Search
2025 Volume 1
Article Contents
ORIGINAL RESEARCH   Open Access    

Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can promote the dissemination of antibiotic resistance via both vertical and horizontal gene transfer

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Received: 10 July 2025
    Revised: 17 September 2025
    Accepted: 17 October 2025
    Published online: 07 November 2025
    Biocontaminant  1 Article number: e005 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • Antibiotics can promote the genetic stability of ARGs.

    Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can elevate both intrageneric and intergeneric transfer of ARGs.

    Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can enhance the transformation of ARGs.

    Mathematical models are proposed to predict the long-term effects of antibiotics on the dissemination of ARGs.

  • Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a significant global threat to human health and is considered a biocontaminant. Both vertical gene transfer (VGT) and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) play important roles in the spread of antibiotic resistance. The impact of environmentally relevant concentrations of typical antibiotics on the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) through these two modes of transmission, as well as the underlying mechanisms, remains an urgent area of research. This study explores the effects of four typical antibiotics (tetracycline, ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin) at environmental concentrations on the genetic stability and horizontal transfer of ARGs across three models (vertical transfer, conjugation, and transformation), along with the mechanisms involved. We conclude that, except for tetracycline, antibiotics exposed to the other three environmental concentrations could potentiate the persistence of resistance in resistant bacteria. Furthermore, all antibiotics, at concentrations ranging from 0.005 to 5 mg/L, were able to induce horizontal shifts in ARGs. Various metrics were employed in the phenotypic and genotypic analyses. The results indicated that enhanced resistance following exposure to antibiotics was directly correlated with the overproduction of reactive oxygen species, an elevated stress response, strengthened efflux pump activity, and intensified cell membrane permeability. Mathematical models were also used to predict the impact of prolonged bacterial exposure to antibiotics on the stability of ARGs and plasmid transformation. Our findings highlight the risks associated with the development of antibiotic resistance under environmentally relevant concentrations of antibiotics.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 Primer list.
    Supplementary Table S3 Tetracycline measurement results.
    Supplementary Table S3 Variables and parameters used in the VGT model.
    Supplementary Table S4 Variables and parameters used in the HGT model.
    Supplementary Text S1 Bacterial Cultivation Conditions.
    Supplementary Text S2 ROS and cell membrane permeability detection.
    Supplementary Text S3 ATP detection.
    Supplementary Text S4 RT-qPCR technique.
    Supplementary Text S5 Model calibration function.
    Supplementary Text S6 Determination of tetracycline concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography.
    Supplementary Fig. S1 The OD600 values of bacterial cultures under antibiotic pressure during the evolution process: (a) E. coli MG1655 with RP4 plasmid, (b) E. coli LE392 with pWH1266 plasmid, and (c) E. coli HB101.
    Supplementary Fig. S2 The growth curves of three bacterial strains under antibiotic pressure (CON: control group): (a) E. coli with RP4 plasmid. (b) E. coli with the pWH1266 plasmid. (c) E. coli HB101.
    Supplementary Fig. S3 Tetracycline concentration detection. (a)Tetracycline standard calibration curve. (b) Chromatogram of the tetracycline control group. (c) Chromatogram of the tetracycline sample group containing E. coli MG1655 with RP4 plasmid. (d) Chromatogram of the tetracycline sample group containing E. coli LE392 with pWH1266 plasmid.
    Supplementary Fig. S4 (a) The variation in the number of recipient bacteria E. coli HB101 on agar plates. (b) The variation in the number of recipient bacteria S. enterica on agar plates. Significant differences between the antibiotic treatment group and the control group are indicated as: * padj < 0.05 and ** padj < 0.01.
    Supplementary Fig. S5 PCR electrophoresis images of tetA and blaTEM genes in the conjugative RP4 plasmid.
    Supplementary Fig. S6 PCR electrophoresis images of the tetA and blaTEM genes in the transformants carrying the pWH1266 plasmid.
    Supplementary Fig. S7 Trajectories of transformant prevalence under the exposure of antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations.
  • [1] Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. 2015. Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathogens and Global Health 109:309−318 doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Ventola CL. 2015. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. Pharmacy and Therapeutics 40(4):277−283

    Google Scholar

    [3] Levy SB, Marshall B. 2004. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nature Medicine 10:S122−S129 doi: 10.1038/nm1145

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Zhang L, Kinkelaar D, Huang Y, Li Y, Li X, et al. 2011. Acquired antibiotic resistance: are we born with it? Applied and Environmental Microbiology 77:7134−7141 doi: 10.1128/AEM.05087-11

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Naghavi M, Vollset SE, Ikuta KS, Swetschinski LR, Gray AP, et al. 2024. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. The Lancet 404:1199−1226 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Woodford N, Ellington MJ. 2007. The emergence of antibiotic resistance by mutation. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 13:5−18 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01492.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Stevenson C, Hall JPJ, Harrison E, Wood AJ, Brockhurst MA. 2017. Gene mobility promotes the spread of resistance in bacterial populations. The ISME Journal 11:1930−1932 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.42

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Mishra S, Klümper U, Voolaid V, Berendonk TU, Kneis D. 2021. Simultaneous estimation of parameters governing the vertical and horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes. Science of The Total Environment 798:149174 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Wang H, Hou L, Liu Y, Liu K, Zhang L, et al. 2021. Horizontal and vertical gene transfer drive sediment antibiotic resistome in an urban lagoon system. Journal of Environmental Sciences 102:11−23 doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.09.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA. 2000. Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 405:299−304 doi: 10.1038/35012500

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Johnston C, Martin B, Fichant G, Polard P, Claverys JP. 2014. Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control. Nature Reviews Microbiology 12:181−196 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3199

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Brabban AD, Hite E, Callaway TR. 2005. Evolution of foodborne pathogens via temperate bacteriophage-mediated gene transfer. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2:287−303 doi: 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.287

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Lood R, Ertürk G, Mattiasson B. 2017. Revisiting antibiotic resistance spreading in wastewater treatment plants – bacteriophages as a much neglected potential transmission vehicle. Frontiers in Microbiology 8:2298 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02298

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] von Wintersdorff CJH, Penders J, van Niekerk JM, Mills ND, Majumder S, et al. 2016. Dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in microbial ecosystems through horizontal gene transfer. Frontiers in Microbiology 7:173 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00173

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Li B, Qiu Y, Song Y, Lin H, Yin H. 2019. Dissecting horizontal and vertical gene transfer of antibiotic resistance plasmid in bacterial community using microfluidics. Environment International 131:105007 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Andersson DI, Hughes D. 2014. Microbiological effects of sublethal levels of antibiotics. Nature Reviews Microbiology 12:465−478 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3270

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Serio AW, Keepers T, Andrews L, Krause KM. 2018. Aminoglycoside revival: review of a historically important class of antimicrobials undergoing rejuvenation. EcoSal Plus 8:10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0002-2018 doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0002-2018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Kounatidis D, Dalamaga M, Grivakou E, Karampela I, Koufopoulos P, et al. 2024. Third-generation tetracyclines: current knowledge and therapeutic potential. Biomolecules 14:783 doi: 10.3390/biom14070783

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Begum S, Begum T, Rahman N, Khan RA. 2021. A review on antibiotic resistance and way of combating antimicrobial resistance. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences 14:87−97 doi: 10.30574/gscbps.2021.14.2.0037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Ye D, Sun J, Jiang R, Chang J, Liu Y, et al. 2024. β-lactam antibiotics induce metabolic perturbations linked to ROS generation leads to bacterial impairment. Frontiers in Microbiology 15:1514825 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1514825

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Klein EY, Impalli I, Poleon S, Denoel P, Cipriano M, et al. 2024. Global trends in antibiotic consumption during 2016–2023 and future projections through 2030. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121:e2411919121 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2411919121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Spherical Insights & Consulting. 2024. Global antibiotics market size to worth USD 72.01 billion by 2033, with a CAGR of 4.10%. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/06/19/2901285/0/en/Global-Antibiotics-Market-Size-To-Worth-USD-72-01-Billion-By-2033-CAGR-of-4-10.html
    [23] Kümmerer K. 2001. Drugs in the environment: emission of drugs, diagnostic aids and disinfectants into wastewater by hospitals in relation to other sources – a review. Chemosphere 45:957−969 doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00144-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Yuan X, Lv Z, Zhang Z, Han Y, Liu Z, et al. 2023. A review of antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and resistance genes in aquaculture: occurrence, contamination, and transmission. Toxics 11:420 doi: 10.3390/toxics11050420

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Bound JP, Voulvoulis N. 2005. Household disposal of pharmaceuticals as a pathway for aquatic contamination in the United Kingdom. Environmental Health Perspectives 113:1705−1711 doi: 10.1289/ehp.8315

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Gao H, Zhang L, Lu Z, He C, Li Q, et al. 2018. Complex migration of antibiotic resistance in natural aquatic environments. Environmental Pollution 232:1−9 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.078

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Wang J, Chu L, Wojnárovits L, Takács E. 2020. Occurrence and fate of antibiotics, antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) and antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) in municipal wastewater treatment plant: an overview. Science of The Total Environment 744:140997 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140997

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Tran NH, Reinhard M, Gin KYH. 2018. Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in municipal wastewater treatment plants from different geographical regions − a review. Water Research 133:182−207 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Szymańska U, Wiergowski M, Sołtyszewski I, Kuzemko J, Wiergowska G, et al. 2019. Presence of antibiotics in the aquatic environment in Europe and their analytical monitoring: recent trends and perspectives. Microchemical Journal 147:729−740 doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.04.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Andersson DI, Hughes D. 2012. Evolution of antibiotic resistance at non-lethal drug concentrations. Drug Resistance Updates 15:162−172 doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2012.03.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Anwar M, Iqbal Q, Saleem F. 2020. Improper disposal of unused antibiotics: an often overlooked driver of antimicrobial resistance. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 18:697−699 doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1754797

