Search
2025 Volume 5
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Physiological and transcriptome analysis of Roucongbing disease in Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc)

More Information
  • Received: 08 January 2025
    Revised: 30 March 2025
    Accepted: 01 April 2025
    Published online: 08 July 2025
    Fruit Research  5 Article number: e027 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc) is a characteristic fruit of China with high nutritional value. The frequent occurrence of Roucongbing disease in bayberry fruits has been a major problem affecting production and marketing in recent years. Unfortunately, the causes and the response mechanisms of this disease are still unclear, which makes it extremely difficult to prevent and treat. In this study, the overall nutrient content between diseased trees and control (non-diseased) trees were compared, which suggested that Mn might be associated with resistance to Roucongbing disease. A comparative analysis of the endogenous hormone profiles between healthy and diseased fruits from the same tree revealed significant differences, with jasmonic acid (JA), gibberellin (GA), abscisic acid (ABA), and auxin (IAA) exhibiting pronounced increments in the diseased fruits. The transcriptome analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were mainly enriched in the plant-pathogen interaction pathway, which included multiple genes encoding some WRKY transcription factor family members, and the pathogenesis-related protein PR1. Our results indicated a strong correlation between the DEGs of these pathways and JA signaling, implying that the upregulation of genes involved in JA biosynthesis might serve as a pivotal defensive response against Roucongbing disease in bayberry fruits. Furthermore, the expression patterns of select DEGs were validated by quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). This study explored the response mechanism at physiological and molecular levels, providing a theoretical foundation for the prevention and control of Roucongbing disease and the breeding of resistant cultivars.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 List of primers used for qRT-PCR analysis.
    Supplementary Table S2 Endogenous hormone contents of fruits in different samples.
  • [1] Sun C, Huang H, Xu C, Li X, Chen K. 2013. Biological activities of extracts from Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc. ): a review. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 68(2):97−106 doi: 10.1007/s11130-013-0349-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Zhang S, Yu Z, Sun L, Ren H, Zheng X, et al. 2022. An overview of the nutritional value, health properties, and future challenges of Chinese bayberry. PeerJ 10:e13070 doi: 10.7717/peerj.13070

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Zhang Q, Huang Z, Wang Y, Wang Y, Fu L, et al. 2021. Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) phenolics mitigated protein glycoxidation and formation of advanced glycation end-products: a mechanistic investigation. Food Chemistry 361:130102 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Atkinson NJ, Urwin PE. 2012. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. Journal of Experimental Botany 63(10):3523−43 doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers100

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Suzuki N, Rivero RM, Shulaev V, Blumwald E, Mittler R. 2014. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytologist 203(1):32−43 doi: 10.1111/nph.12797

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Gong Z, Xiong L, Shi H, Yang S, Herrera-Estrella LR, et al. 2020. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Science China Life Sciences 63(5):635−74 doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1683-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP. 2016. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biology 14:86 doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0771-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Lyzenga WJ, Liu Z, Olukayode T, Zhao Y, Kochian LV, et al. 2023. Getting to the roots of N, P, and K uptake. Journal of Experimental Botany 74(6):1784−805 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Therby-Vale R, Lacombe B, Rhee SY, Nussaume L, Rouached H. 2022. Mineral nutrient signaling controls photosynthesis: focus on iron deficiency-induced chlorosis. Trends in Plant Science 27(5):502−9 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.11.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Debona D, Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE. 2017. Silicon's role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annual Review of Phytopathology 55:85−107 doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Sun Y, Wang M, Mur LAJ, Shen Q, Guo S. 2020. Unravelling the roles of nitrogen nutrition in plant disease defences. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(2):572 doi: 10.3390/ijms21020572

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Fernández-Escobar R. 2019. Olive nutritional status and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1151 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01151

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Tripathi R, Tewari R, Singh KP, Keswani C, Minkina T, et al. 2022. Plant mineral nutrition and disease resistance: a significant linkage for sustainable crop protection. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:883970 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.883970

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Silber A, Goldberg T, Shapira O, Hochberg U. 2022. Nitrogen uptake and macronutrients distribution in mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Keitt) trees. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 181:23−32 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.03.036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Mostofa MG, Rahman MM, Ghosh TK, Kabir AH, Abdelrahman M, et al. 2022. Potassium in plant physiological adaptation to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 186:279−89 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.07.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Wang YI, Wu WH. 2010. Plant sensing and signaling in response to K+-deficiency. Molecular Plant 3(2):280−87 doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Wang M, Zheng Q, Shen Q, Guo S. 2013. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14(4):7370−90 doi: 10.3390/ijms14047370

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Aldon D, Mbengue M, Mazars C, Galaud JP. 2018. Calcium signalling in plant biotic interactions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19(3):665 doi: 10.3390/ijms19030665

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Wang T, Chen X, Ju C, Wang C. 2023. Calcium signaling in plant mineral nutrition: from uptake to transport. Plant Communications 4(6):100678 doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100678

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Jing J, Xu X, Fu W, Zhang H, Qu S, et al. 2023. Difference in calcium accumulation in the fruit of two apple varieties and its relationship with vascular bundle development in the pedicel. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 201:107833 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107833

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Madani B, Mirshekari A, Yahia E. 2016. Effect of calcium chloride treatments on calcium content, anthracnose severity and antioxidant activity in papaya fruit during ambient storage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 96(9):2963−68 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7462

