Search
2025 Volume 1
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Molecular mechanisms and research advances of plant hormone regulation in cut flower senescence

More Information
  • Received: 28 June 2025
    Revised: 28 August 2025
    Accepted: 05 September 2025
    Published online: 26 September 2025
    Plant Hormones  1 Article number: e020 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • Plant hormones play pivotal roles in regulating cut flower senescence. Ethylene dominates senescence in ethylene-sensitive species (such as carnations and roses) by activating senescence-associated genes via ACS/ACO-mediated biosynthesis and the EIN2-EILs signaling cascade, with abscisic acid (ABA) synergistically promoting this process through crosstalk. Conversely, ABA drives senescence in ethylene-insensitive cut flowers (such as chrysanthemums and lilies) through the NCED pathway-induced ABA accumulation and triggers oxidative stress, while ethylene may play a secondary collaborative role. Interactions among ethylene, ABA, gibberellin (GA), cytokinin (CTK), auxin, and salicylic acid (SA) form a sophisticated regulatory network. These hormones orchestrate senescence through biosynthesis pathways, signal transduction, transcription factors, epigenetic modifications, and cellular structural regulation. Preservation technologies based on hormonal regulation, such as 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and sucrose treatments, have been successfully implemented. Understanding these molecular mechanisms and hormonal crosstalk provides a theoretical foundation for extending vase life and enhancing the commercial value of cut flowers.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Woo HR, Kim HJ, Lim PO, Nam HG. 2019. Leaf senescence: systems and dynamics aspects. Annual Review of Plant Biology 70:347−76 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095859

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Chen J, Li Y, Li Y, Li Y, Wang Y, et al. 2021. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 18–HISTONE DEACETYLASE 6 module regulates floral organ identity in rose (Rosa hybrida). Plant Physiology 186:1074−87 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Sun X, Qin M, Yu Q, Huang Z, Xiao Y, et al. 2021. Molecular understanding of postharvest flower opening and senescence. Molecular Horticulture 1:7 doi: 10.1186/s43897-021-00015-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Kim J, Kim JH, Lyu JI, Woo HR, Lim PO. 2018. New insights into the regulation of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 69:787−99 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx287

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Sade N, del Mar Rubio-Wilhelmi M, Umnajkitikorn K, Blumwald E. 2018. Stress-induced senescence and plant tolerance to abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 69:845−53 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx235

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Ma N, Ma C, Liu Y, Shahid MO, Wang C, et al. 2018. Petal senescence: a hormone view. Journal of Experimental Botany 69:719−32 doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Lone ML, ul Haq A, Farooq S, Parveen S, Altaf F, et al. 2025. Flower senescence: a comprehensive update on hormonal regulation and molecular aspects of petal death. Postharvest Biology and Technology 220:113299 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.113299

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Khan S, Alvi AF, Khan NA. 2024. Role of ethylene in the regulation of plant developmental processes. Stresses 4:28−53 doi: 10.3390/stresses4010003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Wang Y, Sun Z, Feng S, Yuan X, Zhong L, et al. 2022. The negative regulation of DcERF-1 on senescence of cut carnation. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 49:1313−26 doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0478

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Wang M, Ni C, Wang R, Zhong L, Cheng Y, et al. 2023. Variation in longevity of cut and in planta flowers of potted carnation varieties affected by their relationship with ethylene and water. Ornamental Plant Research 3:2 doi: 10.48130/opr-2023-0002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Wang M, Wang M, Ni C, Feng S, Wang Y, et al. 2024. Differences in ethylene sensitivity, expression of ethylene biosynthetic genes and vase life among carnation varieties. Ornamental Plant Research 4:e004 doi: 10.48130/opr-0024-0002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Wang M, Pi Z, Pan Z, Li X, Zhong L, et al. 2025. Studies on the mother flower carnation: past, present, and future. Horticulture Research 12:uhaf118 doi: 10.1093/hr/uhaf118

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Wang H, Zhao C, Pan Z, Li X, Wang S, et al. 2025. Dynamic m6A RNA methylation correlates with ethylene-induced petal senescence and may modulate antioxidant and metabolic pathways in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). The Plant Journal 123:e70318 doi: 10.1111/tpj.70318

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Ahmad Dar R, Nisar S, Tahir I. 2021. Ethylene: a key player in ethylene sensitive flower senescence: a review. Scientia Horticulturae 290:110491 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110491

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Iqbal N, Khan NA, Ferrante A, Trivellini A, Francini A, et al. 2017. Ethylene role in plant growth, development and senescence: interaction with other phytohormones. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:475 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00475

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Parveen S, Altaf F, Farooq S, Lone ML, ul Haq A, et al. 2023. The swansong of petal cell death: insights into the mechanism and regulation of ethylene-mediated flower senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany 74:3961−74 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad217

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Farooq S, Lone ML, ul Haq A, Parveen S, Altaf F, et al. 2024. Signalling cascades choreographing petal cell death: implications for postharvest quality. Plant Molecular Biology 114:63 doi: 10.1007/s11103-024-01449-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Zhang F, Wang L, Lim JY, Kim T, Pyo Y, et al. 2016. Phosphorylation of CBP20 links microRNA to root growth in the ethylene response. PLoS Genetics 12:e1006437 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006437

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Zhang F, Qi B, Wang L, Zhao B, Rode S, et al. 2016. EIN2-dependent regulation of acetylation of histone H3K14 and non-canonical histone H3K23 in ethylene signalling. Nature Communications 7:13018 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Zhang F, Wang L, Qi B, Zhao B, Ko EE, et al. 2017. EIN2 mediates direct regulation of histone acetylation in the ethylene response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114:10274−79 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707937114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Zhang F, Wang L, Ko EE, Shao K, Qiao H. 2018. Histone deacetylases SRT1 and SRT2 interact with ENAP1 to mediate ethylene-induced transcriptional repression. The Plant Cell 30:153−66 doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00671

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Wang L, Zhang F, Qiao H. 2020. Chromatin regulation in the response of ethylene: nuclear events in ethylene signaling. Small Methods 4:1900288 doi: 10.1002/smtd.201900288

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Zhao H, Yin CC, Ma B, Chen SY, Zhang JS. 2021. Ethylene signaling in rice and Arabidopsis: new regulators and mechanisms. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 63:102−25 doi: 10.1111/jipb.13028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Mubarok S, Qonit MAH, Rahmat BPN, Budiarto R, Suminar E, et al. 2023. An overview of ethylene insensitive tomato mutants: advantages and disadvantages for postharvest fruit shelf-life and future perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1079052 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1079052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Shibuya K. 2018. Molecular aspects of flower senescence and strategies to improve flower longevity. Breeding Science 68:99−108 doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.17081

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Cocetta G, Natalini A. 2022. Ethylene: management and breeding for postharvest quality in vegetable crops. A review. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:968315 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.968315

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Merchante C, Alonso JM, Stepanova AN. 2013. Ethylene signaling: simple ligand, complex regulation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 16:554−60 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.08.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Ju C, Chang C. 2015. Mechanistic insights in ethylene perception and signal transduction. Plant Physiology 169:85−95 doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00845

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Yang SF, Hoffman NE. 1984. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 35:155−89 doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.001103

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Ichimura K, Niki T. 2014. Ethylene production associated with petal senescence in carnation flowers is induced irrespective of the gynoecium. Journal of Plant Physiology 171:1679−84 doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.08.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Van Altvorst AC, Bovy AG. 1995. The role of ethylene in the senescence of carnation flowers, a review. Plant Growth Regulation 16:43−53 doi: 10.1007/BF00040506

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Tanase K, Otsu S, Satoh S, Onozaki T. 2015. Expression levels of ethylene biosynthetic genes and senescence-related genes in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) with ultra-long-life flowers. Scientia Horticulturae 183:31−38 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.11.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Tanase K, Onozaki T, Satoh S, Shibata M, Ichimura K. 2008. Differential expression levels of ethylene biosynthetic pathway genes during senescence of long-lived carnation cultivars. Postharvest Biology and Technology 47:210−17 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.06.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Ji X, Mao Y, Yuan Y, Wang M, Zhao Y, et al. 2024. PhERF71 regulates petunia flower senescence by modulating ethylene biosynthesis. Postharvest Biology and Technology 216:113070 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.113070

