Search
2026 Volume 5
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Harnessing microbial inoculants for sustainable medicinal plant cultivation

More Information
  • Medicinal plant cultivation confronts distinct challenges, including soil degradation from continuous cropping, diminished regional specificity, and heavy metal contamination, all of which compromise both biomass yield and accumulation of bioactive compounds. Microbial inoculants represent a sustainable strategy to enhance medicinal plants' productivity and quality through improved nutrient uptake and stress tolerance, alongside promotion of secondary metabolite biosynthesis. This review systematically examines the mechanisms through which microbial inoculants regulate plant development, enhance stress resistance, and stimulate bioactive compound synthesis. We emphasize organ-specific application approaches tailored to root, leaf, and flower/fruit medicinal species, and explore advances in alleviating continuous cropping obstacles and reinforcing region-specific microecosystems. Key factors affecting inoculant performance are also identified, including the microbial consortium's composition, carrier materials, soil characteristics, and host genetics. Though significant progress has been made, challenges related to colonization stability and mechanistic clarity persist. Future prospects involve developing synthetic microbial communities, integrating multi-omics technologies, and designing smart delivery systems to advance ecological cultivation practices. This review highlights the potential of microbial inoculants in supporting sustainable production of high-quality medicinal plants while minimizing environmental footprints.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Alami MM, Guo S, Mei Z, Yang G, Wang X. 2024. Environmental factors on secondary metabolism in medicinal plants: exploring accelerating factors. Medicinal Plant Biology 3:e016 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0024-0016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Yuan Y, Huang L. 2020. Molecular pharmacognosy in daodi herbs. Chinese Science Bulletin 65:1093−1102 doi: 10.1360/tb-2020-0184

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Ye C, Fang HY, Liu HJ, Yang M, Zhu SS. 2019. Current status of soil sickness research on Panax notoginseng in Yunnan, China. Allelopathy Journal 47:1−14 doi: 10.26651/allelo.j/2019-47-1-1149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Wei B, Yu J, Cao Z, Meng M, Yang L, et al. 2020. The availability and accumulation of heavy metals in greenhouse soils associated with intensive fertilizer application. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17:5359 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155359

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Awadelkareem W, Haroun M, Wang J, Qian X. 2023. Nitrogen interactions cause soil degradation in greenhouses: their relationship to soil preservation in China. Horticulturae 9:340 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9030340

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Santos MS, Nogueira MA, Hungria M. 2019. Microbial inoculants: reviewing the past, discussing the present and previewing an outstanding future for the use of beneficial bacteria in agriculture. AMB Express 9:205 doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0932-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Lee S, Kim YK, Nie H, Ahn J, Kim N, et al. 2025. Functional characterization of a novel plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium enhancing root growth and salt stress tolerance. Scientific Reports 15:30405 doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14065-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Zeeshan Ul Haq M, Yu J, Yao G, Yang H, Iqbal HA, et al. 2023. A systematic review on the continuous cropping obstacles and control strategies in medicinal plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24:12470 doi: 10.3390/ijms241512470

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Chandra KK. 2020. Biomass yield, nutrient uptake and chemical constituents of Withania somnifera (L.) dunal and adhatoda vasica nees medicinal valued species influenced by microbial inoculation. Plant Archives 20:2061−2069

    Google Scholar

    [10] Wang Z, Xu Z, Chen Z, Kowalchuk GA, Fu X, et al. 2021. Microbial inoculants modulate growth traits, nutrients acquisition and bioactive compounds accumulation of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja under degraded field condition. Forest Ecology and Management 482:118897 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118897

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Wu YH, Qin Y, Cai QQ, Liu M, He DM, et al. 2023. Effect the accumulation of bioactive constituents of a medicinal plant (Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bge.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community. BMC Plant Biology 23:597 doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04608-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zhao J, Chen G, Turatsinze AN, et al. 2026. Functionally complementary bacterial inoculant coordinates arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve Angelica sinensis root yield and quality. iMetaOmics 3:e70091 doi: 10.1002/imo2.70091

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Kashyap AS, Manzar N, Meshram S, Sharma PK. 2023. Screening microbial inoculants and their interventions for cross-kingdom management of wilt disease of solanaceous crops- a step toward sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1174532 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1174532

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Adesemoye AO, Kloepper JW. 2009. Plant–microbes interactions in enhanced fertilizer-use efficiency. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 85:1−12 doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2196-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Wang G, Ren Y, Bai X, Su Y, Han J. 2022. Contributions of beneficial microorganisms in soil remediation and quality improvement of medicinal plants. Plants 11:3200 doi: 10.3390/plants11233200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Karnwal A, Kumar G, El Din Mahmoud A, Dutta J, Singh R, et al. 2025. Eco-engineered remediation: microbial and rhizosphere-based strategies for heavy metal detoxification. Current Research in Biotechnology 9:100297 doi: 10.1016/j.crbiot.2025.100297

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Pan L, Cai B. 2023. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria: advances in their physiology, molecular mechanisms and microbial community effects. Microorganisms 11:2904 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11122904

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA. 2013. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. SpringerPlus 2:587 doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-587

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Wang YJ, Hu BA, Chen JX, Xu LT, Yao L, et al. 2023. Screening and identification of two potassium solubilizer strains and their effects on the yield and quality of alfalfa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 32:139−149 (in Chinese) doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Wu X, Zhao Z, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Li M, et al. 2023. Analysis of the potassium-solubilizing Priestia megaterium strain NK851 and its potassium feldspar-binding proteins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24:14226 doi: 10.3390/ijms241814226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Han AQ, Chen SB, Zhang DD, Liu J, Zhang MC, et al. 2025. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and nutrient uptake in wheat under low potassium stress. Plants 14:1288 doi: 10.3390/plants14091288

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] de Souza R, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP. 2015. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genetics and Molecular Biology 38:401−419 doi: 10.1590/S1415-475738420150053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Singh RP, Shelke GM, Kumar A, Jha PN. 2015. Biochemistry and genetics of ACC deaminase: a weapon to "stress ethylene" produced in plants. Frontiers in Microbiology 6:937 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00937

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Thambugala KM, Daranagama DA, Phillips AJL, Kannangara SD, Promputtha I. 2020. Fungi vs. fungi in biocontrol: an overview of fungal antagonists applied against fungal plant pathogens. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 10:604923 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.604923

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Mukherjee PK, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Zeilinger S, Horwitz BA. 2022. Mycoparasitism as a mechanism of Trichoderma-mediated suppression of plant diseases. Fungal Biology Reviews 39:15−33 doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2021.11.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Wahab A, Muhammad M, Munir A, Abdi G, Zaman W, et al. 2023. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in regulating growth, enhancing productivity, and potentially influencing ecosystems under abiotic and biotic stresses. Plants 12:3102 doi: 10.3390/plants12173102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Boorboori MR, Lackóová L. 2025. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and salinity stress mitigation in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1504970 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1504970

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Abdallah MM, Suo C, Cui Y, Ullah RH, Nhung HH, et al. 2026. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as integrative modulators of plant tolerance to drought, salinity, and heavy metal stress: mechanistic insights and future directions. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 24:100636 doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2025.100636

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Zhang H, Kim MS, Sun Y, Dowd SE, Shi H, et al. 2008. Soil bacteria confer plant salt tolerance by tissue-specific regulation of the sodium transporter HKT1. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 21:737−744 doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-6-0737

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Mukhtar T, Rehman SU, Smith D, Sultan T, Seleiman MF, et al. 2020. Mitigation of heat stress in Solanum lycopersicum L. by ACC-deaminase and exopolysaccharide producing Bacillus cereus: effects on biochemical profiling. Sustainability 12:2159 doi: 10.3390/su12062159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] García-López JV, Redondo-Gómez S, Flores-Duarte NJ, Rodríguez-Llorente ID, Pajuelo E, et al. 2024. PGPR-based biofertilizer modulates strawberry photosynthetic apparatus tolerance responses by severe drought, soil salinization and short extreme heat event. Plant Stress 12:100448 doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2024.100448

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Farooq MA, Ayyaz A, Zou HX, Zhou W, Hannan F, et al. 2024. Jasmonic acid mediates Ca2+ dependent signal transduction and plant immunity. Plant Science 348:112239 doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112239

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Zhou Y, Singh SK, Patra B, Liu Y, Pattanaik S, et al. 2025. Mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated regulation of plant specialized metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 76:262−276 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae400

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Sheard LB, Tan X, Mao H, Withers J, Ben-Nissan G, et al. 2010. Jasmonate perception by inositol-phosphate-potentiated COI1–JAZ co-receptor. Nature 468:400−405 doi: 10.1038/nature09430

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Chini A, Boter M, Solano R. 2009. Plant oxylipins: COI1/JAZs/MYC2 as the core jasmonic acid-signalling module. The FEBS Journal 276:4682−4692 doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07194.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Zhou H, Jiang M, Li J, Xu Y, Li C, et al. 2024. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of Salvia miltiorrhiza microRNAs reveal the negative regulatory role of smi-miR159a in phenolic acid biosynthesis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25:5148 doi: 10.3390/ijms25105148

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Song X, Wu H, Yin Z, Lian M, Yin C. 2017. Endophytic bacteria isolated from Panax ginseng improves ginsenoside accumulation in adventitious ginseng root culture. Molecules 22:837 doi: 10.3390/molecules22060837