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Broadley M, Brown P, Cakmak I, Rengel Z, Zhao F. 2012. Function of nutrient: micronutrients. In Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd edition, ed. Marschner P. Sydney: Academic Press. pp. 191–248. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00007-8
    [23] Pieterse CMJ, Van der Does D, Zamioudis C, Leon-Reyes A, Van Wees SCM. 2012. Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 28:489−521 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Chen K, Li GJ, Bressan RA, Song CP, Zhu JK, et al. 2020. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 62(1):25−54 doi: 10.1111/jipb.12899

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Deng H, Ma L, Gong D, Xue S, Ackah S, et al. 2023. BTH-induced joint regulation of wound healing at the wounds of apple fruit by JA and its downstream transcription factors. Food Chemistry 410:135184 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135184

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Luo D, Sun W, Cai J, Hu G, Zhang D, et al. 2023. SlBBX20 attenuates JA signalling and regulates resistance to Botrytis cinerea by inhibiting SlMED25 in tomato. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21(4):792−805 doi: 10.1111/pbi.13997

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Rivas-San Vicente M, Plasencia J. 2011. Salicylic acid beyond defence: its role in plant growth and development. Journal of Experimental Botany 62(10):3321−38 doi: 10.1093/jxb/err031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Wang J, Wu D, Wang Y, Xie D. 2019. Jasmonate action in plant defense against insects. Journal of Experimental Botany 70(13):3391−400 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Jiang B, Liu R, Fang X, Tong C, Chen H, et al. 2022. Effects of salicylic acid treatment on fruit quality and wax composition of blueberry (Vaccinium virgatum Ait). Food Chemistry 368:130757 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130757

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Imadi SR, Kazi AG, Ahanger MA, Gucel S, Ahmad P. 2015. Plant transcriptomics and responses to environmental stress: an overview. Journal of Genetics 94(3):525−37 doi: 10.1007/s12041-015-0545-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Yao L, Jiang Z, Wang Y, Hu Y, Hao G, et al. 2023. High air humidity dampens salicylic acid pathway and NPR1 function to promote plant disease. The EMBO Journal 42(21):e113499 doi: 10.15252/embj.2023113499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Spoel SH, Dong X. 2024. Salicylic acid in plant immunity and beyond. The Plant Cell 36(5):1451−64 doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad329

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Mir-Marqués A, Domingo A, Cervera ML, de la Guardia M. 2015. Mineral profile of kaki fruits (Diospyros kaki L.). Food Chemistry 172:291−97 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.076

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Liu C, Li H, Ren A, Chen G, Ye W, et al. 2023. A comparison of the mineral element content of 70 different varieties of pear fruit (Pyrus ussuriensis) in China. Peer J 11:e15328 doi: 10.7717/peerj.15328

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Yanu P, Jakmunee J. 2017. Down scaled Kjeldahl digestion and flow injection conductometric system for determination of protein content in some traditional northern Thai foods. Food Chemistry 230:572−77 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.142

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Wang Y, Afeworki Y, Geng S, Kanchupati P, Gu M, et al. 2020. Hydrotropism in the primary roots of maize. New Phytologist 226(6):1796−808 doi: 10.1111/nph.16472

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Sun L, Zhang S, Yu Z, Zheng X, Liang S, et al. 2024. Transcription-associated metabolomic analysis reveals the mechanism of fruit ripening during the development of Chinese bayberry. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25(16):8654 doi: 10.3390/ijms25168654

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Zhang S, Yu Z, Sun L, Liang S, Xu F, et al. 2024. T2T reference genome assembly and genome-wide association study reveal the genetic basis of Chinese bayberry fruit quality. Horticulture Research 11(3):uhae033 doi: 10.1093/hr/uhae033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Schmidt SB, Jensen PE, Husted S. 2016. Manganese deficiency in plants: the impact on photosystem II. Trends in Plant Science 21(7):622−32 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.03.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Lim-Hing S, Gandhi KJK, Villari C. 2024. The role of Manganese in tree defenses against pests and pathogens. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 210:108641 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108641

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Liu F, Cai S, Ma Z, Yue H, Xing L, et al. 2023. RVE2, a new regulatory factor in jasmonic acid pathway, orchestrates resistance to Verticillium wilt. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21(12):2507−24 doi: 10.1111/pbi.14149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Glauser G, Dubugnon L, Mousavi SAR, Rudaz S, Wolfender JL, et al. 2009. Velocity estimates for signal propagation leading to systemic jasmonic acid accumulation in wounded Arabidopsis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284(50):34506−13 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.061432

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Kumar V, Chaudhary P, Prasad A, Dogra V, Kumar A. 2023. Jasmonic acid limits Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA infection in rice by modulating reactive oxygen species homeostasis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 196:520−30 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.02.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Li Z, Wei Y, Cao Z, Jiang S, Chen Y, et al. 2021. The jasmonic acid signaling pathway is associated with terpinen-4-ol-induced disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea in strawberry fruit. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 69(36):10678−87 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04608

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Chai L, Li Y, Chen S, Perl A, Zhao F, et al. 2014. RNA sequencing reveals high resolution expression change of major plant hormone pathway genes after young seedless grape berries treated with gibberellin. Plant Science 229:215−24 doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.09.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Saha B, Nayak J, Srivastava R, Samal S, Kumar D, et al. 2023. Unraveling the involvement of WRKY TFs in regulating plant disease defense signaling. Planta 259(1):7 doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04269-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Sukaoun K, Tsuchiya T, Uchiyama H. 2024. Pathogen challenge in Arabidopsis cotyledons induces enhanced disease resistance at newly formed rosette leaves via sustained upregulation of WRKY70. Genes to Cells 12:1236−50 doi: 10.1111/gtc.13179

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Wang W, Bai XD, Chen K, Gu CR, Yu QB, et al. 2022. Role of PsnWRKY70 in regulatory network response to infection with Alternaria alternata (Fr.) keissl in Populus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(14):7537 doi: 10.3390/ijms23147537