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Yin J, Chang X, Kasuga T, Bui M, Reid MS, et al. 2015. A basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, PhFBH4, regulates flower senescence by modulating ethylene biosynthesis pathway in petunia. Horticulture Research 2:15059 doi: 10.1038/hortres.2015.59

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Chang X, Donnelly L, Sun D, Rao J, Reid MS, et al. 2014. A petunia homeodomain-leucine zipper protein, PhHD-Zip, plays an important role in flower senescence. PLoS One 9:e88320 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088320

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Ji X, Wang M, Xu Z, Wang K, Sun D, et al. 2022. PlMYB308 Regulates flower senescence by modulating ethylene biosynthesis in herbaceous peony. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:872442 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.872442

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Chen J, Zhang Q, Wang Q, Feng M, Li Y, et al. 2017. RhMKK9, a rose MAP KINASE KINASE gene, is involved in rehydration-triggered ethylene production in rose gynoecia. BMC Plant Biology 17:51 doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-0999-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Wang Y, Zhao H, Liu C, Cui G, Qu L, et al. 2020. Integrating physiological and metabolites analysis to identify ethylene involvement in petal senescence in Tulipa gesneriana. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 149:121−31 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Yan X, Zhao J, Deng M, Wen J. 2024. Two key enzyme genes associated with ethylene bio-synthesis, LbACS and LbACO, are involved in the regulation of lily flower senescence. Scientia Horticulturae 330:113045 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Liao WB, Zhang ML, Yu JH. 2013. Role of nitric oxide in delaying senescence of cut rose flowers and its interaction with ethylene. Scientia Horticulturae 155:30−38 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.03.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Dek MSP, Padmanabhan P, Sherif S, Subramanian J, Paliyath AG. 2017. Upregulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) enhances ethylene biosynthesis and accelerates flower senescence in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum L. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18:1533 doi: 10.3390/ijms18071533

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Liu J, Li J, Wang H, Fu Z, Liu J, et al. 2011. Identification and expression analysis of ERF transcription factor genes in petunia during flower senescence and in response to hormone treatments. Journal of Experimental Botany 62:825−40 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq324

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Li F, Gao Y, Jin C, Wen X, Geng H, et al. 2022. The chromosome-level genome of Gypsophila paniculata reveals the molecular mechanism of floral development and ethylene insensitivity. Horticulture Research 9:uhac176 doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac176

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Zhu C, Huang Z, Sun Z, Feng S, Wang S, et al. 2023. The mutual regulation between DcEBF1/2 and DcEIL3-1 is involved in ethylene induced petal senescence in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). The Plant Journal 114:636−50 doi: 10.1111/tpj.16158

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Lu J, Zhang G, Ma C, Li Y, Jiang C, et al. 2024. The F-box protein RhSAF destabilizes the gibberellic acid receptor RhGID1 to mediate ethylene-induced petal senescence in rose. The Plant Cell 36:1736−54 doi: 10.1093/plcell/koae035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Chen C, Ma Y, Zuo L, Xiao Y, Jiang Y, et al. 2023. The CALCINEURIN B-LIKE 4/CBL-INTERACTING PROTEIN 3 module degrades repressor JAZ5 during rose petal senescence. Plant Physiology 193:1605−20 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad365

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Wu Y, Zuo L, Ma Y, Jiang Y, Gao J, et al. 2022. Protein kinase RhCIPK6 promotes petal senescence in response to ethylene in rose (Rosa hybrida). Genes 13:1989 doi: 10.3390/genes13111989

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] In BC, Strable J, Binder BM, Falbel TG, Patterson SE. 2013. Morphological and molecular characterization of ethylene binding inhibition in carnations. Postharvest Biology and Technology 86:272−79 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.07.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Hoppen C, Müller L, Albrecht AC, Groth G. 2019. The NOP-1 peptide derived from the central regulator of ethylene signaling EIN2 delays floral senescence in cut flowers. Scientific Reports 9:1287 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37571-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Yolcu S, Li X, Li S, Kim YJ. 2018. Beyond the genetic code in leaf senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany 69:801−10 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx401

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Yang CP, Xia ZQ, Hu J, Zhuang YF, Pan YW, et al. 2019. Transcriptome analysis of Oncidium petals provides new insights into the initiation of petal senescence. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 94:12−23 doi: 10.1080/14620316.2018.1432297

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Feng S, Jiang X, Wang R, Tan H, Zhong L, et al. 2023. Histone H3K4 methyltransferase DcATX1 promotes ethylene induced petal senescence in carnation. Plant Physiology 192:546−64 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Feng S, Jiang X, Huang Z, Li F, Wang R, et al. 2024. DNA methylation remodeled amino acids biosynthesis regulates flower senescence in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus). New Phytologist 241:1605−20 doi: 10.1111/nph.19499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Thompson JE, Mayak S, Shinitzky M, Halevy AH. 1982. Acceleration of membrane senescence in cut carnation flowers by treatment with ethylene. Plant Physiology 69:859−63 doi: 10.1104/pp.69.4.859

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Borochov A, Faragher J. 1983. Comparison between ultraviolet irradiation and ethylene effects on senescence parameters in carnation flowers. Plant Physiology 71:536−40 doi: 10.1104/pp.71.3.536

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Wang T, Sun Z, Wang S, Feng S, Wang R, et al. 2023. DcWRKY33 promotes petal senescence in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) by activating genes involved in the biosynthesis of ethylene and abscisic acid and accumulation of reactive oxygen species. The Plant Journal 113:698−715 doi: 10.1111/tpj.16075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Xu H, Luo D, Zhang F. 2021. DcWRKY75 promotes ethylene induced petal senescence in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). The Plant Journal 108:1473−92 doi: 10.1111/tpj.15523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Xu H, Wang S, Larkin RM, Zhang F. 2022. The transcription factors DcHB30 and DcWRKY75 antagonistically regulate ethylene-induced petal senescence in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus). Journal of Experimental Botany 73:7326−43 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac357

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Wang S, Xu H, Zhang F. 2024. DcEIL3-1, DcWRKY75 and DcHB30 transcription factors form an activation-inhibition module to regulate petal senescence in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Postharvest Biology and Technology 210:112743 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2023.112743

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Jing W, Zhao Q, Zhang S, Zeng D, Xu J, et al. 2021. RhWRKY33 positively regulates onset of floral senescence by responding to wounding- and ethylene-signaling in rose plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:726797 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.726797

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Sun Z, Wu M, Wang S, Feng S, Wang Y, et al. 2023. An insertion of transposon in DcNAP inverted its function in the ethylene pathway to delay petal senescence in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:2307−21 doi: 10.1111/pbi.14132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Shibuya K, Shimizu K, Niki T, Ichimura K. 2014. Identification of a NAC transcription factor, EPHEMERAL1, that controls petal senescence in Japanese morning glory. The Plant Journal 79:1044−51 doi: 10.1111/tpj.12605

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Luo J, Chen S, Cao S, Zhang T, Li R, et al. 2021. Rose (Rosa hybrida) ethylene responsive factor 3 promotes rose flower senescence via direct activation of the abscisic acid synthesis–related 9-CIS-EPOXYCAROTENOID DIOXYGENASE gene. Plant and Cell Physiology 62:1030−43 doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcab085

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Tan H, Liu X, Ma N, Xue J, Lu W, et al. 2006. Ethylene-influenced flower opening and expression of genes encoding Etrs, Ctrs, and Ein3s in two cut rose cultivars. Postharvest Biology and Technology 40:97−105 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.01.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Taverner E, Letham DS, Wang J, Cornish E, Willcocks DA. 1999. Influence of ethylene on cytokinin metabolism in relation to Petunia corolla senescence. Phytochemistry 51:341−47 doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00757-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Wu L, Ma N, Jia Y, Zhang Y, Feng M, et al. 2017. An ethylene-induced regulatory module delays flower senescence by regulating cytokinin content. Plant Physiology 173:853−62 doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Zhang S, Zhao Q, Zeng D, Xu J, Zhou H, et al. 2019. Author Correction: RhMYB108, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, is involved in ethylene- and JA-induced petal senescence in rose plants. Horticulture Research 6:139 doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0230-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Kondo M, Nakajima T, Shibuya K, Ichimura K. 2020. Comparison of petal senescence between cut and intact carnation flowers using potted plants. Scientia Horticulturae 272:109564 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109564