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, et al. 2004. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 134:1017−1026 doi: 10.1104/pp.103.026583

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Kang JP, Huo Y, Yang DU, Yang DC. 2021. Influence of the plant growth promoting Rhizobium panacihumi on aluminum resistance in Panax ginseng. Journal of Ginseng Research 45:442−449 doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2020.01.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Zhu N, Meng T, Li S, Yu C, Tang D, et al. 2022. Improved growth and metabolite accumulation in Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. by inoculation with the endophytic Geobacillu sp. RHBA19 and Pseudomonas fluorescens RHBA17. Journal of Plant Physiology 274:153718 doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153718

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Kim SJ, Eo JK, Lee EH, Park H, Eom AH. 2017. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil conditions on crop plant growth. Mycobiology 45:20−24 doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2017.45.1.20

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Egamberdieva D, Teixeira da Silva JA. 2015. Medicinal plants and PGPR: a new frontier for phytochemicals. In Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Medicinal Plants, eds. Egamberdieva D, Shrivastava S, Varma A. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 287−303 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-13401-7_14
    [43] Sharma K, Verma R, Kumar D, Kumar V. 2024. Impact of Irpex lenis and Schizophyllum commune endophytic fungi on Perilla frutescens: enhancing nutritional uptake, phytochemicals, and antioxidant potential. Microbial Cell Factories 23:226 doi: 10.1186/s12934-024-02491-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Todorova S, Kozhuharova L. 2010. Characteristics and antimicrobial activity of Bacillus subtilis strains isolated from soil. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 26:1207−1216 doi: 10.1007/s11274-009-0290-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Choudaker KR, Singh VK, Kashyap AS, Patel AV, Sameriya KK, et al. 2024. Evaluating the efficacy of microbial antagonists in inducing resistance, promoting growth, and providing biological control against powdery mildew in wheat. Frontiers in Microbiology 15:1419547 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1419547

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Bao L, Liu Y, Ding Y, Shang J, Wei Y, et al. 2022. Interactions between phenolic acids and microorganisms in rhizospheric soil from continuous cropping of Panax notoginseng. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:791603 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.791603

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Wang X, Wang Q, Li W, Zhang D, Fang W, et al. 2023. Long-term effects of chloropicrin fumigation on soil microbe recovery and growth promotion of Panax notoginseng. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1225944 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1225944

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Zhang T, Xu Z, Wang Y, Gao Q. 2024. Effects of soil properties and microbial community composition on ginsenosides accumulation in farmland ginseng. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 12:1462342 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1462342

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Li X, Wang J, Shen H, Xing C, Kong L, et al. 2024. Biocontrol and growth promotion potential of Bacillus velezensis NT35 on Panax ginseng based on the multifunctional effect. Frontiers in Microbiology 15:1447488 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1447488

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Lin Y, Zhang H, Li P, Jin J, Li Z. 2022. The bacterial consortia promote plant growth and secondary metabolite accumulation in Astragalus mongholicus under drought stress. BMC Plant Biology 22:475 doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03859-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Chen H, Wu H, Yan B, Zhao H, Liu F, et al. 2018. Core microbiome of medicinal plant Salvia miltiorrhiza seed: a rich reservoir of beneficial microbes for secondary metabolism? International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:672 doi: 10.3390/ijms19030672

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Chen HM, Wu HX, He XY, Zhang HH, Miao F, et al. 2020. Promoting tanshinone synthesis of Salvia miltiorrhiza root by a seed endophytic fungus, Phoma herbarum D603. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica 45:65−71 (in Chinese) doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20191113.101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Singh A, Gupta R, Srivastava M, Gupta MM, Pandey R. 2016. Microbial secondary metabolites ameliorate growth, in planta contents and lignification in Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 22:253−260 doi: 10.1007/s12298-016-0359-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Wu X, Yang Y, Zhang H. 2023. Microbial fortification of pharmacological metabolites in medicinal plants. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 21:5066−5072 doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Schmidt R, Köberl M, Mostafa A, Ramadan EM, Monschein M, et al. 2014. Effects of bacterial inoculants on the indigenous microbiome and secondary metabolites of chamomile plants. Frontiers in Microbiology 5:64 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Katiyar D, Kumar S, Singh N. 2020. Effect of Rhizobium and PSB inoculation on growth, yield attributes and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Chemical Studies 8:3729−3734 doi: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4au.10226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Kavusi E, Shahi Khalaf Ansar B, Dehghanian Z, Asgari Lajayer B, Nobaharan K, et al. 2023. Delivery of beneficial microbes via seed coating for medicinal and aromatic plant production: a critical review. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 42:575−597 doi: 10.1007/s00344-022-10597-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Yang JR, Dai D, Chen JF, Wu X, Liu XL, et al. 2023. Insight into recent studies on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in shaping plant community assembly and maintaining rare species. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 47:745−755 doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0373

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Alfiky A, Weisskopf L. 2021. Deciphering Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions for better development of biocontrol applications. Journal of Fungi 7:61 doi: 10.3390/jof7010061

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Malusá E, Sas-Paszt L, Ciesielska J. 2012. Technologies for beneficial microorganisms inocula used as biofertilizers. The Scientific World Journal 2012:491206 doi: 10.1100/2012/491206

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Khan A, Singh AV, Gautam SS, Agarwal A, Punetha A, et al. 2023. Microbial bioformulation: a microbial assisted biostimulating fertilization technique for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1270039 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1270039

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Zago SL, dos Santos MF, Konrad D, Fiorini A, Rosado FR, et al. 2019. Shelf life of Azospirillum brasilense in alginate beads enriched with trehalose and humic acid. Journal of Agricultural Science 11:269−269 doi: 10.5539/jas.v11n6p269

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Aloo BN, Mbega ER, Makumba BA, Tumuhairwe JB. 2022. Effects of carrier materials and storage temperatures on the viability and stability of three biofertilizer inoculants obtained from potato (Solanum tuberosum L. ) rhizosphere. Agriculture 12:140 doi: 10.3390/agriculture12020140

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Rupaedah B, Novella I, Noviyanti AR, Eddy DR, Safarrida A, et al. 2025. Synthesis and the impact of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on the viability and activity of rhizobacteria. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 16:216−228 doi: 10.3762/bjnano.16.17

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Vincze É-B, Becze A, Laslo É, Mara G. 2024. Beneficial soil microbiomes and their potential role in plant growth and soil fertility. Agriculture 14:152 doi: 10.3390/agriculture14010152

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Kong Z, Liu H. 2022. Modification of rhizosphere microbial communities: a possible mechanism of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhancing plant growth and fitness. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:920813 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.920813

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Zhalnina K, Dias R, de Quadros PD, Davis-Richardson A, Camargo FAO, et al. 2015. Soil pH determines microbial diversity and composition in the park grass experiment. Microbial Ecology 69:395−406 doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0530-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Wang GM, Stribley DP, Tinker PB, Walker C. 1993. Effects of pH on arbuscular mycorrhiza I. Field observations on the long-term liming experiments at Rothamsted and Woburn. New Phytologist 124:465−472 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03837.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Singh A, Mazahar S, Chapadgaonkar SS, Giri P, Shourie A. 2023. Phyto-microbiome to mitigate abiotic stress in crop plants. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1210890 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1210890

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] de Santiago A, Quintero JM, Avilés M, Delgado A. 2011. Effect of Trichoderma asperellum strain T34 on iron, copper, manganese, and zinc uptake by wheat grown on a calcareous medium. Plant and Soil 342:97−104 doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0670-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Ren Y, Wang G, Su Y, Li J, Zhang H, et al. 2024. Response of antioxidant activity, active constituent and rhizosphere microorganisms of Salvia miltiorrhiza to combined application of microbial inoculant, microalgae and biochar under Cu stress. Science of the Total Environment 925:171812 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171812

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Kumar P, Singh S, Pranaw K, Kumar S, Singh B, et al. 2022. Bioinoculants as mitigators of multiple stresses: a ray of hope for agriculture in the darkness of climate change. Heliyon 8:e11269 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11269

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Xu L, Naylor D, Dong Z, Simmons T, Pierroz G, et al. 2018. Drought delays development of the sorghum root microbiome and enriches for monoderm bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115:E4284−E4293 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807275115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Pereira SIA, Abreu D, Moreira H, Vega A, Castro PML. 2020. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) improve the growth and nutrient use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit conditions. Heliyon 6:e05106 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Fadiji AE, Babalola OO, Santoyo G, Perazzolli M. 2022. The potential role of microbial biostimulants in the amelioration of climate change-associated abiotic stresses on crops. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:829099 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.829099

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Chen C, Zhong C, Gao X, Tan C, Bai H, Ning K. 2022. Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. Root-associated microbiota: the multifaceted hubs associated with environmental factors, growth status and accumulation of secondary metabolites. Environmental Microbiome 17:23 doi: 10.1186/s40793-022-00418-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Yan H, Xie JB, Ji ZJ, Yuan N, Tian CF, et al. 2017. Evolutionarily conserved nodE, nodO, T1SS, and gydrogenase system in rhizobia of Astragalus membranaceus and Caragana intermedia. Frontiers in Microbiology 8:2282 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02282

