Search
2025 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Anthocyanins as protectors of gut microbiota: mitigating the adverse effects of microplastic-induced disruption

  • Authors contributed equally: Ville M Koistinen, Ambrin Farizah Babu

More Information
  • Anthocyanins, potent bioactive compounds found abundantly in berries, as well as in many other pigmented edible plants, have garnered significant attention for their health-promoting properties, particularly in relation to gut microbiota. This review focuses on the protective role of anthocyanins against gut microbiota disruption caused by microplastics, environmental pollutants that have triggered increased concerns in recent years for their impact on ecosystems and human health. By synthesizing current research, the mechanisms through which anthocyanins may exert their beneficial effects are explored, mitigating the negative health effects of microplastic ingestion. The paper also discusses the potential application of anthocyanin-rich functional foods and supplements as a strategy to preserve gut health in the face of rising environmental challenges.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Mattioli R, Francioso A, Mosca L, Silva P. 2020. Anthocyanins: a comprehensive review of their chemical properties and health effects on cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules 25:3809 doi: 10.3390/molecules25173809

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Hsu WY, Shipman PD, Thompson S. 2023. Molecular transformations and self-association in anthocyanin pigment patterns. Journal of Biosciences 49:4 doi: 10.1007/s12038-023-00367-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Ayvaz H, Cabaroglu T, Akyildiz A, Pala CU, Temizkan R, et al. 2022. Anthocyanins: metabolic digestion, bioavailability, therapeutic effects, current pharmaceutical/industrial use, and innovation potential. Antioxidants 12:48 doi: 10.3390/antiox12010048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Sendri N, Bhandari P. 2024. Anthocyanins: a comprehensive review on biosynthesis, structural diversity, and industrial applications. Phytochemistry Reviews 23:1913−74 doi: 10.1007/s11101-024-09945-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Golovko TK. 2023. Plant anthocyanins: structure, biosynthesis regulation, functions, and ecology. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 70:161 doi: 10.1134/S1021443723700292

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Cappellini F, Marinelli A, Toccaceli M, Tonelli C, Petroni K. 2021. Anthocyanins: from mechanisms of regulation in plants to health benefits in foods. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:748049 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.748049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Alam MA, Islam P, Subhan N, Rahman MM, Khan F, et al. 2021. Potential health benefits of anthocyanins in oxidative stress related disorders. Phytochemistry Reviews 20:705−49 doi: 10.1007/s11101-021-09757-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies. 2010. Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to various food (s)/food constituent (s) and protection of cells from premature ageing (ID 1668, 1917, 2515, 2527, 2530, 2575, 2580, 2591, 2620, 3178, 3179, 3180, 3181, 4329, 4415), antioxidant activity, antioxidant content and antioxidant properties (ID 857, 1306, 2515, 2527, 2530, 2575, 2580, 2591, 2629, 2728, 4327, 4365, 4380, 4390, 4394, 4455, 4464, 4507, 4694, 4705), protection of DNA, proteins and lipids from oxidative damage (ID 1196, 1211, 1216, 1306, 1312, 1440, 1441, 1666, 1668, 1692, 1900, 1914, 1948, 2023, 2158, 2517, 2522, 2527, 2575, 2591, 2620, 2637, 2639, 2663, 2860, 3079, 3276, 3564, 3818, 4324, 4329, 4351, 4397, 4416, 4424, 4507, 4527, 4528, 4542, 4611, 4629, 4659) and bioavailability of anthocyanins in black currants (ID 4220) pursuant to Article 13 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA Journal 8(10):1752 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1752

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Chaiyasut C, Sivamaruthi B, Kesika P, Subasankari K. 2018. Beneficial effects of anthocyanins against diabetes mellitus associated consequences-A mini review. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 8:471−77 doi: 10.4103/2221-1691.244137

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Kapoor P, Tiwari A, Sharma S, Tiwari V, Sheoran B, et al. 2023. Effect of anthocyanins on gut health markers, Firmicutes-Bacteroidetes ratio and short-chain fatty acids: a systematic review via meta-analysis. Scientific Reports 13:1729 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28764-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Liang A, Leonard W, Beasley JT, Fang Z, Zhang P, et al. 2024. Anthocyanins-gut microbiota-health axis: a review. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 64:7563−88 doi: 10.1080/10408398.2023.2187212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Verediano TA, Stampini Duarte Martino H, Dias Paes MC, Tako E. 2021. Effects of anthocyanin on intestinal health: a systematic review. Nutrients 13:1331 doi: 10.3390/nu13041331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Kumkum R, Aston-Mourney K, McNeill BA, Hernández D, Rivera LR. 2024. Bioavailability of Anthocyanins: whole Foods versus Extracts. Nutrients 16:1403 doi: 10.3390/nu16101403

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Bhan C, Anita, Kumar N. 2024. Sources, impacts and distribution of microplastics in different environmental matrices: a review. Environmental Sustainability 7:171−80 doi: 10.1007/s42398-024-00315-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Jiang B, Kauffman AE, Li L, McFee W, Cai B, et al. 2020. Health impacts of environmental contamination of micro-and nanoplastics: a review. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 25:1−15 doi: 10.1186/s12199-019-0839-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Amobonye A, Bhagwat P, Raveendran S, Singh S, Pillai S. 2021. Environmental impacts of microplastics and nanoplastics: a current overview. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:768297 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.768297

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Osman AI, Hosny M, Eltaweil AS, Omar S, Elgarahy AM, et al. 2023. Microplastic sources, formation, toxicity and remediation: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 21:2129−69 doi: 10.1007/s10311-023-01593-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Wright SL, Kelly FJ. 2017. Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Environmental Science & Technology 51:6634−47 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00423

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Pironti C, Ricciardi M, Motta O, Miele Y, Proto A, et al. 2021. Microplastics in the environment: intake through the food web, human exposure and toxicological effects. Toxics 9:224 doi: 10.3390/toxics9090224

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Andrady AL. 2011. Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62:1596−605 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Eriksen M, Lebreton LCM, Carson HS, Thiel M, Moore CJ, et al. 2014. Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PLoS one 9:e111913 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111913

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Yang H, Chen G, Wang J. 2021. Microplastics in the marine environment: Sources, fates, impacts and microbial degradation. Toxics 9:41 doi: 10.3390/toxics9020041

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Boucher J, Friot D. 2017. Primary microplastics in the oceans: a global evaluation of sources. Gland, Switzerland: The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). doi: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.01.en
    [24] Anderson PJ, Warrack S, Langen V, Challis JK, Hanson ML, et al. 2017. Microplastic contamination in lake Winnipeg, Canada. Environmental pollution 225:223−31 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.072

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] He S, Jia M, Xiang Y, Song B, Xiong W, et al. 2022. Biofilm on microplastics in aqueous environment: physicochemical properties and environmental implications. Journal of Hazardous Materials 424:127286 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127286

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Jin Y, Lu L, Tu W, Luo T, Fu Z. 2019. Impacts of polystyrene microplastic on the gut barrier, microbiota and metabolism of mice. Science of The Total Environment 649:308−17 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.353

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Tang KHD, Li R, Li Z, Wang D. 2024. Health risk of human exposure to microplastics: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 22:1155−83 doi: 10.1007/s10311-024-01727-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Lai H, Liu X, Qu M. 2022. Nanoplastics and human health: hazard identification and biointerface. Nanomaterials 12:1298 doi: 10.3390/nano12081298

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Lei J, Ma Q, Ding X, Pang Y, Liu Q, et al. 2024. Microplastic environmental behavior and health risk assessment: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 22:2913−41 doi: 10.1007/s10311-024-01771-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Cui J, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhang Q, Xu S, et al. 2023. Polystyrene microplastics induced inflammation with activating the TLR2 signal by excessive accumulation of ROS in hepatopancreas of carp (Cyprinus carpio). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 251:114539 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114539

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Solomando A, Capó X, Alomar C, Álvarez E, Compa M, et al. 2020. Long-term exposure to microplastics induces oxidative stress and a pro-inflammatory response in the gut of Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758. Environmental Pollution 266:115295 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115295

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Kawa IA, Masood A, Fatima Q, Ahmad Mir S, Jeelani H, et al. 2021. Endocrine disrupting chemical Bisphenol A and its potential effects on female health. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews 15:803−11 doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.03.031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Jones KC. 2021. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and related chemicals in the global environment: some personal reflections. Environmental Science & Technology 55:9400−12 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Jain R, Gaur A, Suravajhala R, Chauhan U, Pant M, et al. 2023. Microplastic pollution: understanding microbial degradation and strategies for pollutant reduction. Science of The Total Environment 905:167098 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167098

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Calero M, Godoy V, Quesada L, Martín-Lara MÁ. 2021. Green strategies for microplastics reduction. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 28:100442 doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100442

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Chen J, Wu J, Sherrell PC, Chen J, Wang H, et al. 2022. How to build a microplastics-free environment: strategies for microplastics degradation and plastics recycling. Advanced Science 9:e2103764 doi: 10.1002/advs.202103764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Hirt N, Body-Malapel M. 2020. Immunotoxicity and intestinal effects of nano-and microplastics: a review of the literature. Particle and fibre toxicology 17:57 doi: 10.1186/s12989-020-00387-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Qiao J, Chen R, Wang M, Bai R, Cui X, et al. 2021. Perturbation of gut microbiota plays an important role in micro/nanoplastics-induced gut barrier dysfunction. Nanoscale 13:8806−16 doi: 10.1039/D1NR00038A

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Neyrinck AM, Van Hée VF, Bindels LB, De Backer F, Cani PD, et al. 2013. Polyphenol-rich extract of pomegranate peel alleviates tissue inflammation and hypercholesterolaemia in high-fat diet-induced obese mice: potential implication of the gut microbiota. British Journal of Nutrition 109:802−9 doi: 10.1017/S0007114512002206

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Sakuta M. 2014. Diversity in plant red pigments: anthocyanins and betacyanins. Plant Biotechnology Reports 8:37−48 doi: 10.1007/s11816-013-0294-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Dudonné S, Dubé P, Anhê FF, Pilon G, Marette A, et al. 2015. Comprehensive analysis of phenolic compounds and abscisic acid profiles of twelve native Canadian berries. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 44:214−24 doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2015.09.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Riihinen K, Jaakola L, Kärenlampi S, Hohtola A. 2008. Organ-specific distribution of phenolic compounds in bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) and 'northblue'blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum × V. angustifolium). Food chemistry 110:156−60 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.057

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Wu X, Beecher GR, Holden JM, Haytowitz DB, Gebhardt SE, et al. 2006. Concentrations of anthocyanins in common foods in the United States and estimation of normal consumption. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54:4069−75 doi: 10.1021/jf060300l

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Qi Q, Chu M, Yu X, Xie Y, Li Y, et al. 2023. Anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins: chemical structures, food sources, bioactivities, and product development. Food Reviews International 39:4581−609 doi: 10.1080/87559129.2022.2029479

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Rauter AlP, Herold B, Horton D, Moss G, Schomburg I, et al. 2017. Nomenclature of flavonoids. Pure and Applied Chemistry 90(9):1429−86 doi: 10.1515/pac-2013-0919