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Larsson DGJ. 2014. Pollution from drug manufacturing: review and perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 369:20130571 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0571

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Milaković M, Vestergaard G, González-Plaza JJ, Petrić I, Šimatović A, et al. 2019. Pollution from azithromycin-manufacturing promotes macrolide-resistance gene propagation and induces spatial and seasonal bacterial community shifts in receiving river sediments. Environment International 123:501−511 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.050

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Bielen A, Šimatović A, Kosić-Vukšić J, Senta I, Ahel M, et al. 2017. Negative environmental impacts of antibiotic-contaminated effluents from pharmaceutical industries. Water Research 126:79−87 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Fick J, Söderström H, Lindberg RH, Phan C, Tysklind M, et al. 2009. Contamination of surface, ground, and drinking water from pharmaceutical production. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 28:2522−2527 doi: 10.1897/09-073.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Larsson DGJ, de Pedro C, Paxeus N. 2007. Effluent from drug manufactures contains extremely high levels of pharmaceuticals. Journal of Hazardous Materials 148:751−755 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Dafale NA, Srivastava S, Purohit HJ. 2020. Zoonosis: an emerging link to antibiotic resistance under "One Health Approach". Indian Journal of Microbiology 60(2):139−152 doi: 10.1007/s12088-020-00860-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Gangar T, Patra S. 2023. Antibiotic persistence and its impact on the environment. 3 Biotech 13:401 doi: 10.1007/s13205-023-03806-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Lv J, Zhang L, Chen Y, Ye B, Han J, et al. 2019. Occurrence and distribution of pharmaceuticals in raw, finished, and drinking water from seven large river basins in China. Journal of Water and Health 17:477−493 doi: 10.2166/wh.2019.250

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Moratalla Á, Cotillas S, Lacasa E, Fernández-Marchante CM, Ruiz S, et al. 2022. Occurrence and toxicity impact of pharmaceuticals in hospital effluents: simulation based on a case of study. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 168:10−21 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.09.066

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Zambello E. 2012. Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in urban wastewater: removal, mass load and environmental risk after a secondary treatment—a review. Science of The Total Environment 429:123−155 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Rizzo L, Manaia C, Merlin C, Schwartz T, Dagot C, et al. 2013. Urban wastewater treatment plants as hotspots for antibiotic resistant bacteria and genes spread into the environment: a review. Science of The Total Environment 447:345−360 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Baawain MS, Al-Mamun A, Omidvarborna H, Al-Sabti A, Choudri BS. 2020. Public perceptions of reusing treated wastewater for urban and industrial applications: challenges and opportunities. Environment, Development and Sustainability 22:1859−1871 doi: 10.1007/s10668-018-0266-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Hernando MD, Mezcua M, Fernández-Alba AR, Barceló D. 2006. Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater effluents, surface waters and sediments. Talanta 69:334−342 doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.09.037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Li Z, Li M, Zhang Z, Li P, Zang Y, et al. 2020. Antibiotics in aquatic environments of China: a review and meta-analysis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 199:110668 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110668

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Henderson-Begg SK, Livermore DM, Hall LMC. 2006. Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on mutation frequency in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 57:849−854 doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Brown CL, Maile-Moskowitz A, Lopatkin AJ, Xia K, Logan LK, et al. 2024. Selection and horizontal gene transfer underlie microdiversity-level heterogeneity in resistance gene fate during wastewater treatment. Nature Communications 15:5412 doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49742-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Bose B, Auchtung JM, Lee CA, Grossman AD. 2008. A conserved anti-repressor controls horizontal gene transfer by proteolysis. Molecular Microbiology 70:570−582 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06414.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Wu Y, Yan H, Zhu X, Liu C, Chu C, et al. 2022. Biochar effectively inhibits the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes via restraining the energy supply for conjugative plasmid transfer. Environmental Science & Technology 56:12573−12583 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02701

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Jia Y, Zheng Z, Yang B, Zhang H, Wang Z, et al. 2024. A broad-spectrum horizontal transfer inhibitor prevents transmission of plasmids carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 2024:7063673 doi: 10.1155/2024/7063673

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Bilal M, Mehmood S, Rasheed T, Iqbal HMN. 2020. Antibiotics traces in the aquatic environment: persistence and adverse environmental impact. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 13:68−74 doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2019.11.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Wang Y, Lu J, Engelstädter J, Zhang S, Ding P, et al. 2020. Non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals enhance the transmission of exogenous antibiotic resistance genes through bacterial transformation. The ISME Journal 14:2179−2196 doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0679-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Luo Y, Wang Q, Lu Q, Mu Q, Mao D. 2014. An ionic liquid facilitates the proliferation of antibiotic resistance genes mediated by class I integrons. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 1:266−270 doi: 10.1021/ez500103v

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Zhang Y, Gu AZ, He M, Li D, Chen J. 2017. Subinhibitory concentrations of disinfectants promote the horizontal transfer of multidrug resistance genes within and across genera. Environmental Science & Technology 51:570−580 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Abou Mourad Ferreira M, Candeias Dos Santos L, Schmidt Castellani LG, Negrelli Brunetti M, Palaci M. 2024. Application of BactTiter-Glo ATP bioluminescence assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 109:116275 doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116275

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Hu X, Wang X, Ren H, Li C, Zhang B, et al. 2024. Preliminary study of the characterization of the viable but noncultivable state of Yersinia enterocolitica induced by chloride and UV irradiation. Microorganisms 12:1778 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091778

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Vizcaíno JA, Csordas A, del-Toro N, Dianes JA, Griss J, et al. 2016. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Research 44:D447−D456 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1145

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Chopra I, Roberts M. 2001. Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 65:232−260 doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.2.232-260.2001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Grossman TH. 2016. Tetracycline antibiotics and resistance. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 6:a025387 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025387

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Møller TSB, Overgaard M, Nielsen SS, Bortolaia V, Sommer MOA, et al. 2016. Relation between tetR and tetA expression in tetracycline resistant Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiology 16:39 doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0649-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Olivares Pacheco J, Alvarez-Ortega C, Alcalde Rico M, Martínez JL. 2017. Metabolic compensation of fitness costs is a general outcome for antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants overexpressing efflux pumps. mBio 8:10.1128/mbio.00500-17 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00500-17

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Li Z, Xu K, Liang B, Li Y. 2013. Determination of trace tetracyclines in surface water by aluminum hydroxide coprecipitation coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytical Methods 5:3516−3522 doi: 10.1039/C3AY40395E

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Jones S. 2004. Magnaporthe blasts into roots. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2:852 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Grant SS, Kaufmann BB, Chand NS, Haseley N, Hung DT. 2012. Eradication of bacterial persisters with antibiotic-generated hydroxyl radicals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:12147−12152 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203735109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Van Acker H, Coenye T. 2017. The role of reactive oxygen species in antibiotic-mediated killing of bacteria. Trends in Microbiology 25:456−466 doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Nikaido H. 1994. Prevention of drug access to bacterial targets: permeability barriers and active efflux. Science 264:382−388 doi: 10.1126/science.8153625

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Putman M, Van Veen HW, Konings WN. 2000. Molecular properties of bacterial multidrug transporters. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 64:672−693 doi: 10.1128/MMBR.64.4.672-693.2000

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Apopa PL, Qian Y, Shao R, Guo NL, Schwegler-Berry D, et al. 2009. Iron oxide nanoparticles induce human microvascular endothelial cell permeability through reactive oxygen species production and microtubule remodeling. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 6:1 doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-6-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Gunawan C, Faiz MB, Mann R, Ting SRS, Sotiriou GA, et al. 2020. Nanosilver targets the bacterial cell envelope: the link with generation of reactive oxygen radicals. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12:5557−5568 doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b20193

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Pomposiello PJ, Bennik MHJ, Demple B. 2001. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the Escherichia coli responses to superoxide stress and sodium salicylate. Journal of Bacteriology 183:3890−3902 doi: 10.1128/JB.183.13.3890-3902.2001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] San Millan A, MacLean RC. 2017. Fitness costs of plasmids: a limit to plasmid transmission. Microbiology Spectrum 5:10.1128/microbiolspec.mtbp-0016-2017 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MTBP-0016-2017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Löffler D, Ternes TA. 2003. Analytical method for the determination of the aminoglycoside gentamicin in hospital wastewater via liquid chromatography–electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 1000:583−588 doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(03)00059-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] De Oliveira Demarco J, Hutchinson SL, Parameswaran P, Hettiarachchi G, Moore T. 2025. Removal of antibiotics from swine wastewater using an environmentally friendly biochar: performance and mechanisms. ACS Omega 10:7711−7721 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c07266

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Samandari M, Movahedian Attar, H, Ebrahimpour K, Mohammadi F, Ghodsi S. 2022. Measurement of ampicillin and penicillin G antibiotics in wastewater treatment plants during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study in Isfahan. Environmental Health Engineering and Management 9:201−211 doi: 10.34172/EHEM.2022.21

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Chen I, Christie PJ, Dubnau D. 2005. The ins and outs of DNA transfer in bacteria. Science 310:1456−1460 doi: 10.1126/science.1114021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Onami, K, Kimura, Y, Ito, Y, Yamauchi, T, Yamasaki, K, et al. 2014. Nonmetal haptens induce ATP release from keratinocytes through opening of pannexin hemichannels by reactive oxygen species. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 134:1951−1960 doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.93

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Li H, Song R, Wang Y, Zhong R, Wang T, et al. 2022. Environmental free radicals efficiently inhibit the conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance by altering cellular metabolism and plasmid transfer. Water Research 209:117946 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117946

