking pepper as an example, long-term monoculture has been demonstrated to reduce yield by as much as 70% and substantially compromise fruit quality[2]. Continuous cropping obstacles (CCOs) refer to the degradation of the crop-growing environment and deviations in plant growth and development caused by repeatedly cultivating the same crop in the same soil[3]. For instance, soil-borne diseases become more prevalent, weakening plant vigor and making crops more susceptible to diseases and developmental abnormalities. This suppression ultimately results in a significant decline in crop yields[4]. To date, most reviews on continuous cropping challenges have focused on medicinal plants, corn, and melons[59]. In contrast, there is a notable lack of comprehensive reviews addressing CCOs in solanaceous vegetables. Furthermore, as the demand for solanaceous vegetables continues to grow, their cultivation area is expanding, which exacerbates the occurrence of CCOs in crops including tomatoes, peppers, potatoes, and eggplants[1013]. For example, one study revealed that 5 years of continuous pepper cultivation led to a decrease in soil enzyme activity and deterioration of the microbial environment, resulting in a significant decline in pepper yields[14]. Similarly, 5 to 7 years of continuous potato cultivation leads to the accumulation of phenolic acid allelochemicals, causing biotic and abiotic environmental stress and thus contributing to CCOs[15]. Jokela et al. also highlighted that continuous cropping disrupts the soil nutrient balance, negatively affecting the growth and nutritional quality of peppers, and ultimately reducing fruit quality[16,17].

      Biochar has recently emerged as a promising amendment for mitigating CCOs, though its efficacy is highly crop-specific. Solanaceous vegetables show particularly strong responses, owing to a unique synergy: their main constraints—sensitivity to poor soil structure, pH shifts, and soil-borne diseases—are directly addressed by biochar's ability to improve rhizosphere properties, modulate nutrients, and suppress pathogens. This leads to rapid gains in yield and quality. In contrast, biochar's effects on cereals are soil-dependent; it may inhibit legume nitrogen fixation, and can immobilize nitrogen in leafy vegetables. Biochar often provides only long-term benefits in perennial systems, underscoring its distinct value for solanaceous crops. This paper presents the first bibliometric analysis of research on solanaceous vegetables and soil biochar. We systematically identify the causes of CCOs in these crops, review mitigation strategies, and elucidate the mechanisms by which biochar alleviates these obstacles, thereby providing a foundation for future research and practical application.

    • The literature visualization software VOSviewer was used to conduct data mining and analysis on the Web of Science (WOS) database. First, the main solanaceous vegetables were identified, and then the search formula was applied to retrieve relevant literature. The search date was as follows: January 6, 2026, on which the main solanaceous vegetables (tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, and potatoes) yielded a total of 5,351 relevant documents; for the solanaceous vegetables (including Solanum lycopersicum, Capsicum annuum, Solanum melongena, Solanum tuberosum, Lycium, Physalis spp, Solanum betaceum (Cyphomandra betacea), Solanum tuberosum 'Andigenum' group, Solanum juzepczukii, Solanum curtilobum, Solanum melanocerasum, Solanum nigrum, tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, and potatoes, a total of 5,606 articles were retrieved, among which the literature on tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, and potatoes accounted for 95.4% of the total. The search data was exported in the form of full records, and used as the primary datasets for bibliometric analysis. VOSviewer was used to conduct keyword co-occurrence analysis (Fig. 1), and the annual publication trends for solanaceous vegetables and the main solanaceous vegetables from 2015 to 2025 were determined. The total amounts of fruits and vegetables were compared in Fig. 2. The top 11 high-frequency keywords included tomatoes, potatoes, in vitro, physical and chemical properties, antioxidant activity, growth, resistance, bioactive compounds, oxidative stress, pseudo Arabidopsis, antioxidants, and quality. These keywords reveal that in vitro experiments on tomatoes have become a major research focus in recent years. Long-term continuous cultivation of tomatoes, potatoes, and other solanaceous vegetables has been proven to alter the physical and chemical properties of the soil, and lead to excessive accumulation of bioactive compounds, which seriously affects the normal growth, stress resistance, gene expression, and quality of the crops. To address the challenges posed by continuous cropping, this study reviews the causes of continuous cropping of the main solanaceous vegetables and discusses corresponding mitigation measures. Through in-depth research and discussion, this study aims to provide practical guidance for the healthy cultivation and sustainable production of solanaceous vegetables.

      Figure 1. 

