Search
2026 Volume 5
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Epigenetic networks in sexual reproduction of plants under environmental stresses

  • # Authors contributed equally: Ruixian Zhu, Lijuan Qi

More Information
  • Received: 21 December 2025
    Revised: 23 January 2026
    Accepted: 27 January 2026
    Published online: 08 April 2026
    Seed Biology  5 Article number: e011 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Sexual reproduction in plants is precisely regulated by intricate epigenetic networks under environmental stress, which are crucial for reproductive success and crop yield. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in epigenetic mechanisms underlying sexual reproduction in plants in response to stresses such as heat, cold, drought, and salinity. We focus on the dynamic roles of DNA methylation, histone modifications, noncoding RNAs, and chromatin remodeling during reproductive development. Stress induces methylation reprogramming at specific genomic loci and influences transposon activity via the RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway. Histone modifications, including H3K27me3, H3K4me3, and acetylation, integrate environmental cues to regulate flowering time, endosperm development, and gametophyte formation. Noncoding RNAs, such as microRNAs, phased small interfering RNAs, and long noncoding RNAs, participate in stress responses through post-transcriptional regulation to maintain normal pollen and ovule development. Furthermore, changes in chromatin's accessibility and structure coordinate stress memory and transgenerational adaptation. These epigenetic layers interact to form a multidimensional regulatory network, enabling developmental plasticity under stress conditions. This review provides an integrated perspective on the epigenetic regulation of plant reproduction under environmental challenges and highlights potential epigenetic strategies for improving crops in terms of stress resistance.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Kawashima T, Berger F. 2014. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant sexual reproduction. Nature Reviews Genetics 15:613−624 doi: 10.1038/nrg3685

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Zhong S, Lan Z, Qu LJ. 2025. Ingenious male-female communication ensures successful double fertilization in angiosperms. Annual Review of Plant Biology 76:401−431 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-083123-071512

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Arshad MS, Farooq M, Asch F, Krishna JSV, Prasad PVV, et al. 2017. Thermal stress impacts reproductive development and grain yield in rice. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 115:57−72 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.03.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Khan A, Ahmad M, Ahmed M, Hussain MI. 2020. Rising atmospheric temperature impact on wheat and thermotolerance strategies. Plants 10:43 doi: 10.3390/plants10010043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Khan AH, Min L, Ma Y, Zeeshan M, Jin S, et al. 2023. High-temperature stress in crops: male sterility, yield loss and potential remedy approaches. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:680−697 doi: 10.1111/pbi.13946

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Li JY, Yang C, Xu J, Lu HP, Liu JX. 2023. The hot science in rice research: how rice plants cope with heat stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 46:1087−1103 doi: 10.1111/pce.14509

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Wang N, Li X, Zhu J, Yang ZN. 2025. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of photoperiod- and thermo-sensitive genic male sterility in plants. Molecular Plant 18:26−41 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2024.12.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Li C, Zhu J, Jin H, Feng H, Zhuang H, et al. 2025. Regulation of plant gene expression by tsRNAs in response to abiotic stress. PeerJ 13:e19487 doi: 10.7717/peerj.19487

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Zhu J, Cao X, Deng X. 2023. Epigenetic and transcription factors synergistically promote the high temperature response in plants. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 48:788−800 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2023.06.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Zhang H, Lang Z, Zhu JK. 2018. Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biolology 19:489−506 doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0016-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Le H, Simmons CH, Zhong X. 2025. Functions and mechanisms of histone modifications in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 76:551−578 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-083123-070919

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Simon SA, Meyers BC. 2011. Small RNA-mediated epigenetic modifications in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14:148−155 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.11.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Ding X, Jia X, Xiang Y, Jiang W. 2022. Histone modification and chromatin remodeling during the seed life cycle. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:865361 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.865361

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Cokus SJ, Feng S, Zhang X, Chen Z, Merriman B, et al. 2008. Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 452:215−219 doi: 10.1038/nature06745

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Huettel B, Kanno T, Daxinger L, Aufsatz W, Matzke AJM, et al. 2006. Endogenous targets of RNA-directed DNA methylation and Pol IV in Arabidopsis. The EMBO Journal 25:2828−2836 doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601150

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Stroud H, Do T, Du J, Zhong X, Feng S, et al. 2014. Non-CG methylation patterns shape the epigenetic landscape in Arabidopsis. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 21:64−72 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2735

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Zemach A, Kim MY, Hsieh PH, Coleman-Derr D, Eshed-Williams L, et al. 2013. The Arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler DDM1 allows DNA methyltransferases to access H1-containing heterochromatin. Cell 153:193−205 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Cao X, Springer NM, Muszynski MG, Phillips RL, Kaeppler S, et al. 2000. Conserved plant genes with similarity to mammalian de novo DNA methyltransferases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97:4979−4984 doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4979

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Zhang H, Gong Z, Zhu JK. 2022. Active DNA demethylation in plants: 20 years of discovery and beyond. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 64:2217−2239 doi: 10.1111/jipb.13423

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Zhu R, Xue Y, Qian W. 2025. Molecular mechanisms and biological functions of active DNA demethylation in plants. Epigenetics & Chromatin 18:41 doi: 10.1186/s13072-025-00605-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Du X, Yang Z, Florez Ariza AJ, Wang Q, Xie G, et al. 2022. Structure of plant RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2, an enzyme involved in small interfering RNA production. The Plant Cell 34:2140−2149 doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Zhang X, Clarenz O, Cokus S, Bernatavichute YV, Pellegrini M, et al. 2007. Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biology 5:e129 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050129

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Fromm M, Avramova Z. 2014. ATX1/AtCOMPASS and the H3K4me3 marks: how do they activate Arabidopsis genes? Current Opinion in Plant Biology 21:75−82 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Ding Y, Avramova Z, Fromm M. 2011. Two distinct roles of ARABIDOPSIS HOMOLOG OF TRITHORAX1 (ATX1) at promoters and within transcribed regions of ATX1-regulated genes. The Plant Cell 23:350−363 doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.080150

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Grewal SIS. 2023. The molecular basis of heterochromatin assembly and epigenetic inheritance. Molecular Cell 83:1767−1785 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.04.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Hu H, Du J. 2022. Structure and mechanism of histone methylation dynamics in Arabidopsis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 67:102211 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102211

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Kim ED, Dorrity MW, Fitzgerald BA, Seo H, Sepuru KM, et al. 2022. Dynamic chromatin accessibility deploys heterotypic cis/trans-acting factors driving stomatal cell-fate commitment. Nature Plants 8:1453−1466 doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01304-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Xiao J, Jin R, Yu X, Shen M, Wagner JD, et al. 2017. Cis and trans determinants of epigenetic silencing by Polycomb repressive complex 2 in Arabidopsis. Nature Genetics 49:1546−1552 doi: 10.1038/ng.3937

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Agarwal G, Kudapa H, Ramalingam A, Choudhary D, Sinha P, et al. 2020. Epigenetics and epigenomics: underlying mechanisms, relevance, and implications in crop improvement. Functional & Integrative Genomics 20:739−761 doi: 10.1007/s10142-020-00756-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Ali S, Khan N, Tang Y. 2022. Epigenetic marks for mitigating abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 275:153740 doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153740

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Akhter Z, Bi Z, Ali K, Sun C, Fiaz S, et al. 2021. In response to abiotic stress, DNA methylation confers epigenetic changes in plants. Plants 10:1096 doi: 10.3390/plants10061096

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Li J, Huang Q, Sun M, Zhang T, Li H, et al. 2016. Global DNA methylation variations after short-term heat shock treatment in cultured microspores of Brassica napus cv. Topas. Scientific Reports 6:38401 doi: 10.1038/srep38401

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Zhang M, Zhang X, Guo L, Qi T, Liu G, et al. 2020. Single-base resolution methylome of cotton cytoplasmic male sterility system reveals epigenomic changes in response to high-temperature stress during anther development. Journal of Experimental Botany 71:951−969 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz470

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Yang F, Sun Y, Du X, Chu Z, Zhong X, et al. 2023. Plant-specific histone deacetylases associate with ARGONAUTE4 to promote heterochromatin stabilization and plant heat tolerance. New Phytologist 238:252−269 doi: 10.1111/nph.18729

