Search
2025 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Sustainable development of Hainan's melon and vegetable industry: new strategies for pest control

More Information
  • Received: 13 March 2025
    Revised: 10 May 2025
    Accepted: 19 June 2025
    Published online: 28 September 2025
    Tropical Plants  4 Article number: e032 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • Focuses on constructing a green pest control technology system, integrating physical control, physicochemical inducement, biological control, and ecological regulation to reduce chemical pesticide use.

    Proposes targeted strategies based on Hainan's tropical climate, analyzing the adaptability of different measures and optimizing combinations according to temperature and humidity dynamics.

    Emphasizes the integration of modern technologies like IoT and drones for real-time monitoring and precise pest management.

    Highlights the core role of integrated pest management (IPM) by combining multiple strategies to achieve sustainable development goals

  • Various crops can be cultivated in Hainan due to its unique climatic conditions, which also lead to overlapping generations and rapid reproduction of pests, posing a serious threat to agricultural production. Traditional chemical control methods have shown substantial limitations in their effectiveness and ecological safety, necessitating a shift toward green, safe, and effective integrated pest management (IPM) measures. This paper explores the current status and strategies for pest control in Hainan's melon and vegetable industry by reviewing various green control technologies, including physical control, physicochemical attraction, biological control, and ecological regulation. Additionally, it discusses the application of technological methods in modern pest management, particularly the importance of the Internet of Things and drone technology in real-time monitoring and data analysis. Finally, this paper emphasizes the necessity of IPM, advocating for a combination of various control methods, as well as rational crop layout and ecological regulation, to enhance the sustainability of agriculture, with the hope of providing strong technical support and assurance for Hainan's melon and vegetable industry.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • [1] Gao RB, Lu RC, Qiu XY, Wang LK, Zhang K, et al. 2023. Detection of putative mutation I873S in the sodium channel of Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) which may be associated with pyrethroid resistance. Insects 14(4):388 doi: 10.3390/insects14040388

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Hou Q, Yuan L, Jin H, Yan H, Li F, et al. 2023. Identification and validation of reference genes for normalization of gene expression analysis using qRT-PCR in Megalurothrips usitatus (thysanoptera: thripidae). Frontiers in Physiology 14:1161680 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1161680

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Wu J, Yuan L, Jin H, Zhang K, Li F, et al. 2023. Double sodium channel mutation, I265T/L1014F, is possibly related to pyrethroid-resistant in Thrips palmi. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 113(4):e22021 doi: 10.1002/arch.22021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Gao R, Ma S, Geng J, Zhang K, Xian L, et al. 2024. Functional characterization of double mutations T929I/K1774N in the voltage-gated sodium channel of Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) related to pyrethroid resistance. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 72:11958−67 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00355

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Li F, Gong X, Yuan L, Pan X, Jin H, et al. 2022. Indoxacarb resistance-associated mutation of Liriomyza trifolii in Hainan, China. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 183:105054 doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Bragard C, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Di Serio F, Gonthier P, Jacques MA, et al. 2020. Pest categorisation of Liriomyza bryoniae. EFSA Journal 18(3):e06038 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Singh Yadav SP, Pokhrel S, Poudel A, Devkota S, Katel S, et al. 2024. Evaluation of different insecticides against Liriomyza sativae (Diptera: Agromyzidae) on cucumber plants. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 15:100987 doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.100987

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Wang YC, Chang YW, Gong WR, Hu J, Du YZ. 2024. The development of abamectin resistance in Liriomyza trifolii and its contribution to thermotolerance. Pest Management Science 80:2053−60 doi: 10.1002/ps.7944

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Bass C, Denholm I, Williamson MS, Nauen R. 2015. The global status of insect resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 121:78−87 doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.04.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Criniti A, Mazzoni E, Cassanelli S, Cravedi P, Tondelli A, et al. 2008. Biochemical and molecular diagnosis of insecticide resistance conferred by esterase, MACE, kdr and super-kdr based mechanisms in Italian strains of the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 90:168−74 doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.11.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Meng J, Zhang C, Chen X, Cao Y, Shang S. 2014. Differential protein expression in the susceptible and resistant Myzus persicae (Sulzer) to imidacloprid. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 115:1−8 doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.09.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Xu X, Ding Q, Wang X, Wang R, Ullah F, et al. 2022. V101I and R81T mutations in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor β1 subunit are associated with neonicotinoid resistance in Myzus persicae. Pest Management Science 78(4):1500−7 doi: 10.1002/ps.6768

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Sain SK, Monga D, Hiremani NS, Nagrale DT, Kranthi S, et al. 2021. Evaluation of bioefficacy potential of entomopathogenic fungi against the whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.) on cotton under polyhouse and field conditions. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 183:107618 doi: 10.1016/J.JIP.2021.107618

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Erdogan C, Velioglu AS, Gurkan MO, Denholm I, Moores GD. 2021. Detection of resistance to pyrethroid and neonicotinoid insecticides in the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westw.) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Crop Protection 146:105661 doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105661

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Wang F, Liu J, Chen P, Li HY, Ma JJ, et al. 2020. Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Insecticide Resistance in Shandong Province, China. Journal of Economic Entomology 113:911−17 doi: 10.1093/jee/toz315

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Xie W, Liu Y, Wang S, Wu Q, Pan H, et al. 2014. Sensitivity of Bemisia Tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) to several new insecticides in China: effects of insecticide type and whitefly species, strain, and stage. Journal of Insect Science 14(1):261 doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Morato RP, do Nascimento DV, Oliveira GM, Bermúdez NC, Lira R, et al. 2024. Indoxacarb, cyantraniliprole, and Euborellia annulipes as options for integrated control of diamondback moth. Journal of Applied Entomology 148:1300−10 doi: 10.1111/jen.13347

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Calvin W, Palumbo JC, Anderson T. 2024. Chlorantraniliprole resistance associated with diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) outbreaks in Arizona Brassica crops. Journal of Economic Entomology 117:2608−17 doi: 10.1093/jee/toae212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Wang D, Lv W, Yuan Y, Zhang T, Teng H, et al. 2022. Effects of insecticides on malacostraca when managing diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) in combination planting-rearing fields. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 229:113090 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113090

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Vincent C, Hallman G, Panneton B, Fleurat-Lessard F. 2003. Management of Agricultural Insects with Physical Control Methods. Annual review of entomology 48:261 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112639

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Xian L, Jin H, Hou Q, Peng X, Ning H, et al. 2024. Cloning and expression analysis of visual genes of Megalurothrips usitatus. Journal of Tropical Biology 15(05):615−22 doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Jin HF, Yuan LL, Wang LK, Li F, Wu SY. 2024. Ultraviolet-absorbing film both reduces major pest abundance (Thripidea & Diptera) and promotes crop yield for greenhouse cowpea Vigna unguiculata. Entomologia Generalis 44:153−61 doi: 10.1127/entomologia/2023/2025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Li F, Jin H, Yao Z, Xian L, Liu K, et al. 2024. A new optical practice as an effective alternative to insecticides for controlling highly resistant thrips. Tropical Plants 3:e021 doi: 10.48130/tp-0024-0014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Ali A, Rashid MA, Huang QY, Lei CL. 2016. Effect of UV-A radiation as an environmental stress on the development, longevity, and reproduction of the oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23(17):17002−17007 doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6865-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Antignus Y, Mor N, Joseph BR, Lapidot M, Cohen S. 1996. Ultraviolet-absorbing plastic sheets protect crops from insect pests and from virus diseases vectored by insects. Environmental Entomology 25(5):919−924 doi: 10.1093/ee/25.5.919

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Wang L, Chen J, Zhao C, Jin H, Li F, et al. 2023. Production and quality of Hami melon (Cucumis melo var. reticulatus) and pest population of Thrips palmi in UV-blocking film greenhouses. Pest management science 79:4011−17 doi: 10.1002/ps.7597

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Briscoe AD. 2008. Reconstructing the ancestral butterfly eye: focus on the opsins. Journal of Experimental Biology 211:1805−13 doi: 10.1242/jeb.013045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Shi L, Qiu L, Jiang Z, Xie Z, Dong M, et al. 2023. The influences of green light on locomotion, growth and reproduction in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens. Pest management science 79(10):4100−12 doi: 10.1002/ps.7612

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Jiang Y, Huang Q, Wei G, Gong Z, Li T, et al. 2023. Effects of yellow and green light stress on emergence, feeding and mating of Anomala corpulenta Motschulsky and Holotrichia parallela Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 16:81−87 doi: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20231601.7639

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Wang Y, Chang Y, Zhang S, Jiang X, Yang B, et al. 2022. Comparison of phototactic behavior between two migratory pests, Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects 13(10):917 doi: 10.3390/insects13100917

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Li W, Quan L, Dong Y, Yao Q, Xu S, et al. 2021. Effects of white led light on reproduction of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) and its field application. Journal of Fruit Science 38(8):1349−58 doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20210182

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Yun CN, Maeng IS, Yang SH, Hwang UJ, Kim KN, et al. 2023. Evaluating the phototactic behavior responses of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, to some different wavelength LED lights in laboratory and field. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 26(3):102080 doi: 10.1016/j.aspen.2023.102080