      Visual analysis diagram of the main solanaceous vegetables. The search period was up to January 6, 2026. Based on the Web of Science (WOS) database, the main solanaceous vegetables and nightshade vegetables were searched according to the search formula TS = (Solanum lycopersicum) OR TS = (Capsicum annuum) OR TS = (Solanum melongena) OR TS = (Solanum tuberosum) OR TS = (Lycium) OR TS = (Physalis spp) OR TS = (Solanum betaceum) OR TS = (Cyphomandra betacea) OR TS = (Solanum tuberosum 'Andigenum' Group) OR TS = (Solanum juzepczukii) OR TS = (Solanum curtilobum) OR TS = (Solanum melanocerasum) OR TS = (Solanum nigrum) OR TS = (tomatoes) OR TS = (eggplants) OR TS = (peppers) OR TS = (Potatoes). The data was visualized using VOSviewer (Version 1.6.20).

      Figure 2. 

      Comparison of the frequency between solanaceous vegetables and the main solanaceous vegetables.

    • To delve further into the focal points of research and the development trends in biochar application in soil, the literature visualization software VOSviewer was used for data mining and quantitative analysis of the Web of Science (WOS) database. In the WOS core collection, the search language was limited to English, the document type was an article, and the search was performed according to the search formula TS = (biochar). The search ended on January 6, 2026, and a total of 3,163 relevant documents were retrieved. VOSviewer was used to conduct keyword co-occurrence analysis.

      Figure 3 presents the co-occurrence network diagram of keywords used in biochar research across multiple fields. The keywords are divided into three major clusters. The top 15 high-frequency keywords include biochar, activated carbon, adsorption, pyrolysis temperature, pyrolysis, aqueous solution, heavy metals, biomass, wastewater, hydrothermal carbonization, sewage sludge, slow pyrolysis, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, black carbon, and soil. These findings indicate that the main areas of biochar application include aqueous solutions, heavy metals, wastewater, sewage sludge, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and soil. Moreover, the main application areas of biochar include adsorption. In addition, biochar, such as hydrothermal carbon and pyrolytic carbon, applies to soil treatment and other fields.

      Figure 3. 

      Keyword co-occurrence analysis of biochar application.

      In cluster 1, biochar is most closely associated with soil, with keywords covering biochar, soil, carbon sequestration, greenhouse gases, microbial communities, plant growth, and related agronomic properties. Its primary applications focus on soil enhancement, carbon sequestration, and microbial community regulation, which facilitate plant growth and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Cluster 2 highlights production methods such as hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis of biomass, sewage sludge, and lignocellulosic waste, emphasizing biochar's role as an adsorbent, particularly in waste treatment. In cluster 3, frequent terms include activated carbon, adsorption, degradation, removal, aqueous solutions, wastewater treatment, magnetic biochar, and methylene blue. This underscores biochar's ability to adsorb and degrade pollutants, with modified magnetic biochar showing enhanced performance in wastewater remediation. As a strategy to address CCOs, biochar's soil improvement mechanism must consider potential polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) formation during production[18]. Thus, optimizing preparation processes and testing PAH content before use are essential.

    • Key factors influencing CCOs in solanaceous vegetables primarily arise from soil physicochemical degradation, allelopathic autotoxicity, soil-borne pathogens/pests, and microbial community shifts[1923]. Moreover, long-term continuous cultivation of solanaceous vegetables can produce a large amount of allelopathic substances, which can have a profound negative impact on crops (Fig. 4). This significantly reduces rhizosphere microbial populations, inhibits growth hormone synthesis, disrupts metabolic pathways, and may trigger soil-borne diseases. Long-term continuous potato cultivation triggers soil salinization and physicochemical degradation, coupled with the accumulation of root-secreted secondary metabolites like vanillin. These compounds inhibit the expression of IAA synthesis genes in seedling roots and disrupt the rhizosphere microbial community, reducing beneficial bacteria and increasing pathogenic fungi. Together, these processes synergistically exacerbate crop growth suppression and the incidence of soil-borne diseases[24]. Eggplant monoculture systems demonstrate this phenomenon, where concentrated allelopathic compounds promote soil-borne pathogen transmission and cause yield losses[25]. Multiomics analyses reveal that root-accumulated allelochemicals modify rhizosphere metabolic pathways, steering the microbiota assembly toward plant-suppressive configurations.

      Figure 4. 

      Mechanism of CCOs in solanaceous vegetables[9].

    • The same plant requires different nutrients at different times, and continuous cropping reduces the contents of certain nutrient elements in the soil, resulting in soil nutrient deficiencies[26]. Compared with continuous potato cropping, broad bean-potato rotation significantly improved yield by improving soil nutrient conditions and microorganisms[13]. Continuous cultivation can consume soil nutrients, reduce the soil organic matter content, and alter the soil cation exchange capacity, leading to soil degradation, and the cultivated layer gradually becomes shallower[27,28]. The absence of mechanical deep tillage and organic fertilizer supplementation leads to the progressive shallowing of the plow layer and continuous deterioration of soil physical properties. This inhibits root growth, reduces water infiltration and nutrient cycling efficiency, thereby affecting soil quality and exacerbating compaction. Furthermore, soil aggregates serve as a key physical indicator of soil structure and health[29,30]. Research has shown that continuous cropping may have a negative effect on the composition of soil aggregates, their stability, and size categories, resulting in a loss of soil structure and nutrient deficiencies[31].

