Search
2025 Volume 5
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Photoprotective pigment plasticity and cold acclimation strategies in Cryptomeria japonica across two common gardens

More Information
  • To cope with winter stress from low temperatures and excessive light, evergreen conifers employ seasonal adjustments in photosynthetic function. Understanding these regulatory mechanisms is critical for predicting coniferous forest responses to climate change and their role in the global carbon cycle. To assess variation in cold acclimation strategies, the following were analyzed: pigment composition, photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, and photosynthetic parameters in three to five provenances (Prv) of Cryptomeria japonica grown in two common gardens (CGs) with contrasting climates. All Prv exhibited winter chlorophyll reduction, increased xanthophyll cycle, lutein pigments, and rhodoxanthin accumulation, reflecting conserved photoprotective responses. However, needle chlorophyll concentrations were unexpectedly higher in the colder site, especially in the northernmost Prv, suggesting genotype-specific plasticity. Higher rhodoxanthin levels in the hotter sites indicated a trade-off between the xanthophyll cycle and rhodoxanthin-mediated protection governed by winter severity. Despite these differences, values of photochemical efficiency of photosystem II were similar among Prv within each garden, though consistently higher in the hotter garden. No significant variation in photosynthetic capacity was detected among the three Prv measured. This local adaptation is further supported by high phenotypic plasticity in pigment composition and leaf morphology. These findings highlight the diverse and flexible mechanisms by which C. japonica regulates pigment composition, enabling sustained photosynthesis across seasonal extremes, and suggest a role for both winter cold and summer heat in shaping local adaptation in this widely distributed conifer.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 F values from ANOVA based on linear mixed-effects models for total chlorophyll (Chl) and each carotenoid components per unit needle dry weight in Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) cultivated in two common gardens (CG).
    Supplementary Table S2 Chlorophyll (Chl) a:b ratio and molar ratios of individual carotenoid components to total Chl (mol·mol−1) in needles of Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) grown in two common gardens (CG), along with statistical summary.
    Supplementary Fig. S1 Monthly rainfall (bars, left axis) and sunshine hours (thick line, left axis), and mean daily mean temperature, daily minimum and maximum temperature (thin lines, right axis) in the year when leaves were sampled from the common garden of Miyagi Prefecture (Nrk) in 2019−2020 and Kumamoto Prefecture (Ksm) in 2020−2021. Data from Japan Meteorological Agency (www.data.jma.go.jp/stats/etrn/index.php).
    Supplementary Fig. S2 Needle dry mass per projected area (LMA) of Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) grown in two common gardens (CG) located in Miyagi (Nrk) and Kumamoto (Ksm), sampled in summer (a) and winter (b). Values represent means ± SE from 3−5 trees. Provenance abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Significant effect of Prv and CG are indicated as * p < 0.05, ns not significant. Note: LMA values in winter were significantly higher than in summer for all provenance (p < 0.05).
    Supplementary Fig. S3 De-epoxidation state (AZ/VAZ ratio) in needles of Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) grown in two common gardens (CG) located in Miyagi (Nrk) and Kumamoto (Ksm), sampled at (a, c) noon and (b, d) night in (a, b) summer and (c, d) winter. Values represent means ± SE from 3−5 trees. Provenance abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Significant effect of Prv and CG are indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns not significant. V: violaxanthin; A: antheraxanthin, Z: zeaxanthin.
    Supplementary Fig. S4 Comparison of phenotypic plasticity index (PIv) in morphological (LAM: leaf mass per area) and physiological traits in needles of Cryptomeria japonica, averaged across five provenances grown in two common gardens located in Miyagi (Nrk) and Kumamoto (Ksm). Pigment PIv values represent the average of all components, including chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, xanthophyll cycle, neoxanthin, lutein, α-carotene and β-carotene in summer, and surplus rhodoxanthin in winter.
    Supplementary Fig. S5 Mean phenotypic plasticity index (PIv) of pigments in each provenance of Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) grown in two common gardens (CG) located in Miyagi (Nrk) and Kumamoto (Ksm). Values represent means ± SE of each pigment component in either summer or winter. Provenance abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Significant effect of Prv and CG are indicated as * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
  • [1] Bag P, Ivanov AG, Huner NP, Jansson S. 2025. Photosynthetic advantages of conifers in the boreal forest. Trends in Plant Science 30:409−23 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2024.10.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Öquist G, Huner NPA. 2003. Photosynthesis of overwintering evergreen plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 54:329−55 doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.072402.115741

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Verhoeven A. 2014. Sustained energy dissipation in winter evergreens. New Phytologist 201:57−65 doi: 10.1111/nph.12466

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Walter-McNeill A, Garcia MA, Logan BA, Bombard DM, Reblin JS, et al. 2021. Wide variation of winter-induced sustained thermal energy dissipation in conifers: a common-garden study. Oecologia 197:589−98 doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-05038-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW, III. 2006. Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytologist 172:11−21 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01835.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW, III. 1992. Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annual Review of Plant Biology 43:599−626 doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.003123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Niyogi KK, Arthur, Grossman R, Björkman O. 1998. Arabidopsis mutants define a central role for the xanthophyll cycle in the regulation of photosynthetic energy conversion. The Plant Cell 10:1121−34 doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.7.1121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Adams WW, III, Demmig-Adams B, Logan BA, Barker DH, Osmond CB. 1999. Rapid changes in xanthophyll cycle-dependent energy dissipation and photosystem II efficiency in two vines, Stephania japonica and Smilax australis, growing in the understory of an open Eucalyptus forest. Plant, Cell & Environment 22:125−36 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00369.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Esteban R, Barrutia O, Artetxe U, Fernández-Marín B, Hernández A, et al. 2015. Internal and external factors affecting photosynthetic pigment composition in plants: a meta-analytical approach. New Phytologist 206:268−80 doi: 10.1111/nph.13186

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Ottander C, Campbell D, Öquist G. 1995. Seasonal changes in photosystem II organisation and pigment composition in Pinus sylvestris. Planta 197:176−83 doi: 10.1007/BF00239954

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] González-Zurdo P, Escudero A, Babiano J, García-Ciudad A, Mediavilla S. 2016. Costs of leaf reinforcement in response to winter cold in evergreen species. Tree Physiology 36:273−86 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv134

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Yang Q, Blanco NE, Hermida-Carrera C, Lehotai N, Hurry V, et al. 2020. Two dominant boreal conifers use contrasting mechanisms to reactivate photosynthesis in the spring. Nature Communications 11:128 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13954-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Han Q, Kawasaki T, Nakano T, Chiba Y. 2008. Leaf-age effects on seasonal variability in photosynthetic parameters and its relationships with leaf mass per area and leaf nitrogen concentration within a Pinus densiflora crown. Tree Physiology 28:551−58 doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.4.551

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Han Q, Katahata S, Kakubari Y, Mukai Y. 2004. Seasonal changes in the xanthophyll cycle and antioxidants in sun-exposed and shaded parts of the crown of Cryptomeria japonica in relation to rhodoxanthin accumulation during cold acclimation. Tree Physiology 24:609−16 doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.6.609

