Search
2026 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Nanobiochar as a multifunctional amendment for coupled water-soil-biota systems: applications in agricultural production, environmental remediation, and arid ecosystem restoration

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Received: 01 December 2025
    Revised: 10 January 2026
    Accepted: 16 January 2026
    Published online: 13 February 2026
    Biochar X  2 Article number: e009 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Nanobiochar outperforms bulk biochar in soil remediation due to superior surface area and reactivity.

    Nanobiochar acts as an efficient carrier for slow-release fertilizers, reducing nitrogen leaching.

    Ball milling offers a sustainable, solvent-free pathway for synthesizing highly functionalized nanobiochar.

    Application of biochar nanocomposites alleviates salinity stress in crops by regulating osmotic balance and ion homeostasis.

    It acts as a bio-ink anchor, enabling pioneer cyanobacteria to colonize unstable dryland soils.

  • Nanobiochar, engineered carbon nanoparticles derived from biomass, represents an emerging interface between nanotechnology and environmental engineering. Produced through mechanical, thermal, and hydrothermal processes, nanobiochar exhibits a markedly higher specific surface area, enhanced surface reactivity, and improved sorption capacity relative to conventional bulk biochar. This review synthesizes recent advances in nanobiochar production pathways, physicochemical characteristics, and the mechanistic controls governing its functional performance across environmental systems. In agricultural applications, nanobiochar has been shown to enhance plant growth by improving nutrient cycling, mitigating salinity stress through ionic immobilization, reducing nitrogen losses via slow-release fertilizer delivery, and fostering beneficial soil microbial communities. Beyond agroecosystems, nanobiochar-based materials demonstrate strong potential for heavy metal immobilization, organic contaminant adsorption, and wastewater treatment. The review further highlights an emerging and largely unexplored frontier in dryland restoration, where nanobiochar may interact with biological soil crusts (BSCs). Preliminary evidence suggests that, when used as a carrier for pioneer cyanobacteria, nanobiochar could contribute to substrate stabilization, potentially influence exopolysaccharide production, and affect soil moisture retention under arid conditions. Considering the global extent of drylands, nanobiochar–BSC systems may offer an exploratory pathway for restoration with possible implications for long-term carbon sequestration. Nevertheless, challenges related to energy-intensive production and large-scale deployment remain and require careful optimization. Overall, this review elucidates key design–function relationships underlying nanobiochar performance, emphasizes the need for responsible upscaling, and identifies critical research priorities for its application in sustainable agriculture, environmental remediation, and ecosystem restoration.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • [1] Khodakovskaya MV, Kim BS, Kim JN, Alimohammadi M, Dervishi E, et al. 2013. Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators: effects on tomato growth, reproductive system, and soil microbial community. Small 9:115−123 doi: 10.1002/smll.201201225

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M. 2006. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems–a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11:403−427 doi: 10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Ashiq A, Vithanage M. 2020. Biochar-mediated soils for efficient use of agrochemicals. In Agrochemicals Detection, Treatment and Remediation. UK: Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 621–645 doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-103017-2.00023-4
    [4] Gao X, Wu H. 2014. Aerodynamic properties of biochar particles: effect of grinding and implications. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 1:60−64 doi: 10.1021/ez400165g

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Lehmann J, Joseph S. 2015. Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In Biochar for Environmental Management. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 1–13 https://biochar-international.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/prelim_ch1_2015biocharforenvironmentalmanagement_text.pdf
    [6] Lee J, Sarmah AK, Kwon EE. 2019. Production and Formation of Biochar. In Biochar from Biomass and Waste: Fundamentals and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 3–18 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811729-3.00001-7
    [7] He L, Yang S, Yang L, Shen S, Li Y, et al. 2023. Ball milling-assisted preparation of sludge biochar as a novel periodate activator for nonradical degradation of sulfamethoxazole: insight into the mechanism of enhanced electron transfer. Environmental Pollution 316:120620 doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2022.120620

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Song B, Cao X, Gao W, Aziz S, Gao S, et al. 2022. Preparation of nano-biochar from conventional biorefineries for high-value applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 157:112057 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.112057

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Lonappan L, Rouissi T, Das RK, Brar SK, Ramirez AA, et al. 2016. Adsorption of methylene blue on biochar microparticles derived from different waste materials. Waste Management 49:537−544 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Oni BA, Oziegbe O, Olawole OO. 2019. Significance of biochar application to the environment and economy. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 64:222−236 doi: 10.1016/j.aoas.2019.12.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Shameli K, Bin Ahmad M, Jazayeri SD, Sedaghat S, Shabanzadeh P, et al. 2012. Synthesis and characterization of polyethylene glycol mediated silver nanoparticles by the green method. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13:6639−6650 doi: 10.3390/ijms13066639

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Sulaiman GM, Mohammed WH, Marzoog TR, Al-Amiery AAA, Kadhum AAH, et al. 2013. Green synthesis, antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles using Eucalyptus chapmaniana leaves extract. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 3:58−63 doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60024-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Yao Y, Gao B, Inyang M, Zimmerman AR, Cao X, et al. 2011. Biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings: characterization and phosphate removal potential. Bioresource Technology 102:6273−6278 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Inyang M, Gao B, Zimmerman A, Zhang M, Chen H. 2014. Synthesis, characterization, and dye sorption ability of carbon nanotube–biochar nanocomposites. Chemical Engineering Journal 236:39−46 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Tan XF, Liu YG, Gu YL, Xu Y, Zeng GM, et al. 2016. Biochar-based nano-composites for the decontamination of wastewater: a review. Bioresource Technology 212:318−333 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Ramadan MM, Asran-Amal, Abd-Elsalam KA. 2020. Micro/nano biochar for sustainable plant health: present status and future prospects. In Carbon Nanomaterials for Agri-food and Environmental Applications, ed. Abd-Elsalam KA. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 323–357 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819786-8.00016-5
    [17] Saxena J, Rana G, Pandey M. 2013. Impact of addition of biochar along with Bacillus sp. on growth and yield of French beans. Scientia Horticulturae 162:351−356 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.08.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Rawat KS, Tripathi VK. 2015. Hydro-chemical survey and quantifying spatial variations of groundwater quality in Dwarka, Sub-city of Delhi, India. Journal of The Institution of Engineers: Series A 96:99−108 doi: 10.1007/s40030-015-0116-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Tan X, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang X, Hu X, et al. 2015. Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 125:70−85 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Naghdi M, Taheran M, Brar SK, Kermanshahi-Pour A, Verma M, et al. 2018. Pinewood nanobiochar: A unique carrier for the immobilization of crude laccase by covalent bonding. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 115:563−571 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Chen B, Chen Z, Lv S. 2011. A novel magnetic biochar efficiently sorbs organic pollutants and phosphate. Bioresource Technology 102:716−723 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Harikishore Kumar Reddy D, Lee SM. 2014. Magnetic biochar composite: facile synthesis, characterization, and application for heavy metal removal. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 454:96−103 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.03.105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Noreen S, Abd-Elsalam KA. 2021. Biochar-based nanocomposites: a sustainable tool in wastewater bioremediation. In Aquananotechnology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 185–200 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-821141-0.00023-9
    [24] Ramanayaka S, Tsang DCW, Hou D, Ok YS, Vithanage M. 2020. Green synthesis of graphitic nanobiochar for the removal of emerging contaminants in aqueous media. Science of the Total Environment 706:135725 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135725

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Greco C, Cosentino U, Pitea D, Moro G, Santangelo S, et al. 2019. Role of the carbon defects in the catalytic oxygen reduction by graphite nanoparticles: a spectromagnetic, electrochemical and computational integrated approach. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 21:6021−6032 doi: 10.1039/C8CP07023G

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Wang D, Zhang W, Hao X, Zhou D. 2013. Transport of biochar particles in saturated granular media: effects of pyrolysis temperature and particle size. Environmental Science & Technology 47:821−828 doi: 10.1021/es303794d

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Gámiz B, Cox L, Hermosín MC, Spokas K, Celis R. 2017. Assessing the effect of organoclays and biochar on the fate of abscisic acid in soil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65:29−38 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03668

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Sani MNH, Amin M, Siddique AB, Nasif SO, Ghaley BB, et al. 2023. Waste-derived nanobiochar: a new avenue towards sustainable agriculture, environment, and circular bioeconomy. Science of the Total Environment 905:166881 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166881

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). 2017. The Global Land Outlook. 1st Edition. Bonn, Germany: UNCCD. www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/documents/2017-09/GLO_Full_Report_low_res.pdf
    [30] Wang J, Huang R, Zhu L, Guan H, Lin L, et al. 2022. The effects of biochar on microbial community composition in and beneath biological soil crusts in a Pinus massoniana lamb. plantation. Forests 13:1141 doi: 10.3390/f13071141

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Wang Z, Liu X, Sun F, Jiang Q, Shang H, et al. 2025. Effect of biochar and cyanobacteria crust incorporation on soil wind erosion in arid mining area under freeze-thaw action. Scientific Reports 15:16363 doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96688-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Meyer S, Glaser B, Quicker P. 2011. Technical, economical, and climate-related aspects of biochar production technologies: a literature review. Environmental Science & Technology 45:9473−9483 doi: 10.1021/es201792c

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Ghodake GS, Shinde SK, Kadam AA, Saratale RG, Saratale GD, et al. 2021. Review on biomass feedstocks, pyrolysis mechanism and physicochemical properties of biochar: state-of-the-art framework to speed up vision of circular bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production 297:126645 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126645

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Ramanayaka S, Vithanage M, Alessi DS, Liu WJ, Jayasundera ACA, et al. 2020. Nanobiochar: production, properties, and multifunctional applications. Environmental Science: Nano 7:3279−3302 doi: 10.1039/D0EN00486C

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Pourkarimi S, Hallajisani A, Alizadehdakhel A, Nouralishahi A. 2019. Biofuel production through micro-and macroalgae pyrolysis–A review of pyrolysis methods and process parameters. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 142:104599 doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2019.04.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Zabot GL, Tres MV, Ferreira PAA, Dal Molin A, Mazutti MA. 2020. Power the future with bioenergy from organic wastes. In Recent Developments in Bioenergy Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 85–114 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819597-0.00004-0
    [37] Cheah S, Jablonski WS, Olstad JL, Carpenter DL, Barthelemy KD, et al. 2016. Effects of thermal pretreatment and catalyst on biomass gasification efficiency and syngas composition. Green Chemistry 18:6291−6304 doi: 10.1039/C6GC01661H

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Ramanayaka S, Vithanage M, Sarmah A, An T, Kim KH, et al. 2019. Performance of metal–organic frameworks for the adsorptive removal of potentially toxic elements in a water system: a critical review. RSC Advances 9:34359−34376 doi: 10.1039/C9RA06879A

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Lyu H, Gao B, He F, Zimmerman AR, Ding C, et al. 2018. Effects of ball milling on the physicochemical and sorptive properties of biochar: experimental observations and governing mechanisms. Environmental Pollution 233:54−63 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Oleszczuk P, Ćwikła-Bundyra W, Bogusz A, Skwarek E, Ok YS. 2016. Characterization of nanoparticles of biochars from different biomass. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 121:165−172 doi: 10.1016/J.JAAP.2016.07.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Karinkanta P, Ämmälä A, Illikainen M, Niinimäki J. 2018. Fine grinding of wood–Overview from wood breakage to applications. Biomass and Bioenergy 113:31−44 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.03.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Curcio I, Gigli R, Mormile F, Mormile C. 2025. A comprehensive review on biochar, with a particular focus on nano properties and applications. Nano Trends 10:100117 doi: 10.1016/j.nwnano.2025.100117

