Search
2026 Volume 11
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Adaptive responses of marine-derived Aspergillus terreus to salinity and chromium stress analysed by peptide mass fingerprinting

More Information
  • Received: 28 May 2025
    Revised: 20 March 2026
    Accepted: 10 April 2026
    Published online: 16 June 2026
    Studies in Fungi  11 Article number: e018 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Fungi inhabiting marine environments often exhibit physiological and biochemical traits that enable survival in saline conditions, distinguishing them from many terrestrial counterparts. The presence of soluble osmolytes, affinity for sodium ions, and streamlined genomes aid marine biota to survive hypertonic environments. With the rise in anthropogenic activities, marine biota face multiple stresses that demand immediate acclimation and adaptation. This study evaluated the cellular responses of a marine-derived fungal isolate to variable salinities and Cr+6 concentrations using peptide mass fingerprinting on an LC-MS-MS QToF. The whole-cell proteins were extracted and digested with trypsin. A total of 659 proteins across nine variable conditions, including salinity (0, 35, 100 PSU) and Cr+6 (0, 100, 500 mg/L), were detected. Fifty-three housekeeping proteins were expressed across all conditions, categorised into carbohydrate metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, genetic information processing, and cellular processes using KEGG pathways. Variation in salinity led to the expression of proteins associated with DNA damage control and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) scavenging mechanisms, whereas an increase in Cr+6 concentration triggered the expression of proteins involved in enzymatic reduction and in transport/metal efflux. Thioredoxin expression was upregulated with fold change values of 5.011 and 5.032 at 100, and 500 mg/L Cr+6 at 35 PSU, and 2.358 and 1.839 at the same Cr+6 concentrations at 100 PSU. This indicated that upregulation of ROS-scavenging proteins was the predominant mechanism used by A. terreus under elevated Cr+6 and salt concentrations. This study observed the expression of multiple stress tolerance mechanisms to combat the synergistic effects of salt and Cr+6.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Matilda CS, Mannully ST, Viditha RP, Shanthi C. 2019. Protein profiling of metal-resistant Bacillus cereus VITSH1. Journal of Applied Microbiology 127:121−133 doi: 10.1111/jam.14293

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Islam S, Kamila S, Chattopadhyay A. 2022. Toxic and carcinogenic effects of hexavalent chromium in mammalian cells in vivo and in vitro: a recent update. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C 40:282−315 doi: 10.1080/26896583.2022.2158675

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Zhao H, Wu Y, Lan X, Yang Y, Wu X, et al. 2022. Comprehensive assessment of harmful heavy metals in contaminated soil in order to score pollution level. Scientific Reports 12:3552 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07602-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] DesMarias TL, Costa M. 2019. Mechanisms of chromium-induced toxicity. Current Opinion in Toxicology 14:1−7 doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2019.05.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Pavesi T, Moreira JC. 2020. Mechanisms and individuality in chromium toxicity in humans. Journal of Applied Toxicology 40:1183−1197 doi: 10.1002/jat.3965

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Hlihor RM, Roşca M, Drăgoi EN, Simion IM, Favier L, et al. 2023. New insights into the application of fungal biomass for chromium(VI) bioremoval from aqueous solutions using Design of Experiments and Differential Evolution based neural network approaches. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 190:233−254 doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.12.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Yu XZ, Lin YJ, Zhang Q. 2019. Metallothioneins enhance chromium detoxification through scavenging ROS and stimulating metal chelation in Oryza sativa. Chemosphere 220:300−313 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Lotlikar NP, Damare SR, Meena RM, Linsy P, Mascarenhas B. 2018. Potential of marine-derived fungi to remove hexavalent chromium pollutant from culture broth. Indian Journal of Microbiology 58:182−192 doi: 10.1007/s12088-018-0719-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] McGenity TJ, Oren A. 2012. Hypersaline environments. In Life at Extremes: Environments, Organisms and Strategies for Survival. UK: CABI. pp. 402−437 doi: 10.1079/9781845938147.0402
    [10] Calheiros CSC, Silva G, Quitério PVB, Crispim LFC, Brix H, et al. 2012. Toxicity of high salinity tannery wastewater and effects on constructed wetland plants. International Journal of Phytoremediation 14:669−680 doi: 10.1080/15226514.2011.619233

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Rabab AM, Asmaa ST, Asmaa HM, Shereen AS. 2025. Adaptability assessment of Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus terreus isolated from long-term municipal/industrial effluent-irrigated soils to cadmium stress. BMC Microbiology 25:297 doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04000-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] You M, Liao L, Hong SH, Park W, Kwon DI, et al. 2015. Lumazine peptides from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus terreus. Marine Drugs 13:1290−1303 doi: 10.3390/md13031290

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Diffels JF, Seret ML, Goffeau A, Baret PV. 2006. Heavy metal transporters in Hemiascomycete yeasts. Biochimie 88:1639−1649 doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.08.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] MacDiarmid CW, Gardner RC. 1998. Overexpression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae magnesium transport system confers resistance to aluminum ion. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273:1727−1732 doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.3.1727

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Zhang Q, Zeng G, Chen G, Yan M, Chen A, et al. 2015. The effect of heavy metal-induced oxidative stress on the enzymes in white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 175:1281−1293 doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-1298-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Stohs SJ, Bagchi D, Hassoun E, Bagchi M. 2001. Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of chromium and cadmium ions. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology 19:201−213 doi: 10.1615/JEnvironPatholToxicolOncol.v20.i2.10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Vaupotič T, Veranic P, Petrovič U, Gunde-Cimerman N, Plemenitaš A. 2008. HMG-CoA reductase is regulated by environmental salinity, and its activity is essential for halotolerance in halophilic fungi. Studies in Mycology 61:61−66 doi: 10.3114/sim.2008.61.05

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Wang M, Yang B, Wang H, Zhu Y, Cao X, et al. 2020. Functioning mechanisms of ectomycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhiza associated with plant in the tolerance to heavy metal toxicity. Proceedings of the 2020 The 9th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 13–16 March, 2020. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 36–40 doi: 10.1145/3386762.3386776
    [19] Dey P, Malik A, Singh DK, Haange SB, von Bergen M, et al. 2024. Unveiling fungal strategies: mycoremediation in multi-metal pesticide environment using proteomics. Scientific Reports 14:23171 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74517-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Shishodia SK, Shankar J. 2020. Exploration of mycelial proteins from Aspergillus terreus revealed ribosome biogenesis and antioxidant enzymes. Current Proteomics 17:433−445 doi: 10.2174/1570164617666191004163734

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Pang KL, Chiang MW, Guo SY, Shih CY, Dahms HU, et al. 2020. Growth study under combined effects of temperature, pH and salinity and transcriptome analysis revealed adaptations of Aspergillus terreus to the extreme conditions at Kueishan Island Hydrothermal Vent Field, Taiwan. PLoS One 15:e0233621 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233621

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Liu Y, Wang L, Feng Y, Liao Q, Lei X, et al. 2024. Untargeted metabolomics approach for the discovery of salinity-related alkaloids in a stony coral-derived fungus Aspergillus terreus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25:10544 doi: 10.3390/ijms251910544

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Khan MI, Ali N, Jan G, Hamayun M, Jan FG, et al. 2022. Salt stress alleviation in Triticum aestivum through primary and secondary metabolites modulation by Aspergillus terreus BTK-1. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:779623 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.779623