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Huang H, Lin L, Bu F, Su Y, Zheng X, et al. 2022. Reductive stress boosts the horizontal transfer of plasmid-borne antibiotic resistance genes: the neglected side of the intracellular redox spectrum. Environmental Science & Technology 56:15594−15606 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c04276

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Bingle LEH, Thomas CM. 2001. Regulatory circuits for plasmid survival. Current Opinion in Microbiology 4:194−200 doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00188-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Smillie C, Garcillán-Barcia MP, Francia MV, Rocha EPC, de la Cruz F. 2010. Mobility of Plasmids. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 74:434−452 doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00020-10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Zhao Y, Hu X, Liu Y, Dong S, Wen Z, et al. 2017. ROS signaling under metabolic stress: cross-talk between AMPK and AKT pathway. Molecular Cancer 16:79 doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0648-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Nielsen KM, Johnsen PJ, Bensasson D, Daffonchio D. 2007. Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment. Environmental Biosafety Research 6:37−53 doi: 10.1051/ebr:2007031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Engelstädter J, Moradigaravand D. 2014. Adaptation through genetic time travel? Fluctuating selection can drive the evolution of bacterial transformation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281:20132609 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2609

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Bushra R, Aslam N. 2010. An overview of clinical pharmacology of ibuprofen. Oman Medical Journal 25:155−161 doi: 10.5001/omj.2010.49

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Bengtsson-Palme J, Larsson DGJ. 2016. Concentrations of antibiotics predicted to select for resistant bacteria: proposed limits for environmental regulation. Environment International 86:140−149 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Guo X, Long X, Li J, Wu J, Zhu X, et al. 2025. Effects of antibiotics and heavy metals on antibiotic resistance genes and mobile gene elements in agricultural activity. Environmental Sciences Europe 37:87 doi: 10.1186/s12302-025-00987-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Wang D, Zhou X, Fu Q, Li Y, Ni BJ, et al. 2025. Understanding bacterial ecology to combat antibiotic resistance dissemination. Trends in Biotechnology 43:1566−1582 doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.12.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Halawa EM, Fadel M, Al-Rabia MW, Behairy A, Nouh NA, et al. 2024. Antibiotic action and resistance: updated review of mechanisms, spread, influencing factors, and alternative approaches for combating resistance. Frontiers in Pharmacology 14:1305294 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1305294

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ. 2010. How antibiotics kill bacteria: from targets to networks. Nature Reviews Microbiology 8:423−435 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2333

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Chan CL, Wai HKF, Wu P, Lai SW, Chan OSK, et al. 2022. A universal LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous detection of antibiotic residues in animal and environmental samples. Antibiotics 11:845 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070845

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Dörr T, Lewis K, Vulić M. 2009. SOS response induces persistence to fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genetics 5:e1000760 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000760

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Hayete B, Lawrence CA, Collins JJ. 2007. A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell 130:797−810 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Wan M, Zhu N, Yang G, Guo X, Sun S, et al. 2023. The function of the gene loiP in transformation efficiency and outer membrane permeability change of Escherichia coli treated by Ca2+ ions. Letters in Applied Microbiology 76:ovac076 doi: 10.1093/lambio/ovac076

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Poole K. 2007. Efflux pumps as antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Annals of Medicine 39:162−176 doi: 10.1080/07853890701195262

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Martindale JL and Holbrook NJ. 2002. Cellular response to oxidative stress: signaling for suicide and survival. Journal of Cellular Physiology 192:1−15 doi: 10.1002/jcp.10119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Wang Q, Wang P, Yang Q. 2018. Occurrence and diversity of antibiotic resistance in untreated hospital wastewater. Science of The Total Environment 621:990−999 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Jutkina J, Marathe NP, Flach CF, Larsson DGJ. 2018. Antibiotics and common antibacterial biocides stimulate horizontal transfer of resistance at low concentrations. Science of The Total Environment 616–617:172−178 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Wang Y, Liu Y, Yang J, Geng M, Jia H, et al. 2025. Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can promote the dissemination of antibiotic resistance via both vertical and horizontal gene transfer. Biocontaminant 1: e005 doi: 10.48130/biocontam-0025-0005
    Wang Y, Liu Y, Yang J, Geng M, Jia H, et al. 2025. Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can promote the dissemination of antibiotic resistance via both vertical and horizontal gene transfer. Biocontaminant 1: e005 doi: 10.48130/biocontam-0025-0005

Figures(10)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(724) PDF downloads(179)

Other Articles By Authors

Original Research   Open Access    

Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can promote the dissemination of antibiotic resistance via both vertical and horizontal gene transfer

Biocontaminant  1 Article number: e005  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a significant global threat to human health and is considered a biocontaminant. Both vertical gene transfer (VGT) and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) play important roles in the spread of antibiotic resistance. The impact of environmentally relevant concentrations of typical antibiotics on the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) through these two modes of transmission, as well as the underlying mechanisms, remains an urgent area of research. This study explores the effects of four typical antibiotics (tetracycline, ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin) at environmental concentrations on the genetic stability and horizontal transfer of ARGs across three models (vertical transfer, conjugation, and transformation), along with the mechanisms involved. We conclude that, except for tetracycline, antibiotics exposed to the other three environmental concentrations could potentiate the persistence of resistance in resistant bacteria. Furthermore, all antibiotics, at concentrations ranging from 0.005 to 5 mg/L, were able to induce horizontal shifts in ARGs. Various metrics were employed in the phenotypic and genotypic analyses. The results indicated that enhanced resistance following exposure to antibiotics was directly correlated with the overproduction of reactive oxygen species, an elevated stress response, strengthened efflux pump activity, and intensified cell membrane permeability. Mathematical models were also used to predict the impact of prolonged bacterial exposure to antibiotics on the stability of ARGs and plasmid transformation. Our findings highlight the risks associated with the development of antibiotic resistance under environmentally relevant concentrations of antibiotics.

    • Antibiotic resistance is defined as the ability of microorganisms (e.g., bacteria, fungi, or viruses) to withstand or diminish the efficacy of antibiotics upon exposure[1,2]. Bacteria that exhibit antibiotic resistance are referred to as antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and harbor the corresponding antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Although antibiotic resistance is not a novel phenomenon, the current global dissemination of ARB and ARGs has escalated to unprecedented levels, raising serious ecological and public health concerns[3]. It is estimated that approximately 70% of hospital infections exhibit resistance to at least one antibiotic[4]. Recent studies have indicated that in 2019, antibiotic-resistant infections directly caused 1.27 million deaths and indirectly contributed to 4.95 million deaths, and an estimated 39 million people worldwide will die from antibiotic resistance between 2025 and 2050[5]. ARGs are transmitted in the environment by vertical gene transfer (VGT)[6] and horizontal gene transfer (HGT)[7]. VGT refers to the transfer of genes from a mother cell to daughter cells through bacterial reproduction[8]. VGT plays a stabilizing role in the succession and expansion of bacterial communities[9]. For HGT, three distinct pathways are involved: (i) conjugation, which facilitates the transfer of ARGs through conjugative bridges and aids in transferring nonresistant bacteria to ARB[10]; (ii) transformation, where competent bacteria take up extracellular DNA, a process identified in over 80 Gram-positive and Gram-negative species[11]; and (iii) transduction or bacteriophage-mediated ARG transfer[12,13]. Among these, conjugation remains the primary driver of horizontal ARG dissemination[14]. VGT plays a dominant role in shaping the composition of ARGs within prokaryotic communities, especially during the expansion of bacterial populations[15]. Resistance genes are efficiently passed on to their progeny through the process of cell division. In addition, there is a synergistic effect between vertical and horizontal transfer, contributing to the widespread dissemination of resistance genes[15].

      Antibiotics are a class of chemicals that inhibit or kill microorganisms, primarily bacteria. They not only possess bactericidal action but also impact the adherence, transcription stability, and electron transfer of bacteria[16]. Antibiotics are classified into eight major categories, with the most common classes being β-lactams (e.g., penicillin), tetracyclines (e.g., tetracycline), and aminoglycosides (e.g., kanamycin)[1720]. Statistical data show that in 2023, global antibiotic consumption reached 49.3 billion defined daily doses (DDD). It is estimated that by 2030, global antibiotic use will reach 75.1 billion DDD, with an increase of over 50% since 2016[21]. In 2023, the global antibiotic market size was approximately ${\$} $48.2 billion, and it is expected to reach ${\$} $72.01 billion by 2030[22]. Generally, the frequency of spontaneous transfer of resistance genes is relatively low. However, when antibiotics are present in the environment, especially at concentrations below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), they become the selective pressure that drives the transmission of resistance genes[23]. It is reported that 73% of antibiotics are primarily used in agriculture, animal husbandry, and aquaculture, with the remaining 27% allocated for human medical purposes or other applications[24]. More than 90% of antibiotics consumed by humans and livestock through food or medication are excreted unmetabolized, directly entering the wastewater through excretion[2529]. Additionally, antibiotics are directly applied to the soil through the spraying or irrigation of crops, and subsequently leach into groundwater. Similarly, untreated medical wastewater and inadequately treated domestic or industrial sewage containing significant antibiotic residues can enter aquatic environments[30,31]. Moreover, waste streams generated during the antibiotic production process also contribute to environmental contamination[3236]. Although antibiotics exhibit a relatively short half-life, they persist in the environment through frequent emissions[37,38]. Recent studies have reported the detection of multiple pharmaceuticals, including various antibiotics such as tetracyclines and sulfonamides, in river basins, with average concentrations ranging from 0.09 to 128.87 ng/L[39]. In the intensive care units (ICUs) of certain hospitals, the concentration of antibiotics can range from 0.001 to 100 mg/L[40]. Typical antibiotic concentrations in untreated urban wastewater range from 0 to 11.51 μg/L, decreasing to 0–1 μg/L after treatment[41,42]. However, treated wastewater and sludge are discharged into rivers or enter the soil through irrigation, leading to the recurrence of antibiotics[4345]. For example, the concentration of tetracyclines and β-lactams from factories can reach 10 mg/L in surface water even after substantial treatment[3235].