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Kumar M, Xiong X, Wan Z, Sun Y, Tsang DCW, et al. 2020. Ball milling as a mechanochemical technology for fabrication of novel biochar nanomaterials. Bioresource Technology 312:123613 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123613

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Fan X, Chang DW, Chen X, Baek JB, Dai L. 2016. Functionalized graphene nanoplatelets from ball milling for energy applications. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 11:52−58 doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2016.01.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Tang J, Lv H, Gong Y, Huang Y. 2015. Preparation and characterization of a novel graphene/biochar composite for aqueous phenanthrene and mercury removal. Bioresource Technology 196:355−363 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Chen L, Chen XL, Zhou CH, Yang HM, Ji SF, et al. 2017. Environmental-friendly montmorillonite-biochar composites: Facile production and tunable adsorption-release of ammonium and phosphate. Journal of Cleaner Production 156:648−659 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.050

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Lin L, Li Z, Liu X, Qiu W, Song Z. 2019. Effects of Fe-Mn modified biochar composite treatment on the properties of As-polluted paddy soil. Environmental Pollution 244:600−607 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Ramos R, Abdelkader-Fernández VK, Matos R, Peixoto AF, Fernandes DM. 2022. Metal-supported biochar catalysts for sustainable biorefinery, electrocatalysis, and energy storage applications: a review. Catalysts 12:207 doi: 10.3390/catal12020207

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Mahor A, Singh PP, Bharadwaj P, Sharma N, Yadav S, et al. 2021. Carbon-based nanomaterials for delivery of biologicals and therapeutics: A cutting-edge technology. C 7:19 doi: 10.3390/c7010019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Yang M, Li C, Zhang Y, Jia D, Zhang X, et al. 2018. Microscale bone grinding temperature by dynamic heat flux in nanoparticle jet mist cooling with different particle sizes. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 33:58−68 doi: 10.1080/10426914.2016.1244846

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Anupama, Khare P. 2021. A comprehensive evaluation of inherent properties and applications of nano-biochar prepared from different methods and feedstocks. Journal of Cleaner Production 320:128759 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128759

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Zhao L, Zhang Y, Wang L, Lyu H, Xia S, et al. 2022. Effective removal of Hg (II) and MeHg from aqueous environment by ball milling aided thiol-modification of biochars: effect of different pyrolysis temperatures. Chemosphere 294:133820 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133820

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Ma S, Jing F, Sohi SP, Chen J. 2019. New insights into contrasting mechanisms for PAE adsorption on millimeter, micron-and nano-scale biochar. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:18636−18650 doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05181-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Wallace CA, Afzal MT, Saha GC. 2019. Effect of feedstock and microwave pyrolysis temperature on physio-chemical and nano-scale mechanical properties of biochar. Bioresources and Bioprocessing 6:33 doi: 10.1186/s40643-019-0268-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Genovese M, Jiang J, Lian K, Holm N. 2015. High capacitive performance of exfoliated biochar nanosheets from biomass waste corn cob. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 3:2903−2913 doi: 10.1039/C4TA06110A

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Mahfoz W, Shah SS, Das M, Basha SI, Ogawa T, et al. 2025. Ball milling approaches for biomass‐derived nanocarbon in advanced sustainable applications. The Chemical Record 25:2500095 doi: 10.1002/tcr.202500095

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Cui R, Shen Y, Zhang Z, Huang Q, Zhu J, et al. 2025. Mechanochemical remediation of heavy metal-polluted soil by ball milling with monocalcium phosphate. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 13:118373 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.118373

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Dutta V, Verma R, Gopalkrishnan C, Yuan MH, Batoo KM, et al. 2022. Bio-inspired synthesis of carbon-based nanomaterials and their potential environmental applications: a state-of-the-art review. Inorganics 10:169 doi: 10.3390/inorganics10100169

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Abed Hussein B, Mahdi AB, Emad Izzat S, Acwin Dwijendra NK, Romero Parra RM, et al. 2022. Production, structural properties nano biochar and effects nano biochar in soil: a review. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry 65:607−618 doi: 10.21608/EJCHEM.2022.131162.5772

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Sun Y, Zong T, Wu Q, Wang X, Hou H, et al. 2025. Fabrication of rice straw nano-biochar by ball milling for efficient adsorption of ammonium nitrogen and reduction of ammonia volatilization: effects and mechanisms. Environmental Science: Nano 12:3122−3138 doi: 10.1039/D5EN00103J

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Yu X, Wu S, Zhang Z, Wang C. 2025. Application of ball milling technology in removal of PFAS and ball milling modified materials: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 18:100709 doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100709

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Bhandari G, Gangola S, Dhasmana A, Rajput V, Gupta S, et al. 2023. Nano-biochar: recent progress, challenges, and opportunities for sustainable environmental remediation. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1214870 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1214870

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Rao N, Singh R, Bashambu L. 2021. Carbon-based nanomaterials: Synthesis and prospective applications. Materials Today: Proceedings 44:608−614 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.593

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Song B, Chen M, Zhao L, Qiu H, Cao X. 2019. Physicochemical property and colloidal stability of micron- and nano-particle biochar derived from a variety of feedstock sources. Science of the Total Environment 661:685−695 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.193

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Naghdi M, Taheran M, Pulicharla R, Rouissi T, Brar SK, et al. 2019. Pine-wood derived nanobiochar for removal of carbamazepine from aqueous media: adsorption behavior and influential parameters. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 12:5292−5301 doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.12.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Yue L, Lian F, Han Y, Bao Q, Wang Z, et al. 2019. The effect of biochar nanoparticles on rice plant growth and the uptake of heavy metals: implications for agronomic benefits and potential risk. Science of the Total Environment 656:9−18 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.364

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Nath BK, Chaliha C, Kalita E. 2019. Iron oxide permeated mesoporous rice-husk nanobiochar (IPMN) mediated removal of dissolved arsenic (As): Chemometric modelling and adsorption dynamics. Journal of Environmental Management 246:397−409 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Ali Baig S, Zhu J, Muhammad N, Sheng T, Xu X. 2014. Effect of synthesis methods on magnetic Kans grass biochar for enhanced As(III, V) adsorption from aqueous solutions. Biomass and Bioenergy 71:299−310 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.09.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Wang MC, Sheng GD, Qiu YP. 2015. A novel manganese-oxide/biochar composite for efficient removal of lead (II) from aqueous solutions. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 12:1719−1726 doi: 10.1007/s13762-014-0538-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Zhang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Inyang M. 2012. Synthesis, characterization, and environmental implications of graphene-coated biochar. Science of the Total Environment 435:567−572 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Yan L, Kong L, Qu Z, Li L, Shen G. 2015. Magnetic biochar decorated with ZnS nanocrytals for Pb(II) removal. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 3:125−132 doi: 10.1021/sc500619r

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Iqbal A, He L, Ali I, Yuan P, Khan A, et al. 2022. Partial substation of organic fertilizer with chemical fertilizer improves soil biochemical attributes, rice yields, and restores bacterial community diversity in a paddy field. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:895230 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.895230

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Bah A, Husni MHA, Teh CBS, Rafii MY, Syed Omar SR, et al. 2014. Reducing runoff loss of applied nutrients in oil palm cultivation using controlled‐release fertilizers. Advances in Agriculture 2014:285387 doi: 10.1155/2014/285387

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Salem HM, Schott LR, Piaskowski J, Chapagain A, Yost JL, et al. 2024. Evaluating Intra-Field Spatial Variability for Nutrient Management Zone Delineation through Geospatial Techniques and Multivariate Analysis. Sustainability 16:645 doi: 10.3390/su16020645

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Salem HM, Schott LR, Ali AM. 2025. Advancements in smart farming: leveraging artificial intelligence and internet of things for sustainable agricultural management. In Future of AI, IoT, and Sustainability. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. pp. 53–72 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-76286-4_4
    [76] Ali AM, Salem HM, Bijay-Singh. 2024. Site-Specific Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Using Canopy Reflectance Sensors, Chlorophyll Meters and Leaf Color Charts: A Review. Nitrogen 5:828−856 doi: 10.3390/nitrogen5040054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Das SK, Ghosh GK. 2023. Developing biochar-based slow-release N-P-K fertilizer for controlled nutrient release and its impact on soil health and yield. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 13:13051−13063 doi: 10.1007/s13399-021-02069-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Singh Yadav SP, Bhandari S, Bhatta D, Poudel A, Bhattarai S, et al. 2023. Biochar application: A sustainable approach to improve soil health. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 11:100498 doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100498

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Xia H, Riaz M, Zhang M, Liu B, Li Y, et al. 2022. Biochar-N fertilizer interaction increases N utilization efficiency by modifying soil C/N component under N fertilizer deep placement modes. Chemosphere 286:131594 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131594

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Hou J, Pugazhendhi A, Sindhu R, Vinayak V, Thanh NC, et al. 2022. An assessment of biochar as a potential amendment to enhance plant nutrient uptake. Environmental Research 214:113909 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113909

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Murtaza G, Ahmed Z, Eldin SM, Ali B, Bawazeer S, et al. 2023. Biochar-Soil-Plant interactions: A cross talk for sustainable agriculture under changing climate. Frontiers in Environmental Science 11:1059449 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1059449

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Crane-Droesch A, Abiven S, Jeffery S, Torn MS. 2013. Heterogeneous global crop yield response to biochar: a meta-regression analysis. Environmental Research Letters 8:044049 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Graber ER, Meller Harel Y, Kolton M, Cytryn E, Silber A, et al. 2010. Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media. Plant and Soil 337:481−496 doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0544-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Bopp C, Christl I, Schulin R, Evangelou MWH. 2016. Biochar as possible long-term soil amendment for phytostabilisation of TE-contaminated soils. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23:17449−17458 doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6935-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Bonanomi G, Ippolito F, Cesarano G, Nanni B, Lombardi N, et al. 2017. Biochar as plant growth promoter: better off alone or mixed with organic amendments?. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1570 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01570

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Scheifele M, Hobi A, Buegger F, Gattinger A, Schulin R, et al. 2017. Impact of pyrochar and hydrochar on soybean (Glycine max L.) root nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 180:199−211 doi: 10.1002/jpln.201600419

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Salem HM. 2014. Effect of conservation tillage on soil physical properties, in-situ rainwater harvesting, and erosion control in arid and semi-arid regions. Doctoral dissertation. E.T.S.I. Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. doi: 10.20868/UPM.thesis.30473
    [88] Salem HM, Muñoz-García MÁ, Rodríguez MG. 2020. Soil physical properties and soil water tension monitoring by wireless sensor network after reservoir and minimum tillage practices. Soil Research 59:309−317 doi: 10.1071/SR20129