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Krishnaswamy A, Barnes N, Lotlikar NP, Damare SR. 2019. An improved method for protein extraction from minuscule quantities of fungal biomass. Indian Journal of Microbiology 59:100−104 doi: 10.1007/s12088-018-0752-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Kinter M, Sherman NE. 2000. Protein Sequencing and Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 301 pp. doi: 10.1002/0471721980
    [26] Villalba-Villalba AG, González-Méndez B. 2021. Evaluación de la tolerancia de Aspergillus terreus a metales tóxicos [Evaluating Aspergillus terreus tolerance to toxic metals]. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente 27:449−464 (in Spanish) doi: 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2020.07.047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Palanivel TM, Pracejus B, Novo LAB. 2023. Bioremediation of copper using indigenous fungi Aspergillus species isolated from an abandoned copper mine soil. Chemosphere 314:137688 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137688

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Soares LW, Bailão AM, de Almeida Soares CM, Bailão MGS. 2020. Zinc at the host–fungus interface: how to uptake the metal? Journal of Fungi 6:305 doi: 10.3390/jof6040305

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Tang Y, Yang X, Li H, Shuai Y, Chen W, et al. 2023. Uncovering the role of wheat magnesium transporter family genes in abiotic responses. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1078299 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1078299

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Razzaque S, Elias SM, Haque T, Biswas S, Nurnabi Azad Jewel GM, et al. 2019. Gene expression analysis associated with salt stress in a reciprocally crossed rice population. Scientific Reports 9:8249 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44757-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Plemenitaš A. 2021. Sensing and responding to hypersaline conditions and the HOG signal transduction pathway in fungi isolated from hypersaline environments: Hortaea werneckii and Wallemia ichthyophaga. Journal of Fungi 7:988 doi: 10.3390/jof7110988

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Song Y, Li F, Ali M, Li X, Zhang X, et al. 2025. Advances in protein kinase regulation of stress responses in fruits and vegetables. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26:768 doi: 10.3390/ijms26020768

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Almeida-Dalmet S, Litchfield CD, Gillevet P, Baxter BK. 2018. Differential gene expression in response to salinity and temperature in a Haloarcula strain from great salt lake, Utah. Genes 9:52 doi: 10.3390/genes9010052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Athar HUR, Zulfiqar F, Moosa A, Ashraf M, Zafar ZU, et al. 2022. Salt stress proteins in plants: an overview. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:999058 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.999058

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Lopez-Ortiz C, Peña-Garcia Y, Natarajan P, Bhandari M, Abburi V, et al. 2020. The ankyrin repeat gene family in Capsicum spp.: genome-wide survey, characterization and gene expression profile. Scientific Reports 10:4044 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61057-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] González-Guerrero M, Escudero V, Saéz Á, Tejada-Jiménez M. 2016. Transition metal transport in plants and associated endosymbionts: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1088 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01088

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Sun GL, Reynolds EE, Belcher AM. 2019. Designing yeast as plant-like hyperaccumulators for heavy metals. Nature Communications 10:5080 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13093-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Murugesan A, Kumar A, Gunasekar A, Arumugam I, Eswaran K, et al. 2016. Hsp70 and theta subunit of T complex protein, a response to salt stress in the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum. Journal of Bioinformatics and Proteomics Review 2:1−9 doi: 10.15436/2381-0793.16.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Eisenberg E, Levanon EY. 2003. Human housekeeping genes are compact. Trends in Genetics 19:362−365 doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00140-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Tao Y, Van Peer AF, Huang Q, Shao Y, Zhang L, et al. 2016. Identification of novel and robust internal control genes from Volvariella volvacea that are suitable for RT-qPCR in filamentous fungi. Scientific Reports 6:29236 doi: 10.1038/srep29236

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Waxman S, Wurmbach E. 2007. De-regulation of common housekeeping genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Genomics 8:243 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-243

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Chang YC, Ding Y, Dong L, Zhu LJ, Jensen RV, et al. 2018. Differential expression patterns of housekeeping genes increase diagnostic and prognostic value in lung cancer. PeerJ 6:e4719 doi: 10.7717/peerj.4719

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Irie N, Warita K, Tashiro J, Zhou Y, Ishikawa T, et al. 2023. Expression of housekeeping genes varies depending on mevalonate pathway inhibition in cancer cells. Heliyon 9:e18017 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Casas AI, Hassan AA, Manz Q, Wiwie C, Kleikers P, et al. 2022. Un-biased housekeeping gene panel selection for high-validity gene expression analysis. Scientific Reports 12:12324 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15989-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Lotlikar NP, Damare SR. 2026. Adaptive responses of marine-derived Aspergillus terreus to salinity and chromium stress analysed by peptide mass fingerprinting. Studies in Fungi 11: e018 doi: 10.48130/sif-0026-0015
    Lotlikar NP, Damare SR. 2026. Adaptive responses of marine-derived Aspergillus terreus to salinity and chromium stress analysed by peptide mass fingerprinting. Studies in Fungi 11: e018 doi: 10.48130/sif-0026-0015

Figures(3)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(98) PDF downloads(30)

Other Articles By Authors

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Adaptive responses of marine-derived Aspergillus terreus to salinity and chromium stress analysed by peptide mass fingerprinting

Studies in Fungi  11 Article number: e018  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Fungi inhabiting marine environments often exhibit physiological and biochemical traits that enable survival in saline conditions, distinguishing them from many terrestrial counterparts. The presence of soluble osmolytes, affinity for sodium ions, and streamlined genomes aid marine biota to survive hypertonic environments. With the rise in anthropogenic activities, marine biota face multiple stresses that demand immediate acclimation and adaptation. This study evaluated the cellular responses of a marine-derived fungal isolate to variable salinities and Cr+6 concentrations using peptide mass fingerprinting on an LC-MS-MS QToF. The whole-cell proteins were extracted and digested with trypsin. A total of 659 proteins across nine variable conditions, including salinity (0, 35, 100 PSU) and Cr+6 (0, 100, 500 mg/L), were detected. Fifty-three housekeeping proteins were expressed across all conditions, categorised into carbohydrate metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, genetic information processing, and cellular processes using KEGG pathways. Variation in salinity led to the expression of proteins associated with DNA damage control and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) scavenging mechanisms, whereas an increase in Cr+6 concentration triggered the expression of proteins involved in enzymatic reduction and in transport/metal efflux. Thioredoxin expression was upregulated with fold change values of 5.011 and 5.032 at 100, and 500 mg/L Cr+6 at 35 PSU, and 2.358 and 1.839 at the same Cr+6 concentrations at 100 PSU. This indicated that upregulation of ROS-scavenging proteins was the predominant mechanism used by A. terreus under elevated Cr+6 and salt concentrations. This study observed the expression of multiple stress tolerance mechanisms to combat the synergistic effects of salt and Cr+6.

    • Industrialisation and infrastructure development require extensive extraction and use of heavy metals, generating large volumes of waste that often enter the environment. Heavy metal pollution remains a pressing concern due to its severe effects on human health and the lack of sustainable remediation solutions. Among these, chromium is one of the most carcinogenic metals, widely used in tanneries, steel/electroplating industries, and the textile industry[1,2]. Over the past 30 years, nearly 30,000 tons has been released into the environment globally[3]. In its hexavalent form, chromium mimics the sulphate oxyanion, allowing easy transmembrane transport into prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Once inside, it is reduced to the trivalent form, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, and protein degradation[2,4,5]. Despite extensive documentation of chromium contamination in industrial effluents, the persistent toxicity of hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) remains a major unresolved environmental and public health challenge. While conventional physical and chemical methods can partially mitigate heavy metal contamination, these technologies fail to remove residual Cr+6, especially in saline wastewaters. This gap underscores the urgent need for eco-friendly biological strategies that can function under high ionic stress.