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Min L, Li Y, Hu Q, Zhu L, Gao W, et al. 2014. Sugar and auxin signaling pathways respond to high-temperature stress during anther development as revealed by transcript profiling analysis in cotton. Plant Physiology 164:1293−1308 doi: 10.1104/pp.113.232314

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Malabarba J, Windels D, Xu W, Verdier J. 2021. Regulation of DNA (de)methylation positively impacts seed germination during seed development under heat stress. Genes 12:457 doi: 10.3390/genes12030457

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Khan S, Anwar S, Ashraf MY, Khaliq B, Sun M, et al. 2019. Mechanisms and adaptation strategies to improve heat tolerance in rice. A review. Plants 8:508 doi: 10.3390/plants8110508

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Singh S, Praveen A, Dudha N, Bhadrecha P. 2024. Integrating physiological and multi-omics methods to elucidate heat stress tolerance for sustainable rice production. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 30:1185−1208 doi: 10.1007/s12298-024-01480-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Ma Y, Min L, Wang M, Wang C, Zhao Y, et al. 2018. Disrupted genome methylation in response to high temperature has distinct affects on microspore abortion and anther indehiscence. The Plant Cell 30:1387−1403 doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Li B, Cai H, Liu K, An B, Wang R, et al. 2023. DNA methylation alterations and their association with high temperature tolerance in rice anthesis. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 42:780−794 doi: 10.1007/s00344-022-10586-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Du X, Sun Y, He Y, Cai H, Chen X. 2025. Epigenetic regulation of JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN genes contributes to heat tolerance in the heat-tolerant rice cultivar Nagina 22. aBIOTECH 6:441−451 doi: 10.1007/s42994-025-00229-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Ito H, Gaubert H, Bucher E, Mirouze M, Vaillant I, et al. 2011. An siRNA pathway prevents transgenerational retrotransposition in plants subjected to stress. Nature 472:115−119 doi: 10.1038/nature09861

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Cavrak VV, Lettner N, Jamge S, Kosarewicz A, Bayer LM, et al. 2014. How a retrotransposon exploits the plant's heat stress response for its activation. PLoS Genetics 10:e1004115 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Song X, Tang S, Liu H, Meng Y, Luo H, et al. 2025. Inheritance of acquired adaptive cold tolerance in rice through DNA methylation. Cell 188:4213−4224.e12 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.04.036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Zhang Z, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Wang X, Li D, et al. 2011. Arabidopsis floral initiator SKB1 confers high salt tolerance by regulating transcription and pre-mRNA splicing through altering histone H4R3 and small nuclear ribonucleoprotein LSM4 methylation. The Plant Cell 23:396−411 doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.081356

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Tang N, Zhang H, Li X, Xiao J, Xiong L. 2012. Constitutive activation of transcription factor OsbZIP46 improves drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiology 158:1755−1768 doi: 10.1104/pp.111.190389

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Kapazoglou A, Drosou V, Argiriou A, Tsaftaris AS. 2013. The study of a barley epigenetic regulator, HvDME, in seed development and under drought. BMC Plant Biology 13:172 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-172

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Surdonja K, Eggert K, Hajirezaei MR, Harshavardhan VT, Seiler C, et al. 2017. Increase of DNA methylation at the HvCKX2.1 promoter by terminal drought stress in barley. Epigenomes 1:9 doi: 10.3390/epigenomes1020009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Molinier J, Ries G, Zipfel C, Hohn B. 2006. Transgeneration memory of stress in plants. Nature 442:1046−1049 doi: 10.1038/nature05022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Pembrey ME, Bygren LO, Kaati G, Edvinsson S, Northstone K, et al. 2006. Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. European Journal of Human Genetics 14:159−166 doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201538

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Siddique AB, Parveen S, Rahman MZ, Rahman J. 2024. Revisiting plant stress memory: mechanisms and contribution to stress adaptation. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 30:349−367 doi: 10.1007/s12298-024-01422-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Boyko A, Blevins T, Yao Y, Golubov A, Bilichak A, et al. 2010. Transgenerational adaptation of Arabidopsis to stress requires DNA methylation and the function of Dicer-like proteins. PLoS One 5:e9514 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009514

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Suriyasak C, Kawaguchi R, Matsumoto R, Sawada Y, Nong HT, et al. 2025. Adaptive memory induced by heat stress during grain filling enhances subsequent thermotolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Scientific Reports 15:14135 doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99146-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Wibowo A, Becker C, Marconi G, Durr J, Price J, et al. 2016. Hyperosmotic stress memory in Arabidopsis is mediated by distinct epigenetically labile sites in the genome and is restricted in the male germline by DNA glycosylase activity. eLife 5:e13546 doi: 10.7554/eLife.13546

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] He Y, Amasino RM. 2005. Role of chromatin modification in flowering-time control. Trends in Plant Science 10:30−35 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.11.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Gan ES, Xu Y, Wong JY, Goh JG, Sun B, et al. 2014. Jumonji demethylases moderate precocious flowering at elevated temperature via regulation of FLC in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications 5:5098 doi: 10.1038/ncomms6098

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Zheng S, Hu H, Ren H, Yang Z, Qiu Q, et al. 2019. The Arabidopsis H3K27me3 demethylase JUMONJI 13 is a temperature and photoperiod dependent flowering repressor. Nature Communications 10:1303 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09310-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Liu J, Feng L, Gu X, Deng X, Qiu Q, et al. 2019. An H3K27me3 demethylase-HSFA2 regulatory loop orchestrates transgenerational thermomemory in Arabidopsis. Cell Research 29:379−390 doi: 10.1038/s41422-019-0145-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Huh JH, Bauer MJ, Hsieh TF, Fischer R. 2007. Endosperm gene imprinting and seed development. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 17:480−485 doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2007.08.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Folsom JJ, Begcy K, Hao X, Wang D, Walia H. 2014. Rice fertilization-independent Endosperm1 regulates seed size under heat stress by controlling early endosperm development. Plant Physiology 165:238−248 doi: 10.1104/pp.113.232413

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Popova OV, Dinh HQ, Aufsatz W, Jonak C. 2013. The RdDM pathway is required for basal heat tolerance in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 6:396−410 doi: 10.1093/mp/sst023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Zheng Y, Ding Y, Sun X, Xie S, Wang D, et al. 2016. Histone deacetylase HDA9 negatively regulates salt and drought stress responsiveness in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:1703−1713 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv562

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Chen X, Lu L, Mayer KS, Scalf M, Qian S, et al. 2016. POWERDRESS interacts with HISTONE DEACETYLASE 9 to promote aging in Arabidopsis. eLife 5:e17214 doi: 10.7554/eLife.17214

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Kim YJ, Wang R, Gao L, Li D, Xu C, et al. 2016. POWERDRESS and HDA9 interact and promote histone H3 deacetylation at specific genomic sites in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:14858−14863 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618618114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Tasset C, Singh Yadav A, Sureshkumar S, Singh R, van der Woude L, et al. 2018. POWERDRESS-mediated histone deacetylation is essential for thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 14:e1007280 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Tang WS, Zhong L, Ding QQ, Dou YN, Li WW, et al. 2022. Histone deacetylase AtSRT2 regulates salt tolerance during seed germination via repression of vesicle-associated membrane protein 714 (VAMP714) in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 234:1278−1293 doi: 10.1111/nph.18060

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Song ZT, Zhang LL, Han JJ, Zhou M, Liu JX. 2021. Histone H3K4 methyltransferases SDG25 and ATX1 maintain heat-stress gene expression during recovery in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 105:1326−1338 doi: 10.1111/tpj.15114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Zeng X, Gao Z, Gu J, Qin G, Ou Y, et al. 2025. CK2 kinase-PRC2 signalling regulates genome-wide H3K27 trimethylation and transduces prolonged cold exposure into epigenetic cold memory in plants. Nature Plants 11:1572−1590 doi: 10.1038/s41477-025-02054-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Bastow R, Mylne JS, Lister C, Lippman Z, Martienssen RA, et al. 2004. Vernalization requires epigenetic silencing of FLC by histone methylation. Nature 427:164−167 doi: 10.1038/nature02269