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Weber DC, Morrison WR, Khrimian A, Rice KB, Leskey TC, et al. 2017. Chemical ecology of Halyomorpha halys: discoveries and applications. Journal of Pest Science 90:989−1008 doi: 10.1007/s10340-017-0876-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] You S, You M, Niu D. 2024. Identification of floral volatiles from Fagopyrum esculentum that attract Cotesia vestalis with potentially better biocontrol efficacy against Plutella xylostella. Pest management science 80:763−75 doi: 10.1002/ps.7808

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Farooq M, Jabran K, Cheema ZA, Wahid A, Siddique KHM. 2011. The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management. Pest Management Science 67(5):493−506 doi: 10.1002/ps.2091

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Rizvi SAH, George J, Reddy GVP, Zeng X, Guerrero A. 2021. Latest developments in insect sex pheromone research and its application in agricultural pest management. Insects 12(6):484 doi: 10.3390/insects12060484

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Liu P, Qin Z, Feng M, Zhang L, Huang X, et al. 2020. The male-produced aggregation pheromone of the bean flower thrips Megalurothrips usitatus in China: identification and attraction of conspecifics in the laboratory and field. Pest management science 76(9):2986−93 doi: 10.1002/ps.5844

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Xiu C, Pan H, Zhang F, Luo Z, Bian L, et al. 2024. Identification of aggregation pheromones released by the stick tea thrips (Dendrothrips minowai) larvae and their application for controlling thrips in tea plantations. Pest management science 80(6):2528−38

    Google Scholar

    [39] Nakashima Y, Ida TY, Powell W, Pickett JA, Birkett MA, et al. 2016. Field evaluation of synthetic aphid sex pheromone in enhancing suppression of aphid abundance by their natural enemies. BioControl 61:485−496 doi: 10.1007/s10526-016-9734-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Tembo Y, Mkindi AG, Mkenda PA, Mpumi N, Mwanauta R, et al. 2018. Pesticidal plant extracts improve yield and reduce insect pests on legume crops without harming beneficial arthropods. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1425 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Ninkovic V, Glinwood R, Ünlü AG, Ganji S, Unelius CR. 2021. Effects of methyl salicylate on host plant acceptance and feeding by the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:710268 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.710268

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Balaško MK, Neral K, Nađ B, Bažok R, Drmić Z, et al. 2021. Azadirachtin efficacy in Colorado potato beetle and western flower thrips control. Romanian Agricultural Research 38:401−10 doi: 10.59665/rar3842

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] McGuire AV, Northfield TD. 2020. Tropical Occurrence and Agricultural Importance of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4:6 doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Uma Devi K, Padmavathi J, Uma Maheswara Rao C, Khan AAP, Mohan MC. 2008. A study of host specificity in the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales, Clavicipitaceae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 18:975−89 doi: 10.1080/09583150802450451

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Sharma A, Sharma S, Yadav PK. 2023. Entomopathogenic fungi and their relevance in sustainable agriculture: a review. Cogent Food & Agriculture 9(1):2180857 doi: 10.1080/23311932.2023.2180857

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Yang B, Du C, Ali S, Wu J. 2020. Molecular characterization and virulence of fungal isolates against the bean flower thrips, Megalurothrips usitatus Bagnall (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 30:1−8 doi: 10.1186/s41938-020-0205-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Swathy K, Parmar MK, Vivekanandhan P. 2024. Biocontrol efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana conidia against agricultural insect pests. Environmental Quality Management 34(1):e22174 doi: 10.1002/tqem.22174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Akutse KS, Khamis FM, Ambele FC, Kimemia JW, Ekesi S, et al. 2020. Combining insect pathogenic fungi and a pheromone trap for sustainable management of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 177:107477 doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2020.107477

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Shehzad M, Tariq M, Mukhtar T, Gulzar A. 2021. On the virulence of the entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae (Ascomycota: Hypocreales), against the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 31(1):86 doi: 10.1186/s41938-020-00345-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Sumalatha BV, Selvaraj K, Poornesha B, Ramanujam B. 2020. Pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungus Isaria fumosorosea on rugose spiralling whitefly Aleurodicus rugioperculatus and its effect on parasitoid Encarsia guadeloupae. Biocontrol Science and Technology 30:1150−61 doi: 10.1080/09583157.2020.1797632

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Chen X, Sun L, Zhang YX, Zhao LL, Lin JZ. 2020. Differing infection of Isaria fumosorosea (Wize) Brown & Smith in an aphid (Myzus persicae [Sulzer]) and predatory mite (Neoseiulus cucumeris [Oudemans]) under a scanning electron microscope. Systematic and Applied Acarology 25:2263−72 doi: 10.11158/saa.25.12.9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Liu Z, Liu FF, Li H, Zhang WT, Wang Q, et al. 2022. Virulence of the bio-control fungus Purpureocillium lilacinum against Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 115:462−73 doi: 10.1093/jee/toab270

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Panyasiri C, Supothina S, Veeranondha S, Chanthaket R, Boonruangprapa T, et al. 2022. Control efficacy of entomopathogenic fungus Purpureocillium lilacinum against chili thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis) on Chili Plant. Insects 13(8):684 doi: 10.3390/insects13080684

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Poveda J. 2021. Trichoderma as biocontrol agent against pests: New uses for a mycoparasite. Biological Control 159:104634 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104634

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Xia M, Munir S, Li Y, Ahmed A, He P, et al. 2024. Bacillus subtilis YZ-1 surfactins are involved in effective toxicity against agricultural pests. Pest management science 80(2):333−40 doi: 10.1002/ps.7759

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Komagata Y, Sekine T, Oe T, Kakui S, Yamanaka S. 2024. Simultaneous use of Beauveria bassiana and Bacillus subtilis-based biopesticides contributed to dual control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and tomato powdery mildew without antagonistic interactions. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 34(1):18 doi: 10.1186/s41938-024-00782-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Gupta R, Keppanan R, Leibman-Markus M, Matveev S, Rav-David D, et al. 2024. Bacillus thuringiensis promotes systemic immunity in tomato, controlling pests and pathogens and promoting yield. Food Security 16:675−90 doi: 10.1007/s12571-024-01441-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Lu Y, Wu K, Jiang Y, Guo Y, Desneux N. 2012. Widespread adoption of Bt cotton and insecticide decrease promotes biocontrol services. Nature 487:362−65 doi: 10.1038/nature11153

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Amarathunga DC, Parry H, Grundy J, Dorin A. 2024. A predator–prey population dynamics simulation for biological control of Frankliniella occidentalis (Western Flower Thrips) by Orius laevigatus in strawberry plants. Biological Control 188:105409 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105409

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Mouratidis A, de Lima AP, Dicke M, Messelink GJ. 2022. Predator-prey interactions and life history of Orius laevigatus and O. majusculus feeding on flower and leaf-inhabiting thrips. Biological Control 172:104954 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.104954

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Chi Y, Yu C, Feng M, Shu K, Zhu Y, et al. 2024. Effects of field releases of Neoseiulus barkeri on Megalurothrips usitatus abundance and arthropod diversity. Scientific Reports 14(1):14247 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64740-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Summerfield A, Buitenhuis R, Jandricic S, Scott-Dupree CD. 2024. Laboratory investigations on the potential efficacy of biological control agents on two thrips species, onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and Western Flower Thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande)). Insects 15(6):400 doi: 10.3390/insects15060400

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Dalir S, Hajiqanbar H, Fathipour Y, Khanamani M. 2021. A comprehensive picture of foraging strategies of Neoseiulus cucumeris and Amblyseius swirskii on western flower thrips. Pest management science 77(12):5418−29 doi: 10.1002/ps.6581

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Mahendran P, Radhakrishnan B. 2019. Franklinothrips vespiformis Crawford (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae), a potential predator of the tea thrips, Scirtothrips bispinosus Bagnall in south Indian tea plantations. Entomon 44:49−56 doi: 10.33307/entomon.v44i1.425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Kumar V, Kakkar G, McKenzie CL, Seal DR, Osborne LS. 2013. An overview of chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) biology, distribution and management. In Weed and pest control-conventional and new challenges, eds. Soloneski S, Larramendy M. UK: IntechOpen. pp. 53−77 doi: 10.5772/55045
    [66] Stopar K, Trdan S, Bartol T. 2020. Thrips and natural enemies through text data mining and visualization. Plant Protection Science 57(1):47−58 doi: 10.17221/34/2020-PPS

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Yang L , Shao Y , Li F , Chen DX , Li FY, et al. 2021. Advances on biological control of thrips pests. Chinese Journal of Biological Control 37(3):393−405 doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.03.033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Nyasani JO, Meyhöfer R, Subramanian S, Poehling HM. 2013. Seasonal abundance of western flower thrips and its natural enemies in different French bean agroecosystems in Kenya. Journal of Pest Science 86:515−23 doi: 10.1007/s10340-013-0491-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Loomans AJM. 2006. Exploration for hymenopterous parasitoids of thrips. Bulletin of Insectology 59:69−83