      Marine-derived fungi have emerged as promising candidates for bioremediation in saline and metal-polluted environments. Unlike many terrestrial microbes, they exhibit inherent halotolerance, osmotic adjustment via compatible solutes (e.g., glycerol and trehalose), halophilic enzymes, and robust ion-transport systems[6,7]. These adaptations allow survival in hypersaline and alkaline habitats where conventional remediation agents fail. Several genera, including Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium, have demonstrated the ability to take up heavy metals, biosorb them, and enzymatically detoxify them under saline conditions[6,8]. Their ability to couple extracellular mechanisms (biosorption, bioleaching, precipitation) with intracellular strategies (enzymatic Cr+6 reduction, vacuolar sequestration, metallothionein production) makes them ideal candidates for sustainable wastewater treatment[79].

      Salinity levels in contaminated habitats can vary widely, and hypersaline conditions (> 100 PSU) are encountered in evaporation ponds, tannery discharge sites, and industrial brines[9,10]. In this study, a salinity of 100 PSU was used to represent such extreme ionic environments, thereby enabling assessment of fungal performance in scenarios where conventional bioremediation agents would be ineffective. Cr+6 was chosen as the test metal because of its toxicity challenge posed for detoxification studies. The isolate Aspergillus terreus (NCBI accession no. KT956259) was selected based on preliminary screening that revealed exceptional Cr+6 tolerance (up to 750 mg/L) and removal efficiency (13 mg Cr g−1 biomass at 300 mg/L). Its marine origin suggests inherent halotolerance, and prior scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging and diphenylcarbazide assays indicated that both biosorption and enzymatic reduction are primary survival strategies. These features make it an ideal candidate for exploring molecular adaptations under simultaneous salt and metal stresses. Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus terreus have been reported to have potential mycoremediative capabilities for Cd2+ removal[11]. ESI-LCMS analysis of the crude extract of A. terreus revealed the expression of two new lumazine-containing peptides with pharmacological activities, thereby promoting this species for multiple applications[12]. These studies collectively strengthen the ecological and biotechnological significance of A. terreus and support it as a candidate organism for remediation-driven research. At the cellular level, tolerance to heavy metals and salinity is mediated by a suite of stress-responsive proteins. Transporter families such as ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, cation diffusion facilitators (CDF), and P-type ATPases play central roles in metal efflux and compartmentation[13,14]. Redox regulators, including thioredoxin and glutathione reductase, along with antioxidant enzymes such as catalases and peroxidases mitigate ROS toxicity[15,16]. Heat shock proteins and T-complex proteins further assist in protein folding and stabilization under stress[17].

      Despite increasing recognition of fungal tolerance to heavy metals and salinity, most studies have examined these stressors in isolation, primarily using physiological assays or targeted biochemical measurements[1518]. In contrast, saline industrial effluents typically impose concurrent ionic and metal stress, creating synergistic cellular pressures that cannot be predicted from single-factor experiments[9,10]. Although proteomic analyses have been conducted in selected terrestrial or clinical fungi[19,20], the integrated molecular responses of marine-derived filamentous fungi under combined stress remain poorly understood. In particular, Aspergillus terreus, a species noted for environmental resilience and biotechnological potential[2123], has not been systematically investigated at the global proteome level under simultaneous salinity and chromium exposure. To address this gap, we employed LC-MS/MS-based peptide mass fingerprinting to profile whole-cell protein expression across nine salt-metal regimes. This systems-level strategy reveals coordinated stress-response pathways, metabolic prioritisation, and adaptive survival mechanisms that cannot be inferred from conventional growth or enzymatic assays, thereby providing a new mechanistic insight into fungal adaptation to complex environmental stressors. Accordingly, this study aimed to: (1) characterise the proteomic response of A. terreus under individual and combined Cr+6 and salinity stresses, (2) identify key tolerance pathways involving ROS detoxification, ion homeostasis, and metal reduction, and (3) evaluate the expression of housekeeping proteins under multi-stress exposure to gain insights into metabolic prioritisation.

    • Aspergillus terreus, #NIOSN-SK56-S52, is a previously isolated culture from Arabian Sea sediments, identified using molecular techniques (NCBI accession no. KT956259), and has been previously reported for chromium tolerance[8].

    • Non-sporulated crushed mycelia of previously grown culture #NIOSN-SK56-S52 were inoculated in Czapek Dox Broth (CDB) with varying concentrations of Cr+6 (0, 100, and 500 mg/L), each prepared with salt solutions of 0, 35, and 100 PSU, in triplicate. The nine different metal-salt combinations were incubated at 80 rpm at 28 °C for 1 week, following which the contents were filtered, lyophilised, weighed, and processed for protein extraction. A previously standardised 3-buffer extraction method[24] was used to extract proteins from a fixed biomass quantity (30 mg). Briefly, the biomass was subjected to buffer I (Tris–MgCl2, pH 8.3, 0.5 M Tris–HCl, 2% CHAPS, 20 mM MgCl2, 2% DTT); buffer II (9 M urea, 4% CHAPS, 100 mM DTT—prepared in 40 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0); and buffer 3 (6 M urea, 3 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 100 mM DTT—prepared in 40 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0). The samples were homogenised at 6.5 m/s for 45 s after each buffer addition and centrifuged to separate the fractions. All three fractions were mixed, and the extracted proteins were quantified using the standard Folin's method and analyzed by SDS-PAGE to assess quality before proceeding with MS analysis.

    • Prior to MS analysis, the protein extracts were processed for In-solution digestion using trypsin (protocol modified from Kinter & Sherman[25]). The extract was initially precipitated with HPLC-grade methanol, vacuum-dried, and suspended in urea to facilitate dissolution. Subsequently, the protein samples were reduced using dithiothreitol (DTT) and further alkylated with Iodoacetamide (IAA). The samples were digested using trypsin and analysed using the LC-MS QToF facility (6538 UHD Accurate Mass QTOF LC/MS, Agilent Technologies, USA). Digested protein samples (8 µL, four replicates) were injected in a 150 × 300 A C18 150 mm column protein chip via an autosampler. A gradient of 3%–97% across HPLC-grade acetonitrile as an organic phase, and 0.22 µm filtered and autoclaved deionised water as an aqueous phase was used to carry out LC separations over a time period of 100 min. Formic acid (0.1%) was added as an additive in both phases. An accuracy rate of 2 mg/L was maintained for the separated ions in positive mode over the range of 50–2,000 m/z. The spectral data were acquired using Mass Hunter software v5.0 (Agilent Technologies, USA) after MS/MS, and were searched in NCBI using Spectrum Mill MS Proteomics Workbench vB.04.01.141 (Agilent Technologies, USA) at 50–100 mg/L accuracy against the organism-specific database (NCBI txid 33178). Protein sequences corresponding to the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were retrieved from the NCBI Aspergillus terreus genome. The MS searches were auto-validated (false discovery rate of 1.2%), and protein summary and MPP files were generated. These files were processed in Mass Profiler Professional v14.09 (MPP13, Agilent Technologies, USA) for further analysis. Mapping and annotation steps were carried out to assign GO terms under the three ontologies: Biological Process (BP), Molecular Function (MF), and Cellular Component (CC). Differential protein abundance was calculated from MS intensity values using log 2-transformed fold changes. Multivariate differences among treatment groups were examined using Principal Component Analysis based on Euclidean distances. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

    • Protein profiling of A. terreus, #NIOSN-SK56-S52, identified 659 proteins expressed across the nine different metal-salt combinations. Based on their functional role as elucidated from KEGG pathways and metabolic processes, they were divided into 17 different categories (Fig. 1). Amino acid metabolism (41), biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (6), carbohydrate metabolism (63), cellular processes (30), energy metabolism (30), environmental information processing (38), genetic information processing (146), glycan biosynthesis and metabolism (3), lipid metabolism (12), metabolism of cofactors and vitamins (10), metabolism of other amino acids (5), metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides (4), nucleotide metabolism (16), stress response (32), xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism (4), hypothetical proteins (213), and uncharacterised proteins (6). To further understand the contribution of proteins under each functional process under salinity stress, proteins expressed only under 0, 35, and 100 PSU were analysed (Fig. 2). Most proteins expressed at 100 PSU belonged to carbohydrate metabolism, genetic information processing, and hypothetical proteins.