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Miyazawa SI, Terashima I. 2001. Slow development of leaf photosynthesis in an evergreen broad-leaved tree, Castanopsis sieboldii: relationships between leaf anatomical characteristics and photosynthetic rate. Plant, Cell & Environment 24:279−91 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00682.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Martínez-Vilalta J, Sala A, Asensio D, Galiano L, Hoch G, et al. 2016. Dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in terrestrial plants: a global synthesis. Ecological Monographs 86:495−516 doi: 10.1002/ecm.1231

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Han Q, Kabeya D, Inagaki Y, Kawasaki T, Satake A. 2024. Carbon use strategies in shoot and acorn growth of two evergreen broadleaf trees unraveled by seasonal carbohydrate measurements and carbon isotope analysis. Tree Physiology 44:221−31 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpad072

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Hughes NM. 2011. Winter leaf reddening in 'evergreen' species. New Phytologist 190:573−81 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03662.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Han Q, Shinohara K, Kakubari Y, Mukai Y. 2003. Photoprotective role of rhodoxanthin during cold acclimation in Cryptomeria japonica. Plant, Cell & Environment 26:715−23 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01008.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Weger HG, Silim SN, Guy RD. 1993. Photosynthetic acclimation to low temperature by western red cedar seedlings. Plant, Cell & Environment 16:711−17 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00490.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Ida K, Saito F, Takeda S. 1991. Isomers of rhodoxanthin in reddish brown leaves of gymnosperms and effect of daylight intensity on the contents of pigments during autumnal coloration. The Botanical Magazine = Shokubutsu-Gaku-Zasshi 104:157−69 doi: 10.1007/BF02493256

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Czeczuga B. 1987. Different rhodoxanthin contents in the leaves of gymnosperms grown under various light intensities. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 15:531−33 doi: 10.1016/0305-1978(87)90100-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Royer J, Shanklin J, Balch-Kenney N, Mayorga M, Houston P, et al. 2020. Rhodoxanthin synthase from honeysuckle; a membrane diiron enzyme catalyzes the multistep conversation of β-carotene to rhodoxanthin. Science Advances 6:eaay9226 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay9226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Katahata SI, Katoh M, Iio A, Mukai Y. 2022. Photoinhibition and pigment composition in relation to needle reddening in sun-exposed Cryptomeria japonica at different altitudes in winter. Journal of Forest Research 27:148−57 doi: 10.1080/13416979.2021.2011561

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Ida K. 1981. Eco-physiological studies on the response of taxodiaceous conifers to shading, with special reference to the behaviour of leaf pigments. I. Distribution of carotenoids in green and autumnal reddish brown leaves of gymnosperms. The Botanical Magazine 94:41−54 doi: 10.1007/BF02490202

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Fujino T, Katsushi K, Yokoyama TT, Hamanaka T, Harazono Y, et al. 2024. A chromosome-level genome assembly of a model conifer plant, the Japanese cedar, Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. BMC Genomics 25:1039 doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10929-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Tsumura Y. 2023. Review: Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural forests of Cryptomeria japonica. Ecological Research 38:64−73 doi: 10.1111/1440-1703.12320

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Nakahata R, Azuma WA, Tanabe T, Kawai K, Hiura T. 2024. Genotypic variations appear in fine root morphological traits of Cryptomeria japonica trees grown in a common garden. Ecological Research 39:717−29 doi: 10.1111/1440-1703.12492

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Saito T, Kusumoto N, Hiura T. 2023. Relation of leaf terpene contents to terpene emission profiles in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica). Ecological Research 38:74−82 doi: 10.1111/1440-1703.12323

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Hiura T, Yoshioka H, Matsunaga SN, Saito T, Kohyama TI, et al. 2021. Diversification of terpenoid emissions proposes a geographic structure based on climate and pathogen composition in Japanese cedar. Scientific Reports 11:8307 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87810-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Azuma WA, Kawai K, Tanabe T, Nakahata R, Hiura T. 2023. Intraspecific variation in growth-related traits—from leaf to whole-tree—in three provenances of Cryptomeria japonica canopy trees grown in a common garden. Ecological Research 38:83−97 doi: 10.1111/1440-1703.12349

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Nishizono T, Kitahara F, Iehara T, Mitsuda Y. 2014. Geographical variation in age-height relationships for dominant trees in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) forests in Japan. Journal of Forest Research 19:305−16 doi: 10.1007/s10310-013-0416-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Uchiyama K, Ujino-Ihara T, Nakao K, Toriyama J, Hashimoto S, et al. 2025. Climate-associated genetic variation and projected genetic offsets for Cryptomeria japonica D. Don under future climate scenarios. Evolutionary Applications 18:e70077 doi: 10.1111/eva.70077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24:1−15 doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Gilmore AM, Yamamoto HY. 1991. Resolution of lutein and Zeaxanthin using a non-endcapped, lightly carbon-loaded C18 high-performance liquid chromatographic column. Journal of Chromatography A 543:137−45 doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)95762-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects 990:87−92 doi: 10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Thornley JHM. 1976. Mathematical models in plant physiology. London, New York: Academic Press Inc. xiii, 318 pp
    [38] Valladares F, Sanchez-Gomez D, Zavala MA. 2006. Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications. Journal of Ecology 94:1103−16 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01176.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Esteban R, Moran JF, Becerril JM, García-Plazaola JI. 2015. Versatility of carotenoids: an integrated view on diversity, evolution, functional roles and environmental interactions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 119:63−75 doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.04.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37:4302−15 doi: 10.1002/joc.5086

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] R Core Team. 2024. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
    [42] Jahns P, Holzwarth AR. 2012. The role of the xanthophyll cycle and of lutein in photoprotection of photosystem II. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 1817:182−93 doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.04.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Bag P, Chukhutsina V, Zhang Z, Paul S, Ivanov AG, et al. 2020. Direct energy transfer from photosystem II to photosystem I confers winter sustainability in Scots Pine. Nature Communications 11:6388 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20137-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Formaggio E, Cinque G, Bassi R. 2001. Functional architecture of the major light-harvesting complex from higher plants. Journal of Molecular Biology 314:1157−66 doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.5179

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Hörtensteiner S. 2013. Update on the biochemistry of chlorophyll breakdown. Plant Molecular Biology 82:505−17 doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9940-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Bethmann S, Melzer M, Schwarz N, Jahns P. 2019. The zeaxanthin epoxidase is degraded along with the D1 protein during photoinhibition of photosystem II. Plant Direct 3:e00185 doi: 10.1002/pld3.185

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Ottander C, Öquist G. 1991. Recovery of photosynthesis in winter-stressed Scots pine. Plant, Cell & Environment 14:345−49 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01511.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR. 1997. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698−702 doi: 10.1038/386698a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Forkel M, Carvalhais N, Rödenbeck C, Keeling R, Heimann M, et al. 2016. Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems. Science 351:696−99 doi: 10.1126/science.aac4971