    Google Scholar

    [70] Cox PD, Matthews L, Jacobson RJ, Cannon R, MacLeod A, et al. 2006. Potential for the use of biological agents for the control of Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) outbreaks. Biocontrol Science and Technology 16:871−91 doi: 10.1080/09583150600827728

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Manandhar R, Wright MG. 2015. Enhancing biological control of corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea and thrips through habitat management and inundative release of Trichogramma pretiosum in corn cropping systems. Biological Control 89:84−90 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Jyothi Sara J. 2014. Biotic agents for the management of American serpentine leaf miner, Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Thesis. Kerala Agricultural University (KAU), Vellanikkara, India. pp. 1−188
    [73] Weintraub PG, Scheffer SJ, Visser D, Valladares G, Soares Correa A, et al. 2017. The invasive Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae): understanding its pest status and management globally. Journal of Insect Science 17(1):28 doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iew121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Ridland PM, Umina PA, Pirtle EI, Hoffmann AA. 2020. Potential for biological control of the vegetable leafminer, Liriomyza sativae (Diptera: Agromyzidae), in Australia with parasitoid wasps. Austral Entomology 59:16−36 doi: 10.1111/aen.12444

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Ho TTG, Ueno T. 2002. Biology of Hemiptarsenus varicornis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a parasitoid wasp of the leafminer Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University 47:45−54 doi: 10.5109/24458

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Cheng XQ, Cao FQ, Zhang YB, Guo JY, Wan FH, et al. 2017. Life history and life table of the host-feeding parasitoid Hemiptarsenus varicornis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 52:1−7 doi: 10.1007/s13355-017-0479-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Xuan JL, Liu WX, Zhang YB, Cheng XQ, Guo JY, et al. 2018. Interactions between Diglyphus isaea and Neochrysocharis formosa (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), two parasitoids of agromyzid leafminers. Biological Control 126(0):45−52 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.07.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Foba CN, Lagat ZO, Gitonga LM, Akutse KS, Fiaboe KKM. 2015. Interaction between Phaedrotoma scabriventris nixon and Opius dissitus muesebeck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): endoparasitoids of liriomyza leafminer. African Entomology 23:120−31 doi: 10.4001/003.023.0110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Du SJ, Ye FY, Xu SY, Wan WJ, Guo J, et al. 2023. Thelytokous Diglyphus wani: a more promising biological control agent against agromyzid leafminers than its arrhenotokous counterpart. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 22(12):3731−43 doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2023.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Xing Z, Zhang L, Wu S, Yi H, Gao Y, et al. 2017. Niche comparison among two invasive leafminer species and their parasitoid Opius biroi: implications for competitive displacement. Scientific Reports 7:4246 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04562-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Wang T, Zhang P, Ma C, Yasir Ali M, Gao G, et al. 2021. Is Orius sauteri poppius a promising biological control agent for walnut aphids? An assessment from the laboratory to field. Insects 12(1):25 doi: 10.3390/insects12010025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Lillo Is, Perez-Bañón C, Rojo S. 2021. Life cycle, population parameters, and predation rate of the hover fly Eupeodes corollae fed on the aphid Myzus persicae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 169:1027−38 doi: 10.1111/eea.13090

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Pekas A, De Smedt L, Verachtert N, Boonen S. 2023. The brown lacewing Micromus angulatus: a new predator for the augmentative biological control of aphids. Biological Control 186:105342 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105342

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Delgado-Ramírez CS, Salas-Araiza MD, Martínez-Jaime OA, Guzmán-Mendoza R, Flores-Mejia S. 2019. Predation capability of Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) feeding of Melanaphis sacchari (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Florida Entomologist 102(1):24−28 doi: 10.1653/024.102.0104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Mohammed AA. 2018. Lecanicillium muscarium and Adalia bipunctata combination for the control of black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. BioControl 63:277−87 doi: 10.1007/s10526-018-9868-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Boulanger FX, Jandricic S, Bolckmans K, Wäckers FL, Pekas A. 2019. Optimizing aphid biocontrol with the predator Aphidoletes aphidimyza, based on biology and ecology. Pest management science 75:1479−93 doi: 10.1002/ps.5270

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Fidelis EG, das Graças do Carmo D, Santos AA, de Sá Farias E, da Silva RS, et al. 2018. Coccinellidae, syrphidae and Aphidoletes are key mortality factors for Myzus persicae in tropical regions: A case study on cabbage crops. Crop Protection 112:288−94 doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Aparicio Y, Riudavets J, Gabarra R, Agustí N, Rodríguez-Gasol N, et al. 2021. Can Insectary plants enhance the presence of natural enemies of the green peach aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Mediterranean Peach Orchards? Journal of Economic Entomology 114(2):784−93 doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa298

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Woolley VC, Tembo YLB, Ndakidemi B, Obanyi JN, Arnold SEJ, et al. 2021. The diversity of aphid parasitoids in East Africa and implications for biological control. Pest Management Science 78(3):1109−16 doi: 10.1002/ps.6723

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Alvarez-Baca JK, Alfaro-Tapia A, Lavandero B, Le Lann C, Van Baaren J. 2020. Suitability and profitability of a cereal aphid for the Parasitoid Aphidius platensis in the context of conservation biological control of Myzus persicae in orchards. Insects 11(6):381 doi: 10.3390/insects11060381

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Wang SY, Wang BL, Yan GL, Liu YH, Zhang DY, et al. 2020. Temperature-dependent demographic characteristics and control potential of Aphelinus asychis reared from Sitobion avenae as a biological control agent for Myzus persicae on chili peppers. Insects 11(8):475 doi: 10.3390/insects11080475

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Lahiri S, Ni X, Buntin GD, Toews MD. 2020. Parasitism of Melanaphis sacchari (Hemiptera: Aphididae) by Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in the greenhouse and field. Journal of Entomological Science 55:14−24 doi: 10.18474/0749-8004-55.1.14

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Di N, Zhu Z, Harwood JD, Xu Z, Wang S, et al. 2022. Fitness of Frankliniella occidentalis and Bemisia tabaci on three plant species pre-inoculated by Orius sauteri. Journal of Pest Science 95:1531−41 doi: 10.1007/s10340-022-01543-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Cardoso AC, Marcossi Í, Fonseca MM, Kalile MO, Francesco LS, et al. 2025. A predatory mite as potential biological control agent of Bemisia tabaci on tomato plants. Journal of Pest Science 98:277−89 doi: 10.1007/s10340-024-01809-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Han GD, Su J, Zhang K, Chen J, Zhang JP. 2020. The predatory mite Neoseiulus bicaudus (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae), a promising biocontrol agent of whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 25:2273−85 doi: 10.11158/saa.25.12.10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Canassa VF, Marchi-Werle L, Schlick-Souza EC, Fernandes da Silva I, Lopes Baldin EL. 2024. Exploring the potential of Delphastus davidsoni (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the biological control of Bemisia tabaci MEAM 1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Florida Entomologist 107:20240040 doi: 10.1515/flaent-2024-0040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Rehman H. 2020. Use of Chrysoperla carnea larvae to control whitefly (Aleyrodidea: Hemiptera) on tomato plant in greenhouse. Pure and Applied Biology 9(4):2128−37 doi: 10.19045/bspab.2020.90227

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Barbosa MFC, Poletti M, Poletti EC. 2019. Functional response of Amblyseius tamatavensis Blommers (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) to eggs of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on five host plants. Biological Control 138:104030 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Kumar V, Mehra L, McKenzie CL, Osborne LS. 2020. Functional response and prey stage preference of Delphastus catalinae and D. pallidus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 30:581−91 doi: 10.1080/09583157.2020.1749833

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Vandervoet TF, Ellsworth PC, Carrière Y, Naranjo SE. 2018. Quantifying conservation biological control for management of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in cotton. Journal of Economic Entomology 111(3):1056−68 doi: 10.1093/jee/toy049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Moerkens R, Janssen D, Brenard N, Reybroeck E, del Mar Tellez M, et al. 2020. Simplified modelling enhances biocontrol decision making in tomato greenhouses for three important pest species. Journal of Pest Science 94(2):285−95 doi: 10.1007/s10340-020-01256-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Yang S, Dou W, Li M, Wang Z, Chen G, et al. 2022. Flowering agricultural landscapes enhance parasitoid biological control to Bemisia tabaci on tomato in south China. PLOS ONE 1(8):e0272314 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272314

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Ou D, Ren LM, Liu Y, Ali S, Wang XM, et al. 2019. Compatibility and efficacy of the Parasitoid Eretmocerus hayati and the entomopathogenic fungus Cordyceps javanica for biological control of whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Insects 10(12):425 doi: 10.3390/insects10120425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Demers C, Dumont F, Jandricic S, McCreary C, Labbé RM. 2024. Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), sweet potato whitefly / Aleurode du tabac and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood), greenhouse whitefly / Aleurode des serres (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). In Biological Control Programmes in Canada, 2013−2023, eds. Vankosky MA, Martel V. Canada: CAB International. pp.143−55 doi: 10.1079/9781800623279.0014
    [105] Tuan SJ, Yeh CC, Atlihan R, Chi H. 2016. Linking life table and predation Rate for biological control: a comparative study of Eocanthecona furcellata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) fed on Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 109:13−24 doi: 10.1093/jee/tov265