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Zhao H, Jiang J, Li K, Liu G. 2017. Populus simonii × Populus nigra WRKY70 is involved in salt stress and leaf blight disease responses. Tree Physiology 37(6):827−44 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Wang X, Qiao Q, Zhao K, Zhai W, Zhang F, et al. 2024. PbWRKY18 promotes resistance against black spot disease by activation of the chalcone synthase gene PbCHS3 in pear. Plant Science 341:112015 doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Liu Z, Shi L, Weng Y, Zou H, Li X, et al. 2019. ChiIV3 acts as a novel target of WRKY40 to mediate pepper immunity against Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 32(9):1121−33 doi: 10.1094/MPMI-11-18-0313-R

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Gu YQ, Wildermuth MC, Chakravarthy S, Loh YT, Yang C, et al. 2002. Tomato transcription factors Pti4, Pti5, and Pti6 activate defense responses when expressed in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 14(4):817−31 doi: 10.1105/tpc.000794

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Niderman T, Genetet I, Bruyere T, Gees R, Stintzi A, et al. 1995. Pathogenesis-related PR-1 proteins are antifungal (isolation and characterization of three 14-kilodalton proteins of tomato and of a basic PR-1 of tobacco with inhibitory activity against phytophthora infestans). Plant Physiology 108:17−27 doi: 10.1104/pp.108.1.17

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Sun L, Qi Y, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Zheng X, et al. 2025. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of Roucongbing disease in Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc). Fruit Research 5: e027 doi: 10.48130/frures-0025-0019
    Sun L, Qi Y, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Zheng X, et al. 2025. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of Roucongbing disease in Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc). Fruit Research 5: e027 doi: 10.48130/frures-0025-0019

Figures(7)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(1471) PDF downloads(450)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Physiological and transcriptome analysis of Roucongbing disease in Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc)

Fruit Research  5 Article number: e027  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc) is a characteristic fruit of China with high nutritional value. The frequent occurrence of Roucongbing disease in bayberry fruits has been a major problem affecting production and marketing in recent years. Unfortunately, the causes and the response mechanisms of this disease are still unclear, which makes it extremely difficult to prevent and treat. In this study, the overall nutrient content between diseased trees and control (non-diseased) trees were compared, which suggested that Mn might be associated with resistance to Roucongbing disease. A comparative analysis of the endogenous hormone profiles between healthy and diseased fruits from the same tree revealed significant differences, with jasmonic acid (JA), gibberellin (GA), abscisic acid (ABA), and auxin (IAA) exhibiting pronounced increments in the diseased fruits. The transcriptome analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were mainly enriched in the plant-pathogen interaction pathway, which included multiple genes encoding some WRKY transcription factor family members, and the pathogenesis-related protein PR1. Our results indicated a strong correlation between the DEGs of these pathways and JA signaling, implying that the upregulation of genes involved in JA biosynthesis might serve as a pivotal defensive response against Roucongbing disease in bayberry fruits. Furthermore, the expression patterns of select DEGs were validated by quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). This study explored the response mechanism at physiological and molecular levels, providing a theoretical foundation for the prevention and control of Roucongbing disease and the breeding of resistant cultivars.

    • Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc), is an evergreen fruit tree native to southern China, belonging to the Myrica genus, a member of the Myriceae family[1]. The Chinese bayberry has a long history of cultivation, and is renowned for its distinctive flavor, vibrant coloration, and nutritional benefits conferred by abundant bioactive compounds including flavonols, phenolic acids, and anthocyanins[2,3]. The fruit of Chinese bayberry has a unique morphology. The outside of the seed exhibits many dense saccular structures radiating from the seed surface. During fruit development, these saccular bodies undergo progressive expansion and thickening, ultimately forming the edible sarcocarp[2]. However, during the expansion of these saccular bodies, they are susceptible to infection by Roucongbing disease that leads to abnormal fruit development in M. rubra. The main symptoms of the disease include excessive growth of fruit saccular bodies, which are separated from the fruit pit at the base and raised significantly. These separated and elevated saccular bodies swiftly wither and necrose, impeding normal fruit expansion and potentially leading to the cessation of fruit development. Currently, Roucongbing disease has been found in several cultivars of Chinese bayberry, such as Dongkui, Biqi, Ruansi, and Yingsi, with a higher incidence in Dongkui. The disease usually occurs in clusters and spreads quickly in orchards, severely incurring substantial economic losses. The unclear etiology and the mechanisms of response to Roucongbing disease in bayberry present a formidable challenge to its effective prevention and management. Consequently, there is an urgent to explore the effects and response mechanisms of the disease at the physiological and molecular levels to enhance our understanding and control of this pernicious condition.

      Both biological and abiotic stresses affect plant growth and development. Plant responses to different stresses are highly complex and involve changes at the transcriptome, cellular, and physiological levels[4]. Under natural conditions, plants face the threat of infection by pathogens (including bacteria, fungi, and viruses) and attack by herbivore pests[5]. In addition to biotic stresses, extreme temperatures, drought, and nutrient limitations are major abiotic factors that reduce plant growth, productivity, and fruit quality[6]. Previous studies have confirmed the roles of the major plant hormones in regulating abiotic and biotic stress responses with a special focus on the significance of crosstalk between different hormones in generating a sophisticated and efficient stress response[7]. Some producers considered that Roucongbing disease was a physiological disease caused by nutritional deficiency or inconsistent growth due to hormonal imbalances, therefore, it was necessary to investigate through integrated transcriptomic and physiological analyses.