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Sung S, Amasino RM. 2004. Vernalization and epigenetics: how plants remember winter. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7:4−10 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2003.11.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Kim DH, Sung S. 2014. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms underlying vernalization. The Arabidopsis Book 12:e0171 doi: 10.1199/tab.0171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Yu Y, Zhang Y, Chen X, Chen Y. 2019. Plant noncoding RNAs: hidden players in development and stress responses. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 35:407−431 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125218

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Wierzbicki AT, Blevins T, Swiezewski S. 2021. Long noncoding RNAs in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 72:245−271 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-093020-035446

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Chao H, Hu Y, Zhao L, Xin S, Ni Q, et al. 2022. Biogenesis, functions, interactions, and resources of non-coding RNAs in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:3695 doi: 10.3390/ijms23073695

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Kindgren P, Ard R, Ivanov M, Marquardt S. 2018. Transcriptional read-through of the long non-coding RNA SVALKA governs plant cold acclimation. Nature Communications 9:4561 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07010-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Liu X, Hao L, Li D, Zhu L, Hu S. 2015. Long non-coding RNAs and their biological roles in plants. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 13:137−147 doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.02.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Wang H, Mao Y, Yang J, He Y. 2015. TCP24 modulates secondary cell wall thickening and anther endothecium development. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:436 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00436

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Wang B, Xue JS, Yu YH, Liu SQ, Zhang JX, et al. 2017. Fine regulation of ARF17 for anther development and pollen formation. BMC Plant Biology 17:243 doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1185-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Unte US, Sorensen AM, Pesaresi P, Gandikota M, Leister D, et al. 2003. SPL8, an SBP-box gene that affects pollen sac development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 15:1009−1019 doi: 10.1105/tpc.010678

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Wang JW, Czech B, Weigel D. 2009. miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 138:738−749 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Stief A, Altmann S, Hoffmann K, Pant BD, Scheible WR, et al. 2014. Arabidopsis miR156 regulates tolerance to recurring environmental stress through SPL transcription factors. The Plant Cell 26:1792−1807 doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.123851

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Duan P, Ni S, Wang J, Zhang B, Xu R, et al. 2016. Regulation of OsGRF4 by OsmiR396 controls grain size and yield in rice. Nature Plants 2:15203 doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.203

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Li S, Tian Y, Wu K, Ye Y, Yu J, et al. 2018. Modulating plant growth-metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture. Nature 560:595−600 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0415-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Zhang J, Zhou Z, Bai J, Tao X, Wang L, et al. 2020. Disruption of MIR396e and MIR396f improves rice yield under nitrogen-deficient conditions. National Science Review 7:102−112 doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz142

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Mo Y, Li G, Liu L, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. 2023. OsGRF4AA compromises heat tolerance of developing pollen grains in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1121852 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1121852

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC. 2005. microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 121:207−221 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Axtell MJ, Jan C, Rajagopalan R, Bartel DP. 2006. A two-hit trigger for siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 127:565−577 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Montgomery TA, Howell MD, Cuperus JT, Li D, Hansen JE, et al. 2008. Specificity of ARGONAUTE7-miR390 interaction and dual functionality in TAS3 trans-acting siRNA formation. Cell 133:128−141 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Li H, You C, Yoshikawa M, Yang X, Gu H, et al. 2022. A spontaneous thermo-sensitive female sterility mutation in rice enables fully mechanized hybrid breeding. Cell Research 32:931−945 doi: 10.1038/s41422-022-00711-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Fan J, Zhang H, Shi Y, Li Y, He Y, et al. 2024. Systematic identification and characterization of microRNAs with target genes involved in high night temperature stress at the filling stage of rice. Physiologia Plantarum 176:e14305 doi: 10.1111/ppl.14305

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Tsuji H, Aya K, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Shimada Y, Nakazono M, et al. 2006. GAMYB controls different sets of genes and is differentially regulated by microRNA in aleurone cells and anthers. The Plant Journal 47:427−444 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02795.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Aya K, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Kondo M, Hamada K, Yano K, et al. 2009. Gibberellin modulates anther development in rice via the transcriptional regulation of GAMYB. The Plant Cell 21:1453−1472 doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.062935

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Xin M, Wang Y, Yao Y, Xie C, Peng H, et al. 2010. Diverse set of microRNAs are responsive to powdery mildew infection and heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biology 10:123 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Wang Y, Sun F, Cao H, Peng H, Ni Z, et al. 2012. TamiR159 directed wheat TaGAMYB cleavage and its involvement in anther development and heat response. PLoS One 7:e48445 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048445

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Chen J, Pan A, He S, Su P, Yuan X, et al. 2020. Different microRNA families involved in regulating high temperature stress response during cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) anther development. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:1280 doi: 10.3390/ijms21041280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Ding Y, Ma Y, Liu N, Xu J, Hu Q, et al. 2017. microRNAs involved in auxin signalling modulate male sterility under high-temperature stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). The Plant Journal 91:977−994 doi: 10.1111/tpj.13620

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Zhang M, Zhang X, Wang R, Zang R, Guo L, et al. 2023. Heat-responsive microRNAs participate in regulating the pollen fertility stability of CMS-D2 restorer line under high-temperature stress. Biological Research 56:58 doi: 10.1186/s40659-023-00465-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Ding X, Guo J, Zhang Q, Yu L, Zhao T, et al. 2021. Heat-responsive miRNAs participate in the regulation of male fertility stability in soybean CMS-based F1 under high temperature stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:2446 doi: 10.3390/ijms22052446

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Bokszczanin KL, Krezdorn N, Fragkostefanakis S, Müller S, Rycak L, et al. 2015. Identification of novel small ncRNAs in pollen of tomato. BMC Genomics 16:714 doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1901-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Pan C, Ye L, Zheng Y, Wang Y, Yang D, et al. 2017. Identification and expression profiling of microRNAs involved in the stigma exsertion under high-temperature stress in tomato. BMC Genomics 18:843 doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4238-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Margis R, Fusaro AF, Smith NA, Curtin SJ, Watson JM, et al. 2006. The evolution and diversification of Dicers in plants. FEBS Letters 580:2442−2450 doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.072

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Teng C, Zhang H, Hammond R, Huang K, Meyers BC, et al. 2020. Dicer-like 5 deficiency confers temperature-sensitive male sterility in maize. Nature Communications 11:2912 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16634-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Rutley N, Poidevin L, Doniger T, Tillett RL, Rath A, et al. 2021. Characterization of novel pollen-expressed transcripts reveals their potential roles in pollen heat stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Reproduction 34:61−78 doi: 10.1007/s00497-020-00400-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Mei M, Chen L, Zhang Z, Li Z, Xu C, et al. 1999. pms3 is the locus causing the original photoperiod-sensitive male sterility mutation of 'Nongken 58S'. Science in China Series C: Life Sciences 42:316−322 doi: 10.1007/BF03183609

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Fan Y, Yang J, Mathioni SM, Yu J, Shen J, et al. 2016. PMS1T, producing phased small-interfering RNAs, regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:15144−15149 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619159114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Li X, Shahid MQ, Wen M, Chen S, Yu H, et al. 2020. Global identification and analysis revealed differentially expressed lncRNAs associated with meiosis and low fertility in autotetraploid rice. BMC Plant Biology 20:82 doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2290-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Ding J, Lu Q, Ouyang Y, Mao H, Zhang P, et al. 2012. A long noncoding RNA regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility, an essential component of hybrid rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:2654−2659 doi: 10.3410/f.14267349.15779554

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Ding J, Shen J, Mao H, Xie W, Li X, et al. 2012. RNA-directed DNA methylation is involved in regulating photoperiod-sensitive male sterility in rice. Molecular Plant 5:1210−1216 doi: 10.1093/mp/sss095

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Dhingra Y, Gupta S, Gupta V, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S. 2023. The emerging role of epitranscriptome in shaping stress responses in plants. Plant Cell Reports 42:1531−1555 doi: 10.1007/s00299-023-03046-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Xiang Y, Zhang D, Li L, Xue YX, Zhang CY, et al. 2024. Detection, distribution, and functions of RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in plant development and environmental signal responses. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1429011 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1429011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Nguyen TKH, Kang H. 2024. Reading m6A marks in mRNA: a potent mechanism of gene regulation in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 66:2586−2599 doi: 10.1111/jipb.13781