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Lee MM, Lee SH, Park KY. 1997. Effects of spermine on ethylene biosynthesis in cut carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) flowers during senescence. Journal of Plant Physiology 151:68−73 doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(97)80038-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Pun UK, Yamada T, Tanase K, Shimizu-Yumoto H, Satoh S, et al. 2014. Effect of ethanol on ethylene biosynthesis and sensitivity in cut carnation flowers. Postharvest Biology and Technology 98:30−33 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.06.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Pun UK, Yamada T, Azuma M, Tanase K, Yoshioka S, et al. 2016. Effect of sucrose on sensitivity to ethylene and enzyme activities and gene expression involved in ethylene biosynthesis in cut carnations. Postharvest Biology and Technology 121:151−58 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.08.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Hoeberichts FA, van Doorn WG, Vorst O, Hall RD, van Wordragen MF. 2007. Sucrose prevents up-regulation of senescence-associated genes in carnation petals. Journal of Experimental Botany 58:2873−85 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm076

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Naing AH, Soe MT, Kyu SY, Kim CK. 2021. Nano-silver controls transcriptional regulation of ethylene- and senescence-associated genes during senescence in cut carnations. Scientia Horticulturae 287:110280 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Ma N, Tan H, Liu X, Xue J, Li Y, et al. 2006. Transcriptional regulation of ethylene receptor and CTR genes involved in ethylene-induced flower opening in cut rose (Rosa hybrida) cv. Samantha. Journal of Experimental Botany 57:2763−73 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Azuma M, Onozaki T, Ichimura K. 2020. Difference of ethylene production and response to ethylene in cut flowers of dahlia (Dahlia variabilis) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 273:109635 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109635

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR. 2010. Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61:651−79 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112122

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Finkelstein RR, Gampala SSL, Rock CD. 2002. Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. The Plant Cell 14:S15−S45 doi: 10.1105/tpc.010441

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Waadt R, Seller CA, Hsu PK, Takahashi Y, Munemasa S, et al. 2022. Plant hormone regulation of abiotic stress responses. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 23:680−94 doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00479-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Zhang H, Zhu J, Gong Z, Zhu JK. 2022. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nature Reviews Genetics 23:104−19 doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Nambara E, Marion-Poll A. 2005. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56:165−85 doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144046

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Lone ML, Farooq S, ul Haq A, Parveen S, Altaf F, et al. 2024. Antagonistic interrelation between abscisic acid and gibberellic acid in the regulation of senescence in ray florets of Calendula officinalis L. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 43:3671−84 doi: 10.1007/s00344-024-11342-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Meng L, Yang H, La Y, Wu Y, Ye T, et al. 2024. Transcriptional modules and hormonal metabolic pathways reveal the critical role of TgHB12-like in the regulation of flower opening and petal senescence in Tulipa gesneriana. Horticulture Advances 2:18 doi: 10.1007/s44281-024-00031-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Meng L, Yang H, Yang J, Wang Y, Ye T, et al. 2024. Tulip transcription factor TgWRKY75 activates salicylic acid and abscisic acid biosynthesis to synergistically promote petal senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany 75:2435−50 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Aalifar M, Aliniaeifard S, Arab M, Mehrjerdi MZ, Serek M. 2020. Blue light postpones senescence of carnation flowers through regulation of ethylene and abscisic acid pathway-related genes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 151:103−12 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.03.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Ji X, Xu Z, Wang M, Zhong X, et al. 2021. A MYB transcription factor, PlMYB308, plays an essential role in flower senescence of herbaceous peony. bioRxiv Preprint doi: 10.1101/2021.09.02.458764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Ji X, Yuan Y, Bai Z, Wang M, Niu L, et al. 2023. PlZFP mediates the combinatorial interactions of abscisic acid with gibberellin and ethylene during flower senescence in cut herbaceous peony. Postharvest Biology and Technology 195:112130 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Arrom L, Munné-Bosch S. 2012. Hormonal regulation of leaf senescence in Lilium. Journal of Plant Physiology 169:1542−50 doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.06.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Deng Y, Wang C, Huo J, Hu W, Liao W. 2019. The involvement of NO in ABA-delayed the senescence of cut roses by maintaining water content and antioxidant enzymes activity. Scientia Horticulturae 247:35−41 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.12.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Liu J, Fan Y, Zou J, Fang Y, Wang L, et al. 2017. A RhABF2/Ferritin module affects rose (Rosa hybrida) petal dehydration tolerance and senescence by modulating iron levels. The Plant Journal 92:1157−69 doi: 10.1111/tpj.13751

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Ronen M, Mayak S. 1981. Interrelationship between abscisic acid and ethylene in the control of senescence processes in carnation flowers. Journal of Experimental Botany 32:759−65 doi: 10.1093/jxb/32.4.759

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Cheng WH, Chiang MH, Hwang SG, Lin PC. 2009. Antagonism between abscisic acid and ethylene in Arabidopsis acts in parallel with the reciprocal regulation of their metabolism and signaling pathways. Plant Molecular Biology 71:61−80 doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9509-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Kumar M, Singh VP, Arora A, Singh N. 2014. The role of abscisic acid (ABA) in ethylene insensitive Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflora Hort.) flower senescence. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 36:151−59 doi: 10.1007/s11738-013-1395-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Hunter DA, Ferrante A, Vernieri P, Reid MS. 2004. Role of abscisic acid in perianth senescence of daffodil (Narcissus pseudonarcissus "Dutch Master"). Physiologia Plantarum 121:313−21 doi: 10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.0311.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Borochov A, Mayak S, Halevy AH. 1976. Combined effects of abscisic acid and sucrose on growth and senescence of rose flowers. Physiologia Plantarum 36:221−24 doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1976.tb04416.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Shimizu-Yumoto H, Ichimura K. 2009. Abscisic acid, in combination with sucrose, is effective as a pulse treatment to suppress leaf damage and extend foliage vase-life in cut Eustoma flowers. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 84:107−11 doi: 10.1080/14620316.2009.11512489

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Ji X, Xin Z, Yuan Y, Wang M, Lu X, et al. 2023. A petunia transcription factor, PhOBF1, regulates flower senescence by modulating gibberellin biosynthesis. Horticulture Research 10:uhad022 doi: 10.1093/hr/uhad022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Lü P, Zhang C, Liu J, Liu X, Jiang G, et al. 2014. RhHB1 mediates the antagonism of gibberellins to ABA and ethylene during rose (Rosa hybrida) petal senescence. The Plant Journal 78:578−90 doi: 10.1111/tpj.12494

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Yuan Y, Zhou N, Bai S, Zeng F, Liu C, et al. 2024. Evolutionary and integrative analysis of the gibberellin 20-oxidase, 3-oxidase, and 2-oxidase gene family in Paeonia ostii: insight into their roles in flower senescence. Agronomy 14:590 doi: 10.3390/agronomy14030590

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Faraji S, Naderi R, Ibadli OV, Basaki T, Gasimov SN, et al. 2011. Effects of post harvesting on biochemical changes in Gladiolus cut flowers cultivars (White prosperity). Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 9:572−77

    Google Scholar

    [101] Hönig M, Plíhalová L, Husičková A, Nisler J, Doležal K. 2018. Role of cytokinins in senescence, antioxidant defence and photosynthesis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:4045 doi: 10.3390/ijms19124045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Trivellini A, Cocetta G, Vernieri P, Mensuali-Sodi A, Ferrante A. 2015. Effect of cytokinins on delaying petunia flower senescence: a transcriptome study approach. Plant Molecular Biology 87:169−80 doi: 10.1007/s11103-014-0268-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Eisinger W. 1977. Role of cytokinins in carnation flower senescence. Plant Physiology 59:707−9 doi: 10.1104/pp.59.4.707