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Wan J, He M, Hou Q, Zou L, Yang Y, et al. 2021. Cell wall associated immunity in plants. Stress Biology 1:3 doi: 10.1007/s44154-021-00003-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Gupta VK, Fatima A, Faridi U, Negi AS, Shanker K, et al. 2008. Antimicrobial potential of Glycyrrhiza glabra roots. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 116:377−380 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.11.037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Park I, Seo YS, Mannaa M. 2023. Recruitment of the rhizo-microbiome army: assembly determinants and engineering of the rhizosphere microbiome as a key to unlocking plant potential. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1163832 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1163832

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Han JH, Lee JH, Lee OR. 2015. Leaf-specific pathogenesis-related 10 homolog, PgPR-10.3, shows in silico binding affinity with several biologically important molecules. Journal of Ginseng Research 39:406−413 doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Wang C, Chen L, Cai Z, Chen C, Liu Z, et al. 2021. Metabolite profiling and transcriptome analysis explains difference in accumulation of bioactive constituents in licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis) under salt stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:727882 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.727882

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Ren Y, Wang G, Su Y, Li J, Zhang H, et al. 2025. Microbial inoculant and microalgae fertilizer improved the growth and quality of Salvia miltiorrhiza cultivated in lead-contaminated soil. Applied Soil Ecology 214:106410 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106410

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Shi Z, Guo Y, Wang Y, Yan X, Guo X, et al. 2024. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria promote growth and bioactive components accumulation of Astragalus mongholicus by regulating plant metabolism and rhizosphere microbiota. BMC Microbiology 24:261 doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03409-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Jiang Y, Wang L, Lu S, Xue Y, Wei X, et al. 2019. Transcriptome sequencing of Salvia miltiorrhiza after infection by its endophytic fungi and identification of genes related to tanshinone biosynthesis. Pharmaceutical Biology 57:760−769 doi: 10.1080/13880209.2019.1680706

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Butler JL, Williams MA, Bottomley PJ, Myrold DD. 2003. Microbial community dynamics associated with rhizosphere carbon flow. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69:6793−6800 doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6793-6800.2003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Albright MBN, Louca S, Winkler DE, Feeser KL, Haig SJ, et al. 2022. Solutions in microbiome engineering: prioritizing barriers to organism establishment. The ISME Journal 16:331−338 doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01088-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Knights HE, Jorrin B, Haskett TL, Poole PS. 2021. Deciphering bacterial mechanisms of root colonization. Environmental Microbiology Reports 13:428−444 doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12934

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Leite MFA, van den Broek SWEB, Kuramae EE. 2022. Current challenges and pitfalls in soil metagenomics. Microorganisms 10:1900 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10101900

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Khan N, Humm EA, Jayakarunakaran A, Hirsch AM. 2023. Reviewing and renewing the use of beneficial root and soil bacteria for plant growth and sustainability in nutrient-poor, arid soils. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1147535 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1147535

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Li Z, Bai X, Jiao S, Li Y, Li P, et al. 2021. A simplified synthetic community rescues Astragalus mongholicus from root rot disease by activating plant-induced systemic resistance. Microbiome 9:217 doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01169-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Li X, Liu Q, Gao Y, Zang P, Zheng T. 2024. Effects of a co-bacterial agent on the growth, disease control, and quality of ginseng based on rhizosphere microbial diversity. BMC Plant Biology 24:647 doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05347-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Cheng KX, Du Y, Li KH, Wang HC, Yang Y, et al. 2024. Genetic mechanism of interaction between maize and phyllospheric microbiome. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 48:215−228 doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0433

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Du J, Li Y, Ur-Rehman S, Mukhtar I, Yin Z, et al. 2021. Synergistically promoting plant health by harnessing synthetic microbial communities and prebiotics. iScience 24:102918 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102918

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Jain A, Sarsaiya S, Singh R, Gong Q, Wu Q, et al. 2024. Omics approaches in understanding the benefits of plant-microbe interactions. Frontiers in Microbiology 15:1391059 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1391059

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Law SR, Mathes F, Paten AM, Alexandre PA, Regmi R, et al. 2024. Life at the borderlands: microbiomes of interfaces critical to One Health. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 48:fuae008 doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuae008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Rezaee Danesh Y. 2025. Harnessing beneficial microbes and sensor technologies for sustainable smart agriculture. Sensors 25:6631 doi: 10.3390/s25216631

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Calia C, González García S, Ingrao C, Lagioia G, Ruta C, et al. 2025. Life cycle assessment of microbial plant biostimulant production for application in sustainable agricultural systems. Science of the Total Environment 981:179610 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179610

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Just BS, Marks EAN, Roquer-Beni L, Llenas L, Ponsà S, et al. 2024. Biofertilization increases soil organic carbon concentrations: results of a meta-analysis. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 22:2361578 doi: 10.1080/14735903.2024.2361578

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Duan J, Kang M, Liu F, Xu Y. 2026. Harnessing microbial inoculants for sustainable medicinal plant cultivation. Medicinal Plant Biology 5: e015 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0026-0010
    Duan J, Kang M, Liu F, Xu Y. 2026. Harnessing microbial inoculants for sustainable medicinal plant cultivation. Medicinal Plant Biology 5: e015 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0026-0010

Figures(2)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(365) PDF downloads(171)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Harnessing microbial inoculants for sustainable medicinal plant cultivation

Medicinal Plant Biology  5 Article number: e015  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Medicinal plant cultivation confronts distinct challenges, including soil degradation from continuous cropping, diminished regional specificity, and heavy metal contamination, all of which compromise both biomass yield and accumulation of bioactive compounds. Microbial inoculants represent a sustainable strategy to enhance medicinal plants' productivity and quality through improved nutrient uptake and stress tolerance, alongside promotion of secondary metabolite biosynthesis. This review systematically examines the mechanisms through which microbial inoculants regulate plant development, enhance stress resistance, and stimulate bioactive compound synthesis. We emphasize organ-specific application approaches tailored to root, leaf, and flower/fruit medicinal species, and explore advances in alleviating continuous cropping obstacles and reinforcing region-specific microecosystems. Key factors affecting inoculant performance are also identified, including the microbial consortium's composition, carrier materials, soil characteristics, and host genetics. Though significant progress has been made, challenges related to colonization stability and mechanistic clarity persist. Future prospects involve developing synthetic microbial communities, integrating multi-omics technologies, and designing smart delivery systems to advance ecological cultivation practices. This review highlights the potential of microbial inoculants in supporting sustainable production of high-quality medicinal plants while minimizing environmental footprints.

    • Medicinal plant cultivation prioritizes both biomass yield and the content/stability of specific bioactive compounds (e.g., alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenes, polysaccharides), presenting distinct challenges compared with conventional crops.

    • According to The Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China (ChP), Daodi medicinal materials refer to Chinese medicinal materials cultivated in specific geographical regions with stable superior quality and significant clinical efficacy. Their formation results from genotype × environment interactions: Specific genotypes drive bioactive compound synthesis under unique habitat conditions (temperature, humidity, soil, altitude). Climate factors shape bioactive compounds' distribution by influencing key enzyme activities in secondary metabolism[1]. Maintaining regional specificity quality thus requires a holistic understanding of the interplay among genetics, environment, and the soil ecosystem.

    • Long-term monoculture leads to soil microecological imbalance and autotoxin accumulation, severely constraining sustainable cultivation. In Panax ginseng, continuous cropping drastically alters the soil's microbial structure: The bacteria–fungi ratio (B/F) decreases from 33.1 to 1.8 after 4 years[2]. Root-secreted autotoxins chemotactically attract pathogens, increasing Ilyonectria robusta infection rates 2.5-fold. After 4 years of cropping, ginseng yield decreases by 30%–50% and saponin content by 11.4%−40.5%. Panax notoginseng also faces severe soil-borne diseases[3]. The core obstacle is the vicious cycle of biotic/abiotic stresses triggered by soil dysbiosis. Addressing these soil health issues is therefore a prerequisite for stable and high-quality medicinal plant production.

    • The global medicinal plant market is expected to grow. However, excessive intensification poses ecological risks. Long-term fertilization increases heavy metal (Cd, Pb, Zn) concentrations and mobility in the topsoil. Nitrogen fertilizers exacerbate Cd/Pb/Zn leaching; manure increases Cd accumulation by 40%; soil acidification further activates metals' bioavailability[4]. In greenhouse systems, high nitrogen (> 500 kg/ha) elevates soil electrical conductivity (EC) to 4.2 dS/m, causing salinization and inhibiting colonization by (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) colonization by ~75%[5]. Balancing yield demands with ecological protection is thus a core challenge. Consequently, sustainable strategies that mitigate these risks while supporting productivity are urgently needed.

    • The application of microbial inoculants in agriculture is relatively mature, demonstrating benefits beyond yield enhancement[6]. Their function include phosphorus and potassium solubilization, phytohormone production that stimulates root growth, and the production of siderophores for iron acquisition[7]. Furthermore, certain microbes act as biocontrol agents, suppressing pathogens through competition and antibiosis, and inducing systemic resistance[8]. These multifaceted mechanisms, which enhance nutrient availability, promote plant vigor, and protect against stress, are directly transferable and particularly valuable for medicinal plant cultivation, where both biomass and secondary metabolite quality are paramount.