      Nutrient deficiency, as one of the major abiotic stress factors, not only directly limits plant growth and fruit development[8,9] but also affects the ability to resist biotic stress[1013]. Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient affecting many parameters in fruit productivity. N deficiency affects vegetative growth, flowering, and fruit quality[14], also N negatively affects the plant defense, N addition generally reduces the amount of defensive compounds and affects plant disease resistance[13]. Potassium (K) regulates multiple plant stress responses, including in concert with jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), and auxins[15]. Various contemporary studies revealed that K+-homeostasis plays a substantial role in plant responses and tolerance to abiotic stresses[16]. K-deficient plants tend to be more susceptible to infection than those with an adequate supply of K[17]. In addition to being a vital component of cell structure, calcium (Ca) also functions as the most prominent second messenger in the cascade reaction of plant defense signals[18,19]. Calcium deficiency in apple fruits causes bitter pit[20], and exogenous Ca treatment of papaya can improve the resistance of anthracnose[21]. In recent years, increasing research is focusing on the function of manganese (Mn) in plant defense against pests and pathogens, especially in woody plants. As a necessary micronutrient for enzymatic reactions and defense, manganese is involved in the creation of lignin and phenolic compounds, which help plants resistance to disease[13,22].

      Plant hormones play an important role in the regulation of fruit development and ripening, and they also emerged as signaling compounds with key functions in responses to disease resistance[23]. The major hormones produced by plants are auxins, gibberellins (GA), cytokinins (CK), abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene (ET), salicylic acid (SA), and jasmonates (JA). Among them, auxins and GAs regulate the progress of cell division and cell expansion in fruit development. ABA, SA, JA, and ET are known to play major roles in mediating plant defense response against pathogens and abiotic stresses. SA signaling positively triggers plant immunity against biotrophic pathogens, while the JA pathway is mostly required for resistance against necrotrophic pathogens[24,25]. Jasmonic acids (JAs) are important injury signaling molecules and play an important role in regulating plant growth and defense responses, which participate in the process of wound healing in apple fruit[26,27]. Various enzymes are involved in JA synthesis, such as allene oxide synthase (AOS), allene oxide cyclase (AOC), and oxo-phytodienoic acid reductase (OPR3). The Arabidopsis mutants of JA biosynthesis genes (such as aos and opr3) are significantly more susceptible to insects when compared with wild-type plants[28]. As a plant defense hormone required for immunity, exogenous salicylic acid (SA) treatment can improve the resistance of fruits[29,30], however, there was reciprocal antagonism between SA and JA signals in shaping the outcome of plant-pathogen interactions[31,32].

      To study the cause and response mechanism of Roucongbing disease in bayberry fruits, the overall nutritional level of diseased and healthy trees and endogenous hormones in healthy and diseased fruits from the same tree were detected quantitatively. Through integrated transcriptomic and targeted hormonal analyses, this study reveals multilevel response mechanisms to Roucongbing disease, advancing our understanding of this economically significant pathology. Overall, this study advances our knowledge of Roucongbing disease, which provides a theoretical foundation for its prevention and control, and the future breeding of resistant cultivars.

    • Fifteen-year-old 'Dongkui' (M. rubra) were used in this study, which were all cultivated in the same orchard in Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province, China. This region experiences a subtropical monsoon climate with slightly acidic red soil. Three disease-free, healthy trees were chosen as control trees, while three trees with severe Roucongbing disease symptoms were designated as diseased trees. All the trees were in the same facility to ensure consistency in environment and agricultural management. Among them, the trees with more than 20% of diseased fruit were selected as diseased trees, while those with no diseased fruit were selected as control trees. In all four directions (east, west, south, and north) of the control trees, the fruits and surrounding branches containing stems and leaves comprised the control group (CK). The diseased fruits and surrounding branches in diseased trees were described as the diseased group (D), and the healthy group (H) was made up of no diseased fruits and surrounding branches from the same tree. A portion of fruits, leaves, and stems from each treatment were collected and used for element content determination, and the other parts were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen after being collected and stored in a −80 °C ultra-low temperature refrigerator for future use. To investigate overall nutrient levels, control trees (CK), and diseased trees (D and H) were systematically compared for differential nutrient profiling. Concurrently, a focused analysis was conducted on endogenous hormone quantification and transcriptome sequence analysis between diesease (D) and healthy (H) fruits within the same trees, with control for genetic and environmental variability.

    • The leaves and fruits were heated at 105 °C for 30 min and then dried at 65 °C for 3 d after cleaning with ultra-pure water. The contents of potassium (K), phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) contents were quantified by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES iCAP series 7000 Plus Thermo Scientific) and slightly improved[33,34]. This method included: weighing 1.0 g of the samples into the microwave digestion inner tank, adding 5 mL of nitric acid (65%), and 2 mL of hydrogen peroxide (30%), placed for a night and digested at 180 °C until complete resolution. After the digestion was completed, the digestive solution was then transferred with deionized water to a constant volume of 50 mL, mixed well for testing, and then the sample blank test was conducted. The nitrogen (N) content used sulfuric acid for digestion and determined using the total Kjeldahl digestion method[35].

    • The quantification of different endogenous hormones was performed by Beijing Biomarker Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) using an LC-MS/MS platform[36]. The procedure involved freeze-drying and grinding the plant fresh samples into powder, followed by extraction using methanol. Following centrifugation and filtration, the samples were examined using an AB Sciex 6500 Q TRAP triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer. Based on the local metabolite database, qualitative and quantitative analyses of metabolites in the samples were performed. Characteristic ions for each substance were screened using a triple quadrupole filter, and the signal intensity of characteristic ions was obtained from the detector. The chromatographic peaks were integrated and calibrated using MultiaQuant software, where the relative quantity of each drug was represented by the peak area (Area) of that particular chromatographic peak. All the data from the chromatographic peak integration were then exported and saved.