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Verhoeven A, Osmolak A, Morales P, Crow J. 2009. Seasonal changes in abundance and phosphorylation status of photosynthetic proteins in eastern white pine and balsam fir. Tree Physiology 29:361−74 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Merry R, Jerrard J, Frebault J, Verhoeven A. 2017. A comparison of pine and spruce in recovery from winter stress; changes in recovery kinetics, and the abundance and phosphorylation status of photosynthetic proteins during winter. Tree Physiology 37:1239−50 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx065

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Ensminger I, Sveshnikov D, Campbell DA, Funk C, Jansson S, et al. 2004. Intermittent low temperatures constrain spring recovery of photosynthesis in boreal Scots pine forests. Global Change Biology 10:995−1008 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00781.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Fréchette E, Wong CYS, Junker LV, Chang CY, Ensminger I. 2015. Zeaxanthin-independent energy quenching and alternative electron sinks cause a decoupling of the relationship between the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and photosynthesis in an evergreen conifer during spring. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:7309−23 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv427

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Pierrat ZA, Magney T, Maguire A, Brissette L, Doughty R, et al. 2024. Seasonal timing of fluorescence and photosynthetic yields at needle and canopy scales in evergreen needleleaf forests. Ecology 105:e4402 doi: 10.1002/ecy.4402

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Chen S, Kosugi Y, Jiao L, Sakabe A, Epron D, et al. 2025. Winter leaf reddening and photoprotection accessed by vegetation indices and its influence on canopy light-use efficiency of a Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 363:110427 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110427

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Nagakura J, Shigenaga H, Akama A, Takahashi M. 2004. Growth and transpiration of Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) and Hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) seedlings in response to soil water content. Tree Physiology 24:1203−8 doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.11.1203

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Gamon JA, Wang R, Russo SE. 2023. Contrasting photoprotective responses of forest trees revealed using PRI light responses sampled with airborne imaging spectrometry. New Phytologist 238:1318−32 doi: 10.1111/nph.18754

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Gamon JA, Huemmrich KF, Wong CYS, Ensminger I, Garrity S, et al. 2016. A remotely sensed pigment index reveals photosynthetic phenology in evergreen conifers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:13087−92 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606162113

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Han Q, Kusumoto N, Kanetani S, Suyama Y, Tsujii Y, et al. 2025. Photoprotective pigment plasticity and cold acclimation strategies in Cryptomeria japonica across two common gardens. Forestry Research 5: e015 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0015
    Han Q, Kusumoto N, Kanetani S, Suyama Y, Tsujii Y, et al. 2025. Photoprotective pigment plasticity and cold acclimation strategies in Cryptomeria japonica across two common gardens. Forestry Research 5: e015 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0015

Figures(5)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(1762) PDF downloads(607)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Photoprotective pigment plasticity and cold acclimation strategies in Cryptomeria japonica across two common gardens

Forestry Research  5 Article number: e015  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: To cope with winter stress from low temperatures and excessive light, evergreen conifers employ seasonal adjustments in photosynthetic function. Understanding these regulatory mechanisms is critical for predicting coniferous forest responses to climate change and their role in the global carbon cycle. To assess variation in cold acclimation strategies, the following were analyzed: pigment composition, photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, and photosynthetic parameters in three to five provenances (Prv) of Cryptomeria japonica grown in two common gardens (CGs) with contrasting climates. All Prv exhibited winter chlorophyll reduction, increased xanthophyll cycle, lutein pigments, and rhodoxanthin accumulation, reflecting conserved photoprotective responses. However, needle chlorophyll concentrations were unexpectedly higher in the colder site, especially in the northernmost Prv, suggesting genotype-specific plasticity. Higher rhodoxanthin levels in the hotter sites indicated a trade-off between the xanthophyll cycle and rhodoxanthin-mediated protection governed by winter severity. Despite these differences, values of photochemical efficiency of photosystem II were similar among Prv within each garden, though consistently higher in the hotter garden. No significant variation in photosynthetic capacity was detected among the three Prv measured. This local adaptation is further supported by high phenotypic plasticity in pigment composition and leaf morphology. These findings highlight the diverse and flexible mechanisms by which C. japonica regulates pigment composition, enabling sustained photosynthesis across seasonal extremes, and suggest a role for both winter cold and summer heat in shaping local adaptation in this widely distributed conifer.

    • Evergreen conifers endure harsh winter conditions characterized by low temperatures and high light intensity. While cold temperatures inhibit enzymatic activity and photosynthetic carbon assimilation, they do not prevent light absorption, potentially leading to excessive excitation pressure in photosystem II (PSII) and consequent photooxidative damage to thylakoid membranes[1]. To mitigate such stress, conifers must either reduce light absorption or dissipate excess absorbed energy through photoprotective mechanisms.

      An important photoprotective mechanism to winter conditions involves increased utilization of sustained forms of thermal energy dissipation: the conversion of light energy absorbed by chlorophyll (Chl) to heat[24]. During the growing season, dynamic engagement of the xanthophyll cycle (VAZ)—de-epoxidation of violaxanthin (V) to zeaxanthin (Z) via antheraxanthin (A)—is rapidly induced under excess light and reversed under low light conditions[1,57]. Seasonal acclimation involves modulation of the VAZ pool size[8], allowing for efficient energy use while minimizing photodamage. Z accumulation is likely to occur in late autumn when conditions are still favorable for de-epoxidase activity[1,3]. Sustained Z accumulation facilitates transitioning from a 'light-harvesting' to a 'dissipating' state in PSII. Although winter increases in VAZ pool size are well-documented, their magnitude varies among species and environments[3,4], and the regulatory mechanisms remain unresolved.

      Cold acclimation also entails seasonal Chl reduction to limit light absorption[3,9,10], though the degree and underlying mechanisms are unclear and species-dependent[11]. Some conifers even increase Chl in winter[4], suggesting divergent strategies[1,3,12]. As Chl biosynthesis is slow, winter reduction may hinder spring photosynthesis recovery[1315]. Moreover, structural rearrangements in the photosynthetic apparatus, such as altered thylakoid architecture in Pinus sylvestris[1], contrast with mechanisms observed in co-occurring species like Picea abies[12]. Nevertheless, photosynthesis reactivates under favorable spring temperatures, as indicated by starch accumulation[16,17]. Coordinated seasonal variation in Chl and carotenoids is thus critical to maintaining energy balance, and intraspecific comparisons can yield novel insights.

      In addition to the VAZ cycle, rhodoxanthin (Rho), a deep red ketocarotenoid, accumulates in gymnosperms such as Cryptomeria, Metasequoia, Taxodium, Chamaecyparis, and Thuja[1821]. Rho biosynthesis originates from VAZ pigments[22,23], and increases during the autumn-winter transition under stress[14,21,24]. Its role in light interception, localized near the leaf surface in chromoplasts, and its prevalence in sun-exposed leaves suggest a photoprotective function[19,25]. However, its physiological role and interactions with other pigments remain unclear.