    • Allelopathic autotoxicity refers to the natural phenomenon in which plants exert direct or indirect adverse effects by releasing certain chemicals into the environment in normal life activities[32]. Many studies have shown that allelopathic autotoxicity is widespread in solanaceous vegetables, especially in large-scale crops such as potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, and peppers[11,3335]. Allelopathic substances usually refer to secondary metabolites of plants that are widely found in various parts of plants, such as roots, stems, leaves, and fruits[36]. There are many types of allelopathic substances, including phenols, terpenes, alkaloids, and fatty acids[37] (Fig. 5).

      Figure 5. 

      Classification diagram of allelopathic substances[37].

      Allelopathic substances disrupt the balance of soil microorganisms and promote the proliferation of pathogenic microorganisms. This alteration severely hinders the normal growth of solanaceous vegetables, leading to reduced crop yield and quality, and in extreme cases, may even result in total crop failure[38]. Therefore, controlling soil allelopathic substances is crucial for solanaceous vegetable production. There are certain differences in the types of allelopathic substances in the root exudates of different solanaceous vegetables (Table 1). The main allelopathic substances include cinnamic acid, ferulic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, and their derivatives. These allelopathic substances have adverse effects on plant roots, soil physicochemical properties, key enzyme activities, and microbial community structure and function, thereby indirectly affecting the yield of vegetables.

      Table 1.  Effects of allelopathy on solanaceous vegetables

      Solanaceous vegetable species Allelopathic substances Impact on crops and soil Ref.
      Potato Vanillin, ferulic acid, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid Reduced root IAA content inhibits adventitious root formation, ultimately
      reducing yield.
      [13,34,39]
      Eggplant Esters, alcohols, hydrocarbons, fatty acids, ethers, ketones, and benzene Continuous cropping promotes Ralstonia solanacearum proliferation, disrupting microbial community stability and function while lowering diversity. [10,40,41]
      Pepper Olefins, phenols, alkanes, aromatics, alcohols, ketones, etc. Decreased bacterial and fungal genera abundance; reduced soil microaggregates; nonlinear β-glucosidase decline; altered microbial composition; impaired plant growth and pathogen resistance. [11,42]
      Tomato Alcohols, terpenes, phenolic acids, etc. Mainly including benzoic acid, ferulic acid, and cinnamic acid Root exudates hinder the germination process of tomato seeds and impede
      the spontaneous growth of tomato seedlings.
      [12]

      Allelopathic substances originate from plant metabolism, environmental stimuli, and genetic inheritance. When damaged by diseases and insect pests, eggplants produce solanine that inhibits its growth and negatively affects their physiology, reproduction, quality, and stress resistance[43]. To enhance solanaceous vegetable yield and quality, it is essential to investigate their allelopathic/autotoxic mechanisms and implement cultivation and breeding strategies to mitigate these adverse effects.

    • Soil microorganisms maintain soil structure and ecological balance via nutrient cycling. Continuous cropping diminishes rhizosphere microbial diversity, reduces bacterial/fungal ratios, and promotes the dominance of fungal pathogens[4446]. Specifically, a > 4-year old potato monoculture depletes beneficial bacteria (Rhodospirillales, Rhizobiales), while enriching pathogenic fungi like Fusarium oxysporum, directly driving cropping barriers and pathogen accumulation[24,4750].

      The soil bacteria/fungi ratio reflects ecosystem health, with higher ratios indicating stronger disease resistance[51,52]. Figure 6 reveals distinct dominant phyla in rhizosphere soils across solanaceous vegetables[11,41,5355], primarily including Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Chloroflexi. Continuous cropping induces dynamic microbial shifts: potato rhizospheres exhibit species release, while tomato systems progressively enrich beneficial bacteria during long-term monoculture. Pepper cultivation over 5 years reduces Acidobacteria and Fusarium abundance[11], whereas 7-year potato rotations show annual succession: Mortierella and Rhizobium (continuous cropping for 1 year), Zygosaccharomyces (continuous cropping for 4 years), and Paecilomyces and Botrytis (continuous cropping for 7 years), with the proliferation of pathogenic Fusarium and Pseudocercospora by year 7[24]. These patterns demonstrate that continuous cropping depletes beneficial taxa, amplifies pathogens, and destabilizes root microbiota, ultimately compromising plant health.

      Figure 6. 

      The main dominant bacterial phyla in common solanaceous vegetables[11,19,41,5355].