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Zhang P, Zhou Y, Qin D, Chen J, Zhang Z. 2022. Metabolic changes in larvae of predator Chrysopa sinica fed on azadirachtin-treated Plutella xylostella Larvae. Metabolites 12(2):158 doi: 10.3390/metabo12020158

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Yuliadhi KA, Supartha IW, Wijaya IN, Pudjianto P, Nurmansyah A, et al. 2021. The preference and functional response of Sycanus aurantiacus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae) on three prey types in laboratory conditions. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity 22(12):5562−67 doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d221252

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Ur Rehman S, Jiang X, Saleem M, Zhou X, Chen B, et al. 2024. Demography and predatory potential of Orius strigicollis on eggs of Plutella xylostella at two temperatures. PeerJ 12:e18044 doi: 10.7717/peerj.18044

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Silva-Torres CSA, Pontes IVAF, Torres JB, Barros R. 2010. New records of natural enemies of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Pernambuco, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 39(5):835−38 doi: 10.1590/s1519-566x2010000500028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Nam H, Kwon M, Ramasamy S, Kim J. 2022. Identification of two diamondback moth parasitoids, Diadegma fenestrale and Diadegma semiclausum, using LAMP for application in biological control. Horticulturae 8(5):366 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8050366

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Munir S. 2019. Contributions to the biology of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), and its larval parasitoid Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Thesis. University of Alberta, US. pp. 1−185
    [112] Cock C, Mason PG, Haye T, Cappuccino N. 2021. Determining the host range of Diadromus collaris (Gravenhorst) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a candidate biological control agent for diamondback moth Plutella xylostella linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Canada. Biological Control 161:104705 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104705

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113] Zolfagharian M, Saeedizadeh A, Abbasipour H. 2016. Efficacy of two entomopathogenic nematode species as potential biocontrol agents against the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella(L.). Journal of Biological Control 30:78−83 doi: 10.18641/jbc/30/2/88697

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Liu S, Wang X, Guo S, He J, Shi Z. 2000. Seasonal abundance of the parasitoid complex associated with the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Hangzhou, China. Bulletin of Entomological Research 90(3):221−31 doi: 10.1017/S0007485300000341

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Jaworski CC, Thomine E, Rusch A, Lavoir AV, Wang S, et al. 2023. Crop diversification to promote arthropod pest management: a review. Agriculture Communications 1:100004 doi: 10.1016/j.agrcom.2023.100004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Perrot T, Rusch A, Gaba S, Bretagnolle V. 2023. Both long-term grasslands and crop diversity are needed to limit pest and weed infestations in agricultural landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(49):e2300861120 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300861120

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Sarkar SC, Wang E, Wu S, Lei Z. 2018. Application of trap cropping as companion plants for the management of agricultural pests: a review. Insects 9(4):128 doi: 10.3390/insects9040128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] Beaumelle L, Auriol A, Grasset M, Pavy A, Thiéry D, et al. 2021. Benefits of increased cover crop diversity for predators and biological pest control depend on the landscape context. Ecological Solutions and Evidence 2(3):e12086 doi: 10.1002/2688-8319.12086

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Reddy GVP, Shrestha G, Sharma A. 2019. Special issue on the application of trap and cover crops in insect pest management. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 112:293−94 doi: 10.1093/aesa/saz017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Liu Z, Wang F, Zhang Y, Temir E, Zhou X, et al. 2024. Combination of functional plants conserves predators, repels pests, and enhances biological control of Aphis spiraecola in apple orchards. Biological Control 192:105512 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105512

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121] Khan ZR, James DG, Midega CAO, Pickett JA. 2008. Chemical ecology and conservation biological control. Biological Control 45(2):210−24 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.11.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122] Braman SK, Westerfield B. 2020. Influence of trap crops on tomato and squash insect pests. Journal of Entomological Science 55:578−83 doi: 10.18474/0749-8004-55.4.578

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Cardim Ferreira Lima M, Damascena de Almeida Leandro ME, Valero C, Pereira Coronel LC, Gonçalves Bazzo CO. 2020. Automatic detection and monitoring of insect pests—a review. Agriculture 10(5):161 doi: 10.3390/agriculture10050161

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124] Yang S, Yang X, Mo J. 2018. The application of unmanned aircraft systems to plant protection in China. Precision agriculture 19:278−92 doi: 10.1007/s11119-017-9516-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Chen CJ, Li YS, Tai CY, Chen YC, Huang YM. 2022. Pest incidence forecasting based on Internet of things and long short-term memory network. Applied Soft Computing 124:108895 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108895

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Zhou W, Arcot Y, Medina RF, Bernal J, Cisneros-Zevallos L, et al. 2024. Integrated pest management: an update on the sustainability approach to crop protection. ACS Omega 9(40):41130−47 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06628

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Murtiningsih R, Kirana R, Hermanto C. 2021. Evaluation of chili accessions for resistance against Thrips sp. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 653:012077 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/653/1/012077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Yu W, He J, Wu J, Xu Z, Lai F, et al. 2024. Resistance to planthoppers and southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus in rice germplasms. Plant Disease 108:2321−029 doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-23-2025-RE

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] Li C, Wang J, Ling F, You A. 2023. Application and Development of Bt Insect Resistance Genes in Rice Breeding. Sustainability 15(12):9779 doi: 10.3390/su15129779

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Karlsson Green K, Stenberg JA, Lankinen Å. 2020. Making sense of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in the light of evolution. Evolutionary Applications 13:1791−805 doi: 10.1111/eva.13067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Han P, Rodriguez-Saona C, Zalucki MP, Liu SS, Desneux N. 2024. A theoretical framework to improve the adoption of green Integrated Pest Management tactics. Communications Biology 7(1):337 doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06027-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132] Ma CS, Wang BX, Wang XJ, Lin QC, Zhang W, et al. 2025. Crop pest responses to global changes in climate and land management. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 6:264−83 doi: 10.1038/s43017-025-00652-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133] Francis JR. 2019. Biocontrol potential and genetic diversity of Metarhizium anisopliae lineage in agricultural habitats. Journal of Applied Microbiology 127(2):556−64 doi: 10.1111/jam.14328

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [134] Tchuenga Seutchueng TG, Tchindjang M, Carine Temegne N, Martial Kamtchoum S, Kenfack Fogang P. 2022. Efects of rainfall variability on the occurrence of crop pests at foumbot subdivision, west region of Cameroon. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science 34:110−24 doi: 10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i1030929

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhang S, Jin H, Liu K, Chen Q, Li F, et al. 2025. Sustainable development of Hainan's melon and vegetable industry: new strategies for pest control. Tropical Plants 4: e032 doi: 10.48130/tp-0025-0023
    Zhang S, Jin H, Liu K, Chen Q, Li F, et al. 2025. Sustainable development of Hainan's melon and vegetable industry: new strategies for pest control. Tropical Plants 4: e032 doi: 10.48130/tp-0025-0023

Figures(3)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(1364) PDF downloads(554)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Sustainable development of Hainan's melon and vegetable industry: new strategies for pest control

Tropical Plants  4 Article number: e032  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Various crops can be cultivated in Hainan due to its unique climatic conditions, which also lead to overlapping generations and rapid reproduction of pests, posing a serious threat to agricultural production. Traditional chemical control methods have shown substantial limitations in their effectiveness and ecological safety, necessitating a shift toward green, safe, and effective integrated pest management (IPM) measures. This paper explores the current status and strategies for pest control in Hainan's melon and vegetable industry by reviewing various green control technologies, including physical control, physicochemical attraction, biological control, and ecological regulation. Additionally, it discusses the application of technological methods in modern pest management, particularly the importance of the Internet of Things and drone technology in real-time monitoring and data analysis. Finally, this paper emphasizes the necessity of IPM, advocating for a combination of various control methods, as well as rational crop layout and ecological regulation, to enhance the sustainability of agriculture, with the hope of providing strong technical support and assurance for Hainan's melon and vegetable industry.

    • Hainan Province is located in the tropics. It is characterized by high average temperatures and abundant water, making it suitable for the cultivation of various crops. It plays a crucial role in China's 'vegetable basket' initiative. Given the favorable temperature and humidity in the province, pests often experience overlapping generations without undergoing winter dormancy, leading to rapid population growth that is difficult to manage. In most areas, pest control primarily relies on chemical pesticides. Tropical agricultural pests have developed complex resistance mechanisms as a result of long-term chemical pesticide pressure, which has become a central obstacle to the adoption of green prevention and control technologies. Resistance mainly stems from the following: amino acid mutations at target sites that reduce pesticide binding ability; enhanced detoxification metabolism, such as overexpression of the CYP450 gene family to accelerate pesticide degradation, GSTs that catalyze the conjugation of electrophilic pesticides with glutathione to promote the efflux of pesticides, and hydrolytic destruction of the structures of organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides by CarE; and strengthened epidermal barrier to penetration, which also significantly contributes to the resistance phenotypes. This situation also leads to issues, such as pesticide residue levels that exceed safety limits and environmental pollution, considerably affecting the quality and safety of agricultural products, ecological security, and the sustainable development of agriculture in Hainan.