      While antibiotics are traditionally considered the most direct selecting factor influencing the development of antibiotic resistance, their effects on VGT and HGT are controversial. For example, subinhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin and streptomycin have been shown to increase the mutation frequency in Streptococcus pneumoniae[46], and sulfadiazine can significantly enhance the VGT rate[15]. In contrast, tetracycline can inhibit bacterial growth and may limit VGT rates[15]. Regarding HGT, the occurrence of specific HGT events coincides with elevated antibiotic levels[47,48]. Moreover, antibiotics at subinhibitory levels can stimulate HGT of ARGs, whereas some studies have shown that acyclovir and biochar inhibit the horizontal transfer of ARGs through specific mechanisms[49,50]. Notably, current studies have focused on the short-term effects of antibiotics on the spread of ARGs, within several hours to several days. Considering that antibiotics persist in the environment[51], their long-term effects on the development of antibiotic resistance remain largely unknown.

      In this study, we tried to fill the knowledge gap by establishing both the genetic evolution model and the HGT model under the exposure of typical antibiotics (i.e., tetracycline, ampicillin, streptomycin, and kanamycin) at concentrations ranging from environmentally relevant (0.005–0.5 mg/L) to subinhibitory levels (5–50 mg/L). For the genetic evolution model, three bacterial strains containing different ARGs were exposed to antibiotics for 10 consecutive days. For the HGT model, conjugation systems were established for both intra- and inter-species transfer using Escherichia coli MG1655 carrying the plasmid RP4 as the donor and E. coli HB101 and Salmonella enterica as the recipients. A transformation model was also established by exposing the free plasmid pWH1266 to the naturally competent Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. Bacterial reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, SOS response, cell membrane permeability, and gene expression levels of the relevant genes were measured under antibiotic exposure to unravel the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, mathematical models were established to predict the long-term effects of antibiotics on the spread of antibiotic resistance.

    • The genetic system was established using E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid (resistant to the antibiotics tetracycline, ampicillin, and kanamycin), E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid (resistant to tetracycline and ampicillin), and E. coli HB101, which is inherently resistant to streptomycin. The conjugation system was established using E. coli MG1655 carrying the RP4 plasmid as the donor, and E. coli HB101 (streptomycin-resistant) and S. enterica as the recipients for intrageneric and intergeneric conjugative transfer, respectively. The transformation system was established by introducing the foreign plasmid pWH1266 into naturally competent A. baylyi ADP1. All bacterial cultivation conditions are provided in Supplementary Text S1.

    • A genetic system was constructed under typical antibiotic exposure (i.e., 20 mg/L tetracycline, 100 mg/L ampicillin sodium, 50 mg/L streptomycin, and 40 mg/L kanamycin). Three selected bacterial strains were cultured overnight to achieve a 108 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL concentration. The bacteria were then exposed to their corresponding antibiotics (i.e., antibiotics to which they exhibit resistance) and evolved aerobically for consecutive 10 d. In detail, resistant bacteria that had been grown overnight were inoculated with 30 μL into 2.97 mL Luria–Bertani (LB) broth containing the corresponding antibiotic. Every 24 h, 30 μL of bacteria was transferred to fresh LB broth with the same antibiotic concentration and incubated for another 24 h. This process was repeated for 10 d. The control group was set as a bacterial culture without any antibiotic exposure. CFU counts on agar plates were further analyzed to validate the stable genetic transmission of the ARGs.

    • Two conjugation systems were constructed by employing E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid as the donor, E. coli HB101 as the recipient (for intrageneric conjugative transfer), and S. enterica as the recipient (for intergeneric conjugative transfer). In both the intrageneric and intergeneric conjugation models, the donor and recipient bacteria were mixed at a 1:1 ratio with a concentration of 108 CFU/mL for each. Conjugation was performed in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-based system (pH = 7.2) with a total volume of 1 mL. Various classes of antibiotics at a range of concentrations, including subinhibitory levels relevant to environmental conditions, were added separately to the conjugation system. The final concentrations of tetracycline, kanamycin, ampicillin, and streptomycin were set at 0.005, 0.05, 0.5, 5, and 50 mg/L. After 8 h of incubation at 25 °C without shaking, 50 μL of the mixture was spread onto LB selective agar plates containing 20 mg/L tetracycline, 100 mg/L ampicillin, 50 mg/L streptomycin, and 40 mg/L kanamycin to screen for transconjugants. Each experiment was conducted in three biological replicates. Conjugative transfer rates were calculated by dividing the number of transconjugant colonies by the recipient colony count. As no nutrients were provided during mating, the growth of the donor, recipient, and transconjugants was excluded. Additionally, the plasmids used in the conjugation experiments were large, and the recipient strains were not competent cells; thus, the possibility of a bacterial transformation process could be eliminated[11].

    • A transformation system was established by applying the naturally competent bacterial strain A. baylyi ADP1 and the free pWH1266 plasmid[52]. In detail, after overnight culture of A. baylyi ADP1 at 30 °C in LB broth, a 1% cell suspension was transferred to fresh LB medium and incubated in a shaking incubator until the exponential growth phase, with an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.2. Cells were then collected by centrifugation, washed twice with PBS buffer to remove any residual LB, and resuspended. Freshly prepared pWH1266 plasmids were suspended in a 2.5 mM Tris-HCl elution buffer and added to the cell suspension, achieving a final plasmid concentration of 1 ng/µL (equivalent to 1.04 × 108 copies/µL). Sodium acetate was included as an energy source to establish the transformation system. The mixture was then exposed to four antibiotics at concentrations of 0.005, 0.05, 0.5, 5, and 50 mg/L. After thorough mixing, the transformation system was incubated at room temperature for 6 h. The total number of cells was cultured on nonselective agar, while the transformation ratio was determined by plating on selective agar containing antibiotics to count the number of transformants. The transformation ratio was calculated as the number of transformants divided by the total number of cells. Each experiment was conducted with three biological replicates.

    • Upon antibiotic exposure, bacterial generation of ROS and changes in cell membrane permeability were assessed. In detail, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) (final concentration of 10 μM) dye was used to detect intracellular ROS, whereas propidium iodide (PI) (final concentration of 2 μg/mL) dye was used to assess enhanced membrane permeability[53,54]. Fluorescence intensity was measured using a multifunctional microplate reader (Synergy H1M, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA), with the fluorescence intensity values representing the levels of ROS and the extent of membrane permeability. Each experiment was conducted with three biological replicates (details are provided in Supplementary Text S2).

    • The intracellular levels of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in donor and recipient microbial populations were quantified using a chemiluminescence-based method (BacTiter-Lumi™ ATP assay kit, Beyotime Biotech Inc.)[55,56]. The relative ATP content was calculated from chemiluminescence signals, normalized to untreated controls. All experiments were performed with three biological replicates. Details are provided in Supplementary Text S3.

    • Expression levels of genes related to antibiotic resistance transfer were assessed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Initially, three systems were established as previously described and exposed to antibiotics. Total RNA was extracted from bacterial samples using the RNeasy MiniKit (QIAGEN®, Germany) with an additional bead-beating step included in the protocol for cell lysis. This was followed by cDNA synthesis using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit, which includes a gDNA Eraser (Takara) for determining mRNA gene expression levels. RT-qPCR was performed using a StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Expressions of six typical genes (i.e., oxyR, soxR, recA, tolC, ompA, and ompC), which are involved in stress responses and membrane permeability, were analyzed under antibiotic exposure. Primer sequences and reaction conditions are provided in Supplementary Text S4 and Supplementary Table S1.

    • Two different mathematical models were used to simulate and predict the long-term effects of antibiotics on the VGT and HGT of ARGs. The first model describes the dynamic changes in plasmid-carrying bacteria (carrying ARGs) and plasmid-free bacteria (Eqs [1] and [2], respectively), which reflects the genetic evolution of ARB. The second model is used to describe the dynamic transfer in naturally competent bacteria, transformants, and free plasmids (Eqs [3]−[5], respectively). Long-term dynamic changes in the horizontal transfer of ARGs can be predicted. Each model contains two key variables, which are implicitly calibrated using an optimization function (details are provided in Supplementary Text S5).

      $ \mathrm{M}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\,\mathrm{I}\left\{\begin{array}{l}& \dfrac{d{M}_{0}}{dt}={r}_{0}{M}_{0}\left(1-\dfrac{{M}_{0}+{M}_{1}}{K}\right)-{d}_{0}{M}_{0}+\alpha {M}_{1}-\beta {M}_{0}{M}_{1}\quad\quad\left(1\right) \\ &\dfrac{d{M}_{1}}{dt}={r}_{1}{M}_{1}\left(1-\dfrac{{M}_{0}+{M}_{1}}{K}\right)-{d}_{1}{M}_{1}-\alpha {M}_{1}+\beta {M}_{0}{M}_{1}\quad\quad\left(2\right)\end{array}\right. $

      Model I is based on the population dynamics of plasmid-carrying bacteria (ARB) and plasmid-free bacteria (antibiotic-sensitive bacteria). The two differential equations describe the changes in the population sizes of the two bacterial types. Equation (1) describes the growth, natural death, plasmid loss, and conjugation of plasmid-bearing ARB (M0). Equation (2) describes the growth, natural death, plasmid acquisition, and conjugation of plasmid-free bacteria (M1). All variables and parameters involved in Model I are defined in Table 1.

