Search
2026 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in forest ecosystems with the globalization of nitrogen deposition

  • # Authors contributed equally: Xiankai Lu, Xiaomin Zhu, Weibin Chen
    Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Received: 05 November 2025
    Revised: 12 December 2025
    Accepted: 12 January 2026
    Published online: 28 February 2026
    Nitrogen Cycling  2 Article number: e015 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Anthropogenic N deposition has substantially altered terrestrial N cycling at global scale, and human interference with the N cycle has exceeded the safe operating space for humanity.

    The hotspots of N deposition have shifted from developed regions to developing ones.

    Despite a global decline in atmospheric N deposition, levels remain high in developing countries, where accumulated N deposition is projected to further increase in the future.

    Forest soils act as a significant sink for atmospheric N deposition, which can accelerate soil carbon sequestration, regardless of ecosystem N status and climate zones.

    Nitrogen biogeochemical cycling has evolved from the exploration of phenomena and processes to the in-depth elucidation of mechanisms and multi-element coupling in the context of global change.

  • Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient for living organisms and a key limiting factor in ecosystem productivity, influencing both ecosystem structure and function. Over the past fifty years, increased anthropogenic N deposition has substantially altered terrestrial N cycling, resulting in cascading effects such as soil acidification, nutrient imbalances, changes in carbon sequestration, and impacts on biodiversity within forest ecosystems. While previous reviews have examined specific aspects of N deposition, few have systematically integrated multi-scale interactions between global N deposition patterns and the entire N biogeochemical cycle in forests. This review provides a comprehensive overview of research progress on forest N biogeochemical cycling in the context of globalized N deposition. Key topics include N deposition dynamics, changes in forest N status and stocks, and critical N-cycling processes, including biological N fixation, mineralization, nitrification, assimilation, and loss pathways. The review also traces the historical development of N cycling research, identifying three distinct stages since the 1860s. In addition, it examines underlying mechanisms, including microbial transformations and plant–soil interactions, and highlights theoretical advances in forest N cycling. By integrating patterns, processes, and mechanisms, this review enhances understanding of ecosystem responses to anthropogenic N enrichment and identifies critical research directions to address these challenges under global change.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • [1] Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, et al. 2004. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70(2):153−226 doi: 10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Aber J, McDowell W, Nadelhoffer K, Magill A, Berntson G, et al. 1998. Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems: hypotheses revisited. BioScience 48:921−934 doi: 10.2307/1313296

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, et al. 2008. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320:889−892 doi: 10.1126/science.1136674

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Lu X, Mao Q, Gilliam FS, Luo Y, Mo J. 2014. Nitrogen deposition contributes to soil acidification in tropical ecosystems. Global Change Biology 20:3790−3801 doi: 10.1111/gcb.12665

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855 doi: 10.1126/science.1259855

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Levy-Booth DJ, Prescott CE, Grayston SJ. 2014. Microbial functional genes involved in nitrogen fixation, nitrification and denitrification in forest ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 75:11−25 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Pajares S, Bohannan BJM. 2016. Ecology of nitrogen fixing, nitrifying, and denitrifying microorganisms in tropical forest soils. Frontiers in Microbiology 7:1045 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Du E, Xia N, Tang Y, Guo Z, Guo Y, et al. 2022. Anthropogenic and climatic shaping of soil nitrogen properties across urban-rural-natural forests in the Beijing metropolitan region. Geoderma 406:115524 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115524

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Cheng Y, Wang J, Chang SX, Cai Z, Müller C, et al. 2019. Nitrogen deposition affects both net and gross soil nitrogen transformations in forest ecosystems: a review. Environmental Pollution 244:608−616 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Zhu X, Zhang W, Chen H, Mo J. 2015. Impacts of nitrogen deposition on soil nitrogen cycle in forest ecosystems: a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica 35(3):35−43 doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2015.04.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Ackerman D, Millet DB, Chen X. 2019. Global estimates of inorganic nitrogen deposition across four decades. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 33:100−107 doi: 10.1029/2018GB005990

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Dentener F, Drevet J, Lamarque JF, Bey I, Eickhout B, et al. 2006. Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: a multimodel evaluation. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 20:2005GB002672 doi: 10.1029/2005GB002672

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] NADP. 2000. National Atmospheric Deposition Program Annual Data Summary: Precipitation Chemistry in the United States. University of Illinois, Champaign, NADP Program Office, Illinois State Water Survey. https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/1007486-the-national-atmospheric-deposition-program-nadp.html
    [14] Zhu J, Jia Y, Yu G, Wang Q, He N, et al. 2025. Changing patterns of global nitrogen deposition driven by socio-economic development. Nature Communications 16:46 doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55606-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Guo Y, Zhao H, Winiwarter W, Chang J, Wang X, et al. 2024. Aspirational nitrogen interventions accelerate air pollution abatement and ecosystem protection. Science Advances 10:eado0112 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado0112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Du E, de Vries W, Galloway JN, Hu X, Fang J. 2014. Changes in wet nitrogen deposition in the United States between 1985 and 2012. Environmental Research Letters 9(9):095004 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/095004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Engardt M, Simpson D, Schwikowski M, Granat L. 2017. Deposition of sulphur and nitrogen in Europe 1900−2050. Model calculations and comparison to historical observations. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 69(1):1328945 doi: 10.1080/16000889.2017.1328945

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Gilliam FS, Burns DA, Driscoll CT, Frey SD, Lovett GM, et al. 2019. Decreased atmospheric nitrogen deposition in eastern North America: predicted responses of forest ecosystems. Environmental Pollution 244:560−574 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.135

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Wen Z, Xu W, Li Q, Han M, Tang A, et al. 2020. Changes of nitrogen deposition in China from 1980 to 2018. Environment International 144:106022 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Liu X, Zhang Y, Han W, Tang A, Shen J, et al. 2013. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494(7438):459−462 doi: 10.1038/nature11917

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Liu L, Wen Z, Liu S, Zhang X, Liu X. 2024. Decline in atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China between 2010 and 2020. Nature Geoscience 17:733−736 doi: 10.1038/s41561-024-01484-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Yu G, Jia Y, He N, Zhu J, Chen Z, et al. 2019. Stabilization of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China over the past decade. Nature Geoscience 12:424−429 doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0352-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Liu L, Zhang X, Xu W, Liu X, Li Y, et al. 2017. Temporal characteristics of atmospheric ammonia and nitrogen dioxide over China based on emission data, satellite observations and atmospheric transport modeling since 1980. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 17:9365−9378 doi: 10.5194/acp-17-9365-2017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Payne RJ, Dise NB, Stevens CJ, Gowing DJ, Partners B, et al. 2013. Impact of nitrogen deposition at the species level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(3):984−987 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214299109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Groffman PM, Rosi EJ, Fulweiler RW. 2021. Chapter 8-The nitrogen cycle. In Fundamentals of Ecosystem Science, eds Weathers KC, Strayer DL, Likens GE. 2nd ed. US: Academic Press. pp. 161−188. www.sciencedirect.com/book/edited-volume/9780128127629/fundamentals-of-ecosystem-science
    [26] Ken T. 2019. The nitrogen cycle: a large, fast, and mystifying cycle. Microbes and Environments 34:223−225 doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME3403rh

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Ma X, Wang T, Shi Z, Chiariello NR, Docherty K, et al. 2022. Long-term nitrogen deposition enhances microbial capacities in soil carbon stabilization but reduces network complexity. Microbiome 10:112 doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01309-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Tang B, Rocci KS, Lehmann A, Rillig MC. 2023. Nitrogen increases soil organic carbon accrual and alters its functionality. Global Change Biology 29:1971−1983 doi: 10.1111/gcb.16588

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Peng X, Wei W, Niu S, Huang Y, Chen L. 2025. Divergent impact of long-term anthropogenic nitrogen inputs on global particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon. Ecological Processes 14:56 doi: 10.1186/s13717-025-00624-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Sun ZC, Xu SQ, Guo HR, Hu CC, Song W, et al. 2025. Atmospheric N deposition as a key driver of soil nitrate production and accumulation in temperate forests under semi-arid climate. Geophysical Research Letters 52:e2025GL117029 doi: 10.1029/2025GL117029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Aber JD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Steudler P, Steudler P, Melillo JM. 1989. Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosystems. BioScience 39(6):378−386 doi: 10.2307/1311067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Gundersen P, Emmett BA, Kjønaas OJ, Koopmans CJ, Tietema A. 1998. Impact of nitrogen deposition on nitrogen cycling in forests: a synthesis of NITREX data. Forest Ecology and Management 101:37−56 doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00124-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Phoenix GK, Emmett BA, Britton AJ, Caporn SJM, Dise NB, et al. 2012. Impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition: responses of multiple plant and soil parameters across contrasting ecosystems in long-term field experiments. Global Change Biology 18:1197−1215 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02590.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Gurmesa GA, Lu X, Gundersen P, Mao Q, Zhou K, et al. 2016. High retention of 15N-labeled nitrogen deposition in a nitrogen saturated old-growth tropical forest. Global Change Biology 22(11):3608−3620 doi: 10.1111/gcb.13327