      This study tests the hypothesis that intraspecific variation and plasticity in Chl, carotenoids, photosynthesis, and leaf morphology have co-evolved in Sugi (C. japonica), a widely distributed species with a recently developed genome assembly[26]. Natural populations form two genetic clusters (Fig. 1): 'Omote-sugi' (Pacific Ocean side) and 'Ura-sugi' (Sea of Japan side), which experience contrasting winter climates[27]. While prior studies have documented population-level variation in roots[28], volatiles[29,30], and growth-related traits[31,32], pigment variation remains unexplored. To investigate cold acclimation strategies, pigment composition and photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) were measured in five provenances grown in two common gardens (CGs) because sustained A and Z levels have previously been associated with reductions in Fv/Fm[4]. The light response curves of photosynthesis in three Prv were also measured to assess variation in photosynthetic parameters. The following hypotheses were tested: (1) To cope with the harsher winter, populations from colder regions exhibit lower Chl and higher VAZ and/or Rho concentrations; (2) Individuals grown in the warmer CGs have higher Chl and lower photoprotective pigments because of lower excitation pressure; (3) Lower Fv/Fm values and reduced photosynthetic capacity are observed in both colder CGs and populations from colder regions.

      Figure 1. 

      Original geographic distribution and principal component analysis (PCA) of climatic variables of C. japonica Prv. (a) Locations of the five Prv used in this study and the two CGs (CG, star). Colors represent genetic structure, modified from Uchiyama et al.[33]. (b) PCA of climatic variables in the Prv and CG. Prv and CG scores are represented by large circles and stars in the same colors as used in (a). Climatic variables are represented by small black circles. The climatic variables are annual mean temperature (bio1), mean diurnal range (bio2), isothermality (bio3), temperature seasonality (bio4), maximum temperature of the warmest month (bio5), minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio6), temperature annual range (bio7), mean temperature of the wettest quarter (bio8), mean temperature of the driest quarter (bio9), mean temperature of the warmest quarter (bio10), mean temperature of the coldest quarter (bio11), annual precipitation (bio12), precipitation of the wettest month (bio13), precipitation of the driest month (bio14), precipitation seasonality (bio15), precipitation of the wettest quarter (bio16), precipitation of the driest quarter (bio17), precipitation of the warmest quarter (bio18), and precipitation of the coldest quarter (bio19). Prv and CG abbreviations are listed in Table 1.

    • Provenance trials of Japanese cedar (C. japonica) were established in Miyagi Prefecture (Nrk) in 2014 and in Kumamoto Prefecture (Ksm) in 2017 by planting two-year-old cuttings from 23 Prv (Fig. 1). Each Prv was represented by five to ten clones, with three ramets per clone, arranged in a randomized complete block design. Each CG comprised approximately 1,000 trees. Three years after the establishment of the CG, the survival rate was 86.4% and 68.9% in Nrk and Ksm, respectively. For this study, five representative Prv were selected based on genetic clustering and the environmental characteristics of their original habitats (Fig. 1a). The selected Prv have notable differences in annual precipitation (1,709.6−4,722.3 mm), minimum temperature of coldest month (−1.2 to −10.8 °C), and temperature annual range (28.3−41.6 °C) (Table 1). Detailed information on the Prv and the two CG sites is provided in Table 1. Monthly rainfall, sunshine hours, daily mean temperature, and daily minimum and maximum temperature in the years when leaves were sampled are presented in Supplementary Fig. S1. Individual tree height in the winter when leaves were sampled ranged from 139 to 422 cm in 2019 at Nrk, and from 62 to 228 cm in 2020 at Ksm.

      Table 1.  General data on Prv and CGs used in this study.

      Prv
      (abbreviation)
      Latitude Longitude Altitude
      (m)
      AMT
      (°C)
      AP
      (mm)
      MTCM
      (°C)
      MTWQ
      (°C)
      TAR
      (°C)
      PWM
      (mm)
      PCQ
      (mm)
      Ajigasawa, Aomori (AJG) 40°41' 140°12' 280 11.1 1,709.6 −9.0 22.1 41.6 204.7 465.9
      Azouji, Shimane (AZJ) 34°29' 131°59' 1,041 9.4 2,539.1 −10.8 19.9 40.4 301.6 432.3
      Kawazu, Shizuoka (KWZ) 34°50' 139°00' 620 14.7 3,645.9 −2.9 23.3 33.5 441.4 455.2
      Shingu, Wakayama (SNG) 33°53' 135°43' 560 13.9 3,105.8 −6.2 24.1 39.8 448.2 317.5
      Yakushima, Kagoshima (YKU) 30°19' 130°34' 1,025 13.8 4,722.3 −1.2 21.3 28.3 835.0 699.9
      Common gardens (CG)
      Kumamoto trial site (Ksm) 32°42' 130°45' 30 17.9 1,908.8 −2.5 27.7 38.9 436.1 191.3
      Miyagi trial site (Nrk) 38°46' 140°45' 290 11.4 1,684.0 −9.3 22.2 42.6 181.6 355.2
      Averaged values between 1981 and 2000 from www.worldclim.org/data/bioclim.html#google_vignette. AMT: annual mean temperature (bio1), AP: annual precipitation (bio12), MTCM: minimum temperature of coldest month (bio6), TAR: temperature annual range (bio7), MTWQ: mean temperature of warmest quarter (bio10), PWM: precipitation of wettest month (bio13), PCQ: precipitation of coldest quarter (bio19).
    • Leaves were sampled from three trees across three to five clones of each Prv during summer and winter at each CG: 30 July 2019 and 6 February 2020 at Nrk, and 5 August 2020 and 2 February 2021 at Ksm, respectively. Collections were made twice per season—at noon and 2 h after sunset on clear days. From each tree, two mature current-year needles (~100 mg fresh weight) were harvested from sun-exposed upper crown positions. One sample was immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen in the field and stored at −80 °C for pigment analysis. These samples were lyophilized for 48 h, and their dry mass was measured under dim green light. The second sample was kept in a cool box for leaf area measurement. Projected leaf areas were measured using a scanner (GT-X900, EPSON, Tokyo, Japan) and LIA32 software (www.agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~shinkan/LIA32/index-e.html). Samples were then dried at 70 °C for 48 h, and dry mass was recorded to calculate leaf mass per area (LMA).

    • Pigments in each leaf were extracted with acetone[34], and quantified with an HPLC system (Agilent 1200, Agilent Technologies Inc., CA, USA) following the method of Gilmore & Yamamoto[35] with modifications by Han et al.[19]. In preliminary tests, pigment composition quantified from lyophilized tissues did not differ from that of liquid nitrogen–frozen tissues (data not shown). Briefly, pigments from each lyophilized sample (< 70 mg) were extracted three times with 500 μL of 100% acetone. The pooled extracts were centrifuged, and 200 μL of the supernatant was filtered through 0.2 μm Mini-Uni Prep™ filters (Whatman, Cytiva, IN, USA). Pigments were separated using a Wakosil-II 5C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm; Fujifilm Wako, Osaka, Japan) at 30 °C and a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min−1. Elution began with a mixture of acetonitrile, methanol, and 100 mM Tris-HCl (75:12:4, v/v, pH 8.0) for 10 min, followed by a 10-min linear gradient to methanol : ethyl acetate (68:32, v/v), continued isocratically for 4 min. The column was re-equilibrated with the initial mobile phase for 10 min between samples. Pigment measured included chlorophyll a (Chla) and Chlb, neoxanthin (Neo), lutein, V, A, Z, Rho, α-carotene (α-Car), and β-carotene (β-Car). Pigment concentrations were determined from calibration curves using authentic standards; all were purchased from CaroteNature (Münsingen, Switzerland) except Chla and Chlb from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Total Chl was the sum of Chla and Chlb.

    • Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was measured in situ using a Mini-Pam fluorometer (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) after at least 2 h dark adaptation following sunset[36]. The same leaves were subsequently used for pigment analysis. Light-response curves of photosynthesis were measured in detached branches with a LI-6400 system (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) under ten irradiance levels (1,600 to 0 μmol·m−2·s−1) at controlled temperatures (25 °C in winter, 28 °C in summer), relative humidity (VPD < 1.2 kPa) and CO2 concentration (400 ± 1.0 µmol·mol−1). From these curves, the light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax) was calculated, alongside the apparent quantum yield of CO2 fixation (Ø), dark respiration rate (Rd), and curve convexity (θ), using a non-rectangular hyperbola model[37].

    • To assess phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental variation, the plasticity index (PIv) for LMA, pigments, and Fv/Fm was calculated following Valladares et al.[38]. PIv for each trait was calculated using average values across all clones within each Prv at each CG:

      $ \mathrm{P}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{v}_{\left(\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\right)}=\dfrac{\mathrm{M}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\; \mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}-\mathrm{ }\mathrm{M}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\; \mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}}{\mathrm{M}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\; \mathrm{v}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{e}} $

      PIv for pigments was the mean of all measured pigment components, including Chla, Chlb, VAZ, Neo, lutein, α-Car, and β-Car in summer, and the surplus Rho in winter. Since pigment data were collected from multiple clones per Prv, PIv(pigments) were also calculated by clone for each Prv and CG. PIv values range from 0 (no plasticity) to 1 (maximum plasticity).

    • Given well-documented seasonal trends—VAZ pigments increasing and Chl decreasing in winter[24,9,10]—the effects of genotype (Prv) and environment (CG) on pigments, LMA, and Fv/Fm were analyzed separately for each season using linear mixed-effects models (LMMs). Clone was treated as a random effect (random intercept). The carotenoid biosynthetic pathway divides from lycopene into α- and β-Car[39], which are referred to as path A and path B, respectively. Lutein is produced from α-Car in path A and zeaxanthin from β-Car in path B. Further analyses were carried out on the seasonal variation in carotenoids of path A (sum of α-Car and lutein) and path B (sum of β-Car, VAZ, Rho, and Neo) using LMMs. Two-way ANOVA was employed to evaluate the effects of Prv and CG on photosynthetic parameters and the mean PIv of pigments. PCA was used to summarize variation in climatic variables and pigment composition across Prv and CG in each season. Nineteen bioclimatic variables for the period of 1981−2000 were extracted from WorldClim 2[40]. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.4[41].

    • The first two PCs of the PCA on population-level climatic variation accounted for 63.40% of the total variance (Fig. 1b). PC1 explained 44.73% of the variance and was positively associated with precipitation of the wettest month and annual precipitation, while negatively associated with temperature annual range and temperature seasonality. The southernmost and northernmost populations were positioned at opposite ends of this axis. The Nrk CG was located at the negative end of PC1, reflecting a climate characterized by high temperature seasonality. PC2 accounted for 20.67% of the variance and was positively associated with precipitation during the coldest quarter and the driest month, but negatively associated with the mean temperature of the warmest quarter and precipitation seasonality. The Krm CG occupied the far negative end of PC2, indicative of a climate with a hot summer and pronounced precipitation seasonality.

    • The effects of Prv and CG on pigment concentrations varied depending on whether values were expressed per unit dry mass (Supplementary Table S1) or projected leaf area, due to differences in LMA (Supplementary Fig. S2). Because light absorption occurs at the leaf surface, comparisons were primarily made based on projected area.

      In contrast to the initial hypothesis, needle Chla, Chlb, and total Chl concentrations were higher in the colder CG than in the warmer CG (Fig. 2). A significant interaction between Prv and CG was observed in summer, but not in winter, indicating that genotype mediates plastic responses to the environment. Notably, the northernmost Prv (AJG) exhibited the highest Chl concentration, particularly when grown in the colder CG. In winter, Chlb levels declined to 79% and 48% of their summer values in the colder and warmer CG, respectively, resulting in a lower Chla:b ratio in the colder CG (Supplementary Table S2). In contrast, the Chla:b ratio was consistent across all Prv in summer.

      Figure 2. 

      Total chlorophyll (Chl = Chla + Chlb) and total carotenoid (Car) concentrations in needles of C. japonica from five Prv grown in two CGs located in Nrk and Ksm. Values represent means from three to five trees. Error bars indicate (a), (c) total Chl and (b), (d) total Car. Car of path A (PtA) is α-carotene + lutein, and Car of path B (PtB) is β-carotene + xanthophyll cycle (V + A + Z) + Rho + Neo. Prv abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Significant effects of Prv, CG, and their interaction are denoted as m p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns not significant.

      Carotenoid of path A had less seasonal variation (p = 0.189), whereas that of path B increased in winter (Fig. 2, Table 2, p < 0.001). Significant differences in Car of path A, path B, and total Car were found between Prv in both seasons, and between CGs in winter, but not in summer.

      Table 2.  Pigment concentration (μmol·m−2) in needles of C. japonica originating from five Prv growing in two CGs and statistical summary.