      Table 1.  Variables used in Model I (VGT model)

      Symbol Description
      Model variables M0 Count of E. coli MG1655
      M1 Count of E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid
      t Time (h)
      Model parameters r0/r1 Growth rate of M0 or M1
      d0/d1 Death rate of M0 or M1
      K Environmental carrying capacity, set as 108
      α Probability of plasmid loss
      β Conjugative transfer ratio
      ${\rm{ Model\; II}} \left\{\begin{array}{l}& \dfrac{d{A}_{0}}{dt}={r}_{0}{A}_{0}\left(1-\dfrac{{A}_{0}+{A}_{1}}{K}\right)-{d}_{0}{A}_{0}-\mu P{A}_{0}\quad\quad\left(3\right) \\ & \dfrac{d{A}_{1}}{dt}={r}_{1}{A}_{1}\left(1-\dfrac{{A}_{0}+{A}_{1}}{K}\right)-{d}_{1}{A}_{1}+\mu P{A}_{0}\quad\quad\left(4\right)\\ & \dfrac{dP}{dt}=-\mu P{A}_{0}+{d}_{1}{A}_{1}\lambda -\theta P\quad\quad\left(5\right) \end{array}\right. $

      Model II is based on the population dynamics of wild-type bacteria (A0), transformants (A1), and free plasmids (P). The equations describe the temporal variations in the abundance of wild-type bacteria, transformed bacteria, and free plasmids. Equations (3) and (4) describe the growth, death, and plasmid-mediated transformation processes of A0 and A1 bacteria, respectively, whereas Eq (5) considers the bacterial uptake of plasmids, the plasmids released during bacterial lysis, and the intrinsic degradation of plasmids. All variables and parameters involved in Model II are defined in Table 2.

      Table 2.  Variables used in Model II (transformation model)

      Symbol Description
      Model variables A0 Count of wild-type A. baylyi
      A1 Count of transformants, A. baylyi with the pWH1266 plasmid
      P Number of free plasmids
      t Time (h)
      Model parameters r0/r1 Growth rate of A0 or A1
      d0/d1 Death rate of A0 or A1
      K Environmental carrying capacity, set as 108
      μ Transformation ratio
      λ Plasmid copy number in the transformant
      θ Decay rate of free plasmids in the environment
    • All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate biological replicates. Significance was analyzed using the Benjamini–Hochberg-corrected independent-sample t-test, with the corrected p-value denoted as padj[57]. A value of padj < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    • To assess the genetic stability of bacterial resistance genes, we constructed a vertical transmission system through a 10-d serial passage experiment to evaluate changes in antibiotic susceptibility and investigate whether subsequent generations can stably inherit bacterial resistance.

      The results showed that kanamycin, ampicillin, and streptomycin could significantly increase the number of ARB during bacterial genetic processes (Fig. 1ac). Under all four antibiotic treatments, the abundance of resistant bacteria exhibited daily fluctuations, peaking on Day 6 under treatment conditions, except for the two ampicillin-treated groups. E. coli HB101 under streptomycin exposure showed the most pronounced change (a 3.76-fold increase compared with the control group) (Fig. 1ac). Although resistant clones accumulated during the mid-phase of treatment, their overall fluctuations in abundance were limited. In contrast, tetracycline exhibited distinct behaviors. Under tetracycline exposure, in contrast to the other treatment groups, resistant bacteria exhibited slower growth; their abundance remained below that of the control during the first 3 d of passage, then began to rise from Day 5 onward and reached a peak on Day 6. This was also shown in the OD600 variation (Supplementary Fig. S1). Additionally, it was noted that the growth of E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid and E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid in the tetracycline-treated group was slower than that in the other antibiotic-treated groups (Supplementary Fig. S2). This difference may be related to tetracycline's reliance on efflux pumps to actively expel the drug from the cell, consuming a large amount of energy (such as ATP). Therefore, even when carrying resistance plasmids, bacterial growth remains slower under tetracycline exposure. Additionally, ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin are bactericidal, rapidly killing sensitive bacteria and promoting the selection of resistant strains. In contrast, tetracycline is bacteriostatic, primarily inhibiting protein synthesis to delay cell proliferation, resulting in more pronounced growth inhibition[5861].

      Figure 1. 

      Fold change in bacterial counts and MIC variation under exposure to antibiotics. (a) Fold change in bacterial counts for E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid. (b) Fold change in bacterial counts for E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid. (c) Fold change in bacterial counts for E. coli HB101. (d) MIC variations of E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid treated with tetracycline. (e) MIC variations of E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid treated with ampicillin. (f) MIC variations of E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid treated with kanamycin. (g) MIC variations of E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid treated with tetracycline. (h) MIC variations of E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid treated with ampicillin. (i) MIC variations of E. coli HB101 treated with streptomycin. Statistical significance between the antibiotic-treated and control groups was analyzed using an independent sample t-test and corrected by the Benjamini–Hochberg method, * padj < 0.05 and ** padj < 0.01. Data represent the mean ± SD of three biological replicates.

      Under exposure to antibiotics, the bacterial strain initially harbors the corresponding antibiotic resistance, and bacterial resistance can be reliably inferred from bacterial count measurements. This was further confirmed by detecting the MIC (Fig. 1di). Under antibiotic selection, MIC values for all strains remained similar to those on Day 0 and remained stable overall throughout serial passage; in contrast, under antibiotic-free conditions, MICs generally decreased by approximately twofold (Fig. 1di). Tetracycline exhibited greater variability than the other treatments; under tetracycline exposure, E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid failed to maintain stable resistance across multiple days (Fig. 1d), whereas tetracycline-treated E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid showed a lower MIC on Day 7 than that of the control (Fig. 1g). We further detected the tetracycline concentration by applying high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)[62] (details are shown in Supplementary Text S6). The HPLC results revealed that the tetracycline concentration in the bacteria-containing treatment (17.98 mg/L) was markedly lower than that in the bacteria-free control (19.97 mg/L), suggesting that the bacterial strain is capable of degrading tetracycline (Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Fig. S3). Overall, the dominant effect of environmentally relevant selection pressures on resistance is the maintenance of a stable baseline.

      Antibiotic exposure enhanced the stability of resistance and further promoted the emergence of new resistant phenotypes, as confirmed by the MIC measurements. The results showed that E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 or pWH1266 plasmids exhibited a gradual increase in streptomycin resistance under antibiotic pressure (the MIC increased by approximately two- to fourfold), with the tetracycline-treated group displaying the earliest and most pronounced enhancement (Fig. 2a, b). Accordingly, E. coli HB101 treated with streptomycin exhibited higher MIC values against other antibiotics compared with the control group, indicating that streptomycin exposure could enhance the resistance of E. coli HB101 to tetracycline, ampicillin, and kanamycin (Fig. 2ce). Furthermore, an examination of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin in the three strains revealed that the MIC values remained largely stable between the control and treated groups, except for the emergence of a new resistant phenotype in tetracycline-treated E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 or pWH1266 plasmids (Fig. 2fh). In summary, environmentally relevant antibiotic concentrations may stabilize existing resistance and promote the development of new cross-resistance, thereby increasing the risk of resistance disseminating.

      Figure 2. 

      (a) MIC variations of E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid treated with streptomycin. (b) MIC variations of E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid treated with streptomycin. (c) MIC variations of E. coli HB101 treated with tetracycline. (d) MIC variations of E. coli HB101 treated with tetracycline. (e) MIC variations of E. coli HB101 treated with ampicillin. (f) MIC variations of E. coli HB101 treated with kanamycin. (g) MIC variations of E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid treated with ciprofloxacin. (h) MIC variations of E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid treated with ciprofloxacin.

      In the bacterial metabolism process, ROS are generated as byproducts. Excessive ROS production induces detoxification mechanisms, triggering oxidative stress responses to counteract cellular damage[63]. ROS-mediated oxidative stress has been recognized as a common antimicrobial mechanism of antibiotics[64,65]. Moreover, the activation of efflux pumps is a crucial resistance mechanism, enabling bacteria to regulate their internal environment by expelling toxic substances such as antibiotics[66,67]. Evidence suggests that ROS can target membrane components, inducing structural damage that increases membrane permeability[68,69]. In this study, we hypothesized that the persistence of ARGs under antibiotic exposure may be mechanistically linked to the overproduction of ROS, SOS-mediated oxidative stress responses, efflux pump activity, and compromised membrane integrity. To test the hypothesis, RT-qPCR was used to investigate the regulation of key genes in response to antibiotic exposure.

      It was shown that for the efflux pump-related gene tolC, ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin could upregulate its expression by up to 5.53-, 5.85-, and 1.95-fold (** padj< 0.01), respectively, whereas tetracycline decreased the expression of tolC in E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid (0.35-fold compared with the untreated control) (Fig. 3a). Regarding genes encoding oxidative stress regulators (oxyR and soxR[70]) and SOS response regulators (recA), most increased significantly under exposure to antibiotics, with the highest fold changes being 4.43-, 4.47-, and 6.67-, respectively (Fig. 3b). However, tetracycline treatment did not induce oxidative stress in E. coli MG1655 with the pWH1266 plasmid, and it even reduced ROS release (with a significant downregulated expression of oxyR by 0.77-fold). Similarly, upregulations of membrane porin genes (ompA and ompC) were observed under exposure to ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin, with the highest fold changes of 6.71- and 7.71-fold, respectively. Tetracycline exhibited limited effects on the regulation of membrane porin-related genes (0.86-fold to 1.49-fold) (Fig. 3c). The expression levels of efflux pump, oxidative stress, and membrane porin-related genes corresponded to the phenotypic phenomenon that antibiotics can promote the stable inheritance of ARGs.

      Figure 3. 

