Search
2026 Volume 6
Article Contents
SHORT COMMUNICATION   Open Access    

Soil heterogeneity and species composition interactively affect the seed germination of three typical forage species

More Information
  • Received: 15 December 2025
    Revised: 20 March 2026
    Accepted: 27 March 2026
    Published online: 15 June 2026
    Grass Research  6 Article number: e018 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Soil heterogeneity has been shown to affect seed germination of plant species in monocultures, and plant species' interactions in a community may also impact seed germination. However, whether and how both factors interact to modulate seed germination is still unclear. To investigate these interactive effects, a controlled experiment was conducted in which seven species compositions derived from all the possible combinations of three forage grasses (Festuca elata, Bromus inermis, and Elymus breviaristatus) were factorially crossed with four levels of soil heterogeneity. This heterogeneity gradient was developed by applying resource-rich and resource-poor substrates in an alternating pattern in pots, creating fine, small, medium, and large patch sizes. The results showed that patch size and species composition interactively affected seed germination percentage. Specifically, the small patch size supported a higher seed germination percentage in the mixture with three species compared with other patch sizes (i.e., fine, medium, and large patch sizes). Moreover, this pattern was only found in the resource-rich substrate, not in the resource-poor substrate. A combination of abiotic (e.g., soil moisture and temperature) and biotic effects (e.g., allelopathic suppression) may have caused these varying patterns. Designs such as ours that vary soil heterogeneity in three dimensions should be combined with additional measurements of the underlying mechanisms to further elucidate the factors governing seed germination.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Feng H, Pan H, Li C, Zhuge Y. 2022. Microscale heterogeneity of soil bacterial communities under long-term fertilizations in fluvo-aquic soils. Soil Ecology Letters 4:337−347 doi: 10.1007/s42832-021-0121-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Wei GW, van Kleunen M. 2025. Responses of naturalized alien plants to soil heterogeneity and competition vary with the global naturalization success of the native competitors. Journal of Ecology 113:1532−1545 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.70041

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Lundholm JT. 2010. Relative importance of available energy, environmental heterogeneity, and seed availability for seedling emergence on a limestone pavement. Botany 88:1045−1056 doi: 10.1139/B10-077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Liu Y, Hou F. 2021. Effects of three-dimensional soil heterogeneity on seed germination in controlled experiments. Journal of Plant Ecology 14:1−9 doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtaa070

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Li H, Ning Y, Liu M, Liu S, Liu Y. 2025. Plant interaction modifies effects of soil heterogeneity on seed germination, plant growth, and biomass of plant communities. AoB Plants 17:plaf013 doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaf013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Jiménez-Alfaro B, Silveira FAO, Fidelis A, Poschlod P, Commander LE. 2016. Seed germination traits can contribute better to plant community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 27:637−645 doi: 10.1111/jvs.12375

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Beck JJ, Givnish TJ. 2021. Fine-scale environmental heterogeneity and spatial niche partitioning among spring-flowering forest herbs. American Journal of Botany 108:63−73 doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1593

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Questad EJ, Foster BL. 2008. Coexistence through spatio-temporal heterogeneity and species sorting in grassland plant communities. Ecology Letters 11:717−726 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01186.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Simolo C, Corti S. 2022. Quantifying the role of variability in future intensification of heat extremes. Nature Communications 13:7930 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35571-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] in 't Zandt D, Hoekstra NJ, de Caluwe H, Cruijsen PMJM, Visser EJW, et al. 2022. Plant life-history traits rather than soil legacies determine colonisation of soil patches in a multi-species grassland. Journal of Ecology 110:889−901 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13850

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Wu YN, Na XY, Huang L, Weng KX, Xue W, et al. 2025. Drought modifies the impacts of soil nutrient heterogeneity on native and alien plant growth in the absence of competition. AoB Plants 17:plaf042 doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaf042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Williams BM, Houseman GR. 2014. Experimental evidence that soil heterogeneity enhances plant diversity during community assembly. Journal of Plant Ecology 7:461−469 doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtt056