      Given the unique tropical climate and limited planting areas in Hainan, pest management for major crop pests in Hainan differs from that in other regions. Traditional chemical control methods often fail to meet pest management demands. Therefore, a pressing need exists to adopt green, safe, and effective integrated pest management (IPM) measures, effectively combining various control strategies to ensure the safety of agricultural production.

      In recent years, extensive research has been conducted domestically and internationally in the fields of biological control, physical control, and ecological regulation, exploring efficient and green technological methods. For example, using natural enemy insects for biological control, employing physical barriers or trapping devices, and optimizing crop layouts through diversified planting have all been proven effective in controlling pest outbreaks. These measures not only enhance the pest resistance of crops but also promote ecological balance, providing beneficial technical support for the sustainable development of Hainan's melon and vegetable industry.

      This paper integrates these green technologies and reviews a green control technology system suitable for the entire growth period of melons and vegetables in Hainan. By addressing pest challenges, it also lays a foundation for the promotion and development of ecological agriculture.

    • The main pests affecting melon and vegetable cultivation in Hainan include thrips, Leafminer fly, aphids, Whitefly, and the Diamondback moth. The specific damage caused by these pests and the primary control agents currently used for their control are detailed in Table 1. These pests are characterized by prolonged periods of harm, widespread occurrence, and severe damage. If effective control measures are not implemented, they can substantially affect the yield and quality of melons and vegetables.

      Table 1.  Main pests of Hainan's melon and vegetable industry and their modes of damage.

      Name Order Family Main affected crops Mode of damage Field pesticides Ref.
      Thrips Thysanoptera Thripidae Cowpeas, watermelon, cantaloupe, eggplant, cucumber The direct feeding of these pests on flowers, buds, and other tender tissues cause damage to growth points. Thrips also transmit various viruses. Affected plant tissues develop galls, influencing normal development and potentially leading to plant death. λ-Cyhalothrin, acetamiprid, spinetoram, abamectin [14]
      Leafminer fly Diptera Agromyzidae Cowpeas, watermelon, cucumber, tomato Larvae burrow inside leaves to feed and lay eggs. This behavior not only affects leaf photosynthesis, it can also lead to leaf wilting and dropping, severely affecting plant growth and yield. Thiamethoxam, cyantraniliprole, abamectin, λ-cyhalothrin [58]
      Aphids Hemiptera Aphididae Chili, cabbage, radish, eggplant Nymphs and adults damage tender leaves and flower buds, causing leaf curling and stunting new growth. In severe cases, such damage can lead to leaf and fruit drop. The honeydew secreted by aphids can result in sooty mold, contaminating fruit surfaces and reducing fruit quality, leading to economic losses. Aphids also transmit various viruses, such as cucumber mosaic virus and pepper mottle virus. λ-Cyhalothrin, abamectin, thiamethoxam, pyriproxyfen
      [912]
      Whitefly Hemiptera Aleyrodidae Cucumber, cantaloupe, eggplant, chili Aleyrodidae feed by piercing and sucking plant sap, causing leaf yellowing and wilting and promoting infection by pathogens. They are also vectors for various viruses, particularly cucumber mosaic virus. Dinotefuran, abamectin, pyriproxyfen,
      λ-cyhalothrin
      [1316]
      Diamondback moth Lepidoptera Plutellidae Cabbage, radish, bok choy, lettuce Larvae feed on leaves, with younger larvae chewing leaf tissue and leaving the epidermis intact, creating transparent spots. Older larvae can create holes or notches in leaves, and in severe cases, only the leaf veins remain, resulting in a net-like appearance. Chlorantraniliprole, chlorfenapyr, indoxacarb, spinetoram [1719]

      Traditional pest management primarily relies on chemical insecticides. However, the widespread use of these insecticides not only has limited effectiveness against target pests, but it can also cause serious harm to the ecosystem.

      Traditional chemical pesticide control methods have shown their limitations, which include not only the presence of pesticide residues and development of resistance but also the destruction of the ecological environment and safety and quality of agricultural products. Therefore, an urgent need exists for selective pest control technologies to align with IPM strategies. Implementing simple, safe, and convenient green control technologies during crop cultivation is particularly important to reduce the use of chemical pesticides and avoid the '3R' issues.

    • Physical control primarily involves using physical means to manage and prevent pest infestations. They can be categorized into passive control (such as trench digging, fencing, and organic mulching) and active control (utilizing mechanical methods, lighting, and sensory cues)[20]. Commonly employed methods include hanging sticky traps in the field and using insect traps to capture pests directly, employing ground covers and insect nets for physical isolation, or fruit bagging techniques.

      Exploiting the visual characteristics of insects has become an effective nonchemical control method in the field of agricultural pest management. Different wavelengths of light remarkably affect the growth, development, and behavior of insects, thus providing a theoretical foundation for developing new pest control technologies[21]. Ultraviolet light has a remarkable effect on the visual systems of many insect species. The results of Jin et al.[22] indicated that a lack of UV light reduced the emergence and adult survival rates and environmental and host selection behaviors of common thrips, suggesting that manipulating light conditions can effectively disrupt insect growth and reproduction, thus achieving pest control. Moreover, different wavelengths of light directly influence insect behavioral choices. Research indicates that light variations not only affect insect behavioral development but also correlate with their physiological states. Li et al.[23] demonstrated that ultraviolet light can affect the vision of thrips. By artificially regulating UV light flux, the visual responses and biological characteristics, such as growth and development, of pests can be effectively influenced, thereby achieving pest management objectives. Ali et al.[24] showed that UV radiation had significant effects on survival, reproduction, all developmental stages, and F1 generation of Mythimna separata, including increased larval mortality, decreased adult longevity, altered fecundity, and egg-laying rate.

      Antignus et al.[25] found that covering UV-absorbing plastic films effectively protect crops from whiteflies, thrips, and aphids, and reduces the spread of viral diseases, the principle of which is related to influencing the visual behavior of pests to UV light. Jin et al.[22], Wang et al.[26], and others have developed a new type of energy conversion film based on studies on the visual characteristics of insects, specifically those targeting the sensitivity of major tropical melon and vegetable pests, such as common thrips and Liriomyza, to different light wavelengths. This technology regulates pest populations by manipulating phototactic behaviors to disrupt host location, mating, and reproductive development. Field applications showed reduced pesticide use in cowpea cultivation cycles under film implementation compared with control groups, with successful deployment in protected crops including cowpeas and cantaloupes.

      Light trapping controls pests through phototropism induced by the stimulation of visual organs. The compound eyes of pests contain light-sensitive cells that can receive light stimuli and transmit signals to the central nervous system, triggering phototropic behavior in insects[27]. Light traps are currently used for monitoring and managing pest populations and play a crucial role in physical pest control, forming an important component of IPM.

      Shi et al.[28] demonstrated that hanging insect traps in agricultural fields effectively attracts and controls pest numbers. The use of green light at night induced unusual movement patterns in Nilaparvata lugens and considerably affected gene expression related to epidermal development, proving that green light treatment can markedly influence the movement, growth, and development of this pest. Jiang et al.[29] experimentally demonstrated that yellow and green light stress remarkably altered the rhythms of the beetles Anomala corpulenta Motschulsky and Holotrichia parallela Motschulsky, resulting in a notable reduction in their occurrence, feeding, and mating activities. Wang et al.[30] compared the phototropic behaviors of two migratory pests, namely, Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera frugiperda, and discovered that the average phototropic rate of S. frugiperda was highest under blue light, whereas H. armigera showed the greatest preference for ultraviolet light. The phototropic rates of both moths increased with rising light intensity. Li et al.[31] found that exposure to white light at night inhibited the behavior of Conopomorpha sinensis, with its inhibitory effect increasing with light intensity, drastically reducing the number of adults and egg-laying on fruits and thereby decreasing damage. Yun et al.[32] discovered that the diamondback moth exhibits strong phototropism to ultraviolet light at 380 nm, with the highest attraction rate reaching 92.4%, indicating that ultraviolet light can be used effectively for trapping this pest. Figure 1 presents a schematic diagram of integrated pest management, which is implemented through the integrated application of different physical pest control measures.

      Figure 1. 

      Schematic of pest physical prevention and control.

    • Physicochemical inducement has become a key means of integrated pest management by its advantages of environmental protection, high efficiency, and high specificity. It mainly covers three categories, namely plant volatiles, insect pheromones, and plant secondary metabolites, which can precisely regulate the behavior and population size of pests through diversified action mechanisms and provide strong support for the development of green agriculture.

      Plant volatiles play a dual-role in pest management, attracting pests for trapping and attracting natural enemies for biological control. Weber et al.[33] proposed that volatile compounds from plants can significantly reduce pest populations. You et al.[34] identified 1,2-diethylbenzene and 1,4-diethylbenzene from the floral volatiles of Fagopyrum esculentum effectively attract the parasitoid insect Cotesia vestalis, thereby controlling the damage caused by Plutella xylostella. Additionally, the volatile oil of Eucalyptus globulus L. has a significant impact on the postembryonic development of the rice stem borer moth during the larval stage and on the adult plumage. Aqueous extracts or volatile oils of various plants have also shown inhibitory effects on pests. For example, 10% of plant extracts mixed into artificial feed increases the absolute mortality rate of Mediterranean solid fly eggs, delays the metamorphosis of first-instar larvae for 2 d, prevents pupae from developing into adults, and reduces the number of pupae by 26%. Water extracts of sorghum, mustard, and sunflower can inhibit the feeding activity of pests, and combinations of sorghum with mulberry or sunflower can control aphids and stinging insects on Brassica plants. An 8% concentration of sorghum aqueous extracts can lead to 62.5% aphid mortality[35].