      Season Prv CG α-carotene Lutein Path A β-carotene Neo Path B Chla Chlb
      Summer AJG Ksm 25.6 ± 2.4 130.9 ± 8.9 155.83 ± 10.95 348.7 ± 21.7 25.7 ± 2.3 391.25 ± 25.97 588.3 ± 55.3 174.1 ± 13.0
      Nrk 43.7 ± 2.5 135.3 ± 6.4 178.89 ± 8.78 373.7 ± 15.7 34.4 ± 2.2 421.67 ± 18.93 700.0 ± 53.3 224.3 ± 12.1
      AZJ Ksm 20.4 ± 1.9 97.8 ± 6.8 118.00 ± 8.57 286.7 ± 19.3 18.9 ± 1.4 318.00 ± 21.47 380.6 ± 38.4 131.8 ± 10.8
      Nrk 31.0 ± 1.7 100.9 ± 3.1 131.67 ± 4.80 295.4 ± 9.1 25.6 ± 0.9 332.22 ± 11.10 533.7 ± 32.6 165.9 ± 6.2
      KWZ Ksm 22.1 ± 1.9 109.2 ± 4.9 132.22 ± 6.84 302.4 ± 13.8 20.4 ± 1.5 339.44 ± 15.91 449.4 ± 29.4 144.9 ± 8.0
      Nrk 29.9 ± 2.0 90.2 ± 3.5 120.56 ± 5.57 265.9 ± 10.0 23.1 ± 1.3 297.78 ± 11.90 467.9 ± 34.8 157.0 ± 7.7
      SNG Ksm 13.5 ± 1.2 80.1 ± 4.1 93.18 ± 5.11 230.3 ± 10.9 14.0 ± 0.9 256.82 ± 13.17 304.0 ± 19.4 98.6 ± 5.2
      Nrk 29.6 ± 2.5 89.5 ± 3.8 118.33 ± 6.28 251.2 ± 10.2 22.6 ± 1.4 282.78 ± 12.12 491.7 ± 28.4 156.2 ± 9.1
      YKU Ksm 24.6 ± 4.2 119.3 ± 10.2 143.33 ± 14.37 328.8 ± 25.4 21.7 ± 2.9 371.67 ± 31.98 518.2 ± 62.9 156.4 ± 16.5
      Nrk 32.2 ± 3.0 97.4 ± 4.7 129.38 ± 7.82 286.5 ± 10.7 23.3 ± 1.5 318.75 ± 12.68 522.0 ± 30.6 164.2 ± 9.9
      Statistics (F value)
      Prv 2.94* 3.71** 3.76* 4.11* 2.84m 3.64* 2.15ns 2.93*
      CG 69.48*** 0.20ns 4.17* 0.49ns 35.23*** 0.61n 18.09*** 36.49***
      Prv × CG 1.23ns 3.18* 2.20m 2.47* 1.51ns 2.46* 2.87* 2.07m
      Winter AJG Ksm 0.7 ± 0.4 131.1 ± 6.9 132.27 ± 7.05 312.6 ± 26.4 16.6 ± 2.4 523.64 ± 29.27 177.8 ± 17.6 77.5 ± 5.5
      Nrk 4.2 ± 0.7 185.1 ± 9.0 189.44 ± 9.98 397.1 ± 42.2 28.5 ± 2.7 608.89 ± 44.01 326.1 ± 48.1 156.3 ± 16.2
      AZJ Ksm 0.0 ± 0.0 104.1 ± 5.0 103.50 ± 4.99 254.1 ± 18.4 10.1 ± 0.9 467.00 ± 24.89 121.9 ± 14.1 56.0 ± 5.8
      Nrk 1.9 ± 0.5 136.2 ± 6.1 137.65 ± 6.33 292.5 ± 23.7 23.5 ± 1.8 509.41 ± 33.34 227.4 ± 20.7 116.4 ± 10.6
      KWZ Ksm 0.0 ± 0.0 122.9 ± 9.2 124.71 ± 9.32 305.4 ± 31.0 14.5 ± 1.7 501.76 ± 43.46 207.1 ± 31.5 86.6 ± 10.2
      Nrk 3.2 ± 0.8 153.8 ± 7.4 156.67 ± 8.12 363.9 ± 25.7 25.7 ± 2.0 583.33 ± 25.46 268.9 ± 30.5 132.6 ± 13.4
      SNG Ksm 0.0 ± 0.0 83.8 ± 4.6 83.18 ± 4.62 191.1 ± 13.0 9.8 ± 0.9 347.73 ± 15.62 111.4 ± 10.7 44.5 ± 4.4
      Nrk 1.9 ± 0.5 128.9 ± 5.6 130.56 ± 5.91 277.8 ± 17.1 21.2 ± 1.7 442.22 ± 18.09 196.7 ± 19.0 111.8 ± 9.1
      YKU Ksm 0.0 ± 0.0 108.3 ± 11.1 108.33 ± 11.34 261.8 ± 28.7 11.9 ± 1.7 425.00 ± 49.58 180.5 ± 18.0 77.3 ± 8.8
      Nrk 0.6 ± 0.4 114.3 ± 5.9 114.67 ± 6.46 251.5 ± 20.0 17.3 ± 1.1 382.67 ± 23.12 196.5 ± 21.8 95.5 ± 7.5
      Statistics (F value)
      Prv 3.24* 7.42*** 7.56*** 4.62** 3.05* 4.53* 4.71** 3.87*
      CG 57.04*** 63.71*** 62.90*** 12.08*** 87.07*** 7.8** 20.59*** 80.16***
      Prv × CG 3.32* 3.31* 3.33* 1.2ns 1.07ns 1.03n 1.25ns 2.44*
      Values represent means ± SE from three to five trees. Carotenoid of path A is α-carotene + lutein, and path B is the sum of β-carotene, Neo, xanthophyll cycle (VAZ), and Rho. Significant effects of Prv, CG, and their interaction are indicated as m p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns not significant.

      In summer, plants from all Prv exhibited similar VAZ concentrations, with lower levels observed in the colder CG on both area and chlorophyll bases (Fig. 3a, b). However, in winter, VAZ levels were higher in the colder CG (Fig. 3c, d), increasing 4.4–6.5-fold compared to summer when expressed per unit area. On a chlorophyll basis, the increase was even more pronounced.

      Figure 3. 

      VAZ and Rho concentrations in needles of C. japonica from five Prv grown in two CG located in Nrk and Ksm. Values represent means ± SE from three to five trees, shown on a (a), (c), (e) projected area basis, and a (b), (d), (f) chlorophyll basis. Prv abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Significant effects of Prv, CG, and their interaction are denoted as m p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns not significant.

      Thermal dissipation capacity, as indicated by the proportion of A and Z in the VAZ pool, was lower in summer in the colder CG (Supplementary Fig. S3a). At night, over 90% of A and Z were epoxidized to V in both CGs (Supplementary Fig. S3b). In winter, A and Z were largely retained overnight in all Prv and CGs (Supplementary Fig. S3c, d).

      Contrary to expectations, Rho concentrations were higher in the warmer CG (Fig. 3e). On a chlorophyll basis, Rho varied significantly by Prv, with wider variation observed in the warmer CG (Fig. 3f). Rho levels were 1.2–2.8 and 6.3–14.6 times higher than VAZ in the colder and warmer CGs, respectively.

      The effects of Prv and CG on other carotenoids were season-dependent. In summer, Prv affected lutein, α-Car, and β-Car concentration, whereas the effect of CG was found on Neo and α-Car (Table 2). In winter, both factors significantly affected all carotenoids: levels were generally higher in the colder CG and in the northernmost AJG Prv. Notably, α-Car was downregulated in winter in both CGs of all Prv, absent in all but AJG in the warmer CG; lutein was upregulated in winter; Neo decreased in winter than in summer.

    • In summer, Fv/Fm values ranged from 0.79–0.83 across all Prv and CGs (Fig. 4a), suggesting the absence of chronic stress. Surprisingly, Fv/Fm was slightly higher in the colder CG. In winter, Fv/Fm declined in both CGs, but remained higher in the warmer CG (0.45–0.54) compared to the colder CG (0.15–0.18), with no significant effect of Prv (Fig. 4b).