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Liu Y, De Boeck HJ, Wellens MJ, Nijs I. 2017. A simple method to vary soil heterogeneity in three dimensions in experimental mesocosms. Ecological Research 32:287−295 doi: 10.1007/s11284-017-1435-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Liu Y, De Boeck HJ, Li Z, Nijs I. 2019. Unimodal relationship between three-dimensional soil heterogeneity and plant species diversity in experimental mesocosms. Plant and Soil 436:397−411 doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-03938-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Zhang S, Liu J, Bao X, Niu K. 2011. Seed-to-seed potential allelopathic effects between Ligularia virgaurea and native grass species of Tibetan Alpine grasslands. Ecological Research 26:47−52 doi: 10.1007/s11284-010-0751-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Dai WL, Wang TH, Wang CH. 2020. Effects of interspecific interactions on seed germination between dominant species in the Yangtze River Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 232:106483 doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106483

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Wang ZY, Yan KL, Qin YM, Zhang NC, Chen XC, et al. 2025. Effects of allelochemicals from plants on seed germination. Seed Biology 4:e023 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0025-0022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Wang ML, Zhao RS, Wang XK, Tian JY, Hu QK, et al. 2026. The potential relationships between soil microbial communities and seed germination in the floodplain wetlands. Plant and Soil 519:1901−1917 doi: 10.1007/s11104-025-08253-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Larson JE, Anacker BL, Wanous S, Funk JL. 2020. Ecological strategies begin at germination: traits, plasticity and survival in the first 4 days of plant life. Functional Ecology 34:968−979 doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13543

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Saatkamp A, Cochrane A, Commander L, Guja LK, Jimenez-Alfaro B, et al. 2019. A research agenda for seed-trait functional ecology. New Phytologist 221:1764−1775 doi: 10.1111/nph.15502

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Zhang C, Willis CG, Burghardt LT, Qi W, Liu K, et al. 2014. The community-level effect of light on germination timing in relation to seed mass: a source of regeneration niche differentiation. New Phytologist 204:496−506 doi: 10.1111/nph.12955

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Donohue K, Rubio de Casas R, Burghardt L, Kovach K, Willis CG. 2010. Germination, postgermination adaptation, and species ecological ranges. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41:293−319 doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144715

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Chen DL, Luo XP, Yuan Z, Bai MJ, Hu XW. 2020. Seed dormancy release of Halenia elliptica in response to stratification temperature, duration and soil moisture content. BMC Plant Biology 20:352 doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02560-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Pillay T, Ward D. 2013. Competitive effect and response of savanna tree seedlings: comparison of survival, growth and associated functional traits. Journal of Vegetation Science 25:226−234 doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2013.02.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Liu Y, Wang M, Li G, Ma C, Xu M, et al. 2022. Soil heterogeneity and species composition jointly affect individual variation of three forage grasses. Acta Oecologica 117:103874 doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2022.103874

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Wang YC, Zhang XN, Yang JF, Tian JY, Song DH, et al. 2024. Spatial heterogeneity of soil factors enhances intraspecific variation in plant functional traits in a desert ecosystem. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1504238 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1504238

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Ghani MU, Kamran M, Pandey SP, Ning J, Lou S, et al. 2025. Optimizing cutting and mix-cropping improves forage yield and quality of cultivated grassland in a semi-arid environment. European Journal of Agronomy 171:127816 doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2025.127816

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Liu Y, Bortier MF, De Boeck HJ, Nijs I. 2017. Root distribution responses to three-dimensional soil heterogeneity in experimental mesocosms. Plant and Soil 421:353−366 doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3472-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Maestre FT, Reynolds JF. 2006. Nutrient availability and atmospheric CO2 partial pressure modulate the effects of nutrient heterogeneity on the size structure of populations in grassland species. Annals of Botany 98:227−235 doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Mackin HC, Shek KL, Thornton TE, Evens KC, Hallett LM, et al. 2021. The 'black box' of plant demography: how do seed type, climate and seed fungal communities affect grass seed germination? New Phytologist 231:2319−2332 doi: 10.1111/nph.17532