    • Medicinal plant cultivation prioritizes the content/stability of bioactive compounds, differing from conventional crops' focus on biomass/yield. This imposes stricter requirements: Regulated quality standards mandate identity, purity, and content testing, and chemical inputs are restricted to avoid interfering with secondary metabolism or residue risks. Biological control is thus one of the preferred strategies. Microbial inoculants offer unique synergistic advantages for simultaneously enhancing yield and quality through multiple mechanisms: (1) Improving nutrient uptake (e.g., N fixation, P solubilization), directly increasing biomass. For example, arbuscular AMF + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) increased Withania somnifera and Adhatoda vasica biomass by 1.56-fold and 2-fold, respectively[9]. (2) Specifically activating secondary metabolic pathways to regulate bioactive compound synthesis. For example, specific inoculants enhance tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza and increase protein/polysaccharide/polyphenol in W. somnifera[10]. (3) Mitigating abiotic and biotic stresses, such as drought or pathogen attack, which can otherwise compromise both yield and quality. Even in degraded soils, mixed inoculants can optimize resource allocation (e.g., via leaf C/N, C/P regulation) for synergistic yield–quality[10].

    • The improvements translate directly into economic value. The higher accumulation of premium bioactive compounds in S. miltiorrhiza induced by AMF inoculation[11] enables higher economic benefits per unit of area. Increased bioactive compound content directly translates to higher quality grades and enables premium pricing, thereby enhancing profitability per unit of area. Moreover, by reducing reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, inoculants lower the input costs and mitigate the risks of chemical residues, ensuring compliance with strict quality standards[12]. Thus, the economic benefits are multifaceted, encompassing higher product value, reduced input costs, and improved market access. The significant effects of various microbial inoculants on yield, quality, and stress resistance in key medicinal plants are systematically summarized in Table 1.

      Table 1.  Effects of microbial inoculants on the growth and metabolism of medicinal plants.

      Microbial category Medicinal plant Microbial inoculant(s) Documented effects (key outcomes on yield/quality/stress)
      Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) Salvia miltiorrhiza Glomus mosseae Under optimized conditions: Tanshinone IIA 0.252% (significant increase)
      Ginkgo biloba Glomus mosseae Leaf area +28.1%; dry weight +59.2%; flavonoid glycosides increased
      Perilla frutescens Glomus mosseae Leaf phenolic content +15%; root rot resistance +76.8%
      Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) Calendula officinalis Bacillus subtilis Vanillin content in petals +50%
      Glycyrrhiza uralensis Bacillus cereus Activated jasmonic acid (JA) signaling; increased sodium dismutase (SOD)/catalase (CAT); enhanced glycyrrhizin
      Cyclocarya paliurus Bacillus megaterium + Pseudomonas fluorescens Flavonoids and polysaccharides accumulation promoted
      Mentha piperita Bacillus subtilis Essential oil content enhanced (via improved P uptake and terpenoid synthesis)
      Lonicera japonica Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens Chlorogenic acid content increased synergistically
      Catharanthus roseus Azotobacter + Bacillus + Pseudomonas Alkaloids +30%; N, P, K uptake efficiency improved
      Lonicera japonica Bacillus subtilis (alone) Chlorogenic acid +18%; HQT gene expression upregulated
      Mentha piperita Pseudomonas fluorescens + Bacillus subtilis Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and phenolic content synergistically increased
      Cicer arietinum Rhizobium spp. + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) Pod yield +39.5%; soil-available P +2.3-fold
      Eleusine coracana Azospirillum + Azotobacter Plant dry weight +30%–40%; N uptake +28%; P uptake +35%
      Other beneficial fungi Salvia miltiorrhiza Phoma herbarum D603 Tanshinone IIA increased to 6.5× control
      Panax ginseng Trichoderma harzianum T22 Suppressed Rhizoctonia solani by 90%; disease incidence –65%; promoted ginsenosides
      Catharanthus roseus Aspergillus niger extract Upregulated ABC transporters via JA signaling; enhanced alkaloid vacuolar sequestration
      Microbial consortia/combined inoculants Adhatoda vasica AMF (Acaulospora scrobiculata, Glomus funneliformis and Acaulospora) + PSB + azotobacter Biomass increased by > 2-fold
      Panax notoginseng Trichoderma spp. + composite inoculants (e.g., effective microorganisms [EM]) Seedling emergence +35%; yield +25%; disease incidence reduced > 50%; enriched beneficial bacteria
      Lonicera japonica Bacillus subtilis + gibberellin (GA3) Chlorogenic acid content +40%
      Withania somnifera AMF (Acaulospora scrobiculata, Glomus funneliformis and Acaulospora) + PSB + Azotobacter Biomass +1.56-fold; polyphenols +266.23%
      Salvia miltiorrhiza Glomus spp. + Rhizopus spp. Root biomass +65.1%; phenolic acids +27%; tanshinones +34%
      Others (Actinobacteria, rare earth elements) Salvia miltiorrhiza Actinomyces bovis + Streptomyces spp. Root-knot nematode infection –50%; soilborne pathogens inhibited
      Salvia miltiorrhiza PGPR + praseodymium (rare earth) Tanshinone content +40% (at 100 μM Pr)
      Panax ginseng Rhizobium panacihumi DCY116T Root biomass +25%; saponin content significantly enhanced
    • Inoculants are key to achieving green cultivation in several ways. First, for reducing chemical inputs, biofungicides (e.g., Trichoderma spp.) suppress pathogens via competition, antibiosis (e.g., chitinases), and induced systemic resistance (ISR), reducing fungicide use, minimizing residues/pollution, and protecting biodiversity[13]. Second, in terms of improving nutrient use efficiency, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and AMF enable stable yields with 20%–50% reduced chemical fertilizer application[14]. Furthermore, inoculants address specific soil problems and ensure safety. For example, specific actinomycetes reduce infection rates and suppress soilborne pathogens (e.g., root-knot nematodes), alleviating continuous cropping obstacles[15]. PGPR immobilize heavy metals (Cd, Pb) via adsorption, redox, and precipitation, reducing plant uptake and ensuring the material's safety[16]. Thus, inoculants are core for transitioning medicinal plant cultivation towards environmental friendliness and resource efficiency.

    • The multifaceted mechanisms through which microbial inoculants promote plant growth and the biosynthesis of medicinal compounds are illustrated in Fig. 1, encompassing nutritional, hormonal, defensive, and biosynthetic pathways, which are detailed in the following subsections.

      Figure 1. 

      Mechanisms of microbial inoculant action in medicinal plants. A simplified schematic illustrating key processes such as phytohormone synthesis (e.g., IAA), nutrient solubilization (e.g., phosphorus), antagonism against pathogens, abiotic stress mitigation, and activation of plants' secondary metabolite biosynthesis pathways.

    • The activation of essential nutrients by soil microorganisms, such as phosphorus (P), potassium (K), nitrogen (N), and micronutrients, are governed by distinct molecular mechanisms. P-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) activate insoluble P via (1) acidolysis, which involves secreting organic acids (gluconic, acetic) to lower pH and dissociate metal phosphates; (2) enzymolysis, which involves aecreting acid phosphatases (e.g., phytase) to hydrolyze organic P; and (3) genetic regulation, in which key genes (e.g., pqq, gdh) regulate organic acid production (e.g., via glucose dehydrogenase)[17]. For example, Bacillus spp. dissolve tricalcium phosphate (30−50 μg/mL capacity) and Pseudomonas spp. dynamically adjust their secretion[18].

      For K mobilization, K-solubilizing bacteria (KSB) such as Priestia megaterium and Peribacillus frigoritolerans secrete organic acids (citric, oxalic, tartaric acid) that dissolve K-bearing minerals (e.g., feldspar, mica), releasing soluble K+ into the soil solution[19]. At the molecular level, KSB strains use multiple mechanisms[20], including organic acid-mediated acidolysis; biofilm formation on mineral surfaces, which concentrates organic acids and facilitates mineral weathering; and synthesis of mineral binding proteins (e.g., elongation factor Tu [EF-Tu], enolase) that specifically attach to potassium feldspar and promote K+ release. Genome sequencing of the high efficiency KSB strain Priestia megaterium NK851 has revealed abundant genes related to K decomposition and intracellular K+ transport[20]. Moreover, these KSB strains often coexpress genes for siderophore production and indole acetic acid (IAA) synthesis, thereby synergistically enhancing nutrient availability and root development.

      Beyond bacteria, symbiotic fungi also play a critical role in nutrient activation. Under low-K stress, Rhizophagus intraradices significantly enhances the uptake of not only P but also K and N in crops such as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through upregulating the expression of root K+ transporter genes[21]. Thus, the molecular basis of microbial nutrient activation encompasses a coordinated multi-nutrient framework (P, K, N) mediated by organic acid secretion, biofilm formation, mineral-binding proteins, and the upregulation of transporter gene expression.

    • Approximately 80% of PGPR synthesize IAA, primarily via tryptophan-dependent pathways (indole-3-pyruvic acid [IPyA], indole-3-acetamide [IAM])[22]. Root-secreted L-tryptophan is a key precursor. Bacterial IAA exhibits concentration-dependent effects: Low concentrations (0.1−10 μM) promote primary root elongation/root hair proliferation; high concentrations (> 20 μM) inhibit primary roots but stimulate laterals. This involves crosstalk with ethylene signaling; PGPR-secreted 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase degrades ethylene precursor ACC, alleviating inhibition by high IAA[22].