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Bauters M, Verbeeck H, Rütting T, Baethel M, Bazirake Mujinya B, et al. 2019. Contrasting nitrogen fluxes in African tropical forests of the Congo Basin. Ecological Monographs 89:e01342 doi: 10.1002/ecm.1342

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Houle D, Renaudin M, Moore JD, Duchesne L. 2024. Black spruce boreal forest soil solution inorganic nitrogen is highly resilient to 20 years of elevated nitrogen deposition. Biogeochemistry 168:2 doi: 10.1007/s10533-024-01190-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Cui N, Zhao Y, Sun F, Wang M, Guo J, et al. 2021. Elevated temperature and nitrogen deposition did not affect the impacts of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil carbon or nitrogen stocks in a temperate meadow. Ecological Indicators 131:108209 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108209

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Köchy M, Wilson SD. 2001. Nitrogen deposition and forest expansion in the northern Great Plains. Journal of Ecology 89:807−817 doi: 10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00600.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Yang Y, Yang J, Dong Q, Li D, Tan B, et al. 2024. Heavy nitrogen application rate and long-term duration decrease the soil organic carbon and nitrogen sequestration rates in forest ecosystems. Forests 15:1585 doi: 10.3390/f15091585

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Gurmesa GA, Wang A, Li S, Peng S, de Vries W, et al. 2022. Retention of deposited ammonium and nitrate and its impact on the global forest carbon sink. Nature Communications 13: 880 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28345-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Templer PH, Mack MC, Chapin FS 3rd, Christenson LM, Compton JE, et al. 2012. Sinks for nitrogen inputs in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta-analysis of 15N tracer field studies. Ecology 93(8):1816−1829 doi: 10.1890/11-1146.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Lu X, Vitousek PM, Mao Q, Gilliam FS, Luo Y, et al. 2021. Nitrogen deposition accelerates soil carbon sequestration in tropical forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118: e2020790118 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020790118

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Davies-Barnard T, Friedlingstein P. 2020. The global distribution of biological nitrogen fixation in terrestrial natural ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 34:e2019GB006387 doi: 10.1029/2019GB006387

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Reis Ely CR, Perakis SS, Cleveland CC, Menge DN, Reed SC, et al. 2025. Global terrestrial nitrogen fixation and its modification by agriculture. Nature 643:705−711 doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09201-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Menge DN, Batterman SA, Hedin LO, Liao W, Pacala SW, et al. 2017. Why are nitrogen-fixing trees rare at higher compared to lower latitudes? Ecology 98:3127−3140 doi: 10.1002/ecy.2034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Bytnerowicz TA, Akana PR, Griffin KL, Menge DNL. 2022. Temperature sensitivity of woody nitrogen fixation across species and growing temperatures. Nature Plants 8(3):209−216 doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01090-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Vitousek PM, Menge DNL, Reed SC, Cleveland CC. 2013. Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series b, Biological Sciences 368:20130119 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Zheng M, Zhou Z, Luo Y, Zhao P, Mo J. 2019. Global pattern and controls of biological nitrogen fixation under nutrient enrichment: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology 25:3018−3030 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14705

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Zheng M, Xu M, Li D, Deng Q, Mo J. 2023. Negative responses of terrestrial nitrogen fixation to nitrogen addition weaken across increased soil organic carbon levels. Science of The Total Environment 877:162965 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162965

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Fu R, Ge D, Li J, Yu Y, Qian Z, et al. 2025. Nitrogen deposition reshapes biological nitrogen fixation and soil diazotrophic communities across urban and rural forests. CATENA 256:109101 doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2025.109101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang M, Wang K, Meng F, et al. 2021. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition: a review of quantification methods and its spatial pattern derived from the global monitoring networks. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 216:112180 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112180

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Davidson EA, Keller M, Erickson HE, Verchot LV, Veldkamp E. 2000. Testing a conceptual model of soil emissions of nitrous and nitric oxides. BioScience 50:667–680 doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0667:tacmos]2.0.co;2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Zhang J, Cai Z, Müller C. 2018. Terrestrial N cycling associated with climate and plant-specific N preferences: a review. European Journal of Soil Science 69:488−501 doi: 10.1111/ejss.12533

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Elrys AS, Zhu Q, Jiang C, Liu J, Sobhy HH, et al. 2023. Global soil nitrogen cycle pattern and nitrogen enrichment effects: tropical versus subtropical forests. Global Change Biology 29:1905−1921 doi: 10.1111/gcb.16603

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Schulte A, Ruhiyat D. 1998. Soils of tropical forest ecology ecosystems: characteristics, ecology and management. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03649-5
    [56] Zhang, LM, Hu HW, Shen JP, He JZ. 2012. Ammonia-oxidizing archaea have more important role than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in ammonia oxidation of strongly acidic soils. The ISME Journal 6(5):1032−1045 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.168

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Corre MD, Veldkamp E, Arnold J, Wright SJ. 2010. Impact of elevated N input on soil N cycling and losses in old-growth lowland and montane forests in Panama. Ecology 91(6):1715−1729 doi: 10.1890/09-0274.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Rütting T, Boeckx P, Müller C, Klemedtsson L. 2011. Assessment of the importance of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium for the terrestrial nitrogen cycle. Biogeosciences 8:1779−1791 doi: 10.5194/bg-8-1779-2011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Zhu J, Jansen-Willems A, Müller C, Dörsch P. 2021. Topographic differences in nitrogen cycling mediate nitrogen retention in a subtropical, N-saturated forest catchment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 159:108303 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108303

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Yao H, Gao Y, Nicol GW, Campbell CD, Prosser JI, et al. 2011. Links between ammonia oxidizer community structure, abundance, and nitrification potential in acidic soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 77(13):4618−4625 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00136-11

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Janssens IA, Luyssaert S. 2009. Nitrogen's carbon bonus. Nature Geoscience 2(5):318−319 doi: 10.1038/ngeo505

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Liao K, Lai X, Zhu Q. 2021. Soil δ15N is a better indicator of ecosystem nitrogen cycling than plant δ15N: a meta-analysis. SOIL 7:733−742 doi: 10.5194/soil-7-733-2021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Zeng Y, Xiang W, Deng X, Fang X, Liu C, et al. 2014. Soil N forms and gross transformation rates in Chinese subtropical forests dominated by different tree species. Plant and Soil 384:231−242 doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2206-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Leff JW, Jones SE, Prober SM, Barberán A, Borer ET. 2015. Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112:10967−10972 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508382112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Phillips RP, Brzostek E, Midgley MG. 2013. The mycorrhizal-associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon-nutrient couplings in temperate forests. New Phytologist 199:41−51 doi: 10.1111/nph.12221

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Gao W, Yang H, Kou L, Li S. 2015. Effects of nitrogen deposition and fertilization on N transformations in forest soils: a review. Journal of Soils and Sediments 15:863−879 doi: 10.1007/s11368-015-1064-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Cheng Y, Wang J, Wang J, Wang S, Chang SX, et al. 2020. Nitrogen deposition differentially affects soil gross nitrogen transformations in organic and mineral horizons. Earth-Science Reviews 201:103033 doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.103033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Song L, Li Z, Niu S. 2021. Global soil gross nitrogen transformation under increasing nitrogen deposition. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 35:e2020GB006711 doi: 10.1029/2020GB006711

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Elrys AS, Chen Z, Wang J, Uwiragiye Y, Helmy AM, et al. 2022. Global patterns of soil gross immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology 28:4472−4488 doi: 10.1111/gcb.16202

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Han X, Shen W, Zhang J, Müller C. 2018. Microbial adaptation to long-term N supply prevents large responses in N dynamics and N losses of a subtropical forest. Science of The Total Environment 626:1175−1187 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Tang Y, Yu G, Zhang X, Wang Q, Tian D, et al. 2019. Environmental variables better explain changes in potential nitrification and denitrification activities than microbial properties in fertilized forest soils. Science of The Total Environment 647:653−662 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.437

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Chen WB, Peng SL. 2020. Land-use legacy effects shape microbial contribution to N2O production in three tropical forests. Geoderma 358:113979 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113979