    • Transcriptomics was performed by Beijing Biomarker Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Total RNA was extracted from fruit pulp using the CTAB method, and Oligo (dT) magnetic beads were employed to enrich mRNA. After being reverse-transcribed into single-stranded cDNA, the enriched fragments were synthesized into double-stranded cDNA. After purification and blunt-end modification, sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform. Trinity software (version 2.4.0) was used for assembly and identification. The longest sequence for each gene was selected based on similarity and length. CD-HIT software (version 4.6) was used to cluster the sequences and eliminate redundancy.

    • Raw data were filtered to remove low-quality data, eliminate adapter sequences, and obtain high-quality clean data for analysis. The clean data was aligned to the reference sequence, the Bayberry T2T genome, using the Hisat2 program[37,38]. Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM), which is equal to mapped cDNA fragments (million) × transcript length (kb), were used to quantify the levels of gene expression. Using the DESeq program, differential expression analysis was carried out, and genes with FPKM values greater than 1 were classified as DEGs. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed using the GOseq R package based on the Wallenius non-central hyper-geometric distribution. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was conducted using KOBAS 3.0. The heatmap of DEGs and the correlation network diagram of transcriptome and targeted hormones were generated using the R heatmap package on the BMK Cloud platform (www.biocloud.net).

    • Total RNA from fruits was extracted using the Trizol method. cDNA was synthesized in a 10 μL reaction using the HiScript III RT SuperMix with gDNA wiper (Vazyme, China). The qRT-PCR reaction was performed on a LightCycler 96 real-time PCR instrument (Roche, China) referring to previous research methods[37]. Each sample was analyzed with three technical replicates. Quantitative primers were designed based on gene sequences, with MrACT used as the housekeeping gene. Data were processed using the 2−ΔΔCᴛ method. All primers were listed in Supplementary Table S1.

    • Roucongbing disease in M. rubra often occurs in large areas, especially abundant in the lower and middle strata of the canopy, with a higher incidence in humid and warm environments, particularly during the early stage of fruit development (fruit enlargement period) (Fig. 1a). The early symptoms of this disease are abnormal growth and clustered protrusions of saccular bodies (Fig. 1b). With fruit growth and development, the saccular bodies become detached from the fruit core and gradually wither into a brownish-yellow color (Fig. 1c), either remaining attached to the fruit surface or falling off. Microscopic examination of diseased and healthy fruits revealed distinct differences: the diseased fruits exhibited a blackened seed epidermis and a dark brown base of the pulp, which was absent in the healthy controls (Fig. 1d, e). The diseased fruits exhibited morphological deformities severely, ultimately failing to form normal mature fruits. Fruits with milder early symptoms also tend to show uneven surface textures at the mature stage, significantly affecting their commercial value.

      Figure 1. 

      The phenotype of Roucongbing disease in bayberry fruit. (a) The disease occurs in large areas, (b) morphology of diseased fruits, and (c) healthy fruits, the anatomical observation of (d) diseased fruit, and (e) control fruit.

      The imbalance of nutrient levels can lead to plant physiological diseases and also affect the resistance to plant disease. To examine the hypothesis that this disease is associated with element deficiency, the whole nutrient levels of the control tree and diseased tree were compared. The mineral element contents of each group (CK, H, and D) fruits, as well as the surrounding leaves, were quantified (Table 1). Our results showed that the magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) concentrations in the leaves of the diseased trees changed overall when compared to the control trees. The K content of diseased leaves decreased but that of fruits increased significantly, which suggested that more K was transferred from the leaves to the fruit when diseased. The contents of Mg and Zn in diseased leaves were significantly higher than those in the control and healthy groups. Interestingly, our data revealed that the concentration of Mn, a pivotal element in plant defense mechanisms, was substantially reduced in both the leaves and fruits of diseased trees compared to the CK group. In healthy and diseased fruits from the same tree, there were no significant differences in other elements except for a change in N content, which implied that Roucongbing disease might not be directly caused by nutritional deficiencies.

      Table 1.  Mineral element contents of leaves and fruits in different groups.