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Rabbi SMF, Minasny B, Salami ST, McBratney AB, Young IM. 2021. Greater, but not necessarily better: the influence of biochar on soil hydraulic properties. European Journal of Soil Science 72:2033−2048 doi: 10.1111/ejss.13105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Adhikari S, Timms W, Parvez Mahmud MA. 2022. Optimising water holding capacity and hydrophobicity of biochar for soil amendment–a review. Science of the Total Environment 851:158043 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Ali AM, Salem HM. 2024. Salinity-induced desertification in oasis ecosystems: challenges and future directions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 196:696 doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12804-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Qin S, Zhang YJ, Yuan B, Xu PY, Xing K, et al. 2014. Isolation of ACC deaminase-producing habitat-adapted symbiotic bacteria associated with halophyte Limonium sinense (Girard) Kuntze and evaluating their plant growth-promoting activity under salt stress. Plant and Soil 374:753−766 doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1918-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Xiao L, Meng F. 2020. Evaluating the effect of biochar on salt leaching and nutrient retention of Yellow River Delta soil. Soil Use and Management 36:740−750 doi: 10.1111/sum.12638

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Farouk S, Al-Huqail AA. 2022. Sustainable biochar and/or melatonin improve salinity tolerance in borage plants by modulating osmotic adjustment, antioxidants, and ion homeostasis. Plants 11:765 doi: 10.3390/plants11060765

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Mehmood S, Ahmed W, Alatalo JM, Mahmood M, Asghar RMA, et al. 2023. A systematic review on the bioremediation of metal contaminated soils using biochar and slag: current status and future outlook. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195:961 doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11561-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Amorim TL, Santos HRB, Neto JB, Hermínio PJ, Silva JRI, et al. 2023. Resistant rootstocks mitigate ionic toxicity with beneficial effects for growth and photosynthesis in grapevine grafted plants under salinity. Scientia Horticulturae 317:112053 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Lee X, Yang F, Xing Y, Huang Y, Xu L, et al. 2022. Use of biochar to manage soil salts and water: effects and mechanisms. CATENA 211:106018 doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Bigot S, Fuksová M, Martínez JP, Lutts S, Quinet M. 2023. Sodium and chloride accumulation and repartition differed between the cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and its wild halophyte relative Solanum chilense under salt stress. Scientia Horticulturae 321:112324 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112324

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Liu W, Li Y, Feng Y, Qiao J, Zhao H, et al. 2020. The effectiveness of nanobiochar for reducing phytotoxicity and improving soil remediation in cadmium-contaminated soil. Scientific Reports 10:858 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57954-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Wang C, Luo D, Zhang X, Huang R, Cao Y, et al. 2022. Biochar-based slow-release of fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: a mini review. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology 10:100167 doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2022.100167

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] González ME, Cea M, Medina J, González A, Diez MC, et al. 2015. Evaluation of biodegradable polymers as encapsulating agents for the development of a urea controlled-release fertilizer using biochar as support material. Science of the Total Environment 505:446−453 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Rashid MI, Shah GA, Sadiq M, Amin NU, Ali AM, et al. 2023. Nanobiochar and copper oxide nanoparticles mixture synergistically increases soil nutrient availability and improves wheat production. Plants 12:1312 doi: 10.3390/plants12061312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Chaudhary T, Priya P, Maurya A, Sharma V, Balyan G, et al. 2024. Carbon nitride nano-biochar exhibit dose-dependent effect on rice growth. BIO Web of Conferences 110:01007 doi: 10.1051/bioconf/202411001007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Chen X, Zhou B, Wang Q, Tao W, Lin H. 2020. Nano-biochar reduced soil erosion and nitrate loss in sloping fields on the Loess Plateau of China. CATENA 187:104346 doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104346

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Zhao F, Xin X, Cao Y, Su D, Ji P, et al. 2021. Use of carbon nanoparticles to improve soil fertility, crop growth and nutrient uptake by corn (Zea mays L.). Nanomaterials 11:2717 doi: 10.3390/nano11102717

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Yang Y, Zhou B, Hu Z, Lin H. 2020. The effects of nano-biochar on maize growth in Northern Shaanxi province on the loess plateau. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 18:2863−2877 doi: 10.15666/aeer/1802_28632877

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Brar B, Saharan BS, Seth CS, Kamboj A, Surekha, et al. 2024. Nanobiochar: soil and plant interactions and their implications for sustainable agriculture. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 57:103077 doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2024.103077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Helal MI, Husein ME, Walaa G, Mostafa ED. 2019. Characterization of agricultural residues-based nano biochar and its efficiency in adsorption/desorption of nutrients. International Journal of Environment 8:130−141

    Google Scholar

    [109] Lateef A, Nazir R, Jamil N, Alam S, Shah R, et al. 2019. Synthesis and characterization of environmental friendly corncob biochar based nano-composite–a potential slow release nano-fertilizer for sustainable agriculture. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 11:100212 doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Das SK, Ghosh GK. 2022. Hydrogel-biochar composite for agricultural applications and controlled release fertilizer: a step towards pollution free environment. Energy 242:122977 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122977

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Herrmann L, Lesueur D, Robin A, Robain H, Wiriyakitnateekul W, et al. 2019. Impact of biochar application dose on soil microbial communities associated with rubber trees in North East Thailand. Science of the Total Environment 689:970−979 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.441

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Yin D, Li H, Wang H, Guo X, Wang Z, et al. 2021. Impact of different biochars on microbial community structure in the rhizospheric soil of rice grown in albic soil. Molecules 26:4783 doi: 10.3390/molecules26164783

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113] Taheran M, Naghdi M, Brar SK, Verma M, Surampalli RY. 2018. Emerging contaminants: here today, there tomorrow!. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 10:122−126 doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2018.05.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Jadhav V, Ahire B, Pawar A, Roy A, Kumar A, et al. 2025. Nanobiochar: a sustainable solution for environmental remediation. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 23:101061 doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2025.101061

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Raczkiewicz M, Mašek O, Ok YS, Oleszczuk P. 2024. Size reduction of biochar to nanoscale decrease polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals content and bioavailability in nanobiochar. Science of the Total Environment 937:173372 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173372

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Pathak HK, Seth CS, Chauhan PK, Dubey G, Singh G, et al. 2024. Recent advancement of nano-biochar for the remediation of heavy metals and emerging contaminants: mechanism, adsorption kinetic model, plant growth and development. Environmental Research 255:119136 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119136

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Rajput P, Kumar P, Priya AK, Kumari S, Shiade SRG, et al. 2024. Nanomaterials and biochar mediated remediation of emerging contaminants. Science of the Total Environment 916:170064 doi: 10.1016/j

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] Goswami L, Kushwaha A, Singh A, Saha P, Choi Y, et al. 2022. Nano-Biochar as a sustainable catalyst for anaerobic digestion: a synergetic Closed-Loop approach. Catalysts 12:186 doi: 10.3390/catal12020186

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Zhu Y, Hu J, Wang J. 2012. Competitive adsorption of Pb(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) onto xanthate-modified magnetic chitosan. Journal of Hazardous Materials 221:155−161 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Gan C, Liu Y, Tan X, Wang S, Zeng G, et al. 2015. Effect of porous zinc–biochar nanocomposites on Cr (VI) adsorption from aqueous solution. RSC Advances 5:35107−35115 doi: 10.1039/C5RA04416B

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121] Cope CO, Webster DS, Sabatini DA. 2014. Arsenate adsorption onto iron oxide amended rice husk char. Science of the Total Environment 488:554−561 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.120

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122] Huang X, Liu Y, Liu S, Tan X, Ding Y, et al. 2016. Effective removal of Cr(VI) using β-cyclodextrin–chitosan modified biochars with adsorption/reduction bifuctional roles. RSC Advances 6:94−104 doi: 10.1039/C5RA22886G

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Zhou L, Huang Y, Qiu W, Sun Z, Liu Z, et al. 2017. Adsorption properties of nano-MnO2–biochar composites for copper in aqueous solution. Molecules 22:173 doi: 10.3390/molecules22010173

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124] Bakshi S, Banik C, Rathke SJ, Laird DA. 2018. Arsenic sorption on zero-valent iron-biochar complexes. Water Research 137:153−163 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Li C, Zhang L, Gao Y, Li A. 2018. Facile synthesis of nano ZnO/ZnS modified biochar by directly pyrolyzing of zinc contaminated corn stover for Pb (II), Cu (II) and Cr (VI) removals. Waste Management 79:625−637 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Wang YY, Liu YX, Lu HH, Yang RQ, Yang SM. 2018. Competitive adsorption of Pb (II), Cu (II), and Zn (II) ions onto hydroxyapatite-biochar nanocomposite in aqueous solutions. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 261:53−61 doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2018.02.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Mahmoud ME, El-Ghanam AM, Saad SR, Mohamed RHA. 2020. Promoted removal of metformin hydrochloride anti-diabetic drug from water by fabricated and modified nanobiochar from artichoke leaves. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy 18:100336 doi: 10.1016/j.scp.2020.100336

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Li R, Zhang Y, Deng H, Zhang Z, Wang JJ, et al. 2020. Removing tetracycline and Hg (II) with ball-milled magnetic nanobiochar and its potential on polluted irrigation water reclamation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 384:121095 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121095

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] Mohan D, Kumar S, Srivastava A. 2014. Fluoride removal from ground water using magnetic and nonmagnetic corn stover biochars. Ecological Engineering 73:798−808 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.08.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Yao Y, Gao B, Fang J, Zhang M, Chen H, et al. 2014. Characterization and environmental applications of clay–biochar composites. Chemical Engineering Journal 242:136−143 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.062

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Yao Y, Gao B, Chen J, Zhang M, Inyang M, et al. 2013. Engineered carbon (biochar) prepared by direct pyrolysis of Mg-accumulated tomato tissues: characterization and phosphate removal potential. Bioresource Technology 138:8−13 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.057

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132] Wang Z, Tong H, Sun F, Wang W, Jiang Q, et al. 2025. Biochar assists desert cyanobacteria to resist Cd stress and enhance Cd adsorption. Algal Research 90:104197 doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2025.104197

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133] Li XR, Jia RL, Zhang ZS, Zhang P, Hui R. 2018. Hydrological response of biological soil crusts to global warming: a ten-year simulative study. Global Change Biology 24:4960−4971 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14378

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [134] Li Z, Chen C, Gao Y, Wang B, Wang D, et al. 2021. Synergistic effect of cyanobacteria and nano-sand-stabilizer on biocrust formation and sand fixation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 9:104887 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104887

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [135] Emamverdian A, Khalofah A, Pehlivan N, Ghorbani A. 2025. Utilizing nano-biochar and biochar for sustainable heavy metal remediation and enhanced crop tolerance: innovative approaches in nano-biosensing and environmental health. Industrial Crops and Products 234:121462 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121462

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136] Wang L, Li T, Liu H, Zhang Z, Yang A, et al. 2024. Combined effect of freeze–thaw cycles and biochar addition on soil nitrogen leaching characteristics in seasonally frozen farmland in Northeast China. Agronomy 14:153 doi: 10.3390/agronomy14010153

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [137] Weber K, Quicker P. 2018. Properties of biochar. Fuel 217:240−261 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138] Yu X, Lu S. 2020. Double effects of biochar in affecting the macropore system of paddy soils identified by high-resolution X-ray tomography. Science of the Total Environment 720:137690 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137690

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [139] Sun Y, Wang X, Wu Q, Zong T, Xin X, et al. 2024. Use of rice straw nano-biochar to slow down water infiltration and reduce nitrogen leaching in a clayey soil. Science of the Total Environment 948:174956 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174956

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140] Chen X, Duan M, Zhou B, Cui L. 2022. Effects of biochar nanoparticles as a soil amendment on the structure and hydraulic characteristics of a sandy loam soil. Soil Use and Management 38:836−849 doi: 10.1111/sum.12740

