Search
2025 Volume 1
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Advances in biochar modification for environmental remediation with emphasis on iron functionalization

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Received: 22 July 2025
    Revised: 23 September 2025
    Accepted: 17 October 2025
    Published online: 05 November 2025
    Biochar X  1 Article number: e009 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • Comprehensive review of biochar modification methods, with an emphasis on iron-modified biochar (Fe–biochar).

    Clarifies Fe–C interactions driving adsorption, redox activity, and electron transfer mechanisms.

    Explores emerging Fe–biochar applications in remediation, energy storage, and smart sensing.

    Proposes future directions linking Fe–biochar with circular bioeconomy and climate-resilient agriculture.

  • Biochar, a porous carbonaceous material produced from biomass pyrolysis under limited oxygen, has emerged as a promising material for environmental remediation due to its stability, adsorption capacity, and potential for carbon sequestration. Though raw or unmodified biochar often exhibits limited surface functionality, low surface area, and poor affinity for specific contaminants, its effectiveness in practical applications is restricted. Various modification techniques have been developed to address these limitations, including physical activation, chemical functionalization, and surface doping with metals. Among these, iron-modified biochar (Fe-BC) has attracted considerable attention due to the unique redox properties of iron and its strong binding affinity for anions and organic pollutants. Fe-BC is typically synthesized through impregnation, co-pyrolysis with iron salts, or post-pyrolysis treatment. These modifications enhance the surface area and porosity and introduce reactive sites that significantly improve the sorption of phosphate, arsenic, heavy metals, and dyes from wastewater, as well as facilitate catalytic reactions such as Fenton-like oxidation. Recent studies have demonstrated the multifunctionality of Fe-BC in wastewater treatment and soil remediation, as well as in agriculture as a slow-release nutrient carrier. Moreover, novel synthesis approaches using green chemistry principles and low-cost iron precursors have made Fe-BC more sustainable and scalable. Despite its potential, challenges remain regarding the long-term stability of leaching iron, regeneration, and environmental risks. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current modification strategies for biochar with a focused evaluation of Fe-BC, including synthesis methods, physicochemical properties, contaminant removal mechanisms, and practical applications. Future perspectives are discussed to guide research toward optimizing Fe-BC for the circular economy and sustainable environmental technologies.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • [1] Ippolito JA, Cui L, Kammann C, Wrage-Mönnig N, Estavillo JM, et al. 2020. Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: a comprehensive meta-data analysis review. Biochar 2:421−438 doi: 10.1007/s42773-020-00067-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Fahmy TYA, Fahmy Y, Mobarak F, El-Sakhawy M, Abou-Zeid RE. 2020. Biomass pyrolysis: past, present, and future. Environment, Development and Sustainability 22:17−32 doi: 10.1007/s10668-018-0200-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Qiu B, Tao X, Wang H, Li W, Ding X, et al. 2021. Biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal removal: a review. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 155:105081 doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105081

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Yu H, Zou W, Chen J, Chen H, Yu Z, et al. 2019. Biochar amendment improves crop production in problem soils: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 232:8−21 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.117

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Oni BA, Oziegbe O, Olawole OO. 2019. Significance of biochar application to the environment and economy. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 64:222−236 doi: 10.1016/j.aoas.2019.12.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Xu L, Zhao F, Peng J, Ji M, Li BL. 2025. A comprehensive review of the application and potential of straw biochar in the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil. Toxics 13:69 doi: 10.3390/toxics13020069

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Rajamony RK, Suraparaju SK, Kalidasan B, Yadav A, Pandey AK, et al. 2025. Energizing solar still efficiency with eco-friendly coconut shell biochar enhanced organic phase change material. Separation and Purification Technology 360:131200 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.131200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Lin G, Wang Y, Wu X, Meng J, Ok YS, et al. 2025. Enhancing agricultural productivity with biochar: evaluating feedstock and quality standards. Bioresource Technology Reports 29:102059 doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102059

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Atinafu DG, Choi JY, Nam J, Kang Y, Kim S. 2025. Insights into the effects of biomass feedstock and pyrolysis conditions on the energy storage capacity and durability of standard biochar-based phase-change composites. Biochar 7:18 doi: 10.1007/s42773-024-00396-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Monteiro MDS, dos Santos MVQ, dos Santos de Almeida W, Martins T, Wisniewski A, et al. 2025. Non-conventional electrode based on cattle manure biochar applied in electrocatalytic reactions for the evolution of low-carbon hydrogen. Fuel 381:133619 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133619

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Behnami A, Pourakbar M, Ayyar AS, Lee JW, Gagnon G, et al. 2024. Treatment of aqueous per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances: a review of biochar adsorbent preparation methods. Chemosphere 357:142088 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142088

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Saletnik B, Zaguła G, Bajcar M, Tarapatskyy M, Bobula G, et al. 2019. Biochar as a multifunctional component of the environment—a review. Applied Sciences 9:1139 doi: 10.3390/app9061139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Kumar P, Singhania RR, Sumathi Y, Kurrey NK, Chen CW, et al. 2025. Investigating innovative techniques for biochar modification to enhance the removal of heavy metals from aqueous environments: a comprehensive review. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 27:3271−3293 doi: 10.1007/s10098-024-02962-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Zhang C, Liu L, Zhao M, Rong H, Xu Y. 2018. The environmental characteristics and applications of biochar. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25:21525−21534 doi: 10.1007/S11356-018-2521-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Lan W, Zhao X, Wang Y, Jin X, Ji J, et al. 2024. Research progress of biochar modification technology and its application in environmental remediation. Biomass and Bioenergy 184:107178 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107178

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Chen H, Gao Y, Li J, Fang Z, Bolan N, et al. 2022. Engineered biochar for environmental decontamination in aquatic and soil systems: a review. Carbon Research 1:4 doi: 10.1007/s44246-022-00005-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Liang Y, Zhao B, Yuan C. 2022. Adsorption of atrazine by Fe-Mn-modified biochar: the dominant mechanism of ππ interaction and pore structure. Agronomy 12:3097 doi: 10.3390/agronomy12123097

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Diao ZH, Zhang WX, Liang JY, Huang ST, Dong FX, et al. 2021. Removal of herbicide atrazine by a novel biochar based iron composite coupling with peroxymonosulfate process from soil: synergistic effect and mechanism. Chemical Engineering Journal 409:127684 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127684

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Cao Y, Jiang S, Kang X, Zhang H, Zhang Q, et al. 2021. Enhancing degradation of atrazine by Fe-phenol modified biochar/ferrate(VI) under alkaline conditions: analysis of the mechanism and intermediate products. Chemosphere 285:131399 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131399

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Tan X, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang X, Hu X, et al. 2015. Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 125:70−85 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, et al. 2014. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19−33 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Yaashikaa PR, Kumar PS, Varjani S, Saravanan A. 2020. A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy. Biotechnology Reports 28:e00570 doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Mohan D, Sarswat A, Ok YS, Pittman CU Jr. 2014. Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent—a critical review. Bioresource Technology 160:191−202 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.120

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Leng L, Xiong Q, Yang L, Li H, Zhou Y, et al. 2021. An overview on engineering the surface area and porosity of biochar. Science of The Total Environment 763:144204 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144204

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Cui R, Shen Y, Zhang Z, Huang Q, Zhu J, et al. 2025. Mechanochemical remediation of heavy metal-polluted soil by ball milling with monocalcium phosphate. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 13:118373 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.118373

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Yu X, Wu S, Zhang Z, Wang C. 2025. Application of ball milling technology in removal of PFAS and ball milling modified materials: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 18:100709 doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100709

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Islam MS, Kwak JH, Nzediegwu C, Wang S, Palansuriya K, et al. 2021. Biochar heavy metal removal in aqueous solution depends on feedstock type and pyrolysis purging gas. Environmental Pollution 281:117094 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117094

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Wang RZ, Huang DL, Liu YG, Zhang C, Lai C, et al. 2020. Synergistic removal of copper and tetracycline from aqueous solution by steam-activated bamboo-derived biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials 384:121470 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121470

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Zhang Y, Wan Y, Zheng Y, Yang Y, Huang J, et al. 2023. Potassium permanganate modification of hydrochar enhances sorption of Pb(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II). Bioresource Technology 386:129482 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129482

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Ambika S, Kumar M, Pisharody L, Malhotra M, Kumar G, et al. 2022. Modified biochar as a green adsorbent for removal of hexavalent chromium from various environmental matrices: mechanisms, methods, and prospects. Chemical Engineering Journal 439:135716 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135716

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Qi C, Zhang C, Yang Z, Liu N, Gao Y, et al. 2025. Acid-modified biochar-based bacterial fertilizer and increase soil available phosphorus. Journal of Soils and Sediments 25:59−66 doi: 10.1007/s11368-024-03937-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Zhu X, Wang Z, Teng Y, Sun Y, Wang W, et al. 2024. Green modification of biochar with poly(aspartic acid) enhances the remediation of Cd and Pb in water and soil. Journal of Environmental Management 370:122642 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122642