      Figure 4. 

      Dark-adapted photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) measured in situ 2 h after sunset on clear days in (a) summer and (b) winter in needles of C. japonica from five Prv grown in two CGs located in Nrk and Ksm. Values represent means ± SE from three to five trees. Prv abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Significant effects of Prv and CG are indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns not significant.

    • Amax was similar across Prv and CGs in both seasons (Table 3), though it declined by about half in winter. In contrast, Ø varied by CG in summer, with the northernmost AJG exhibiting the highest value. Compared to its summer values, the decrease rate in both Ø and Amax in winter in the warmer CG was marginally lower than in the colder CG (p < 0.10). Rd was higher in the warmer CG, suggesting greater metabolic activity.

      Table 3.  Photosynthetic parameters in needles of C. japonica originated from three Prv growing in two CG and two-way ANOVA results.

      Season Prv CG Ø θ Amax Rd
      μmol·m−2·s−1
      Summer Ajigasawa (AJG) Nrk 0.083 ± 0.010 0.86 ± 0.01 21.10 ± 1.60 2.38 ± 0.09
      Ksm 0.050 ± 0.005 0.68 ± 0.05 20.33 ± 2.10 2.93 ± 0.36
      Azouji (AZJ) Nrk 0.063 ± 0.007 0.82 ± 0.04 20.89 ± 1.65 2.00 ± 0.70
      Ksm 0.060 ± 0.011 0.82 ± 0.05 17.31 ± 1.97 2.23 ± 0.25
      Singu (SNG) Nrk 0.065 ± 0.008 0.82 ± 0.06 16.85 ± 0.59 1.73 ± 0.47
      Ksm 0.042 ± 0.004 0.73 ± 0.04 17.84 ± 0.59 1.97 ± 0.19
      Statistics
      Prv p = 0.308 p = 0.442 p = 0.134 p = 0.156
      CG p = 0.010 p = 0.022 p = 0.391 p = 0.324
      Winter Ajigasawa (AJG) Nrk 0.019 ± 0.005 0.76 ± 0.12 9.33 ± 2.35 2.73 ± 0.33
      Ksm 0.022 ± 0.006 0.45 ± 0.17 11.13 ± 2.47 3.97 ± 0.79
      Azouji (AZJ) Nrk 0.023 ± 0.005 0.57 ± 0.16 10.84 ± 0.84 3.13 ± 0.57
      Ksm 0.024 ± 0.000 0.81 ± 0.00 12.14 ± 1.27 4.32 ± 0.09
      Singu (SNG) Nrk 0.017 ± 0.003 0.30 ± 0.12 6.93 ± 1.17 3.06 ± 0.30
      Ksm 0.027 ± 0.009 0.03 ± 0.01 9.92 ± 2.01 3.65 ± 0.49
      Statistics
      Prv p = 0.813 p = 0.212 p = 0.268 p = 0.677
      CG p = 0.267 p = 0.670 p = 0.192 p = 0.025
      Values shown are means ± SE from three trees of each CG. Ø: apparent quantum yield of CO2 fixation, θ: the convexity of the light-response curve, Amax: the light-saturated photosynthetic rate, Rd: dark respiration rate. Significant values are highlighted in bold.
    • PIv was highest for pigments (0.334–0.455), followed by LMA (0.234–0.287), and lowest for Fv/Fm (0.019–0.240) (Supplementary Fig. S4). Seasonal variation was evident only in PIv of Fv/Fm, which was higher in winter.

      At the Prv level, PIv of pigments varied significantly among Prv and CGs (Supplementary Fig. S5). Within-Prv variation in pigment, PIv was comparable to that observed across Prv (Supplementary Figs S4 & S5).

    • In summer, PC1 and PC2 explained 73.93% and 24.11% of variance, corresponding to light absorption and thermal dissipation capacity, respectively (Fig. 5a). SNG from the 'Omote-sugi' in the warmer CG and the northernmost AJG in the colder CG were at opposite ends of PC1. Two CGs, regardless of their origin, were clearly distinct along the PC2. In winter, PC1 and PC2 explained 79.84% and 16.07% of the variance, representing light absorption/Rho accumulation and contrasting photoprotective strategies (VAZ vs Rho), respectively (Fig. 5b). Two CGs, regardless of their origin, were distinct along the PC1.

      Figure 5. 

      Principal component ordination of pigment components in needles of C. japonica from five Prv grown in two CG located in Nrk and Ksm in (a) summer and (b) winter. Prv abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Chla: chlorophyll a, Chlb: chlorophyll b, VAZ: xanthophyll cycle, Rho: rhodoxanthin, Neo: neoxanthin, Lut: lutein, α-Car: α-carotene, β-Car: β-carotene.

    • All C. japonica trees from the five Prv exhibited winter Chl reduction accompanied by upregulation of the VAZ cycle pool and Rho accumulation in both CGs. These seasonal pigment changes align with previous findings[1,3,19], indicating that evergreen conifers employ pigment-mediated strategies to endure winter stress. Notably, significant genetic variation was observed in the degree of Chl reduction across Prv and CGs. Unexpectedly, higher Chl concentrations in winter were found in the colder CG, especially in the northernmost Prv. The risk of high excitation pressure in PSII was mitigated by a six-fold increase in VAZ (sustained AZ) and elevated lutein levels—both recognized mechanisms of cold acclimation[1,3]. Conversely, Rho levels were lower in the colder CG, contrary to findings along elevational gradients from the same species[24]. This suggests that winter severity regulates the relative deployment of VAZ- and Rho-mediated photoprotection, with genotype-dependent plasticity. Despite variations in pigment composition, Fv/Fm remained comparable among Prv, consistently higher in the warmer CG, while photosynthetic parameters showed slight variation. Together with greater phenotypic plasticity in pigment traits and LMA at inter- and intra-Prv levels, these results imply that C. japonica possesses adaptive resilience to climatic changes, as seen in its robust performance under high summer temperatures in the warmer CG.

    • Seasonal Chl reduction is a hallmark of conifer cold acclimation, yet species-specific patterns and mechanisms remain elusive[4,11]. These results suggest that pigment variation reflects a strategic balance between maximizing photosynthesis and minimizing stress, shaped by environmental context. In the colder CG, high Chl and coordinated carotenoids indicate an adaptive strategy for a short growing season. High Chlb in summer correlated with enhanced quantum yield of CO2 fixation in the northernmost Prv. The presence of substantial α-Car in summer, followed by marked depletion in winter, underscores this strategy because it is often upregulated under low light[39]. Winter upregulation of lutein, synthesized from α-carotene, led to an increased lutein : Chl ratio—a known response to cold stress[9]—and supports its role in quenching chlorophyll triplet states[42]. Moreover, β-Car levels, localized exclusively in PSI and PSII core complexes[9], were maintained in winter and higher in the northernmost Prv, implying that winter Chl reduction targets the antenna while core complexes remain as observed in Pinus sylvestris[43]. This structural reconfiguration may facilitate energy transfer from PSII to PSI[1]. Enhanced VAZ and sustained AZ level provided additional photoprotection via energy dissipation. Furthermore, seasonal reduction in Neo—exclusively associated with the PSII antenna and synthesized from zeaxanthin[44]—supports this interpretation. These results suggest that coordinated Chl and carotenoid adjustments, along with fluxes through α- and β-carotene pathways, regulate the pools of lutein, VAZ cycle, and Rho[39].