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141] Hussain R, Ghosh KK, Ravi K. 2023. Influence of biochar particle size on the hydraulic conductivity of two different compacted engineered soils. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 13:801−811 doi: 10.1007/s13399-020-01226-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142] Hartmann A, Schmid M, van Tuinen D, Berg G. 2009. Plant-driven selection of microbes. Plant and Soil 321:235−257 doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9814-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143] Muhammad N, Hussain M, Ullah W, Khan TA, Ali S, et al. 2018. Biochar for sustainable soil and environment: a comprehensive review. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 11:731 doi: 10.1007/s12517-018-4074-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144] Sarma H, Shyam S, Zhang M, Guerriero G. 2024. Nano-biochar interactions with contaminants in the rhizosphere and their implications for plant-soil dynamics. Soil Environmental Health 2:100095 doi: 10.1016/j.seh.2024.100095

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [145] Osman AI, Farghali M, Rashwan AK. 2024. Life cycle assessment of biochar as a green sorbent for soil remediation. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 46:100882 doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100882

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Salem H. 2026. Nanobiochar as a multifunctional amendment for coupled water-soil-biota systems: applications in agricultural production, environmental remediation, and arid ecosystem restoration. Biochar X 2: e009 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0026-0008
    Salem H. 2026. Nanobiochar as a multifunctional amendment for coupled water-soil-biota systems: applications in agricultural production, environmental remediation, and arid ecosystem restoration. Biochar X 2: e009 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0026-0008

Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(47) PDF downloads(9)

Other Articles By Authors

Review   Open Access    

Nanobiochar as a multifunctional amendment for coupled water-soil-biota systems: applications in agricultural production, environmental remediation, and arid ecosystem restoration

Biochar X  2 Article number: e009  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Nanobiochar, engineered carbon nanoparticles derived from biomass, represents an emerging interface between nanotechnology and environmental engineering. Produced through mechanical, thermal, and hydrothermal processes, nanobiochar exhibits a markedly higher specific surface area, enhanced surface reactivity, and improved sorption capacity relative to conventional bulk biochar. This review synthesizes recent advances in nanobiochar production pathways, physicochemical characteristics, and the mechanistic controls governing its functional performance across environmental systems. In agricultural applications, nanobiochar has been shown to enhance plant growth by improving nutrient cycling, mitigating salinity stress through ionic immobilization, reducing nitrogen losses via slow-release fertilizer delivery, and fostering beneficial soil microbial communities. Beyond agroecosystems, nanobiochar-based materials demonstrate strong potential for heavy metal immobilization, organic contaminant adsorption, and wastewater treatment. The review further highlights an emerging and largely unexplored frontier in dryland restoration, where nanobiochar may interact with biological soil crusts (BSCs). Preliminary evidence suggests that, when used as a carrier for pioneer cyanobacteria, nanobiochar could contribute to substrate stabilization, potentially influence exopolysaccharide production, and affect soil moisture retention under arid conditions. Considering the global extent of drylands, nanobiochar–BSC systems may offer an exploratory pathway for restoration with possible implications for long-term carbon sequestration. Nevertheless, challenges related to energy-intensive production and large-scale deployment remain and require careful optimization. Overall, this review elucidates key design–function relationships underlying nanobiochar performance, emphasizes the need for responsible upscaling, and identifies critical research priorities for its application in sustainable agriculture, environmental remediation, and ecosystem restoration.

    • Carbon-based nanomaterials have garnered growing scientific interest because of their wide-ranging potential in agricultural and environmental applications. Among these materials, biochar has gained particular prominence due to its multifunctional contributions to climate change mitigation, pollution remediation, and soil quality enhancement. Biochar is a carbon-rich solid produced via the thermochemical conversion of biomass feedstocks—including agricultural residues, lignocellulosic materials, animal manures, and other organic wastes—under oxygen-limited conditions (gasification) or in the absence of oxygen (pyrolysis)[1]. Biochar production is generally considered cost-effective and environmentally sustainable, as it utilizes readily available waste resources, typically involves relatively low energy consumption, and is commonly carried out at temperatures below 700 °C[2,3]. These characteristics have supported its widespread use in both research and practical applications aimed at improving soil properties, promoting plant growth, and mitigating environmental pollution (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Multifunctional benefits of biochar: physical, chemical, and biological soil improvements.

      Beyond its environmental benefits, biochar has long been recognized as a valuable amendment for promoting agricultural sustainability[4]. The physicochemical properties of bulk biochar vary with feedstock type and thermochemical conditions, resulting in particle sizes that commonly range from the micrometer to centimeter scale[5]. These properties influence its interaction with soil, water, and contaminants. Importantly, biochar also serves as a versatile precursor material that can be further processed into finer particles to enhance its functional performance.

      Nanobiochar represents a refined form of bulk biochar that has been engineered to achieve substantially smaller particle sizes, particularly at the nanoscale. Biochar itself is defined as a stable form of charcoal derived from biomass sources, including wood, agricultural residues, herbaceous materials, animal manure, or sewage sludge, intended for applications that prevent rapid carbon release to the atmosphere[6]. Through additional processing, bulk biochar can be transformed into nanobiochar using methods such as hydrothermal carbonization, ball milling, and sonication[7,8]. Reducing biochar particle size to the microscale (10–600 μm) increases the number of exposed adsorption sites, thereby improving its ability to bind contaminants[9,10]. Further reduction to the nanoscale (≤ 100 nm) dramatically enhances surface-to-volume ratio, surface energy, reactivity, and biological effectiveness[10].

      As a result of these enhanced properties, nanobiochar has become a focal point of contemporary research, combining the established benefits of bulk biochar with the unique advantages of nanoscale materials. Nanometer-sized particles are typically produced through mechanical exfoliation or by controlling thermochemical parameters such as pyrolysis temperature[11,12]. This convergence of carbon stability, high reactivity, and tunable surface properties positions nanobiochar as a promising, yet complex, material for advanced environmental and agricultural applications.

      While nanobiochar itself offers enhanced properties through size reduction, further advances have extended these applications through the synthesis of biochar nanocomposites, which integrate nanobiochar or bulk biochar with functional nanomaterials to achieve multifunctional properties[13,14]. Biochar nanocomposites are hybrid, multi-component materials created by incorporating functional nanomaterials (metal oxides, graphene, magnetic iron particles, etc.) into biochar or by coating biochar with nanoparticles. Nanocomposites incorporating nanobiochar display improved pore architecture, surface chemistry, catalytic activity, and separation efficiency, enabling simultaneous adsorption and degradation of contaminants[15,16].

      Biochar-based materials have been widely investigated as adsorbents due to their role in improving plant performance, enhancing carbon sequestration, and contributing to climate mitigation[17,18]. Their physicochemical characteristics—high surface area, microporosity, environmental abundance, and strong sorption capacity—enable them to remove a variety of contaminants from aqueous systems, including minerals, vitamins, and pharmaceuticals[19,20]. During thermochemical processing, biofuels and syngas are also produced alongside biochar, making the entire process economically more attractive relative to direct biomass combustion[19]. However, the performance of biochar in water treatment can be constrained by the choice of feedstock, reaction conditions, and pyrolysis method[15].

      Raw biochar typically exhibits limited adsorption capacity, and powdered forms can be difficult to recover from aqueous environments[21,22]. Nanobiochar helps overcome these limitations by providing enhanced chemical, structural, and mechanical features. Its nanoscale size offers a larger surface area and a greater abundance of reactive functional groups, as well as improved mechanical and thermal stability[23]. Moreover, nanobiochar often exhibits more negative zeta potentials, smaller hydrodynamic radii, and a higher density of carbon and oxygen defect sites capable of generating reactive organic species, all of which contribute to superior adsorption performance compared with bulk biochar[24].

      Defects in carbon nanomaterials—whether topological or located at material edges—play a major role in modulating their physicochemical behavior. These structural irregularities increase the number of unpaired π electrons, reduce formation energy, enhance electron transfer, and influence catalytic reactions such as oxygen reduction[25]. Owing to these properties, nanobiochar is now widely recognized as an effective soil amendment, enzyme support, and multifunctional adsorbent. Its high specific surface area, microporosity, and hydrophobic surfaces enable it to retain diverse pollutants, including herbicides, heavy metals, polychlorinated biphenyls, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Its inherent alkalinity also contributes to reductions in soil acidity[26,27].

      Nanobiochar may exhibit properties different from its well-known macroforms, and these different properties have raised questions about potential environmental risks, including toxicity in aquatic and terrestrial environments, the remediation of pollutants, and influence on crop yields[28]. Hybrid nanocomposites, such as carbon nanotube–biochar combinations, have shown promise as low-cost materials for removing dyes and organic contaminants. Emerging evidence indicates that such hybrids may also provide efficient and economical options for heavy metal remediation[14].

      With drylands accounting for 41% of the Earth's land surface and experiencing degradation at rates approaching 12 million hectares annually, there is an urgent need for innovative restoration strategies[29]. Conventional approaches often fail due to extreme abiotic stress, particularly in hyper-arid regions. In this context, biochar offers a promising pathway by facilitating the establishment and development of biological soil crusts (BSCs)[30,31]. Through nanoscale interactions with pioneer cyanobacteria, nanobiochar can enhance exopolysaccharides (EPS) production, improve moisture retention, and help stabilize mobile sandy substrates, effectively acting as a bio-geoengineering agent.

      This review bridges recognized knowledge gaps by establishing mechanistic connections between nanobiochar production methodologies, encompassing mechanical attrition and hydrothermal synthesis, and the physicochemical transformations governing material performance. Rather than enumerating isolated case studies, it develops integrated design-function frameworks that clarify mechanistic explanations for nanobiochar's enhanced functionality relative to macroscale biochar amendments across diverse soil and aqueous environments. Significantly, this analysis advances nanobiochar as a bio-geoengineering platform material capable of catalyzing cyanobacterial recruitment, enhancing extracellular polysaccharide biosynthesis, and stabilizing unstable desert substrates. Consequently, nanobiochar transitions from a conventional soil conditioner to a strategic agent for large-scale desertification mitigation and ecological recovery of degraded arid lands.

      This review pursues four integrated objectives: (1) to establish quantitative relationships between nanobiochar synthesis pathways and the physicochemical attributes controlling functional capacity; (2) to identify convergent mechanistic principles underlying performance in nutrient bioavailability and pollutant immobilization; (3) to delineate nanobiochar-BSC interactions as a frontier research domain for accelerating dryland ecosystem recovery; and (4) to systematically evaluate sustainability constraints encompassing production energy intensity, technology scalability, environmental persistence, and potential ecological perturbations. These integrated analyses aim to inform responsible technology translation from laboratory-scale investigations toward operational deployment in agricultural and restoration contexts.

      The objectives of this review are fourfold: (i) to connect nanobiochar synthesis methods with key physicochemical properties that govern functionality; (ii) to identify shared mechanistic principles underlying its performance in nutrient management and contaminant remediation; (iii) to establish nanobiochar–BSC interactions as a promising frontier for accelerating dryland recovery; and (iv) to critically assess sustainability challenges related to energy demand, scalability, environmental fate, and potential ecological risks. Together, these perspectives aim to support the responsible translation of nanobiochar from laboratory studies to real-world agricultural and ecological applications.