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Song L, Tian P, Zhang J, Jin G. 2017. Effects of three years of simulated nitrogen deposition on soil nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in a Korean pine plantation of Northeast China. Science of The Total Environment 609:1303−1311 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Liu L, Greaver TL. 2009. A review of nitrogen enrichment effects on three biogenic GHGs: the CO2 sink may be largely offset by stimulated N2O and CH4 emission. Ecology Letters 12:1103−1117 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01351.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Zhang Y, Zhang F, Abalos D, Luo Y, Hui D, et al. 2022. Stimulation of ammonia oxidizer and denitrifier abundances by nitrogen loading: poor predictability for increased soil N2O emission. Global Change Biology 28:2158−2168 doi: 10.1111/gcb.16042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Cen X, Müller C, Kang X, Zhou X, Zhang J, et al. 2024. Nitrogen deposition contributed to a global increase in nitrous oxide emissions from forest soils. Communications Earth & Environment 5:532 doi: 10.1038/s43247-024-01647-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Tang W, Chen D, Phillips OL, Liu X, Zhou Z, et al. 2018. Effects of long-term increased N deposition on tropical montane forest soil N2 and N2O emissions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 126:194−203 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Fang Y, Gundersen P, Mo J, Zhu W. 2009. Nitrogen leaching in response to increased nitrogen inputs in subtropical monsoon forests in Southern China. Forest Ecology and Management 257:332−342 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Huang Y, Kang R, Mulder J, Zhang T, Duan L. 2015. Nitrogen saturation, soil acidification, and ecological effects in a subtropical pine forest on acid soil in southwest China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 120:2457−2472 doi: 10.1002/2015JG003048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Song L, Zhang J, Müller C, Jin G. 2019. Responses of soil N transformations and N loss to three years of simulated N deposition in a temperate Korean pine plantation in Northeast China. Applied Soil Ecology 137:49−56 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.01.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Peng Y, Wang T, Ao J, Liu X, Herath S, et al. 2023. The stimulation effect of nitrogen-addition on soil nitrogen leaching weakens over time in an Alpine forest. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 128:e2023JG007504 doi: 10.1029/2023JG007504

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Tian D, Du E, Jiang L, Ma S, Zeng W. 2018. Responses of forest ecosystems to increasing N deposition in China: a critical review. Environmental Pollution 243:75−86
    [83] Wang J, Shi X, Zheng C, Suter H, Huang Z. 2021. Different responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to nitrogen deposition in a subtropical forest. Science of The Total Environment 755:142449 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142449

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Cao M, Zheng X, Cui L, Wu F, Gao H, et al. 2023. Soil bacterial communities are more sensitive to short-term nitrogen deposition than fungal communities in subtropical Chinese fir forests. Forest Ecology and Management 549:121490 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121490

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Liu L, Greaver TL. 2010. A global perspective on belowground carbon dynamics under nitrogen enrichment. Ecology Letters 13:819−828 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01482.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Xing W, Lu X, Ying J, Lan Z, Chen D, et al. 2022. Disentangling the effects of nitrogen availability and soil acidification on microbial taxa and soil carbon dynamics in natural grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 164:108495 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108495

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Fierer N, Lauber CL, Ramirez KS, Zaneveld J, Bradford MA, et al. 2012. Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic, and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. The ISME Journal 6:1007−1017 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Ramirez KS, Craine JM, Fierer N. 2012. Consistent effects of nitrogen amendments on soil microbial communities and processes across biomes. Global Change Biology 18(6):1918−1927 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02639.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Wang C, Lu X, Mori T, Mao Q, Zhou K, et al. 2018. Responses of soil microbial community to continuous experimental nitrogen additions for 13 years in a nitrogen-rich tropical forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 121:103−112 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Jian S, Li J, Chen J, Wang G, Mayes MA, et al. 2016. Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: a meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 101:32−43 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Xu H, Qu Q, Li G, Liu G, Geissen V, et al. 2022. Impact of nitrogen addition on plant-soil-enzyme C-N-P stoichiometry and microbial nutrient limitation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 170:108714 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108714

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Chen W, Su F, Nie Y, Zhong B, Zheng Y, et al. 2022. Divergent responses of soil microbial functional groups to long-term high nitrogen presence in the tropical forests. Science of The Total Environment 821:153251 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153251

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] You L, Ros GH, Chen Y, Yang X, Cui Z, et al. 2022. Global meta-analysis of terrestrial nitrous oxide emissions and associated functional genes under nitrogen addition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 165:108523 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Tang Y, Jia Y, Zhang S, Zhang Y. 2024. Impact of nitrogen and phosphorus amendments on nitrogen-cycling microbial abundances and potentials: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Soil Science 75:e13585 doi: 10.1111/ejss.13585

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Li J, Wang G, Yan B, Liu G. 2020. The responses of soil nitrogen transformation to nitrogen addition are mainly related to the changes in functional gene relative abundance in artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forests. Science of The Total Environment 723:137679 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137679

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Dong J, Zhang J, Liu Y, Jing H. 2022. How climate and soil properties affect the abundances of nitrogen-cycling genes in nitrogen-treated ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Plant and Soil 477:389−404 doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05420-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] el Zahar Haichar F, Santaella C, Heulin T, Achouak W. 2014. Root exudates mediated interactions belowground. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 77:69−80 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.06.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Coskun D, Britto DT, Shi W, Kronzucker HJ. 2017. How plant root exudates shape the nitrogen cycle. Trends in Plant Science 22:661−673 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.05.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Zhu X, Liu D, Yin H. 2021. Roots regulate microbial N processes to achieve an efficient NH4+ supply in the rhizosphere of Alpine coniferous forests. Biogeochemistry 155(1):39−57 doi: 10.1007/s10533-021-00811-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Dijkstra FA, Carrillo Y, Pendall E, Morgan JA. 2013. Rhizosphere priming: a nutrient perspective. Frontiers in Microbiology 4:216 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00216

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Meier IC, Finzi AC, Phillips RP. 2017. Root exudates increase N availability by stimulating microbial turnover of fast-cycling N pools. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 106:119−128 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Li J, Bol R, Jones DL, Chadwick DR, Ju X, et al. 2025. Exploiter no more: root metabolites driving denitrification inhibition from diverse plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 209:109898 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109898

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Lu Y, Kronzucker HJ, Yu M, Shabala S, Shi W. 2024. Nitrogen-loss and carbon-footprint reduction by root-rhizosphere exudates. Trends in Plant Science 29(4):469−481 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.09.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Fransson PMA, Johansson EM. 2010. Elevated CO2 and nitrogen influence exudation of soluble organic compounds by ectomycorrhizal root systems. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 71:186−196 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00795.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Carrara E, Walter CA, Hawkins JS, Peterjohn WT, Averill C, et al. 2018. Interactions among plants, bacteria, and fungi reduce extracellular enzyme activities under long–term N fertilization. Global Change Biology 24(6):6721−6734 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14081

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Schwedt G. 2025. Organic chemistry in its applications to agriculture and physiology. In Justus von Liebig, ed. Schwedt G. Berlin, Heidelberg: Birkhäuser. pp. 31–428 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-70312-0_2
    [107] Stacey G, Bums RH, Evans HJ. 1992. Biological nitrogen fixation. London: Chapman and Hall
    [108] Schimel JP, Bennett J. 2004. Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85:591−602 doi: 10.1890/03-8002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Silver WL, Thompson AW, Reich A, Ewel JJ, Firestone MK. 2005. Nitrogen cycling in tropical plantation forests: potential controls on nitrogen retention. Ecological Applications 15(5):1604−1614

    Google Scholar

    [110] Galloway N, Aber JD, Erisman JW, Seitzinger SP, Howarth RW, et al. 2003. The nitrogen cascade. BioScience 53:341−356 doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Matson P, Lohse KA, Hall SJ. 2002. The globalization of nitrogen deposition: consequences for terrestrial ecosystems. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human. Environment 31:113−119 doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.113

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Vollenweider R. 1986. The scientific basis of lake and stream eutrophication with particular reference to phosphorus and nitrogen as eutrophication factors. Technical Report DAS/DSI/68. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. No. 27:1−182.
    [113] Aerts R. 1996. Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? Journal of Ecology 84:597−608 doi: 10.2307/2261481

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] van Heerwaarden LM, Toet S, Aerts R. 2003. Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiency and proficiency in six sub-arctic bog species after 4 years of nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Ecology 91(6):1060−1070 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00828.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. xxi, 439 pp
    [116] Lucas RW, Klaminder J, Futter MN, Bishop KH, Egnell G, et al. 2011. A meta-analysis of the effects of nitrogen additions on base cations: implications for plants, soils, and streams. Forest Ecology and Management 262(2):95−104 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Xu X, Zhang X, Zou Y, Chen T, Zhang J, et al. 2025. Integrated carbon and nitrogen management for cost-effective environmental policies in China. Science 388:6751 doi: 10.1126/science.ads4105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] Kuypers MMM, Marchant HK, Kartal B, et al. 2018. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nature Reviews Microbiology 16(5):263−276 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Wang S, Wang W, Liu L, Zhuang L, Zhao S, et al. 2018. Microbial nitrogen cycle hotspots in the plant-bed/ditch system of a constructed wetland with N2O mitigation. Environmental Science and Technology 52:6226–6223 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04925