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Xia X, Riaz M, Babar S, Li Y, Wang X, et al. 2024. Acid-modified cotton straw biochar has instructive for the improvement of saline-alkali soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments 24:2334−2348 doi: 10.1007/s11368-024-03800-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Hawryluk-Sidoruk M, Raczkiewicz M, Krasucka P, Duan W, Mašek O, et al. 2024. Effect of biochar chemical modification (acid, base and hydrogen peroxide) on contaminants content depending on feedstock and pyrolysis conditions. Chemical Engineering Journal 481:148329 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.148329

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Mosleh MH, Rajabi H. 2024. NaOH-benzoic acid modified biochar for enhanced removal of aromatic VOCs. Separation and Purification Technology 330:125453 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125453

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Liao X, Mao S, Gao W, Wang S, Hu J, et al. 2025. Risk of increasing soil nitrous oxide emissions by chemical oxidation modification on biochar. Journal of Environmental Management 375:124336 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124336

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Paredes-Laverde M, Paniagua-Macias J, Serna-Galvis EA, Torres-Palma RA. 2025. Biochar from agro-industrial wastes as carbocatalysts in advanced oxidation processes for pollutant degradation—novel insights. In Innovative and Hybrid Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water Treatment. ed. Hamdaoui O. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 371−387 doi: 10.1016/b978-0-443-14100-3.00002-8
    [38] Tomczyk A, Kondracki B, Szewczuk-Karpisz K. 2023. Chemical modification of biochars as a method to improve its surface properties and efficiency in removing xenobiotics from aqueous media. Chemosphere 312:137238 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137238

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Uppuluri NST, Ran X, Guo J, Müller J. 2025. Enhanced phosphorus recovery from digestate via solid-liquid separation using Mg2+ and Ca2+ modified biochar. Bioresource Technology 427:132409 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132409

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Naidu Subramaniam M, Zhou S, Zhang G, Manayil JC, Wu Z. 2025. Enhancing nanofiltration in thin film nanocomposite membranes using bi-metal modified biochar nanofillers. Separation and Purification Technology 352:128236 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.128236

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Wang J, Riaz M, Babar S, Xia H, Li Y, et al. 2023. Iron-modified biochar reduces nitrogen loss and improves nitrogen retention in Luvisols by adsorption and microbial regulation. Science of The Total Environment 879:163196 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163196

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Li G, Ceng S, Sun S, Xu K, Bian D. 2021. Preparation of biochar supported iron oxides composites and its application in water treatment. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress 40:917−931

    Google Scholar

    [43] Han M, Liu Z, Huang S, Zhang H, Yang H, et al. 2024. Application of biochar-based materials for effective pollutant removal in wastewater treatment. Nanomaterials 14:1933 doi: 10.3390/nano14231933

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Subramanian P, Pandian K, Pakkiyam S, Dhanuskodi KV, Annamalai S, et al. 2025. Biochar for heavy metal cleanup in soil and water: a review. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 15:11421−11441 doi: 10.1007/s13399-024-05989-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Dai J, Meng X, Zhang Y, Huang Y. 2020. Effects of modification and magnetization of rice straw derived biochar on adsorption of tetracycline from water. Bioresource Technology 311:123455 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123455

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Jiang T, Pervez MN, Ilango AK, Ravi YK, Zhang W, et al. 2024. Magnetic surfactant-modified clay for enhanced adsorption of mixtures of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in snowmelt: improving practical applicability and efficiency. Journal of Hazardous Materials 471:134390 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134390

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Jiang Z, Li J, Jiang D, Gao Y, Chen Y, et al. 2020. Removal of atrazine by biochar-supported zero-valent iron catalyzed persulfate oxidation: reactivity, radical production and transformation pathway. Environmental Research 184:109260 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109260

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Lyu H, Gao B, He F, Ding C, Tang J, et al. 2017. Ball-milled carbon nanomaterials for energy and environmental applications. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5:9568−9585 doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02170

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Huang J, Chen H, Zheng Y, Yang Y, Zhang Y, et al. 2021. Microplastic pollution in soils and groundwater: characteristics, analytical methods and impacts. Chemical Engineering Journal 425:131870 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131870

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Wang J, Wang S. 2019. Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production 227:1002−1022 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] He X, Hong ZN, Jiang J, Dong G, Liu H, et al. 2021. Enhancement of Cd(II) adsorption by rice straw biochar through oxidant and acid modifications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28:42787−42797 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13742-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Liu C, Wang W, Wu R, Liu Y, Lin X, et al. 2020. Preparation of acid-and alkali-modified biochar for removal of methylene blue pigment. ACS Omega 5:30906−30922 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03688

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Hafeez A, Pan T, Tian J, Cai K. 2022. Modified biochars and their effects on soil quality: a review. Environments 9:60 doi: 10.3390/environments9050060

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] El-Nemr MA, Abdelmonem NM, Ismail IMA, Ragab S, El Nemr A. 2020. Ozone and ammonium hydroxide modification of biochar prepared from Pisum sativum peels improves the adsorption of copper (II) from an aqueous medium. Environmental Processes 7:973−1007 doi: 10.1007/s40710-020-00455-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Li L, Han J, Huang X, Qiu S, Liu X, et al. 2023. Organic pollutants removal from aqueous solutions using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as adsorbents: a review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 11:111217 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111217

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Yang Y, Huang J, Zimmerman AR, et al. 2021. Mechanisms and adsorption capacities of hydrogen peroxide modified ball milled biochar for the removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions. Bioresource Technology 337:125432 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125432

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Karunanayake AG, Todd OA, Crowley M, Ricchetti L, Pittman Jr CU, et al. 2018. Lead and cadmium remediation using magnetized and nonmagnetized biochar from Douglas fir. Chemical Engineering Journal 331:480−491 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.124

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Son EB, Poo KM, Chang JS, Chae KJ. 2018. Heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions using engineered magnetic biochars derived from waste marine macro-algal biomass. Science of The Total Environment 615:161−168 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Li H, Yu L, Chen Z, Xiao B, Jin K. 2024. The characteristics of adsorption Cr(VI) by iron-modified and iron-doped phosphorus-based biochar biochar. Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews 17:2329607 doi: 10.1080/17518253.2024.2329607

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Ni Z, Zhou L, Lin Z, Kuang B, Zhu G, et al. 2023. Iron-modified biochar boosts anaerobic digestion of sulfamethoxazole pharmaceutical wastewater: performance and microbial mechanism. Journal of Hazardous Materials 452:131314 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131314

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Ou W, Lan X, Guo J, Cai A, Liu P, et al. 2023. Preparation of iron/calcium-modified biochar for phosphate removal from industrial wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production 383:135468 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135468

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] El-Bestawy EA, Gaber M, Shokry H, Samy M. 2023. Effective degradation of atrazine by spinach-derived biochar via persulfate activation system: process optimization, mechanism, degradation pathway and application in real wastewater. Environmental Research 229:115987 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115987

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Liang Y, Tao R, Zhao B, Meng Z, Cheng Y, et al. 2024. Roles of iron and manganese in bimetallic biochar composites for efficient persulfate activation and atrazine removal. Biochar 6:41 doi: 10.1007/s42773-024-00331-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Kumar M, Xiong X, Wan Z, Sun Y, Tsang DCW, et al. 2020. Ball milling as a mechanochemical technology for fabrication of novel biochar nanomaterials. Bioresource Technology 312:123613 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123613

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Amusat SO, Kebede TG, Dube S, Nindi MM. 2021. Ball-milling synthesis of biochar and biochar-based nanocomposites and prospects for removal of emerging contaminants: a review. Journal of Water Process Engineering 41:101993 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101993

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Shao J, Zhang J, Zhang X, Feng Y, Zhang H, et al. 2018. Enhance SO2 adsorption performance of biochar modified by CO2 activation and amine impregnation. Fuel 224:138−146 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Pallarés J, González-Cencerrado A, Arauzo I. 2018. Production and characterization of activated carbon from barley straw by physical activation with carbon dioxide and steam. Biomass and Bioenergy 115:64−73 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.04.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Tao Q, Li B, Chen Y, Zhao J, Li Q, et al. 2021. An integrated method to produce fermented liquid feed and biologically modified biochar as cadmium adsorbents using corn stalks. Waste Management 127:112−120 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Xu Y, Wu S, Huang F, Huang H, Yi Z, et al. 2022. Biomodification of feedstock for quality-improved biochar: a green method to enhance the Cd sorption capacity of Miscanthus lutarioriparius-derived biochar. Journal of Cleaner Production 350:131241 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131241

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Muhammad H, Wei T, Cao G, Yu S, Ren X, et al. 2021. Study of soil microorganisms modified wheat straw and biochar for reducing cadmium leaching potential and bioavailability. Chemosphere 273:129644 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129644

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Zhang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Inyang M. 2012. Synthesis of porous MgO-biochar nanocomposites for removal of phosphate and nitrate from aqueous solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal 210:26−32 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Yin S, Yi H, Liu M, Yang J, Yang S, et al. 2024. An in situ exploration of how Fe/N/C oxygen reduction catalysts evolve during synthesis under pyrolytic conditions. Nature Communications 15:6229 doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50629-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Wang Y, Li J, Xu L, Wu D, Li Q, et al. 2024. EDTA functionalized Mg/Al hydroxides modified biochar for Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal: adsorption performance and mechanism. Separation and Purification Technology 335:126199 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.126199