      Beyond modulating IAA concentration and ethylene balance, IAA itself directly remodels the root architecture through well-established signaling pathways. IAA acts by inducing transporters (AUX1/LAX3) for polar auxin transport; activating nuclear signaling through IAA binding to SCF-TIR1/AFB triggers Aux/IAA degradation, releasing auxin response factors (ARF) transcription factors (e.g., ARF7/ARF19) to activate lateral root genes (e.g., LBD16); and possibly by rapid atypical signaling. The synergistic action of ACC deaminase further refines this hormonal regulation. By reducing stress-induced ethylene levels, ACC deaminase permits auxin-driven lateral root organogenesis to proceed without ethylene-mediated antagonism, thereby optimizing the root system's architecture for improved water and nutrient acquisition under both optimal and stress conditions[23]. Thus, microbial inoculants remodel the root architecture through an integrated hormonal regulatory network centered on IAA signaling and ethylene modulation, with ACC deaminase activity serving as a key coordinator that fine-tunes the balance between these two phytohormones.

    • Beneficial microbes suppress pathogens via several mechanims. The first is nutrient/space competition, which involves depleting key resources (C, P, Fe). Trichoderma spp. utilize soluble P faster than pathogens, thus antagonizing Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani[24]. Rapid hyphal growth (1.5−12.8× the pathogens' rate) occupies niches and forms barriers. Second, antibiosis and mycoparasitism operate by secreting antibiotics (e.g., gliotoxin, viridin) that inhibit pathogens up to 100%, secreting chitinases/β-1,3-glucanases to degrade pathogens' cell walls, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling activates mycoparasitism, with the hyphae coiling around or penetrating pathogens[25]. Field efficacy is significant: T. harzianum T22 inhibits R. solani by 90%, reducing disease incidence by 65% and promoting ginsenosides; T. virens reduces anthracnose incidence by 58%[26].

    • Microbial inoculants enhance plants' tolerance to diverse abiotic stresses through multiple mechanisms, with different microbial taxa exhibiting distinct but often complementary strategies. AMF enhance tolerance to drought, salinity, and heavy metal stresses. Under drought, AMF improve water use efficiency (WUE) by regulating abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, upregulating aquaporins (PIPs), utilizing hyphal water absorption, and inducing osmoprotectants (proline, sugars)[26]. For salinity, AMF promote K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ uptake while inhibiting Na+ influx, maintain the K+/Na+ ratio, alleviate photosynthetic inhibition, and induce sodium dismutase (SOD)/ascorbic acid to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) (reducing H2O2 by 40%−60%)[27]. For heavy metal stress, AMF use multiple detoxification strategies, including metal immobilization, metal chelation via phytochelatins, and vacuolar sequestration, thereby reducing oxidative damage[28].

      Beyond AMF, PGPR confer stress tolerance through distinct molecular pathways. Bacillus subtilis GB03 enhances salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana via tissue-specific regulation of the sodium transporter HKT1. Under salt stress, GB03 simultaneously downregulates HKT1 expression in the roots (reducing Na+ import) and upregulates it in the shoots (facilitating Na+ recirculation), resulting in lower total Na+ accumulation throughout the plant[29]. Additionally, PGPR-based biofertilizers containing ACC deaminase-producing strains mitigate drought, salinity, and heat stress by limiting stress-induced ethylene levels, thereby reducing photosynthetic damage and preserving carboxylation capacity[30,31].

      Collectively, the stress-adaptive benefits of microbial inoculants span multiple microbial taxa, each contributing unique mechanisms ranging from aquaporin regulation and ion transporter modulation to siderophore-mediated metal chelation and glomalin-based immobilization. The synergistic application of diverse microbial inoculants thus offers a comprehensive strategy for enhancing medicinal plants' resilience under the complex stress conditions commonly encountered in ecological cultivation systems.

    • Inoculants (e.g., PGPR, endophytes) promote the accumulation of bioactive compounds by inducing defense responses and activating secondary metabolism. The core mechanism involves the recognition of microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) by plant pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which triggers MAPK cascades and calcium signaling, leading to jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis[32,33]. (3R,7S)-jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine (JA-Ile) is perceived by the COI1-JAZ coreceptor complex, triggering the jasmonate zim domain (JAZ) repressor's ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, which releases MYC2 transcription factors to activate downstream biosynthetic genes (e.g., terpene synthases, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase)[34]. Empirical evidence confirms this pathway: Fungal inducers upregulate HMGR/CYP450 via JA signaling in ginseng, increasing its saponin content[35].

      Emerging regulatory mechanisms have also been revealed. Beyond the classical JA cascade, recent studies have identified additional layers of regulation. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) fine-tune secondary metabolism at the post-transcriptional level. For instance, in Salvia miltiorrhiza, miR396b targets the transcription factors involved in tanshinone biosynthesis[36]. Microbial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as 2,3-butanediol represent a novel signaling mode, modulating JA/ethylene (ET) signaling pathways, thereby enhancing induced systemic resistance and accumulation of secondary metabolites[37,38].

      Collectively, microbial inoculants activate the syntehsis of medicinal ingredients through a multilayered network involving MAMP-triggered signaling, JA-dependent transcriptional reprogramming, ncRNA regulation, and VOC-mediated signaling.

    • The efficacy of microbial inoculants is highly organ-dependent, dictated by the primary physiological functions and sites of secondary metabolite accumulation in the roots/rhizomes, leaves, and flowers/fruits (Table 2).

      Table 2.  Comparative analysis of microbial inoculants' functions across medicinal plants' organs (roots, rhizomes, leaves, flowers, and fruits).

      Category Representative plants Major active compounds Preferred microbial inoculant types Core mechanisms of action Representative case studies
      Roots/rhizomes Ginseng (Panax ginseng) Ginsenosides (triterpenoid saponins), phenolic compounds, polysaccharides Rhizobium panacihumi Rhizobia increase proline accumulation (osmoregulation), total phenolic content (antioxidants), and total soluble sugars (osmoprotection), while reducing aluminum-induced ROS levels. Upregulates antioxidant genes (PgAPX, PgCAT) and a proline synthesis gene (PgP5CS), enhancing ROS scavenging and cytoprotection. Rhizobium panacihumi DCY116T isolated from ginseng cultivation soil enhances aluminum resistance (500 μM Al) in 2-year-old ginseng seedlings by reducing oxidative stress and promoting growth biomarkers.
      Codonopsis (Codonopsis pilosula) Lobetyolin, polysaccharides Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B. amyloliquefaciens regulates auxin (IAA) biosynthesis and transport while inhibiting stress-related hormones like ABA and enhancing cell expansion and nutrient uptake. Improves photosynthetic efficiency, chlorophyll synthesis, and N/P assimilation, alleviating oxidative stress and ion toxicity under abiotic stresses (e.g., salinity). Inoculation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GB03 in Codonopsis pilosula significantly improves plant growth metrics (e.g., biomass, root length, chlorophyll content) and doubles lobetyolin accumulation. GB03 also enhances stress resistance (e.g., salt tolerance) and photosynthetic efficiency.
      Leaf Basil (Ocimum basilicum) Linalool, methyl chavicol (estragole), eugenol, α-terpineol Bacillus spp., Azotobacter, Azospirillum PGPR strains primarily enhance basil's growth and essential oil production by improving nutrient availability (e.g., N fixation by Azotobacter/Azospirillum, P solubilization by Bacillus), producing plant growth-promoting hormones (e.g., auxins, gibberellins), and modulating plants' physiological processes, collectively stimulating plant development and secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Coinoculation of Azotobacter, Azospirillum lipoferum, and Bacillus circulans in an ecological cropping system significantly increased basil's plant biomass (fresh/dry weight), essential oil yield, and plant height compared with uninoculated controls or single-strain applications.
      Hyptis (Hyptis suaveolens) β-Caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 mitigates ion toxicity by modulating sodium transporters (e.g., HKT1) to reduce Na+ accumulation in tissues. Enhances antioxidant activity (e.g., peroxidase/catalase), osmoregulation (proline/soluble sugar accumulation), and hormonal balance (e.g., reduced ethylene stress) to alleviate oxidative damage and maintain cellular integrity under osmotic stress. Inoculation of PGPR (B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9) in Hyptis suaveolens under salt stress (up to 105 mM NaCl) significantly enhanced essential oil content and physiological resilience (e.g., biomass, chlorophyll levels) compared with uninoculated plants.
      Peppermint (Mentha piperita) Menthol, menthone, pulegone, 1,8-cineole, linalool Pseudomonas spp. PGPR strains induce systemic resistance in mint by modulating hormone signaling pathways (e.g., jasmonates, salicylates) and increasing the density of glandular trichomes (specialized structures for monoterpene synthesis and storage). This interaction enhances photosynthetic efficiency and carbon allocation to secondary metabolism, promoting phenolic and terpenoid production, potentially via volatile or nonvolatile bacterial elicitors, even without direct pathogen attack. Inoculation of peppermint with PGPR strains (single or combined) significantly increased volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions (~3-fold) and elevated total phenolic content in leaves, with the highest induction observed in coinoculated plants (e.g., Pseudomonas WCS417r + SJ04).
      Fruit/flower Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) Steviol glycosides IAA-producing PGPR strains IAA produced by PGPR acts as a phytohormone (auxin), directly stimulating plant growth by enhancing root elongation, root hair development, and nutrient uptake. This facilitates improved water and mineral absorption, increasing biomass and overall plant vigor. Bacteria primarily synthesize IAA via tryptophan-dependent pathways, utilizing root exudates as precursors, establishing a mutualistic plant–microbe relationship. IAA-producing PGPR isolated from the Stevia rebaudiana rhizosphere were optimized for IAA production (varying pH, temperature, carbon, nitrogen sources). Application of these optimized strains to stevia plants significantly increased root and shoot biomass.
      Tangerine peel (Citri reticulatae pericarpium) Flavonoids (e.g., nobiletin, tangeretin), volatile oils (e.g., limonene, γ-terpinene) Burkholderia spp., Streptomyces spp. Burkholderia and Streptomyces activate the plant innate immune system by secreting microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) (e.g., lipopolysaccharides, flagellin), triggering JA/ethylene (ET) signaling pathways and upregulating antioxidant enzymes (e.g., SOD, peroxidase [POD]) expression, significantly enhancing plants' tolerance to drought and salt stress. Secondary metabolites produced by Streptomyces (e.g., actinomycin) directly inhibit soil pathogens, whereas regulating plant stomatal closure reduces water loss and enhances water retention. Specific beneficial microbes (e.g., Burkholderia, Streptomyces) were inoculated during the cultivation of tangerine peel to optimize growth and medicinal quality. These microbes improved environmental stress tolerance (e.g., drought/salinity) and stimulated the synthesis of active compounds like flavonoids through microecological interactions.
    • For medicinal plants where the roots or rhizomes serve as the harvested organs (e.g., ginseng, S. miltiorrhiza), the primary goal of inoculation is to enhance both belowground biomass and the accumulation of root-specific bioactive compounds. PGPR achieve this through a combination of direct promotion of root growth and targeted activation of root-specific secondary metabolic pathways. For instance, Rhizobium panacihumi DCY116T increased ginseng root biomass by 25% while simultaneously upregulating the genes involved in ginsenoside biosynthesis, thereby enhancing the saponin content[39]. Similarly, co-inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, Bacillus, and Pseudomonas increased the root alkaloid content in Catharanthus roseus by 30%, accompanied by improved nutrient uptake[40]. These examples demonstrate that inoculants' effects on root-type medicinal plants yield outcomes that are directly measurable in the harvested root organ.