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Liu R, Han C, Kang Y, Jiang Y, Deng H, et al. 2024. Active microbial taxa preferentially assimilate inorganic nitrogen in acidic upland soils using a 15N-DNA-SIP approach. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 188:109226 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121] Xia Z, Yang J, Sang C, Wang X, Sun L, et al. 2020. Phosphorus reduces negative effects of nitrogen addition on soil microbial communities and functions. Microorganisms 8:1828 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111828

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122] Li J, Sang C, Yang J, Qu L, Xia Z, et al. 2021. Stoichiometric imbalance and microbial community regulate microbial elements use efficiencies under nitrogen addition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 156:108207 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108207

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH. 2013. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nature Reviews Microbiology 11:789−799 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124] Erisman JW, Sutton MA, Galloway J, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W. 2008. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nature Geoscience 1:636−639 doi: 10.1038/ngeo325

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Zhu J, Chen Z, Wang Q, Xu L, He N, et al. 2020. Potential transition in the effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China. Environmental Pollution 258:113739 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113739

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Vervaet H, Boeckx P, Boko AMC, Van Cleemput O, Hofman G. 2004. The role of gross and net N transformation processes and NH4+ and NO3 immobilization in controlling the mineral N pool of a temperate mixed deciduous forest soil. Plant and Soil 264:349−357 doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047766.16919.5e

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Rütting T, Huygens D, Müller C, Van Cleemput O, Godoy R, et al. 2008. Functional role of DNRA and nitrite reduction in a pristine south Chilean Nothofagus forest. Biogeochemistry 90(3):243−258 doi: 10.1007/s10533-008-9250-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Staelens J, Rütting T, Huygens D, de Schrijver A, Müller C. 2012. In situ gross nitrogen transformations differ between temperate deciduous and coniferous forest soils. Biogeochemistry 108(1−3):259−277 doi: 10.1007/s10533-011-9598-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] Zhang JB, Cai ZC, Zhu TB Yang WY, Müller C, et al. 2013. Mechanisms for the retention of inorganic N in acidic forest soils of Southern China. Scientific Reports 3:2342 doi: 10.1038/srep02342

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Masse J, Prescott CE, Müller C, Grayston SJ. 2016. Gross nitrogen transformation rates differ in reconstructed oil-sand soils from natural boreal-forest soils as revealed using a 15N tracing method. Geoderma 282:37−48 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.07.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Wang C, Wang N, Zhu J, Liu Y, Xu X, et al. 2018. Soil gross N ammonification and nitrification from tropical to temperate forests in Eastern China. Functional Ecology 32:83−94 doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132] Li Z, Tian D, Wang B, Wang J, Wang S, et al. 2019. Microbes drive global soil nitrogen mineralization and availability. Global Change Biology 25:1078−1088 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14557

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133] Li Z, Zeng Z, Song Z, Wang F, Tian D, et al. 2021. Vital roles of soil microbes in driving terrestrial nitrogen immobilization. Global Change Biology 27(9):1848−1858 doi: 10.1111/gcb.15552

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [134] Bobbink R, Loran C, Tomassen H. 2022. Review and revision of empirical critical loads of nitrogen for Europe. UBA-Texte 110/2022, German Environment Agency. www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/review-revision-of-empirical-critical-loads-of
    [135] Benish SE, Bash JO, Foley KM, Appel KW, Hogrefe C, et al. 2022. Long-term regional trends of nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the United States from 2002 to 2017. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22:12749−12767 doi: 10.5194/acp-22-12749-2022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136] Houdijk AL, Smolders AJ, Roelofs JG. 1993. The effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on the soil chemistry of coniferous forests in The Netherlands. Environmental Pollution 80:73−78 doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(93)90012-D

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [137] Huang WJ, Zhou GY, Liu JX. 2012. Nitrogen and phosphorus status and their influence on aboveground production under increasing nitrogen deposition in three successional forests. Acta Oecologica 44:20−27 doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2011.06.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138] Zhao H, Yao X, Wang Q, Chen YS, Xu XN. 2013. Nitrogen deposition and soil nitrogen dynamics in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved stands along an age-sequence. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 13:237−250 doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162013005000021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Lu X, Zhu X, Chen W, Gao Y, Hamani AKM, et al. 2026. Nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in forest ecosystems with the globalization of nitrogen deposition. Nitrogen Cycling 2: e015 doi: 10.48130/nc-0026-0002
    Lu X, Zhu X, Chen W, Gao Y, Hamani AKM, et al. 2026. Nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in forest ecosystems with the globalization of nitrogen deposition. Nitrogen Cycling 2: e015 doi: 10.48130/nc-0026-0002

Figures(5)  /  Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(218) PDF downloads(73)

Review   Open Access    

Nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in forest ecosystems with the globalization of nitrogen deposition

Nitrogen Cycling  2 Article number: e015  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient for living organisms and a key limiting factor in ecosystem productivity, influencing both ecosystem structure and function. Over the past fifty years, increased anthropogenic N deposition has substantially altered terrestrial N cycling, resulting in cascading effects such as soil acidification, nutrient imbalances, changes in carbon sequestration, and impacts on biodiversity within forest ecosystems. While previous reviews have examined specific aspects of N deposition, few have systematically integrated multi-scale interactions between global N deposition patterns and the entire N biogeochemical cycle in forests. This review provides a comprehensive overview of research progress on forest N biogeochemical cycling in the context of globalized N deposition. Key topics include N deposition dynamics, changes in forest N status and stocks, and critical N-cycling processes, including biological N fixation, mineralization, nitrification, assimilation, and loss pathways. The review also traces the historical development of N cycling research, identifying three distinct stages since the 1860s. In addition, it examines underlying mechanisms, including microbial transformations and plant–soil interactions, and highlights theoretical advances in forest N cycling. By integrating patterns, processes, and mechanisms, this review enhances understanding of ecosystem responses to anthropogenic N enrichment and identifies critical research directions to address these challenges under global change.

    • Nitrogen is the fundamental element for all living organisms, acting as a primary limiting nutrient for plant productivity. Nitrogen biogeochemical cycling represents a cornerstone ecological process that supports terrestrial ecosystem structure and function. Nitrogen cycling encompasses a suite of interconnected processes, including biological fixation, mineralization, nitrification, assimilation, retention, and gaseous emission or leaching, which collectively regulate N availability in terrestrial ecosystems. Since the 1860s, however, human activities have drastically altered terrestrial N cycling patterns and processes by increasing biological N fixation, fossil fuel combustion, and converting inert N2 into reactive N (Nr) via industrial fertilizer synthesis, especially over the last half century[1]. These interventions have led to increased Nr emissions and subsequent deposition of both oxidized (NOy) and reduced N (NHx) at the global scale, threatening ecosystem structure and function through acidification and eutrophication[24]. Nowadays, human interference with the N cycle has exceeded the safe operating space for humanity[5], and N deposition has been recognized as one of the major drivers of global environmental change.

      Forests are the main component of terrestrial ecosystems and play a vital role in harboring biodiversity, sequestering atmospheric CO2, mitigating global change, and supporting ecological functions and services. Over the past two decades, the understanding of N biogeochemical cycling in forest ecosystems has undergone a significant shift, driven by advances in molecular biology, isotopic tracing techniques, and modeling approaches. These developments have revealed spatial patterns in N deposition rates at the global scale, as well as uncovered previously unrecognized N cycling pathways and microbial contributions to N cycling processes[3,6,7]. Under elevated deposition, forests across varied climatic zones and land-use histories exhibit divergent shifts in N status and stocks, giving rise to emerging spatial and temporal patterns[2,8]. These progresses have enhanced the understanding of global N deposition patterns and the mechanisms in regulating N availability, turnover, and loss in forest ecosystems. Although several comprehensive reviews have addressed soil N cycling processes in forest ecosystems, they have mainly focused on specific forest types and discrete components of the soil N cycle, such as nitrification, mineralization, and denitrification[9,10].

      Until now, relatively little attention has been paid to integrating the complete N biogeochemical cycle across diverse forest ecosystems, particularly in tropical and temperate forests, which exhibit distinct climatic conditions, vegetation structures, and soil properties. Furthermore, interactions among plants, soils, and microbial communities, such as root exudates and mycorrhizal associations, are frequently studied in isolation rather than as integral components of a coupled plant–soil–microbe system that regulates N transformation rates. Moreover, key N cycling mechanisms, such as biological N fixation, microbial-mediated transformations, plant-soil interactions, and N loss pathways, are being reconfigured in complex and often nonlinear ways[69]. Therefore, a synthesized, mechanistic understanding of these processes is urgently needed to forecast ecosystem responses across large spatial scales under ongoing atmospheric N enrichment.