      Figure 1. 

      Graphical representation of all proteins expressed by A. terreus (#NIOSN-SK56-S52) %.

      Figure 2. 

      Distribution of proteins expressed by A. terreus (#NIOSN-SK56-S52) under 0, 35, and 100 PSU salinity.

      Amongst the expressed proteins, 53 were commonly expressed across all nine conditions, suggesting they are involved in housekeeping metabolic activities (Table 1). Amongst these, 16 proteins (cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide IV (NCBI gi–114188084), cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide VI (NCBI gi−114188679), enolase (NCBI gi–114194476), eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (NCBI gi–114196711), Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (NCBI gi–114193156), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NCBI gi–540849772), heat shock 70 kDa protein (NCBI gi–114187927), histone H2A (NCBI gi–114189434), histone H2B (NCBI gi–114189435), malate dehydrogenase (NCBI gi–114191202), phosphoglycerate kinase (NCBI gi–114197170), pyruvate kinase (NCBI gi–114193787), thioredoxin (NCBI gi–114190288), transaldolase (NCBI gi–114191388), transketolase 1 (NCBI gi–114197498), and tubulin beta chain (NCBI gi–114197233) have been previously reported as housekeeping genes in humans. In a separate study, reference genes in filamentous fungi suitable for RT-qPCR were studied and revealed nine such novel genes, namely, the β-actin, 18S rRNA, cyclophilin, histone H3, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, α, β1, β2-tubulin, and ubiquitin.

      Table 1.  Commonly expressed proteins across all salinities and Cr (VI) concentrations by A. terreus.

      Protein name NCBI gi Function Protein name NCBI gi Function
      40S ribosomal protein S0 114194180 Translation Hexokinase 114191625 Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis
      6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 114191912 Pentose phosphate pathway Histone H2A 114189434 Pyrimidine metabolism
      Adenosylhomocysteinase 114197109 Cysteine and methionine metabolism Histone H2B 114189435 Pyrimidine metabolism
      ADP, ATP carrier protein 114194661 Mitochondrial biogenesis Inorganic pyrophosphatase 114196689 Oxidative phosphorylation
      Alcohol dehydrogenase I 114188844 Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis Ketol-acid reductoisomerase, mp 114195083 Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis
      Aldehyde dehydrogenase 114192389 Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism L-xylulose reductase 114195667 Pentose and glucuronate interconversions
      ATP synthase alpha chain, mp 114193514 Oxidative phosphorylation Malate dehydrogenase, mp 114191202 Carbohydrate metabolism
      ATP synthase beta chain, mitochondrial precursor 114190171 Oxidative phosphorylation Mitochondrial peroxiredoxin PRX1 114192711 Glutathione metabolism/
      stress response
      ATP-citrate synthase subunit 1 114195637 Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) Mitochondrial phosphate carrier protein 114197783 Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis
      Bacterial hemoglobin 114195409 Uncharacterised Mitochondrial processing peptidase beta subunit 114197569 Folding, sorting and degradation
      Cell division cycle protein 48 114187782 Meiosis Nucleoside diphosphate kinase 114189539 Purine metabolism
      Cerevisin precursor 114191390 Autophagy Outer mitochondrial membrane protein porin 114192911 Mitochondrial biogenesis
      Citrate synthase, mp 114189463 Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) Phosphoglycerate kinase 114197170 Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis
      Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide IV, mp 114188084 Oxidative phosphorylation Pyruvate decarboxylase 114193380 Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis
      Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide VI, mp 114188679 Oxidative phosphorylation Pyruvate kinase 114193787 Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis
      DNA damage checkpoint protein rad24 114188055 Stress/ DNA repair S-adenosylmethionine synthetase 114197201 Cysteine and methionine metabolism
      Elongation factor 1-beta 114197267 Translation Superoxide dismutase, mp 114191387 Response to oxidative stress
      Elongation factor 2 114196384 Translation Thioredoxin 114190288 Response to oxidative stress
      Enolase 114194476 Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis Transaldolase 114191388 Carbohydrate metabolism
      Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A 114196711 Translation Transketolase 1 114197498 Carbohydrate metabolism
      Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A 114193909 Translation Triosephosphate isomerase 114192224 Carbohydrate metabolism
      Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase 114193156 Carbohydrate metabolic process Tubulin alpha-1 chain 114193585 Transport and catabolism
      Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 540849772 Carbohydrate metabolic process Tubulin beta chain 114197233 Transport and catabolism
      GTP-binding nuclear protein GSP1/Ran 114194939 Signal transduction UDP-glucose 4-epimerase 114190193 Carbohydrate metabolism
      Heat shock 70 kDa protein 114187927 Stress response Vacuolar protease A precursor 114193423 Fungal-type cell wall organization
      Heat shock protein 82 114189469 Stress response Woronin body major protein 114191425 Translation
      Heat shock protein SSC1, mp 114193179 Stress response
      mp = mitochondrial precursor.

      A group of unique proteins expressed under specific conditions was also studied (Table 2). At 0 PSU, expression of proteins involved in biosynthetic pathways and genetic information processing was dominant, indicating a relatively stress-free physiological state consistent with the facultative marine nature of the isolate. In the presence of 500 mg/L of Cr+6, proteins such as WD-repeat protein mip1 (NCBI gi–114191519), involved in cell senescence, and nonhistone chromosomal protein 6A (NCBI gi–114193442), which is involved in replication and repair were expressed. In addition to Cr+6 stress in the presence of 35 PSU, magnesium transporter MRS2 (NCBI gi–114190882) and T-Complex protein one subunit delta (NCBI gi–114193665) were also expressed.

      Table 2.  Unique proteins expressed at varying salinities and Cr (VI) concentrations and combinations by A. terreus.