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Khaskheli AJ, Ahmed W, Ma C, Zhang S, Liu Y, et al. 2018. RhERF113 functions in ethylene-induced petal senescence by modulating cytokinin content in rose. Plant and Cell Physiology 59:2442−51 doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy162

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Jiang C, Liang Y, Deng S, Liu Y, Zhao H, et al. 2023. The RhLOL1–RhILR3 module mediates cytokinin-induced petal abscission in rose. New Phytologist 237:483−96 doi: 10.1111/nph.18556

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Zou J, Lü P, Jiang L, Liu K, Zhang T, et al. 2021. Regulation of rose petal dehydration tolerance and senescence by RhNAP transcription factor via the modulation of cytokinin catabolism. Molecular Horticulture 1:13 doi: 10.1186/s43897-021-00016-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Mayak S, Halevy AH. 1970. Cytokinin activity in rose petals and its relation to senescence. Plant Physiology 46:497−99 doi: 10.1104/pp.46.4.497

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Cubría-Radío M, Arrom L, Puig S, Munné-Bosch S. 2017. Hormonal sensitivity decreases during the progression of flower senescence in Lilium longiflorum. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 36:402−12 doi: 10.1007/s00344-016-9648-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Liang Y, Jiang C, Liu Y, Gao Y, Lu J, et al. 2020. Auxin regulates sucrose transport to repress petal abscission in rose (Rosa hybrida). The Plant Cell 32:3485−99 doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00695

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Kwon HS, Leporini C, Kim S, Heo S. 2024. Prolonged vase life by salicylic acid treatment and prediction of vase life using petal color senescence of cut lisianthus. Postharvest Biology and Technology 209:112726 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2023.112726

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Meng L, Yang H, Xiang L, Wang Y, Chan Z. 2022. NAC transcription factor TgNAP promotes tulip petal senescence. Plant Physiology 190:1960−77 doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac351

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] In BC, Ha STT, Lee YS, Lim JH. 2017. Relationships between the longevity, water relations, ethylene sensitivity, and gene expression of cut roses. Postharvest Biology and Technology 131:74−83 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.05.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113] MöLler R, Lind-Iversen S, Stumman BM, Serek M. 2000. Expression of genes for ethylene biosynthetic enzymes and anethylene receptor in senescing flowers of miniature potted roses. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 75:12−18 doi: 10.1080/14620316.2000.11511193

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Jensen L, Hegelund JN, Olsen A, Lütken H, Müller R. 2016. A natural frameshift mutation in Campanula EIL2 correlates with ethylene insensitivity in flowers. BMC Plant Biology 16:117 doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0786-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Yao H, Zhong L, Luo J, Cheng Y, Bao M, et al. 2025. Molecular mechanisms and research advances of plant hormone regulation in cut flower senescence. Plant Hormones 1: e020 doi: 10.48130/ph-0025-0021
    Yao H, Zhong L, Luo J, Cheng Y, Bao M, et al. 2025. Molecular mechanisms and research advances of plant hormone regulation in cut flower senescence. Plant Hormones 1: e020 doi: 10.48130/ph-0025-0021

Figures(2)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(1130) PDF downloads(870)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Molecular mechanisms and research advances of plant hormone regulation in cut flower senescence

Plant Hormones  1 Article number: e020  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Plant hormones play pivotal roles in regulating cut flower senescence. Ethylene dominates senescence in ethylene-sensitive species (such as carnations and roses) by activating senescence-associated genes via ACS/ACO-mediated biosynthesis and the EIN2-EILs signaling cascade, with abscisic acid (ABA) synergistically promoting this process through crosstalk. Conversely, ABA drives senescence in ethylene-insensitive cut flowers (such as chrysanthemums and lilies) through the NCED pathway-induced ABA accumulation and triggers oxidative stress, while ethylene may play a secondary collaborative role. Interactions among ethylene, ABA, gibberellin (GA), cytokinin (CTK), auxin, and salicylic acid (SA) form a sophisticated regulatory network. These hormones orchestrate senescence through biosynthesis pathways, signal transduction, transcription factors, epigenetic modifications, and cellular structural regulation. Preservation technologies based on hormonal regulation, such as 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and sucrose treatments, have been successfully implemented. Understanding these molecular mechanisms and hormonal crosstalk provides a theoretical foundation for extending vase life and enhancing the commercial value of cut flowers.

    • Senescence is a universal life characteristic of all organisms, playing a significant role in the survival and adaptation of plants. In the final stage of plant growth and development, senescence is typically characterized by the gradual and orderly degradation of macromolecules and organelles, accompanied by the directional redistribution of nutrients from senescing organs to developing tissues[13]. Plant senescence is a complex biological process mediated by a multi-level regulatory network, involving the dynamic integration of endogenous developmental signals and exogenous environmental stresses. Among these, plant hormones play a core regulatory role in organ-level programmed senescence by precisely regulating the expression of related genes and physiological-biochemical reactions[4,5]. As an important component of the horticultural industry, the postharvest senescence of cut flowers directly affects their ornamental and economic values, making it one of the key scientific issues restricting industrial development[3,6].

      Among numerous hormones, ethylene is recognized as the 'core regulatory factor' for the senescence of ethylene-sensitive cut flowers[7]. As a gaseous plant hormone, ethylene plays a crucial role in the senescence process of cut flowers. It not only regulates the expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO) genes to form an autocatalytic ethylene biosynthesis pathway, but also regulates petal senescence-related genes directly or indirectly through signaling pathways such as ethylene insensitive 2 (EIN2) and EIN3, participating in petal senescence and flower organ abscission[8]. It is worth noting that the regulatory effect of ethylene exhibits significant species specificity, coupled with conserved crosstalk with ABA: in a typical ethylene-sensitive cut flowers such as carnations and roses, ethylene dominates senescence regulation (with its concentration and action time directly affecting the rate), while ABA synergistically enhances this process through mutual promotion[913]; In contrast, in ethylene-insensitive cut flowers such as lilies chrysanthemums and lilies, ABA serves as the primary regulator of the senescence process, whereas ethylene may only exert a secondary or synergistic function[7] (Table 1). Cultivars/varieties with high ethylene sensitivity exhibit severe damage upon ethylene exposure, characterized by abnormal flower morphology (bull bud), accelerated petal wilting, and abscission, whereas ethylene-induced alterations are minimal in less sensitive cultivars/varieties[6]. In-depth analysis of the regulatory mechanisms of hormones on cut flower senescence not only helps to reveal the molecular logic of plant organ programmed death, but also provides theoretical support for the development of new preservation technologies.

      Table 1.  Comparison of regulatory mechanisms of ethylene and ABA in cut flower senescence.

      Regulatory factor Ethylene ABA
      Target plants Ethylene-sensitive cut flowers (carnations and roses) Ethylene-insensitive cut flowers (chrysanthemums and lilies); sometimes collaborates with ethylene in sensitive flowers
      Biosynthetic pathway Catalyzed by ACC synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO): SAM → ACC → ethylene, with ACS as the rate-limiting step Mediated by 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED): carotenoids → ABA, with NCED as the key rate-limiting enzyme
      Signaling pathway EIN2-EILs signaling cascade: Ethylene binds to receptors (DcETR1) → inhibits CTR1 → activates EIN2 → EILs transcription factors regulate senescence genes ABA accumulation induced by NCED activates WRKY, HD-Zip and other transcription factors, triggering oxidative stress
      Key genes/proteins ACS/ACO genes (DcACS1, DcACO1), signaling components EIN2,
      DcEIL3-1, transcription factors DcWRKY33, RhERF3
      NCED genes (DcNCED2, DcNCED5), transcription factors TgWRKY75, PlMYB308, oxidase DcRBOHB
      Hormone interactions Antagonizes cytokinin (CTK): promotes CTK O-glucosylation and degradation; synergizes with ABA: activates ABA biosynthesis
      genes via DcWRKY33
      Synergizes with ethylene: activates ethylene biosynthesis genes via RhERF3; antagonizes gibberellin (GA): inhibits GA synthesis and promotes membrane permeability
      Applications in preservation technology 1-MCP (irreversibly binds to ethylene receptors), AVG (inhibits ACS activity), sucrose (suppresses ethylene biosynthesis gene expression) ABA antagonist pyrabactin (inhibits ABA signaling), GA3 (antagonizes ABA effect), sucrose (regulates water and carbon metabolism)

      The synergistic and antagonistic interactions among multiple hormones jointly influence the physiological and biochemical changes during cut flower senescence, further enriching the senescence regulatory network (Fig. 1). In the senescence process of ethylene-sensitive cut flowers, as a key regulatory factor, ethylene can regulate senescence through interactions with hormones such as auxin, abscisic acid, cytokinin, gibberellin, and polyamines, and can also interacts with sugars to jointly regulate the expression of related genes, thereby affecting the senescence of cut flowers[1417]. These complex interaction relationships indicate that cut flower senescence is not a 'solo performance' of a single hormone, but the result of the dynamic balance of a multi-hormone network.