      This review presents recent developments in forest N biogeochemical cycling within the context of global N deposition. It addresses spatiotemporal patterns of N deposition, deposition dynamics, forest N status, N-cycling processes, underlying mechanisms, and relevant theoretical advances. By clarifying the interconnections among these processes, the review aims to deepen understanding of the implications of N deposition for forest health, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, especially their role as carbon sinks. The review also identifies critical knowledge gaps and prioritizes future research directions to address the challenges of anthropogenic N deposition, thereby supporting the sustainable management of global forest resources in the Anthropocene.

    • Two anthropogenic activities have greatly increased reactive nitrogen (Nr) availability: food and energy production, which have grown with population[1] (Fig. 1). At the beginning of the 21st century, food and energy production increased the anthropogenic Nr creation rate by over a factor of ten compared to the late 19th century. Global N deposition was estimated at only 31.6 Tg N yr−1 in 1860 but rose to 103 Tg N yr−1 by the early 1990s. Between 1990 and 2010, deposition rates remained relatively stable, ranging from 93.0–96.1 Tg N yr−1[1,11]. During this period, North America, Europe, and Asia were identified as hotspots of N deposition[3,12]. Following severe atmospheric N pollution and high deposition loads, deposition rates in the United States and Europe began to stabilize or decline from the late 1980s to early 1990s, mainly due to the implementation of stricter air pollution control legislation[13,14]. A global synthesis of more than 52,000 site-years (1977–2021) revealed that land N deposition reached approximately 92.7 Tg N in 2020, peaking around 2015[14].

      Figure 1. 

      Trends in world population and nitrogen deposition flux of world and in China. Data are cited from[14,19,124,125].

      With shifts in socioeconomic development patterns, a recent assessment estimates the global average terrestrial N deposition at ~7.0 kg N ha−1 yr−1 in 2020 (Fig. 1). The hotspots have shifted from developed regions to developing regions, particularly in South Asia, Southeast Asia, and South America at low to mid-latitudes[1,14]. This spatial redistribution reflects differing emission trends: the increase in N deposition across developing regions is primarily driven by rising NH4+, while the decline in Europe and North America stems primarily from reduced NO3 concentrations. Guo et al. systematically evaluated the effects of reactive N control policies and projected that, by 2050, global anthropogenic emissions of NH3 and NOx could be reduced by 40% and 52%, respectively, relative to the 2015 levels[15]. In fact, N deposition has declined since the mid-1990s in the United States and Europe, and more recently in China[1619]. However, many countries (such as China, India, and the United States) still have a long way to go to address NH3 pollution, as they lack policies to reduce N overuse. In fact, current N deposition remains very high, especially in developing countries, and accumulated N deposition will continue to increase in the future.

      China represents the core of this southward shift of deposition hotspots. The global fertilizer production and Haber–Bosch-fixed N rose exponentially after the 1950s (Fig. 1). Accordingly, total N deposition in China deviated markedly from the global background after 1980, closely tracking the national curves of livestock numbers and urea consumption, forming a pronounced high-deposition center. Using nationwide datasets on bulk N deposition across China between 1980 and 2010, Liu et al. found that annual bulk N deposition averaged 13.2 and 21.1 kg N ha−1 in the 1980s and 2000s, respectively, indicating an increase of approximately 60%[20]. The maximum was in south-central China, where N deposition reached 65 kg N ha−1 yr−1, ranking the country among the world's three highest deposition regions[14,21]. There are three significant transitions in N deposition in China: (1) the total N deposition began to stabilize in 2001–2005 mostly due to a decline in wet NH4+ deposition; (2) approximately equal wet and dry N deposition occurred in 2011–2015; and (3) the contribution of reduced N components in the deposition decreased due to increasing NO3 deposition[22]. In fact, systematic efforts to control atmospheric reactive N emissions were initiated during the 2011–2015 period[23].

      Spatial patterns of N deposition are shaped by emission sources and atmospheric processes. While NOᵧ deposition has declined in many industrialized regions due to emission controls, NHx from agriculture often persists, leading to continued exceedances of ecosystem critical loads in sensitive areas. These exceedances drive biodiversity loss, with a global synthesis confirming that N deposition significantly reduces plant species richness across habitats[24]. Table 1 synthesizes N deposition rates and critical load exceedance across continents. Some studies projected that N deposition will continue to decline under current policies, yet reducing NHx emissions will depend on targeted agricultural measures[14,21,23]. Without such interventions, critical load exceedances are expected to persist, highlighting that future trends in N deposition hinge on the effective mitigation of ammonia.

      Table 1.  Selected continental-scale nitrogen deposition fluxes and exceedance of critical loads

      Region Estimated total deposition (kg N ha−1 yr−1) Main forms (NHx/NOγ) Critical load exceedance (% of area) Ref.
      Europe ~10–20 (temperate) ~60% NH4+/40% NO3 ~40% of the forest area [134]
      North America ~5–15 (variable) Increasing NHx fraction ~25% of the forest area [135]
      East and South Asia ~15–40 (hotspots > 30) NHx dominated in some sites ~60%–70% in hotspot zones [14]
      Sub-Saharan Africa ~2–8 (less measured) NHx emerging Unknown/limited data [14]
      Global average ~8 NHx:NOy = 1.5:1 Limited data [14]
      Data compiled from recent monitoring and modelling syntheses.
    • Terrestrial N cycling represents a complex network of biogeochemical processes that mediate the transformation, partitioning, and flux of N between atmospheric, terrestrial, and aquatic reservoirs, ultimately regulating ecosystem productivity, greenhouse gas balance, and environmental quality. The terrestrial N cycle comprises biological N2 fixation (BNF), gross N mineralization (GNM), gross nitrification (GN), denitrification (DEN), microbial NH4+ and NO3 immobilization (INH4 + INO3), dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) (which occurs in select waterlogged soils and sedimentary environments), plant uptake and loss pathways via leaching (e.g., NO3 and DON) and gaseous emissions (e.g., NO, N2O and N2; Fig. 2). These processes are tightly coupled to carbon (C), phosphorus (P), and water cycles and are sensitive to climate change, substrate supply, and biotic interactions[25,26]. To contextualize the complexity of these interconnected processes, Table 2 summarizes the major pathways of the terrestrial N cycle, their key controlling factors (e.g., redox conditions, temperature, and soil C/N ratio), and representative indicators used in field monitoring (e.g., enzyme activities and gene abundances) and modeling (e.g., flux estimates and pool sizes).

      Figure 2. 

      Key soil gross N transformation and N cycle-associated microbial functional genes.

      Table 2.  Major nitrogen cycling processes in terrestrial ecosystems, their controlling factors, and representative indicators

      Process Description/transformation Key controlling factors Representative indicators/measurements
      Biological N2
      fixation (BNF)
      Conversion of atmospheric N2 → NH3 by diazotrophs or symbiotic bacteria Soil P and Mo availability, temperature, moisture, and vegetation type Acetylene-reduction, 15N2 tracer,
      δ15N natural abundance
      Mineralization (ammonification) Organic N → NH4+ C : N ratio, microbial biomass, temperature NH4+ flux, gross mineralization
      (15N pool dilution)
      Nitrification NH4+ → NO2 → NO3 (by AOB/AOA) O2 availability, pH, temperature NO3 production, nitrifier gene abundance (amoA)
      Denitrification NO3 → NO → N2O → N2 under anoxia Soil moisture, C availability, redox potential N2O/N2 flux ratios (15N gas tracing)
      DNRA/Anammox NO3 → NH4+ (retention)/NH4+ + NO2 → N2 (loss) Organic C : NO3 ratio, anaerobiosis Isotope pairing, 15N mass balance
      Plant uptake and resorption Root/fungal uptake of NH4+, NO3, or DON; N resorption from senescent leaves Root traits, mycorrhizae, soil N form availability Leaf/root N content, resorption efficiency
      Leaching and gaseous losses Export of NO3/DON; emission of NO, N2O, N2 Rainfall, texture, drainage, and land use Stream NO3, N2O flux, NO emission
    • Elevated N deposition significantly alters the forms and stocks of soil N in forest ecosystems (Table 3). While atmospheric N deposition enriches the soil N pool, excessive inputs can disrupt C-N coupling, stimulating microbial activity and reducing soil organic carbon (SOC) stability[2729]. Elevated N deposition generally increases soil NH4+ and NO3 concentrations, thereby enhancing N cycling[8,30]. However, prolonged N inputs can shift ecosystem N status from N limitation (defined as N availability fails to meet plant and microbial demand) to N saturation (defined as N supply exceeds the ecosystem's capacity to retain or utilize it), leading to nitrate leaching and nutrient imbalances[3133]. In N-limited forests, ecosystem N stocks are relatively low, and N is tightly cycled and retained within the system to support plant and microbial growth, leading to ecosystem N accumulation with succession. In N-saturated ecosystems, however, most of the deposited N is lost through leaching and denitrification, without stimulation of CO2 sequestration[34]. Forest age and type can further mediate these responses.