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Eker ME, Aaby K, Budic-Leto I, Rimac Brnčić S, El SN, et al. 2020. A review of factors affecting anthocyanin bioavailability: Possible implications for the inter-individual variability. Foods 9:2 doi: 10.3390/foods9010002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Cavalcanti RN, Santos DT, Meireles MAA. 2011. Non-thermal stabilization mechanisms of anthocyanins in model and food systems—an overview. Food Research International 44:499−509 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Charron CS, Kurilich AC, Clevidence BA, Simon PW, Harrison DJ, et al. 2009. Bioavailability of anthocyanins from purple carrot juice: effects of acylation and plant matrix. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57:1226−30 doi: 10.1021/jf802988s

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Felgines C, Texier O, Besson C, Lyan B, Lamaison JL, et al. 2007. Strawberry pelargonidin glycosides are excreted in urine as intact glycosides and glucuronidated pelargonidin derivatives in rats. British Journal of Nutrition 98:1126−31 doi: 10.1017/S0007114507764772

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Barba FJ, Nikmaram N, Roohinejad S, Khelfa A, Zhu Z, et al. 2016. Bioavailability of glucosinolates and their breakdown products: Impact of processing. Frontiers in Nutrition 3:24 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2016.00024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Calderaro A, Barreca D, Bellocco E, Smeriglio A, Trombetta D, et al. 2020. Colored phytonutrients: role and applications in the functional foods of anthocyanins. In Phytonutrients in food, eds. Nabavi SM, Suntar I, Barreca D, Khan H. UK: Woodhead Publishing. pp. 177-95. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815354-3.00011-3
    [52] Keppler K, Humpf HU. 2005. Metabolism of anthocyanins and their phenolic degradation products by the intestinal microflora. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 13:5195−205 doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.05.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Aura AM, Martin-Lopez P, O'Leary KA, Williamson G, Oksman-Caldentey KM, et al. 2005. In vitro metabolism of anthocyanins by human gut microflora. European Journal of Nutrition 44:133−42 doi: 10.1007/s00394-004-0502-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Hidalgo M, Oruna-Concha MJ, Kolida S, Walton GE, Kallithraka S, et al. 2012. Metabolism of anthocyanins by human gut microflora and their influence on gut bacterial growth. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 60:3882−90 doi: 10.1021/jf3002153

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Gentile CL, Weir TL. 2018. The gut microbiota at the intersection of diet and human health. Science 362:776−80 doi: 10.1126/science.aau5812

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Tamargo A, Molinero N, Reinosa JJ, Alcolea-Rodriguez V, Portela R, et al. 2022. PET microplastics affect human gut microbiota communities during simulated gastrointestinal digestion, first evidence of plausible polymer biodegradation during human digestion. Scientific Reports 12:528 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04489-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Sofield CE, Anderton RS, Gorecki AM. 2024. Mind over microplastics: exploring microplastic-induced gut disruption and gut-brain-axis consequences. Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46:4186−202 doi: 10.3390/cimb46050256

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Zhao Y, Qin Z, Huang Z, Bao Z, Luo T, et al. 2021. Effects of polyethylene microplastics on the microbiome and metabolism in larval zebrafish. Environmental Pollution 282:117039 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117039

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Xu R, Cao JW, Lv HL, Geng Y, Guo MY. 2024. Polyethylene microplastics induced gut microbiota dysbiosis leading to liver injury via the TLR2/NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway in mice. Science of The Total Environment 917:170518 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170518

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Zhang X, He X, Pan D, Shi L, Wu Y, et al. 2024. Effects of thermal exposure to disposable plastic tableware on human gut microbiota and metabolites: a quasi-experimental study. Journal of Hazardous Materials 462:132800 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132800

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] de Souza-Silva TG, Oliveira IA, da Silva GG, Giusti FCV, Novaes RD, et al. 2022. Impact of microplastics on the intestinal microbiota: a systematic review of preclinical evidence. Life Sciences 294:120366 doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120366

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Su QL, Wu J, Tan SW, Guo XY, Zou DZ, et al. 2024. The impact of microplastics polystyrene on the microscopic structure of mouse intestine, tight junction genes and gut microbiota. PLoS one 19:e0304686 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304686

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Wen S, Zhao Y, Liu S, Chen Y, Yuan H, et al. 2022. Polystyrene microplastics exacerbated liver injury from cyclophosphamide in mice: Insight into gut microbiota. Science of the Total Environment 840:156668 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156668

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Tong X, Li B, Li J, Li L, Zhang R, et al. 2022. Polyethylene microplastics cooperate with Helicobacter pylori to promote gastric injury and inflammation in mice. Chemosphere 288:132579 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132579

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Sinha P, Saini V, Varshney N, Pandey RK, Jha HC. 2025. The infiltration of microplastics in human systems: gastrointestinal accumulation and pathogenic impacts. Heliyon 11:e42606 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42606

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Fackelmann G, Sommer S. 2019. Microplastics and the gut microbiome: how chronically exposed species may suffer from gut dysbiosis. Marine Pollution Bulletin 143:193−203 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.04.030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Demarquoy J. 2024. Microplastics and microbiota: Unraveling the hidden environmental challenge. World Journal of Gastroenterology 30:2191 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i16.2191

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Dawson AL, Kawaguchi S, King CK, Townsend KA, King R, et al. 2018. Turning microplastics into nanoplastics through digestive fragmentation by Antarctic krill. Nature communications 9:1001 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03465-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Ni J, Wu GD, Albenberg L, Tomov VT. 2017. Gut microbiota and IBD: causation or correlation? Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 14:573−84 doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.88

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Tavelli R, Callens M, Grootaert C, Abdallah MF, Rajkovic A. 2022. Foodborne pathogens in the plastisphere: can microplastics in the food chain threaten microbial food safety? Trends in Food Science & Technology 129:1−10

    Google Scholar

    [71] Chen W, Chu Q, Ye X, Sun Y, Liu Y, et al. 2021. Canidin-3-glucoside prevents nano-plastics induced toxicity via activating autophagy and promoting discharge. Environmental pollution 274:116524 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116524

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Chen W, Zhu R, Ye X, Sun Y, Tang Q, et al. 2022. Food-derived cyanidin-3-O-glucoside reverses microplastic toxicity via promoting discharge and modulating the gut microbiota in mice. Food & function 13:1447−58

    Google Scholar

    [73] Zhang J, Liu W, Cui F, Kolehmainen M, Chen J, et al. 2025. Exploring the potential protective role of anthocyanins in mitigating micro/nanoplastic-induced reproductive toxicity: a steroid receptor perspective. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 15:101148 doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101148

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Faria A, Fernandes I, Norberto S, Mateus N, Calhau C. 2014. Interplay between anthocyanins and gut microbiota. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 62:6898−902 doi: 10.1021/jf501808a

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Morais CA, de Rosso VV, Estadella D, Pisani LP. 2016. Anthocyanins as inflammatory modulators and the role of the gut microbiota. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry 33:1−7 doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.11.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Wang H, Liu D, Ji Y, Liu Y, Xu L, et al. 2020. Dietary supplementation of black rice anthocyanin extract regulates cholesterol metabolism and improves gut microbiota dysbiosis in C57BL/6J mice fed a high-fat and cholesterol diet. Molecular nutrition & food research 64:1900876 doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201900876

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Ding R, Ma Y, Li T, Sun M, Sun Z, Duan J. 2023. The detrimental effects of micro-and nano-plastics on digestive system: An overview of oxidative stress-related adverse outcome pathway. Science of The Total Environment 878:163144 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163144

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Hu M, Palić D. 2020. Micro-and nano-plastics activation of oxidative and inflammatory adverse outcome pathways. Redox biology 37:101620 doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101620

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Kadac-Czapska K, Ośko J, Knez E, Grembecka M. 2024. Microplastics and oxidative stress—current problems and prospects. Antioxidants 13:579 doi: 10.3390/antiox13050579

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Kunst C, Schmid S, Michalski M, Tümen D, Buttenschön J, et al. 2023. The influence of gut microbiota on oxidative stress and the immune system. Biomedicines 11:1388 doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11051388

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Caputi S, Diomede F, Lanuti P, Marconi GD, Di Carlo P, et al. 2022. Microplastics affect the inflammation pathway in human gingival fibroblasts: a study in the Adriatic Sea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19:7782 doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137782

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Huang W, Yan Z, Li D, Ma Y, Zhou J, et al. 2018. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of blueberry anthocyanins on high glucose-induced human retinal capillary endothelial cells. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2018:1862462 doi: 10.1155/2018/1862462

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Ma H, Johnson SL, Liu W, DaSilva NA, Meschwitz S, et al. 2018. Evaluation of polyphenol anthocyanin-enriched extracts of blackberry, black raspberry, blueberry, cranberry, red raspberry, and strawberry for free radical scavenging, reactive carbonyl species trapping, anti-glycation, anti-β-amyloid aggregation, and microglial neuroprotective effects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:461 doi: 10.3390/ijms19020461

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Rehman SU, Ali Shah S, Ali T, Chung JI, Kim MO. 2017. Anthocyanins reversed D-galactose-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation mediated cognitive impairment in adult rats. Molecular Neurobiology 54:255−71 doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9604-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Furuuchi R, Shimizu I, Yoshida Y, Hayashi Y, Ikegami R, et al. 2018. Boysenberry polyphenol inhibits endothelial dysfunction and improves vascular health. PloS one 13:e0202051 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Bicudo MOP, Ribani RH, Beta T. 2014. Anthocyanins, phenolic acids and antioxidant properties of juçara fruits (Euterpe edulis M) along the on-tree ripening process. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 69:142−47 doi: 10.1007/s11130-014-0406-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Ma Z, Du B, Li J, Yang Y, Zhu F. 2021. An insight into anti-inflammatory activities and inflammation related diseases of anthocyanins: a review of both in vivo and in vitro investigations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:11076 doi: 10.3390/ijms222011076

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Duarte LJ, Chaves VC, dos Santos Nascimento MVP, Calvete E, Li M, et al. 2018. Molecular mechanism of action of Pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside, the main anthocyanin responsible for the anti-inflammatory effect of strawberry fruits. Food Chemistry 247:56−65 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.12.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Roth S, Spalinger MR, Gottier C, Biedermann L, Zeitz J, et al. 2016. Bilberry-derived anthocyanins modulate cytokine expression in the intestine of patients with ulcerative colitis. PLoS one 11:e0154817 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154817

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Le Phuong Nguyen T, Fenyvesi F, Remenyik J, Homoki JR, Gogolák P, et al. 2018. Protective effect of pure sour cherry anthocyanin extract on cytokine-induced inflammatory caco-2 monolayers. Nutrients 10:861 doi: 10.3390/nu10070861

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Zhang Y, Meng Q, Yin J, Zhang Z, Bao H, et al. 2020. Anthocyanins attenuate neuroinflammation through the suppression of MLK3 activation in a mouse model of perioperative neurocognitive disorders. Brain Research 1726:146504 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146504

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Cui HX, Chen JH, Li JW, Cheng FR, Yuan K. 2018. Protection of anthocyanin from Myrica rubra against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury via modulation of the TLR4/NF-κB and NLRP3 pathways. Molecules 23:1788 doi: 10.3390/molecules23071788