      Such integration may enhance photosynthetic recovery in spring. Chl resynthesis is energetically costly[45], while conversion of sustained Z back to V occurs within days[3,46,47], enabling rapid functional shifts in PSII from photoprotection to light harvesting[1,3]. These dynamics support earlier observations linking pigment plasticity with spring productivity increases in high-latitude conifers under global warming[48,49]. Given the limited data on interspecific variation in photosynthetic recovery in spring[5053], further research is needed to clarify species-specific responses and their broader implications for forest carbon dynamics[54,55].

      Although cold winters are typically considered the primary selective force in C. janopica[33], these findings also highlight the importance of hot summers. PCA of climatic data identified the Ksm CG as having the hottest summer and greatest precipitation seasonality. The SNG Prv, from the Pacific-side 'Omote-sugi' group, showed low Chl and high VAZ when grown in the Ksm CG, consistent with adaptation to drought and heat stress in root and growth traits[31,56]. Furthermore, higher VAZ pool per Chl in the Ksm CG supports its role in photoprotection under summer stress. These trends were corroborated by PCA of pigment composition. Both genetic diversity and phenotypic plasticity in pigments and LMA appear essential for maintaining photosynthetic function across variable environments.

    • Contrary to expectations, Rho accumulation was greater in the warmer CG. The balance between VAZ and Rho may depend on winter severity and the rate of pigment synthesis and degradation. Rho synthesis, likely triggered by sustained Z[22], proceeds more slowly than the VAZ cycle[14,19,24]. Notably, experimental Rho degradation required 10 d at room temperature[24], considerably longer than Z-epoxidation[3,39]. In C. japonica, Fv/Fm did not fully recover even after degradation of Rho when it grew under the minimum temperature below –10 °C[24], indicating a decoupling of pigment dynamics and PSII recovery under harsher conditions. This aligns with the natural distribution of Rho-accumulating conifers, which typically inhabit milder winter regions.

      These findings support Rho's role in light interception under moderate winter stress[19]. In winter, higher Rho and lower VAZ in the warmer CG coincided with smaller decreases in quantum yield of CO2 fixation and Amax. Rho accumulation is associated with chloroplast-to-chromoplast conversion in sun-exposed tissues[21,25], restricting PSII excitation under low light while allowing limited photosynthetic activity when irradiance increases[19].

    • Understanding how C. japonica regulates chlorophyll and carotenoids across thermal gradients is critical for assessing resilience to climate change. These findings reveal that higher winter chlorophyll, particularly in colder sites, reflects adaptation to short growing seasons. Photoprotective strategies—via VAZ or Rho—varied across sites and Prv, but pigment plasticity ensured consistent photochemical efficiency. Integrating remote sensing indices sensitive to foliar chlorophyll and carotenoid dynamics[55,57,58], may improve carbon cycle estimates under climate change scenarios.

      • The authors thank Ms Naoko Kano for the sample preparation and Dr Chiharu Migita for the pigment analyses. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Nos JP18H02248, JP23H04970, JP24H00055, and JP24H00527).

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Han Q, Uchiyama K, Suyama Y, Tsumura Y; fieldwork: Han Q, Kusumoto N, Kanetani S, Uchiyama K; laboratory work: Han Q; analysis and interpretation of results: Han Q, Tsujii Y, Kabeya D; draft manuscript preparation: Han Q. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Supplementary Table S1 F values from ANOVA based on linear mixed-effects models for total chlorophyll (Chl) and each carotenoid components per unit needle dry weight in Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) cultivated in two common gardens (CG).
      • Supplementary Table S2 Chlorophyll (Chl) a:b ratio and molar ratios of individual carotenoid components to total Chl (mol·mol−1) in needles of Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) grown in two common gardens (CG), along with statistical summary.
      • Supplementary Fig. S1 Monthly rainfall (bars, left axis) and sunshine hours (thick line, left axis), and mean daily mean temperature, daily minimum and maximum temperature (thin lines, right axis) in the year when leaves were sampled from the common garden of Miyagi Prefecture (Nrk) in 2019−2020 and Kumamoto Prefecture (Ksm) in 2020−2021. Data from Japan Meteorological Agency (www.data.jma.go.jp/stats/etrn/index.php).
      • Supplementary Fig. S2 Needle dry mass per projected area (LMA) of Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) grown in two common gardens (CG) located in Miyagi (Nrk) and Kumamoto (Ksm), sampled in summer (a) and winter (b). Values represent means ± SE from 3−5 trees. Provenance abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Significant effect of Prv and CG are indicated as * p < 0.05, ns not significant. Note: LMA values in winter were significantly higher than in summer for all provenance (p < 0.05).
      • Supplementary Fig. S3 De-epoxidation state (AZ/VAZ ratio) in needles of Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) grown in two common gardens (CG) located in Miyagi (Nrk) and Kumamoto (Ksm), sampled at (a, c) noon and (b, d) night in (a, b) summer and (c, d) winter. Values represent means ± SE from 3−5 trees. Provenance abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Significant effect of Prv and CG are indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns not significant. V: violaxanthin; A: antheraxanthin, Z: zeaxanthin.
      • Supplementary Fig. S4 Comparison of phenotypic plasticity index (PIv) in morphological (LAM: leaf mass per area) and physiological traits in needles of Cryptomeria japonica, averaged across five provenances grown in two common gardens located in Miyagi (Nrk) and Kumamoto (Ksm). Pigment PIv values represent the average of all components, including chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, xanthophyll cycle, neoxanthin, lutein, α-carotene and β-carotene in summer, and surplus rhodoxanthin in winter.
      • Supplementary Fig. S5 Mean phenotypic plasticity index (PIv) of pigments in each provenance of Cryptomeria japonica from five provenances (Prv) grown in two common gardens (CG) located in Miyagi (Nrk) and Kumamoto (Ksm). Values represent means ± SE of each pigment component in either summer or winter. Provenance abbreviations are listed in Table 1. Significant effect of Prv and CG are indicated as * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (3) References (58)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Han Q, Kusumoto N, Kanetani S, Suyama Y, Tsujii Y, et al. 2025. Photoprotective pigment plasticity and cold acclimation strategies in Cryptomeria japonica across two common gardens. Forestry Research 5: e015 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0015
    Han Q, Kusumoto N, Kanetani S, Suyama Y, Tsujii Y, et al. 2025. Photoprotective pigment plasticity and cold acclimation strategies in Cryptomeria japonica across two common gardens. Forestry Research 5: e015 doi: 10.48130/forres-0025-0015

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return