      Condition Protein name NCBI gi Function
      0 PSU, 0 mg/L ATP-dependent RNA helicase DOB1 114192864 Spliceosome
      Cystathionine beta-lyase 114195508 Cysteine and methionine metabolism
      Glycolipid-anchored surface protein 5 precursor 114189622 Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism
      Guanine nucleotide-binding protein beta subunit 114195314 Transport and catabolism
      Methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase beta chain, mitochondrial precursor 114191417 Valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation
      Molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis protein 1 B 114192533 Folding, sorting, and degradation
      Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit B 114196357 Autophagy
      0 PSU, 100 mg/L Allergen Asp f 7 114192930 TNF signaling pathway
      Alternative oxidase, mitochondrial precursor 114190002 Oxidative phosphorylation
      Arabinan endo-1,5-alpha-L-arabinosidase A precursor 114193790 carbohydrate metabolic process
      ATP-dependent protease La 114196169 Cell growth and death
      DNA-directed RNA polymerase II 45 kDa polypeptide 114196335 Transcription
      Quinate permease 114190347 Quinate metabolism
      0 PSU, 500 mg/L Anthranilate synthase component II 114197450 Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis
      Endochitinase 1 precursor 114194948 Starch and sucrose metabolism
      Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial precursor 114193625 carbohydrate metabolic process
      Nonhistone chromosomal protein 6A 114193442 Replication and repair
      Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase 114196505 Pyrimidine metabolism
      Proliferating cell nuclear antigen 114195863 DNA replication
      Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 56 kDa regulatory subunit delta 1 isoform 114188660 Cell cycle
      Signal recognition particle 54 kDa protein 114189491 Folding, sorting, and degradation
      Transcriptional repressor rco-1 114191721 Transcription
      Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit E 114190926 Oxidative phosphorylation
      WD-repeat protein mip1 114190613 cellular senescence
      35 PSU, 0 mg/L 26S proteasome regulatory subunit rpn-1 114195360 Proteosome
      3-methyl-2-oxobutanoate hydroxymethyltransferase 114191519 Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis
      Alpha,alpha-trehalose-phosphate synthase 1 114194901 Starch and sucrose metabolism
      Catalase 114196544 Stress response
      cell differentiation protein rcd1 114194699 Meiosis
      Chromosome segregation protein sudA 114196456 Meiosis
      CURS1 443610053 Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites
      Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay protein 3 114194516 Translation
      Nonspecific lipid-transfer protein, mitochondrial precursor 114192954 Lipid metabolism
      Protein kinase lkh1 114192486 MAPK signaling pathway
      35 PSU, 100 mg/L 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme 114190170 Starch and sucrose metabolism
      Coatomer beta subunit 114197239 Oxidative phosphorylation
      Inner membrane magnesium transporter MRS2, mitochondrial precursor 114190882 Metal ion transmembrane transporter activity
      Inositol-3-phosphate synthase 114189610 phosphatidylinositol signaling system
      NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 21 kDa subunit 114196031 Oxidative phosphorylation
      Pre-mRNA splicing factor CLF1 114197157 Transcription
      Zinc-regulated transporter 1 114193659 Transcription factors
      35 PSU, 500 mg/L 26S protease regulatory subunit 8 114196020 Proteosome
      Activator 1 subunit 3 114188298 Folding, sorting, and degradation
      Alanyl-tRNA synthetase 114196954 Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis
      C-1-tetrahydrofolate synthase, mitochondrial precursor 114196661 Folate biosynthesis
      Cholinesterase 114195928 Glycerophospholipid metabolism
      Iron sulfur assembly protein 1 114194102 Biotin metabolism
      Lactoylglutathione lyase 114191927 Pyruvate metabolism
      Methionine aminopeptidase 2B 114192909 Fructose and mannose metabolism
      NAD-dependent histone deacetylase SIR2 114193955 Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins
      Nucleolar GTP-binding protein 2 114192691 Translation
      Splicing factor 3B subunit 3 114194961 Spliceosome
      T-complex protein 1 subunit delta 114193665 Chaperones and folding catalysts
      Transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 12 114189293 Transcription
      100 PSU, 0 mg/L 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase 114188011 Melavonate pathway/terpenoid synthesis
      Ankyrin repeat protein nuc-2 114191665 Toll and Imd signaling pathway
      Argininosuccinate lyase 114196749 Arginine biosynthesis
      Aryl-alcohol dehydrogenase 114196508 Tyrosine metabolism
      Casein kinase I isoform epsilon 114190610 Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes
      Chitin synthase 6 114196376 Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism
      Dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation regulated kinase 2 114189670 MAPK signaling pathway
      100 PSU, 0 mg/L Mannose-6-phosphate isomerase 114197475 Fructose and mannose metabolism
      Peroxisomal biogenesis factor 6 114196745 Transport and catabolism
      Proteasome subunit alpha type 1 114190652 Folding, sorting, and degradation
      Serine/threonine-protein kinase CLA4 114188881 Cell cycle
      Two-component signaling kinase TcsC 421994880 Signal transduction
      Vacuolar ATP synthase 98 kDa subunit 114194052 Oxidative phosphorylation
      100 PSU, 100 mg/L Aldo-keto reductase yakc 114195515 Arachidonic acid metabolism
      Calcium-transporting ATPase 1 114191621 Calcium signaling pathway
      Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide V, mitochondrial precursor 114190172 Oxidative phosphorylation
      DNA repair and recombination protein RAD54 114188055 Stress/ DNA repair
      Enoyl-CoA hydratase, mitochondrial precursor 114196542 Fatty acid elongation
      G2/mitotic-specific cyclin cdc13 114195591 Cell cycle
      Glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial precursor 114189298 Lipid metabolism
      GTP-binding protein 1 114195273 Signal transduction
      Maleylacetate reductase 114193824 Chlorocyclohexane and chlorobenzene degradation
      Peroxidase/catalase 2 114189895 Stress response
      Phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase 114196550 Purine metabolism
      T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha 114195604 Chaperones and folding catalysts
      Threonine synthase 114191253 Glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism
      Thymidylate synthase 114187858 Pyrimidine metabolism
      100 PSU, 500 mg/L 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3 114189291 Proteosome
      3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase B 114194981 Valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis
      Aconitate hydratase, mitochondrial precursor 114194899 Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)
      Branched-chain-amino-acid aminotransferase 114191652 Cysteine and methionine metabolism
      Bystin 114193014 Ribosome biogenesis
      DNA replication licensing factor mcm7 114193195 DNA replication
      Elongation factor G 114188759 Translation
      Elongation factor G 1, mitochondrial precursor 114192760 Translation
      Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunit 1 114188901 Translation
      Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 gamma subunit 114192814 Translation
      Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B 114193915 Translation
      Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 6 114188867 Translation
      Exoglucanase 1 precursor 114192372 Starch and sucrose metabolism
      Glycine cleavage system H protein 114197351 Glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism
      HIRA-interacting protein 5 114193863 Oxidative phosphorylation
      Isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial precursor 114191418 Amino acid metabolism
      Mitochondrial import receptor subunit tom-20 114192401 Transporters
      Multidrug resistance protein 1 114188861 Drug resistance
      Myosin-1 114190321 Cellular processes
      NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 19.3 kDa subunit, mitochondrial precursor 114191677 Oxidative phosphorylation
      NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 51 kDa subunit, mitochondrial precursor 114194075 Oxidative phosphorylation
      Nucleolar essential protein 1 114189301 Translation
      Nucleolar protein NOP58 114194165 Translation
      Phenylacrylic acid decarboxylase 114187643 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
      Phospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase 114193629 Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis
      Prohibitin-2 114188359 Mitochondrial biogenesis
      Queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase 114187859 queuosine biosynthesis
      Sec14 cytosolic factor 114193260 Transporters
      Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Sm D1 114192048 Spliceosome
      Thioredoxin reductase 114194755 Response to oxidative stress
      Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase 114195131 Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis
      Valyl-tRNA synthetase, mitochondrial precursor 114189806 Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis

      The protein regulation of A. terreus subjected to salinity and chromium stresses was analysed using MPP software (v14.09), and the up-/downregulated proteins are shown in Table 3. It was observed that proteins commonly expressed across all conditions were generally downregulated under metal stress at all salinities, except for a few, suggesting that stress affects the expression of housekeeping genes. The priority of organisms is survival, rather than growth and reproduction, leading to downregulation of these proteins. Oxidoreductive proteins, such as cytochrome c oxidase (NCBI gi–114188084), were found to be upregulated at both 35 and 100 PSU in the presence of Cr+6, along with heat shock protein 82 (NCBI gi–114187927). The DNA damage checkpoint protein Rad24 (NCBI gi–114188055), involved in checkpoint response and DNA double-strand break repair was also found to be upregulated. Thioredoxin (NCBI gi–114190288), which is known to scavenge ROS actively, was upregulated at all salinities with chromium stress, with a fold change value of 5.011 and 5.532 at 100 and 500 mg/L Cr+6 under 35 PSU salinity, respectively. The catalase B precursor (NCBI gi–114190039) was downregulated at 35 PSU under Cr+6 stress. Antioxidant enzymes can be affected by free radical regeneration, and the expression of common housekeeping genes may also be altered. The downregulation of carbohydrate metabolism proteins indicated this: pyruvate kinase (NCBI gi−114193787) and transketolase 1 (NCBI gi–114197498) at 0 and 100 PSU, respectively, when subjected to Cr+6.

      Table 3.  Protein regulation by A. terreus under chromium stress.