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Peng Z, Fan Z, Chen X, Zhou X, Gao ZF, et al. 2022. Fabrication of nano iron oxide-modified biochar from co-hydrothermal carbonization of microalgae and Fe(II) salt for efficient removal of rhodamine B. Nanomaterials 12:2271 doi: 10.3390/nano12132271

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Fang Y, Ni X, Xiao Q, Huang S, López-Valdivieso A. 2025. Iron-based materials synthesized by mechanical ball milling for environmental contaminants removal: progress and prospects. International Journal of Environmental Research 19:12 doi: 10.1007/s41742-024-00671-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Zhang H, Cheng Z, Hu K, Shen B, Lyu H, et al. 2025. Atmosphere regulation: unraveling effective strategies for creating high-performance iron ore/biochar composite nanomaterials in ball milling processes. Biochar 7:82 doi: 10.1007/s42773-025-00474-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Qiu M, Liu L, Ling Q, Cai Y, Yu S, et al. 2022. Biochar for the removal of contaminants from soil and water: a review. Biochar 4:19 doi: 10.1007/s42773-022-00146-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Wei J, Wang L, Liu Y, Ding D, Li Q, et al. 2024. Synergistic ultra-high adsorption and oxidation of arsenic in groundwater by iron-modified biochar: mechanisms and potential application. Chemical Engineering Journal 499:156281 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.156281

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Xu L, Dong J, Bai Y, Liu Y, Li T, et al. 2025. Iron modified biochar derived from diverse feedstock: enhancing denitrification and mechanistic insights into the detoxification and removal of Cu2+ and Pb2+. Journal of Hazardous Materials 495:139126 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139126

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Wang T, Zhao R, Wang Z, Wang Y, Cheng W, et al. 2024. Insights into iron-induced structural changes in N-rich biochar for facilitating efficient organic pollutants removal by peroxymonosulfate activation: cooperation of enrichment and degradation. Separation and Purification Technology 346:127486 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127486

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Wang X, Zou T, Lian J, Chen Y, Cheng L, et al. 2025. Simultaneous mitigation of cadmium contamination and greenhouse gas emissions in paddy soil by iron-modified biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials 488:137430 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137430

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Huang H, Zheng Y, Wei D, Yang G, Peng X, et al. 2022. Efficient removal of pefloxacin from aqueous solution by acid–alkali modified sludge-based biochar: adsorption kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamics, and mechanism. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29:43201−43211 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18220-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Yan L, Gao G, Lu M, Riaz M, Zhang M, et al. 2024. Insight into the amelioration effect of nitric acid-modified biochar on saline soil physicochemical properties and plant growth. Plants 13:3434 doi: 10.3390/plants13233434

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Zhang S, Wang Y, Wang Y, Bai X. 2025. Adsorption effect of sodium dihydrogen phosphate-modified kaolin on heavy metals during MSW pyrolysis. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 47:755−769 doi: 10.1080/15567036.2024.2445122

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Jiang L, Yi X, Yang K, Li M, Rao H, et al. 2023. Comparison of adsorption behavior of Pb(II) by acid–alkali and chitosan modified biochar derived from kiwifruit branch. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 29:410−426 doi: 10.1080/10807039.2022.2098467

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Tan Y, Wang J, Zhan L, Yang H, Gong Y. 2024. Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using ball mill modified biochar: multivariate modeling, optimization and experimental study. Scientific Reports 14:4853 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55520-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Jiang F, Liu M, Li S, Liang M, Hu X, et al. 2024. Mechanism study on the immobilization of Cu2+/Pb2+ in aqueous phase by mineral co-milling-modified biochar. Langmuir 40:17897−17908 doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00948

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Yang X, Luo S, Zhou J, Sun P, Guo Y, et al. 2025. Ball-milled dysprosium oxide loaded biochar-montmorillonite composite for efficient removal and great recycling performance of cationic organic pollutants. Industrial Crops and Products 235:121777 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121777

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Nan H, Huang R, Zhang X, Wang C. 2024. How does ball-milling elevate biochar as a value-added peroxydisulfate activator for antibiotics removal? Industrial Crops and Products 214:118569 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118569

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Su J, Guo Z, Zhang M, Xie Y, Shi R, et al. 2024. Mn-modified bamboo biochar improves soil quality and immobilizes heavy metals in contaminated soils. Environmental Technology & Innovation 34:103630 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2024.103630

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Mu R, Qian S, Ma Y, Deng Z, Tang J, et al. 2024. Functionally-designed metal salt and ball milling co-modified sludge biochar for adsorptive removal of trace level sulfamethoxazole: behavior, characterization, mechanism and dft study. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 12:113479 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2024.113479

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Su JZ, Feng XN, Xiang P, Guo ZL, Li LX, et al. 2024. Remediation of multi-metal (loid) contaminated soils using Mn-modified biochar: mechanistic insights and influencing factors. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 192:36−48 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2024.09.115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Kabir E, Kim KH, Kwon EE. 2023. Biochar as a tool for the improvement of soil and environment. Frontiers in Environmental Science 11:1324533 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1324533

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Yang F, Jiang Y, Dai M, Hou X, Peng C. 2022. Active biochar-supported iron oxides for Cr(VI) removal from groundwater: kinetics, stability and the key role of FeO in electron-transfer mechanism. Journal of Hazardous Materials 424:127542 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127542

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Ye Z, Wang C, Xia P, Xu A. 2025. Sustainable electro-Fenton system for water/wastewater treatment. In Management of Water Resources Using Electrochemical Methods, eds. Liu G, Jiang Y, Zhang C. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 59−86 doi: 10.1201/9781003515753
    [96] Yang Y, Ma P, Li Y, Chen Y, Zhang H. 2024. Sludge-derived biochar improves sludge electro-dewatering performance: conductivity analysis. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 701:134838 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.134838

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Yao Y, Gao B, Zhang M, Inyang M, Zimmerman AR. 2012. Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere 89:1467−1471 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Sharma G, Verma Y, Lai CW, Naushad M, Iqbal J, et al. 2024. Biochar and biosorbents derived from biomass for arsenic remediation. Heliyon 10:e36288 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36288

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Dong X, Ma LQ, Li Y. 2011. Characteristics and mechanisms of hexavalent chromium removal by biochar from sugar beet tailing. Journal of Hazardous Materials 190:909−915 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Al Masud MA, Samaraweera H, Mondol MMH, Septian A, Kumar R, Terry LG. 2025. Iron biochar synergy in aquatic systems through surface functionalities electron transfer and reactive species dynamics. npj Clean Water 8:46 doi: 10.1038/s41545-025-00471-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Wang Y, Fang W, Cheng M, Li W, Cen Q, et al. 2025. A review on the application of iron-carbon composites prepared from red mud and organic solid waste for wastewater treatment. Desalination 614:119202 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2025.119202

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Meng F, Wang Y, Wei Y. 2025. Advancements in biochar for soil remediation of heavy metals and/or organic pollutants. Materials 18:1524 doi: 10.3390/ma18071524

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Fdez-Sanromán A, Pazos M, Rosales E, Sanromán MA. 2020. Unravelling the environmental application of biochar as low-cost biosorbent: a review. Applied Sciences 10:7810 doi: 10.3390/app10217810

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Frank JR, Brown TR, Malmsheimer RW, Volk TA, Ha H. 2020. The financial trade-off between the production of biochar and biofuel via pyrolysis under uncertainty. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 14:594−604 doi: 10.1002/bbb.2092

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Tang L, Yu J, Pang Y, Zeng G, Deng Y, et al. 2018. Sustainable efficient adsorbent: alkali-acid modified magnetic biochar derived from sewage sludge for aqueous organic contaminant removal. Chemical Engineering Journal 336:160−169 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Yan L, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liu S, Wang C, et al. 2020. ZnCl2 modified biochar derived from aerobic granular sludge for developed microporosity and enhanced adsorption to tetracycline. Bioresource Technology 297:122381 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122381

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Zhao W, Zhang Z, Xin Y, Xiao R, Gao F, et al. 2024. Na2S-modified biochar for Hg(II) removal from wastewater: a techno-economic assessment. Fuel 356:129641 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129641

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Zhang M, Liu R, Huang J, Si W, Wang G, et al. 2025. Life cycle assessment and environmental benefit analysis of a modified biochar system for heavy metal wastewater treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering 76:108072 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108072

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Maroušek J, Kolář L, Strunecký O, Kopecký M, Bartoš P, et al. 2020. Modified biochars present an economic challenge to phosphate management in wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Cleaner Production 272:123015 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Chen M, Liu Y, Pan J, Jiang Y, Zou X, et al. 2024. Low-cost Ca/Mg co-modified biochar for effective phosphorus recovery: adsorption mechanisms, resourceful utilization, and life cycle assessment. Chemical Engineering Journal 502:157993 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.157993

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Nguyen MV, Lee BK. 2015. Removal of dimethyl sulfide from aqueous solution using cost-effective modified chicken manure biochar produced from slow pyrolysis. Sustainability 7:15057−15072 doi: 10.3390/su71115057