      Changes in the expression of key genes under exposure to antibiotics. (a) Efflux pump-related gene tolC. (b) Oxidative stress-related genes (oxyR and soxR) and an SOS response-related gene (recA). (c) Membrane porin-related genes ompA and ompC. Statistical significance between the antibiotic-treated groups and controls is indicated by * padj < 0.05 and ** padj < 0.01.

      In order to gain a deeper understanding of the long-term dynamic changes in the ARB population under antibiotic pressure, this study constructed an ordinary differential equation (ODE) model based on the number of plasmid-carrying bacteria (ARB) and plasmid-free bacteria (antibiotic-sensitive bacteria). The model simulates and predicts the long-term genetic changes of these bacteria under different antibiotic environments (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4).

      By utilizing experimental data from the continuous 10-d evolution experiments of the control group (no antibiotic treatment) and the experimental group (exposed to antibiotics), we calibrated two key parameters in the ODE model: the probability of plasmid loss and the probability of potential gene conjugation transfer. Upon solving the differential equations, we observed that in the control group without antibiotics, the number of plasmid-carrying bacteria (ARB) first increased and then decreased over time. In contrast, plasmid-free bacterial populations (antibiotic-sensitive bacteria) demonstrated sustained growth, eventually stabilizing as the dominant subpopulation within the system (Fig. 4a). This phenomenon likely arises from elimination of the metabolic burden imposed by plasmid maintenance, enabling plasmid-free strains to achieve higher growth rates in the absence of antibiotics[71]. In the experimental groups exposed to antibiotics, the changes in the population size of plasmid-carrying bacteria and plasmid-free bacteria during genetic processes showed significant differences compared with the control group. Plasmid-carrying bacterial populations exhibited a progressive increase followed by stabilization, whereas plasmid-free bacteria rapidly decreased under the effect of the antibiotics and approached extinction. (Fig. 4bd). In the tetracycline-treated group, a longer time was required to achieve a stable bacterial number, namely 45 d, whereas the times for the kanamycin- and ampicillin-treated groups were 31 and 32 d, respectively. The mathematical model further confirmed that, under antibiotic exposure, plasmid-carrying bacteria can maintain stable genetic inheritance, whereas plasmids harboring ARGs can be easily lost without antibiotic exposure.

      Figure 4. 

      (a) Long-term genetic dynamics of plasmid-carrying bacteria (ARB) and plasmid-free bacteria (antibiotic-sensitive bacteria) in the control group without any antibiotic dosage. (b) Long-term genetic dynamics of resistant and susceptible bacterial strains under exposure to tetracycline. (c) Long-term genetic dynamics of resistant and susceptible bacterial strains under exposure to kanamycin. (d) Long-term genetic dynamics of resistant and susceptible bacterial strains under exposure to ampicillin.

    • To better understand how ARGs are transferred horizontally in the presence of antibiotics, both intrageneric and intergeneric conjugation systems were established. Low doses of antibiotics (0.005–5 mg/L) significantly increased transconjugant counts for both intrageneric and intergeneric conjugative transfer, with increases of 1.61- to 5.17-fold (** padj < 0.01). This increase also corresponded with a rise in the RP4 plasmid-mediated conjugative transfer ratio, which were elevated 1.15- to 4.88-fold (** padj < 0.01) (Fig. 5). Notably, tetracycline, kanamycin, and streptomycin at a concentration of 0.05 mg/L (environmentally relevant)[72,73] showed the highest transconjugant number and the highest transfer ratio, whereas ampicillin reached its peak effect at 0.5 mg/L (environmentally relevant)[74]. In contrast, when exposed to antibiotics at a concentration of 50 mg/L, the conjugation system exhibited different patterns. Only the ampicillin-dosed group showed a significant increase in transconjugant number compared with the untreated control; the transconjugant number in other antibiotic-dosed groups decreased. However, the fold change in the transfer ratio still increased because of the decrease in the recipient number (Supplementary Fig. S4).

      Figure 5. 

      Intrageneric and intergeneric conjugative transfer under exposure to antibiotics. (a) Fold change in transconjugants under intrageneric conjugative transfer. (b) Fold change in the transfer ratio under intrageneric conjugative transfer. (c) Fold change in transconjugants under intergeneric conjugative transfer. (d) Fold change in the transfer ratio under intergenic conjugative transfer. Statistical significance between the antibiotic-treated and control groups was analyzed using an independent sample t-test and corrected by the Benjamini–Hochberg method, * padj < 0.05 and ** padj < 0.01. Data represent the mean ± SD of three biological replicates.

      The effectiveness of the transconjugants was also validated by extracting the RP4 plasmid from randomly selected transconjugants on selective agar plates, followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and gel electrophoresis. Distinct single bands corresponding to the tetA and blaTEM genes confirmed successful intrageneric and intergeneric RP4 plasmid transfer from the donor to recipient strains (Supplementary Fig. S5).

      The underlying mechanisms were further unraveled by detecting bacterial ROS production, cell membrane permeability, and ATP production. The expression of genes related to bacterial oxidative stress, cell membrane, and conjugative regulation were examined.

      Under exposure to antibiotics, ROS production in both the donor and recipient bacteria, as measured by fluorescence, significantly increased by 1.21–2.38-fold (padj < 0.01, Fig. 6ac). Dose-dependent ROS levels were observed in the groups treated with kanamycin, streptomycin, and tetracycline. Notably, ampicillin at 0.5 mg/L resulted in the highest ROS production in the recipient bacteria, which corresponded well with the highest transconjugant number (Fig. 5a). Correspondingly, ROS regulatory genes (oxyR and soxR) and the SOS response marker gene (recA) were also upregulated significantly (p < 0.01, Fig. 6d). Specifically, 0.5 mg/L of ampicillin also exhibited higher ROS-related gene regulation compared with 50 mg/L ampicillin. For cell membrane permeability, which was detected by PI dye staining, both the donor and recipient bacteria showed elevated permeability levels, with 1.13–1.73-fold enhancement (padj < 0.01, Fig. 6eg). Dose-dependent ROS levels were also observed in the kanamycin-, streptomycin-, and tetracycline-dosed groups, whereas ampicillin at 0.5 mg/L showed the highest increment. The expression levels of key genes related to the cell membrane, ompA and ompC, increased 1.42–2.51-fold and 1.58–2.21-fold, respectively, under exposure to antibiotics except ampicillin (p < 0.01, Fig. 6h), which was consistent with the changes in the conjugative transfer ratio. At high antibiotic doses, the expression of ompA and ompC genes was higher than that at lower doses, aligning with the changes in ROS production and cell membrane permeability. High-dose antibiotics may severely damage the cell membrane and inhibit plasmid transfer, leading to a significant decrease in the number of transconjugants (Fig. 5a, c).

      Figure 6. 

      Bacterial ROS production, cell membrane permeability, and ATP production under the exposure to antibiotics in conjugative systems. (a) ROS production in donor E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid. (b) ROS production in the intraspecies recipient E. coli HB101. (c) ROS production in the interspecies recipient bacteria S. enterica. (d) Fold changes in the expression of key oxidative stress-related genes in intrageneric and intergeneric conjugative systems. (e) Fold change in cell membrane permeability in donor E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid. (f) Fold change in cell membrane permeability in the intraspecies recipient E. coli HB101. (g) Fold change in cell membrane permeability of interspecies recipient S. enterica. (h) Fold change in the expression of key membrane porin-related genes in intrageneric and intergeneric conjugative systems. (i) Fold change in ATP production in donor E. coli MG1655 with the RP4 plasmid. (j) Fold change in ATP production in the intraspecies recipient E. coli HB101. (k) Fold change in ATP production in the interspecies recipient S. enterica. (l) Fold changes in the expression of conjugative regulation genes in intrageneric and intergeneric conjugative systems. Statistical significance between the antibiotic-treated and control groups was analyzed using an independent sample t-test and corrected by the Benjamini–Hochberg method, * padj < 0.05 and ** padj < 0.01. Data represent the mean ± SD of biological triplicates.

      ATP, as an essential energy molecule for cells, provides the necessary energy for DNA translocation across membranes[75]. ROS can induce the release of ATP from cells[76]. The results showed that exposure to low-dose antibiotics (0.005–0.5 mg/L) significantly elevated ATP levels in the donor bacteria, with a 1.13- to 1.56-fold increase compared with the untreated control (padj < 0.01, Fig. 6i). ATP levels in the recipient bacteria significantly increased in the 0.005–0.05 mg/L concentration range of antibiotics (padj < 0.01, Fig. 6j, k). The elevated ATP level indicates that more energy is available during the conjugative transfer process[71,77,78]. Conversely, higher antibiotic doses (excluding ampicillin) reduced ATP levels by 25%–58% in the donor and recipient cells. This decrease may result from the excessive release of ROS, which reduces viable cell numbers and further decreases the transconjugant number.

      Conjugation efficiency in plasmids is critically regulated by plasmid-borne genes governing replication, partition, and mating pair formation[79]. Focusing on the RP4 plasmid, key factors influencing conjugation include the genes responsible for DNA transfer, replication, and transmembrane transport[80]. Specifically, trafAp (regulating transmembrane translocation) and trabBp (modulating conjugation dynamics) directly orchestrate RP4-mediated conjugative transfer. In this study, antibiotic concentrations corresponding to the highest conjugation transfer ratios were selected for testing the expression of trafAp and trabBp genes. It was shown that compared with the control group, the expression levels of trafAp and trabBp genes significantly increased under both intrageneric and intergeneric conjugative transfer systems by 1.42–2.95-fold and 1.23–2.61-fold, respectively (p < 0.01, Fig. 6i). Among the antibiotics, 0.05 mg/L of tetracycline resulted in the highest upregulation of intrageneric conjugation regulation genes, whereas 0.05 mg/L of kanamycin resulted in the highest upregulation of intergeneric conjugation genes. These findings align with the changes in the number of transconjugants (Fig. 5a, c), which were also likely attributable to antibiotic-induced alterations in recipient cells' viability and population dynamics.