      Table 3.  Effects of elevated nitrogen deposition on ecosystem nitrogen forms in forests

      N deposition/experiment N form studied Findings from studies Future implications Ref.
      Atmospheric N deposition NH4+, NO3 Elevated N deposition increased both NH4+ and NO3 concentrations in forest soils in the Netherlands forest Prolonged N loading may lead to N saturation and enhanced nitrate leaching [30,136]
      Atmospheric N deposition (linked to urban/industrial regions) NH4+, NO3 Increased soil available nitrogen (mainly NH4+ and NO3), especially in areas with higher population density and industrialization Continued emissions may accelerate soil N enrichment and N loss in urban ecosystems [8,30,31,38]
      Atmospheric N deposition NH4+, NO3 Chronic high N inputs lead to N saturation and elevated nitrate leaching Long-term high N deposition disrupts nutrient cycling and soil carbon stability [32]
      Atmospheric N deposition TN, NH4+, NO3 Enrichment of total and available inorganic N, accelerating nitrogen cycling and altering soil chemistry even at low deposition rates Alters ecosystem structure and functioning, e.g., species composition and productivity [33]
      Long-term N deposition TN, NH4+, NO3 Significantly higher total and available inorganic N in monsoon evergreen broadleaved forest than in
      younger successional forests
      Indicates older forests accumulate more inorganic N, reflecting stage-dependent N retention [137]
      Atmospheric N deposition NH4+, NO3 Enhanced inorganic N quantity and mobility through stimulated mineralization and transformation; older stands showed higher inorganic N fluxes Ecosystems are still efficient in N retention, but may reach N saturation with continued inputs [138]
      Atmospheric N deposition in Central African tropical forests DON, NH4+, NO3 Lowland forests lost N mainly as DON, others as inorganic N; tight N cycling but growing input-output imbalance Potential for future N saturation or shifts in dominant N forms [2,35]
      Meta-analysis of N deposition studies NH4+, NO3 Enhanced mineralization and nitrification increased inorganic N availability and possible N losses Broad-scale acceleration of N cycling and potential for increased N leaching [9]
      Long-term ammonium nitrate deposition NH4+, NO3 Despite long-term deposition, NH4+ and NO3 remained stable, indicating strong N limitation and ecosystem resilience Boreal forests remain resistant to N saturation, unlike temperate/tropical systems [36]

      In tropical/subtropical and temperate forests, soil N forms experience remarkable change from NH4+ to NO3 dominance, and increased N efflux[35], while the ratio of NH4+ to NO3 remains stable under long-term N deposition in boreal forests[36]. Regarding soil N stocks, existing results are inconsistent. Some studies reported no significant increase in soil N stocks due to N deposition[37] or noted that deposited N was largely assimilated by vegetation[38]. Nitrogen amendment experiments showed that, while total soil N may increase initially, the accumulation rate declines over prolonged periods and at higher input levels[39]. Moreover,15N-tracing experiments and a global meta-analysis confirm that forest soils act as a significant sink for atmospheric N deposition[34,40,41]. Lu et al.[42] found that soil N sequestration can keep pace with soil C (e.g., N-induced soil C accumulation rate at ~9 kg C/kg N), and developed a soil C sequestration hypothesis, suggesting N deposition can accelerate soil C sequestration in forest ecosystems at the global scale, regardless of ecosystem N status and climate zones.

    • Biological N fixation (BNF) is the largest natural source of new N input that supports terrestrial productivity. The BNF in natural biomes is 65–88 Tg N y−1[43,44]. Terrestrial biological N fixation shows a discrete latitudinal gradient, with tropical ecosystems demonstrating high rates of fixation and higher abundance of N-fixing species due to warm temperatures, heavy rainfall, and greater diversity of N-fixing species, while boreal and temperate ecosystems experience lower rates and lower abundance[45,46]. The rate of BNF is controlled by environmental factors (e.g., light and temperature), soil nutrients (e.g., P, iron, molybdenum, and vanadium), and N-fixers (e.g., the composition and abundance of rhizobial community, and nitrogenase activity)[47] (Table 4). The impact of N deposition on BNF in forests is complex and regulated by multiple factors. The conventional understanding is that N addition suppresses BNF because N fixation is energy-intensive, and elevated soil N availability may reduce the activity of N-fixing microorganisms. A meta-analysis showed that N addition reduced BNF by 31%[48]. However, the suppressive effect of N deposition is not universal and can be modulated by factors such as SOC content. Studies have shown that the adverse impact of N addition on BNF diminishes with increasing SOC, which can supply energy for N fixation and thereby alleviate energy limitation[49]. Furthermore, the response of BNF to N addition is influenced by both the forest succession stage and location. For instance, while N addition significantly suppresses BNF in disturbed and urban forests, it has no significant effect in suburban/rural and rehabilitative forests. These differential responses can be well explained by variations in the sensitivity of N-fixing microbial communities across forest types[50].

      Table 4.  Limiting factors of biological nitrogen fixation

      Controlling factorMechanism of actionMain affected systemsAdaptive responses
      Iron deficiencyLimited synthesis of nitrogenase cofactorsMarine systems, calcareous soilsIncreased secretion of iron chelators
      Phosphorus deficiencyInadequate ATP supply, constrained energy metabolismTropical soils, lateritic soilsEnhanced phosphatase activity, increased
      phosphorus uptake
      Molybdenum limitationImpaired function of iron-molybdenum cofactorsAcidic soils, marine environmentsAlternative pathways (e.g., using iron-vanadium
      nitrogenase)
      Oxygen sensitivityNitrogenase deactivationAerobic environmentsFormation of heterocysts, increased respiration,
      spatial-temporal separation
      Carbon limitationInsufficient energy supplyBarren soils, deep-sea environmentsSymbiosis with photosynthetic organisms, utilization of organic carbon
    • Soil gross N cycling represents a fundamental nutrient process in forest ecosystems and collectively governs productivity patterns, soil C sequestration, and nutrient retention capacity. Due to pronounced differences in climate conditions, vegetation types, and soil properties across global climatic zones, both the rates and patterns of soil N cycling exhibit significant spatial heterogeneity among forest types. Understanding these variations is critical for predicting how forest ecosystem structure and function respond and adapt to global change. Current research on gross N transformation rates reveals that tropical forests exhibit the highest rates of GNM, INH4, GN, INO3, and DNRA, followed by subtropical forests, while temperate forests generally demonstrate the lowest rates (Fig. 3). In contrast, subtropical forests show the highest levels of soil ammonium and nitrate content, as well as the highest denitrification rates. Microbial N immobilization (INH4 + INO3) in subtropical forests is comparable to that in temperate forests. The ratios of soil NO3 to NH4+ (NO3/NH4+) and that of GN to INH4 (GN/INH4) are indicators to estimate the potential risk of soil N loss[5153]. Thus, the highest NO3/NH4+ and GN/INH4 ratios in the subtropical forests indicate an N-leaky ecosystem. Elevated N inputs generally lead to a leaky N cycle in tropical forests, considering the increase in GN/INH4, NO3/NH4+, and nitrous oxide emissions and the decrease in INO3 and DNRA[54].

      Figure 3. 

      Global patterns of SOC, TN, C/N ratio, available N, microbial biomass, and N transformation rates in (a) tropical, (b) subtropical, and (c) temperate forest soils. The red and blue line represents the processes of soil N production and retention, respectively. The thickness of line and arrows refers to the degree of each N transformation rate. GNM, gross N mineralization; GN, gross nitrification; GHN, gross heterotrophic nitrification; GAN, gross autotrophic nitrification; INH4, microbial NH4+ immobilization; INO3, microbial NO3 immobilization; DEN, denitrification; MBC, microbial biomass carbon; MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen. SOC, soil organic carbon; NH4+, extractable ammonium; NO3, extractable nitrate. SOC: g kg−1, TN: g kg−1, NH4+: mg kg−1, NO3: mg kg−1, MBC and MBN: mg kg−1; GNM, INH4, GN (GAN+GHN), INO3, DNRA and DEN: mg kg−1day−1. Data are cited from [54,126133].