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Chen G, Jin Y, Lu J. 2024. Experimental study on adsorption of SO2 and DCM from air pollutants by modified biochar. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 14:15705−15719 doi: 10.1007/s13399-023-03864-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113] Yao Q, Yang Z, Nie C, Chen M, Sun X, et al. 2024. Online in-situ modification of biochar for the efficient removal of elemental mercury and co-benefit of SO2/NO removal. Chemical Engineering Journal 499:156565 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.156565

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Liao J, Hu A, Zhao Z, Liu X, Jiang C, et al. 2021. Biochar with large specific surface area recruits N2O-reducing microbes and mitigate N2O emission. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 156:108212 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Abbas HMM, Rais U, Altaf MM, Rasul F, Shah A, et al. 2024. Microbial-inoculated biochar for remediation of salt and heavy metal contaminated soils. Science of The Total Environment 954:176104 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Zhou Y, Gu G, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Peng C, et al. 2025. Chloride-induced electron enrichment strategy: stabilization mechanism and efficacy of calcium/magnesium modified biochar against chromium contamination in soil. Environmental Research 285:122622 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2025.122622

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Fakhar A, Galgo SJC, Canatoy RC, Rafique M, Sarfraz R, et al. 2025. Advancing modified biochar for sustainable agriculture: a comprehensive review on characterization, analysis, and soil performance. Biochar 7:8 doi: 10.1007/s42773-024-00397-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] Kapoor A, Sharma R, Kumar A, Sepehya S. 2022. Biochar as a means to improve soil fertility and crop productivity: a review. Journal of Plant Nutrition 45:2380−2388 doi: 10.1080/01904167.2022.2027980

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Bolan N, Hoang SA, Beiyuan J, Gupta S, Hou D, et al. 2022. Multifunctional applications of biochar beyond carbon storage. International Materials Reviews 67:150−200 doi: 10.1080/09506608.2021.1922047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] El-Naggar A, Lee SS, Rinklebe J, Farooq M, Song H, et al. 2019. Biochar application to low fertility soils: a review of current status, and future prospects. Geoderma 337:536−554 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121] Tatarková V, Hiller E, Vaculík M. 2013. Impact of wheat straw biochar addition to soil on the sorption, leaching, dissipation of the herbicide (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) acetic acid and the growth of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 92:215−221 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.02.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122] Yavari S, Kamyab H, Asadpour R, Yavari S, Sapari NB, et al. 2023. The fate of imazapyr herbicide in the soil amended with carbon sorbents. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 13:7561−7569 doi: 10.1007/s13399-021-01587-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Manna S, Singh N. 2019. Biochars mediated degradation, leaching and bioavailability of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl in a sandy loam soil. Geoderma 334:63−71 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124] Yang X, Wan Y, Zheng Y, He F, Yu Z, et al. 2019. Surface functional groups of carbon-based adsorbents and their roles in the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions: a critical review. Chemical Engineering Journal 366:608−621 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Huang J, Zimmerman AR, Chen H, Wan Y, Zheng Y, et al. 2022. Fixed bed column performance of Al-modified biochar for the removal of sulfamethoxazole and sulfapyridine antibiotics from wastewater. Chemosphere 305:135475 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135475

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Schmidt HP, Pandit BH, Martinsen V, Cornelissen G, Conte P, et al. 2015. Fourfold increase in pumpkin yield in response to low-dosage root zone application of urine-enhanced biochar to a fertile tropical soil. Agriculture 5:723−741 doi: 10.3390/agriculture5030723

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha SJ, Lehmann J. 2010. Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant and soil 333:117−128 doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0327-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Hagemann N, Joseph S, Schmidt HP, Kammann CI, Harter J, et al. 2017. Organic coating on biochar explains its nutrient retention and stimulation of soil fertility. Nature Communications 8:1089 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01123-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] Khan S, Irshad S, Mehmood K, Hasnain Z, Nawaz M, et al. 2024. Biochar production and characteristics, its impacts on soil health, crop production, and yield enhancement: a review. Plants 13:166 doi: 10.3390/plants13020166

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Guo L, Zhao L, Tang Y, Zhou J, Shi B. 2022. An iron-based biochar for persulfate activation with highly efficient and durable removal of refractory dyes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10:106979 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106979

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Tyagi U, Anand N. 2022. Sustainable and eco-friendly biomass derived biochars for the removal of contaminants from wastewater: current status and perspectives. In Biochar - Productive Technologies, Properties and Applications. eds. Bartoli M, Giorcelli M, Tagliaferro A. London: IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.105534
    [132] Algethami JS, Irshad MK, Javed W, Alhamami MAM, Ibrahim M. 2023. Iron-modified biochar improves plant physiology, soil nutritional status and mitigates pb and cd-hazard in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1221434 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1221434

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133] Galaburda M, Bosacka A, Sternik D, Oranska O, Borysenko M, et al. 2023. Physicochemical and sorption characteristics of carbon biochars based on lignin and industrial waste magnetic iron dust. Water 15:189 doi: 10.3390/w15010189

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [134] Yang W, Feng G, Miles D, Gao L, Jia Y, et al. 2020. Impact of biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and soil carbon sequestration in corn grown under drip irrigation with mulching. Science of The Total Environment 729:138752 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138752

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhang Y, Chen H, Islam S. 2025. Advances in biochar modification for environmental remediation with emphasis on iron functionalization. Biochar X 1: e009 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0025-0010
    Zhang Y, Chen H, Islam S. 2025. Advances in biochar modification for environmental remediation with emphasis on iron functionalization. Biochar X 1: e009 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0025-0010

Figures(5)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(1661) PDF downloads(1148)

Other Articles By Authors

Review   Open Access    

Advances in biochar modification for environmental remediation with emphasis on iron functionalization

Biochar X  1 Article number: e009  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Biochar, a porous carbonaceous material produced from biomass pyrolysis under limited oxygen, has emerged as a promising material for environmental remediation due to its stability, adsorption capacity, and potential for carbon sequestration. Though raw or unmodified biochar often exhibits limited surface functionality, low surface area, and poor affinity for specific contaminants, its effectiveness in practical applications is restricted. Various modification techniques have been developed to address these limitations, including physical activation, chemical functionalization, and surface doping with metals. Among these, iron-modified biochar (Fe-BC) has attracted considerable attention due to the unique redox properties of iron and its strong binding affinity for anions and organic pollutants. Fe-BC is typically synthesized through impregnation, co-pyrolysis with iron salts, or post-pyrolysis treatment. These modifications enhance the surface area and porosity and introduce reactive sites that significantly improve the sorption of phosphate, arsenic, heavy metals, and dyes from wastewater, as well as facilitate catalytic reactions such as Fenton-like oxidation. Recent studies have demonstrated the multifunctionality of Fe-BC in wastewater treatment and soil remediation, as well as in agriculture as a slow-release nutrient carrier. Moreover, novel synthesis approaches using green chemistry principles and low-cost iron precursors have made Fe-BC more sustainable and scalable. Despite its potential, challenges remain regarding the long-term stability of leaching iron, regeneration, and environmental risks. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current modification strategies for biochar with a focused evaluation of Fe-BC, including synthesis methods, physicochemical properties, contaminant removal mechanisms, and practical applications. Future perspectives are discussed to guide research toward optimizing Fe-BC for the circular economy and sustainable environmental technologies.

    • Biochar is a carbonaceous material produced by pyrolyzing biomass in an oxygen-limited atmosphere[1]. Typical feedstocks for biochar production include agricultural waste, forestry residues, municipal sludge, and animal manure (Fig. 1)[2]. Biochar is gaining increasing attention in environmental remediation due to its advantages of a large specific surface area, high adsorption performance, and low cost[3]. As a multifunctional material, biochar has become an increasingly prominent research focus in various disciplines due to its low-cost advantage and beneficial carbon sequestration and environmental applications[4]. Biochar is utilized extensively for its benefits, including reducing nutrient leaching from the soil, improving soil conditions, and facilitating carbon sequestration. It is also used to remove organic pollutants, such as fungicides, herbicides, and other pesticides, from the soil[5]. Various agricultural residues can be utilized as feedstocks for biochar production, including crop residues (e.g., straw, husks, shells), wood products, animal manure, and dairy byproducts[610]. The type of feedstocks used and the pyrolysis conditions play essential roles in determining the physical and chemical properties of the produced biochar[11]. Biochar exhibits sorption properties, making it an alternative medium for immobilizing organic pollutants and heavy metals from wastewater, sewage, and aqueous media[12]. However, the physico-chemical characteristics of pristine biochar are heterogeneous, including surface area, porosity, chemical functionality, and surface charge, and vary with feedstock and pyrolysis conditions. Consequently, the adsorption capacity of pristine biochar for pollutants is relatively low. In this regard, various methods are employed to modify biochar, thereby improving its physicochemical properties, such as surface area, functionality, and pore structure, and enhancing its ability to remove contaminants efficiently[13]. Therefore, the development of low-cost, high-efficiency, and environmentally friendly functionalized biochar is of great importance for improving pollution control, with recent attention focusing on increasing sorption sites and functional groups through functionalization.

      Figure 1. 

      Biochar is produced from various feedstocks through pyrolysis.