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Wu T, Tang Q, Yu Z, Gao Z, Hu H, et al. 2014. Inhibitory effects of sweet cherry anthocyanins on the obesity development in C57BL/6 mice. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 65:351−59 doi: 10.3109/09637486.2013.854749

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Nazir N, Akbar A, Salar MZ, Ahmed MZ, Ishtiaq A. 2024. Pharmacological assessment of delphinidin in counteracting polystyrene microplastic induced renal dysfunction in rats. Journal of King Saud University-Science 36:103462 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103462

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Chen W, Zheng X, Yan F, Xu L, Ye X. 2024. Modulation of gut microbial metabolism by cyanidin-3-O-glucoside in mitigating polystyrene-induced colonic inflammation: insights from 16S rRNa sequencing and metabolomics. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 72:7140−54 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c08454

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Wang M, Zhang Z, Sun H, He S, Liu S, et al. 2022. Research progress of anthocyanin prebiotic activity: A review. Phytomedicine 102:154145 doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154145

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Doughari JH, Ndakidemi PA, Human IS, Benade S. 2012. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and antiverotoxic potentials of extracts of Curtisia dentata. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 141:1041−50 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.03.051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Sun XH, Zhou TT, Wei CH, Lan WQ, Zhao Y, et al. 2018. Antibacterial effect and mechanism of anthocyanin rich Chinese wild blueberry extract on various foodborne pathogens. Food Control 94:155−61 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Ivanovski S, Haase HR, Bartold PM. 2001. Expression of bone matrix protein mRNAs by primary and cloned cultures of the regenerative phenotype of human periodontal fibroblasts. Journal of Dental Research 80:1665−71 doi: 10.1177/00220345010800071301

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Lacombe A, Li RW, Klimis-Zacas D, Kristo AS, Tadepalli S, et al. 2013. Lowbush wild blueberries have the potential to modify gut microbiota and xenobiotic metabolism in the rat colon. PLoS One 8:e67497 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067497

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Sun H, Zhang P, Zhu Y, Lou Q, He S. 2018. Antioxidant and prebiotic activity of five peonidin-based anthocyanins extracted from purple sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). Scientific Reports 8:5018 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23397-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Chen W, Tu P, Ye X, Tang Q, Yu T, et al. 2022. Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside impacts fecal discharge of polystyrene microplastics in mice: Potential role of microbiota-derived metabolites. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 453:116212 doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2022.116212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Shipp J, Abdel-Aal ESM. 2010. Food applications and physiological effects of anthocyanins as functional food ingredients. The Open Food Science Journal 4:7−22 doi: 10.2174/1874256401004010007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food. 2013. Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of anthocyanins (E 163) as a food additive. EFSA Journal 11:3145 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3145

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Lehto S, Buchweitz M, Klimm A, Straßburger R, Bechtold C, et al. 2017. Comparison of food colour regulations in the EU and the US: a review of current provisions. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 34:335−55 doi: 10.1080/19440049.2016.1274431

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Du L, Lü H, Chen Y, Yu X, Jian T, et al. 2023. Blueberry and blackberry anthocyanins ameliorate metabolic syndrome by modulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids metabolism in high-fat diet-fed C57BL/6J mice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 71:14649−65 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04606

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Della Lucia CM, Oliveira LA, Dias KA, Pereira SMS, da Conceição AR, et al. 2023. Scientific evidence for the beneficial effects of dietary blueberries on gut health: a systematic review. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 67:2300096

    Google Scholar

    [108] Stevenson D, Scalzo J. 2012. Anthocyanin composition and content of blueberries from around the world. Journal of Berry Research 2:179−89 doi: 10.3233/JBR-2012-038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Wu Y, Han Y, Tao Y, Li D, Xie G, et al. 2020. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion and fecal fermentation reveal the effect of different encapsulation materials on the release, degradation and modulation of gut microbiota of blueberry anthocyanin extract. Food Research International 132:109098 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109098

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Lätti AK, Riihinen KR, Kainulainen PS. 2008. Analysis of anthocyanin variation in wild populations of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) in Finland. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56:190−96 doi: 10.1021/jf072857m

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Li J, Wu T, Li N, Wang X, Chen G, et al. 2019. Bilberry anthocyanin extract promotes intestinal barrier function and inhibits digestive enzyme activity by regulating the gut microbiota in aging rats. Food & Function 10:333−43

    Google Scholar

    [112] Wang L, Jiang G, Jing N, Liu X, Li Q, et al. 2020. Bilberry anthocyanin extracts enhance anti-PD-L1 efficiency by modulating gut microbiota. Food & Function 11:3180−90

    Google Scholar

    [113] Mauray A, Felgines C, Morand C, Mazur A, Scalbert A, et al. 2012. Bilberry anthocyanin-rich extract alters expression of genes related to atherosclerosis development in aorta of apo E-deficient mice. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 22:72−80 doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.04.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Marques C, Fernandes I, Meireles M, Faria A, Spencer JPE, et al. 2018. Gut microbiota modulation accounts for the neuroprotective properties of anthocyanins. Scientific Reports 8:11341 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29744-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Pan P, Lam V, Salzman N, Huang YW, Yu J, et al. 2017. Black raspberries and their anthocyanin and fiber fractions alter the composition and diversity of gut microbiota in F-344 rats. Nutrition and Cancer 69:943−51 doi: 10.1080/01635581.2017.1340491

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Gu J, Thomas-Ahner JM, Riedl KM, Bailey MT, Vodovotz Y, et al. 2019. Dietary black raspberries impact the colonic microbiome and phytochemical metabolites in mice. Molecular nutrition & food research 63:1800636

    Google Scholar

    [117] Zhang S, Xu M, Sun X, Liu X, Choueiry F, et al. 2022. Black raspberry extract shifted gut microbe diversity and their metabolic landscape in a human colonic model. Journal of Chromatography B 1188:123027 doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.123027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] Wang J, Yuan ZY, Wang XY, Zhu JX, Huang WF, et al. 2024. Anthocyanins-rich cranberry extract attenuates DSS-induced IBD in an intestinal flora independent manner. Current Research in Food Science 9:100815 doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100815

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Petersen C, Wankhade UD, Bharat D, Wong K, Mueller JE, et al. 2019. Dietary supplementation with strawberry induces marked changes in the composition and functional potential of the gut microbiome in diabetic mice. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 66:63−69 doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2019.01.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Sidor A, Gramza-Michałowska A. 2015. Advanced research on the antioxidant and health benefit of elderberry (Sambucus nigra) in food–a review. Journal of Functional Foods 18:941−58 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2014.07.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121] Pahlke G, Ahlberg K, Oertel A, Janson-Schaffer T, Grabher S, et al. 2021. Antioxidant effects of elderberry anthocyanins in human colon carcinoma cells: A study on structure–activity relationships. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 65:2100229

    Google Scholar

    [122] Koskela AKJ, Anttonen MJ, Soininen TH, Saviranta NMM, Auriola S, et al. 2010. Variation in the anthocyanin concentration of wild populations of crowberries (Empetrum nigrum L. subsp. hermaphroditum). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58:12286−91 doi: 10.1021/jf1037695

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Cremonini E, Mastaloudis A, Hester SN, Verstraeten SV, Anderson M, et al. 2017. Anthocyanins inhibit tumor necrosis alpha-induced loss of Caco-2 cell barrier integrity. Food & Function 8:2915−23

    Google Scholar

    [124] Zhu Y, Zhang JY, Wei YL, Hao JY, Lei YQ, et al. 2020. The polyphenol-rich extract from chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa L.) modulates gut microbiota and improves lipid metabolism in diet-induced obese rats. Nutrition & metabolism 17:54 doi: 10.1186/s12986-020-00473-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Istas G, Wood E, Le Sayec M, Rawlings C, Yoon J, et al. 2019. Effects of aronia berry (poly)phenols on vascular function and gut microbiota: a double-blind randomized controlled trial in adult men. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 110:316−29 doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Cao L, Lee SG, Melough MM, Sakaki JR, Maas KR, et al. 2020. Long-term blackcurrant supplementation modified gut microbiome profiles in mice in an age-dependent manner: an exploratory study. Nutrients 12:290 doi: 10.3390/nu12020290

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] de Moura Amália Soares dos Reis C, da Silva Vanderlei Aparecido de Lima LD, Cadorin Oldoni TL, Pereira C, Carpes ST. 2018. Optimization of phenolic compounds extraction with antioxidant activity from açaí, blueberry and goji berry using response surface methodology. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 30:180−89 doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i3.1639

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Mertens-Talcott SU, Rios J, Jilma-Stohlawetz P, Pacheco-Palencia LA, Meibohm B, et al. 2008. Pharmacokinetics of anthocyanins and antioxidant effects after the consumption of anthocyanin-rich acai juice and pulp (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) in human healthy volunteers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56:7796−802 doi: 10.1021/jf8007037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] Song H, Shen X, Deng R, Zhang Y, Zheng X. 2021. Dietary anthocyanin-rich extract of açai protects from diet-induced obesity, liver steatosis, and insulin resistance with modulation of gut microbiota in mice. Nutrition 86:111176 doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111176

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Alqurashi RM, Alarifi SN, Walton GE, Costabile AF, Rowland IR, et al. 2017. In vitro approaches to assess the effects of açai (Euterpe oleracea) digestion on polyphenol availability and the subsequent impact on the faecal microbiota. Food Chemistry 234:190−98 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.164

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Zheng J, Ding C, Wang L, Li G, Shi J, et al. 2011. Anthocyanins composition and antioxidant activity of wild Lycium ruthenicum Murr. from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Food chemistry 126:859−65 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132] Yan Y, Peng Y, Tang J, Mi J, Lu L, et al. 2018. Effects of anthocyanins from the fruit of Lycium ruthenicum Murray on intestinal microbiota. Journal of Functional Foods 48:533−41 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2018.07.053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133] Tian B, Zhao J, Zhang M, Chen Z, Ma Q, et al. 2021. Lycium ruthenicum anthocyanins attenuate high-fat diet-induced colonic barrier dysfunction and inflammation in mice by modulating the gut microbiota. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 65:2000745

    Google Scholar

    [134] Peng Y, Yan Y, Wan P, Dong W, Huang K, et al. 2020. Effects of long-term intake of anthocyanins from Lycium ruthenicum Murray on the organism health and gut microbiota in vivo. Food Research International 130:108952 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108952