      Leave Fruit
      CK H D CK H D
      N (g/kg) 13.51 ± 0.39 b 14.75 ± 0.38 a 13.37 ± 0.34 b 18.89 ± 0.03 c 21.04 ± 0.20 b 22.49 ± 0.07 a
      K (g/kg) 5.84 ± 0.10 a 5.28 ± 0.11 c 5.57 ± 0.02 b 10.12 ± 0.17 b 12.35 ± 0.43 a 13.56 ± 0.69 a
      Ca (g/kg) 9.74 ± 0.31 b 10.47 ± 0.36 b 14.13 ± 0.34 a 2.33 ± 0.03 b 2.68 ± 0.09 a 2.76 ± 0.12 a
      P (g/kg) 0.44 ± 0.01 b 0.40 ± 0.01 c 0.47 ± 0.02 a 1.09 ± 0.04 b 1.30 ± 0.06 a 1.33 ± 0.03 a
      Mg (g/kg) 1.15 ± 0.05 c 1.27 ± 0.03 b 1.54 ± 0.04 a 0.98 ± 0.04 b 1.13 ± 0.09 a 1.15 ± 0.08 a
      Mn (mg/kg) 1,256.21 ± 14.70 a 495.29 ± 5.18 b 488.18 ± 7.87 b 197.15 ± 5.63 a 74.75 ± 2.36 b 66.72 ± 0.15 b
      Fe (mg/kg) 253.88 ± 10.41 a 276.57 ± 12.43 a 252.80 ± 10.04 a 432.43 ± 18.17 a 392.91 ± 21.62 a 400.75 ± 18.47 a
      Zn (mg/kg) 60.31 ± 0.73 c 88.79 ± 1.40 a 77.30 ± 2.25 b 35.35 ± 0.67 a 35.31 ± 0.93 a 36.63 ± 0.34 a
      B (mg/kg) 38.92 ± 3.08 a 32.77 ± 1.90 a 35.99 ± 4.15 a 0.75 ± 0.13 a 0.72 ± 0.13 a 0.66 ± 0.09 a
      Data in the table are expressed as mean ± SE. CK: the leaves and fruits from the trees with no diseased fruits; D: the diseased fruits and surrounding leaves in diseased trees (with more than 20% of diseased fruit); H: the healthy fruits and surrounding leaves from the same trees as D group. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences in one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05).
    • Plant hormones are the main signal substances that regulate fruit growth, and development and respond to stress. To explore the main hormone signaling pathways in response to Roucongbing disease, the endogenous hormones in bayberry fruit were quantified and revealed a total of 13 endogenous hormones (Supplementary Table S2), most of which were significantly different between healthy and diseased fruits (Fig. 2a). Our results showed that gibberellin A3 (GA3) (Fig. 2g), abscisic acid (ABA) (Fig. 2f), jasmonic acid (JA) (Fig. 2e), 1-Aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid (ACC) (Fig. 2b), salicylic acid (SA) (Fig. 2d), and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (Fig. 2c) are several major hormones with high content in bayberry fruits. GA3 is the main hormone in the expanded stage of fruit, in our results, the content of GA3 was the most abundant in bayberry fruits. In addition to GA3, the contents of ABA, JA, and IAA were also significantly increased in diseased fruits, among them, JA was the most increased hormone and the content in diseased fruits was about seven times that of healthy fruits. On the contrary, the ethylene synthesis precursor ACC was significantly decreased in diseased fruits. While SA, as the main hormone in plant response to disease, had no significant difference between healthy and diseased fruits.

      Figure 2. 

      Hormone content analysis of healthy and diseased fruits. (a) Heatmap and cluster analysis of all endogenous hormones, and the quantitative comparison of (b) 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid, (c) indole-3-acetic acid, (d) salicylic acid, (e) jasmonic acid, (f) abscisic acid, and (g) gibberellin A3 were analyzed in healthy and diseased fruits. Error bars indicate standard error from three biological replicates (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (Student's t-test; p < 0.05).

    • To elucidate the response mechanism in bayberry fruit, healthy and diseased fruit pulp tissue samples from the same tree underwent transcriptome sequencing by the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 high-throughput sequencing platform. The data are as follows in Table 2: 124.67 million reads were included in the clean data that was produced following filtering. The Q30 base ratio exceeded 93.46%, whereas the GC base ratio reached 47.96%−48.64%, suggesting a comparatively high sequencing quality of the samples that complied with bioinformatics standards.

      Table 2.  Statistical analysis of transcriptome sequencing data.

      #Sample ID ReadSum BaseSum GC (%) N (%) Q20 (%) Q30 (%)
      H-1 20031820 5981473950 48.12 0 97.92 94.57
      H-2 20965481 6269407182 47.99 0 98.04 94.84
      H-3 20704915 6179849928 47.96 0 97.87 94.45
      D-1 20425378 6102338718 48.64 0 97.29 93.46
      D-2 21524247 6421989748 48.15 0 97.66 94.19
      D-3 21018045 6268115810 48.17 0 97.59 94

      To confirm the relationship between all samples, correlation, and principal component analysis (PCA) analysis were performed. As shown in Fig. 3, the R2 values among the three replicates of the same treatment were all larger than 0.942, while the correlation among the two groups was significantly different (Fig. 3a). For the PCA analysis, three replicates of the same treatment clustered together, indicating high reliability among the samples (Fig. 3b). The samples from the different groups were distant from each other, indicating significant differences in transcriptome samples between different treatments, with PC1 and PC2 contributing rates of 52.99% and 16.31%, respectively. Gene expression in different samples was assessed using the FPKM method, and differential analysis was carried out. Transcriptomic profiling revealed 16,155 genes co-expressed across H and D groups (Fig. 3e), and there were 2,582 genes expressed differentially (2,582 DEGs) (Fig. 3c), with 1,603 genes upregulated and 979 down-regulated in the D group (Fig. 3d).

      Figure 3. 

      Transcriptome analysis of healthy and diseased fruits. (a) Heatmap of Pearson correlation analysis. (b) Principal component analysis of all samples. (c) Heatmap clustering, and (d) volcano plot analysis of all differentially expressed genes. (e) Venn diagrams of all genes.

    • All of the annotated genes were used as background and GO enrichment analysis was performed to characterize the biological functions of DEGs and further classified into three categories: the cellular component, biological process, as well as molecular function process (Fig. 4a). The results showed that in the biological process (BP), the DEGs between H vs D were mainly involved in the cellular process, metabolic process, and biological regulatory activities. In the cellular component (CC), the DEGs were mainly linked to the cellular anatomical entity, intracellular, and protein-containing complex. The results showed that in the molecular function (MF), the DEGs were mainly involved in the catalytic activity, binding, and transporter activity.

      Figure 4. 

      GO and KEGG analysis. (a) GO enrichment analysis, and (b) the top 20 KEGG pathways of DEGs were analyzed in healthy and diseased fruits.