      Biochar modification involving various methods such as acid treatment, alkali treatment, amination, surfactant modification, mineral adsorbent impregnation, steam activation, and magnetic modification has been extensively studied[14]. These methods can be categorized into three main groups: chemical modification, physical modification, and biological modification[15]. Iron mineral-loaded biochar has emerged as a popular modification in recent years. Iron-modified biochar enhances contaminant adsorption by increasing surface charge, introducing hydroxyl groups, and providing active sites from iron oxides (e.g., hematite, goethite), while also imparting magnetic properties that facilitate reuse and recycling[16,17]. According to Diao et al.[18], when peroxymonosulfate (PMS) was activated to remove atrazine from soil using a novel biochar-supported zero-valent iron (BC-nZVI), about 96% of atrazine was removed. Another study found that Fe-phenol-modified biochar removed 94% of atrazine in 30 min at pH 8[19]. In conclusion, the advancement of biochar modification techniques, particularly iron-modified biochar, demonstrates significant potential for environmental remediation. Continued research and development in biochar modifications could lead to broader water and soil treatment applications, supporting environmental sustainability efforts.

      This review significantly advances the discussion on iron-modified biochar by systematically exploring iron–carbon (Fe–C) interactions across environmental and energy applications, moving beyond conventional biochar reviews. It delves into iron functionalization methods—including in situ pyrolysis, post-treatment impregnation, and emerging techniques—and elucidates the synergistic roles of Fe species and carbon matrices in enhancing adsorption, redox reactivity, and electron transfer. Critically, the review highlights persistent research gaps such as the insufficient mechanistic understanding of contaminant interactions, the lack of standardized evaluation protocols, and limited field-scale validation. It further identifies future priorities, including lifecycle assessments, multifunctional hybrid composites, circular bioeconomy integration, and novel 'smart' biochar applications for sensing and controlled remediation. By addressing these understudied areas, this work provides a comprehensive and forward-looking perspective that distinguishes it from earlier reviews and guides future research toward scalable, sustainable, and mechanism-driven applications of Fe-biochar.

    • Biochar modification methods have garnered significant attention in recent years due to their potential to enhance the physicochemical properties of biochar for various environmental and agricultural applications. Unmodified biochar often has limitations such as low surface area, limited porosity, and inadequate active functional groups, which can restrict its effectiveness in adsorption, nutrient retention, or catalysis. Several modification techniques have been developed to address these issues, broadly categorized into physical, chemical, and biological methods. Physical modifications include steam activation, heat treatment, and ball milling to increase porosity and surface area[20]. Chemical modifications involve the use of acids (e.g., HNO3, H2SO4), bases (e.g., NaOH, KOH), oxidizing agents (e.g., H2O2), or metal impregnation (e.g., Fe, Mn, Zn) to enhance surface functionality and ion exchange capacity[21,22]. Biological methods utilize microbial treatments to introduce specific functional groups or biofilm layers that can aid in biodegradation or nutrient transformation[23]. These tailored modifications significantly improve the biochar's adsorption capacity for heavy metals, nutrients, and organic pollutants, making it a versatile material for soil remediation, water treatment, and carbon sequestration. Overall, the choice of modification method depends on the intended application and the source material used for biochar production. A comprehensive summary of biochar modification methods and iron-functionalized biochar is provided in Fig. 2 and Table 1.

      Figure 2. 

      Preparation, modification methods, and environmental applications of iron-modified biochar.

      Table 1.  Biochar modification methods and iron-modified biochar

      Modification method Description Key feature Target contaminant/
      application
      Ref.
      Physical activation Steam, CO2, N2, or air at high temperatures activate biochar Increases surface area and porosity Adsorption of dyes, heavy metals [24]
      Ball milling Utilizes the kinetic energy of moving balls to alter particle morphology Improves specific surface area, pore volume, and functional groups Heavy metals, PFAS removal [25,26]
      Gas filling Introduces oxidizing gases to react with carbon in biochar Increases surface area, micropore area, micropore capacity, and formation of surface oxides Heavy metals removal [27]
      Steam Thermal treatment without oxygen, reacts with carbon to form CO and H2 Enhances mesopore structures at higher temperatures, while reducing micropore structure Heavy metals, tetracycline, sulfamethazine removal [13,28]
      Chemical activation Uses activating agents like KOH, H3PO4, or ZnCl2 Enhances functional groups and pore structure Pollutant removal, energy storage [29]
      Acid Treatment with hydrochloric, sulfuric, nitric, phosphoric, oxalic, or citric acid effectively removes metallic impurities while introducing acidic functional groups Increases the acidic functional groups and improving the pore structure to provide more cation exchange active sites Heavy metals removal, prepare biochar-based fertilizers, improvement of saline-alkali soil [3033]
      Alkali Common alkaline agents include potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide. Increases the number of functional groups, improve the specific surface area and pore volume, provide better anion attachment sites Heavy metals, antibiotics, VOCs removal [34,35]
      Oxidizer Use oxidizing-agents like H2O2 or KMnO4 Provides additional redox potential by increasing the number of oxygen-containing functional groups Soil amendment, heavy metals, organic pollutants removal [29,36,37]
      Metal salts Pyrolyzed together with the feedstock, or treating pre-formed biochar under specific conditions. Form the porous structure, oxygen-containing functional groups, catalytic capacity, recycled biochar Heavy metals, dyes, antibiotics removal [30,3840]
      Iron impregnation Post-pyrolysis treatment with FeCl3, Fe(NO3)3, or FeSO4 solutions Introduction of Fe species for redox activity Heavy metals, phosphate, arsenic [41,42]
      Co-pyrolysis with iron Biomass and iron precursors are pyrolyzed together Strong interaction between Fe and the carbon matrix Enhanced stability and adsorption [43]
      Precipitation method Iron salts precipitated onto the biochar surface Uniform Fe distribution, nano-Fe formation Nitrate, antibiotics, organics [44]
      Magnetic modification Embeds magnetite or maghemite (Fe3O4/γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles Magnetic recovery, reusable sorbents Magnetic separation, water treatment [45]
      Hybrid composite Blending Fe-biochar with zeolite, silica, graphene, or polymers Multifunctionality and synergistic remediation effects Emerging pollutants, multi-contaminant sites [46,47]
      Nano-iron functionalization Biochar functionalized with zero-valent iron (nZVI) Enhanced reactivity, Fenton-like activity Organic pollutants, Cr(VI), pesticides [16,48]
      Red mud incorporation Utilizes industrial waste (iron-rich red mud) as Fe source Sustainable, cost-effective approach Soil remediation, acid mine drainage [49]
      Smart biochar sensor systems Iron-biochar integrated with sensing agents or responsive materials Environmental sensing and contaminant detection Real-time monitoring, innovative remediation [14]
    • Currently, chemical techniques are one of the most used modification methods. They usually include modification with acids, bases, oxidizing agents, metal salts or metal oxides, and organic reagents. Acid modification can enhance adsorption efficiency by increasing acidic functional groups and improving the pore structure, thereby providing more active sites for cation exchange. However, the use of strong acids may adversely affect the pore structure. Additionally, acid modification can alter the specific surface area of biochar, with the extent of this alteration depending on the type and concentration of the acid used[30,50,51]. Alkali modification can enhance the number of functional groups on the surface of biochar, increase its specific surface area and pore volume, and provide more attachment sites for anions, thereby enhancing the adsorption of pollutants[5254]. Oxidant modification can increase the quantity of oxygen-containing functional groups on biochar. Biochar modified with H2O2 or KMnO4 exhibits higher contaminant adsorption capacity than pristine biochar[55,56].

      Modification with metal salts or metal oxides can change biochar's adsorption, catalytic, and magnetic properties. The biochar surface is typically negatively charged and exhibits low adsorption capacity for anionic contaminants. Metal modification can alter the surface properties of biochar, thereby increasing its adsorption capacity for anionic pollutants. Additionally, metal salt modification can load metals onto biochar, enhancing its adsorption capacity and imparting catalytic properties. Moreover, due to the small particle size of biochar, recovering it from water used for pollutant removal is challenging. Modification with iron salts or iron oxides can enhance the magnetic properties of biochar, facilitating its recovery and recycling. For instance, combining biochar with magnetic adsorbents, such as magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles or zero-valent iron, imparts magnetic properties to the biochar. This modification facilitates the recycling of biochar and enhances its adsorption capacity for heavy metals[57,58].

      Two methods were employed to modify biochar using metal salts or metal oxides. The first method involves mixing metal salts or metal oxides with the feedstock, followed by pyrolysis to produce biochar. The second method entails first pyrolyzing the feedstock to prepare biochar, which is then impregnated with metal ions or metal oxides under specific conditions[41,5961]. Common metals used include iron, manganese, magnesium, and aluminum. Several studies have indicated that iron-modified biochar exhibits the highest efficiency in contaminant degradation. The superior performance of iron-modified biochar can be attributed to the presence of iron particles on the biochar surface, as demonstrated by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis[62]. Jiang et al.[47] reported a contaminant degradation efficiency of 73.47% when using a composite of zero-valent iron and biochar (ZVI/BC) for activation. The enhanced catalytic reactivity of Fe-loaded biochar is likely due to the increased density of active sites available for activation, which facilitates more efficient electron transfer[63].