      A systematic literature review was conducted, synthesizing evidence from four international scientific databases—Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar—which captured peer-reviewed primary literature, edited chapters, and technical reports. Literature collection employed a hierarchical keyword strategy across three thematic domains to optimize both comprehensiveness and specificity. Domain 1 (Production and Characterization) utilized search terms such as nanobiochar synthesis, ball-milled biochar, hydrothermal carbonization, biochar nanocomposites, and physicochemical properties. Domain 2 (Agricultural and Environmental Applications) incorporated keywords including soil remediation, nutrient release, heavy metal adsorption, wastewater treatment, and sustainable agriculture. Domain 3 (Dryland Restoration— the review's primary focus) employed cross-disciplinary search strings coupling nanotechnology with arid ecological processes: nanobiochar and biological soil crusts, cyanobacteria inoculation, dryland restoration, desertification control, and soil aggregate stability. This tiered methodology facilitated the systematic capture of knowledge spanning nanobiochar development, mechanistic functionality, and innovative applications in degraded arid ecosystems.

    • Biochar synthesis employs diverse thermochemical pathways. The primary routes—slow pyrolysis, fast pyrolysis, gasification, and carbonization—convert biomass feedstocks, including agricultural residues, wood, and animal waste, into biochar[32,33]. Among these approaches, slow pyrolysis in oxygen-depleted conditions yields approximately 35% biochar by mass[3436]. Fast pyrolysis is commonly preferred for biofuel generation, whereas gasification is mainly used to produce syngas that can subsequently be utilized for heat and power production[37]. Previous studies have shown that lignocellulosic feedstocks produce greater amounts of nanobiochar than municipal solid waste materials[3]. The effectiveness of biochar for targeted applications can be significantly improved through various physical and chemical modification strategies. Chemical approaches include CO2 activation, oxidative treatments, acid or alkaline modification, steam activation, and the incorporation of engineered nanoparticles[38]. In contrast, physical modification methods, such as ball milling, have demonstrated considerable potential but remain less extensively investigated[38,39].

      Nanobiochar synthesis involves various techniques applied to conventional biochar. Mechanical grinding is employed to generate nanoparticles (Fig. 2), while flash heating directly produces graphitic nanosheets from biochar[40]. Ultrasonic vibration and sonication techniques disperse biochar and facilitate the formation of nanosized particles[41]. Ball milling represents the most widely applied industrial method for nanobiochar production[42]. In this process, repeated impacts and friction generated by moving metallic balls within a milling chamber induce bond rupture and facilitate charge redistribution within the material. The resulting particle size distribution can be precisely regulated by modifying operational parameters such as milling time, rotational speed, and ball-to-material ratio[43,44]. Alternative methods for nanobiochar preparation include double-disc milling and vibration disc milling, with the latter demonstrating superior results in generating a higher quantity of nanobiochar with uniform shape and size[41]. Additionally, nanobiochar can be produced through a hydrothermal reaction method using agricultural waste and its by-products. For instance, cattle dung and soybean straw can be converted into bulk biochar, which is then subjected to concentrated sulfuric and nitric acid digestion in a high-pressure hydrothermal reactor.

      Figure 2. 

      Biochar production and nanobiochar synthesis: integration of multiple pathways.

      Several studies have investigated the creation of functional composites by incorporating modified nanoparticles into biomass prior to pyrolysis. For example, graphene-enhanced biochar composites were produced using slow pyrolysis of wheat straw biomass treated with graphene. The results indicated that graphene-coated biochar exhibited increased surface area, enhanced thermal stability, and improved mercury and phenanthrene removal capabilities, along with a greater abundance of functional groups, compared to untreated biochar[45]. The development of biochar-based nanocomposites, which integrate the advantages of biochar with various nanomaterials, has shown significant promise. Nanobiochar particles typically exhibit sizes in the nanometer range, achievable through methods such as controlling exfoliation or pyrolysis temperature techniques, as reported in numerous studies[46,47]. Exfoliated biochar has been observed to possess particle sizes smaller than 10 nm.

      Magnetic nanobiochar composites have been synthesized by first carbonizing biochar via pyrolysis, followed by FeCl3 pretreatment, sulfuric acid sulfonation, and oleic acid acidification to enhance acidity, ultimately yielding magnetic nanobiochar composites with improved catalytic properties. Nanobiochar derived from pine wood biochar has been successfully produced using the planetary ball mill method. Pretreating the biochar prior to milling reduced particle size by approximately 60 nm and increased the nanobiochar surface area by 15-fold compared to conventional biochar.

      Thermal and chemical treatments of biomass not only yield syngas and biofuels but also promote biochar formation, thereby addressing multiple objectives: waste recycling, pollutant removal, energy production, and carbon sequestration[48]. Therefore, the production of biochar nanomaterials holds significant promise in effectively addressing these goals. The demonstrated advantages of nanocomposites suggest their potential as innovative adsorbents for economically removing pollutants such as chromium (Cr VI) from aqueous solutions. Tailored biochar nanocomposites can be synthesized by slow pyrolysis of bagasse biomass coated with a suspension of carbon nanotubes[49]. On the other hand, physical modification techniques such as ball milling have not gained significant attention, despite limited research indicating promising outcomes that merit further exploration. Mechanical grinding or milling is commonly employed to generate nanoparticles[50]. Despite the application of mechanical techniques, direct nanobiochar production through flash ignition can lead to the formation of graphitic nanosheets. Researchers have also employed ultrasonic vibration to physically disintegrate biochar, followed by sonication to produce nanosized particles[51]. According to current literature, nanobiochar production via ball milling is considered the most suitable and recommended method[52]. Ball milling achieves grinding through particle collisions, which decreases particle size. Another method for producing nanobiochar is double-disc milling, although its higher operational costs make it less common[34].

      While numerous strategies exist for nanobiochar fabrication, selecting the appropriate synthesis pathway is critical for determining the material's final physicochemical properties and scalability. As summarized in Table 1, production methods are generally categorized into 'top-down' approaches (e.g., ball milling), and 'bottom-up' approaches (e.g., hydrothermal carbonization). Top-down methods, which rely on mechanical attrition, are currently favored for large-scale environmental applications due to their scalability and solvent-free nature. However, bottom-up synthesis allows for superior control over surface functionality, creating 'hydrochars' that may offer enhanced water-retention capabilities valuable for dryland restoration. Table 1 provides a comparative assessment of these primary synthesis routes, evaluating their respective advantages, limitations, and potential for industrial scaling.

      Table 1.  Comprehensive comparison of nanobiochar synthesis methods: production pathways and performance metrics

      Synthesis method Classification and process description Key advantages Limitations Ref.
      Ball milling (Top-down) Mechanical grinding of bulk biochar using planetary mills; repeated impacts and friction induce particle size reduction; parameters include milling time, rotational speed, and ball-to-material ratio Eco-friendly; solvent-free; significantly increases surface area (up to 15-fold); creates acidic and oxygen-containing functional groups crucial for water retention; can be integrated into existing biochar supply chains High energy consumption; long processing times; potential contamination from milling media; particle size distribution variability; requires careful optimization of milling parameters [5662]
      Hydrothermal carbonization (Bottom-up) Thermochemical conversion of wet biomass in water at high pressure and temperature (using concentrated sulfuric and nitric acid in high-pressure reactor) Produces uniform, spherical hydrochar nanoparticles; rich in surface functional groups; ideal for coating seeds or bacteria; superior control over surface functionality; enhanced water-retention Lower porosity compared to pyrolysis chars; requires post-synthesis activation; expensive reactor infrastructure; higher capital costs; more complex operational parameters [34,59]
      Pyrolysis + sonication (Hybrid) Conventional pyrolysis at 500–700 °C followed by high-intensity ultrasonic exfoliation; ultrasonic vibration physically disintegrates biochar to facilitate nanosized particle formation Effectively separates graphitic layers; improves aqueous dispersion; ideal for hydro-seeding applications; carbon enrichment through selective ash removal; enhanced dispersion in water Lower yield of nanoscale fraction; difficulty achieving uniform particle size distribution; energy-intensive sonication stage; incomplete particle separation [20,40,63]
      Vibration disc milling (Top-down) Similar to ball milling but uses vibrating disc mechanism instead of planetary mills; mechanical particle reduction through disc oscillation Superior results compared to ball milling in uniform shape and size generation; higher quantity of nanobiochar produced; consistent particle morphology Higher operational costs than planetary ball milling; less widely available equipment; similar energy demands [34,41]
      Double-disc milling (Top-down) Mechanical grinding between rotating discs; two-stage milling process for particle size reduction Produces fine particles; alternative to ball milling; suitable for specific feedstock types Higher operational costs; limited industrial adoption; requires specialized equipment maintenance [34]

      The synthesis of nanobiochar from diverse feedstocks results in method-specific transformations in physicochemical properties that clearly distinguish it from bulk biochar. As summarized in Table 2, nanobiochar characteristics arise from distinct interactions between feedstock type and production technique. Sonication promotes carbon enrichment primarily through selective ash removal[40], whereas mechanical milling increases the hydrogen-containing functional groups and enhances structural and mechanical properties[53]. Microwave-assisted processing yields nanobiochar with high carbon purity and improved thermal stability[54], while chemical modification combined with thermal treatment produces materials with highly developed surface characteristics suitable for adsorption-driven applications[55]. These contrasting pathways highlight the importance of tailoring nanobiochar production protocols to meet specific environmental remediation and industrial performance objectives.

      Table 2.  Comprehensive physicochemical characterization of biochar and nanobiochar: transformation of properties by feedstock type and production method

      Feedstock type Synthesis method
      and conditions
      Particle size transformation Surface area (m2/g) Moisture (%) Ash (%) H/C ratio Ref.
      Wheat straw Pyrolysis at 700 °C followed by sonication Bulk biochar reduced to nanoparticles via ultrasonic exfoliation Bulk: 56.65;
      Nano: 88.4
      Bulk: 41.14;
      Nano: 52.35
      Bulk: 53.87;
      Nano: 27.88
      Bulk: 0.39;
      Nano: 0.67
      [40]
      Dairy manure Pyrolysis at 500 °C with sonication
      (30 min) and centrifugation
      Bulk biochar transformed to nanoparticles through ultrasonic separation Bulk: 38.5;
      Nano: 56.6
      Bulk: 50.5;
      Nano: 6.58
      Bulk: 0.12;
      Nano: 3.65
      [64]
      Corn straw Pyrolysis at 500 °C with planetary ball milling (600 rpm, 150 min) Bulk biochar mechanically milled to approximately 60 nm particle size Bulk: 8.1;
      Nano: 7.9
      Bulk: 5.13;
      Nano: 6.27
      Bulk: 78.96;
      Nano: 77.62
      Bulk: 0.72;
      Nano: 0.51
      [53]
      Rice husk Pyrolysis at 500 °C with planetary ball milling (600 rpm, 150 min) Bulk biochar ground to nanoparticles via mechanical attrition Bulk: 8.6;
      Nano: 8.7
      Bulk: 31.55;
      Nano: 31.51
      Bulk: 54.62;
      Nano: 53.05
      Bulk: 0.77;
      Nano: 0.78
      [53]
      Pine wood Pyrolysis at 525 °C with ball milling (575 rpm, 100 min) Bulk biochar mechanically reduced to nanoscale particles Bulk: 47.25;
      Nano: higher values
      Bulk: 2;
      Nano: 2.11
      Bulk: 1.0;
      Nano: 0.5
      [65]
      Rice hull Carbonization at 600 °C with centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 30 min) and freeze-drying Bulk biochar processed to nanoparticles through centrifugal separation Bulk: 27.1;
      Nano: 123.2
      Bulk: 79.62;
      Nano: 80.87
      Bulk: 1.08;
      Nano: 1.27
      [66]
      Rice husk Pyrolysis at 600 °C with planetary ball milling and chemical amendment
      (Iron Oxide nanobiochar)
      Bulk biochar converted to nanoparticles Bulk: —;
      Nano: 1,736
      [67]
      A dash (—) indicates that specific data for that property were not reported. H/C: Hydrogen-to-Carbon ratio.
    • The fabrication methods for various biochar-based nanomaterials are illustrated in Fig. 3. Based on the nanomaterials incorporated into nanobiochar, these materials can be classified into three categories: oxide/hydroxide-biochar nanocomposites, magnetic-biochar nanocomposites, and biochar coated with functional nanoparticles (such as graphene, graphene oxide, chitosan, and carbon nanotubes). These composites are synthesized through different methods, typically involving two treatment processes: pre-treatment and post-treatment of biomass[15].