      The spatial patterns of soil N cycling across forest biomes arise from distinct environmental and biological factors. Climate factors, particularly temperature and precipitation, directly regulate microbial and enzyme activities, serving as the 'master switch' for N transformation processes. In tropical forests, consistently warm and humid conditions sustain a rapid and continuous N cycle[54]. These soils, often acidic and rich in kaolinite and iron-aluminum oxides, strongly adsorb ammonium, thereby reducing nitrogen loss[55]. Under low pH (usually pH: 4.0−5.5), nitrification is primarily driven by ammonia-oxidizing archaea, albeit at relatively lower rates[56]. High rates of microbial N immobilization, alongside significant DNRA rates in anaerobic microsites, further promote efficient nitrogen retention[57,58]. In contrast, subtropical forests experience distinct seasonal shifts in dry/wet and cool/warm conditions, leading to a pulsed N cycle. Mineralization and nitrification intensify during wet/warm seasons, and NO3 is prone to leaching during rainy periods, while these processes are suppressed during dry/cold seasons[54,59]. Subtropical soils are generally less acidic (e.g., pH: 5.0−6.5), allowing both ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea to contribute to nitrification, often resulting in a higher nitrification potential compared to tropical forests[56,60]. Thus, while tropical and subtropical forests are governed by climate, soil physicochemical properties, and microbial communities, the specific mechanisms differ markedly, shaping their distinct N cycling dynamics. In temperate forests, however, low temperatures and higher soil C/N ratios are the primary constraints, leading to lower N transformation rates[61,62]. Beyond these type-specific factors, tree species, soil properties (e.g., SOC, total N, and texture), microbial community traits (e.g., functional gene abundance such as amoA and nirK/S), and mycorrhizal types (e.g., ectomycorrhizal vs. arbuscular mycorrhizal) are further shaping soil N cycling[6365]. Hence, it is necessary to integrate these biotic and abiotic factors to build more universal predictive models of soil N cycling.

    • Studies from different periods have consistently showed that N addition promotes both GNM and GN rates in forest soils, although the increase magnitude is modulated by N dosage, climate zone, and soil depth[6669] (Fig. 4). This stimulatory effect primarily arises because external N inputs directly enhance soil available N pool, thereby supplying more abundant substrates for microbe-mediated N transformation processes. In N-limited forest ecosystems, exogenous N can stimulate soil microbial activity and accelerate the decomposition and transformation of organic N. Moreover, N deposition has been shown to suppress microbial N immobilization, particularly in N-rich tropical and subtropical forests[54]. Meta-analyses and reviews on DNRA and denitrification in global forest soils under N deposition remain scarce. The limited number of case studies available suggests that these processes either decrease or show non-significant responses to N addition[70,71]. Furthermore, Elrys et al. indicated that N deposition may impair soil N retention capacity in tropical forests compared to subtropical systems, as reflected by increased ratios of NO3/NH4+ and GN/INH4, along with reduced DNRA rates. These shifts could elevate the risk of N loss from tropical forest soils[69].

      Figure 4. 

      The general pattern on the responses of soil microbes-driven gross N transformation to elevated N deposition in forest ecosystems. Red arrows indicate that N deposition exerts stimulatory effects on N pool size, N transformation processes, and associated fluxes, whereas gray arrows represent inhibitory effects of N deposition on these aspects. 'x' symbols denote uncertain effects under N addition.

    • Soil N2O emissions and NO3 leaching are key indicators reflecting the N saturation status and loss risk in forest ecosystems. N2O is primarily produced by microbial nitrification and denitrification processes[72]. Most studies have shown that N deposition significantly stimulates N2O emissions from forest soils. For instance, long-term N addition in temperate and tropical forests has been found to increase N2O emissions by 113% to 250%[73]. Global meta-analyses further confirm that N addition enhances forest N2O emissions by 216% to 591%[74,75], contributing directly to 9.0% of global forest N2O emissions[76]. However, some tropical montane forests show no significant response to high N inputs[77], a variability that can be explained by the ecosystem N saturation hypothesis[2]. This theory also predicts an increase in N leaching with elevated N deposition[78]. Multiple long-term experiments have observed significant increases in NO3 and total dissolved N leaching under N addition[79,80] (Fig. 4), although the extent of increase is influenced by forest type, N application rate, and duration[81].

    • Nitrogen deposition directly or indirectly affects soil N transformation rates by altering soil physical and chemical properties (e.g., increasing SOC, NH4+, and NO3 content, and reducing soil pH), thereby changing the community composition, function, and activity of microorganisms involved in soil N transformation.

      (1) N effect on microbial biomass and community composition. The effects of N deposition on soil microbes vary spatiotemporally, depending on duration and ecosystem type[54,82,83]. In N-limited ecosystems, short-term N input elevates soil available N, directly stimulating microbial growth and increasing microbial biomass C and N[84]. Microbes act as a critical N sink, assimilating available N into their biomass. This process can reduce substrates used for nitrification and denitrification, potentially lowering short-term N loss. However, long-term N deposition can reduce the biomass and activity of bacteria and fungi through abiotic and biotic pathways such as soil acidification and exacerbated microbial C limitation, thereby suppressing the mineralization of soil organic matter (SOM)[85,86]. Furthermore, N deposition can reshape microbial community structure and diversity, directly interfering with soil N cycling. It can increase the relative abundance of copiotrophic taxa such as Bacteroidetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Actinomycetes, and Firmicutes, which preferentially utilize labile organic C and have higher requirements for inorganic N. Simultaneously, elevated N input can reduce the relative abundance of oligotrophic taxa, including Verrucomicrobia, Acidobacteria, and Basidiomycetes among fungi, which primarily acquire nutrients by mineralizing complex SOM. This shift can decrease activities of various extracellular enzymes involved in SOM decomposition, thereby affecting the release and transformation of soil N[8688]. In addition, long-term input simplifies community structure and increases the gram-positive-to-gram-negative ratio, indicating a strategic shift from a 'rapid investment–return' to an 'energy-saving tolerance' mode[27,89].

      (2) N effect on the activity of enzymes involved in soil N transformation. Studies demonstrate that elevated N deposition directly constrains the rate of organic N mineralization by strongly suppressing microbe-derived N-releasing enzymes, such as glycine aminopeptidase, while exerting minimal effect on nonspecific proteases. This selective inhibition effectively slows the rate-limiting step in the depolymerization of organic N[67]. The resulting pronounced increase in C-acquiring enzyme activity, coupled with only marginal changes in N-acquiring enzymes, significantly raises the enzymatic C/N ratio[90,91]. These results suggest that microbial communities can adapt to excess N by shifting their enzymatic investment patterns, triggering a fundamental change in their resource-allocation strategy from mining N toward securing C and acquiring P[89]. Consequently, the soil N cycle is progressively steered toward a new dynamic paradigm characterized by accelerated nitrification rates and enhanced microbial N immobilization.

      (3) N effect on N cycling-associated microbial functional genes. An increasing number of studies focus on key functional genes for N fixation (nifH), nitrification (amoA), and denitrification (nirS, nirK, nosZ), as their abundance often serves as a proxy for potential N transformation rates. Their responses to N addition are highly variable and rate-dependent, shaped by N application rates, forest types, and soil properties[92,93]. This variability leads to divergent effects on N transformation rates across biomes. For instance, in tropical/subtropical forests, N addition often decreases archaeal amoA while increasing nirK abundance[92,94]. Conversely, in temperate/boreal forests, it can enhance bacterial amoA but reduce denitrifier genes[71,94,95]. A recent meta-analysis showed that N addition increased the abundance of archaeal and bacterial amoA genes but suppressed the abundance of the N-fixing gene nifH[94]. In contrast, responses of denitrification genes (nirS, nirK, nosZ) are generally less consistent and often non-significant[93]. This response pattern highlights a fundamental shift in the soil N cycle under enrichment: deceleration in N fixation, pronounced acceleration in nitrification, and variable impact on denitrification, which can steer the soil N cycle toward greater inorganic N turnover and loss potential[94,96] (Fig. 4).

      (4) N effect on rhizosphere processes. Root exudates, which include sugars, amino acids, organic acids, and phenolic acids, represent a crucial plant adaptation mechanism and a significant carbon flux (5%–21% of net fixed C) into soils[97]. They critically regulate soil N transformations, including mineralization, nitrification, immobilization, denitrification, and DNRA[98,99]. First, root exudates can stimulate N mineralization by supplying labile C, which enhances microbial and enzyme activity[100,101]. Second, root exudates suppress nitrification by releasing biological nitrification inhibitors (BNIs), which immobilize NH4+ and facilitate plant N absorption due to the lower pH in the rhizosphere[102]. Third, root exudates can enhance microbial N immobilization due to their low C/N ratio and regulate denitrification by providing energy and redox conditions[103]. Fourth, root exudates favor DNRA over denitrification under C-rich, anaerobic conditions[99]. In sum, N inputs can alter mycorrhizal types and the quantity and quality of root C input, modifying exudate composition and C/N stoichiometry, and further altering microbial nutrient limitations, gene expression, and enzyme activities[104,105]. These changes are expected to alter rhizosphere N cycling. However, the mechanisms by which N deposition influences specific rhizosphere N-cycle processes remain poorly understood. Comprehensive, long-term studies are required to clarify the mechanisms underlying N deposition's effects on rhizosphere N losses.