      Protein name NCBI gi FCa FCb Protein name NCBI gi FCa FCb
      Commonly upregulated proteins at 0 PSU (17 nos.)
      40S ribosomal protein S5 114197792 2.766 0.738 Hypothetical protein ATEG_07937 114190499 1.383 0.298
      ADP, ATP carrier protein 114194661 1.045 0.756 Hypothetical protein ATEG_08274 114189747 3.400 2.199
      ATP synthase gamma chain, mp 114195813 2.271 3.245 Ketol-acid reductoisomerase, mp 114195083 1.382 0.463
      Bacterial hemoglobin 114195409 0.313 1.337 Mitochondrial phosphate carrier protein 114197783 1.587 2.695
      Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase component of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, mp 114191205 2.716 1.100 Mitochondrial processing peptidase β subunit 114197569 0.663 1.044
      Hypothetical protein ATEG_04611 114193358 2.318 3.437 S-adenosylmethionine synthetase 114197201 2.128 3.614
      Hypothetical protein ATEG_04814 114193561 0.792 3.772 Sulfate adenylyltransferase 114189197 2.245 1.548
      Hypothetical protein ATEG_06597 114191441 2.031 1.491 Thioredoxin 114190288 1.054 1.366
      Hypothetical protein ATEG_07125 114190809 3.702 4.735
      Commonly downregulated proteins at 0 PSU (28 nos.)
      30 kDa heat shock protein 114195087 −1.489 −3.989 Hypothetical protein ATEG_03766 114193868 −3.495 −4.500
      40S ribosomal protein S7 114193349 −0.400 −1.867 Hypothetical protein ATEG_04029 114194131 −0.329 −5.081
      Adenosylhomocysteinase 114197109 −2.504 −1.255 Hypothetical protein ATEG_07892 114190454 −2.436 −3.554
      Alcohol dehydrogenase I 114188844 −1.262 −2.186 Nucleoside diphosphate kinase 114189539 −0.270 −1.198
      Allergen Asp f 15 precursor 114196299 −1.670 −1.123 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, mp 114188009 −1.079 −1.164
      ATP-citrate synthase subunit 1 114195637 −0.241 −1.403 Phosphoglycerate kinase 114197170 −0.876 −1.691
      Cell division control protein 3 114191267 −0.026 −1.425 Pyruvate decarboxylase 114193380 −1.080 −1.857
      Citrate synthase, mp 114189463 −1.648 −1.952 Pyruvate kinase 114193787 −1.254 −2.345
      Cytochrome c peroxidase, mp 114194980 −2.517 −2.468 Superoxide dismutase, mp 114197603 −2.990 −5.415
      Enolase 114194476 −0.766 −1.167 Transaldolase 114191388 −0.240 −1.012
      Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A 114193909 −1.433 −2.481 Transketolase 1 114197498 −2.501 −3.119
      Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 114193450 −1.280 −2.084 Triosephosphate isomerase 114192224 −2.191 −2.825
      Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 114188308 −0.692 −1.064 Tubulin beta chain 114197233 −0.815 −2.778
      Histone H2A 114189434 −0.898 −1.043 UDP-glucose 4-epimerase 114190193 −0.734 −2.722
      Commonly upregulated proteins at 35 PSU (63 nos.)
      2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase 114196604 2.324 3.720 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 114187927 1.578 1.973
      40S ribosomal protein S0 114194180 2.509 3.045 Heat shock protein 82 114189469 4.514 3.642
      40S ribosomal protein S12 114194654 1.124 2.256 Hexokinase 114191625 2.103 1.510
      40S ribosomal protein S4-A 114189168 0.829 1.918 Histone H4.2 114196427 0.609 1.157
      40S ribosomal protein S5 114197792 0.692 2.155 Hypothetical protein ATEG_01302 114196359 0.892 1.508
      40S ribosomal protein S7 114193349 1.349 2.410 Hypothetical protein ATEG_04182 114194284 1.632 2.166
      60S ribosomal protein L13 114196001 0.697 2.429 Hypothetical protein ATEG_05472 114192841 1.102 1.171
      60S ribosomal protein L14-A 114190763 1.619 1.637 Hypothetical protein ATEG_07125 114190809 0.681 1.325
      60S ribosomal protein L17 114197587 0.870 1.694 Hypothetical protein ATEG_07222 114190906 1.819 1.008
      60S ribosomal protein L23A 114188904 0.374 1.561 Inorganic pyrophosphatase 114196689 1.807 1.504
      60S ribosomal protein L4-2 114188716 1.276 3.004 Ketol-acid reductoisomerase, mp 114195083 2.091 2.069
      60S ribosomal protein L43 114187815 1.296 1.853 Malate dehydrogenase, mp 114191202 1.331 0.976
      6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 114191912 1.563 2.096 Mitochondrial peroxiredoxin PRX1 114192711 2.872 3.131
      Actin 114190657 1.288 1.599 Mitochondrial phosphate carrier protein 114197783 2.236 2.705
      ADP, ATP carrier protein 114194661 0.997 1.245 Mitochondrial processing peptidase β subunit 114197569 2.160 3.326
      ATP synthase alpha chain, mp 114193514 1.267 1.362 Outer mitochondrial membrane protein porin 114192911 1.732 0.165
      ATP synthase beta chain, mp 114190171 1.010 1.178 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase cyp8 114192233 0.985 1.330
      ATP-citrate synthase subunit 1 114195637 3.057 3.839 Phosphoglycerate kinase 114197170 0.272 1.118
      Bacterial hemoglobin 114195409 2.965 5.151 Predicted protein 114191395 0.951 2.529
      Cell division cycle protein 48 114187782 2.262 1.642 Protein MMF1, mp 114196923 1.349 0.962
      Cerevisin precursor 114191390 1.711 1.105 Rab GDP-dissociation inhibitor 114196519 1.423 1.503
      Conserved hypothetical protein 114196475 1.396 2.587 S-adenosylmethionine synthetase 114197201 2.622 3.822
      Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide IV, mp 114188084 3.281 3.780 Thioredoxin 114190288 5.011 5.532
      Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide VI, mp 114188679 1.105 1.648 Transaldolase 114191388 1.929 1.609
      DNA damage checkpoint protein rad24 114188055 1.449 1.457 Transketolase 1 114197498 1.548 0.710
      Elongation factor 1-alpha 114194584 1.020 1.685 Triosephosphate isomerase 114192224 1.975 2.215
      Elongation factor 2 114196384 1.127 1.052 Tubulin beta chain 114197233 1.919 0.493
      Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A 114196711 2.100 1.766 UDP-glucose 4-epimerase 114190193 2.064 1.063
      Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 114193450 0.739 1.528 Uricase 114196577 1.110 1.717
      Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase 114193156 2.410 3.284 Vacuolar protease A precursor 114193423 1.442 1.539
      Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 114188308 0.718 1.222 Woronin body major protein 114191425 1.183 0.351
      GTP-binding nuclear protein GSP1/Ran 114194939 2.158 2.763
      Commonly downregulated proteins at 35 PSU (02 nos.)
      Catalase B precursor 114190039 −0.738 −1.267 Hypothetical protein ATEG_04940 114192309 −1.152 −3.181
      Hypothetical protein ATEG_02219 114195481 −1.691 −0.240 Hypothetical protein ATEG_07892 114190454 −2.963 −0.709
      Commonly upregulated proteins at 100 PSU (60 nos.)
      40S ribosomal protein S12 114194654 1.270 0.419 ATP synthase D chain, mp 114190764 1.467 1.799
      40S ribosomal protein S14 114196585 1.452 2.090 ATP synthase gamma chain, mp 114195813 1.783 2.225
      40S ribosomal protein S18 114194976 1.482 1.444 ATP synthase subunit 4, mp 114193524 1.860 1.327
      40S ribosomal protein S2 114189125 1.241 1.859 Bacterial hemoglobin 114195409 1.772 2.860
      40S ribosomal protein S22 114192590 2.391 3.118 Cell division cycle protein 48 114187782 0.806 2.239
      40S ribosomal protein S3 114194638 2.251 1.819 Cerevisin precursor 114191390 1.431 0.988
      40S ribosomal protein S4-A 114189168 1.112 2.637 Citrate synthase, mp 114189463 0.473 1.825
      40S ribosomal protein S5 114197792 1.161 1.795 Conserved hypothetical protein 114196475 2.126 2.297
      40S ribosomal protein S6 114194091 2.466 4.689 Cytochrome c 114196337 1.893 1.957
      40S ribosomal protein S7 114193349 1.105 2.259 Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide IV, mp 114188084 0.740 1.015
      40S ribosomal protein S8-B 114193882 1.527 3.730 D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase 2 114188915 0.435 2.825
      60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 114195838 1.810 2.371 Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase component of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, mp 114191205 0.997 2.215
      60S ribosomal protein L10-B 114188346 0.697 1.575 Elongation factor 1-alpha 114194584 0.602 1.119
      60S ribosomal protein L11 114192799 1.454 3.276 Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase 114196680 4.509 4.948
      60S ribosomal protein L12 114195804 0.921 1.374 Heat shock protein 60, mp 114188341 1.130 2.925
      60S ribosomal protein L13 114196001 1.628 1.675 Heat shock protein 82 114189469 0.437 1.829
      60S ribosomal protein L14-A 114190763 0.583 1.701 Heat shock protein SSC1, mp 114193179 0.308 1.746
      60S ribosomal protein L17 114197587 3.057 4.125 Hypothetical protein ATEG_03432 114195006 2.416 2.892
      60S ribosomal protein L2 114188833 3.644 3.886 Hypothetical protein ATEG_03766 114193868 0.613 1.904
      60S ribosomal protein L20 114193847 0.326 1.473 Hypothetical protein ATEG_04611 114193358 2.060 1.378
      60S ribosomal protein L22 114194260 1.264 1.760 Hypothetical protein ATEG_08708 114189140 2.900 2.194
      60S ribosomal protein L23 114188046 1.750 2.336 Hypothetical protein ATEG_09084 114188521 0.106 1.874
      60S ribosomal protein L23A 114188904 1.337 2.134 Isocitrate dehydrogenase subunit 2, mp 114197413 2.411 3.027
      60S ribosomal protein L27a 114189407 1.732 3.080 Mitochondrial phosphate carrier protein 114197783 0.882 2.216
      60S ribosomal protein L34-B 114188081 2.250 2.919 Mitochondrial processing peptidase β subunit 114197569 1.436 2.454
      60S ribosomal protein L4-2 114188716 1.634 1.888 NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 30.4 kDa subunit, mp 114191474 0.895 1.475
      60S ribosomal protein L43 114187815 0.561 1.072 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase cyp8 114192233 1.009 0.636
      60S ribosomal protein L7 114195468 1.105 1.453 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component α subunit, mp 114193839 1.026 1.899
      ADP, ATP carrier protein 114194661 0.351 1.904 Thioredoxin 114190288 2.358 1.839
      Aspartate aminotransferase, mp 114197845 0.859 1.208 Tubulin beta chain 114197233 0.194 1.720
      Commonly downregulated proteins at 100 PSU (14 nos.)
      2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase 114196604 −0.221 −1.250 Hypothetical protein ATEG_07892 114190454 −0.894 −3.342
      Adenosylhomocysteinase 114197109 −1.786 −0.439 Inorganic pyrophosphatase 114196689 −0.643 −2.344
      Aldehyde dehydrogenase 114192389 −1.095 −0.509 Phosphoglycerate kinase 114197170 −0.042 −1.044
      Cytochrome c peroxidase, mp 114194980 −1.986 −1.345 Pyruvate kinase 114193787 −1.707 −1.342
      Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 114193450 −0.326 −1.110 Superoxide dismutase, mp 114197603 −2.076 −0.414
      Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase 114193156 −1.044 −0.166 Transketolase 1 114197498 −1.322 −0.163
      Hypothetical protein ATEG_03892 114193994 −1.528 −0.492 UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase 114196870 −0.195 −1.299
      FCa = fold change values for proteins expressed under chromium stress (100 ppm vs. 0 ppm); FCb = fold change values for proteins expressed under chromium stress (500 ppm vs. 0 ppm); mp = mitochondrial precursor.
    • This study provides an in-depth mechanistic insight into how a marine-derived Aspergillus terreus isolate responds to simultaneous hypersaline (100 PSU) and Cr+6 stress—conditions that mimic industrial effluents from tanneries, electroplating, and salt-production sites where heavy metals and high ionic strength co-occur. Cr+6 is recognised for its high mobility, toxicity, and ability to induce oxidative and genotoxic stress, while hypersalinity creates osmotic and ionic stress that impairs many traditional bioremediation microbes.

      Metal tolerance in A. terreus has been extensively explored and well cited[26,27]. When subjected to multi-metal stress, Aspergillus fumigatus PD-18, isolated from polluted banks of the Yamuna River, India expressed about 2,190 proteins, of which 387 were exclusively present under stressed conditions[19]. In another study, 2,646 proteins were identified in Aspergillus ochraceus grown on 20 and 70 g/L NaCl substrates, resulting in elevated ergosterol production[9]. In our study, we have shown a synergistic effect of hypersalinity and heavy metal stress on A. terreus.

      Survival mechanisms in fungi are broadly categorised as extracellular mechanisms involving biosorption, bioleaching, biotransformation, and bioprecipitation, and intracellular mechanisms where enzymatic transformation, chelation, and multiple signalling pathways play a very important role, along with transporter proteins[27]. The most prominent transporters identified in fungi are reported to be ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, conjugated ABC transporters (CT), cation diffusion transporters (CDF), MIT family (Cor A metal ion transporters), SIT (siderophore ion transport) subfamily under major facilitator superfamily (MFS), mitochondrial carriers, P-type ATPases, and Nramp family transporters[9,28]. Some of these were identified in the present study too (Table 2, Fig. 2). MacDiarmid & Gardner[14] reported aluminium tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to overexpression of Mg transporters (ALR1/ALR2). In another study, Mg transporters conferred resistance to Co+2 growth inhibition in Salmonella typhimurium[29].