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Mira S, Arnal A, Pérez-García F. 2017. Habitat-correlated seed germination and morphology in populations of Phillyrea angustifolia L. (Oleaceae). Seed Science Research 27:50−60 doi: 10.1017/S0960258517000034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Zhu J, Buchmann CM, Schurr FM. 2022. Effects of seed morphology and orientation on secondary seed dispersal by wind. Journal of Plant Ecology 15:1257−1272 doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtac023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Li H, Pang S, Ning Y, Yang Q, Zhu Q, et al. 2026. Soil heterogeneity and species composition interactively affect the seed germination of three typical forage species. Grass Research 6: e018 doi: 10.48130/grares-0026-0009
    Li H, Pang S, Ning Y, Yang Q, Zhu Q, et al. 2026. Soil heterogeneity and species composition interactively affect the seed germination of three typical forage species. Grass Research 6: e018 doi: 10.48130/grares-0026-0009

Figures(3)  /  Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(332) PDF downloads(157)

SHORT COMMUNICATION   Open Access    

Soil heterogeneity and species composition interactively affect the seed germination of three typical forage species

Grass Research  6 Article number: e018  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Soil heterogeneity has been shown to affect seed germination of plant species in monocultures, and plant species' interactions in a community may also impact seed germination. However, whether and how both factors interact to modulate seed germination is still unclear. To investigate these interactive effects, a controlled experiment was conducted in which seven species compositions derived from all the possible combinations of three forage grasses (Festuca elata, Bromus inermis, and Elymus breviaristatus) were factorially crossed with four levels of soil heterogeneity. This heterogeneity gradient was developed by applying resource-rich and resource-poor substrates in an alternating pattern in pots, creating fine, small, medium, and large patch sizes. The results showed that patch size and species composition interactively affected seed germination percentage. Specifically, the small patch size supported a higher seed germination percentage in the mixture with three species compared with other patch sizes (i.e., fine, medium, and large patch sizes). Moreover, this pattern was only found in the resource-rich substrate, not in the resource-poor substrate. A combination of abiotic (e.g., soil moisture and temperature) and biotic effects (e.g., allelopathic suppression) may have caused these varying patterns. Designs such as ours that vary soil heterogeneity in three dimensions should be combined with additional measurements of the underlying mechanisms to further elucidate the factors governing seed germination.

    • Soil heterogeneity refers to the nonuniform distribution of soil resources (e.g., water and nutrients), which significantly affects plant dynamics such as seed germination[14]. Germination rates have been shown to change when the soil heterogeneity is different[4,5], which, in turn, affects species' coexistence in plant communities[6]. Previous studies found that higher environmental heterogeneity could improve plants' coexistence through increasing spatial niche partitioning[7] and/or species sorting among heterogeneous niches[8]. Soil heterogeneity may increase in the future through the effects of both climate change and of human disturbance[9]. Thus, it is important to improve our understanding of the relationship between plants' coexistence and their responses to soil heterogeneity. However, exploring the effects of soil heterogeneity on seed germination under natural conditions is complex, because co-occurring factors such as soil legacies[10] and climate change[11] make it difficult to separate the effects of soil heterogeneity from those of other factors. Thus, experimental research is necessary to establish the cause-and-effect relationships. However, soil heterogeneity in many studies is only considered in two dimensions (i.e., either horizontally or vertically)[2,12], although natural soils vary both horizontally and vertically (i.e., in three dimensions)[5,13]. As two-dimensional approaches may obscure patterns that would appear in the field, here, we simulate soil heterogeneity in three dimensions.