    • A transformation system was established to further assess antibiotic-driven HGT using the naturally competent bacterium A. baylyi ADP1 and the free plasmid pWH1266, which encodes resistance to tetracycline and ampicillin. After successful transformation, A. baylyi ADP1 carrying the pWH1266 plasmid (transformants) were obtained and quantified using selective agar plates. The transformation ratio was normalized as the percentage of transformants relative to the total bacterial count after 6 h of exposure to antibiotics.

      Low-dose antibiotic exposure (0.005–5 mg/L) universally elevated both transformant numbers and transformation ratios across all tested antibiotics compared with the no-antibiotic control, with fold changes ranging from 1.28- to 2.72-fold (padj < 0.01, Fig. 7a) and 1.22- to 2.16-fold (padj < 0.01, Fig. 7b), respectively. Notably, exposure to kanamycin and streptomycin, to which the plasmid lacks resistance, resulted in a higher number of transformants compared with the other two antibiotics that the plasmid initially harbors resistance to. However, a divergence emerged in the transformation ratio: at 0.005–0.05 mg/L, ampicillin and tetracycline induced higher values compared with streptomycin or kanamycin, whereas streptomycin-dominated enhancement occurred at higher concentrations (> 0.5 mg/L). This disparity likely reflects antibiotic-specific shifts in total viable recipient populations. Notably, ampicillin and tetracycline at 50 mg/L decreased the transformant number and suppressed the transformation ratio, whereas kanamycin and streptomycin exhibited the opposite effects. This may be caused by varying levels of cell damage caused by exposure to different antibiotics as high concentrations. To validate the successful transformation, we further extracted the pWH1266 plasmid from randomly selected transformants on selective plates. After PCR amplification and agarose gel electrophoresis, we confirmed that the pWH1266 plasmid had been successfully transferred into A. baylyi ADP1 successfully, with clear bands for tetA and blaTEM genes matching the original plasmid (Supplementary Fig. S6).

      Figure 7. 

      Transformation under exposure to antibiotics. (a) Fold change in absolute transformant number. (b) Fold change in the transformation ratio.

      ROS generation levels, cell membrane permeability, ATP production, and the expression of transformation-related genes were measured further to unravel the underlying mechanisms. ROS levels were significantly upregulated by 1.11–1.85-fold (padj < 0.01, Fig. 8a), accompanied by a marked increase in cell membrane permeability (1.05–1.57-fold, padj < 0.01, Fig. 8d). Both ROS generation levels and cell membrane permeability showed a dose-dependent effect. Kanamycin and streptomycin at 50 mg/L induced the highest increases in ROS (1.48- and 1.47-fold, padj < 0.01) and cell membrane permeability (1.57- and 1.47-fold, padj < 0.01), which corresponded to an enhanced pWH1266 plasmid transformation ratio (Fig. 8b). Gene expression profiling was conducted with antibiotic concentrations at either a high dose (50 mg/L) or a low dose (0.005 mg/L). High-dose tetracycline and ampicillin (50 mg/L) exhibited the most pronounced upregulation of oxidative stress response genes (oxyR, soxR), a DNA repair gene (recA), and outer membrane porin genes (ompA, ompC), with expression levels 1.37- to 1.43-fold higher (p < 0.01) than in the control (Fig. 8b, e). This also suggests that antibiotics at higher concentrations may disrupt the cell membrane, leading to inhibitory effects on transformation. Antibiotics at lower concentrations enhance transformation, suggesting that moderate oxidative stress (e.g., low ROS levels and membrane perturbations) may transiently induce competence without overwhelming cellular repair mechanisms. Conversely, high-dose tetracycline and ampicillin (50 mg/L) disrupted this balance, driving excessive ROS production and membrane damage that coincided with hyperactivation of stress-response genes, ultimately impairing the efficiency of transformation.

      Figure 8. 

      ROS production, cell membrane permeability, and ATP production of recipient A. baylyi ADP1 under exposure to antibiotics. (a) Fold change in ROS production. (b) Fold change in oxidative stress-related gene expression. (c) Fold change in cell membrane permeability. (d) Fold change in membrane porin-related gene expression. (e) Fold change in ATP production. Statistical significance between the antibiotic-treated and control groups was analyzed using an independent sample t-test and corrected by the Benjamini–Hochberg method, * padj < 0.05 and ** padj < 0.01. Data represent the mean ± SD of biological triplicates.

      ATP production in the recipient exhibited a concentration-dependent decline. At 0.005 mg/L of ampicillin, kanamycin, streptomycin, and tetracycline, ATP production was the highest, reaching 1.31-, 1.53-, 1.32-, and 1.38-fold compared with the control group (padj < 0.05, Fig. 8c). The number of transformants was also highest at this concentration (Fig. 7a), indicating a positive correlation between ATP production and transformation efficiency. Conversely, higher doses (50 mg/L) of ampicillin and tetracycline suppressed ATP production by 11% and 20% (padj < 0.05), corresponding to severe declines in the transformation ratio. This suppression likely stems from energy depletion and cumulative cytotoxicity (e.g., ROS overproduction and membrane damage), which impair cellular viability and metabolic activity[81]. Thus, ATP availability can be a critical modulator of HGT. At lower antibiotic levels, enhanced ATP synthesis (padj < 0.05) may energize transformation-related processes (e.g., plasmid uptake, recombination, or repair), driving the transformation ratio.

      As transformation systems were incubated experimentally for 6 h, whereas free plasmids and competent bacteria can coexist for timespans of several hours to several months in real environments[82], another mathematical model based on ODEs was developed to overcome the experimental limitations.

      By utilizing experimental data from the transformation system after 6 h of cultivation, we calibrated the unknown parameters (μ, d) in the model. In the spontaneous transformation system without antibiotics, transformant numbers gradually increased initially and then rapidly grew after a certain period, eventually reaching a plateau and stabilizing (Fig. 9a). In contrast, wild-type recipient bacterial populations declined initially, stabilized transiently, and ultimately underwent complete depletion over prolonged durations[83,84]. The plasmid remained at a stable concentration after initial enhancement, as plasmids can be released from transformants upon their death. For the transformation system with antibiotic dosage, transformant numbers gradually increased over time and eventually stabilized (Fig. 9b, Supplementary Fig. S7). Notably, except for the 0.05 mg/L ampicillin group, where the final transformant number was lower than that of the control group, all other antibiotic treatment groups had a final transformant number higher than the control group, with 0.74 to 1.74-fold enhancement. They reached stability in 26 h, although the slower ones took up to 87 h. However, the group treated with 0.05 mg/L ampicillin reached a stable state earlier than the other groups, namely at 11.89 h. Thus, mathematical modeling further confirms that antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can enhance both the transformant number and accelerate the HGT rate in the long term.

      Figure 9. 

      Simulated changes in the number of bacteria with increased transformation time. (a) Temporal dynamics of recipient bacteria, transformants, and plasmid abundance in the absence of antibiotics. (b) Trajectories of transformant prevalence under exposure to antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations.

    • Antibiotic resistance is not a new phenomenon, but the recent increase in the prevalence of ARGs and ARB is unprecedented. Within the scope of the One Health Perspective, antibiotic resistance can be widely spread among various environments and is considered a biocontaminant. Although antibiotics are traditionally considered to be the most direct factor influencing the development of antibiotic resistance, their effects on the dissemination of antibiotic resistance are controversial[46,47,50,8588]. Moreover, limited studies have focused on both bacterial genetic stability and the long-term horizontal transfer of ARGs in environmental settings. Here, we provide insights into the effects of four typical antibiotics (i.e., tetracycline, ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin) on bacterial vertical and horizontal transfer of ARGs at concentrations ranging from environmentally relevant to sub-MIC levels.

      Three bacterial models were established: the genetic stability model (VGT), conjugation, and transformation. The experimental results indicated that antibiotics can enhance the genetic stability of ARGs. Long-term exposure to ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin significantly increased the retention rate of ARGs within bacterial populations, which is consistent with the theory proposed by Andersson and Hughes that sublethal concentrations of antibiotics drive bacterial adaptive evolution[16]. In contrast, tetracycline exhibited a unique effect, reducing the number of resistant bacteria early in exposure, which is likely caused by its bacteriostatic mechanism of inhibiting protein synthesis[89]. HPLC-based metabolomic profiling further revealed that the transient suppression in the tetracycline-dosed group may correlate with an enhanced bacterial enzyme-mediated degradation capacity[90], though the specific mechanisms of bacterial enzyme mediation require further investigation. In addition, long-term predictions from the mathematical model indicate that although it took 42 d for the resistant bacteria to reach a stable state in the tetracycline treatment group, the final concentration of resistant bacteria was similar to that in the kanamycin or ampicillin treatment groups.

      Regarding the horizontal transfer of ARGs, antibiotics at environmentally relevant levels (i.e., 0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 mg/L) can significantly promote the intrageneric, intergeneric, and transformation of ARGs. The levels had increases that ranged from 1.61- to 5.17-fold and from 1.22- to 2.72-fold for conjugation and transformation, respectively. In contrast, antibiotics at high concentrations (50 mg/L) could decrease and suppress both conjugation and transformation. The long-term effects of antibiotics on HGT were indicated by mathematical modeling, which showed that antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can increase the final transformant (ARB) number and accelerate the transformation rate. Thus, in real environments where bacteria and plasmids stably coexist, ARB can reach a new equilibrium at a higher population density and at a faster rate when antibiotics are present. This further highlights the potential health risks associated with antibiotics in the environment.