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [135] Peng Y, Yan Y, Wan P, Chen D, Ding Y, et al. 2019. Gut microbiota modulation and anti-inflammatory properties of anthocyanins from the fruits of Lycium ruthenicum Murray in dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in mice. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 136:96−108 doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.04.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136] David L, Danciu V, Moldovan B, Filip A. 2019. Effects of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion on the antioxidant capacity and anthocyanin content of cornelian cherry fruit extract. Antioxidants 8:114 doi: 10.3390/antiox8050114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [137] Van Hul M, Geurts L, Plovier H, Druart C, Everard A, et al. 2018. Reduced obesity, diabetes, and steatosis upon cinnamon and grape pomace are associated with changes in gut microbiota and markers of gut barrier. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 314:E334−E352 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00107.2017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138] Igwe EO, Charlton KE, Roodenrys S, Kent K, Fanning K, et al. 2017. Anthocyanin-rich plum juice reduces ambulatory blood pressure but not acute cognitive function in younger and older adults: a pilot crossover dose-timing study. Nutrition Research 47:28−43 doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2017.08.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [139] Bhaswant M, Brown L, Mathai ML. 2019. Queen Garnet plum juice and raspberry cordial in mildly hypertensive obese or overweight subjects: a randomized, double-blind study. Journal of functional foods 56:119−26 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.03.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140] Song H, Shen X, Deng R, Chu Q, Zheng X. 2022. Pomegranate peel anthocyanins prevent diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in association with modulation of the gut microbiota in mice. European journal of nutrition 61:1837−47 doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02771-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141] Zhu F, Yuan Z, Zhao X, Yin Y, Feng L. 2015. Composition and contents of anthocyanins in different pomegranate cultivars. Acta Horticulturae 1089:35−41 doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1089.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142] Corrêa TAF, Tobaruela EdC, Capetini VC, Quintanilha BJ, Cortez RV, et al. 2023. Blood orange juice intake changes specific bacteria of gut microbiota associated with cardiometabolic biomarkers. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1199383 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1199383

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143] Lee HS. 2002. Characterization of major anthocyanins and the color of red-fleshed Budd Blood orange (Citrus sinensis). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50:1243−46 doi: 10.1021/jf011205+

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144] Zhang N, Jing P. 2023. Red cabbage anthocyanins attenuate cognitive impairment by attenuating neuroinflammation and regulating gut microbiota in aging mice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 71:15064−72 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c03183

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [145] Żary-Sikorska E, Fotschki B, Fotschki J, Wiczkowski W, Juśkiewicz J. 2019. Preparations from purple carrots containing anthocyanins improved intestine microbial activity, serum lipid profile and antioxidant status in rats. Journal of Functional Foods 60:103442 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.103442

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [146] Kim HJ, Koo KA, Park WS, Kang DM, Kim HS, et al. 2020. Anti-obesity activity of anthocyanin and carotenoid extracts from color-fleshed sweet potatoes. Journal of Food Biochemistry 44:e13438

    Google Scholar

    [147] Lee EJ, Yoo KS, Patil BS. 2011. Total carotenoid, anthocyanin, and sugar contents in sliced or whole purple (cv. Betasweet) and orange carrots during 4-week cold storage. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 52:402−07 doi: 10.1007/s13580-011-0227-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [148] Condurache (Lazăr) NN, Croitoru C, Enachi E, Bahrim GE, Stănciuc N, et al. 2021. Eggplant peels as a valuable source of anthocyanins: extraction, thermal stability and biological activities. Plants 10:577 doi: 10.3390/plants10030577

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149] Liu D, Ji Y, Wang K, Guo Y, Wang H, et al. 2022. Purple sweet potato anthocyanin extract regulates redox state related to gut microbiota homeostasis in obese mice. Journal of Food Science 87:2133−46 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [150] Mi W, Hu Z, Zhao S, Wang W, Lian W, et al. 2024. Purple sweet potato anthocyanins normalize the blood glucose concentration and restore the gut microbiota in mice with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Heliyon 10:e31784 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31784

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [151] Steed LE, Truong VD. 2008. Anthocyanin content, antioxidant activity, and selected physical properties of flowable purple-fleshed sweetpotato purees. Journal of Food Science 73:S215−S221 doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00774.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [152] Fang JL, Luo Y, Jin SH, Yuan K, Guo Y. 2020. Ameliorative effect of anthocyanin on depression mice by increasing monoamine neurotransmitter and up-regulating BDNF expression. Journal of Functional Foods 66:103757 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.103757

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [153] Volden J, Bengtsson GB, Wicklund T. 2009. Glucosin olates, L-ascorbic acid, total phenols, anthocyanins, antioxidant capacities and colour in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. ssp. botrytis); effects of long-term freezer storage. Food Chemistry 112:967−76

    Google Scholar

    [154] Marrelli M, Russo C, Statti G, Argentieri MP, Meleleo D, et al. 2022. Phytochemical and biological characterization of dry outer scales extract from Tropea red onion (Allium cepa L. var. Tropea)–A promising inhibitor of pancreatic lipase. Phytomedicine Plus 2:100235

    Google Scholar

    [155] Sun M, Li D, Hua M, Miao X, Su Y, et al. 2022. Black bean husk and black rice anthocyanin extracts modulated gut microbiota and serum metabolites for improvement in type 2 diabetic rats. Food & Function 13:7377−91

    Google Scholar

    [156] Lee JH. 2010. Identification and quantification of anthocyanins from the grains of black rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Food Science and Biotechnology 19:391−97 doi: 10.1007/s10068-010-0055-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [157] Tian XZ, Li JX, Luo QY, Zhou D, Long QM, et al. 2021. Effects of purple corn anthocyanin on blood biochemical indexes, ruminal fluid fermentation, and rumen microbiota in goats. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8:715710 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.715710

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [158] Xu H, Liu M, Liu H, Zhao B, Zheng M, et al. 2021. Anthocyanins from purple corn ameliorated obesity in high fat diet-induced obese mice through activating hepatic AMPK. Journal of Functional Foods 84:104582 doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104582

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [159] Lao F, Giusti MM. 2016. Quantification of purple corn (Zea mays L.) anthocyanins using spectrophotometric and HPLC approaches: method comparison and correlation. Food Analytical Methods 9:1367−80 doi: 10.1007/s12161-015-0318-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [160] Takeoka GR, Dao LT, Full GH, Wong RY, Harden LA, et al. 1997. Characterization of black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) anthocyanins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45:3395−400 doi: 10.1021/jf970264d

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [161] Le Roy CI, Wells PM, Si J, Raes J, Bell JT, et al. 2020. Red wine consumption associated with increased gut microbiota α-diversity in 3 independent cohorts. Gastroenterology 158:270−272.e2 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [162] Boto-Ordóñez M, Urpi-Sarda M, Queipo-Ortuño MI, Tulipani S, Tinahones FJ, et al. 2014. High levels of Bifidobacteria are associated with increased levels of anthocyanin microbial metabolites: a randomized clinical trial. Food & Function 5:1932−38 doi: 10.1039/C4FO00029C

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [163] Cliff MA, King MC, Schlosser J. 2007. Anthocyanin, phenolic composition, colour measurement and sensory analysis of BC commercial red wines. Food research international 40:92−100 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.08.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [164] Amer SA, Al-Khalaifah HS, Gouda A, Osman A, Goda NIA, et al. 2022. Potential effects of anthocyanin-rich Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) extract on the growth, intestinal histomorphology, blood biochemical parameters, and the immune status of broiler chickens. Antioxidants 11:544 doi: 10.3390/antiox11030544

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [165] Paraíso CM, Januário JGB, Mizuta AG, dos Santos SS, dos Santos Magon TF, et al. 2021. Comparative studies on chemical stability, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity from hot and cold hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) calyces tea infusions. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 15:3531−38 doi: 10.1007/s11694-021-00936-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Koistinen VM, Babu AF, Shad E, Zarei I. 2025. Anthocyanins as protectors of gut microbiota: mitigating the adverse effects of microplastic-induced disruption. Food Innovation and Advances 4(2): 238−252 doi: 10.48130/fia-0025-0022
    Koistinen VM, Babu AF, Shad E, Zarei I. 2025. Anthocyanins as protectors of gut microbiota: mitigating the adverse effects of microplastic-induced disruption. Food Innovation and Advances 4(2): 238−252 doi: 10.48130/fia-0025-0022

Figures(2)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(3790) PDF downloads(1270)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Anthocyanins as protectors of gut microbiota: mitigating the adverse effects of microplastic-induced disruption

Food Innovation and Advances  4 2025, 4(2): 238−252  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Anthocyanins, potent bioactive compounds found abundantly in berries, as well as in many other pigmented edible plants, have garnered significant attention for their health-promoting properties, particularly in relation to gut microbiota. This review focuses on the protective role of anthocyanins against gut microbiota disruption caused by microplastics, environmental pollutants that have triggered increased concerns in recent years for their impact on ecosystems and human health. By synthesizing current research, the mechanisms through which anthocyanins may exert their beneficial effects are explored, mitigating the negative health effects of microplastic ingestion. The paper also discusses the potential application of anthocyanin-rich functional foods and supplements as a strategy to preserve gut health in the face of rising environmental challenges.

    • Anthocyanins are a group of naturally occurring water-soluble pigments that are widely distributed in nature, primarily in colorful fruits, flowers, vegetables, leaves, and grains. They belong to the flavonoid family, a subclass of (poly)phenols. These pigments give a variety of foods their vibrant red, purple, blue, and black hues. Their specific coloration is pH-dependent: under acidic conditions (pH < 3), they appear red; in near-neutral environments (pH 4–6), they appear purple; and in alkaline conditions (pH > 7), blue-green [1,2].

      In plants, anthocyanins play crucial roles, including attracting pollinators and seed dispersers through their bright colors, protecting plant tissues from ultraviolet (UV) light-induced damage and oxidative stress by neutralizing reactive oxygen species (ROS)[3], and acting as defensive compounds against herbivores and pathogens. From a dietary perspective, anthocyanins are widely present in many commonly consumed fruits and vegetables, particularly berries, grapes, red cabbage, eggplant, and purple carrots. Foods derived from these plants, such as red wine, fruit juices, and certain herbal teas, also contain anthocyanins in varying amounts[46] (Table 1).

      Table 1.  Food sources of anthocyanins, typical anthocyanin concentrations in the foods, and effects on host and gut microbiota associated with anthocyanins.