      Differences between soil patches can give rise to changes in plant growth. In an earlier experiment, perennial grasses tended to grow better on resource-rich patches compared with annual species because of stronger competitiveness of the former, whereas the opposite pattern was observed on resource-poor patches[4,14]. Specifically for seed germination, some plant species release allelochemicals to hinder the germination of the seeds of other coexisting species[1517], or can enhance their own seed germination by associating with some types of microbes such as mycorrhizal fungi in mutualisms[18]. Moreover, the microclimate (especially temperature and moisture) also significantly affects germination[4]. These factors may change with soil heterogeneity, for example, because the microbial communities[18] or soil moisture[4] differ between soil patches.

      Seed germination is the first step in plants' establishment[19,20], and differences in germination-stage responses influence the seasonal and competitive environments experienced by plants[21,22]. Environmental and biological factors collectively contribute to divergent responses of seeds during germination (i.e., different species exhibit distinct requirements for temperature and soil moisture during germination)[23], and plant competition may favor early germination to gain a competitive advantage[24]. Soil heterogeneity and species composition can significantly affect plant biomass[5], but studies focusing solely on biomass production cannot directly elucidate the effects of soil heterogeneity and species composition on the early plant establishment process. As the coexistence of species in a plant community depends on both germination and plant growth dynamics, it is important to establish the exact effects of soil heterogeneity and species composition on seed germination in plant communities.

      To explore the effect of species composition and soil heterogeneity on seed germination of plant species, a controlled experiment was performed in which seven species compositions, derived from all the possible combinations of three forage grasses (i.e., Festuca elata, Bromus inermis, and Elymus breviaristatus) were crossed with four levels of soil heterogeneity. These soil heterogeneity levels were created by filling pots with two substrates (the resource-rich and resource-poor substrate) in an alternating pattern to simulate fine, small, medium, or large patch sizes (Fig. 1a, b). Specifically, we tested two hypotheses. (1) At the pot scale (whole system), seed germination is assumed to increase with increasing patch size, as plants tend to reduce germination to mitigate negative influences induced by strong variation in the soil conditions (including the microenvironment)[5], which we expect is likely to be more variable in pots with relatively smaller patch sizes[4]; we also expect this pattern to be modified by species composition (Fig. 1c)[5,25,26]. (2) At the substrate scale (within-pot patches), the positive association between patch size and germination rate (Hypothesis 1) is mainly observed on the resource-rich substrate because of the relatively better conditions for seed germination (e.g., higher soil moisture and temperature buffering) (Fig. 1d)[14].

      Figure 1. 

      Four soil heterogeneity levels were applied in this experiment, where each level was created by alternatively filling pots with resource-rich (black) and resource-poor (white) substrates, giving rise to fine, small, medium, and large patch sizes: (a) Top view; (b) lateral view. (c) Hypothesis 1 (at the pot scale): Seed germination is expected to increase with increasing patch size, and this pattern is supposed to be modified by species composition. (d) Hypothesis 2 (at the substrate scale): seed germination is hypothesized to increase in the resource-rich substrate with increasing patch size, whereas the opposite pattern is predicted to be found on the resource-poor substrate. Note that the one-species (monoculture), two-species mixtures, and three-species mixture in (c) could be any of the target species.

    • A controlled experiment was performed in a greenhouse at the Linze Pratacultural Research Station of Lanzhou University, China (39°14′30″ N, 100°3′25″ E) from May 15 to September 14, 2021. The station is characterized by a temperate continental arid monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation of 7.79 °C and 110.7 mm, respectively[27].

      Soil heterogeneity in this study was experimentally created via the method developed by Liu et al.[13] in three steps. (1) A pot was vertically separated into two layers, and the space in each layer was divided into patches with equal size by placing plastic plates with slits in each layer. (2) These patches were filled with two substrates (i.e., the resource-rich and resource-poor substrate; Table 1) in an alternating pattern. (3) The plastic plates were subsequently removed, allowing plant roots to grow freely into all patches. It is worth mentioning that similar compression was applied when filling the substrates in each pot to ensure that the amount of soil resources was identical in all pots. In this experiment, soil heterogeneity was modified by varying the patch size (Fig. 1). The resource-poor and resource-rich substrates used in this experiment were created by mixing soil and sand in a ratio of 1:4 and 4:1, respectively. The sand was bought from a locally commercial supplier; the soil was collected from the local crop field. Characteristics of the resource-rich and resource-poor substrates (Table 2) were tested at the beginning of the experiment.