    • Continuous cropping has become essential for intensive agriculture due to limited arable land[3,31]. While multiple strategies address CCOs (Fig. 7; Table 2)[33,53,5662], microbial remediation shows particular promise. Beneficial microorganisms enhance crop growth through nitrogen fixation and phytohormone synthesis[63], with corn inoculation improving both yield and nitrogen use efficiency[64]. However, microbial interventions may alter protist communities and microbiome functions[65]. Traditional soil disinfection (physical and chemical) demonstrates dual efficacy: chemical methods regulate carbon utilization and suppress pathogens[66], while quicklime remediates acidic soils. Excessive applications, however, reduce nitrogen availability and organic matter, inhibiting plant growth[67].

      Fertilizers (inorganic and organic) remain predominant in agricultural management, with biochar-enhanced formulations shown to boost crop nutrient uptake and soil microbial diversity[68]. However, excessive long-term application induces environmental degradation and soil nutrient imbalances[69]. While crop rotation/intercropping effectively addresses CCOs, their implementation requires technical precision and extended timelines, along with cross-infection risks. Subsurface nutrient reserves can be mobilized through deep ploughing to replenish topsoil fertility, yet this method incurs relatively high labor and resource costs[70]. These limitations highlight the critical need for integrated strategies targeting solanaceous vegetable CCOs.

      Figure 7. 

      Common methods used to alleviate the CCOs of solanaceous vegetables[71,72].

      Table 2.  Methods and effects of alleviating CCOs in solanaceous vegetables

      Solanaceous vegetables Treatment methods Effects Ref.
      Potato Ridge and furrow mulching planting method Increases crop yield and promotes the proliferation of soil basidiomycete fungi. [60]
      Tomato Organic fertilizers Promotes the increase of organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total potassium contents. [56]
      Tomato Microbial restoration substrate (MRS) Increases the abundances of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, while decreasing the abundances of Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinomycetes. [72]
      Tomato New bio-organic fertilizer Improves growth conditions and inhibits the spread of soil pathogen Fusarium wilt. [61]
      Eggplant Garlic stems or biological fertilizers Enhances photosynthesis and antioxidant systems, and promotes the synthesis of plant hormones and the absorption of mineral nutrients. [58]
      Eggplant Grafting technology Effectively controls the occurrence of bacterial wilt and increases eggplant yield. [33]
      Pepper Cannabis and chili pepper crop rotation Significantly reduces the incidence of chili pepper diseases. [59]
      Pepper Interplanting deep-rooted and shallow-rooted plants Enhances nutrient absorption and nitrogen utilization in the deep soil layer, and reduces nitrate loss. [57]
    • Biochar, a carbon-rich material produced by thermochemical conversion (pyrolysis/gasification) of biomass under oxygen-limited conditions, contains abundant nutrients (K, Ca, P) and trace elements (Li, Be, V, Cr)[73]. This porous material demonstrates multifunctional environmental benefits: reducing greenhouse gas emissions, immobilizing soil contaminants (heavy metals and organic pollutants), enhancing cation exchange capacity, and alleviating CCOs[42]. During pyrolysis, biomass components (cellulose, proteins, lipids) generate surface functional groups (carboxyl, carbonyl, ketone), which enhance contaminant adsorption[74]. Furthermore, biochar-soil interactions improve nutrient availability and modify the soil microbial habitat, which plays a crucial role in suppressing soil-borne pathogens and alleviating CCOs.

      Biochar has emerged as a globally recognized soil amendment for addressing continuous cropping challenges. Recent studies demonstrate its multifunctional benefits: adding 5% biochar can not only significantly increase the effective water content of sandy arid agricultural soil, but also serve as a safe soil amendment agent for adjusting the pH values of saline-alkali soil and acidic soil[75,76]. Israeli agricultural trials revealed that greenhouse waste-derived biochar enhances tomato plant growth by 63% and reduces the incidence of Fusarium crown rot[77]. Chinese investigations demonstrated biochar's effectiveness in suppressing soil-borne diseases in continuous cropping systems[78]. These beneficial effects are partly attributed to biochar-mediated improvements in soil microbial communities.

      The rising demand for solanaceous vegetables has accelerated intercropping adoption. Studies demonstrate biochar's efficacy in suppressing soil-borne diseases, with soybean stalk and cassava biochar reducing the severity of tomato bacterial wilt by 30% in sandy soils[79]. Biochar amendments elevate critical soil parameters, including pH (by 0.58 units), electrical conductivity (by 101 μS/cm), and organic matter decomposition rate (by 9.48%), while also enhancing pepper fruit yield and plant height[80]. Root-knot nematode (RKN) infestations, responsible for up to 30% of vegetable yield losses, can be mitigated by a 3% rice husk biochar combined with biocontrol agents, which also stimulate tomato plant biomass and defense-related gene expression[81]. Additionally, biochar alleviates allelopathic stress by reducing benzoic acid accumulation in soybean root systems[82]. Table 3 summarizes biochar-mediated impacts on carbon cycling organisms in solanaceous cropping systems.