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Wang L, Zhuang H, Fan W, Zhang X, Dong H, et al. 2022. m6A RNA methylation impairs gene expression variability and reproductive thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Genome Biology 23:244 doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02814-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113] Yang LH, Jiang YT, Yu SX, Zhang YY, Jiang BC, et al. 2026. Chilling stress suppresses plant reproduction through modulating BZR1 translation efficiency by CSP2. Current Biology 36:426−444.e7 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.11.074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Wu X, Zhang S, Su T, Zhang Y, Wong CE, et al. 2025. Temperature-responsive N4-acetylcytidine mRNA modification controls thermosensory flowering in Arabidopsis. Developmental Cell 60:3185−3200.e6 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2025.07.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Crhak Khaitova L, Mikulkova P, Pecinkova J, Kalidass M, Heckmann S, et al. 2024. Heat stress impairs centromere structure and segregation of meiotic chromosomes in Arabidopsis. eLife 12:RP90253 doi: 10.7554/eLife.90253

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Lang-Mladek C, Popova O, Kiok K, Berlinger M, Rakic B, et al. 2010. Transgenerational inheritance and resetting of stress-induced loss of epigenetic gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 3:594−602 doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Lee YS, Maple R, Dürr J, Dawson A, Tamim S, et al. 2021. A transposon surveillance mechanism that safeguards plant male fertility during stress. Nature Plants 7:34−41 doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00818-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] Li Y, Ma H, Wu Y, Ma Y, Yang J, et al. 2024. Single-cell transcriptome atlas and regulatory dynamics in developing cotton anthers. Advanced Science 11:e2304017 doi: 10.1002/advs.202304017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Zander M, Willige BC, He Y, Nguyen TA, Langford AE, et al. 2019. Epigenetic silencing of a multifunctional plant stress regulator. eLife 8:e47835 doi: 10.7554/eLife.47835

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Ramakrishnan M, Papolu PK, Satish L, Vinod KK, Wei Q, et al. 2022. Redox status of the plant cell determines epigenetic modifications under abiotic stress conditions and during developmental processes. Journal of Advanced Research 42:99−116 doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.04.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121] Almeida J, Perez-Fons L, Fraser PD. 2021. A transcriptomic, metabolomic and cellular approach to the physiological adaptation of tomato fruit to high temperature. Plant, Cell & Environment 44:2211−2229 doi: 10.1111/pce.13854

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122] Song Y, Jia Z, Hou Y, Ma X, Li L, et al. 2020. Roles of DNA methylation in cold priming in Tartary buckwheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:608540 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.608540

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Ming X, Wan MC, Zhang ZD, Xue HC, Wu YQ, et al. 2025. FX-Cell: a method for single-cell RNA sequencing on difficult-to-digest and cryopreserved plant samples. Nature Methods 22:2551−2562 doi: 10.1038/s41592-025-02900-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124] Marand AP, Chen Z, Gallavotti A, Schmitz RJ. 2021. A cis-regulatory atlas in maize at single-cell resolution. Cell 184:3041−3055.e21 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Grosselin K, Durand A, Marsolier J, Poitou A, Marangoni E, et al. 2019. High-throughput single-cell ChIP-seq identifies heterogeneity of chromatin states in breast cancer. Nature Genetics 51:1060−1066 doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0424-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Li L, Chen G, Zhu G, Wu J, Kui X, et al. 2025. Single-molecule views of chromatin accessibility and structure during photomorphogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 122:e2516708122 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2516708122

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Song Z, Xia Q, Yang M, Yang T, Liu Y, et al. 2025. Dynamic changes in 3D chromatin structure during male gametogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biology 26:27 doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03496-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Zheng X, Chen L, Xia H, Wei H, Lou Q, et al. 2017. Transgenerational epimutations induced by multi-generation drought imposition mediate rice plant's adaptation to drought condition. Scientific Reports 7:39843 doi: 10.1038/srep39843

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] He L, Yao Y, You Y, Wei X, Ma Y, et al. 2026. Versatile molecular tools enabling customizable DNA methylation editing in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications 16:1123 doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-66933-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Zhang L, Fu J, Long T, Zhang C, Fan F, et al. 2025. A modular and customizable CRISPR/Cas toolkit for epigenome editing of cis-regulatory modules. Advanced Science 12:e03917 doi: 10.1002/advs.202503917

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhu R, Qi L, Qian W. 2026. Epigenetic networks in sexual reproduction of plants under environmental stresses. Seed Biology 5: e011 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0026-0006
    Zhu R, Qi L, Qian W. 2026. Epigenetic networks in sexual reproduction of plants under environmental stresses. Seed Biology 5: e011 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0026-0006

Figures(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(176) PDF downloads(25)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Epigenetic networks in sexual reproduction of plants under environmental stresses

Seed Biology  5 Article number: e011  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Sexual reproduction in plants is precisely regulated by intricate epigenetic networks under environmental stress, which are crucial for reproductive success and crop yield. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in epigenetic mechanisms underlying sexual reproduction in plants in response to stresses such as heat, cold, drought, and salinity. We focus on the dynamic roles of DNA methylation, histone modifications, noncoding RNAs, and chromatin remodeling during reproductive development. Stress induces methylation reprogramming at specific genomic loci and influences transposon activity via the RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway. Histone modifications, including H3K27me3, H3K4me3, and acetylation, integrate environmental cues to regulate flowering time, endosperm development, and gametophyte formation. Noncoding RNAs, such as microRNAs, phased small interfering RNAs, and long noncoding RNAs, participate in stress responses through post-transcriptional regulation to maintain normal pollen and ovule development. Furthermore, changes in chromatin's accessibility and structure coordinate stress memory and transgenerational adaptation. These epigenetic layers interact to form a multidimensional regulatory network, enabling developmental plasticity under stress conditions. This review provides an integrated perspective on the epigenetic regulation of plant reproduction under environmental challenges and highlights potential epigenetic strategies for improving crops in terms of stress resistance.

    • Sexual reproduction is fundamental for the propagation, genetic diversity, and long-term adaptability of plant species. It ensures the formation of viable seeds, supports crops' productivity, and enables plants to respond evolutionarily to changing environments. Because reproductive development is highly sensitive to external cues, understanding its regulatory mechanisms is crucial for both basic plant biology and agricultural improvement. In plants, spore mother cells arise from somatic cells in the reproductive tissues and undergo meiosis to produce megaspores and microspores. These further develop through mitosis into female and male gametophytes. The female gametophyte comprises the egg cell, the central cell, synergids, and antipodals, whereas the mature male gametophyte (pollen grain) consists of two sperm cells and a vegetative cell. Upon pollination, pollen germinates on the stigma, and the sperm cells are delivered to the ovule through the pollen tube[1,2]. Double fertilization occurs, giving rise to the embryo and endosperm, the latter providing nutrients for the embryo's development[2]. Recent studies indicate that environmental stresses such as heat, cold, drought, and salinity threaten plants' sexual reproduction, reducing fertility, seed yield, and quality, especially in major crops like rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)[37]. Being sessile, plants have evolved sophisticated regulatory mechanisms to sense and respond to these challenges, thereby safeguarding reproductive success under stress[8,9].