      Figure 1. 

      Network diagram of synergistic and antagonistic effects among different hormones.

      There are still many gaps in the research on the influence of hormones on cut flower senescence, such as the precise action targets of abscisic acid in ethylene-insensitive cut flowers, the quantitative model of multi-hormone interactions, and the practical application effects of preservation technologies based on hormone regulation, all of which need further in-depth exploration. This review examines the regulatory mechanisms and interaction relationships of hormones in cut flower senescence, and discusses their application potential in postharvest preservation, combined with the latest research progress, in order to provide theoretical references for prolonging the lifespan of cut flowers and improving their commercial value.

    • As a gaseous plant hormone, ethylene plays a key role in plant growth and development, stress responses, and the post-harvest shelf life of vegetables, fruits, and flowers[1822]. The ethylene signaling pathway has been deeply studied in plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa[2326]. The biosynthesis and signal transduction of ethylene are two steps of the ethylene response[2729]. Ethylene biosynthesis is initiated by the conversion of methionine to S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM); SAM is then converted to 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) by ACC synthase (ACS). Finally, ACC is oxidized to ethylene by ACC oxidase (ACO). The synthesis step of ACC is generally considered the rate-limiting step of ethylene biosynthesis[29]. The generated ethylene regulates the senescence of cut flowers through signaling pathways such as EIN2 and EIN3[8].

    • The core enzymes of ethylene biosynthesis are ACS and ACO, and the expression levels of their encoding genes directly determine the ethylene production, thereby accelerating the process of senescence.

      Ethylene plays a key role in the petal senescence process of carnations. Removing the pistil does not affect the induction of petal senescence and ethylene production. During senescence, the transcription levels of DcACS1 and DcACO1 genes in petals increase, and ethylene production rises[30,31]. In long-vase-life carnation varieties such as 'Miracle Rouge', 'Miracle Symphony', and 'Sandrosa', as well as the super-long-life carnation line 532-6, they are related to the low expression of ethylene biosynthesis genes DcACS1 and DcACO1, low ethylene production, and different expression patterns of senescence-related genes. Currently, there is a lack of direct research on the specific responses of long-vase-life ethylene-sensitive cultivars such as 'Miracle Rouge' to ABA. It is hypothesized that the low-ethylene environment characteristic of these long vase-life varieties may downregulate the expression of ABA signaling-related genes, thereby weakening the petal response to ABA and consequently delaying senescence[32,33].

      In petunias, the ethylene response element binding factor PhERF71 and the bHLH transcription factor PhFBH4 are upregulated during flower senescence. They directly bind to the promoters of ethylene synthesis genes PhACS4, PhACO4, and PhACS1, respectively, activating the expression of related genes to promote ethylene production, thereby accelerating flower senescence[34,35]. The transcription factor PhHD-Zip is upregulated during flower senescence. Silencing this gene can extend the lifespan of cut flowers by 20%, reduce the transcription of ethylene and related hormone synthesis genes, and lower the expression of senescence-related genes[36].

      PlMYB308 in peonies can specifically bind to the promoter of PlACO1, induce ethylene production, and make ethylene accumulate in leaves; silencing PlMYB308 significantly increases the content of gibberellin in petals, playing a role in delaying senescence[37]. The rehydration treatment of rose cut flowers activates the RhMKK9-RhMPK6-RhACS1 signaling cascade, rapidly inducing ethylene biosynthesis in the pistil, thereby accelerating petal senescence[38]. The flower senescence of tulip 'American Dream' and lily is regulated by ethylene. The expression of ethylene synthesis genes (such as TgACS1/2, TgACO, LbACS, LbACO) is significantly upregulated during senescence, and the ethylene release increases. Exogenous ethylene treatment accelerates senescence, while the inhibitor 1-MCP delays senescence by binding to ethylene receptors and blocking ethylene action[39,40]. Exogenous nitric oxide (NO) treatment of roses can reduce ethylene production by inhibiting the activity of ACO, prolonging the vase life of cut flowers[41].

      In addition, overexpression of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) in transgenic tobacco can enhance ethylene biosynthesis, promote an increase in ethylene production in flowers and upregulation of related gene expression, thereby accelerating flower senescence. This indicates that PI3K plays an important role in the hormone regulation of cut flower senescence by affecting the ethylene signal transduction[42].

    • The ethylene signal transduction takes the 'receptor-CTR1-EIN2-EILs' pathway as the core, and dynamically balances the signal intensity through ubiquitination and degradation, transcriptional regulation, and epigenetic modification, which is the core regulatory network of cut flower senescence.

      As downstream components of the ethylene signaling pathway, Ethylene Responsive Factor (ERF) family proteins play a crucial role in petal senescence by regulating the expression of target genes, and they are differentially regulated in ethylene-sensitive and ethylene-insensitive cut flowers. In petunias, the expression peaks of some PhERF genes (PhERF2-5) are synchronized with the ethylene production peak and the progression of petal senescence, and exogenous ethylene can accelerate their expression[43]. In contrast, in baby's breath (Gypsophila), the expression level of the ethylene response sensor (ERS) is low, and the number of downstream ethylene response factor (ERF) genes is significantly reduced (only 34, much lower than 205 in bananas, and 118 in Arabidopsis), which contributes to its ethylene insensitivity[44].

      Under ethylene induction, DcEBF1/2 in carnations regulates the expression of downstream genes by ubiquitination and degradation of the ethylene signal core transcription factor DcEIL3-1, and DcEIL3-1 can activate the promoters of DcEBF1/2. The two interact to participate in petal senescence regulation[45]. During the senescence process of rose cut flowers, ethylene regulates petal senescence through the synergistic regulation of multiple signaling pathways: inducing the expression of the F-box protein gene RhSAF, and its encoded protein promotes the degradation of the gibberellin receptor RhGID1 as an SCF-type E3 ligase recognition subunit, weakening the gibberellin signal; the calcium signal-related RhCBL4-RhCIPK3 module phosphorylates and promotes the degradation of the jasmonic acid response inhibitor RhJAZ5 under ethylene induction, relieve the inhibition of downstream senescence genes; the protein kinase RhCIPK6 responds to ethylene signals, directly binds to RhCBL3 to activate the expression of downstream senescence genes, and accelerates petal senescence[4648].

      Blocking receptors can effectively delay ethylene-induced cut flower senescence. 1-MCP inhibits ethylene perception by irreversibly binding to the ethylene receptors of carnations (DcETR1, DcERS1). A single treatment can delay, but not completely block, the expression of ethylene synthesis genes (DcACS1, DcACO1) and petal involution senescence, while multiple treatments can continuously inhibit receptor synthesis and ethylene response, extending the vase life by three times, providing a new perspective on receptor regulation for the preservation of ethylene-sensitive cut flowers[49]. The NOP-1 peptide derived from the ethylene signal core regulatory factor EIN2 specifically binds to ethylene receptors and blocks downstream signal transduction, significantly delaying the senescence process of cut flowers such as carnations and roses[50].