      Table 3.  Different biochars used to mitigate obstacles to the continuous cropping of solanaceous vegetables

      Solanaceous vegetablesPreparation of biochar raw materialsEffectsRef.
      TomatoOlive branchBiochar concentration of 10%–15% significantly promotes the development of tomato seedlings, while enhancing its defense against systemic pathogens, including potato spindle tuber viroid and tomato spotted wilt virus.
      [83]
      TomatoVine pruning residue (grapes)Through the improved soil treatment, plant height, leaf count, and collar diameter were over 50% greater than those in other methods, accompanied by increased soil conductivity, pH, and soluble nutrients. Furthermore, the application of biochar reduced soil bulk density by approximately 50%, enhancing root growth and subsequent water and nutrient absorption.
      [84]
      TomatoTwo biochar nanoparticles were prepared from rice and corn stoverThrough the application of biochar, the biomass of aboveground parts and roots was enhanced, while their fresh weights increased. Additionally, it suppressed the upward transfer of sodium, thereby enhancing crops' salt tolerance.
      [85]
      TomatoRice husk biocharThrough biochar amendment, the microbial biomass C : N : P of soil increased, resulting in enhanced tomato height, stem circumference, and leaf area.
      [86]
      EggplantDate palm, pistachio biocharThrough the application of biochar, vegetative growth, yield, and water use efficiency of eggplant were enhanced.
      [87]
      EggplantLeaf waste biocharThrough the addition of leaf waste biochar (LWB) with the biocontrol agent trichoderma harzianum (BCA), plants showed higher levels of phenolics, flavonoids, and peroxidase, NPK content in eggplants significantly rose.
      [88]
      PotatoBarley strawThrough biochar application, cation exchange in soil, organic matter, soil pH, and crop yield were enhanced.
      [89]
      PotatoCorn straw biocharThrough the use of 7% biochar, plant growth was optimized, significantly reducing the metal accumulation in potato plants. Biochar enhanced the leaf growth, stem growth, and tuber growth, while mitigating the accumulation of As, Cd, Cu, and Pb.
      [90]
      PotatoPig and cow fecesBiochar combined with recommended nutrients from mineral fertilizers (RNPK) significantly increased potato yield and water use efficiency.
      [91]
      PepperBiocharThrough the combined treatment of chemical fertilizer and biochar, the pepper yield significantly increased.[92]

      Despite significant progress in biochar application for alleviating intercropping disorders, critical limitations persist. Key challenges include: (1) material specificity—high-ash livestock manure-derived biochar (> 40% ash) risks soil salinization; (2) application thresholds—excessive dosage (> 50 t/ha) induces abnormal soil porosity; (3) temporal effects—prolonged application (> 3 years) may trigger secondary disorders like phosphorus fixation. Current understanding remains incomplete regarding the biochar-soil-microbe interaction network and the molecular mechanisms suppressing soil-borne pathogens[81]. Notably, pyrolysis temperature variations (300–700 °C) induce distinct rhizosphere microbiome modifications, yet their specific regulatory pathways remain undefined.

    • Biochar has been used to treat CCOs in solanaceous vegetables because of its unique advantages (such as its porosity, high adsorption capacity, and abundance of minerals and organic matter) (Fig. 8). Biochar alleviates CCOs in solanaceous vegetables through multiple interconnected mechanisms, primarily via improving soil physicochemical properties, adsorbing and degrading allelopathic substances, and modulating the soil microbial community (Fig. 8). Its porous structure, high adsorption capacity, and richness in minerals and organic matter provide the foundation for these functions[9]. Research has shown that adding biochar to soil can reduce the production and release of benzoic acid from soybean roots and has a positive effect on alleviating allelopathic effects[93]. The excellent characteristics of biochar lay the foundation for mitigating CCOs in solanaceous vegetables. Therefore, the application of biochar is a new pathway for alleviating CCOs in solanaceous vegetables (Table 3). The specific mechanisms are shown in Fig. 8.

      Figure 8. 

      Mechanistic diagram of the recovery of solanaceous vegetables from CCOs by biochar treatment[9].