      Figure 3. 

      Engineering biochar nanocomposites: synthesis methods for metal oxide, graphene, and magnetic systems.

    • Oxide/hydroxide biochar nanocomposites are primarily synthesized through three methods: (i) fortification with target elements via bioaccumulation; (ii) pre-treatment of biomass using metal salts; and (iii) post-pyrolysis insertion of nanometal oxides. The first two methods involve pre-pyrolysis metal impregnation of the biomass, whereas the third method involves the direct introduction of oxide/hydroxide nanometals into the pyrolyzed biochar[15,16].

    • Biochar coated with functional nanoparticles, including graphene and its carbon, chitosan, oxide nanotubes, and layered double hydroxides, forms effective nanocomposite materials. These composites are capable of efficiently removing various contaminants.

    • Considering the challenges associated with separating biochar from aqueous solutions, magnetic biochar composites can be synthesized using two primary approaches: pre-treatment of biomass with iron ions or chemical co-precipitation of iron oxides onto biochar. These methods facilitate the coating of nanosized magnetic iron oxides, such as CoFe2O4 and Fe3O4[68,69], onto the biochar surface. This modification not only imparts magnetic properties to the biochar, enabling easy separation from solutions, but also enhances the availability of active sites for iron oxide, thereby improving the removal of pollutants and increasing adsorption capacity[15].

      Biochar-based nanocomposites, which exhibit enhanced parameters such as specific surface area, availability of active sites, catalytic degradation capacity, pore size distribution, pore volume, and ease of separation, have demonstrated high efficiency in contaminant removal. Numerous studies have shown that these composites possess superior adsorption capabilities, allowing them to adsorb a wide variety of contaminants from aqueous solutions[70,71]. Additionally, these nanocomposites, when incorporating diverse reductive/oxidative and catalytic nanoparticles (such as graphitic C3N4 and nanoscale zero-valent iron), can simultaneously adsorb and degrade various toxic substances[15]. Therefore, biochar-based nanocomposites hold significant potential for treating various waste materials and have diverse environmental applications.

    • Biochar, an organic material, has been recognized for its diverse applications in agriculture, including enhancing plant growth, managing diseases, remediating pesticides, serving as a fertilizer and soil amendment, and supporting microbial growth. Additionally, biochar has been reported to improve crop productivity, reduce soil salinity, and enhance soil quality and plant biomass. The incorporation of biochar into agricultural soils has also been shown to decrease dependence on chemical fertilizers, particularly nitrogen fertilizers, thereby reducing nitrogen leaching into groundwater.

    • Global agriculture faces a critical soil nutrient deficit driven by multiple anthropogenic pressures: intensive monoculture, livestock overgrazing, forest clearance, and industrialization. Traditionally, chemical fertilizers have been the primary solution for addressing soil nutrient deficiencies[72]. While synthetic fertilizers can temporarily remedy these deficiencies, their continuous application generates significant environmental costs through nutrient runoff and groundwater contamination[7376]. Despite numerous strategies proposed to tackle nutrient management challenges and resource limitations, practical solutions remain scarce.

      Recent evidence indicates that nanobiochar amendments act as highly effective soil conditioners, mitigating nutrient loss while sustaining plant-available nutrient pools through enhanced sorption and controlled release mechanisms[77,78]. Biochar can improve fertilizer use efficiency by preserving nutrients and reducing their loss from soil[79]. Researchers have documented favorable plant responses to biochar amendments, noting that nanobiochar functions effectively as a soil conditioner that enhances plant growth by effectively delivering and retaining nutrients, among other benefits[80]. Nanobiochar enhances plant nutrient acquisition due to its nutrient-rich composition and release characteristics, as well as its ability to increase nutrient sorption, enhance soil cation exchange capacity, improve soil physical properties, boost water retention capacity, and adjust soil pH[81].

      Nanobiochar has demonstrated more promising results in enhancing plant growth in acidic soils compared to alkaline soils[82]. A study by Graber et al.[83] investigated the effects of nanobiochar in soilless growth media, finding significant benefits in improving yields of crops such as peppers and tomatoes. With the horticultural industry increasingly acknowledging the need to reduce or eliminate peat use in favor of more sustainable and cost-effective growth media, biochar has emerged as a leading alternative. Research indicates that combining biochar with engineered nanomaterials and chemicals can provide additional benefits. For instance, the use of biochar with water-soluble carbon nanotubes significantly enhanced wheat growth[17]. In terms of root growth, alkaline nanobiochar has been shown to significantly increase root biomass compared to biochar with a lower pH[84]. Both biochar and non-pyrogenic organic amendments have demonstrated positive effects on plant growth; their variable impacts can limit their widespread agricultural use[85]. A study by Scheifele et al.[86] found that applying bamboo biochar at concentrations below 10% stimulated nodulation and improved soybean growth. Plant nutrition and dry mass are influenced by the quantity and type of biomass applied during agricultural practices and cropping.

    • Biochar enhances soil structure by promoting aggregation and reducing compaction. As a physical conditioner, it aids in forming stable soil aggregates, leading to the development of macro- and micro-aggregates. These improvements increase soil porosity and aeration, facilitating better root penetration and water infiltration[87,88]. The effect of biochar on soil hydraulic conductivity is dependent on soil water content, providing valuable insights into how biochar influences soil hydrological properties. Enhanced water infiltration and drainage reduce the risk of waterlogging and increase oxygen availability to plant roots[89]. Biochar also helps mitigate soil hydrophobicity, improving infiltration and water distribution[90].

    • To mitigate excessive soil salinity, plant scientists utilize various techniques, including sub-soiling, sand mixing, seed bed preparation, and salt scraping[91]. Modern agronomic practices such as the application of hydrophilic polymers, gypsum, sulfuric acid, green manuring, humic substances, olive mill wastes, farmyard manures, improved irrigation systems, and cultivation of salt-tolerant crops are also employed[92,93].

      Biochar application has been widely reported to improve soil quality under saline conditions through multiple, interrelated mechanisms. One of the most important effects is its capacity to immobilize excess sodium ions in the soil matrix, thereby facilitating the release and uptake of essential mineral nutrients and alleviating osmotic stress in the root zone. Previous studies have demonstrated that biochar amendments can significantly reduce exchangeable sodium levels and lower the sodium-to-potassium (Na+/K+) ratio in saline soils, resulting in a more balanced and favorable rhizospheric environment for plant development[94]. In addition, biochar influences nutrient cycling by enhancing the retention and availability of essential elements, while simultaneously limiting the bioavailability of potentially toxic ions commonly associated with saline conditions.

      Improvements in soil chemical and physical properties following biochar addition are closely reflected in plant performance under salinity stress. Numerous studies have demonstrated that biochar enhances plant tolerance to salinity by stimulating antioxidant defense systems and reducing oxidative damage[95,96]. Biochar-amended soils have been associated with improvements in key morphological traits, including seedling establishment, leaf expansion, shoot and root biomass accumulation, plant height, dry matter production, and final yield under saline stress conditions[95]. Moreover, biochar contributes to improved osmotic regulation by increasing soil water-holding capacity and enhancing carbon dioxide assimilation. These changes promote higher transcriptional activity, increased stomatal conductance, and improved photosynthetic efficiency[97]. Collectively, these responses highlight the integrated nature of soil–plant interactions and underscore the role of biochar as a soil amendment that mediates physiological resilience through improvements in soil quality.

      Nanobiochar, due to its nanoscale dimensions and increased surface area, effectively alleviates salinity stress in plants and soils through several mechanisms. Its increased porosity and surface area enhance its ability to adsorb ions, particularly chloride and sodium, which are the dominant soluble salts in saline soils. The simultaneous removal of both Na+ and Cl is essential because each ion creates distinct phytotoxic effects: sodium causes osmotic stress and interferes with potassium uptake, while chloride accumulates in plant tissues to toxic levels independent of sodium presence[98,99]. This adsorption capability effectively lowers the concentration of detrimental salts in the rhizosphere, thereby minimizing osmotic stress on plants. Additionally, nano-biochar can improve nutrient cycling dynamics in saline soils by enhancing nutrient availability. It adsorbs and retains essential nutrients, preventing their leaching and creating a favorable microenvironment that enhances nutrient uptake by plants. This process mitigates the adverse effects of salinity by improving nutrient absorption[99].

    • Biochar produced from biomass is not only a carbon-rich material but also contains appreciable quantities of essential macro- and micro-nutrients, including nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, manganese, copper, zinc, iron, and ash. This nutrient-rich composition underpins its growing use as an organic soil amendment and fertilizer[100]. The use of biochar as a nutrient carrier has opened new avenues for the development of slow-release biofertilizers. For example, nitrogen use efficiency has been shown to increase by up to 64.3%, while nitrogen leaching losses and surface migration are substantially reduced, leading to improved crop growth and nutrient availability over time[100,101].

      At the nanoscale, nanobiochar has demonstrated considerable potential as a slow-release nutrient source, contributing to improved soil fertility and enhanced crop productivity[34]. Yield and growth improvements observed in rice systems have been largely attributed to synergistic interactions between nanobiochar and mineral fertilizers, resulting in increases in plant height, tiller number, and overall biomass[102,103]. These findings highlight the effectiveness of nanobiochar–fertilizer combinations as efficient nutrient delivery systems in intensive cropping systems.

      The superior performance of nanobiochar is closely linked to its physicochemical characteristics. Its large specific surface area and charged surface facilitate the adsorption and subsequent availability of nutrients following fertilization[104,105]. Oxygen-containing functional groups on nanobiochar surfaces further enhance the adsorption of ammonium and ammonia, improving nitrogen retention and reducing losses through leaching and volatilization[102]. The porous structure of nanobiochar also enables the capture and retention of nitrate ions, limiting their displacement by irrigation or rainfall[106]. Through these mechanisms, nanobiochar improves key soil nitrogen processes such as mineralization and nitrification, ensuring a more consistent and readily available nitrogen supply for plant uptake and ultimately supporting higher productivity[107]. In parallel, improvements in soil structure and microbial diversity further enhance nutrient cycling and availability[108].