    • In leaf-harvested medicinal plants (e.g., Ginkgo, Perilla), microbial inoculants enhance yield and quality primarily by improving photosynthetic efficiency and activating foliar defense mechanism. Diverse microbial inoculants have demonstrated efficacy in leaf-harvested medicinal plants. AMF such as Glomus mosseae inoculation in Ginkgo biloba increased leaf area by 28%, dry weight by 59%, and flavonoid glycosides content by enhancing photosynthetic pigment efficiency[41]. PGPR can increase chlorophyll content, photosynthetic efficiency, and secondary metabolite accumulation in medicinal plants[42]. Perilla frutescens, characterized by high rosmarinic acid and total flavonoid contents, is amenable to such microbial elicitation[43]. Collectively, microbial inoculants, such as AMF and PGPR, can effectively enhance photosynthetic capacity and foliar defense in leaf-harvested medicinal plants.

    • For medicinal plants where flowers or fruits are the harvested organs (e.g., honeysuckle, chrysanthemum), the application of Bacillus species offers dual benefits: Suppression of floral pathogens and activation of reproductive-stage secondary metabolism. Bacillus subtilis secretes antimicrobial lipopeptides that antagonize fungal pathogens such as Alternaria while simultaneously upregulating phenylpropanoid pathway genes (HQT, C4H, 4CL) to promote the accumulation of flower-specific compounds like chlorogenic acid[44]. In chamomile, B. subtilis combined with cyanobacteria increased essential oil yield by 35% while enhancing powdery mildew resistance via induced peroxidase (POD) activity[45]. Thus, for flower- or fruit-type medicinal plants, inoculants exert organ-specific effects by integrating pathogen suppression with targeted activation of reproductive-stage metabolic pathways.

    • Continuous cropping obstacles in medicinal plants primarily stem from microbial dysbiosis and autotoxin accumulation. In P. notoginseng, phenolic acid autotoxins (e.g., vanillic acid) accumulate, promoting pathogens and inhibiting beneficial microbes, ultimately shifting the soil to a fungal-dominated state[46]. Microbial inoculants alleviate this problem through two synergistic mechanisms. First, they reshape the microbial community. Application of Trichoderma inoculants and composite microbial agents significantly increases the abundance of beneficial bacteria (e.g., Sphingomonas) in the P. notoginseng rhizosphere, reduces the proportion of harmful fungi, and increases soil actinomycetes' diversity, thereby restoring a beneficial bacteria-dominated microecological balance. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analyses confirm that inoculant treatment increases the gene copy numbers of beneficial bacterial genesby over 40% and reduces pathogens by 30%–50%[47]. Second, they degrade autotoxins. Functional microorganisms in inoculants (e.g., Pseudomonas spp.) efficiently degrade phenolic acids. For instance, treatment with the ZZMZ microbial agent for 28 days degraded over 50% of total phenolic acids (e.g., vanillic acid, ferulic acid) in the rhizosphere of Rehmannia glutinosa[8]. Crucially, inoculants often act indirectly by improving the rhizosphere microenvironment rather than completely eliminating autotoxins[46,47].

      Field trials validate this efficacy: EM and Trichoderma treatments increased the seedling emergence rate by 35% and yield by 25% in continuous-cropped Panax notoginseng while significantly reducing disease incidence by over 50%[47]. Collectively, these results demonstrate that microbial inoculants, through the synergistic action of community reconstruction and autotoxin reduction, serve as a key biological strategies for overcoming continuous cropping obstacles in medicinal plants.

    • The quality of regional specificity medicinal materials is closely linked to the unique microbe–plant interactions in their production regions. For instance, the rhizosphere microbiome of Panax ginseng cultivated in its traditional production region (Jilin Province, China) exhibits a distinct microbial community structure enriched with beneficial taxa positively correlated with ginsenoside content[48]. Inoculation with these region-specific microbial consortia has been shown to enhance ginsenoside accumulation by upregulating key biosynthetic genes (PgSS, PgSE) in ginseng roots[49]. Similarly, for Astragalus membranaceus, the quality superiority of materials from the Gansu region has been linked to the enrichment of specific rhizosphere bacteria that enhance the biosynthesis of calycosin-7-glucoside[50].

      The core mechanism underlying these region-specific effects lies in the ability of specific growth-promoting microbes to upregulate key biosynthetic genes in the target secondary metabolic pathways. In the Salvia miltiorrhiza rhizosphere, for example, Pseudomonas spp. and Cladosporium spp. can upregulate the expression of key genes in the tanshinone synthesis pathway (SmAACT, SmCMK, DXS, CYP76AH1), thereby promoting the accumulation of active ingredients[51]. A typical example is the seed endophytic fungus Phoma herbarum D603. Its cocultivation with S. miltiorrhiza activatedthe HMGR and CPS genes, increasing tanshinone IIA content to 6.5 times that of the control group[52]. Thus, microbial inoculants can effectively simulate or reinforce the inherent microecological advantages of specific regions, thereby consolidating the quality of these medicinal materials.

    • In organic cultivation systems, the combination of microbial inoculants with organic fertilizer offers a promising strategy to balance yield and quality while reducing chemical inputs. Multiple case studies across different medicinal plants support this synergistic approach. For ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) and Malabar nut (Adhatoda vasica), AMF inoculation combined with PSB increased ashwagandha biomass by 1.56-fold and total alkaloid content by 266.23%; whereas a ternary inoculation of AMF + PSB + nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Azotobacter) increased Malabar nuts' polyphenol content by 29.6%, achieving over 98% of the yield obtained with chemical fertilizer treatment, effectively reducing fertilizer dependence[53]. The key mechanism involves inoculants activating the JA signaling pathway via induced systemic resistance (ISR), promoting the accumulation of terpenoid indole alkaloids (TIAs)[54]. In chamomile, inoculation with Bacillus subtilis Co1-6 and Paenibacillus polymyxa Mc5Re-14 significantly increased flavonoid glycoside content (e.g., apigenin-7-O-glucoside), raised the proportion of active ingredients in the essential oil by 22%−35%, and maintained fresh flower yield similar to the chemical fertilizer treatment[55]. This quality improvement stems from inoculants' regulation of the rhizosphere microbiome, suppressing pathogens (e.g., Fusarium) and promoting the synthesis of beneficial plant–microbe interaction-related metabolites[55]. These diverse cases collectively indicate that microbial inoculants, when integrated with organic fertilizers, serve as effective tools for achieving high-value organic production across a range of medicinal plant species.

    • The efficacy of microbial inoculants is governed by a complex interplay of factors related to the inoculant itself, the environment, and the host plant, as overviewed in Fig. 2.

      Figure 2. 

      Key factors influencing the efficacy of microbial inoculants. Conceptual model showing the interconnections among the inoculants' formulation and carriers, environmental stresses (e.g., climate, soil properties), and the hosts' plant properties (e.g., genetics, developmental stage).