    • Previous studies have shown that biochar positively affects soil organic carbon, electrical conductivity, and water content[94,95] (Fig. 8). It can effectively adjust the structural distribution of soil aggregates and optimize soil structure. Due to its high porosity, biochar slows water evaporation from farmland soil. This extends the time for soil moisture to decline to field capacity and enhances the upward flow of deep soil water at night[96]. Research indicates that biochar can significantly improve soil carbon pools and promote the formation of favorable soil aggregates in dryland cropping systems[97]. It is particularly effective for sandy soil improvement. Compared to unamended soil, biochar application increases the available water capacity of sandy soil by an average of 28.5%. Hydraulic conductivity and saturated water content are also significantly enhanced[98]. Studies further show that biochar-soil interaction benefits acidic sandy soils and soil biota[99], and can significantly increase soil nutrient levels. In water-scarce regions, biochar addition can effectively raise soil temperature and improve its insulation properties, thereby enhancing crop stress resistance[100]. Biochar also enriches soil organic matter, retains nutrients, and provides a material basis for organism growth and reproduction[101]. Its hydrophilic nature helps retain soil moisture, significantly reducing evaporation and water loss[102].

      Biochar has good adsorption properties due to its high charge density on its surface and easily forms a magnetic field, which can effectively absorb soil nutrients and reduce nutrient loss[103]. In general, biochar has a high adsorption potential for organic matter[104]. Another study further demonstrated that biochar can effectively address key challenges in solar greenhouse agriculture by ameliorating degraded soil. It significantly improves soil structure by reducing bulk density and increasing water-holding capacity, which in turn enhances crop photosynthesis. Additionally, biochar application promotes tomato growth and development by creating a more favorable rhizosphere environment, leading to improved fruit appearance and mitigation of CCOs. Therefore, biochar can improve the physicochemical properties of soil and alleviate CCOs in solanaceous vegetables.

    • Allelopathic substances are secreted by the rhizosphere of plants. After decomposition, plant residues penetrate the soil growth system through rain and dew, causing adverse effects on crops. Continuous cropping leads to a large accumulation of allelopathic substances in the soil of solanaceous vegetables[14]. Cinnamic acid and benzoic acid are the main allelopathic autotoxic substances in tomatoes. Long-term continuous cropping causes harm to plant cell lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. It can affect the activity of plant photosynthesis-inhibitory enzymes and reduce the length and biomass of roots and stems[105]. After ten years of field experiments, vanillin is the main allelopathic substance causing potato CCOs, and its inhibitory effect is more obvious than that of ferulic acid and p-hydroxybenzoic acid. Vanillin reduces the concentration of indole-3-acetic acid in potato roots and inhibits the formation of adventitious roots, ultimately leading to a decrease in crop yield[34]. Biochar effectively adsorbs and exchanges ions, lowering allelopathic substance levels in continuously cropped soil, increasing the abundance of beneficial bacterial groups (Actinobacteria) and changing the fungal community. Reductions were observed in Ascomycota and Aspergillus, accompanied by changes in mould abundance[17]. In the presence of the allelochemical dimethyl phthalate, the addition of biochar has a positive effect on the germination of tomato plants[106]. Biochar adsorbs soil-free allelochemicals (such as hydroxy acids, benzoic acids, n-alkanoic acids, acetoxy acids, diols, triols, and phenols) released from the rhizosphere of peppers and tomatoes in cultivation media, thereby promoting the growth of beneficial microorganisms and increasing plant disease resistance, which ultimately improves crop yield[107]. The efficacy and mechanisms of such adsorption can be quantitatively elucidated through specific adsorption models and kinetics. A representative case study on alleviating celery (Apium graveolens) CCOs demonstrated that phosphoric acid (H3PO4)-modified wood biochar (WP400) exhibited superior adsorption of phenolic allelopathic substances such as gallic and ferulic acids. The adsorption isotherm followed the Langmuir model (R2 > 0.97), indicating monolayer chemical adsorption with a maximum capacity (Qmax) of 106–120 mg/g at pH 3–4. Kinetics adhered to the pseudo-second-order model (R2 ≈ 1.0), confirming chemisorption-controlled rates. The high performance was attributed to an exceptionally high specific surface area (1,273 m2/g) and oxygen-containing functional groups introduced by modification, which facilitated adsorption via hydrogen bonding and π-π interactions. Notably, adsorption was highly pH-dependent, with optimal capacity under acidic conditions due to reduced electrostatic repulsion and enhanced π-π donor-acceptor interactions. Pot experiments validated that 0.3% (w/w) WP400 reduced water-soluble phenolic compounds by > 40% in soil and significantly promoted celery growth, directly linking high adsorption capacity to alleviated allelopathy in practice[82].