      Insect pheromones are highly species specific, have low toxicity to mammals, and are environmentally friendly, making them ideal for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) applications[36]. Male thrips produce the aggregation pheromone (2E,6E)-farnesyl acetate. Field studies have shown that synthetic versions of this pheromone can capture 1.5−7 times more thrips than the control group, and the pheromones can persist in the environment for 6 d[37]. D. minowai larvae produce trap pheromones, dodecyl acetate and tetradecyl acetate, which can reduce thrips numbers by 29%−59% in field-treated areas compared to the control group[38]. Nakashima et al.[39] found that aphid pheromones (4aS,7S,7aR)-nepetalactone and (1R,4aS,7S,7aR)-nepetalactol can effectively attract parasitic natural enemy insects of aphids in alfalfa fields, enhancing the defense and control of aphid populations.

      Plant secondary metabolites act through direct toxicity or behavioral modulation. Research has demonstrated that secondary metabolites extracted from Lippia javanica, Tephrosia vogelii, and Tithonia diversifolia can effectively kill pests on leguminous crops while showing low toxicity to other arthropods[40]. Low doses of methyl salicylate can repel wheat aphids and inhibit their feeding behavior[41]. Balaško et al.[42] reported that although neem extracts do not directly kill Colorado potato beetles and thrips, they can reduce pest populations by influencing oviposition and larval feeding. Azadirachta indica L. seed oil acts as a food repellent for both the larvae and adults of the strawberry aphid, and the neemin it contains can inhibit a wide range of insects, including the green cicada and whitefly. Ethanol extracts of the leaves of the Schinus molle L. at concentrations of 4.3% and 4.7% (w/v) can kill more than 97% of adult elm leaf beetles, and its aqueous extract can completely inhibit the feeding activity of this pest[35].

      In conclusion, the utilization of different types of metabolites and pheromones in physicochemical inducement provides effective and environmentally friendly strategies for pest management. These findings further support the potential of using plant volatiles, insect pheromones, and plant secondary metabolites in sustainable pest control practices.

    • Biological control is a key strategy for green pest management in agriculture. It primarily utilizes natural enemy insects and other biological agents, such as bacteria and fungi, to suppress pest populations. It is not only an effective method for controlling pests and diseases but also a core pillar of IPM systems. By introducing and protecting natural enemies, the use of chemical pesticides can be reduced while ecological balance is promoted, thereby achieving sustainable agricultural development. As such, biological control holds an irreplaceable position in modern agriculture. Future research should further explore its application potential and mechanisms to enhance its effectiveness and ecological safety.

    • Biocontrol bacteria are an important resource in biological control technology, which utilizes the parasitic, competitive, and toxin-secreting actions of microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, to suppress harmful organisms. They have broad application prospects in tropical agricultural ecosystems, providing effective biological control technologies for green pest management. They can serve as a vital tool in IPM strategies.

      McGuire & Northfield[43] noted that tropical abiotic conditions are often highly conducive to microbial growth, and tropical habitats may be rich in microbial diversity. In tropical and subtropical agricultural ecosystems, the most common insect pathogenic fungi are Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Uma Devi et al.[44] found that B. bassiana effectively controls a variety of pests, including thrips, aphids, S. frugiperda, whiteflies, and H. armigera, demonstrating a diverse and wide host range. Compared with B. bassiana, M. anisopliae has a narrower host range but can still infect over 200 species across seven orders of insects, showing remarkable control efficacy[45]. Yang et al.[46] demonstrated that B. bassiana and M. anisopliae are effective against common thrips and can be employed as green control technologies. Swathy et al.[47] found that treatment with the conidia of B. bassiana resulted in a 100% mortality rate of Halyomorpha halys and Tenebrio molitor within 10 d. Akutse et al.[48] screened 16 strains of M. anisopliae and six strains of B. bassiana and discovered that these 22 strains exhibited extremely high efficacy against S. frugiperda, causing complete mortality within 4 d. Shehzad et al.[49] indicated that spraying B. bassiana and M. anisopliae can effectively kill diamondback moth larvae, achieving a mortality rate of 70%, with B. bassiana demonstrating stronger insecticidal effects than M. anisopliae.

      Different strains of Paecilomyces exhibit some toxicity against whiteflies, thrips, aphids, and termites[45]. Sumalatha et al.[50] conducted pathogenicity studies on Isaria fumosorosea strain Pfu-5, finding that within different concentration ranges, it induced a certain mortality rate in whiteflies. Chen et al.[51] indicated that I. fumosorosea showed high toxicity to aphids while exhibiting low toxicity to predatory mites. Liu et al.[52] performed toxicity assessments using Purpureocillium lilacinum against Myzus persicae and S. frugiperda. P. lilacinum was found to exhibit strong insecticidal activity against M. persicae, causing effective mortality and growth on their surfaces, but had a weak direct lethal effect on S. frugiperda larvae. However, injecting the fungus can considerably increase mortality rates. Panyasiri et al.[53] found that P. lilacinum strain TBRC10638 is a promising biocontrol agent, with its efficacy in field experiments showing no significant difference from that of chemical insecticide treatments, making it a potential substitute for chemical insecticides in controlling Scirtothrips dorsalis. Trichoderma species can directly kill pests through parasitism and the production of insecticidal secondary metabolites; they can also indirectly manage pests by activating plant defense systems and attracting natural enemies[54]. It currently plays a role in the control of root-knot nematodes in cantaloupe.

      The main biocontrol bacteria in common use today are Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus subtilis. Xia et al.[55] demonstrated that B. subtilis YZ-1 exhibits considerable insecticidal activity against agricultural pests, with the concentration of surfactants correlating positively with insecticidal efficacy. Experimental results showed that the YZ-1 strain can cause a mortality rate of 90%–95% in yellow mealworms and diamondback moths. Komagata et al.[56] proved that the simultaneous use of B. bassiana and Bacillus thuringiensis effectively controlled greenhouse whiteflies, with the insecticidal effect of mixed treatments being approximately 1.32 to 1.78 times that of individual applications. In tomato plants, B. thuringiensis can control whiteflies by inducing the immune system and directly inhibiting pest activity, thus reducing damage[57]. Lu et al.[58] found that in Chinese cotton production, genetically modified crops can effectively control H. armigera and reduce the demand for pesticides. Compared with those in conventional crops, the population of aphid pests decreased, whereas the numbers of beneficial insects, such as ladybugs, aphids, and spiders, remarkably increased in transgenic crops. The Vegetable Research Institute of the Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences has utilized a high-efficiency, broad-spectrum BT formulation as a biopesticide to manage major pests in melons and vegetables, resulting in a dramatic reduction in the use of chemical pesticides and notable pest control effectiveness. Table 2 classifies the main biocontrol strains for pests of melon and vegetable crops in Hainan, and also lists the major pests they control as well as precautions for use.

      Table 2.  Correspondence table between the resources of biocontrol strains of common pests of melon and vegetable and pest control in Hainan Province.

      Name Categorization Main pest control Precautions for use
      Beauveria bassiana Fungi Thrips, aphids, whiteflies, cotton bollworms, diamondback moth, fall armyworm, etc. Needs to be used at humidity > 80%, avoid mixing with fungicides.
      Metarhizium anisopliae Thrips, diamondback moth, fall armyworm, etc. Need to work with slow-release dosage forms during rainy season to avoid rain washout.
      Paecilomyces lilacinus Thrips, aphids, whiteflies, root-knot nematodes, etc. It needs to be used in conjunction with organic fertilizers to improve soil bacterial holding capacity.
      Trichoderma species Root-knot nematodes, etc. Avoid mixing with copper preparations, storage should be protected from light and dry.
      Bacillus thuringiensis Bacteria Whiteflies, diamondback moth, etc. Compound with amino-oligosaccharides to increase effectiveness and avoid strong alkaline environments.
      Bacillus subtilis Fall armyworm, whiteflies, diamondback moth, etc. The virulence decreases at high temperatures (> 35 °C), and temperature-resistant strains need to be selected.
    • Hainan, as a tropical island, has a rich diversity of insect resources, creating favorable conditions for the development and utilization of natural enemy insects. Releasing or protecting predatory arthropods for biological control is one of the most successful management practices. Identifying and cultivating appropriate natural enemies for the main pests of different crops has become a green and efficient pest control method.

      Natural enemy insects are diverse and numerous. They are primarily categorized into predatory and parasitic enemies. Predatory natural enemies include predatory bugs, predatory mites, lacewings, and predatory flies, whereas parasitic enemies mainly include parasitoid wasps. Considerable progress has been made in domestic and international research on pest natural enemies.