    • Optimizing inoculant efficacy requires attention to microbial strains' compatibility, i.e., integrating two or more microorganisms with mutualistic symbiotic relationships. Functionally synergistic formulation is a core aspect. For example, combining nitrogen-fixing bacteria with PSB significantly improves plant nutrition and yield through dual nitrogen and phosphorus activation (e.g., increasing chickpea [Cicer arietinum] pod yield by 39.5%)[56]. Cross-functional synergy (e.g., growth promoters + pathogen suppressors + root promoters) can form a multidimensional efficacy network, increasing biomass by over 50%, or simultaneously achieving disease control and metabolic promotion[57].

      Resource-complementary formulation focuses on ecological niche differentiation, which is particularly suitable for AMF combinations. The diversity of AMF community structure directly affects the host's resource utilization efficiency. For example, inoculating Salvia miltiorrhiza with a combination of Glomus (promoting phosphorus) and Rhizopus (drought-tolerant) increased root biomass by 65.1%, total phenolic acid by 27%, and tanshinone content by 34%[11]. Taxonomic distance is crucial: Distantly related (cross-genus) AMF combinations (e.g., five species inoculated in cucumber [Cucumis sativus]) reduce competition through resource utilization and spatial complementarity, enhancing the community's stability and function (e.g., soil phosphorus utilization efficiency increased to 1.8 times that of single strains). In contrast, combinations within the same family may lead to reduced efficacy because of competition[11,58]. Metabolic exchange among microbes determines a formulation's success (synergy or antagonism). For instance, Trichoderma harzianum VOCs may inhibit spore germination in Glomus intraradices, whereas Pseudomonas siderophores can alleviate this inhibition[59]. Positive interactions enhance efficacy; for example, coapplication of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis increased peppermint volatiles and phenolic content[54]. Therefore, formulation design requires an assessment of the strains' compatibility.

    • Carrier materials directly impact inoculants' survival rate, stability, colonization efficiency, and field efficacy. Their protective capacity depends on physicochemical properties (porosity, pH, nutrients) and environmental adaptability (storage temperature, soil conditions)[60]. Ideal carriers need to be biodegradable, nontoxic, and low-cost; have a near-neutral pH; and possess good water absorption and buffering capacity[60,61]. Natural solid carriers like sodium alginate significantly prolong microbial survival time (maintaining high viability after 8 weeks of storage) through high biocompatibility and encapsulation protection, whereas the addition of humic acid can improve oxygen permeability and enhance bacterial activity[62].

      Agricultural waste carriers (e.g., bagasse, farmyard manure) are significant because of their low cost and sustainability value. The high porosity and rich nutrients of bagasse help maintain microbial viability under refrigeration; farmyard manure, which has high organic carbon and a near-neutral pH, can maintain a high density of PSB at room temperature and promote plants' phosphorus uptake[63]. Nanomaterial carriers (e.g., nano-hydroxyapatite) physically isolate stress and enhance strains' activity through high-porosity structures[64]. Liquid inoculants optimized with additives (e.g., trehalose, glycerol, polyvinylpyrrolidone [PVP]) can overcome storage bottlenecks, protecting cell membranes or enhancing adhesion[61,63]. Key carrier characteristics (porosity, nutrients, pH) and environmental compatibility directly determine microbial survival and efficacy. For example, bagasse is suitable for refrigeration, and sodium alginate requires 4 °C for long-term storage[65]. Optimizing the carriers (especially agricultural waste) can improve plants' performance and reduce costs[65].

    • The efficacy of microbial inoculants is highly dependent on the dynamic regulation of environmental factors, which affect their rhizosphere colonization, survival, metabolic activity, and functional expression, ultimately determining the growth-promoting effect[66].

    • Soil physicochemical properties (pH, salinity, calcareous content, etc.) are core factors regulating inoculant colonization and functional performance. Soil pH directly determines microbial activity[67,68]. Acidic soils (pH < 7) significantly inhibit spore germination and hyphal extension in AMF, leading to a reduction in colonization efficiency and nutrient absorption capacity compared with neutral soils. Alkaline soils (pH > 9) cause osmotic stress and phosphorus fixation problems, although alkali-tolerant strains can secrete organic acids to activate nutrients and enhance adaptability. Saline stress has a dual effect on inoculants, with high-salt environments damaging cell membranes and reducing survival rates. However, specific strains (e.g., rhizobia combined with urea compost) can improve growth in barley (Hordeum vulgare) by producing IAA and cytokinins. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus spp. secrete exopolysaccharides (EPSs) to form an ionic barrier, inhibiting Na+ uptake and antioxidant enzyme activity[69]. In calcareous soils, low iron solubility often causes plant chlorosis. Strains like Trichoderma asperellum T34 secrete siderophores to chelate iron ions, significantly improving iron's bioavailability[70].

      Heavy metal pollution poses a severe challenge to microbial inoculants, but specific tolerant strains can mitigate toxicity through bioremediation mechanisms. In copper-contaminated soil, microbial inoculants combined with microalgae can adsorb and precipitate Cu2+, reducing copper uptake in S. miltiorrhiza by 25.37% while increasing root biomass and antioxidant enzyme activity[71]. For cadmium contamination, PGPR convert heavy metals into less toxic forms through biosorption and redox reactions[16]. Notably, heavy metals damage microbial cells' membrane structures. Therefore, inoculant screening must prioritize tolerant strains (e.g., those carrying heavy metal resistance genes) and be combined with organic amendments (biochar, humic acid) for synergistic effects. These amendments significantly enhance inoculants' survival and functional expression by passivating heavy metals and improving the soil microenvironment[72].

    • Climate factors, especially drought and temperature fluctuations, significantly regulate inoculants' survival and function by altering soil moisture status and the microbial community's structure. Drought stress causes water shortage and ion imbalance, inhibiting inoculant metabolic activity. However, drought-tolerant strains can maintain activity through multiple mechanisms: PGPR produce ACC deaminase to degrade the ethylene precursor ACC, lowering the ET concentration to promote root development and water absorption while secreting osmoregulators (e.g., compatible solutes) to maintain cell water potential[69]. Notably, drought reshapes the rhizosphere microbiome's composition (e.g., increasing the abundance of monoderms). These microbes enhance metabolite exchange via ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, indirectly improving plant drought resistance. Therefore, screening adaptive strains with these drought-tolerance mechanisms should be prioritized in inoculant development[73].

      Temperature is a core regulatory factor directly determining inoculants' metabolic state: High temperatures accelerate microbial decay, whereas low temperatures (e.g., 4 °C refrigeration) effectively maintain inoculants' stability (e.g., Klebsiella and Citrobacter freundii survive significantly longer under refrigeration than at room temperature)[74]. This indicates that the transport and storage of inoculants require strict optimization of temperature control to ensure field efficacy[69]. Facing the compounded stresses exacerbated by climate warming (e.g., drought accompanied by high temperature), microbial biostimulants can protect cellular structures by producing heat shock proteins or assist plants in regulating stomatal closure to alleviate heat damage, providing key technical support for coping with extreme climates[75].

      In summary, water and temperature stresses profoundly affect inoculants' efficacy by reshaping microbial communities and their metabolic networks. This means that future inoculant design should integrate climate adaptation strategies, including selecting broad-spectrum stress-resistant strains and optimizing formulation processes.

    • The differential responses of medicinal plant cultivars to the same microbial inoculant primarily stem from genetic background-driven physiological and biochemical traits. Host cultivars shape unique rhizosphere microecologies through the composition of root exudates (e.g., organic acids, flavonoids). For instance, Astragalus membranaceus and Glycyrrhiza uralensis exhibit differences in secreted sugars and organic acids when the same bacterial strain is applied, leading to divergent colonization patterns: The A. membranaceus rhizosphere is enriched in Firmicutes and Prevotella, whereas G. uralensis favors Bacteroidetes and Bacteroides[76,77]. Additionally, cultivar-specific cell wall components (e.g., lignified walls in high-fiber cannabis [Cannabis sativa] inhibit fungal colonization), whereas the parenchyma in high-medicinal cultivars facilitates endophyte peneration[78] and immune response intensity (e.g., antibacterial saponins in G. glabra inhibit bacterial inoculants) further determine inoculants' compatibility[79].

      The induction of medicinal active ingredients by inoculants also exhibits cultivar dependence, regulated by the host's metabolic enzyme profile and gene promoter specificity[80]. A typical example is the comparison between Astragalus polysaccharides (APSs) and Glycyrrhiza polysaccharides (GPSs). APSs significantly enhance the expression of the astragaloside synthesis gene PgPR-10.3, whereas GPS induces the same gene at only 60% efficiency; conversely, GPS specifically activates the glycyrrhizin synthesis gene GA3ox, whereas APS has no significant effect[81,82]. Thus, inoculants' efficacy is strongly coupled to the host's inherent genetic and metabolic background.

    • The response of medicinal plants to inoculants exhibits significant dependence on the developmental stage, with the seedling stage being the optimal window for intervention. At this stage, highly active roots systems secrete abundant organic carbon sources that serve as both nutrients and colonization signals for rhizobacteria. For example, inoculation of Salvia miltiorrhiza seedlings with Bacillus subtilis significantly enhanced root biomass and tanshinone accumulation[83]. Similarly, seedling-stage inoculation of Astragalus membranaceus with Rhizobium strains resulted in superior nodulation and flavonoid content[84].