    • Physical biochar modification methods generally include ball milling modification, steam activation, and gasification. The primary aim of these methods is to change the surface properties and porous structure of biochar.

      Lately, ball milling has received increasing attention as an approach to manufacturing advanced nano-materials due to its high efficiency and eco-friendly features[48]. The high-speed moving spheres in the ball mill mechanically reduce the particle size of biochar to the micro- or nano-range, thus increasing the surface area and homogeneity of biochar. Ball milling application technology is favored by researchers for its affordability and reproducibility[64]. It is recognized that ball milling can improve biochar's functional characteristics and specific surface area, thus improving its sorption ability to various pollutants.

      Modification with gases such as steam, oxygen, or carbon dioxide has proven effective in increasing the surface area and pore volume of biochar, while also forming active sites on its surface. The gas modification process typically occurs at temperatures above 700 °C and requires small amounts of steam and oxygen; however, biochar yield is lower than that from conventional pyrolysis. The advantages of gas modification include its environmental friendliness and the absence of secondary pollution. However, the method's high temperature and energy requirements, along with a relatively low carbon yield, limit its widespread application[6567].

    • Biological modification primarily involves utilizing biological resources, such as microorganisms or plants, to modify biochar. For instance, microorganisms can be introduced and cultivated on the surface of biochar. Typically, microbial residual biomass, including bacteria, algae, fungi, and yeasts, can effectively accumulate heavy metals. Additionally, these microorganisms can enhance the adsorption and biodegradation of both organic and inorganic materials[6870]. Currently, the use of this type of method is relatively low compared to other modification methods. The main reason for this is the complexity and duration of the modification process using microorganisms or plants.

    • The modification of biochar with iron (Fe) represents a crucial research frontier in environmental remediation, carbon sequestration, and nutrient recovery. Biochar, a carbon-rich material produced through the pyrolysis of biomass, is highly valued for its porous structure, high surface area, and diverse functional groups. However, pristine biochar often exhibits limited reactivity toward specific contaminants. To enhance its physicochemical performance, especially for applications such as heavy metal adsorption, phosphate immobilization, and redox-based pollutant degradation, researchers have increasingly focused on iron modification strategies. Iron-carbon (Fe–C) interactions within modified biochar systems are critical in driving sorption, catalytic, and electron transfer mechanisms (Table 1, Fig. 3).

      Figure 3. 

      Iron–carbon interactions in biochar.

    • Iron-loaded biochar composites are typically synthesized using four primary methods: hybrid pyrolysis of precursors, chemical precipitation, the hydrothermal process, and ball milling[42]. The precursor-mixing pyrolysis method primarily involves the incorporation of metal ions into the biomass before pyrolysis. In this process, the biomass feedstock is impregnated with a solution of divalent or trivalent iron salts, allowing Fe ions to be introduced onto the surface or into the interior of the biomass precursor. In the in situ method, iron salts such as FeCl3, Fe(NO3)3, or FeSO4 are mixed with biomass feedstocks (e.g., sawdust, rice husk, sewage sludge) before pyrolysis, enabling the formation of Fe3O4, Fe2O3, or Fe0 nanoparticles within the biochar matrix during thermal treatment[71]. During pyrolysis, these Fe ions are subsequently converted in situ to iron oxides through interactions with reducing agents produced during the thermal decomposition of the biomass[72]. Post-pyrolysis modification involves impregnating pre-formed biochar with iron solutions, followed by thermal or chemical treatment, which facilitates the deposition of iron oxide or zero-valent iron (ZVI) on the biochar surface[20].

      Furthermore, the process of immersing biochar in a solution containing metal ions and introducing a chemical reagent to induce the precipitation of metal ions onto the biochar surface is referred to as chemical precipitation[73]. In addition, the hydrothermal method involves the crystallization and uniform dispersion of iron oxides on the surface or within the biochar under high temperature and pressure, using water or other solvents as the reaction medium[74]. The ball milling method enhances the adsorption properties of biochar and iron oxides by applying mechanical external forces. This process induces structural defects, reduces the size of solid particles to the nanoscale, generates accelerated bond-breaking energy, and facilitates the formation of free radicals through various mechanisms[75,76]. Emerging modification techniques include hydrothermal synthesis, sol–gel processes, and microwave-assisted impregnation, which allow for better control over nanoparticle distribution and oxidation states of iron. These methods can tailor the pore size distribution, surface charge, and redox activity of biochar, enhancing its environmental functionality[77]. Table 2 provides a comparative overview of biochar modification techniques, highlighting iron-based modification's enhanced efficacy and benefits.

      Table 2.  The advantages of iron modification compared with other modification methods

      Feature Iron-modified biochar Acid/alkali-modified biochar Physical modification Other metal modifications (e.g., Mg, Al, Zn)
      Magnetic separation Excellent, enables easy recovery None None Usually none (unless with magnetic metals)
      Adsorption of anions (e.g., As, Cr, F) Very strong (specific adsorption + reduction for Cr) Alkali-modification improves it, but weaker and non-specific Moderate (mainly physisorption) Strong (e.g., Al-modified for As, Mg-modified for P)
      Adsorption of cations (e.g., Pb2+, Cd2+) Good Excellent (acid-modification increases surface O-groups) Good Excellent (e.g., Mg-modified
      for Cd)
      Treatment of organic pollutants Adsorption + catalytic degradation Adsorption (may be enhanced
      via porosity)
      Adsorption (high surface area) Adsorption (some may have catalytic properties)
      Primary function Adsorption, reduction, catalysis, magnetism Enhancement of ion exchange/
      electrostatic adsorption
      Creation of porous structure Enhancement of specific adsorption/complexation
      Application cost Low Low to moderate Moderate (high temperature
      & energy)
      Moderate to high
      (depends on metal salt)
      Key application field Wastewater (As/Cr removal, organic degradation), soil remediation Adjustment of adsorption for cations/anions General-purpose adsorbent, energy storage Targeted pollutant removal (e.g., P, F)
      Ref. [7881] [8285] [8689] [9092]
    • Iron-modified biochar (Fe–BC) demonstrates distinctive Fe–C synergisms that extend its role from a passive sorbent to an active redox mediator. The incorporated iron species serve as electron donors or acceptors, thereby enhancing the transformation of contaminants such as Cr(VI), As(III), and various organic pollutants through Fenton-like reactions[93]. In the case of Cr(VI) removal, multiple synergistic mechanisms operate concurrently. Initially, electrostatic attraction between negatively charged Cr(VI) species (e.g., CrO42, HCrO4) and the positively charged surface of Fe–BC promotes adsorption. Reduction then becomes the dominant pathway, whereby Fe(II) in FeO and redox-active functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl and carbonyl moieties) donate electrons to convert toxic Cr(VI) into the less harmful Cr(III). The resulting Cr(III) is subsequently stabilized through complexation with oxygen-containing functional groups on the biochar surface or through co-precipitation with iron species, forming insoluble compounds such as FeCr2O4 and Cr2O3. Collectively, these processes—adsorption, reduction, complexation, and precipitation—act in concert to ensure effective immobilization and detoxification of Cr(VI)[94]. Simultaneously, the carbon matrix provides structural stability, retards iron leaching, and facilitates electron shuttling via π-conjugated systems and redox-active quinone groups[95,96].

      Beyond chromium remediation, Fe–C interactions enhance the sorption capacity of modified biochar for phosphate and heavy metals. Iron hydroxides and oxides furnish abundant binding sites for anionic species, while the biochar matrix maintains high dispersion and mechanical stability[97,98]. The incorporation of zero-valent iron (ZVI) further strengthens reductive immobilization processes, enabling detoxification of contaminants such as Cr(VI) and U(VI), thereby improving the environmental safety of contaminated systems[99]. More broadly, Fe–BC removes pollutants through a synergistic integration of adsorption, catalytic oxidation, reduction, and electron transfer. The introduction of iron species increases surface area, porosity, and the abundance of functional groups, thereby enhancing adsorption efficiency and ensuring close contact between pollutants and reactive sites. Crucially, Fe–BC also serves as an effective catalyst in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), where Fe2+/Fe3+ cycling and embedded iron oxides or ZVI activate oxidants such as H2O2, peroxymonosulfate (PMS), and peroxydisulfate (PDS), generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) including •OH, SO4, O2, 1O2, and high-valent Fe(IV)/Fe(V) species. These intermediates drive the oxidative degradation of a wide range of organic pollutants, often operating in parallel with direct reduction pathways such as the conversion of Cr(VI) to Cr(III). Furthermore, the graphitic domains and structural defects within the carbon matrix facilitate electron transfer, sustain redox cycling, and prolong catalytic activity. By coupling pre-adsorption with catalytic degradation, Fe–BC not only concentrates contaminants at its surface but also decomposes them into less harmful products, thereby achieving more efficient and sustainable remediation compared with unmodified biochar[100].