      KEGG enrichment analysis of metabolic pathways was performed for DEGs in each group. The DEGs between healthy and diseased fruits were assigned to 126 pathways (Fig. 4b). Notably, the plant-pathogen interaction pathway was the most abundant among these pathways, containing 146 DEGs in total (134 up-regulated and 12 down-regulated). Furthermore, the pathways of plant hormone signal transduction, the MAPK signaling pathway in plants, starch, and sucrose metabolism, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were also prominently enriched, with 96, 78, 75, and 63 DEGs, respectively. These pathways are recognized as pivotal in the plant's response to disease, indicating fruits of bayberry are involved in the defense against pathogens.

    • The plant-pathogen interaction pathway is the major pathway for the enriching of DEGs between diseased and healthy bayberry fruits. Therefore, we conducted further analysis of this pathway (Fig. 5a), among them, there were a total of 20 transcription factors. Two of them belonged to the Pti transcription factor family, four belonged to the bHLH transcription factor family, and the WRKY transcription factor family had the largest number, with 13 DEGs. Importantly, all WRKY transcription factors exhibit significantly upregulated expression levels in diseased fruits. In the plant-pathogen interaction, the DEGs also include 20 Receptor-Like Kinases (RLKs). Except for two downregulated RLKs, the expression levels of other MrRLK genes were significantly upregulated in diseased bayberry fruits. Pathogenesis-related proteins (PRs), TIR domains, and NB-ARC domains play crucial roles in plant disease resistance. Among these 146 DEGs, there were five DEGs encoding PR proteins, four DEGs encoding TIR domain proteins, and seven DEGs encoding NB-ARC domain proteins (Fig. 5b). The expression levels of these genes in diseased fruits were significantly higher than those in healthy fruits of the same plant.

      Figure 5. 

      Heatmap analysis of plant-pathogen interaction pathway. (a) Heatmap of 146 DEGs of the plant-pathogen interaction pathway. (b) Gene expression analysis of some transcription factors families and disease resistance related genes in this pathway.

    • By conjoint analysis of transcriptome and major hormones, 124 DEGs in the plant-pathogen interaction pathway were identified that correlated with the six hormones, JA was in the center role of the correlation network diagram, which suggested that JA played a key role in Roucongbing disease resistance (Fig. 6a). Next, we focused on the genes related to JA synthesis in the transcriptome. We found that the expression levels of all genes in the JA synthesis pathway, including MrLOX, MrAOS, MrAOC, MrOPR3, and MrJMT were all significantly increased in the diseased fruits (Fig. 6b). These results were consistent with the determination of JA hormone content, indicating that the JA pathway played an important role in disease defense.

      Figure 6. 

      The role of JA in Roucongbing disease resistance. (a) Correlation network diagram of the plant-pathogen interaction pathway and six major hormones. (b) Transcriptome analysis of the expression patterns of JA synthesis related genes. Green to red color indicates the gene expression increasing in abundance.

    • To validate the RNA-Seq data, we conducted qRT-PCR analysis. We selected four hormone related genes, such as the JA synthesis gene MrAOS (MrChr3G07730) (Fig. 7a), MrOPR3 (MrChr6G28260) (Fig. 7b), MrLOX2.1 (MrChr1G00740) (Fig. 7c), the ABA synthesis related gene MrNCED2 (MrChr2G18590) (Fig. 7d), and several genes in the plant-pathogen interaction pathway, including WRKY70 (MrChr2G34190) (Fig. 7e), WRKY18 (MrChr8G34190) (Fig. 7f), MrPTI6-like (MrChr1G10520) (Fig. 7g), and MrPR1 (MrChr7G02890) (Fig. 7h). All the qRT-PCR results were consistent with the transcriptome, providing robust support for our transcriptomic observations.

      Figure 7. 

      qRT-PCR analysis of DEGs identified from RNA-Seq. (a) MrAOS: allene oxide synthase 1; (b) MrOPR3: 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 3; (c) MrLOX2.1: Linoleate 13S-lipoxygenase 2-1; (d) MrNCED2: 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 2; (e) MrWRKY70: transcripdion factor WRKY70; (f) MrWRKY18: transcripdion factor WRKY18; (g) MrPTI6L: pathogenesis-related genes transcriptional activator PTI6-like; (h) MrPR1: Pathogenesis-related protein PR1. Error bars indicate standard error from three biological replicates (n = 3). An asterisk indicates statistically significant differences compared with the control (Student's t-test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).

    • At present, there are many speculations on the causes of Roucongbing disease, and no pathogenic microorganism has yet been isolated. In this study, a comprehensive analysis was conducted at the physiological and transcriptome levels. The results of nutrient element content in both diseased and healthy fruits within the same tree did not show significant differences, which implied the nutritional level of the same tree remained consistent. However, the nutritional state of diseased and control trees differed, such as the content of N, Ca, and Mg were increased and the Mn content decreased in the diseased trees. The plants with high N content were more susceptible to disease[13], and our results were consistent with this. Interestingly, Mn was shown to be the most significant difference in content. Our results showed that the leaves and fruits in diseased trees had lower concentrations of Mn than those of the control trees significantly, however, no Mn deficiency phenotype was observed in the diseased trees. Mn is an antioxidant that might lessen oxidative damage[39]. Additionally, Mn plays a key role in plant defense. The immune system is typically triggered by pathogen infection, which causes a significant build-up of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and significant damage to plant cells. Under abiotic stress, ROS also accumulates in large quantities in plants. Mn is a cofactor of Mn-SOD that is present in peroxisomes and mitochondria and is involved in lignin synthesis in plants. Previous studies have shown that exogenous Mn treatment for leaves can lessen pathogen-induced lignification and ROS generation, hence improving plant resistance.[40]. In our study, the significant decrease in Mn content in diseased bayberry trees suggests a potential role of Mn in the defense against Roucongbing disease and a higher Mn content might contribute to strengthen the resistance in M. rubra, providing a theoretical basis for improving disease resistance through cultivation techniques.