      Category Food source Total AC content (mg/100 g FW) Major anthocyanidin aglycone(s) Anthropometrics and
      clinical parameters
      Gut health Gut microbiota Genes Metabolism and enzymatic activity Ref.
      1. Berries Blueberry (Vaccinium sect. Cyanococcus) 57–503 Delphinidin, malvidin, cyanidin ↓Body weight gain;
      ↓fat accumulation; Improved liver damage, inflammation, glucose, and lipid metabolism; suppressed oxidative stress
      ↓Gut permeability; ↓gut inflammation Bacteroidota, Prevotella, and Oscillospira; ↓Actinobacterium, Allobaculum, and Bifidobacterium, Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio Restoration of SCFA [106109]
      Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) 350–525 Cyanidin, delphinidin ↑Intestinal barrier function Akkermansia, Aspergillus, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, and Clostridia; ↓Verrucomicrobia and Euryarchaeota ↓AOX1, ↓CYP2E1, ↓TXNIP, ↓JAM-A, ↓VEGFR2, ↑CRB3, ↑CLDN14, ↑CDH4 ↓Digestive enzyme activity [110113]
      Blackberry
      (Rubus spp.)
      177–313 Cyanidin, delphinidin ↓Body weight gain;
      ↓fat accumulation; Improved liver damage, inflammation, glucose, and lipid metabolism
      Bacteroidota, Prevotella, and Oscillospira; ↓Actinobacterium, Allobaculum, and Bifidobacterium Restoration of SCFA; ↑Kynurenic acid [43,106,114]
      Black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis) 687 Cyanidin Akkermansia, Desulfovibrio, Bacteroidetes, Barnessiella, and butyrate-producing bacteria; ↓Bacillota and Clostridium Regulation of short-chain and medium-chain fatty acids, polar metabolites, and phenolic metabolism [43,115117]
      Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) 112–169 Peonidin, cyanidin Alleviated IBD symptoms Alleviated colonic ferroptosis and inflammation Lactobacillus, Proteobacteria, and Escherichia-Shigella Modulated ferroptosis-associated genes (↑GPX4, ↑SLC7A11, and ↑HO-1) ↑SCFA; Restored glutathione (GSH) levels [43,118]
      Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) 18–42 Pelargonidin Bifidobacterium; ↓Verrucomicrobia [43,119]
      Elderberry (Sambucus nigra) 1375 Cyanidin ↓Blood pressure; ↓Glycemia; Immune system stimulation No activation of Nrf2 ↑Activity of antioxidant enzymes in plasma; ↑Glutathione;
      ↓Uric acid
      [43,120,121]
      Crowberry (Empetrum nigrum) 402–675 Delphinidin, cyanidin Restored TEER loss; ↓FITC-dextran transport induced by TNF-α [122,123]
      Chokeberry
      (Aronia spp.)
      357–1,480 Cyanidin ↑Flow-mediated dilation Anaerostipes, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Blautia, Faecalibaterium, Prevotella, Akkermansia; ↓Escherichia-Shigella, Megamonas, Prevotella, Bacillota:Bacteroidota ratio ↑FXR, TGR5 ↓Total bile acids [41,43,124,
      125]
      Blackcurrant
      (Ribes nigrum)
      476–591 Delphinidin, cyanidin Bacteroidetes; ↓Verrucomicrobia and Bacillota:Bacteroidota ratio [126]
      Açaí
      (Euterpe oleracea)
      97–410 Cyanidin ↓Body weight, hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance Akkermansia; ↓Bacteroides/Prevotella, Hathewaya ↑SCFA [127130]
      Black goji berry, black wolfberry (Lycium ruthenicum) 470–530 Petunidin ↓Body weight gain ↑Intestinal barrier function Akkermansia, Alistipes, Allisonella, Bacteroides, Barnesiella, Bifidobacterium, Coprobacter, Eisenbergiella, Muribaculaceae, Odoribacter, Ruminococcaceae; ↓Bacillota:Bacteroidota ratio ↑mRNA IL-10, ZO-1, OCLN, CLDN-1 and MUC1; ↓mRNA TLR4, NF-κB, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, MCP-1, TGF-β1, GPR5, iNOS, COX-2, and IFN-γ ↑SCFA; ↓lipopolysaccharides [131135]
      2. Other fruits Cherry
      (Prunus avium)
      101–143 Cyanidin, peonidin ↑Antioxidant capacity ↓the release of IL-6 and IL-8 production in intestinal cells and glutathione peroxidase activity stimulated by cytokine [43,90,136]
      Grape (Vitis spp.) 16–120 Malvidin, delphinidin, peonidin Bacteroidota, Prevotellaceae, and Erysipelotrichaceae; ↓Desulfovibrionaceae and Spreptoccaceae ↑mRNA Lyz1 [43,137]
      Plum
      (Prunus domestica)
      15–146 Cyanidin ↓Blood pressure; ↓Fasting plasma insulin, glucose, leptin, inflammatory cytokines [43,138,139]
      Pomegranate (Punica granatum) 17–39 Delphinidin, cyanidin ↓body weight gain; ↓Steatosis scores; ↓Insulin resistance index Bacteroidota, Akkermansia, Parabacteroides, Anaerotruncus, and Lachnoclostridium;
      Bacillota and Proteobacteria
      Improved gene expression profiles involved in glucose and lipid metabolism (↑Cpt1b; ↑Hepatic lipase; ↑Insig1; ↑Insig2; ↑Irs2; ↓Pepck; ↓G6pc) ↓Pancreatic lipase [140,141]
      Blood orange (Citrus × sinensis) 1–17 Cyanidin; malonated anthocyanins Improved blood pressure and plasma VCAM-1; ↓Fasting glucose; ↓Insulin; ↓HOMA.IR Significant associations between Bacteroidota, Prevotella 9, and cardiometabolic biomarkers [142,143]
      3. Vegetables Red cabbage (Brassica oleracea) 281–363 Cyanidin ↓IL-1β; ↓IL-6 ↑Butyrate-producing bacteria Promoted MAPK signaling pathway [43,144]
      Purple carrot (Daucus carota ssp. sativus) 40–50 Cyanidin, pelargonidin ↓body weight gain; ↓Triglycerides; Improved high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio ↓Cecal pH α- and β-Glucosidase; α- and β-Galactosidade; β-glucuronidase; ↑Total cecal SCFA [145147]
      Eggplant (Solanum melongena) 86 Delphinidin (e.g., nasunin) Inhibitory activity against lipoxygenase (LOX), lipase, and α-amylase [43,148]
      Purple sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) 52–175 Peonidin, cyanidin ↓body weight gain; ↓Triglycerides; ↓total cholesterol Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus ↓TLR-4; ↓NF-κB; ↓interleukin 6; ↓tumor necrosis factor α; Preserved Nrf2 gene expression ↑serum activities of glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, catalase; ↑SCFAs; ↓malondialdehyde; ↓lipopolysaccharides [149151]
      Purple cauliflower (Brassica oleracea) 71–77 Anthocyanins ↑Neurotransmitters ↑tyrosine receptor kinase B; ↑brain-derive neurotrophic factor (BDNF); ↑phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2 and CREB [152,153]
      Red onion
      (Allium cepa)
      49 Cyanidin Prevented lipid ester hydrolysis; Conferred protective effect against phospholipase Inhibited pancreatic lipase [43,154]
      4. Grains and legumes Black rice
      (Oryza sativa)
      5–168 Cyanidin, peonidin ↓body weight gain; ↓serum triglycerides; ↓total cholesterol ; ↓non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Improved blood glucose, insulin resistance, serum oxidative stress state, lipid metabolism and inflammatory cytokines levels, and alleviated liver damage. ↑Villus height (ileum and caecum); ↑Goblet cell number per villus of the colon; Positive effect on TEER and FITC-dextran permeability Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Akkermansia, Phascolarctobacterium, Bacteroides, and Coprococcus; ↓Bacillota:Bacteroidota ratio ↑mRNA of JAM-A, occludin and Muc-2; ↑Genes involved in cholesterol uptake and efflux; Regulated AMPKα; Preserved CYP7A1, ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 5/8 mRNA expression ↑Cecal SCFA; ↑fecal sterols excretion [76,123,
      155,156]
      Purple maize
      (Zea mays)
      93–1640 Cyanidin, pelargonidin, peonidin ↑antioxidant potential; ↑Fatty acid oxidation; ↓body weight gain; ↓serum triglycerides; ↓total cholesterol ; ↓Epididymal fat mass ↓PPARγ; ↓C/EBPα; ↓SREBP-1c; ↑PPARα; ↑PGC1α,; ↑PRDM16; ↑FGF21; Promoted Hepatic AMPK activity Improved rumen volatile fatty acids [157159]
      Black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) 213 Cyanidin Improved blood glucose, insulin resistance, serum oxidative stress state, lipid metabolism and inflammatory cytokines levels, and alleviated liver damage. Akkermansia, Phascolarctobacterium, Bacteroides, and Coprococcus Activated AMPK, PI3K, and AKT; Inhibited HMGCR, G6pase and PEPCK expression [155,160]
      5. Beverages and processed foods Red wine 6–12 Malvidin, delphinidin, peonidin ↓BMI α-diversity, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Eggerthella lenta [161163]
      Hibiscus tea (Hibiscus sabdariffa) 35–66 Delphinidin, cyanidin ↓serum triglycerides; ↑Antioxidant capacity; ↑IL10 Superoxide dismutase; ↑Malondialdehyde; ↑Lysozymes [164,165]

      In humans, anthocyanins are known for their wide range of potential health-promoting properties. Among their most researched health benefits are their antioxidant activity and anti-inflammatory effects, which may further help reduce the risk of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders[7], although the evidence for the antioxidant properties in human health is considered insufficient[8]. They also exhibit beneficial anti-diabetic properties for both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes; they help regulate glucose metabolism, enhance insulin secretion, reduce insulin resistance, improve glucose uptake, and lower post-meal blood sugar levels by modulating glucose transporters and signaling pathways[9]. Additionally, among the health benefits of anthocyanins, their role in supporting and protecting the gut microbiota is an important aspect, as gut health is crucial for overall well-being[1012].

      Anthocyanins are relatively unstable compounds, prone to degradation when exposed to light, heat, or oxygen. Despite limited bioavailability, their stability can be improved through glycosylation, the presence of acyl groups, and their metabolism in the digestive system. Additionally, interactions with the gut microbiota enhance their bioavailability[3,13].

      Microplastics are tiny plastic particles less than 5 mm in diameter and have become a significant environmental concern due to their pervasive presence in ecosystems worldwide[14,15]. This pollution is considered one of the most pressing environmental challenges of the 21st century[16]. Microplastics originate from a variety of sources, including the breakdown of larger plastic debris and the release of micro-sized plastics from everyday products. The widespread use of plastics over the past few decades has resulted in significant environmental contamination, leading to concerns about the long-term impacts on wildlife, human health, and the planet's ecological balance[1416].

      Microplastics can be categorized in several ways. They are broadly divided into two types based on their origin: primary and secondary. Primary microplastics are directly manufactured in small sizes and are used in consumer products, such as (1) microbeads—tiny plastic particles found in personal care products, such as exfoliating facial scrubs, toothpaste, and body washes[17,18], (2) microfibers—synthetic fibers from fabrics (e.g., polyester, nylon) released during washing of clothes[19], (3) pre-production plastic industrial pellets—used in manufacturing processes and often lost to the environment during transport or handling[20]. Secondary microplastics result from the fragmentation of larger plastic debris due to weathering, UV radiation, and mechanical forces. Common sources include: (1) plastic waste—such as plastic bags, bottles, and packaging—that degrades over time[21], (2) marine debris—fishing nets, ropes, and other plastic items that deteriorate in the ocean[22], (3) tire wear particles—resulting from the abrasion of vehicle tires on roads, which release microplastic particles into the air and water[23]. Microplastics are categorized into five types based on their physical forms: fragments, fibers, foam, pellets, and films[24]. Moreover, they can be grouped into six major categories based on the chemical structure of the polymer backbone: polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP), polyurethane (PU), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET)[25]. Polystyrene is one of the most widely studied microplastics due to its negative influence on the gut microbiota and its role in causing metabolic disorders[26].