      Epigenetic regulation is essential for controlling gene expression, silencing transposable elements (TEs), and managing developmental plasticity in plants. The main mechanisms include DNA methylation (5mC), small RNA-mediated regulation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling[1013]. In the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, DNA methylation occurs at the cytosine residues in the context of CG, CHG, and CHH (where H represents A, C, or T) sequences [10,14]. CG and CHG methylation are mainly maintained by METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 (MET1) and CHROMOMETHYLASE 3 (CMT3), respectively. The maintenance of asymmetric CHH methylation is managed by DOMAIN REARRANGED METHYLTRANSFERASE 2 (DRM2) and CMT2, depending on the genomic region[1518]. DNA demethylation happens through passive and active processes[19]. Passive demethylation occurs when DNA methyltransferase activity is suppressed during DNA replication, leading to dilution of the methylation marks in newly synthesized DNA strands[10]. In contrast, active demethylation removes 5mC through the base-excision repair pathway and is mainly mediated by DNA glycosylases such as REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 (ROS1), DEMETER (DME), DEMETER-LIKE 2 (DML2), and DML3[20]. This dynamic regulation is essential for plants' development and ensures precise epigenetic control during growth and reproduction. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are produced through the coordinated action of RNA POLYMERASE IV (Pol IV), RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 (RDR2), and DICER-LIKE 3 (DCL3). These siRNAs are loaded onto ARGONAUTE 4 (AGO4) to guide RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM), which directs DRM2-dependent de novo methylation at homologous loci[20,21]. In parallel, histone modifications influence the chromatin structure and transcriptional activity[22]. Activating marks such as the trimethylation of Histone H3 at Lysine 4 (H3K4me3) and histone acetylation (HAc) promote gene expression[23,24], wherea repressive marks such as the dimethylation of Histone H3 at Lysine 9 (H3K9me2) and trimethylation of Histone H3 at Lysine 27 (H3K27me3) establish heterochromatin and silence transcription[25,26]. Notably, the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) mediates the deposition of H3K27me3, which is crucial for regulating developmental transitions[27,28]. Together, these epigenetic pathways form an integrated regulatory framework that enables plants to safeguard their reproductive development. Under environmental stresses, this framework becomes particularly vital, providing the molecular flexibility needed to maintain fertility and ensure successful seed set.

      This review summarizes the epigenetic regulatory mechanisms underlying sexual reproduction in plants in response to environmental stresses, with a focus on DNA methylation, histone modifications, noncoding RNAs, and chromatin remodeling. Integrating recent advances in epigenetics, we discuss how novel technologies can further illuminate these regulatory mechanisms under stress and explore their potential applications for engineering crops with enhanced "smart" traits and improved resilience to environmental challenges.

    • Environmental stresses have a great effect on plants' growth, development, and reproduction. To maintain fitness and ensure reproductive success, plants have evolved intricate epigenetic regulatory networks that allow them to sense, respond to, and "remember" environmental cues[29,30]. Among these mechanisms, DNA methylation plays a key role in coordinating gene expression, genomic stability, and transposon silencing during stress adaptation[31].

    • Abiotic stresses such as heat, cold, salinity, and drought can cause rapid changes in DNA methylation at specific loci, reflecting an adaptive plasticity of the plant epigenome. Heat stress has been widely studied and is known to cause significant genome-wide changes in DNA methylation patterns (Fig. 1a)[32,33]. For instance, heat stress decreases global DNA methylation in Arabidopsis[34]. In addition, high temperature causes genome-wide hypomethylation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) anthers during the tetrad and tapetal degradation stages[12]. In Brassica napus, short-term heat shock promotes demethylation and decreases global methylation in cultured microspores[35]. Thus, there is no consistent trend in heat-induced changes in methylation across different species or cell types.

      Figure 1. 

      Abiotic stress-induced DNA methylation dynamics and their roles in plants' reproductive development and stress memory. (a) Abiotic stresses including heat, cold, drought, and salinity trigger dynamic changes in DNA methylation patterns. The regulation involves a balance between the RdDM pathway and active demethylation catalyzed by DNA glycosylases (e.g., DME and ROS1). These dynamic DNA methylation changes interact with histone modifications (e.g., H4R3 symmetric dimethylation and histone acetylation) and RNA methylation (m6A) to modulate the state of chromatin and gene regulation. (b) Stress-induced methylation changes lead to transcriptional reprogramming, including the upregulation of stress-responsive genes (e.g., JAZ genes, oxidative phosphorylation-related genes) and the downregulation of developmental pathways (e.g., sugar/auxin signaling, cytokinin pathway). (c) Altered methylation states also affect transposon regulation, enabling transitions from silenced to active states under stress conditions, exemplified by the activation of the heat-responsive retrotransposon ONSEN. (d) Stress-induced epigenetic alterations affect reproductive development, causing defects such as microspore abortion, anther indehiscence, pollen viability, altered flowering time, and impaired seed germination and grain filling. (e) Epigenetic modifications can form a somatic memory within the same generation or be transmitted to the next generation. Although some stress-induced epigenetic marks contribute to somatic memory or transgenerational acquired tolerance (priming) in the progeny, others undergo selective resetting to maintain genomic integrity. Created in BioRender. https://BioRender.com/zj6e1eq.

      High temperature affects seed germination, pollen viability, and anther development, leading to significant yield reductions in crops (Figs 1d and 2a)[3638]. During seed development, the regulation of DNA (de)methylation positively influences seed germination and thermotolerance[36]. In cotton, heat stress disrupts genome methylation, leading to microspore abortion and anther indehiscence. This disruption alters the expression of genes in the sugar and auxin signaling pathways, which are essential for pollen maturation (Fig. 1b, d)[3539]. Furthermore, single-base resolution methylome analysis of cotton's cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) systems showed extensive epigenomic changes under heat stress. DNA methylation-mediated transcriptional changes in genes related to oxidative phosphorylation may modulate the balance of mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) bursts under heat stress during anther development (Fig. 1b)[33]. In rice, an analysis of spikelets from 14 varieties revealed that heat-tolerant varieties exhibited DNA demethylation during flowering, whereas heat-sensitive varieties showed increased methylation. Their flowering time differences are associated with their methylation status (Fig. 1d)[40]. Additionally, in the heat-tolerant rice variety Nagina 22, JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN (JAZ) genes are specifically upregulated under heat stress, with demethylation and increased histone acetylation at their promoters (Fig. 1b)[41]. These findings show that DNA methylation status is closely linked to heat tolerance and yield stability. Loss of methylation can activate TEs. For example, defects in the siRNA biosynthesis pathway lead to heat-induced activation of ONSEN retrotransposon[42]. ONSEN couples its activation to a stress-defense pathway and amplifies preferentially in dividing tissues. This ensures efficient propagation while avoiding stable remethylation (Fig. 1c). These findings demonstrate that heat-induced demethylation can reactivate retrotransposons, which exploit the plant's stress pathways for mobilization[43].

      Plants' responses to cold stress are also regulated by DNA methylation. Adaptive stress tolerance in plants can be transmitted across generations via epigenetic mechanisms. In rice, repeated low-temperature exposure confers heritable cold tolerance mediated by DNA methylation. Hypomethylation of the ACQUIRED COLD TOLERANCE 1 (ACT1) promoter sustains its expression under cold stress, directly affecting tolerance, and natural variation in ACT1 methylation aligns with geographic distribution and cold adaptation[44]. Importantly, this epigenetic change improves reproductive performance under cold stress, as evidenced by increased seed-setting ratios, whereas key agronomic traits such as panicle number, grains per panicle, 1,000-grain weight, and overall grain yield are maintained or enhanced[44]. These findings highlight DNA methylation as a molecular basis for inherited adaptive traits and underscore the potential of epigenetic regulation for improving stress resilience and crops' productivity.

      Salinity stress also triggers epigenetic modifications to help plants cope with high salt conditions. In Arabidopsis, the floral initiator Shk1 KINASE BINDING PROTEIN 1 (SKB1) and Histone H4 Arginine 3 symmetric dimethylation (H4R3sme2) integrate the plant's developmental progression with responses to salt stress. Loss of SKB1 function results in salt hypersensitivity, delayed flowering, and retarded growth. SKB1 is associated with chromatin and promotes the deposition of H4R3sme2, thereby repressing the transcription of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and multiple stress-responsive genes (Fig. 1a)[45]. In response to drought stress, plants used a variety of mechanisms to enhance their tolerance. For example, the rice bZIP transcription factor OsbZIP46 contributes to drought resistance by directly or indirectly activating the expression of multiple abscisic acid (ABA)- and stress-responsive genes[46]. At the same time, drought stress can also trigger epigenetic mechanisms, which help fine-tune the expression of stress-responsive genes and facilitate adaptive responses. Active DNA demethylation, mediated by DNA glycosylases like DME and ROS1, balances methyltransferase activity to maintain epigenomic flexibility (Fig. 1a). In barley (Hordeum vulgare), the DME homolog HvDME is essential for seed development and participates in drought-responsive demethylation[47]. In addition, terminal drought stress induces hypermethylation of the promoter of the cytokinin oxidase gene HvCKX2.1, reducing its expression and helping maintain cytokinin levels for grain-filling (Fig. 1b)[48]. Together, these findings highlight that DNA methylation is a highly dynamic regulator of stress-responsive transcriptional networks, rather than a static silencing mechanism.