      Table 1.  Soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), available phosphorus (AP), and total nitrogen of the resource-rich and resource-poor substrate at the beginning of the experiment.

      Substrate pH EC (μS·cm−1) SOC (g·kg−1) AP (mg·kg−1) Total nitrogen (g·kg−1)
      Resource-rich 7.1 ± 0.02 1,469 ± 38 7.52 ± 0.15 4.04 ± 0.09 0.14 ± 0.01
      Resource-poor 7.2 ± 0.07 1,120 ± 102 6.73 ± 0.25 3.36 ± 0.06 0.05 ± 0.01
      Note that three replicates were used in these tests, and the values in this table are shown as the mean ± standard error (SE).

      Table 2.  Effects of patch size (fine, small, medium, and large), species composition, and their interaction on seed germination percentage tested by a generalized linear mixed model at the pot scale.

      df F p
      Patch size 3, 56 4.3 0.009
      Species composition 6, 56 12.7 < 0.001
      Patch size × species composition 18, 56 3.6 < 0.001
      F-values, p-values, and degrees of freedom (dfbetween-groups, dfwithin-groups) are given, with significant results (p < 0.05) in bold.

      Identical pots (28.5 cm top diameter, 20.0 cm bottom diameter, 22.0 cm height) were used in this study, and they were separated into four groups by patch size (fine, small, medium, or large) (Fig. 1a, b). The pot size was based on the previous studies such as Liu et al.[14], and Liu and Hou[4]. The only difference among these pots was the patch size, with the fraction of resource-rich and resource-poor substrate always being 50% each. Six holes 10 mm in diameter were made in the central bottom of each pot to enable drainage and avoid standing water. Soil heterogeneity in this experiment was considered to increase with decreasing patch size, since the soil conditions vary more frequently (spatially) in pots with a smaller patch size[13,14,28].

      We focused on three perennial grasses (i.e., F. elata, B. inermis, and E. breviaristatus) commonly used in cultivated grasslands and the restoration of degraded grasslands. Seeds used in this study were bought from a commercial company (Best, Beijing, China). Seven species compositions were created by using all the possible combinations of the three target species (i.e., F. elata, B. inermis, E. breviaristatus, F. elata + B. inermis, F. elata + E. breviaristatus, B. inermis + E. breviaristatus, and F. elata + B. inermis + E. breviaristatus). Thus, our experiment had 28 treatments (four levels of soil heterogeneity × seven species compositions), resulting in 84 pots in total with three replicates for each unique treatment. Seed density was based on our previous studies[13,28]. At the beginning of the experiment, all the seeds (in the appropriate proportion per species) were thoroughly mixed and evenly separated into two halves. Each half was randomly sown in each of the two substrates in each pot. A few millimetres of substrate were subsequently added to maintain soil moisture and temperature. During the experiment, water was added to each pot when necessary to avoid drought. All pots were randomly placed in a greenhouse.

      Germinated seeds of each species were counted daily when they could be discerned as separate species, and the experiment was ended when no more new seeds had germinated for three consecutive days. Germinated seeds were counted separately in the resource-rich and resource-poor substrate in each pot. To quantify the seed germination percentage, we considered the amount of seeds sown; in the resource-rich (or resource-poor) substrate, this was half of the total number of seeds added in each pot. The data from the last record were used to calculate the seed germination percentage.