      The presence of microplastics in the environment has raised concerns about their potential impact on human health[27]. Given their small size and persistence, microplastics can be ingested or inhaled, leading to concerns about their bioaccumulation and toxicity in humans. Nanoplastics, a subtype of microplastics less than 1 µm in size, can even penetrate important biological barriers, such as the blood–brain barrier, placental barrier, and gut barrier[28]. Some research has suggested that prolonged exposure to microplastics may increase the risk of metabolic disorders, such as obesity and diabetes, by influencing gut bacteria or promoting chronic inflammation[2931]. While data on long-term health effects are limited, animal studies have shown that microplastic exposure can lead to tissue damage, inflammation, oxidative stress, and disruption of cellular processes. Potential toxicological impacts of microplastics are also related to their chemical composition. Many plastics contain toxic additives, such as phthalates, bisphenol A (BPA), and heavy metals, which can leach out and exert endocrine-disrupting or carcinogenic effects[32]. Additionally, microplastics can act as vectors for environmental pollutants, such as persistent organic pollutants (POPs), which may further amplify health risks upon entry into the body[33].

      Given the increasing concern about the impact of microplastics on human health, particularly their ability to disrupt gut microbiota composition and function, identifying potential protective strategies is essential[3436]. Microplastic ingestion has been associated with alterations in microbial diversity, intestinal inflammation, and compromised gut barrier integrity, which may contribute to broader metabolic and immunological consequences[37,38]. In this context, anthocyanins, with their well-documented antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and prebiotic properties, may offer a promising dietary approach to counteract these adverse effects[39]. By modulating gut microbiota composition, promoting beneficial bacteria, and reinforcing gut barrier function, anthocyanins may serve as a natural intervention to mitigate the harmful effects of microplastic exposure.

      The novelty of this review lies in its exploration of anthocyanins as a natural protective strategy against microplastic-induced gut microbiota disruption—a connection that has not been extensively discussed in the existing literature. While previous studies have separately examined the harmful effects of microplastics on gut health and the beneficial properties of anthocyanins, this review integrates these perspectives to explore the interplay between microplastics, gut microbiota, and anthocyanins, shedding light on the potential role of anthocyanins in preserving gut health in the context of environmental pollutants.

    • Anthocyanins are widespread in nearly all groups of flowering plants (Angiospermae) and are, therefore, present in varying amounts in most edible plants. One exception is the order Caryophyllales—including amaranths, beets, and cacti—the members of which produce betalain pigments instead of anthocyanins[40]. Among plant foods, the highest concentrations of anthocyanins are found in fruits that are commonly consumed as berries, particularly in species belonging to Aronia, Empetrum, Ribes, Rubus, and Vaccinium. Crowberry (Empetrum nigrum L.) and chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa Michx.) have some of the highest known concentrations of anthocyanins among edible plants, about 500 mg/100 g fresh weight (FW) and 360 mg/100 g FW, respectively[41]; however, they are not commonly eaten as such (fresh with peels) due to their less favorable sensory properties, such as astringency, compared to more widely consumed berries. For instance, bilberry peel has an anthocyanin content of 2,026 mg/100 g, whereas the fruit pulp has a considerably lower concentration (104 mg/100 g)[42]. Therefore, anthocyanin-rich fruits and berries typically consumed unprocessed with their peels often become the richest sources of anthocyanins in the diet; in the United States, raw (unprocessed) blueberry have been estimated as the largest contributor (27%) to dietary anthocyanin intake[43]. The same study by Wu et al. found negligible or zero amounts of anthocyanins in processed foods containing anthocyanin-rich ingredients, which can be attributed to either a low content of the anthocyanin-rich ingredient in the product or the destruction of these unstable molecules during food processing[43]. Table 1 lists common sources of anthocyanins and their typical concentrations in the foods.

    • Anthocyanins are glycosylated forms of anthocyanidins, consisting of an aglycone core (anthocyanidin) bound to one or more sugar moieties, which influence their stability, solubility, and color expression[4]. They should not be confused with proanthocyanidins, another group of flavonoids with similar biological properties, which are polymers of flavan-3-ol structural units[44]. The six most common anthocyanidin aglycones—cyanidin, delphinidin, malvidin, pelargonidin, peonidin, and petunidin—differ in their substituents located at the 3′ and 5′ positions of the C6-C3-C6 flavonoid backbone, which is composed of two aromatic benzene rings (A and B) connected by a three-carbon bridge that forms a heterocyclic C-ring (Fig. 1). Anthocyanins are typically glycosylated at the 3-position of the C-ring, but glycosylation can also occur at the 5-, 7-, and 4′ positions. Common sugars attaching to the core structure include glucose, rhamnose, galactose, xylose, and arabinose. These sugars can further form acylated anthocyanins by attaching phenolic acyl groups, such as p-coumaric, ferulic, and caffeic acids. The specific sugar moieties and their attachments influence anthocyanin stability, solubility, and color expression; for example, glycosylation at the 3-position improves the thermal stability of the compounds[4].

      Figure 1. 

      General structure of an anthocyanin with a glycosyl group at position 3[45], and the functional groups of the six most common anthoyanidins at positions 3′ and 5′.

    • Food processing significantly influences the bioavailability of anthocyanins[46]. Processing methods can either degrade or enhance the ability of anthocyanins to reach the colon intact, impacting their subsequent interaction with the gut microbiota. Various factors, including temperature, pH, and interactions with other food components - such as fats, proteins, and alcohol - can affect their structural integrity and absorption[47]. Acylation can enhance anthocyanin stability but may reduce its bioavailability[48], increasing the likelihood of intact anthocyanins reaching the colon. The structural variation of anthocyanins also affects their absorption, with pelargonidin-based anthocyanins being more efficiently absorbed than those containing additional substituents on the B-ring[49]. Thermal processing, a common practice in food preparation, often leads to a reduction in anthocyanin content. However, it can also enhance bio-accessibility by breaking down plant cell walls, thereby increasing the availability of anthocyanins for absorption[50]. Furthermore, anthocyanins interact with various food constituents that can either promote or hinder their bioavailability by influencing their solubility, stability, or binding capacity[50].

      To exert bioactivity in the colon where the majority of the human gut microbiota resides, a sufficient proportion of the dietary anthocyanins must avoid absorption or destruction during earlier phases of digestion. Up to 50% of anthocyanins are metabolized and partially degraded already in the oral cavity by oral microbiota[13]. Anthocyanins are stable at low pH and, therefore survive the gastric phase with a very high recovery rate, although 8% to 25% of anthocyanin glycosides are absorbed in the stomach[11]. They have a relatively low absorption rate from the small intestine, with a wide range of estimates from as low as 0.005% to 22%[13]. In the colon, the remaining anthocyanins are rapidly converted into more bioavailable metabolites by microbiota, either through breakdown into aldehydes or phenolic acids or by conjugation with methyl, hydroxyl, sulfuric, or glycosidic groups[11]. Thus, these microbial metabolites of anthocyanins need to be considered when assessing the bioavailability and the bioactivity of anthocyanins.

      It is generally considered that when anthocyanins are entrapped within a complex food matrix, they have a better chance of surviving until the small intestine and colon compared to purified compounds, although the evidence remains inconclusive[4650]. The bioavailability of anthocyanins is generally low, at approximately 1%, although cyanidin-3-O-glucoside has been reported to have a bioavailability of 12%[51]. This emphasizes their potential role within the gut lumen in exerting health benefits.

      Individual differences in gut microbiota also play a crucial role in anthocyanin metabolism and bioactivity. Since a significant portion of anthocyanins reaches the colon intact, where they are metabolized by gut microbes, their ultimate bioactivity depends on microbial composition and enzymatic capacity. Microbes capable of metabolizing anthocyanins in the gut include species in genera Bacteroides, Clostridium, Enterococcus, and Eubacterium[11]. These bacteria use hydrolyzing enzymes, such as α-galactosidase, α-rhamnosidase, and β-glucosidase, for cleaving the sugar linkages, resulting in the hydrolyzation of all anthocyanins in as little as 20 min in vitro[52]. The anthocyanidin aglycones released in the enzymatic process are unstable and are further metabolized by the microbes into phenolic aldehydes and phenolic acids; this conversion process reaches its peak at 60–120 min after inoculation during in vitro human colonic fermentation[53]. The exact metabolites produced from the anthocyanins depend on the functional groups at the 3′ and 5′ positions of the anthocyanidin aglycone (Fig. 1) and the possible acyl groups[11]. Cyanidin-derived anthocyanins are first metabolized into phloroglucinol aldehyde (2,4,6-trihydroxybenzaldehyde), protocatechuic acid (PCA; 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid), and p-coumaric acid (4-hydroxycinnamic acid). Protocatechuic acid is considered the main gut microbial metabolite of anthocyanins. Delphinidin-derived anthocyanins produce gallic acid (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid), syringic acid (4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid), and phloroglucinol aldehyde. Malvidin-derived anthocyanins produce syringic acid, pelargonidin-derived anthocyanins, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid; peonidin-derived anthocyanins, vanillic acid (3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzoic acid); and petunidin-derived anthocyanins 3-O-methylgallic acid (3,4-dihydroxy-5-methoxybenzoic acid). At the same time, the acylated phenolic groups are released as phenolic acids. These metabolites are further transformed by the bacteria; for example, vanillic acid is demethylated into protocatechuic acid, which can be hydroxylated into gallic acid.

      Anthocyanins and their metabolites also impact the composition of gut microbiota. One of the main effects of anthocyanin intake on microbiota is the reduced ratio of Bacillota:Bacteroidota (the former previously named Firmicutes and the latter Bacteroidetes), two major bacterial phyla present in a typical gut microbiome[11]. A high Bacillota:Bacteroidota ratio has been linked with obesity. Anthocyanins isolated from foods also generally increase the abundance of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria, including Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Prevotella, and decrease the abundance of Clostridium, Escherichia-Shigella, Hathewaya, and the Bacteroides : Prevotella ratio (Table 1). However, some studies on anthocyanin-rich foods have reported a decrease in Bifidobacterium and Prevotella. The β-glucosidase activity of anthocyanin-metabolizing bacteria allows them to release the sugar units from anthocyanins to be used as their energy source thus promoting their growth[12]. The microbial metabolites produced from the anthocyanidin aglycones also play a role in modulating the gut microbial composition; for example, gallic acid inhibits the growth of Hathewaya histolytica (formerly Clostridium histolyticum) and promotes Atopobium[54]. The following chapters examine the processes by which microplastics disrupt gut microbiota and how the interaction between microbes and anthocyanins described in this chapter—as well as other anthocyanin properties—could alleviate the disruption.

    • The gut microbiota is closely linked to host health and various disorders. These microorganisms play a crucial role in the interactions between the intestines and the host. Any environmental disruption in the composition of intestinal bacteria can have a negative impact on the host balance and its essential functions[55]. Research has documented the effects and toxicities of microplastics, such as disruptions in gut microbiota, damage to intestinal function, and metabolic problems[37,38].