    • Nitrogen was formally named the 7th element of the periodic table by Jean Antoine Claude Chaptal (1,756–1,832) in 1790. Over the past two centuries, N biogeochemical cycling has evolved from the exploration of phenomena and processes to the in-depth elucidation of mechanisms and multi-element coupling in the context of global change. A critical thread in this ecological evolution is the growing recognition of anthropogenic disruption on the ecosystem N cycle, particularly through atmospheric deposition of reactive N and its cascading consequences for forest ecosystems. This historical perspective can be categorized into three distinct stages (Fig. 5).

      Figure 5. 

      Historical perspective on nitrogen biogeochemical cycling.

    • This era established the fundamental components of the N cycle and the perceived balance of the natural N cycle. Key milestones included the identification of crucial N compounds (e.g., NO, NH3, and HNO3) by chemists such as Priestley since 1772, and the important role of litter N returning in forest nutrient retention[106]. The confirmation of biological N fixation highlighted the primary natural pathway for N entry into ecosystems[107]. Collectively, this stage describes a largely closed and self-regulating N cycle, providing an essential baseline against which the magnitude and consequences of future atmospheric N deposition can be quantified and contextualized.

    • The mid-20th century marked a shift toward mechanistic and ecosystem-scale research on N cycling. Key microbial processes such as mineralization, nitrification, immobilization, DNRA, and denitrification were intensively studied[108,109]. Since the 1980s, atmospheric N deposition has emerged as a central ecological issue, with pioneering studies documenting its cascade impacts on forests and freshwater systems[110112]. This period gave rise to foundational concepts such as ecosystem N saturation[2], which described sequential forest decline under chronic N loading. The concept of N resorption efficiency was developed to assess alterations in plant nutrient use strategies[113,114]. This stage culminated in the 'Nitrogen Cascade' framework[110], which illustrates how increasing reactive N can sequentially exacerbate watershed eutrophication, soil acidification, climate change, and biodiversity loss. This stage redefined N from a historically limiting nutrient to a pervasive environmental pollutant, with atmospheric deposition emerging as a primary dispersal vector for its widespread distribution.

    • During this stage, biological stoichiometry coupled the N cycle with C and P, and the theory of multi-nutrient co-limitation replaced the simplistic view of single-nutrient limitation, emphasizing that N deposition effects can be mediated by P[115,116]. C-N coupled cycling has received widespread attention for predicting ecosystem C sequestration and its feedback to climate change under elevated N deposition[40,42]. Current research also links excessive N inputs to global challenges, including climate feedbacks and biodiversity loss, and frames N management as critical for achieving Sustainable Development Goals[24,117]. In China, studies on the ecological effects of N deposition began in 2002 at the Dinghushan Nature Reserve[4,34,42,72]. Since then, many N addition experiments have been established across different ecosystem types, including forests, grasslands, shrublands, and croplands.

    • This review examines the historical development of research on forest N biogeochemical cycling, a field that has been fundamentally transformed by global-scale atmospheric N deposition. Over the past two decades, advances in key methodologies and conceptual frameworks have substantially enhanced scientific understanding.

      First, molecular biological tools such as metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and proteomics offer unprecedented opportunities to describe microbial regulatory networks of functional N cycling genes. Coupling these approaches with stable isotope labeling (e.g., 15N2, 15NH4+, and 15NO3) allows precise tracking of N transformation pathways and associated microbial metabolic fluxes. For example, DNA-stable isotope probing (DNA-SIP) directly links metabolic function to microbial identity, clarifying niche differentiation within N-cycling networks[118120]. Second, the view of C-N-P stoichiometric coupling redefines the framework for N-induced ecological effects, shifting from nitrogen's isolated role to a balanced multi-element synergistic regulation. For example, N deposition modulates the nonlinear relationships between microbial C use efficiency (CUE) and N use efficiency (NUE) by altering microbial stoichiometric imbalances. High N inputs can exacerbate C–P imbalances in the organic layer and reduce NUE, whereas P supplementation can restore microbial functional potential by mitigating stoichiometric constraints[121,122]. Third, biotic interactions and interface processes in regulating N cycling have attracted increasing attention, specifically highlighting the ecological contributions of the rhizosphere and mycorrhizal networks[100,123].

      However, current understanding remains limited in terms of underlying mechanisms and predictive certainty. Moving forward, interdisciplinary integration is essential to overcome existing research bottlenecks, with emphasis on the following key directions.

      (1) Integrating novel technologies and methods: Deep integration of multi-omics with high-resolution in situ techniques like stable isotope tracing (NanoSIMS) is needed. This will quantitatively link the activity of key functional genes (e.g., nifH, amoA, and nosZ) to actual microbial metabolic fluxes, mapping regulatory networks in soil N transformation.

      (2) Quantifying C-N-P-H2O coupling mechanisms: The coupling mechanisms among key elements, such as C, N, and P, and water, are complex and fundamental to understanding the functioning and stability of forest ecosystems. Water acts as a carrier for nutrient transport, linking belowground with aboveground, and individual transpiration with ecosystem hydrology. The coupling of C, N, and P use efficiencies across forest types, especially across different mycorrhizal associations, should be systematically quantified to identify critical thresholds where microbial community structure may drive these changes under chronic N inputs.

      (3) Elucidating plant-microbe-soil interactions: Exudates not only provide energy for microorganisms but also stimulate the rhizosphere priming effect, significantly accelerating soil organic matter mineralization and shaping soil N cycling. It remains unclear, however, how enhanced or reduced root exudation due to environmental change (e.g., elevated N deposition) affects soil N biogeochemical cycles, such as BNF, nitrification, and denitrification, and determines the trade-off between mycorrhizal C sequestration and nutrient transport. This requires deciphering chemical and molecular signaling in plant-microbe-soil interactions.

      (4) Assessing interactive effects among global change factors: Interactions among atmospheric N deposition, climate warming, and altered precipitation can modulate—or even override—the ecological impacts of individual drivers. Future research priorities should include establishing long-term, multi-factor experimental platforms in emerging low-latitude N deposition hotspots, considering these regions are also biodiversity hotspots and are subject to frequent extreme climate events (e.g., warming and heatwaves, changes in precipitation patterns, and typhoons). It is urgent to address the synergistic effects of these stressors on ecosystem N cycling and overall ecosystem stability.

      (5) Evaluating ecosystem responses to the declining rates of N deposition: Most existing studies have focused on the effects of elevated N deposition on forest ecosystems. As N deposition rates decline, however, there is growing scientific concern about whether and how forest ecosystems can recover following reductions in N input. Future experimental and modeling approaches are required to predict the biogeochemical and ecological responses of forest ecosystems to the decline in N deposition, both individually and in combination with other global change factors.

      • The authors confirm contributions to the paper as follows: Xiankai Lu: study conception and design, writing, revision and funding acquisition; Xiaomin Zhu: data collection and analysis, draft manuscript preparation and revision; Weibin Chen: data collection and analysis, draft manuscript preparation and revision; Yushu Gao: draft manuscript preparation; Abdoul Kader Mounkaila Hamani: draft manuscript preparation; Lasisi Hammed Tobiloba: draft manuscript preparation; Nazar Abbas: draft manuscript preparation; Junbing Bai: draft manuscript preparation; Zhihao Qiu: draft manuscript preparation; Jun Pan: draft manuscript preparation; Nimra Maqsood: draft manuscript preparation; Zebing Xiao: draft manuscript preparation; Yingxue Xuan: draft manuscript preparation; Jiangming Mo: draft manuscript preparation and suggestions. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

      • This work was supported by Guangdong S&T Program (Grant No. 2022B1111230001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 32371735, 32271687), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2024A1515011088), and Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (Grant No. 2024A04J4592).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Anthropogenic N deposition has substantially altered terrestrial N cycling at global scale, and human interference with the N cycle has exceeded the safe operating space for humanity.

        The hotspots of N deposition have shifted from developed regions to developing ones.

        Despite a global decline in atmospheric N deposition, levels remain high in developing countries, where accumulated N deposition is projected to further increase in the future.

        Forest soils act as a significant sink for atmospheric N deposition, which can accelerate soil carbon sequestration, regardless of ecosystem N status and climate zones.

        Nitrogen biogeochemical cycling has evolved from the exploration of phenomena and processes to the in-depth elucidation of mechanisms and multi-element coupling in the context of global change.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Xiankai Lu, Xiaomin Zhu, Weibin Chen
        Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (4) References (138)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Lu X, Zhu X, Chen W, Gao Y, Hamani AKM, et al. 2026. Nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in forest ecosystems with the globalization of nitrogen deposition. Nitrogen Cycling 2: e015 doi: 10.48130/nc-0026-0002
    Lu X, Zhu X, Chen W, Gao Y, Hamani AKM, et al. 2026. Nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in forest ecosystems with the globalization of nitrogen deposition. Nitrogen Cycling 2: e015 doi: 10.48130/nc-0026-0002

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return