      The pronounced efficacy stems from the high metabolic plasticity of seedlings. Transcriptomic analyses reveal that upon microbial elicitation, key biosynthetic genes in the tanshinone pathway such as HMGR, PAL, and PMK are significantly upregulated in S. miltiorrhiza seedlings[85]. Moreover, during early growth, plants allocate a greater proportion of photosynthates to the roots, resulting in higher rhizodeposition that supports larger and compositionally distinct microbial communities[86]. This positive feedback loop, in which enhanced microbial colonization promotes root development and secondary metabolism, which, in turn, supports further microbial activity, is most effectively established when initiated during the seedling stages.

    • Current microbial inoculants face three core challenges in agricultural application: Low colonization stability, unclear synergistic mechanisms, and a lack of standardized evaluation systems. First, microbial consortia exhibit insufficient colonization stability in complex soil environments (the survival rate is often below 20%), particularly struggling to maintain stable function under long-term field conditions (e.g., synthetic communities are stable for only about 2 weeks). This is primarily caused by variations in the soil's physicochemical properties and interference from native microbial competition[87]. Second, existing research often focuses on single strains, lacking in-depth analyses of synergistic mechanisms at the microbial community level (e.g., how metabolic interactions between strains affect overall function)[88]. Furthermore, the absence of standardized evaluation systems leads to poor comparability of inoculants' efficacy across different laboratories. This is manifested in inconsistent methods used for detecting active ingredients, and soil metagenomics studies often neglect to set up untreated control groups, making it difficult to effectively distinguish treatment effects from environmental interference[89].

    • To address the abovementioned challenges, breakthroughs can be achieved through the synergistic development of synthetic microbial communities (SynComs), plant–microbe interaction omics research, and optimizing field management.

    • For addressing the challenges in current microbial inoculant application, constructing SynComs has become a key strategy. Its core lies in a customized design based on the principle of functional complementarity, integrating strains with different core functions (e.g., nitrogen fixation, disease resistance, growth promotion) to build synergistic microbial alliances. A typical example is combining the proteobacterium Sphingomonas with the actinobacterium Methylobacterium. This design not only integrates multiple beneficial functions but, more critically, leverages metabolic functional redundancy within the microbial community. This means different strains can perform similar or complementary metabolic tasks, significantly enhancing the entire community's resistance to environmental fluctuations and stability. The advantage of SynComs is also reflected in interaction synergy among their members. Through resource exchange (e.g., carbon sources, vitamins, siderophores) across species and signal coordination mechanisms like quorum sensing, the colonization efficiency and persistence of the community in the rhizosphere are significantly improved. Experiments prove that colonization efficiency can be over 30% higher than single-strain formulations[90]. This "design-assembly" SynCom strategy provides an important direction for developing efficient and stable next-generation microbial inoculants.

      Recent studies have demonstrated the successful application of SynComs in medicinal plants. For instance, a synthetic community comprising Stenotrophomonas sp., Rhizobium sp., Ochrobactrum sp., and Advenella sp., was applied to A. mongholicus to control root rot disease[91]. This SynCom significantly enhanced plant biomass and reduced disease incidence by 42.7% compared with the control. In P. ginseng, a SynCom consisting of Paenibacillus polymyxa and Bacillus cereus, selected for their capacity for pathogen suppression and growth promotion, effectively improved ginseng's yield, ginsenoside accumulation, disease prevention, and pesticide degradation[92]. These examples confirm that SynComs, through interspecies cooperation, can achieve more stable colonization and superior efficacy in medicinal plants.

    • To address the need for deeper mechanistic understanding, integrating multiomics approaches with controllable simulation platforms is essential. Deeply analyzing the interaction mechanisms within the rhizosphere's microbial networks requires combining metagenomics with a genetic analysis of the host. For example, genome-wide assosicaton studies on microbes in the maize (Zea mays) phyllosphere successfully identified 23 hub genes that significantly shape the composition of beneficial microbiota by regulating the host's immune signaling pathways[93]. To further quantify the fine-grained metabolic interactions between microbes and plants, the EcoFAB system (ecosystem fabrication) can be utilized to precisely simulate the rhizosphere microenvironment, enabling dynamic monitoring and quantitative analyses of the interaction processes[94]. This research strategy integrating omics analysis with controllable microenvironment simulation provides new perspectives for precise regulation of the rhizosphere's microbiome.

      On this basis, deeper multiomics integration, including transcriptomics, metabolomics, and microbiome analysis, can systematically elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which inoculants regulate secondary metabolic pathways and stress resistance in medicinal plants, through constructing integrated regulatory network models of gene expression, active ingredients, and the microbiome's structure. This integration strategy can precisely identify the key regulatory nodes (e.g., key genes or metabolic hubs) and guide the design of SynComs with clear functions and synergistic efficacy (e.g., combinations optimized for nitrogen fixation and growth promotion).

    • The inoculant + organic fertilizer co-application model should be vigorously promoted. Here, organic matter acts as a carrier buffering environmental stress and providing carbon sources to enhance microbial colonization, and adding humus can also increase inoculants' survival rate by 30%. It optimizes the microbial habitat by regulating soil pH and pore structure[94]. Additionally, there is an urgent need to establish unified evaluation standards. Integrating key physicochemical parameters like soil C/N ratio with multiomics data can build a comprehensive cross-platform framework for assessing in inoculants, improving research comparability and application reliability.

    • To further overcome the application bottlenecks of microbial inoculants, the convergence of synthetic biology, smart delivery systems, and eco-economic assessment is imperative.

    • There is a need to apply clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) gene editing, genome streamlining, and other techniques to directionally engineer functional strains, enhancing their ability to promote the synthesis of medicinal active ingredients. Utilizing biotechnological means like adaptive evolution or gene editing can significantly enhance the colonization ability of engineered strains in complex field environments[95].

    • Developing smart responsive delivery systems (e.g., pH-responsive nanocarriers) and integrating them with Internet of Things (IoT) sensing networks can achieve dynamic monitoring of the rhizosphere microenvironment and precise, on-demand release of inoculants[96]. The Smart-MIP (microbial- and sensor-based integrated precision) approach, combining precision design with smart delivery and real-time feedback, enhances microbial colonization efficiency and functional stability in the rhizosphere[97].

    • In the eco-economic dimension, promoting the large-scale application of microbial inoculants requires integrating lifecycle assessment models to quantify their carbon emission reduction benefits (e.g., reduced emissions from fertilizer production, enhanced soil carbon sequestration) and comprehensive economic benefits (e.g., yield premiums, reduced pesticide inputs)[98]. This would provide solid data support for policy formulation and industry promotion. Simultaneously, linking with carbon markets could transform the agricultural carbon sinks generated by inoculant application (e.g., increased soil organic carbon, reduced N2O emissions) into economic returns for growers[99]. This establishes a closed loop of green benefits and economic returns that synergistically drives technological innovation and policy incentives.

    • Microbial inoculants, acting through the tripartite growth-promoting mechanism of hormone regulation, nutrient activation, and resistance induction, have become core tools for achieving green and sustainable cultivation of medicinal plants. Future research needs to focus on three core research directions: (1) Deepen multi-omics integration to enhance the precision of data integration, develop efficient algorithms to deeply analyze the complex spatiotemporal dynamic interaction networks between microbes and plants, and precisely identify regulatory hubs; (2) optimize engineered strains by enhancing their functions (e.g., active ingredient synthesis, stress resistance) while prioritizing the improvement of their biosafety and adaptability in complex field environments, including long-term monitoring of nontarget effects on the native soil microflora (e.g., disruption of the community structure, horizontal gene transfer risks); and (3) break through smart carrier bottlenecks by focusing on resolving the biocompatibility issues of smart responsive carriers (e.g., nanomaterials) and improving the response of response sensitivity and delivery accuracy to changes in the rhizosphere's microenvironment (e.g., pH, specific metabolites). Additionally, future research should systematically evaluate key application parameters such as inoculant dosage, carrier selection (e.g., organic vs. clay-based carriers for different soil textures), and regional adaptability (e.g., performance under arid vs. acidic soil conditions) to guide field-specific recommendations.

      Building a complete industrial chain of laboratory-based precision screening, field-based pilot verification, and regional-scale application will systematically propel medicinal plant cultivation towards the comprehensive goals of high and stable yield, superior and controllable medicinal efficacy components, and eco-environmental friendliness. To address the current lack of unified evaluation standards, we propose a multitiered framework (soil parameters, inoculant characterization, common controls, and standardized reporting) to improve cross-study comparability and facilitate meta-analyses.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: conducted the data search: Duan J, Kang M; designed and wrote the paper: Liu F, Xu Y. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • This work was supported by the Young Talent Promotion Project by the Ecological Society of China, the Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program, the Scientific Research Fund Project of the Yunnan Provincial Department of Education (2025Y0029), and the Graduate Student Research Innovation Project of Yunnan University (KC-24248854).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (2) References (99)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Duan J, Kang M, Liu F, Xu Y. 2026. Harnessing microbial inoculants for sustainable medicinal plant cultivation. Medicinal Plant Biology 5: e015 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0026-0010
    Duan J, Kang M, Liu F, Xu Y. 2026. Harnessing microbial inoculants for sustainable medicinal plant cultivation. Medicinal Plant Biology 5: e015 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0026-0010

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return