      Epigenetic modifications also participate in the regulation of gene expression, including DNA methylation and histone modification, which can activate or inhibit the expression of senescence genes. At the same time, epigenetics and multiple hormones jointly construct a complex regulatory network for petal senescence[51,52]. The histone methyltransferase DcATX1 can positively regulate the expression of ethylene synthesis downstream target genes DcWRKY75, DcACO1, and DcSAG12 by regulating the level of H3K4me3, thereby accelerating ethylene-induced carnation petal senescence[53]. During ethylene-induced carnation petal senescence, the expression of the DNA demethylase DcROS1 decreases, leading to DNA hypermethylation in the promoter region of the amino acid synthesis genes, thereby reducing the accumulation of arginine and branched-chain amino acids and accelerating senescence[54].

      Ethylene can also accelerate the senescence of cut flowers by affecting cell structure. Exogenous ethylene promotes the membrane lipid changes in carnation cut flower petals (increased membrane micro-viscosity and decreased fluidity), causing petal incurvature, increased electrolyte leakage and physiological function decline, accelerating the senescence process[55,56].

    • Transcription factors are the core nodes for ethylene to integrate multiple signals. Genes of the WRKY, NAC, ERF, and other families drive senescence by regulating ethylene synthesis, other hormone metabolism, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation.

      In carnations, a typical ethylene-sensitive cut flower, DcWRKY33 directly binds to the promoter regions of ABA biosynthesis genes (DcNCED2 and DcNCED5) and ROS generation genes (DcRBOHB), activating their expression, thereby synergistically promoting the accumulation of ethylene, ABA, and ROS, forming a positive feedback regulation network, and significantly accelerating the petal senescence process[57]. The ethylene signal core transcription factor DcEIL3-1 directly activates the downstream factor DcWRKY75, jointly promoting the expression of ethylene biosynthesis genes (DcACS1/DcACO1) and senescence-related genes (DcSAG12/DcSAG29), accelerating the senescence process[58]. Further studies have found that DcEIL3-1, DcWRKY75, and DcHB30 form an activation-inhibition interaction network: DcWRKY75 and DcHB30 mutually inhibit each other's expression, while DcEIL3-1 and DcHB30 also antagonize each other, forming a fine balance regulation module, jointly determining the senescence rate mediated by ethylene[59,60]. Studies have also revealed that RhWRKY33 of roses integrates mechanical damage and ethylene signals, positively regulating petal senescence. After silencing, it can delay ethylene and mechanical damage-induced senescence, and down-regulate the expression of RhSAG12. It shows that it plays a core regulatory role in abiotic stress-induced senescence by mediating the hormone interaction network dominated by ethylene[61].

      In the NAC family, the transposon dTdic1 is inserted into the second exon of the ethylene-induced NAC transcription factor gene DcNAP, and a truncated variant DcNAP2 is generated through alternative splicing; DcNAP2 forms a heterodimer with the complete functional variant DcNAP1, inhibiting the transcriptional activation ability of the latter on the ethylene biosynthesis genes DcACS1 and DcACO1, thereby delaying the ethylene signal-mediated carnation petal senescence at the post-transcriptional level[62]. In Japanese petunias, exogenous ethylene can induce the NAC transcription factor EPH1 through the InEIN2-dependent pathway and accelerate the senescence process[63].

      Thirteen ERF genes were cloned from petunias, and their expression patterns were different during flower senescence, and they were regulated by multiple hormones such as ethylene, ABA, and auxin. For example, Group VII PhERF2-PhERF5 is closely related to the increase in ethylene production, and may play an important role in the senescence process of petunia cut flowers[43]. The ethylene response element binding factor PhERF71 is upregulated during petunia flower senescence, and it can directly bind to the promoters of ethylene synthesis genes PhACS4 and PhACO4, promote ethylene biosynthesis, and positively regulate the flower senescence process[34]. While the ethylene response factor RhERF3 in roses directly binds to and activates the promoter of the abscisic acid biosynthesis key gene RhNCED1, promoting the accumulation of endogenous ABA, thereby accelerating ethylene-dependent petal senescence[64].

      The hormonal regulation of cut flower senescence is highly complex, and the synergistic or antagonistic effects among different hormones are achieved through gene expression differences, metabolic pathway intersections, and signal cascade networks for precise regulation. Studies have found that the regulation of flowering by ethylene in cut roses 'Kardinal' and 'Samantha' has varietal differences, and the key mechanism lies in the differences in the transcription levels of ethylene receptor genes (ETR): after ethylene treatment, ETR in 'Samantha' is significantly upregulated, while the expression of ETR in 'Kardinal' remains unchanged, indicating that the differences in the expression of the hormone signaling pathway genes play a core role in the regulation of cut flower senescence[65].

      Ethylene and CTK show an antagonistic effect in the regulation of cut flower senescence, forming an interaction network through metabolic modification and gene expression regulation. In petunias, ethylene promotes the O-glucosylation and degradation inactivation of cytokinins, antagonizing the senescence-delaying effect of cytokinins, and the two jointly regulate the senescence of cut flowers[66]. In roses, ethylene induces the transcription factor RhHB6 to directly activate the expression of RhPR10.1, upregulate the cytokinin metabolism-related genes, and significantly inhibit flower senescence, while the silencing of RhPR10.1 not only reduces the CTK level but also accelerates the expression of senescence marker genes[67].

      The synergistic effect of ethylene and jasmonic acid (JA) is an important mechanism for the regulation of cut flower senescence, and its molecular pathway is mediated by key transcription factors. The R2R3-MYB transcription factor RhMYB108 directly binds to the promoter regions of senescence-related genes SAG113, NAC053, and NAC092 and activates their transcriptional activity, mediating the synergistic regulation of rose petal senescence by ethylene and JA[68]. In addition, the study of the interaction between sugar signals and ethylene shows that the rapid decrease in glucose and fructose content in cut flowers accelerates the induction of DcACS1, DcACO1 expression, and ethylene burst. At the same time, the transcription levels of ethylene signal genes DcEIL1/2 decrease, and the expression of autophagy-related gene DcATG8a increases synchronously with ethylene production, revealing a new mechanism by which sugar starvation accelerates senescence by enhancing ethylene metabolism and autophagy processes[69].

    • The preservation technologies for cut flowers were developed based on hormonal regulation mechanisms that delay senescence by interfering with ethylene biosynthesis and signal transduction. Treatments with spermine, 1% ethanol, and 5% sucrose all delay carnation senescence and prolong their vase life by inhibiting the activity and transcription level of key ethylene synthesis enzymes (ACS and ACO) and reducing ethylene production. Among them, sucrose inhibits the expression of Dc-EIL3, a core transcription factor in the ethylene signaling pathway, thereby blocking the activation of downstream ethylene-responsive genes (such as ACS and ACO)[7073]. NAg treatment can significantly inhibit ethylene production and delay carnation petal senescence. This process is related to NAg inhibiting the expression of ethylene biosynthesis genes (ACS1 and ACO1), petal senescence-related genes (CP1), and ethylene signal transduction positive regulatory genes (EIL1/2, ERS2, EBF1), while upregulating the expression of senescence inhibitory gene CPi[74] (Fig. 2). Ethylene accelerates the opening of rose 'Samantha' flowers by regulating the expression of receptor ETR and CTR genes, and drives the variety-specific senescence (petal abscission/wilting) of dahlias. Its effect is jointly regulated by the developmental stage and the endogenous ethylene production pattern, and the ethylene inhibitor 1-MCP can effectively block this effect[75,76].

      Figure 2. 

      Regulatory network diagram of ethylene-mediated petal senescence in carnation. ACS:1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase; ACO: ACC oxidase; DcEIL3-1: core ethylene-responsive transcription factor (homolog of ethylene-insensitive 3-like 1); DcEBF1/2: homologs of EIN3-binding F-Box protein 1/2; DcROS1: DNA demethylase; DcATX1: histone methyltransferase; DcWRKY33, DcWRKY75: WRKY transcription factors; DcNCED2/5: 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase genes; DcRBOHB: respiratory burst oxidase homolog B; ABA: abscisic acid; DcCARA: carbamoyl-phosphate synthase subunit A; DcDHAD: dihydroxyacid dehydratase; Arg: arginine; BCAAs: branch chain amino acids; DcETR1, DcERS1: ethylene receptors; DcSAG12/29: senescence-associated genes.