      Beyond conventional fertilizers, biochar-based nanocomposites derived from agricultural wastes, such as corn residues, have been developed to provide slow-release macro- and micronutrients to plants[77]. These approaches contribute to sustainable waste management by transforming agricultural by-products into value-added fertilizers, while also mitigating nutrient leaching associated with traditional fertilization practices[109]. More recently, hydrogel-based biochar composites have been introduced as environmentally safe materials capable of retaining moisture and nutrients, thereby supporting eco-friendly and resource-efficient agricultural production systems[110]. Despite these advances, further research remains necessary to fully evaluate the capacity of biochar-derived fertilizers to simultaneously immobilize heavy metals while providing controlled and sustained nitrogen release under diverse soil and environmental conditions.

    • Nanobiochar has emerged as a promising option for soil enhancement, enzyme activity promotion, and pollutant adsorption due to its porous structure and unique physical and chemical properties. These properties, including a high surface area, hydrophobicity, and microporosity, enable nanobiochar to effectively adsorb pollutants such as heavy metals, herbicides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and polychlorinated biphenyls[27]. Additionally, nanobiochar's alkaline nature makes it effective in neutralizing soil acidity, broadening its applications in agriculture and environmental management by improving soil quality.

      An investigation of nanobiochar's effects on tobacco rhizosphere microbiology[100] demonstrated substantial increases in bacterial and fungal diversity alongside shifts in microbial community composition. These shifts coincided with elevated soil enzyme activities (catalase, invertase, phosphatase) and enhanced microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen pools. Application rates of 3% nanobiochar proved optimal for maximizing metabolic activity and community diversity in tobacco-cultivated soil, with statistically significant positive correlations between enzymatic activity and microbial richness[100].

      In a study conducted in a rubber tree plantation in Northeast Thailand, increasing doses of nanobiochar were found to influence soil pH, nutrient content, and microbial communities, with fungal communities being more affected than bacterial communities[111]. Nanobiochar impacts soil microbial diversity and function through both abiotic processes and modifications to the soil's physical environment. Changes in pH and oxidation potential due to nanobiochar can affect microbial population structure and activity, as well as nitrogen and carbon adsorption dynamics. Nanobiochar's porous structure provides a microhabitat for soil fungi and bacteria, supplying essential organic components and minerals. This structure supports microbial growth, enhancing soil nutrient content and altering community structures[112]. Understanding nanobiochar's effects on microbial populations and functions is crucial for developing systems that maintain soil health and improve degraded soils, ultimately protecting plants[112].

    • The environmental applications of macro-biochar have been extensively studied and documented by various researchers. However, nanobiochar is now being explored for numerous environmental purposes, including phytoremediation, carbon sequestration, and energy generation, as well as applications in waste management, wastewater treatment, and pollutant removal.

      Nanobiochar demonstrates effective sorption properties for removing pollutants such as pesticides, steroid hormones, pharmaceuticals, and toxic metals[113]. These micropollutants pose significant risks to human health and the environment, primarily spreading through improper wastewater discharge, waste disposal, and agricultural chemical use. Nanobiochar and biochar modified with nanominerals exhibit exceptional adsorption capabilities due to their unique characteristics compared to conventional biochar[53]. Furthermore, by adsorbing toxic chemicals like pesticides and immobilizing metals, nanobiochar contributes to remediating pollution that can lead to severe environmental and health issues. Therefore, nanobiochar is increasingly recognized as a promising agent for the bioremediation of a wide range of contaminants.

      The superior environmental performance of nanobiochar compared to bulk biochar fundamentally derives from enhanced physicochemical properties that create multiple coordinated remediation mechanisms[114]. Nanobiochar exhibits dramatically increased specific surface area and porosity, generating exponentially more adsorption sites and reactive functional groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl, and phenolic groups) capable of binding diverse pollutants[115]. The primary mechanism for nanobiochar interacting with heavy metals and organic pollutants is adsorption, enabled by surface functional groups including lactone, carboxyl, and hydroxyl moieties that increase its ability to adsorb and immobilize various contaminants through multiple simultaneous pathways: interactions with aromatic organics (e.g., pesticides, pharmaceutical compounds), coordination bonding with metal cations, and pore-filling mechanisms[114]. For heavy metal removal, aged nanobiochar exhibits a higher surface area and more functional groups favorable for binding cadmium through enhanced chemisorption and physical adsorption processes such as hydrogen bonding and pore filling, with chemical ageing producing the most significant effect[116]. Critically, the synthesis method determines the primary remediation mechanism: ball milling and mechanical grinding increase surface area and porosity suitable for contaminant immobilization, while chemical modifications incorporating metal oxides enable catalytic degradation pathways in addition to adsorption[115,117]. Notably, magnetic nanobiochar modifications incorporating iron nanoparticles impart magnetic properties, enabling facile recovery of treated nanobiochar from water and supporting multiple regeneration cycles. These integrated mechanisms—combining adsorption, absorption, precipitation, complexation, and catalytic transformation—position nanobiochar as a multifunctional environmental remediator substantially outperforming conventional biochar across diverse contaminant classes (heavy metals, organic pollutants, pharmaceuticals) and environmental matrices (contaminated water and soil)[118].

    • Water contamination by persistent heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu) represents a major environmental and public health hazard due to bioaccumulation and non-degradability. The most widely accepted methods for removing heavy metals include adsorption, ion exchange, and chemical precipitation[119]. Among these, adsorption from aqueous solutions or effluents has gained popularity due to its economic feasibility.

      Conventional remediation technologies, including activated carbon, zeolite, iron oxide, and silica gel-based adsorbents, exhibit significant practical limitations, including oxidative instability, suboptimal adsorption kinetics, insufficient selectivity, and prohibitive costs[120]. These constraints have motivated the investigation of nanobiochar-based alternatives. Recent research has focused on synthesizing different types of nanobiochar to enhance its adsorption capacity for aqueous and ionic pollutants[121,122]. Studies have demonstrated significant improvements in wastewater treatment using biochar nanocomposites, highlighting their removal efficiencies and adsorption capacities.

      Heavy metals such as cadmium, arsenic, copper, and chromium contribute significantly to water pollution, primarily due to their adsorption and degradation by nanobiochar and biochar-based nanocomposites. A study by Liu et al.[99] demonstrated that transforming pristine magnetic biochars into ball-milled magnetic nanobiochar derived from wheat straw markedly improved the removal efficiency of tetracycline and mercury from contaminated irrigation water. Recent studies have shown that modifying biochar with hydroxides, metal oxides, magnetic iron particles, and other functional nanoparticles has enabled researchers to harness its potential for wastewater treatment[123,124]. These biochar-based nanocomposites have proven highly efficient, sustainable, and cost-effective for the bioremediation of wastewater by adsorbing toxic metals and other contaminants.

    • Biochar is widely recognized for its adsorption capabilities and has been utilized to remove pollutants effectively. Additionally, various forms of nano-carbon materials, such as carbon black, activated carbon, or engineered carbon nanomaterials, have demonstrated a high ability to adsorb natural organic matter. Research has shown that contaminants like heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, and dyes can be effectively removed using biochar, with nanobiochar proving particularly efficient. Table 3 summarizes the effectiveness of different nanobiochar composites. Furthermore, numerous studies have confirmed that biochar nanocomposites possess a significant capacity to eliminate major heavy metal contaminants, including arsenic, lead, copper, chromium, and cadmium, as well as other pollutants such as toxic chemicals, dyes, and antibiotics. For instance, as shown in Table 3, a study by Li et al.[125] reported that ZnO/ZnS-modified nanobiochar demonstrated high potential for adsorbing Cr6+, Cu2+, and Pb2+.

      Table 3.  Comprehensive assessment of pollutant elimination through adsorption using nanobiochar and biochar nanocomposites

      Pollutants removed Pollutant category Composite composition Adsorption mechanism Application scope Ref.
      Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ Heavy metals Biochar + hydroxyapatite mineral coating Chelation bonding with phosphate groups; ion exchange Industrial wastewater treatment; Contaminated water remediation [126]
      Cr6+, Cu2+, Pb2+ Heavy metals (hexavalent chromium) Biochar integrated with zinc oxide and zinc sulfide nanoparticles Redox reduction of Cr6+ to Cr3+; electrostatic adsorption; complexation Chromium-contaminated wastewater; Metal-rich industrial effluents [125]
      Pb2+ Heavy metal (lead) Biochar surface coated with manganese oxide nanoparticles Oxidation-adsorption synergy; manganese oxide sorption sites; ion exchange Lead contamination in aqueous solutions; Mining wastewater [69]
      Metformin hydrochloride (MFH) Pharmaceutical pollutant (antidiabetic drug metabolite) Biochar treated with sodium hydroxide creating alkaline surface Electrostatic attraction to basic sites; hydrogen bonding; pore filling Pharmaceutical wastewater [127]
      Tetracycline and Hg2+ Antibiotic + toxic metal Biochar with embedded magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4 or CoFe2O4) Magnetic adsorption; surface functional group binding; chelation Antibiotic-contaminated agricultural runoff; Mercury-contaminated water; Easy magnetic recovery [128]
      Fluoride (inorganic) Inorganic anion pollutant Biochar derived from corn stover with iron oxide modification Ion exchange mechanism with iron oxide sites; adsorption to hydroxyl groups Fluoride-contaminated groundwater; Industrial fluoride-containing wastewater [129]
      Cu2+, Cd2+, Pb2+ Multiple heavy metals Biochar surface treated with potassium permanganate creating nanometal oxide sites Oxidative adsorption from permanganate sites; ion exchange; complexation Multi-metal contaminated solutions; Electroplating industry wastewater [130]
      Phosphate (inorganic) Nutrient ion pollutant (eutrophication control) Biochar with magnesium oxide and magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles Precipitation reaction with magnesium species; Lewis acid-base interactions Nutrient-rich wastewater treatment; Eutrophication prevention; Agricultural runoff [131]
    • The intersection of nanotechnology and ecological restoration represents a paradigm shift in dryland management. While traditional restoration efforts often rely on the passive natural recovery of BSCs—a process that can take decades and is prone to failure under hyper-arid conditions—the integration of carbon-based amendments offers a pathway to active, accelerated 'bio-geo-engineering'. Although existing research has primarily documented the benefits of bulk biochar in facilitating BSCs establishment[30,31,132], the theoretical properties of nanobiochar suggest that it could overcome the limitations of macroscopic amendments. By creating a hybrid material system with exponentially higher surface area and colloidal reactivity, nanobiochar-amended BSCs are hypothesized to transcend the performance of either component individually. This section explores the future trajectory of this synergy, proposing how nanobiochar could facilitate the emergence of resilient, self-sustaining soil skins in degraded drylands more effectively than conventional methods.

    • A major constraint in dryland restoration is the high mortality of inoculated cyanobacteria, which are often destroyed by wind erosion and intense UV radiation before they develop protective pigments or filament networks[133,134]. While bulk biochar has been shown to provide physical shelter for microbial colonization[40], a promising direction for future work is the development of nanobiochar-based 'bio-inks' for precision hydro-seeding. In this proposed approach, nanobiochar particles (50–200 nm) would act as protective colloidal carriers for cyanobacterial inocula. Their superior surface area-to-volume ratio compared to bulk biochar suggests they could promote the rapid formation of stable organo-mineral aggregates immediately upon application.