      Table 3 summarizes the key natural enemy resources related to major pests on melons and vegetables in Hainan in recent years, providing a theoretical foundation for the green control of pests. These studies not only offer empirical support for biological control but also lay a solid foundation for the development of sustainable agriculture.

      Table 3.  List of natural enemy resources for major pests in melon and vegetables in Hainan.

      Pest name Groups Name of natural enemies
      Thrips Predatory natural enemy Orius sauteri[59], Orius laevigatus[60], Orius majusculus[60], Neoseiulus barkeri[61], Orius insidiosus[62], Amblyseius swirskii[62], Steinernema feltiae[62], Neoseiulus cucumeris[63], Franklinothrips vespiformis[64], Scolothrips sexmaculatus[65], Orius niger[66], Orius minutus[66], Orius strigicolli[66], Orius albipennis[66], Scolothrips longicornis[66], Neoseiulus californicus[66], Typhlodromus bagdasarjani[66], Chrysopa sinica[67], Chrysoperla nipponensis[67], Mallada signata[67]
      Parasitic natural enemy Ceranisus menes[68], Ceranisus americensis[69], Megaphragma sp.[70], Trichogramma pretiosum[71], Ceranisus incerta[67], Ceranisus lepidotus[67], Podibius indicus[67]
      Leafminer fly Predatory natural enemy Dolichopus sp.[72], Coenosia attenuata[73], Coenosia humilis[73], Condylostylus similis[73], Drapetis sp.[73]
      Parasitic natural enemy Opius chromatomyiae[73], Opius scabriventris[73], Halticoptera arduine[73], Halticoptera helioponi[73], Gronotoma micromorpha[73], Dacnusa sibirica[74], Hemiptarsenus varicornis[75], Chrysocharis flacilla[76], Diglyphus isaea[77], Neochrysocharis formosa[77], Phaedrotoma scabriventri[78], Cirrospilus acadius[72], C. bievicorpus[72], Aprostocetus sp.[72], Opius dissitus[78], Diglyphus wani[79], Opius biroi[80]
      Aphids Predatory natural enemy Orius sauteri[81], Eupeodes corollae[82], Micromus angulatus[83], Chrysoperla carnea[84], Hippodamia convergens[84], Adalia bipunctata[85], Aphidoletes aphidimyza[86], Coccinella septempunctata[87], Cycloneda sanguinea[87], Eriopis connexa[87], Harmonia axyridis[87], Allograpta exotica[87], Pseudodorus clavatus[87], Ocyptamus gastrostactus[87], Episyrphus balteatus[88], Orius majusculus[88]
      Parasitic natural enemy Aphidius matricariae[88], Aphidius colemani[89], Lysiphlebus testaceipes[89], Diaeretiella rapae[89], Aphidius platensis[90], Aphelinus asychis[91], Lysiphlebus testaceipes[92], Aphidius ervi[39], Praon barbatum[39]
      Whitefly Predatory natural enemy Orius sauteri[93], Amblyseius herbicolus[94], Neoseiulus bicaudus[95], Delphastus davidsoni[96], Chrysoperla carnea[97], Amblyseius tamatavensis[98], Delphastus catalinge[99], Misumenops celer[100], Drapetis nr divergens[100], Geocoris pallens Stäl[100], Orius tristicolor[100], Collops spp.[100], Macrolophus pygmaeus[101], Nesidiocoris tenuis[101]
      Parasitic natural enemy Encarsia sophia[102], Encarsia transvena[102], Eretmocerus mundus[102], Eretmocerus hayati[103], Eretmocerus eremicus[104], Encarsia formosa[104]
      Diamondback moth Predatory natural enemy Euborellia annulipes[17], Eocanthecona furcellata[105], Chrysopa sinica[106], Sycanus aurantiacus[107], Orius strigicollis[108], Pheidole sp.[109], Podisus nigrispinus[109], Cheiracanthium inclusum[109]
      Parasitic natural enemy Cotesia plutellae[109], Conura pseudofulvovariegata[109], Tetrastichus howardi[109], Cotesia vestalis[34], Diadegma fenestrale[110], Diadegma semiclausum[110], Diadegma insulare[111], Diadromus collaris[112], Steinernema carpocapsae[113], Heterorhabditis bacteriophora[113], Trichogramma chilonis[114], Oomyzus sokolowskii[114], Itoplectis naranyae[114], Exochus sp.[114], Brachymeria excarinata[114], Eurytoma verticillata[114], Ceraphron manilae[114], Trichomalopsis apanteloctenus[114], Trichomalopsis shirakii[114]
    • The ecological regulation of agricultural pests refers to managing and controlling pest populations by optimizing the ecological environment and utilizing natural processes within ecosystems. Crop diversity can directly limit pest populations by altering pest detection and host crop selection, enhancing crop resistance or tolerance to pests, and breaking the spatial and temporal continuity of resources[115]. Perrot et al.[116] found that maintaining seminatural habitats adjacent to crop planting areas can effectively control pests, increasing pest predation rates while reducing pest density in most crops. Additionally, diverse food resources and habitats can enhance the abundance and diversity of natural enemies, indirectly promoting biological control. Planting specific plants around or between crops can effectively attract pests, thereby reducing pesticide use and achieving ecological regulation. Sarkar et al.[117] demonstrated that intercropping kale with parsley reduced aphid damage to kale and that intercropping with parsley led to a decrease in initial aphid density and an increase in natural enemy populations, thereby suppressing pest damage. Beaumele et al.[118] found that planting diverse cover crops in vineyards drastically increased the number of natural enemies, enhancing biological control effectiveness, especially in areas with simple crop plantings. Planting trap and cover crops has been proven to effectively improve the populations of natural enemies in fields of crops, such as corn, rice, and wheat, to achieve pest control[119]. For example, Cai et al.[120] planted plants, such as sweet flag, rapeseed, basil, and mint, in apple orchards to enhance the effects of ecological regulation against Aphis spiraecola. Additionally, in Africa, planting trap crops, like Pennisetum purpureum, in maize fields successfully attracted pests to the trap crops for elimination[121]. Braman & Westerfield[122] confirmed that using 'Juliet' cherry tomatoes and 'Blue Hubbard' squash as trap plants effectively reduced common pests on squash and tomatoes. These studies indicated that ecological regulation strategies can effectively manage agricultural pests and promote the development of ecological agriculture. Figure 2 presents a schematic diagram of pest trapping via ecological control measures. Such measures can increase the quantity and diversity of natural enemy insects while enhancing the effectiveness of biological control.

      Figure 2. 

      Schematic of pest control using ecological regulation.

    • With advancements in technology, the integration of agricultural science and pest control has become increasingly close, particularly through the comprehensive application of the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, and drone systems, which provide strong technical support for modern agriculture. Automated detection technologies combined with integrated IoT and cloud computing decision support systems enable real-time pest monitoring and management, which is crucial for implementing effective IPM strategies[123]. Through real-time data collection, farmers can quickly identify pest activity patterns and take timely control measures (Fig. 3).

      Figure 3. 

      Schematic of pest control using technology-driven modern pest control.

      Drone systems play an important role in pest monitoring and management; they can cover large areas of farmland while efficiently collecting images and analyzing data[124]. Drones are equipped with advanced sensors that can accurately capture crop health and pest activity under different environmental conditions. On the basis of IoT and big data analysis, the collected data can not only be used for real-time monitoring but can also be used to predict pest occurrences through intelligent algorithms[125]. This predictive capability allows farmers to take preventive measures in advance, thereby reducing potential economic losses.

      By analyzing sensor data, specific environmental factors, such as temperature and humidity, related to the reproduction of certain pests can be identified, enabling the establishment of precise pest warning systems. Additionally, combining drone aerial monitoring capabilities can effectively determine the extent and density of pest outbreaks, optimize application strategies, reduce pesticide usage, and minimize environmental impact.

    • Agricultural control, as a core component of green pest management for insects, enhances the inherent resistance of cropping systems through optimized agronomic practices, reducing target pest population bases from an ecological perspective, and serving as a critical foundation for building sustainable agricultural production systems. This technical system regulates the micro-environment of crop growth, suppressing the occurrence of plant diseases and insect pests while maintaining the service functions of agricultural ecosystems.

      Traditional agricultural control techniques primarily include modules such as crop rotation, intercropping, field sanitation management, and application of insect-resistant varieties. Crop rotation establishes ecological suppression of pests and diseases by spatially and temporally isolating host plants, introducing non-host plants, and enhancing community biodiversity. Its control efficacy is closely related to crop configuration patterns, species diversity levels, and rotation cycles. Intercropping utilizes niche complementarity among species to create microhabitat heterogeneity in complex planting systems, forming biological barriers that interfere with pest host localization and feeding behavior. Field sanitation management reduces initial infection sources by promptly removing diseased/residual plant materials, weeds, and senescent debris, thereby disrupting pest propagation microhabitats and blocking the transmission vectors and habitats of pests and diseases. The application of insect-resistant varieties relies on the morphological, physiological, or biochemical resistance mechanisms of crops to reduce dependence on chemical pesticides, though attention must be paid to the risk of pest adaptive evolution caused by long-term use of single resistance genes[126].