    • Epigenetic states triggered by environmental fluctuations can be inherited across generations in both mammals and seed plants[49,50]. These stress-induced changes in DNA methylation often persist even after the stress is removed, establishing an epigenetic memory that pre-adapts plants to subsequent environmental challenges (Fig. 1e)[29,51]. For instance, in Arabidopsis, parental exposure to stress alters global DNA methylation in the offspring and enhances their stress tolerance, suggesting that stress signals can be transmitted through the germline[52]. Similarly, in rice, acquired cold tolerance can be inherited across generations via heritable changes in DNA methylation[44]. Moreover, heat stress during grain filling leads to hypomethylation of starch biosynthesis gene promoters and hypermethylation of α-amylase gene promoters in rice. These epigenetic modifications establish an adaptive transgenerational memory, enabling subsequent generations to better withstand heat stress[53]. However, the transmission of stress-induced epialleles is tightly regulated to preserve genomic integrity. In Arabidopsis, the memory of hyperosmotic stress is embedded at epigenetically unstable loci. During pollen development, the male germline utilizes DNA glycosylases to erase many stress-induced epigenetic marks, thereby preventing uncontrolled inheritance of such epialleles (Fig. 1e)[54]. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that DNA methylation-linked stress memory is not simply passed on passively but undergoes strict regulation during reproduction, balancing environmental adaptation with epigenomic stability.

    • Although DNA methylation plays a key role in stress-responsive reproductive regulation, histone modifications act in parallel to further modulate flowering and seed development under changing environments.

    • In addition to DNA methylation, diverse histone and RNA modifications constitute key epigenetic mechanisms that precisely regulate plants' reproductive development under environmental stresses (Fig. 2a). Beyond DNA methylation, histones are also subject to methylation, which play indispensable roles in the epigenetic regulation of flowering in plants. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the floral repressor FLC modulates flowering time by regulating the expression of its downstream targets FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1)[55]. Elevated temperature induces the JUMONJI-C domain-containing demethylases JMJ30 and JMJ32, which remove the repressive H3K27me3 mark from the FLC locus, thereby maintaining the expression of FLC and preventing premature flowering[56]. Similarly, JMJ13, another H3K27me3 demethylase, functions as a temperature- and photoperiod-dependent floral repressor, and precisely regulates flowering time under varying environmental cues[57]. Under high-temperature conditions, jmj13 mutant plants exhibit early flowering irrespective of daylength, whereas under low temperature, early flowering occurs only under short days. In all cases, FT transcript levels are elevated, suggesting that JMJ13 modulates flowering primarily through activating FT[57]. Another H3K27me3 demethylase, RELATIVE OF EARLY FLOWERING 6 (REF6), forms a positive regulatory loop with the heat-induced transcription factor HEAT SHOCK TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR A2 (HSFA2) (Fig. 2b)[58]. This feedback loop activates SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3)-INTERACTING PROTEIN 1 (SGIP1), promoting SGS3 degradation and thereby releasing the trans-acting siRNA (tasiRNA) target HEAT-INDUCED TAS1 TARGET 5 (HTT5), ultimately facilitating heat-induced flowering (Fig. 2b)[58]. Histone methylation also exerts critical regulatory effects on seed development under thermal stress. In rice, the PRC2 component FERTILIZATION-INDEPENDENT ENDOSPERM 1 (OsFIE1) is essential for the transition of the endosperm from the syncytial to the cellularized state during seed development[59]. The epigenetic status of OsFIE1, including both DNA methylation and H3K9me2 levels, is sensitive to temperature. Heat stress reduces the methylation of OsFIE1 and increases its transcriptional activity, which negatively correlates with seed size and results in smaller seeds[60]. Collectively, these studies highlight the pivotal roles of histone methylation in integrating environmental cues to modulate flowering time and seed development, underscoring its importance in maintaining reproductive success under stress conditions.

      Figure 2. 

      Epigenetic mechanisms safeguarding plant reproduction under abiotic stress. (a) Epigenetic regulation plays a pivotal role in maintaining the proper progression of sexual reproduction in plants under heat stress. Multiple epigenetic mechanisms are involved in modulating heat stress responses, including DNA methylation, histone methylation, and histone acetylation, as well as noncoding RNAs such as lncRNAs, miRNAs, and siRNAs. Together, these regulatory mechanisms influence flowering time and the development of floral organs and seeds. (b) The H3K27me3 demethylase REF6 establishes a positive regulatory feedback loop with the heat-responsive transcription factor HSFA2. This loop induces the expression of SGIP1, promotes degradation of SGS3, and consequently derepresses the tasiRNAs target HTT5, thereby contributing to heat-induced flowering. (c) In cotton, overexpression of miR157 or miR160 compromises auxin signaling, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of male fertility to heat stress and leading to microspore abortion or anther indehiscence. (d) Under low ambient temperatures, Arabidopsis NAT10A/B promote temperature-responsive ac4C deposition on FLM transcripts, thereby modulating alternative splicing of FLM and preventing extremely late flowering. (e) In Arabidopsis, brief exposure to chilling induces the RNA-binding protein CSP2, which binds to BZR1 mRNA and modulates its m6A modification, thereby reducing the mRNA translation efficiency of BZR1, inhibiting ovule initiation, and decreasing seed number. Created in BioRender. https://BioRender.com/l6d6j9a.

    • Histone acetylation is a major form of histone-related epigenetic modification and plays an important role in helping plants adapt to environmental stresses, particularly during the reproductive stages. In Arabidopsis thaliana, HISTONE DEACETYLASE 6 (HDA6) enhances thermotolerance by modulating histone acetylation levels. Loss of HDA6 disrupts the expression of genes associated with reproductive development under heat stress, thereby impairing sexual reproduction[61]. Similarly, HISTONE DEACETYLASE 9 (HDA9) regulates seeds' responses to drought and salt stresses. In this context, hda9-1 and hda9-2 mutants exhibit increased stress sensitivity and accelerated seed germination, likely caused by elevated histone acetylation at the promoters of stress-responsive genes[62]. In addition, POWERDRESS (PWR) interacts with HDA9 to cooperatively mediate histone deacetylation, which is important for floral transition under heat stress[63,64]. In the pwr mutant, transcriptional levels of heat-responsive factors such as PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4) are reduced, resulting in decreased thermosensitivity during floral transition, indicating that PWR-mediated deacetylation is essential for thermomorphogenesis[65]. Moreover, histone acetylation regulates seed germination under stress. SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR2 HOMOLOG (SRT2), a histone deacetylase, represses the expression of VESICLE-ASSOCIATED MEMBRANE PROTEIN 714 (VAMP714) to modulate seed germination under salt stress[66].

    • Plants can establish short-term stress memories, and the formation and maintenance of such memories are closely associated with histone methylation. The H3K4 methyltransferases SET DOMAIN GROUP 25 (SDG25) and ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX 1 (ATX1) deposit H3K4me3 marks at heat stress-responsive loci, preventing the establishment of DNA methylation at these regions and sustaining the proper expression of heat-inducible genes during and after heat exposure[67]. To initiate flowering, plants require prolonged cold exposure (vernalization) and maintain this cold memory throughout their growth. During prolonged cold, CASEIN KINASE II (CK2), induced by low temperature, phosphorylates the H3K27 methyltransferase, promoting genome-wide accumulation of H3K27me3 in Arabidopsis. This cold–CK2–PRC2 signaling pathway facilitates PRC2 enrichment at the FLC locus[68], increasing H3K27me3 levels and switching transcription from activation to repression. After vernalization, FLC remains transcriptionally silenced throughout the subsequent growth stages, ensuring normal flowering. This cold-induced epigenetic memory is eventually erased in the next generation[6971].