    • To test the first hypothesis, an analysis was performed with a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) focusing on the pot scale (1), in which the effects of patch size (i.e., fine, small, medium, and large), species composition, and their interaction on seed germination percentage were explored, with pot identity as a random factor. To examine the second hypothesis, we used GLMMs at the substrate scale (2), investigating the effects of patch size (i.e., small, medium, and large), species composition, substrate, and their interactions on seed germination percentage, again with pot identity as a random factor. The fine patch size was not included in this second (patch-based) analysis, since the two substrates could not be accurately separated at this scale. Moreover, separate analyses were conducted for the resource-rich and resource-poor substrate (3), using GLMMs to study the effect of patch size, species composition, and their interaction on the seed germination percentage in the resource-rich and resource-poor substrate, with pot identity as a random factor. In all three analyses, post-hoc analyses (pairwise comparisons with least significant difference [LSD]) were performed to test the differences among the variables. To account for the increased Type I error risk with multiple comparisons, we also applied Tukey corrections, which resulted in identical outcomes regarding significant and nonsignificant differences, underlining the robustness of our findings. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp., 2015).

    • In the first analysis, patch size, species composition, and their interaction all significantly affected the seed germination percentage (Fig. 2; Table 2). Specifically, the small patch size supported a higher seed germination percentage than the other patch sizes in the mixture with three species growing together (Fig. 2), and a similar pattern was found for the mixture of F. elata + B. inermis. However, a different pattern was found for the mixture of B. inermis + E. breviaristatus, where the fine and large patch sizes had higher seed germination percentages than the small and medium patch sizes. Such effects were not apparent in the mixture of F. elata + E. breviaristatus, where patch size had no significant effect on the seed germination percentage (Fig. 2). All these indicate the complex effects of patch size and species composition on seed germination.

      Figure 2. 

      Mean ± SE of seed germination percentage of the seven species compositions shown at the pot scale, separated by patch sizes (soil heterogeneity), i.e., fine, small, medium, and large. Significant differences between patch sizes for each species composition are labeled by different letters (post hoc analysis with LSD).

      In the second analysis, patch size, species composition, and their interaction significantly affected seed germination percentage (Table 3). The substrate did not significantly affect the seed germination percentage as a single factor, but a marginally significant effect of patch size × species composition × substrate was found (Table 3).

      Table 3.  Effects of patch size (small, medium, and large), species composition, substrate, and their interactions on seed germination percentage were explored via GLMM at the substrate scale, separated by substrate.

      df F p
      Patch size 2, 92 5.3 0.007
      Species composition 6, 92 7.3 < 0.001
      Substrate 1, 92 2.3 0.134
      Patch size × species composition 8, 92 4.3 < 0.001
      Patch size × substrate 2, 92 1.9 0.160
      Species composition × substrate 6, 92 1.2 0.312
      Patch size × species
      composition × substrate
      8, 92 1.8 0.064
      F-values, p-values, and degrees of freedom (dfbetween-groups, dfwithin-groups) are given, with significant results (p < 0.05) in bold.

      In the third analysis, a significant interactive effect of patch size and species composition was found in both the resource-rich and resource-poor substrates (Table 4). As a single factor, patch size and species composition showed different patterns in resource-rich and resource-poor substrates (Table 4). Specifically, the small patch size supported a higher seed germination percentage than the medium and large patch sizes with the three-species mixture grown on a resource-rich patch (Fig. 3a), but this effect disappeared in the resource-poor substrate (Fig. 3b).

      Table 4.  The effects of patch size, species composition, and their interaction on seed germination percentage investigated via GLMM.

      Resource-rich Resource-poor
      df F p df F p
      Patch size 2, 46 4.6 0.015 2, 46 2.8 0.070
      Species composition 6, 46 2.3 0.053 6, 46 5.9 < 0.001
      Patch size × species composition 8, 46 2.4 0.016 8, 46 3.4 0.001
      F-values, p-values, and degrees of freedom (dfbetween-groups, dfwithin-groups) are given, with significant results (p < 0.05) in bold.

      Figure 3. 

      Mean ± SE of seed germination percentage of the seven species compositions on (a) the resource-rich and (b) the resource-poor substrate, shown at the substrate scale and separated by patch size (soil heterogeneity; i.e., small, medium, and large). Significant differences between patch sizes for each species composition are labeled by different letters (post hoc analysis with LSD).