      Microplastics, once ingested, can interfere with the normal functioning of gut microbiota, leading to dysbiosis (Fig. 2). Notably, exposure to microplastics consistently reduces the relative abundance of the Bacteroidota phylum, which is known for its anti-inflammatory effects on the gut[56,57]. Additionally, microplastic exposure decreases species richness and diversity within the gut microbiome, thereby altering the expression of various genes and metabolites involved in lipid, nucleic acid, and hormone metabolism, as well as in protein secretion, neurotoxicity, inflammation, aging, metabolic diseases, and cancer[5760]. As an example, exposure to microplastics has been shown to upregulate genes involved in the immune function, including H2-DMb2, H2-Eb, and Gm8909, as well as genes encoding defensins and antioxidant enzymes such CAT, SOD, and GstD1[61]. The levels of MDA, a marker of oxidative stress, also increased[61]. Furthermore, TLR2, TLR4, Ap-1, and IRF5 increased, suggesting an enhanced immune and inflammatory response in the intestine. At the metabolic level, microplastic exposure suppressed pathways involved in lipid metabolism, hormonal regulation, cellular repair and replication, and xenobiotic detoxification. Conversely, genes related to the metabolism of carbohydrates, nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus were upregulated, along with genes linked to cellular stress responses (cspB, desK, pspA, lpr, groEL, hshX, catalase, oxyR, soxR, narJ)[61].

      Figure 2. 

      Impact of microplastics on gut microbiota and the known and proposed (dashed lines) mechanisms of action of anthocyanins in counteracting dysbiosis.

      Increased intestinal permeability is another significant functional change linked to microbial dysbiosis caused by microplastic exposure[57]. Previous studies have demonstrated that microplastic exposure significantly reduces mucus secretion by goblet cells, which play a crucial role in protecting the intestinal lining[62]. This weakened mucus barrier increases the susceptibility of the intestinal epithelium to pathogenic bacterial infiltration. Additionally, microplastics have been shown to compromise intestinal morphology by reducing villus height, disrupting villus integrity, decreasing villus surface area, increasing crypt depth, and altering crypt structure[62]. These structural changes, coupled with a reduction in small intestinal epithelial cells and impaired cell maturation, further diminish the synthesis and secretion of digestive enzymes, ultimately weakening the capacity for nutrient absorption.

      Furthermore, microplastics disrupt intestinal structure, impair absorption efficiency, and weaken defense mechanisms, leading to digestive dysfunction and compromised barrier integrity in mouse small intestines. Gene expression analysis has revealed a significant downregulation of claudin family genes in both the duodenum and jejunum, which are essential for maintaining intestinal permeability and structural integrity[62,63]. This disruption destabilizes the tight junction protein network, reducing intestinal barrier tightness and triggering immune imbalances and inflammatory responses[62,63]. The resulting intestinal damage further exacerbates gut dysfunction.

      Beyond structural and functional impairments, microplastic exposure has also been linked to gastric injury and inflammation[64]. The inflammatory response may be triggered through cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8), released by activated immune cells like macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells. Alternatively, microplastics may induce phagocytosis, leading to ROS production and subsequent apoptosis[65].

      The exact mechanisms by which microplastics disrupt the gut microbiota are poorly understood. One possibility is that the ingestion of microplastics may cause mechanical damage to the gastrointestinal tract, potentially leading to abrasions, perforations, or obstructions[66]. These physical injuries could impair nutrient absorption, resulting in reduced body size, weight loss, and compromised growth and reproductive fitness[66]. Additionally, microplastics may fragment and translocate across biological barriers. The physical presence of microplastics in the gut may directly interact with the gut microbiota, influencing microbial growth, survival, and metabolic functions[67]. They can provoke immune and inflammatory responses and restructure gut epithelial villi[68]. In particular, microplastic ingestion has been known to increase the phagocytic activity of immune cells, suggesting an immune-driven inflammatory response often associated with dysbiosis. This dysbiosis may be driven by the oxidative state induced by inflammation, which may favor the proliferation of bacterial taxa such as Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria that thrive in such hostile conditions[66,69]. Alternatively, the chemical composition of microplastics, including environmental pollutants or endocrine disruptors adsorbed onto their surfaces—such as bisphenol A and plasticizers—could also exert direct or indirect effects on the gut microbiota[67]. Additionally, microplastics have been shown to act as carriers for additional pollutants or pathogens, thereby adding complexity to their impact on gut microbial communities[67]. Microplastics can harbor foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella enterica, which, when bound to microplastics, may exhibit increased resistance to environmental stressors and persist longer in the gut[70]. Bacteria readily adhere to microplastics surfaces, leading to biofilm formation. Within these biofilms, bacteria are embedded in a self-secreted exopolymeric substance (EPS), which provides structural support and enhances bacterial survival. For example, in Salmonella enterica, cellulose and O-antigens within the EPS are critical for initial attachment and biofilm persistence, particularly on plastic surfaces[70]. This ability of microplastics to promote biofilm formation and shield pathogens from host immune defenses can exacerbate gut dysbiosis, trigger inflammatory responses, and may increase the risk of gastrointestinal infections. Microplastics may even function as vectors for pathogens to infiltrate the digestive system, further compounding the ecological risks posed by these contaminants[66].

    • As discussed in the previous chapter, microplastics can disrupt gut microbiota in various ways, including adverse changes in the relative abundance of certain bacteria taxa, decreased microbial richness and diversity, increased immune and inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, increased intestinal permeability, and other adverse morphological changes, as well as direct interaction with microbes, such as serving as a growth surface for pathogenic bacteria. Anthocyanins may play a significant role in protecting gut microbiota from microplastics-induced disruption, as they possess several properties that can counteract many of these adverse effects. Figure 2 provides an overview of the confirmed and potential mechanisms of these counteractions.

      Despite the well-documented antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and gut microbiota-modulating properties of anthocyanins, studies examining their protective effects against microplastic-induced toxicity remain limited. Existing research suggests that, in particular, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G), an extensively studied anthocyanin, can mitigate polystyrene-induced toxicity by activating autophagy, promoting fecal discharge and alleviating oxidative stress and inflammation[71,72]. Additionally, anthocyanins may offer protective effects against reproductive toxicity induced by microplastics and nanoplastics, potentially through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms, modulation of steroid receptors, and restoration of hormonal balance[73]. However, comprehensive studies on the effects of anthocyanins on microplastic toxicity are still lacking, highlighting the need for further research in this area.

      It is currently hypothesized that anthocyanins and their colonic metabolites can act as modifiers to change the composition of the gut microbiota. These compounds mainly exert their effects by promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria and inhibiting or suppressing the proliferation of harmful bacteria[74]. Numerous studies conducted in laboratory, animal, and even human models have shown that anthocyanins and their metabolites can improve the balance of intestinal microbiota and thus improve intestinal health and related functions. Previous studies have demonstrated that anthocyanin supplementation offers significant benefits to intestinal health, including improvements in the gut microbiota population, enhanced production of SCFAs, increased goblet cell numbers, and better tight junction protein expression and villi structure[12]. Specifically, dietary intake of anthocyanins has been linked to an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes and a decrease in Firmicutes[12]. Anthocyanins influence gut microbiota by promoting SCFA-producing bacteria, which lower intestinal pH, thereby inhibiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria. SCFAs, such as butyrate, serve as an energy source for epithelial cells, strengthening the intestinal barrier and preventing the translocation of pathogens and antigens[75]. These potential effects in addressing chronic diseases associated with changes in gut microbiota—including chronic inflammation, obesity, and type 2 diabetes—have also been noted by researchers[76].

    • Oxidative stress plays a significant role in the damage caused by microplastics[77,78]. When microplastics are absorbed, they compromise cell membrane integrity, alter the lipid bilayer, create pores, and increase intracellular reactive oxygen species production. This ROS generation leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and cellular damage[79]. Furthermore, elevated levels of ROS have been demonstrated to induce gut microbiota dysbiosis by altering microbial composition, impairing epithelial barrier function, and interfering with metabolic pathways[80]. Moreover, microplastics can stimulate chronic inflammation by activating markers such as NF-κB, MyD88, and NLRP3, leading to oxidative stress and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β[81]. The persistent activation of these pathways can result in harmful inflammatory responses and reduced cellular metabolic activity[81].

      Anthocyanins are known for their strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which are critical in protecting gut health. These properties help mitigate oxidative stress and inflammation induced by microplastics, thereby preserving the integrity of the gut microbiota and the gut barrier. Studies indicate that anthocyanins play a crucial role in reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, as well as lowering the risk of chronic diseases[39]. For instance, blueberry anthocyanins have been shown to significantly inhibit ROS accumulation in endothelial cells exposed to high glucose while preserving the activity of antioxidant enzymes[82]. Studies by Rehman et al. and Ma et al. have further confirmed anthocyanins' ability to significantly reduce ROS production in vitro and in vivo[83,84]. In particular, anthocyanin-rich berry extracts have been found to attenuate H2O2-induced ROS generation and suppress lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced nitric oxide production in BV-2 microglia[83]. Additionally, research by Ryo Furuuchi et al., using a diet-induced obesity mouse model, demonstrated that supplementation with borsenberry polyphenols and anthocyanins can inhibit ROS production in the aorta[85].

      Anthocyanins have a high antioxidant capacity due to their phenolic structure and work by inhibiting or neutralizing free radicals through the donation or transfer of electrons from hydrogen atoms[86]. Additionally, anthocyanins have the potential to reduce the risk of diseases due to their anti-estrogenic, anti-inflammatory, and cell proliferation-inhibition effects. They help counteract inflammation caused by microplastics through the modulation of key inflammatory pathways. Anthocyanins can inhibit the NF-κB pathway by blocking the translocation of the p65 subunit to the nucleus, thereby reducing cytokine expression[87]. For instance, strawberry anthocyanins significantly inhibited the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway[88], while anthocyanins from blueberry reduced serum levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ, increasing anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and IL-22 in colon patients[89]. Moreover, sour cherry anthocyanins have also been shown to prevent the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 in human Caco-2 cells[90]. Additionally, anthocyanins suppress the MAPK signaling pathway, reducing the inflammatory response. For example, anthocyanins extracted from Lycium ruthenicum was capable of attenuating inflammation by suppressing the activation of MLK3 and its downstream JNK and p38MAPK signaling cascades[91]. Moreover, anthocyanins modulate Toll-like receptor (TLR) activity, as evidenced by Myrica rubra anthocyanins, which reduced TLR4 and TNF-α expression in a cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury model in mice[92].

      More recently, it has been discovered that these compounds can decrease the accumulation of lipids during the differentiation process of fat cells, highlighting their role in preventing obesity and related problems[93]. The findings of Chen et al.[72] indicated that cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G) supplementation significantly decreased tissue accumulation and enhanced fecal PS excretion, resulting in the mitigation of PS-induced oxidative stress and inflammatory response. Simultaneously, C3G influenced PS-related alterations in the gut microbiota and modified functional bacteria involved in inflammation, including Desulfovibrio, Helicobacter, Oscillospiraceae, and Lachnoclostridium. C3G treatment prompted modifications in functional pathways in response to xenobiotic PS and decreased bacterial functional genes associated with inflammation and human diseases. They revealed that these findings may provide support for the protective function of C3G in mitigating PS-induced toxicity and gut dysbiosis[72]. Another study evaluated the protective effect of delphinidin (25 mg/kg) to prevent renal dysfunction caused by polystyrene microplastics (PSMP). The findings demonstrated that PSMP exposure increased the expression of Keap1 and decreased the expression of Nrf-2 and antioxidant genes. Upon PSMP exposure, levels of inflammatory biomarkers such as IL-1β, TNF-α, NF-κB, IL-6, and COX-2 activity were elevated. Nonetheless, the renal deficits caused by PSMP were significantly improved with delphinidin therapy[94].