      The various traits of allelopathic substances (such as hydrophobicity, polarity, and molecular size) influence biochar adsorption. Biochar has a greater tendency to adsorb hydrophilic allelopathic substances, whereas hydrophobic substances are attracted via weak hydrophobic effects or van der Waals forces, resulting in different sizes of allelochemical molecules remaining at different positions after being adsorbed[108110]. In addition, the phenolic hydroxyl groups of biochar and allelopathic substances are prone to redox reactions, which promote the decomposition of allelopathic substances and are beneficial to crop growth, as shown in Fig. 9[111]. The application of biochar to adsorb and degrade allelopathic substances has become an effective method for alleviating CCOs in solanaceous vegetables. As shown in Fig. 9, the mechanism by which biochar decreases allelopathic substances can be roughly divided into two processes: (1) Adsorption process: oxygen-containing functional groups (OFGs) on biochar can form an electron donor‒acceptor complex (EDA) through a binary or ternary adsorption system to adsorb organic substances[112]. Allelochemical and biochar structures feature carboxyl, hydroxyl, aromatic, and quinone groups, some of which can form binary complexes. Hydrogen bonding, including charge-assisted hydrogen bonding, as well as hydrophobic effects and partitioning, potentially aid in allelochemical adsorption on biochar[113,114]. Research has indicated that cation bridges between negative allelochemicals and biochar can increase adsorption[115]. (2) Degradation process: the biochar-mediated degradation pathways of organic pollutants can be divided into free radical pathways and nonradical pathways[111,116]. The primary contributors to the free radical pathway are environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs), hydroxyl radicals (•OH), and superoxide radicals (•O2)[117]. EPFRs on biochar can degrade organic pollutants after direct contact or induce water or oxygen to produce •OH or •O2 to degrade organic pollutants[118,119]. Many allelopathic substances contain abundant phenolic hydroxyl groups, which readily undergo redox reactions with biochar[120]. This process facilitates the transformation and biological conversion of chemical substances[111].

      Figure 9. 

      Adsorption and degradation mechanisms of allelopathy by biochar[111].

    • Enhancing the soil microenvironment is key to overcoming CCOs and improving the yield and quality of solanaceous vegetables. Biochar can improve soil microbial ecology and increase soil microbial abundance and diversity[65, 121] (Fig. 10). Jaiswal et al. reported that biochar promoted the growth of Pseudomonas fluorescens, Actinobacteria, and Trichoderma[122]. For instance, Jaiswal et al. reported that greenhouse waste-derived biochar conferred systemic resistance against Fusarium crown rot in tomato by modulating the rhizosphere microbiome[77]. Similarly, Ge et al. employed ITS rRNA sequencing to demonstrate that biochar application significantly reduced the abundance of pathogenic fungi (e.g., Trichoderma and Monosporangium spp.) in continuous tobacco cropping systems[78]. These effects are facilitated by biochar's creation of microhabitats that selectively stimulate beneficial microbiota and suppress phytopathogens. Moreover, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas koreensis, Pseudomonas moraviensis and Pseudomonas monteilii have been shown to exhibit up to 72% antagonistic activity against root rot pathogens while inhibiting mycelial growth, thus suppressing the occurrence of soil-borne diseases in tomato. After the application of biochar, the dominant fungi in the eggplant rhizosphere (Humicola and Chaetomium, Mortierella, and Tausonia) increased in number and suppressed the occurrence of diseases. Biochar application enriches the rhizosphere with the bacterial genus Bacillus and promotes dominant fungal taxa, including Humicola, Chaetomium, Mortierella, and the yeast Tausonia, which collectively contribute to disease suppression[123]. Biochar increases the number of actinomycetes in the rhizosphere (such as those belonging to Micrococcaceae, Nocardioides, Janibacter, Corynebacteriaceae, and Terrabacter) and Alphaproteobacteria (such as Caulobacter and Qipengyuania), thereby increasing the release of refractory organic carbon and improving soil fertility[124126]. Biochar can increase the number of beneficial functional microorganisms and metabolic pathways related to energy utilization efficiency.