      Hormonal signaling controls the conflict between defense and development in plants. In our research, hormone levels in healthy and diseased fruits differed significantly. In diseased fruits, there was a considerable rise in JA, ABA, IAA, and GA3, among them, GA3 was the most abundant hormone and JA was the most significantly increased within them. Previous studies have revealed that the JA pathway plays an essential role in plant defense responses against necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens[41]. Tissue injury or local pathogen infection causes a rise in the concentration of JA[42,43]. In strawberry, terpinen-4-ol induced the expression of genes in jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis (FaLOX, FaAOC, and FaOPR3) and increased JA content to enhance disease resistance, which demonstrates the effect of JA in the induction of disease resistance[44]. In our study, it was observed that Roucongbing disease promoted a significant accumulation of JA locally. The combined analysis of transcriptome and targeted hormones showed that JA played a central role in response to Roucongbing disease and the key genes in the JA synthesis pathway were significantly upregulated in diseased fruits, consistent with the observed trends in hormonal changes, which showed a potentially important role for JA in defense against this disease. It has been confirmed that exogenous GA3 treatment can promote early enlargement of grape berries[45], indicating that GA plays an important role in fruit expansion. In the results of this study, the high content of GA was consistent with the fact that the fruit deformity mainly occurs in the fruit expansion stage, which was significantly increased in diseased fruit with the disease symptoms of fruit overexpansion, this suggests that the accumulation of GA3 might be the cause of abnormal enlargement in diseased fruits. The primary plant defense hormone, SA, did not significantly alter between unhealthy and diseased fruits, indicating that it may not be directly involved in defending against Roucongbing disease in M. rubra fruits.

      At the transcriptional level, several transcription factors exhibited differential expression. It has been consistently demonstrated that WRKY transcription factors are essential for plants to respond to biotic and abiotic stressors[46]. In this study, it was noted that the WRKY family contained the most differentially expressed transcription factors in the plant-pathogen interaction pathway. Analysis of all DEGs in healthy and diseased groups showed that all differentially expressed WRKY members (22 in total) were significantly upregulated in diseased fruits (Fig. 2). Pathogens induce WRKY70 expression in Arabidopsis[47], and overexpression of WRKY70 strengthens plant resistance in poplars[48,49]. PbWRKY18 expression was induced by pathogens and MeJA, and overexpression of PbWRKY18 positively regulated the expression of PbCHS3 to enhance pear resistance to pathogens[50]. WRKY40 directly binds to the chitinase ChilV3 promoter in peppers to improve defense against pepper bacterial wilt[51]. The most highly activated transcription factors in Roucongbing diseased fruits were MrWRKY70, MrWRKY40, and MrWRKY18, indicating their critical roles in the resistance to Roucongbing disease. Several genes linked to the disease were shown to be highly elevated in infected fruits, in addition to transcription factors. In addition to WRKY transcription factors, the MrPti gene also increased significantly. In Arabidopsis, Pti4/5/6 could activate the expression of the AtPR1 and AtPR2[52], and in our results, a member of the Pti family, the MrPTI6-like gene was increased significantly in diseased fruit. In plant defense, the TIR domain and NB-ARC, have less substantial expression changes than pathogenesis-related genes (PRs), especially those in the PR1 protein family, however, whether it was activated by MrPti6-like remains to be further investigated. PR proteins play a critical role among the accumulated resistance genes, as evidenced by the increased expression levels of these genes in sick fruits. Subsequent investigation reveals that the majority of the differentially expressed MrPR genes found in this study are members of the PR1 family. Previous studies showed that PR1 basic protein has antifungal activity in tobacco and tomato[53]. According to our study, MrPR1 plays an important role in the defense mechanism of M. rubra fruit. Consequently, the differentially expressed MrWRKY70, MrWRKY18, and MrPR1 genes identified in this study can serve as candidate genes for improving resistance to Roucongbing disease in M. rubra and for the breeding of new varieties.

    • This study showed that there were alterations in the nutrient levels of leaves and fruits in diseased trees compared with the control trees, the Mn content in diseased trees decreased significantly. Meanwhile, there was a noticeable increase in JA content in diseased fruits, along with a significant elevation in the expression levels of JA synthesis-related genes. Furthermore, the transcriptome analysis results revealed that the expression of disease-resistance-related genes such as WRKY, Pti, and PR were significantly increased in diseased fruits. The findings enrich our comprehension of Roucongbing disease, which provides a scientific basis for the resistance strategy and breeding of resistant varieties.

      • The present work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (32402531), the special breeding program for new varieties in Zhejiang (2021C02066-2), the Agricultural Project of Huangyan district, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province (JBGS2022-HYNY01), and the 'Lingyan' R&D in Zhejiang (2023C02031).

      • The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Sun L; analysis and interpretation of results: Qi Y, Zhang Y; data collection: Zheng X, Yu Z; funding management: Qi X, Zhang S. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published byMaximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This articleis an open access article distributed under Creative CommonsAttribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (7)  Table (2) References (53)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Sun L, Qi Y, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Zheng X, et al. 2025. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of Roucongbing disease in Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc). Fruit Research 5: e027 doi: 10.48130/frures-0025-0019
    Sun L, Qi Y, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Zheng X, et al. 2025. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of Roucongbing disease in Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra Sieb. et Zucc). Fruit Research 5: e027 doi: 10.48130/frures-0025-0019

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return