      As a core technology of agricultural pest control, the breeding of insect-resistant varieties has significantly improved the efficiency of targeted resistance gene screening in recent years through the integration of traditional hybrid breeding with molecular marker-assisted selection and gene editing techniques. For example, Murtiningsih et al.[127] evaluated thrips resistance in 30 pepper germplasm resources in Indonesia, screening out 10 resistant varieties with low leaf damage rates for thrips-resistant pepper breeding based on field surveys of pest populations, leaf damage severity, and morphological trait analysis. Yu et al.[128] identified during the seedling-stage insect resistance evaluation of 318 rice germplasms that the accessions HN12-239 and HN12-328 exhibited stable anti-insect phenotypes against brown planthopper (BPH) and whitebacked planthopper (WBPH) across multiple growth stages, qualifying them as elite resistance sources for insect-resistant rice breeding. Additionally, the successful introduction and commercial application of Bt insect-resistant genes have established biological protection barriers for major crops such as cotton, rice, and maize, blocking pest damage at the source[129].

    • Although IPM is widely recognized globally, a unified management approach has yet to be established. In practical field control, several management strategies are typically combined rather than effectively integrated. Karlsson et al.[130] emphasized that a comprehensive and eco-friendly IPM approach that incorporates an evolutionary perspective to fundamentally address the issue of pest resistance and promote sustainable agricultural development should be adopted in pest control. Han et al.[131] suggested that pest control could be effectively implemented by increasing crop diversity and arranging crops reasonably, taking into account the timing of different pests during crop growth stages, thus utilizing the interrelationships within ecosystems from spatial and temporal dimensions.

    • Due to the elevated temperature and humidity characteristic of Hainan's tropical climate and habitat, individual pest control technologies often encounter efficiency limitations. There is a pressing need to develop a multi-faceted pest management system that leverages regional ecological characteristics to address complex biotic stresses. This system should aim to achieve multiple objectives, including effective pest control, high agricultural yield, and environmental protection, thereby establishing a technological model for the sustainable development of regional agriculture.

      Physical control methods, such as the use of insecticide-treated nets and fruit bagging, can create three-dimensional protective barriers that effectively reduce the intrusion of small pests like thrips and whiteflies during the seedling stage. Additionally, shade nets can help regulate the microclimate of the field when used in conjunction with mulching. However, these methods have limitations; shade nets may lack sufficient resistance to typhoons, and fruit bagging in high-humidity environments can lead to mold growth. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate air-permeable non-woven fabric bags and implement regular ventilation management to enhance their effectiveness.

      Physicochemical methods, such as the use of sticky boards and trap lights, offer the benefits of early detection and directional trapping. However, elevated temperatures can cause the adhesive to melt and accelerate the volatilization rate of the core, thereby shortening the period of effectiveness and necessitating frequent replacements, particularly after typhoon-induced rains. Consequently, the cost associated with timely management is high.

      In contrast, ecological regulation can mitigate pest damage to the primary crop by intercropping with insect-attracting plants and incorporating green manure into the field to establish an ecological barrier. Nonetheless, excessive vegetation growth under conditions of high temperature and humidity can lead to field depression, and there is an increased risk of nutrient loss when tilling green manure during the rainy season.

      Biological control relies on the natural pest control abilities of biocontrol fungi and natural enemies, which can reduce the use of chemical pesticides. However, high temperatures shorten the survival cycle of biocontrol fungi spores, and high humidity increases the fungal infection rate for natural enemies, and typhoons destroy the habitats, resulting in a longer period of recovery of the natural enemy populations. High temperatures reduce the infestation efficiency of pathogenic microorganisms (e.g., Beauveria bassiana) and necessitate the development of high-temperature-tolerant biologics. The control efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae is influenced by its genetic diversity, which affects the pathogenicity, environmental adaptability, and infestation-related enzyme activities of the strain, and ultimately determines the strength of the biocontrol effect[132,133].

      The technology-driven modern pest control system facilitates real-time monitoring of temperature, humidity, and insect activity, providing essential data to inform prevention and control strategies. However, during typhoon season, it is crucial to enhance the structural support of the system to prevent equipment damage. The high cost of such technology often renders it inaccessible to small-scale farmers.

      Traditional agricultural control measures, such as crop rotation, the use of disease-resistant varieties, and soil disinfection, serve as fundamental strategies to mitigate initial infestations. Nonetheless, their efficacy diminishes under cloudy and rainy conditions, and post-typhoon debris, if not promptly cleared, can become a breeding ground for pests and diseases. Additionally, tropical heat accelerates the degradation of Bt toxins, thereby reducing the effectiveness of insect-resistant crops.

    • The uncertainty and variability of rainfall, along with the transitional processes between wet and dry seasons, are likely to trigger unpredictable pest risks. These factors exacerbate the dynamic uncertainty of pest population distribution, species composition, and dominance, thereby increasing the complexity of integrated pest management[134]. Currently, prevention and control efforts encounter challenges such as delayed monitoring, the development of resistance, and the failure of ecological regulation. Therefore, it is imperative to establish an integrated prevention and control system that is adapted to climate change through institutional research, technological innovation, and international collaboration[132].

      During the typhoon rainy season (July to September), priority should be given to employing physical barriers, such as wind-resistant insect nets and steel frame reinforcements, as well as rain-resistant biological agents. Additionally, the use of drones for directional spraying during intervals of rain and sunshine is recommended. Within 24 h following a typhoon, efforts should focus on garden restoration, pruning, and foliar fertilizer application to rapidly restore crop resilience and reduce insect pest populations.

      During the winter melon and vegetable growth period (October to March), emphasis is placed on managing pest outbreaks. This is achieved by strategically placing insecticide panels at the height of the inflorescence and utilizing pheromones to establish a three-dimensional trapping network. This system is complemented by real-time monitoring of insect populations through Internet of Things (IoT) technology, which captures data on adult pest thresholds. Concurrently, high-temperature-resistant natural enemies are released to manage the pest population, thereby achieving a closed-loop management system characterized by 'monitoring, early warning, prevention, and control'.

      In contrast, during the high-temperature and dry period (April to June), the focus shifts to fundamental agricultural practices and ecological control measures. This involves using black mulch covers and insect-proof nets to provide initial protection, as well as planting trap crops to lure pests. Additionally, a heat-resistant xylococcus fungus agent is applied in the evening, addressing both soil disinfection and foliar protection. These measures collectively form a preliminary prevention and control barrier, aimed at 'suppressing the source of the insect, enhancing resistance, and maintaining ecological stability'.

    • The sustainable development of pest control in the melon and vegetable industry in Hainan faces numerous challenges. Green pest management is a top priority, and effective reduction in the use of chemical pesticides, minimizing environmental pollution, and enhancing the safety of agricultural products are possible through the use of integrated measures, such as physical control, physicochemical attraction and control, biological control, and ecological regulation. Pest management strategies should increasingly rely on technological support. The application of technologies, like IoT and drone technology, will provide new solutions for real-time monitoring and data analysis. These technologies can not only improve the efficiency of pest control but also promote the intelligence and precision of agricultural production. Furthermore, promoting the development and application of beneficial insects and biological control agents will be key to enhancing the effectiveness of biological pest control and achieving ecological agriculture.

      In the future, research should focus on diversified pest management strategies to meet the practical needs of different crops and environments. This approach will comprehensively enhance the sustainable development capacity of Hainan's melon and vegetable industry and further achieve efficient, green, and safe production goals.

      • The financial support for this study was provided by the Project of Sanya Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City (SCKJ-JYRC-2023-15), Hainan winter melon and vegetable technology industry system (HNARS2023-3-G5), 'Mojie' after the disaster Qiongbei perennial vegetable greenhouse pest control green technology (ZDYF2024YJGG002-10), and the China National Natural Science Foundation (32260666 and 32460659). The material in the illustrations in this overview was obtained from the websites 'app.biorender.com' and 'www.figdraw.com'.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: draft manuscript preparation and revision: Zhang S, Li F, Wu S; data analyses (analytical approaches and charts): Jin H, Liu K, Chen Q. All authorsreviewed the results and approved the final version of themanuscript

      • Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Received 13 March 2025; Accepted 19 June 2025; Published online 28 September 2025

      • Focuses on constructing a green pest control technology system, integrating physical control, physicochemical inducement, biological control, and ecological regulation to reduce chemical pesticide use.

        Proposes targeted strategies based on Hainan's tropical climate, analyzing the adaptability of different measures and optimizing combinations according to temperature and humidity dynamics.

        Emphasizes the integration of modern technologies like IoT and drones for real-time monitoring and precise pest management.

        Highlights the core role of integrated pest management (IPM) by combining multiple strategies to achieve sustainable development goals

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  Table (3) References (134)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhang S, Jin H, Liu K, Chen Q, Li F, et al. 2025. Sustainable development of Hainan's melon and vegetable industry: new strategies for pest control. Tropical Plants 4: e032 doi: 10.48130/tp-0025-0023
    Zhang S, Jin H, Liu K, Chen Q, Li F, et al. 2025. Sustainable development of Hainan's melon and vegetable industry: new strategies for pest control. Tropical Plants 4: e032 doi: 10.48130/tp-0025-0023

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return