    • The first hypothesis was that the seed germination of plant species was interactively affected by species composition and soil heterogeneity. This was supported, since we recorded significant interactive effects of patch size (i.e., soil heterogeneity) and species composition on the seed germination percentage (Table 2). Moreover, a higher germination percentage was generally found in pots with small patches than in the pots with the other patch sizes, a pattern that was found in four of the seven species compositions (Fig. 2). This differs from earlier observations in monocultures[4], where seed germination was higher in pots with large patches than in pots with small patches. One possible reason may be that when multiple species germinate, they can affect each other's germination success, through, for example, association with specific microbes or through allelochemicals[17,18]. Previous studies found that the seed germination of a species can be either be impeded by the allelochemicals released by the neighboring species through inhibition or promotion of radicle and hypocotyl elongation[17]. In two of the seven communities (i.e., E. breviaristatus and B. inermis + E. breviaristatus), a higher seed germination percentage was observed in pots with large patches (Fig. 2). This is consistent with the finding of Maestre and Reynolds[29], where seed germination percentage decreased with increasing distance to a resource-rich patch. The varied results in our study highlight the need for further investigation into the exact mechanisms that govern seed germination in differing circumstances (soil heterogeneity and species composition in this case).

      Our second hypothesis proposed that any increases in germination with patch size at the pot scale (the whole system) would mainly be derived from the resource-rich substrate but not the resource-poor substrate. This hypothesis was not supported, even though different germination patterns were observed on the resource-rich and resource-poor substrates. Seed germination percentage first decreased and then increased with increasing patch size in communities of B. inermis + E. breviaristatus growing on the resource-rich substrate (Fig. 3a), and in F. elata + B. inermis communities growing on the resource-poor substrate (Fig. 3b). Reasons for this pattern may be linked to allelochemicals affecting seed germination via processes such as inhibiting the growth of the plant embryo[17], whereas microbial association could drive seed germination differentially if their activity differs in resource-rich and resource-poor substrates[26,30]. However, these mechanisms remain speculative, as allelochemicals, microbial communities, and microclimatic variation were not directly quantified.

      The results of this study should be extrapolated and interpreted with caution because of the following reasons. (1) The origin of the seeds (wild or commercial) may affect germination[31,32]. Seeds used in this study were bought from a seed company, but wild seeds may perform differently[4]. (2) Seed germination was only tested for mixtures of three forage grasses, and more species originating from different functional groups should be considered, since plant communities often feature a more diverse species mix[10]. (3) Allelochemicals and microbial associations were not measured in our study[5], which prevents us from exploring the underlying mechanisms pertaining to seed germination in more detail. In our study, the results from the substrate scale could not be extrapolated additively to the pot scale. Interactive and nonadditive effects are common in ecology, necessitating further research into the underlying mechanisms to enable extrapolation through modeling. Furthermore, extrapolation to natural environments (e.g., for restoration applications) will require further studies at larger scales, incorporating more sources of naturally occurring heterogeneity (seeds, species, soils, etc.).

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: study design: Liu Y; experiment, data collection, and analyses: Li H, Pang S, Ning Y, Yang Q, Zhu Q, Liu Y; manuscript drafting: Liu Y, Ying Z, De Boeck HJ. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

      • We thank Mingxia Wang, Guoe Li, Cheng Zhang, Wanhe Zhu, Weiqi Jiang, and Lijuan Ran for experimental assistance. This work was supported by the Longyuan Youth Talent Project of Gansu Province and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University (lzujbky-2025-14).

      • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  Table (4) References (32)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Li H, Pang S, Ning Y, Yang Q, Zhu Q, et al. 2026. Soil heterogeneity and species composition interactively affect the seed germination of three typical forage species. Grass Research 6: e018 doi: 10.48130/grares-0026-0009
    Li H, Pang S, Ning Y, Yang Q, Zhu Q, et al. 2026. Soil heterogeneity and species composition interactively affect the seed germination of three typical forage species. Grass Research 6: e018 doi: 10.48130/grares-0026-0009

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return