    • Despite significant advances, several critical research areas remain to be addressed to harness the potential of Fe-modified biochar systems fully: (1) Redox stability and aging behavior—Long-term field performance of iron-modified biochar under varying pH, redox, and microbial conditions remains poorly understood. Studies must assess how Fe–C interactions evolve and influence the retention and release of contaminants; (2) Structural characterization at the nanoscale—Advanced tools such as X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), Mössbauer spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are essential for elucidating the oxidation states, bonding environments, and spatial distribution of Fe species within the biochar matrix[101]; (3) Controlled synthesis for target—specific applications. Future research should develop standardized, scalable, and cost-effective iron-loading methods optimized for specific pollutants (e.g., nitrate, arsenic, PFAS). The nature of the biomass precursor and the type of iron salt must be tailored to achieve the desirable surface chemistry; (4) Environmental trade-offs and life-cycle analysis. Studies must evaluate the potential risks associated with Fe leaching, nanoparticle toxicity, and greenhouse gas emissions. A systems-level life-cycle assessment of Fe-modified biochar will guide its sustainable implementation[102]; (5) Integration in treatment systems—There is growing interest in deploying Fe-modified biochar in constructed wetlands, bioreactors, and permeable reactive barriers. Field-scale studies assessing regeneration potential, hydraulic behavior, and pollutant removal kinetics are urgently needed[100]. Thus, iron-modified biochar represents a promising multifunctional material at the interface of carbon and iron chemistry. A deeper mechanistic understanding of Fe–C interactions and the development of targeted modification strategies will significantly advance its application in pollution control, nutrient cycling, and climate-smart agriculture.

    • Some research confirms that modified biochar costs almost half that of activated carbon (Table 3). However, its adsorption capacity is comparable to that of activated carbon[103]. At the same time, the adsorption capacity of modified biochar for contaminants is much higher than that of other inexpensive adsorbents. Currently, the feedstock used in biochar production is primarily solid waste from agricultural, forestry, or sewage sludge sources, enabling the resource-oriented utilization of solid waste. Furthermore, the by-products generated during the preparation and modification of biochar can be utilized for energy recovery, further contributing to cost reduction[104].

      Most types of modified biochar, including acid- and alkali-modified biochar and magnetic-modified biochar, exhibit excellent regeneration capabilities. Typically, modified biochar can maintain a stable and high adsorption capacity over three to five cycles[45,105,106]. Although the production of modified biochar, which involves the use of various modifying reagents or techniques, is more expensive than that of pristine biochar, its application cost in actual remediation processes is lower. This is attributed to the higher adsorption capacity of modified biochar and its greater potential for reuse.

      Table 3.  Cost-benefit comparative analysis table of modified biochars for pollutant removal

      Modified biochar Target pollutant Modification method Key cost advantage Cost efficiency
      (USD/g pollutant)
      Ref.
      Na2S-BC Hg(II) One-step pyrolysis with Na2S Use of industrial byproduct Na2S; Simplified one-step process. 1.74 [107]
      K2FeO4-BC Heavy metals Pyrolysis + K2FeO4 impregnation High regeneration capability; Biomass oil/gas byproducts offset energy cost. Becomes cheaper
      after three cycles
      [108]
      Fe-BC P Chemisorption with Fe3+ Feedstock is waste with gate fee; modifiers from scrap metal/waste. ~2.00 [109]
      Ca-BC P Chemisorption with Ca2+ Feedstock is waste with gate fee; modifiers from scrap metal/waste. ~1.50 [109]
      Struvite precipitation P Chemical precipitation Benchmark for P recovery ~17.29 [109]
      Ca/Mg-BC P One-step co-modification with CaCl2/MgCl2 Very low-cost waste feedstock; high capacity. 0.66 [110]
      Amine-modified BC Dimethyl sulfide HNO3/NH3 ammoxidation Free feedstock; modification cost is low. 2.28 [111]
      Commercial AC Dimethyl sulfide Benchmark for comparison 2.62 [111]
    • Modified biochar has exhibited excellent remediation capabilities for air, soil, and water pollution (Fig. 4). For instance, previous literature has shown that the adsorption capacity of modified biochar for SO2 surpasses that of unmodified biochar[112,113]. Additionally, modified biochar can influence soil microorganisms, reducing the denitrification pathway that converts nitrous oxide to nitrogen. This significantly lowers N2O emissions[114].

      Figure 4. 

      Biochar application to the environment.

      Modified biochar effectively remediates various types of soil, particularly saline or heavy metal-contaminated agricultural and forest soils[115,116]. The primary application methods for modified biochar in soil include topsoil incorporation, deep application, and follow-up fertilization. The remediation process mainly occurs through adsorption[117]. Furthermore, using modified biochar can enhance soil fertility and increase crop yields[118]. It can also be utilized to boost microbial activity and regulate plant abundance[117,119]. One of the primary applications of biochar is its role in enhancing the soil's physical and chemical properties. Numerous studies have reported that the incorporation of biochar into agricultural soils offers several benefits, including improved soil water availability, increased water-holding capacity, enhanced soil organic carbon content, and the stimulation of microbial activity[120]. Additionally, biochar amendments are widely utilized to mitigate the leaching of soil contaminants. The application of wheat straw biochar to soil resulted in the transport of 35% of the applied herbicide, 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), compared to 56% transport in non-amended soil[121]. In another study, Yavari et al.[122] reported that only 2.8% of the herbicide imazapyr was leached in soil amended with oil palm empty fruit bunch biochar, compared to 14.2% leaching in unamended soil. In contrast, soil containing oil palm empty fruit bunch biochar alone exhibited 4% leaching. Manna and Singh[123] reported that 78% of the herbicide pyrazosulfuron-ethyl (PYRAZO) leached from untreated sandy loam soil. However, when the soil was amended with rice straw biochar pyrolyzed at 400 °C, PYRAZO leaching was reduced by 25%–58%. In soil treated with rice straw biochar pyrolyzed at 600 °C, the reduction in leaching ranged from 55%–67%. These findings suggest that biochar can serve as an effective medium for mitigating the leaching of contaminants from soil into surface and groundwater systems.

      Modified biochar has been demonstrated to be effective in adsorbing various pollutants in aquatic environments, including organic pollutants, inorganic pollutants, and emerging contaminants such as microplastics. Its adsorption efficiency is significantly higher than that of pristine biochar. Currently, the most effective method for removing heavy metal contaminants from aqueous solutions is adsorption using biochar. Biochar produced through various modification methods contains different functional groups, resulting in varying adsorption capacities for specific heavy metals[124]. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that modified biochar serves as a cost-effective and reusable adsorbent for the removal of antibiotics[125], dyes[56], PFAS[46], and microplastic contaminants[49].

      Several large-scale field trials have confirmed the feasibility of applying modified biochar. A field study on pumpkin cultivation in Nepal demonstrated that the addition of a cow urine-biochar combination (0.75 tons/ha of biochar and 6.3 m3/ha of cow urine) increased yields by 300% compared to urine-only treatments and by 85% compared to biochar-only treatments[126]. A 4-year field trial on corn and soybean yields in the District of Columbia showed no increase in corn yields during the first year. However, yields increased by 20%, 30%, and 140% in the second, third, and fourth years, respectively[127]. This suggests that biochar requires a certain degree of aging in the soil before it has a positive impact on crop yields. As biochar ages in the composting medium, it gradually forms an organic coating on its surface, which enhances nutrient retention compared to fresh biochar[128].

    • Biochar has garnered global attention for its multifaceted roles in environmental sustainability, including carbon sequestration, enhancing soil fertility, pollution remediation, and energy applications. Recent years have witnessed an expansion of biochar utilization beyond traditional soil amendments to advanced fields, including wastewater treatment, composite materials, energy storage, and climate change mitigation. These emerging application areas, while promising, have introduced a critical need for robust evaluation frameworks to assess performance, stability, and environmental impact. However, a significant gap persists in the depth and consistency of research related to biochar modification methods, particularly the use of iron-modified biochar (Fe-biochar) in these evolving domains (Fig. 5).

      Figure 5. 

      Emerging biochar application areas and evaluation criteria.

      The rapid diversification of biochar applications has introduced new opportunities and complexities. In wastewater treatment, biochar is increasingly employed for removing heavy metals, nutrients, dyes, and organic pollutants due to its porosity and surface chemistry[20]. Iron-functionalized biochar has demonstrated an enhanced affinity for anions, such as phosphate and arsenate, as well as for redox-active pollutants like Cr(VI) and nitroaromatic compounds[129]. In catalysis and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), Fe-modified biochar acts as a catalyst in Fenton-like reactions, generating reactive oxygen species to degrade persistent organic pollutants[130]. In energy applications, iron-modified biochar is also being explored for use in supercapacitors, batteries, and as a support material for electrocatalysts, owing to its conductivity and redox potential[131]. Despite these advances, the underlying structure-function relationships, especially those involving Fe–C interactions, are often insufficiently studied or reported. Studies tend to focus on performance metrics (e.g., adsorption capacity or degradation rate) without deeply characterizing the physicochemical transformations and reaction mechanisms of iron within the biochar matrix under environmental or operational conditions.