    • ABA is an important plant hormone that participates in the regulation of plant growth and development, plays a crucial role in responding to abiotic stresses, inducing stomatal closure, promoting senescence, regulating seed dormancy and germination, etc. At the same time, abscisic acid also has signal cross-interactions with other hormones to jointly coordinate plant growth and stress responses[7780]. N-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) is a key rate-limiting enzyme in ABA biosynthesis[81]. In ethylene-sensitive cut flowers, the role of abscisic acid may be dependent on ethylene; in ethylene-insensitive cut flowers, abscisic acid replaces ethylene as the primary hormone for senescence[6,8].

      For ethylene-insensitive flowers, when the flowers of Calendula officinalis transition from the fully open stage (Stage IV) to the senescence stage (Stage V), the ABA content in petal tissues increases significantly, with the highest ABA content observed in senescent petal tissues. In contrast, ethylene content does not show a significant increase across various developmental stages, and there is no significant difference between the senescence stage V and the fully open stage IV[82]. It is reasonable to hypothesize that in ethylene-insensitive flowers, the expression of genes related to the ABA pathway may occur more rapidly than that of the ethylene pathway; however, relevant reports remain scarce. In the future, time-series transcriptome analysis can be performed on the senescence process of ethylene-insensitive species to monitor the expression dynamics of key genes in the ABA pathway (NCED, WRKY75) and the ethylene pathway (ACS, ACO, ERF). Combined with verification using real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), the occurrence time of expression peaks and the upregulation rates of these two types of genes can be compared to clarify their temporal differences during the senescence process.

    • A variety of transcription factors become key nodes for ABA to regulate senescence by regulating ABA synthesis or signaling genes. During the senescence of tulip petals, the content of ABA increases significantly, and the HD-Zip transcription factor TgHB12-like positively regulates the petal senescence process by upregulating the expression of the senescence-related gene TgSAG6[83]. Exogenous application of ABA to tulips induces the expression of the transcription factor TgWRKY75, which directly binds to and activates the transcription of the ABA synthesis-related gene TgNCED3, increases ABA accumulation, and promotes petal senescence[84]. Blue light significantly delays the senescence of carnation cut flowers and prolongs the vase life by 33% by inhibiting the expression of ethylene biosynthesis genes DcACS1 and DcACO1 and upregulating ABA biosynthesis and transport-related genes DcZEP1, DcNCED1, and DcABCG40[85]. In peonies, the PlMYB308 transcription factor directly activates the promoter of the ethylene biosynthesis gene PlACO1, promotes the accumulation of ethylene and ABA, and inhibits the synthesis of GA, thereby accelerating petal senescence[86]. The PlZFP gene specifically regulates ABA biosynthesis by targeting PlNCED2, positively regulating the flower senescence process[87].

    • ABA has both promoting and delaying effects on the regulation of cut flower senescence, and realizes the fine regulation of the senescence process through hormone interactions, signal transduction, and antioxidant mechanisms.

      During the natural senescence process of the leaves of the Asiatic lily 'Courier', the content of ABA increases, and dark treatment can accelerate ABA accumulation and induce leaf premature senescence; exogenous spraying of ABA promotes leaf senescence, and its antagonist pyrabactin delays chlorophyll degradation and photosystem II inactivation by inhibiting ABA signals, playing a role in delaying senescence[88]. DcWRKY33 and ethylene response factor RhERF3 directly bind to the promoter regions of ABA biosynthesis genes (DcNCED2, DcNCED5, and RhNCED1), activate their expression, promote the accumulation of endogenous ABA, and form a positive feedback regulation network to accelerate ethylene-dependent petal senescence[57,64].

      Studies have found that ABA induces the synthesis of NO, synergistically inhibits stomatal opening, reduces water loss, and activates the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), maintains chlorophyll content, and thus delays the senescence of rose cut flowers[89]. In rose petals, the ABA signaling pathway directly activates the expression of the ferritin gene RhFer1 through the transcription factor RhABF2, regulates iron ion homeostasis, and reduces dehydration-induced oxidative stress, thereby enhancing the dehydration tolerance of petals; at the same time, the RhABF2/RhFer1 module works together with iron transport genes to delay the natural senescence process[90].

    • The synergistic effect of ABA and ethylene is one of the core pathways for the regulation of cut flower senescence, and the two form a positive feedback loop through the gene expression network mediated by transcription factors. The transcription factor DcWRKY33 can promote the accumulation of ethylene, ABA, and ROS, forming a synergistic network that accelerates carnation petal senescence[57]. The ethylene response factor RhERF3 directly binds to and activates the promoter of the abscisic acid biosynthesis key gene RhNCED1, promotes the accumulation of endogenous ABA, and thus accelerates the ethylene-dependent petal senescence of roses[64]. ABA can also accelerate senescence by promoting ethylene synthesis and enhancing the sensitivity of carnations to ethylene, while the ethylene synthesis inhibitor AVG can completely offset the senescence-promoting effect of ABA[91]. However, in ethylene-insensitive flowers, existing studies have primarily focused on the regulatory role of ABA as the main hormone in senescence, while the antagonistic interaction mechanism between ABA and ethylene remains underexplored. However, in Arabidopsis thaliana, abscisic acid and ethylene exert antagonistic effects on seed germination and post-germinative seedling growth, with their antagonism enhanced through mutual regulation of metabolism and signal transduction. In the aba2 mutant, the key ethylene synthesis gene ACO is upregulated, suggesting that ABA may inhibit ethylene synthesis; in the ein2 mutant, the key ABA synthesis gene NCED3 is upregulated, indicating that ethylene signaling can suppress ABA synthesis[92]. Given that plant hormone interaction mechanisms are generally conserved across species, it is hypothesized that similar mechanisms may exist in ethylene-insensitive flowers. Future studies could employ transcriptome sequencing to screen for genes in ethylene-insensitive flowers that respond to both ABA and ethylene, and examine whether these genes mediate their antagonistic signals.

      The dynamic balance between ABA and GA plays a key regulatory role in the senescence of cut flowers. In ethylene-insensitive gladiolus, the content of endogenous ABA significantly accumulates with the natural senescence of petals. Exogenous ABA treatment accelerates the senescence process by enhancing membrane permeability, reducing water absorption, and fresh weight, while GA3 can restore membrane stability and prolong the vase life by antagonizing the effect of ABA[93]. Similarly, exogenous application of ABA (10–100 μM) significantly shortens the vase life of 'Dutch Master' daffodil cut flowers, and GA3 can also antagonize the effect of ABA to delay senescence[94]. Studies have also shown that silencing the PlZFP gene can reduce the levels of ethylene and ABA and increase the content of GA, thereby delaying the senescence of peony flowers[87].

      In addition, ABA and sucrose have an antagonistic effect on cut flower senescence, and synergistically delay the senescence of Eustoma and 'Super Star' rose cut flowers by regulating water balance and carbon metabolism pathways, providing a new strategy mechanism for the preservation of cut flowers[95,96].

    • GA plays a role in the regulation of flower senescence through transcription factor interactions and metabolic dynamic balance. The bZIP transcription factor PhOBF1 of petunia can specifically bind to the promoter of the GA biosynthesis gene PhGA20ox3, regulate the accumulation of active GA, and negatively regulate the ethylene-mediated flower senescence[97]. During the senescence of rose petals, ABA, and ethylene induce the expression of RhHB1, which in turn inhibits the expression of the GA biosynthesis gene RhGA20ox1, reduces the level of active GA, and promotes petal senescence[98]. In peonies, the upregulation of the expression of gibberellin degradation genes PoGA2ox1 and PoGA2ox8.1 reduces the level of active gibberellin and accelerates flower senescence[99]. In addition, studies on 'White Prosperity' gladiolus show that soaking bulbs in benzyl adenine (BA, 200 mg/L) and gibberellin (GA3, 100 mg/L) before harvesting can increase the content of soluble sugars, proteins, and chlorophyll in petals and leaves, delay protein degradation and chlorophyll decomposition, extend the vase life to 11 d, and significantly improve the quality of cut flowers[100].