      Chen et al. found that C3G effectively reversed the increased mRNA expression (Il-6, Il-1β, and TNF-α) and elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α) caused by PS exposure[95]. C3G substantially reduced the decrease in levels (IL-22, IL-10, and IL-4) and the downregulation of mRNA expression (Il-22, Il-10, and Il-4) of anti-inflammatory. Furthermore, C3G suppressed the PS-induced phosphorylation of the transcription factor NF-κB in the nucleus, along with the elevated protein expression levels of iNOS and COX-2 in the colon. The metabolic activities of gut bacteria involving tryptophan and bile acids are significantly associated with the control of inflammatory responses. The gut microbiota results revealed that PS treatment markedly elevated the prevalence of pro-inflammatory bacteria (Desulfovibrio, unclassified bacteria in the family Oscillospiraceae, Helicobacter, and Lachnoclostridium) while reducing the prevalence of anti-inflammatory bacteria (Dubosiella, Akkermansia, and Alistipes). Intriguingly, C3G intervention reversed these pro-inflammatory alterations in bacterial abundances and boosted the enrichment of bacterial genes implicated in tryptophan and bile acid metabolism pathways[95].

    • Anthocyanins have prebiotic effects and can increase the amount of probiotics in the digestive system. These compounds can boost the production of SCFA and lactic acid in the intestines and create favorable conditions for the growth of probiotics. Additionally, anthocyanins can serve as a carbon source for probiotics and stimulate the production of bacteriocins, which enhances the ability of probiotics to compete against harmful bacteria in the gut[96].

      The mechanisms of inhibiting the growth of harmful bacteria by anthocyanins are as follows: (1) Preventing the expression of genes of harmful bacteria: Anthocyanins prevent the expression of certain genes in harmful bacteria. As a result, these bacteria cannot naturally produce toxins and thus lose the ability to harm humans[97]. (2) Destroying the cell structure of bacteria: Anthocyanins destroy the cell structure of harmful bacteria. This destruction causes the leakage of internal contents such as sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), protein, and nucleic acid from the cell, and finally, the bacteria are destroyed[98]. (3) Interference with the synthesis of vital enzymes: Anthocyanins interfere with the synthesis of enzymes that are necessary for the growth of harmful bacteria. Since many of the vital reactions of bacteria are catalyzed by these enzymes, the failure of these enzymes causes the death of the bacteria[99]. (4) Interfering with the energy production of bacteria: Energy is essential for life and the normal functioning of bacteria. By disrupting the energy production process in harmful bacteria, anthocyanins make these bacteria unable to grow normally and eventually die. These mechanisms together make anthocyanins play an important role in preventing the growth of harmful bacteria[100].

      Lacombe et al. studied changes in the gut microflora in rat-fed blueberry anthocyanins[100]. The results showed that an anthocyanin-rich diet significantly increased the abundance of bifidobacterium and Coriobacteriae in the colon of rats. In another experiment, co-cultivation of malic glycoside with human feces showed that the number of bacteria, especially bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, increased significantly within 24 h. These findings indicate that anthocyanins can have positive effects on the population of beneficial intestinal bacteria. Sun et al. reported that peonidin-based anthocyanin monomers from the Chinese purple sweet potato cultivar (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. increased the abundance of Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. These compounds also inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhimurium in culture medium[101]. They illustrated that anthocyanin could potentially have a prebiotic-like activity to modulate gut microbiota. In an in vitro experiment, it was observed that malvidin-3-glucoside in the presence of fecal slurry increased the growth of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. but did not affect the growth of Bacteroides spp. Interestingly, when malvidin-3-glucoside was combined with other anthocyanins, the combination was able to synergistically stimulate the growth of beneficial bacteria. Gallic acid, one of the metabolites of anthocyanins, has also been shown to reduce the growth of harmful bacteria such as Hathewaya histolytica without negatively affecting beneficial bacteria. In addition, gallic acid significantly reduced the abundance of Bacteroides while increasing the total bacterial count and the abundance of Atopobium species[54]. The potential of anthocyanins to increase beneficial bacteria in the gut can also play a role in reducing environmental hazards. Chen et al. showed that following the consumption of PS and C3G, differences in the shape of gut bacteria and enrichment of functional pathways were observed[102]. Metabolomic analysis showed that the levels of PS in the colon and feces were highly connected with important metabolites generated from the microbiota. These compounds are linked to the control of enzymes and transporters that are involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics. These findings could provide new perspectives on the functions of gut bacterial metabolites and the protective benefits of C3G against exposure to xenobiotic PS[102].

    • Anthocyanins have been used as food colorants for decades, such as purple corn and red rice in China[103]. The demand for natural alternatives to artificial colorants has underlined the potential of anthocyanins in providing red, purple, and blue pigments in food. The increasing evidence on the benefits of anthocyanins for gut microbiota and the lack of toxicity provides yet another reason for using these compounds as anthocyanin-rich food ingredients or extracts in foods and supplements. Scientific research has been conducted on using black sorghum bran and colored wheat as potential ingredients for functional foods, but applications in the food market are scarce[51]. Anthocyanin extracts prepared from bilberry and blackcurrant with a purity of approximately 25% and powdered anthocyanin-rich berries are being sold as supplements in several markets globally. Despite promising results on the benefits of anthocyanin supplementation in the gut and overall health, the scientific evidence has not been considered sufficient for establishing a health claim on blackcurrant anthocyanins in the EU[8], in contrast with cocoa flavanols and olive oil polyphenols, which may have discouraged the food industry from developing anthocyanin-enriched functional foods thus far.

      The use of anthocyanins in foods is limited by their instability in high pH and sensitivity to light and heat[103]. However, glycosylated and acylated anthocyanins have better stability in typical food pH, and their content is high in certain vegetables, such as the red or purple varieties of cabbage, carrot, potato, and radish. Anthocyanins that are more sensitive to high pH can be suitable in acidic products such as soft drinks[51]. Regulatory policies may also limit the use of anthocyanins in foods in different countries. For example, anthocyanins extracted from natural sources are classified as a food additive (E 163) in the EU[104], and their use in food is permitted in quantum satis for all foods except those listed in Commission Regulation No. 1333/2008. Some anthocyanin-rich plant foods prepared without selective extraction of anthocyanins, such as black carrot juice, can be used as ingredients (termed coloring foods) as long as they are officially recognized as foods or novel foods. In the US, extracted anthocyanins are not recognized as permitted food additives, but individual anthocyanin-rich extracts, such as grape color and grape skin extract, are approved as color additives[105], excluding a list of over 300 foods for which the use of any color additives is prohibited.

      As discussed in Section "Structural diversity of anthocyanins", food processing plays a critical role in the stability and bioavailability of anthocyanins, influencing their efficacy in functional food applications. The structural sensitivity of these compounds to heat, light, and pH presents a major formulation challenge. While structural modifications such as glycosylation and acylation can improve their stability, this often occurs at the cost of reduced absorption efficiency. Developing protective strategies, such as encapsulation, selecting appropriate food matrices, or using anthocyanins in acidic products, such as those fermented with lactic acid bacteria, is essential to ensure that functional benefits are retained in commercial products.

      In general, while anthocyanins hold substantial promise for both visual appeal and potential health benefits, their integration into functional food products requires a careful balance of chemical stability, processing conditions, and compliance with national food regulations. Stronger evidence from well-designed clinical trials may also be necessary to support future health claims.

    • This review highlights the central role of anthocyanins in protecting gut microbiota from environmental pollutants such as microplastics. The protective effects of these compounds, including their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and prebiotic properties, position them as powerful tools for maintaining gut health. The findings of this review suggest that incorporating anthocyanin-rich foods into the diet could be a valuable strategy for mitigating the health impacts of environmental pollutants. Public health initiatives and policies that promote the consumption of such foods, along with efforts to reduce microplastic pollution could have far-reaching benefits for population health. As environmental challenges continue to grow, natural compounds like anthocyanins offer promising avenues for protecting human health, while other measures are still required to tackle the underlying causes of microplastic pollution.

      Addressing microplastic pollution, however, requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach beyond dietary strategies. Policy reforms aimed at reducing plastic production and promoting circular economy models, technological innovations such as biodegradable materials and filtration systems, and improved waste management infrastructures are all critical components. Furthermore, raising public awareness and encouraging consumer-driven action, such as reducing single-use plastics and avoiding products with microbeads, can play a pivotal role in mitigating environmental exposure. These upstream solutions, when combined with dietary interventions like anthocyanin-rich foods, offer a synergistic path toward improved health outcomes in the face of rising environmental threats[3436].

      Despite the promising health benefits of anthocyanins, several research gaps remain. The precise mechanisms by which anthocyanins exert their protective effects on gut microbiota require further elucidation, particularly in understanding the microbial species and molecular pathways involved. Additionally, challenges related to anthocyanin bioavailability must be addressed, as their absorption, metabolism, and bioactivity are influenced by structural variations, the food matrix, and individual differences in gut microbiota composition. More research is warranted for investigating the contribution of various factors, such as differences between anthocyanin molecular species, the importance of food matrix effect vs purified supplements, and potential synergy between other phytochemicals; studying poorly utilised anthocyanin-rich materials as potential and sustainable sources of anthocyanins; and extending the most promising results into animal models and clinical studies, focusing on key indicators such as gut microbiota composition, inflammatory responses, and anthocyanin metabolism. Experimental designs should account for factors including dosage, bioavailability, and individual variability in gut microbiota to ensure the translational relevance of findings. The long-term impact of anthocyanin consumption on gut microbiota and overall host health also remains an open question, necessitating longitudinal studies to evaluate sustained dietary intake and potential cumulative benefits. Continued research and innovation in these areas will be crucial for developing effective strategies to combat the health effects of pollutants and support overall well-being.

      • This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland through Seed Funding for the Finland-China Food and Health Network (FCFH) 2023, University of Eastern Finland. Koistinen VM was supported by the Lantmännen Research Foundation (Grant No. 2022H045). Babu AF received a working grant from the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Grant No. 00210224).

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: draft manuscript preparation: Koistinen VM, Babu AF, Shad E, Zarei I; table and figures preparation: Koistinen VM, Babu AF. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Authors contributed equally: Ville M Koistinen, Ambrin Farizah Babu

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of China Agricultural University, Zhejiang University and Shenyang Agricultural University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (1) References (165)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Koistinen VM, Babu AF, Shad E, Zarei I. 2025. Anthocyanins as protectors of gut microbiota: mitigating the adverse effects of microplastic-induced disruption. Food Innovation and Advances 4(2): 238−252 doi: 10.48130/fia-0025-0022
    Koistinen VM, Babu AF, Shad E, Zarei I. 2025. Anthocyanins as protectors of gut microbiota: mitigating the adverse effects of microplastic-induced disruption. Food Innovation and Advances 4(2): 238−252 doi: 10.48130/fia-0025-0022

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return