    • A recurring concern in the literature is the insufficient mechanistic understanding of how iron species are distributed, interact with the carbon matrix, and behave under operational conditions. For example, while numerous papers report enhanced phosphate or arsenic removal by Fe-modified biochar, only a subset investigates whether adsorption occurs via ligand exchange, electrostatic attraction, or surface precipitation, and even fewer distinguish between contributions from Fe(II), Fe(III), and ZVI (zero-valent iron) phases[97]. Similarly, while pyrolysis temperature and biomass feedstock type are known to affect the dispersion of iron nanoparticles and the porosity of biochar, comprehensive investigations of these parameters are scarce. Most existing work does not systematically explore how modification variables (e.g., iron precursor type, loading concentration, activation method) impact surface chemistry and reactivity across different functional applications. Moreover, scaling up the synthesis of Fe-modified biochar remains a challenge due to concerns over cost, consistency, and environmental safety. Research typically remains confined to lab-scale studies with limited field validation or techno-economic analysis. Without detailed pilot studies, policy and commercial adoption will remain restricted.

      The lack of standardized, universally accepted evaluation criteria for modified biochar further impedes scientific progress. Researchers often employ diverse units, batch adsorption protocols, and characterization techniques, which make comparative analysis challenging. There is an urgent need for harmonized criteria based on the following aspects: (1) Structural and chemical characterization—including detailed analysis of pore distribution, iron oxidation states, and surface functional groups using XPS, BET, FTIR, and Mössbauer spectroscopy[101]; (2) Environmental stability and leaching behavior—evaluating Fe leachability and structural integrity under field-relevant pH, redox, and microbial conditions to predict long-term performance; (3) Reusability and regeneration—systematically assessing the ability of Fe-biochar to maintain its sorption or catalytic capacity over multiple cycles, particularly in water treatment applications; (4) Life cycle assessment (LCA)—expanding cradle-to-grave evaluations of Fe-modified biochar to including energy input during synthesis, environmental benefits, and potential ecotoxicity[41]. In the absence of these standardized protocols, many research efforts remain case-specific and exploratory rather than contributing to cumulative knowledge or practical scalability.

    • Biochar modification, particularly with iron, has shown significant potential in enhancing the physicochemical properties of raw biochar, enabling its application in soil remediation, wastewater treatment, and energy storage. Despite the growing body of literature on this topic, several knowledge gaps and future research avenues remain unexplored or inadequately addressed. This section outlines critical future research directions necessary to optimize biochar modification strategies and expand the practical applications of iron-modified biochar (Fe-modified biochar).

    • One of the primary challenges in biochar research is the lack of standardized methods for modifying biochar, particularly when incorporating metal ions such as iron. The properties of Fe-modified biochar vary significantly depending on the biomass feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, iron precursor used, and the modification technique (e.g., co-pyrolysis, post-pyrolysis impregnation, or precipitation methods). Comparative studies using consistent protocols and controlled variables are needed to determine the most efficient and reproducible methods for modifying biochar with iron across diverse feedstocks. Establishing universal guidelines for Fe-modified biochar synthesis will facilitate comparative assessments and scalability across various industrial and environmental applications[29,132].

    • Although many studies demonstrate improved adsorption capacities of Fe-modified biochar for heavy metals (e.g., Pb, Cd, As) and anions (e.g., phosphate, nitrate), the precise mechanisms of interaction—particularly at the molecular level—are not fully understood. Advanced analytical techniques such as X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and synchrotron-based imaging should be employed more systematically to explore the binding pathways, redox transformations, and surface complexation processes of contaminants with Fe-modified biochar[133]. Moreover, computational modeling and density functional theory (DFT) simulations can complement experimental data to elucidate the energetics and kinetics of sorption mechanisms.

    • A critical limitation in current Fe-modified biochar research is the lack of comprehensive life-cycle assessments (LCAs) and environmental risk analyses. While Fe-modification enhances biochar's functional performance, it may introduce potential risks, including iron leaching, ecotoxicity, and disruption of soil microbial ecology over the long term. Future research should include detailed studies evaluating the fate and transport of iron species in Fe-modified biochar-amended soils and aquatic systems. Additionally, LCAs comparing the environmental footprint of modified versus unmodified biochar (from synthesis to end-of-life) will help determine these materials' sustainability and commercial viability[16,45].

    • Emerging research suggests that combining iron with other functional materials such as graphene, nanosilica, zeolites, or layered double hydroxides can lead to the development of multifunctional Fe-modified biochar composites with enhanced sorption, catalytic, and redox capabilities[43]. These hybrid systems show promise for the remediation of complex contaminants, such as the simultaneous removal of heavy metals and antibiotics, as well as emerging contaminants. However, more interdisciplinary work is needed to optimize the composition, structure, and stability of such composites under real-world environmental conditions. Further investigation into their reusability, regeneration methods, and scalability is also essential.

    • Most studies on Fe-modified biochar have been confined to laboratory-scale batch experiments, limiting their applicability in real-world settings. Future research should focus on field-scale pilot trials across varied agroecosystems, polluted water bodies, and industrial effluent treatment plants to validate the performance of modified biochar under diverse environmental stresses. These studies should assess long-term performance metrics, including degradation rates, improvements in soil fertility, contaminant immobilization, and carbon sequestration efficiency[24]. Collaborations with local industries, farmers, and environmental agencies will facilitate the integration of Fe-modified biochar into broader ecological management frameworks.

    • To fully realize the potential of biochar technologies, especially Fe-modified biochar, research must also focus on their role within a circular bioeconomy framework. Future work should investigate how waste biomass and industrial byproducts (e.g., iron-rich sludges, mining waste, red mud) can serve as sustainable sources for Fe-modified biochar production, thereby closing resource loops and reducing environmental burdens. Moreover, economic analyses and techno-economic assessments (TEAs) must be conducted to evaluate the profitability of Fe-modified biochar applications at industrial scales[48,125]. Integrating bioenergy production (e.g., syngas, bio-oil) through co-pyrolysis can also improve system efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

    • There is growing interest in using biochar for climate resilience, particularly through soil carbon sequestration and drought mitigation. While standard biochar has shown promise in this area, Fe-modified biochar may offer additional benefits due to its role in redox cycling, which improves soil structure and enhances nutrient retention. Future studies should investigate the comparative efficacy of Fe-modified biochar in enhancing carbon storage and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions (especially N2O and CH4) under different land use conditions. Long-term agronomic trials will be crucial in determining its impact on crop yield, shifts in microbial communities, and ecosystem health[134].

    • A novel but underexplored direction is the development of 'smart biochar' systems incorporating iron-based nanomaterials for environmental sensing and controlled release applications. Fe-modified biochar can be engineered to function as a redox-responsive material capable of sensing changes in pH, heavy metal concentration, or redox potential in soils and water. Integrating biosensors or optical markers into biochar frameworks could lead to real-time monitoring tools for environmental remediation systems, offering a dual role as both remediation agent and analytical platform[44].

    • Iron-functionalized biochar represents a compelling intersection of materials science, environmental engineering, and sustainable agriculture. While current research has laid a robust foundation, advancing the field requires a more integrated, interdisciplinary approach. Future studies should focus on uncovering mechanistic insights, implementing long-term field trials, conducting comprehensive risk assessments, and aligning applications with the principles of the circular economy. These steps are crucial for bridging the gap between experimental findings and large-scale, real-world implementation. This review has examined current biochar modification strategies, highlighted their practical advantages, and evaluated their readiness for field applications. Through chemical and physical tailoring, biochar can be engineered to exhibit high surface activity, enhancing its capabilities in pollutant removal. Notably, modified biochar has gained attention as an effective adsorbent, catalyst, and catalyst support for environmental remediation. Its ability to transform organic and inorganic waste into functional materials underscores its value as a sustainable, cost-effective solution for pollution control. Among various modifications, iron-functionalized biochar shows exceptional promise for multifunctional environmental applications, including water treatment, redox catalysis, and nutrient recovery. However, critical challenges remain. Research must move beyond general feasibility toward standardized methodologies, consistent evaluation criteria, and deeper investigation into iron-carbon interactions. Addressing these gaps is crucial to realizing the full potential of iron-modified biochar in emerging domains. To catalyze progress, future research should emphasize advanced material characterization, environmental impact analysis, and scalability assessments. Strong interdisciplinary collaboration among chemists, engineers, environmental scientists, and policymakers will be crucial to developing reliable, eco-friendly, and commercially viable biochar technologies that can effectively address complex environmental challenges.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing: Zhang Y; review and editing: Chen H; resources, conceptualization, visualization, writing, review and editing, supervision, project PI: Islam S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • This work is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-NIFA) (Grant No. GR 019129 entitled 'Iron Biochar for Agri-pollution control').

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Comprehensive review of biochar modification methods, with an emphasis on iron-modified biochar (Fe–biochar).

        Clarifies Fe–C interactions driving adsorption, redox activity, and electron transfer mechanisms.

        Explores emerging Fe–biochar applications in remediation, energy storage, and smart sensing.

        Proposes future directions linking Fe–biochar with circular bioeconomy and climate-resilient agriculture.

      • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (3) References (134)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhang Y, Chen H, Islam S. 2025. Advances in biochar modification for environmental remediation with emphasis on iron functionalization. Biochar X 1: e009 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0025-0010
    Zhang Y, Chen H, Islam S. 2025. Advances in biochar modification for environmental remediation with emphasis on iron functionalization. Biochar X 1: e009 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0025-0010

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return