    • In plants, noncoding RNAs are broadly classified into small noncoding RNAs (small ncRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) according to their length[72,73]. Small noncoding RNAs include microRNAs (miRNAs) and siRNAs, which are processed by DCL proteins and function in association with AGO family proteins to mediate post-transcriptional or transcriptional gene silencing[72,74]. Most lncRNAs are primarily transcribed by RNA polymerase II and function through modulating transcriptional and epigenetic processes[75,76]. Under environmental stress conditions, noncoding RNAs play pivotal roles in safeguarding the normal progression of sexual reproduction in plants.

    • miRNAs and siRNAs are important post-transcriptional regulators that modulate plants' reproductive development, ensuring proper anther and ovule formation and contributing to fertility under both normal and stress conditions (Fig. 2a). miRNAs play crucial roles in regulating anther development in plants. For example, miR319 promotes secondary cell wall thickening in the anther endothecium of Arabidopsis by repressing TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR 24 (TCP24)[77]. Similarly, AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 17 (ARF17), which is expressed in the microspores and tetrads and is required for tetrad wall synthesis, is directly targeted by miR160, thereby critically regulating the development of pollen[78]. miRNAs also participate in heat stress responses, enhancing reproductive thermotolerance in plants. In Arabidopsis, miR156 regulates normal growth under heat stress by repressing the expression of SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) transcription factors. Given that SPL proteins also play critical roles in flowering time and the development of gametophytes (e.g., in pollen wall formation), this suggests that this epigenetic regulatory module may be essential for ensuring proper sexual reproduction under stress conditions[7981]. In rice, the transcription factor GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR 4 (OsGRF4) is encoded by a semi-dominant quantitative trait locus (QTL) for grain size and weight (GS2)[82,83]. OsGRF4 is post-transcriptionally regulated by miR396. In GS2, OsGRF4 mRNA escapes miR396-mediated degradation, leading to accumulation of OsGRF4, which promotes nitrogen storage and metabolism, and consequently increases grain size and yield[84]. However, under high-temperature conditions, OsGRF4 in GS2 modulates the transcription and splicing of reproduction-related genes in the anthers, thereby reducing thermotolerance, pollen viability, and seed set[85]. Thus, the miR396-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of OsGRF4 plays a pivotal role in the development of rice under both nitrogen deficiency and heat stress[84,85]. Most studies on the effects of stress on sexual reproduction in rice have focused on male fertility, whereas female fertility has received comparatively less attention. Emerging evidence indicates that female fertility is also regulated by miRNAs. miR390 cooperates with AGO7 to form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which triggers siRNA biogenesis and suppresses the expression of auxin response factors[8689]. The thermo-sensitive female sterility 1 (tfs1) mutant, which carries a point mutation in AGO7, disrupts RISCs' formation and reduces the accumulation of siRNAs, ultimately compromising female fertility under high-temperature conditions[89]. High night temperatures also impair reproductive development and grain-filling in rice, and recent studies have revealed regulatory roles for miRNAs in this response. Several high night temperature-responsive miRNAs that differ between heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive rice lines, target mRNAs involved in heat-related biological processes[90]. In wheat (Triticum aestivum), GAMYB, a target of miR159, participates in flower development and gibberellin (GA) signaling in aleurone cells[91,92]. Notably, the expression of TamiR159 is downregulated after 2 h of heat treatment, suggesting a role in thermotolerance[93]. Moreover, the overexpression of TamiR159 in rice causes delayed heading and male sterility, indirectly supporting its importance in maintaining normal anther development in wheat under heat stress[94]. miRNAs also regulate male thermotolerance in cotton, exhibiting stage-specific expression patterns during anther development[95]. In cotton, overexpression of miR157 or miR160 disrupts auxin signaling, rendering male fertility more sensitive to heat stress and leading to phenotypes such as microspore sterility or anther indehiscence (Fig. 2c)[96]. Proper miRNA regulation is therefore critical for the application of the three-line hybrid system in cotton, particularly under heat stress. For instance, the CMS-D2 restorer line based on cotton cytoplasm is heat-sensitive, severely restricting the utility of the three-line system. Differential expression of heat-responsive miRNAs has been observed among cotton restorer lines carrying distinct cytoplasms under high-temperature stress[97]. In heat-sensitive restorer lines, downregulation of mtr-miR167a_R+1 leads to increased expression of its target AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 8 (ARF8), disrupting auxin signaling and ultimately reducing pollen viability[97]. In soybean (Glycine max), downregulation of specific miRNAs contributes to protecting male fertility from heat stress. For example, the overexpression of gma-miR156b in Arabidopsis leads to heat-sensitive anther fertility, highlighting its conserved regulatory role[98]. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), heat-responsive miRNAs have also been detected at the post-meiotic stage and in mature pollen[99]. Additionally, several miRNAs are downregulated in the pistils under heat stress, contributing to the regulation of stigma exsertion[100]. In maize (Zea mays), phased siRNAs (phasiRNAs) play critical roles in anther development under high-temperature conditions. DCL5, a monocot-specific protein, regulates the biogenesis of 24-nt phasiRNAs, which facilitate heat stress responses and maintain male fertility[101,102]. Mutations in DCL5 abolish the production of 24-nt phasiRNAs, making the dcl5 mutant temperature-sensitive during meiosis and leading to abnormal development in the anthers[102]. Collectively, these studies highlight the central roles of miRNAs and siRNAs in safeguarding plants' reproductive development under environmental stress conditions.

    • lncRNAs provide an additional epigenetic layer influencing reproductive development under environmental stresses. Upon heat stress, numerous pollen-specific lncRNAs are induced in Arabidopsis thaliana, suggesting that lncRNAs contribute to the reproductive response to thermal stress[103]. Beyond temperature, lncRNAs also play critical roles in regulating fertility in response to varying photoperiods. Photoperiod-sensitive male sterility (PSMS) in rice is characterized by male sterility under long-day conditions and fertility under short-day conditions. Two loci, PHOTOPERIOD-SENSITIVE GENIC MALE STERILITY 1 (PMS1) and PMS3, were identified in the PSMS line Nongken 58S[104]. PMS1 encodes a lncRNA, PMS1T, which is preferentially expressed in young panicles. Under long-day conditions, PMS1T is targeted by miR2118, leading to the production and accumulation of 21-nt phasiRNAs and ultimately causing male sterility[105,106]. PMS3 encodes another lncRNA, the LONG-DAY SPECIFIC MALE-FERTILITY-ASSOCIATED RNA (LDMAR)[107,108]. Proper accumulation of LDMAR is critical for maintaining male fertility under long-day conditions. Compared with wild-type Nongken 58, the Nongken 58S line carries a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) within LDMAR that alters its secondary structure and increases DNA methylation at its promoter region. This epigenetic modification suppresses the transcription of LDMAR, triggers premature programmed cell death (PCD) in developing anthers, and consequently leads to long-day-dependent male sterility[107]. Moreover, the restoration of fertility following a shift to short-day conditions is delayed in Nongken 58S[108]. Together, these findings highlight lncRNAs as key epigenetic regulators that fine-tune male reproductive development and fertility in response to environmental and photoperiodic cues.

    • RNA modifications constitute an important post-transcriptional regulatory layer that enables plants to fine-tune their gene expression in response to environmental stresses (Fig. 2a). These modifications dynamically influence RNA metabolism, including stability, splicing, and translation, thereby shaping stress-responsive gene expression programs[109,110].

    • Among the diverse RNA modifications identified in plants, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant internal modification of mRNA and is deposited, removed, and interpreted by conserved writer, eraser, and reader proteins[111]. Increasing evidence indicates that m6A plays a central role in coordinating plants' stress responses in a context- and tissue-dependent manner. In Arabidopsis thaliana, m6A dynamically modulates the variability of gene expression in floral tissues under heat stress, thereby affecting reproductive thermotolerance and fertility outcomes. For example, the disruption of m6A demethylation mediated by the RNA demethylase ALKBH10 impairs the heat-induced activation of numerous genes, ultimately leading to shortened siliques and reduced seed fertility[112]. In addition, m6A modification also participates in the regulation of sexual reproduction in plants in response to cold stress. Under low-temperature conditions, the Arabidopsis RNA-binding protein COLD SHOCK PROTEIN 2 (CSP2) modulates the m6A methylation of BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT 1 (BZR1) mRNA, thereby affecting BZR1's translation efficiency (Fig. 2e)[113]. This negative regulatory mechanism disrupts normal sexual reproductive development, leading to a significant reduction in ovule number and ultimately resulting in shortened siliques and decreased seed set[113].