      The enhanced VGT and HGT under antibiotic exposure share similar underlying mechanisms, including elevated stress levels, enhanced cell membrane permeability, stimulated bacterial efflux pumps, and increased ATP production (Fig. 10). These were observed through both phenotypic fluorescence and gene expression. During the evolution of ARB, pronounced upregulation of oxidative stress biomarkers (oxyR and soxR, up to 4.47-fold) and SOS response regulators (recA, up to 6.79-fold) were observed, coupled with elevated ROS levels (excluding tetracycline-exposed groups). Among these, the stress response induced by ampicillin in the VGT process was the most pronounced, likely because of the direct action of ampicillin on the cell wall. This validates the hypothesis that hydroxyl radical-induced DNA damage mediates antibiotic-driven genetic transfer[91,92]. Concurrently, the efflux pump-associated tolC and the porin-encoding ompA and ompC exhibited > 5-fold induction, suggesting that bacteria may respond to drug pressure through active efflux (reducing intracellular antibiotic accumulation) and membrane remodeling (limiting drug penetration)[93,94]. Notably, tetracycline uniquely suppressed tolC expression while preserving membrane integrity, a pattern that aligns with a previous study showing that tetracycline exhibits an efflux-independent resistance mechanism in metabolically active E. coli[69]. In the HGT process, elevated cell membrane permeability (up to 1.46-fold) and ATP levels (up to 1.76-fold) were observed, accompanied by increased ROS production (up to 2.36-fold). Gene expression levels (with tetracycline imposing the most significant effect) were consistent with the observed phenotypic phenomenon, where cell membrane, oxidative stress, and ATP levels correlated well with the enhanced HGT. Low doses of gentamicin were also found to increase plasmid transfer through the SOS response[95], and the bacterial cellular energy crisis model of antibiotic lethality is closely related to the membrane's structural collapse[89]. Among the two pathways of HGT applied in this study, the conjugation system relies on the upregulation of trafAp/trabBp for active regulation, whereas the transformation system operates through DNA uptake, highlighting the mechanistic differences between HGT pathways.

      Figure 10. 

      Underlying mechanisms of antibiotic-promoted dissemination of antibiotic resistance. (a) VGT model. (b) HGT model.

      Another important observation in this study is the role of ATP as a critical energy molecule for bacterial survival and HGT. Low concentrations of antibiotics were found to increase ATP levels, which aligns with the idea that moderate oxidative stress and mild membrane damage facilitate transformation and conjugation by providing the necessary energy for these processes[96]. However, high doses (e.g., 50 mg/L) triggered ATP exhaustion (a 58% decline), collapsing the energy-dependent HGT machinery. This is consistent with previous studies which showed that high concentrations of antibiotics can cause energy depletion and reduce cellular activity, ultimately inhibiting HGT[20]. This highlights the complex relationship of antibiotic concentration, bacterial stress responses, and the efficiency of gene transfer.

      Numerous studies have demonstrated that antibiotics significantly promote the spread of ARGs, addressing VGT and HGT independently. For example, low concentrations of ciprofloxacin and streptomycin increase bacterial mutation rates, enhancing ARG enrichment, whereas sulfamethoxazole promotes VGT and amoxicillin inhibits it by suppressing bacterial growth[15,46]. In terms of HGT, low concentrations of antibiotics, including gentamicin, chlorhexidine, and triclosan, can facilitate the conjugative transfer of ARGs, which drives resistance spread. Some studies also report that certain compounds (e.g., tetracycline, amoxicillin) can inhibit the transfer of resistance genes[50,97]. However, these studies focus on the short-term effects of VGT and HGT separately, overlooking their long-term simultaneous interactions. In reality, VGT and HGT are mutually reinforcing: VTG provides hosts for the resistance genes, whereas HGT accelerates their dissemination across bacterial populations.

      In this study, we focusd on investigating the dual effects of antibiotics on the genetic stability and HGT of ARGs. The results reveal that low antibiotic concentrations promote HGT, but high concentrations inhibit it. Long-term exposure to low doses (i.e., 0.005–0.5 mg/L) of antibiotics could also enhance the bacterial genetic stability of ARGs. This highlights the potential ecological and health risks posed by sub-MIC antibiotic residues. Additionally, mathematical model simulations and long-term predictions demonstrate that prolonged exposure to antibiotics can significantly accelerate the spread of ARGs in real environments. This finding provides new evidence for the long-term impact of antibiotics on the dissemination of ARGs.

      Regarding the comparison of different antibiotics, tetracycline exhibited a unique effect, with the number of resistant bacteria in the tetracycline-treated group remaining lower than that of the control for at least 4 d in the VGT experiments. In contrast, in the HGT experiments, although exposure to 50 mg/L tetracycline significantly reduced the number of resistant bacteria; this concentration showed a resistance-enhancing effect similar to that of the other three antibiotics. This may be related to the antibiotic's mode of action and may need further investigation. In summary, this study highlights the dual effects of typical antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations on the dissemination of antibiotic resistance, as demonstrated through both experimental studies and mathematical simulations. The findings provide valuable insights for future antibiotic management strategies.

      However, the results of this study are primarily based on controlled experimental conditions and do not fully reflect the complex scenarios of coexisting multiple pollutants, strains, and plasmids in real-world environments. In natural ecosystems, interactions between different pollutants, the diversity of microbial community structures, and the varied modes of plasmid carriage could significantly affect the stability and transfer efficiency of ARGs. Future studies incorporating environmental samples are needed to enhance the environmental applicability and ecological relevance of these methods.

    • This study reveals, through multidimensional evidence, that antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations (i.e., 0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 mg/L) drive the spread of ARGs in many ways, including promoting the retention rate of ARGs during bacterial evolution, increasing the intrageneric and intergeneric transfer of ARGs, and enhancing the transformation of ARGs. On the contrary, antibiotics at higher levels (e.g., 50 mg/L) inhibit the conjugation and transformation ratios. Elevated ROS production, increased cell membrane permeability, stimulated stress levels, and promoted ATP are correlated with the enhanced dissemination of ARGs. Among these factors, ATP plays a pivotal role in regulating HGT efficiency. A mathematical model based on bacterial dynamic changes was established, and parameter calibration according to experimental data indicated that prolonged exposure to antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can promote the proliferation of resistant bacteria through both VGT and HGT. These findings underscore the importance of reconsidering antibiotic usage and discharge standards in the context of environmental health.

      • We would like to thank the Analytical & Testing Center of Tiangong University for the high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry work.

      • All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Jie Yang, Yifan Liu, and Mengke Geng. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yue Wang and Yifan Liu, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable requests.

      • This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42307529 and 42577486), Hebei Natural Science Foundation (Nos. C2023110006 and E2023110001), the Research Fund of Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology (No. TJKLAST-PT-2021-04), and Cangzhou Institute of Tiangong University (No. TGCYY-F-0103).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Antibiotics can promote the genetic stability of ARGs.

        Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can elevate both intrageneric and intergeneric transfer of ARGs.

        Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can enhance the transformation of ARGs.

        Mathematical models are proposed to predict the long-term effects of antibiotics on the dissemination of ARGs.

      • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Supplementary Table S1 Primer list.
      • Supplementary Table S3 Tetracycline measurement results.
      • Supplementary Table S3 Variables and parameters used in the VGT model.
      • Supplementary Table S4 Variables and parameters used in the HGT model.
      • Supplementary Text S1 Bacterial Cultivation Conditions.
      • Supplementary Text S2 ROS and cell membrane permeability detection.
      • Supplementary Text S3 ATP detection.
      • Supplementary Text S4 RT-qPCR technique.
      • Supplementary Text S5 Model calibration function.
      • Supplementary Text S6 Determination of tetracycline concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography.
      • Supplementary Fig. S1 The OD600 values of bacterial cultures under antibiotic pressure during the evolution process: (a) E. coli MG1655 with RP4 plasmid, (b) E. coli LE392 with pWH1266 plasmid, and (c) E. coli HB101.
      • Supplementary Fig. S2 The growth curves of three bacterial strains under antibiotic pressure (CON: control group): (a) E. coli with RP4 plasmid. (b) E. coli with the pWH1266 plasmid. (c) E. coli HB101.
      • Supplementary Fig. S3 Tetracycline concentration detection. (a)Tetracycline standard calibration curve. (b) Chromatogram of the tetracycline control group. (c) Chromatogram of the tetracycline sample group containing E. coli MG1655 with RP4 plasmid. (d) Chromatogram of the tetracycline sample group containing E. coli LE392 with pWH1266 plasmid.
      • Supplementary Fig. S4 (a) The variation in the number of recipient bacteria E. coli HB101 on agar plates. (b) The variation in the number of recipient bacteria S. enterica on agar plates. Significant differences between the antibiotic treatment group and the control group are indicated as: * padj < 0.05 and ** padj < 0.01.
      • Supplementary Fig. S5 PCR electrophoresis images of tetA and blaTEM genes in the conjugative RP4 plasmid.
      • Supplementary Fig. S6 PCR electrophoresis images of the tetA and blaTEM genes in the transformants carrying the pWH1266 plasmid.
      • Supplementary Fig. S7 Trajectories of transformant prevalence under the exposure of antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations.
      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (10)  Table (2) References (97)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Wang Y, Liu Y, Yang J, Geng M, Jia H, et al. 2025. Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can promote the dissemination of antibiotic resistance via both vertical and horizontal gene transfer. Biocontaminant 1: e005 doi: 10.48130/biocontam-0025-0005
    Wang Y, Liu Y, Yang J, Geng M, Jia H, et al. 2025. Antibiotics at environmentally relevant concentrations can promote the dissemination of antibiotic resistance via both vertical and horizontal gene transfer. Biocontaminant 1: e005 doi: 10.48130/biocontam-0025-0005

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return