      Biochar alters plant rhizosphere microbe populations, generating beneficial bacteria while inhibiting pathogens. This enhances plant growth, increases disease resistance, and increases crop yields in consecutive planting cycles[127]. The application of biochar to the rhizosphere soil of continuously cropped cucumbers can increase the abundance of beneficial bacterial groups in the soil, such as Firmicutes (gram-positive bacteria), Actinobacteria (actinomycetes), and Bacillus (bacillus), and by altering the pathogenic fungal community (with reduced abundance of Aspergillus and Penicillium), the crop yield can be significantly improved[128]. Graber et al. reported that the addition of biochar promoted the development of microbial populations (for example, Pseudomonas, Mesorhizobium, Microbacterium, Brevibacillus, Bacillus, and Streptomyces) that are beneficial for the growth of tomato and pepper crops[107]. In addition, biochar can increase the number of potentially beneficial organisms (Pseudeurotium and Solirubrobacter) and reduce the number of potential pathogenic organisms (Kribbella and Ilyonectria) while increasing the transformation capacity of microorganisms and improving the ability to convert root nutrients (N, P, K, etc.) to increase crop yields[129,130]. Beyond altering the microbial community composition, biochar fundamentally reshapes the functional potential of the soil microbiome by modulating the abundance of key functional genes and metabolic pathways. Specifically, biochar amendment significantly enriches functional genes critical to soil nutrient cycling. For phosphorus cycling, biochar (especially produced at 350 °C) markedly increases the abundance of the phoD gene, which encodes alkaline phosphatase, thereby enhancing the transformation and availability of soil phosphorus[48]. For nitrogen cycling, biochar application elevates the abundance of genes involved in nitrification (AOA-amoA, AOB-amoA), denitrification (narG, nirS, nirK), and N2O reduction (nosZ), collectively accelerating nitrogen mineralization and nitrification processes, while potentially mitigating N2O emissions[92]. Metabolomic analyses further reveal that biochar addition reprograms soil metabolic pathways. Long-term field studies indicate that biochar triggers the upregulation of differential metabolites and enriches metabolic pathways such as oxidative phosphorylation and benzoxazinoid biosynthesis, which are closely linked to energy metabolism and plant defense[20]. Concurrently, biochar fosters the proliferation of key functional microbial taxa, such as Nitrospira, involved in nitrification, enhancing the soil nitrification capacity[20]. These synergistic shifts—in functional gene abundance, microbial taxa, and metabolic pathway activity—equip the soil microbiome with enhanced capabilities for nutrient transformation, disease suppression, and stress alleviation. This provides a mechanistic bridge between biochar-induced microbial community changes and the observed alleviation of CCOs. Biochar can significantly improve the diversity and structure of the soil microbial communities of solanaceous vegetables, adjust the proportion of beneficial and harmful bacteria, and thereby promote the growth and yield of vegetables.

      Figure 10. 

      Effects of biochar on soil microbial communities[131].

    • In this review, the latest research progress of biochar in alleviating CCOs in solanaceous vegetables is discussed in terms of the changes in the way of alleviating CCOs, the improvement of soil quality, the transformation of microbial community structure, and the adsorption of allelopathic toxic substances. Additionally, the adsorption mechanism of biochar as an allelopathic substance adsorbent is explored. This includes two application processes: adsorption and degradation, and emphasizes the specific mechanism of biochar in degrading allelopathic substances. Biochar provides excellent prospects for future development in alleviating CCOs in crops. However, its application is constrained by some inherent limitations, such as low nutrient supply efficiency, limited adsorption capacity, and potential risks, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pollution, soil alkalization, and micro-ecological imbalance. To address these shortcomings and guide future research, the following key directions are proposed.

    • Future work must elucidate the physicochemical and biological interactions at biochar-mineral-microbe-organic matter interfaces. Key foci include the co-assembly of biochar pores with organic amendments for controlled nutrient release, the colonization and signaling of functional microbes on biochar surfaces, and the use of isotope tracing and multi-omics to map element fluxes and metabolic networks. This will inform the design of integrated 'carrier-nutrient-consortium' soil amendments.

    • Research should expand from soil-based allelopathy to aerial interactions mediated by plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Employing volatilomics, isotopic labeling, and canopy diffusion models can quantify how biochar alters VOC profiles in solanaceous crops and their ecological effects. Mechanistic studies should reveal the phytohormonal pathways involved, advancing the theory of coordinated above-belowground interference for novel ecological management strategies.

    • A robust framework is needed to assess the sustainability of long-term use of biochar. This requires modeling pollutant fate (e.g., free radicals, PAHs) across soil-plant-water interfaces, diagnosing microbial network stability to identify vulnerability thresholds, and evaluating trade-offs in soil carbon sequestration, nitrogen cycling, and greenhouse gas emissions. Such an approach would define safe application thresholds and support science-based management.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: all authors contributed to the conception and design of this study. Zengquan Luo and Wenxuan Quan: material preparation, analysis, and original draft writing. Anping Wang: revising, writing − review. Chaochan Li and Bing Wang: conceptualization, writing − original draft, supervision, manuscript revision and review. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • This work was supported by the Project of Guizhou Provincial Department of Science and Technology [Grant Nos. QKHPTRC-GCC(2023)067, QKHCG(2023)YB541, QKHZC(2023)YB078, and QKH-ZK(2024)YB645], the Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Provincial Branch of the CNTC [Grant No. 2023XM16], the Project of Guizhou Education Bureau [Grant No. QJJ(2024)324], and the Project of Guizhou Forestry Bureau [Grant No. GUI(2022)TSLY07].

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (10)  Table (3) References (131)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Luo Z, Wang A, Quan W, Li C, Wang B. 2026. Application of biochar for the prevention and control of soil continuous cropping obstacles in solanaceous vegetables: a review. Biochar X 2: e013 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0026-0012
    Luo Z, Wang A, Quan W, Li C, Wang B. 2026. Application of biochar for the prevention and control of soil continuous cropping obstacles in solanaceous vegetables: a review. Biochar X 2: e013 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0026-0012

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return