    • In addition to histone acetylation, recent studies have revealed that mRNA acetylation also plays an important role in plants' responses to environmental cues. In Arabidopsis, the mRNA N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) writers N-ACETYLTRANSFERASE 10A/B (NAT10A/B) are rapidly induced under low-temperature conditions, leading to ac4C modification of FLOWERING LOCUS M (FLM) transcripts (Fig. 2d)[114]. This modification facilitates the recruitment of SPLICING FACTOR 1 (SF1) to FLM, thereby modulating its alternative splicing. Through this mechanism, Arabidopsis fine-tunes flowering time under cold conditions and prevents excessive flowering delay[114].

    • Chromatin-level epigenetic modifications mediate plants' reproductive responses to abiotic stress. It balances genomic stability, gene regulation, and physiological adaptations during critical developmental stages such as gametogenesis and fruit development.

      Maintaining the chromatin structure during meiosis is foundational for fertility, but heat can disturb this process. For instance, heat stress impairs the centromeres' structure and segregation of meiotic chromosomes in Arabidopsis, leading to defects and reduced fertility[115]. Heat stress also likely influences chromatin's conformation in pollen through critical chromatin modifications[116]. Stress conditions often relax epigenetic silencing, potentially allowing TEs to mobilize. A transposon surveillance system operating at the chromatin level is crucial to maintain male fertility during stress and prevent the activation of deleterious TEs in the germline[117]. A single-cell transcriptome atlas and chromatin accessibility survey of cotton anthers revealed that tapetal cells are particularly sensitive to heat. Heat reduces the chromatin accessibility of specific genes, such as QUARTET 3 (QRT3) and CYTOCHROME P450 703A2 (CYP703A2), silencing them and causing defects in pollen wall formation and male sterility[118]. These results further illustrate that chromatin-level stress responses are deeply integrated with reproductive development.

      Beyond structural integrity, chromatin modifications also regulate key stress-response genes. Overexpression of the chromatin remodeling ATPase genes AtCHR12 or AtCHR23 reduced seed germination in Arabidopsis, especially under salt or heat stress. Epigenetic repression of multifunctional stress regulators enables plants to balance stress tolerance with reproductive development by preventing harmful overactivation of defense pathways[119]. A critical question regarding these chromatin modifications is their heritability. In Arabidopsis, stress-triggered loss of gene silencing can be transmitted to the next generation. However, the male germline possesses an active reprogramming system that selectively resets these marks. This ensures that only a subset of stress-induced epialleles is heritable, preventing long-term destabilization of the germline's epigenome[116].

      The upstream signals driving these chromatin-level changes are linked to the cell's physiological state. Redox status may act as a metabolic sensor that connects abiotic stress to chromatin remodeling[120]. The connection between cellular physiology and genetic regulation is further supported by multi-omics analyses. In tomato fruit, transcriptome analyses suggest that epigenetic mechanisms mediate heat-induced transcriptional changes. Genes involved in chromatin remodeling and histone methylation are enriched among those upregulated in response to heat[121].

    • In this review, we have emphasized the central role of epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, noncoding RNAs, and chromatin remodeling, in coordinating reproductive development in plants under environmental stresses. These multilayered regulatory networks enable developmental plasticity, mediate stress memory, and, in some cases, facilitate transgenerational adaptation. We have also discussed how emerging high-resolution technologies, from single-cell and spatial multi-omics to long-read epigenomics and chromatin conformation profiling, are transforming our understanding of stress-responsive epigenetic regulation and paving the way for strategies to enhance reproductive resilience and crops' performance in challenging environments.

    • Plants' reproductive organs are embedded within complex tissues, making it difficult to resolve cell-type-specific epigenetic regulation using bulk approaches. Recent advances in single-cell and spatial multi-omics have begun to overcome these limitations. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revealed pronounced transcriptional heterogeneity and cell type-specific sensitivity to heat stress during anther and stamen development in both Arabidopsis and crops[118,122], whereas fixation-based based scRNA-seq methods have extended the applicability of this technology to recalcitrant and field-grown samples[123]. However, understanding stress adaptation requires us to move beyond the transcriptome to directly profile epigenetic states. Techniques such as the single-cell assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (scATAC-seq) enable the profiling of chromatin's accessibility, allowing the identification of cell-type-specific regulatory elements and stress-induced changes in chromatin's openness. In maize, scATAC-seq of developing anthers under heat stress pinpointed cis-regulatory elements whose accessibility is altered in heat-sensitive cell types, such as the tapetum or microspores[124]. Similarly, single-cell chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (scChIP-seq) methods, though technically challenging, are emerging to profile histone modifications (e.g., H3K27me3, H3K4me3) at a cellular resolution, potentially revealing how stress reshapes the epigenome in specific lineages leading to gametes[125]. In parallel, long-read-based approaches such as Fiber-seq and advances in capturing chromatin conformation have uncovered fine-scale cis-epigenetic features and dynamic three-dimensional genome organization in plants' reproductive cells[126,127]. Such innovations are redefining the study of reproductive stress, moving from descriptive, tissue-level analyses to integrated, cell-resolved insights into the epigenetic mechanisms.

    • A defining feature of epigenetic regulation is its potential persistence through mitosis and, in some cases, across generations. Although stress-induced epigenetic memory has been observed in plants, the principles determining which marks are transmitted through the germline and which are reset remain poorly understood. In Arabidopsis, many stress-induced DNA methylation changes arise at epigenetically unstable loci and are actively erased by DNA demethylases such as DME and ROS1, suggesting a selective filtering mechanism that limits the inheritance of deleterious epialleles[54]. Future studies need to systematically define which epigenetic features, including specific DNA methylation contexts, histone modifications, or small RNA pathways, are more likely to escape germline reprogramming. A central unresolved question is how stress-induced epigenetic states are selectively inherited across generations. It remains unclear whether specific reader proteins protect certain epigenetic marks during gametogenesis, or whether epigenetic reprogramming differs between male and female germlines. Evidence from rice indicates that multigenerational drought or heat stress can induce heritable DNA hypomethylation at specific loci, contributing to adaptive phenotypic variation[53,128]. Using isogenic lines, isolated gametes or embryos, and high-resolution technologies like Fiber-seq will be key to decoding epigenetic inheritance, potentially allowing the deliberate stabilization of beneficial stress memories to enhance a crop's resilience without changing its DNA.

    • The growing understanding of epigenetic regulation in plants' stress responses offers new avenues for crop improvement. Beyond traditional genetic engineering, "epigenetic engineering" aims to stably modulate gene expression to enhance complex traits such as stress resilience. Targeting key regulators, such as histone demethylases, deacetylases, or chromatin remodelers, can reprogram entire gene networks, providing broader tolerance than single-gene edits. More precise approaches utilize epigenome editing, such as CRISPR-dCas9 fused to effector domains to modify histone marks (e.g., for H3K27me3) or DNA methylation at specific loci, enabling the targeted activation or repression of stress-responsive genes[129,130]. Ensuring stability, specificity, and heritability remains a key challenge. Complementarily, harnessing natural epigenetic variation through epiQTL mapping or epigenome-wide association studies allows the identification of beneficial epialleles for breeding. Integrating high-throughput epigenotyping with genomic selection could accelerate the development of "epi-bred" crops with enhanced resilience.

      In conclusion, integrating single-cell and single-molecule epigenomics, deciphering transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, and leveraging advanced epigenetic engineering will be key to developing climate-resilient crops and safeguarding global food security.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: study design and writing the manuscript: Zhu R, Qi L, Qian W; figure preparation: Zhu R, Qi L. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024T170028 and 2023M740096 to Lijuan Qi), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270288 to Weiqiang Qian).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Ruixian Zhu, Lijuan Qi

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  References (130)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhu R, Qi L, Qian W. 2026. Epigenetic networks in sexual reproduction of plants under environmental stresses. Seed Biology 5: e011 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0026-0006
    Zhu R, Qi L, Qian W. 2026. Epigenetic networks in sexual reproduction of plants under environmental stresses. Seed Biology 5: e011 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0026-0006

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return