      Fungi in the marine environment initially need to adapt to high osmotic pressure and then devise mechanisms to tolerate any metal stress. Salinity stress alone (100 PSU) caused the expression of some of the very important proteins, such as the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, a key enzyme in the mevalonate pathway and sterol biosynthesis[17], as reported in this study. Aspergillus terreus (NTOU4989) isolated from a Kueishan Island hydrothermal vent showed upregulation of glycerol lipid metabolism, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase genes in the presence of salt[21]. Another study reported overexpression of specific alkaloids in A. terreus, an endophyte isolated from Porites pukoensis, Xuwen coral reef, China, in the presence of 10% salt in PDB, known to modulate cell membranes and regulate membrane fluidity[22]. Interestingly, the endophytic fungus A. terreus isolated from the roots of Chenopodium album (wheat) under saline conditions showed low activities of ascorbate, catalase, and peroxidase[23]. Collectively, these three studies demonstrated that diverse A. terreus strains modulate both primary and secondary metabolism under salinity stress, regardless of ecological origin. Transcriptional activation of osmoadaptive pathways and alkaloid biosynthesis demonstrates the multi-faceted influence of salinity on metabolic output and stress physiology in fungi. The synergistic effect of salinity and Cr+6 stress led to four major stress response-related mechanisms in the current study (Fig. 3).

      Figure 3. 

      Mechanism of metal tolerance by A. terreus (#NIOSN-SK56-S52) under salinity and chromium stress.

      Sodium ions, which are themselves toxic, act as signalling molecules to open up non-selective cation channels within the cell membrane, causing activation of Ca+2 transporters, MAPK pathways, ROS generation, and activation of subsequent repair mechanisms such as SOS repair and production of NADPH oxidase[30] HMG-CoA, also identified as the biochemical signature of halophily, is reportedly involved in post-translational modification by prenylation in H. werneckii and catering to metabolic demands under hypo-, hypersaline conditions[31]. Protein kinases, a group of silent stress busters, are widely reported and cited in eukaryotic systems for regulatory roles in managing stress response[32]. Expression of proteins involved in signalling, regulation, or the promotion of protein kinase production is indicative of stressful conditions. Almeida-Dalmet et al.[33] reported upregulated expression of the protein kinase gene and phenyl acetyl CoA ligase gene under salinity and temperature stresses in the Haloarcula strain.

      ROS-generated stress leads to the production of proteins such as kinases and phosphatases, which may be grouped as salt stress proteins that further enhance the production of proteins involved in cell wall building, nutrient metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and cell enlargement and division[34]. Both enzymatic (catalase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidases, glutathione reductases) and non-enzymatic (ascorbic acid, glutathione, phenolics, proline) antioxidants have immense ability to scavenge ROS[18]. Ankyrin repeats have also been reported to participate in ROS under salt stress[35]. Some of these proteins were expressed under salinity stress in the current study (Tables 1, 2). Proteins such as thioredoxin, catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione S-transferase, along with heat shock proteins have been previously reported in the opportunistic pathogen, A. terreus, when subjected to 37 °C for 48 h and exposed to amphotericin B[20]. Toxicity of metal, once within the cell, can be curbed using multiple measures, one of which is organelle compartmentation or vacuolar accumulation after being chelated using glutathione, metallothioneins, or phytochelatins, as in the case of hyperaccumulating plants[36,37]. Expression of these T-complex proteins (TCPs) has been reported to be dominant under salt stress, along with heat shock proteins[38], and was detected under 35 and 100 PSU salt stress in the current study. Elevated salt concentrations may cause physiological changes in subjected organisms and trigger molecular, cellular, and metabolic responses. Expression of stress proteins, proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation, and transporter proteins was observed under Cr+6 stress and increasing salinity, indicating a synergistic effect of both stresses on the culture.

      Housekeeping proteins are vital for survival and are expressed in organisms at all times, irrespective of favourable or stressful conditions[39]. However, their expression may be altered or become irregular under certain conditions[40]. We found changes in the expressions of some housekeeping proteins in response to the stress imparted. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression was downregulated at 0 PSU salt concentration in the presence of Cr+6, but was upregulated at 100 PSU (Table 3). Similarly, the expression of the Tubulin beta chain varied under different salt concentrations in the presence of metal. Differential expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and beta-actin genes was also reported during the course of hepatitis C virus-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCV-HCC)[41]. Further, this differential expression property has previously been used to diagnose lung cancer[42]. Therefore, any drastic variations in the expression levels of such genes may shed light on an organism's adaptive strategies in the presence of stress. On the contrary, relying solely on the expression of housekeeping genes as an internal reference may not always generate dependable results. A study by Irie et al.[43] reported that atorvastatin altered the expression of housekeeping genes, thereby misleading the data obtained for the target gene expression set, and emphasised caution when using internal reference gene expression data, especially in cancer-related studies. Such caution during experimental setup has also been reported previously[44]. Although RT-qPCR analysis of this gene expression in the current study would shed more light on this conclusion, the preliminary experiments also provide reliable proof.

    • This study shows that the marine-derived A. terreus employs a coordinated and multi-layered defense network to survive the combined effects of Cr+6 stress and hypersaline (100 PSU) conditions. Based on proteomics results, the isolate primarily activates DNA damage control and repair systems, in addition to robust ROS detoxification mechanisms, when exposed to salinity alone, thereby protecting cellular components and genomic integrity. The addition of Cr+6 induces further adaptive responses, such as upregulation of membrane transporters to mediate metal and ion flux and the conversion of toxic Cr+6 to the less harmful Cr+3 via enzymatic reduction pathways. Together, these systems lessen the cumulative harm and enable the cell to redistribute resources from growth to essential survival functions. The ecological adaptability of A. terreus and its potential for bioremediation of saline, metal-contaminated wastewaters are highlighted by its ability to continue functioning under extreme ionic and oxidative pressures, where conventional microorganisms are ineffective. Together, these abilities contribute to the strategic application of marine fungi for high-salinity sustainable heavy-metal remediation technologies, and enhance our knowledge of fungal stress adaptation.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: conceptualised: Lotlikar NP, Damare SR; carried out as part of the doctoral thesis: Lotlikar NP. Both authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data will be made available on request.

      • The first author is thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for the fellowship 18-12/2011(ii)EU-V and the Director, CSIR-NIO, for providing the facilities. Both authors are thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India, for funding this work under the project PSC0206. The first author is thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for the fellowship 18-12/2011(ii)EU-V. The authors are also thankful to anonymous reviewers for their comments, which improved the manuscript.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  Table (3) References (44)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Lotlikar NP, Damare SR. 2026. Adaptive responses of marine-derived Aspergillus terreus to salinity and chromium stress analysed by peptide mass fingerprinting. Studies in Fungi 11: e018 doi: 10.48130/sif-0026-0015
    Lotlikar NP, Damare SR. 2026. Adaptive responses of marine-derived Aspergillus terreus to salinity and chromium stress analysed by peptide mass fingerprinting. Studies in Fungi 11: e018 doi: 10.48130/sif-0026-0015

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return