      As illustrated in Fig. 4, this microscopic interaction is central to the hypothesized method's effectiveness because nanobiochar's enhanced surface area and nanoscale pore structure create mechanistic advantages for cyanobacterial colonization. Nanobiochar particles possess higher surface area-to-volume ratios, enabling stronger electrostatic anchoring of cyanobacterial cells and more rapid stabilization of soil micro-aggregates. The nanoscale pores reduce diffusion distances for essential nutrients and water, supporting rapid metabolic activity during critical early establishment phases. Additionally, nanobiochar's superior capacity to bind and concentrate EPS creates stronger bio-cement for aggregate stability, addressing wind erosion—a dominant failure mechanism in arid restoration. Unlike macroscopic biochar granules, which simply mix with soil, nanobiochar particles position themselves between sand grains and filamentous cyanobacteria, functioning as electrostatic micro-anchors within the EPS biofilm matrix. This integrated three-component assembly creates a refined micro-niche environment that provides mechanical stability, enhances water retention, and buffers early cyanobacterial cells from UV stress and desiccation during the critical establishment phase. Furthermore, nanobiochar-amended formulations are expected to maintain matric water at levels usable by cyanobacteria more effectively than bulk amendments, prolonging the metabolic window for photosynthesis and EPS secretion processes essential for initiating biological soil crust formation.

      Figure 4. 

      Nanobiochar-mediated bio-Ink formation: nano-microbe-EPS interface in BSCs.

    • Future research will likely focus on nanobiochar not just as a physical anchor, but as a highly efficient biochemical catalyst for the 'cyanosphere'—the consortium of heterotrophic bacteria that supports cyanobacterial growth. Bulk biochar is already utilized as a carrier for beneficial microbes, but nanobiochar offers a superior platform due to its increased loading capacity. By engineering nanobiochar to be pre-loaded with specific signaling molecules or limiting nutrients (e.g., phosphorus), restorationists could selectively recruit beneficial heterotrophs (Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria) with greater precision than is possible with macroscopic carriers. This synergy could transform the restoration process from a linear accumulation of biomass to an exponential assembly of community function. Field trials using biochar carriers suggest that co-inoculation strategies can compress succession timelines; shifting to nanobiochar could theoretically accelerate this further, potentially reducing recovery times in even nutrient-depleted substrates like mining tailings.

    • Perhaps the most critical advantage of transitioning from bulk to nanobiochar is the potential for emergent resilience to climate change stressors[135], particularly in cold deserts. Evidence indicates that biochar-amended soils exhibit improved resistance to freeze-thaw cycles, a major cause of crust destabilization[136]. Nanobiochar is expected to amplify this effect through 'thermal buffering' and structural reinforcement. Its nanoscale pores can better accommodate the volumetric expansion of freezing soil water without disrupting the aggregate structure, while its uniform dispersion provides a darker albedo that increases surface temperatures. This would create a 'bio-composite armor' capable of withstanding erosion forces that would strip away natural crusts—an application particularly relevant for alpine steppes facing increasing climate variability.

    • Finally, the widespread application of nanobiochar-BSC systems presents a scalable opportunity for carbon sequestration. This approach offers a 'double-locking' mechanism for carbon storage: the recalcitrant, aromatic carbon of the nanobiochar itself (stable for centuries) and the labile, photosynthetically fixed carbon trapped within the mineralized crust matrix. While biochar is a known carbon sink, nanobiochar's potential for deeper integration into the mineral matrix suggests it may be less susceptible to oxidative loss. As global carbon markets evolve, quantifying this sequestration potential could monetize dryland restoration, providing the economic model necessary to fund landscape-scale initiatives.

    • The growing interest in nanobiochar is primarily attributed to its distinctive physicochemical properties associated with particle size, including a higher specific surface area[115], reduced hydrodynamic radius and more negative zeta potential[64], increased abundance of oxygen-containing functional groups, and the presence of carbon defects relative to pristine biochar[137]. These characteristics enhance the reactivity of nanobiochar and underpin its strong adsorption capacity for trace metals and organic contaminants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[34], which has promoted its application in wastewater treatment and contaminant immobilization. However, these same properties also introduce a range of limitations and potential adverse effects that require careful evaluation[115].

      At the soil scale, both biochar and nanobiochar can alter soil physical structure in ways that are strongly dependent on soil texture, application rate, and surface chemistry. Due to their extremely small size and high surface reactivity, nanobiochar particles are capable of migrating into soil pore spaces, which may reduce macroporosity and restrict gas exchange and root penetration when applied at excessive rates[138]. In addition, surface chemical characteristics inherited from feedstock selection and pyrolysis conditions may enhance hydrophobic behavior at the nanoscale. This water repellency can disrupt aggregate bonding mechanisms, increasing the susceptibility of soil aggregates to slaking and breakdown during repeated wetting and drying cycles. Consequently, improvements in soil structure observed at low application rates may shift toward compaction and structural instability under less controlled conditions.

      Alterations in soil structure are closely linked to changes in soil water dynamics, where the effects of nanobiochar are often contradictory[139]. While the internal porosity and surface functional groups of nanobiochar can increase soil water-holding capacity, particularly in coarse-textured soils, surface-applied nanobiochar may simultaneously accelerate moisture loss. In some cases, nanobiochar forms thin surface layers that promote capillary rise and rapid evaporation rather than sustained moisture storage. Moreover, the high mobility of nano-sized particles can modify hydraulic conductivity and promote preferential flow pathways, resulting in uneven water distribution within the soil profile[139]. As a result, enhanced soil water retention does not always translate into improved plant water availability. A study by Chen et al.[140] reported that nanobiochar increased water repellency and decreased soil water retention, a discrepancy that may be largely attributed to differences in raw materials and preparation methods. Another contributing factor may be the redistribution of soil pore structure caused by nanobiochar entering small- and medium-sized pores, leading to the formation of zigzagging and complex water flow channels[141].

      In addition to physical and hydrological effects, high application rates of biochar and nanobiochar may negatively influence soil biological properties. Excessive inputs can result in the accumulation of toxic compounds or the formation of physical barriers that impede microbial growth, ultimately reducing microbial abundance and diversity[142]. The presence of potentially toxic components within biochar and nanobiochar may further suppress bacterial populations[143]. These effects may also be linked to reductions in soil organic carbon availability, as discussed earlier, while elevated C/N ratios in nanobiochar can restrict carbon metabolism among microbial communities, thereby exerting additional pressure on microbial diversity[99].

      Beyond soil-related effects, the production of nanobiochar raises important economic and energy concerns. The conversion of bulk biochar into nano-sized material typically relies on energy-intensive post-processing techniques such as ball milling, chemical oxidation, or ultrasonication. These processes substantially increase production costs and embodied energy compared with conventional biochar, limiting the feasibility of large-scale agricultural or restoration applications[28]. From a life-cycle perspective, the environmental benefits attributed to nanobiochar may be offset by its high energy demand unless its performance clearly exceeds that of bulk biochar, thereby confining its use primarily to specialized or high-value applications.

      Given that both bulk biochar and nanobiochar are increasingly applied in agriculture and soil remediation[144], it is essential to assess their impacts on plants and diverse groups of organisms. Physicochemical characterization and contaminant profiling alone are insufficient for evaluating the environmental risks associated with nanobiochar[145], due to the complex interactions between nanobiochar, environmental matrices, and biological systems, as well as the dynamic nature of contaminant release and particle transport.

    • This review highlights the rapidly expanding role of nanobiochar and biochar-based nanocomposites in addressing critical agricultural and environmental challenges. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that nanobiochar can substantially enhance plant performance by improving nutrient cycling, alleviating salinity stress, and increasing fertilizer use efficiency. These benefits arise not only from its unique physicochemical properties but also from its capacity to influence the soil–plant–microbe continuum. In particular, nanobiochar-induced shifts in microbial activity and community structure play a central role in sustaining long-term soil fertility, ecosystem functioning, and resilience.

      Beyond agronomic applications, nanobiochar exhibits strong environmental remediation potential due to its high sorption capacity associated with its large surface area and fine pore structure. This enables effective immobilization of a wide range of organic and inorganic contaminants in soils, aquatic systems, and even atmospheric environments. When coupled with its role in waste valorization and its contribution to enhanced crop productivity, these multifunctional attributes position nanobiochar as a key material supporting sustainable development goals.

      An emerging and particularly promising frontier identified in this review is the application of nanobiochar in dryland restoration, especially through its interaction with biological soil crusts. Synthesis of current studies suggests that nanobiochar can act as an effective nucleation substrate for BSC initiation, helping to overcome constraints such as wind erosion, nutrient limitation, and rapid moisture loss in arid ecosystems. By promoting cyanobacterial colonization and strengthening the physical integrity of desert surface soils, nanobiochar facilitates the development of a stable bio-composite matrix. In this context, nanobiochar transcends the role of a conventional soil amendment and emerges as a strategic tool for bio–geo-engineering, offering a scalable, nature-based approach to combating desertification and enhancing long-term soil carbon sequestration.

      To fully realize the potential of nanobiochar across agricultural and ecological systems, several research priorities must be addressed. First, mechanistic studies are required to unravel the complex and often non-linear interactions among nanobiochar, soil mineralogy, and microbial networks. Such knowledge is essential for the design of precision-engineered nanobiochar formulations tailored to specific soil types and degradation levels. Second, greater emphasis should be placed on optimizing biochar–organic and biochar–microbial consortia, particularly co-inoculation strategies that integrate nanobiochar with cyanobacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, or other beneficial microorganisms to enhance restoration success in nutrient-poor drylands.

      Third, scaling up nanobiochar production remains a critical challenge. Advances in energy-efficient manufacturing pathways such as optimized ball milling, hydrothermal carbonization, and controlled pyrolysis are needed to improve product consistency, reduce energy demand, and enable landscape-scale applications. Fourth, the functional scope of nanobiochar extends beyond soil systems into emerging technological domains, including energy storage materials such as supercapacitor electrodes and the development of 'smart' soil sensors that integrate nanomaterials with real-time environmental monitoring technologies.

      Finally, long-term ecological evaluations are indispensable for the responsible deployment of nanobiochar. Comprehensive field-based studies examining particle stability, mobility, trophic transfer, and ecosystem-level impacts over multi-year to decadal timescales are necessary to ensure environmental safety and regulatory acceptance. Addressing these knowledge gaps will allow the scientific community to harness the full versatility of nanobiochar, advancing innovative solutions for sustainable agriculture, environmental remediation, and the restoration of fragile dryland ecosystems.

      • This work is supported by Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

      • The author confirms sole responsibility for the following: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, writing—original draft, and approval for the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • No funding was received for conducting this study.

      • The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

      • Nanobiochar outperforms bulk biochar in soil remediation due to superior surface area and reactivity.

        Nanobiochar acts as an efficient carrier for slow-release fertilizers, reducing nitrogen leaching.

        Ball milling offers a sustainable, solvent-free pathway for synthesizing highly functionalized nanobiochar.

        Application of biochar nanocomposites alleviates salinity stress in crops by regulating osmotic balance and ion homeostasis.

        It acts as a bio-ink anchor, enabling pioneer cyanobacteria to colonize unstable dryland soils.

      • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (4)  Table (3) References (145)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Salem H. 2026. Nanobiochar as a multifunctional amendment for coupled water-soil-biota systems: applications in agricultural production, environmental remediation, and arid ecosystem restoration. Biochar X 2: e009 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0026-0008
    Salem H. 2026. Nanobiochar as a multifunctional amendment for coupled water-soil-biota systems: applications in agricultural production, environmental remediation, and arid ecosystem restoration. Biochar X 2: e009 doi: 10.48130/bchax-0026-0008

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return