    • CTK shows bidirectional effects of delaying and promoting in the regulation of cut flower senescence, and its function is realized through hormone interactions, gene expression regulation, and tissue-specific responses. CTK can delay senescence by inhibiting chlorophyll degradation, activating antioxidant enzymes (such as CAT, APX, SOD), and upregulating photosynthesis-related genes (such as CAB, RBCS). Its synthetic derivatives (such as TDZ, 3F-BAPR) have better anti-aging activity than natural CTK due to their structural stability and receptor affinity advantages[101].

    • In petunias, exogenous application of the cytokinin analog 6-benzylaminopurine (BA) can significantly prolong the vase life of cut flowers by inhibiting the expression of ethylene biosynthesis genes (such as PhACS, PhACO) and receptor genes (such as PhERS1, PhETR2)[102]. Exogenous application of kinetin (5–10 μg/mL) to carnations prolongs the vase life of cut flowers by reducing the ethylene peak production (by more than 55%), delaying the occurrence time of the ethylene peak, and reducing the sensitivity of flowers to ethylene[103]. Studies have also shown that CTK pretreatment of carnation petals can inhibit ethylene synthesis through multiple pathways, and there are tissue-specific responses to CTK between leaves and petals[56]. The ethylene response transcription factor RhERF113 positively regulates the expression of CTK biosynthesis genes (such as RhIPT5, RhIPT8) and signaling pathway-related genes (RhHK2, RhHK3, RhCRR3/5/8), significantly increasing the content of isopentenyladenosine (iPA) in rose petals, and playing a role in delaying senescence[104].

    • During the senescence of rose cut flowers, CTK accumulates in the petal abscission zone as a promoter of petal abscission, and CK-induced RhLOL1 interacts with the bHLH transcription factor RhILR3 to activate the expression of Aux/IAA genes, thereby accelerating petal abscission[105]. The RhNAP transcription factor directly activates the CTK oxidase gene RhCKX6, promotes CTK degradation, enhances dehydration tolerance by reducing CTK levels in young petals, and accelerates senescence in mature petals. This process interacts with ABA signals and is independent of stomatal regulation[106].

    • The content and activity of endogenous CTK in the young petals of the long-life rose variety 'Lovita' are significantly higher than those of the short-life variety 'Golden Wave', indicating that the difference in CTK content may be one of the reasons for the different life spans between varieties[107]. Application of a GA and CTK compound agent 1 d after flowering of the lily 'White Heaven' can prolong the vase life by more than 2 d, and the treatment after 4 d and later is ineffective. Along with the decrease in the content of endogenous active CTK (IPA) and the late increase in ABA, it indicates that the dynamic balance between hormones and the timing change of tissue sensitivity regulates senescence, and there is a key time node for hormone intervention[108].

    • The auxin-sucrose module plays an important role in cut flower senescence by regulating carbon distribution and hormone signal interactions. Auxin maintains the transport of sucrose to the petals by directly activating the expression of the sucrose transporter RhSUC2, inhibits ethylene sensitivity, and delays rose petal abscission; exogenous application of auxin or sucrose can significantly delay the abscission process induced by ethylene[109].

    • SA has both delaying and promoting effects in the regulation of cut flower senescence, and its function is closely related to the treatment timing, plant species, and molecular regulation network. In Eustoma cut flowers, 0.5 mM SA treatment during the reproductive period using a hydroponic method can significantly prolong the vase life of some varieties (such as 'Blue Picote' and 'Kroma White')[110]. The tulip NAC transcription factor TgNAP directly activates the transcription of SA biosynthesis genes TgICS1 and TgPAL1, and inhibits the expression of ROS scavenging-related genes TgPOD12 and TgPOD17, dual-regulates the accumulation of SA and the dynamic balance of ROS, thereby positively mediating the petal senescence process, confirming that it plays a core hub role in the cut flower senescence regulation network by integrating SA signals and oxidative stress pathways[111].

    • The regulation of cut flower senescence by plant hormones is a complex network mechanism. As the core regulatory factor for the senescence of ethylene-sensitive cut flowers (such as carnations and roses), ethylene catalyzes the biosynthesis of ethylene by activating the expression of ACS and ACO genes, and regulates petal senescence-related genes through signaling pathways such as EIN2 and EIN3. Its role involves the coordination of transcription factors (such as ERF, WRKY families), epigenetic modifications (DNA methylation, histone modification), and cell structure damage (membrane lipid changes, electrolyte leakage). In ethylene-insensitive cut flowers (such as chrysanthemums and lilies), ABA replaces ethylene as the dominant hormone for senescence, driving senescence by regulating the synthesis genes of NCED and interacting with GA and CTK.

      Differences in the expression levels and activities of ethylene biosynthesis-related genes (ACS, ACO) can indirectly affect ethylene sensitivity. A study on 33 rose cultivars with varying ethylene sensitivity revealed that the transcriptional abundance of RhACO1 in roses is significantly correlated with ethylene sensitivity and vase life[112]. In the ethylene signaling pathway, alterations in the expression or sequence of ethylene receptors can partially account for the differences in ethylene sensitivity among different species and cultivars[6]. There are differences in the expression levels of receptor genes between short-lived and long-lived rose cultivars[65,113]. Meanwhile, differences in the expression and function of downstream transcription factors (such as EIN3, EILs, and ERFs) can also influence ethylene sensitivity. A 7-bp frameshift mutation in the EIN3-like2 (EIL2) gene in Campanula leads to ethylene insensitivity in floral organs[114].

      In addition, multi-hormone interactions, sugar signals, ROS, and other factors jointly participate in senescence regulation. At present, preservation technologies based on hormonal regulation (such as 1-MCP inhibiting ethylene signals and sucrose maintaining sugar levels) have been applied in some cut flowers, but the ABA action targets of ethylene-insensitive cut flowers, the quantitative model of multi-hormone interactions, and the broad-spectrum nature of preservation technologies still need in-depth study.

      With the continuous development of artificial intelligence (AI), it is expected to develop a cut flower senescence prediction model based on machine learning in the future, combined with physiological indicators such as real-time monitored ethylene/ABA concentration and sugar content, to dynamically optimize the preservative formula. At the same time, AI can be used to design new molecular inhibitors, and screen small-molecule compounds targeting ethylene receptors (such as DcETR1) or ABA synthases (NCED) through structural biology simulation to improve preservation efficiency.

      • This work was supported by the National Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops (Grant No. Horti-3Y-2024-015), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos 2662025YLPY006, 2662023PY023, and 2662019PY049), the Knowledge Innovation Program of Wuhan-Basic Research (Grant No. 2023020201010106), the Thousand Youth Talents Plan Project and the Start-up Funding from Huazhong Agricultural University to FZ, and by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos 2662025YLPY008 and 2662023PY011), the Young Scientist Fostering Funds for the National Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops (Grant No. Horti-PY-2023-001), and the Yunnan Xingdian Talents-Special Selection Project for High-level Scientific and Technological Talents and Innovation Teams-Team Specific Project (Grant No. 202505AS350021).

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: study conception and design, project supervision, manuscript editing: Zhang F; draft manuscript preparation: Yao H; manuscript review and suggestions: Zhong L, Luo J, Cheng Y, Bao M. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Chongqing University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (1) References (114)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Yao H, Zhong L, Luo J, Cheng Y, Bao M, et al. 2025. Molecular mechanisms and research advances of plant hormone regulation in cut flower senescence. Plant Hormones 1: e020 doi: 10.48130/ph-0025-0021
    Yao H, Zhong L, Luo J, Cheng Y, Bao M, et al. 2025. Molecular mechanisms and research advances of plant hormone regulation in cut flower senescence. Plant Hormones 1: e020 doi: 10.48130/ph-0025-0021

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return